CA2061829C - Threshold time dependent logic system for assigning elevator cars - Google Patents
Threshold time dependent logic system for assigning elevator carsInfo
- Publication number
- CA2061829C CA2061829C CA002061829A CA2061829A CA2061829C CA 2061829 C CA2061829 C CA 2061829C CA 002061829 A CA002061829 A CA 002061829A CA 2061829 A CA2061829 A CA 2061829A CA 2061829 C CA2061829 C CA 2061829C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- elevator car
- time
- threshold time
- value
- threshold
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/02—Control systems without regulation, i.e. without retroactive action
- B66B1/06—Control systems without regulation, i.e. without retroactive action electric
- B66B1/14—Control systems without regulation, i.e. without retroactive action electric with devices, e.g. push-buttons, for indirect control of movements
- B66B1/18—Control systems without regulation, i.e. without retroactive action electric with devices, e.g. push-buttons, for indirect control of movements with means for storing pulses controlling the movements of several cars or cages
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Elevator Control (AREA)
- Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention is directed to notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a threshold time value before elevator car arrival. In the preferred embodiment, an elevator car is assigned to a floor in response to a hall call. The amount of time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor is determined and compared with the threshold time value. If the arrival time is greater than the threshold time value, the system reexamines assignment, possibly reassigning a different elevator car to respond to the hall call. The arrival time of the assigned (or newly assigned) elevator car is again determined, and this process continues until the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value. When the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value, the hall lantern at the door of the assigned elevator car is energized, e.g., illuminated and/or sounded. Additionally, the hall call is removed from further consideration regarding reassignment to another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car assignment In the preferred embodiment the threshold time value can be a constant value determined by, e.g., the building manager.
Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system, e.g., based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.
Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system, e.g., based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.
Description
2061 82~
THRESHOLD TIME DEPENDENT LOGIC SYSTEM FOR
ASSIGNING ELEVATOR CARS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Techni~-~l Field The present invention is directed to notifying a user of an arriving elevator car.
More particularly, the present invention is directed to notifying a user as to which elevator car will be responding to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives.
As used herein, notifying a user means energizing, e.g., sounding and/or illuminating, a hall lantern located at or near the elevator car which will be responding to the llall call, thereby indicating to the user which elevator car will be arriving.
BackgTound Information In a building having a plurality of floors, each floor typically has a set of buttons located in the hallway at or near the elevators. These buttons, commonly referred to as hall call buttons, enable users to request elevator car service in a predetermined direction, i.e., up and/or down. Additionally, the interior of an elevator car is generally equipped Wit}l a plurality of buttons, cornmonly referred to as car call buttons, which enable users to request service to specific floors.
In simplified terms, an elevator control system, also referred to in the art as an 2 o elevator dispatching system, monitors the status of the hall call buttons at the floors and car call buttons in the elevator cars, assigning elevator cars to the floors in response to hall calls registered a~ the floors and/or car calls registered in the elevator car.
Several dispatching techniques are known in the art, e.g., dispatching based on static or dynamic sectors, peak-period dispatching (e.g., up-pealc, down-peak and noon-time) and dispatching based on bonuses and/or penalties, e.g., the Relative System Response (RSR) methodology proprietary to the assignee of the present invention.
OT-1088 ~C
A
Typically, a user is notified as to which elevator car will be responding to the hall call in one of two ways: immediately or at the last possible moment, i.e., when the elevator car commits to ssop at the floor registering the hall call.
In Japan, users typically want to be informed as to which elevator car will be 5 responding to the hall call almost immedi~tely upon hall call registration. In this way, the users can wait near the door of the elevator car which will be responding to the hall call.
Thus, in dispatching systems commonly referred to as having instantaneous car assignment, the hall lantem is energized at the time of initial elevator car assignment, which occurs about the time the hall call is registered.
In RSR systems which employ instantaneous car assignment, since the hall lanternis energized at the time of initial elevator car assignment, the system attempts to maintain the integrity of the initial assignment, e.g., by heavily favoring the initial elevator car ac~i~nment. In practice, the elevator car which receives the initial assignment is usually the elevator car which responds to the hall call.
In the other types of systems, herein referred to as conventional systems, the hall lantern is energized when the elevator car commits to stop at the floor registering the hall call. As used herein, an elevator car commits when it begins to decelerate so as to come into position and stop at the floor registering the hall call.
The point in time at which the elevator car commits is herein referred to as the stop 2 o control point (SCP). The SCP varies since it is dependent upon several factors including the speed of the elevator car, its deceleration rate and its position with respect to the floor.
Typically, however, the SCP occurs about 3 to 5 seconds before the elevator car arrives at the floor.
In conventional systems which employ RSR dispatching, the system initially 25 assigns an elevator car to respond to the hall call at the time the hall call is registered.
Subsequently, however, the system can reassign a different elevator car to respond to the hall call if the subsequent assignment will provide faster response or improved system performance. In order to improve RSR dispatching efficiency, the decision regarding possible reassignment occurs often, e.g., on the order of every second. Since the hall 3 o lantern is energized at the time the assigned elevator car commits to the floor, reassignment - is transparent to the user.
