CA2321877A1 - Method for cacheing configuration data of data flow processors and modules with a two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (fpgas, dpgas or similar) according to a hierarchy - Google Patents

Method for cacheing configuration data of data flow processors and modules with a two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (fpgas, dpgas or similar) according to a hierarchy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2321877A1
CA2321877A1 CA002321877A CA2321877A CA2321877A1 CA 2321877 A1 CA2321877 A1 CA 2321877A1 CA 002321877 A CA002321877 A CA 002321877A CA 2321877 A CA2321877 A CA 2321877A CA 2321877 A1 CA2321877 A1 CA 2321877A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
command
configuration
kenyon
memory
address
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA002321877A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Martin Vorbach
Robert Munch
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pact Informationstechnologie GmbH
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2321877A1 publication Critical patent/CA2321877A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F15/00Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
    • G06F15/76Architectures of general purpose stored program computers
    • G06F15/78Architectures of general purpose stored program computers comprising a single central processing unit
    • G06F15/7867Architectures of general purpose stored program computers comprising a single central processing unit with reconfigurable architecture
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F12/00Accessing, addressing or allocating within memory systems or architectures
    • G06F12/02Addressing or allocation; Relocation
    • G06F12/08Addressing or allocation; Relocation in hierarchically structured memory systems, e.g. virtual memory systems
    • G06F12/0802Addressing of a memory level in which the access to the desired data or data block requires associative addressing means, e.g. caches
    • G06F12/0806Multiuser, multiprocessor or multiprocessing cache systems
    • G06F12/0811Multiuser, multiprocessor or multiprocessing cache systems with multilevel cache hierarchies
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F12/00Accessing, addressing or allocating within memory systems or architectures
    • G06F12/02Addressing or allocation; Relocation
    • G06F12/08Addressing or allocation; Relocation in hierarchically structured memory systems, e.g. virtual memory systems
    • G06F12/0802Addressing of a memory level in which the access to the desired data or data block requires associative addressing means, e.g. caches
    • G06F12/0806Multiuser, multiprocessor or multiprocessing cache systems
    • G06F12/0813Multiuser, multiprocessor or multiprocessing cache systems with a network or matrix configuration
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F12/00Accessing, addressing or allocating within memory systems or architectures
    • G06F12/02Addressing or allocation; Relocation
    • G06F12/08Addressing or allocation; Relocation in hierarchically structured memory systems, e.g. virtual memory systems
    • G06F12/0802Addressing of a memory level in which the access to the desired data or data block requires associative addressing means, e.g. caches
    • G06F12/0806Multiuser, multiprocessor or multiprocessing cache systems
    • G06F12/084Multiuser, multiprocessor or multiprocessing cache systems with a shared cache

Abstract

Up until now, a central and global unit have been integrated into one module which processes all of the configuration requests. The invention provides for a plurality of active units which can take over this task. These units are arranged in a hierarchy. A request from the lowest level is only transferred to the next highest level if the request cannot be processed. The highest level is connected to an internal or external higher-order configuration memory which contains all the configuration data ever required for this programme run. The tree structure of the configuration units enables a kind of cacheing of the configuration data. The configurations are mainly accessed locally. In the worst case scenario, a configuration has to be loaded from the higher-order configuration memory in case the relative data are not available in any of the CTs (configuration tables) in the hierarchy.

Description

f AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.05 R-111 Job-648 Sent_b,y.: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:37; lletFax #984;Page 5 ;d-METHOD OF HIERARCHICAL CACHING OF CONFIGURATION DATA HAVING
DATAFLOW PROCESSORS ANJ7 MODULES HAVING TWp- OR
MUIJTIDIMENSIONAL PROGRAMMABLE CELL STRUCTURE
(FpGAs, DpGAS, etc.) Background information Related art The related art on which this patent spec:if.ication is based is described ir. Patent Application 196 54 846_2-53 (Method of automatic dynamic reloading of dataflow processors (D>~'Fs) and modules having a two- or multidimensional programmable cell.
matrix (FpGAs, DPGAs, etc.) and in Patent Application 196 59 593, 5-53 (l~un-time reconfiguration method far programmable modules). A method of configuring and reconfiguring DFPs, as well as FPGAs, DPGAs and similar modules according to the related art in which a separately configured central higher-order microcontroller-like module assumes the task of distribution of configuration data to a plurality of lower-order, mostly passive control units is described in these documents.
pisadvantages of the Related Art Hy using a central global unit which controls the reconfiguration of parts (e. g_ cells (CELs)) of one or more modules, bottlenecks occur when a plurality of different reconfiguration requests are to be handled at the same t~me_ The advantages of the parallelism of the abcve-described modules are considerably limited by such a central unit, since it represents the typical bottleneck and substantially slows down the processinc3 of data.
Furthermore, assigning the event source to the configuration i0 to be loaded represents a problem because absolute addresses NY01 307590 v 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.06 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:38; JIetFax #984;Page 6 r of the configuration memory are used. The reconfiguration unit must therefore contain a type of memory management system which, like in an operating system, also doc~,xments which memory area is used by which configuration.
Management of resources (e. g. CELs) represents an additional problem_ It must be ensured that each CEL is assigned exactly once to each algorithm started by a recon:Eiguration request and, specifically, to the one that also uses the remaining surrounding CELs: otherwise deadlocks may occur.
In order to elucidate the problem of reconfiguration again, the following example is given: a matrix of CELs is reconfigures and in the RESET state. Each CEL is capable of W dicating whether it is in a reconfigurable state. All CELs in the matrix are ready to be configured: thus they are in a recon>;igurable state. A first configuration routine (KR1) is ~.oaded: the matrix is not fully utilized. The configured CELs clear the indication that they are in a configurable state. A
second configuration routine (KR2) independent of the first one is loaded in a group of not yet configured C>rLs. A third configuration cannot be loaded, since thi:~ requires GELS of the first and/or second configuration routine (KR3); however these are not in a reconfigurable state as they are being used.
KR3 must be stopped until the required CELs are released, i.e., KR1 and KR2 are terminated_ During the execution of KRl and KR2, a load request for a fourth configuration routine (KR4) and a fifth configuration routine (KR5) arrives, which cannot all be loaded immediately, because they use CELs that are being used lay KR1 and KR2. KR3 ar~r~ KR4 partially use the same ~Ei_.s: ):CRS uses none of the CET.s of KR3 and KR9_ In or3er to properly reload KR3 - KRS, the following NY01 307590 v 1 AUC-24-00 10:52 212 P.07 R-111 Job-648 5e_nt by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:38; JetFax #984; Page 7 ~ . ' '°
requirements must be met:
1. KR3 - KR5 should be loaded in the order' of the load requests i.f oossilale_ 2. As many KRs as possible that are independent of one another, i.e., have nc common CELs, should be loaded in order to achiEve maximum parallelism.
3. The KRs should not block one another, i..e., KR3 is partially loaded but cannot be loaded any further since other CELs are blocked by the partially loaded KR9; while KR4 also cannot be loaded further since again required CELs are blocked by KR3. This results in a typical deadlock situation_ 4. The compiler which generated the KRs cannot recognize and cancer the interaction over. time of the KRs so that no conflict situation arises_ The ratio between the cost of a circuit to be implemented and an optimum result should be as good as possible, i.e., the object of the invention is to provide a flexible, parallel, deadlock-free configuration that can be executed using moderate tine and computing resources at a low cost_ In this context the following basic problems must be solved:
-~if only KR3 were to be loaded. the process would be deadlock free but not optimum since KR5 could also be loaded.
3a -if KR3 is loaded but KRS is not, and KR5 [is~, KR4 must be pre-marked so that it ryas the highest priority in a subsequent loading sequence, which means high overhEad.
Deadlock-fzee operation is pnsurad by thF fc~lloW ng procedures:
Improvements Through and Object of the Invention NY01 307590 v 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.AB R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:38; )etFsx #984;Page 8 , i The laasic object of the present invention is a unit.
hereinafter referred to as configuration table (CTS, which has a hierarchical structure and may occur sevexal times a~ each level, the number of CTs from the lowest hierarchical level to the highest diminishing so that exactly one CT is pxesent at the highest level. >~a~h cr Configures and controls independently from others and in parallel a plurality of configurable elements (CELs}. CTs cf the higher hierarchical levels can buffer configuration routines f:or lower-level CTs.
Tf more than one lower-level CT requires t:he same configuration routine, it is buffered in a higher-level CT and retrieved by the individual CTs, the higher-level CT
retrieving the respective configuration routine only once from a global Common COrifigLiratlon memory whereby a cache effect is lY achieved. In addition to configurable modules, the present invention can be used as a cache procedure for instruction and data cache in microprocessors, DFP or the like having a plurality of arithmetic units. Some of the units to be described below may be omitted depending on the application 2U (e.g., FILNtd} however, basically nothing is changed in the hierarchical structure_ 'therefore this application is considered a subset and is not described in detail. one considerable adv~ar~tage of the method described over conventional cache procedures is that data and/or codes are 25 cached selectively, i.e., using methods adapted accurately to the algorithm.
The present invention also allows large cell structures to be re~onfigux'ed in d Completely deadlock-freEa manner.
Description of the Invention Instead of integrating. as previously, a central and global unit in one module, with this unit proces:~ing all zhe corifiguration requests, there is a plurality of hierarchically (tree structure) arrarxged active units which can assume this n~YO ~ 3o~s9o v t AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.09 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON 8 KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:39; JetF~c #984;Page 9 < s task.
A request from the lowest level (the leavE~s in the 1-Hierarchy;
is forwarded to the next higher level only if the request could not be processed_ These steps are repeated for all the levels present until the highest le~rel is reached_ The highest level is connected to an internal or external higher-level configuration memory which contains all the configuration data required by this program run.
Due to the tree structure of the configuration units a kind of caching of the configuration da~a is achieved_ Accesses to configurations mainly occur locally. In the roost unfavorable case, a configuration must be loaded from the higher-level configuration memory if. the correspor~ding data is not available in any of the hierarchically arranged CTs_ Deadlocks are avoided in that a fixed time sequence of the configurations to be loaded is introduced and the configurations are combined to form a list. The status information of the CEhs is saved prior to loading and thus remains unchanged during the processing of' the entire list of configurations_ Basic Principle of the CT
A configuration table (CT) is an active unit which responds to sync signals, k=Town as triggers. The triggers are generated by a two- or mufti-dimensional matrix of electronic components usually for arithmetic or logical units, address generators, arithmetic units, and the like, hereinafter zeferred to as configurable elements (CEL). The trigger that occurs triggers a certain actio:~ within t-_hP C'r_ The task ef r_he CT is to assume the control of a plurality of CELs and to determine their arithmetic and/or logical operations. In particular, CELs must lae configured and reconfigured. ,A CT assumes this Nvo1 so75AO v t 5 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.10 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON & KENYON 212' 08/24/00 10:39' _., , _-..._... ~ , _lretFax #984 ~ Page 1 0 1 w task by managina a plurality of possible configuration roLtines (KR; which in turn each contain a plurality of individual configuration words (KW') and configure [sic] a plurality of CELs on the basis of the trigger conditions using one or more KR. Each CEL -eceives one or more configuration words, which are provided with the address of the CAL to be configured. A KR must be fully and correctly mapped to a plurality of CELs; a plurality of CELs can be combined to form groups; these groups are configured using different but fully executed KRs. All C~Ls in a group are interconnected so that after a necessary reconfiguration has been determined it is commur_icated to all the grouped CELs, via a common signal (ReConfig), that each CEL must terminate data processing and go ~.nto a reconfigurable state.
l.s Basic Principles of tl:e Deadlock-free Reconfiguration In systems that are reconfigurable in runtime the problem ?0 arises that the system may enter a state in which two parts wait for each other, thus creating a deadlock situation.
This problem could be a~croided by only loading a new configuration always entirely or not at al.l into the system or 25 by using a type of timeout procedure_ This entails a series of disadvantages (space requirements, running time, etc.) and problems such as:
- procedure if a configuration cannot be loaded.
- managing the order in which the configurations are loaded.
- deteriorated performance, since other configurations that could possibly be loaded into the CELs are not taken ~.nto aCCOUnt_ These problems can be el-urinated with the metl-god described in NY01 307S9o v 1 AUC-24-00 10:52 212 P.11 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212' 08/24/00 10:39-__-. , , ~ , _lletFs~c #984; Page 1 1 the following. The starting point is a DFF system according to the related art.
A trigger signal is transmitted from a CEL to a CT_ Th,~s CT
determines the trigger source ar_d selects a configuration (KR)to be loaded using a Lookup table_ The ir_comirig trigger signals are blocked, and no further triggers are accepted until the current configuration is completely processed. A
configuration contains a plurality of commands which are transmitted to a number of CELs_ In a system configurable in runtime it is, however, not guaranteed that each configuratxcn command (KW) can also be executed. Impossibility of execution may be caused, for exampla, by the fact that the addressed configurable element (CEL) has not yet completed its task anC
thus cannot accept any new configuration data. In order to avoid performance deterioration, aJ~l configuration commands that could not be processed (since the respective CELs were not in a reconfigurable state and rejected the configuration (R1~JECT)) are written according to the FIFO principle in a configuration command located in a special memory (F1LM0) (to be described in detail below) after the last command_ Subsequently the next configuration command is executed by the same procedure. This is repeated until tha end of a configuration has been reached-Subsequently, the CT assumes a state in which it accepts trigger signals allowing it to continue to load configurations. m this state, the CT processes the FILMO in regular intervals under the control of a timer.

The configurations to be loaded are prioritized by the fact that the CT runs through the FILMO memory before tre configuration to be actually loaded is processed. A FIFO--like structure of the FIL.MO ensures that KWs which could not be fully processed during previous trigger requests automatically obtain a highex priority with respect to the new [KW] to be processed. When the tr'-LMO memory i$ processed each AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.12 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON 8. KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:39; _TetFax #f984;Page 12 configurable element (CEL) addressed by a configuration command is tested prior to or during the transmission of a KW
to see whether it is in the "reconfzgurable" state. If this state is "reconfigurable" (ACCEPT), the data i.s transmitted S and deleted from the FILMO memory. Tf the state is "not reconfigurable" (REJECT), the data remain: in FZLMO and is processed again in the next run. The CT pracesses the next entry in FILMO_ This is repeated until the end of the FILMO is reached. Then the actual configuration activated by the occurrence of the trigger signal is processed. The structure' of the FILMO
corresponds to the FZFO principle, i.e., the oldest entry is processed first. In order to process the >r'ILMp even when no new KR is loaded, the FILMO is run through in regular intervals under the control of a timer.
The other, uninvolved configurable elements ;CEL) continue to work simultaneously during this phase without their function being affected. Thus it may occur that while the CT processes the FILMO, one or more configurable elements (CELs) change to the "reconfigurable" state. Since the CT with the processing may be at any location within the F2x,M~, the following may occur:
The CT attempts to process a first command whose addressed element to ba configured (CEL) is not in the "reconfigurable"
state. Therefore, the CT continues with the next command (KW).
At the same time one or more configurable elements change to the "reconfigurable" state, among them also the configurable element whit-z could have been written via the first configuration command. The CT processes a second configuration command (KW), which uses the same configurable element (CEL) as the first Configuration command. however originates from another configuration. At this time, the configurable element (CEL) .is i.n the "reconfigurable" state and the command cam be processed successf-ully_ NY01 307590 v 1 8 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.13 R-111 Job-64B
Sent by: KENYON & KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:40; jetFs~ ~g84;Page 13 This no longer ensures that the configuration which should have been loaded first is actually completed first. Two partially completed configurations can now exist each of which xequires configurable elements of the other configuration in order to be fully loaded. A deadlock situation has occurred, which is illustrated in Figure 18. Configuration A and configuration B are to be configured. The CT has already loaded the crosshatched part of configuration A and configuration H. Configuration A still requires the light double shaded area of configuration B for completion and configuration H still requires the dark double shaded area of configuration A for completion_ Since neither configuration is fully completed and thus functional, tk~e termination state in which one of the two configurations would be removed does not occur fox either of the two configurations. Both conficuratiozs are waiting the for the release of the configurable elements sr_ill needed.
In the present method a deadlock is prevented in that the CT
detects the states of all configurable element$ prior to processing the ~'rbMO and then allows no more changes or ignores the changes that occur until the sequence is completed_ In other words, either the states of all configurable elements are saved prior to processing the FILMp 2.5 or a status change is prevented while the fILMO is being processed. One possible technical implementation is the use of a register in each contzgurable element in which the status prior to processing the FI~MO .is saved. The CT only works on the basis of the states detected and not with the current states of the configurable elements_ This c=nsures that each command (KW) to be processed is faced with the same state of the configurable elements (CELs). This step does not rule out that one or more Configurable elements switch to the "reconfigurable" state while the );'ILMO is being processed.
This change, however, is not immediately visible to the CT
during processing, but only when the next run begins.
NYOi ao75so v ~ g AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.14 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:40; JIetFax #g84;Page 14 r Configuration Sequences In order to Configure certain algorithms, it is absolutely necessary to strictly observe the order in which the KW are written in the CEL_ For example, it is recom.-nended that the bus system be configured first before a CEL is connected to a bus system, so that the CEL is not connected to a bus used by another routine. In other words, a CET is only configured if the respective bus links have been previously configured.
In the method according to the present invention, a fixed seguence is observed as follows:
Configuration words (KWs) whose execution is decisive for the configuration of the subsequent KWs are especially marked ;and referred to as KWR below). If the configuration of such a KWR
fails, all subsequent KWs within the respective configuration routine (KR) are written to the FILMO and are not executed in this run. Even when running through the FILMO, all KWs located in the sequence behind a KWR whose configuration failed are not executed in the current run_ Cache Procedure The CT has a hierarchical structure, i.e., there are several CT levels in a module_ The arrangement is preferably a tree structure (CT tree}_ An external configuration memory (ECIa), containing all KRs is assigned here to the root CT, while the Configurable elements (CELs) which call up the individual KRs are assigned to the lea~cres. The configurable elements are assigned to the mid-level CTs of the same hierarchical level.
A lpcal internal memory is assigned to each CT. This memory i.s partially cleared when there is no more space for new KRs to be stored or when this is explicitly requested by a special CT
command (RFMpVE). The memory is cleared one KR at a time using a delete strategy such that in the ideal case only those KRs are deleted that are no longer requested or are explicitly NY01 307590 v 1 1 0 AUG-24-00 t0:52 212 P.15 R-111 Job-64B
Sent by: KENYON & KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:40; JetFax #984;Page 15 a r identified in the REMOVE command. xhe number of YRs deleted individually is such as to free the exact amount of memory space required to write the new KRs to be loaded into the memory. Rs a result, as many KRs as possible remain in the memory to optimize the cache effect.
The advantage is that the each CT subordinate to any desired CTx and thus located further up in the CT tree does not request a KR stored in the CTx from the external Configuration memory ECR but obtains it directly from CTx. This results in a cache structure over several levels_ The data transmission overhead in the CT tree, in particular the required ECxt memory bandwidth, is considerably reduced.
In other words, each CT buffers the KRs of the CT below it.
This means that the lower level CTs obtain the required KRs directly from those above them, and no memory ar.cess tv the external ECR is necessary. Only if a required KR is not available in one of the higher level CTs must the KR be loaded 2o by accessing the ECR. This results in a particularly efficient hierarchical cache structure for KRs.
This structure also results in delete strategy options which however should be determined empirically, depending on the application. These options include:
- deleting the oldest entries - deleting the smallest entries - deleting the largest entries - deleting the entries retrieved least often.
3S Hasic Principles of the Gt Hierarchies In oxder to achieve a cache effect, CTS are connected together NY01 307590 v 1 1 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.16 R-111 Job-646 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:41-]~#984;Page 16 w a to form a hierarchical tree structure. A bus system (inter-CT
bust connecting an upper node (CT) to a plurality of lower nodes (CTs) is located between the individual nodes (CTs).
Lower nodes (CTs) request data from the upper nodes (CTs); the uppex nodes then send data to the lower nodes. The lower nodes exchange status information using the networks between the higher nodes which therefoz~e must resolve the addresses.
Ct Hierarchies and Addressing CT hierarchies are arranged so that a binary tree can be used for addressing the individual CTs. This means that the least significant address bit identifies the individual leaves of the tree and each additional address bit selects the next higher hierarchical level. Thus, each CT has a unique address.
The following table shows how the individual address bits are assigned to the respective levels-3 2 1 D Address Width - - - * Level 0: Leaves 1 - - * * Intermed. Level 1 - * * '* Intermed. Level 2 3 * * * * Intermed. Level 3 4 ...

* = address bits used - - address bits not used sa If a higher level CT is assigned to a group of CTs, multiple address bits of the group are co_nbined accordingly.
The followinc table shows how the individual address bits are assigned to the respective levels; a group with 8 CTs is AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.17 R-111 Job-648 ~ent by: KENYON 8 KENYON 212; 08124!00 10:41; j~t~#984;Page 17 located on level 0. (Address bit 2-0):
[insert table 4 3 2 ... Address 0 Width S - ~ - * Level 0: Leaves 3 - - * * Intermed_ Level 1 4 - * * * Intermed_ Level 2 S

* * * Intermed. Level 3 6 to * - address bits used - - address bits not used The binary tree can have an unidimensional or multidimensional structure by having Qne binary tree for each dimension.
A certain CT (TARGET) i_s addressed in that the initiating CT
(INITIATOR) eitrer provides the exact target address or uses the relative TARGET address.
The evaluation of a relati~cre address is described in more detail below.
Example of a relative address field for a two-dimensional addressing:

Higher Broad- Y X-Address CT cast Address Bit I5 is set when the CT of the next higher hierarchical level is to be selected.
NYD1 307590 v 1 I 3 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.1A R-111 Job-648 ~ent by: KENYON 8: KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:41 ; lletFax #984;Page 18 Bit 14 identifies broadcasts, i.e., selects all. CTs.
The X/Y addresses pro~cside the address of the TARGET based Qn the acdress of the INITIATOR.
The addresses are "signed" (plus or minus) integers. The TARGET is de~ermined by adding the Y/X addresses of the address field to the current address position_ Each level has a certain address width. The addexs correspond to this width.
Overrun or underrun during addition means that the addressed CT is not be~ow the current node and the address request is forwarded to the CT above it (the next higher node).
If no overrun or underrun occurs, TARGET is below the current node_ The address bit calculated on the current level (see tables) selects the CT located directl~r below the current node. The next lower CT (node) i.s selected from this CT using the correspondingly calculated address bit.
Prioritizing Access in Ct Hierarchies Access to the inter-CT buy is managed by an arbiter. All Lower nodes hare the same priority_ The upper node has a higher priority. Therefore, an access transmitted from a higher node downward or one that has already covered a long distance from the TN_TTIATOR is prioritized over other accesses.
Basic Structure of a CT
The following description of the CT provides an overview of the individual components. The detailed description of the main groups is given below.
The core of a CT is the control state machine (CTS) which controls all configuration routine (KR) processing. The garbage collector (GC) which controls the removal of KR from NYOt 307590v 1 14 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.10 R-111 Job-648 gent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:42; ]etFax #984;Page 19 the memory (CTR) of the CT; the ~'ILMO which assumes the mal:~age_nent of the KWs still to be processed, and the LOAD
state -nachine which controls the loading of KRs are assigned to the CTs.
The memory (CTR) is designed as a conventional read-write memory where all technically possible implementations may be used, and is used for local storage of KRs for the respective CT and the CTs subordinate to it_ As a special case, the memory (CTR) can also be designed as a ROM, )rPROM, EEPROM, flash ROM, or the like, in order to provide the module with a fixed, ASIC cr PLD-type (sEe Background information) function.
In order to generate the CTR addresses, four pointers configured as loadable counters are used.
1. Free Pointer (FP). Points to the first free memory location after the last KR in the CTR.
2. Garbage Pointer (GP). Points to an entry to be removed by the garbage collector (GC) from the CTR_ 3. Move Pointer (MP). Points to the memory location in the CTR
from which a valid configuration word (KW), not to be removed, i.e., Gn entry of a KR, is to be copied/moved to the entry defined by the GP_ 4. Program Pointer (PP). Points to the KW currently being executed by the CTS.
KWs are forwarded to the respective CELs via an output interface (OUT). The CELs acknowledge (ACCEPT) the receipt of the KW, provided they are in a reconfigurable state. If a KW
i.s not acknowledged (RE,7l~:CT) it is temporarily buffered in a FIFO-like memory (FILMO) to be written again to the addressed Cc.L at a later time without using the program pointer.
NY01 307590 V 1 I rJ

AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.20 R-111 Job-648 ~ent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:42; JetFax #984;Page 20 The CTS receives, via trigger signals, a request to process a KR. The trigger signals pass through a mask, i.e. a filter, which filters out (masks out) undesirable triggers_ A mask can be designed according to the related art using an AND gate, which links a trigger with an AND enable signal_ The triggers are converted into binary signals via a prioritized round-robin arbitex (SCRR-ARB). A prioritized round-robin arbiter combines the advantage of the democratic character of a round-robzn arbiter with the recognition of the next enable Tn a cycle, i_e., the advantage of a priority arbi.ter_ The masked t=iggers are switched as an address to a first lookup table (LUT1), i.e., a memory that assigns the ID of the respective KR to the trigger incoming as an address and outputs it over the data -fines.
In a second lookup table (LUT2) the ID of the K)a is assigned to the address of the memory location of the KR in the CTR.
The second lookup table is used not only for assigning trigger signals, but commands using an ID as a parameter also use the LUT2 for address assignment.
The assignment of the trigger signals to the respective IDs is entered into LUT2 via the "REFERENC)3" command to be described later. LUT2 is managed, i.e., the IDs are assigned to the addresses in CTR, automatically by the CTS and the GC_ To better understand the CT, a possible basic set of commands is illustrated below:
1. BEGIN <ID>
BEGIN <ID> denotes the start of a configuration routine. <ID>
provides the unique identification number of the configuration routine.

c. STOP
STOP denotes the end of a configuration z~outine. At this paint NYQ1 307590v f 16 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.21 R-111 Job-648 ent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:42; JetFax ~984;Page 21 /103 the conf~.guration table (CT) terminates the processing of the configuration routine. The garbage collector (GC) terminates the z'emoval of entr~.es of this configuration routine.
3. EXECUTE <ID>
Jumps to the start (BEGIN <ID>) of a conf_guration routine. If this routine is not present zn the CT memory, it is requested from the next higher CT, or loaded from the memory.
4. LpAL7 <ID>
Requests the KR <ID> from the next higher CT.
5. REMOVE <ID>
Calls the GC in order to remove the configuration routine <ID>
from BEGIN' <ID> to STOP from the CT memory and pre-write the subsequent configuration routines to the point where no memory hole is created by the removed configuration routine.
6. PUSH <):'ORCED> <ADDRESS> <DATA> <EXIT>
Writes the configuration data <DATPr> to the <ADDRESS>
register. If <FORCED> is set, data is written even if the RECONFIG flag of the respective target register is not set.
<EXIT> is used td indicate a KWR which interrupts further execution of the subsequent KWRs in the evEnt of a REJECT.
7. MASK <SR> <TR~GGER>
Sets or resets the trigger mask using <TRIGGER> as a function of <SR> tSet/Reset).
8. WAIT <UNMASKED> <TRIGGER>
Stops the processing of the configuration routine and waits for <TRIGGER>. If <UNMASKED> is set, there is a response to the expected trigger regardless of the state of the trigger mask.
9. TRIGGER <TRIGGER> <CT#>
Sends t?'~e binary value of a tx'igger to the higher level CT
NY01 307590 v 1 1 7 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.22 R-111 Job-648 ~ent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:42; J tFa~c #984; Page 22/103 addressed by CT#_ 10.GETBUS/GETCTS
Establishes a connection to the inter-CT bus.
11. LOOSEBUS/LOpSECTS
Terminates the connection to the ir_ter-CT bus.
12. REFERENCE <TRIGGER> <ID>
Writes the value <ID> into the LUT2 at the address cTRIGGER>, whereby a certain configuration routine (ccR) is assigned to a trigger signal.
The commands EXECUTE, LOAD, REMd'VE, PUSH, MASK, WAIT, TRIGGER, 25 REFERENCE are only valid within the BEGIN' - STOf brackets. T!~e commands are not executed outside these brackets.
A configuration routine (KR) has the followixig structure:
BEGrN <ID>;
valid commands STOP;
Indirect Addressing (Referencing;
The cache principle of the CT allows a KR tQ be buffered in a CT, the KR being used by a plurality of different 7.ower-level CTs or CELs.
If the lower-level units access the external interface of the module (e. g., RAM, periphery), it becomes necessary to store different addresses or parts of the external interface, This would make the contents of the required individual KRs fundamentally different. Caching is no longer possible.
NY01 307590 v 7 1 8 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.23 R-111 Job-648 ~ent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08124/00 10:43; )etFax #984; Page 23/103 Indirect referencing provides a remedy. Far this purpose, special KR (hereinafter referred to as ZKR) are used, which contain and set the required external parameters. Other different KRs may be called up ~~ria triggers on different hierarchical levels. The actual KR is called up starting at the end of an IKR. The IKR are not cachable, however, while the KR called up are all uniform and are therefore cachable.
It is advisable that the size of the 1KR be reduced to the absolute minimum, i.e_, only the external and different parameters and the call up of the uniform KRs.
An indirect configuration routine (TKR1 is structured as follows:
BEGIN <xI7>;
xxx; valid commands where only external peripherals are to be activated, TRIGGER <ID>; start, stop, or load requests to peripheral 2U processes GOTO <ZD> Jump to uniform KRs STOP;

Specia~ Cases:
1. WAIT FOR BpOT
This command is only valid at the first address of the CTR, During the boot sequence, the complete boat KR is initially 30 written into the CTR, but not the start sequence of the bpot KR BEGIN <0>. In its place (at address i) is WAIT FOR_BpOT
which is set automatically after a RESET. WAIT FOR )300T is not overwritten with BEGIN <0> and the CTS does not begin processing Lhe boot KR until the entire boot KR has beC3n 35 written to the CTR_ WAIT_FOR-1300T should not occur wl.thin a program.
NY07 307590 y ~

AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.24 R-111 Jab-64B
gent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:43; lfetFsx #984;Page 24/103 2. $OOT <CT ID>
BOOT <CT ID> marks the CT in which the following boot KR
should be written_ No BEGIN follows after BOOT <CT ID>, the boot KR is not terminated by STOP, but by a subsequent BOOT
<CT ID>. A STOP ends the boot sequence.
BOOT <CT ID> should not occur within a program.
Boot Sequence After a RESET, the CT Qf the uppermost hierarchical level (ROOT CT) loads the boot KR into the CTs of the lower hierarchies. For this purpose, there is a Jump to a fixed address (BOOT RDR) in the external. configuration memory (ECR) 1-5 assigned to the ROOT CT_ The ROOT CT executes this jump and arrives at the boot sequence. This is structured as follows:
);LOOT <CT IDO>; COMr2AND; CO_~R~IAND; . ..
BOO'.' <CT ID1>; COMMAND; COMMRND; . _ .
BOOT <C'X' IDn>; COMMAND; COM~p~ND . _ _ STOP;
During the boot sequence the complete boot :KR is initially written into the CTR startitZg at address 2 of the CT defined by <CT ID>. The start sequence of the boot KR (BEGIN <0>) is not written to address 2. In its place is WAIT FOR BOOT which is automatically set after a RESET_ STOP is not written to the end of the boct KR in the CTR, overwriting WAIT_FOR BOOT with BEGIN <0> until the entire boot KR has been written'ixlto the GTR and the ROOT CT has reached the next B0.7T <CT ID>. The CTS
starts processing the boot KR.
Loading a Configuration Rout=zne There are three basic mecha-iisms for requesting a configuratipn routine in addition to the boot KR:
NY01 307590 y ~ 2 0 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.25 R-111 Job-64B
~ent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:43; jetFax #984;Page 25/103 1. Execution of a LOAD <ID> by the CTS
2_ Execution of an EXECUTE <ID> by the CTS, the KR with the respective ID not being available in the C'rR.
3. Occurrence of a trigger which is translated into an <ID>
whose respective KR is not available in CTR, via LUTl.
The sequence is the same in all three cases:
The ID of the requested KR is provided as an address to LUT2.
LUT2 checks whether a valid address exists in CTR_ If it does not exist, i.e., <ID> points to the value G .in LUT2, load <ID>
is sent to the CTS.
Subsequently CTS requests the <ID> of the respective KR from the hierarchically higher-level CT. This request reaches the higher--order CT in the form of a trigger and is eval-aated by it accordingly.
The higher-order CT transmits the requested KR to the requesting CT. The data is written, starting at the address to which FREE-POINTER (FP) points, into the CTR, the FP being incremented by one after each write access.
?5 When FP reaches the upper limit of the CT1~, the garbage collector (GC) is called up to remove the lowermost KR within the CTR and to compress the CTR. The FP is reset. This sequence continues until the KR to be loaded f-is completely into the CTR.
;Jump Table in the Configuration Memoxy The configuration memory assigned td ROOT C~ contains alb the 39 KR that must be loaded for an application, In the external.
configuration memory (ECR) there is a jump to the boot configuration routine at a fixed address (ADR BOOT). AL
NY01 307590 v 1 7 ~, AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.26 R-111 Job-648 ant by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; - -. I 08/,24100 10:43; _lietFax #984;Page another fixed address range (LUT ECR) of any desired length which is, however, predefined within an application there are jumps to the individual KRs. The <ID> of each KR is used as an address in ECR where the start address of the respective KR is located; thus KRs are addressed indirect~y:
ID -> LUT ECR -> KR
Modifying the Kr in the Configuration Memory The KR with the ID <A> is to be modified_ The HOST initially writes the new KR for the ID <A> to a free memory location in the ECR_ The ID <A>, together with the new address of the KR, i.s written in the configuration memory from the higher-level unit (HQST) into a RpOT CT register pxovided for that purpose.
The ROCT CT sends the command REMOVE <A> to all CTs below it.
Subsequently, when a STOP is reached or during IDLE cycles, i_e., as long as no KR is being executed, all CTs remove the KRs related to this ID from the CTR and set LUT2 at address <A> to "NoAdr," which means there are no ~ralid address entr~.es for ID <A> in LUT?. If the ID <A> is requesi~ed again, the missing entry ("NoAdr") at the location <A> in LUT? foxces each CT to request the KR <A> from the ECR again.
The FILMO
A KR is composed basically of the command PUSH, which writes new configuration wards to a certain address. if a configuration word of the t;rpe KW cannot be written because the configurable element (CEL) addressed is not ready to receive a new coz~figurati.on (REJECT), the configuration word is written into a memory hereinafter referred to as fILMO
instead of to the configurable element (CEL) addressed_ The sub8eque:zt Commands are prCSCessed normally until a configuration word cannot be written again; it is then written into the FILMO.
NY01 307590 v 1 2 2 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.27 R-111 Job-648 ant by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:44; jetFax #984;Page,27/103 If a configuration word of the Hype KWR cannot be written because the configurable element (CLL) addressed is not ready to receive a new configuration (REJECT), the configuration word zs written into a memory hereinafter referred to as FILMO
instead of to the configurable element (CEL) addressed. All subsequent commands to the end of the KR are written directly into the FILtdO, rather than to the CEL.
The entire F~LMO is run through in IDLE cycles and before each execution of a new KR. Each word of the FILMO that is read out, beginning with the oldest data word is to be sent to its addressed element accordir_g to the known FzFO principle; the addressed element must be ready to receive the configuration word. If the data words can be written from the beginning (i.e., the addressed configurable elements (CELs) are ready), the entry is remo~esed from the FILMO by the FIFO principle. If a configuration word cannot be written, it is skipped and is not removed from the FILMO_ Contrary to FIFO, the data after the skipped configuration word continue to be read. The configuration words written after a skipped configuration word can, depending on the implementation of the FILMO, be 1. marked as written and not deleted from FILMO; configuration words marked as wr~.tten are no longer read during subsequent runs or are immediately deleted zf a skipped configuration word is no longer located in front of them;
or 2. deleted from the FII,MO; the configuration wards before and after the deleted configuration word are preserved. The subsequent words must be shifted forward (up) or the previous words must be shifted backward (down) for deletion, the order of the configuration words being preser~red in all cases.
If a new KR is executed, the configuration words (KW) which could ndt be written by the CTS to the addressed elements (CELs) are appended again to FIT~MO, i.e_ the KW are written to the end (in the reading direction) of the FI:LMO. If the FILMQ
is full, i.e., there are no free entries for configuration NYp1 307590 v 1 2 3 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.28 R-111 Job-648 ant by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24100 10:44; ~tF~ ..#984;Page 281103 words, the execution of the KR is stopped. The FILMO is run through until a sufficient number of configuration words could be written and a corresponding number of free entries have been created, whereupon the KR continues tc> be processed_ The FILMU is a FIFO-like memory which is always run r_hrough linearly starting from the oldest entry; contrary to a FIFO, however, entries are skipped (First In Linear Multiple Out).
Function of the Configuration Table State Machine (Cts) The configuration table state machine (CTS) is respcnsible for controlling the CT. It executes the commands of the KR and responds to incoming triggers. It manages the FILMO by readinc the FILMO during IDLE cycl~5 and before executing a KR.
It responds to the signals illegal <TRG> (I1_legal Trigger, see >:igure 1, 0102) and load <ID> generated by the LUT structure.
load <ID> is generated when a cache miss exists in LUT2 (0105) or the KR/IKR referenced by ID has been marked as deleted (0107). It responds to the control signals of the higher level CT.
An example of implementation for processing the commands is illustrated in Figures 2 through 7.
Control Signa7.s to Higher Level Cts - illegal <TRG> (0102) shows to the higher level CT that an unknown trigger <TRG>
has occurred.
- load <ID> (0105/0107) requests the higher level CT to load the tID>.
-- trigger <TRG> <CT#> (0108) sends a trigger <TRG> to the higher level or NV01 307590 v t 2 4 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.29 R-111 Job-64B
nt by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; "08/24/00 10:44; ktFax #984; Page 29/103 to the addressed Cf <CT#>.
Control Signals from Higher Level CTs - remove <ID> (see Figure 15, 1513) requests the CT to delete the <ID>.
- write-to_FP <data> (sea Figure 2, 0205) sends the data to the CT. The data is appended to the end of the data in the memory.
lU
Function of the Garbage Collector (Gc) The CTR has two problems:
1.5 1. zf a LORD or EXECUTE command or a trigger refers to an ID
whose KR is not present in the CTR, the KR must be re-loaded_ Sometimes however there is not er_ough space available in the CTR to load the requested KR_ 20 2. If a REMOVE <ID> occurs, the respective KR must be remo~sed fxom the CTR. This creates a gap unless the KR is located at the end of the CTR. When a new KR is loaded, the gap may not be completely filled again or the gap may be too small for the new KR_ This results in fragmenting of the C:TR. The function 25 of the garbage collector is to remove KR from the CTR in order to create space for new entrzes AND to reorganize the CTR
after the removal of entries so that all remaining KR are located in succession in the memory as a contiguous block and the freed memory blocks are located at the end of the CTR as a 30 cont~.guous block_ Thus new KR can be re-loaded in an optimum manner and without loss of memory space.
35 Evaluating Trigger Pulses Each CT has a link to a plurality of trigger signals belonging NYO 1 30759p v t 2 5 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.30 R-111 Job-648 ant by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; , 08124100 10:45;_, ]etFax #984;Page 301103 to its respective hierarchical level, which are combined to form a bus. Incoming triggers are evaluated via a mask, i.e.
only the enabled trigger signals are forwarded. The enabled trigger signals are buffered in a sample register .5 synchronously with the system clock (sampled). An arbiter selects one of the stored trigger signals and conve-is the signal into a binary vector. The selected trigger signal is deleted from the sample register. The binary vector is forwarded to a first lookup table (LUTI) which translates the binary vector into the identification number (ID) of the configuration routine (KR) to be called up. The Zp is translated into the address of the KR in the CT memory (CTR) in a second lookup table (LUT2). The CT state machine (CTS) sets its program pointer (PP) to this address and begins the I5 execution of the KR. 1~he prerequisite is that each trigger enab~.ed via the mask has a corresponding entry in LUT1.
Otherwise an error condition is forwarded to the CTS (illegal trigger); each ID = "NoAdr" is eva~.uated as a non-existing entry. "NoAdr" is a token selected depending on the implementation.
If there is no entry in LUT2, i.e., the KR of the respective ID is not in the CTR, a load request is sent. to the CTS (load ~Ip>) _ Sending Trigger Pulses to the Higher Level CT
In addition to the interface described above to a higher level CT for loading KR, there is an additional interface for exchanging freely definable commands, in particular, however, trigger vectors. A CT sends - either a command to all the other CTs (>3ROrIDCAST) - or a command to any addressed CT (ADDRESSED)_ fhe "Triggervector" command represents a binary value that refers to an entry in the LUT2 of the receiving CT.
rvvot 3o~sao v ~

AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.31 R-111 Job-64B
nt by: KENYON 8~ KENYON . 212;. , 08/24100 10:45; JetFax #984, Page 31/103 It is necessary to send trigger vectors in order to start a KR
within an IKR in an additional CT, in ordez- to acti~rate the periphery or the memory, for example.
In order to forward trigger vectors to a hi,grer level CT, there are two mechanisms:
1. A bz.t indicating whether the content of the memory is regarded as a KR ID or as a binary value for 3 trigger pulse is supplied to LUT1. If a trigger pulse is present, the data content of LUT1 is sent directly to the higher level CT as a trigger.
2. The binary value of a trigger can be indicated with Lhe TRIGGER command which is sent directly to the higher le~crel CT.
(AS an alternative, zDs can also be transmitted directly instead of a trigger value).
In order td start a KR in another Cx via trigger vectors, a synchronization procedure must be created in order to prevent a deadlock. The procedure must make sure that only one KR
within a certain group of CTs starts other KRs in other CTs within this group. Starting se~reral KRs at the same time may result in a deadlock among the CTs, similar to the deadlock on 2S the Cl~h level described above_ In principle such a procedure runs as follows:
A KR is structured as follows:
...
GETCTS/GETBUS
'TRIGGER <I17>, <CT#>
TRZGG>ER <ID>, <CT#>
T.,oOSECTS/LOOSEB:1S
NY01 3b7580 V Z 2 7 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.32 R-111 Job-648 08I24J00 10:45; ]etFsx #984, Page 32/103 >.nt by: KENYON 8~ KENYON_._.___._.._...._. _,._~ 212, _ , raw.
~~. ... .. .n.v.~..._: ~~l.J .....~ ~.."._a.. ..... .. ._. ......~._ ~
:.:.u... ..... . ..~....... . _ .....
~ S 1 r. - ~ . .. . .w ,..a _. .. .
The "GETCTS" command within a KR of the CT (INITIATOR) indicates that signals are sent to other CTS (TARGET? zn the following. With xrigger <ID>, <CT#> the ID of a ItR to be started is sent to the CT haring the unique ID CT#_ The S trigger is initially sent to the directly higher level CT, which sends the trigger according to the CT# to a lower level CT within its Cx space or to its higher level CT (see CT
hierarchies). When the command reaches the TARGET, the latter acknowledges receipt.
When tl:e command runs through a CT, a priority ID of the command zs incremented by one. If the forward request of a command encounters another request within a CT, the command having the lowest priority .is rejected. Thus a) it is ensured that only one command propagates at any one time within an overlapping system and thus only one KR is started, which prevents deadlock as required;
b7 it is ensured that the command that has propagated least far is rejected, which may result in enhanced performance.
GO
After a command has been rejected, all pre~crious commands within the GETCTS/LOOSECTS are also rejected, i.e., INITIATOR
sends the DISMISS signal to all TARGETS and the execu~ion of the ):CR starts again after a wait t~.me upon GETCTS.
The acknowledgments of all triggers within a GETCTS , I,OOSECTS
command segment are sent to the INTTIATOR CT. Processing of the next command continues with each incoming acknowledgment.
When the LOOSECTS command is reached, INITIATOR sends the GO
signal to all TARGETS. This starts the execution of the KR
having the ID transmitted by the trigger by the TARGET CTS.
After the occurrence of a trigger, TARGETS ct-_anga to a state in which they wait for the occurrence of a GO or DISMISS
signal.
NYa, ao~sea v t 2 8 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.33 R-111 Job-648 ent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08!24/00 10:45; Jc~tFax #984; Page 33/103 .._ - rw..~. ~,~t'~ :.w For better implementability, a slightly modified procedure is also presented:
A bus system (inter-CT bus) is located between the CTs in a group of a hierarchical level_ Thxs bus system connects all CTs of the group and a CT of the next higher level group.
The bus system is arbitrated by a CT through the GETHUS
command which is functionally similar to GETCTS. The commands are forwarded via the bus system to the CTs of the same group.
If the addressed CT# is not within the group, the higher level.
bus is automatically arbitrated by the higher level CT and the command is forwarded_ The arbitrated buses remain assigned to INITIATOR and thus blocked fox all other CTs until either a reject occurs or the LOOSEBUS command frees the bus. LOOSEBUS
is comparable to LOOSECTS. Before executing the LOOSEBUS
command, the GO s~.gnal is sent to all involved CTs. This is accomplished either through the ~,OOSEBUS command or through a special command that precedes it_ Commands, in particular ?0 triggers, are also processed according to the basic procedure described above. A reject occurs if a bus system cannot be arbitrated_ The CTs of. a certain Ie~iel have the same priarity for arbitration; the higher level CT has a izigher priority.
When a command is sent via the inter,CT bus, the command remains active until the addressed CT accepts (ACCEPT) or rejects (REJECT) the command_ The Prioritized Round-robin Arbiter The prioritized round-robin arbiter (single-cycle round-robin arbiter SCRR-AfcB) has a clock synchronous structure, i.e, for each (positive or negative depending on the implementation) cycle flank (TFZ) it delivers 3 result_ The incoming signals (ARS-IN) pass through a mask (ARB-MASK) which is managed by the arbiter itself by the procedure described below. The output signals of the mask are supplied to a priority arbiter (ARB-PRIG) according to the related art. The arbiter delivers NYO1 30t59p v 1 2 9 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.34 R-111 Job-64B
ent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:46; )~#984;Page 34/103 _ . . . . "w~,,~,~,..;
a result (ARt3-OUT), synchronized with the system clock, for each cycle flank (TF1), i_e., the binary value of the highest-priority signal after the mask (RRB-MAS)Ef). A signal (VALI») which indicates whether the binary value is valid or in~ralid is assigned to the result. Depending on the implementation of the priority arbiter, it is possible that t:he same binary value is generated when the signal 0 is present and when no signal is present; in this Cafe VALID indicates that the result is invalid if no signal is present. This signal is 1_ output as the result of the arbiter and 2_ sent to a decoder which decodes the binary values as shown in the following table for a three-bit binary value as an example. (The coding procedure can be adapted to any desired binary value according to this principle);
Binary Decoding Note Value (ARB DEC) (ARB OUT ) 111 Olll 1111 100 0000 11.11 oll o000 0111 000 1111 17.11 Reset state and when binary value (ARB OUT) inval-wd A register (ARB RBG) which receives the decoded values (ARB
DEC) of the decoder at a cycle flank (TF2) that is the invex-se of TFl is assigned to the decoder. ARB DEC is fed back to the mask (ARE MASK) and enables the individual input signals (ARB
IN) _ NYU1 307590 v 1 3 0 AUG-24-OD 10:52 212 P.35 R-111 Job-64B
ant by: KENYON 8~ KENYON ._,._ ,., _ 212; I 08/24,00 10:46; ]c~tF~ #984;Page _ .__ .___. . ;. . .._~::: -_ z,~,-.~. ._. _-_:::. .. ._. -_.___~
The functional sequence in the arbiter is as follows:
1. After a RESET, all r''LRB IIV are enabled via AR13 MASK, since RRB DEC sets all signals to "enable"_ 2. The highest priority ARB IN set (for example signal 7 (binary :1.11) has the highest priority a-~d 0 (binary X00) the lowest priority in the above table) is output as a binary value.
3_ Via ARB DEC the signal is blocked, as are all the other inputs that may have had a higher priority, but are not set_ 4. The following steps 5 and 6 are repeated until signal o (binary OOO) is reached or no signal is present after AIt73 MASK. Then ARB DEC (see decoding table) enables all signals through ARB MASK via ARB pEC again and the sequence starts at step 2.
5_ The F,RB IN set that now has the highest priority is output as a binary value.
6. Via AR» DEC the signal is blocked, as are all the other inputs that may have had a higher priority but are not set.
(Continues with step 4) Thus it is achieved that all input signa~.s are handled with the same priority and one of the input signals (Afts IN) is decoded as a binary signal and output (ARB OUT) in each clock cycle_ ARB REG can be provided with an enable input (EN) which allows the contents of the register to be changed only at TF2, when a corresponding signal is present. The resuJ.t is that a binary vector is not output ~n each cycle, but is output instead as a function of an enable by EN and TF2. The input is needed fvr synchronization when the downstream circuit cannot perform the processing in one clock cycle, but needs multiple cycles before accepting the next binary vector.
NYOt 307SB0 v 1 3 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.36 R-111 Job-648 ant by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24100 10:46; .,J~tFax #984; Page 36/103 Sometimes it is recommended that the arbiter consider a series of signals as having a higher priority, while the majority of signals have the same priority. This is necessary, for example, in the case of the previously described procedure for forwarding s~.gnals between CTs. In order to give a signal a higher pxiority, the link of the ARB PRIG having the highest priority is not masked, i.e., it bypasses the mask (RRB MASKy.
Thus the signal zs treated preferentially.
Structure of a Microcontroller-based CT
Contrary to the previous descriptions, a CT can also be implemented to have a microcontroller architecture.
It can be easily seen that the basic functions such as trigger control, lookup tables LUT1 and LUf2, as well as the inter-CT
communication and writing the KW to the CEL can be readily accomplished by a microcontroller. Only the structure of an efficient FILMO represents a problem which is mainly manifested in the performance that can be achieved. Therefore the structure of the FIJJMO will be described separately.
Structure of the FzLMC7 The FIX.~MO is not designed as a separate rnemcxy. Instead, the conventional program memory is extended to include FILMO
functionality. For this purpose, an additional bit (FILMO BIT) which indicates whether or not the corresponding KW has been written into the CEL is assigned to each KW_ If the FILMO BIT
is set, the corresponding KW is not executed_ when a KW is written into the memory, the FIZ,,MO BIT is reset. All KRs within a CT are connected vria a Chaining list (FILMO LISTS in the order in which they were called up by tr'_ggers or LOAb <ID>. A KR remains in the FILMO LIST until it is fully executed, after which it i.s removed from the list. The FILMO
Nvoy 3o~sso v ~ 3 2 AUG-24-0D 10:52 212 P.37 R-111 Job-648 snt by: KENYON 8~ KENYON _ ._._._ ". ~ 21 2 ~ 08124100 1 0:47; Je~~#i84; Page ... . . ,.~... ~:~-;:;.:.,_ _. ,.
. _.. . .... _ ~ .... . . .._ _ . . _ _ LIST is run through according to the FILMO p=ocedure and thus represents a direct substitute xor the fILMO mernory_ (For the sake oz completeness we shall note that contrary to the original FIZ.MO procedure no KR may occur twice in the list. If a KR that is still in the FILMO LIST is called up, its execution must be delayed until it is removed from the FILMO LIST.) The structure of a F2LM0 memory location is as follows:
FII,MO BIT KW
Gommancs The microcontroller supports the following commands that have a direct influence on the FILMO:
PUSH write a KW to a CEL
PUSHSF write a KW to a CEL and set the FILMO BIT if the KW
has been accepted (ACCEPT) PC1SHRET write a KW to a CEL and return (RETURN) from the subroutine z.f the KW has not been accepted by the CEL (1~EJECT). This command is used when subsequent KW in tre KR are dependent on the configuration of this KW (ACCEPT): their con>=igurat=ion is prevented 3~ by the return from the KR until PLJSHRET is successful (ACCEPT).
PLJSHNR write a KW to a CEL only if no REJECT occurred previously within the KR. Like PUSHRET, PUSHNR is also used to handle dependencies i.n the order in which the KWs are configurated.
NY01 307590 v t 3 3 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.3B R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:47; _JetFax #984; Page 38/103 y.,.
Garbage Co7.lector As described previQUSly, a garbage collector (GG) is used to remove KRs that are no longer needed. The GC is started either when there is insufficient space in the memory for loading a new KR and IDs rr.ust be removed, or when a TcR is explicitly deleted by the REMOVE command with the inaication of the ID of the KR to be deleted.
IO In order to configure the GC run as simply as possible, all KRs are Connected via a chained list. GC runs through the list and removes the KRs that are no longer needed by overwriting them with other KRs and adjusting the list Pntries acr,ordingly. All the remain~.ng KR in the memory are shifted so that the memory gap created by the KR to be deleted is closed and a larger contiguous free space is created at the end of the memory.
structure of G KR
2. 0 One possible basic structure of a KR is shown in the following table:

At the beginning of the KR, a jump occurs over the following NY01 3p7590 v 1 3 4 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.39 R-111 Job-648 lent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:47; _IetFa~c #984;Page 39/103 _ , ." ~.-._..._..._...._. . , _ _ . .. . _ .::
header to the start of the command sequences. It follows the double-chained lift for the garbage collector in which alI KR
are linked to one another. "length" indicates the length of the KR. This infcrmation can be used for Block--Move commands according to the related art which are used when the KR have to be moved in the memory (Garbage, Load, etc.)_ The FILMO is formed in the following double-chained list; only those KRs that contain KWs which have not yet been wra_tten to 1o the CE1, are ccnnected to one another.
Statistics on the condition of the cache follow, containing, for example, the number of KR calls (the va_Lue is incremented by one for each call), the age (can be measured using the number of GC runs over the KR; the value is incremented by one far each GC run), etc. The GC can evaluate these statistics when a KR must be removed for reasons of memory space.
Considerable advantages result for the caches from these statistics. Thus, for example, the microcont_roller can be programmed depending on the cache algorithm used according to the requirements of the application so that ~.. the oldest/newest KR
2. the smalles°_/largest KR (see the "length" entry) 3. the /east often/most often called KR
is deleted from the cache when free memory i.s needed_ of course, additional appropriate status information can be stored. Such a selective caching is not possible with the cache structures known today_ In particu~.ar, freely programmable cache algorithms are not supported in caches according to the related art.
In conclusion, there are KR statistics containing, for example, the number of not yet configured (REJECT) or configured (ACCEPT) KWs. At the same time, the address of the first x'W yet tc be configured can be stozed_ This has the advantage that in the case cf a FTLMO run a jump can be made directly to the KW and the complete KR does not have to be run NY01 301590 v 1 3 .5 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.40 R-111 Job-648 lent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:48; ]etF~ #984;Page 40/103 .. .._._..__~~_.-,_. .. . ~Va ....... _ .~ .... . ' ~ ~. ~ .. .,;.~..
. . _ y~,.~ -"~.",~y(i;:rrvem~.i~,;nyv~.wHfli.~Sf~::!1t'~.A. <r , ~ .
T~._...C,'.;
through, which results in a considerably enhanced performance.
In conclusion, it should be noted regarding the KR that the chained lists are preferably built up by entering the previous/next ID, since thus the absolute memory addresses can be easily shifted by the GC_ Only relative jumps instead of absolute jumps should be used within a KR i:n order to avoid problems when loading the KR and during GC runs, since the absolute addresses are modified in those cases.
for the sake of completeness it should also be mentioned that, according to the above-described principle, the FILMd is run through prior to executing a new KR (upon a trigger or command even from another CT) and the status of the CEL
(reconfigurable or not? is saved prior to running through the FILMO, also when a microcontroJ.ler is used.
1~ figures The figures described below show the management of configuration date according to the method presented, with reference to an example of implementation:
Figure 1: address generation procedure within the lookup tables Figures 2-7. processing of the commands arid function of the state machines Figure 8: Structure of the SCRR-ARB
Figure 9, Structure of the LTJT1 and LUT2 Figure 1p. structure of the pointer arithmetics and the CTR
Figure 11: Structure of a FzL,MO
NY01 307590 v t 3 6 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.41 R-111 Job-648 lent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08!24100 10:48; ~fetFsx #984; Page 41/103 _ - . _ _......".__,......... ....: ~-._:-.. _ ! " .:. . . .., . ..,_.. ~~.
Figure 12a: Hierarchical arrangement of the CTs Figure 12b: Sending a trigger between the CTs Figures 12c, d: Method far sending a [incomplete]
Figure 13: Calling up a KR by multiple IKR
Figure 1$: Structure of the LUTI of a ROOT CT
Figure 15: Structure of the HOST control of a ROOT CT
Figure 16: Illustration of the LUT and ECR principle Figure 17: Sequence control of a CT of mid-level hierarchy and of a ROOT-CT
Figure I8: Deadlock problem during the configuration of a twd-dimensional array (see patent description) Figure 19: Illustration of -_he FILMO principle Figure 20: Basic principle of the inter-CT communication Figure 21: Example of implementation of the inter-CT
communication according Lo the GETCTS method Figure 22: Example of implementation of the inter-CT
communication according to the GETBUS method Figure 23: Bus structure of the inter-CT bus Figure 24: Addressing within CT hierarchies Figure 25: GARBAGE list Figure 26: FILMO list NYOt 307590 v 1 3 7 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.42 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON 8 KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:48; JetFax #984; Page 42/103 .,.:. .. ,. . _._....."..,.. .. _.:_.-._.::._:_:.~_,_-Figure 27: f'ILMO function within a KR
Figure 28: Storing the states prior to the execution of a KR
or the FILMO.
J
Description of the Figures Figure 1 shows the sequence of the CTR address generation within a CT. An incoming b:.nary trigger vectox (0107.; is translated into a valid KR or IKR ID in LUT1_ If no valid ID
exists, an "Illegal Triggex" signal is generated (0102), which indicates that the trigger is riot known in Lt,)'T1, The signal c_an be forwarded to the higher level CT as an error message or ignored. The translation of "triggers" according to "ID" is entered into LUT1 uszng the "REFERENCE" command_ A valid Ip (0103) is forwarded to hUT2. IDs provided within commands, i.e. through an operand (0104), are sent directly to hUT2, LUT2 translates an incoming zD to the address of the FfR/rKR within the CTR. If the TfR/IKR is not stored in CTR
(there is no cache) the "miss" signal is generated (0105). Tf the translated address of the KR/IKR is marked with the "NoAdr" token, it is indicated wa.t:~ "NoEntry" (~z07) that the address has been deleted. "Miss" and "NoEntry" indicate that translation into an address internal to CTR .is not possible_ On the basis of this sigr_al the LOAD state machine loads the KR/IKR having the corresponding ID from a higher level CT.
If a valid address is available, it is torwardec to the pointer arithrnetics of the address generator (0106). An incoming binary trigger ver.tor is translated in LUT1 either into an ID or into another trigger vector; ir_ this case the trigger vectox is output (0108).
Figure 2 shows the sequence when loading a KR/IKR. The ID
(0201) of the KR/ZKR to be loaded is initially sent to the higher level CT. Then the value of FreePointer (FP) is entered NY01 307590 v 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.43 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:48; JetFax #984; Page 43/103 w;-.x~r~-..w~:
in LUT2 at the lQCation of the entry for the requested ID. FP
points tQ the entry aftex the last entry used for a KR/zKR in the CTR_ This is the first entry, on which the KR/IKR to be loaded is stored_ The state machine waits for a data word frcm the higher level CT. As soon as the word is available, it is written to the location referenced by FP. FP is incremented. If FP points to an entry after the end of the CTR, the first entry in the CTR
is removed in order to create room (0202); FP is updated. If the data word sent by the higher level CT is "STOP," the loading procedure is interrupted (0203); otherwise the state machine continues to wait for a new data word (0204).
Figure 3a shows the "MASK" command. The operand oP the command is written into the MASK register. The MASK xegister is located at the input of the trigger szgnals before LUT1 and masks out invalid triggers.
In Figure 3b, the operand of the command is sent to the other CTs as a trigger vector by the "TRfGGER" command_ In Figure 3c, the translation of a trigger into the corresponding KR/IKR ID is written into LUTl using the "REFERENCE" command.
Figure 4a shows the "WAIT" command. The operand of the command is written into the WAITMASK register. All t_=iggers except for the one/ones expected and therefore enabled in wAITSMASK are zgnored. Only upon the occurrence of the trigger does the system return to the program flpw_ Figure 4b shows the "PUSH" command. The conf_i.guration word is sent to the addre$sed configurable element (C.EL). If the CEL
does not accept the configuration ward, for example, because the CEL is in the "non-configurable" state, the configuration ward is written into the FILMO (0401).
NY01 307590 v 1 3 9 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.44 R-111 Job-648 lent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24100 10:49; ;IetFs~c #984;Page 44/103 .-_-~_~.....--r..~_...........~y"~s._..._.... _.........nt:h:l".V.. _~/
Lrn.....~J_ ........ ~ ...~-=~'.~"".i'~'.
Figure 5 shows the sequence of a "REMOVE" command. There axe two call variants:
1. The first KR/IKR located in the CTR is removed from the CTR. Address 0 of the CTR is assigned to t?:e GarbagePointer (GP) .
2. 1~, specific KR/IKR defined by its ID is removed from the CTR_ The first address of the KR/IKR to be removed from the CTR is assigned to the GarbagePointer (GP) (0502).
The MovePointer is loaded with the value from the GP. Gt:" and MP refers to a "HEGIN <ID>" command in the CTR even if the first KR/IKR is to be removed from the CTR. The relevant ID i.s marked as inva.Iid in LUT2. MP is incremented until the "BEGIN
<Ip>" of the next KR/IKR located in the memory is reached (0503), OR MP is equal to FreePointer (FP), wh-ch means that the KR/IKR to be removed is the last one in the CTR (0509), - Zn this case, FP is loaded with r_he value from GP, whereby the memory locations occupied by the KR/1KR to be deleted are marked as free; the"REMOVE" functzon is terminated (0505).
Otherwise (">3EGIN <Ip>'~ is reached (0506) ) the data referenced by MP is copied to the memory J.ocation referenced by GI'. M1~ and GP are incremented. This procedure continues until MP reaches the end of GTR or the position of Fp (0507)_ I.f during the sequence a memory location containing "BEGIN
<ID>" is referenced by MP, the entry for the respective ID is overwritten in hUT2 with MP (0508); thus the correct memory location is output in the case of a lookup.
Figure 6 shows the sequence diagram of the FILMO. f, FILMO
contains three pointers:
1. WriteP: the write pointer of the FILMO RAM;
NY01 30T590 y ~ 4 0 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.45 R-111 Job-648 Tent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:49; JetFax #984; Page 45/103 _-.._._.~.___ ,._:.~.,~.;.".~_...."_~~.~y::rw~~.,~~:__.._ ~ "._ . ., ......,~... _._.. ...,". ,~... _,... ... _.._. .. ,... . ... _.._ ..._ '~r:..
2. ReadP: the read pointer of the FILMp RAM;
3. FullP: the status pointer representing the "filling status"
of the >r'ILMO RRN' that prevents overrun or underruri.
A one-bit resister "BeginF" indicates whether the current read access is at the beginning of the FILMC~ RAM (TRUE), i.e. iwhere are no deleted entries between the read pointer and the beginning of the FzLMO RAM; or the read pointer is in the neiddle of the FrhMO RAM {FALSE), i.e_ there are entries used between the read pointer and the beginning of the FrLMO RAM.
Furthermore, there are two registers for storing the states of ReadP and Ful:.P. It is necessary to save both registers upon the occurrence of the first unde~.eted entry, because a IS subsequent read access to the ~.ocation of this entry must he begun with the readout. On the other hand, Read? and FullP
must be modified during the current read sequence in order to obtain the next read addresses, or to establish the end of the FILMO RAM_ The beginning and the end of the memory cannot be 2O established using a zero address or a maximum address due to the structure of the FILMp as a FIFO-like structure {"ring memory"). Two sequence paths originate from the base state:
1. Read path (0601) 25 FullP and ReadP are saved in the registers. The processing loop begins:
BeginF is TRUE_ 30 If Fu~lP is equal to 0, ReadP and FullP are read back from their registers {OE02) and the state machine jumps back to its base state.
otherwise (0603) it is rested to determine whether the entry 35 in the FILMO to which ReadP is pointing is equal to "NOP,~' i_e_, whe~her this is an entry marked as deleted in the middle of the FZLMO. Zf this is not the case t0604~ i.t is attempted IVY01 307590 y 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.46 R-ill Job-648 lent by: & KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:49; J#984;Page KENYON

., .

to write the entry into the configurable element (CEL). xf this is not successful (REJECT, 0605), because C~L zs -got reconfigurable, »eginF is set to FALSE, FullP is decremented, and ReadP is incremented. The state machine jumps to the beginning of the processing loop (0606).
Tf the write of the entry to CEL (0607) i~ successful or the entxy is an NOP, HeginF is tested: BeginF =- TRUE (0608);
there are no undeleted entries before this one. FullP is 20 incremented, ReadP is sawed in the associated register in order to secure the new beginning of the FILMO. FullP is saved in order to secure the current data set; ReadP is incremented_ BeginF =- FALSE (0609): Fullp is incremented and the current 15 entry in the fII,MO RAM is overwritten with NOP, i.e. the eiWry is deleted. ReadP is incrernented_ In both cases the state machine jumps to the beginning of the processing loop.
2~ Write path (0610) It is tESted wiether the FIT,M~ RAM is full by checking FullP
for the maximum value. If this is the case (0617.), a jump ~.s made to the read path in order to create room.
Otherwise the data word is written into the FILMO RAM and writeP and ~'ullP are incremented_ Figure 7 shows the sequence in the main state machine. The base state (IDLE) is exited as soon as a 1. REMOVE command from the higher level CT occurs (0701): the REMOVE command is executed and the state machine returns to 5 I L)LE .
2. A trigger signal for generating a trigger occurs between NYO ~ 307580 v 1 4 Z

AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.4' R-111 Job-648 lent by: KENYON 8. KENYON 212; 08/24100 10:50; j~#984;Page 47/103 .,. . _. . ..... .,.., r~,,:.,"~,~ri_;,y__ ,.. _ .~.:w:::~~.1.:,:-,,.c -~:_:.,w:. ...
_. . __~.";;c ~:.-,~.,.~,_'....
the CTs (0702):
i f ' The tri gger is output.
l 5 The state machine jumps to the "STOP" command and the IDLE.
n back to 3. A triggex signal for executing a KR/IKR <ID> occurs (0703);
The programPointer (Pp) is loaded with the address generated by LUT2. If the address is invalid, i.e. no entry is available for the KR/IKR to be loaded, it is loaded (0704) and the pp is reset.
zs The execution loop beUins:
PP is incremented (this causes the $EGIN <ID> command to be skipped in the first loop pass), the occurrence of additional triggers is suppressed, RECONFIG is blockec~_ fihe commands are executed and a jump is made to the beginning of the execution loop (0707) .
The "STOP" command is executed separately (0705)_ The trigger and RECONJrIG are enabled again and the state machine jumps to IDLE_ The "EXECUTE" command is also executed separately (0706), The ID provided in EXECUTE <ZD> .is written into the ID REG. pp is reloaded and the KR/rKR provided via ID is executed (0708)-After resetting the CT, the base configuration is zoaded into the CTR and a jump is made dixectly to the exec;ut~,on of the basic configuration (0700 .
Figure B shows the structure of an SCR1'~,~,Rg_ The signals to be arbitrated go via Dataln to a mask (0801), which lets through or blocks a contiguous part of the signals ac~~pr;~,_tlg to the NY01 307590 v 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.49 R-111 Job-648 ~ent by: KENYON 8 KENYON 212' 08/24/00 10:50' _-_~_~ ~ ~ , -lf~tFax #984;Page 48/103 :v.~~.Y,S~.-.. .V.y,ir~~..lt-W-.nJ3i'ilhtyy ....~ _.:..~...y 4 .i,. ....
:~.~'~~.,~u knpwn table. A conventional priority arbiter (080?) according to the related art arbitrates a signal from those let through and delivers its binary vector (Binary0ut) together with a valid/invalid identifier (ValidOut) (also according to the related art) as an output of the SCRR-AR73.
This signal is decoded according to the known table (0803) and sent to a register for clock synchronization (0809). The DataIn mask is sent via this register. The register is controlled either by a clock signal or by a Next signal (Enable EN) which queries the next valid binazy vector. In the case of a reset or if the indication of the ValidOut identifier is invalid, the register is switched so that the Datazn mask lets all signals through_ The structure of the mask is shown in 0805. In 0806 the mask is illustrated again, signals DataIn 0 - DataIn J. having the same priority according to the SC1~R principle while Dataln m -DataTn n have a higher priority.
Figure 9 shows the LUT structure. The binary vector (Hinaryln) of the arbitrated trigger is supplied to the address input of LL1T1 (0901) , L:JTI translates the binary VeCtpr Either into a valid trigger in order to forward the latter to another CT or into a valid zD. Bath are output via 0910. 09I1 shows whether this is a trigger or an ID.
If no translation of the incoming binary vectoz is entered in LUT1 Via the "REFERENCE" cp~and, the "Yllegal Trigger" signal 0914 is generated via a bit entry or a comparator upon a certain token (e.g_, "VpTD").
A trigger is sent to external CTs via 0912; rlaS are further processed Via the multiplexer (0902). 090 switches either- the data output of LUTI, which provides a valid ID, or the ID
register (0903) of the CT to the address inputs of IaUT2 (0904).
0904 has a cache-like strur_ture, i.e. the less significant NY~t 307590 V f AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.49 R-111 Job-648 ant by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; _ , 08/24100 10:50;- ]etFax #984, Page 49/103 _ :::.._ ~ _y ,.-_.;
,. . . . _.
part (0906) of the data output of 0902 is switched to the address input of 0904, while the more significant part (0907) is switched to the data input of 0904. The data output belonging tQ 0907 is cpmpared to 0907 by a comparator (0905).
The advantage of this procedure is that 0904 does not have to have the depth to translate all IDs, but may be considerably smaller. Like a conventional cache, only some of the IDs are translated, it being possible to establish in the LUT2 with the help of 0907 whether the selected ID corresponds to the one specified by LUT1. This corresponds to a cache/TAG
procedure according to the related art.
A multiplexer 0908 zs assigned to a second data input of 0904;
depending on the operation, this multiplexer provides t2~e 7.5 FreePointer (FP, LOAD operation), the GarbagePr~inter (GF, REMOVE operation) or an invalid identifier/token (NoAdr, REMOVE operation) for storage at r~UT2. $oth pointers refer to memory =ocations in the CTR; "NOAdr" indicates that no entry exists for the appropriate ID; the entry has been deleted.
This is determined at the data output by comparing the data with the "NoAdr" token via comparator 0909. The following is forwarded to the state machine:
-- the occurrence of a binary vector, via "Validln" (see Figure B) _ - l;he information of whether a trigger or an ID results from the translation in LUTl (0911, "Trigger/ID Out"). Triggers are forwarded tn other CTs via 0912; IDs are processed in their own CTs arid forwarded to LUT2.
- the result of 0905 indicating whether the corresponding ID
is stored in 0909 ("Hit/Miss Out").
- the result of 0909 indicating whether the respective Ip points to a valid address in the CTR ("NoEntry Owt").
NY01 3p759D v t Gj ,5 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.50 R-111 Job-64B
ant by: KENYON 8~ KENYON ..__"~._212;~'_3,_ , 08/24100 10 51; J tFax ~#984;Page 50~103~~J
.,."..__.., . _ ~ .,~.~ _~..... __ ..,. _.. ...~. .__.~..~..:. , ~.~_ .
.....~.. .. ..._ . ....
The address generated by 0909 is forwarded to the CTR ("CTR
Address Out").
LUT1 is loaded via the "REFERENCE" command with the translation of the incoming binary vector to a trigger or an ID. The operands of the command are sent to LUT1 via the 0913 bus_ The ID register (0909) is loaded via the same bus_ Figure 10 shows the pointer arithmetics of the GarbagePointer (PG) [sic], ProgramPointer (PP), MovePointe.r (MP) and FreePointer (Fp). Each pointer has a separately activatable loadable up/down counter. Each counter can be loaded with the value of each other counter, if necessary, as well as with the output of LUT2 (100?).
It is determined via the comparatar whether 1_ PP is equal to MP
2U 2. MP is equal to FP
3. FP is equal. to the maximum position in CTR. The results are used for controlling the state machine.
Orle of the pointers is sent to the CTR address input via a multiplexer (1001). The data arrives at the ~CTR via a multiplexer (1002) either from the higher level CT (1005) or, from a register (1003). The data from the higher le~crel CT or the CTR -s forwarded to the state machine and the >rILMO (1006) ~cria a multiplexer (1004). If a REMOVE command occurs, the data is sent from the higher level CT directly to the state machine via 1009, while otherwise the commands axe sent from the CTR
to the state machine [German text garbled . Register 1003 is used for storage and feedback of commands, shifted from one address to anpi;her during one pass of the GaxbacJe Collector, to the CTR input.
NYO~ 3o75sov a 46 AUG-24-DO 10:52 212 P.51 R-111 Job-648 ;nt by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08124/00 10:51; )etFax #984; Page 51/103 y ~ sn~~~u The structure of a FII,MO is illustrated in Figure 11. The data arrives from CTR 11101) in FILMO and it is either written into the FIhMO RAM (1103) via the multiplexes (1T.02) or sent t4 the configurable elements (1216) via the multipl.exer (1104). Tf data is deleted in 1103, a "NOP" token is written after 1103 via 1102_ The "NOP" token is recognized by the comparator (1105) at the data output and a write to the configurable elements is prevented_ Either the write pointer WriteP (1107) or the read pointer (1108) is sent to the address input of 1103 ~cria multi.plexer 1105. The read pointer is saved in register 2109 in order to a allow a reset (see Figure 6).
The "FZZll" fill status counter (1110) of 1103 is stored in register 1111 for resetting according to figure 6. Two comparators test whether 1103 is empty (1112) or full (1113).
It is selected via multiplexes 1115 whether the control signals of the state machine (from 1101) or of the FILMO are sent to 1116.
Figure 12a shows the hierarchical structure of the CTs. All CTs obtain their data fram the ROCT CT (1201) and the ECR
assigned to it (1204). pne or more CTs exist for each implementation level in a module. Each CT is responsible far managing its level and the lower-7.eve1 CTs. It is not necessary for all bxanches of the tree to have the same depth.
For example, trere may be fewer levels for controlling the periphery (2202) of a module than for controlling the operating units (2203). Data transfer takes place in the form of a tree. Each CT operates as a cache for all the lower-level CTs_ )~igure 12b shows the trigger flow between the CTs. While data flow takes place in the form of a tree, the trigger flow is undetermined. Each CT can send a trigger to each other CT. In general, trigger exchange only takes place from the leaves (1203) in the direction of the ROOT CT (1201). Occasionally, however, transfer may also take place in the opposite Nro~ so~seo ~ ~ 4 7 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.52 R-111 Job-648 nt by: KENYON 8~ KENYON __._ 212; 08124/00 10:51; letFax #984;Page 521103 ~4J ;:,.-,.~~
direction.
Figure 12c shows a trigger vector broadcast, with 1205 sending a trigger vector to all CTs_ Figure 12d shows a HIGHER trigger vector whic'_-~ 1206 sends to the higher level CT. 1207 sends a LOWER trigger vector to all the lower-level CTs. 1208 transmits a directly addressed (ADDRESSED) trigger vector to a certain CT which is not directly connected to 1207.
In Figure 13 two independent IKR n and m request a common KRx cached in the higher level CT. It is indiCat~ed that 'his KR is cacred by the entire branch and is also available in an I5 adjacent branch (1301) via a common CT.
Figure 14 shows an LUT system, mod.itied with respect to Figure 9, used in Ro~T CTs and CTs of the middle hierarchical levels.
The basic difference with respect to the CT=. described so far is that, instead of individual tr;gger signals, ID vectors and/or trigger vectors must be managed by the CT. A handshake signal (RDY) is assigned to each vector to indicate the validity of the vector, which are sent to an. arbiter (1401).
One of the trigger vectors (1404) or one of the ID vectors (2405) is selected via the multiplexers (1402, 1403)_ Trigger vectors go directly to the address input of LUT1 (1406), which is otherwise wired according to Figure 9. The ID register (1407) is also wired according to Figure 9. Contrary to Figure 9, multiplexer 1408 has three inputs (see 0902}. The multiplexer is activated by arbitex 1401, in addition to the state machine. ID vectors are directly forwarded to LL7T2 via 1403 over the additional input. l3us 1409 is used for this purpose. (In principle, IDs can be directly switched to LUT2 via a multiplexer (1408) even in t)~e case of CTs according to Figure 9. The IDs can then be sent without translation directly from the CEL to the LUT2.) "Txigger/ID Out" is generated according to >~igure 9. A "ValidZn" signal which is NY01 3o75A0 y 1 4 8 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.53 R-111 Job-648 ant by: KENYON & KENYON _ _.." 212; 08/24/00 10:52; 1 lttFap#984,Page 53/103 forwarded onto a "Valid Cut" according to Figure 9 does not exist. Tnstead, depending on the arbitration by x.401, a "Valid Trigger Out" is generated for trigger vectors and a "Valid Ib Out" is generated for ID vectors in order t.o inform the state .5 machine on how the processing is to take place_ Bus 1409 is connected to another unit via 1410; this unit onJ.y exists in ROOT CT and is described in )~igure 15.
A ROOT CT requires, in addition to the nor;nal CT functions, an interface to the external configuration memory (ECR), as well as the required address generator and units for managing access to the ECR.
A conventionai CT transJ_ates the trigger vectors received in LUT1 to an ID and the ZD in LUT2 to a memory location in the CTR (see Figure 16a). A ROOT CT translates an ID within the ECR, upon access to the ECR, to an address in she ECR where the KR/TKR referenced by ID begins. For this purpose, a memory range is established in the ECR, whose size corresponds ko the possible number o~' IDs (for example, if an ID is 10 bits wide, 21° = 1024 possible Ins result, i_e., 1024 entries are reserved in the ECR). In the following examples, this memory range is located at the lower end of the ECR and is referred to as L,UTECR in order to emphasize the similarity w~.th LUT2. The translation of a trigger to an ID takes place according to the known CTs in LLT1 (1601). For greater clarity, Figure 16b illustrates access to the ECR.
In Figure 1S an ID goes to multiplexes 1501 via bus 1410 of Figure 14_ The ID is written into loadable counter 1502 via 1501_ The output of 1502 goes, via a multiplexes 1503, to the address bus (1504) of the ECR. The translation of the TD into a memory address goes via databus 1505 through a multiplexsr/demultiplexer (2506) to 1501, which loads 1502 with the memory address. Subsequently the data words of the correspond~.ng KFt/IKR are read from the ECR via the LOAD ECR
NYOt 307590 v i 4 9 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.54 R-111 Job-64B
ant by: KENYON & KENYON 212; ' II , 08124100 10:52; JetFax #984,Page 541103 ----~.'.°z--;r:;w,.,~~t~.~,r~= ~:-.y,:.-'.~"y.1° a : .
state machine (see Figure 17) arid written into the CTR, 1502 being incremented after each read sequenr_e, until the "STOP"
command is read.
The higher level HOST writes KR/IKR into the BCR via 1503/1506 through interface 1507. The state machine (CTS) arbitrates whether the HOST or the ROOT CT has access tv the ECR_ After resetting the module, a base configuration (BOOT KR) must be loaded_ For this purpose, a fixed memory address (BOOT
ADR) is introduced which points to the first memory location of the BOOT KR. The memory location Oh is recommended as the BOOT ADR if the TDs start with 1; otherwise 2-'° or some other memory location can be used. In the exemplary embodiment, 2T"
is used.
The ROOT CT performs a lookup in order to load the BOOT KR at the location BOOT ADR if a BOOT KR is loaded. The ROOT CT
writes the data after 2502 in order to Load the BOOT KR from there until a "STOP" command occurs.
A monitoring unit within the ROOT CT assmme5 the synchronization of the HOST with the module. This takes place as follows:
The addresses small 2I° [sic] are monztdred by 1508, z.e., when the HOST accesses these addresses, a signal. (ACC ID) is sent to the state machine (CTS).
BOOT ADR is also monitored via 1509 and sends ar ACC BOOT
signal t4 the state machine (CTS).
The state machine (CTS) responds as follows:
- if HOST writes to the BOOT ADR, this causes Fi00T KR to load.
NYOt 907590 v 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.55 R-111 Job-648 08124/00 10:52; J~#984;Page 551103 ant by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212;
..~_.-__-~ - .~a~~w~....n:~r:X.~~.w-,..e... ~ a n ......._.. ~.__ _,. ..._ ..
.....
- if HOST writes the data word 0 (1512) to the BOOT ADR, this is confirmed via comparator 1510 and causes the module to stop.
- if the HOST writes to a small 2~°address, the address is loaded into the REMOVE register (1511). Since the address corresponds to the ID (see ECR LUT), the ID oz the modified KR/IKR is positioned it 1521. The REMOVE <ID> command fox immediate execution is sent to all CTS (151:3). The CTs then delete the KR/ZKR of the corresponding ID from their CTR, i.e., LUT2. Upon the subsequent call up of the KR/IKR, the CTs must necessarily load the new KR/IKR fzom the ECR.
Figure 17 shows the sequence in a ROOT CT when a KR/IKR is loaded from the ECR. If an ID is not found in the internal CTR
(see Figure 1, 1701), the ID is written into counter 1502 (1703?. Are access to the ECR having the adar_ess in 1502 delivers the base address of the KR/IKR. This is written into 1502 (1704). A LOAD according to Figure 2 takes place (1702).
The data is read from the >=.CR (1705) instead of a highex level CT and is not only written into the CTR of t=he same CT, but is also sent to the lower--level CT (1706) .
In a mid-hierarchical level CT, the translation of the triggers takes place as in Figure 1, with the exception =hat trigger vectors and ID vectors are handled according to Figure 14. The KR/IKR are loaded according to Figure 2, with the exception that the data words are not only written into the CTR of the same CT (0210), but are also sent: at the same time to tre lower-level CT.
Figure 19 illustrates the FILMO principle. The FILMO (1901) is always run through from the beginning to the end during read arid write accesses (1902). If entries are written and deleted from the beginr_ing of the FIT~MO (1900 , the read poimter is shzfted to the first undeleted entry (1904). If entries are written from the middle of the FILMO (1905), the read pointer NY01 307580 v 1 51 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.56 R-111 Job-64B
ent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24100 10:52, J[~at~FL3_#984,Page 56.,/103 ..
,...
. ,.,~ , .,. :.. ." : , . _.,.. ~~~..~;.ir : ;. ~ .~
remains unchanged (1906), and the entries are marked with "NOP" (1907). If data is written into the FILMO (1908), it is appended to the end of it after the last entry (/909)_ The read po~.nter (1910) xemains unchanged_ Of course, a CT may also be designed with a single memory which includes LUT1, LUT2, and CTR_ However, control is more complEx in this case. The CTs have a design similar to that of ROOT CT, which already integrates LUT2 and the CTR in the EcR.
A descriptior. Qf these CTs is unnecessary for understanding the procedure.
If a CT is used as a cache system far data, triggers are introd~:ced for writing data into the CTR. The data is written from a C>;L into the CTR. The necessary changes are triv'_al;
the FILMO is no longer required.
In caching data, the problem of data consistency arises_ It can be circumvented by using a method according to German Patent Application 42 21 278 A1 in order to ~.dentify the data and its va7.idity at the individual hierarchical levels, zf data is requested for executing a read-modify-write cycle (RMW
cycle), the data is marked at all hierarchical levels as INVALrD using an additional entry in the ~TR./ECR. The unique ID of the KR/IKR using the data can be inserted in the entry for this purpose_ The data cannot be ~.~sed by any KR/IKR having another Ip until the KR/IKR using the data has written back the data (see write-back method according to tha related arty and dele'~ed its ID.
Figure 20 shows one embodiment:
In Figure 20a CT 2007 requests data from the higher level CT, which in turn requests data from ROOT CT 2004; the ID of the requesting >:CR/IKR (2001) is transmitted with the data request.
The data (2002) is sent to 2007_ 1111 other subsequent accesses are rejected (2003).
~uYO ~ so~sso y ~ S 2 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.57 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:53; JetFax #984; Page 57/103 . ._. . .... . ._ _ _. .... ..
rn Figure 20b the data zs written back (2005); other subsequent accesses are accepted again (2006).
In Figure 20c data is requested from a mid-hierarchical level CT, which has the data and sends its to 2007_ The ID for blocking the data is sent to all CTS in that hierarchy (x001;.
When the data is written back (Write-Hack} in Figure 20d, the data is written to all CTs of that hierarchy and the ID is deleted.
IO
Figure 21 shows the communication of an INITIATOR CT (2101) via a plurality of intermediate CTS (2109, 2~.~05, 2106) with a TARGET CT (2102), as well as direct communication without the intermediary levels with a TARGET CT (2103) by the 15 G)aTCTS/LpOSECTS method_ 2101 establishes a link to 2103_ After successfully establishing the link, 2101 recei~ses a GRANT from 2103 as an acknowledgment. Subsequently 2101 establishes the link to 2102 20 via 2109, 2105, 2106. The link to 2102 is not acknowledged (GRANT) until 2102 is reached_ If the link canr_ot be established because one of the buses is busy, a FtI;JECT is sent to 2101, and 2101 interrupts the 25 sequence_ This means that the link to 2103 is also interrupted and a REJECT is sent to 2103.
However, if 2102 acknowledges the link with GRANT, 2101 sends a GO command to 2103 and 2102 to acknowledge the successful 30 establishment of the bus link and the synchronization to 2103 and 2102 at the same time. Data ar command~~ can be transmitted through this protocol synchronously and without deadlocks, since GO ensures that all TARGETS correctly receive the commands.
Figure 22 shows the sequence of. the inter-CT communication by the GET$iJS/LOOSEBUS method. While ix~ the method according to NY01 307590 v 1 S 3 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.58 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:53; :IetFax #984; Page 58/103 "~_ -_._,r._._.,.___-.._._._...-__. ._ Figure 21 the higher level cTs have the controlling and prioritizing task, control is assumed here by the inter-CT
buses (2201 ) .
A link to 2103 is established by the fact t-ha*~ the INITIATOR
CT (2101) requests its local inter-CT bus (2202)_ Requests are acknowledged if the bus is free (ACCEPT? or rejected if the bus is busy (R>JEC:T)_ Subsequently it sends the address of 2102 to the bus. According to the addressing plan, the bus control recognizes that the address is outside the local bus addresses and establishes a link to its local bus (2203) via the higher level CT 2104. As the address of 2102 is within its address range, the link to the local bus is established by 2102 (2204) via 2106. Since 2101 is now the sole bus master of all the buses required for the data common=ication, it is ensured that problem-free and deadlock-free communication takes place, since the communication channels are blocked for all the other CTs. 2102 and 2103 also cannot use the buses, . since, in their TARGET role, they can only receive commands and can only send data themselves upon request by the INITIATOR (2101).
As soon. as the communication is terminated, the buses are freed by a signal from 2101_ If 2101 encounters a busy bus during the establishment of the link, a REJECT is sent to 2101, and 2101 frees the bus systems again and attemFts to establish the link at a later time. If multiple CTs request the same bus at the same time. the higher level CT has a higher priority (2205). This prevents a link that has reached an advanced stage in beir_g established and already runs over multiple levels from being interrupted by a still vexy local bus buildup.
3S An extended protocol makes it possible in the case of a REJECT
to free only those buses that are required by the bus buildup having a higher priority. This cari Considerably enhance NY01 307590 v 1 5 4 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.59 R-111 Job-649 lent by: KENYON & KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:53; ;/etF~ #984;Page 59/103 performance. since not all links have to be established anew at a later tlme_ The structure of the inter-CT bus far the method according to Figure 22 is shown in cigure 23. CTs 2301-2304 are conr_ected, together with higher level CT 2305 (interface 2307), to inter-CT bus 2312 via their interfaces (2308-2311.)_ Connection to the inter-CT bus takes place via a round-robin arbiter which provides 230$-2311 with the same priority and 2307 with a higher priority; it activates a multiplexer to connect the buses (2306). A state machine which evaluates the control signals (e.g. establish/remove links, ACCEPT, REJECT, etc.) is assigned to the arbiter.
Figure 24 shows the structure of the address plan of a unidimensional CT tree. The rectangles symbolize a CT. The address of the CT has been entered. "-" identifies irrelevant address bits, which are not evaluated; the relevant address bits are given as binary 0 ox 1~ "*" stands far any desired address bit. It can be easily seen that this design can also be used for multidimensional trees by projection in which case each of the given addresses represents one of the axes; in other words, a corresponding separate address system exists for each axis.
>=igure 24a shows the addressing from CT 0007.. The relative address -1 is specified. By calculating -1~+1 = 00 ("xelative motion" + "address of the INITIATOR CT on current level"), the CT 0000 connected to the same local bus can be calculated.
In Figure 24b, CT 0010 calls up the relative address +10. ~'he calculation 10+0 = 10 ("reJ.ative motion" + "address of the INITIATOR CT on current level") provides the carryover 1, since the address range of the lowermost local bus is exactly one bit wide. Therefore the next higher bus is selected. This address calculation with 10 + 10 = 100 ("relative motion" +
"address of INITIATOR CT on current level") again provides a NY01 3075AD v 1 $ 5 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.60 R-111 Job-64B
Sent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24100 10:54; j tFa~c #984;Page 60/103 o ~..caKrhc~.c ....,~_ ....~..._.__~__-_-.._.... _._._... ..
carryover, since its address range (2 bits) is exactly one bit larger than the address range of the lowermost bus. On the next higher level no carryover occurs with the calculation 10+010 = 0100 so that the t=bird bit (from the left) addresses path 1** having the next lower level; the second bit (from the left) addresses path 10* of the next lower level and, finally, the last bit selects the TA.RG~T CT.
Figure 29c shows the known method over twc levels in the positive direction, and Figure 29d shows the method over three levels in the negative direction with a negative overrun.
Figure 25 shows the structure of a two-dimensional CT tree.
The CTS (2501) are located on the lowermost level (2502) in a two-dimensional arrangement. The address of the dimension is provided in the respective CT with x/y. Tre next higher level (2504) is above 2502. Each of its CTS (2503) controls a group of four CTs of the level 2502. The address space o~ the CTs at 2504 is one bit wider; * identifies the address bits of level 2502 which are irrelevant for the selection of the CTs at 2504, ROOT C. 2505 is one level above 2504. Its address is again one bit wider; t=ze z-.~eaning of * is equivalent Figure 26 shows the li-~kage of the garbage collector ir. the case of the r_ticrocontroller implementation. All >:CRs are linked to one another via the header entries (garbade-previous/garbage-next). When the garbage co~.lector runs through the list, the age of the KR is documented for the cache statistics (2502) by incrementing the entry by (+1)_ The 3o garbage collector looks fox the KR statistics entry (2601) which shows whether the KR still exists in the flLMO list_ In this case KR should not be deleted by the GC since it still contains unconfigured KWs. As an alternative, this test could also run via the FILMO-next and ~'r~MO-previous entries_ Figure 27 shows the linkages of the FILMO list.
The linkage can be completely different from that in the NYD1 307590 v ~ 5 6 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.61 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:54; JetFau #984; Page 61 /103 j ".LI:.vEY"iT.lYla._:'-.-~ ..._wn...v.vw.~w~.. ...-...u . ~.. . v ~ _.... ..
. . . . . ... ...
garbage list (Figure 26). The KRs are linked via FILMO-previous and FIZ:MO-next. The KR statistics (2701) entries point to the first not yet configured KW in the respective KR.
A FILMO run is structured so that the KR is started in the fi.xst II3. After execution, the position of the unexecuted KW
is written after 2701. If KR has been completely executed, the KR is removed from the linked FILMO list, but remains in the mempry. Then a jump is made aver the FILMO list, to the next KR which is also processed.
E'igure 28 illustrates the structure o.f a KR in the case of microcontroller control. Rt: the beginning there is a jump command, which jumps behind the header (2801) of the KR. The FILMO bit (2802) is assigned to each KW. A 1 (2803) shows that the KW has been accepted (ACCEPT) by the CEL and is no longer executed in the next run. A 0 (2809) shows a REJECT; the KW
must be executed again in the next run_ The optional KR
statistics (2701) point to the first KW marked with 0. If PUSHRET (2805) receives a REJ):CT, the prQCessing of the KR is interrupted here and set up again in the next run either at the first KW or to the location at which 2'701 points_ Otherwise the KR is terminated properly at its end 2806.
Figure 29 shows the circuit for saving the status information of a CEL prior to runn'_ng throug'i the FILMO or starting a KR.
The status information goes from the CEL (2901) to a register (2902). Prior to running through the FILMO or starting a KR, the CT sends an enable signal (2903) to 2902. Then the status information is accepted and forwarded to the CT (2904). 2904 remains constant until the next transmission from 2903.
NYOt 3U75so v t 5 7 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.62 R-111 Job-64B
Sent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08124/00 10:54; jetFsx #984; Page 62/103 Definition of Terms ACCEPT Signal showing that the addressed CEL is in a configurable state and accepts the transmitted KW.
S
Block commands (such as BLOCK-MOVE) Commands that shift a plurality of data to block) in the memory or between the memory and the periphery_ The origination address of the data to be shifted, the target address of the data, and the length of the data block are provided.
Broadcast Sending of information to a plurality of receivers.
Data receiver The units(s) that further processes) the results of the CEL.
l7ata transmitter The units(s) that makes) data available to the CEL as operands_ Data word A data word has a bit array of any desired length_ This bit array represents a processing unit for a system_ Both commands for processors or similar modules and pure data can be encoded in a data word.
Deadlock State in which no data processing is possible due to mutual blockage.
DF):' Data flow processor according to German Patent/Offenlegungsschrift 44 16 881.
DPGA Dynamically configurable FPGAs. Related art.
Elements Umbrella term for all types 4f standalone units that may be used as pieces in an electronic module. Thusr elements include;
-- configurable cells of all types NYGt 397590 v 1 5 8 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.63 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:55; JetFax #984; Page 63/103 - clusters - IMAM blacks - logic ~- arithmetic units - registers - multiplexers - x/~ pins of a chip Event An event can be evaluated by a hardware element in ~0 any manner that is fitting for the application and can trigger a conditional action as a response to this evaluation.
Thus, events include, for example:
- clock cycle of a computer system - ini=ernal or external interrupt signal 15 - trigger signal from other elements within the module - comparison of a data flow and/or a command flow with a value - input/output events - expiration, overrun, reset, ete. a counter - evaluation of a comparison.
FIFO First-in first-out memory according to the related art.
FILMO Modified FIFO from which linear rata is read_ The read pointer is not restricted to the beginning of the memory.
FPGA Programmable logic module. Relatad art f-PLUREG Register in which the function of the CEL is set.
The OneShOT and Sleep modes are also set. PLU writes into the xegister.
Fragmentation Fragmentation of the memory into a plurality of often small and therefore useless memory ranges.
Garbage collector Unit for managing the memory. Prevents fragmentation.
NY01 307880 v s 5 9 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.64 R-111 Job-64B
lent by: KENYON ~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:55; lfetFsx #984; Page 64/103 H level Logical 1 level depending on the technology used.
HOST A computer on a level higher than the module or component.
S
IDLE cycle The cycle in which a state machllle performs no processing. Basic state of a sta-e machine.
INTER-CT BUS Bus system between the CTs of one .level and a higher level CT (or CT group).
INITIA=OR CT which initiates access to an inter-CT bus.
Pointer pointer to an address or a data word.
Configurable element (KE) A configurabJ_e element represents a unit of a logic module which can be set for a special function via a configuration word_ Configurable elements are therefore all types of RAM cells, multiplexers, 2_0 arithmetic logical units, registers, and al_1 types of internal and external interconnection descriptions, etc.).
Configurable cells (CEL) See logic cells_ Configuring Setting the function and interconnection of a logical unit, an (FPGA) cell, or a CEL (se~~ Reconfiguring).
Configuration data Any number of configuration words.
Configuration routine (KR) Mu-tiple configuration words combined to form an algorithm.
Configuration memory The configuration memory contains one or more configuration words_ Configuration word (KW) A configuration word has a bit array of any desired length. This bit array represents a valid Nvot so~s9o v ~ 6 O

AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.65 R-111 Job-64B
Sent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08124/00 10:55; JctF~ #984;P2ge E51103 o .~._-~-_..~.~........~.~---_.~...__,.-_.,_--,......___._...,..,...._..............._ ... _.._"... " ,....._ ....,... -..
....,. ... . ... ..
settir_g fox the element to be configured so that a functional unit is obtained.
Load logic Unit for configuring and reconfiguring the CEL.
Structured by a special microcor_troller adapted to its function.
Logic cells Configurable cells used in DFPs, FPGAs, D)~GAs, which perform simple logical or arithmetic operations according to their configuration Lockup table 1'cnown method for translating data.
LUT1 Lookup table which translates a trigger to an Ip and determines whether the trigger is assigned to a valid ID.
LUT2 Lookup table which translates an ID to the address of the respecti'fe KR in the local memory and determines whether the hR is available in the -ocal memory, L level Logical 0 level, depending on the; technology used.
Mask Hit combination providing the valid signals within a plurality of signals.
Prioritizing Determining a sequence order.
RECONFIG Reconfigurable state of a CEL
RECONFIG trigger Setting a CEL into the reconfigurable state.
REJECT Signal which Shows that the addressed CEL is in a non-configuraale state arid does not aCc~e~L the KW sent.
REMOVE <ID> 1. Command within a KR to remove the KR
referenced by its ID.
NY01 307580 v t ~ 1 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.66 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON & KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:55; JetFax #984;P2ge 66/103 . . ..... . .. .. . . . .. .. ..
2. Command of a higher level CT via a separate interface or handshaking to a lower level CT to delete the KR referenced by i.ts ID.
RESET Resetting a module or an entire computer system inter a certain basic state.
ROOT CT CT of the highest hierarchical level having direct access to the external configuration memory_ Round-robin arbiter P_rbiter running in a circle that always assigns the lowest priority to the last-arbitrated signal.
State nachine Sync signals Status signals generated by a configurable element or an arithmetic unit and forwarded to other configurable elements cr arithmetic units t_o control and synchron~.ze data processing. A sync signal can also be sent back to the same configurable element or arithmetic unite with a time delay (stored).
TARGET CT which is a target of an access to the inter-CT
bus.
Trigger Synonym for sync signals.
Reconfiguring Reconfiguring any desired 2lumber Of CELs while any number of other CELs- continue to perform their own functions (see configuring).
T~inked list Data structure linked together via pointers according to the related art..
Cells Synonym for configurable elements.
NY01 3~758p v t 62 AUG-24-00 10:52 212 P.E~7 R-111 Job-648 Sent by: KENYON 8~ KENYON 212; 08/24/00 10:5E; lfetFsx #984; Page 67/103 ,y . .._.. . . -State macl-iine Logic capable of assuming different states. The transitions between the states depsnd on different input parameters. These macnines are used for controlling complex >:unctions and are known from the related art.
NYO1 307~agp y ~

Claims (11)

Claims
1. Method of caching commands in microprocessors having a plurality of arithmetic units and in modules having a two- or multidimensional cell arrangement (e.g. FPGAs, DPGAs, DFPs or the like), characterized in that 1.1 a plurality of cells and arithmetic units (CEL) are combined to form a plurality of groups, a cache unit (CT) being assigned to each subgroup;
1.2 the cache units of the individual subgroups are connected, via a tree structure, to a higher level cache unit (ROOT CT) having access to the command memory memory [sic] (ECR) in which the commands are stored;
1.3 commands are combined to form command sequences (KR), which are always cached as a whole and transmitted between the caches;
1.4 each cache unit on the lowermost or middle level of the tree requests the required commands from the respectively assigned higher level cache unit;
1.5 a higher level cache unit sends a requested command sequence to the lower level unit if it holds the command sequences in its local memory;
1.6 a higher level cache unit requests a requested command sequence from the respective higher level cache unit if it does not hold the command sequences in its local memory;
2. Method according to Claim 1, characterized in that command sequences are deleted as a whole.
3. Method according to Claims 1 through 2, characterized in that command sequences of a cache unit are deleted if there is insufficient room in the local memory for loading an additional requested command sequence.
4. Method according to Claims 1 through 2, characterized in that a command (REMOVE) within a command sequence triggers an action through which the command sequences of a cache unit are deleted.
5. Method according to Claims 1 through 4, characterized in that a command (EXECUTE) within a command sequence triggers the loading of a certain complete command sequence.
6. Method according to Claims 1 through 5, characterized in that any desired command (EXECUTE, REMOVE, etc.) via a bus link between the cache units triggers an action on any desired addressed cache unit according to the command.
7. Method according to Claims 1 through 6, characterized in that a program sequence that is not effectively cachable because it is only used by one cache unit, is broken into small subsequences which are needed by a plurality of cache units, an additional subsequence (IKR) contains the non-cachable remainder of the command sequence and the calls of the cachable subsequences.
7. Method according to Claims 1 through 6, characterized in that statistics providing information concerning the age of the command sequence, i.e., the dwelling time in the memory of the cache unit, are assigned to each command sequence.
8. Method according to Claims 1 through 6, characterized in that statistics providing information concerning the frequency of the calls of the command sequence are assigned to each command sequence.
9. Method according to Claims 1 through 6, characterized in that statistics providing information concerning the length of the command sequence are assigned to each command sequence.
10. Method according to Claims 1 through 9, characterized in that the delete routine is designed so that it evaluates the statistics of each command sequence and removes the least significant command sequence according to the algorithm executed.
11. Method according to Claims 1 through 10, characterized in that the delete routine can be adjusted to the algorithm to be executed in a programmable manner.
CA002321877A 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 Method for cacheing configuration data of data flow processors and modules with a two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (fpgas, dpgas or similar) according to a hierarchy Abandoned CA2321877A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19807872A DE19807872A1 (en) 1998-02-25 1998-02-25 Method of managing configuration data in data flow processors
DE19807872.2 1998-02-25
PCT/DE1999/000504 WO1999044147A2 (en) 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 METHOD FOR CACHEING CONFIGURATION DATA OF DATA FLOW PROCESSORS AND MODULES WITH A TWO- OR MULTIDIMENSIONAL PROGRAMMABLE CELL STRUCTURE (FPGAs, DPGAs OR SIMILAR) ACCORDING TO A HIERARCHY

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2321877A1 true CA2321877A1 (en) 1999-09-02

Family

ID=7858839

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002321877A Abandoned CA2321877A1 (en) 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 Method for cacheing configuration data of data flow processors and modules with a two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (fpgas, dpgas or similar) according to a hierarchy
CA002321874A Abandoned CA2321874A1 (en) 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 Method for configuring data flow processors and modules with a two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (fpgas, dpgas or similar) without producing deadlocks

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002321874A Abandoned CA2321874A1 (en) 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 Method for configuring data flow processors and modules with a two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (fpgas, dpgas or similar) without producing deadlocks

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (3) US6571381B1 (en)
EP (4) EP1057117B1 (en)
JP (2) JP4215394B2 (en)
CN (2) CN1298520A (en)
AT (2) ATE217715T1 (en)
AU (2) AU3326299A (en)
CA (2) CA2321877A1 (en)
DE (5) DE19807872A1 (en)
EA (2) EA003407B1 (en)
WO (2) WO1999044120A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (106)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003025781A2 (en) * 2001-09-19 2003-03-27 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Router
US7266725B2 (en) 2001-09-03 2007-09-04 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method for debugging reconfigurable architectures
US6205249B1 (en) 1998-04-02 2001-03-20 Scott A. Moskowitz Multiple transform utilization and applications for secure digital watermarking
US7664263B2 (en) 1998-03-24 2010-02-16 Moskowitz Scott A Method for combining transfer functions with predetermined key creation
US7177429B2 (en) 2000-12-07 2007-02-13 Blue Spike, Inc. System and methods for permitting open access to data objects and for securing data within the data objects
US7457962B2 (en) 1996-07-02 2008-11-25 Wistaria Trading, Inc Optimization methods for the insertion, protection, and detection of digital watermarks in digitized data
US7346472B1 (en) 2000-09-07 2008-03-18 Blue Spike, Inc. Method and device for monitoring and analyzing signals
US7159116B2 (en) 1999-12-07 2007-01-02 Blue Spike, Inc. Systems, methods and devices for trusted transactions
US7095874B2 (en) 1996-07-02 2006-08-22 Wistaria Trading, Inc. Optimization methods for the insertion, protection, and detection of digital watermarks in digitized data
DE19651075A1 (en) * 1996-12-09 1998-06-10 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Unit for processing numerical and logical operations, for use in processors (CPU's), multi-computer systems, data flow processors (DFP's), digital signal processors (DSP's) or the like
DE19654595A1 (en) 1996-12-20 1998-07-02 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh I0 and memory bus system for DFPs as well as building blocks with two- or multi-dimensional programmable cell structures
EP1329816B1 (en) 1996-12-27 2011-06-22 Richter, Thomas Method for automatic dynamic unloading of data flow processors (dfp) as well as modules with bidimensional or multidimensional programmable cell structures (fpgas, dpgas or the like)
DE19654846A1 (en) * 1996-12-27 1998-07-09 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Process for the independent dynamic reloading of data flow processors (DFPs) as well as modules with two- or multi-dimensional programmable cell structures (FPGAs, DPGAs, etc.)
DE19704728A1 (en) * 1997-02-08 1998-08-13 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Method for self-synchronization of configurable elements of a programmable module
US6542998B1 (en) 1997-02-08 2003-04-01 Pact Gmbh Method of self-synchronization of configurable elements of a programmable module
DE19704742A1 (en) * 1997-02-11 1998-09-24 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Internal bus system for DFPs, as well as modules with two- or multi-dimensional programmable cell structures, for coping with large amounts of data with high networking effort
US8686549B2 (en) 2001-09-03 2014-04-01 Martin Vorbach Reconfigurable elements
DE19861088A1 (en) 1997-12-22 2000-02-10 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Repairing integrated circuits by replacing subassemblies with substitutes
US7664264B2 (en) 1999-03-24 2010-02-16 Blue Spike, Inc. Utilizing data reduction in steganographic and cryptographic systems
JP2003505753A (en) 1999-06-10 2003-02-12 ペーアーツェーテー インフォルマツィオーンステヒノロギー ゲゼルシャフト ミット ベシュレンクテル ハフツング Sequence division method in cell structure
US7475246B1 (en) * 1999-08-04 2009-01-06 Blue Spike, Inc. Secure personal content server
DE19946752A1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2001-04-12 Infineon Technologies Ag Reconfigurable gate array
DE50115584D1 (en) 2000-06-13 2010-09-16 Krass Maren PIPELINE CT PROTOCOLS AND COMMUNICATION
US7127615B2 (en) 2000-09-20 2006-10-24 Blue Spike, Inc. Security based on subliminal and supraliminal channels for data objects
US7502920B2 (en) * 2000-10-03 2009-03-10 Intel Corporation Hierarchical storage architecture for reconfigurable logic configurations
US8058899B2 (en) 2000-10-06 2011-11-15 Martin Vorbach Logic cell array and bus system
US20040015899A1 (en) * 2000-10-06 2004-01-22 Frank May Method for processing data
GB2406416A (en) * 2000-10-31 2005-03-30 Advanced Risc Mach Ltd Describing an integrated circuit configuration
US20090300262A1 (en) * 2001-03-05 2009-12-03 Martin Vorbach Methods and devices for treating and/or processing data
US9037807B2 (en) * 2001-03-05 2015-05-19 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Processor arrangement on a chip including data processing, memory, and interface elements
US20090210653A1 (en) * 2001-03-05 2009-08-20 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method and device for treating and processing data
US7444531B2 (en) * 2001-03-05 2008-10-28 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Methods and devices for treating and processing data
US7844796B2 (en) 2001-03-05 2010-11-30 Martin Vorbach Data processing device and method
AU2002257615A1 (en) 2001-03-05 2002-09-19 Pact Informationstechnologie Gmbh Methods and devices for treating and/or processing data
US7210129B2 (en) * 2001-08-16 2007-04-24 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method for translating programs for reconfigurable architectures
US7624204B2 (en) * 2001-03-22 2009-11-24 Nvidia Corporation Input/output controller node in an adaptable computing environment
AU2002347560A1 (en) * 2001-06-20 2003-01-02 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Data processing method
US7996827B2 (en) 2001-08-16 2011-08-09 Martin Vorbach Method for the translation of programs for reconfigurable architectures
US7434191B2 (en) 2001-09-03 2008-10-07 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Router
JP4152319B2 (en) * 2001-09-07 2008-09-17 アイピーフレックス株式会社 Data processing system and control method thereof
US8686475B2 (en) 2001-09-19 2014-04-01 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Reconfigurable elements
DE10147772C1 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-09-11 Siemens Ag Method for operating a transmission system and transmission system in a power supply network
US7594229B2 (en) * 2001-10-09 2009-09-22 Nvidia Corp. Predictive resource allocation in computing systems
US7644279B2 (en) * 2001-12-05 2010-01-05 Nvidia Corporation Consumer product distribution in the embedded system market
US7577822B2 (en) * 2001-12-14 2009-08-18 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Parallel task operation in processor and reconfigurable coprocessor configured based on information in link list including termination information for synchronization
AU2003214046A1 (en) * 2002-01-18 2003-09-09 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method and device for partitioning large computer programs
WO2003060747A2 (en) 2002-01-19 2003-07-24 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Reconfigurable processor
AU2003214003A1 (en) 2002-02-18 2003-09-09 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Bus systems and method for reconfiguration
WO2003081454A2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2003-10-02 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method and device for data processing
US8914590B2 (en) 2002-08-07 2014-12-16 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Data processing method and device
JP4501914B2 (en) * 2002-04-03 2010-07-14 ソニー株式会社 Integrated circuit and integrated circuit device
US7287275B2 (en) 2002-04-17 2007-10-23 Moskowitz Scott A Methods, systems and devices for packet watermarking and efficient provisioning of bandwidth
US7093255B1 (en) * 2002-05-31 2006-08-15 Quicksilver Technology, Inc. Method for estimating cost when placing operations within a modulo scheduler when scheduling for processors with a large number of function units or reconfigurable data paths
US7620678B1 (en) 2002-06-12 2009-11-17 Nvidia Corporation Method and system for reducing the time-to-market concerns for embedded system design
US7802108B1 (en) 2002-07-18 2010-09-21 Nvidia Corporation Secure storage of program code for an embedded system
AU2003286131A1 (en) 2002-08-07 2004-03-19 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method and device for processing data
US20110238948A1 (en) * 2002-08-07 2011-09-29 Martin Vorbach Method and device for coupling a data processing unit and a data processing array
US7657861B2 (en) 2002-08-07 2010-02-02 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method and device for processing data
US7249352B2 (en) * 2002-08-22 2007-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for removing elements from a linked list
EP1537486A1 (en) 2002-09-06 2005-06-08 PACT XPP Technologies AG Reconfigurable sequencer structure
US7502915B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2009-03-10 Nvidia Corporation System and method using embedded microprocessor as a node in an adaptable computing machine
US8949576B2 (en) * 2002-11-01 2015-02-03 Nvidia Corporation Arithmetic node including general digital signal processing functions for an adaptive computing machine
US7617100B1 (en) 2003-01-10 2009-11-10 Nvidia Corporation Method and system for providing an excitation-pattern based audio coding scheme
DE112004000026D2 (en) * 2003-04-04 2006-06-14 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Method and device for data processing
US9330060B1 (en) * 2003-04-15 2016-05-03 Nvidia Corporation Method and device for encoding and decoding video image data
US7565677B1 (en) 2003-04-21 2009-07-21 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for managing a data carousel
US7450600B2 (en) * 2003-04-21 2008-11-11 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for managing a data carousel
US8660182B2 (en) * 2003-06-09 2014-02-25 Nvidia Corporation MPEG motion estimation based on dual start points
JP4665760B2 (en) * 2003-06-25 2011-04-06 日本電気株式会社 Electronic computer, semiconductor integrated circuit, control method, program generation method, and program
WO2006082091A2 (en) * 2005-02-07 2006-08-10 Pact Xpp Technologies Ag Low latency massive parallel data processing device
US8296764B2 (en) * 2003-08-14 2012-10-23 Nvidia Corporation Internal synchronization control for adaptive integrated circuitry
EP1676208A2 (en) 2003-08-28 2006-07-05 PACT XPP Technologies AG Data processing device and method
US7484045B2 (en) * 2004-03-30 2009-01-27 Intel Corporation Store performance in strongly-ordered microprocessor architecture
US8018463B2 (en) 2004-05-10 2011-09-13 Nvidia Corporation Processor for video data
US8130825B2 (en) * 2004-05-10 2012-03-06 Nvidia Corporation Processor for video data encoding/decoding
US7278122B2 (en) * 2004-06-24 2007-10-02 Ftl Systems, Inc. Hardware/software design tool and language specification mechanism enabling efficient technology retargeting and optimization
TWI256013B (en) * 2004-10-12 2006-06-01 Uli Electronics Inc Sound-effect processing circuit
CN100476795C (en) * 2005-02-21 2009-04-08 徐建 Event processor
WO2006128396A1 (en) * 2005-06-01 2006-12-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Measurement or protective device with independent software modules
US7281942B2 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-10-16 Ideal Industries, Inc. Releasable wire connector
US8731071B1 (en) 2005-12-15 2014-05-20 Nvidia Corporation System for performing finite input response (FIR) filtering in motion estimation
EP1974265A1 (en) 2006-01-18 2008-10-01 PACT XPP Technologies AG Hardware definition method
US8724702B1 (en) 2006-03-29 2014-05-13 Nvidia Corporation Methods and systems for motion estimation used in video coding
US7827451B2 (en) * 2006-05-24 2010-11-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for establishing decimal floating point operands for facilitating testing of decimal floating point instructions
US8660380B2 (en) * 2006-08-25 2014-02-25 Nvidia Corporation Method and system for performing two-dimensional transform on data value array with reduced power consumption
JP5045036B2 (en) * 2006-09-05 2012-10-10 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Data processing device
US7999820B1 (en) 2006-10-23 2011-08-16 Nvidia Corporation Methods and systems for reusing memory addresses in a graphics system
US20080111923A1 (en) * 2006-11-09 2008-05-15 Scheuermann W James Processor for video data
WO2008061161A2 (en) * 2006-11-14 2008-05-22 Star Bridge Systems, Inc. Execution of legacy code on hybrid computing platform
US8169789B1 (en) 2007-04-10 2012-05-01 Nvidia Corporation Graphics processing unit stiffening frame
US7987065B1 (en) 2007-04-17 2011-07-26 Nvidia Corporation Automatic quality testing of multimedia rendering by software drivers
US8572598B1 (en) 2007-04-18 2013-10-29 Nvidia Corporation Method and system for upgrading software in a computing device
US8756482B2 (en) * 2007-05-25 2014-06-17 Nvidia Corporation Efficient encoding/decoding of a sequence of data frames
US20080291209A1 (en) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-27 Nvidia Corporation Encoding Multi-media Signals
US8726283B1 (en) 2007-06-04 2014-05-13 Nvidia Corporation Deadlock avoidance skid buffer
US7944453B1 (en) 2007-06-07 2011-05-17 Nvidia Corporation Extrapolation texture filtering for nonresident mipmaps
US7948500B2 (en) * 2007-06-07 2011-05-24 Nvidia Corporation Extrapolation of nonresident mipmap data using resident mipmap data
US9118927B2 (en) * 2007-06-13 2015-08-25 Nvidia Corporation Sub-pixel interpolation and its application in motion compensated encoding of a video signal
US8873625B2 (en) 2007-07-18 2014-10-28 Nvidia Corporation Enhanced compression in representing non-frame-edge blocks of image frames
JP5294304B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2013-09-18 日本電気株式会社 Reconfigurable electronic circuit device
US8598990B2 (en) * 2008-06-30 2013-12-03 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Delimited read command for efficient data access from radio frequency identification (RFID) tags
US8666181B2 (en) * 2008-12-10 2014-03-04 Nvidia Corporation Adaptive multiple engine image motion detection system and method
WO2010142432A2 (en) 2009-06-09 2010-12-16 Martin Vorbach System and method for a cache in a multi-core processor
JP2016178229A (en) 2015-03-20 2016-10-06 株式会社東芝 Reconfigurable circuit
JP6672190B2 (en) * 2017-01-16 2020-03-25 株式会社東芝 Database system and data processing method
US11803507B2 (en) 2018-10-29 2023-10-31 Secturion Systems, Inc. Data stream protocol field decoding by a systolic array

Family Cites Families (152)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5936857A (en) 1982-08-25 1984-02-29 Nec Corp Processor unit
US4739474A (en) 1983-03-10 1988-04-19 Martin Marietta Corporation Geometric-arithmetic parallel processor
US5123109A (en) 1983-05-31 1992-06-16 Thinking Machines Corporation Parallel processor including a processor array with plural data transfer arrangements including (1) a global router and (2) a proximate-neighbor transfer system
US4870302A (en) 1984-03-12 1989-09-26 Xilinx, Inc. Configurable electrical circuit having configurable logic elements and configurable interconnects
USRE34363E (en) 1984-03-12 1993-08-31 Xilinx, Inc. Configurable electrical circuit having configurable logic elements and configurable interconnects
US4761755A (en) 1984-07-11 1988-08-02 Prime Computer, Inc. Data processing system and method having an improved arithmetic unit
US5023775A (en) 1985-02-14 1991-06-11 Intel Corporation Software programmable logic array utilizing "and" and "or" gates
US5247689A (en) 1985-02-25 1993-09-21 Ewert Alfred P Parallel digital processor including lateral transfer buses with interrupt switches to form bus interconnection segments
US4706216A (en) 1985-02-27 1987-11-10 Xilinx, Inc. Configurable logic element
US5015884A (en) 1985-03-29 1991-05-14 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Multiple array high performance programmable logic device family
US5225719A (en) 1985-03-29 1993-07-06 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Family of multiple segmented programmable logic blocks interconnected by a high speed centralized switch matrix
US4967340A (en) 1985-06-12 1990-10-30 E-Systems, Inc. Adaptive processing system having an array of individually configurable processing components
EP0221360B1 (en) 1985-11-04 1992-12-30 International Business Machines Corporation Digital data message transmission networks and the establishing of communication paths therein
US4852048A (en) 1985-12-12 1989-07-25 Itt Corporation Single instruction multiple data (SIMD) cellular array processing apparatus employing a common bus where a first number of bits manifest a first bus portion and a second number of bits manifest a second bus portion
US5021947A (en) 1986-03-31 1991-06-04 Hughes Aircraft Company Data-flow multiprocessor architecture with three dimensional multistage interconnection network for efficient signal and data processing
US4860201A (en) * 1986-09-02 1989-08-22 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Binary tree parallel processor
US5367208A (en) 1986-09-19 1994-11-22 Actel Corporation Reconfigurable programmable interconnect architecture
US4811214A (en) 1986-11-14 1989-03-07 Princeton University Multinode reconfigurable pipeline computer
US5226122A (en) 1987-08-21 1993-07-06 Compaq Computer Corp. Programmable logic system for filtering commands to a microprocessor
US5115510A (en) 1987-10-20 1992-05-19 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Multistage data flow processor with instruction packet, fetch, storage transmission and address generation controlled by destination information
US4918690A (en) 1987-11-10 1990-04-17 Echelon Systems Corp. Network and intelligent cell for providing sensing, bidirectional communications and control
US5113498A (en) 1987-11-10 1992-05-12 Echelon Corporation Input/output section for an intelligent cell which provides sensing, bidirectional communications and control
US5303172A (en) 1988-02-16 1994-04-12 Array Microsystems Pipelined combination and vector signal processor
US4901268A (en) 1988-08-19 1990-02-13 General Electric Company Multiple function data processor
US5204935A (en) 1988-08-19 1993-04-20 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Programmable fuzzy logic circuits
US5353432A (en) * 1988-09-09 1994-10-04 Compaq Computer Corporation Interactive method for configuration of computer system and circuit boards with user specification of system resources and computer resolution of resource conflicts
EP0363631B1 (en) 1988-09-22 1993-12-15 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Circuit arrangement for telecommunication exchanges, especially PCM time division telephone exchanges, with distributed switching networks connected to a central switching network
WO1990004235A1 (en) 1988-10-07 1990-04-19 Martin Marietta Corporation Parallel data processor
US5014193A (en) 1988-10-14 1991-05-07 Compaq Computer Corporation Dynamically configurable portable computer system
US5136717A (en) 1988-11-23 1992-08-04 Flavors Technology Inc. Realtime systolic, multiple-instruction, single-data parallel computer system
US5081375A (en) 1989-01-19 1992-01-14 National Semiconductor Corp. Method for operating a multiple page programmable logic device
GB8906145D0 (en) 1989-03-17 1989-05-04 Algotronix Ltd Configurable cellular array
US5203005A (en) 1989-05-02 1993-04-13 Horst Robert W Cell structure for linear array wafer scale integration architecture with capability to open boundary i/o bus without neighbor acknowledgement
US5109503A (en) 1989-05-22 1992-04-28 Ge Fanuc Automation North America, Inc. Apparatus with reconfigurable counter includes memory for storing plurality of counter configuration files which respectively define plurality of predetermined counters
US5212652A (en) 1989-08-15 1993-05-18 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Programmable gate array with improved interconnect structure
US5489857A (en) 1992-08-03 1996-02-06 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Flexible synchronous/asynchronous cell structure for a high density programmable logic device
US5233539A (en) 1989-08-15 1993-08-03 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Programmable gate array with improved interconnect structure, input/output structure and configurable logic block
US5128559A (en) 1989-09-29 1992-07-07 Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. Logic block for programmable logic devices
JP2968289B2 (en) 1989-11-08 1999-10-25 株式会社リコー Central processing unit
GB8925721D0 (en) 1989-11-14 1990-01-04 Amt Holdings Processor array system
US5522083A (en) 1989-11-17 1996-05-28 Texas Instruments Incorporated Reconfigurable multi-processor operating in SIMD mode with one processor fetching instructions for use by remaining processors
US5125801A (en) 1990-02-02 1992-06-30 Isco, Inc. Pumping system
US5142469A (en) 1990-03-29 1992-08-25 Ge Fanuc Automation North America, Inc. Method for converting a programmable logic controller hardware configuration and corresponding control program for use on a first programmable logic controller to use on a second programmable logic controller
US5198705A (en) 1990-05-11 1993-03-30 Actel Corporation Logic module with configurable combinational and sequential blocks
US5483620A (en) 1990-05-22 1996-01-09 International Business Machines Corp. Learning machine synapse processor system apparatus
US5111079A (en) 1990-06-29 1992-05-05 Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. Power reduction circuit for programmable logic device
SE9002558D0 (en) 1990-08-02 1990-08-02 Carlstedt Elektronik Ab PROCESSOR
US5765011A (en) 1990-11-13 1998-06-09 International Business Machines Corporation Parallel processing system having a synchronous SIMD processing with processing elements emulating SIMD operation using individual instruction streams
US5734921A (en) 1990-11-13 1998-03-31 International Business Machines Corporation Advanced parallel array processor computer package
US5713037A (en) 1990-11-13 1998-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Slide bus communication functions for SIMD/MIMD array processor
US5588152A (en) 1990-11-13 1996-12-24 International Business Machines Corporation Advanced parallel processor including advanced support hardware
US5590345A (en) 1990-11-13 1996-12-31 International Business Machines Corporation Advanced parallel array processor(APAP)
CA2051222C (en) * 1990-11-30 1998-05-05 Pradeep S. Sindhu Consistent packet switched memory bus for shared memory multiprocessors
US5301344A (en) 1991-01-29 1994-04-05 Analogic Corporation Multibus sequential processor to perform in parallel a plurality of reconfigurable logic operations on a plurality of data sets
EP0499695B1 (en) 1991-02-22 1996-05-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Programmable logic controller
JPH04290155A (en) 1991-03-19 1992-10-14 Fujitsu Ltd Parallel data processing system
JPH04293151A (en) 1991-03-20 1992-10-16 Fujitsu Ltd Parallel data processing system
US5617547A (en) 1991-03-29 1997-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation Switch network extension of bus architecture
JPH04328657A (en) * 1991-04-30 1992-11-17 Toshiba Corp Cache memory
WO1992020850A1 (en) 1991-05-14 1992-11-26 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Nonwoven fabric and method of manufacturing said fabric
US5551033A (en) * 1991-05-17 1996-08-27 Zenith Data Systems Corporation Apparatus for maintaining one interrupt mask register in conformity with another in a manner invisible to an executing program
JPH06507990A (en) 1991-05-24 1994-09-08 ブリティッシュ・テクノロジー・グループ・ユーエスエイ・インコーポレーテッド Optimizing compiler for computers
US5659797A (en) 1991-06-24 1997-08-19 U.S. Philips Corporation Sparc RISC based computer system including a single chip processor with memory management and DMA units coupled to a DRAM interface
US5317209A (en) 1991-08-29 1994-05-31 National Semiconductor Corporation Dynamic three-state bussing capability in a configurable logic array
US5260610A (en) 1991-09-03 1993-11-09 Altera Corporation Programmable logic element interconnections for programmable logic array integrated circuits
WO1993011503A1 (en) 1991-12-06 1993-06-10 Norman Richard S Massively-parallel direct output processor array
US5208491A (en) 1992-01-07 1993-05-04 Washington Research Foundation Field programmable gate array
JP2791243B2 (en) 1992-03-13 1998-08-27 株式会社東芝 Hierarchical synchronization system and large scale integrated circuit using the same
US5452401A (en) 1992-03-31 1995-09-19 Seiko Epson Corporation Selective power-down for high performance CPU/system
US5611049A (en) * 1992-06-03 1997-03-11 Pitts; William M. System for accessing distributed data cache channel at each network node to pass requests and data
WO1993024895A2 (en) 1992-06-04 1993-12-09 Xilinx, Inc. Timing driven method for laying out a user's circuit onto a programmable integrated circuit device
DE4221278C2 (en) 1992-06-29 1996-02-29 Martin Vorbach Bus-linked multi-computer system
US5475803A (en) 1992-07-10 1995-12-12 Lsi Logic Corporation Method for 2-D affine transformation of images
US5590348A (en) 1992-07-28 1996-12-31 International Business Machines Corporation Status predictor for combined shifter-rotate/merge unit
US5684980A (en) * 1992-07-29 1997-11-04 Virtual Computer Corporation FPGA virtual computer for executing a sequence of program instructions by successively reconfiguring a group of FPGA in response to those instructions
US5497498A (en) 1992-11-05 1996-03-05 Giga Operations Corporation Video processing module using a second programmable logic device which reconfigures a first programmable logic device for data transformation
US5392437A (en) 1992-11-06 1995-02-21 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for independently stopping and restarting functional units
US5361373A (en) 1992-12-11 1994-11-01 Gilson Kent L Integrated circuit computing device comprising a dynamically configurable gate array having a microprocessor and reconfigurable instruction execution means and method therefor
GB9303084D0 (en) 1993-02-16 1993-03-31 Inmos Ltd Programmable logic circuit
JPH06276086A (en) 1993-03-18 1994-09-30 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Field programmable gate array
US5548773A (en) 1993-03-30 1996-08-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Digital parallel processor array for optimum path planning
US5596742A (en) 1993-04-02 1997-01-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Virtual interconnections for reconfigurable logic systems
US5473266A (en) 1993-04-19 1995-12-05 Altera Corporation Programmable logic device having fast programmable logic array blocks and a central global interconnect array
DE4416881C2 (en) 1993-05-13 1998-03-19 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Method for operating a data processing device
IL109921A (en) * 1993-06-24 1997-09-30 Quickturn Design Systems Method and apparatus for configuring memory circuits
US5444394A (en) 1993-07-08 1995-08-22 Altera Corporation PLD with selective inputs from local and global conductors
JPH0736858A (en) 1993-07-21 1995-02-07 Hitachi Ltd Signal processor
US5457644A (en) 1993-08-20 1995-10-10 Actel Corporation Field programmable digital signal processing array integrated circuit
US5440538A (en) 1993-09-23 1995-08-08 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Communication system with redundant links and data bit time multiplexing
US5455525A (en) 1993-12-06 1995-10-03 Intelligent Logic Systems, Inc. Hierarchically-structured programmable logic array and system for interconnecting logic elements in the logic array
US5535406A (en) 1993-12-29 1996-07-09 Kolchinsky; Alexander Virtual processor module including a reconfigurable programmable matrix
AU700629B2 (en) 1994-03-22 1999-01-07 Hyperchip Inc. Efficient direct cell replacement fault tolerant architecture supporting completely integrated systems with means for direct communication with system operator
US5561738A (en) 1994-03-25 1996-10-01 Motorola, Inc. Data processor for executing a fuzzy logic operation and method therefor
US5430687A (en) 1994-04-01 1995-07-04 Xilinx, Inc. Programmable logic device including a parallel input device for loading memory cells
US5761484A (en) 1994-04-01 1998-06-02 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Virtual interconnections for reconfigurable logic systems
US5896551A (en) * 1994-04-15 1999-04-20 Micron Technology, Inc. Initializing and reprogramming circuitry for state independent memory array burst operations control
US5426378A (en) 1994-04-20 1995-06-20 Xilinx, Inc. Programmable logic device which stores more than one configuration and means for switching configurations
JP2671804B2 (en) 1994-05-27 1997-11-05 日本電気株式会社 Hierarchical resource management method
US5532693A (en) 1994-06-13 1996-07-02 Advanced Hardware Architectures Adaptive data compression system with systolic string matching logic
US5513366A (en) 1994-09-28 1996-04-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for dynamically reconfiguring a register file in a vector processor
EP0707269A1 (en) 1994-10-11 1996-04-17 International Business Machines Corporation Cache coherence network for a multiprocessor data processing system
US5532957A (en) 1995-01-31 1996-07-02 Texas Instruments Incorporated Field reconfigurable logic/memory array
US5493239A (en) 1995-01-31 1996-02-20 Motorola, Inc. Circuit and method of configuring a field programmable gate array
US6052773A (en) 1995-02-10 2000-04-18 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology DPGA-coupled microprocessors
US5742180A (en) 1995-02-10 1998-04-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Dynamically programmable gate array with multiple contexts
US5659785A (en) 1995-02-10 1997-08-19 International Business Machines Corporation Array processor communication architecture with broadcast processor instructions
US5537057A (en) 1995-02-14 1996-07-16 Altera Corporation Programmable logic array device with grouped logic regions and three types of conductors
US5892961A (en) 1995-02-17 1999-04-06 Xilinx, Inc. Field programmable gate array having programming instructions in the configuration bitstream
US5570040A (en) 1995-03-22 1996-10-29 Altera Corporation Programmable logic array integrated circuit incorporating a first-in first-out memory
US5541530A (en) 1995-05-17 1996-07-30 Altera Corporation Programmable logic array integrated circuits with blocks of logic regions grouped into super-blocks
US5646544A (en) 1995-06-05 1997-07-08 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for dynamically reconfiguring a programmable gate array
US5559450A (en) 1995-07-27 1996-09-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Field programmable gate array with multi-port RAM
US5784313A (en) * 1995-08-18 1998-07-21 Xilinx, Inc. Programmable logic device including configuration data or user data memory slices
US5583450A (en) 1995-08-18 1996-12-10 Xilinx, Inc. Sequencer for a time multiplexed programmable logic device
US5778439A (en) 1995-08-18 1998-07-07 Xilinx, Inc. Programmable logic device with hierarchical confiquration and state storage
US5652894A (en) 1995-09-29 1997-07-29 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for providing power saving modes to a pipelined processor
US5943242A (en) * 1995-11-17 1999-08-24 Pact Gmbh Dynamically reconfigurable data processing system
US5936424A (en) 1996-02-02 1999-08-10 Xilinx, Inc. High speed bus with tree structure for selecting bus driver
US5956518A (en) 1996-04-11 1999-09-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Intermediate-grain reconfigurable processing device
US5894565A (en) 1996-05-20 1999-04-13 Atmel Corporation Field programmable gate array with distributed RAM and increased cell utilization
US6023564A (en) * 1996-07-19 2000-02-08 Xilinx, Inc. Data processing system using a flash reconfigurable logic device as a dynamic execution unit for a sequence of instructions
US5838165A (en) 1996-08-21 1998-11-17 Chatter; Mukesh High performance self modifying on-the-fly alterable logic FPGA, architecture and method
US5828858A (en) 1996-09-16 1998-10-27 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Worm-hole run-time reconfigurable processor field programmable gate array (FPGA)
US6005410A (en) 1996-12-05 1999-12-21 International Business Machines Corporation Interconnect structure between heterogeneous core regions in a programmable array
DE19651075A1 (en) 1996-12-09 1998-06-10 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Unit for processing numerical and logical operations, for use in processors (CPU's), multi-computer systems, data flow processors (DFP's), digital signal processors (DSP's) or the like
DE19654593A1 (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-07-02 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Reconfiguration procedure for programmable blocks at runtime
DE19654595A1 (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-07-02 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh I0 and memory bus system for DFPs as well as building blocks with two- or multi-dimensional programmable cell structures
DE19654846A1 (en) 1996-12-27 1998-07-09 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Process for the independent dynamic reloading of data flow processors (DFPs) as well as modules with two- or multi-dimensional programmable cell structures (FPGAs, DPGAs, etc.)
DE19704044A1 (en) * 1997-02-04 1998-08-13 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Address generation with systems having programmable modules
DE19704728A1 (en) 1997-02-08 1998-08-13 Pact Inf Tech Gmbh Method for self-synchronization of configurable elements of a programmable module
WO1998038958A1 (en) 1997-03-05 1998-09-11 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology A reconfigurable footprint mechanism for omnidirectional vehicles
US6125408A (en) * 1997-03-10 2000-09-26 Compaq Computer Corporation Resource type prioritization in generating a device configuration
US5884075A (en) * 1997-03-10 1999-03-16 Compaq Computer Corporation Conflict resolution using self-contained virtual devices
US6085317A (en) * 1997-08-15 2000-07-04 Altera Corporation Reconfigurable computer architecture using programmable logic devices
US6389379B1 (en) * 1997-05-02 2002-05-14 Axis Systems, Inc. Converification system and method
US6321366B1 (en) * 1997-05-02 2001-11-20 Axis Systems, Inc. Timing-insensitive glitch-free logic system and method
US6421817B1 (en) * 1997-05-29 2002-07-16 Xilinx, Inc. System and method of computation in a programmable logic device using virtual instructions
US6047115A (en) * 1997-05-29 2000-04-04 Xilinx, Inc. Method for configuring FPGA memory planes for virtual hardware computation
US6122719A (en) 1997-10-31 2000-09-19 Silicon Spice Method and apparatus for retiming in a network of multiple context processing elements
US6108760A (en) 1997-10-31 2000-08-22 Silicon Spice Method and apparatus for position independent reconfiguration in a network of multiple context processing elements
US5915123A (en) * 1997-10-31 1999-06-22 Silicon Spice Method and apparatus for controlling configuration memory contexts of processing elements in a network of multiple context processing elements
US6127908A (en) 1997-11-17 2000-10-03 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Microelectro-mechanical system actuator device and reconfigurable circuits utilizing same
AU2562899A (en) 1998-01-26 1999-08-09 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Reconfigurable logic for table lookup
US6282627B1 (en) 1998-06-29 2001-08-28 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Integrated processor and programmable data path chip for reconfigurable computing
US6243808B1 (en) 1999-03-08 2001-06-05 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Digital data bit order conversion using universal switch matrix comprising rows of bit swapping selector groups
US6347346B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2002-02-12 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Local memory unit system with global access for use on reconfigurable chips
US6370596B1 (en) 1999-08-03 2002-04-09 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Logic flag registers for monitoring processing system events
US6341318B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2002-01-22 Chameleon Systems, Inc. DMA data streaming
US6288566B1 (en) 1999-09-23 2001-09-11 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Configuration state memory for functional blocks on a reconfigurable chip
US6349346B1 (en) 1999-09-23 2002-02-19 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Control fabric unit including associated configuration memory and PSOP state machine adapted to provide configuration address to reconfigurable functional unit
US6311200B1 (en) 1999-09-23 2001-10-30 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Reconfigurable program sum of products generator
US6392912B1 (en) 2001-01-10 2002-05-21 Chameleon Systems, Inc. Loading data plane on reconfigurable chip

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6571381B1 (en) 2003-05-27
EA200000880A1 (en) 2001-12-24
JP4338308B2 (en) 2009-10-07
EP1057117A2 (en) 2000-12-06
ATE217713T1 (en) 2002-06-15
DE19980309D2 (en) 2001-03-29
EA003406B1 (en) 2003-04-24
WO1999044147A3 (en) 1999-10-28
WO1999044120A3 (en) 1999-11-11
JP4215394B2 (en) 2009-01-28
DE19807872A1 (en) 1999-08-26
EP1057102B1 (en) 2002-05-15
JP2002505535A (en) 2002-02-19
US20030074518A1 (en) 2003-04-17
CN1298521A (en) 2001-06-06
US6480937B1 (en) 2002-11-12
ATE217715T1 (en) 2002-06-15
WO1999044147A2 (en) 1999-09-02
DE59901447D1 (en) 2002-06-20
US6687788B2 (en) 2004-02-03
DE59901446D1 (en) 2002-06-20
WO1999044120A2 (en) 1999-09-02
CA2321874A1 (en) 1999-09-02
EP1057117B1 (en) 2002-05-15
CN1298520A (en) 2001-06-06
EA003407B1 (en) 2003-04-24
JP2002505480A (en) 2002-02-19
EP2293193A1 (en) 2011-03-09
EP1164474A3 (en) 2009-08-12
EA200000879A1 (en) 2001-12-24
DE19980312D2 (en) 2001-03-22
EP1164474A2 (en) 2001-12-19
AU3137199A (en) 1999-09-15
EP1057102A2 (en) 2000-12-06
AU3326299A (en) 1999-09-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2321877A1 (en) Method for cacheing configuration data of data flow processors and modules with a two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (fpgas, dpgas or similar) according to a hierarchy
US6990555B2 (en) Method of hierarchical caching of configuration data having dataflow processors and modules having two- or multidimensional programmable cell structure (FPGAs, DPGAs, etc.)
US9218290B2 (en) Data caching in a network communications processor architecture
JP2512651B2 (en) Memory sharing multiprocessor
US5265235A (en) Consistency protocols for shared memory multiprocessors
US10789175B2 (en) Caching policy in a multicore system on a chip (SOC)
US9183145B2 (en) Data caching in a network communications processor architecture
AU675501B2 (en) Apparatus, method and network adapter with host interrupt and indication management
EP1660992B1 (en) Multi-core multi-thread processor
US4152764A (en) Floating-priority storage control for processors in a multi-processor system
US9444757B2 (en) Dynamic configuration of processing modules in a network communications processor architecture
US20060206635A1 (en) DMA engine for protocol processing
US8793442B2 (en) Forward progress mechanism for stores in the presence of load contention in a system favoring loads
CN103959261B (en) More kernels interconnection in network processing unit
WO2004088462A2 (en) Hardware assisted firmware task scheduling and management
WO2004109432A2 (en) Method and apparatus for local and distributed data memory access (&#39;dma&#39;) control
EP0339270A2 (en) Apparatus and method for automatically detecting hot-spot references and diverting same from memory traffic in a multiprocessor computer system
US20120020368A1 (en) Dynamic updating of scheduling hierarchy in a traffic manager of a network processor
EP0489556B1 (en) Consistency protocols for shared memory multiprocessors
CN112416851B (en) Extensible multi-core on-chip shared memory
US20120020250A1 (en) Shared task parameters in a scheduler of a network processor
JP2002091933A (en) Processor system
CN114936171A (en) Memory access controller architecture
CN114968906A (en) Coarse-grained reconfigurable processor based on ISP (internet service provider) assembly line
NZ716954A (en) Computing architecture with peripherals

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
FZDE Discontinued