CA1107267A - Absorbent composition for oil and the like - Google Patents
Absorbent composition for oil and the likeInfo
- Publication number
- CA1107267A CA1107267A CA301,338A CA301338A CA1107267A CA 1107267 A CA1107267 A CA 1107267A CA 301338 A CA301338 A CA 301338A CA 1107267 A CA1107267 A CA 1107267A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- oil
- composition
- water
- mixture
- solid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/68—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition of specified substances, e.g. trace elements, for ameliorating potable water
- C02F1/681—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition of specified substances, e.g. trace elements, for ameliorating potable water by addition of solid materials for removing an oily layer on water
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Hydrocarbons such as oil floating on the surface of water are removed rapidly by contact with a multi-component porous solid solvent composition consisting mainly of a mixture of a solvent for oil, fibres and a sinking agent, a floating mixture which sinks when filled with oil. The oil forms a true solution in the solid mixture and is retained as such on sinking to the bottom of the body of water.
Hydrocarbons such as oil floating on the surface of water are removed rapidly by contact with a multi-component porous solid solvent composition consisting mainly of a mixture of a solvent for oil, fibres and a sinking agent, a floating mixture which sinks when filled with oil. The oil forms a true solution in the solid mixture and is retained as such on sinking to the bottom of the body of water.
Description
~07267 This invention relates to a novel material which is useful for neutralizing the harmful effects of oil and like materials, particularly floating on bodies of water.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hydrocarbons such as crude oil or various refinery products cause contamination of oceanic or fresh waters when spilled thereon. Such floating hydrocarbons constitute a nuisance and hazard from spills around harbour facilities, leakage from tankers, or from damage to or sinking of a vessel carrying crude oil. Incidents of this type can have disasterous effects upon beaches and marine life.
Numerous methods have been proposed for removing spilled hydrocarbons from the surface of a body of water. For example, it has been proposed to apply various powdered minerals such as asbestos, dolomite, magnetite, silicone treated floating agents such as perlite, wood chips, paper, felt, straw, sawdust, expanded mica, peat fibres, hard and soft clays and various foamed synthetic products such as polyisocyanates to mention a few. In the case of heavy minerals they tend to absorb an -appreciable amount of hydrocarbon and then sink. The oil however, may be released and float to the surface again.
Those absorbent materials that float on the surface of the water must be recovered with the oil in some fashion to effect removal from its surface. A frequent flaw is that the oil tends to drain from the floating solid and recoat the water surface. It has been suggested to add polymers such as rubber latices with mineral fillers, to the floating body of the hydrocarbon,the rubber latex containing the hydrocarbon is subsequently coagulated by addition of an acidic material to the latex after it is sprayed on the hydro-carbon to coagulate the latex, particularly around the edge of the spill area.
It is then necessary to skim the coagulum from the surface of the water.
liO7267 Another approach is to produce a ine (35-45 mesh) powdery mixture of a polymer (in which oil is g~nerally soluble) plus heavy mineral filler. The fines are then carefully added on to the oily surface so they will sink taking oil with them to the bottom. However, wherever it was added in any appreciable thickness, the powdery mixture is so dense it would tend to agglomerate into large blobs, the edges folding over on top of the heavy matte to sink rapidly by-passing the oil. Silicone oils have been used to coat light floating materials such as treated cellulosic material. ~il can be recovered by collecting and squeezing the cellulosic material. However, 10 oil on this or other floating gleaning agents is not thoroughly fixed by solu-tion in the floating agent and can float back out to recontaminate the water surface. This occurs with perlite, wood chips, vermiculite and other similar floating agents.
Among items of prior art which are of interest are the following.
U.S. Patent No. 3,591,494 of Crouch and Childers issued July 6, 1971, discloses the use of a fine powder of portland cement and clay coated with a polymer compatible with hydrocarbons. The material does not float on the surface of the water. U.S. Patent No. 3,888,766 of De Young issued June 10, 1975 deals with a cellular material impregnated with a hydrophobic oleophilic 20 compounds, for use in absorbing oil from the surface of water. The matrix is wood fibre or foamed plastic, and it will float, but would not be expected tG sink when loaded with oil. Similarly, U.S. Patent No. 3,607,741 of Sohnius issued September 21, 1971 involves a cellulosic material treated with a surfactant and silicone oil, yielding a material which will not sink when loaded with oil. British Patent Specification No. 1,340,333 of Harris and Shorthouse published 12 December 1973 discloses the step o~ applying to oil on a body of water a dispersion of a mineral filler in a latex of an oil absorbing rubber. Again, that material would not be expected to float well prior to its absorption of oil on the water, and accordingly problems are 30 encountered in ensuring that the material picks up oil before it sinks. Other patents of some interest are U.S. Patent No. 3,562,153 of Fully, Lippe and Fletcher issued February 9, 1971 and U.S. Patent No. 3,7~9,667 of , 0~7Z67 Lindstrom issued July 31, 1973. None of these items of prior art disclose the invention set out in the present specification, nor do they render it obvious .
- BRIEF STAT MENT OF THE ~N~ENTION
In accordance with our invention a mixture of roughly pea-sized and smaller particles of a porous mixture are contacted with surface oil, absorbing the latter in interstitial and porous areas coated with fine particles of rubbery solvent. The oil then gradually dissolves in the poly-mer and becomes strongly bound into the solid mixture.
The oil dissolves in the rubbery component forming a permanent solid solution, displacing air from the void spaces increasing the density OI
the composite and sinking from the oil contaminated surface. The com- `
ponents of the mixture are chosen so they will avoid environmental contami-nation.
The composition is effective in soaking up oil from either solid or aqueous surfaces converting it to oil dissolved in a polymer spread out on a porous support. This is a preponderantly irreversible process resulting in a non-oily mixture which will eventually sink from view. Release of hydrocarbon from the solid mixture is not a problem because of the very 20 high partition coefficient of oil in favour of the polymeric component fixed on the solid support. The composite can incorporate special oil-eating bacteria incorporated as one of the components to promote biodegradation of the hydrocarbon content as it lies on the bottom. It is a further feature of our invention that usually simple rinsing with water will remove evidence of personal contact with the oil laden composite.
