CA2272556C - Guard bands for tuning fork gyroscopes - Google Patents
Guard bands for tuning fork gyroscopes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2272556C CA2272556C CA002272556A CA2272556A CA2272556C CA 2272556 C CA2272556 C CA 2272556C CA 002272556 A CA002272556 A CA 002272556A CA 2272556 A CA2272556 A CA 2272556A CA 2272556 C CA2272556 C CA 2272556C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- comb electrodes
- drive
- substrate
- electrodes
- interleaved
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C19/00—Gyroscopes; Turn-sensitive devices using vibrating masses; Turn-sensitive devices without moving masses; Measuring angular rate using gyroscopic effects
- G01C19/56—Turn-sensitive devices using vibrating masses, e.g. vibratory angular rate sensors based on Coriolis forces
- G01C19/5719—Turn-sensitive devices using vibrating masses, e.g. vibratory angular rate sensors based on Coriolis forces using planar vibrating masses driven in a translation vibration along an axis
Abstract
Guard bands (20a, 20b, 20c, 20d) in a tuning fork gyroscope reduce or eliminate force and sensitivity associated with proof mass (13) motion norma l to the substrate (22) as a result of voltage transients. The guard bands reduce the undesired effects of transient voltages on electrostatic coupling of interleaved comb electrodes (12a, 18a; 14a, 18b; 14b, 18c; 12d, 18d). The guard bands are biased to reduce the coupling ratio to zero and thereby enab le starting and improved performance. Various configurations of guard bands may be employed including distinct inner (20b, 20c) and outer (20a, 20d) guard bands, distinct inner guard bands only, extended sense electrodes below inne r sensing combs with no outer guards, distinct outer guard bands with extended sense electrodes, and sense electrodes extended beneath both drive and sensi ng combs.
Description
GUARD BANDS FOR TUNING FORK GYROSCOPES
S
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to tuning fork gyroscopes, and more particularly to a drive with interleaved comb electrodes which provides vibratory motion in a tuning fork gyroscope.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The basic theories of operation and construction of tuning fork gyroscopes are now fairly we~Zl known. Such gyroscopes include a substrate, silicon proof masses with comb electrodes, position sensitive pick-offs, sense electrodes, and inner and outer drives with comb electrodes.
The proof masses are suspended above the substrate by a support flexure which permits movement of the proof masses relative to the sense electrode, the drive electrodes and the substrate.
The substrate, which is commonly constructed from glass, has a high electrical resistivity which is partially responsible for voltage transients which can adversely effect gyroscope performance. In particular, coupling between comb electrodes is sensitive to such voltage transients.
Additionally, the transients impart undesirable vertical (Z-WO 98122827 PCT/US97121000 =
S
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to tuning fork gyroscopes, and more particularly to a drive with interleaved comb electrodes which provides vibratory motion in a tuning fork gyroscope.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The basic theories of operation and construction of tuning fork gyroscopes are now fairly we~Zl known. Such gyroscopes include a substrate, silicon proof masses with comb electrodes, position sensitive pick-offs, sense electrodes, and inner and outer drives with comb electrodes.
The proof masses are suspended above the substrate by a support flexure which permits movement of the proof masses relative to the sense electrode, the drive electrodes and the substrate.
The substrate, which is commonly constructed from glass, has a high electrical resistivity which is partially responsible for voltage transients which can adversely effect gyroscope performance. In particular, coupling between comb electrodes is sensitive to such voltage transients.
Additionally, the transients impart undesirable vertical (Z-WO 98122827 PCT/US97121000 =
axis) forces normal to the proof masses and pick-off sensitivity. This vertical force and pick-off sensitivity can (a) degrade tuning fork gyroscope performance and (b}
prevent the tuning fork gyroscope motor self-oscillator loop from starting.
It is known in the art to attempt to alleviate these problems by shortening the comb electrodes of both the drives and proof masses. However, this technique has at least one potential drawback. Shortening the comb electrodes limits maximum drive amplitude because the combs disengage so that the drive force becomes small. As such, the performance of the tuning fork gyroscope may be adversely affected.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Guard bands which reduce or eliminate force and sensitivity to proof mass motion normal to the substrate is disclosed. The guard bands are biased to reduce the coupling ratio to zero and thereby enable starting and improved performance. Various configurations of guard bands may be employed including distinct inner and outer guard bands, distinct inner guard bands only, extended sense electrodes below inner sensing combs with no outer guards, distinct outer guard bands with extended sense electrodes, and sense electrodes extended beneath both drive and sensing combs.
The guard bands of the present invention significantly reduce the undesired effects of transient voltages on WO 98/22827 PCT/US97/2I000 _-electrostatic coupling of interleaved comb electrodes. For combs-with teeth 3 microns wide, 6 to 7 microns thick and 3 micron spacing and an overlap X, coupling force can be reduced to zero by placing 30% of the drive voltage on the guard band beneath the drive combs. Further, the response coupling force can be made small by exciting the inner guard bands with a voltage roughly 1.6 times the inner comb bias voltage. Such proportionally biased guard bands can provide high performance tuning fork gyroscopes with bias stability better than 1, 000°/hr. Further, use of greater length comb electrodes and thus greater maximum drive amplitude become possible. For other dimensions, optimal guard band voltages vary in a predictable manner.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRA4aING
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the invention in which:
Fig. 1 is a plan view of a tuning fork gyroscope according to the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the gyroscope of Fig. 1 taken along line 1-1;
Fig. 2A is a top view of one set of sense electrodes from Figs. 1 and 2;
Fig. 3 is an exploded view of the interleaved comb electrodes of the gyroscope of Fig. 2;
WO 98/22827 PCT/US97/21000 _ Fig. 4 is a plot of drive forces versus Vb for the gyroscope of Fig. 3;
Fig. 5 is a plot of comb sensitivity;
Fig. 6 is an alternative embodiment of the gyroscope;
Fig. 7 is another ~:.ternative embodiment of the gyroscope;
Fig. 8 is a cross-sectional view of the alternative embodiment of Fig. 7 taken along line 1-1;
Figs. 9 and 10 illustrate an alternative embodiment having distinct outer guards and extended sense electrodes;
and Figs. 11 and 12 illustrate an alternative embodiment having extended sense electrodes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Referring to Figs. 1, 2 and 2A, a tuning fork gyroscope includes outer drives 10a, lOb with comb electrodes 12a, 12b, an inner drive 13 with comb electrodes 14a, 14b, proof masses 16a, 16b with comb electrodes 18a, 18b, 18c, 18d, guard bands 20a, 20b, 20c, 20d, a substrate 22 with an upper surface 24, and a support flexure 26 with drive beams 28, torsion beams 30, base beams 32, anchors 34, sense electrodes 36 and force electrodes 37 (which may be eliminated to reduce exposed glass below the proof mass). The proof masses are suspended above the substrate, and are connected thereto by the support flexure. The anchors connect the torsion beams to the substrate. The torsion beams support the base beams, which in turn support the drive beams. The proof masses are connected to the base beams by the drive beams.