20~ 1 ~2~
To improve system efficiency, the elevator car door begins to open before the car fully stops at the floor so that the door is almost completely open when the car stops.
l~egardless of which dispatching technique is used, the door will typically remain open a fixed time in response to a hall call (e.g., about 4 seconds) or a fixed time in response to a 5 car call (e.g., about 2 seconds).
In conventional systems where notification occurs about 3 to 5 seconds before car arrival, the waiting users have a relatively short amount of time to walk over to and fully board the elevator car before its door begins to close. There are situations where this fixed amount of time might not be satisfactory to accommodate all users wishing to board the 10 elevator car before the door begins to close.
For example, where a rather large number of users are in the hallway, boarding time will increase. Also, if the waiting area where users congregate is relatively large, and a user is stationed relatively far away from the elevator car, this fixed time may not be long enough to accommodate the user. This is especially true in cross-traffic conditions and/or 15 where the user is only partially ambulatory, e.g., due to an injury, a handicap or old age.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to notify a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives, thereby providing the user with 2 0 the selectable amount of time in which the user may move towards the arriving elevator car door.
It is also an object of the present invention to notify a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives, wherein the selectable amount of time is independent of both the time corresponding to the 2 5 SCP and the time the hall call is registered.
In accordance with these and other objects, the present invention is directed tonotifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a threshold time value before elevator car arrival.
In the preferred embodiment, an elevator car is assigned to a floor in response to a 3 o hall call. The amount of time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor is determined and compared with the threshold time value.
2~ 1 829 ~
If the arrival time is greater than the threshold time value, the system reexamines assignment, possibly reassigning a different elevator car to respond to the hall call. The arrival time of the assigned (or newly assigned) elevator car is again determined, and this process co~inues until the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value.
When the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value, the hall lantern at the door of the assigned elevator car is energized, e.g., illl]min:~ted and/or sounded. Additionally, the hall call is removed from further consideration regarding reassignment to another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car assignment.
In the preferred embodiment, the threshold time value can be a constant value determined by, e.g., the building manager. Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system, e.g., based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.
By notifying a user of an arriving elevator car a selectable amount of time before car arrival, based on the value of the threshold time value, the present invention provides earlier notification for users to position themselves at the arriving elevator car door, relative to conventional prior art dispatching systems. Further, the present invention enables the dispatching system to be more efficient, relative to prior art dispatching systems utilizing instantaneous car assignment, since the car assignment may be optimally selected until the elevator car is the threshold time value away from the floor, as opposed to the time the hall 2 0 call was registered.
BREF DESCRIPT~ON OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 depicts an exemplary elevator control system.
Figure 2 illustrates a preferred embodiment for notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a 2 5 predetermined amount of time before the elevator car arrives.
Figure 3 illustrates a preferred embodiment for varying the predetermined amountof time based on user waiting time.
DESCRIPIION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S) The dispatching and operation of the elevator car is controlled by an elevator control 3 0 system, preferably as described in DE/EP 0,239,662 to Auer et al., published 7 October ~06 1 8~9 1987 (corresponding to US application serial number 029,49S, ~lled March 23, 1987), and shown with reference to Figure 1. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention can be used with any other elevator control system, including but not limited to US 4,363,381 to Bittar.
Turning now to Figure 1, an exemplary elevator control system is shown. Each elevator car has operational control subsystem (OCSS) 101 which communicates to every other OCSS in a ring communication system via lines 102, 103. It is to be understood th~t each OCSS has various circuitry connected thereto. However, for the sake of simplicity, the circuitry associated with only one OCSS will be described.
Hall call buttons and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station lW, remote serial communication link 10~ and switch-over module 106. Car buttons and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station 107 and remote serial communication link 108.
Hall lanterns, in~licating e.g. the direction of travel of the car which is to stop and/or which set of doors will be opened to accornrnodate the elevator car which is to stop, and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station 109 and remote serial communication link 110.
The operation of the elevator car door is controlled by door control subsystem 2 o (DCSS) 111. The movement of the elevator car is controlled by motion control subsystem (MCSS) 112, which operates in conjunction with drive and brake subsystem (DBSS) 112A. Dispatching is determined and executed by the OCSS with additional inputs generated by advanced dispatching subsystem (ADSS) 113, which can be housed, e.g., in co~ ul~;r 115, colll-llul~icating via information control subsystem acss) 114.
The DCSS preferably determines the load of the elevator car, the load being converted into user boarding and/or deboarding rates by the MCS~. This information can be sent to the ADSS for recordation and prediction of traffic ~low in or~der to increase the efficiency of elevator service. Alternatively, user boarding and/or deboarding rates can be determined by a people sensing/counting arrangement as shown, e.g., in US 4,799,243 issued to Zepke.
Turning now to Pigure 2, a preferred embodiment for notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user is illustrated. In the A
2061 ~9 preferred embodiment, the method of Figure 2 is performed for each hall call on a periodic basis, e.g., every second.
At step 202, the elevator control system assigns an elevator car in response to a hall call registered by a user. Several dispatching techniques are known in the art, e.g., 5 dispatching based on static or dynamic sectors, peak-period dispatching (e.g., up-peak, down-peak and noon-time) and dispatching based on bonuses and/or penalties, e.g., the Relative System Response (RSR) methodology proprietary to the assignee of the present invention. The present invention is equally applicable regardless of which dispatching technique is employed. The elevator control system, however, preferably employs the RSR system as disclosed in US 4,815,568 or US 4,363,381, both issued to Bittar.
At step 204, the time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor registering tlle hall call is determined. As known in the art, the arrival time is a function of several factors, including but not limited to the speed of the elevator car, its acceleration and deceleration rates, its current position relative to the floor registering the hall call and the number of hall and/or car calls previously assigned thereto.
At step 206, the arrival time is compared with a threshold time value (I rV). The threshold time value can have a constant value or a variable value.
In the preferred embodiment, the threshold time value is a constant value determined by, e.g., a person in charge of elevator or building m~inten~nce. The threshold time value preferably has a value between about 4 and about 15 seconds, and morepreferably about 9 seconds.
However, the range and the prefell~d value for l-rV is an empirical quantity which is preferably a function of the desires of the building manager and the specific building configuration and its traffic patterns. As used herein, building configuration means the physical attributes of the building which impact traffic flow thel~;lhfough, including but not limited to number of floors, number of elevators, elevator speed, location of express zone(s), location of lobby level and/or parking level(s), total building population, and distribution of the population per floor.
3 o Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system. As discussed in more detail with reference to Figure 3, the threshold time value can be varied by the 2(~61~2~
system, e.g., based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.
At step 206, if the time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor registering the hall call is less than or equal to the threshold time value, then at step 208 the system energizes, e.g., illuminates and/or sounds, the hall lantern associated with the assigned elevator car. Additionally, at step 210, the system removes the hall call from further consideration regarding reassignment to another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car ~signment.
In the event the assigned elevator car is precluded from responding to the hall call, the system re~c~igns another elevator car to respond to the hall call. An elevator car can be precluded from responding to a hall call, e.g., because it is taken out of service due to a malfunction or the elevator car reaches full capacity before responding to the hall call.
At step 206, if the arrival time of the assigned elevator car is greater than the threshold time value, step 204 is repeated given the assigned elevator car's current position, speed, and the like. This process continues until the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value.
Turning now to Figure 3, a preferred embodiment for varying the threshold time value, based on user waiting time, is illustrated.
At step 302, the response dme for each hall call is determined. The response time is preferably the time between when the hall call was registered and when the assigned elevator car commits to the floor registering the hall call. Other response timedeterminations will be obvious to those in the art.
At step 304, the response time for each hall call is cumulated, and at step 306 the number of hall calls comprising the cumulated response time is cum~ ted This process 2 5 continues until the end of each period (step 308). In the preferred embodiment, each period is, e.g., 3 to S minutes. Other periodic rates, e.g., based on the specific building configuration and its traffic patterns, will be obvious to those skilled in the art.
At step 310, the average waiting time (~W~) for the period is determined. In thepreferred embodiment, the average waiting time is equal to the cumulated response times 3 o (of step 304) divided by the cumulated number of hall calls (of step 306). Alternatively, average waiting time for the period can be determined by dividing the period by the number of hall calls to which an elevator car responded during the period.
206 ~ 829 At step 312, the absolute value of the difference between average waiting time of the period which just ended, AWTi, and the average waiting time of the period previous thereto, AWTi l, is determined.
If the absolute value of this difference is less than or equal to predetermined tolerance x, threshold time value TTV of step 206 (Figure 2) is not varied by the system.
However, if the absolute value of this difference is greater than predetermined tolerance x, threshold time value TTV is varied.
At step 314, if AWTi is greater than AWTi 1, then users during the period which just ended are waiting longer than they waited during the period previous thereto. Thus, at step 316, threshold time value TTV is decreased by ~t. In this way, the dispatching system fin~li7es its elevator car assignment later, increasing the efficiency of the dispatching system to lower user waiting time.
At step 314, if AWTi is less than or equal to AWTi 1, then users during the period which just ended are waiting less time than they waited during the period previous thereto.
Thus, at step 318, threshold time value TTV is increased by ~t. Thus, the user will be notified of an arriving elevator car at an earlier time. Earlier notification will appear, at least psychologically, that the user is obtaining faster response. Earlier notification should not greatly affect system performance, since a lower average waiting time corresponds to high system efficiency and/or relatively low traffic volume.
In the preferred embodiment, the initial value of threshold time value TTV is between about 4 and about 15 seconds, and more preferably about 9 seconds. The value of predetermined tolerance x is between about 5 and about 10 seconds, more preferably about 5 seconds. The value of ~t is between about 0.5 and about S seconds, more preferably about 1 second. However, the ranges and the preferred values for the threshold time value, 2 5 prede~ ined tolerance x and ~t are em~ ical quantities which are preferably a function of the specific building configuration and its traf~lc patterns.
In another embodiment, the threshold time value can be varied based on boarding and/or deboa~.ling rates, whether actual or predicted. Determining actual and/or predicted boarding and/or deboarding rates is known in the art. See, e.g., publications of3 0 Thangavelu, this technology being ow~ed by the same assignee as the present invention.
A
21~6~ 8~
_ ~ .
Where the threshold time value is varied based on actual and/or predicted user boarding and/or deboarding rates, step 312 can be modified to compare the boarding and/or deboarding rates for two consecutive periods. The values of predetermined tolerance x and ~t (steps 312 through 318) are preferably empirical quantities based on the specific 5 building configuration, its traffic patterns and/or a percentage of the building population.
