CA1320028C

CA1320028C - Reduction of carboxyl end groups in polyester with lactim ethers

Info

Publication number: CA1320028C
Application number: CA000592134A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Yousef Mohajer; Robert Sanderson Cooke; Stanley David Lazarus
Original assignee: AlliedSignal Inc
Current assignee: Performance Fibers Inc
Priority date: 1988-02-29
Filing date: 1989-02-27
Publication date: 1993-07-13
Anticipated expiration: 2010-07-13
Also published as: KR960005966B1; DE3872885T2; ES2010073A6; WO1989008160A1; CN1035534A; EP0395726A1; JP2714463B2; CN1029999C; JPH03504398A; EP0395726B1; US4839124A; TR24388A; DE3872885D1; AU2937589A; BR8807891A; AU611996B2; KR900700667A

Abstract

REDUCTION OF CARBOXYL END GROUPS IN POLYESTER
WITH LACTIM ETHERS
ABSTRACT OF THE INVENTION
An improved process for controlling and reducing the concentration of free carboxyl end groups in condensation polyester melt spun fiber is provided. By selection of a multifunctional compound, it is possible to increase the intrinsic viscosity of the fiber. The process comprises admixing and reacting with molten polyester polymer an effective amount of a lactim compound of the formula wherein n is an integer of 2 to 15;
m is an integer of 1 to 4;
R1 and R2 are independently hydrogen, halogen, nitro, amine, C1-C10 alkyl, C5-C12 cycloalkyl, C7-C9 alkyl aromatic, or C6-C10 aromatic; and R3 is a mono- to tetravalent organic radical selected from the group consisting of C1-C32 alkyl, C5-C14 cycloalkyl, C7-C16 alkyl aromatic, and C6-C14 aromatic.
The lactim reacted polymer is then melt spun to form a fiber.

Description

132~28 R~DUCTION OF CARBO~YL END GROUPS IN POLYESTER
WITH LAclrIM ETH~RS
-- BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to the preparation of synthetic polyester filaments, yarns, and cords useful as industrial fibers which show improved strength retention when exposed to hydrolytic conditions or when sealed in a rubber and exposed to elevated temperatures. More particularly, the invention relates to a process whereby the free carboxyl end group concentration of synthetic polyesters may be reduced to a low level while producing yarns having good tensile properties.

2. Description of Related Art . . _ . _ . .
Terephthalate polyesters such as those disclosed by U.S. Patent 2,465,319 are produced in significant quantities for a variety of commercial products.
Polyethylene terephthalate, one of the better known tere-phthalate polyesters, is a reaction product o~ terephtha-lic acid and ethylene glycol and is produced having a high degree of polymerization forming long linear polymer chains which normally terminate with either a carboxyl end group or a hydroxyl end group. The melt-spinning of high molecular weight polyethylene ter~ephthalate has been successfully employed to produce fibers possessing properties suitable for use in rein~orcing rubber articles including pneumatic tires.
In U.S. Patent 3,051,212 to Daniels, it is disclosed that when rubber articles such as tires, belting, and the li~e are reinforced with fibers or cords comprising synthetic linear polyester, these fibers or cords show superior strength retention during exposure to high operating temperatures when the free carboxyl end group concentration of the polyester which comprises the cords is reduced to less than 15 milliequivalents per kilogram (meq/kg). It has also been observed that there appears to be a correlation between the resistance of linear polyes-ters o~ a given carboxyl end group -" ~ 3 ~ 8 concentration to high running temperatures in rubber and their resistance to hydrolytic conditions which may be encountered within hot rubber structures.
When structures haviny polyester reinforcing filaments with high carboxyl group concentration are exposed to high operating temperatures under hydrolytic conditions, excessive loss of strength is observed. This strength loss is particularly evident with polyester filaments used as reinforcing cords or ~abrics in pneumatic tires which normally are expected to operate in a safe manner at high temperatures caused by high speeds and heavy loads.
Thus, low free carboxyl end group concentrations for polyester are highly desirable because it is believed to reduce degradation of the fiber. U.S. Patent 4,016,142 to Alexander et al. discloses reducing the free carboxyl end groups by modifying the polyester with small amounts of a glycidyl ether which react with the carboxyl end groups present to form free hydroxy end groups. U.S.
Patent 4,442,058 to Griffith et al. discloses a method of reducing the number of free carboxyl end groups whereby minor amounts of a low-boiling oxirane compound such as ethylene oxide are addad. U.S. Patent 4,543,396 to Arai et al. discloses reaction of a bisoxazoline compound with the free carboxyl end groups.
It is the object o.this invention to provide an improved process for controlling and reducing the concentration of free carboxyl end groups in synthetic linear polyesters. A further object of this invention is to provide a process whereby a modified synthetic condensation polyester polymer of increased molecular weight may be obtained. ~et a further object of this invention is to provide a technique for producing high strength fibers, and provide for drawn yarn having high tensile properties.
As used herein synthetic polyesters mean film-forming or fiber-forming condensation products of dicarboxylic acids such as terephthalic acid and glycols .

~ 3 2 ~

of the series HO(CH2)nO~1 w~ere n is an integer from 2 to 10. An important example of this class of polyesters is polyethylene terephthalate which may be prepared by a number of well known processes. For use as reinforcing elements in rubber structures, melt-spun filaments of polyethylene terephthalate are drawn to about 3.5 to about 7.0 times their length after melt spinning, twisted into yarns and plied into cords or woven into fabrics. The cords or fabrics are then treated with adhesive and bonded against or into the rubber structures.
Synthetic linear polyester yarns or cords made by known means can be shown to contain a free carboxyl end group concentration of about 20 or more milliequivalents per kiloyram (meq/kg). By "free carboxyl end groups" are meant the acid group, o -C-OH, the concentration o~ which may be determined by Pohl's Method as described in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 26, page 1614, October, 1954. The formation of such free carboxyl end groups, referred to hereinafter as "COOH", results as a natural consequence of the processes normally employed in the production of linear polyester polymers.
Known synthetic linear polyester yarns or cords for use as rubber structure reinforcing elements are preferably made from a polymer having an intrinsic viscosity of from 0.75 to 1.0 g/dl or higher. Whereas synthetic linear polyester ~ilaments used in textile products normally have an intrinsic viscosity of the poly-rner o~ from 0.35 to 0.66 g/dl, these filaments are less suitable as rubber reinforcing elements since they are comparatively weak at a given extension level and fatigue -to rupture with relatively little flexing. Filaments made from higher intrinsic viscosity synthetic linear polyester are stronger and less susceptible to such flexing fatigue.
It has been found, however, that in the production of a polymer of a high intrinsic viscosity by the normal method o:E extending the polymerization period, an increase in 3 2 ~

free carboxyl group concentration results. Thus, while a high intrinsic viscosity polymer may be produced to overcome the problem of filament strength and flexing fatigue, at the same time the added carboxyl end c3roup content results in an increase in the amount of strength lost when the filaments are exposed to high temperatures under hydrolytic conditions in rubber.
The carboxyl concentration is determined by dissolving the polyester in a 70/30 o-cresol/chloroform mixture and titrating the solution with 0.05N KOH in methanol. The end point is determined potentiometrically.
By the phrase "intrinsic viscosity", sometimes denominated IV, it is meant to describe the reduced viscosity of the polymer at zero concentration, which may be de-termined by measuring the flow times of a polymer solution after successive dilutions with fresh solvent, calculating the reduced viscosities, and extrapolating a plot of the reduced viscoslties against concentration to zero concentration. The reduced viscosity is obtained from the expression:
rFlow time of polymer solution L Flow time of solvent ~ x c where c is the concentration expressed as grams of polymer per 100 milliliter of solvent (g/dl). As used herein, the in-trinsic viscosity was measured at 25C, using a 60/40 mixture o~ phenol and tetrachloroethane as a solvent in a modified Ostwald viscometer.
SUMMARY OF T~IE INVENTION
This invention provides an improved process for controlling and reducing the concentration of Eree carboxyl end groups in 'inear condensation polyester melt spun fiber. In addition, by selection of a multifunctional compound within the invention, lt is possible to increase the intxinsic viscosity of the fiber.
The process comprises admixing and reacting with molten polyethylene terephthalate polymer an effective amount of a l~ctim compound of the formula 32~2g Rl N
(CH2)n 11 ~ C - O - - R3 _R2 m wherein n is an integer of 2 to 15;
m is an integer of l to 4;
Rl and R2 are independently hydrogen, halogen, nitro, amine, Cl-Clo alkyl, C5-C12 cycloalkyl~
C7-Cg alkyl arolnatic, or C6-Clo aromatic; and R3 is a mono- to tetravalent organic radical selected from the group consisting of Cl-C32 alkyl, Cs-Cl4 cycloalkyl, C7-Cl6 alkyl aromatic, and C6-C14 aromatic.
The lactim reacted polymer is then melt spun to form a fiber.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFE RED EMBODIMENT
The process of the invention pertains to melt spinning high molec~llar weight po.Lyester polymer to produce fibers with reduced carboxyl end group concentratlon. The~molten polyester polymer is admixed and reacted with an effective amount of a lactim compound of the formula (CH2)n li ~ C ~ ~ R3 m ` 5 wherein n is an integer of 2 to 15;
m is an integer of 1 to 4;

` 132~2~

Rl and R2 are independently hydrogen, halogen, nitro, amine, Cl-C10 alkyl, Cs-C12 cycloalkyl, C7-Cg alkyl aromatic, or C6-Clo arornatic; and R3 is a mono- to tetravalent organic radical selected from the group consisting of Cl-C32 alkyl, Cs-C14 cycloalkyl, C7-C16 alkyl aromatic, and C6-C14 aromatic.
The reacted molten polymer is forced under pressure to a spinneret and extrucled into a zone of lower pressure and temperature to form a fiber.
Preferably, R3 is selected from the group consistiny of Cl-C32 alkyl, Cs-C14 cycloalkyl, and C7-C16 alkyl aromatic. Most preferably, R3 is Cl-C32 alkyl.
~he lactim compounds used in this invention can be made according to the method disclosed in West German Offenlegungsschrift 1,912,739 published October 1, 1970, Krimm et al. inventors.
As demonstrated below in the examples, the lactim compound reacts readily with molten polyethylene terephthalate polymer, with demonstrated advantages within as little as one rninute reaction time. It would thus be advantageous to the process to extrude -the molten polymer into fiber within a reasonable period after admixing with 2S the lactim compound to minimize any thermal degradation that may ~esult. The lactims are ad~ed in a sufficient amount to obtain desired results. A pre~erred range is 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent based on weight of the polymer, more preferably 0.1 to 200 weight percent, most preferably 0.1 to 1.0 weight percent.
The lactims are best described in reference to the general ~ormula glven above and by giving examples of materials used in their synthesis. Above, (n+l) d~enotes the size of the parent lac-tam used in the syn-thesis of the lactim. Suitable lactams include 4-butyrolactam (n+l=4), 5-valerolactam (n+l=5), 6-caprolactam (n~l=6), 8-capryllactam (n+l=8), and 12-laurolactam (n+l=12~.

~2~

The reactivity of -the lactim compound with molten PET polymer can be modified by substitution oE
hydrogens in the parent lactam by appropriate groups such as halogen, nitro, amine, alkoxy, or aromatics. Thus in the general formula provided above Rl and R2 are intended to represent substitution for the hydrogens in the ring methylene groups (CH2)n. Examples of such lactams are 3,3-dimethyl-3-propiolactam, -chloro-caprolactam, -nitro-caprolactam, a through ~-phenyl caprolactams.
One may also use bislactams in -the synthesis of the lactim compound. Examples include ~, ~'-bis-caprolactam and methylene-bis-caprolactam.
In the general Eormula above, R can be an aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, alkyl aromatic or an aromatic radical and is derived from the hydroxy compound used in the syntheis of the lactim. Monofunctional alcohols produce monolactims (m=l), bisfunctional alcohols result in bislactims (m=2), trifunctional alcohols give trislactims (m=3), and -tetrafunctional alcohols producing tetrafunctional lactims. Use of heteroatoms in the structure of R is permitted. Examples of monofunctional alcohols include rnethanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol, decanol, stearyl alcohol, allyl alcohol, 2-chloroethanol, tribromoethanol, cyclohexanol, and benæyl alcohol. Examples of bis~unctional alcohols include ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, butylene glycol, neopentyl glycol, hexanediol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, 2,2'-dihydroxydiethyl sulfide, and dihydroxycyclohexane. Examples of trifunctional alcohols include glycerin, o,o~,O~-trishydroxyethyl pyrogallol, and triethanol amine. Examples of tetrafunctional alcohols include tetrahydroxyet}lyl ethylenediamine and tetrahydroxyethyl-p-phenylenediamine.
A selected alcohol is reacted with a selected lactam in a known manner such as that described in Offenlegunysschrift 1,912,739 to obtain the lactim compound utilized in this invention.

2 ~

Some specific examples of lactim ether compounds usefu] in the invention include:
~ 0-methylcaprolactim (R is -CH3, m=l, n=5), 0-ethylcaprolactim tR is -CH2C~3, m=l, n=5), O,0'-butylene bis-caprolactim (R is -CH2-CH2-CH2-CH2-, m=2, n=5), 0,0'-triethylene glycol bis-caprolactim (R is -cH2-cH2-o-cH2-cH2-o-cH2-cH2-~ m=2, n=5), and 0,0'-diethylene glycol bis-caprolactim (R is -C112-CH2-0-C~2-CH2-, m=2, n=5).
In the practice of this invention the lactim compound is permitted to react with the molten PET
polymer. The lactim compound can be added directly to molten polymer or, alternatively, can be mixed with polymer chips prior to melting.
The lactim compound reacts with a carboxyl end group of PET to form an ester linkage of R with the polymer chain, with a lactam formed as a reaction byproduct. The lactim reacts with water to form an alcohol and a lactam. Thus it is thought tha-t the reaction byproducts or products of hydrolysis fo~ the lactim compound are innocuous materials such as lactams, alcohols, glycols, or the like. This provides important environmental advantages regarding saEety and handling.
It will be appreciated -that a monofunctional lactim compound (m=l) will serve to end cap a carboxyl end group, thus reducing such end group concentraton.
However, by selecting a multifunctional lactim compound ~m-2, 3 or 4), it becomes addi-tionally possible to 3~ increase~intrinsic viscosity by chain extension. ~y selection of trifunctional or tetrafunctional lac-tim compounds and by control of reaction conditions it becomes possible to promote chain extension or to promo-te branching of the linear PET polymer.
EXAMPLE _ In this experiment monofunctional caprolactims are blended with molten polyester in a Brabender plasto-graph at a certain temperature. Samples are removed after .

" ~L32~2~
g a given reaction time and the changes in IV and free carboxyl end group concentration (CO0~1) are measured. The polyethylene terephthala-te (PET) polymer used in this experiment had an original IV of 0.95 g/dl and carboxyl content of 18 meq/kg. It was dried by a standard procedure (6 hours at 120C and 18 hours at 160C, all under vacuum) and was immediately stored under dry nitrogen until use. The plastograph was turned on and allowed to reach the desired temperature (280C in this case). Fifty (50) grams of dried PET chips were poured into the plastograph at 30 rpm as rapidly as possible and were allowed to melt for two minutes. A preweighed quantity of the additives (0.25 gram in this example) was put on the molten PET and was allowed to react with the polymer for a given time (2 minutes) after which the sample was removed rapidly and quenched in an ice water bath. The IV and carboxyl content of the samples were analyzed as described previously. For control PET, no additive was used, but after allowing the polymer to melt for 2 minutes, the polymer was allowed to remain in the plastograph for the same amount of time (2 minutes in this case) as the samples containing the additives before it was removed and quenched. The data is given below in Table l.
Comparing the COOH results, it is apparent that the additives examine~ have been beneficial for reduction of the carboxyl as compared to the control which did not contain any additive~ The 0-methyl caprolactim results in carboxyl reduction of ~ me~/kg as compared to the control and 0-ethyl caprolactim produces 12 meq/kg reduction under this given set of conditions. Thus caprolactim ethers are good carboxyl scavengers and moreover the reactivity of the scavenger appears to be dependent on the nature of the R group attached to lactim moieties. It is important to realize that under -the experimental conditions the carboxyl content of the control polymer relative to that of the original chip may increase ~Run l and 3) due to thermal degradation and hydroly~sis. I~e wiLl there-Eore :l 3,~
--~.o--focus our attention in the forthcoming examples to the relative change of carboxyl ( ~COOH = COOHControl -CHsarnple) or change of IV (~ IV = IVcontrol IVsample) and not their absolute values.
Another i.mportant point -to consider is the calculated percent efficiency which is based on observecl ratio of molar changes of carboxyl content to -the moles o additive used as defined below.
% Efficiency = Decrease in No. equivalence COOH x 100 No. equivalence of additive used Rearranging we obtain Efficiency = - ~ COOH x MWadditiVe % wt of additive x m x 100 where ~ COOH is defined as above and units are meq/k~;
MWadditive is the molecular weight of the additive;
~ wt of additive is wei~ht oE additive per 100 g polyester;
m is the functionality of lactim additive as defined previously and for example -m = 1 for monofunctional m = 2 for bifunctional m = 3 for trifunctional m = ~ for tetrafunctional.
As seen in Table l the efficiencies are not 100 percent under this experimental condi-tion and could therefore potentially be improved either by Tnodification of the chemical structure (Rl, R2 and/or R3), or reactlon conditions or addi-~ion of catalyst such as potassium iodide. As expected neither O-methyl or O-ethyl caprolactim result in increase of IV because both of the additives are monofunctional~

32~2~
TABLE l Changes ln Intrinsic Viscosity and Carboxyl - Content for PET After Reaction with Additives in Brabender Plastograph 5IV COOEI ~ IV ~ COOH
Run Additive g/dl meq/kg _g/dl meq/kg E~ficienc~
1 None, Control 0.82 23 - - -2 O-Methyl 0.80 21 -0.02 -2 5.1 Caprolactim 3 O-Ethyl 0.7~ ll -0.03 -12 33.g Caprolactim The original PET polymer had IV of 0.95 g/dl and carboxyl content of 18 meq/kg. The reaction temperature was 280C
and reaction time was 2 minutes. The additive loading was 0.5 percent by weight in all cases except zero for the control.

This experiment describes the extent of reaction of a monofunctioinal caprolactim (O-ethyl caprolactim~ as a function of reaction time. The experimental procedure is the same as those described in Example l, except that instead of removing one sample at the predetermined time, samples were removed from the same reaction mixture at stated intervals. Thus the first sample was removed after l minute of reaction time, sample 2 after 2 minutes, sample 3 after 4 minutes and sample 4 after 6 minutes.
A11 the samples were quenched immediately in ice/water bath and analyzed later. As described in Example l a control sample was run along with this experiment and the samples were removed af-ter 1, 2, 4, and 6 minutes. The data is presented in Table 2. The reduction of carboxyl occurs gradually reaching the ~ull value at about 4 minutes of reaction at 290C. At 6 minutes, the carboxyl value has gone up slightly probably due to thermal degradation. As an-ticipated this monofunctional capro-lactim does not help build up of the molecular ~eight and indeed as compared to the control it results in some re-duction as reflected in the negative change of IV (- ~IV).

-12- ~ 32~8 Reaction of P~T with O-Ethyl Caprolactim - at 290C in Brabender Rheometer as a Function of Time 5Reaction ~IV ~COOH %
Additive Time, ming/dl meq/kg Efficiency O-Ethyl caprolactim 1-0.026 -4.5 12.7 2-0.015 -4.6 13.0 40.032 -8.6 24.3 6-0.020 -7.7 21.7 The Rheometer is operated at 30 rpm and the additive load is 0.5 percent by weight.
EXAMPL~ 3 In this example we examine the ex-ten-t of reac-tion of a bifunc-tional caprolactim (O,O'-butylene bis-caprolactim) as a func-tion of -time at 290C in a Brabender Rheometer. The experimental details are the same described in Example 2. The data is summarized in Table 3. The rate and extent of carboxyl reduction appear to be higher wi-th this bifunctional additive as compared to the monofunctional additive O-ethyl caprolactim. ~ithin one minute the carboxyl was reduced by about 22 meq/kg and remained at a highly reduced level -through the entire course of the reaction. Contrary to -the monofunctional caprolactims, -the bislactims, as expec-ted, tie -the carboxyl end of the polyester and result in increase in molecular weight of the polymer. This is re1ected in -the positive ~ IV. The build up of the molecular weight occurs more gradually (as compared to rapid reduction o COOH) over the 6-minute period and perhaps a higher + ~IV
would result with additional reaction time Thus the bifunctional caprolactim not only reduces carboxyl conten-t, but also builds up molecular weight and therefore should improve the s-trength of yarn produced from the polymer.

-13- ~ 3~28 Reaction of PET with O,O'-Butylene bis-Caprolactim - at 290C in a Brabender Rheometer as a Function of Time %

Carboxyl Reaction ~IV ~COOH Scavenging Additive Time, min g/dl me~/kg Efficiency O,O'-Butylene bis- 1 +0.0~1 -21.6 60.6 Caprolactim 2 ~0.084 -~0.5 57.5 4 -~.115 -20.3 56.9 6 +0.12~3 -20.5 57.5 The Rheometer is operated at 30 rpm and the additive level is 0O5 percent by weigh-t.
EXAMPL~ 4 In this example we describe the reaction rate of another bifunctional caprolactim (0,0'-triethylene glycol bis-caprolactim) using the same procedure described in Example 2. We show that this bifunctional caprolactim is also capable of producing an increase in molecular weight of polymer while decreasing carboxyl content. What becomes apparent from comparison of this example to that described in Example 3 is that the reactivity o~ a bifunctional group is also greatly affected by t~le nature of the R group attaching the lactim moieties. Thus by varia-~ion of the nature o R gxoup one may increase or decrease the reactivity of -the lactims.
In this example 0,0'-triethylene glycol bis-caprolactim, which is a bifunctional caprolac-tim, is used as additive for modification of carboxyl content and IV of PET. Within a one minute reaction time the carboxyl content is reduced by 15 meq/kg and remains relatively constant during the en-tire experiment. Initially the additive does not cause a build up of molecular weight, indeed causing a slight reduction. But the molecular weight is increased gradually over the 6 minutes. The chain extendability and carboxyl reducing capability of this additive is not as good as that observed by 0,0'-butylene bis-caprolactim ether in example 3~ Therefore although both of these ': ~

~3~2~

bifunctional caprolactims have the same reacting moieties at the end of the molecules, but because of the nature of ~ the R group i.e.

vs --(CH2)2--0-(CH2)2--0--(CH2)2--the reactivities of these two bifunc-tional caprolactims differ.
This becomes evident comparing carboxyl scavenging of several caprolactims (see Table 5~ under similar experimental conditions. It is apparent that the nature of the R group greatly affects reactivity o~ the caprolactims.

Reaction of PET with 0,0'-Triethylene Glcyol bis-Caprolactim at 290C in a Brabender Rheometer as a Function of Time _ % Carboxyl Reacti.on ~IV ~COOH Scavenging 20_ Additive Time, min _g/dl meq/kg Efficiency O,O'-Triethylene- 1 -0.01~ -14.9 50.7 Glycol-bis- 2 +0.005 -14.4 49.0 Caprolactim 4 +t).054 -14.6 49.7 6 +().07~ -12.9 ~3.9 Reaction temperature was 290C, the rheumeter was operated at 30 rpm.

A Comparison of Carboxyl Scavenging Efficiency o-f Several Caprolactims .. . _ . . ... .. . .
% Carboxyl Scavenging Efficiency O-~1ethyl Caprolactim 5-6 O-Ethyl Caprolactim 25-30 35 O,O'-Butylene bis-Caprolactim 40-60 O,O'-Triethylene Glycol bis-Caprolactim 30-50 Reaction carried on in a Brabender Rheometer at 280C, 0.5% by ~eight loading at 30 rpm.

~3~Q2~

In this experiment a bifunctional caprolactim ~ (O,O'-butylene bis-caprolactim) was melted and injected into a PET melt in the amounts given in Table 6. The PET
melt was passed through static mixers, then spun into yarn. In the -table -the IV and COOH (absolute values) of the yarn samples with additive are compared to a control yarn with no caprolactim additive. The physical properties of the yarns with additive were equal or better than those of the control.

IV COOH
Additive,%_ g/dl meq/kg 0 (Control) 0.868 24.6 0.14 0.87920.0 0.27 0.89614.2 : . ' .

Claims

1. A method of melt spinning high molecular weight polyester polymer to produce fibers with reduced carboxyl end group concentration comprising admixing and reacting with molten polyester polymer an effective amount of at least one lactim compound of the formula wherein n is an integer of 2 to 15;
m is an integer of 1 to 4;
R1 and R2 are independently hydrogen, halogen, nitro, amine, C1-C10 alkyl, C5-C12 cycloalkyl, C7-C9 alkyl aromatic, or C6-C10 aromatic; and R3 is a mono- to tetravalent organic radical selected from the group consisting of C1-C32 alkyl, C5-C14 cycloalkyl, C7-C16 alkyl aromatic, and C6-C14 aromatic forcing the reacted molten polymer under pressure to a spinneret;
and extruding the lactim reacted polymer into a zone of lower pressure and temperature to form a fiber.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein R1 and R2 are each hydrogen.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein R3 is selected from the group consisting of C1-C32 alkyl, C5-C14 cycloalkyl, and C7-C16 alkyl aromatic.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent based on weight of the polymer of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

5. The method of claim 3 wherein R3 is C1-C32 alkyl.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent based on weight of the polymer of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein 0.1 to 2.0 weight percent of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein 0.1 to 1.0 weight percent of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein said lactim is selected from the group consisting of 0-methyl caprolactim;
0-ethyl caprolactim;
0,0'-butylene bis-caprolactim;
0,0'-triethylene glycol bis-caprolactim; and 0,0'-diethylene glycol bis-caprolactim.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein at least a portion of said lactim compound comprises a lactim compound of said formula wherein m is an integer of 2 to 4 and R3 is a bis- to tetravalent radical in an amount sufficient to produce fibers with increased intrinsic viscosity.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein R1 and R2 are each hydrogen.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein R3 is selected from the group consisting of C1-C32 alkyl, C5-C14 cycloalkyl, and C7-C16 alkyl aromatic.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent based on weight of the polymer o-f said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein 0.1 to 2.0 weight percent of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein 0.1 to 1.0 weight percent of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

16. The method of claim 12 wherein R3 is C1-C32 alkyl.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent based on weight of the polymer of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein 0.1 to 2.0 weight percent of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein 0.1 to 1.0 weight percent of said lactim compound is admixed with said polymer.