The tuning fork gyroscope functions electromechanically. In operation, the outer drives 10a, 10b impart a vibratory motion to the proof masses 16a, 16b through the comb electrodes 12a, 18a, 18d, 12b. The comb electrodes of the outer drives extend outward toward the adjacent proof mass, and are disposed above the surtace of the substrate. The comb electrodes of the adjacent proof mass extend outward toward the outer drive such that the outer drive comb electrodes and proof mass comb electrodes are interleaved. Comb electrodes between adjacent proof masses and inner drives are similarly interleaved. As such, time varying drive signals Vd can be provided to the outer drives to induce electrostatic coupling of comb electrodes, and thereby impart vibratory motion to the proof masses.
Measurement with the tuning fork gyroscope has been described with detail in U.S. Patent No. 5,481,914, entitled ELECTRONICS FOR CORiOLIS FORCE
AND OTHER SENSORS, in the name of Paul Ward. Briefly, a bipolar DC voltage +Vs, -Vs is applied to right and left sense electrodes 36, respectively, to establish a potential difference so that a change in proof mass position with respect to the sense electrodes results in a measurable change in capacitance between the sense electrodes and the associated proof masses.
prevent the tuning fork gyroscope motor self-oscillator loop from starting.
It is known in the art to attempt to alleviate these problems by shortening the comb electrodes of both the drives and proof masses. However, this technique has at least one potential drawback. Shortening the comb electrodes limits maximum drive amplitude because the combs disengage so that the drive force becomes small. As such, the performance of the tuning fork gyroscope may be adversely affected.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Guard bands which reduce or eliminate force and sensitivity to proof mass motion normal to the substrate is disclosed. The guard bands are biased to reduce the coupling ratio to zero and thereby enable starting and improved performance. Various configurations of guard bands may be employed including distinct inner and outer guard bands, distinct inner guard bands only, extended sense electrodes below inner sensing combs with no outer guards, distinct outer guard bands with extended sense electrodes, and sense electrodes extended beneath both drive and sensing combs.
The guard bands of the present invention significantly reduce the undesired effects of transient voltages on WO 98/22827 PCT/US97/2I000 _-electrostatic coupling of interleaved comb electrodes. For combs-with teeth 3 microns wide, 6 to 7 microns thick and 3 micron spacing and an overlap X, coupling force can be reduced to zero by placing 30% of the drive voltage on the guard band beneath the drive combs. Further, the response coupling force can be made small by exciting the inner guard bands with a voltage roughly 1.6 times the inner comb bias voltage. Such proportionally biased guard bands can provide high performance tuning fork gyroscopes with bias stability better than 1, 000°/hr. Further, use of greater length comb electrodes and thus greater maximum drive amplitude become possible. For other dimensions, optimal guard band voltages vary in a predictable manner.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRA4aING
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the invention in which:
Fig. 1 is a plan view of a tuning fork gyroscope according to the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the gyroscope of Fig. 1 taken along line 1-1;
Fig. 2A is a top view of one set of sense electrodes from Figs. 1 and 2;
Fig. 3 is an exploded view of the interleaved comb electrodes of the gyroscope of Fig. 2;
WO 98/22827 PCT/US97/21000 _ Fig. 4 is a plot of drive forces versus Vb for the gyroscope of Fig. 3;
Fig. 5 is a plot of comb sensitivity;
Fig. 6 is an alternative embodiment of the gyroscope;
Fig. 7 is another ~:.ternative embodiment of the gyroscope;
Fig. 8 is a cross-sectional view of the alternative embodiment of Fig. 7 taken along line 1-1;
Figs. 9 and 10 illustrate an alternative embodiment having distinct outer guards and extended sense electrodes;
and Figs. 11 and 12 illustrate an alternative embodiment having extended sense electrodes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Referring to Figs. 1, 2 and 2A, a tuning fork gyroscope includes outer drives 10a, lOb with comb electrodes 12a, 12b, an inner drive 13 with comb electrodes 14a, 14b, proof masses 16a, 16b with comb electrodes 18a, 18b, 18c, 18d, guard bands 20a, 20b, 20c, 20d, a substrate 22 with an upper surface 24, and a support flexure 26 with drive beams 28, torsion beams 30, base beams 32, anchors 34, sense electrodes 36 and force electrodes 37 (which may be eliminated to reduce exposed glass below the proof mass). The proof masses are suspended above the substrate, and are connected thereto by the support flexure. The anchors connect the torsion beams to the substrate. The torsion beams support the base beams, which in turn support the drive beams. The proof masses are connected to the base beams by the drive beams.
The tuning fork gyroscope functions electromechanically. In operation, the outer drives 10a, 10b impart a vibratory motion to the proof masses 16a, 16b through the comb electrodes 12a, 18a, 18d, 12b. The comb electrodes of the outer drives extend outward toward the adjacent proof mass, and are disposed above the surtace of the substrate. The comb electrodes of the adjacent proof mass extend outward toward the outer drive such that the outer drive comb electrodes and proof mass comb electrodes are interleaved. Comb electrodes between adjacent proof masses and inner drives are similarly interleaved. As such, time varying drive signals Vd can be provided to the outer drives to induce electrostatic coupling of comb electrodes, and thereby impart vibratory motion to the proof masses.
Measurement with the tuning fork gyroscope has been described with detail in U.S. Patent No. 5,481,914, entitled ELECTRONICS FOR CORiOLIS FORCE
AND OTHER SENSORS, in the name of Paul Ward. Briefly, a bipolar DC voltage +Vs, -Vs is applied to right and left sense electrodes 36, respectively, to establish a potential difference so that a change in proof mass position with respect to the sense electrodes results in a measurable change in capacitance between the sense electrodes and the associated proof masses.
In response to an inertial input, and specifically to a rotational rate about an input a:-is coplanar to the plane of vibration, the proof masses deflect out of the normal plane of vibration. Such out-of-plane deflection of the proof masses occurs at a frequency corresponding to the resonant frequency of the proof masses, and with an amplitude corresponding to the input rotational rate. Thus, detection of out-of-plane deflection of the proof masses as manifested by capacitance change provides a measure of the rotational rate.
Voltages applied to the comb electrodes 12a, 12b, 14a, 14b and to the sense electrodes 36 induce both slow transient and AC voltages in the glass substrate, which is a dielectric with loss factor and high, but finite, electrical resistivity. These voltages tend to degrade tuning fork gyroscope bias and scale factor versus time and temperature.
Voltages applied to the outer comb electrodes move the proof mass parallel to the substrate (at constant distance}, which is a desired effect. The comb voltages also result in electrostatic forces which move the proof mass normal to the substrate. This normal force is generally not desired. The inner comb electrodes are intended to sense motion parallel to and at constant distance from the substrate, but also sense proof mass motion perpendicular to the substrate. This vertical force and pick-off sensitivity can degrade tuning fork gyroscope performance and prevent the tuning fork gyroscopes motor self-oscillator loop from starting.
Voltages applied to the comb electrodes 12a, 12b, 14a, 14b and to the sense electrodes 36 induce both slow transient and AC voltages in the glass substrate, which is a dielectric with loss factor and high, but finite, electrical resistivity. These voltages tend to degrade tuning fork gyroscope bias and scale factor versus time and temperature.
Voltages applied to the outer comb electrodes move the proof mass parallel to the substrate (at constant distance}, which is a desired effect. The comb voltages also result in electrostatic forces which move the proof mass normal to the substrate. This normal force is generally not desired. The inner comb electrodes are intended to sense motion parallel to and at constant distance from the substrate, but also sense proof mass motion perpendicular to the substrate. This vertical force and pick-off sensitivity can degrade tuning fork gyroscope performance and prevent the tuning fork gyroscopes motor self-oscillator loop from starting.
The guard bands shield the silicon parts from the substrate voltage transients, and thereby reduce or eliminate the normal force and sensitivity. The guard bands 20a, 20b, 20c, 20d are constructed of conducting material and are disposed on the substrate 22 substantially directly below the interleaved comb electrodes. More particularly, the interleaved comb electrodes have a length 38, and the guard bands extend along the substrate for a length 40 which is equal to or greater than the interleaved comb electrode length.
Further placement details for the guard bands are illustrated in Fig. 3. The interleaved comb electrodes, e.g., 12a, 18a, have three regions which define width of overlap: region A is an unengaged drive comb electrode region, region B is an engaged comb electrode region, and region C is an unengaged proof mass comb electrode region.
Magnitude of region B is directly related to maximum drive amplitude, i.e., greater width affords greater maximum drive amplitude. It should be appreciated, however, that regions A-C vary as the proof mass 16a is vibrated in-plane, and that this variation is taken into account when determining guard band placement. In particular, the guard bands are disposed between the substrate and the comb electrodes such that the guard bands have a width 41 which is greater than or equal to a maximum operational width of region B. The term "overlap region" as used herein refers to the maximum operational WO 98/22827 PCT/iJS97/21000 _ g _ width of region B. The guard bands are disposed on the substrate substantially directly below the overlap region.
A significant feature of the gyroscope and method is a technique for starting the tuning fork mode where the two proof masses move parallel to the substrate and in opposite directions. The tuning fork gyroscope oscillator is intended to lock onto the tuning fork mode. Because of the out-of-plane effects in the drive (outer) and sensing (inner) combs, it is possible to lock onto the normal motion (out-of-plane mode) and exclude the tuning fork mode. The loop closes to the tuning fork mode when SFSsQo < 1 QTF
where SF = ratio of vertical to horizontal force exerted by the drive combs SS = ratio of vertical to horizontal response of sense combs Qo = quality factor of out-of-plane mode QTR. = quality factor of tuning fork mode For tuning fork gyroscopes with perforated plates, QTF/Qo is 5 to 10. For contemporary tuning fork gyroscopes built without guard bands and 25~,m of tooth overlap, Sr = SS = 1/2 and the tuning fork mode is easily excited. As shown in Fig.
4 and Fig. 5, with guard bands grounded Sr - SS = 2 so that the tuning fork mode is not excited and the gyroscope does g _ not function. By decreasing the overlap of the teeth, it is possi-ble to reduce the coupling ratios SF and SS to start successfully. However, decreasing tooth overlap reduces the maximum drive amplitude and hence is generally not desirable.
Fig. 4 indicates that the coupling force SF can be reduced to zero by placing 30% of the drive voltage on the guard band beneath the drive combs 20a, 20d. Fig. 5 indicates that the response coupling SF can be made small by exciting the inner guard bands 20b, 20C with a voltage roughly 1.6 times the inner comb bias voltage. These voltages are appropriate for a tuning fork gyroscope with combs of approximately 6 to 7 microns thickness, 3 microns width and 3 micron spacing, and will vary with comb length, plate thickness, and comb air gap. This reduction of coupling ratios enables starting and improved performance.
In an alternative embodiment shown in Fig. 6, guard bands 20b, 20c are placed below the inner interleaved comb electrodes 18b, 14a, 14b, 18c, but not the outer interleaved comb electrodes. It has been found that the undesired effects of transients on unguarded outer comb electrodes are relatively small in comparison to the effects of transients on unguarded inner combs. A savings can thus be realized by forming fewer guard bands since less associated circuitry for driving the guard bands is required. The guard bands under the inner interleaved comb electrodes may be grounded or have a bias voltage applied as described with regard to other embodiments above.
Another alternative embodiment is shown in Figs. 7 & 8.
In this embodiment extended sense electrodes 50a, 50b are employed to reduce the undesired effect of voltage transients. The extended electrodes 50a, 50b are disposed on the substrate below the proof masses 16a, 16b and extend inward beyond the proof masses to the interleaved comb electrodes 18b, 14a, 14b, 18c. More particularly, the extended sense electrodes are disposed under the overlap region of the interleaved comb electrodes.
The extended sense electrodes may be formed below each set of interleaved comb electrodes, or under the inner interleaved comb electrodes only. (Through experimentation, the inner comb electrode only arrangement has been found to produce tuning fork gyroscopes with bias stability of 1,000+/hr. This embodiment has a cost savings advantage insofar as manufacturing larger sense electrodes requires little additional effort.) Figs. 9 and 10 illustrate another alternative embodiment. This embodiment includes distinct outer guard bands 52a, 52b and extended sense electrodes 54a, 54b. The extended electrodes 54a, 54b are disposed on the substrate below the proof masses 16a, 16b and extend inward beyond the proof masses to the interleaved comb electrodes 14a, 14b, 18b, 18c. More particularly, the extended sense electrodes are disposed under the overlap region of the interleaved inner comb electrodes. In this configuration both the sense electrode and the adjacent inner comb have the same bias.
As a result, SF is small and SS is 0.7, providing a suitable solution to the problem.
As shown in Figs. 11 and 12, inner and outer extended sense electrodes 56a, 56b, 58a, 58b may be employed. In this configuration the sense electrodes are extended beneath both the drive and sensing comb electrodes. More particularly, the sense plates may be extended below the drive combs with geometry which satisfies the loop closing equation above.
Coupling coefficients SF and SS are reduced by thicker proof masses and smaller gaps between teeth. Another possibility os setting SS (motor sense coupling) to zero (or some other small value) by appropriate selection of motor sense and inner guard band (or extended sense plate) voltages and allowing a larger SF (motor drive coupling) . The guard bands may also be extended below the suspension beams for more isolation of glass effects.
It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments shown and described herein, but that various changes and modifications may be 2o made without departing from the spirit and scope of this novel concept as defined by the following claims.
Further placement details for the guard bands are illustrated in Fig. 3. The interleaved comb electrodes, e.g., 12a, 18a, have three regions which define width of overlap: region A is an unengaged drive comb electrode region, region B is an engaged comb electrode region, and region C is an unengaged proof mass comb electrode region.
Magnitude of region B is directly related to maximum drive amplitude, i.e., greater width affords greater maximum drive amplitude. It should be appreciated, however, that regions A-C vary as the proof mass 16a is vibrated in-plane, and that this variation is taken into account when determining guard band placement. In particular, the guard bands are disposed between the substrate and the comb electrodes such that the guard bands have a width 41 which is greater than or equal to a maximum operational width of region B. The term "overlap region" as used herein refers to the maximum operational WO 98/22827 PCT/iJS97/21000 _ g _ width of region B. The guard bands are disposed on the substrate substantially directly below the overlap region.
A significant feature of the gyroscope and method is a technique for starting the tuning fork mode where the two proof masses move parallel to the substrate and in opposite directions. The tuning fork gyroscope oscillator is intended to lock onto the tuning fork mode. Because of the out-of-plane effects in the drive (outer) and sensing (inner) combs, it is possible to lock onto the normal motion (out-of-plane mode) and exclude the tuning fork mode. The loop closes to the tuning fork mode when SFSsQo < 1 QTF
where SF = ratio of vertical to horizontal force exerted by the drive combs SS = ratio of vertical to horizontal response of sense combs Qo = quality factor of out-of-plane mode QTR. = quality factor of tuning fork mode For tuning fork gyroscopes with perforated plates, QTF/Qo is 5 to 10. For contemporary tuning fork gyroscopes built without guard bands and 25~,m of tooth overlap, Sr = SS = 1/2 and the tuning fork mode is easily excited. As shown in Fig.
4 and Fig. 5, with guard bands grounded Sr - SS = 2 so that the tuning fork mode is not excited and the gyroscope does g _ not function. By decreasing the overlap of the teeth, it is possi-ble to reduce the coupling ratios SF and SS to start successfully. However, decreasing tooth overlap reduces the maximum drive amplitude and hence is generally not desirable.
Fig. 4 indicates that the coupling force SF can be reduced to zero by placing 30% of the drive voltage on the guard band beneath the drive combs 20a, 20d. Fig. 5 indicates that the response coupling SF can be made small by exciting the inner guard bands 20b, 20C with a voltage roughly 1.6 times the inner comb bias voltage. These voltages are appropriate for a tuning fork gyroscope with combs of approximately 6 to 7 microns thickness, 3 microns width and 3 micron spacing, and will vary with comb length, plate thickness, and comb air gap. This reduction of coupling ratios enables starting and improved performance.
In an alternative embodiment shown in Fig. 6, guard bands 20b, 20c are placed below the inner interleaved comb electrodes 18b, 14a, 14b, 18c, but not the outer interleaved comb electrodes. It has been found that the undesired effects of transients on unguarded outer comb electrodes are relatively small in comparison to the effects of transients on unguarded inner combs. A savings can thus be realized by forming fewer guard bands since less associated circuitry for driving the guard bands is required. The guard bands under the inner interleaved comb electrodes may be grounded or have a bias voltage applied as described with regard to other embodiments above.
Another alternative embodiment is shown in Figs. 7 & 8.
In this embodiment extended sense electrodes 50a, 50b are employed to reduce the undesired effect of voltage transients. The extended electrodes 50a, 50b are disposed on the substrate below the proof masses 16a, 16b and extend inward beyond the proof masses to the interleaved comb electrodes 18b, 14a, 14b, 18c. More particularly, the extended sense electrodes are disposed under the overlap region of the interleaved comb electrodes.
The extended sense electrodes may be formed below each set of interleaved comb electrodes, or under the inner interleaved comb electrodes only. (Through experimentation, the inner comb electrode only arrangement has been found to produce tuning fork gyroscopes with bias stability of 1,000+/hr. This embodiment has a cost savings advantage insofar as manufacturing larger sense electrodes requires little additional effort.) Figs. 9 and 10 illustrate another alternative embodiment. This embodiment includes distinct outer guard bands 52a, 52b and extended sense electrodes 54a, 54b. The extended electrodes 54a, 54b are disposed on the substrate below the proof masses 16a, 16b and extend inward beyond the proof masses to the interleaved comb electrodes 14a, 14b, 18b, 18c. More particularly, the extended sense electrodes are disposed under the overlap region of the interleaved inner comb electrodes. In this configuration both the sense electrode and the adjacent inner comb have the same bias.
As a result, SF is small and SS is 0.7, providing a suitable solution to the problem.
As shown in Figs. 11 and 12, inner and outer extended sense electrodes 56a, 56b, 58a, 58b may be employed. In this configuration the sense electrodes are extended beneath both the drive and sensing comb electrodes. More particularly, the sense plates may be extended below the drive combs with geometry which satisfies the loop closing equation above.
Coupling coefficients SF and SS are reduced by thicker proof masses and smaller gaps between teeth. Another possibility os setting SS (motor sense coupling) to zero (or some other small value) by appropriate selection of motor sense and inner guard band (or extended sense plate) voltages and allowing a larger SF (motor drive coupling) . The guard bands may also be extended below the suspension beams for more isolation of glass effects.
It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments shown and described herein, but that various changes and modifications may be 2o made without departing from the spirit and scope of this novel concept as defined by the following claims.
Claims (39)
1. A drive for imparting a vibratory force to a vibrating member with a driving member using drive signals, the vibrating member suspended by a support flexure above a sense electrode on a surface of a substrate, a voltage being applied to the sense electrode to detect capacitive changes, the drive comprising:
first comb electrodes connected to the driving member;
second comb electrodes connected to the vibrating member, said second comb electrodes interleaved with said first comb electrodes, an overlap region defined thereby, a gap being defined between the substrate surface and the interleaved comb electrodes; and a guard band disposed between said substrate and said interleaved comb electrodes.
first comb electrodes connected to the driving member;
second comb electrodes connected to the vibrating member, said second comb electrodes interleaved with said first comb electrodes, an overlap region defined thereby, a gap being defined between the substrate surface and the interleaved comb electrodes; and a guard band disposed between said substrate and said interleaved comb electrodes.
2. The drive of claim 1 wherein a bias voltage is applied to said guard band.
3. The drive of claim 2 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the drive signals.
4. The drive of claim 2 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the voltage applied to the sense electrodes.
5. The drive of claim 4 wherein said bias voltage is about sixty percent greater than the voltage applied to the sense electrodes.
6. The drive of claim 1 wherein said guard band is grounded.
7. The drive of claim 1 wherein said guard band has a width which is greater than or equal to the overlap region.
8. The drive of claim 7 wherein said guard band is constructed of a conducting material.
9. A tuning fork gyroscope comprising:
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
sense electrodes disposed on said substrate below said proof masses, a voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and guard bands formed on said substrate substantially between said inner and outer interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate.
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
sense electrodes disposed on said substrate below said proof masses, a voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and guard bands formed on said substrate substantially between said inner and outer interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate.
10. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 9 wherein at least one bias voltage is applied to said guard bands.
11. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 10 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the drive signals.
12. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 10 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the voltage applied to the comb electrodes.
13. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 12 wherein the bias voltage applied to the outer guard bands is approximately 30% of the drive voltage.
14. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 13 wherein the bias voltage applied to the inner guard bands is approximately 1.6 times the inner comb electrode bias voltage.
15. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 9 wherein said guard bands have a width which is greater than or equal to said overlap region.
16. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 15 wherein said guard bands are constructed of a conducting material.
17. In a tuning fork gyroscope having interleaved comb electrodes and a substrate surface, a method for alleviating undesirable effects of substrate voltage transients on gyroscope operation comprising the step of:
counteractively exciting the comb electrodes to reduce undesirable effects of substrate voltage transients on electrostatic coupling of the comb electrodes.
counteractively exciting the comb electrodes to reduce undesirable effects of substrate voltage transients on electrostatic coupling of the comb electrodes.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein said exciting step includes forming guard bands on the substrate substantially below the interleaved comb electrodes.
19. The method of claim 18 including the step of applying a bias voltage to said guard bands.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the signal applied to the comb electrodes.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein said bias voltage is sixty percent greater than said signal applied to said sense electrodes.
22. The method of claim 17 wherein said exciting step includes setting an excitation voltage proportional to the drive voltage.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein said setting step includes setting a fixed proportion of drive voltage: excitation voltage to 3:1.
24. A tuning fork gyroscope comprising:
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
sense electrodes disposed on said substrate below said proof masses, a voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and guard bands formed on said substrate substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate.
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
sense electrodes disposed on said substrate below said proof masses, a voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and guard bands formed on said substrate substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate.
25. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 24 wherein a bias voltage is applied to said guard bands.
26. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 25 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the drive signals.
27. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 25 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the voltage applied to the comb electrodes.
28. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 27 wherein said bias voltage is approximately sixty percent greater than said voltage applied to the sense electrodes.
29. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 24 wherein said guard bands have a width which is greater than or equal to said overlap region.
30. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 29 wherein said guard bands are constructed of a conducting material.
31. A tuning fork gyroscope comprising:
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes; and sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, wherein a bias voltage that is proportional to the drive signals is applied to said extended sense electrodes.
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes; and sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, wherein a bias voltage that is proportional to the drive signals is applied to said extended sense electrodes.
32. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 31 wherein said extended sense electrodes have a width which is greater than or equal to said overlap region.
33. A tuning fork gyroscope comprising:
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signal s are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, a voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and guard bands formed on said substrate substantially between said outer interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate.
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signal s are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, a voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and guard bands formed on said substrate substantially between said outer interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate.
34. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 33 wherein a bias voltage is applied to said guard bands.
35. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 34 wherein said bias voltage is proportional to the drive signals.
36. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 35 wherein said bias voltage is approximately 30% of the drive signal voltage.
37. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 36 wherein said guard bands have a width which is greater than or equal to said overlap region.
38. A tuning fork gyroscope comprising:
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
a first set of sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, a first voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and a second set of sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said outer interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, a second voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes.
a substrate with a surface;
an outer drive with comb electrodes to which drive signals are applied;
an inner drive with comb electrodes;
proof masses with inner and outer comb electrodes, said proof masses suspended above said substrate by a support flexure, said inner comb electrodes interleaved with said inner drive comb electrodes and said outer comb electrodes interleaved with said outer drive comb electrodes, an overlap region defined by said interleaved comb electrodes;
a first set of sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said inner interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, a first voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes; and a second set of sense electrodes disposed on said substrate and extended below said proof masses substantially between said outer interleaved comb electrodes and said substrate, a second voltage applied to said sense electrodes to detect capacitive changes.
39. The tuning fork gyroscope of claim 38 wherein said first and second voltages are proportional to the drive signals.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/752,570 | 1996-11-21 | ||
| US08/752,570 US5892153A (en) | 1996-11-21 | 1996-11-21 | Guard bands which control out-of-plane sensitivities in tuning fork gyroscopes and other sensors |
| PCT/US1997/021000 WO1998022827A1 (en) | 1996-11-21 | 1997-11-18 | Guard bands for tuning fork gyroscopes |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2272556A1 CA2272556A1 (en) | 1998-05-28 |
| CA2272556C true CA2272556C (en) | 2003-10-14 |
Family
ID=25026850
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002272556A Expired - Lifetime CA2272556C (en) | 1996-11-21 | 1997-11-18 | Guard bands for tuning fork gyroscopes |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5892153A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1007977B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3474582B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2272556C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69735726T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1998022827A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (43)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6122961A (en) | 1997-09-02 | 2000-09-26 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Micromachined gyros |
| JP3771100B2 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2006-04-26 | アルプス電気株式会社 | Capacitance detection type sensor, gyroscope and input device |
| US6679886B2 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2004-01-20 | Synthes (Usa) | Tools and methods for creating cavities in bone |
| JP3627648B2 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2005-03-09 | 株式会社デンソー | Angular velocity sensor |
| JP2002188924A (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2002-07-05 | Denso Corp | Semiconductor device |
| SG103276A1 (en) * | 2001-01-03 | 2004-04-29 | Inst Materials Research & Eng | Vibratory in-plane tunnelling gyroscope |
| JP4392246B2 (en) * | 2002-02-06 | 2009-12-24 | アナログ・デバイスズ・インク | Micromachined gyroscope |
| US7089792B2 (en) * | 2002-02-06 | 2006-08-15 | Analod Devices, Inc. | Micromachined apparatus utilizing box suspensions |
| US6792802B2 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2004-09-21 | Honeywell International Inc. | Noise source for starting MEMS gyroscope |
| AU2003226083A1 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-10-13 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Microelectromechanical sensors having reduced signal bias errors and methods of manufacturing the same |
| US6769304B2 (en) | 2002-04-02 | 2004-08-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Reduced start time for MEMS gyroscope |
| US6865944B2 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2005-03-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for decelerating proof mass movements within MEMS structures |
| US6817244B2 (en) * | 2003-01-06 | 2004-11-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for actively controlling movement within MEMS structures |
| US6718825B1 (en) | 2003-01-17 | 2004-04-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for reducing stick-down within MEMS structures |
| US6860151B2 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2005-03-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for controlling movement within MEMS structures |
| US6978673B2 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2005-12-27 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Methods and systems for simultaneously fabricating multi-frequency MEMS devices |
| US6843127B1 (en) * | 2003-07-30 | 2005-01-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Flexible vibratory micro-electromechanical device |
| JP4512636B2 (en) * | 2004-04-14 | 2010-07-28 | アナログ デバイシス， インコーポレイテッド | Inertial sensor with linearly arrayed sensor elements |
| JP4590976B2 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2010-12-01 | 株式会社日本自動車部品総合研究所 | Mechanical quantity sensor |
| US7478557B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2009-01-20 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Common centroid micromachine driver |
| US7300814B2 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2007-11-27 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Method for fabricating micro-mechanical devices |
| US7302848B2 (en) | 2005-03-10 | 2007-12-04 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Force compensated comb drive |
| US7231824B2 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2007-06-19 | Honeywell International Inc. | Use of electrodes to cancel lift effects in inertial sensors |
| US7213458B2 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2007-05-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | Quadrature reduction in MEMS gyro devices using quad steering voltages |
| US7421897B2 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2008-09-09 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Cross-quad and vertically coupled inertial sensors |
| US7426861B2 (en) | 2005-06-15 | 2008-09-23 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Tuning fork gyroscopes, accelerometers, and other sensors with improved scale factor |
| US20070163346A1 (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2007-07-19 | Honeywell International Inc. | Frequency shifting of rotational harmonics in mems devices |
| US7401515B2 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2008-07-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Adaptive circuits and methods for reducing vibration or shock induced errors in inertial sensors |
| US7444868B2 (en) | 2006-06-29 | 2008-11-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force rebalancing for MEMS inertial sensors using time-varying voltages |
| DE102007062732B4 (en) * | 2007-12-27 | 2016-08-25 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for operating a rotation rate sensor |
| JP4538503B2 (en) * | 2008-01-18 | 2010-09-08 | Ｏｋｉセミコンダクタ株式会社 | Resonator |
| US8011247B2 (en) * | 2008-06-26 | 2011-09-06 | Honeywell International Inc. | Multistage proof-mass movement deceleration within MEMS structures |
| US8187902B2 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2012-05-29 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | High performance sensors and methods for forming the same |
| US9171964B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2015-10-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for a three-layer chip-scale MEMS device |
| US9493344B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2016-11-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | MEMS vertical comb structure with linear drive/pickoff |
| US8748206B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2014-06-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for a four-layer chip-scale MEMS device |
| US8776601B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2014-07-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | MEMS sensor using multi-layer movable combs |
| US9568491B2 (en) * | 2013-07-08 | 2017-02-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Reducing the effect of glass charging in MEMS devices |
| CN103528577B (en) * | 2013-10-12 | 2016-06-01 | 深迪半导体(上海)有限公司 | A kind of Z axle MEMS capacitive gyroscope |
| ITUB20159197A1 (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2017-06-29 | St Microelectronics Srl | MICROELETTROMECHANICAL GYROSCOPE WITH DISORDER REJECTION AND METHOD OF DETECTING AN ANGULAR SPEED |
| CN108955663B (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2022-03-25 | 北京大学 | Resonant double-shaft micro-mechanical wheel type gyroscope |
| JP2019007855A (en) | 2017-06-26 | 2019-01-17 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Vibrating device, vibration device module, electronic device and mobile object |
| JP6802125B2 (en) * | 2017-08-24 | 2020-12-16 | 株式会社豊田中央研究所 | Vibrating gyro |
Family Cites Families (114)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH359552A (en) * | 1957-07-20 | 1962-01-15 | Boelkow Entwicklungen Kg | Measuring and control device for very low speeds |
| GB989101A (en) * | 1961-07-11 | 1965-04-14 | Mini Of Aviat London | Improvements in gyroscope apparatus |
| US3370458A (en) * | 1965-09-10 | 1968-02-27 | W C Dillon & Company Inc | Mechanical force gauge |
| US3696429A (en) * | 1971-05-24 | 1972-10-03 | Cutler Hammer Inc | Signal cancellation system |
| US3913035A (en) * | 1974-07-01 | 1975-10-14 | Motorola Inc | Negative resistance high-q-microwave oscillator |
| US4044305A (en) * | 1975-03-17 | 1977-08-23 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Apparatus for providing a displacement representative of the magnitude of a signal |
| JPS6025926B2 (en) * | 1976-10-01 | 1985-06-21 | シャープ株式会社 | Crystal oscillator |
| US4155257A (en) * | 1977-05-23 | 1979-05-22 | The Singer Company | Temperature compensated vibrating beam accelerometer |
| US4122448A (en) * | 1977-07-21 | 1978-10-24 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Automatic phase and gain balance controller for a baseband processor |
| US4144764A (en) * | 1978-05-11 | 1979-03-20 | Schaevitz Engineering | Servo amplifier for an electrically damped accelerometer |
| US4234666A (en) * | 1978-07-26 | 1980-11-18 | Western Electric Company, Inc. | Carrier tapes for semiconductor devices |
| US4321500A (en) * | 1979-12-17 | 1982-03-23 | Paroscientific, Inc. | Longitudinal isolation system for flexurally vibrating force transducers |
| US4336718A (en) * | 1980-09-08 | 1982-06-29 | Lear Siegler, Inc. | Control circuit for accelerometer |
| US4342227A (en) * | 1980-12-24 | 1982-08-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Planar semiconductor three direction acceleration detecting device and method of fabrication |
| US4499778A (en) * | 1981-02-03 | 1985-02-19 | Northrop Corporation | Flexure mount assembly for a dynamically tuned gyroscope and method of manufacturing same |
| US4381672A (en) * | 1981-03-04 | 1983-05-03 | The Bendix Corporation | Vibrating beam rotation sensor |
| US4447753A (en) * | 1981-03-25 | 1984-05-08 | Seiko Instruments & Electronics Ltd. | Miniature GT-cut quartz resonator |
| DE3112560C2 (en) * | 1981-03-30 | 1983-01-27 | M.A.N.- Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 6050 Offenbach | Proximity switch which, by means of excitation and detection of a field, indicates the presence or absence of field-changing objects in a defined distance range from the proximity switch using a binary signal |
| US4406992A (en) * | 1981-04-20 | 1983-09-27 | Kulite Semiconductor Products, Inc. | Semiconductor pressure transducer or other product employing layers of single crystal silicon |
| JPS57188121A (en) * | 1981-05-15 | 1982-11-19 | Seiko Instr & Electronics Ltd | Frequency adjusting method of coupling oscillator |
| CH642461A5 (en) * | 1981-07-02 | 1984-04-13 | Centre Electron Horloger | ACCELEROMETER. |
| US4495499A (en) * | 1981-09-08 | 1985-01-22 | David Richardson | Integrated oscillator-duplexer-mixer |
| US4414852A (en) * | 1981-09-14 | 1983-11-15 | Gould Inc. | Automatic zero balance circuit |
| US4654663A (en) * | 1981-11-16 | 1987-03-31 | Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Ltd. | Angular rate sensor system |
| US4411741A (en) * | 1982-01-12 | 1983-10-25 | University Of Utah | Apparatus and method for measuring the concentration of components in fluids |
| DE3213720C2 (en) * | 1982-04-14 | 1985-09-05 | Bodenseewerk Gerätetechnik GmbH, 7770 Überlingen | Dynamically coordinated cardan suspension with two degrees of freedom |
| US4478077A (en) * | 1982-09-30 | 1984-10-23 | Honeywell Inc. | Flow sensor |
| US4651564A (en) * | 1982-09-30 | 1987-03-24 | Honeywell Inc. | Semiconductor device |
| US4478076A (en) * | 1982-09-30 | 1984-10-23 | Honeywell Inc. | Flow sensor |
| US4621925A (en) * | 1982-11-11 | 1986-11-11 | Fujitsu Limited | Fiber-optic gyro |
| US4596158A (en) * | 1983-01-05 | 1986-06-24 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Tuned gyroscope with dynamic absorber |
| US4522072A (en) * | 1983-04-22 | 1985-06-11 | Insouth Microsystems, Inc. | Electromechanical transducer strain sensor arrangement and construction |
| US4490772A (en) * | 1983-06-13 | 1984-12-25 | Blickstein Martin J | Voltage and mechanically variable trimmer capacitor |
| US4619001A (en) * | 1983-08-02 | 1986-10-21 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Tuning systems on dielectric substrates |
| US4590801A (en) * | 1983-09-02 | 1986-05-27 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Apparatus for measuring inertial specific force and angular rate of a moving body |
| US4585083A (en) * | 1983-11-01 | 1986-04-29 | Shinko Denshi Company Ltd. | Mechanism for detecting load |
| US4628283A (en) * | 1983-11-07 | 1986-12-09 | The Narda Microwave Corporation | Hermetically sealed oscillator with dielectric resonator tuned through dielectric window by adjusting screw |
| US4783237A (en) * | 1983-12-01 | 1988-11-08 | Harry E. Aine | Solid state transducer and method of making same |
| US4600934A (en) * | 1984-01-06 | 1986-07-15 | Harry E. Aine | Method of undercut anisotropic etching of semiconductor material |
| FR2558263B1 (en) * | 1984-01-12 | 1986-04-25 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | DIRECTIVE ACCELEROMETER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING IT WITH MICROLITHOGRAPHY |
| US4538461A (en) * | 1984-01-23 | 1985-09-03 | Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Inc. | Vibratory angular rate sensing system |
| GB2158579B (en) * | 1984-01-23 | 1988-07-13 | Piezoelectric Technology Inves | Angular rate sensor system |
| USRE32931E (en) * | 1984-01-23 | 1989-05-30 | Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Inc. | Vibratory angular rate sensor system |
| US4524619A (en) * | 1984-01-23 | 1985-06-25 | Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Limited | Vibratory angular rate sensor system |
| US4899587A (en) * | 1984-01-23 | 1990-02-13 | Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Limited | Method for sensing rotation using vibrating piezoelectric elements |
| US4699006A (en) * | 1984-03-19 | 1987-10-13 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Vibratory digital integrating accelerometer |
| US4598585A (en) * | 1984-03-19 | 1986-07-08 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Planar inertial sensor |
| CA1234705A (en) * | 1984-03-22 | 1988-04-05 | Suzushi Kimura | Angular velocity sensor |
| GB8407847D0 (en) * | 1984-03-27 | 1984-05-02 | Emi Ltd | Sensing apparatus |
| US4674180A (en) * | 1984-05-01 | 1987-06-23 | The Foxboro Company | Method of making a micromechanical electric shunt |
| US4680606A (en) * | 1984-06-04 | 1987-07-14 | Tactile Perceptions, Inc. | Semiconductor transducer |
| US4644793A (en) * | 1984-09-07 | 1987-02-24 | The Marconi Company Limited | Vibrational gyroscope |
| JPS6197572A (en) * | 1984-10-19 | 1986-05-16 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Manufacture of semiconductor acceleration sensor |
| US4674319A (en) * | 1985-03-20 | 1987-06-23 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Integrated circuit sensor |
| US4705659A (en) * | 1985-04-01 | 1987-11-10 | Motorola, Inc. | Carbon film oxidation for free-standing film formation |
| US4735506A (en) * | 1985-04-01 | 1988-04-05 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Phase nulling optical gyroscope |
| US4764244A (en) * | 1985-06-11 | 1988-08-16 | The Foxboro Company | Resonant sensor and method of making same |
| US4639690A (en) * | 1985-07-05 | 1987-01-27 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Tunable, dielectric-resonator-stabilized oscillator and method of tuning same |
| US4744248A (en) * | 1985-07-25 | 1988-05-17 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Vibrating accelerometer-multisensor |
| US4744249A (en) * | 1985-07-25 | 1988-05-17 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Vibrating accelerometer-multisensor |
| US4679434A (en) * | 1985-07-25 | 1987-07-14 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Integrated force balanced accelerometer |
| JPS6293668A (en) * | 1985-10-21 | 1987-04-30 | Hitachi Ltd | Angular speed/acceleration detector |
| JPS6295421A (en) * | 1985-10-22 | 1987-05-01 | Tokyo Keiki Co Ltd | Gyroscope |
| GB2183040B (en) | 1985-11-19 | 1990-02-07 | Stc Plc | Transducer |
| US4761743A (en) * | 1985-12-02 | 1988-08-02 | The Singer Company | Dynamic system analysis in a vibrating beam accelerometer |
| US4736629A (en) * | 1985-12-20 | 1988-04-12 | Silicon Designs, Inc. | Micro-miniature accelerometer |
| US4747312A (en) * | 1986-02-21 | 1988-05-31 | Fischer & Porter Co. | Double-loop Coriolis type mass flowmeter |
| US4712439A (en) * | 1986-02-24 | 1987-12-15 | Henry North | Apparatus for producing a force |
| US4670092A (en) * | 1986-04-18 | 1987-06-02 | Rockwell International Corporation | Method of fabricating a cantilever beam for a monolithic accelerometer |
| US4922756A (en) * | 1988-06-20 | 1990-05-08 | Triton Technologies, Inc. | Micro-machined accelerometer |
| JPS6341080A (en) * | 1986-08-06 | 1988-02-22 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Semiconductor acceleration sensor |
| FR2604791B1 (en) * | 1986-10-02 | 1988-11-25 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | METHODS OF MANUFACTURING A PIEZORESISTIVE GAUGE AND AN ACCELEROMETER COMPRISING SUCH A GAUGE |
| US4743789A (en) * | 1987-01-12 | 1988-05-10 | Puskas William L | Variable frequency drive circuit |
| US4727752A (en) * | 1987-02-04 | 1988-03-01 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Pseudosinusoidal oscillator drive system |
| US4884446A (en) * | 1987-03-12 | 1989-12-05 | Ljung Per B | Solid state vibrating gyro |
| GB2202325B (en) * | 1987-03-19 | 1992-02-05 | Stc Plc | Fibre optic gyro |
| US4805456A (en) * | 1987-05-19 | 1989-02-21 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Resonant accelerometer |
| US4815472A (en) * | 1987-06-01 | 1989-03-28 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Multipoint pressure-sensing catheter system |
| US4881410A (en) * | 1987-06-01 | 1989-11-21 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Ultraminiature pressure sensor and method of making same |
| US5013396A (en) * | 1987-06-01 | 1991-05-07 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Method of making an ultraminiature pressure sensor |
| US4851080A (en) * | 1987-06-29 | 1989-07-25 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Resonant accelerometer |
| GB8716047D0 (en) * | 1987-07-08 | 1987-08-12 | Thorn Emi Electronics Ltd | Rate sensor |
| US4789803A (en) * | 1987-08-04 | 1988-12-06 | Sarcos, Inc. | Micropositioner systems and methods |
| JPS6481343A (en) * | 1987-09-24 | 1989-03-27 | Nec Corp | Manufacture of integrated circuit |
| US4808948A (en) * | 1987-09-28 | 1989-02-28 | Kulicke And Soffa Indusries, Inc. | Automatic tuning system for ultrasonic generators |
| US5060039A (en) * | 1988-01-13 | 1991-10-22 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Permanent magnet force rebalance micro accelerometer |
| US5016072A (en) * | 1988-01-13 | 1991-05-14 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Semiconductor chip gyroscopic transducer |
| US5195371A (en) | 1988-01-13 | 1993-03-23 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Semiconductor chip transducer |
| US5216490A (en) | 1988-01-13 | 1993-06-01 | Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Bridge electrodes for microelectromechanical devices |
| US4890812A (en) * | 1988-02-01 | 1990-01-02 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Temperature compensated mount for supporting a ring laser gyro |
| US4900971A (en) * | 1988-03-10 | 1990-02-13 | Seiko Electronic Components Ltd. | Face shear mode quartz crystal resonator |
| US4929860A (en) * | 1988-05-17 | 1990-05-29 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Electrode configuration for vibrating beam transducers |
| US4882933A (en) * | 1988-06-03 | 1989-11-28 | Novasensor | Accelerometer with integral bidirectional shock protection and controllable viscous damping |
| US4855544A (en) * | 1988-09-01 | 1989-08-08 | Honeywell Inc. | Multiple level miniature electromechanical accelerometer switch |
| GB2224159B (en) * | 1988-09-09 | 1992-07-08 | Seiko Electronic Components | Resonator |
| US5055838A (en) * | 1988-12-09 | 1991-10-08 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Silicon tactile imaging array and method of making same |
| US4893509A (en) * | 1988-12-27 | 1990-01-16 | General Motors Corporation | Method and product for fabricating a resonant-bridge microaccelerometer |
| US5025346A (en) * | 1989-02-17 | 1991-06-18 | Regents Of The University Of California | Laterally driven resonant microstructures |
| US4901586A (en) * | 1989-02-27 | 1990-02-20 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Electrostatically driven dual vibrating beam force transducer |
| JPH02306111A (en) * | 1989-05-19 | 1990-12-19 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Angular velocity detector |
| US4981359A (en) * | 1989-06-19 | 1991-01-01 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Ring laser gyroscope dither drive system and method |
| CA1332969C (en) | 1989-09-29 | 1994-11-08 | Francois Paquet | Analog torque rebalance loop for a tuned rotor gyroscope |
| DE69102590T2 (en) | 1990-05-18 | 1994-10-06 | British Aerospace | Inertial sensors. |
| US5090809A (en) * | 1990-06-04 | 1992-02-25 | Ferrar Carl M | Modulation frequency control in a fiber optic rotation sensor |
| US5205171A (en) | 1991-01-11 | 1993-04-27 | Northrop Corporation | Miniature silicon accelerometer and method |
| US5241861A (en) | 1991-02-08 | 1993-09-07 | Sundstrand Corporation | Micromachined rate and acceleration sensor |
| US5094537A (en) | 1991-03-08 | 1992-03-10 | Honeywell Inc. | Signal processing system for correcting ring laser gyroscope readout |
| US5203208A (en) | 1991-04-29 | 1993-04-20 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory | Symmetrical micromechanical gyroscope |
| US5233874A (en) | 1991-08-19 | 1993-08-10 | General Motors Corporation | Active microaccelerometer |
| US5349855A (en) | 1992-04-07 | 1994-09-27 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Comb drive micromechanical tuning fork gyro |
| FR2700065B1 (en) | 1992-12-28 | 1995-02-10 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | Method of manufacturing accelerometers using silicon on insulator technology. |
| US5481914A (en) | 1994-03-28 | 1996-01-09 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Electronics for coriolis force and other sensors |
| US5646348A (en) | 1994-08-29 | 1997-07-08 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical sensor with a guard band electrode and fabrication technique therefor |
| US5581035A (en) * | 1994-08-29 | 1996-12-03 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical sensor with a guard band electrode |
-
1996
- 1996-11-21 US US08/752,570 patent/US5892153A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1997
- 1997-11-18 EP EP97947558A patent/EP1007977B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-11-18 WO PCT/US1997/021000 patent/WO1998022827A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1997-11-18 DE DE69735726T patent/DE69735726T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-11-18 CA CA002272556A patent/CA2272556C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-11-18 JP JP52379598A patent/JP3474582B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE69735726D1 (en) | 2006-05-24 |
| EP1007977A1 (en) | 2000-06-14 |
| CA2272556A1 (en) | 1998-05-28 |
| DE69735726T2 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
| JP3474582B2 (en) | 2003-12-08 |
| EP1007977B1 (en) | 2006-04-19 |
| JP2001504585A (en) | 2001-04-03 |
| WO1998022827A1 (en) | 1998-05-28 |
| US5892153A (en) | 1999-04-06 |
| EP1007977A4 (en) | 2000-07-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2272556C (en) | Guard bands for tuning fork gyroscopes | |
| WO1998022827A9 (en) | Guard bands for tuning fork gyroscopes | |
| EP0970349B1 (en) | Tuning fork gyro with split electrode | |
| US5952574A (en) | Trenches to reduce charging effects and to control out-of-plane sensitivities in tuning fork gyroscopes and other sensors | |
| US5392650A (en) | Micromachined accelerometer gyroscope | |
| EP1216397B1 (en) | Microfabricated tuning fork gyroscope and associated three-axis inertial measurement system to sense out-of-plane rotation | |
| US7426861B2 (en) | Tuning fork gyroscopes, accelerometers, and other sensors with improved scale factor | |
| EP1831644B1 (en) | Oscillating micro-mechanical sensor of angular velocity | |
| EP3249356B1 (en) | Systems and methods for a four-mass vibrating mems structure | |
| WO2003031912A2 (en) | Tuning fork gyroscope | |
| US6966224B2 (en) | Micromachined vibratory gyroscope with electrostatic coupling | |
| EP1914511B1 (en) | Tuning fork gyro with sense plate read-out | |
| JP4126826B2 (en) | Angular velocity sensor | |
| JP2000074673A (en) | Compound movement sensor | |
| JP3601822B2 (en) | Double tone type vibration gyro sensor | |
| JPH0650761A (en) | Vibrating gyro | |
| US5460043A (en) | Vibratory gyroscope | |
| US9303994B2 (en) | Planar Coriolis gyroscope | |
| US20040118205A1 (en) | Vibratory gyroscopic rate sensor | |
| JP3049305B2 (en) | Resonator accelerometer | |
| RU2085848C1 (en) | Micromechanical vibratory gyroscope (versions) | |
| Bel et al. | Effect of geometrical electrode defects on the bias and sensitivity of tuning fork angular rate sensor | |
| JP2000180176A (en) | Vibration-type angular velocity sensor | |
| JPH0251066A (en) | Vibration gyroscope | |
| JPH0650762A (en) | Vibrating gyro |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20171120 |