By notifying a user of an arriving elevator car a selectable amount of time before car arrival, based on the value of the threshold time value, the present invention provides earlier notification for users to position themselves at the arriving elevator car door, reladve to conventional prior art dispatching systems. Further, the present invention enables the l o dispatching system to be more efficient, relative to prior art dispatching systems utilizing instantaneous car assignment, since the car assignment may be optimally selected until the elevator car is the threshold time value away from the floor, as opposed to the time of hall call was registered.
Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described in 15 detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments. Various changes or modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
THRESHOLD TIME DEPENDENT LOGIC SYSTEM FOR
ASSIGNING ELEVATOR CARS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Techni~-~l Field The present invention is directed to notifying a user of an arriving elevator car.
More particularly, the present invention is directed to notifying a user as to which elevator car will be responding to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives.
As used herein, notifying a user means energizing, e.g., sounding and/or illuminating, a hall lantern located at or near the elevator car which will be responding to the llall call, thereby indicating to the user which elevator car will be arriving.
BackgTound Information In a building having a plurality of floors, each floor typically has a set of buttons located in the hallway at or near the elevators. These buttons, commonly referred to as hall call buttons, enable users to request elevator car service in a predetermined direction, i.e., up and/or down. Additionally, the interior of an elevator car is generally equipped Wit}l a plurality of buttons, cornmonly referred to as car call buttons, which enable users to request service to specific floors.
In simplified terms, an elevator control system, also referred to in the art as an 2 o elevator dispatching system, monitors the status of the hall call buttons at the floors and car call buttons in the elevator cars, assigning elevator cars to the floors in response to hall calls registered a~ the floors and/or car calls registered in the elevator car.
Several dispatching techniques are known in the art, e.g., dispatching based on static or dynamic sectors, peak-period dispatching (e.g., up-pealc, down-peak and noon-time) and dispatching based on bonuses and/or penalties, e.g., the Relative System Response (RSR) methodology proprietary to the assignee of the present invention.
OT-1088 ~C
A
Typically, a user is notified as to which elevator car will be responding to the hall call in one of two ways: immediately or at the last possible moment, i.e., when the elevator car commits to ssop at the floor registering the hall call.
In Japan, users typically want to be informed as to which elevator car will be 5 responding to the hall call almost immedi~tely upon hall call registration. In this way, the users can wait near the door of the elevator car which will be responding to the hall call.
Thus, in dispatching systems commonly referred to as having instantaneous car assignment, the hall lantem is energized at the time of initial elevator car assignment, which occurs about the time the hall call is registered.
In RSR systems which employ instantaneous car assignment, since the hall lanternis energized at the time of initial elevator car assignment, the system attempts to maintain the integrity of the initial assignment, e.g., by heavily favoring the initial elevator car ac~i~nment. In practice, the elevator car which receives the initial assignment is usually the elevator car which responds to the hall call.
In the other types of systems, herein referred to as conventional systems, the hall lantern is energized when the elevator car commits to stop at the floor registering the hall call. As used herein, an elevator car commits when it begins to decelerate so as to come into position and stop at the floor registering the hall call.
The point in time at which the elevator car commits is herein referred to as the stop 2 o control point (SCP). The SCP varies since it is dependent upon several factors including the speed of the elevator car, its deceleration rate and its position with respect to the floor.
Typically, however, the SCP occurs about 3 to 5 seconds before the elevator car arrives at the floor.
In conventional systems which employ RSR dispatching, the system initially 25 assigns an elevator car to respond to the hall call at the time the hall call is registered.
Subsequently, however, the system can reassign a different elevator car to respond to the hall call if the subsequent assignment will provide faster response or improved system performance. In order to improve RSR dispatching efficiency, the decision regarding possible reassignment occurs often, e.g., on the order of every second. Since the hall 3 o lantern is energized at the time the assigned elevator car commits to the floor, reassignment - is transparent to the user.
20~ 1 ~2~
To improve system efficiency, the elevator car door begins to open before the car fully stops at the floor so that the door is almost completely open when the car stops.
l~egardless of which dispatching technique is used, the door will typically remain open a fixed time in response to a hall call (e.g., about 4 seconds) or a fixed time in response to a 5 car call (e.g., about 2 seconds).
In conventional systems where notification occurs about 3 to 5 seconds before car arrival, the waiting users have a relatively short amount of time to walk over to and fully board the elevator car before its door begins to close. There are situations where this fixed amount of time might not be satisfactory to accommodate all users wishing to board the 10 elevator car before the door begins to close.
For example, where a rather large number of users are in the hallway, boarding time will increase. Also, if the waiting area where users congregate is relatively large, and a user is stationed relatively far away from the elevator car, this fixed time may not be long enough to accommodate the user. This is especially true in cross-traffic conditions and/or 15 where the user is only partially ambulatory, e.g., due to an injury, a handicap or old age.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to notify a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives, thereby providing the user with 2 0 the selectable amount of time in which the user may move towards the arriving elevator car door.
It is also an object of the present invention to notify a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives, wherein the selectable amount of time is independent of both the time corresponding to the 2 5 SCP and the time the hall call is registered.
In accordance with these and other objects, the present invention is directed tonotifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a threshold time value before elevator car arrival.
