CA1165991A

CA1165991A - Filament draw nozzle

Info

Publication number: CA1165991A
Application number: CA000382288A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Imants Reba
Original assignee: Crown Zellerbach Corp
Current assignee: James River Corp of Nevada
Priority date: 1980-10-02
Filing date: 1981-07-22
Publication date: 1984-04-24
Also published as: ATE19104T1; EP0049563A2; EP0049563A3; WO1982001180A1; JPS619221B2; DE3174312D1; US4322027A; EP0049563B1; JPS57501577A; MX153464A

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

A filament draw nozzle including throughbore defining means having a shoulder spaced from the throughbore, a housing defining an aperture and positioned on the throughbore defining means, said housing abutting the shoulder whereby the housing is aligned relative to the throughbore defining means, and fiber inlet defining means, said fiber inlet defining means in-cluding a fiber inlet feed tube slidably positioned in the housing aper-ture. The throughbore and the housing aperture are disposed in alignment whereby the fiber feed tube is concentrically disposed within said through-bore.

Description

5~9:~

FILAMENT DRAW NOZZLE

2 _C _ OUND OF ~HE INVENTION

4 1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to air guns or filament draw nozzles used for the production of spun bonded nonwoven fabrics.
7 2. Description of the Prior Art 8 In the production of nonwoven webs from continuous filaments air guns or ~ filament draw nozzles are commonly used to direct the filaments to the de-sired web forming location. Compressed air is generally supplied to the ~1 nozzles to serve as an entraining medium for the filaments. Examples of 12 prior art filament draw nozzles are disclosed in Kinney U.S. Patent 13 3,338,992, which issued August 29, 1967; Kinney U.S. Patent No. 3,341,394, 14 which issued September 12, 1967; Dorschner et. al. U.S. Patent No.

3,66~,862, which issued April 11, 1972; Dorschner et. al. U.S. Patent No.
~6 3,692,618~ which issuea September 19, 1972; and Reba U.S. Patent No.
17 3~754,694, which issued August 28, 1973.
~8 Prior art draw nozzles used for the production of nonwoven webs have a 19 number of shortcomings, bein9 generally charact~rized by their IPlatively comple~ dQsign, often incorporating numerous parts, which results in high 21 r~placement cost and problems in maintaining the accurate alignment of 22 parts. This latter problem can lead to asymmetric air flows which create 23 swirl and thus roping of the filaments being conveyed by the nozzles. In 24 addition, prior art nozzle constructions are often prone to plugging and wear problems and require high air pressure to operate. Thus, their opera-26 tion is energy intensive and costly. Prior art draw nozzles also charac-27 teristically generally are difficult to thread initially and have relatively 28 low fiber entrainment capacities due in large part to the fact that they 29 commonly incorporate fiber feed tubes having relatively small internal dia-meters. Further, prior art dra~ nozzles, due tn their cnmplexity ~f con-31 struction, do not readily adapt themselves to internal vacuum m~nitoring, a 32 desirable feature for filament flow control.
Il ~., ~

` il J ~ 65~9 ~1 1 It is therefore an object of the present lnvention to provide a filament2 draw nozzle which ~liminates, or at least minimizes, the aforesaid short-3 comings of prioI aIt arrangements.

BRIEF SUMMARY DF THE INVENTION
7 The filament draw nozzle of the present inven~ion comprises thIee prin-8 cipal components that are self aligned when assembled- Assembly itself is 9 quite simple since the three filament draw nozzle components are slip fit into position. The components are a throughbore defining means, a housing, 11 and fiber inlet defining means which cooperate to draw filaments under ~2 tension and under controlled conditions through the nozzle- Several fea-13 tures of the nozzle contribute to attainment oF the advantages set forth 14 above~ One significant feature is the use of a relatively large internal diameter cylindrical fiber feed tube which gives the nozzle a high fiber 16 entrainment capacity. The interior of the fiber feed tube is in communi-1~ cation with a shallow bell mouth sur~ace formed on the body member which 1~ cooperates with the fiber feed tube to minimize nozzle plugging and provide 19 a high vacuum at the.nozzle fiber inlet to facilitate initial fiber threading and provide a self-cleaning feature.
21 Cooperating structure on the three above identi~ied componentS insures 22 that skewness is avoided when the components are assembled. In addltion, ~3 the nozzle readily lends itself to prompt and inexpensive parts replacement 24 and internal vacuum monitoring for filament flow control purposes.
2~ In the pTeferred embodiments of the invention continuously conYerging 26 (and thus accelerating) flow passages are provided between an annu~ar air 27 cavity which receives pressurized air and the flow path for the fi~aments 28 being drawn through the nozzle. This arrangement contributes to the ability29 o~ tne nozzle to dampen air flow non-uni~ormities which contribut~ to the fiber swirl and otherwise maintain good swirl control over the fihers being 31 orawn through the nozzle.

~ ~ 659~ ~
DE5CRIP~ION OF DRAWINGS

3 Fig. 1 is an elevational view in section of a preferred form of ~ilament

4 draw nozzle constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention;
6 Fig. 2 is a view similar to that of Fig. 1 but illustrating an alterna-7 tive embodimentj 8 Fig. 3 is a view similar to that Fig. 1 but illustrating yet another 9 alternative embodiment; and Fig. 4 is a schematic illustration of a filament draw nozzle and asso-11 ciated structure; and ~ Fig. 5 is an elevational view in section sho~ing operational details of 13 selected elements of the nozzle of Fig. 1.

D~TAILED DESCRIPTION

17 Fig. l illustrates a preferred form of filament draw nozzle 10 construc-18 ted in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. The nozzle 19 receives a plurality of fibers from a fiber source (not shown) and trans-20 ports them nownwardly through a draw pipe 11 (Fig. 4) to a moving wire 13. .
21 A ~oil element 15 of the type disclosed in Canadian Patent 22 Application Serial ~o. 368,942, filed January 21, 1981, may 23 be disposed at the bottom of draw pipe 11 to assist in dis-24 tribution of the fibers which may be drawn-.onto wire 13 by a vacuum box (not shown) disposed thereunder.
26 Tne nozzle 10 includes a throughbore defining means 12 having a throu3h-27 bore 14 formed therein and a shoulder 16 extending about the periphery of 28 means 12 at a location spaced from the throughbore. Means 12 additinnally 29 comprises an upwardly projecting annular boss 18 having a cylindrical peri-pheral ~all 20 leading to a generally smooth~y curved surface 22 extending 31 to throughbore 14. A peripheral channel 24 is f~rmed in means 12 at a loca-32 tion adjacent to shoulder 16, said channel accommodating an ~-ring seal 26.
33 Slip fit over throughbore defining means 12 and seated upon shculder 16 il 1 is a housing 30 defining an aperture 32 at the upper end thereof. When the 2 housing 30 is positioned on shoulder 16 the housing is ali9ned relative to 3 the throughbore defining means so tnat throughbore 14 and aperture and 32 4 are coaxial. Precise coaxial alignment may be accomplished by positioning a mandrel (not shown) in throughbore 14 and aperture 32 and then securing the 6 housing to the throughbore defining means by means of screws 21, for ex-7 ample. ~-ring 26 provides an airtight seal between throughbore defining 8 means 12 and housing 3Q. Together the wall 2û of bûss 18 and the inner wall 9 of the housing define therebetween an annular air cavity which is in commu-nication with the interior of a conduit 34 connected to a source (not shown) l~ of pressurized air. The annular air cavity is also in communication with a 12 generally increasingly restricted annular passageway or slit leading from 13 the annular air cavity to throughbore 14. The restrictea annular passageway 14 is partially defined by the housing 30 and the generally smoothly curved l~ surface 22 of boss 18.
16 The nozzle of Fig. 1 adoitionally comprises fiber feed tube 42 having a 17 smooth cylindrical outer wall and slip fit into aperture 32 with said wall 18 bearing against housing 30. The interior of fiber feed tube 42 has a cir-19 cular cross section and is in communication with throughbore 14 and concen-tric therewith. The diameter of the fiber feed tube interior is at least 21 0.2 inches. Because it is slip fit the tube may be readily removed and 22 cleaned by the operator. It should be noted that the inner wall of housing ~3 30 is smoothly curved toward the feed tube outer wall so that said outer 2~ wall aefines with surface 22 of boss 18 a continuation of the restricted 2~ annular passageway or slit.
26 Fiber inlet defining means 40 additionally includes a body member 44 27 connected to the fiber feeo tube 42 in any desired fashion as by means of 28 set screws7 press fit, etc. Alternatively, of course, the body member 44 29 and fiber feed tube 42 coula be integrally formed. Body me~ber 44 has formea therein a shallow bell mouth surface 46 leading to the interior of 31 the fiber feed tube. ~he term "shallow" as used herein and as applied to 32 surface 4G shall mean that the bell mouth surface formed in body member 44 1 has a radius of curvature R not exceeding 150 percent of the inner diameter 2 of fiber feed tube 42. The upper extent of surface 46 is preferably curved 3 to define a rabius R lying in the range of from about 1/16 inch to about 3/~
inch. It will be noted that fiber feed tube 42 is concentrically disposed relative to and within throughbore 14. To control the extent to which the 6 fiber feed tube is disposed within the throughbore, spacer means in a form 7 of a ring 50 is positioned between fiber lnlet defining means 40 and the top 8 of housing 30. The f`iber feed tube 42 may be raised or lowered by using 9 different sized rings. This may be accomplished readily and the operator can effectively ~Itune~ the nozzle for efficient operation since this depends 1 to a significant degree on placement of the tube end. It has been found 12 that wear is greatest at the tube ends. Rather than replace a complete tube 3 the worn end may be cut off and the tube lowered by using a smaller spacer 14 ring.
~ Fig. 5 illustrates in detail the cooperative relationship existing be-16 tween ~iber feed tube 42, housing 30 and boss 18 at the location whereat the 17 tube projects from the bottom of aperture 32. The annular passageway or 18 slit defined by the housing inner wall and surface 22 of boss 18 gradually 9 reduces in thickness From a central location at the top of the boss to the ~0 location whereat the housing terminates and the slit is defined by the tube ~1 and boss. In the preferred embodiment of this invention the slit thickness 22 at its central location at the top of the boss is preferably less than 3û%
23 of the width of the annular air cavity. In Fig. 5 details of a nozzle 24 actually fabricated are provided wherein such midpoint slit thickness is 0.06û inches. The width of the annular air cavity of such constructed 26 nozzle was û.375 inches. At the terminal point of the housing the slit 27 thickness has been reduced by approximately half to 0.035 inches. The slit 28 continues to reduce in thickness due to convergence of boss surface 22 and 29 the outer wall of tube 42 until a point is reached whereat curvature of the surface 22 terminates and the boss outer surface has a constant diameter for 31 a ~istance of 0.05û inches. For this distance the slit defines a throat 3~ having a constant thickness of 0.012 inches or approxi~ately 5% of the fiber

5 9 9 1 ~ tuoe inner diameter of 0.250 inches. The len9th over which the constant 2 slit thickness extends is preferably in the order of 3 to 4 times minimum 3 slit thickness. The boss wall then form5 a divergent at an angle in the 4 order of 15 vertical until the diameter of throughbore 14 is n-atched.
The annular passageway or slit throat and the diverging passageway to

6 which it leads constitute the elements of a supersonic nozzle and sonic flow

7 at the throat and supersonic flow at the exit of the divergent is esta-

8 blished by providing sufficiently high air supply pressures upstream there-

9 from. Exit Mach numbers (ratio of exit velocity to the velocity of sound) are defined by the ratio of areas of the divergent and the area of the ~ throat. The area of the divergent can be changed by changing the length of l2 divergent, i.e., by the positioning of the lo~er end of the ~iber inlet tube 13 relative to the divergent within a range X. A good working range exists if 14 the area ratios are in the range of 1.7 to 3.2 with a corresponding theore-~ tical exit Mach number range of about 2 to 2.7.
16 These particular design features also provide an operational safety fea-l7 ture. When the fiber inlet tube is pulled out there is no air blow-~oc ~ ?~
l8 which could hurt the operator. The air pressuce in the annular passageway 19 drops upon tube removal since the communication to the throughbore 14 occurs through a much longer exit slit (in the order of three times) and the nozzle 21 operates as an internal Coanda nozzle directing the air flow in a downward ~ direction.
23 In operation, pressurized air is introduced through conduit 34 into the ~4 annular air cavity of the nozzle. The pressurized air then flows through the generally increasingly restricted annular passageway and is directed 26 downwardly through throughbore 14. It will be appreciated that flow of the 27 pressurized air will be accelerated as it progresses through the restricted ~8 annular passageway alony 9enerally smoothly curved surface 22 of boss 18.
29 This will result in a oampening of flow non-uniformities which cause un-desired swirl. In the event a swirl controller of the type dis~losed in 3l Reba UOS. Patent No~ 3,754,694, issued August 28, 1973, is employed in asso-32 ciation with the filament draw nozzle o~ this invention, swirl control is 1 1 ~gc~,~
~ enhance~ due to the high velocity of pressurized air passin~ through the 2 restricted passageway. It will be appreciated that downward flow of pres-3 surized air in throughbore 14 will create a vacuum in the interior of fiber 4 feed tube 42. Because of the rapidly converging shallow bell mouth surface a high vacuum is located at the fiber inlet opening. Consequently, Iapid 6 nozzle threading is facilitated and nozzle plugging is minimized. In fact, 7 it has been found that a nozzle of the type illustrated in Fig. 1 is vir-8 tually self cleaning in that broken f;laments disposed about the nozzle tops 9 will be continuously vacuumed off by the high inlet suction. The relatively large diameter of tube 42 permits even clumps ûr polymer beads up to a 1l quarter of an inch to readily pass therethrough.
~2 Fiber inlet defining means 40 can be easily instrumented with a static 13 pressure probe 52, in communication with the fiber feed tube below the bell 14 mouth surface 46, thus providing continuous monitoring of nozzle performance and loading. Fi9. 4 sch~ematically illustrates a vacuum'9auge 53 associated 16 with such a probe. It will be appreciated that nozzle 10 is only one of 17 many àisposed in an array over wire 13 and thdt the nozzles have different l8 performance characteristics. To make up for any such differences different 19 air pressures may be applied to the nozzles to ensure that the vacuums in the fiber inlet tubes are essentially the same as shown by vacuum gauges 21 attached to each nozzle. This is first done without filaments passing 22 through the nozzles, air pressure adjustment being made by a control valve 23 19 between the nozzle and a source of compressed air. After the nozzles 24 have been indiYidually adjusted to equalize the vacuums in the fiber inlet tubes thereof the operator introduces identical numbers of filaments into 26 the nozzles. Any changes in vacuum thereafter will indicate changes in 27 fi~er loading in the nozzles caused for example by the accidential jumping 28 of fiber strands between nozzles due to their close proximity to one an-29 other. The operator can easily detect this by comparing gauge readings and take appropriate steps to correct the problem. A separate Quidk shut off 3] valve 21 is also preferably employed in line 34 as is a swirl control handle32 23 if a swirl control mechanism of the type shown, for example, in Reba U.S.

1 Patent No. 3,754,694, issued August 28, 1973, is employed in associatiOn 2 with nozzle 10~
3 As indicated above, the fiber inlet defining means may be readily re-4 moved by the operator for cleaning or other purposes. It has been found that removal can take place eYen while pressurized air is being introduced 6 to the nozzle without upward blow back nf the air occurring- This is due to 7 the fact that surface 22 functions as a Coanda surface directing pressurized 8 air downwardly into throughbore 14 due to the Coanda effect, as stated above.
9 Referring now to Fig. 2, an alternative embodiment of filament draw nozzle constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention 11 is illustrated. The Fig. 2 embodiment is quite similar to that illustrated 12 in Fig. 1 and corresponding parts carry corresponding part numbers with the 13 addition of modifier reference letter "a". In the Fig. 2 embodiment a se-14 parate tail pipe 70 is secured in any desired manner to the rest of thrnugh_ bore defining means 12a as by being press fit thereto, for example. A se-16 parate tail pipe can cause excessive noise and interference with air and 17 fiber flow unless perfectly matched to the throu9hbore defining means. For 18 that reason a one piece throughbore defining ~leans such as that shown in 19 Fig. 2 is preferred.. In addition, fiber inlet defining means 40a has a somewhat different configuration than fiber inlet defining means 40 in Fig.
21 1 and has incorporated therein a monitoring probe 72 soldered or otherwise ~2 fixedly secured to body member 44a. Further, the precise geometry of the ~3 nozzle annular air cavity and restricted annular passageway differs somewhat 24 from that of the Fig. 1 embodiment.
Fig. 3 shows yet another embodiment of the filament draw no~71e of the 26 present invention, the primary difference residing in te elimination of a 27 restricted passageway defined by generally smoothly curved surface 22b of 28 boss 18b. ln other words, the width of the passageway leading rrom the 29 annular air cavity of the nozzle in Fig. 3 approximates that of the annular air cavity. This arrangement has not been found t~ be quite as satisfactOry 31 as the arrangements illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2.

32 It may be seen from the above that no7zles constructed in ax~rdance `~ ll s g ~ :~

1 with the teachings of the present invention have several advant~es over 2 prior art nozzles. The nozzles of this invention may operate e~n at very 3 low suppiy pressures tin the range of two atmospheres) and still establish 4 supersonic flow expansion even at high fiber loading. These no~les, how-ever, can aiso ~ork at high pressures, e.g. twenty atmospheres. Operatio 6 pressure is chosen depending upon the denier of the fibers. N~al opera-7 tion is at about ten atmospheres. In addition, the nozzles areeasy to 9 o d, clean, repair and monitor and have low noise characterist~s.

18 . .

`20 .
~1 ~4 2a _g_ `

Claims

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A filament draw nozzle comprising, in combination:
means defining a throughbore, and including a shoulder spaced from said throughbore;
a housing defining an aperture and positioned in engagement with said throughbore defining means, said housing abutting said shoulder whereby said housing is aligned relative to said throughbore means;
and fiber inlet defining means including a cylindrical fiber feed tube having an outer wall positioned in said housing aperture with said outer wall bearing against said housing, said throughbore and said housing aperture being disposed in alignment whereby said fiber feed tube is concentrically disposed relative to and within said throughbore.

2. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 1 additionally comprising spacer means disposed between said fiber inlet defining means and said housing for controlling the extent to which said fiber feed tube is disposed within said throughbore.

3. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 1 wherein said throughbore defining means and said housing are concentrically disposed and de-fine therebetween an annular air cavity in fluid flow communication with said throughbore.

4. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 3 wherein said throughbore defining means and said housing further define therebetween a re-stricted annular passageway leading from said annular air cavity to said throughbore.

5. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 4 wherein said throughbore defining means includes an upwardly projecting annular boss, said boss having a cylindrical peripheral wall leading to a generally smoothly curved surface extending to said throughbore, said cylin-drical peripheral wall defining said annular air cavity with said housing and said generally smoothly curved surface defining said restricted annular passageway with said housing.

6. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 1 wherein said fiber inlet defining means additionally includes a body member connected to said fiber feed tube, said body member having a shallow bell mouth surface leading to the interior of said fiber feed tube.

7. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 1 wherein said housing is slip fit over said throughbore defining means and said fiber inlet defining means is slip fit in said housing aperture.

8. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 1 wherein an O-ring seal is positioned between said housing and said throughbore defining means at a location adjacent to said shoulder.

9. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 1 wherein said fiber feed tube interior has a circular cross section and is in communication with said throughbore and concentric therewith, the diameter of said interior being at least 0.2 inches.

10. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 4 wherein the width of said restricted annular passageway at its narrowest point is less than about 30 percent of the width of said annular air cavity.

11. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 5 wherein said restricted annular passageway is further defined by said fiber feed tube and said generally smoothly curved surface.

12. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 11 wherein said annular boss further includes a surface having constant diameter over a predetermined distance, said constant diameter surface defining with said fiber feed tube an annular passageway of a fixed width extending said distance and in communication with said restricted annular passageway.

13. The filament draw nozzle of Claim 12 wherein said annular boss forms an area of divergence communicating with said annular fixed width passageway.