CA1252416A - Electrochemical machining metal-ceramic composite material using a porous electrode - Google Patents

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

Electrochemical machining of ceramic parti-culate and metal matrix surfaces, and of other uneven or discontinuous surfaces, is conducted using an electrode which has a porous working face made of sintered metal.
Relatively low electrolyte pressures of the order of 5 kPa and low flow rates of the order of 6 ml/s/cm2 of electrode surface are used. Preferably the electrode face is made of sintered powder. Facing the electrode upward and the workpiece surface downward enables machining of workpieces without unwanted flow of electrolyte onto areas away from the machined surface.

Description

~2~

Description Electrochemical Machining Metal-Ceramic Composite Material Using A Porous Electrode Technical Field 5The present invention relates to electrochemical machining, particularly to thé uniform machining of metal-ceramic composites.
.

Background Art Electrochemical machining (ECM) has been widely used in the gas turbine industry to machine tough alloys. Over the past two decades, there has been considerable progress with respect to machinery and specialized techniques for particular materials.
Still, new demands arise from time to time, and the present invention arose from the search for a solu-tion to a particular problem.
The tips of superalloy turbine blades in gas turbine engines occasionally come in contact with the circumscribing air seal. When this occurs, the mode of interac-tion and wear between the components must be controlled. As a result, specialized mate-rials have been applied to the tip of the blade, to act as an abrasive when in contact with the air seal. Owing to the high temperatures and severe environment, most conventional abrasives are not suitable. An abrasive material which has been found to be useful is comprised of a metal matrix containing a multiplicity of ceramic particulates;
specifically, a nickel or cobalt alloy matrix containing particulates of silicon carbide. U.S.

57 ~ 9~3 Patent No. 4,249,913 to Johnson et al, commonly owned by -~he pre~ent assignee, descri~es such a material. See also U.S. Patent No. 4,227,703 to Stalker et al.
It is now appreciated tha-t to enhance the performance of these specialized abrasive ma-terials, the ceramic grains on the tips of the turbine blades should be exposed, or relievèd of their surrounding matrix material, so that they project slightly aoove the surface of the ma-trix. Inasmuch as the abrasive is a composite of ceramic and me-tal and since -the metal is a relatively complex superalloy, i-t is no-t a simple matter to uniformly remove the matrix. About 0.15 mm of matrix material has to be removed, but the removal must be uniform in depth across -the surface and from one blade to the nex-t, and the removal technique must not substan-tially undercut the silicon carbide grains. ~reas of the superalloy blade adjacent the abrasive should not be attacked.
Simple chemical milling works but is not optimal owing to the complexity of the alloy and the selective attack of different phases. Fur-thermore, chemical milling is slow. ECM is preferred because i-t is a high rate production process.
In conventional ECM, an electrode is placed in proximi-ty to the workpiece and an electric potential is placed across the electrode and the workpiece. Electro-lyte is forced into the gap between the electrode and the workpiece, and as material is removed, the electrode is advanced .6 .

toward the workpiece. Typically, the electrode is hollow and the electrolyte flows internally along the electrode, issuing through a hole, slot, or some other like aperture at the working face of the electrode. However, in such an instance there will tend to be left on the sur-face of the workpiece a small protuberance at the vicinity of the orifice through which the electrolyte issues. See Figures 1 and 3 of U.S.
Patent No. 3,723,268 to Johns et al. In most instances, these protuberances are not a problem.
But in certain situations where blind holes are drilled, supplemental machining operations must be used to remove the protuberance and achieve a flat bottomed hole. In the removal of matrix from the silicon carbide and metal composite material, an electrode which leaves protuberances or substantial local high spots is not acceptable.
Of course, the electrolyte need not be introduced through the internal passages of the ECM electrode but instead can be cross flowed through the gap.
However, such procedures require often times com-plex apparatus to channel the flow across the end of the electrode.
In both the conventional procedures there is a further tendency for uneven matrix removal since the insoluble ceramic grains create stag-nant electrolyte flow areas. It has been found that temperature rise and other adverse effects in stagnation areas will tend to produce under-cut or uneven removal of matrix. The dissimilar electrical properties of the ceramic and metal further complicate analysis of what occurs during ECM.

~isclosure of Invention It is an object of the invention to provide an improved method of electrochemical machining where very uniform surfaces must be produced in metals and where small amounts of material must be removed from metal-ceramic composites.
The invention involves the use of an elec-trode with a plurality of small passages on its working face. Preferably, the end of a hollow electrode is closed by a porous powder metal sheet. In use, electrolyte flows through a rela-tively large interior passage and then through the porous working face of the electrode. It then exits from the gap between the electrode face and the workpiece surface being machined.
Because of the rela-tionbetween the electrode working face and the sizes of the interior elec-trode passages and the gap, the principal. pres-sure drop in the electrolyte flow path is across the working face of the electrode. This means that flow rate is relatively insensitive to the gap. Thus, when the electrode is used to remove matrix material from a surface comprised of in-soluble ceramic particulate and metal, the elec-trolyte and current are both evenly distributedover the surface of the workpiece. Similarly, use of the electrode converts uneven surfaces, such as those made by a conventional ECM elec-trode with a large central passage to an even surface.
In the preferred practice of the invention the electrode working face is made of sintered powder metal sheet of the type commonly used ~2~

for filterlng. Such sheets have nominal particle size capture ratings of 20-100 micrometers, but the individual fluid discharge ports on the working face will range up to four times the nominal rating. The hollow electrode of the in-vention is configured so that the closure which comprises the working face has an apparent flow path area of less than 50% of the interior channel of the electrode body which is imme-diately upstream of the closure.
When machining composite ceramic particulateand metal abrasive materials, the size of the fluid discharge ports on the working face will be equal or less than the nominal size of the parti-culate, to obtain uniform matrix removal. Generally,the gap between the electrode and the workpiece will range from 0.05-0.5 mm, most preferably at about 0.38 mm. In this range, with the preferred 100 micrometer powder metal electrode, and a constant flow rate in the range of about 6 ml/sec/cm2 the pressure drop across the electrode will be always two times or greater than the pres-sure drop in the gap, which of course is greatest for the minimum gap dimension.
Because of the even distribu-tion of electro-lyte which is obtained relatively low electrolyte pressures, of the order of 2.5-7.5 kPa (-25-75 cm of water column) are usable. Thus, instead of jetting from the electrode face, the electrolyte tends to seep. When machining the tip of a turbine blade or other article, unwanted attack away from the working face is prevented by dis-posing upwardly the electrode working face.

~;~5~

~lectrolyte discharged from the gap flows downward and away from tne wor~piece. ln the preferred practice of this aspect of the invention the electrolyte pressure is in the range of 2.5-7.5 kPa and the flow rate is in the range 3-8 ml~sec/cm2.
In accordance with the invention, there is provided an electrode for electrochemical machining con-sis-ting of a conductive body having an interior por-tion for conveying electrolyte to the tip of the electrode and a porous concluc~ive closure covering the tip. The closure is made of porous powder metal having a porosity of 30-50 percent.
The electrode has an interior portion shaped for conveying electrolyte to the tip thereof. The closure allows electrolyte to flow from the interior portion to the exterior portion of the electrode. The porous closure has a plurality of through holes of less than ~00 micrometer exit diameter and the cross-sectional flow area of the hole exits at the ex-cerior surface of the closure being less -than 50 percent of the cross-sectional area of the closure.
Also in accordance with the invention there is provided a process of electrochemically machining a workpiece to remove material uniformly therefrom. An electrode has a working face spaced apart by a gap from the workpiece surface and -the elec-trolyte is flowed under pressure through the electrode working face an~d then through the gap. In accordance with the invention the electrode working face is made of a porous powder . .

~2~

- 6a -metal filter element material having a filtration rating in the range of 20 lOOxlO m and hy flo~A7i ng the electrolyte through the worlcing face, the pressure drop of the electrolyte through the portion oE the electrode which comprises the working face is greater than the pressuxe drop of the elec-trolyte within the gap.
Compared to conventional ECM techniques the invention produces uniform rinish surfaces and minimizes extraneous workpiece at-tack. ~he foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present inven-tion will become more appaxent from the following des-cription of preferred embodiments and accompanying drawings.

Brief Deseription of Drawings Fiyure 1 shows how the tip of a turbine blade is eleetrochemically milled using a porous metal tipped electrode faeing vertically up.
Figure 2 shows a composi-te material of ceramic particulates and metal matrix composite material prior to maehining.
Figure 3 shows the material of Figure 2 after eleetrochemieal maehining to remove some of the matrix and uniformly expose the grains.
Figure 4 shows in more detail a structure like that of Figure 3 but instead illustrates the types of defects which oecur when electro-chemical machining is not done correctly.
Figure 5 is a partial cross seetion through the parts shown in Figure 1.
Figure 6 is a photograph of silieon earbide particulate in a nickel alloy matrix after 0.15 mm of matrix has been removed from a flat ground surfaee.

Bes~ Mode for Carrying Out the Invention The invention is described in terms of the removal of a portion of the matrix metal from a composite material comprised of silicon carbide particulates dispersed in a high temperature alloy o nickel or cobalt, such as are described in the Johnson Patent No. ~,249,913, mentioned in the background. Because of its function on a gas turbine blade, this material is referred to herein as an abrasive; but the appelation will be understood to refer to any composite of ceramic particulate and metal.
It will be apparent that the invention is relevant to other materials and other configura-tions of articles.
The essential processes o~ electrochemicalmachining (ECM) are described in the aforemen-tioned Patent No. 3,723,268 and in the book by J. F. Wilson, "Practice and Theory of Electro-chemical Machining", Wiley-Interscience, New York (1971). A blade 10 comprised of a hollow body 12 and an abrasive closure 14 at its -tip is shown in Figure 1, as it is positioned for electrochemical machining. Figure 2 shows in simplified fashion how the blade tip appears prior to ECM. The sur-face 16 of the abrasive has been ground to a precise dimension which may be curvilinear or planar.
Figures 3 and 6 show how the same structure appears after processing according to the method of the invention. The ceramic particulates 18 project above the matrix metal 20 by an amount A, owing to removal of some of the matrix metal from the surface.

Figure 4 illustrates in detail what happens when ECM is not properly carried out in accord with the invention. ~11 the defects in the Figure may not occur on the same workpiece, but they are shown here in one illustration for convenience.
In one deviation, the particulates 18 are sur-rounded by moats; i.e., they are undercut by selective localized attack of the matrix metal.
In a second type of defect, the surface 16 o~ the matrix metal is uneven across the surface of the workpiece, meaning that the degree of exposure o~ the various particulates is uneven. In the third type of defect, the side 13 of the ab~asive has been electrochemically attacked. All such defects can be deleterious to the performance of the component. When the particulates are under-cut, they tend to easily pull out. When the matrix is uneven, the abrasive does not function uniformly across its surface; i.e., the desired effects of controlled removal of the matri~ are not obtained.
When the workpiece is selectively attacked at regions away from the surface, such as the side, it is potentially weakened.
Figures 1 and 5 illustrate how the invention is prac-ticed. An electrode 26 is configured with a working face 28, shaped according to the area which i-t is desired to electrochemically machine.
The electrode 26 has a hollow body 30 to which is attached a closure 32 made of a porous sintered 30 metal, such as an AIsI 316 stainless steel 100 micron metal filter element. The electrode 26 has interior portions or passages 34, 36 adapted to convey electrolyte through the interior of the electrode to the porous closure, as indicated by the arrows 38. The electrolyte passes through the closure 32 and is discharged towards the workpiece face 16. The workpiece face 16 is spaced apart S from the face 28 of the electrode by a gap G.
During ECM of the surface 16, current is applied between the electrode and the workpiece. When a small amount of su~face material is to be removed, such as 0.02-0.15 mm, the electrode and workpiece are fixed with respect to one another. When more material is desired to be removed from the work-piece, in instances other than those described for the abrasive herein, then the electrode would advance toward the workpiece as remo~al of material from the workpiece tended to increase the gap G.
The cross-sectional area of the passage 36 which feeds electrolyte to the closure is greater -than the summation of cross-sectional areas of the porous metal closure passages. Therefore, the porous metal closure acts as a metering device.
The primary pressure drop along -the electrolyte flow path, from inside the elec-trode body, through the closure, and out the gap is caused to occur at the closure. The flow area of the closure is related to the gap G so that there is relatively little pressure drop in the electrolyte in the gap.
As an example, a total pressure of 2.5-7.5 kPa (about 0.3-1 m water column) is supplied when the electrode is a 100 micron filter element (described in more detail below). With this pressure, the electrolyte gently oozes from the surface of an upward facing electrode working face, forming a meniscus layer of about 1 mm thick. Since the principal pressure drop is across the electrode closure, the flow at different locations across the working face 28 is relatively uniform regard-less of whether a workpiece is present or not.
This is in contrast to the situation with a con-ventional electrode having very few large elec-trode face passages, where the change in the distance G, either by movement or variation in electrode posi-tion, or by erosion of the workpiece, will affect the electrolyte flow. And flow at one location on the electrode face will, by its increase or decrease, affect conversely the flow at another location in the workpiece surface.
In the invention, since the porous metal closure causes a relatively high pressure drop of a rather low absolute value, and since the flow is relatively constant, when the workpiece is mounted vertically above the electrode, the elec-trolyte will fall vertically downward upon issuing from the gap. This prevents unwanted attack of the portions of the workpiece away from the working surface, such as -the part 13 without requiring the necessity of masking. It is also found, probably due to the same effects, that there is comparatively little erosion at the edge ~0 of the workpiece, com-pared to that which is found in conventional ECM,whether electrolyte is flowing through the electrode or across the gap from an external supply. Notwith-standing the foregoing, in the best practice of the invention lacquer or other impermeable membrane is applied to the surface 13 as a matter of prudence.
The following more particular descriptions exemplify the practice of the invention when ~2~

machining an abrasive. The abrasive is comprised of about 30-~5 volume percent alumlna coated silicon carbide particulate sized between 0.2-0.6 mm, preferably between 35-45 U.S. sieve series size (0.495-0.351 mm opening) in a matrix of nickel or cobalt superalloy, preferably an alloy of ~.S. Pa-tent 4,152,488 to Shilke et al. The abrasive is made by hot pressing or plasma spraying processes. The par-ticulate is coated with a nonconductive oxide such as alumina and therefore the ceramic is not conductive of electricity a-t -the voltages used in ECM. From 0.05-Q.20 mm of matrix ordinarily must be removed to expose the particulate and enhance the abrasive properties.
The electrode is comprised of 20-100 micron AISI 316 steel filter element material, such as may be obtained from Mott Metallurgical Corp., Farmington, Connec-ticut, USA. The micron designation is a measure of the permeability and refers to the minimum particle which is captured from a fluid stream by the material.
A sheet of the sintered stainless steel powder material is welded to an electrode body made of compatible material The thickness of -the powder metal closure is chosen according to structural needs and preferably is relatively thin; a 2.3 mm thick piece has been found satisfactory. The working face of the electrode is shaped according to the con-tour of the workpeice (or that which is desired if the contour is to be changed).

The electrode circumferential dimensions preferably fit the workpiece as shown in Figure 5, but may be larger or smaller. The electrode is fixedly positioned with respect to the work-piece so the gap G is 0.05-0.5 mm, preferably 0.25-0.38 mm. The electrolyte may be selected from those known in the art. Preferably it is comprised of 0.4 kg/l sodium nitrate in water with caustic soda or nitric acid added as needed to obtain a pH of 7-3. A specific gravity of 1.23-1.25 at 38C is maintained during operation by adding water or sodium nitrate. The electro-lyte is pressurized to at least 2.5 kPa, as needed to obtain a flow rate of at least 3 ml/sec/cm2 through the electrode working face. Higher pressures are needed with finer pore size elec-trodes. For a 100 micron electrode material the preferred flow rate of 6.5 ml/sec/cm is obtained with an upstream pressure of about 5 kPa. The electrolyte is filtered, preferably with a 0.45 micron absolute membrane final filter (such as a Type 12571 Fil-ter, from Gelman Sciences Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan) to avoid particulates which may cumulatively plug the electrode during use.
A constant voltage power supply is connected across the gap. For the above-mentioned pre-ferred material and parameters, a voltage of 10.5 v will be applied, producing an initial current of about 11 a/cm2, decreasing to about 9 a/cm2 as matrix is removed and the effective gap widens from the starting point of 0.38 mm to the final 0.51 mm. Different voltages and current densities may be used to vary the rate of removal. However, ~ 2~

the current density is desirably maintained in the generally low range indicated, so that the exiting electrolyte temperature does not heat to greater than about 50-60C.
With respect to the foregoing ranges, limited experiments have been run. As electrocles, filter element materials having nominal ratings of 0.5,

2, 10, 20, 40 and 100 microns were tested and found usable. However, those less than 20 microns are more prone to eventual plugging and are to be avoided. About 35-50~ of the working face area of an electrode made of the preferred 20-100 micron material is the electrolyte passage exit area, based on the typical porosity of the powder metal material. The passages tend to be larger in nominal diameter than the nominal micron rating.
Thus a 100 micron material may have passage exits of varying dimension, from very small to up to ~~
microns. However, as indicated in connection with the Table below, the tortuous flow path through the powder metal closure provides a pressure drop substantially greater than the apparent porosity would suggest. The upper size limit of usable electrode closure was not determined but if the ~5 passages become too big then irregular surface finishes will eventually be obtained, as are obtained with electrodes having a single large central port. In the present invention the ceramic particulates are nominally 350-500 micron diameter and thus the preferred electrode nominal passage si~e is equal or less than the particulate size.
This means not only that there will be even dis-charge of electrolyte, but that there will be no significant areas, on the scale of the particulate, whe~ there will be an absence of con~uctlve electrode material due to the presence of an elec-trode passage opening on the working face. In summary, -the multi-plicity of passages smaller than the size of -the par-ticulate ensures even distribution of electrolyte and even distribution of electrical current.
While a porous sintered powder metal is easiest to fabricate, the closure in my invention can be made by other means, such as by drilling a multiplicity of very small holes -through the surface oE a solid piece of metal. In such an instance, the diameter and spacing of the holes would approximate the surface charac-ter-istics of the powder metal which we described above. Of course the electrode may be made of other materials, such as copper, brass, and the like, as are known to be useful in ECM electrodes.
Elec-troly-te flow through the electrode working face can ordinarily be affected by the size of the gap during machining. In the invention, the gap is great enough to ensure that the predominant pressure drop is through the elec-trode and not in the gap. Thus in the exemplary case of -the 100 micron electrode, the gap should not be less than 0.05 mm and desirably is 0.3~
mm. Table 1 shows data illustrative of standard sodium nitrate electrolyte flow behavior for an electrode which was airfoil shaped the same as the workpeice. The cross-sectional area of the electrode working face was about ~.5 cm2 and the peripheral length . ~.

Table 1 Electrolyte flow Path Pressure Drop For Different Gaps At Constant Flow Rate Gap Total ~PElectrode ~PGap ~P
(mm) (kPa)(kPa) _ (kPa) ~ 5 5 -0.38 5.5 5 0.5 0.13 6.2 5 0.7 0.~5 7.5 5 2.5 was about 120 mm, meaning tha-t for a 0.38 mm gap -the pelipll~dl disc}ldrge area was a~out ~.45 mm~, sub-stantially less than the working face area.
The electrolyte flow was constant at 0.65 ml/s/cm2 and tnus the pressure drop (~P) across the electrode working face (or closure) was constant a-t the value measured when no workpiece was present (~ = 0 in the Table). It is seen tha-t the electrode pressure drop is always more than two times -the gap pressure drop, even for the very small 0.05 mm gap~ Thus, flow is relatively insensitive to gap within the overall, and especially, the preferred opelating range. The preferred starting gap is relatively large at about 0.3 mm when machining the abrasive because with larger gaps there is less sensitivity in current density (and thus material removal) due to planar misalignment of the electrode face wi-th the workpiece face. If the gap becomes too large, substantially greater than 0.5 mm, then the surface velocities of electrolyte character-istic of ECM will not be obtained. Stagnation, hea-ting, and even boiling at the workpiece surface may be encountered. The process will be conver-ted into one characterizable as electropolishing and current densities will necessarily be lowered, beneath those of about 3 a/cm characteristic of ECM. Generally, I have found that when the gap is smaller than abou-t 0.3-0.4 mm or if there is insufficient flow of electrolyte, there will be a tendency for undercutting of the particulate and uneven removal. That is, there is pre-ferential remova:L o~ material proximate the grains. I attribute these results to the peculiar electrical character of the ceramic-metal material. Additionally, while on a macro-scale the particulate is uniformly distributed in the matrix, on a micro-scale there are regions between small agglomerations of particulates where stagnation of electroly-te -takes place, as can be seen in Figure 6.
In the invention, the even distribution of electrolyte obtained by -the great many closely spaced orifices of the e]ectrode permits the use of unusually low flows. These enable low resultant exi-t velocities from the gap, which combined wi-th the orientation of electrode and workpiece, prevent the electrolyte from rlowing around the workpiece and causing unwanted, extraneous attack.
As described, the inventive electrode is use-ful for removing material uniformly from any surface.
Thus, if uniform bottomed blind holes are desired, an electrode can be accordingly shaped and plunged in-to a workpiece. For various reasons, it may be desirable to use the more conventional type of electrode having a large hollow internal passage which discharges fluid at a high velocity and flow rate, compared to tha-t which is possible with -the powder metal cap. Using this, a blind hole which has a small raised por-tion in the center will be created. To eliminate -the protuberance and provide ~a flat bottom hole, the first electrode is removed wh~n the desired depth is virtually achieved. Then, an electrode according to the invention is placed into the hole. This second electrode will have a shape similar to the first electrode, or a shape which is smaller but sufficient to encom-pass the area where the raised protuberance is.
Then, ECM will be conducted to remove the pro-tuberance and smooth the bottom of the hole.
Thus, the advantages of high production using conventional electrodes are achieved while obtaining a more uniform shaped cavity than heretofore possible.
Al-though this inven-tion has been shown and described with respect to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in this art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.

Claims (7)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:-

1. An electrode, having a tip, for electro-chemical machining comprised of a conductive body having an interior portion shaped for conveying electrolyte to the tip of the electrode and a porous conductive closure covering the tip of the electrode, the closure allowing electrolyte to flow from the interior portion to the exterior portion of the electrode, the porous closure having a plurality of through holes of less than 400 micrometer exit diameter and the cross-sectional flow area of the hole exits at the exterior surface of the closure being less than 50 percent of the cross-sectional area of the closure.

2. The electrode of claim 1 characterized by a sintered powder metal closure.

3. The electrode of claim 1 characterized by a powder metal closure having a filtration rating of 20-100 micrometers.

4. The electrode of claim 1 characterized by a closure having a flow rate in the range of 3-8 ml/sec/cm2 when the pressure drop across the closure is in the range of 2.5-7.5 kPa.

5. An electrode, having a tip, for electro-chemical machining comprised of a conductive body having an interior portion for conveying electrolyte to the tip of the electrode and a porous conductive working face area covering the tip, the working face area consisting of porous powder metal having a porosity of 35-50 percent.

6. The process of electrochemically machining a workpiece to remove material uniformly therefrom, wherein an electrode has a working face spaced apart by a gap from the workpiece surface and wherein electrolyte is flowed under pressure through the electrode working face and then through the gap characterized by an electrode working face made of a porous powder metal filter element material having a filtration rating in the range of 20-100x10-6 m and by the electrolyte flowing through said working face the pressure drop of the electrolyte through the portion of the electrode which comprises the working face being greater than the pressure drop of the electrolyte within the gap.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the electrolyte is provided to the upstream side of the electrode working face at a pressure of 2.5-7.5 kPa.