Thus in one aspect the present invention provides a granular absorbent composition for absorbing oil, said composition being hydrophobic and oleophilic, said composition being porous and being lighter than water when dry, said composition being heavier than water when said pores are 30 loaded with liquid oil, said composition comprising a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material whose intersticial voids are impregnated with a hydrophobic agent and a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, and a plurality ~.~
1:10~6'7 of solid particles of a sinking agent, said solid particles being held together and being adhered to the surface of the buoyant material by said oil solvent.
In another aspect the present invention provides a method for preparing a granular absorbent composition for oil and the like which composition floats on an oi~-contaminated water surface and, upon absorbing oil, sinks to the bottom of the water, comprislng: (a) mixing an emulsion of a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material and a hydrophobic agent; (b) adding to the mixture solid particles formed of a porous sinking agent and a coagulant, and then mixing together to form an intimate mixture of the above components;
(c) drying the intimate mixture thus obtained; and (d) comminuting the dried mixture to particles of suitable size.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a method for removing oil from a contaminated water surface, comprising the steps of:
(a) spreading on to the contaminated water surface a granular absorbent composition for oil, said composition being hydrophobic and oleophilic, said composition being porous and being lighter than water when dry, said composition be:Lng heavier than water when said pores are loaded with liquid oil, said composition comprising a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material whose intersticial voids are impregnated with a hydrophobic agent and a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, and a plurality of solid particles of a sinking agent, said solid particles being held together and being adhered to the surface of the buoyant material by said oil solvent;
(b) adding further absorbent composition as the oil is absorbed and the composition sinks, until no more oil is present on the water surface.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Broadly speaking our invention is a composite of cellulose fibers, cotton linters, or recycled paper coated with very fine particles of polymer in which oil is soluble. This intimate mixture is easily obtained by coagulation of a latex on the cellulose fines in the presence of a ¦ hydrophobic agent ~ 4 -.. . . . _ .... .. . . . . . . .
110~267 such as aluminurn, zinc, calcium, or magncsium stearate, oleate, palmitate or miYtures thereof with each other or with other fatty acids. These salts are not water soluble so they will not adversely affect the aquatic environ-ment. The mixture is then completed by adding a sinking agent and binder such as Portland or Medusa cement, Plaster components, plaster of Paris, any of which optionally may be extended with fly ash, ground limestone, lime, quartz fines, clays and other similar materials..
The polymer originally should be in latex form for ease 10 of widespread and fine dispersion. The preferred latices are of any natural rubber or synthetic compositions which dissol~re up to ten times their weight of oil and vary from 100% polybutadiene up to ca. 80% polybutadiene generally the rest is simply polystyrene, together wit~ minor amounts of other polymerizeable monomers. Polystyrene latex can be used but is an inferior solvent component aue to limited oil solubility in the polymer. Because oil solubilities are limited by the presence of polyacrylonitrile, latices containing acrylonitrile are not desirable. Polyisoprene components are useful but expensive. Polyvinyl Z0 chloride polymers are satisfactory but may present possible environmental problem~. For best results the composition of our invention is broadly defined as follows. Wide variations are desired for different end uses.
- These ranges should not be considered limiting.
cellulose fiDes 2 - 30 polymer solvent 3 - ~0 hydrophobic agent 1 - 10 s inker and binder 10 - 9 0 coagulant 0- 10 If silicone oil is used as a hydrophobic agent it must be sprayed on after 30 the composite is dry, since otherwise it inhibits formation of air holes in the composite.
7;~67 The presence of some large holes assures that the pieces will float while oil is being absorbed.
The composition is a solid mixture of:
a) a polymer in which oil is soluble.
b) a porous support for the polymer or copolymer to permit drying and crushing of the aggregate and sufficient ~eight to sink the mixture of oil and so1id after spreading the composition on water.
c) preferably a bulking agent such as used paper ~ines to make it easier for the solid mixture to float for a period of time after application on w~ter.
d) a hydrophobic agent that will delay wetting of.
the mixture by water but will not impede and preferablywillassist in the wetting of the solid with oil.
e) a coagulant for residual emulsifier andtor .. .
uncoagulated latex.
The most useful particle size ranges between ~ dusty powder and pea-sized particles, say generally less than ~". I
. , . . I
Various procedure~ can be used in the incorporation of the hydrophobic agent. The agent is formed in s;tu generally by adding ammonium, sodium, or potassium salts of stearate oleate or palmitate and other high molecular weight fatty acids to the latex before coagulation. Then destabilizing both with aluminum, calcium, magnesium, or zinc salts ; together with or just before adding the cementitious component. The hydrophobic addition may be made by adding the dry fatty acid salt before or after the cementitious component. Silicone oil if used must be added after the composite has been dried. This means a second drying stage is necessary. Silicone oil is , . _ . . _ .
~07Z67 relatively expensive and would only be used when necessary.
The solid composition is spread out on an oil contaminated water surface. The oil is obsorbed in the porous solid by capillary action, then permanently dissolves in the polymeric part of the composite. After picking up and dissolving the oil the porous compite becomes relatively heavy and sinks. The process apparently is unaffected by wave action, in fact non-static conditions seem to help the process.
Since the process sequence is capillary action followed by solution in a polymer, oil is removed from solid as well as aqueous surfaces by the same composition of matter. Either the used material or an excess of ~ntreated material may be washed away by a stream of water.
The solid solvent can be brought into contact with hydrocarbon con-taminant such as oil by a variety of methods. After thick layers of oil are recovered as far as possible by conventional means such as pumping, then the remaining oil is gleaned from the surface by adding the "solid solvent", by flowing or blowing onto the hydrocarbon coated surface until the water is free of contaminant. For larger spills or in emergency more than a single vessel may be used to distribute the solid solvent or aerial spraying can also be employed. Any conventional distributing or dispensing device can be used with the oil-sinking composites of this invention. Mixing action promotes contact of the solid solvent with the oil and normally wave action is generally sufficient for this purpose. Micro-organisms, which consume or degrade hydrocarbons, can be added to the dry composite mixture before application of the composite to an oil spill. Examples of micro-organisms that can be used are species of the genera Norcardia, Pseudomonas and Bacillus. Together with naturally occurring micro-organisms these strains will accelerate biodegradation of the sunken oil component .
The foregoing description shows we have achieved the object of our invention, i.e., combining quickly with the oil and removing it from the surface and rendering the oil harmle~s to, and removing the hydrocarbon 'I
~)7Z67 - permanently from harmful contact with the sub-surface environment. Unlike other sinking agents the oil retention is complete and there has been no evidence of traces of oil being released later to repollute the surface.
There may be certain specific situations where the present invention will not be the treatment of choice for the removal of an oil contaminant from water. For example, if there is any reason why the presence of this oil-filled material on the bottom of the water would be deleterious to certain specific vegetable or animal life, then other means should be used for the removal of the floating oil. Howe~er, in the great majority of cases no 10 harm will be done by causing the oil to sinlc to the bottom of the water on this oil absorbent composition, where it can decompose gradually and harmlessly without contaminating the environment. Obviously the farther out from shore the treatment is effected the less likelihood there is of harm accruing. The present invention is well adapted to prompt and complete treatment of oil near the site of the spill, sinking it to the bottom in the relatively deeper water away from shore wherever this is possible.
We have also found that the present oi~ absorbent composition is useful for removing oil from solid surfaces. A.s an example the material is useful for picking up spilled oil from ground or building floors. This 20 may hold certain advantages over prior art methods under certain circum-stances. In such cases the oil soaked absorbent composition could be dis-posed of by usual refuse disposal means or it could be burned. The material is also a useful composition for absorbing oil from living animals and birds, being harmless to the animals and being capable of picking up oil from their surface .
The following examples will give some indication of the preparation and use of the oil absorbent composition of the present invention. These examples should be considered as illustrative only, and should not be considered limiting. The invention iB capable of wide variations without 30 departing from the inventive concept, and the protection afforded by this patent should be considered limited only by the claims appended hereto.
~7ZG7 Example 1:
40 9. of crude cellulose fibres were made from newspapers by adding an excess of water and grinding it up in a high speed blender for 10 seconds. The excess water was filtered off through a coarse sieve an~ the wet residue squeezed to a non-flowing muddy consist-ency (about 35~ water). 50 9. (dry weight basis) of 25% of type 776 latex, obtainable as a commercial product from Polysar Corp., Sarnia, Ontario, Canada was stirred in. Type 776 polymer typically contains 25% polybutadiene, 70% polystyrene and about 5% of miscell- 1 aneous wetting or emulsifying agents like sodium stearate unsatur- I -ated acids like itaconic acid and traces of antioxidants such as hydroqu;none or substituted phenols. Then 5 9. of potassium stearate as a 2% solution in water (to increase the hydrophobic content of the mix) was stirred in, followed by 20 c. c. of AlCl3 (as a 20% solution in water) as rapidly as possible. After about
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hydrocarbons such as crude oil or various refinery products cause contamination of oceanic or fresh waters when spilled thereon. Such floating hydrocarbons constitute a nuisance and hazard from spills around harbour facilities, leakage from tankers, or from damage to or sinking of a vessel carrying crude oil. Incidents of this type can have disasterous effects upon beaches and marine life.
Numerous methods have been proposed for removing spilled hydrocarbons from the surface of a body of water. For example, it has been proposed to apply various powdered minerals such as asbestos, dolomite, magnetite, silicone treated floating agents such as perlite, wood chips, paper, felt, straw, sawdust, expanded mica, peat fibres, hard and soft clays and various foamed synthetic products such as polyisocyanates to mention a few. In the case of heavy minerals they tend to absorb an -appreciable amount of hydrocarbon and then sink. The oil however, may be released and float to the surface again.
Those absorbent materials that float on the surface of the water must be recovered with the oil in some fashion to effect removal from its surface. A frequent flaw is that the oil tends to drain from the floating solid and recoat the water surface. It has been suggested to add polymers such as rubber latices with mineral fillers, to the floating body of the hydrocarbon,the rubber latex containing the hydrocarbon is subsequently coagulated by addition of an acidic material to the latex after it is sprayed on the hydro-carbon to coagulate the latex, particularly around the edge of the spill area.
It is then necessary to skim the coagulum from the surface of the water.
liO7267 Another approach is to produce a ine (35-45 mesh) powdery mixture of a polymer (in which oil is g~nerally soluble) plus heavy mineral filler. The fines are then carefully added on to the oily surface so they will sink taking oil with them to the bottom. However, wherever it was added in any appreciable thickness, the powdery mixture is so dense it would tend to agglomerate into large blobs, the edges folding over on top of the heavy matte to sink rapidly by-passing the oil. Silicone oils have been used to coat light floating materials such as treated cellulosic material. ~il can be recovered by collecting and squeezing the cellulosic material. However, 10 oil on this or other floating gleaning agents is not thoroughly fixed by solu-tion in the floating agent and can float back out to recontaminate the water surface. This occurs with perlite, wood chips, vermiculite and other similar floating agents.
Among items of prior art which are of interest are the following.
U.S. Patent No. 3,591,494 of Crouch and Childers issued July 6, 1971, discloses the use of a fine powder of portland cement and clay coated with a polymer compatible with hydrocarbons. The material does not float on the surface of the water. U.S. Patent No. 3,888,766 of De Young issued June 10, 1975 deals with a cellular material impregnated with a hydrophobic oleophilic 20 compounds, for use in absorbing oil from the surface of water. The matrix is wood fibre or foamed plastic, and it will float, but would not be expected tG sink when loaded with oil. Similarly, U.S. Patent No. 3,607,741 of Sohnius issued September 21, 1971 involves a cellulosic material treated with a surfactant and silicone oil, yielding a material which will not sink when loaded with oil. British Patent Specification No. 1,340,333 of Harris and Shorthouse published 12 December 1973 discloses the step o~ applying to oil on a body of water a dispersion of a mineral filler in a latex of an oil absorbing rubber. Again, that material would not be expected to float well prior to its absorption of oil on the water, and accordingly problems are 30 encountered in ensuring that the material picks up oil before it sinks. Other patents of some interest are U.S. Patent No. 3,562,153 of Fully, Lippe and Fletcher issued February 9, 1971 and U.S. Patent No. 3,7~9,667 of , 0~7Z67 Lindstrom issued July 31, 1973. None of these items of prior art disclose the invention set out in the present specification, nor do they render it obvious .
- BRIEF STAT MENT OF THE ~N~ENTION
In accordance with our invention a mixture of roughly pea-sized and smaller particles of a porous mixture are contacted with surface oil, absorbing the latter in interstitial and porous areas coated with fine particles of rubbery solvent. The oil then gradually dissolves in the poly-mer and becomes strongly bound into the solid mixture.
The oil dissolves in the rubbery component forming a permanent solid solution, displacing air from the void spaces increasing the density OI
the composite and sinking from the oil contaminated surface. The com- `
ponents of the mixture are chosen so they will avoid environmental contami-nation.
The composition is effective in soaking up oil from either solid or aqueous surfaces converting it to oil dissolved in a polymer spread out on a porous support. This is a preponderantly irreversible process resulting in a non-oily mixture which will eventually sink from view. Release of hydrocarbon from the solid mixture is not a problem because of the very 20 high partition coefficient of oil in favour of the polymeric component fixed on the solid support. The composite can incorporate special oil-eating bacteria incorporated as one of the components to promote biodegradation of the hydrocarbon content as it lies on the bottom. It is a further feature of our invention that usually simple rinsing with water will remove evidence of personal contact with the oil laden composite.
Thus in one aspect the present invention provides a granular absorbent composition for absorbing oil, said composition being hydrophobic and oleophilic, said composition being porous and being lighter than water when dry, said composition being heavier than water when said pores are 30 loaded with liquid oil, said composition comprising a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material whose intersticial voids are impregnated with a hydrophobic agent and a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, and a plurality ~.~
1:10~6'7 of solid particles of a sinking agent, said solid particles being held together and being adhered to the surface of the buoyant material by said oil solvent.
In another aspect the present invention provides a method for preparing a granular absorbent composition for oil and the like which composition floats on an oi~-contaminated water surface and, upon absorbing oil, sinks to the bottom of the water, comprislng: (a) mixing an emulsion of a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material and a hydrophobic agent; (b) adding to the mixture solid particles formed of a porous sinking agent and a coagulant, and then mixing together to form an intimate mixture of the above components;
(c) drying the intimate mixture thus obtained; and (d) comminuting the dried mixture to particles of suitable size.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a method for removing oil from a contaminated water surface, comprising the steps of:
(a) spreading on to the contaminated water surface a granular absorbent composition for oil, said composition being hydrophobic and oleophilic, said composition being porous and being lighter than water when dry, said composition be:Lng heavier than water when said pores are loaded with liquid oil, said composition comprising a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material whose intersticial voids are impregnated with a hydrophobic agent and a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, and a plurality of solid particles of a sinking agent, said solid particles being held together and being adhered to the surface of the buoyant material by said oil solvent;
(b) adding further absorbent composition as the oil is absorbed and the composition sinks, until no more oil is present on the water surface.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Broadly speaking our invention is a composite of cellulose fibers, cotton linters, or recycled paper coated with very fine particles of polymer in which oil is soluble. This intimate mixture is easily obtained by coagulation of a latex on the cellulose fines in the presence of a ¦ hydrophobic agent ~ 4 -.. . . . _ .... .. . . . . . . .
110~267 such as aluminurn, zinc, calcium, or magncsium stearate, oleate, palmitate or miYtures thereof with each other or with other fatty acids. These salts are not water soluble so they will not adversely affect the aquatic environ-ment. The mixture is then completed by adding a sinking agent and binder such as Portland or Medusa cement, Plaster components, plaster of Paris, any of which optionally may be extended with fly ash, ground limestone, lime, quartz fines, clays and other similar materials..
The polymer originally should be in latex form for ease 10 of widespread and fine dispersion. The preferred latices are of any natural rubber or synthetic compositions which dissol~re up to ten times their weight of oil and vary from 100% polybutadiene up to ca. 80% polybutadiene generally the rest is simply polystyrene, together wit~ minor amounts of other polymerizeable monomers. Polystyrene latex can be used but is an inferior solvent component aue to limited oil solubility in the polymer. Because oil solubilities are limited by the presence of polyacrylonitrile, latices containing acrylonitrile are not desirable. Polyisoprene components are useful but expensive. Polyvinyl Z0 chloride polymers are satisfactory but may present possible environmental problem~. For best results the composition of our invention is broadly defined as follows. Wide variations are desired for different end uses.
- These ranges should not be considered limiting.
cellulose fiDes 2 - 30 polymer solvent 3 - ~0 hydrophobic agent 1 - 10 s inker and binder 10 - 9 0 coagulant 0- 10 If silicone oil is used as a hydrophobic agent it must be sprayed on after 30 the composite is dry, since otherwise it inhibits formation of air holes in the composite.
7;~67 The presence of some large holes assures that the pieces will float while oil is being absorbed.
The composition is a solid mixture of:
a) a polymer in which oil is soluble.
b) a porous support for the polymer or copolymer to permit drying and crushing of the aggregate and sufficient ~eight to sink the mixture of oil and so1id after spreading the composition on water.
c) preferably a bulking agent such as used paper ~ines to make it easier for the solid mixture to float for a period of time after application on w~ter.
d) a hydrophobic agent that will delay wetting of.
the mixture by water but will not impede and preferablywillassist in the wetting of the solid with oil.
e) a coagulant for residual emulsifier andtor .. .
uncoagulated latex.
The most useful particle size ranges between ~ dusty powder and pea-sized particles, say generally less than ~". I
. , . . I
Various procedure~ can be used in the incorporation of the hydrophobic agent. The agent is formed in s;tu generally by adding ammonium, sodium, or potassium salts of stearate oleate or palmitate and other high molecular weight fatty acids to the latex before coagulation. Then destabilizing both with aluminum, calcium, magnesium, or zinc salts ; together with or just before adding the cementitious component. The hydrophobic addition may be made by adding the dry fatty acid salt before or after the cementitious component. Silicone oil if used must be added after the composite has been dried. This means a second drying stage is necessary. Silicone oil is , . _ . . _ .
~07Z67 relatively expensive and would only be used when necessary.
The solid composition is spread out on an oil contaminated water surface. The oil is obsorbed in the porous solid by capillary action, then permanently dissolves in the polymeric part of the composite. After picking up and dissolving the oil the porous compite becomes relatively heavy and sinks. The process apparently is unaffected by wave action, in fact non-static conditions seem to help the process.
Since the process sequence is capillary action followed by solution in a polymer, oil is removed from solid as well as aqueous surfaces by the same composition of matter. Either the used material or an excess of ~ntreated material may be washed away by a stream of water.
The solid solvent can be brought into contact with hydrocarbon con-taminant such as oil by a variety of methods. After thick layers of oil are recovered as far as possible by conventional means such as pumping, then the remaining oil is gleaned from the surface by adding the "solid solvent", by flowing or blowing onto the hydrocarbon coated surface until the water is free of contaminant. For larger spills or in emergency more than a single vessel may be used to distribute the solid solvent or aerial spraying can also be employed. Any conventional distributing or dispensing device can be used with the oil-sinking composites of this invention. Mixing action promotes contact of the solid solvent with the oil and normally wave action is generally sufficient for this purpose. Micro-organisms, which consume or degrade hydrocarbons, can be added to the dry composite mixture before application of the composite to an oil spill. Examples of micro-organisms that can be used are species of the genera Norcardia, Pseudomonas and Bacillus. Together with naturally occurring micro-organisms these strains will accelerate biodegradation of the sunken oil component .
The foregoing description shows we have achieved the object of our invention, i.e., combining quickly with the oil and removing it from the surface and rendering the oil harmle~s to, and removing the hydrocarbon 'I
~)7Z67 - permanently from harmful contact with the sub-surface environment. Unlike other sinking agents the oil retention is complete and there has been no evidence of traces of oil being released later to repollute the surface.
There may be certain specific situations where the present invention will not be the treatment of choice for the removal of an oil contaminant from water. For example, if there is any reason why the presence of this oil-filled material on the bottom of the water would be deleterious to certain specific vegetable or animal life, then other means should be used for the removal of the floating oil. Howe~er, in the great majority of cases no 10 harm will be done by causing the oil to sinlc to the bottom of the water on this oil absorbent composition, where it can decompose gradually and harmlessly without contaminating the environment. Obviously the farther out from shore the treatment is effected the less likelihood there is of harm accruing. The present invention is well adapted to prompt and complete treatment of oil near the site of the spill, sinking it to the bottom in the relatively deeper water away from shore wherever this is possible.
We have also found that the present oi~ absorbent composition is useful for removing oil from solid surfaces. A.s an example the material is useful for picking up spilled oil from ground or building floors. This 20 may hold certain advantages over prior art methods under certain circum-stances. In such cases the oil soaked absorbent composition could be dis-posed of by usual refuse disposal means or it could be burned. The material is also a useful composition for absorbing oil from living animals and birds, being harmless to the animals and being capable of picking up oil from their surface .
The following examples will give some indication of the preparation and use of the oil absorbent composition of the present invention. These examples should be considered as illustrative only, and should not be considered limiting. The invention iB capable of wide variations without 30 departing from the inventive concept, and the protection afforded by this patent should be considered limited only by the claims appended hereto.
~7ZG7 Example 1:
40 9. of crude cellulose fibres were made from newspapers by adding an excess of water and grinding it up in a high speed blender for 10 seconds. The excess water was filtered off through a coarse sieve an~ the wet residue squeezed to a non-flowing muddy consist-ency (about 35~ water). 50 9. (dry weight basis) of 25% of type 776 latex, obtainable as a commercial product from Polysar Corp., Sarnia, Ontario, Canada was stirred in. Type 776 polymer typically contains 25% polybutadiene, 70% polystyrene and about 5% of miscell- 1 aneous wetting or emulsifying agents like sodium stearate unsatur- I -ated acids like itaconic acid and traces of antioxidants such as hydroqu;none or substituted phenols. Then 5 9. of potassium stearate as a 2% solution in water (to increase the hydrophobic content of the mix) was stirred in, followed by 20 c. c. of AlCl3 (as a 20% solution in water) as rapidly as possible. After about
2 minutes the mixture was smooth but some of the latex had not been completely destabilized since some white latex solution could be observed around the top surface at the inside edge of the glass container. 300 g. of Portland cement was then stirred in and latex destabilization was then complete since water at the top edge of the beaker was ciear. The mix was spread out on paper and dried @103+3C for ~ hours at which time it was dry to touch. Some of the dry cake was cooled and broken up into particles of approx;mately pea size. when these particles were added to crude oil on the surface of water @10C, it was noted that the solid mixture absorbed oil rap-_ idly and the oil-rich particles settled in 5-10 minute~ to the bottom of the vessel when given a slight Jar or some agitation.
When the identical sequence of the above experiment was repeated except that 40 c.c. of 20g AlCl3 in water was added instead of 20 c.
c., complete destabilization of the latex occurred before the 300 g.
of Portland cement was stirred in. This mixture added to oil on water at 10C permitted the oil-rich particles to settle to the bottom in 3-5 minutes when the beaker was jarred slightly or some agitation applied.
~ )7Z6~7 ~ Example #2 A second sample of solid solvent was made by` adding 50g of type 776 latex, a commercial grade of latex available from Polysar Corp. Ltd., and as in example ~l it was added to 40g of paper fines, then stirred in with 5g of potassium oleate as hydrophobic agent (250cc of a 2~ solution~. After 2 minutes, when the mixture was obviously smooth and homogeneous, 40cc of 20% Al Cl3 solution was added and immediately there-after while still stirring with a mechanical mixer 500g of Medusa cement as a binder and sinking agent.
When the mixture was obviously homogeneous after 4 - 5 minutes, mixing, it was spread out on an absorbent base and dried at 103 + 3C for 4 - 5 hours, at which time the "cake" was obviously dry to touch.
About lg of the "cake" was broken up into pea sized pellets and these together with the small amount ¢10%) of the dusty fraction co-produced were added to 20 drops ~O.Sg) of crude oil in the surface of water at zo 8C. The oil was absorbed rapidly by the solid solvent.
After 15 minutes the oil soaked particles sank when a slight agitation was applied to the container. By - morning all oil soaked or partly oil soaked pellets had sunk without further agitation.
When 500g of Portland cement was substituted for Medusa cement in the same manner as above, the oil soaked pellets left only a slight stain when rubbed firmly between the fingers. The Medusa mixture was stain free when the same test was applied to it.
When the identical sequence of the above experiment was repeated except that 40 c.c. of 20g AlCl3 in water was added instead of 20 c.
c., complete destabilization of the latex occurred before the 300 g.
of Portland cement was stirred in. This mixture added to oil on water at 10C permitted the oil-rich particles to settle to the bottom in 3-5 minutes when the beaker was jarred slightly or some agitation applied.
~ )7Z6~7 ~ Example #2 A second sample of solid solvent was made by` adding 50g of type 776 latex, a commercial grade of latex available from Polysar Corp. Ltd., and as in example ~l it was added to 40g of paper fines, then stirred in with 5g of potassium oleate as hydrophobic agent (250cc of a 2~ solution~. After 2 minutes, when the mixture was obviously smooth and homogeneous, 40cc of 20% Al Cl3 solution was added and immediately there-after while still stirring with a mechanical mixer 500g of Medusa cement as a binder and sinking agent.
When the mixture was obviously homogeneous after 4 - 5 minutes, mixing, it was spread out on an absorbent base and dried at 103 + 3C for 4 - 5 hours, at which time the "cake" was obviously dry to touch.
About lg of the "cake" was broken up into pea sized pellets and these together with the small amount ¢10%) of the dusty fraction co-produced were added to 20 drops ~O.Sg) of crude oil in the surface of water at zo 8C. The oil was absorbed rapidly by the solid solvent.
After 15 minutes the oil soaked particles sank when a slight agitation was applied to the container. By - morning all oil soaked or partly oil soaked pellets had sunk without further agitation.
When 500g of Portland cement was substituted for Medusa cement in the same manner as above, the oil soaked pellets left only a slight stain when rubbed firmly between the fingers. The Medusa mixture was stain free when the same test was applied to it.
3~
6~
Example ~3 The same mixture as the Medusa cement Example in ~2 was made excepting that SOg rather than 40g of paper fines were used. A solid solvent was produced that soaked up oil rapidly and the oil saturated sol~ent easily sank when slight motion was applied after 10 - 15 minutes. After 1 week on the surface of the water some white particles that had no chance to pick up oil on the first occasion, attacked and absorbed extra crude oil when it was added. Two particles that were over half submerged after standing 1 week also picked up oil and sank.
Again, rubbing the o~l soaked particles between ones fingers left no stain.
Example ~4 .
Repeating Example ~3 except that 500g of Plaster of Paris rather than 500g of Medusa cement as a sinking and binding agent produced a solid solvent that was less friable and appreciably harder to the touch than Example #3. It settled - with very little agitation after absorbing oil from the surface of 12C water in 5 minutes~
.
.
~0'~267 - Example ~5 This was a repeat of Example #4 except that 600g rather than 500g of Plaster of Paris was used as a binding and sinking agent. Surprisingly this resulted in a mixture that did not sink as fast from the surface as the lighter mix in example ~4.
It is believed that this is the result of less continuity in the pores and/or interstitial areas of t~e mixture, a fact confirmed by microscopic examination, ie. a contInuous pore structure permits air to be displaced as oil is abs~rbed.
Example #6 The procedure followed in Example ~4 was repeated except that potassium salts of a typical impure commercial mixture of fatty acids, rather than potassium oleate was used. The fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography as follows:
Acid %
Stearic 27.4 Oleic 23.0 Palmitic 29.0 An 11 - 12 component mixture of miscellaneous small amounts of acids such as myristic, ricinoleic, and ClQ to C14 acids totalled 10.6%.
There was no evident difference in behaviour of this ~mixture and that produced i~ example ~4.
~iO7~7 Example ~7 The procedure followed in example #4 was repeated with ~he exception that Type 741 latex available commercially from Polysar Corp. Ltd., Sarnia Canada was used in the same way and at the same rubber solids concentration as be~ore with Type 776 latex.
Type 741 latex typically contains 70 - 75% polybutadiene and 30 - 25% polystyrene with sodium stearate as the main emulsifier and typical water soluble initiators, modifiers, and inhibitors to produce a general purpose or tire rubber.
The final product while wet is slightly less smooth and spreadable on an absorbent base for drying at 103C.
However, the oil absorption and sinking characteristics are indistinguishable from Example ~4.
Since type 741 represents the highest polybutadiene/
lowest polystyrene co-polymer and type 776 represents the lowest polybutadiene/highest polystyrene co-polymer commercially available for butadiene/styrene co-polymers it means that the whole range up to 80% polystyrene is useful for making solid solvent compositions. This was proved by successful use of 100% polybutadiene emulsion and 60/40 and 40/60 polybutadiene/polystyr~ne co-polymers in emulsion form in the formula used or the present example.
Polystyrene emulsion could be used but oil solubility reduces rapidly by about 2 orders of magnitude as one increased the polystyrene content frnm 80% to 100%.
-- ~iO72~;7 Example #8 60g of paper fines were prepared in the usual fashion then 50g of commercial type 776 latex from Polysar Corp. Ltd., Sarnia Canada plus Sg of potassium stearate (as a 2% solution~ was mixed until thoroughly homo-geneous as indicated by the smooth appearance of the mixture. While stirring, 40cc of 20% Al C13 solution were added, followed immediately by 500g of Plaster of Paris until an obviously smooth and homogeneous mixture was obtained. After drying in the usual fashion it was tested by adding to oil on water at 11C. In 2 - 3 minutes the larger sized pieces had picked up over 95% o~ the oil as determined by extraction and sank to the bottom with very little agitation. The fines from the grinding process dissolved the fine droplets of oil that otherwise would have remained on the surface of the water.
Example #9 60g of sawdust was used to replace the 60g o~
paper fines in example ~8. It was found that the relatively low surface area of the sawdust ~compared - to cellulose fines~ caused production of a relatively dense cake which sank readily before it had a chance to pick up surface oi1.
Exa~ #10 When Example ~8 was repeated substituting 500g of plaster base coat ~Hardwall) in place of 500g o~
Plaster o Paris as a binding and sinking agent, it had extrem~ly rapid oil scavenging properties with both high and low concentrations of polybutadiene latice~.
11~7Z6~
Example #11 When both examples #10 were repeated using 5~g of paper fines instead of 60g and 7.5g of potassium oleate instead of 5g potassium stearate, it was noted that both finished mixes picked up oil more selectively pressumably due to the 50% increase in hydrophobic agent.
Example #12 When 50g of either type 776 or 741 latices or a mixture thereof was homogenized as judged by an even white color of mixtures with 50g of paper fines, prepared in the usual manner, then lOg o dry zinc stearate and 500g of hardwall were stirred in until homogeneous to sight. It was found that ~-the product was much more dense than when aluminum stearate was made in situ, ie. adding Al C13 to sodium or potassium fatty acid salts. In addition air bubbles were noted bubbling up out of the solid solvent while oil was being rapidly absorbed and the solid sank in a few minutes without agitation.
EXample ~13 When 20g of dry zinc stearate was added instead of lOg as noted in example ~12, the rate both of air bubbling from the surface and the rate of sinking increased.
:
.
110~72~7 Example #14 -When 6g of dry aluminum stearate was added to the mixtures as produced in Example #12 ie. Type 741, Type 776 and mixtures thereof, excellent absorbents result. Air bubbles out of the porous solid solvent and the solids sank in 3 minutes.
:: 10 - 16 _
6~
Example ~3 The same mixture as the Medusa cement Example in ~2 was made excepting that SOg rather than 40g of paper fines were used. A solid solvent was produced that soaked up oil rapidly and the oil saturated sol~ent easily sank when slight motion was applied after 10 - 15 minutes. After 1 week on the surface of the water some white particles that had no chance to pick up oil on the first occasion, attacked and absorbed extra crude oil when it was added. Two particles that were over half submerged after standing 1 week also picked up oil and sank.
Again, rubbing the o~l soaked particles between ones fingers left no stain.
Example ~4 .
Repeating Example ~3 except that 500g of Plaster of Paris rather than 500g of Medusa cement as a sinking and binding agent produced a solid solvent that was less friable and appreciably harder to the touch than Example #3. It settled - with very little agitation after absorbing oil from the surface of 12C water in 5 minutes~
.
.
~0'~267 - Example ~5 This was a repeat of Example #4 except that 600g rather than 500g of Plaster of Paris was used as a binding and sinking agent. Surprisingly this resulted in a mixture that did not sink as fast from the surface as the lighter mix in example ~4.
It is believed that this is the result of less continuity in the pores and/or interstitial areas of t~e mixture, a fact confirmed by microscopic examination, ie. a contInuous pore structure permits air to be displaced as oil is abs~rbed.
Example #6 The procedure followed in Example ~4 was repeated except that potassium salts of a typical impure commercial mixture of fatty acids, rather than potassium oleate was used. The fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography as follows:
Acid %
Stearic 27.4 Oleic 23.0 Palmitic 29.0 An 11 - 12 component mixture of miscellaneous small amounts of acids such as myristic, ricinoleic, and ClQ to C14 acids totalled 10.6%.
There was no evident difference in behaviour of this ~mixture and that produced i~ example ~4.
~iO7~7 Example ~7 The procedure followed in example #4 was repeated with ~he exception that Type 741 latex available commercially from Polysar Corp. Ltd., Sarnia Canada was used in the same way and at the same rubber solids concentration as be~ore with Type 776 latex.
Type 741 latex typically contains 70 - 75% polybutadiene and 30 - 25% polystyrene with sodium stearate as the main emulsifier and typical water soluble initiators, modifiers, and inhibitors to produce a general purpose or tire rubber.
The final product while wet is slightly less smooth and spreadable on an absorbent base for drying at 103C.
However, the oil absorption and sinking characteristics are indistinguishable from Example ~4.
Since type 741 represents the highest polybutadiene/
lowest polystyrene co-polymer and type 776 represents the lowest polybutadiene/highest polystyrene co-polymer commercially available for butadiene/styrene co-polymers it means that the whole range up to 80% polystyrene is useful for making solid solvent compositions. This was proved by successful use of 100% polybutadiene emulsion and 60/40 and 40/60 polybutadiene/polystyr~ne co-polymers in emulsion form in the formula used or the present example.
Polystyrene emulsion could be used but oil solubility reduces rapidly by about 2 orders of magnitude as one increased the polystyrene content frnm 80% to 100%.
-- ~iO72~;7 Example #8 60g of paper fines were prepared in the usual fashion then 50g of commercial type 776 latex from Polysar Corp. Ltd., Sarnia Canada plus Sg of potassium stearate (as a 2% solution~ was mixed until thoroughly homo-geneous as indicated by the smooth appearance of the mixture. While stirring, 40cc of 20% Al C13 solution were added, followed immediately by 500g of Plaster of Paris until an obviously smooth and homogeneous mixture was obtained. After drying in the usual fashion it was tested by adding to oil on water at 11C. In 2 - 3 minutes the larger sized pieces had picked up over 95% o~ the oil as determined by extraction and sank to the bottom with very little agitation. The fines from the grinding process dissolved the fine droplets of oil that otherwise would have remained on the surface of the water.
Example #9 60g of sawdust was used to replace the 60g o~
paper fines in example ~8. It was found that the relatively low surface area of the sawdust ~compared - to cellulose fines~ caused production of a relatively dense cake which sank readily before it had a chance to pick up surface oi1.
Exa~ #10 When Example ~8 was repeated substituting 500g of plaster base coat ~Hardwall) in place of 500g o~
Plaster o Paris as a binding and sinking agent, it had extrem~ly rapid oil scavenging properties with both high and low concentrations of polybutadiene latice~.
11~7Z6~
Example #11 When both examples #10 were repeated using 5~g of paper fines instead of 60g and 7.5g of potassium oleate instead of 5g potassium stearate, it was noted that both finished mixes picked up oil more selectively pressumably due to the 50% increase in hydrophobic agent.
Example #12 When 50g of either type 776 or 741 latices or a mixture thereof was homogenized as judged by an even white color of mixtures with 50g of paper fines, prepared in the usual manner, then lOg o dry zinc stearate and 500g of hardwall were stirred in until homogeneous to sight. It was found that ~-the product was much more dense than when aluminum stearate was made in situ, ie. adding Al C13 to sodium or potassium fatty acid salts. In addition air bubbles were noted bubbling up out of the solid solvent while oil was being rapidly absorbed and the solid sank in a few minutes without agitation.
EXample ~13 When 20g of dry zinc stearate was added instead of lOg as noted in example ~12, the rate both of air bubbling from the surface and the rate of sinking increased.
:
.
110~72~7 Example #14 -When 6g of dry aluminum stearate was added to the mixtures as produced in Example #12 ie. Type 741, Type 776 and mixtures thereof, excellent absorbents result. Air bubbles out of the porous solid solvent and the solids sank in 3 minutes.
:: 10 - 16 _
Claims (4)
1. A granular absorbent composition for absorbing oil, said composition being hydrophobic and oleophilic, said composition being porous and being lighter than water when dry, said composition being heavier than water when said pores are loaded with liquid oil, said composition comprising a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material whose intersticial voids are impregnated with a hydrophobic agent and a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, and a plurality of solid particles of a sinking agent, said solid particles being held together and being adhered to the surface of the buoyant material by said oil solvent.
2. A method for preparing a granular absorbent composition for oil and the like which composition floats on an oil-contaminated water surface and, upon absorbing oil, sinks to the bottom of the water, comprising:
(a) mixing an emulsion of a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material and a hydrophobic agent;
(b) adding to the mixture solid particles formed of a porous sinking agent and a coagulant, and then mixing together to form an intimate mixture of the above components;
(c) drying the intimate mixture thus obtained; and (d) comminuting the dried mixture to particles of suitable size.
(a) mixing an emulsion of a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material and a hydrophobic agent;
(b) adding to the mixture solid particles formed of a porous sinking agent and a coagulant, and then mixing together to form an intimate mixture of the above components;
(c) drying the intimate mixture thus obtained; and (d) comminuting the dried mixture to particles of suitable size.
3. A method as in claim 2 wherein step (d) comprises grinding the dried mixture to particles of a suitable size ranging from a dusty powder to pea-sized particles.
4. A method for removing oil from a contaminated water surface, comprising the steps of:
(a) spreading on to the contaminated water surface a granular absorbent composition for oil, said composition being hydrophobic and oleophilic, said composition being porous and being lighter than water when dry, said composition being heavier than water when said pores are loaded with liquid oil, said composition comprising a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material whose intersticial voids are impregnated with a hydrophobic agent and a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, and a plurality of solid particles of a sinking agent, said solid particles being held together and being adhered to the surface of the buoyant material by said oil solvent;
(b) adding further absorbent composition as the oil is absorbed and the composition sinks, until no more oil is present on the water surface.
(a) spreading on to the contaminated water surface a granular absorbent composition for oil, said composition being hydrophobic and oleophilic, said composition being porous and being lighter than water when dry, said composition being heavier than water when said pores are loaded with liquid oil, said composition comprising a solid cellulosic porous buoyant material whose intersticial voids are impregnated with a hydrophobic agent and a rubbery polymeric solvent for oil, and a plurality of solid particles of a sinking agent, said solid particles being held together and being adhered to the surface of the buoyant material by said oil solvent;
(b) adding further absorbent composition as the oil is absorbed and the composition sinks, until no more oil is present on the water surface.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA301,338A CA1107267A (en) | 1978-04-18 | 1978-04-18 | Absorbent composition for oil and the like |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA301,338A CA1107267A (en) | 1978-04-18 | 1978-04-18 | Absorbent composition for oil and the like |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1107267A true CA1107267A (en) | 1981-08-18 |
Family
ID=4111269
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA301,338A Expired CA1107267A (en) | 1978-04-18 | 1978-04-18 | Absorbent composition for oil and the like |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1107267A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1991001356A1 (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1991-02-07 | International Cellulose, Inc. | Method for cleaning up liquids, absorbent pellets for use in such method, and method for making such pellets |
| US5195465A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1993-03-23 | International Cellulose Corporation | Flaked cellulose litter material which can be reused as food or fertilizer |
| WO1993014034A1 (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1993-07-22 | Harry James Bradbury | Composition for oil removal |
| US5352780A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1994-10-04 | Ecosorb International, Inc. | Absorbent material and litter from ground cellulose |
| US5429741A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1995-07-04 | Ecosorb International, Inc. | Sludge conditioning |
| US5614458A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1997-03-25 | Ecosorb International, Inc. | Method for sludge conditioning |
-
1978
- 1978-04-18 CA CA301,338A patent/CA1107267A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1991001356A1 (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1991-02-07 | International Cellulose, Inc. | Method for cleaning up liquids, absorbent pellets for use in such method, and method for making such pellets |
| US5082563A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1992-01-21 | International Cellulose, Inc. | Methods for cleaning up liquids using absorbent pellets |
| US5195465A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1993-03-23 | International Cellulose Corporation | Flaked cellulose litter material which can be reused as food or fertilizer |
| US5352780A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1994-10-04 | Ecosorb International, Inc. | Absorbent material and litter from ground cellulose |
| US5429741A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1995-07-04 | Ecosorb International, Inc. | Sludge conditioning |
| US5614458A (en) * | 1989-07-20 | 1997-03-25 | Ecosorb International, Inc. | Method for sludge conditioning |
| WO1993014034A1 (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1993-07-22 | Harry James Bradbury | Composition for oil removal |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5035804A (en) | Oil spill water treatment | |
| US4018679A (en) | Method of rendering waste substances harmless | |
| JPH0153314B2 (en) | ||
| US5104548A (en) | Controlling and recovering oil spills from the environment | |
| US4941978A (en) | Controlling and recovering oil spills from the environment | |
| CA1107267A (en) | Absorbent composition for oil and the like | |
| US4011159A (en) | Method of removal of petroleum products from solid or liquid surfaces | |
| US9206062B2 (en) | Methods to recover and reclaim hydrocarbons or hydrophobic substances in an aqueous environment | |
| EP0075384B1 (en) | Oil spill absorbing peat | |
| CN100333827C (en) | Oil recovery and environmental cleanup compositions | |
| US3503774A (en) | Method of cleaning oil-contaminated particulate materials | |
| US20140018600A1 (en) | Removal of hydrophobic contaminants | |
| CA1041127A (en) | Method of rendering waste substances harmless | |
| JPH10273650A (en) | Treatment of oil to be treated and solid fuel | |
| EP0149396B1 (en) | Solid material with oleophilic and hydrophobic properties and its use for the absorption of hydrocarbons | |
| US20120061326A1 (en) | Method for the Environmental Remediation of Oil Spills and Other Chemical Contaminants | |
| KR100350209B1 (en) | Manufacturing Method of Oil Geling Agent | |
| RU2080298C1 (en) | Method of cleaning surfaces from petroleum and petroleum products | |
| Bocard et al. | Cleaning products used in operations after the Amoco Cadiz disaster | |
| AU2020103483A4 (en) | Method of remediating a contaminated medium | |
| RU2148024C1 (en) | Appliance for removing crude oil and petroleum products from surface of water | |
| JP2000512325A (en) | Methods and products for absorbing oils and organic solvents from water and sea | |
| KR970006135B1 (en) | Gel for sea effluence oil treatment | |
| JPH10147772A (en) | Composite oil absorbent | |
| SU1749340A1 (en) | Method of cleaning oil-polluted ground |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |