CA1045027A

CA1045027A - Hydraulic fracturing method using sintered bauxite propping agent

Info

Publication number: CA1045027A
Application number: CA249,956A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Walter A. Hedden; Claude E. Cooke (Jr.); William C. Chard
Original assignee: Exxon Production Research Co
Current assignee: ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co
Priority date: 1975-09-26
Filing date: 1976-04-09
Publication date: 1978-12-26
Also published as: US4068718A

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
An improved method of fracturing a subterranean formation wherein particles composed of sintered bauxite are placed in the formation fracture to maintain the walls of the fracture spaced apart. The sintered bauxite particles have a specific gravity greater than 3.4 and substantially all of the grains of the particles are 25 microns or smaller.

Description

o~s~

2 1. Field of the Invention

3 This invention relates to a method of fracturing subterranean

4 formations surrounding oil wells, gas wells, and similar boreholes. In one aspect the invention relates to a method which employs sintered bauxite 6 particles for maintaining a fracture in a subterranean formation in a propped ,. , 7 condition.
8 2. Description of th Prior Art 9 Hydraulic fracturing is a well stimulation technique designed to increase the productivity of a well by creating highly conductive fractures 11 or channels in the producing formation surround~ng the well. The process 12 normally involves two basic steps: (1) inJecting a fluid at sufficient rate 13 and pressure to rupture the formation thereby creating a crack (fracture) in ' 14 the reservoir rock, and (2) thereafter placing a particulate material (propping agent) in the formation to maintain the fracture walls open by resisting ~ 16 forces tending to close the fracture. If stimulation is to occur, the propping ;.1 17 agent must have sufficient mechanical strength to bear the closure stresses 18 and provide relatively high permeability in the propped fracture.
19 ~lthough a variety of particulate materials have been proposed for 29 use as proppants, silica sand remains the only material that i8 used extensively.
, 21 It has been long recognized, however, that sand is not the ideal proppant.
22 Sand at closure stresses encountered in deep formations tends to disintegrate, 23 producing fines or fragments which can drastically reduce permeability of the 1 24 propped fracture.
Efforts to develop a proppant capable of bearing high stresses 26 without excessive fragmentation have produced such material as glass beads, 27 steel shot, and aluminum pellets. These materials, however, are quite e*pen-28 sive and therefore have not been widely used. The cost of proppant can best 29 be appreciated when realizing that a typical fracturing treatment uses 30,000 pounds of proppant. High strength proppants such as glass heads currently 31 cost from 10 to 20 times more than sand. This price can be ~ustified only in ,~

.. . .. ...

LS~7 ~ .
1 deep wells where low priced proppants cannot bear the high stress levels.

2 However, many of the available high strength proppants have not proven satis-3 factory for deep wells. Multilayers of glass beads, for example, at high 4 stress levels under reservoir conditions do not provide high fracture per-meability. Steel shot and aluminum pellets are susceptible to corrosion by 6 formation brine.

7 U.S. Patent 3,399,727 discloses the use of propping agent particles 8 composed of ceramics having internal voids. These particles, preferably made g by the evolution of gas bubbles within a molten ceramic (e.g. glass, porcelain 1~ or alumina), are designed to have partial crushability characteristics. Accord-11 ing to the patent, the slow settling rate resulting from the low density parti-12 cles and the partial crushability features make the proppants suitable for 13 partial monolayer propping. However, such particles, because of their cellular 14 structure and partial crushing characteristics, do not have sufficient com-pressive strength to withstand high stresses encountered in deep well fractures.

16 Note that U.S. Patent 3,399,727 states the voids reduce compressive strength 17 and are useful at usual stress levels.

18 In summary, proppants for deep wells must possess sufficiently high 19 compressive strength to avoid excessive fragmentation. They should also be inert to fluids in~ected into wells and reasonably priced.

.
21 UMMARY OF THE _ F TION
22 The present invention provides a method which employs improved 23 propping agent particles that are particularly suited for deep, high stress 24 formations.
In the method, a fracture generated in a subterranean formation by 26 the application of hydraulic force is propped with the improved propping 27 agent composed of high density, fine grained sintered bauxite material. The 28 sintered particles possess excellent compressive strength, are inert to 29 formation fluids and can be packed in multilayers.
~' .
,~ , `.
-3-~

: ~0~5~?Z7 More particularly, the present invention provides a hydraulic fracturing method in which a fluid is injected into a subterranean formation to open a fracture therein, said formation being located at a depth in excess of about 7150 feet, the improvement wherein said Eracture is propped with a slightly deformable, high strength propp:Lng agent having a permeability to brine at about 200F which decreases not more than about three-fourths when the applied stress on said propping agent is increased from 1000 to 10,000 psi, said high strength propping agent comprising particles of sintered bauxite having a specific gravity greater than about 3.4, said particles prepared from bauxite material, substantially all of the grains of said bauxite D material being about 12 microns or less.
Sintered bauxite is a polycrystalline material made primarily fro~ finely divided natural bauxite. ~he sin.ering process for producing the ~' ;
~.

~ -3a-, -1~45~Z7 , 1 proppant is controlled such that ~ost of the crystals in the final product 2 are finer than about 25 microns and have a specific gravity greater than 3 about 3.4, preferably between about 3.5 and 3.8. Sintered bauxite, having a 4 specific gra~ity below 3.4, is difficult to produce and, because of the high void concentration would likely result :Ln a product having low compressive 6 strength.

7 Laboratory tests have shown that multilayers of fine grained sin-8 tered bauxite particles provide higher permeability under stress than other 9 materials proposed for propping agents which include sand, glass beads, and fused alumina. The reasons for the improved results are not fully understood 11 but are belieYed to involve, at least ln part, the small grain size of the 12 low porosity sintered product and its polycrystalline structure. Natural 13 bauxite normally contains a variety of materials including silicon oxide, 14 iron oxide, titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, calcium o~ide, magnesium oxide, and sodium oxide in varying degrees. The grain boundaries in the sintered 1~ particle are important. When stress is ~pplied it is believed that the 17 grains move along these boundaries, thus deforming and altering the load on 18 the particle. This decreases stress concentration on the particle and mini-19 mizes fragmentation. Monocrystalline or large crystal structures such as sand or corrundum do not contain small grains (i.e., they are not polycrystal-21 line) and, therefore, are more 6rittle. It is known that these brittle 22 materials do not deform sufficiently under load, but instead disintengrate 23 catastrophically as a result of high stress concentration at the point contacts 24 between particles. Other mechanisms ~ay be involved which account for the ~' 25 superior performance of the sintered bauxite particles, but the small grain 26 siæe and the slightly deformable behavior of the sintered bauxite are believed 27 to be major contributing factors.
28 The improved sintered particles can be made from natural bauxite, 29 with the result that the final propping agent is less expensive than many other aluminum or alu~ina products. Bauxite, unlike alu~ina, contains 31 naturally occurring impurities and does not require the addition of sintering !, --)45~2,~
1 agents. It produces high-strength sintered particles which are significantly 2 less expensive than sintered alumina. The features of low cost and high 3 strength make sintered bauxite particularly well suited in deep well frac-4 turing operat$ons.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRA~ING
6 The drawing is a plot of stress versus permeability for various 7 proppants tested under laboratory conditions.
.'' :
8 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED~EMBODIMENTS
9 Propping agents for use in the present invention may be prepared ;j from natural bauxite. Bauxite is a natural ore consisting mainly of alumina 11 (A1203) and containing various impurities including iron oxide, aluminum 12 silicate, titanium dioxide, quartz, and components of phosphorus and vanadium.
, l .
13 The term as used herein refers to rocks of mineral deposits in which alumina 14 predominates. Sintering of bauxite is a process by which particles in the natural ore are sized, compacted, and welded together at temperatures below 16 the melting point of the material. By properly processing the bauxite ore 17 and controlling the sintering process, particles of the desired size, shape, 18 and strength can be obtained.
19 In the manufacture of the propp~ng agent, it is preferred that the bau~ite ore be first ground to a fine powder, c~mpacted, and then sintered at 21 conditions to produce a limited grain growth. The particle size distribution 22 should fall in tlle 3 to 25 micron range and the particles should have a speci-23 fic gravity grester than about 3.4. A preferred specific gravity range is 24 from about 3.5 to about 3.8. It appears that high density, fine grain particles have higher compressi~e strength than sintered large grain particles.
26 It is also preferred that the propping agent par~icles be well 27 rounded or spherical in shape. Nell rounded particles are sub;ected to less 28 interparticle stress when packed ln ~ultilayers and are less apt to bridge 29 within the well perforations or formation fracture than angular particles.

~4S~27 l The sintering process can be controlled to produce generally spherical parti-2 cles or the final product can be processed to produce a well rounded configur-3 ation.
4 A preferred propping agent for use in the present invention is a sintered bauxite sold by Norton Company under the trademark "Alundum 75".
6 This material has the following typical chemical analysis:
7 Aluminum Oxide 85.14%
8 Titania 4.55%
9 Silica 2.82%
Zirconia 0.16%
11 Iron oxide 6.89%
12 Maganese oxide 0.01%
13 Calcium oxide 0.21%
14 Magnesia 0.22%
"Alundum 75" is prepared by first sub~ecting the natural bauxite 16 ore to preliminar~ calcination, grinding and sizing the ore to the proper 17 powder size, compacting the powder at high pressure into agglomerated rounded 18 masses of the generall~ desired sizes (e.g. 6 to 80 ~esh~, and finally sub-19 jecting the agglomerated masses to an elevated temperature to sinter the powder grains together. The initial particle crystal size is obtained by 21 crushing the ore followed by screening and ball milling t~ obtain a particle 22 size distributlon ranging from about 1 micron to about 12 ~icrons with the 23 average particle siæe being about 4 to 5 microns. The agglomeration step is 24 performed by compacting the powder and su~lecting it to a high pressure9 usually about 5,000 psi. The compacted agglomerations may be made in propping 26 agent si~es. Specific gravity o~ ~'Alundum 75" is about 3.7.
27 The sintering process welds the fine grains together in the areas 28 of contact. Although the sintering process is not fully understood, it is 29 generally conceded that the driving force is the surface energy which decreases as a result of surface area decreaslng during the sintering process. Because 31 of the tendency of the material to reduce in surface area, the discrete . .
~ . .. , . ,,., "~.,.", ~ .

; 1~)45C~Z7 1 powder particles g~ow together during the sintering process. Although the 2 grain growth is referred to variously as recrystallization, or crystal growth, 3 the mechanism herein will be referred to as simply "grain growth".
4 Also usable in the present invention is sintered bauxite particles sold by General Abrasive Company under the tradename SA Lionite. These 6 sintered bauxite particles are prepared from calcined bauxite by the so-':j 7 called "wet process". The bauxite ore after being subjected to a calcination ,i 8 step is sized by screening and crushing to produce fine powder. A slurry of ; 9 the powdered bauxite and water solution is passed through a ball mill to ' 10 further reduce the powder fineness (usually to a particle size less than j 11 about 7 microns~. The slurry then is transferred to a conveyor and passed 12 through a drier. This produces a coherent plate-like cake having a thickness 13 about equal to one dimension of the finished particle. The dried cake is 14 then broken into generally cubical or cubiform particles~ After being screened i 15 to the proper size, the particles are sintered in a suitable kiln at conditions 16 to produce strong generally cubicle polycrystalline particles composed of 17 grains sintered together. Most of the grains are ~iner than 25 microns with 18 the average grain size being bet~een about 4 and 15 microns. Specific gravity 19 of SA Lionite is about 3.75.
The shape of slntered bauxite particles may be made more spherica~
21 by several means. For example, the mass of powder can be rolled before 22 sintering to make essentially spherical particles or the particles after 23 sintering can be made more spherical by fluidizing and agitating the particles.
~ .
24 The starting materials, in addition to bau~ite, may include other materials such as silica, pure alumlna and the like. These materials in parti-26 culate form may be mixed with the bauxlte prior to the sintering step. As 27 used herein, however, the term bauxite material includes bauxite or bauxite 28 mixtures in which bauxite is the principal ingredient.
. .j 29 The methods for sintering natural bauxite or bauxite mixtures are well known and are discussed in length in the literature. See for example, 31 U.S. Patents 3,079,243 and 3,491;492.

'1 _ _

5~27 1 The final particle size of the sintered product is normally slightly 2 smaller than the agglomerated masses before sintering. The amount of shrinkage 3 depends in part on the materials employed and the sintering techniques, but 4 normally is between about 10 and 20 percent. The final product can be classi-fied according to particle size to produce a proper size range for fracturing

6 operations. Size ranges typically employed in fracturing are 8-12 mesh, 10-20

7 mesh, 20-40 mesh, and 40-60 mesh.

8 Since the degree of stimulation attainable by hydraulic fracturing is

9 dependent upon the conductivity of the propped fracture, measurement of com-pressive strength of the material alone is not sufficient to adequately evaluate11 proppants. ~ more realistic test involYes measuring permeability of the prop-12 pant when stress is applied. Stress in the earth exerted on the proppant is13 commonly up to 0.7 psi per foot of depth, and frequently is much greater. The 14 severity of the propping condition in deep ~ells is not only a result of in-creased stress or overburden press~re but also high temperature. Tests have 16 illustrated tbat the ~luid in contact with the pxoppant can also have a drama-17 tic effe~t on permeability at high stresS leYels, particularly at temperatures 18 normall~ encountered in deep wells. For example, when ~rine was flowed through 19 multilayers of proppants, the permeability was much lower than when oil was used. Glass beads were found to be highly susceptible to brine, showing a 21 marked decrease in permeability at stress levels above about 5000 psi. The 22 tests and test results are discussed at length in a paper by C. E. Cooke, Jr.g ... .... .. . .. . .. .
23 published in Journal of Petroleum Technology, Sept., 1~73, pp. 1101-1107.
24 The test procedures and apparatus employed to test the materials of the present invention and certain prior art proppants was similar to that 26 described in tbe paper noted above. Each test sample was placed in a multilayer 27 pattern in a pressure cell which included two platens for applying a controlled 28 stress. The platens were equipped with ~eans for maintaining the desired 29 temperature during the test. Brine was flowed through the packed cell and the permeability determined at various stress levels and temperatures to 31 determine the effect of temperature. The materials, material description, 32 test conditions, and test results are presented in Table I.

-~ (~4S~2~7 ~q ~ .
.~ o g ~ g u~ I I I I
oo P~ ~
J- O ~ I I I I I I I I ~1 0 ,, Ul ~ ~ .
. .
g ~ g ~ o ~ ~ , a~ o ,~ ~o ~ ~ ,.

aJ ~q ~ o o o o o o o o o o o .,, ~q ~o o o o o o o o o o o ,~ a) tqO o o o o o ~ o o o o P. ô ô ô ~ ~ ô ~ ô ô ô

_ o ~ ~ ~ C~l oo C J C~l C~l a ~ U~
h ~J

,,^ a a a a ~ ~
H O ~ 0C) U~ U a ~ c a ~ ~ J o h '' æ
Fq ~ X u~ u~ u~ u~ o U~
rl ~ . O O U~ U~ ~ U~ U~
U~ ~ U~ I~ I~ r~
WI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~i ~C~~ r~ ~
W W
u~ ,, e~
h h h ~ rl w ,1 W~ wa wa ~ O ~ 'q ^
?' e- e U ,~ 1 u u 1 ~
a~ u~ O u~ O o 0~ a ~ ~a u O a ~ d al E~ ^ I~ o ~ ~iæ o ~1 ~

o O a ~ ~, ah q h ~ o e ~ u ~ u ~D u o ~ O~ O ~ ho~ O ~ a ~ a E~ ~ ' Z ~ ~ c~ x ~ c~ o X

w ~ C) a~ w w ~rl S., U uh U u u 4 u a ~1 q ,. 0 0 u I ~ ~ ua ~ a ~ Ua X Ua ~ u~ x a~ w0 ~w w rl w rl w rl wrl W rl w rl w ~ r~ rl I ~
X u~ n m u~ ~ ¢ u~ c~
r~
~ ,~ ~ ," ~ u) ~ I~ O
U~ r~
,~ ~ ~ ~ U) ~D r~ oo a~ o ,~ ~`I ~ ~ ul ~ r~ o~ ~ o ,~ ~ ~ ~ u, _g_ ` - `

lV45~Z~
; 1 The drawing presents plots showing permeability at different stress 2 levels for various propping agents tested. As illustrated, the silica sand 3 performed satisfactorily at low stress levels (3000 psi and lower). At the 4 higher stress levels, the silica sand, fused alumina, and glass beads showed marked reductions in permeability. However, the sintered bauxite material 6 provided adequate permeability even at stresses up to 10,000 psi and at 7 315~F.
8 Density of the individual sintered particles is another important 9 factor in achieving high permeability at high stress conditions. A high density particle is necessary to attain high strength and resist fragmentation 11 under high stress levels. Laboratory tests show that permeability drops off 12 significantly when lo~ density particles are used. For example, at an applied 13 stress of 2000 psi and 315~F, sintered bauxite particles with a specific 14 gravity of 3.7 have a permeability of a~out 2000 darcies while particles with a specific gravity of 3.2 have a permeability of only 45 darcies. Sizes of 16 both particles were in the 14 to 18 mesh range. Tests on fine sintered bauxite 17 particles (20-24 mesh~ having a speci~ic gravity of 3.50 indicated high 18 permeability (627 darcies) under the same test conditions. It is therefore 19 believed that sintered bauxite particles having a specific gravity above about 3.4 make suitable high strength proppants whereas lower density particles would 21 not provide sufficient compressive strength. The data in Table I, however, 22 clearly shows that sintered ba~ite particles having specific gravities 23 between 3.50 and about 3.80 (sample 4~ possess ample compressive strength 24 for high stress service. The finer mesh size (28-44) of sample 4 provides less permeability than the coarser mesh size (8-12) of sample 5. The preferred 26 range of specific gravity is fr~m about 3.5 to about 3.8, the range of most 27 commercially available sintered bauxite particles. The best results were ob-28 tained with particles having a specific gravity of at least about 3.65.
29 As mentioned previously, one of the attractive features of the present invention is that it provides a strong, highly permeable proppant 31 which is relatively ine~pensive when compared to many of the high strength ~10-,: , , , .

104S~7 1 proppants proposed heretofore. Sintered bauxite is presently commercially 2 available in small quantities at a cost about equal that of high strength 3 glass beads, about 2/3 that of sintered alumina, about 1/3 that of aluminum 4 pellets and about 1/3 that of iron shot (cost per unit volume). When large quantities are made that will be needed for use as proppants, economies 6 of scale should reduce the cost of sintered bauxite appreciably, because the 7 raw material is low cost. In considering the cost of high strength proppants, 8 a valid comparison can be made only as to the proppants that perform satisfac-g torily at the severe condîtions encountered in deep, high temperature forma-tions. The inexpensive proppants such as sand normally cannot be used under 11 these conditions and therefore cannot provide a fair basis for cost comparison.
12 Of the high strength materials that can be used, sintered bauxite proposed by 13 the present invention offers the cheapest proppant material available to 14 date. However, to reduce costs even further the sintered bauxite can be blended with a cheap propping agent, such as sand, to provide a low cost 16 proppant which is significantly stronger than the cheap propping agent but is 17 less costly than pure sintered bauxite proppant. Alternatively, the fracture 18 can first be partially propped with sand and the remainder of the fracture, 19 especially those areas near the well~ore, is then propped with sintered bauxite. The sintered bauxite proppant when used in this manner provides the 21 fracture with sufficient support to prevent excess~ve fragmentation of the 22 sand.
23 In carrying out the method of the present invention, the sintered 24 bauxite material may be handled in tKe same manner as other propping agents.
The particulate material in sacks or in bulk form may be delivered to the 26 well site along with other materials used in the fracturing treatment. The 27 method normally will be performed using conventional equipment and techniques.
28 Pollowing pressure testing of pumping and well equipment, a ViSCOllS
29 fluid, frequently referred to as "pad", is in~ected into the well at a rate and pressure to initiate and propagate a fracture in the for~ation. The 31 earth stresses are such that the fracture normally is along a vertical plane 32 radiating outwardly from the wellbore ln opposite directions. The fracturing --1].--~)45~.~27 1 fluid may be an oil base, water base, acid, emulsion, foam, or any other 2 fluid. Normally, the fluid contains several additives such as viscosity 3 builders, drag reducers, fluid loss additives, corrosion inhibitors, and the 4 like. Injection of the pad is continued until a fracture of sufficient geometry is obtained to permit the placement of the propping agent particles.
6 Normally the treatment is designed to provide a fracture width at the well-7 bore of at least 2-1/2 times the diameter of the largest propping agent 8 particle. Onc~ the fracture of the desired geometry is obtained, the propping 9 agent suspended in the fluid is carried and placed in the fracture. The propping agent particles are usually placed in the fracture in a multilayer 11 pattern by maintaining the concentration of the propping agent at from about 12 0.8 to about 8 pounds per gallon of fracturing fluid. As mentioned previously, 13 the particle size ranges fro~ about-6 to ab~ut 80 ~esh, with the 10-20 or 20-14 40 mesh being the most common. Pollowing the placement of the proppant, the well is shut in for a sufficient time to permit the pressure to bleed off 16 into the formation. This causes the fracture to close and exert a closure 17 stress on the propping agent particles. The shut-~n period ~ay vary from a 18 few minutes to seYeral days.
19 When the well is placed on production, hydroca~b~ns ~ill flow from the formation through the propped fracture and into the well. The closure 21 stress of the fracture walls bearing on the proppants tend to disintegrate 22 the particles, form$ng fragments which under producing conditions collect and 23 clog or plug interstitial flow passages in the propped fracture, and thereby 24 substantially reduce its permeability. The laboratory test described above indicates that sintered bauxite proppants exhibit far less tendency to frag-26 ment than silica sand, glass bead~, or other commercially available proppants 27 and thereby provide highly permeable conductive channels ln the formation.

29 A South Texas well producing ~rom a depth of 10,348 feet was frac-30 tured by the method of the present invention. About 19000 pounds of 12-24 mesh ~, . ' ,. : .
- : . . .

- -1~)45'r~27 1 sintered bauxite particles, sold by Norton Company as Alundum 75, were injected 2 into the well. The fracturing fluid with the particles suspended therein at 3 a concentration of 1 to 3 pounds per gallon was in~ected into the well 4 at an average rate of 8 barrels per minute and at a surface pressure of about 9400 psi.
6 Prior to the fracturing treatment, the well had a stabilized produc-7 tion rate of 1.5 million standard cubic feet of gas per day. Following the 8 treatment, the stabilized production rate was 7.5 million standard cubic feet 9 per day, or a five-fold productivity increase. Estimates indicated that at the stress level present at 10,000 feet, sand would have resulted in substan-11 tially less improvement in production rate.
12 It is believed that the success of this treatment was primarily due 13 to the increased compressive strength of the sintered bauxite pareicles.

:.

.,.. , , , ~ ,. .... . . . . . . . . . .

Claims

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE
IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. In a hydraulic fracturing method in which a fluid is injected into a subterranean formation to open a fracture therein, said formation being located at a depth in excess of about 7150 feet, the improvement wherein said fracture is propped with a slightly deformable, high strength propping agent having a permeability to brine at about 200°F which decreases not more than about three-fourths when the applied stress on said propping agent is increased from 1000 to 10,000 psi, said high strength propping agent comprising particles of sintered bauxite having a specific gravity greater than about 3.4, said particles prepared from bauxite material, substantially all of the grains of said bauxite material being about 12 microns or less.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the particles of sintered bauxite are well rounded.

3. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said sintered bauxite particles have a mesh size between about 6 and about 80 on the U.S. Standard Sieve Series.

4. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said sintered bauxite particles have a specific gravity of at least about 3.5.

5. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said sintered bauxite particles have a specific gravity of from about 3.5 to about 3.8.

6. A method of fracturing a subterranean formation located at a depth in excess of about 7150 feet, which comprises injecting into said formation at a rate and pressure sufficient to open a fracture therein a hydraulic fluid; injecting into said fracture a fluid containing slightly deformable, high strength propping agent particles having a permeability to brine at about 200°F which decreases not more than about three-fourths when the applied stress on said propping agent is increased from 1000 to 10,000 psi, said propping agent particles being composed of sintered bauxite having a specific gravity greater than about 3.4, said sintered bauxite prepared from calcined natural bauxite material having a grain size of about 12 microns or less; and thereafter permitting the fracture to close on said propping agent particles.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the particles of sintered bauxite are well rounded.

8. A method as defined in claim 6 wherein said particles are made by agglomerating under pressure grains of calcined natural bauxite to form discrete particles of approximate size of propping agent particles, most of said grains being between about 1 and about 12 microns, and thereafter sintering said agglomerated particles at conditions which induce limited grain growth, the final size of most grains being about 25 microns or less.

9. A method as defined in claim 8 wherein the grains of the sintered particle have a grain size between about 8 and about 25 microns.

10. A method as defined in claim 6 wherein said bauxite particles have a specific gravity of at least 3.5.

11. A method as defined in claim 6 wherein said bauxite particles have a specific gravity of from about 3.5 to about 3.8.

12. A method as defined in claim 6 wherein the concentration of said particles in said fluid is sufficient to provide a multilayer propping pattern in said fracture.

13. In a hydraulic fracturing method in which a fluid is injected into a subterranean formation to open a fracture therein, said formation being located at a depth in excess of about 7150 feet, the improvement wherein said fracture is propped with a slightly deformable, high strength propping agent having a permeability to brine at about 200°F which decreases not more than about three-fourths when the applied stress on said propping agent is increased from 1000 to 10,000 psi, said high strength propping agent comprising particles of sintered bauxite having a specific gravity greater than about 3.4, said particles prepared from bauxite material, substantially all of the grains of said bauxite material being about 12 microns or less and having an average grain size of about 4 to about 5 microns.

14. A method of fracturing a subterranean formation located at a depth in excess of about 7150 feet, which comprises injecting into said formation at a rate and pressure sufficient to open a fracture therein a hydraulic fluid; injecting into said fracture a fluid containing slightly deformable, high strength propping agent particles having a permeability to brine at about 200°F which decreases not more than about three-fourths when the applied stress on said propping agent is increased from 1000 to 10,000 psi, said propping agent particles being composed of sintered bauxite having a specific gravity greater than about 3.4, said sintered bauxite prepared from calcined natural bauxite material having a grain size of about 12 microns or less and an average grain size of about 4 to about 5 microns;
and thereafter permitting the fracture to close on said propping agent particles.

15. In a hydraulic fracturing method in which a fluid is injected into a subterranean formation to open a fracture therein, said formation being located at a depth in excess of about 7150 feet, the improvement wherein said fracture is propped with a slightly deformable, high strength propping agent having a permeability to brine at about 200°F which decreases not more than about three-fourths when the applied stress on said propping agent is increased from 1000 to 10,000 psi, said high strength propping agent comprising particles of sintered bauxite having a specific gravity greater than about 3.4, said particles prepared from bauxite material having a grain size of about 12 microns or less and an average grain size of about 5 microns or less.