In the preferred embodiment, an elevator car is assigned to a floor in response to a 3 o hall call. The amount of time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor is determined and compared with the threshold time value.
2~ 1 829 ~
If the arrival time is greater than the threshold time value, the system reexamines assignment, possibly reassigning a different elevator car to respond to the hall call. The arrival time of the assigned (or newly assigned) elevator car is again determined, and this process co~inues until the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value.
When the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value, the hall lantern at the door of the assigned elevator car is energized, e.g., illl]min:~ted and/or sounded. Additionally, the hall call is removed from further consideration regarding reassignment to another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car assignment.
In the preferred embodiment, the threshold time value can be a constant value determined by, e.g., the building manager. Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system, e.g., based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.
By notifying a user of an arriving elevator car a selectable amount of time before car arrival, based on the value of the threshold time value, the present invention provides earlier notification for users to position themselves at the arriving elevator car door, relative to conventional prior art dispatching systems. Further, the present invention enables the dispatching system to be more efficient, relative to prior art dispatching systems utilizing instantaneous car assignment, since the car assignment may be optimally selected until the elevator car is the threshold time value away from the floor, as opposed to the time the hall 2 0 call was registered.
BREF DESCRIPT~ON OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 depicts an exemplary elevator control system.
Figure 2 illustrates a preferred embodiment for notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a 2 5 predetermined amount of time before the elevator car arrives.
Figure 3 illustrates a preferred embodiment for varying the predetermined amountof time based on user waiting time.
DESCRIPIION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S) The dispatching and operation of the elevator car is controlled by an elevator control 3 0 system, preferably as described in DE/EP 0,239,662 to Auer et al., published 7 October ~06 1 8~9 1987 (corresponding to US application serial number 029,49S, ~lled March 23, 1987), and shown with reference to Figure 1. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention can be used with any other elevator control system, including but not limited to US 4,363,381 to Bittar.
Turning now to Figure 1, an exemplary elevator control system is shown. Each elevator car has operational control subsystem (OCSS) 101 which communicates to every other OCSS in a ring communication system via lines 102, 103. It is to be understood th~t each OCSS has various circuitry connected thereto. However, for the sake of simplicity, the circuitry associated with only one OCSS will be described.
Hall call buttons and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station lW, remote serial communication link 10~ and switch-over module 106. Car buttons and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station 107 and remote serial communication link 108.
Hall lanterns, in~licating e.g. the direction of travel of the car which is to stop and/or which set of doors will be opened to accornrnodate the elevator car which is to stop, and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station 109 and remote serial communication link 110.
The operation of the elevator car door is controlled by door control subsystem 2 o (DCSS) 111. The movement of the elevator car is controlled by motion control subsystem (MCSS) 112, which operates in conjunction with drive and brake subsystem (DBSS) 112A. Dispatching is determined and executed by the OCSS with additional inputs generated by advanced dispatching subsystem (ADSS) 113, which can be housed, e.g., in co~ ul~;r 115, colll-llul~icating via information control subsystem acss) 114.
The DCSS preferably determines the load of the elevator car, the load being converted into user boarding and/or deboarding rates by the MCS~. This information can be sent to the ADSS for recordation and prediction of traffic ~low in or~der to increase the efficiency of elevator service. Alternatively, user boarding and/or deboarding rates can be determined by a people sensing/counting arrangement as shown, e.g., in US 4,799,243 issued to Zepke.
Turning now to Pigure 2, a preferred embodiment for notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user is illustrated. In the A
2061 ~9 preferred embodiment, the method of Figure 2 is performed for each hall call on a periodic basis, e.g., every second.
At step 202, the elevator control system assigns an elevator car in response to a hall call registered by a user. Several dispatching techniques are known in the art, e.g., 5 dispatching based on static or dynamic sectors, peak-period dispatching (e.g., up-peak, down-peak and noon-time) and dispatching based on bonuses and/or penalties, e.g., the Relative System Response (RSR) methodology proprietary to the assignee of the present invention. The present invention is equally applicable regardless of which dispatching technique is employed. The elevator control system, however, preferably employs the RSR system as disclosed in US 4,815,568 or US 4,363,381, both issued to Bittar.
At step 204, the time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor registering tlle hall call is determined. As known in the art, the arrival time is a function of several factors, including but not limited to the speed of the elevator car, its acceleration and deceleration rates, its current position relative to the floor registering the hall call and the number of hall and/or car calls previously assigned thereto.
At step 206, the arrival time is compared with a threshold time value (I rV). The threshold time value can have a constant value or a variable value.
In the preferred embodiment, the threshold time value is a constant value determined by, e.g., a person in charge of elevator or building m~inten~nce. The threshold time value preferably has a value between about 4 and about 15 seconds, and morepreferably about 9 seconds.
However, the range and the prefell~d value for l-rV is an empirical quantity which is preferably a function of the desires of the building manager and the specific building configuration and its traffic patterns. As used herein, building configuration means the physical attributes of the building which impact traffic flow thel~;lhfough, including but not limited to number of floors, number of elevators, elevator speed, location of express zone(s), location of lobby level and/or parking level(s), total building population, and distribution of the population per floor.
3 o Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system. As discussed in more detail with reference to Figure 3, the threshold time value can be varied by the 2(~61~2~
system, e.g., based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.
At step 206, if the time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor registering the hall call is less than or equal to the threshold time value, then at step 208 the system energizes, e.g., illuminates and/or sounds, the hall lantern associated with the assigned elevator car. Additionally, at step 210, the system removes the hall call from further consideration regarding reassignment to another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car ~signment.
In the event the assigned elevator car is precluded from responding to the hall call, the system re~c~igns another elevator car to respond to the hall call. An elevator car can be precluded from responding to a hall call, e.g., because it is taken out of service due to a malfunction or the elevator car reaches full capacity before responding to the hall call.
At step 206, if the arrival time of the assigned elevator car is greater than the threshold time value, step 204 is repeated given the assigned elevator car's current position, speed, and the like. This process continues until the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value.
Turning now to Figure 3, a preferred embodiment for varying the threshold time value, based on user waiting time, is illustrated.
At step 302, the response dme for each hall call is determined. The response time is preferably the time between when the hall call was registered and when the assigned elevator car commits to the floor registering the hall call. Other response timedeterminations will be obvious to those in the art.
At step 304, the response time for each hall call is cumulated, and at step 306 the number of hall calls comprising the cumulated response time is cum~ ted This process 2 5 continues until the end of each period (step 308). In the preferred embodiment, each period is, e.g., 3 to S minutes. Other periodic rates, e.g., based on the specific building configuration and its traffic patterns, will be obvious to those skilled in the art.
At step 310, the average waiting time (~W~) for the period is determined. In thepreferred embodiment, the average waiting time is equal to the cumulated response times 3 o (of step 304) divided by the cumulated number of hall calls (of step 306). Alternatively, average waiting time for the period can be determined by dividing the period by the number of hall calls to which an elevator car responded during the period.
206 ~ 829 At step 312, the absolute value of the difference between average waiting time of the period which just ended, AWTi, and the average waiting time of the period previous thereto, AWTi l, is determined.
If the absolute value of this difference is less than or equal to predetermined tolerance x, threshold time value TTV of step 206 (Figure 2) is not varied by the system.
However, if the absolute value of this difference is greater than predetermined tolerance x, threshold time value TTV is varied.
At step 314, if AWTi is greater than AWTi 1, then users during the period which just ended are waiting longer than they waited during the period previous thereto. Thus, at step 316, threshold time value TTV is decreased by ~t. In this way, the dispatching system fin~li7es its elevator car assignment later, increasing the efficiency of the dispatching system to lower user waiting time.
At step 314, if AWTi is less than or equal to AWTi 1, then users during the period which just ended are waiting less time than they waited during the period previous thereto.
Thus, at step 318, threshold time value TTV is increased by ~t. Thus, the user will be notified of an arriving elevator car at an earlier time. Earlier notification will appear, at least psychologically, that the user is obtaining faster response. Earlier notification should not greatly affect system performance, since a lower average waiting time corresponds to high system efficiency and/or relatively low traffic volume.
In the preferred embodiment, the initial value of threshold time value TTV is between about 4 and about 15 seconds, and more preferably about 9 seconds. The value of predetermined tolerance x is between about 5 and about 10 seconds, more preferably about 5 seconds. The value of ~t is between about 0.5 and about S seconds, more preferably about 1 second. However, the ranges and the preferred values for the threshold time value, 2 5 prede~ ined tolerance x and ~t are em~ ical quantities which are preferably a function of the specific building configuration and its traf~lc patterns.
In another embodiment, the threshold time value can be varied based on boarding and/or deboa~.ling rates, whether actual or predicted. Determining actual and/or predicted boarding and/or deboarding rates is known in the art. See, e.g., publications of3 0 Thangavelu, this technology being ow~ed by the same assignee as the present invention.
A
21~6~ 8~
_ ~ .
Where the threshold time value is varied based on actual and/or predicted user boarding and/or deboarding rates, step 312 can be modified to compare the boarding and/or deboarding rates for two consecutive periods. The values of predetermined tolerance x and ~t (steps 312 through 318) are preferably empirical quantities based on the specific 5 building configuration, its traffic patterns and/or a percentage of the building population.
By notifying a user of an arriving elevator car a selectable amount of time before car arrival, based on the value of the threshold time value, the present invention provides earlier notification for users to position themselves at the arriving elevator car door, reladve to conventional prior art dispatching systems. Further, the present invention enables the l o dispatching system to be more efficient, relative to prior art dispatching systems utilizing instantaneous car assignment, since the car assignment may be optimally selected until the elevator car is the threshold time value away from the floor, as opposed to the time of hall call was registered.
Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described in 15 detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments. Various changes or modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method of dispatching a plurality of elevator cars to various floors in a building, each specific floor having a hall call means for registering a hall call and a hall lantern corresponding to each elevator, including notifying a user on a specific floor of an elevator car arriving in response to a hall call registered by the user, comprising: (a) determining, for each elevator car, a value indicative of the suitability of such elevator car for servicing the hall call; (b) assigning to the specific floor to service the registered hall call, the elevator car which has the value indicating the most suitability to service such hall call; (c) determining the arrival time of the assigned elevator car at the specific floor; (d) comparing the determined arrival time to a threshold time value; and (e) alternatively, either energizing the hall lantern corresponding to the assigned elevator car and fixing the elevator car assignment if the determined arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value, or repeating steps (a) through (d) if the determined arrival time is greater than the threshold time value.
2. The method of claim 1, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on waiting time of users.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said step of varying the threshold time value based on waiting time of users comprises the steps of: determining average waiting time of users for a first predetermined time period;
determining average waiting time of users for a second predetermined time period; comparing the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period with the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period; and alternatively, either decreasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is less than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period, or increasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is greater than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period.
determining average waiting time of users for a second predetermined time period; comparing the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period with the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period; and alternatively, either decreasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is less than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period, or increasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is greater than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period.
4. The method of claim 1, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on an actual number of users which boarded and/or deboarded the elevator cars during a predetermined period of time.
5. The method of claim 1, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on a predicted number of users which will be boarding and/or deboarding the elevator cars during a predetermined period of time.
6. In an elevator system for controlling the dispatching of a plurality of elevator cars to various floors in a building, each specific floor having a hall lantern corresponding to each elevator to indicate at which elevator door to expect the eventual arrival of the respective elevator car, a method of notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user at a specific floor, said method comprising the steps of: (a) assigning an elevator car to the specific floor to service the registered hall call;
(b) determining arrival time of the assigned elevator car to the specific floor; (c) comparing the determined arrival time to a threshold time value; and (d) alternatively, either energizing the hall lantern corresponding to the assigned elevator car and fixing the elevator car assignment if the determined arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value, or repeating steps (a) through (c) if the determined arrival time is greater than the threshold time value.
(b) determining arrival time of the assigned elevator car to the specific floor; (c) comparing the determined arrival time to a threshold time value; and (d) alternatively, either energizing the hall lantern corresponding to the assigned elevator car and fixing the elevator car assignment if the determined arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value, or repeating steps (a) through (c) if the determined arrival time is greater than the threshold time value.
7. The method of claim 6, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on waiting time of uses.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said step of varying the threshold time value based on waiting time of users comprises the steps of: determining average waiting time of users for a first predetermined time period;
determining average waiting time of users for a second predetermined time period following said first predetermined time period; comparing the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period with the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period; and alternatively, either decreasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is greater than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period, or increasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is less than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period.
determining average waiting time of users for a second predetermined time period following said first predetermined time period; comparing the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period with the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period; and alternatively, either decreasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is greater than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period, or increasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is less than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period.
9. The method of claim 6, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on an actual number of users which boarded and/or deboarded the elevator cars during a predetermined period of time.
10. The method of claim 6, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on a predicted number of users which will be boarding and/or deboarding the elevator cars during a predetermined period of time.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US683,141 | 1991-04-10 | ||
| US07/683,141 US5271484A (en) | 1991-04-10 | 1991-04-10 | Selectable notification time indicating elevator car arrival |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2061829A1 CA2061829A1 (en) | 1992-10-11 |
| CA2061829C true CA2061829C (en) | 1996-01-02 |
Family
ID=24742735
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002061829A Expired - Fee Related CA2061829C (en) | 1991-04-10 | 1992-02-25 | Threshold time dependent logic system for assigning elevator cars |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5271484A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0508438B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3444605B2 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU648641B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2061829C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69200936T2 (en) |
| ZA (1) | ZA921293B (en) |
Families Citing this family (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6278936B1 (en) | 1993-05-18 | 2001-08-21 | Global Research Systems, Inc. | System and method for an advance notification system for monitoring and reporting proximity of a vehicle |
| US20030193413A1 (en) * | 1993-05-18 | 2003-10-16 | Jones M. Kelly | Business methods for notification systems |
| US6700507B2 (en) | 1993-05-18 | 2004-03-02 | Arrivalstar, Inc. | Advance notification system and method utilizing vehicle signaling |
| US6748320B2 (en) | 1993-05-18 | 2004-06-08 | Arrivalstar, Inc. | Advance notification systems and methods utilizing a computer network |
| US6952645B1 (en) | 1997-03-10 | 2005-10-04 | Arrivalstar, Inc. | System and method for activation of an advance notification system for monitoring and reporting status of vehicle travel |
| US6748318B1 (en) | 1993-05-18 | 2004-06-08 | Arrivalstar, Inc. | Advanced notification systems and methods utilizing a computer network |
| US6618668B1 (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2003-09-09 | Arrivalstar, Inc. | System and method for obtaining vehicle schedule information in an advance notification system |
| US5338904A (en) * | 1993-09-29 | 1994-08-16 | Otis Elevator Company | Early car announcement |
| US5551533A (en) * | 1994-04-01 | 1996-09-03 | Otis Elevator Company | Audio direction and information for elevator passengers |
| US6975998B1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2005-12-13 | Arrivalstar, Inc. | Package delivery notification system and method |
| US7119716B2 (en) | 2003-05-28 | 2006-10-10 | Legalview Assets, Limited | Response systems and methods for notification systems for modifying future notifications |
| US7561069B2 (en) | 2003-11-12 | 2009-07-14 | Legalview Assets, Limited | Notification systems and methods enabling a response to change particulars of delivery or pickup |
| JP5208386B2 (en) * | 2006-08-18 | 2013-06-12 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator management system |
| JP2009202997A (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2009-09-10 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Elevator control device and elevator device |
| JP5429173B2 (en) * | 2008-09-18 | 2014-02-26 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator system |
| WO2013151533A1 (en) * | 2012-04-03 | 2013-10-10 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator system using dual communication channels |
| CN105722778A (en) | 2013-05-20 | 2016-06-29 | 奥的斯电梯公司 | Method for an allocation of elevators in elevator systems |
| EP2949613A1 (en) * | 2014-05-26 | 2015-12-02 | ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG | Control system for an elevator system, elevator system and method of operating an elevator systems |
| WO2017026032A1 (en) * | 2015-08-10 | 2017-02-16 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator control device and method for controlling notification timing of elevator |
| CA3130986A1 (en) * | 2020-09-28 | 2022-03-28 | Appana Industries LLC | Systems and methods for dispatching elevators |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS51131046A (en) * | 1975-05-12 | 1976-11-15 | Hitachi Ltd | Elevator arrival order indicating device |
| US4323142A (en) * | 1979-12-03 | 1982-04-06 | Otis Elevator Company | Dynamically reevaluated elevator call assignments |
| US4363381A (en) * | 1979-12-03 | 1982-12-14 | Otis Elevator Company | Relative system response elevator call assignments |
| US4901822A (en) * | 1987-08-06 | 1990-02-20 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Group supervisory apparatus for elevator |
| US4799243A (en) * | 1987-09-01 | 1989-01-17 | Otis Elevator Company | Directional people counting arrangement |
| ATE82560T1 (en) * | 1987-12-18 | 1992-12-15 | Inventio Ag | CALL REGISTRATION AND INDICATION DEVICES FOR ELEVATORS LOCATED ON THE FLOORS. |
| JP2607597B2 (en) * | 1988-03-02 | 1997-05-07 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Elevator group management control method |
| US4989694A (en) * | 1988-03-09 | 1991-02-05 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Elevator group supervisory system |
| JP2563963B2 (en) * | 1988-03-31 | 1996-12-18 | 株式会社東芝 | Elevator group control device |
| US4815568A (en) * | 1988-05-11 | 1989-03-28 | Otis Elevator Company | Weighted relative system response elevator car assignment system with variable bonuses and penalties |
| JPH0699099B2 (en) * | 1988-09-20 | 1994-12-07 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Elevator information guidance control system |
| US5004076A (en) * | 1989-04-18 | 1991-04-02 | Chen Hai C | Apparatus for controlling an electric elevator |
| ATE102893T1 (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1994-04-15 | Inventio Ag | GROUP CONTROL FOR ELEVATORS WITH IMMEDIATE ALLOCATION OF DESTINATION CALLS DEPENDENT ON THE CALL INPUT LOCATION ON A FLOOR. |
-
1991
- 1991-04-10 US US07/683,141 patent/US5271484A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1992
- 1992-02-19 AU AU11095/92A patent/AU648641B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1992-02-21 ZA ZA921293A patent/ZA921293B/en unknown
- 1992-02-25 CA CA002061829A patent/CA2061829C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1992-04-08 JP JP08585792A patent/JP3444605B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-04-09 EP EP92106191A patent/EP0508438B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-04-09 DE DE69200936T patent/DE69200936T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE69200936D1 (en) | 1995-02-02 |
| EP0508438B1 (en) | 1994-12-21 |
| DE69200936T2 (en) | 1995-04-20 |
| JPH0597335A (en) | 1993-04-20 |
| CA2061829A1 (en) | 1992-10-11 |
| AU648641B2 (en) | 1994-04-28 |
| ZA921293B (en) | 1993-01-27 |
| US5271484A (en) | 1993-12-21 |
| EP0508438A1 (en) | 1992-10-14 |
| JP3444605B2 (en) | 2003-09-08 |
| AU1109592A (en) | 1992-10-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2061829C (en) | Threshold time dependent logic system for assigning elevator cars | |
| US5022497A (en) | "Artificial intelligence" based crowd sensing system for elevator car assignment | |
| EP1021368B1 (en) | Procedure for controlling an elevator group where virtual passenger traffic is generated | |
| CA2010932C (en) | Relative system response elevator dispatcher system using "artificial intelligence" to vary bonuses and penalties | |
| JP3486424B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for improving congestion service by empty car assignment | |
| US5317114A (en) | Elevator system having dynamic sector assignments | |
| US5625176A (en) | Crowd service enhancements with multi-deck elevators | |
| KR100928212B1 (en) | Method for controlling an elevator group | |
| US5235143A (en) | Elevator system having dynamically variable door dwell time based upon average waiting time | |
| JPH04317966A (en) | Method of elevator movement on basis of remaining response time | |
| EP0452130A2 (en) | Controlling door dwell time | |
| US5511634A (en) | Instantaneous elevator up-peak sector assignment | |
| US5298695A (en) | Elevator system with varying motion profiles and parameters based on crowd related predictions | |
| US5411118A (en) | Arrival time determination for passengers boarding an elevator car | |
| FI112197B (en) | Lifts group in building controlling | |
| EP0727381A1 (en) | Channeling with dynamic number of elevator cars | |
| JPH06127849A (en) | Device to manage elevator group | |
| KR100548764B1 (en) | Group management control device of elevator |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |