CA1204695A - Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils - Google Patents

Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils

Info

Publication number
CA1204695A
CA1204695A CA000430447A CA430447A CA1204695A CA 1204695 A CA1204695 A CA 1204695A CA 000430447 A CA000430447 A CA 000430447A CA 430447 A CA430447 A CA 430447A CA 1204695 A CA1204695 A CA 1204695A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
oil
less
sulfur
nitrogen
heteroatom
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA000430447A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Patrick S. Tam
James R. Kittrell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Environmental Research and Technology Inc
Original Assignee
Environmental Research and Technology Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Environmental Research and Technology Inc filed Critical Environmental Research and Technology Inc
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1204695A publication Critical patent/CA1204695A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G21/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by extraction with selective solvents
    • C10G21/06Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by extraction with selective solvents characterised by the solvent used
    • C10G21/12Organic compounds only
    • C10G21/16Oxygen-containing compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G21/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by extraction with selective solvents
    • C10G21/06Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by extraction with selective solvents characterised by the solvent used
    • C10G21/12Organic compounds only
    • C10G21/20Nitrogen-containing compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G27/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation
    • C10G27/04Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation with oxygen or compounds generating oxygen
    • C10G27/12Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation with oxygen or compounds generating oxygen with oxygen-generating compounds, e.g. per-compounds, chromic acid, chromates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G53/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes
    • C10G53/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only
    • C10G53/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only including at least one extraction step
    • C10G53/06Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only including at least one extraction step including only extraction steps, e.g. deasphalting by solvent treatment followed by extraction of aromatics
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G53/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes
    • C10G53/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only
    • C10G53/14Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only including at least one oxidation step

Abstract

PROCESS FOR PURIFYING HYDROCARBONACEOUS OILS

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils containing heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities comprising the steps of:
(1) reacting said hydrocarbonaceous oil with an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitro-gen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom while maintaining (a) the molar ratio of the nitrogen oxide to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1.5:1 or less, (b) the reaction time to about one hour or less, (c) the temperature to about 100°C or less, and (d) a conversion of sulfur heteroatom content into gaseous sulfur oxides to about 60% or less on a weight basis;
(2) contacting the oil from step (1) above with (i) an extracting solvent comprising at least one amine selected from the group consisting of ethylene diamine, mono-ethanolamine, diethanolamine and mixtures thereof, or a water mixture thereof containing about 50% by weight or less water, and (ii) an extracting solvent comprising formic acid or a water mixture thereof con-taining about 50% by weight or less water, with the contacting with (i) and (ii) being sequential and in any order; and (3) separating said oil from step (2) above from the extracting solvents;
to recover purified hydrocarbonaceous oil.

Description

~ ~ ~9 PROCESS FOR PURIFYING HYDROCARBONACEOUS OILS

FIELD OF THE _NVENTION
This invention relates to a process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils. More particularly, this invention relates to a process for purifying hydrocar-bonaceous oils wherein compounds containing hetero-atomic sulfur and compounds containing heteroatomic nitrogen as impurities are removed from the oil. In particular, this invention relates to a process for o purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils containing such impurities comprising oxidizing the hydrocarbonaceous oils under conditions enhancing removal by solvents in solvent extraction, solvent extracting the oxidized oil using selected solvents to remove the heteroatom sulfur compound impurities and to remove the hetero-atom nitrogen compound impurities followed by sepa-rating the oil from the solvents employed for extraction.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Prior to the development of the petroleum indus-try in the first part of the latter half of -the 1800's, coal and oil shale had been used as primary sources of energy. However, with the discovery of sources of crude oil and the development of the petroleum industry, the use of coal and oil shale as a source of energy markedly declined.
However, in the mid-1970's as a result of politi-cal and economic factors increasing the world oil price markedly and with the recognition that at some time in the future liquid petroleum reserves would be exhausted, the ener~y industry turned to alternative sources of fossil uel. Activities in research and development of shale oil and coal thereby increased substantially. This research and development activity has predominantly been directed toward producing readily available supplies of energy from not only oil shale and coal but also to recover oil locked up in tar sands such as those in the well-known Athabasca tar sand deposits in Canada.
The world supply of oil shale, coal and tar sands is markedly larger than presently known world reserves of liquid petroleum. Procedures to unlock the compo-nents of oil shale, coal and tar sands to substitute for present petroleum products produced from crude oil o have been actively investigated by many large oil companies. Generally, the approach has been to resort to retorting processes to recover the components locked up in oil shale, notably kerogen, coal and tar sands.
Unfortunately, the level of oxygen-, nitrogen-and sulfur-containing components in oil recovered from oil shale, coal and tar sands is typically much higher than that experienced with petroleum. Industrial concerns exist as to the presence of sulfur and nitrogen impurities in oil derived from such sources because their presence can lead to corrosion of proc-essing e~uipment, and poisoning of catalysts used in cracking or reforming of the oil in producing various desirable consumer products therefrom. This has meant that in addition to research and development on effi-cient and economically viable methods of not only recovering the oil from oil shale, coal and tar sand sources, methods to remove or at least reduce the level of these impurities are essential.
Further, with increasing environmental concerns and with more stringent federal, state and local regulations on emission of noxious gases into the environment, for this reason alone research and devel-opment on methods of reduction of such impurities are essential.

~5 The problem of removal of particularly sulfur and nitrogen compound impurities from oil sources such as shale oil has been recognized in the art. The most generally used present approach for desulfurizing petroleum is catalytic hydro-desulfurization at high temperature and high pressure. In this process, hydrogen is reacted with the sulfur present as an impurity to form hydrogen sulfide and the hydrogen also reacts with the nitrogen present in the impuri-o ties to form ammonia. The hydrogen sulfide can bescrubbed and ammonia is removed generally with water washing. Unfortunately, the hydro-desulfurization process for purification involves a high operating cost because of the high temperature and high pressure conditions of ~peration, the necessity for use o~
safety precautions when hydrogen is employed, the consumption of hydrogen which is expensive, undesir-able hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbons present in the oil and catalyst usage, to name a few of the problems recognized with catalytic hydro-desulfuriza-tion of oil obtained from sources such as oil shale, coal and tar sands.
Recently, with the change in economic conditions resulting in a marked decrease in world oil prices and a surplus of oil available from conventional petroleum sources, research and development toward production of alternative energy sources rom oil shale, coal and tar sands have become more difficult to justify economically. However, it must be recognized that employing oil shale, coal and tar sands as energy sources will ultimately become a necessity to supply the world's energy needs. Thus, it is particularly important to develop methods of removal of impurities, particularly sulfur- and nitrogen-con~aining organic compounds from oil produced from oil shale, coal and tar sands.

~2~

The invention described and claimed herein is directed to a process for sulfur- and nitro~en-con-taining organic compound impurity removal from hydro-carbonaceous oils utilizing an oxidation/extraction/
separation approach to impurity removal in opposition to the currently used catalytic hydro-clesulfurization approach as conventionally practiced.
As to the oxidation of petroleum stocks to remove sulfur-containing compounds, oxidation using nitric lo acids was investigated as early as 1893 (~s disclosed in U.S. Patent 508,479) and a process is described in U.S. Patent 542,849, issued in 1895, which involves the oxidation of petroleum stocks using nitrous acid fumes. Further, U.S. Patent 1,864,5~1, issued in 1925, discloses the oxidation of organic compounds by nitrogen oxides at 400 to 500C with contact times on the order of seconds, the oxidation being either homogeneous or cakalytic using copper and silver catalysts. U.S. Patent 1,933,748 describes the utili-zation of nitrogen oxides to remove sulfur compoundsfrom cracked petroleum stocks at 150 to 350F followed by the use of sulfuxic acid for extraction and U.S.
Patent 1,935,207 describes a similar process with disclosure o~ improved results where the oxidation is 2s carried out using nitrogen oxides in the presence of sulfuric acid at a temperature below 30C. U.S.
Patent 2,009,898 describes the treatmenk of cracked gasoline vapors with nitrogen oxides without signifi-cant olefin oxidation, followed by clay-treatment of the product to achieve a reduction in sulfur content.
U.S. Patent 2,825,744 discloses a similar process operated in the vapor phase at temperatures Iess than 200C to produce low molecular weight sulfoxides.
Technigues, including an extraction step, for removal of sulfur impurities from oil are also known.
For example, U.S. Patent 2,114,852 discloses a process ~20~95i comprising heating high boiling hydrocarbon oils or shale containing objectionable sulfur compounds as an impurity to obtain hydrocarbon fractions, extracting the product obtained with polar solvents to remove high boiling sulfur compounds in the presence of unsaturated hydrocarbons, ~ollowed by oxidizing the extract. U.S. Patent 3,163,593 describes a process using a number of different types of oxidants~ includ-ing nitrogen dioxides, to treat vacuum residues, residues from cracking processes, oil from tar sands and oil shale followed by thermal decomposition at 350 to 400~C to produce volatile sulfur compounds and low sulfur oil. The disclosure in this patent is that an alkaline material such as dolomite or lime can be used to accelerate the process.
The use of air as an oxidizing agent for ther-mally decomposed residues, along with Group 5A and Group 8 metal catalysts, as an alternative to nitrogen oxides, followed by hydro-desulfurization is disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,341,448. A disclosed advantage of this procedure is higher degrees of desulfurization at comparable conditions than can be achieved with hydro-treating alone.
Oxidation/extraction processes of hydrocar-bonaceous oils to produce sulfoxides and sulfones axe also known in the art as disclosed in U.S.
Patent 2,825,744, British Patent 442,524, U.S. Pat-ent ~,702,824, and U.S. Patent 2,925,442.
The art also recognizes that nitrogen removal from oil can be also achieved by oxidation. For example, U.S. Patent 3,105,812 discloses the treatment of a vaxiety of petroleum stocks or shale oil with air or oæone utilizing mixed phosphorus and vanadium oxide catalysts. The disclosure is that preoxidation appears to remove those nitrogen-containing compounds which are more difficult to remove by hydrogenation and as a result, any subsequent hydro-denitrification step can be conducted under less severe conditions for complete nitrogen removal than if a hydro-denitrifica tion step were used alone.
Further, U.S. Patents 3,847,800 and 3,919,402 describe the use of nitroyen oxides followed by extraction by methanol to remove bo~h sulfur and nitrogen compounds from petroleum stocks.
It is known in ~he art tha-t liquid extraction can be employed -to separate oxidized sulfur compounds and nitrogen compounds from oil. A hydrolysis reaction with a dilute base to separate the inorganic com-pounds from a hydrocarbon is described in U.S. Pat-ent 3,847,800. Separations in the organic chemistry field to remove sulfur and nitrogen impurities utilize physical interactions between sulfur and nitrogen compounds as a solute in a solution and the solvents employed for extraction, with an advantageous physical difference being polarity. Since oxidized organic compounds are generally polar in nature, based on these physical principles, this might suggest a successful solvent for extraction, for example, of impurities from a hydrocarbonaceous oil would be a polar solvent. Further knowledge of solvent extrac~
tion procedures would indicate that a solvent for use in extraction of impurities ~rom a hydrocarbonaceous oil desirably would be of immiscibile in the oil, would not form an emulsion with the oil, would have a different density from the oil and would have a boiling point difference to facilita-te recovery of solvent after the extraction. From a commercial standpoint, advantageously the solvent should also be low in cost and should not alter, in the case of hydrocarbonaceous oils, the ability of such to be sub-sequently used as a fuel.

~l20~S

As described above, methanol is disclosed in U.S.
Patents 3,847,800 and 3,919,402 as a solvent to remove both sulfur and nitrogen compounds after oxidation of petroleum stocks using nitrogen oxides. U.S. Pat-ent 2,114,852 discloses a preference for solvents whose boiling points are no more than B0C below the boiling range of the initial hydrocarbonaceous oil mixture to facilitate ease of fractionation. I.N.
Diyarov, Khim. Tekhnol. Topl. Masel, (5), p. 14-16 (197~) discloses treatment of diesel fuel with ethylene chlorohydrin mixed with water and Yu.E.
Nikitin, Neftekhimiya, _, ~6), p. 917-920 ~1976) describes a comparison o extraction of sulfoxides from diesel fuel using citric and tartaric acids with citric acid beiny found to be five kimes more effi-cient than tartaric acid in the extraction of sul-foxides. An agueous solution of ~uaternary ammonium compounds (as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application (OPI) 74-30,401) and an aqueous alkali and organic solvents (as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,164,546~ are also described in the art as suitable for treating diesel fuel oil. Further, U.S. Patent 4,113,607 describes the use of ferric chloride and furfural as an effective solvent in reducing the nitrogen content in hydrogenated oils and U.S. Patent 3,804,749 discloses the utilization of a complex of boron tri1uoride in a petroleum immiscible solvent to remove sulfur in oil.
Knowledge of hydrocarbonaceous oils produced from sources such as oil shale, coal and tar sands indi-cates that a major component of the sulur compounds in oil from these sources is thiophenic sulfur. As a result, processing to remove impurities from hydrocar-bonaceous oils, particularly where sulfur-containing impurities are present, should in~olve a recognition that thiophenlc sulfur-containing compounds must be :

~z~

removed and, based on the art, this would appear to be difficult without sufficient oxidation of the crude hydrocarbonaceous oil.
Approaches toward oxidation of sulfur impurities such as thiophenic compounds to sulfoxides and sul-fones and to correspondingly achieve an oxidized form of the organic nitrogen compound impurities present to convert such impurities into forms more easily extractable without loss of the desirable hydrocar~
lo bonaceous oil or alteration thereof has, in the past, met with some limited success.
Unfortunately, the prior art approaches toward oxidation to remove a portion of the original sulfux content as gaseous sulfur oxides and to convert a portion of the original sulfur content into sulfoxides and/or sulfones followed by extraction with appro~
priate solvents to achieve a desired low sulfur raffinate have not been completely successful.
The prior art methods described above basically have the disadvantages that (a) they are sufficiently nonselective that extremely severe oxidizing condi-tions are required to effect sulfur removal, resulting in undesirable and substantial increases in the nitrogen con-tent of the oil; (b) they use a solvent which is suitable only for specific selected oils, they result in poor extraction yields or they do not result in sufficient phase separation that solvent extraction is possible; (c) they require expensive or complicated processing equipment; or (d) they involve combinations of the disadvantages enumerated above.
Thus, present technology for impuritiy removal involving oxidation and subsequent extraction of`
hydrocarbonaceous oils needs to be greatly improved.
Similarly, direct extraction of hydrocarbonaceous oils 35 with selected solvents to remove sulfur and nitrogen impurities to produce a raffinate which is low in ~LZQ14695 sulfur and nitrogen con~ent results in uneconomically low yields o the desired raffina~e, reductions in the sulfur and nitrogen content of the hydrocarbonaceous oil which are uneconomic or combinations of these.
The p.rior approaches involving high temperature, high pressure hydro-desulfurization to reduce the sulfur and nitrogen content of hydrocarbonaceous oils invol~e a number of major disadvantages. As indicated previously, the high temperature, high pressure 0 requirements of the process makes the process guite expensive. The hydrogen re~lired in the process is expensive and requires water for its production.
Unfortunately, in those areas where major deposits of oil shale exist, water to produce the hydrogen may well be in short supply. Investigations Qf the process have resulted in findin~ thak the proce~s is nonselective in that although sulfur and nitrogen compounds are removed, desirable olefinic or aromatic compounds are also destroyed. Processing of the products produced such as hydrogen sulfide, which is highly toxic, and ammonia also contributes to the expense of the process and in view of the catalytic nature of the process, with the catalyst being poisoned by materials contained in the hydrocarbona-ceous oil, this even furthex contributes to thee~pense of the process. All of these factors result in the process not being economically desirable.
SUMM~RY OF THE INVENTION
An object of this invention is to provide a 30 process whereby sulfur- and nitrogen~compound impuri-ties present in hydrocarbonaceous oils can be removed.
Another object of this invention is to provide a process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils wherei~
heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities can be removed without destroying or reducing the content of other desirable components, such as aromatics and olefinics, of the oil.

~2~4~i9~

A further object of this invention is to provide a process for removing sulfur and nitrogen-compound impurities from hydrocarbonaceous oils wherein marked reduction of the sulfur- and nitxogen-compound impurities over that present originally in the oil can be achieved and at the same time a high yield of hydrocarbonaceous oil can be obtained from the process.
An even further object of this invention is to lo provide a process or purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils wherein impurities can be removed under mild condi-tions such that the necessity for expensive process~
ing and control equipment, required in prior art approaches, is eliminated.
An additional object of this invention is to provide a process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils to remove heteroatom sulfur- and nitrogen-compound impurities therefrom wherein processing of the impuri-ties, which would cause damage to the environment if released directly, can be facilitated.
Also, an additional object of this invention is to provide a process for purification of hydrocarbona-ceous oils involving sulfur- and nitrogen-compound impurity removal which is simpler and less expensive than prior approaches to hydrocarbonaceous oil purification.
Accordingly, one embodiment of this invention provides a process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils containing ~eteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities, this embodiment comprising the steps of:
(1) reacting the hydrocarbonaceous oil with an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitro-gen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom, while maintaining:

~ .~

~z~

(a) the molar ratio of the nitrogen oxlde to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1.5:1 or less, (b) the reaction time to about one hour or less, ~c) the ~emperature to about 100C or less, and (d) the conversion of sulfur heteroatom lo content into gaseous sulfur oxides to about 60% or less on a weight basisi
(2) contacting the oil from step (1) above with (i) an extracting solvent comprisin~ at least one amine selected from the group consisting of ethylene diam.ine, mono-ethanolamine, diethanolamine, and mixtures thereof, or a water mixture thereof containing about 50% by weight or less water, and (ii) an extracting solvent comprising formic acid or a water mixture thereof con taining about 50% by weight or less water, the contacting with the extracting solvent (i) and the extracting solvent (ii) being sequentia:L
and in any order; and
(3) separating the oil from step (2) above from the extracting solvents to recover purified hydrocarbonaceous oil.
Where the nature of the hydrocarbonaceous oil containing heteratom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities is such that either the heteroatom sulfur compound impurity or the heteroatom nitrogen compound impurity is sufficiently low that problems in use without reduction of that impurity level would not give rise to substantial problems in use of the oil, , 6~5 1~

another embodiment of this invention provides a proc-ess for purifyiny such hydrocarbonaceous oils compris-ing the steps of:
(1) reacting the hydrocarbonaceous oil with an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitrog~n oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom, while maintaining:
(a) the molar ratio of the nitrogen oxide o to the total o the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1.5:1 or less, (b) the reaction time to about one hour or less, (c) the temperature to about 100C or less, and (d) the conversion o sulfur heteroatom content into gaseous sulfur oxides to about 60% or less on a weight basis;
(2) contacting the oil from step (1) above with an extracting solvent comprising:
(i) at least one amine selected from the group consisting of ethylene diamine, monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, and mixtures thereof, or a water mixture thereof containing about 50% by weight or less water where removal of heteroatom sulfur compound impurities is desired, or (ii) an extracting solvent comprising formic acid or a water mixture thereof con-taining about 50% by weight or less water, where removal of heteroatom nitrogen compolmd impuri-ties is desired; and ~2~g695 (3) separating the oil from step (2) above from the extracting solvent to recover purified hydrocarbonaceous oil.
A preferred embodiment of the process of this invention involves a process for purifying hydro-carbonaceous oils containing heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities comprising ~he steps of:
(1) reacting the hydrocarbonaceous oil with an o oxidizing gas containing at least one nitro-gen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom, whlle malntalnlng:
(a) the molar ratio of the nitrogen oxide to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1:1 or less, tb) the reaction time to ahout 30 minutes or less, (c) the temperature to about 60C or less, and (d) the conversion of sulfur heteroatom content into yaseous sulfur oxides to about 60% or less on a weight basis;
(23 contacting the oil from step (1) above with (i) an extracting solvent comprising at least one amine selected from the group consisting of ethylene diamine, mono-ethanolamine, diethanolamine, and mixtures thereof, or a water mixture thereof containing about 50% by weight or less water, and (ii3 an extracting solvent comprising formic acid or a water mixture thereof con-taining about 50% by weight or less waterj ~2~46~5 the contacting with the extracting solvent (i~
and the extracting solvent (ii) being seguential and in any order; and (3) separatin~ the oil from step ~2) above ~rom the extracting solvents to recover purified oil.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the proc~
ess of this invention comprises utilizing monoethanol-amine as the extracting solvent ~i) and an even 0 further particularly preferred embodiment of this invention involves contacting the oil in step (2) with the extracting solvent (i) followed by the extracting solvent ~ii) in order.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic flow diagram of one embodiment of the process of this invention.
F'igure 2 is a graphical presentation showing the relationship of sulfur and nitrogen levels in a hydro-carbonaceous oil subjected to oxidation in the process of this invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As indicated above, this invention provides a process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils contain-ing heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen com-pounds as impurities in the hydrocarbonaceous oil.The process of this invention is applicable to the purification of hydrocarbonaceous oil which can be derived from any source, for example, conversion of oil shale, coal and tar sands into a crude hydro-carbonaceous material, hereinafter hydrocarbonaceousoil. Further, the hydrocarbonaceous oil can b~ a conventional petroleum crude oil or crude oil fraction containing sulfur and/or nitrogen compound impurities.
The terms "oil" and "hydrocarbonaceous oil" are used herein interchangeably and are basically employed in their generic sense to describe any hydrocarbon which ~. ~

91LZ046~5 is considered to be liquid or substantially liquid at room temperature. These terms are intended to encom-pass not only -those materials which are pourable at room temperature but those mat~rials which may be considered liquid yet having a viscosity sufficiently high to render them basically non-pourable. Various conventional fractions and boiling point cuts may be present therein.
The process of this invention is basically not o limited in terms of the source of the hydrocarbona-ceous oil but is applicable to any hydrocarbonaceous oil such as those obtained by thermally treating oil shale, coal and tar sands giving rise to a crude and subsequently subjectable to processing, to produce various components such as gasoline, kerosene, diesel and fuel oils as well as asphalts. The process of this invention is applicable to any such hydrocarbona-ceous oil or fraction thereof which contains sulfur and nitrogen compound impurities where removal of these impurities from the oil is desired.
For ease of discussion in the following descrip-tion of this invention, the embodiments thereo~ will be described by reference to the use of shale oil as a hydrocarbonaceous oil. It should be emphasized, however, that the description as to use of shale oil here is merely for the purposes of exemplification and ease of description and the process of the present in~ention should in no way be construed as being limited to shale oil or materials derived therefrom.
Figure 1 describes schematically an embodiment of the process of this invention comprising mixing crude shale oil 1 and the nitrogen oxide oxidizing gas 2 and passing the mixture into a reactor 3. After reaction in the reactor, the oxidized shale oil is passed into a first solvent extractor 5 where such is contacted with a first extracting solvent (either extracting ~l2~)~6~i solvent ~i) or extracting solvent (ii) and after solvent/oxidized oil separation to remove solvent with impurities 6, the oxidized oil is passed into a second solvent extractor 7 and mixed with the other of the extracting solvents (either extracting solvent (i) or extracting solvent (ii)). After separation of the oil from the second extracting solvent to remove solvent with impurities 8, the hydrocarbonaceous oil with residual solvent is subjected to recovery at 9 to o remove residual solvents 10 and obtain purified hydro-carbonaceous oil 11.
In the first step of the process of this inven-tion, a hydrocarbonaceous oil such as shale oil is reacted and oxidized by contacting -the oil with an oxidizing gas. This oxidizing gas is one which contains at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom. The oxidizing gas used can be a gas containing only such a nitrogen oxide or can be one which contains mixtures of such nitrogen oxides. Further, the oxidiæing gas can be one which contains other components such as oxygen, nitrogen, lower nitrogen oxides, i.e., nitrogen oxides containing only one oxygen atom or less than one oxygen atom per nitrogen atom in the oxide. For efficieIlcy, preferably, the oxidizing gas will be one which contains only nitrogen oxides with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom but mixtures with other gases such as oxygen, nitrogen, as well as inert gases such as helium and helium or with air can be employed if desired. Suitably, the oxidizing gas will contain at least 0.5 % by volume of at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom. Nitrogen dioxide or its dimer N204 can be advantageously employed, alone or in admixture with air.

Typically, the process o this in~ention can be employed on a hydrocarbonaceous oil derived from oil shale. Oil shale contains kerogen as an organic component thereof and shale oil typically is produced from kerogen by retorting at temperatures in the range of 450 to 500~C. As indicated above, n:itrogen, sulfur and oxygen compounds are present in sha:Le oil produced from kerogen in larger amounts than typically are present in crude oil derived from liquid petroleum sources. Typically, oxygen compounds are found in shale oil as carboxylic acids and phenols, sulfur as a heteroatom is present as thiols, disulfides, sulfides and thiophenes and nitrogen is typically present as substituted pyridines and pyrroles. A typical analy-sis of raw oil shale and of crude shale oil producedthere~rom, as published by the Laramie Energy Techno-logy Center of the Department of Energy, is set forth in Tc~bles 1 and 2 below.

Fischer assay, gal/ton25.70 Oil content, % g.80 Water content, % 1.90 Hydrogen, % 1.71 Mineral carbon, % 4.76 Organic carbon, % 11.15 Carbon dioxide, % 17.44 Mineral carbonate, % 23.79 Total carbon, % 15.91 Ash, % 67.62 Nitrogen, % 0.48 Sulfur, % 0.60 Heating value, Btu/lb2256.00 ~Z6~ 315 Naphtha, vol % 8.90 Light distillate, vol % 21.00 Heavy distillate, vol % 40.80 Residuum 24.30 Specific gravity, 60F/60F 0.929 Gravity, API 20.80 Pour point, F 55.00 Viscosity, SUS @ 100F 114.60 o Hydrogen, % 11.39 Nitrogen, % 1.75 Carbon, % 83.19 Sulfur, D~ 2.85 Heating value, Btu/lb 18,372.00 As can be seen from an examination of the analy-sis presented ~bove in Table 2, a crude shale oil typically has a high nitrogen content and a high sulfur content and the process of this invention can be guite advantageous for purifying such so that the levels of sulfur and nitrogen compound impurities therein can be thereby reduced.
In the first step of the process of this inven tion a hydrocarbonaceous oil such as shale oil is reacted with an oxidizing gas such as at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom or an oxidiæing gas containing at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom or each nitrogen atom. The contacting of the hydrocar-bonaceous oil with the oxidizing gas can be using any 30 means conventional in the art for contacting a gaseous reactant with a liquid reactant. Suitable examples of such means for contacting a gaseous reactant with a liquid reactant include dispersing a gas as bubbles in a liquid, trickling a liquid over an inert solid bed with gas passing also over the bed concurrently or countercurrently to the liquid flow, the latter type flow beiny preferred.
It is important in the first step of the process of this invention to control the operating parameters during the reacting of the hydrocarbonaceous oil with the oxidizing gas to ensure oxidation of the sulfur and nitrogen heteroatom compound containing impurities to the extent that extraction efficiency in the second lo step of the process of this invention is maximized and deleterious effects on the hydrocarbonaceous oil substrate ultimately obtained and recov red after the process for purification of this invention do not arise. These important processing controls as to the reaction of the hydrocarbonaceous oil with the oxidiz-ing gas are described in detail below.
A particularly important parameter to control during the reaction o the hydrocarbonaceous oil with the oxidizing gas in the first step of the process of this invention is to control the molar ratio of (i) the nitrogen oxide in the oxidizing gas to (ii) the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1.5:1 or less, more preferably about 1:1 or less and most pre-ferably to about 0.5:1 to above about 0.1:1. By controlling the molar ratio of nitrogen oxide in the oxidizing gas to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to the range of about 1.5:1 to about 0.1:1, the oil yield 30 ultimately obtained can be maximized with maximum efficiency of reduction in the sulfur and nitrogen content originally present in the crude hydrocarbona-ceous oil. This control of the molar ratio of nitro-gen oxide to the total of the sulfur heteroatom 35 content and nitrogen heteroatom content can be easily maintained. For example, with a knowledge of the ~Z~146~i concentration of the nitrogen oxide in the oxidizing gas and from a knowledge of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content, attained using conventional chemical analysis on the crude hydrocarbonaceous oil, of the hydrocarbonaceous oil as a feed, the feed ratios of the hydrocarbonaceous oil and the oxidizing gas can be adjusted. Conventional ~eans for metering gaseous and li~uid reactants can be employed.
lo ~nother important parameter controlled during reaction of a hydrocarbonaceous oil such as shale oil wi~h the oxidi~ing gas in the process of this inven-tion is to control the reaction time, which can be expressed also in terms of reactant contact time, to about one hour or less, more preferably about 30 minutes or less, even more preerably to about 15 minutes or less and most preferably to about five minutes or less. It must be recognized that there is a balance between the minimum contact time and the maximum contact time. The minimum contact time basically which can be used in the process of this invention is that contact time which is necessary in order to achieve oxidation to some extent of the hydrocarbonaceous oil containing the impurities and contact times of less than about five minutes may provide less than optimal oxidation results. Longer contact times, for example, on the order of contact times of 30 to 60 minutes, while resulting in the ability to improve upon sulfur heteroatom compound impurity removal, may resul~ in a reduction in the ability to simultaneously achieve a reduction in the heteroatom nitrogen compound content present in the crude hydrocarbonaceous oil.
Figure 2 shows the effect on increasing oxidation severity where oxidation of the crude shale oil more severely can result in a reduction in the percent ~` ~20~95 ~1 heteroatom sulfur content of the purified oil but that this must be balanced with undesirable increase in the percent heteroatom nitrogen content impurities arising as a result of nitration of the hydrocarbonaceous oil substrate.
While not desiring to be bound, t~e reason for the increase in observed nitrogen cornpound content over that originally present in the hydrocarbonaceous oil is believed to be that with longer contact times, in view of the use of an oxidizing gas containing at lo least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom that nitration of the hydrocarbonaceous oil substrate can occur resulting i:n an increase in the heteroatom nitrogen compound impurity content. It has been found, however, that an interrelationship exists between the contact time of the oxidizing gas containing the nitrogen oxide as discus~ed above and the mole ratio of nitrogen oxide in the o~idizing gas to the total sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content of the hydro~arbonaceous oil. As can be seen from the examples given hereinafter to illustrate the present invention, for longer contact times, desirably the mole ratio of nitrogen oxide to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content should be appropriately reduced. For example, by utilizing low mole ratios o~ nitroyen oxide to total sulfur heteroatom content and nitrogen hetero--atom content, longer contact times can be employed without deleteriously affec-ting the degree of sulfur content removal, the degree of nitrogen co~tent removal and without undesired nitration of the hydro carbonaceous oil substrate. Short contact times on the order of about five minutes and lower mole ratios of nitrogen oxide to total sulfur heteroatom content and nitrogen heteroato~ content of about 0.5:1 are - 3L;204~;9S

desirable not only from the standpoint of efficiency of operation but also from the standpoint of econo-mics. Particularly preferably, a contact time of around five minutes in combination with. a molar ratio of nitrogen oxide to total sulfur heteroatom content and nitrogen heteroatom content in the crude hydro-carbonaceous oil of about 1:1 or less can be advan-tageously employed with maximal yield of reduced sulfur content/nitrogen content from hyclrocarbonaceous 0 oil.
One skilled in the art can easily cletermine for a particular crude hydrocarbonaceous oil to be purified what the appropriate mole ratio of nitrogen oxide to total sulfur heteroatom content/nitrogen heteroatom content and appropriate contact time should be. One skilled in the art need only conduct a series of routine oxidations and exkractions in accordance with the process of this invention anA by varying the contact time and mole ratio of nitrogen oxide to total sulfur heteroatom content/nitrogen heteroatom content and from analysis of the results, one can easily determine the best balance between these reaction parameters o~ contact time and molar ratio.
Control of the reaction time or contact time of the oxidizing gas can be easily achieved by appro-priately controlling reactant feed rate to the reactor to thereby control the reaction or contact time.
Conventional chemical engineering principles and techniques can be generally employed to achieve this control and such control is well within the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art.
A further parameter which is controlled in step (1) of the process of this invention is to employ mild temperature conditions and this is a particularly advantageous feature of the process of this invention.
Specifically, the temperature at which the reaction of . 3.. Z~
~3 the oxidizing gas with the hydrocarbonaceous oil is conducted is a temperature of about 100C or less, more preferably about 60C or less and most preferably at about 30C or less. The ability to achieve an oxidation of the hydrocarbonaceous oil util.izing the oxidizing gas employed in step (1) of the process of this invention and operation at temperatures of about 100C or less provides the ability to oxidize the hydrocarbonaceous oil in an extremely efficient and lo cost effective manner. Since only temperatures of about 100C or less are required, energy requirements to achieve these appropriate reaction temperature conditions are markedly reduced in comparison with high temperature, high pressure hydrodesulfurization conventionally employed in the past as a means for reducing the impurity content in hydrocarbonaceous oils. In fact, a particularly advantageous aspect of this invention is the utilization of an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom which provides the ability to achieve an oxidation of the hydro-carbonaceous oil thereby permitting a reduction in the nitrogen/sulfur compound impurity content under extremely mild conditions not heretofore generally believed possible. This uni~ue choice of oxidizing gas and reaction temperature thus provides a particu-larly advantageous aspect of this invention in that within the temperature ranges required for step (1), the energy requirements to achieve such can be considered to be minimal.
An even further parameter controlled in step (1) of the process of this invention is to conduct the reaction of the oxidizing gas containing at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each 35 nitrogen atom with the hydrocarbonaceous oil under conditions such that a maximum of 60% of the sulfur 3L2~6~

heteroatom content is converted into gaseous sulfur oxides. It has been found that a balance exists between sulfur content removal and nitrogen content removal in using the process of this invention. More S specifically, oxidization of crude hycLrocarbonaceous oil to high extents results in the ability to reduce the sulfur heteroatom content. However, under condi-tions where more than about 60~, on a weight basis, of the sulfur heteroatom content is converted into lo gaseous sulfur oxides, the nitrogen heteroatom content impurity level of the oxidized hydrocarbonaceous oil increases. WhilP not desiring to be bound, the reason for this is believed to be ln situ nitration of the hydrocarbonaceous oil substrate. Where an ln situ nitration occurs, this is detrimental because under these circumstances the nitrogen heteroatom content of the oxidized hydrocarbonaceous oil is increased. Thi.s heteroatom nitrogen compound impurity content arises from that originally present in the crude hydrocarbo-naceous oil as well as heteroatom nitrogen compoundimpurities arising as a result of nitration of the hydrocarbonaceous oil substrate. This is illustrated graphically in Figure 2, described hereinbefore.
As a result, in step (1) of the process of this invention, the reaction of the hydrocarbonaceous oi:L
with the oxidizing gas is conducted under conditions such that about 60% or less on a weight basis of the sulfur heteroatom content of the crude hydrocarbona-ceous oil is converted into gaseous sulfur oxides.
This step o the process of this invention can be simply monitored by analyzing off-gas vented from the reactor and with knowledge of the heteroatom sulfur compound impurity content of the crude hydrocarbona-ceous oil being processed and the content of gaseous sulfur oxides present in the off-gas, parameters of contact time, molar ratio of the nitroyen oxide to ~Z~ 5 total sulfur heteroatom content/nitroyen heteroatom content and temperature can be appropriately adjusted to achieve about 60% or less conversion, on a weight basis, of sulfur heteroatom content into gaseous sulfur oxides.
A hydrocarbonaceous oil, after being subjected to the reaction described above for step (1) of the process of this invention, is then subjected to an extraction step (2) with an appropriate extracting lo solvent. As will be seen from the examples to be given hereinafter, processing conditions set forth for the oxidation step (1~ above are judiciously con-trolled to maximize the ability of the specific and selected extracking solvents used in the extxaction step (2) of the process of this invention to facili~
tate removal by extraction of the sulfur and nitrogen content present originally in the crude hydrocarbona-ceous oil and thereby reduce their levels in the ultimate oil recovered and purified as a result of the process of this invention.
In the extraction step (2) of the process of this invention, one extraction involves contacting the oil obtained from step (1) of the process of this inven-tion with an extracting solvent comprising at least one amine selected from the group consisting of ethylene d.ia~ine, monoethanolamine, diethanolamine or mixtures thereof.
Further, in extraction step (2) of the process of this invention, in another extraction, the oil is simply contacted with an extracting solvent comprising ~ormic acid.
These two extraction steps are conducted se~uen- 4 tially on hydrocarbonaceous oil produced from step (1) of the process of this invention. For example, the 35 hydrocarbonaceous oil produced in step (l) can be first contacted with one or more of the amine extract-ing solvents described above and then with formic acid ,~. ..

~ 2~ ~ ~ $

as an extracting solvent. ~lternatively, the hydro-carbonaceous oil processed in accordance with step (1) can be first contacted with formic acid and subse-~lently with one or more of the amine extracting solvents set forth above. In both of these extracting steps, conventional extraction procedures are employed. Generally, the extracting solvent, whether amine or formic acid, is simply added to and mixed with the hydrocarbonaceous oil processed as in o step (1). The length of time for contact o the extracting solvent, whe~her amine or formic acid, is only that time necessary to permit a simple mass transfer of the sulfur or nitrogen compound impurities from the hydrocarbonaceous oil phase into the extract-ing solvent phase. It should be recognized that inthis extraction the amine extracting solvent and the formic acid extracting solvent are suhstantially immiscible with the hydrocarbonaceous oil thus per-mitting an easy phase separation after the extraction is completed To the extent of emulsion formation, such is easily broken, e.g., by warming, for phase separation.
The extractions in step (2) of the process of this invention can be generally conducted by simply adding the extracting solvent to the hydrocarbonaceous ore, mixing such with the hydrocarbonaceous oil, allowing phase separation of the mixture to occur and then separating the extracting solvent phase contain-ing therein the sulfur or nitrogen atom impurity 30 content removed from the hydrocarbonaceous oil sub-strate phase. Conventional chemical engineering tech-niques can be employed to achieve this extraction conducted in step (2) of the process of this inven-tion. The amine extracting solvent acts to remove 35 sulfur compound impurities and the formic acid extracting solvent acts to remove basic nitrogen compound impurities. Generally a suitable extracting solvent to oil ratio by weight can range from about 0.1:1 to ~bout 4:1, but these ratios are not considered to be limiting. Conventional extraction eguipment such as stagewise contactors with counter-current flow of extracting solvent to hydrocarbona-ceous oil can be used.
As indicated above, in step (2) of the process of this invention, an amine extracting solvent and a formic acid extracting solvent are employed in a sequential manner. The order of extraction, whether amine extracting solvent followed by formic acid extracting solvent or formic acid extracting solvent followed by amine extracting solvent, is immaterial and either order can be employed. Preferably, the amine extracting solvent is used in a first extraction followed by use of the formic acid extracting solvent in a second extraction.
It should be recognized to maximize efficiency in these extractions that since the amine extracting solvent is a basic compound and the formic acid extracting solvent is an acid compound, one or more water washing steps between the extractions is desired to minimize the amount of residual extracting solvent remaining from the first extraction. Otherwise, -the effectiveness of the extracting solvent used in the second extraction will be reduced since a portion of the extracting solvent used second will be involved in an acid-base reaction with any extracting solvent used first which remains. The use of a water wash, how-ever, is not essential between the extracting stepsiIlvolving step (2~ of the process of this invention or prior to separating the oil from the extracting solvents in step (3). However, one or more water washing steps, for example, up to five water washing steps with the amine extracting solvents and up to .

three water washing steps with the formic acid extracting solvent, can be advantayeously used to minimize and eliminate extracting solvent interaction and efficiency reduction.
The ethylene diamine, monoethanolamine and diethanolamine employed as the amine extracting solvent and the formic acid extracting solvent can be used in their commercially available forms or can be purified to remove any undesired components which lo might be present in the commercially available forms.
Further, in the extraction step (2), each of the amine extracting solvents and the formic acid extract-ing solvent ca~ be used in admixture with water to the extent of up to about 50% by weight of water. Water in combination with these extracting solvents can be advantageously used to maximize phase separation and improve yields o oil recovered and to reduce cost since a water mixture with the extracting solvent is less expensive than use of the pure solvent. The amount of water which can be used with any particular extracting solvent can be appropriately determined by running routine screening tests to determine for a particular crude hydrocarbonaceous oil to be purified and under the reaction conditions employed in step (1), which of the amine or formic acid extracting solvents, pure or in admixture with water and to what e~tent in admixture with water can be advantageously used. These routine screening tests can be simply a consideration of yield and reduction in the nitrogen and sulfur content present, determined by routine chemical analysis, which of the pure extracting solvent or water extracting solvent mixture can be most advantageously used.
Step t3) of the process of this invention simply comprises recovery of the hydrocarbonaceous oil sub-strate purified as a result of the oxidation step ~1) -and the extraction step (2) of the process of this invention. Co~ventional purification procedures for removal of an extracting solvent from a hydrocarbona~
ceous oil, or for that matter any organic oil in general, can be employed. These extraction procedures include distillation, fractional crystallation and any other appropriate con~entional procedures for removing an extracting solvent from an oil substrate. The process of this invention is not limitecl in any way to lo selection of a specific hydrocarbonaceous oil recovery and separation procedure.
The process of this invention described above can be advantageously used to purify various types of crude hydrocarbonaceous oils containing heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities.
Generally, crude hydrocarbonaceous oils whose hetero-atom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen content rang~s up to about 10 % by weight and about 3 % by weight, respectively, can be subjected to and purified in accordance with the process of this invention to yield a purified hydrocarbonaceous oil having on the order of at least about 75 % and 50 % sulfur and nitrogen impurity content removal, respectively. It can be seen from an examination of the essential steps in the process of this invention that because of the mild oxidizing conditions employed in step (1) of the process of this invention, the fact that the essential parameters which need to be controlled can be easily controlled and in view of the efficiency and selec--tivity of the extracting solvents employed, the amineextracting solvent alone or in admixture with water to remove sulfur compounds and the formic acid extracting solvent, alone or in admixture with water, to remove nitrogen compounds and the easy and con~entional chemical engineering processing involved results in quite an economic and advantageous process. This is . ~

~ ~z~

particularly true when such is compared with the high ~emperature/high pressure hydrodesulfurixation treat-ments employed conventionally in the past. Further, the advantages of the process of this invention can be seen in comparison with impurity removal processing using catalysts conventionally employed in the art since an expensive catalyst is not needed nor are any steps needed to separate catalyst or regenerate catalyst involved. Thus, the process of this inv~n-tion is guite advantageous, is considered to be a marked advance over current technology in purification of hydrocarbonaceous oils containing nitrogen/sulfur impurities such as those that might be derived from oil shale, coal and tar sands, and is believed to be of particular commercial significance.
lS It is to be emphasized that the hydrocarbonaceous oil purified in accordance with the process of this invention can be subjected to subsequent processing as is conventional in the art. For example, the hydro-carbonaceous oil purified in accordance with the process of this invention can be subjected to conven-tional catalytic cracking, reforming, distillation, and like processing to produce desired products, boiling point fractions, or components therefrom. The hydrocarbonaceous oil produced by the process of this invention should provide an advantageous feedstock material for ultimate use ~in catalytic cracking, reforming and hydrocracking, as desired, since the amount of sulfur and nitrogen impurity content has been greatly reduced thereby resulting in a feedstock appropriate for use within the scope of the art in such conventional processing.
As indicated above, further embodiments of the process of this invention can arise as a result of utilization of a crude hydrocarbonaceous oil where only one of the heteroatom sulfur or heteroatom : !

~2(J~

nitrogen content is sufficiently high that purifica-tion and reduction of that impurity content is desired. For example, should the crude hydrocarbona-ceous oil have a high heteroatom sulfur content but relatively low heteroatom nitrogen conten-t, then it would be considered unnecessary to conduct the process of this invention and subject the hydrocarbonaceous oil produced in step (1) to both of the extracting solvents (i) and (ii) as described above for step (2) 0 of this invention. For example, with such a high sulfur content hydrocarbonaceous oil, after conducting step (l~ of the process of this invention, the hydro-carbonaceous oil obtained from step (1) would need to be subjected only to extracting with the amine extracting solvent or water mixture thereof to remove the sulfur impurities present. Conversely, should the crude hydrocarbonaceous oil contain a relatively low heteroatom sulfur content but relatively high hetero-atom nitrogen content and reduction in the heteroatom nitrogen content was only desired, subjecting the hydrocarbonaceous oil obtained in step (1) for such a crude hydrocarbonaceous oil to the extraction contact-ing step (2) with formic acid as an extracting solvent to remove the nitrogen impurities would only be necessary.
In general, because of the nature of crude hydro-carbonaceous oils obtained from sources such as oil shale, coal and tar sands, the process of this inven-tion will generally involve conducting step (1) above followed by both extractions in step (2) above and then separation and recovery of the purified oil in step (3). However, where only one of the heteroatom sulfur or heteroatom nitrogen content needs to be reduced, the process of this invention can be appro-priately conducted as discussed above.

Further, each of the embodiments of the process of ~his invention described above can be advanta-yeously conducted in a batch-wise, semi-continuous or continuous mannerO
The following examples are given to illustrate the process of the present invention in greater detail. These examples are given for the purpose of exemplification and are not to be construed in any way as limiting the process of the present invention.
o Unless otherwise indicated herein, all parts, percents, ratios and the like are by weight.
In the examples to follow, the reacting of the hydrocarbonaceous oil with an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom was conducted using a cylindrical, thermally jacketed Pyre~ (trademark of the Corning Glass Works) vessel capable of accommodat-ing a one-liter charge. The reactor was fitted with an impeller shaft terminating with a Teflon (trademark of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.) impeller. The reactor was further eguipped with a thermometer, a sample withdrawal tube and a glass condensor. A gas inlet tube passing through the jacket and into the bottom of the reactor was employed to introduce the oxidizing gas into the system.
In the examples to follow, the shale oil used was Colorado shale oil, Run No. 55 from Laxamie Energy Technology Center, with the chemical analyses of the raw shale from which it was derived and the crude shale oil obtained being shown in Tables 1 and 2 given hereinbefore.
/ The procedure employed for reacting of the oxidizing gas with the shale oil was a weighed amount of the oil, approximately 200 grams, was charged into the reactor. From the weight of the oil charged and the chemical analysis thereof, the total moles of `` ~2~9~6~5 sulfur heteroatom compounds and nitrogen heteroatom compounds were known.
The nitrogen dioxide flow rate into the reactor was determined by considering the nitrogen dioxide mole ratio to the total sulfur and nitrogen heteroatom content and the contact time. The mole ratio set forth in the examples to follow is the ratio of total moles of nitrogen dioxide used for a particular contact time to the total moles of sulfur and nitrogen lo in the oil charge. Control of the flow rate thereby was achieved using a rotameter, appropriately cali-brated. Various contact times for reaction of 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes, various mole ratios of nitrogen dioxide to total sulfur and nitrogen heteroatom content of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 wexe employed at an initial reactor temperature of 60C unless otherwise indicated.
In operation, after calculation of an appropriate rotameter setting, crude hydrocarbonaceous oil was charged to the reactor, the reactor heated to 60C, the rotameter valve was opened to achieve an appro-priate nitrogen dioxide flow into the reactor along with timer startin~. Temperature measurèments were made at appropriate intervals and at the conclusion, flow of the nitrogen dioxide gas was stopped and a sample of the oxidized hydrocarbonaceous oil was obtained for sulfur and nitrogen analysis. The remainder of the oxidized oil was then employed in extraction.
In the extraction set forth in the examples below, approximately 10 ml of oil was poured into a 60 ml separatory funnel. The solvent to be employed was then added to the oil in the separatory funnel in an appropriate ratio by weight to the oil The sepa-ratory funnel was then shaken and allowed to stand for at least one ~hour at room temperature to enhance :~2~ i9S

complete separation. After the system has stabilized, an extract pha~e (solvent ~ sulfur and nitrogen com-pounds) was collected and the yield of raffinate (oil ~ minor amount of dissolved solvent) was determined.
The raffinate phase was then washed with water three times to remove the dissolved solvent in the oil. The ratio of water to raffinate used was 5:1 by weight for each washing. After the washing, the final oil obtained and from which the solvent had been removed was collected and weighed.
Sulfur and nitrogen analysis was conducted using a Dohrmann Envirotech MCTS-300 (Microcoulometric Titrating System) employing operating procedures recommended by the manufacturer.

Samples of shale oil were individually contacted with each solvent shown in Table 3 below. Each 10 ml oil sample was contacted for five minutes by shaking with 20 ml of each solvent. After phase separation had occurred, the yield of raffinate with low sulfur content which was obtained was determined and the percent nitrogen and sulfur removal in the raffinate was determined.

2s Fxtraction of Crude Shale Oil Extracting Oil Nitrogen Sulfur Solvent Yield Removal Removal ( % ) ( % ) ( % ) Ethylene Glycol 97 14 0 30 Methanol 74 42 2 Acetic Anhydride 73 44 10 Formic Acid 72 75 5 Furfural 61 59 41 Acetic Acid 54 78 16 35 Ethylene Chlorohydrin 52 67 34 Dimethyl Formamide 46 69 54 Methyl Cyanide 44 48 0 Nitromethane 43 37 0 ~2C~ S

TABLE 3 Cont.
Extraction of Crude Shale Oil Extracting Oil Nitrogen Sulfur Solvent _ _~ield Removal Removal (%~ (%) - (%) Phenol 38 79 63 M-Pyrol 20 59 50 80% TEA* 77 15 23 Monoethanolamine (MEA) 76 47 51 0 Ethylene diamine 47 ~o 67 100% Diethanolamine (D~A) 89 33 13 90% DEA 88 14 0 80% DEA 100 9 2 100% ME~ 89 21 52 90% MEA 102 18 37 80% MEA 100 13 34 90% Formic Acid 82 63 13 Formic Acid/MEA 60 73 50 90% Formic Acid/MEA 55 62 48 Formic Acid 50 84 76 (with 10 wt.% FeCl3) * No phase separation occurred with 100% & 80~ T~A.

The results shown in Table 3 above demonstrate that a high yield of oil (greater than about 75%) could not be achieved simultaneously with a high degree (greater than about 50%) of nitrogen or sulfur heteroatom removal employing a wide range of solvents which have been conventionally used in the prior art for extraction and impurity removal.

A one-liter sample of shale oil was oxidized at 30C, 1 atmosphere pressure, using a stream of 20% by weight nitrogen dioxide in air, for a contact time of 60 minutes.
A 10 ml sample of this oxidized oil was extracted using 20 ml of methanol using the same procedures as described above in Comparative Example 1. Phase ~2~ ~ ~ 9 S

separation did not occur for the resulting mixture of.
methanol and oxidized shale oil. Thus, methanol was found to be totally unsatisfactory as a means for reducing the sulfur and nitrogen heteroatom content of the oxidized oil.
Water was then added in appropriate ratios to the methanol to achieve phase separation of the mixture with a water/methanol mixture being thereby employed as an extracting solvent. It was found that a reduc-0 tion ~less than 20%) of sulfur and nitrogen heteroatomcontent in the oxidized oil was achieved, which level of reduction was unsatisfactory.

Samples o~ shale oil were oxidized in accordance with the procedures described in Comparative Example 2 above with the mole ratio of nitrogen dioxide to the total moles of sulfur plus nitrogen heteroatom content in the oil of about l:l.
Following the oxidation, samples of the oxidized ~o oil were extracted using the solvents set forth in Table 4 below, using the extraction procedures as described above in Comparative Example 1. The extrac-tion results obtained are also shown in Table 4 below.

EXTRACTION IMPROVEMENT DUE TO OXIDATION
Oxidized Crude Shale Oil Shale Oil Extracting Oil Sulfur Oil Sulfur Solvent Yield RemovalYield Removal 3a (%) (%) (%) (%), Ethylene Glycol 97 0 95 7 Nitromethane 43 0 85 23 Acetic Anhydride 73 10 76 17 Ethylene Chlorohydrin 52 34 75 36 Methyl Cyanide 44 0 75 7 Methanol 74 2 71 0 TABLE 4 Cont.
EXTRACTION IMPROVEMENT DUE TO OXIDATION
Oxidized Crude Shale Oil Shale Oil Extracting OilSulfur Oil Sulfur Solvent YieldRemoval Yield Removal (%) (~) (%) (%) Furfural 61 41 66 39 l-Methyl-2~Pyrrolidinone 20 50 51 67 0 Eth~lene Diamine 47 67 76 63 Formic Acid 72 5 95 3 It can be seen that an improvement in oil yield after oxidation of the shale oil, in comparison to direct extraction on the unoxidized shale oil, is lS achieved for formic acid, nitromethane, ethylene chlorohydrin, ethylene diamine, methyl cyanide and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone~ It is further clear that the use of methanol as an extracting solvent is unsatisactory.
From the results presented in Table 4 above, it can be further seen that only ethylene diamine pro-vides satisfactorily high raffinate yields combined with high levels of sulfur removal. Further, although formic acid is not a solvent which results in a reduc-tion in the sulfur content, virtually all the basic nitrogen compounds are removed using formic acid as an extracting solvent. These results indicate that the extremely high raffinate yield achieved with formic acid makes formic~ acid a suitable extracting solvent where sequential extractions with solvents exhibiting high sulfur removal capabilities are employed.
~AMPLE
Oxidation of samples of shale oil, as described in Comparative Example 1, was carried out but under varying oxidation conditions as shown in Table S

::

below. After the oxidation, 10 ml aliquots of the oxidized shale oil were extracted sequentially, first with formic acid and then with monoethanolamine, using the extracting procedures described in Comparative Example 1. The results obtained are shown in Table 5 below.

EFFECT OF OXIDATION CONDITIONS ON HETEROATOM REMOVAL
USING SE~UENTIAL EX~RACTIONS ~~
Sulfur Content/Nitrogen Content Oxidized Oxidized Contact Mole Oil Unextracted Extracted Time Ratlo _ Yield Oil Oil (mi.n) (NO2/(N+S) (%) (%) (%) Crude Oil 0 60.02.85/1.75 1.43~0.47 0.1:1 61.32.81/1.85 1.42/0.57 0.5:1 68.0~.22/1.79 1.14/0.55 1.0:1 69.22.08/1.87 1.01/0.77 2.0:1 73.01.90/2.65 0.78/1.55 3.0:1 63.91.81/3.02 0.74/1.93
4.0:1 65.31.67/3.93 0.77/2.13 0.5:1 64.42.25/1.7~ 1.07/0.55 2.0:1 65.71.85/3.16 0.63/1.80 4.0:1 63.11.60/4.03 0.59/1.89 0.5:1 62.82.34/1.84 0.73/0.70 2.0:1 64.11.88/3.01 0.49/2.50 4.0:1 66.41.51/4.15 0.49/2.52 0.5:1 64.22.30/1.72 0.95/0.89 2.0:1 59.91.40/3.13 0.56/2.87 It is apparent from the results shown in Table 5 above that as long as the molar ratio of NO2 to the combined nitrogen plus sulfur heteroatom level is about 1.5:- or less, good yields of raffinate can be :
achieved, along with substantial removal oE both sulfur and nitrogen compound impurities. Further, it can be further seen that althou~h reductions in sul:Eur level can be achieved with grea~er oxidation of the shale oil, undesirably, an increase in the nitrogen content of oil occurs. As a result, these results in combination with the results set forth in Fig. 2 S demonstrate it is desirable that about 60% or less by weight of the sulfur impurity content to be oxidized to gaseous sulfur oxides in the oxidation step.
From these results set forth in Table 5, by employing o~idizing conditions and solvent extraction conditions in accordance with the present invention, this results in the ability to remove undesirable nitrogen compounds and sulfur compounds while obtain-ing a high oil yield.

15A one-liter sample of shale oil was oxidized or 60 minutes at a molar ratio of NO2/(N+S) of 1.48:1 at a temperature of 30C, in accordance with the process of the present invention. The oxidized oil obtained was then extracted with mixtures of ethylene diamine Zo and water, ln the proportions set forth in Table 6, utilizing the extraction procedures described above for Comparative Example 1. The results obtained are set forth in Table 6 below.

SULFUR REMOVAL BY OXIDATION/EXTRACTION
USING-A MIXTURE OF _THYLE.NE DIAMINE ~ND ~ATER
Solvent Composition Raffinate Content of Sulfur Sulfur Ethy~ene Diamine tlt Yield (2) in Raffinate (31 Removal 30 (%3 (%) (%) (%) 99 1.08 62 100 0.92 68 86 0.80 72 100 77 0.62 78 100 (shale oil (4)) 47. --- 67 695i Notes:
(1) Balance of solvent = water.
(2) Yield = Weight of raffinate/Weight of oil subjected to oxidation.
(33 Oxidized oil = 1.65% sulfur prior to extraction.
4) Prior to oxidation.

REFERENCE

A sample of crude shale oil was extracted in accordance with the procedures of Comparative Exam-ple 1 utilizing ethylene diamine as the extracting solvent with variations, as shown in Table 7 below in the ratio of extracting solvent to oil. The results obtained in terms of sulfur removal in comparison with the weight ratio of solvent to oil are shown in Table 7 below.

SULFUR REMOVAL BY ETHYLENE DIAMINE
WITH DIFFERENT SOLVENT TO OIL_RATIO
Weight Ratio of Raffinate Sulfur Content Sulfur Solvent to Oil Yieldin Raffinate Removal (%) (%) (%) 1:1 76.7 0.620 62.4 2:1 72:9 0.619 62.5 3:1 72.1 0.571 65.4 4:1 70.5 0.543 67.1 Note:
Weight % of sulfur unoxidized after oxidation but before extraction = 1.65. ' Raffinate = mixture of oxidized oil and dissolved solvent.
Yield = weight of raffinate/weight of original oil.

- ~z~

The results set forth in Table 7 above demon-strate that removal of sulfur impurity content can be increased as the extracting solvent to oil ratio is increased but that the yield decreases somewhat.
However, the overall results indicate that a weight ratio of extracting solvent to oil within the range of about 1:1 to about 4:1 can be employed wi-thout markedly deleterious effects on yield.
Similar results to the above with ethylene diamine were also obtained with monoethanolamine using the same procedures as described above with various extracting solvent to oil ratios as shown in Table 8 below.

SULFUR CONTENT OF OIL IN THE RAFFINATE
~ND IN EXTRACT USING MON-OETHANOL~MINE AS EXTRACTING SOLVENT
Sulfur Content of oi 1 Weight Ratio of Solvent to Oil Raffinate Extract _ _ (wt.%) (wt.%) 0.5:1 1.37 19.19 1.0:1 1.36 18.46 2 0:1 1.34 17.20 3 0:1 1.27 17.05 25 4.0:1 1.25 15.35 REFERENCE

Samples of shale oil were extracted in accordance with the procedures set forth in Comparative Example 1 using monoethanolamine as an extraction solvent and by varying the ratio of extracting solvent to oil. The results obtained and effect on nitrogen content in the oil in the raffinate and in the extract are shown in Table 9 below.

~s~

NITROGEN CONTENT OF OIL IN ~FFINATE
AND IN EXTRACT USING MONOETHANOLAMINE AS EXTRACTING SOLVENT
Nitrogen Content of Oil 5Weight Ratio of Solvent to Oil Raffinate Extract ~wt.%) (wt.%) 0.5:1 1.19 9.79 1.0:1 1.11 9.40 2.0:1 1.03 9.22 3.0:1 0.99 8.91 4Ø1 1.00 8.35 REFERENCE

Shale oil was extracted in accordance with the procedures described in Comparative Example 1 using formic acid as an extracting solvent to remove nitro-gen compounds as impurities. The ratio of formic acid as an extracting solvent to oil was varied and the results obtained are shown in Table 10 below.

NITROGEN CONTENT OF OIL IN RAFE'INATE
AND IN EXTRACT USING FORMIC AC.D ~5 E~IRA ~ rNG SOLVENT
Nitrogen Content o~ Oil 25Weight Ratio of Solvent _to Oil _ Raffinate Extract (wt.%) (wto%) 1.0:1 0.394 4.18 2.0:1 0.377 3.57 4.0:1 0.352 3.60 6.0:1 0.339 3.40 9.0:1 0.343 3.66 15.0:1 0.346 3.3 The above results set forth in Table 10 demon-strate that lower weight ratios of solvent to oil are - ~LZ~}6~5 desirable but a markedly deleterious effec-t on nitro-gen content removal does not result. Desirably, weight ratios of solven-t to oil of about ~:1 or less provide efficient nitrogen content removal with the preferred range being about 0.5:1 to 1:1 for good removal of sulfur and nitrogen.
While the invention has been described in detail and with respect to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modi-lo fications and changes can be made therein withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope thereof.

Claims (17)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils containing heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities comprising the steps of:
(1) reacting said hydrocarbonaceous oil with an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitro-gen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom while maintaining (a) the molar ratio of the nitrogen oxide to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1.5:1 or less, (b) the reaction time to about one hour or less, (c) the temperature to about 100°C or less, and (d) a conversion of sulfur heteroatom content into gaseous sulfur oxides to about 60% or less on a weight basis;
(2) contacting the oil from step (1) above with (i) an extracting solvent comprising at least one amine selected from the group consisting of ethylene diamine, mono-ethanolamine, diethanolamine and mixtures thereof, or a water mixture thereof containing about 50% by weight or less water, and (ii) an extracting solvent comprising formic acid or a water mixture thereof con-taining about 50% by weight or less water, with the contacting with (i) and (ii) being sequential and in any order; and (3) separating said oil from step (2) above from said extracting solvents;
to recover purified hydrocarbonaceous oil.
2. The process of Claim 1, wherein said molar ratio (a) is about 1:1 or less.
3. The process of Claim 1, wherein the reaction time (b) is about 30 minutes or less.
4. The process of Claim 1, wherein the tempera-ture (c) is about 60°C or less.
5. The process of Claim 1, wherein said extracting solvent (i) is monoethanolamine.
6. The process of Claim 1, wherein said extracting solvent (i) is monoethanolamine undiluted with water.
7. The process of Claim 1, wherein said molar ratio (a) is about 0.5:1 or less, the reaction time (b) is about five minutes, the temperature (c) is about 30°C, and said extracting solvent (i) is mono-ethanolamine.
8. A process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oil containing heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities comprising the steps of:
(1) reacting said oil with an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom while maintaining (a) the molar ratio of the nitrogen oxide to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1.5:1 or less, (b) the reaction time to about one hour or less, (c) the temperature to about 100°C or less, and (d) a conversion of sulfur heteroatom content into gaseous sulfur oxides to about 60% or less on a weight basis;
(2) contacting the oil from step (1) above with an extracting solvent comprising ethylene diamine, or a water mixture thereof con-taining about 50% by weight or less water; and (3) separating said oil from step (2) above from said extracting solvent to recover purified hydrocarbonaceous oil.
9. The process of claim 8, wherein said molar ratio (a) is about 1:1 or less.
10. The process of claim 8, wherein the reaction time (b) is about 30 minutes or less.
11. The process of claim 8, wherein the temperature (c) is about 60°C or less.
12. The process of claim 8; wherein said molar ratio (a) is about 0.5:1 or less, the reaction time (b) is about five minutes, and the temperature (c) is about 30°C.
13. A process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils containing heteroatom sulfur and heteroatom nitrogen compound impurities comprising the steps of:
(1) reacting said oil with an oxidizing gas containing at least one nitrogen oxide with more than one oxygen atom for each nitrogen atom while maintaining (a) the molar ratio of the nitrogen oxide to the total of the sulfur heteroatom content and the nitrogen heteroatom content to about 1.5:1 or less, (b) the reaction time to about one hour or less, (c) the temperature to about 100°C or less, and (d) a conversion of sulfur heteroatom content into gaseous sulfur oxides to about 60% or less on a weight basis;
(2) contacting the oil from step (1) above with an extracting solvent comprising formic acid or a water mixture thereof containing about 50% by weight or less water; and (3) separating said oil from step (2) above from said extracting solvent to recover purified hydrocarbonaceous oil.
14. The process of claim 13, wherein said molar ratio (a) is about 1:1 or less.
15. The process of claim 13, wherein the reaction time (b) is about 30 minutes or less.
16. The process of claim 13, wherein the temperature (c) is about 60°C or less.
17. The process of claim 13, wherein said molar ratio (a) is about 0.5:1 or less, the reaction time (b) is about five minutes and the temperature (c) is about 30°C.
CA000430447A 1982-06-15 1983-06-15 Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils Expired CA1204695A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US388,792 1982-06-15
US06/388,792 US4485007A (en) 1982-06-15 1982-06-15 Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1204695A true CA1204695A (en) 1986-05-20

Family

ID=23535548

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000430447A Expired CA1204695A (en) 1982-06-15 1983-06-15 Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US4485007A (en)
EP (1) EP0097055B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS594686A (en)
CA (1) CA1204695A (en)
DE (1) DE3374416D1 (en)
MX (1) MX162403A (en)

Families Citing this family (47)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4711713A (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-12-08 Rei Technologies, Inc. Process for enhancing the cetane number and color of diesel fuel
US4746420A (en) * 1986-02-24 1988-05-24 Rei Technologies, Inc. Process for upgrading diesel oils
US4643820A (en) * 1986-02-24 1987-02-17 Oxiprocessing Process for enhancing the cetane number of diesel fuel
EP0236021A3 (en) * 1986-02-24 1989-01-25 ENSR Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) Process for upgrading diesel oils
GB8926436D0 (en) * 1989-11-22 1990-01-10 Secr Defence Diesel oil purification
JPH05202367A (en) * 1991-10-15 1993-08-10 General Sekiyu Kk Method for desulfurizing and denitrating light oil by extraction
US5745300A (en) * 1993-02-17 1998-04-28 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Zoom lens of the inner focus type
US5760967A (en) * 1993-11-30 1998-06-02 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Zoom lens
JP3376171B2 (en) * 1995-06-22 2003-02-10 キヤノン株式会社 Zoom lens
JP3376177B2 (en) * 1995-06-29 2003-02-10 キヤノン株式会社 Zoom lens
US6545818B2 (en) 1999-05-10 2003-04-08 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Zoom lens and camera system
US6251289B1 (en) 1999-06-03 2001-06-26 Grt, Inc. Treatment of contaminated liquids with oxidizing gases and liquids
JP4463909B2 (en) 1999-10-19 2010-05-19 キヤノン株式会社 Zoom lens
US6596914B2 (en) * 2000-08-01 2003-07-22 Walter Gore Method of desulfurization and dearomatization of petroleum liquids by oxidation and solvent extraction
US7153414B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2006-12-26 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.-Petrobras Process for the upgrading of raw hydrocarbon streams
US7842181B2 (en) * 2006-12-06 2010-11-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Composition and process for the removal of sulfur from middle distillate fuels
US8470166B2 (en) * 2006-12-22 2013-06-25 PetroRadiant, Inc. Radiation processing of heavy oils
US8101812B2 (en) 2007-09-20 2012-01-24 Green Source Energy Llc Extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials
US8272442B2 (en) 2007-09-20 2012-09-25 Green Source Energy Llc In situ extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials
US8404108B2 (en) 2007-09-20 2013-03-26 Green Source Energy Llc Extraction of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing materials and/or processing of hydrocarbon-containing materials
US8142646B2 (en) 2007-11-30 2012-03-27 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process to produce low sulfur catalytically cracked gasoline without saturation of olefinic compounds
US8088711B2 (en) * 2007-11-30 2012-01-03 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process and catalyst for desulfurization of hydrocarbonaceous oil stream
US20090145808A1 (en) * 2007-11-30 2009-06-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Catalyst to attain low sulfur diesel
EP2250129A2 (en) 2008-02-21 2010-11-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Catalyst to attain low sulfur gasoline
US20100264067A1 (en) * 2009-04-16 2010-10-21 General Electric Company Method for removing impurities from hydrocarbon oils
US8888994B2 (en) * 2010-04-22 2014-11-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method for deep desulphurization of hydrocarbon fuels
US9005432B2 (en) 2010-06-29 2015-04-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Removal of sulfur compounds from petroleum stream
US8535518B2 (en) 2011-01-19 2013-09-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Petroleum upgrading and desulfurizing process
US10125319B2 (en) 2011-07-31 2018-11-13 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated process to produce asphalt and desulfurized oil
CN103917911B (en) 2011-11-04 2016-03-30 富士胶片株式会社 Zoom lens and camera head
CN104024912B (en) 2011-11-04 2016-09-07 富士胶片株式会社 Zoom lens and camera head
WO2013078306A1 (en) 2011-11-23 2013-05-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Tight gas stimulation by in-situ nitrogen generation
CA2997969C (en) 2012-01-17 2019-12-03 Mohammed Nasser Al-Dahlan Non-acidic-exothermic sandstone stimulation fluids
WO2013181229A2 (en) 2012-05-29 2013-12-05 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Enhanced oil recovery by in-situ steam generation
PT2861698T (en) 2012-06-15 2017-02-23 Dow Global Technologies Llc Process for the treatment of liquefied hydrocarbon gas using 2-amino-2 (hydroxymethyl) propane-1,3-diol compounds
EP3132000B1 (en) 2014-04-17 2021-12-15 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Method for enhanced fracture cleanup using redox treatment
US10308862B2 (en) 2014-04-17 2019-06-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Compositions and methods for enhanced fracture cleanup using redox treatment
WO2015161213A1 (en) 2014-04-17 2015-10-22 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Chemically-induced pulsed fracturing method
US10053614B2 (en) 2014-04-17 2018-08-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Compositions for enhanced fracture cleanup using redox treatment
US9896629B2 (en) 2014-07-25 2018-02-20 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated process to produce asphalt, petroleum green coke, and liquid and gas coking unit products
EP3371411B1 (en) 2015-11-05 2021-02-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods and apparatus for spatially-oriented chemically-induced pulsed fracturing in reservoirs
US10752847B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2020-08-25 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated hydrothermal process to upgrade heavy oil
US10703999B2 (en) 2017-03-14 2020-07-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated supercritical water and steam cracking process
RU2669803C1 (en) * 2018-05-23 2018-10-16 Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет" Method of oil refining from heteroatomic components
CN109439366B (en) * 2018-09-07 2021-06-15 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for removing thiophene sulfur from gasoline
US10526552B1 (en) 2018-10-12 2020-01-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Upgrading of heavy oil for steam cracking process
US11739616B1 (en) 2022-06-02 2023-08-29 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Forming perforation tunnels in a subterranean formation

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US508479A (en) * 1893-11-14 Method of deodorizing hydrocarbon oils
US542849A (en) * 1895-07-16 Process of refining petroleum
US1864541A (en) * 1924-05-06 1932-06-28 Consortium Elektrochem Ind Process of oxidizing organic substances
US2009898A (en) * 1929-11-11 1935-07-30 Universal Oil Prod Co Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US1933748A (en) * 1929-11-15 1933-11-07 Universal Oil Prod Co Process for treating hydrocarbon oils
US1935207A (en) * 1930-03-27 1933-11-14 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Process for the purification of a crude hydrocarbon
US2069329A (en) * 1935-03-20 1937-02-02 Shell Dev Process of refining oils
US2263176A (en) * 1938-06-20 1941-11-18 Tide Water Associated Oil Comp Process of recovering nitrogen bases
US2311342A (en) * 1941-03-15 1943-02-16 Standard Oil Dev Co Sulphur removal from hydrocarbons
US2487577A (en) * 1945-11-19 1949-11-08 Phillips Petroleum Co Absorption process
US2662843A (en) * 1951-05-25 1953-12-15 Shell Dev Shale oil refining
US2702824A (en) * 1952-08-18 1955-02-22 Nitroglycerin Ab Liquid-vapor phase method for producing lower dialkyl sulfoxides
US2825744A (en) * 1956-03-27 1958-03-04 Stepan Chemical Co Vapor phase oxidation
NL276740A (en) * 1961-04-06
US3267027A (en) * 1961-07-17 1966-08-16 Union Oil Co Process of desulfurization employing alkali and nitrogen dioxide
BE625074A (en) * 1961-11-24
US3164546A (en) * 1961-12-22 1965-01-05 Pure Oil Co Two stage process of refining diesel fuel
US3105812A (en) * 1961-12-27 1963-10-01 Gulf Research Development Co Process of removing nitrogen compounds by oxidation
GB1051515A (en) * 1964-04-22
FR2150617B1 (en) * 1971-08-31 1974-09-06 Cholet Prosper
US3919402A (en) * 1973-08-06 1975-11-11 Kvb Inc Petroleum oil desulfurization process
US3847800A (en) * 1973-08-06 1974-11-12 Kvb Eng Inc Method for removing sulfur and nitrogen in petroleum oils
US4113607A (en) * 1977-03-03 1978-09-12 Chevron Research Company Denitrification process for hydrogenated distillate oils
US4272361A (en) * 1979-06-27 1981-06-09 Occidental Research Corporation Method for reducing the nitrogen content of shale oil

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0097055B1 (en) 1987-11-11
EP0097055A3 (en) 1985-01-09
DE3374416D1 (en) 1987-12-17
MX162403A (en) 1991-05-06
JPS594686A (en) 1984-01-11
US4485007A (en) 1984-11-27
EP0097055A2 (en) 1983-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1204695A (en) Process for purifying hydrocarbonaceous oils
Tam et al. Desulfurization of fuel oil by oxidation and extraction. 1. Enhancement of extraction oil yield
US6402940B1 (en) Process for removing low amounts of organic sulfur from hydrocarbon fuels
US7153414B2 (en) Process for the upgrading of raw hydrocarbon streams
US2343841A (en) Removal of aromatics, sulphur, or unsaturates from hydrocarbons
JP3227521B2 (en) Method for recovering organic sulfur compounds from liquid oil
KR890003657B1 (en) Continuous process for mercaptan extraction from a highly olefinic feed stream
US20030051988A1 (en) Treatment of crude oil fractions, fossil fuels, and products thereof with ultrasound
US5961820A (en) Desulfurization process utilizing an oxidizing agent, carbonyl compound, and hydroxide
US4842715A (en) Novel technique for rendering oily sludges environmentally acceptable
US3449242A (en) Desulfurization process for heavy petroleum fractions
US3445380A (en) Treating sour hydrocarbon distillates containing mercapto compounds and acidic,surface-active materials
US3919402A (en) Petroleum oil desulfurization process
EP0236021A2 (en) Process for upgrading diesel oils
US2472473A (en) Conversion of hydrosulfides to neutral sulfur substances
US3383304A (en) Alkali-desulfurization process
US4392947A (en) Integrated refining process
US2729593A (en) Demetalation of hydrocarbon oils
US4761222A (en) Method for separating normally liquid organic compounds
US20040200759A1 (en) Sulfone removal process
JPS6345851B2 (en)
US2357121A (en) Process for desulphurizing a hydrocarbon distillate
US2733190A (en) Treatment of sulphur-containing
US2915461A (en) Multi-stage sweetening process employing an alkaline hypochlorite solution
EP0020053A1 (en) Desulphurization of oil

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry