CA2463751A1 - Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators - Google Patents
Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2463751A1 CA2463751A1 CA002463751A CA2463751A CA2463751A1 CA 2463751 A1 CA2463751 A1 CA 2463751A1 CA 002463751 A CA002463751 A CA 002463751A CA 2463751 A CA2463751 A CA 2463751A CA 2463751 A1 CA2463751 A1 CA 2463751A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- stimulus
- configuration
- patient
- controller
- sensing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/36014—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes
- A61N1/36021—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes for treatment of pain
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/02—Details
- A61N1/04—Electrodes
- A61N1/05—Electrodes for implantation or insertion into the body, e.g. heart electrode
- A61N1/0526—Head electrodes
- A61N1/0529—Electrodes for brain stimulation
- A61N1/0531—Brain cortex electrodes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/02—Details
- A61N1/04—Electrodes
- A61N1/05—Electrodes for implantation or insertion into the body, e.g. heart electrode
- A61N1/0526—Head electrodes
- A61N1/0529—Electrodes for brain stimulation
- A61N1/0534—Electrodes for deep brain stimulation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/02—Details
- A61N1/04—Electrodes
- A61N1/05—Electrodes for implantation or insertion into the body, e.g. heart electrode
- A61N1/0551—Spinal or peripheral nerve electrodes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
- A61N1/3606—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system adapted for a particular treatment
- A61N1/36071—Pain
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
- A61N1/3606—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system adapted for a particular treatment
- A61N1/36082—Cognitive or psychiatric applications, e.g. dementia or Alzheimer's disease
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
- A61N1/36128—Control systems
- A61N1/36146—Control systems specified by the stimulation parameters
- A61N1/36182—Direction of the electrical field, e.g. with sleeve around stimulating electrode
- A61N1/36185—Selection of the electrode configuration
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/02—Details
- A61N1/04—Electrodes
- A61N1/05—Electrodes for implantation or insertion into the body, e.g. heart electrode
- A61N1/0551—Spinal or peripheral nerve electrodes
- A61N1/0553—Paddle shaped electrodes, e.g. for laminotomy
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/36014—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes
- A61N1/36025—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes for treating a mental or cerebral condition
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/372—Arrangements in connection with the implantation of stimulators
- A61N1/375—Constructional arrangements, e.g. casings
- A61N1/3756—Casings with electrodes thereon, e.g. leadless stimulators
Abstract
Methods and devices for automatically optimizing the stimulus parameters and/or the configuration of electrodes to provide neural stimulation to a patient. In one embodiment, a system includes an electrode array having an implantable support member configured to be implanted into a patient and a plurality of therapy electrodes carried by the support member. The system can also have a pulse system operatively coupled to the therapy electrodes to deliver a stimulus to the therapy electrodes, and a sensing device configured to be attached to a sensing location of the patient. The sensing device generates response signals in response to the stimulus. The system can also include a controller operatively coupled to the pulse system and to the sensing device. The controller includes a computer operable medium that generates command signals that define the stimulus delivered by the pulse system, evaluates the response signals from the sensing device, and determines a desired configuration for the therapy electrodes and/or a desired stimulus to be delivered to the therapy electrodes.
Description
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY OPTIMIZING
STIMULUS PARAMETERS AND ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS FOR
NEURO-STIMULATORS
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS) ~ooo~~ This application claims benefit of U.S. Application No. 09/978,134, filed October 15, 2001, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No.
09/802'p808 'filed March 8, 2001, which claims priority to U.S. Application No.
60/217,981 filed July 13, 2000, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
10002 The present disclosure is related to systems and methods for automatically optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters of the electrical or magnetic waveforms applied to a target stimulation site of a patient.
BACKGROUND
10003 A wide variety of mental and physical processes are known to be controlled or influenced by neural activity in the central and peripheral nervous systems. For example, the neural-functions in some areas of the brain (i.e., the sensory or motor cortices) are organized according to physical or cognitive functions. There are also several other areas of the brain that appear to have distinct functions in most individuals. fn the majority of people, for example, the areas of the occipital lobes relate to vision, the regions of the left interior frontal lobes relate to language, and the regions of the cerebral cortex appear to be consistently involved with conscious awareness, memory and intellect. The spinal cord is also organized so that specific regions of spinal cord are related to particular i functions. Because of the location-specific functional organization of the central nervous system in which neurons at discreet locations are statistically likely to control particular mental or physical functions in normal individuals, stimulating neurons at selected locations of the central nervous system can be used to effectuate cognitive and/or motor functions throughout the body.
10004 The neural activity in the central nervous system can be influenced by electrical and/or magnetic energy that is supplied from an external source outside of the body. Various neural functions can thus be promoted or disrupted by applying an electrical current to the cortex or other part of the central nervous system. As a result, the quest for treating or augmenting neural functions in the brain, spinal cord, or other parts of the body have led to research directed toward using electricity or magnetism to control these functions.
(ooos~ In several existing applications, the electrical or magnetic stimulation is provided by a neural-stimulator that has a plurality of therapy electrodes and a pulse system coupled to the therapy electrodes. The therapy electrodes can be implanted into the patient at a target site for stimulating the desired neurons. For example, one existing technique for masking pain in the lower extremities of a patient is to apply an electrical stimulus to a desired target stimulation site of the spinal cord. Although determining the general location of the target stimulation site may be relatively straight forward, identifying the specific configuration of electrodes for applying the stimulus will generally vary for specific patients.
(0006 The conventional procedure for optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes involves several steps and relies on the subjective input from the patient. Conventional techniques generally involve rendering the patient unconscious, implanting an electrode array in the patient at the stimulation site, and then letting the patient regain consciousness. After the patienfi is conscious, the particular configuration of electrodes is optimized for that patient by selecting different combinations of the therapy electrodes and applying a constant electrical stimulus. The patient subjectively evaluates the effectiveness ofi each stimulus by indicating the degree to which the stimulus masks the pain. After testing the various configurations of therapy electrodes and deciding upon a desired electrode configuration according to the input of the patient, the patient is rendered unconscious for a second time to close the electrode array in the patient.
looo~~ A similar procedure can be followed for determining the desired configuration of therapy electrodes for intra-cranial electrical stimulation.
For example, a device for stimulating a region of the brain is disclosed by King in U.S. Patent No. 5,713,922. King discloses a device for cortical surface stimulation having electrodes mounted on a paddle. The paddle can be implanted under the skull of the patient so that the electrodes are on the surface of the brain in a fixed position. King also discloses that the electrical pulses are generated by a pulse generator implanted in the patient remotely from the cranium (e.g., subclavicular implantation). The pulse generator is coupled to the electrodes by a cable that extends from the paddle, around the skull, and down the neck to the subclavicular location of the pulse generator.
(ooos~ King discloses implanting the electrodes in contact with the surface of the cortex to create paresthesia, which is a vibrating or buzzing sensation.
More specifically, King discloses inducing paresthesia in large areas by placing the electrodes against particular regions ofi the brain and applying an electrical stimulus to the electrodes. This is similar to implanting therapy electrodes at the spinal cord of a patient for masking pain in the lower extremities of a patient, and thus King appears to require stimulation that exceeds the membrane activation threshold for a population of neurons at the electrodes (supra-threshold stimulation). King further discloses applying a stimulus to one set of electrodes, and then applying a stimulus to a separate configuration of electrodes to shift the location of the paresthesia.
~ooos~ One problem of the procedures for optimizing the configuration ofi therapy electrodes for either spinal or cortical stimulation is that existing systems and methods are expensive and time consuming. First, it is expensive to render the patient unconscious, implant the neural-stimulators in the patient, then wait for the patient to regain consciousness, then test various electrode configurations by asking the patient to subjectively estimate the degree to which the particular stimulus masks the pain, and then finally render the patient unconscious again to complete the implantation. Second, it can be a reasonably high risk operation because the patient is placed under general anesthesia at two separate stages of the process. It will be appreciated that this is an extremely long process that requires highly skilled doctors and personnel to attend to the patient for a significant period of time. Moreover, the patient occupies costly operating rooms and utilizes expensive equipment throughout the process. Third, relying on the subjective response from the patient may not provide accurate data for evaluating minor variances in the results. Fourth, the patient may experience pain or discomfort because some configurations may provide high intensity stimulation that exceeds the sensory level of stimulation.
Therefore, existing systems for determining a desired configuration of electrodes to apply a neural-stimulus to specific patients are expensive, time consuming, potentially painful, and may not determine the most effective electrode configuration.
~oo~o~ Another drawback of configuring the therapy electrodes using existing systems and methods is that the procedures are not effective for on-going use. This is because the patient's condition changes continually. For example, the location of the pain or the sensation typically shifts over time such that the optimal configuration of the electrodes at one point of the therapy may not mask the pain after a period of time. A large number of patients accordingly terminate electrical therapies for paresthesia within one year because of such a shift in the location of the pain/sensation. Therefore, although electrical stimulation for masking pain, inducing or enhancing plasticity, and other reasons appears to be very promising, it has not yet gained wide acceptance because of the drawbacks of configuring the therapy electrodes to apply an effective stimulus to different patients over a long period of time.
loo~~~ Additionally, it is also difficult to optimize the parameters of the electrical or magnetic stimulus. For example, even when a desired configuration of therapy electrodes is used, different waveforms can produce different results in each patient. Determining the stimulus parameters of the waveform can be even more time consuming than determining the desirable configuration of therapy electrodes because it involves testing a large number of independent variables. In a biphasic pulse train, for example, the stimulus parameters can include (a) the intensity of the electrical current, (b) the time of the stimulus of the first phase, (c) the time of the stimulus of the second phase, (d) the total time of the stimulus pulse, (e) the frequency of the stimulus pulse, (f) the pulse duty cycle, (g) the burst time of the stimulus, (h) the burst repetition rate of the stimulus, and (i) additional variables.
Because of the large number of stimulus parameters, a particular waveform for the stimulus is typically selected for a given treatment for all patients such that the parameters for stimulus itself are not optimized.
100~2~ In light of the several drawbacks for existing techniques of applying electrical or magnetic neural-stimulation to produce desired results, there is a significant need to enhance the procedures for applying such stimulus to individual patients. For example, it would be desirable to have more cost effective and less time consuming procedures for determining an effective configuration of therapy electrodes and stimulus parameters. Additionally, it would be desirable to update the electrode configuration and stimulus parameters in each individual patient without surgically operating on the patient to compensate for shifts in the target stimulation site.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
1003] Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a system for automatically optimizing the configuration of the electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
s ~oo~a~ Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for automatically optimizing the configuration of electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, loo~s~ Figure 3 is a flow diagram of an embodiment of a method for optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes that can be used in the method of Figure 2 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
loo~s~ Figures 4A-4F illustrate various examples of- using the system of Figure 1 to optimize the configuration of the electrodes in accordance with an embodiment of the methods of Figures 2 and 3.
100~7~ Figure 5 is a flow diagram of a method for optimizing the stimulus parameters that can be used in the method of Figure 2 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
loo~a~ Figure 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of several stimulus parameters that can be optimized using an embodiment of the method of Figure 5.
loo~s~ Figure 7 is a flow diagram of a method for optimizing the electrode configuration and/or stimulus parameters for inducing and/or enhancing neural-plasticity using sub-threshold stimulation in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
too2ol The following disclosure describes several methods and apparatus for automatically determining the configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the parameters for the stimulus to treat or otherwise effectuate a change in neural-functions of a patient. Several embodiments of methods in accordance with the invention are practiced using a computer to automatically implement such processes, but it is not necessary to use a computer in all of the embodiments. The specific details of certain embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following description and in Figures 1-7 to provide a thorough understanding of these embodiments to a person of ordinary skill in the art. More specifically, several embodiments of a system in accordance with the invention are described with reference to Figure 1, and then several embodiments of methods for determining a desired configuration of therapy electrodes and/or stimulus parameters are described with reference to Figures 2-7. A person skilled in the art will understand that the present invention may have additional embodiments, or that the invention can be practiced without several of the details described below.
A. SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATICALLY OPTIMIZING THERAPY
ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS AND/OR STIMULUS
PARAMETERS
~002~~ Figure 1 illustrates an embodiment of a system for providing neuro-stimulation to a patient that can automatically optimize (a) the configuration of therapy electrodes, (b) the waveform parameters for the electrical stimulus, and/or (c) additional stimulation parameters. In this embodiment, the system 100 comprises an electrode array 110, a stimulus unit 120 operatively coupled to the electrode array 110, and at least one sensing device 180 operatively coupled to the stimulus unit 120. The electrode array 110 and the sensing unit 180 can be operatively coupled to the stimulus unit 120 by a direct connection (e.g., wires, cables, or fiber optical lines) or an indirect connection (e.g., RF energy, magnetic energy, infrared, etc.).
Ioo22~ The electrode array 110 can include a support member 112 and a plurality of electrodes 114 that are carried by the support member 112. The electrode array 110 is generally configured to be implanted into a patient P
for cortical stimulation, deep brain stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, cardiac stimulation, or stimulation of other parts of the body. For example, the electrode array 110 can be a corfiical neural-stimulation device, such as one of the devices described in U.S. Application No. 091802,808 incorporated by reference above. The electrode array 110 can alternatively be a grid having a plurality of discreet electrodes 114 arranged in an X-Y
coordinate system or another type of coordinate system. The therapy electrodes 114 can be independently coupled to the stimulus unit 120 by a link 116. In one embodiment, the fink 116 is a wire or another type of conductive line, but in alternate embodiments the link 116 can be an indirect link (e.g., infrared, magnetic or RF energy). The link 116 can accordingly be a direct connection or an indirect connection to operatively couple the therapy electrodes 114 to the stimulus unit 120. It will be appreciated that many of the electrode arrays can be implanted at the spinal cord for spinal cord stimulation.
10023 The stimulus unit 120 can include a controller 130 with a processor, a memory, and a programmable computer medium. The controller 130, for example, can be a computer and the programmable computer medium can be software loaded into the memory of the computer and/or hardware that performs the processes described below. The stimulus unit 120 can further include a pulse system 140, a converter 150, and a plurality of controls/indicators 160. The pulse system 140 can generate and send energy pulses to the electrode array, and the converter 150 can receive signals from the sensing device 180. The pulse system 140 and the converter 150 are both operatively coupled to the controller 130. The controls and indicators 160 can include a computer display, an input/output device (e.g., a keyboard, touch sensitive screen, etc.), or other types of devices commonly used to enter commands or receive output from computers.
10024 The electrode array 110 and the pulse system 140 can be integrated into a single stimulation apparatus that can be implanted into the patient, as described in U.S. Application No. 09/082,808. One example of an integrated pulse system 140 and electrode array 110 is configured to be implanted into the skull of the patient so that the electrodes contact the pia matter of the cortex. Such a device can have an internal power source that can be implanted into the patient and/or an external power source coupled to the pulse system via electromagnetic coupling or a direct connection. In alternate embodiments, the pulse system 140 is an external unit that is not s implanted into the patient. The external pulse unit 140 can provide the electrical stimulus to the therapy electrodes 114 using RF energy, electromagnetism, or wire terminals exposed on the scalp of the patient P.
~0025~ The sensing device 180 can be an electrode that produces an analog signal, and the converter 150 can convert the analog signal to a digital signal for processing by the controller 130. The sensing device 180 can be an implantable electrode that can be implanted at a number of different locations according to the desired response of the stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes 114. In alternate embodiments, the sensing device 180 can be an imaging device (e.g., an fMRI apparatus), an ultrasound apparatus, an EEG, a device that detects somatosensory evoked potentials, or another suitable apparatus for determining a response in the patient P to a stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes 114. The sensing device can alternatively detect behavioral responses. In an alternate embodiment, the sensing device 180 can produce a digital output and be coupled directly to the controller 130. Therefore, the converter 150 may only be used in some of the embodiments of the system 100.
loo~sl The system 100 can automatically test the efficacy of various electrode configurations and stimulus parameters either with or without subjective input from the patient. In operation, the controller 130 sends command signals to the pulse system 140 defining the configuration of active electrodes and the waveform parameters for the stimulus. The pulse system 140 generates and sends a single pulse or pulse train to the active therapy electrodes in accordance with the command signals, and the sensing device 180 senses the neural responses, motor responses, or other types of responses to the stimulus. The sensing device 180 also sends signals corresponding to the magnitude of the responses to the controller 130, which compares the responses to previous responses and/or empirical responses for the type of therapy stored in the memory of the controller.
The controller 130 then adjusts the configuration of active therapy electrodes and/or the waveform parameters of the stimulus to optimize the therapy for the particular patient. Several methods for using embodiments of the system 100 for supra- and sub-threshold neural-stimulation therapies are described below.
B. METHODS OF OPTIMIZING ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS
AND STIMULUS PARAMETERS FOR NEURO-STIMULATION
10027 Figures 2-7 illustrate several embodiments of methods in accordance with the invention that can be practiced using the stimulator system 100 described above. Figure 2, for example, is a flow diagram illustrating an optimization process 200 that can be executed, at least in part, in a computer for automatically optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the waveform parameters for the stimulus. The optimization process 200 generally starts after the therapy electrode array has been installed at a target stimulation site using surgical techniques known in the art and a sensing device has been positioned to sense a response to the electrical stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes.
loo~s~ After the therapy electrode array has been installed and the sensing device is ready to sense a response in the patient, the optimization process 200 begins with a setup procedure 210 in which a setup configuration of therapy electrodes and the waveform parameters for a control stimulus are selected. The controller can select the setup configuration for the electrodes and the control stimulus by retrieving predetermined setup values stored in a setup database in the memory of the controller. The setup database can contain at least one setup configuration for the therapy electrodes and at least one set of waveform parameters for the control stimulus. In several embodiments, a plurality of different setup configurations for the electrodes and the stimulus parameters can be stored in a database so that the system 100 can be used for many different types of neural therapies and procedures. An alternate embodiment can involve manually inputting the setup configuration for the electrodes and the waveform parameters for the control stimulus either in lieu of or in addition to having the controller retrieve io setup data from memory. A practitioner, for example, can select the setup data from pull-down menus provided by the system 100 or manually key in the data.
loo2s~ The setup configurations for the therapy electrodes and the waveform parameters for control stimuli can be determined by manually performing optimization procedures on test groups of patients for each type of therapy.
The optimal setups can be correlated with the particular therapy (e.g., enhancing neural plasticity in the cortex, masking pain, etc.), the particular target site, and the patient factors. For example, a first electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for sub-threshold cortical neural stimulation to restore functionality of a limb that was affected by a stroke or other type of brain damage; a second electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for cortical neural stimulation to enhance learning capabilities; a third electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for spinal stimulation to mask pain; and a fourth electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for sub- or supra-threshold stimulation applied to the cortex. It will be appreciated that many additional electrode configurations and stimulus parameters can be determined for other types of therapies such that the foregoing is not exhaustive of the various types of setup configurations.
~ooso~ Referring again to Figure 2, the optimization process 200 continues with a stimulating procedure 220 and then a sensing procedure 230. The stimulating procedure 220 involves applying an electrical stimulus to a configuration of the therapy electrodes. Several iterations of the stimulation procedure 220 are generally performed several times at different stages throughout the optimization process 200, and the configuration of the electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters can be changed at each iteration of the stimulation procedure 220. For example, the initial iteration of the stimulating procedure 220 can involve applying the control stimulus to the setup configuration of therapy electrodes. Subsequent iterations of the stimulation procedure 220 can involve applying (a) the control stimulus to an m alternate configuration of therapy electrodes; (b) an alternate stimulus with a different waveform to the setup electrode configuration; and/or (c) alternate stimuli with different waveforms to alternate electrode configurations. As explained above with reference to Figure 1, the controller carries out the stimulation procedure 220 by sending command signals to the pulse system, which in turn generates and transmits energy having the parameters for the stimulus to the selected. configuration of active therapy electrodes.
loose The sensing procedure 230 is generally performed after each iteration of the stimulation procedure 220. The sensing procedure 230 involves monitoring a location in the patient for a response to the stimulus applied in the stimulation procedure 220. The location for sensing the response and the particular type of response that is measured varies according to the particular type of therapy and other factors. In general, the physiologic outcome that the response measures can be categorized into three general areas: (1 ) cortical; (2) peripheral; and (3) functional. The types of measurements for monitoring cortical physiologic outcomes include:
(a) action potential generation of the neurons; (b) excitability changes of the neurons measured waveform characteristics of EEG or field potentials within the cortex; (c) blood flow (e.g., doppler measurements); (d) thermal changes; (e) pulse oxymetry; (f) chemical metabolites; and (g) imaging techniques (e.g., functional MRI, MR spectroscopy, diffusion MRI, PET, CT, etc.). The types of measurements for monitoring peripheral physiologic outcomes include: (a) EMG (surface, percutaneous, or implanted); (b) external potentiometer or other forms of physiologic input; and (c) motion detectors (e.g., accelerometers). The types of measurements for monitoring functional physiologic outcomes include: (a) force/strength tests; (b) dexterity tests; (c) speed/reflex tests; and (d) performing complex tasks.
loos2~ Several types of measurements that monitor the physiologic outcomes can be automated so that they generate signals which can be processed by the controller either with or without subjective input from the patient. In the case of EMG measurements for sensing peripheral i2 responses to the applied stimulus, the electrical signals from the EMG
sensors are automatically received and processed by the controller. In other applications, the data sensed by functional MRI, blood flow monitors, thermal monitors, pulse oxymeters, PET, MR spectroscopy, accelerometers, etc. can be digitized and process by the controller in a similar manner. In this manner, the stimulating procedure 220 and the sensing procedure 230 can be automated using a controller with the appropriate hardware and/or software.
looss~ The optimization process 200 also includes performing an evaluation procedure 240 after one or more iterations of the stimulating procedure 220 and the sensing procedure 230. The evaluation procedure 240 can involve a determination routine 242 in which a sensed response from the sensing procedure 230 is compared with a desired response range and/or other responses from previous iterations of the stimulation procedure 220 and the sensing procedure 230. Based upon whether the sensed response is within a desired range and/or shows an improvement compared to previous responses or target ranges, the controller can automatically test the effectiveness of other electrode configurations and stimulus parameters.
For example, if the response is not within the desired response range, then the determination routine 242 directs the controller to select an alternate configuration for the therapy electrodes and/or alternate parameter for the stimulus. Alternatively, in one embodiment when the sensed response is within the desired response range, the determination routine 242 can direct the controller to proceed directly to a stop 270 and indicate that the configuration of therapy electrodes and the parameters for the stimulus have been optimized to treat the specific patient. In another embodiment when the sensed response is within the desired response range, the determination routine 242 directs the controller to select additional alternate configurations of the therapy electrodes and/or stimulus parameters to discover whether a more effective response can be achieved.
loosa.~ The process of selecting alternate therapy electrode configurations or stimulus parameters is performed by an analyzing procedure 260. In one embodiment, the analyzing procedure 260 is predicated upon the understanding that the electrode configuration and each of the stimulus parameters are independent variables that can be individually optimized while keeping the other variables constant. The analyzing procedure 260, therefore, can proceed by keeping one of. the configuration of the therapy electrodes or the stimulus parameters constant and then progressively adjusting the other of these variables until the most effective result is obtained for the adjusted variable. For example, when the analyzing procedure 260 selects alternate stimulus parameters, it typically maintains the previous configuration of therapy electrodes and it adjusts only one of the stimulus parameters at a time. Conversely, the analyzing procedure 260 can keep the same stimulus parameters and select alternate configurations of therapy electrodes. The analyzing procedure 260 can select alternate inputs for the stimulus parameters and/or the electrode configurations by dynamically estimating new parameters based on projected response patterns for using empirical data developed for particular therapies and/or actual responses from previous stimuli applied to the patient. In one embodiment, the controller automatically analyzes the responses from previous stimulating procedures 220 to determine a pattern of improved or degraded effectiveness of the corresponding configurations of therapy electrodes and stimulus parameters that were applied in the iterations of the stimulation procedure 220. Based upon the pattern of responses, the analyzing routine 260 can then incrementally change one of the variables in a manner that concurs with a pattern showing improved responses or moves away from the pattern that shows deteriorated responses.
~0035~ A basic example of the analyzing routine 260 involves optimizing the frequency of the electrical stimulus. As such, the configuration of electrodes and the other stimulus parameters remain constant for several iterations of the applying procedure 220. In one iteration a stimulus having a first frequency (e.g., 50 Hz) may produce marginal results as determined by the sensing and evaluation procedures 230 and 240. Without additional data, the analyzing procedure 260 selects a second stimulus with a second frequency either less or greater than the first frequency to get a general understanding of whether higher or lower frequencies produce more efficacious results. The controller, for example, can select a second frequency of 25 Hz. .If a frequency of 25 Hz produces better results than 50 Hz, the controller can select still lower frequencies in the analyzing procedure 260; but, assuming for the sake of this example that a frequency of 25 Hz produces a worse result than 50 Hz, then the controller can select a third frequency higher than the second frequency (e.g., 100 Hz). If the higher third frequency (e.g., 100 Hz) produces a better result than the first frequency (e.g., 50 Hz), then the controller can select a still higher fourth frequency (e.g., 200 Hz) in a subsequent iteration of the procedure. The method 200 can continue in this manner by adjusting variables in a direction that produces better results until the results begin to deteriorate. At this point, it is expected that the optimal value for the variable is bracketed between the last value selected for the variable and the value of the iteration immediately preceding the penultimate iteration (i.e., the second-to-the-last iteration).
~oo3s~ Several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 that use the system 100 are expected to reduce the cost and time for optimizing the configuration of the therapy electrodes and the stimulus parameters. One feature of the optimizing method 200 is that the pulse system and the therapy electrodes can be an integrated unit that is implanted into the patient and controlled externally from the patient such that an external controller can adjust the variables (e.g., electrode configuration and/or stimulus parameters) without requiring opening the patient for access to the pulse system and/or the therapy electrodes. One benefit of this feature is that several different electrode configurations and stimulus parameters can be adjusted after implanting the electrode array, and the variables can also is be tested rather quickly because the controller can automatically adjust the variables and apply the stimulus to the therapy electrodes in a manner that is expected to be much faster than manually adjusting the variables.
Another benefit of this feature is that the patient need only be subject to a single application of an anesthetic because the patient can be closed up soon after implanting the electrode array and the test can be performed after closing the patient.. As a result, several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 are expected to reduce the time and costs for determining a desirable electrode configuration and stimulus parameters.
~oos7~ Several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 are also expected to provide better results than relying solely on the subjective input of the patient. Another aspect of several embodiments of the system 100 is that the sensing device provides objective criteria that measures the response to the stimuli. This feature is expected to provide better accuracy in determining the effectiveness of the individual stimuli applied to the therapy electrodes. Moreover, the optimization procedure 200 can also expediently optimize the waveform parameters in addition to optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes such that both the electrical components of the stimulus and the locations) where the stimulus is applied are optimized for specific patients.
looss~ Another feature of several embodiments of the optimization method 200 using the system 100 is that they are expected to provide more effective therapies over a long period of time without additional surgical procedures.
One feature that provides this benefit is that the pulse system and the electrode array can be implanted into the patient and controlled externally from the patient. As a result, when the effectiveness of the therapy degrades because the target site shifts or another variable changes, the sensing device 180 can be positioned relative to the patient and coupled to the controller to re-optimize the electrode configuration and/or the stimulus parameters without having to perform surgery on the patient. The system 100 can accordingly be operated using embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 at any time to compensate for shifts in the target location.
Several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 that use the system 100 are accordingly expected to provide more effective therapies for ongoing applications.
loo3s~ Still another benefit of several embodiments of the method 200 is that they are expected to be more comfortable for patients. One feature of the method 200 is that the sensing procedure can sense responses at levels that the patient cannot feel any sensations. As a result, is it not likely that the application of the stimulus will cause pain or discomfort.
~ooa.o~ Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method for optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes in accordance with the invention. In this embodiment, the method 300 can include a setup procedure 310 in which a setup configuration of therapy electrodes is selected. The setup configuration of therapy electrodes can be based upon historical data obtained from previous optimization procedures for specific patients or different types of therapies. After performing the setup procedure 310, the method 300 continues with a stimulating procedure 320 in which a control electrical stimulus is applied to the selected configuration of therapy electrodes. A response in the patient to the applied control stimulus is then sensed in a sensing procedure 330, which is generally performed after each iteration of the stimulating procedure 320. The stimulating procedure 320 and the sensing procedure 330 can be similar to those described above with reference to Figure 2, except that the stimulating procedure 320 involves applying the same control stimulus for each iteration. The primary difference, therefore, is that the configuration of therapy electrodes can be changed for each iteration of the stimulating procedure 320.
loo4~a The method 300 continues with an evaluation procedure 340 in which the sensed response from the sensing procedure 330 is compared with a predetermined range of desired responses and/or previous responses from the sensing procedure 330. The evaluation procedure 340 can have several m different embodiments. The evaluation procedure 340, for example, can include a determination routine 342 that determines whether the sensed response is the optimized response. In one embodiment, the sense response is considered to be optimized when it is within a desired range of responses. The method 300 can accordingly proceed to stop when such a response is sensed. In another embodiment, the sensed response is considered to be optimized when- it provides the best result of all possible configurations of electrodes. This embodiment generally involves applying the control stimulus to all possible configurations of electrodes before identifying the optimized electrode configuration. In still another embodiment, the sensed response is the optimized response when it provides the most effective result compared to other responses without testing all of the possible configurations of electrodes. This embodiment involves testing a number of electrode configurations, identifying a trend in electrode configurations that produce effective results, and determining if or when the trend no longer holds true. It will be appreciated that the evaluation procedure 340 can have several additional or different embodiments.
~ooa.2~ The method 300 can continue with an analyzing procedure 360 that selects an alternate therapy electrode configuration. The alternate therapy electrode configuration selected in the analyzing procedure 360 can be determined by comparing previous responses to other configurations of therapy electrodes to develop a pattern of improved responses and selecting a configuration that is expected to continue the trend.
Alternatively, the analyzing procedure 360 can simply select another therapy electrode configuration that has not yet been tested. The method can also include a final selection procedure 365 that selects the optimized configuration of the therapy electrodes based upon the sensed responses.
The process 300 can then terminate with a final stop procedure 370 in which the optimized electrode configuration is stored in memory, displayed to a practitioner, or otherwise presented for use.
is ~0043~ Figures 4A-4L illustrate several examples of therapy electrode configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 and then tested in the stimulating procedure 320, the sensing procedure 330, and the evaluation procedure 340. In these embodiments, a therapy electrode array 400 for use with the system 100 (Figure 1 ) can include an implantable support member 410 and a plurality of electrodes 420 carried by the support member 410. The therapy electrodes 420 can be individual electrodes that are arranged in a grid array having M columns and N rows. The electrode array 400 can have several other arrangements of electrodes 420, such as concentric circles, elongated lines, or many other patterns. Each of the electrodes 420 can be independently coupled to a pulse system so that individual electrodes 420 can be activated or inactivated using the controller 130 (Figure 1 ) and the pulse system 140 (Figure 1 ). The electrode array 400 is typically implanted into the patient so that the electrodes 420 are placed generally over or proximate to a target location T for stimulation. In many embodiments, the target location T can be at the surface of the cortex, along the spinal cord, or within a deep brain region of a patient depending upon the particular treatment being applied to the patient.
~ooa.4~ Figures 4A and 4B illustrate two alternate embodiments of selecting therapy electrode configurations. Referring to Figure 4A, a setup configuration of two active electrodes 420a can be selected such that the electrodes are within the target location T. One of the active electrodes 420a can be biased with a positive polarity and the other active electrode 420a can be biased with a negative polarity. Referring to Figure 4B, a subsequent iteration of the process can include selecting an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes in which the polarity of the active electrodes 420a is switched. Figures 4C-4E illustrate alternate embodiments of selecting different configurations of therapy electrodes using the analyzing procedure 360 explained above with reference to Figure 3. As can be seen from Figures 4C-4E, the active therapy electrodes 420a can be inside and/or outside of the target location T. Figure 4C illustrates an embodiment in which all of the active electrodes 420a are within the target location and adjacent to one another, and Figures 4D and 4E illustrate embodiments in which at least some of the active electrodes 420a are outside of the target location T and one or more inactive electrodes 420 are between some of the active electrodes 420x. It will be appreciated that the analyzing procedure 360 can select any configuration of therapy electrodes 420 in the.MxN electrode array 400 such that any combination of electrodes 420 can be active electrodes.
loo4s~ Figure 4F illustrates another aspect of selecting a desired configuration of therapy electrodes in which an original target location To (shown in broken lines) has changed to a current target location T~. The shift from the original target location To to the current target location T~
can be caused by several generally unpredictable factors. The methods 200 and 300 can compensate for such a target location shift without additional surgery because the therapy electrodes can be optimized using an external control and indirect coupling with the pulse system and/or or the electrode array. Thus, the application of the stimulus can be changed as the target location of neural activity shifts to provide efficacious treatment over a long period of time.
~oo4s~ Figures 4G and 4H illustrate different embodiments of therapy electrical configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 in which several electrodes on opposite areas of the target location are activated with a common polarity. Referring to Figure 4G, for example, this embodiment illustrates a series of active electrodes on opposite ends of the target location T. One embodiment of this configuration applies a common polarity to a first set 420x, of active electrodes and an opposite polarity to a second set 420x2 of active electrodes. Another embodiment can apply the same polarity to all of the active electrodes in both of the sets 420a~ and 420x2. Figure 4H illustrates a related embodiment in which a number of electrodes on opposite sides of the target location T are active electrodes.
The electrode configuration shown in Figure 4H can also apply a common polarity to all of the active electrodes on each side of the target location T
or all of the electrodes on both sides of the target location T.
~ooa.7~ Figures 41 and 4J illustrate additional embodiments of electrode configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 and then tested in the stimulation procedure 320. Figure 41 illustrates an embodiment in which a first set 420x, of active electrodes has a common polarity at one end of the target location T,-and a second set 420x2 of active electrodes is located at an opposite end of the target location T. The polarity of the electrodes in the second set 420x2 can be opposite or the same as those of the active electrodes in the first subset 420x,. Figure 4J illustrates a similar embodiment in which a first set 420x, of active electrodes is located within the target location T along one side, and a second set 420x2 of active electrodes is located within a target location T along an opposite side. The electrodes in the first set 420x, can have one polarity, and the electrodes in the second set 420x2 can have an opposite polarity.
~ooaa~ Figures 4K and 4L illustrate additional embodiments of therapy electrode configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 and then tested in the stimulation procedure 320. Referring to Figure 4K, this embodiment illustrates a first set 420x, of active electrodes at one end of the target location T and a second set 420x2 of active electrodes at an opposite end of the target location T. The active electrodes in the first set 420a~ can have opposite polarities and similarly the active electrodes in the second set 420x2 can have opposite polarities. The active electrodes in the first and second sets 420x, and 420x2 can be located outside of the target location T as shown in Figure 4K. Figure 4L illustrates a related embodiment in which the active electrodes in the first set 420a~ have opposite polarities, and the active electrodes in the second set 420x2 have opposite polarities. The active electrodes in the first and second sets 420a~
and 420x2 shown in Figure 4L are located within the boundaries of the target location T. It will be appreciated that the invention can have several additional embodiments in which the individual sets of electrodes can be 2i inside, outside, inside and outside, and have different combinations of polarities.
looa.s~ Another aspect of the invention is optimizing the parameters for the electrical stimulus in addition to or in lieu of optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes. Figure 5 is a flow diagram of a method for optimizing the desired parameters for the electrical stimulus in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In this .embodiment, the method 500 can include a setup procedure 510 in which a therapy electrode configuration and the initial parameters for the electrical stimulus are selected. The configuration of therapy electrodes can be the optimized configuration from the method 300 explained above with reference to Figure 3, or it can be another configuration input by a practitioner or retrieved from memory in the controller. The same configuration of therapy electrodes is generally maintained throughout the method 500. After performing the setup procedure 510, the method 500 continues with a first stimulating procedure 520 in which the electrical stimulus is applied to the selected configuration of therapy electrodes using the initial parameters of the electrical stimulus. A
response in the patient to the initial electrical stimulus is sensed in a first sensing procedure 530. The procedures 510-530 accordingly provide a response to an initial electrical stimulus based upon the initial stimulus parameters to provide a baseline response.
10050 The method 500 continues with an adjusting procedure 540 in which one of the stimulus parameters for the electrical stimulus is adjusted, and then a second stimulating procedure 550 in which the adjusted stimulus is applied to the therapy electrodes. A response to the adjusted stimulus is then determined using a second sensing procedure 560. The method 500 can repeat the procedures 540-560 several times for each of the parameters of the electrical stimulus to develop a plurality of responses for each parameter.
loose The method 500 can then continue with an evaluation procedure 570 in which the responses are evaluated to determine specific values for the stimulus parameters that provide an efficacious result. The evaluation procedure 570 can include a determination routine 572 that determines whether a parameter of the stimulus has been optimized. If the response for a parameter is not optimized, then the method can continue by repeating the procedures 540-560 for the parameters that are not within a desired range.
However, if the response is optimized, then the determination routine 572 can continue to a final selection procedure 580 in which a set of electrical parameters that produce a desirable response are selected.
loose Figure 6 is a graph illustrating some of the stimulus parameters that can be optimized using the method 500. A stimulus start time to defines the initial point at which an electrical or magnetic pulse is applied to the therapy electrodes. For a biphasic waveform, the parameters typically include a pulse width t, for a first phase, a pulse width t2 for a second phase, and a stimulus pulse width t3 for a single biphasic pulse. The pulse can alternatively be a monophasic pulse. The parameters can also include a stimulus repetition rate 11t~ corresponding to the frequency of the pulses, a stimulus pulse duty cycle equal to t3 divided by t4, a stimulus burst time t5 that defines the number of pulses in a pulse train, and/or a stimulus pulse repetition rate 1/ts that defines the stimulus burst frequency. Another parameter of the electrical stimulus is the intensity of the current 1, for the first phase and the current intensity h for the second phase of each pulse.
In another embodiment, a continuous pulse train can be used such that t5 ts.
loos3~ In a typical application, one of the parameters is adjusted for each application of the stimulus while maintaining the other parameters constant to determine the affect that adjusting the one parameter has on the response in the patient. Each of the parameters are believed to be independent from one another, thus one of the parameters can be optimized by applying a number of different stimuli using different values for the parameter to determine whether increasing or decreasing the parameter enhances the efficacy of the stimulus. Once it is determined whether increasing or decreasing the parameter provides a better result, then the parameter can be further increased or decreased (whichever is more desirable) until the effectiveness of the stimulation degrades. The optimized value for a particular stimulus parameter can then be stored in memory, and then a different stimulus parameter can be optimized using a similar procedure for that parameter. As such, one or more of the stimulus parameters can be optimized using this procedure.
~0054~ The embodiments of the methods 200, 300 and 500 described above can be used to optimize procedures for cortical stimulation, spinal stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and peripheral stimulation for a number of different applications. The spinal stimulation and certain aspects of the cortical stimulation can be used to mask pain, such as back pain, phantom limb pain experienced by amputees, or pain in the lower extremities. The deep brain stimulation can be optimized to treat movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, distonia, etc.), depression, or other functions related to deep brain neural activity. The methods can also be used to optimize therapies for cortical stimulation that enhance learning functions, restore motor functions (e.g., use of muscle groups affected by stroke or other trauma), and treating diseases or seizures (e.g., Alzheimer's, epilepsy, etc.).
Many of the embodiments of the methods 200, 300 and 500 for masking pain involve applying supra-threshold activation stimuli to the therapy electrodes. On the other hand, several of the cortical neural-stimulation procedures that are not directed toward masking pain but rather seek to enhance existing functions (e.g., learning) or rehabilitate impaired functions (e.g., brain damage) use sub-threshold activation stimuli that do not exceed the membrane activation threshold of a population of neurons in the target stimulation site. Several embodiments of the methods 200, 300 and 500 that are directed more specifically toward sub-threshold optimization of the neural-stimulation procedures are described below with reference to Figure 7.
C. SUB-THRESHOLD OPTIMIZATION METHODS
looss~ Figure 7 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment for optimizing a sub-threshold simulation therapy. Sub-threshold simulation involves training and/or recruiting neurons to perform a neural-function. The target locatipn can be a site where neural-plasticity is occurring or is expected to occur.
The present inventors believe that neurons become more likely to be able to carry out desired neural-functions for enhancing, repairing or restoring functionality after being stimulated electrically at a level below the membrane activation threshold for a significant population of neurons at the target site. The present inventors also believe that certain sub-threshold simulation lowers the threshold at which neurons are activated in response to physical or cognitive input to produce a lasting change in the membrane potential such that the neurons may eventually "fire" in response to motor or cognitive functions after termination of the stimulus. The optimization procedure for sub-threshold simulation accordingly seeks to select stimulus parameters that produce the desired neural-activity at the lowest level of stimulation.
looss~ Referring to the flow diagram of Figure 7, this figure illustrates an embodiment of a method 700 including a setup procedure 710 in which the configuration of therapy electrodes and the parameters for the stimulus are selected. The therapy electrode configuration and the stimulus parameters can be determined by optimizing them as described above with reference to Figures 1-6. The method 700 then continues with an activation threshold determination procedure 720 that determines the intensity of the electrical current for the stimulus that causes a reaction in a population of the neurons at the target location to exceed the membrane activation threshold. In one embodiment, the threshold determination procedure 720 involves sensing responses in the patient that are related to changes in the membrane potential of the neurons. It is difficult to measure the actual membrane potential of a neuron, so the determination procedure 720 generally 2s measures a tangible response that is a surrogate for the change in the membrane potential. One such surrogate measurement of changes in the membrane potential is the EMG response to the stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes. The threshold determination 'procedure 720 accordingly involves adjusting the stimulus parameters until the electrical current intensity just begins to produce an EMG response indicating that a significant population of neurons at the target location have just exceeded their membrane potential. After the EMG indicates a threshold electrical current, the method 700 includes a delaying period 730 in which the effects of the supra-threshold stimulus are allowed to "wash out" from the neurons.
~oos~~ The method 700 further includes a sub-threshold stimulation procedure involving a selecting procedure 740 in which the intensity of the electrical current is lowered to a "sub-threshold" level, and a stimulation procedure 750 in which the sub-threshold stimulus is applied to the configuration of therapy electrodes. The selecting procedure 740 can involve selecting an electrical current that is a percentage of the threshold electrical current identified in the threshold determination procedure 720. In one embodiment, the sub-threshold current intensity is initially selected to be from approximately 40%-99% of the threshold electrical current membrane.
After the sub-threshold electrical current intensity has been applied to the electrode configuration in the stimulation procedure 750, a sensing procedure 760 determines whether the sub-threshold stimulus reduced the membrane activation threshold for a population of neurons.
looss~ The sensing procedure 760 can proceed in a manner similar to the activation threshold procedure 720 explained above by applying an electrical pulse having a sensing current intensity above the sub-threshold stimulus applied in the stimulating procedure 740 and below the initial threshold stimulus level that was measured in the threshold determining procedure 720. For example, if the threshold current for the threshold stimulus that produced the threshold activation was 10 mA and the sub-threshold current applied in the stimulating procedure 750 was 7 mA, then the sensing procedure 760 can start with a sensing current intensity of 7.5 mA and incrementally increase the sensing current intensity (e.g., by 0.5 mA
increments). The sensing current is increased until the EMG measurements indicate that the membrane potential of a population of neurons has been exceeded. This is a ramp up procedure that works up from the sub-threshold current intensity applied in the stimulating procedure 750. An alternate embodiment . is a ramp down procedure in which the sensing current intensity is initially set at a level near the threshold current intensity (e.g., 90-99%) and works down until a threshold activation is not detected.
In either case, the sensing procedure 760 determines a secondary threshold current intensity corresponding to a change in the membrane threshold activation.
too5~~ The method 700 then continues with an analyzing procedure 770 that determines whether the secondary current intensity is less than the initial threshold current intensity. If so, then the method 700 continues to identify that the stimulation is enhancing the plasticity of the neurons at stage 772, and then the method 700 either repeats procedures 740-760 with a lower sub-threshold electrical current intensity or it selects an optimized sub-threshold current intensity for use with the patient at stage 782. If the analyzing procedure 770 determines that the threshold activation of the neurons is not decreasing, then the method 700 proceeds to stage 774. In one embodiment in which a number of different electrical current intensities have reduced the activation threshold of the neurons, the method 700 continues from stage 774 to stage 782 to select the most effective sub-threshold current intensity that has been tested for use on the patient. In another embodiment in which the stimulus parameters applied to the therapy electrodes have not decreased the activation threshold, the method 700 can repeat procedures 740-770 to determine whether a different electrical current intensity can produce a lower activation threshold. In still another embodiment in which the activation threshold does not decrease after application of the stimulus, the method 700 can continue with stage 2~
784 that involves adjusting the electrical configuration, the timing parameters of the electrical stimulation, andlor the target location of the electrodes. After stage 784, the method 700 can then proceed with repeating procedures 740-770 to determine whether the activation threshold can be lowered by applying the new stimulus parameters to the therapy electrodes in accordance with the changes that were made in stage 784.
looso~ From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the electrode arrays and sensing devices could be configured for use in cardiac applications to optimize implantable pacemakers or implantable defibrillators. It will be appreciated that the applications of the invention in the field of cardiology are embodiments of optimizing a peripheral stimulation treatment. Many aspects of the invention are also applicable to magnetic stimulation in addition to or in lieu of electrical stimulation. In magnetic applications, the parameters for the stimulation can be automatically set using the algorithms explained above for electrical stimulation; but, instead of selecting different configurations of a subcutaneous array of electrodes, the location and configuration of a magnetic transducer can be moved externally relative to the body. In still further applications of the inventions, many of the embodiments of the apparatus and methods can be particularly useful for optimizing spinal cord stimulation therapies and procedures. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
2s
STIMULUS PARAMETERS AND ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS FOR
NEURO-STIMULATORS
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS) ~ooo~~ This application claims benefit of U.S. Application No. 09/978,134, filed October 15, 2001, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No.
09/802'p808 'filed March 8, 2001, which claims priority to U.S. Application No.
60/217,981 filed July 13, 2000, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
10002 The present disclosure is related to systems and methods for automatically optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters of the electrical or magnetic waveforms applied to a target stimulation site of a patient.
BACKGROUND
10003 A wide variety of mental and physical processes are known to be controlled or influenced by neural activity in the central and peripheral nervous systems. For example, the neural-functions in some areas of the brain (i.e., the sensory or motor cortices) are organized according to physical or cognitive functions. There are also several other areas of the brain that appear to have distinct functions in most individuals. fn the majority of people, for example, the areas of the occipital lobes relate to vision, the regions of the left interior frontal lobes relate to language, and the regions of the cerebral cortex appear to be consistently involved with conscious awareness, memory and intellect. The spinal cord is also organized so that specific regions of spinal cord are related to particular i functions. Because of the location-specific functional organization of the central nervous system in which neurons at discreet locations are statistically likely to control particular mental or physical functions in normal individuals, stimulating neurons at selected locations of the central nervous system can be used to effectuate cognitive and/or motor functions throughout the body.
10004 The neural activity in the central nervous system can be influenced by electrical and/or magnetic energy that is supplied from an external source outside of the body. Various neural functions can thus be promoted or disrupted by applying an electrical current to the cortex or other part of the central nervous system. As a result, the quest for treating or augmenting neural functions in the brain, spinal cord, or other parts of the body have led to research directed toward using electricity or magnetism to control these functions.
(ooos~ In several existing applications, the electrical or magnetic stimulation is provided by a neural-stimulator that has a plurality of therapy electrodes and a pulse system coupled to the therapy electrodes. The therapy electrodes can be implanted into the patient at a target site for stimulating the desired neurons. For example, one existing technique for masking pain in the lower extremities of a patient is to apply an electrical stimulus to a desired target stimulation site of the spinal cord. Although determining the general location of the target stimulation site may be relatively straight forward, identifying the specific configuration of electrodes for applying the stimulus will generally vary for specific patients.
(0006 The conventional procedure for optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes involves several steps and relies on the subjective input from the patient. Conventional techniques generally involve rendering the patient unconscious, implanting an electrode array in the patient at the stimulation site, and then letting the patient regain consciousness. After the patienfi is conscious, the particular configuration of electrodes is optimized for that patient by selecting different combinations of the therapy electrodes and applying a constant electrical stimulus. The patient subjectively evaluates the effectiveness ofi each stimulus by indicating the degree to which the stimulus masks the pain. After testing the various configurations of therapy electrodes and deciding upon a desired electrode configuration according to the input of the patient, the patient is rendered unconscious for a second time to close the electrode array in the patient.
looo~~ A similar procedure can be followed for determining the desired configuration of therapy electrodes for intra-cranial electrical stimulation.
For example, a device for stimulating a region of the brain is disclosed by King in U.S. Patent No. 5,713,922. King discloses a device for cortical surface stimulation having electrodes mounted on a paddle. The paddle can be implanted under the skull of the patient so that the electrodes are on the surface of the brain in a fixed position. King also discloses that the electrical pulses are generated by a pulse generator implanted in the patient remotely from the cranium (e.g., subclavicular implantation). The pulse generator is coupled to the electrodes by a cable that extends from the paddle, around the skull, and down the neck to the subclavicular location of the pulse generator.
(ooos~ King discloses implanting the electrodes in contact with the surface of the cortex to create paresthesia, which is a vibrating or buzzing sensation.
More specifically, King discloses inducing paresthesia in large areas by placing the electrodes against particular regions ofi the brain and applying an electrical stimulus to the electrodes. This is similar to implanting therapy electrodes at the spinal cord of a patient for masking pain in the lower extremities of a patient, and thus King appears to require stimulation that exceeds the membrane activation threshold for a population of neurons at the electrodes (supra-threshold stimulation). King further discloses applying a stimulus to one set of electrodes, and then applying a stimulus to a separate configuration of electrodes to shift the location of the paresthesia.
~ooos~ One problem of the procedures for optimizing the configuration ofi therapy electrodes for either spinal or cortical stimulation is that existing systems and methods are expensive and time consuming. First, it is expensive to render the patient unconscious, implant the neural-stimulators in the patient, then wait for the patient to regain consciousness, then test various electrode configurations by asking the patient to subjectively estimate the degree to which the particular stimulus masks the pain, and then finally render the patient unconscious again to complete the implantation. Second, it can be a reasonably high risk operation because the patient is placed under general anesthesia at two separate stages of the process. It will be appreciated that this is an extremely long process that requires highly skilled doctors and personnel to attend to the patient for a significant period of time. Moreover, the patient occupies costly operating rooms and utilizes expensive equipment throughout the process. Third, relying on the subjective response from the patient may not provide accurate data for evaluating minor variances in the results. Fourth, the patient may experience pain or discomfort because some configurations may provide high intensity stimulation that exceeds the sensory level of stimulation.
Therefore, existing systems for determining a desired configuration of electrodes to apply a neural-stimulus to specific patients are expensive, time consuming, potentially painful, and may not determine the most effective electrode configuration.
~oo~o~ Another drawback of configuring the therapy electrodes using existing systems and methods is that the procedures are not effective for on-going use. This is because the patient's condition changes continually. For example, the location of the pain or the sensation typically shifts over time such that the optimal configuration of the electrodes at one point of the therapy may not mask the pain after a period of time. A large number of patients accordingly terminate electrical therapies for paresthesia within one year because of such a shift in the location of the pain/sensation. Therefore, although electrical stimulation for masking pain, inducing or enhancing plasticity, and other reasons appears to be very promising, it has not yet gained wide acceptance because of the drawbacks of configuring the therapy electrodes to apply an effective stimulus to different patients over a long period of time.
loo~~~ Additionally, it is also difficult to optimize the parameters of the electrical or magnetic stimulus. For example, even when a desired configuration of therapy electrodes is used, different waveforms can produce different results in each patient. Determining the stimulus parameters of the waveform can be even more time consuming than determining the desirable configuration of therapy electrodes because it involves testing a large number of independent variables. In a biphasic pulse train, for example, the stimulus parameters can include (a) the intensity of the electrical current, (b) the time of the stimulus of the first phase, (c) the time of the stimulus of the second phase, (d) the total time of the stimulus pulse, (e) the frequency of the stimulus pulse, (f) the pulse duty cycle, (g) the burst time of the stimulus, (h) the burst repetition rate of the stimulus, and (i) additional variables.
Because of the large number of stimulus parameters, a particular waveform for the stimulus is typically selected for a given treatment for all patients such that the parameters for stimulus itself are not optimized.
100~2~ In light of the several drawbacks for existing techniques of applying electrical or magnetic neural-stimulation to produce desired results, there is a significant need to enhance the procedures for applying such stimulus to individual patients. For example, it would be desirable to have more cost effective and less time consuming procedures for determining an effective configuration of therapy electrodes and stimulus parameters. Additionally, it would be desirable to update the electrode configuration and stimulus parameters in each individual patient without surgically operating on the patient to compensate for shifts in the target stimulation site.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
1003] Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a system for automatically optimizing the configuration of the electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
s ~oo~a~ Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for automatically optimizing the configuration of electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, loo~s~ Figure 3 is a flow diagram of an embodiment of a method for optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes that can be used in the method of Figure 2 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
loo~s~ Figures 4A-4F illustrate various examples of- using the system of Figure 1 to optimize the configuration of the electrodes in accordance with an embodiment of the methods of Figures 2 and 3.
100~7~ Figure 5 is a flow diagram of a method for optimizing the stimulus parameters that can be used in the method of Figure 2 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
loo~a~ Figure 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of several stimulus parameters that can be optimized using an embodiment of the method of Figure 5.
loo~s~ Figure 7 is a flow diagram of a method for optimizing the electrode configuration and/or stimulus parameters for inducing and/or enhancing neural-plasticity using sub-threshold stimulation in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
too2ol The following disclosure describes several methods and apparatus for automatically determining the configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the parameters for the stimulus to treat or otherwise effectuate a change in neural-functions of a patient. Several embodiments of methods in accordance with the invention are practiced using a computer to automatically implement such processes, but it is not necessary to use a computer in all of the embodiments. The specific details of certain embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following description and in Figures 1-7 to provide a thorough understanding of these embodiments to a person of ordinary skill in the art. More specifically, several embodiments of a system in accordance with the invention are described with reference to Figure 1, and then several embodiments of methods for determining a desired configuration of therapy electrodes and/or stimulus parameters are described with reference to Figures 2-7. A person skilled in the art will understand that the present invention may have additional embodiments, or that the invention can be practiced without several of the details described below.
A. SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATICALLY OPTIMIZING THERAPY
ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS AND/OR STIMULUS
PARAMETERS
~002~~ Figure 1 illustrates an embodiment of a system for providing neuro-stimulation to a patient that can automatically optimize (a) the configuration of therapy electrodes, (b) the waveform parameters for the electrical stimulus, and/or (c) additional stimulation parameters. In this embodiment, the system 100 comprises an electrode array 110, a stimulus unit 120 operatively coupled to the electrode array 110, and at least one sensing device 180 operatively coupled to the stimulus unit 120. The electrode array 110 and the sensing unit 180 can be operatively coupled to the stimulus unit 120 by a direct connection (e.g., wires, cables, or fiber optical lines) or an indirect connection (e.g., RF energy, magnetic energy, infrared, etc.).
Ioo22~ The electrode array 110 can include a support member 112 and a plurality of electrodes 114 that are carried by the support member 112. The electrode array 110 is generally configured to be implanted into a patient P
for cortical stimulation, deep brain stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, cardiac stimulation, or stimulation of other parts of the body. For example, the electrode array 110 can be a corfiical neural-stimulation device, such as one of the devices described in U.S. Application No. 091802,808 incorporated by reference above. The electrode array 110 can alternatively be a grid having a plurality of discreet electrodes 114 arranged in an X-Y
coordinate system or another type of coordinate system. The therapy electrodes 114 can be independently coupled to the stimulus unit 120 by a link 116. In one embodiment, the fink 116 is a wire or another type of conductive line, but in alternate embodiments the link 116 can be an indirect link (e.g., infrared, magnetic or RF energy). The link 116 can accordingly be a direct connection or an indirect connection to operatively couple the therapy electrodes 114 to the stimulus unit 120. It will be appreciated that many of the electrode arrays can be implanted at the spinal cord for spinal cord stimulation.
10023 The stimulus unit 120 can include a controller 130 with a processor, a memory, and a programmable computer medium. The controller 130, for example, can be a computer and the programmable computer medium can be software loaded into the memory of the computer and/or hardware that performs the processes described below. The stimulus unit 120 can further include a pulse system 140, a converter 150, and a plurality of controls/indicators 160. The pulse system 140 can generate and send energy pulses to the electrode array, and the converter 150 can receive signals from the sensing device 180. The pulse system 140 and the converter 150 are both operatively coupled to the controller 130. The controls and indicators 160 can include a computer display, an input/output device (e.g., a keyboard, touch sensitive screen, etc.), or other types of devices commonly used to enter commands or receive output from computers.
10024 The electrode array 110 and the pulse system 140 can be integrated into a single stimulation apparatus that can be implanted into the patient, as described in U.S. Application No. 09/082,808. One example of an integrated pulse system 140 and electrode array 110 is configured to be implanted into the skull of the patient so that the electrodes contact the pia matter of the cortex. Such a device can have an internal power source that can be implanted into the patient and/or an external power source coupled to the pulse system via electromagnetic coupling or a direct connection. In alternate embodiments, the pulse system 140 is an external unit that is not s implanted into the patient. The external pulse unit 140 can provide the electrical stimulus to the therapy electrodes 114 using RF energy, electromagnetism, or wire terminals exposed on the scalp of the patient P.
~0025~ The sensing device 180 can be an electrode that produces an analog signal, and the converter 150 can convert the analog signal to a digital signal for processing by the controller 130. The sensing device 180 can be an implantable electrode that can be implanted at a number of different locations according to the desired response of the stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes 114. In alternate embodiments, the sensing device 180 can be an imaging device (e.g., an fMRI apparatus), an ultrasound apparatus, an EEG, a device that detects somatosensory evoked potentials, or another suitable apparatus for determining a response in the patient P to a stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes 114. The sensing device can alternatively detect behavioral responses. In an alternate embodiment, the sensing device 180 can produce a digital output and be coupled directly to the controller 130. Therefore, the converter 150 may only be used in some of the embodiments of the system 100.
loo~sl The system 100 can automatically test the efficacy of various electrode configurations and stimulus parameters either with or without subjective input from the patient. In operation, the controller 130 sends command signals to the pulse system 140 defining the configuration of active electrodes and the waveform parameters for the stimulus. The pulse system 140 generates and sends a single pulse or pulse train to the active therapy electrodes in accordance with the command signals, and the sensing device 180 senses the neural responses, motor responses, or other types of responses to the stimulus. The sensing device 180 also sends signals corresponding to the magnitude of the responses to the controller 130, which compares the responses to previous responses and/or empirical responses for the type of therapy stored in the memory of the controller.
The controller 130 then adjusts the configuration of active therapy electrodes and/or the waveform parameters of the stimulus to optimize the therapy for the particular patient. Several methods for using embodiments of the system 100 for supra- and sub-threshold neural-stimulation therapies are described below.
B. METHODS OF OPTIMIZING ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS
AND STIMULUS PARAMETERS FOR NEURO-STIMULATION
10027 Figures 2-7 illustrate several embodiments of methods in accordance with the invention that can be practiced using the stimulator system 100 described above. Figure 2, for example, is a flow diagram illustrating an optimization process 200 that can be executed, at least in part, in a computer for automatically optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the waveform parameters for the stimulus. The optimization process 200 generally starts after the therapy electrode array has been installed at a target stimulation site using surgical techniques known in the art and a sensing device has been positioned to sense a response to the electrical stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes.
loo~s~ After the therapy electrode array has been installed and the sensing device is ready to sense a response in the patient, the optimization process 200 begins with a setup procedure 210 in which a setup configuration of therapy electrodes and the waveform parameters for a control stimulus are selected. The controller can select the setup configuration for the electrodes and the control stimulus by retrieving predetermined setup values stored in a setup database in the memory of the controller. The setup database can contain at least one setup configuration for the therapy electrodes and at least one set of waveform parameters for the control stimulus. In several embodiments, a plurality of different setup configurations for the electrodes and the stimulus parameters can be stored in a database so that the system 100 can be used for many different types of neural therapies and procedures. An alternate embodiment can involve manually inputting the setup configuration for the electrodes and the waveform parameters for the control stimulus either in lieu of or in addition to having the controller retrieve io setup data from memory. A practitioner, for example, can select the setup data from pull-down menus provided by the system 100 or manually key in the data.
loo2s~ The setup configurations for the therapy electrodes and the waveform parameters for control stimuli can be determined by manually performing optimization procedures on test groups of patients for each type of therapy.
The optimal setups can be correlated with the particular therapy (e.g., enhancing neural plasticity in the cortex, masking pain, etc.), the particular target site, and the patient factors. For example, a first electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for sub-threshold cortical neural stimulation to restore functionality of a limb that was affected by a stroke or other type of brain damage; a second electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for cortical neural stimulation to enhance learning capabilities; a third electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for spinal stimulation to mask pain; and a fourth electrode configuration and control stimulus can be determined for sub- or supra-threshold stimulation applied to the cortex. It will be appreciated that many additional electrode configurations and stimulus parameters can be determined for other types of therapies such that the foregoing is not exhaustive of the various types of setup configurations.
~ooso~ Referring again to Figure 2, the optimization process 200 continues with a stimulating procedure 220 and then a sensing procedure 230. The stimulating procedure 220 involves applying an electrical stimulus to a configuration of the therapy electrodes. Several iterations of the stimulation procedure 220 are generally performed several times at different stages throughout the optimization process 200, and the configuration of the electrodes and/or the stimulus parameters can be changed at each iteration of the stimulation procedure 220. For example, the initial iteration of the stimulating procedure 220 can involve applying the control stimulus to the setup configuration of therapy electrodes. Subsequent iterations of the stimulation procedure 220 can involve applying (a) the control stimulus to an m alternate configuration of therapy electrodes; (b) an alternate stimulus with a different waveform to the setup electrode configuration; and/or (c) alternate stimuli with different waveforms to alternate electrode configurations. As explained above with reference to Figure 1, the controller carries out the stimulation procedure 220 by sending command signals to the pulse system, which in turn generates and transmits energy having the parameters for the stimulus to the selected. configuration of active therapy electrodes.
loose The sensing procedure 230 is generally performed after each iteration of the stimulation procedure 220. The sensing procedure 230 involves monitoring a location in the patient for a response to the stimulus applied in the stimulation procedure 220. The location for sensing the response and the particular type of response that is measured varies according to the particular type of therapy and other factors. In general, the physiologic outcome that the response measures can be categorized into three general areas: (1 ) cortical; (2) peripheral; and (3) functional. The types of measurements for monitoring cortical physiologic outcomes include:
(a) action potential generation of the neurons; (b) excitability changes of the neurons measured waveform characteristics of EEG or field potentials within the cortex; (c) blood flow (e.g., doppler measurements); (d) thermal changes; (e) pulse oxymetry; (f) chemical metabolites; and (g) imaging techniques (e.g., functional MRI, MR spectroscopy, diffusion MRI, PET, CT, etc.). The types of measurements for monitoring peripheral physiologic outcomes include: (a) EMG (surface, percutaneous, or implanted); (b) external potentiometer or other forms of physiologic input; and (c) motion detectors (e.g., accelerometers). The types of measurements for monitoring functional physiologic outcomes include: (a) force/strength tests; (b) dexterity tests; (c) speed/reflex tests; and (d) performing complex tasks.
loos2~ Several types of measurements that monitor the physiologic outcomes can be automated so that they generate signals which can be processed by the controller either with or without subjective input from the patient. In the case of EMG measurements for sensing peripheral i2 responses to the applied stimulus, the electrical signals from the EMG
sensors are automatically received and processed by the controller. In other applications, the data sensed by functional MRI, blood flow monitors, thermal monitors, pulse oxymeters, PET, MR spectroscopy, accelerometers, etc. can be digitized and process by the controller in a similar manner. In this manner, the stimulating procedure 220 and the sensing procedure 230 can be automated using a controller with the appropriate hardware and/or software.
looss~ The optimization process 200 also includes performing an evaluation procedure 240 after one or more iterations of the stimulating procedure 220 and the sensing procedure 230. The evaluation procedure 240 can involve a determination routine 242 in which a sensed response from the sensing procedure 230 is compared with a desired response range and/or other responses from previous iterations of the stimulation procedure 220 and the sensing procedure 230. Based upon whether the sensed response is within a desired range and/or shows an improvement compared to previous responses or target ranges, the controller can automatically test the effectiveness of other electrode configurations and stimulus parameters.
For example, if the response is not within the desired response range, then the determination routine 242 directs the controller to select an alternate configuration for the therapy electrodes and/or alternate parameter for the stimulus. Alternatively, in one embodiment when the sensed response is within the desired response range, the determination routine 242 can direct the controller to proceed directly to a stop 270 and indicate that the configuration of therapy electrodes and the parameters for the stimulus have been optimized to treat the specific patient. In another embodiment when the sensed response is within the desired response range, the determination routine 242 directs the controller to select additional alternate configurations of the therapy electrodes and/or stimulus parameters to discover whether a more effective response can be achieved.
loosa.~ The process of selecting alternate therapy electrode configurations or stimulus parameters is performed by an analyzing procedure 260. In one embodiment, the analyzing procedure 260 is predicated upon the understanding that the electrode configuration and each of the stimulus parameters are independent variables that can be individually optimized while keeping the other variables constant. The analyzing procedure 260, therefore, can proceed by keeping one of. the configuration of the therapy electrodes or the stimulus parameters constant and then progressively adjusting the other of these variables until the most effective result is obtained for the adjusted variable. For example, when the analyzing procedure 260 selects alternate stimulus parameters, it typically maintains the previous configuration of therapy electrodes and it adjusts only one of the stimulus parameters at a time. Conversely, the analyzing procedure 260 can keep the same stimulus parameters and select alternate configurations of therapy electrodes. The analyzing procedure 260 can select alternate inputs for the stimulus parameters and/or the electrode configurations by dynamically estimating new parameters based on projected response patterns for using empirical data developed for particular therapies and/or actual responses from previous stimuli applied to the patient. In one embodiment, the controller automatically analyzes the responses from previous stimulating procedures 220 to determine a pattern of improved or degraded effectiveness of the corresponding configurations of therapy electrodes and stimulus parameters that were applied in the iterations of the stimulation procedure 220. Based upon the pattern of responses, the analyzing routine 260 can then incrementally change one of the variables in a manner that concurs with a pattern showing improved responses or moves away from the pattern that shows deteriorated responses.
~0035~ A basic example of the analyzing routine 260 involves optimizing the frequency of the electrical stimulus. As such, the configuration of electrodes and the other stimulus parameters remain constant for several iterations of the applying procedure 220. In one iteration a stimulus having a first frequency (e.g., 50 Hz) may produce marginal results as determined by the sensing and evaluation procedures 230 and 240. Without additional data, the analyzing procedure 260 selects a second stimulus with a second frequency either less or greater than the first frequency to get a general understanding of whether higher or lower frequencies produce more efficacious results. The controller, for example, can select a second frequency of 25 Hz. .If a frequency of 25 Hz produces better results than 50 Hz, the controller can select still lower frequencies in the analyzing procedure 260; but, assuming for the sake of this example that a frequency of 25 Hz produces a worse result than 50 Hz, then the controller can select a third frequency higher than the second frequency (e.g., 100 Hz). If the higher third frequency (e.g., 100 Hz) produces a better result than the first frequency (e.g., 50 Hz), then the controller can select a still higher fourth frequency (e.g., 200 Hz) in a subsequent iteration of the procedure. The method 200 can continue in this manner by adjusting variables in a direction that produces better results until the results begin to deteriorate. At this point, it is expected that the optimal value for the variable is bracketed between the last value selected for the variable and the value of the iteration immediately preceding the penultimate iteration (i.e., the second-to-the-last iteration).
~oo3s~ Several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 that use the system 100 are expected to reduce the cost and time for optimizing the configuration of the therapy electrodes and the stimulus parameters. One feature of the optimizing method 200 is that the pulse system and the therapy electrodes can be an integrated unit that is implanted into the patient and controlled externally from the patient such that an external controller can adjust the variables (e.g., electrode configuration and/or stimulus parameters) without requiring opening the patient for access to the pulse system and/or the therapy electrodes. One benefit of this feature is that several different electrode configurations and stimulus parameters can be adjusted after implanting the electrode array, and the variables can also is be tested rather quickly because the controller can automatically adjust the variables and apply the stimulus to the therapy electrodes in a manner that is expected to be much faster than manually adjusting the variables.
Another benefit of this feature is that the patient need only be subject to a single application of an anesthetic because the patient can be closed up soon after implanting the electrode array and the test can be performed after closing the patient.. As a result, several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 are expected to reduce the time and costs for determining a desirable electrode configuration and stimulus parameters.
~oos7~ Several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 are also expected to provide better results than relying solely on the subjective input of the patient. Another aspect of several embodiments of the system 100 is that the sensing device provides objective criteria that measures the response to the stimuli. This feature is expected to provide better accuracy in determining the effectiveness of the individual stimuli applied to the therapy electrodes. Moreover, the optimization procedure 200 can also expediently optimize the waveform parameters in addition to optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes such that both the electrical components of the stimulus and the locations) where the stimulus is applied are optimized for specific patients.
looss~ Another feature of several embodiments of the optimization method 200 using the system 100 is that they are expected to provide more effective therapies over a long period of time without additional surgical procedures.
One feature that provides this benefit is that the pulse system and the electrode array can be implanted into the patient and controlled externally from the patient. As a result, when the effectiveness of the therapy degrades because the target site shifts or another variable changes, the sensing device 180 can be positioned relative to the patient and coupled to the controller to re-optimize the electrode configuration and/or the stimulus parameters without having to perform surgery on the patient. The system 100 can accordingly be operated using embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 at any time to compensate for shifts in the target location.
Several embodiments of the optimization procedure 200 that use the system 100 are accordingly expected to provide more effective therapies for ongoing applications.
loo3s~ Still another benefit of several embodiments of the method 200 is that they are expected to be more comfortable for patients. One feature of the method 200 is that the sensing procedure can sense responses at levels that the patient cannot feel any sensations. As a result, is it not likely that the application of the stimulus will cause pain or discomfort.
~ooa.o~ Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method for optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes in accordance with the invention. In this embodiment, the method 300 can include a setup procedure 310 in which a setup configuration of therapy electrodes is selected. The setup configuration of therapy electrodes can be based upon historical data obtained from previous optimization procedures for specific patients or different types of therapies. After performing the setup procedure 310, the method 300 continues with a stimulating procedure 320 in which a control electrical stimulus is applied to the selected configuration of therapy electrodes. A response in the patient to the applied control stimulus is then sensed in a sensing procedure 330, which is generally performed after each iteration of the stimulating procedure 320. The stimulating procedure 320 and the sensing procedure 330 can be similar to those described above with reference to Figure 2, except that the stimulating procedure 320 involves applying the same control stimulus for each iteration. The primary difference, therefore, is that the configuration of therapy electrodes can be changed for each iteration of the stimulating procedure 320.
loo4~a The method 300 continues with an evaluation procedure 340 in which the sensed response from the sensing procedure 330 is compared with a predetermined range of desired responses and/or previous responses from the sensing procedure 330. The evaluation procedure 340 can have several m different embodiments. The evaluation procedure 340, for example, can include a determination routine 342 that determines whether the sensed response is the optimized response. In one embodiment, the sense response is considered to be optimized when it is within a desired range of responses. The method 300 can accordingly proceed to stop when such a response is sensed. In another embodiment, the sensed response is considered to be optimized when- it provides the best result of all possible configurations of electrodes. This embodiment generally involves applying the control stimulus to all possible configurations of electrodes before identifying the optimized electrode configuration. In still another embodiment, the sensed response is the optimized response when it provides the most effective result compared to other responses without testing all of the possible configurations of electrodes. This embodiment involves testing a number of electrode configurations, identifying a trend in electrode configurations that produce effective results, and determining if or when the trend no longer holds true. It will be appreciated that the evaluation procedure 340 can have several additional or different embodiments.
~ooa.2~ The method 300 can continue with an analyzing procedure 360 that selects an alternate therapy electrode configuration. The alternate therapy electrode configuration selected in the analyzing procedure 360 can be determined by comparing previous responses to other configurations of therapy electrodes to develop a pattern of improved responses and selecting a configuration that is expected to continue the trend.
Alternatively, the analyzing procedure 360 can simply select another therapy electrode configuration that has not yet been tested. The method can also include a final selection procedure 365 that selects the optimized configuration of the therapy electrodes based upon the sensed responses.
The process 300 can then terminate with a final stop procedure 370 in which the optimized electrode configuration is stored in memory, displayed to a practitioner, or otherwise presented for use.
is ~0043~ Figures 4A-4L illustrate several examples of therapy electrode configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 and then tested in the stimulating procedure 320, the sensing procedure 330, and the evaluation procedure 340. In these embodiments, a therapy electrode array 400 for use with the system 100 (Figure 1 ) can include an implantable support member 410 and a plurality of electrodes 420 carried by the support member 410. The therapy electrodes 420 can be individual electrodes that are arranged in a grid array having M columns and N rows. The electrode array 400 can have several other arrangements of electrodes 420, such as concentric circles, elongated lines, or many other patterns. Each of the electrodes 420 can be independently coupled to a pulse system so that individual electrodes 420 can be activated or inactivated using the controller 130 (Figure 1 ) and the pulse system 140 (Figure 1 ). The electrode array 400 is typically implanted into the patient so that the electrodes 420 are placed generally over or proximate to a target location T for stimulation. In many embodiments, the target location T can be at the surface of the cortex, along the spinal cord, or within a deep brain region of a patient depending upon the particular treatment being applied to the patient.
~ooa.4~ Figures 4A and 4B illustrate two alternate embodiments of selecting therapy electrode configurations. Referring to Figure 4A, a setup configuration of two active electrodes 420a can be selected such that the electrodes are within the target location T. One of the active electrodes 420a can be biased with a positive polarity and the other active electrode 420a can be biased with a negative polarity. Referring to Figure 4B, a subsequent iteration of the process can include selecting an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes in which the polarity of the active electrodes 420a is switched. Figures 4C-4E illustrate alternate embodiments of selecting different configurations of therapy electrodes using the analyzing procedure 360 explained above with reference to Figure 3. As can be seen from Figures 4C-4E, the active therapy electrodes 420a can be inside and/or outside of the target location T. Figure 4C illustrates an embodiment in which all of the active electrodes 420a are within the target location and adjacent to one another, and Figures 4D and 4E illustrate embodiments in which at least some of the active electrodes 420a are outside of the target location T and one or more inactive electrodes 420 are between some of the active electrodes 420x. It will be appreciated that the analyzing procedure 360 can select any configuration of therapy electrodes 420 in the.MxN electrode array 400 such that any combination of electrodes 420 can be active electrodes.
loo4s~ Figure 4F illustrates another aspect of selecting a desired configuration of therapy electrodes in which an original target location To (shown in broken lines) has changed to a current target location T~. The shift from the original target location To to the current target location T~
can be caused by several generally unpredictable factors. The methods 200 and 300 can compensate for such a target location shift without additional surgery because the therapy electrodes can be optimized using an external control and indirect coupling with the pulse system and/or or the electrode array. Thus, the application of the stimulus can be changed as the target location of neural activity shifts to provide efficacious treatment over a long period of time.
~oo4s~ Figures 4G and 4H illustrate different embodiments of therapy electrical configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 in which several electrodes on opposite areas of the target location are activated with a common polarity. Referring to Figure 4G, for example, this embodiment illustrates a series of active electrodes on opposite ends of the target location T. One embodiment of this configuration applies a common polarity to a first set 420x, of active electrodes and an opposite polarity to a second set 420x2 of active electrodes. Another embodiment can apply the same polarity to all of the active electrodes in both of the sets 420a~ and 420x2. Figure 4H illustrates a related embodiment in which a number of electrodes on opposite sides of the target location T are active electrodes.
The electrode configuration shown in Figure 4H can also apply a common polarity to all of the active electrodes on each side of the target location T
or all of the electrodes on both sides of the target location T.
~ooa.7~ Figures 41 and 4J illustrate additional embodiments of electrode configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 and then tested in the stimulation procedure 320. Figure 41 illustrates an embodiment in which a first set 420x, of active electrodes has a common polarity at one end of the target location T,-and a second set 420x2 of active electrodes is located at an opposite end of the target location T. The polarity of the electrodes in the second set 420x2 can be opposite or the same as those of the active electrodes in the first subset 420x,. Figure 4J illustrates a similar embodiment in which a first set 420x, of active electrodes is located within the target location T along one side, and a second set 420x2 of active electrodes is located within a target location T along an opposite side. The electrodes in the first set 420x, can have one polarity, and the electrodes in the second set 420x2 can have an opposite polarity.
~ooaa~ Figures 4K and 4L illustrate additional embodiments of therapy electrode configurations that can be selected in the analyzing procedure 360 and then tested in the stimulation procedure 320. Referring to Figure 4K, this embodiment illustrates a first set 420x, of active electrodes at one end of the target location T and a second set 420x2 of active electrodes at an opposite end of the target location T. The active electrodes in the first set 420a~ can have opposite polarities and similarly the active electrodes in the second set 420x2 can have opposite polarities. The active electrodes in the first and second sets 420x, and 420x2 can be located outside of the target location T as shown in Figure 4K. Figure 4L illustrates a related embodiment in which the active electrodes in the first set 420a~ have opposite polarities, and the active electrodes in the second set 420x2 have opposite polarities. The active electrodes in the first and second sets 420a~
and 420x2 shown in Figure 4L are located within the boundaries of the target location T. It will be appreciated that the invention can have several additional embodiments in which the individual sets of electrodes can be 2i inside, outside, inside and outside, and have different combinations of polarities.
looa.s~ Another aspect of the invention is optimizing the parameters for the electrical stimulus in addition to or in lieu of optimizing the configuration of therapy electrodes. Figure 5 is a flow diagram of a method for optimizing the desired parameters for the electrical stimulus in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In this .embodiment, the method 500 can include a setup procedure 510 in which a therapy electrode configuration and the initial parameters for the electrical stimulus are selected. The configuration of therapy electrodes can be the optimized configuration from the method 300 explained above with reference to Figure 3, or it can be another configuration input by a practitioner or retrieved from memory in the controller. The same configuration of therapy electrodes is generally maintained throughout the method 500. After performing the setup procedure 510, the method 500 continues with a first stimulating procedure 520 in which the electrical stimulus is applied to the selected configuration of therapy electrodes using the initial parameters of the electrical stimulus. A
response in the patient to the initial electrical stimulus is sensed in a first sensing procedure 530. The procedures 510-530 accordingly provide a response to an initial electrical stimulus based upon the initial stimulus parameters to provide a baseline response.
10050 The method 500 continues with an adjusting procedure 540 in which one of the stimulus parameters for the electrical stimulus is adjusted, and then a second stimulating procedure 550 in which the adjusted stimulus is applied to the therapy electrodes. A response to the adjusted stimulus is then determined using a second sensing procedure 560. The method 500 can repeat the procedures 540-560 several times for each of the parameters of the electrical stimulus to develop a plurality of responses for each parameter.
loose The method 500 can then continue with an evaluation procedure 570 in which the responses are evaluated to determine specific values for the stimulus parameters that provide an efficacious result. The evaluation procedure 570 can include a determination routine 572 that determines whether a parameter of the stimulus has been optimized. If the response for a parameter is not optimized, then the method can continue by repeating the procedures 540-560 for the parameters that are not within a desired range.
However, if the response is optimized, then the determination routine 572 can continue to a final selection procedure 580 in which a set of electrical parameters that produce a desirable response are selected.
loose Figure 6 is a graph illustrating some of the stimulus parameters that can be optimized using the method 500. A stimulus start time to defines the initial point at which an electrical or magnetic pulse is applied to the therapy electrodes. For a biphasic waveform, the parameters typically include a pulse width t, for a first phase, a pulse width t2 for a second phase, and a stimulus pulse width t3 for a single biphasic pulse. The pulse can alternatively be a monophasic pulse. The parameters can also include a stimulus repetition rate 11t~ corresponding to the frequency of the pulses, a stimulus pulse duty cycle equal to t3 divided by t4, a stimulus burst time t5 that defines the number of pulses in a pulse train, and/or a stimulus pulse repetition rate 1/ts that defines the stimulus burst frequency. Another parameter of the electrical stimulus is the intensity of the current 1, for the first phase and the current intensity h for the second phase of each pulse.
In another embodiment, a continuous pulse train can be used such that t5 ts.
loos3~ In a typical application, one of the parameters is adjusted for each application of the stimulus while maintaining the other parameters constant to determine the affect that adjusting the one parameter has on the response in the patient. Each of the parameters are believed to be independent from one another, thus one of the parameters can be optimized by applying a number of different stimuli using different values for the parameter to determine whether increasing or decreasing the parameter enhances the efficacy of the stimulus. Once it is determined whether increasing or decreasing the parameter provides a better result, then the parameter can be further increased or decreased (whichever is more desirable) until the effectiveness of the stimulation degrades. The optimized value for a particular stimulus parameter can then be stored in memory, and then a different stimulus parameter can be optimized using a similar procedure for that parameter. As such, one or more of the stimulus parameters can be optimized using this procedure.
~0054~ The embodiments of the methods 200, 300 and 500 described above can be used to optimize procedures for cortical stimulation, spinal stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and peripheral stimulation for a number of different applications. The spinal stimulation and certain aspects of the cortical stimulation can be used to mask pain, such as back pain, phantom limb pain experienced by amputees, or pain in the lower extremities. The deep brain stimulation can be optimized to treat movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, distonia, etc.), depression, or other functions related to deep brain neural activity. The methods can also be used to optimize therapies for cortical stimulation that enhance learning functions, restore motor functions (e.g., use of muscle groups affected by stroke or other trauma), and treating diseases or seizures (e.g., Alzheimer's, epilepsy, etc.).
Many of the embodiments of the methods 200, 300 and 500 for masking pain involve applying supra-threshold activation stimuli to the therapy electrodes. On the other hand, several of the cortical neural-stimulation procedures that are not directed toward masking pain but rather seek to enhance existing functions (e.g., learning) or rehabilitate impaired functions (e.g., brain damage) use sub-threshold activation stimuli that do not exceed the membrane activation threshold of a population of neurons in the target stimulation site. Several embodiments of the methods 200, 300 and 500 that are directed more specifically toward sub-threshold optimization of the neural-stimulation procedures are described below with reference to Figure 7.
C. SUB-THRESHOLD OPTIMIZATION METHODS
looss~ Figure 7 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment for optimizing a sub-threshold simulation therapy. Sub-threshold simulation involves training and/or recruiting neurons to perform a neural-function. The target locatipn can be a site where neural-plasticity is occurring or is expected to occur.
The present inventors believe that neurons become more likely to be able to carry out desired neural-functions for enhancing, repairing or restoring functionality after being stimulated electrically at a level below the membrane activation threshold for a significant population of neurons at the target site. The present inventors also believe that certain sub-threshold simulation lowers the threshold at which neurons are activated in response to physical or cognitive input to produce a lasting change in the membrane potential such that the neurons may eventually "fire" in response to motor or cognitive functions after termination of the stimulus. The optimization procedure for sub-threshold simulation accordingly seeks to select stimulus parameters that produce the desired neural-activity at the lowest level of stimulation.
looss~ Referring to the flow diagram of Figure 7, this figure illustrates an embodiment of a method 700 including a setup procedure 710 in which the configuration of therapy electrodes and the parameters for the stimulus are selected. The therapy electrode configuration and the stimulus parameters can be determined by optimizing them as described above with reference to Figures 1-6. The method 700 then continues with an activation threshold determination procedure 720 that determines the intensity of the electrical current for the stimulus that causes a reaction in a population of the neurons at the target location to exceed the membrane activation threshold. In one embodiment, the threshold determination procedure 720 involves sensing responses in the patient that are related to changes in the membrane potential of the neurons. It is difficult to measure the actual membrane potential of a neuron, so the determination procedure 720 generally 2s measures a tangible response that is a surrogate for the change in the membrane potential. One such surrogate measurement of changes in the membrane potential is the EMG response to the stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes. The threshold determination 'procedure 720 accordingly involves adjusting the stimulus parameters until the electrical current intensity just begins to produce an EMG response indicating that a significant population of neurons at the target location have just exceeded their membrane potential. After the EMG indicates a threshold electrical current, the method 700 includes a delaying period 730 in which the effects of the supra-threshold stimulus are allowed to "wash out" from the neurons.
~oos~~ The method 700 further includes a sub-threshold stimulation procedure involving a selecting procedure 740 in which the intensity of the electrical current is lowered to a "sub-threshold" level, and a stimulation procedure 750 in which the sub-threshold stimulus is applied to the configuration of therapy electrodes. The selecting procedure 740 can involve selecting an electrical current that is a percentage of the threshold electrical current identified in the threshold determination procedure 720. In one embodiment, the sub-threshold current intensity is initially selected to be from approximately 40%-99% of the threshold electrical current membrane.
After the sub-threshold electrical current intensity has been applied to the electrode configuration in the stimulation procedure 750, a sensing procedure 760 determines whether the sub-threshold stimulus reduced the membrane activation threshold for a population of neurons.
looss~ The sensing procedure 760 can proceed in a manner similar to the activation threshold procedure 720 explained above by applying an electrical pulse having a sensing current intensity above the sub-threshold stimulus applied in the stimulating procedure 740 and below the initial threshold stimulus level that was measured in the threshold determining procedure 720. For example, if the threshold current for the threshold stimulus that produced the threshold activation was 10 mA and the sub-threshold current applied in the stimulating procedure 750 was 7 mA, then the sensing procedure 760 can start with a sensing current intensity of 7.5 mA and incrementally increase the sensing current intensity (e.g., by 0.5 mA
increments). The sensing current is increased until the EMG measurements indicate that the membrane potential of a population of neurons has been exceeded. This is a ramp up procedure that works up from the sub-threshold current intensity applied in the stimulating procedure 750. An alternate embodiment . is a ramp down procedure in which the sensing current intensity is initially set at a level near the threshold current intensity (e.g., 90-99%) and works down until a threshold activation is not detected.
In either case, the sensing procedure 760 determines a secondary threshold current intensity corresponding to a change in the membrane threshold activation.
too5~~ The method 700 then continues with an analyzing procedure 770 that determines whether the secondary current intensity is less than the initial threshold current intensity. If so, then the method 700 continues to identify that the stimulation is enhancing the plasticity of the neurons at stage 772, and then the method 700 either repeats procedures 740-760 with a lower sub-threshold electrical current intensity or it selects an optimized sub-threshold current intensity for use with the patient at stage 782. If the analyzing procedure 770 determines that the threshold activation of the neurons is not decreasing, then the method 700 proceeds to stage 774. In one embodiment in which a number of different electrical current intensities have reduced the activation threshold of the neurons, the method 700 continues from stage 774 to stage 782 to select the most effective sub-threshold current intensity that has been tested for use on the patient. In another embodiment in which the stimulus parameters applied to the therapy electrodes have not decreased the activation threshold, the method 700 can repeat procedures 740-770 to determine whether a different electrical current intensity can produce a lower activation threshold. In still another embodiment in which the activation threshold does not decrease after application of the stimulus, the method 700 can continue with stage 2~
784 that involves adjusting the electrical configuration, the timing parameters of the electrical stimulation, andlor the target location of the electrodes. After stage 784, the method 700 can then proceed with repeating procedures 740-770 to determine whether the activation threshold can be lowered by applying the new stimulus parameters to the therapy electrodes in accordance with the changes that were made in stage 784.
looso~ From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the electrode arrays and sensing devices could be configured for use in cardiac applications to optimize implantable pacemakers or implantable defibrillators. It will be appreciated that the applications of the invention in the field of cardiology are embodiments of optimizing a peripheral stimulation treatment. Many aspects of the invention are also applicable to magnetic stimulation in addition to or in lieu of electrical stimulation. In magnetic applications, the parameters for the stimulation can be automatically set using the algorithms explained above for electrical stimulation; but, instead of selecting different configurations of a subcutaneous array of electrodes, the location and configuration of a magnetic transducer can be moved externally relative to the body. In still further applications of the inventions, many of the embodiments of the apparatus and methods can be particularly useful for optimizing spinal cord stimulation therapies and procedures. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
2s
Claims (49)
1. A neuro-stimulation system, comprising:
an electrode array having an implantable support member configured to be implanted into a patient and a plurality of therapy electrodes carried by the support member;
a pulse system operatively coupled to the therapy electrodes, the pulse system delivering a stimulus to the therapy electrodes; and a controller operatively coupled to the pulse system, the controller including a computer operable medium containing instructions that generate command signals that define the stimulus delivered by the pulse system and determine a desired configuration for the therapy electrodes and/or a desired stimulus to be delivered to the therapy electrodes based upon feedback input to the controller.
an electrode array having an implantable support member configured to be implanted into a patient and a plurality of therapy electrodes carried by the support member;
a pulse system operatively coupled to the therapy electrodes, the pulse system delivering a stimulus to the therapy electrodes; and a controller operatively coupled to the pulse system, the controller including a computer operable medium containing instructions that generate command signals that define the stimulus delivered by the pulse system and determine a desired configuration for the therapy electrodes and/or a desired stimulus to be delivered to the therapy electrodes based upon feedback input to the controller.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the therapy electrodes are independently coupled to the pulse system such that the pulse system can activate and/or deactivate individual therapy electrodes.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the pulse system and the electrode array are components of an integrated unit configured to be implanted in the patient at a stimulation site.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the electrode array is configured to be implanted at a stimulation site in the patient and the pulse system is separate from the electrode array and configured to be implanted at a site in the patient remote from the stimulation site, and the pulse system being coupled to the electrode array by a conductive line implanted in the patient.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the controller is configured to be external to the patient and the pulse system is configured to be implanted in the patient, and wherein the pulse system is linked to the controller via a direct link or an indirect link such that the controller can direct the pulse system to activate and/or deactivate the electrodes independently.
6. The system of claim 1, further comprising a sensing device configured to be attached to a sensing location of the patient, the sensing device generating response signals defining the feedback input into the controller;
and wherein the computer operable medium contains instructions that evaluate the response signals from the sensing device.
and wherein the computer operable medium contains instructions that evaluate the response signals from the sensing device.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein the sensing device comprises a sense electrode configured to be attached to the patient at a sense location to sense a response to the stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes.
8. The system of claim 6 wherein the sensing device comprises a sense electrode configured to be attached to the patient at a sense location and an EMG unit coupled to the sense electrode.
9. The system of claim 6 wherein the sensing device comprises a functional MRI device that detects locations of neural-activity in the brain.
10. The system of claim 6 wherein the computer operable medium of the controller comprises a computer readable medium containing instructions causing the controller to perform the following method:
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a selected configuration of the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response to the applied electrical stimulus using the sensing device;
determining whether the response is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous sensed response from a different electrical stimulus and/or a different configuration of therapy electrodes;
selecting an alternate configuration of the therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical stimulus;
repeating the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures using the alternate configuration of the therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical stimulus; and choosing a configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an electrical stimulus corresponding to a sensed response that is within a desired range and/or is an improvement compared to other sensed responses.
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a selected configuration of the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response to the applied electrical stimulus using the sensing device;
determining whether the response is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous sensed response from a different electrical stimulus and/or a different configuration of therapy electrodes;
selecting an alternate configuration of the therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical stimulus;
repeating the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures using the alternate configuration of the therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical stimulus; and choosing a configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an electrical stimulus corresponding to a sensed response that is within a desired range and/or is an improvement compared to other sensed responses.
11. The system of claim 6 wherein the computer operable medium of the controller comprises a computer readable medium containing instructions causing the controller to perform the following method:
sending a command signal from the controller to the pulse system;
delivering an electrical pulse from the pulse system to a configuration of the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response to the electrical pulse using the sensing device;
receiving a response signal from the sensing device at the controller;
in the controller, determining whether the signal is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous response signal from another electrical pulse and/or another configuration of the therapy electrodes, and selecting an alternate configuration of the therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical pulse;
repeating the sending, delivering, sensing, receiving, and determining procedures using the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical pulse; and in the controller, identifying an effective pulse therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical pulse; and storing the effective therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical parameter in a memory of the controller.
sending a command signal from the controller to the pulse system;
delivering an electrical pulse from the pulse system to a configuration of the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response to the electrical pulse using the sensing device;
receiving a response signal from the sensing device at the controller;
in the controller, determining whether the signal is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous response signal from another electrical pulse and/or another configuration of the therapy electrodes, and selecting an alternate configuration of the therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical pulse;
repeating the sending, delivering, sensing, receiving, and determining procedures using the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical pulse; and in the controller, identifying an effective pulse therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical pulse; and storing the effective therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical parameter in a memory of the controller.
12. The system of claim 6 wherein the computer operable medium of the controller comprises a computer readable medium containing instructions causing the controller to perform the following method:
installing the electrode array at a therapy site of a patient;
installing the sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
selecting a setup configuration of the therapy electrodes and a control stimulus of electrical parameters;
applying the control stimulus to the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device that have been stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, automatically choosing an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the control stimulus to the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device;
and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of therapy electrode configurations have been tested.
installing the electrode array at a therapy site of a patient;
installing the sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
selecting a setup configuration of the therapy electrodes and a control stimulus of electrical parameters;
applying the control stimulus to the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device that have been stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, automatically choosing an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the control stimulus to the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device;
and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of therapy electrode configurations have been tested.
13. The system of claim 6 wherein the computer operable medium of the controller comprises a computer readable medium containing instructions causing the controller to perform the following method:
installing the electrode array at a therapy site of a patient;
installing the sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a control configuration of therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, automatically choosing an alternate set of stimulus parameters according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the alternate set of stimulus parameters to the setup configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device; and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of stimulus parameters have been tested.
installing the electrode array at a therapy site of a patient;
installing the sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a control configuration of therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, automatically choosing an alternate set of stimulus parameters according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the alternate set of stimulus parameters to the setup configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device; and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of stimulus parameters have been tested.
14. The system of claim 6 wherein the computer operable medium of the controller comprises a computer readable medium containing instructions causing the controller to perform the following method:
selecting an initial set of stimulation parameters for an initial electrical stimulus;
applying the initial electrical stimulus to a configuration of the therapy electrodes at a target stimulation site of the patient;
sensing a response signal at a sensing site of the patient that corresponds to the initial electrical stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes;
independently adjusting a current intensity until a threshold electrical stimulus is identified, the threshold electrical stimulus having a threshold current intensity at which a response is first identified in a population of neurons of the target site; and applying a sub-threshold electrical stimulus to the configuration of therapy electrodes, the sub-threshold electrical stimulus having a current intensity less than the current intensity of the threshold electrical stimulus.
selecting an initial set of stimulation parameters for an initial electrical stimulus;
applying the initial electrical stimulus to a configuration of the therapy electrodes at a target stimulation site of the patient;
sensing a response signal at a sensing site of the patient that corresponds to the initial electrical stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes;
independently adjusting a current intensity until a threshold electrical stimulus is identified, the threshold electrical stimulus having a threshold current intensity at which a response is first identified in a population of neurons of the target site; and applying a sub-threshold electrical stimulus to the configuration of therapy electrodes, the sub-threshold electrical stimulus having a current intensity less than the current intensity of the threshold electrical stimulus.
15. In a computer, a method of automatically determining a favorable neuro-stimulation program for a patient, comprising:
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a selected configuration of the therapy electrodes that have been installed at a target therapy site of a patient;
sensing a response to the applied electrical stimulus at a sensing device that has been installed at a sense location of the patient;
determining whether the response is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous sensed response from a different electrical stimulus and/or a different configuration of therapy electrodes;
selecting an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical stimulus;
repeating the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures using the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical stimulus; and choosing a configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an electrical stimulus corresponding to a sensed response that is within a desired range and/or provides a better result compared to other sensed responses.
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a selected configuration of the therapy electrodes that have been installed at a target therapy site of a patient;
sensing a response to the applied electrical stimulus at a sensing device that has been installed at a sense location of the patient;
determining whether the response is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous sensed response from a different electrical stimulus and/or a different configuration of therapy electrodes;
selecting an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical stimulus;
repeating the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures using the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical stimulus; and choosing a configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an electrical stimulus corresponding to a sensed response that is within a desired range and/or provides a better result compared to other sensed responses.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the selecting procedure comprises computing an alternate stimulus parameter while maintaining a constant electrode configuration, and wherein computing the alternate stimulus parameter comprises correlating a plurality of different stimuli applied to the constant electrode configuration with corresponding sensed responses to determine a stimulus/response trend and estimating a new stimulus parameter that is expected to improve the efficacy according to the stimulus/response trend.
17. The method of claim 15 wherein the selecting procedure comprises computing an alternate electrode configuration while maintaining constant stimulus parameters, and wherein computing the alternate electrode configuration comprises correlating a plurality of sensed responses with corresponding electrode configurations to which the constant stimulus parameters were applied to determine an electrode-configuration/response trend and estimating a new electrode configuration that is expected to improve the efficacy according to the electrode-configuration/response trend.
18. The method of claim 15 wherein the selecting procedure comprises increasing a stimulus parameter when a stimulus/response trend indicates that an increase in the stimulus parameter improves the efficacy of the stimulus.
19. The method of claim 15 wherein the selecting procedure comprises decreasing a stimulus parameter when a stimulus/response trend indicates that a decrease in the stimulus parameter improves the efficacy of the stimulus.
20. The method of claim 15 wherein the applying, sensing, determining, selecting, repeating and choosing procedures are repeated on the same patient within a period not greater than one week.
21. The method of claim 15 wherein the applying, sensing, determining, selecting, repeating and choosing procedures are repeated on the same patient on consecutive days.
22. The method of claim 15 wherein the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures are completed in a time period not greater than approximately 300 seconds.
23. The method of claim 15 wherein two iterations of the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures are repeated in a time period not greater than approximately 90 seconds.
24. The method of claim 15 wherein two iterations of the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures are repeated in a time period not greater than approximately 180 seconds.
25. The method of claim 15 wherein two iterations of the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures are repeated in a time period of approximately 20-90 seconds.
26. The method of claim 15 wherein a single iteration of the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures is completed in a time period not greater than approximately 45 seconds.
27. The method of claim 15 wherein a single iteration of the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures is completed in a time period of approximately 10-30 seconds.
28. The method of claim 15 wherein the sensing procedure comprises attaching EMG sensors to a sense site of the patient, detecting peripheral responses to the stimuli applied to the electrodes, and automatically sending the detected peripheral responses to the controller.
29. The method of claim 15 wherein the sensing procedure comprises detecting data related to neural activity using a functional MRI and automatically sending the data to the controller.
30. The method of claim 15 wherein the data comprises coordinates of neural activity relative to the therapy electrodes.
31. The method of claim 15 wherein the data comprises intensity levels of neural activity.
32. In a computer, a method of automatically determining a favorable a neuro-stimulation program for a patient, comprising:
sending a command signal from a controller to a pulse system operatively coupled to the controller;
delivering an electrical pulse from the pulse system to a configuration of therapy electrodes in a therapy electrode array installed at a target stimulation site of a patient;
sensing a response to the electrical pulse at a sensing device installed at a sense location of the patient;
receiving a response signal from the sensing device at the controller;
in the controller, determining whether the signal is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous response signal from another electrical pulse and/or another configuration of therapy electrodes, and selecting an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical poise;
repeating the sending, delivering, sensing, receiving, and determining procedures using the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical pulse; and in the controller, identifying an effective pulse therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical pulse; and storing the effective therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical pulse in a memory of the controller.
sending a command signal from a controller to a pulse system operatively coupled to the controller;
delivering an electrical pulse from the pulse system to a configuration of therapy electrodes in a therapy electrode array installed at a target stimulation site of a patient;
sensing a response to the electrical pulse at a sensing device installed at a sense location of the patient;
receiving a response signal from the sensing device at the controller;
in the controller, determining whether the signal is within a desired range or an improvement over a previous response signal from another electrical pulse and/or another configuration of therapy electrodes, and selecting an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or an alternate electrical poise;
repeating the sending, delivering, sensing, receiving, and determining procedures using the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the alternate electrical pulse; and in the controller, identifying an effective pulse therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical pulse; and storing the effective therapy electrode configuration and/or electrical pulse in a memory of the controller.
33. The method of claim 32 wherein the selecting procedure comprises computing an alternate stimulus parameter while maintaining a constant electrode configuration, and wherein computing the alternate stimulus parameter comprises correlating a plurality of different stimuli applied to the constant electrode configuration with corresponding sensed responses to determine a stimulus/response trend and estimating a new stimulus parameter that is expected to improve the efficacy according to the stimulus/response trend.
34. The method of claim 32 wherein the selecting procedure comprises computing an alternate electrode configuration while maintaining constant stimulus parameters, and wherein computing the alternate electrode configuration comprises correlating a plurality of sensed responses with corresponding electrode configurations to which the constant stimulus parameters were applied to determine an electrode-configuration/response trend and estimating a new electrode configuration that is expected to improve the efficacy according to the electrode-configuration/response trend.
35. The method of claim 32 wherein the selecting procedure comprises increasing a stimulus parameter when a stimulus/response trend indicates that an increase in the stimulus parameter improves the efficacy of the stimulus.
36. The method of claim 32 wherein the selecting procedure comprises decreasing a stimulus parameter when a stimulus/response trend indicates that a decrease in the stimulus parameter improves the efficacy of the stimulus.
37. The method of claim 32 wherein two iterations of the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures are repeated in a time period not greater than approximately 90 seconds.
38. The method of claim 32 wherein two iterations of the applying, sensing, determining and selecting procedures are completed in a time period not greater than approximately 180 seconds.
39. The method of claim 32 wherein the sensing procedure comprises attaching EMG sensors to a sense site of the patient, detecting peripheral responses to the stimuli applied to the electrodes, and automatically sending the detected peripheral responses to the controller.
40. The method of claim 32 wherein the sensing procedure comprises detecting data related to neural activity using a functional MRI and automatically sending the data to the controller.
41. A method of automatically determining a favorable neuro-stimulation program for a patient, comprising:
installing an electrode array having a plurality of therapy electrodes at a therapy site of a patient;
installing a sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
selecting a setup configuration of therapy electrodes and a control stimulus of electrical parameters;
applying the control stimulus to the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device that have been stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, automatically choosing an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the control stimulus to the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device;
and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of therapy electrode configurations have been tested.
installing an electrode array having a plurality of therapy electrodes at a therapy site of a patient;
installing a sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
selecting a setup configuration of therapy electrodes and a control stimulus of electrical parameters;
applying the control stimulus to the therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device that have been stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, automatically choosing an alternate configuration of therapy electrodes according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the control stimulus to the alternate configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device;
and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of therapy electrode configurations have been tested.
42. A method of automatically determining a favorable neuro-stimulation program for a patient, comprising:
installing an electrode array having a plurality of therapy electrodes at a therapy site of a patient;
installing a sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a control configuration of therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, adjusting at least one of the stimulus parameters according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the adjusted stimulus parameters to the setup configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device; and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of stimulus parameters have been tested.
installing an electrode array having a plurality of therapy electrodes at a therapy site of a patient;
installing a sensing device at a sense location of the patient;
applying an electrical stimulus having a plurality of stimulus parameters to a control configuration of therapy electrodes;
sensing a response in the patient with the sensing device and generating a response signal;
in the controller, evaluating the response signal by comparing the response signal with at least one of a desired response signal and/or an antecedent response signal sensed by the sensing device stored in a memory of the controller;
in the controller, adjusting at least one of the stimulus parameters according to the evaluation of the response signal with the desired response signal and/or the antecedent response signal;
reapplying the adjusted stimulus parameters to the setup configuration of therapy electrodes and sensing a response signal using the sensing device; and repeating the evaluating, choosing and reapplying procedures until the response signal is within a desired range and/or a desired number of stimulus parameters have been tested.
43. A method of automatically determining a favorable sub-threshold neuro-stimulation program for a patient, comprising:
selecting a set of stimulation parameters for an electrical stimulus;
applying the electrical stimulus to a configuration of therapy electrodes at a target stimulation site of the patient;
sensing a response signal at a sensing site of the patient that corresponds to the electrical stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes;
independently adjusting a current intensity until a threshold electrical stimulus is identified, the threshold electrical stimulus having a threshold current intensity at which a response is first identified in a population of neurons of the target site; and applying a sub-threshold electrical stimulus to the configuration of therapy electrodes, the sub-threshold electrical stimulus having a current intensity less than the current intensity of the threshold electrical stimulus.
selecting a set of stimulation parameters for an electrical stimulus;
applying the electrical stimulus to a configuration of therapy electrodes at a target stimulation site of the patient;
sensing a response signal at a sensing site of the patient that corresponds to the electrical stimulus applied to the therapy electrodes;
independently adjusting a current intensity until a threshold electrical stimulus is identified, the threshold electrical stimulus having a threshold current intensity at which a response is first identified in a population of neurons of the target site; and applying a sub-threshold electrical stimulus to the configuration of therapy electrodes, the sub-threshold electrical stimulus having a current intensity less than the current intensity of the threshold electrical stimulus.
44. The method of claim 43 wherein applying a sub-threshold stimulus comprises applying a sub-threshold current intensity of approximately 40-99%
of the threshold current intensity.
of the threshold current intensity.
45. The method of claim 43 wherein applying a sub-threshold stimulus comprises applying a sub-threshold current intensity of approximately 60-80%
of the threshold current intensity.
of the threshold current intensity.
46. The method of claim 43 wherein applying a sub-threshold stimulus comprises applying a sub-threshold current intensity of approximately 68-72%
of the threshold current intensity.
of the threshold current intensity.
47. The method of claim 43 wherein:
applying a sub-threshold stimulus comprises applying a sub-threshold current intensity of approximately 40-99% of the threshold current intensity; and the method further comprises determining whether the application of the sub-threshold current intensity decreased a membrane activation threshold for a population of neurons subject to the sub-threshold stimulus.
applying a sub-threshold stimulus comprises applying a sub-threshold current intensity of approximately 40-99% of the threshold current intensity; and the method further comprises determining whether the application of the sub-threshold current intensity decreased a membrane activation threshold for a population of neurons subject to the sub-threshold stimulus.
48. The method of claim 43, further comprising decreasing the sub-threshold current intensity to a lower level and re-applying the decreased sub-threshold stimulus with the lower current intensity to the neurons, and further determining whether the application of the decreased sub-threshold current intensity further decreased the membrane activation threshold for the population of neurons.
49. The method of claim 43, further comprising repeating (a) decreasing the sub-threshold current intensity to a lower level, (b) re-applying the decreased sub-threshold stimulus with the lower current intensity to the neurons, and (c) further determining whether the application of the decreased sub-threshold current intensity further decreased the membrane activation threshold for the population of neurons until the membrane activation threshold does not decreased by a desired amount.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/978,134 | 2001-10-15 | ||
US09/978,134 US7305268B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2001-10-15 | Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators |
PCT/US2002/032695 WO2003043690A1 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2002-10-15 | Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2463751A1 true CA2463751A1 (en) | 2003-05-30 |
Family
ID=25525817
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002463751A Abandoned CA2463751A1 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2002-10-15 | Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (5) | US7305268B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1438100A1 (en) |
AU (2) | AU2002340189B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2463751A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003043690A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (358)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060217782A1 (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2006-09-28 | Boveja Birinder R | Method and system for cortical stimulation to provide adjunct (ADD-ON) therapy for stroke, tinnitus and other medical disorders using implantable and external components |
US7062330B1 (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2006-06-13 | Boveja Birinder R | Electrical stimulation adjunct (Add-ON) therapy for urinary incontinence and urological disorders using implanted lead stimulus-receiver and an external pulse generator |
US7672730B2 (en) * | 2001-03-08 | 2010-03-02 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US7831305B2 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2010-11-09 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Neural stimulation system and method responsive to collateral neural activity |
US7024247B2 (en) * | 2001-10-15 | 2006-04-04 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing the likelihood of inducing collateral neural activity during neural stimulation threshold test procedures |
US7010351B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2006-03-07 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US7756584B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2010-07-13 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US7305268B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2007-12-04 | Northstar Neurscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators |
US7236831B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2007-06-26 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US20030125786A1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2003-07-03 | Gliner Bradford Evan | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
WO2003026738A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for electrically stimulating cells implanted in the nervous system |
WO2003026736A2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and implantable apparatus for electrical therapy |
US20030100931A1 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2003-05-29 | Keith Mullett | Brain signal feedback for pain management |
DE10211766B4 (en) * | 2002-03-14 | 2004-07-01 | Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH | Device for treating patients by means of brain stimulation and the use of the device in medicine |
US7221981B2 (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2007-05-22 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Electrode geometries for efficient neural stimulation |
US7076292B2 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2006-07-11 | Medtronic, Inc. | Optical communication of neurostimulation-system information |
US6934580B1 (en) * | 2002-07-20 | 2005-08-23 | Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C. | Stimulation methodologies and apparatus for control of brain states |
US20050075679A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2005-04-07 | Gliner Bradford E. | Methods and apparatuses for treating neurological disorders by electrically stimulating cells implanted in the nervous system |
US7236830B2 (en) * | 2002-12-10 | 2007-06-26 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for enhancing or optimizing neural stimulation therapy for treating symptoms of Parkinson's disease and/or other movement disorders |
US20050075680A1 (en) | 2003-04-18 | 2005-04-07 | Lowry David Warren | Methods and systems for intracranial neurostimulation and/or sensing |
US6959215B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2005-10-25 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods for treating essential tremor |
US7565199B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2009-07-21 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods for treating and/or collecting information regarding neurological disorders, including language disorders |
US7894908B2 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2011-02-22 | Medtronic, Inc. | Neurostimulation therapy optimization based on a rated session log |
WO2005000153A2 (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2005-01-06 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating and/or effectuating development, rehabilitation, restoration, and/or recovery of visual function through neural stimulation |
US7463928B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2008-12-09 | Medtronic, Inc. | Identifying combinations of electrodes for neurostimulation therapy |
WO2005007120A2 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2005-01-27 | The Johns Hopkins University | System and method for treating nausea and vomiting by vagus nerve stimulation |
AU2004261290A1 (en) * | 2003-08-01 | 2005-02-10 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for applying neural stimulation to a patient |
US7239926B2 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2007-07-03 | Medtronic, Inc. | Selection of neurostimulator parameter configurations using genetic algorithms |
US7184837B2 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2007-02-27 | Medtronic, Inc. | Selection of neurostimulator parameter configurations using bayesian networks |
US7617002B2 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2009-11-10 | Medtronic, Inc. | Selection of neurostimulator parameter configurations using decision trees |
US7252090B2 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2007-08-07 | Medtronic, Inc. | Selection of neurostimulator parameter configurations using neural network |
US8190248B2 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2012-05-29 | Louisiana Tech University Foundation, Inc. | Medical devices for the detection, prevention and/or treatment of neurological disorders, and methods related thereto |
EP1694403A2 (en) * | 2003-11-20 | 2006-08-30 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Electrical stimulation system, lead, and method providing reduced neuroplasticity effects |
US9050469B1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2015-06-09 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Method and system for logging quantitative seizure information and assessing efficacy of therapy using cardiac signals |
US20050182456A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-08-18 | Ziobro John F. | Automated cortical mapping |
US7346382B2 (en) | 2004-07-07 | 2008-03-18 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Brain stimulation models, systems, devices, and methods |
US7483747B2 (en) | 2004-07-15 | 2009-01-27 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for enhancing or affecting neural stimulation efficiency and/or efficacy |
US7819909B2 (en) * | 2004-07-20 | 2010-10-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Therapy programming guidance based on stored programming history |
US9205261B2 (en) | 2004-09-08 | 2015-12-08 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Neurostimulation methods and systems |
US20120277839A1 (en) | 2004-09-08 | 2012-11-01 | Kramer Jeffery M | Selective stimulation to modulate the sympathetic nervous system |
US20060052856A1 (en) | 2004-09-08 | 2006-03-09 | Kim Daniel H | Stimulation components |
JP2008513082A (en) * | 2004-09-20 | 2008-05-01 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Deep brain stimulation system |
JP2008516696A (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2008-05-22 | ルイジアナ テック ユニバーシティ ファウンデーション | Medical device for detection, prevention and / or treatment of neurological disorders and method related to the medical device |
US7565200B2 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2009-07-21 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for selecting stimulation sites and applying treatment, including treatment of symptoms of Parkinson's disease, other movement disorders, and/or drug side effects |
DE102004060514A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2006-06-29 | Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH | Method and apparatus for desynchronizing neuronal brain activity, control, and methods for treating neuronal and / or psychiatric disorders |
US8260426B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2012-09-04 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Method, apparatus and system for bipolar charge utilization during stimulation by an implantable medical device |
US8565867B2 (en) | 2005-01-28 | 2013-10-22 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Changeable electrode polarity stimulation by an implantable medical device |
US9314633B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2016-04-19 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Contingent cardio-protection for epilepsy patients |
US20090177112A1 (en) | 2005-02-02 | 2009-07-09 | James Gharib | System and Methods for Performing Neurophysiologic Assessments During Spine Surgery |
CA2599959A1 (en) | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-08 | Functional Neuroscience Inc. | Method of treating depression, mood disorders and anxiety disorders using neuromodulation |
US8702629B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2014-04-22 | Great Lakes Neuro Technologies Inc. | Movement disorder recovery system and method for continuous monitoring |
DE602006004722D1 (en) * | 2005-04-11 | 2009-02-26 | Medtronic Inc | MOVEMENT BETWEEN ELECTRODE COMBINATIONS IN AN ELECTRIC STIMULATION DEVICE |
US7519431B2 (en) | 2005-04-11 | 2009-04-14 | Medtronic, Inc. | Shifting between electrode combinations in electrical stimulation device |
US20060229687A1 (en) * | 2005-04-11 | 2006-10-12 | Medtronic, Inc. | Shifting between electrode combinations in electrical stimulation device |
US7657317B2 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2010-02-02 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Evaluating stimulation therapies and patient satisfaction |
US20060259078A1 (en) * | 2005-05-16 | 2006-11-16 | Imad Libbus | Method and apparatus for electronically switching electrode configuration |
KR101025442B1 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2011-03-28 | 바이오레이즈 테크놀로지, 인크. | Tissue treatment device and method |
US20160055304A1 (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2016-02-25 | Aaken Laboratories | Targeted electrical stimulation |
KR20080027378A (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2008-03-26 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Measurement and stimulation of muscle tissue |
US7729773B2 (en) | 2005-10-19 | 2010-06-01 | Advanced Neuromodualation Systems, Inc. | Neural stimulation and optical monitoring systems and methods |
US7856264B2 (en) | 2005-10-19 | 2010-12-21 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for patient interactive neural stimulation and/or chemical substance delivery |
US8929991B2 (en) * | 2005-10-19 | 2015-01-06 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods for establishing parameters for neural stimulation, including via performance of working memory tasks, and associated kits |
US20070088403A1 (en) * | 2005-10-19 | 2007-04-19 | Allen Wyler | Methods and systems for establishing parameters for neural stimulation |
US8700178B2 (en) | 2005-12-27 | 2014-04-15 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Stimulator leads and methods for lead fabrication |
US7672734B2 (en) * | 2005-12-27 | 2010-03-02 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Non-linear electrode array |
US7957808B2 (en) * | 2006-01-13 | 2011-06-07 | Vanderbilt University | System and methods of deep brain stimulation for post-operation patients |
US7996079B2 (en) | 2006-01-24 | 2011-08-09 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Input response override for an implantable medical device |
US7657310B2 (en) * | 2006-01-26 | 2010-02-02 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Treatment of reproductive endocrine disorders by vagus nerve stimulation |
US7801601B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2010-09-21 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Controlling neuromodulation using stimulus modalities |
US20070179558A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2007-08-02 | Gliner Bradford E | Systems and methods for varying electromagnetic and adjunctive neural therapies |
EP2026874B1 (en) | 2006-03-29 | 2015-05-20 | Dignity Health | Vagus nerve stimulation system |
US7774067B2 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2010-08-10 | Medtronic, Inc. | Autogeneration of neurostimulation therapy program groups |
US8712539B2 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2014-04-29 | Medtronic, Inc. | Rule-based stimulation program search |
US8180462B2 (en) * | 2006-04-18 | 2012-05-15 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Heat dissipation for a lead assembly |
US8544473B2 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2013-10-01 | Biolase, Inc. | Methods for treating eye conditions with low-level light therapy |
US7869885B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2011-01-11 | Cyberonics, Inc | Threshold optimization for tissue stimulation therapy |
US7962220B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2011-06-14 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Compensation reduction in tissue stimulation therapy |
US8380300B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2013-02-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | Efficacy visualization |
US8306624B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-11-06 | Medtronic, Inc. | Patient-individualized efficacy rating |
US7715920B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2010-05-11 | Medtronic, Inc. | Tree-based electrical stimulator programming |
US8666506B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2014-03-04 | Medtronic, Inc. | Selecting electrode combinations for stimulation therapy |
EP2038004B1 (en) | 2006-07-05 | 2018-01-24 | Precisis AG | System for treatment of neurological disorders via electrical stimulation |
US8478420B2 (en) * | 2006-07-12 | 2013-07-02 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Implantable medical device charge balance assessment |
US20080027524A1 (en) * | 2006-07-26 | 2008-01-31 | Maschino Steven E | Multi-electrode assembly for an implantable medical device |
US8321025B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2012-11-27 | Cranial Medical Systems, Inc. | Lead and methods for brain monitoring and modulation |
US8620422B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2013-12-31 | Cvrx, Inc. | Electrode array structures and methods of use for cardiovascular reflex control |
US7869867B2 (en) | 2006-10-27 | 2011-01-11 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Implantable neurostimulator with refractory stimulation |
US20080103572A1 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable medical lead with threaded fixation |
JP2010512186A (en) | 2006-12-06 | 2010-04-22 | スパイナル・モデュレーション・インコーポレイテッド | Hard tissue anchor and delivery device |
WO2008070808A2 (en) | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-12 | Spinal Modulation, Inc. | Expandable stimulation leads and methods of use |
AU2012203467B2 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2014-02-27 | Spinal Modulation, Inc. | Grouped leads for spinal stimulation |
US9314618B2 (en) | 2006-12-06 | 2016-04-19 | Spinal Modulation, Inc. | Implantable flexible circuit leads and methods of use |
CA2671286C (en) | 2006-12-06 | 2017-09-19 | Spinal Modulation, Inc. | Delivery devices, systems and methods for stimulating nerve tissue on multiple spinal levels |
US8700167B2 (en) | 2006-12-22 | 2014-04-15 | Ebs Technologies Gmbh | Apparatus and method for stimulating a brain of a person |
US7974707B2 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2011-07-05 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Electrode assembly with fibers for a medical device |
WO2008094952A2 (en) | 2007-01-29 | 2008-08-07 | Spinal Modulation, Inc. | Sutureless lead retention features |
US8224453B2 (en) | 2007-03-15 | 2012-07-17 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Spinal cord stimulation to treat pain |
US20080249584A1 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2008-10-09 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Method and device for cardiosympathetic inhibition |
US8090446B2 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2012-01-03 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for establishing neural stimulation parameters and providing neural stimulation |
US20080261183A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-23 | Steven Donaldson | Device for treating stuttering and method of using the same |
US7974701B2 (en) * | 2007-04-27 | 2011-07-05 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Dosing limitation for an implantable medical device |
EP2160220A4 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2012-07-04 | Advanced Neuromodulation Sys | Microdevice-based electrode assemblies and associated neural stimulation systems, devices, and methods |
US7801618B2 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2010-09-21 | Neuropace, Inc. | Auto adjusting system for brain tissue stimulator |
US8475172B2 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2013-07-02 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Motor learning and rehabilitation using tactile feedback |
EP2207590A1 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2010-07-21 | Medtronic, INC. | Therapy program selection |
US8380314B2 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2013-02-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | Patient directed therapy control |
US20090264789A1 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2009-10-22 | Medtronic, Inc. | Therapy program selection |
WO2009051638A1 (en) | 2007-10-16 | 2009-04-23 | Medtronic, Inc. | Therapy control based on a patient movement state |
US20090105786A1 (en) * | 2007-10-22 | 2009-04-23 | University Of Washington | Method and device for strengthening synaptic connections |
US8868203B2 (en) | 2007-10-26 | 2014-10-21 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Dynamic lead condition detection for an implantable medical device |
US7983757B2 (en) * | 2007-10-26 | 2011-07-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | Medical device configuration based on sensed brain signals |
US8942798B2 (en) | 2007-10-26 | 2015-01-27 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Alternative operation mode for an implantable medical device based upon lead condition |
US20090118786A1 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2009-05-07 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Automated fitting system for deep brain stimulation |
US9248280B2 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2016-02-02 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Closed-loop feedback for steering stimulation energy within tissue |
US20090118804A1 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2009-05-07 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Method of mounting minimally invasive plug electrodes within cranium of patient |
JP4488057B2 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2010-06-23 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Active matrix device, electro-optical display device, and electronic apparatus |
US8457757B2 (en) * | 2007-11-26 | 2013-06-04 | Micro Transponder, Inc. | Implantable transponder systems and methods |
US9089707B2 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2015-07-28 | The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Systems, methods and devices for paired plasticity |
US8337404B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2012-12-25 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Detecting, quantifying, and/or classifying seizures using multimodal data |
CN101925377A (en) * | 2008-01-25 | 2010-12-22 | 麦德托尼克公司 | The detection of Sleep stages |
US8571643B2 (en) | 2010-09-16 | 2013-10-29 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Detecting or validating a detection of a state change from a template of heart rate derivative shape or heart beat wave complex |
US8382667B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2013-02-26 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Detecting, quantifying, and/or classifying seizures using multimodal data |
US9220889B2 (en) | 2008-02-11 | 2015-12-29 | Intelect Medical, Inc. | Directional electrode devices with locating features |
US8019440B2 (en) | 2008-02-12 | 2011-09-13 | Intelect Medical, Inc. | Directional lead assembly |
US8204603B2 (en) | 2008-04-25 | 2012-06-19 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Blocking exogenous action potentials by an implantable medical device |
WO2009134477A1 (en) * | 2008-04-29 | 2009-11-05 | Medtronic, Inc. | Therapy program modification |
US8315703B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2012-11-20 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods for targeting deep brain sites to treat mood and/or anxiety disorders |
US8805518B2 (en) * | 2008-05-09 | 2014-08-12 | Medtronic, Inc. | Peripheral nerve field stimulation control |
US9272153B2 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2016-03-01 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | VOA generation system and method using a fiber specific analysis |
US8700177B2 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2014-04-15 | Ndi Medical, Llc | Systems and methods for providing percutaneous electrical stimulation |
US8262714B2 (en) | 2008-08-05 | 2012-09-11 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Techniques for selecting signal delivery sites and other parameters for treating depression and other neurological disorders, and associated systems and methods |
ES2334316B1 (en) * | 2008-08-13 | 2011-06-13 | Starlab Barcelona, S.L. | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF MULTISITIAN CRANIAL STIMULATION. |
EP2341858B1 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2014-02-12 | Sherwin Hua | System for wire-guided pedicle screw stabilization of spinal vertebrae |
AU2009300264B2 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2014-07-17 | Duke University | Non-regular electrical stimulation patterns for treating neurological disorders |
US9802046B2 (en) | 2008-10-03 | 2017-10-31 | Duke University | Non-regular electrical stimulation patterns for improved efficiency in treating Parkinson's Disease |
US8923981B2 (en) | 2008-10-03 | 2014-12-30 | Duke University | Non-regular electrical stimulation patterns designed with a cost function for treating neurological disorders |
US8798755B2 (en) | 2008-10-03 | 2014-08-05 | Duke University | Non-regular electrical stimulation patterns for treating neurological disorders |
US11013924B2 (en) | 2008-10-03 | 2021-05-25 | Duke University | Non-regular electrical stimulation patterns for treating neurological disorders |
US9393418B2 (en) * | 2011-06-03 | 2016-07-19 | Great Lakes Neuro Technologies Inc. | Movement disorder therapy system, devices and methods of tuning |
US9662502B2 (en) | 2008-10-14 | 2017-05-30 | Great Lakes Neurotechnologies Inc. | Method and system for tuning of movement disorder therapy devices |
US8249701B2 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2012-08-21 | Spinal Modulation, Inc. | Methods, devices and systems for programming neurostimulation |
US8428733B2 (en) | 2008-10-16 | 2013-04-23 | Medtronic, Inc. | Stimulation electrode selection |
US8457747B2 (en) | 2008-10-20 | 2013-06-04 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Neurostimulation with signal duration determined by a cardiac cycle |
US8417344B2 (en) | 2008-10-24 | 2013-04-09 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Dynamic cranial nerve stimulation based on brain state determination from cardiac data |
CN102202729B (en) | 2008-10-27 | 2014-11-05 | 脊髓调制公司 | Selective stimulation systems and signal parameters for medical conditions |
US8255057B2 (en) | 2009-01-29 | 2012-08-28 | Nevro Corporation | Systems and methods for producing asynchronous neural responses to treat pain and/or other patient conditions |
US9895530B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2018-02-20 | Spr Therapeutics, Inc. | Systems and methods to place one or more leads in tissue to electrically stimulate nerves of passage to treat pain |
CA2761530C (en) * | 2008-12-05 | 2018-09-04 | Spr Therapeutics, Llc | Systems and methods to place one or more leads in tissue for providing functional and/or therapeutic stimulation |
US10668285B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2020-06-02 | Spr Therapeutics, Inc. | Systems and methods to place one or more leads in tissue to electrically stimulate nerves to treat pain |
US20150105840A1 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2015-04-16 | Spr Therapeutics, Llc | Systems and methods to place one or more leads in tissue for providing functional and/or therapeutic stimulation |
US20100191304A1 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2010-07-29 | Scott Timothy L | Implantable Medical Device for Providing Chronic Condition Therapy and Acute Condition Therapy Using Vagus Nerve Stimulation |
US8560073B2 (en) * | 2009-03-23 | 2013-10-15 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | System and apparatus for automated quantitative assessment, optimization and logging of the effects of a therapy |
WO2010111358A2 (en) | 2009-03-24 | 2010-09-30 | Spinal Modulation, Inc. | Pain management with stimulation subthreshold to parasthesia |
US8965514B2 (en) | 2009-04-13 | 2015-02-24 | Research Foundation Of The City University Of New York | Transcranial stimulation |
EP2419171B1 (en) * | 2009-04-13 | 2017-11-01 | Research Foundation Of The City University Of New York | Neurocranial electrostimulation models |
DE202010018338U1 (en) | 2009-04-22 | 2015-10-12 | Nevro Corporation | Spinal cord modulation system for the relief of chronic pain |
AU2010238752B2 (en) | 2009-04-22 | 2014-05-29 | Nevro Corporation | Spinal cord modulation for inducing paresthetic and anesthetic effects, and associated systems and methods |
US8827912B2 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2014-09-09 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Methods and systems for detecting epileptic events using NNXX, optionally with nonlinear analysis parameters |
US20100274329A1 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2010-10-28 | Chris Bradley | System and method for skin care using light and microcurrents |
US8239028B2 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2012-08-07 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Use of cardiac parameters in methods and systems for treating a chronic medical condition |
CN102497823B (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2016-05-11 | 脊髓调制公司 | For the mthods, systems and devices of nerve regulation anatomy of spine structure |
US8498710B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2013-07-30 | Nevro Corporation | Linked area parameter adjustment for spinal cord stimulation and associated systems and methods |
CA2772330A1 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2011-03-03 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | System and method to estimate region of tissue activation |
CA2777126C (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2020-08-25 | The Board Of Governors For Higher Education, State Of Rhode Island And Providence Plantations | Biomedical electrode |
US9770204B2 (en) * | 2009-11-11 | 2017-09-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Deep brain stimulation for sleep and movement disorders |
WO2011068997A1 (en) | 2009-12-02 | 2011-06-09 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Reversing cognitive-motor impairments in patients having a neuro-degenerative disease using a computational modeling approach to deep brain stimulation programming |
US8670833B2 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2014-03-11 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Methods and apparatus for using sensors with a deep brain stimulation system |
CN102791185A (en) | 2009-12-21 | 2012-11-21 | S·华 | Insertion of medical devices through non-orthogonal and orthogonal trajectories within the cranium and methods of using |
US8958882B1 (en) * | 2010-01-06 | 2015-02-17 | Evoke Neuroscience, Inc. | Transcranial stimulation device and method based on electrophysiological testing |
US8886323B2 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2014-11-11 | Medtronic, Inc. | Electrical brain stimulation in gamma band |
US8478428B2 (en) | 2010-04-23 | 2013-07-02 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Helical electrode for nerve stimulation |
US8649871B2 (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2014-02-11 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Validity test adaptive constraint modification for cardiac data used for detection of state changes |
US8562536B2 (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2013-10-22 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Algorithm for detecting a seizure from cardiac data |
US8831732B2 (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2014-09-09 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Method, apparatus and system for validating and quantifying cardiac beat data quality |
US20110276056A1 (en) | 2010-05-10 | 2011-11-10 | Grigsby Eric J | Methods, systems and devices for reducing migration |
EP3305363A1 (en) | 2010-05-27 | 2018-04-11 | Ndi Medical, LLC | Waveform shapes for treating neurological disorders optimized for energy efficiency |
WO2011156286A2 (en) * | 2010-06-07 | 2011-12-15 | Medtronic, Inc. | Stimulation therapy for bladder dysfunction |
CA2802708A1 (en) | 2010-06-14 | 2011-12-22 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Programming interface for spinal cord neuromodulation |
US8679009B2 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2014-03-25 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Systems approach to comorbidity assessment |
US10085689B1 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2018-10-02 | Great Lakes NeuroTechnolgies Inc. | Device and method for monitoring and assessment of movement disorder symptoms |
US8641646B2 (en) | 2010-07-30 | 2014-02-04 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Seizure detection using coordinate data |
US9211411B2 (en) | 2010-08-26 | 2015-12-15 | Medtronic, Inc. | Therapy for rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD) |
US8583237B2 (en) | 2010-09-13 | 2013-11-12 | Cranial Medical Systems, Inc. | Devices and methods for tissue modulation and monitoring |
US8684921B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2014-04-01 | Flint Hills Scientific Llc | Detecting, assessing and managing epilepsy using a multi-variate, metric-based classification analysis |
US8562524B2 (en) | 2011-03-04 | 2013-10-22 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Detecting, assessing and managing a risk of death in epilepsy |
US8562523B2 (en) | 2011-03-04 | 2013-10-22 | Flint Hills Scientific, Llc | Detecting, assessing and managing extreme epileptic events |
AU2011317137B9 (en) * | 2010-10-19 | 2016-01-21 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Methods for identifying target stimulation regions associated with therapeutic and non-therapeutic clinical outcomes for neural stimulation |
US9420960B2 (en) * | 2010-10-21 | 2016-08-23 | Medtronic, Inc. | Stereo data representation of biomedical signals along a lead |
US8788048B2 (en) | 2010-11-11 | 2014-07-22 | Spr Therapeutics, Llc | Systems and methods for the treatment of pain through neural fiber stimulation |
US8788046B2 (en) | 2010-11-11 | 2014-07-22 | Spr Therapeutics, Llc | Systems and methods for the treatment of pain through neural fiber stimulation |
US8788047B2 (en) | 2010-11-11 | 2014-07-22 | Spr Therapeutics, Llc | Systems and methods for the treatment of pain through neural fiber stimulation |
EP2670478B1 (en) | 2011-02-02 | 2016-07-27 | Spinal Modulation Inc. | Devices and systemsfor the targeted treatment of movement disorders |
US9504390B2 (en) | 2011-03-04 | 2016-11-29 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Detecting, assessing and managing a risk of death in epilepsy |
MX344095B (en) * | 2011-03-24 | 2016-12-05 | Univ Louisville Res Found Inc | Neurostimulator. |
CA2828318A1 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2012-10-04 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | System and method for image registration |
US9498162B2 (en) | 2011-04-25 | 2016-11-22 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Identifying seizures using heart data from two or more windows |
US9277874B2 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2016-03-08 | Yale University | Fault-tolerant multielectrode array for brain implantable device |
US9649494B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2017-05-16 | Medtronic, Inc. | Electrical stimulation therapy based on head position |
US9402550B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2016-08-02 | Cybertronics, Inc. | Dynamic heart rate threshold for neurological event detection |
US9789307B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2017-10-17 | Medtronic, Inc. | Dual prophylactic and abortive electrical stimulation |
US10448889B2 (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2019-10-22 | Medtronic, Inc. | Determining nerve location relative to electrodes |
US10588524B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2020-03-17 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Method and apparatus for measurement of neural response |
WO2012155189A1 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2012-11-22 | National Ict Australia Ltd | Method and apparatus for estimating neural recruitment - f |
EP2707096B1 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2018-08-22 | Saluda Medical Pty Limited | Apparatus for measurement of neural response |
CN103842022B (en) * | 2011-05-13 | 2016-03-09 | 萨鲁达医疗有限公司 | For controlling the method and apparatus of nerve stimulation-E |
EP2707095B1 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2018-09-26 | Saluda Medical Pty Limited | Apparatus for application of a neural stimulus |
US9872990B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2018-01-23 | Saluda Medical Pty Limited | Method and apparatus for application of a neural stimulus |
WO2012155185A1 (en) * | 2011-05-13 | 2012-11-22 | National Ict Australia Ltd | Method and apparatus for measurement of neural response |
US9592389B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2017-03-14 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Visualization of relevant stimulation leadwire electrodes relative to selected stimulation information |
US9144680B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2015-09-29 | Greatbatch Ltd. | System and method of establishing a protocol for providing electrical stimulation with a stimulation system to treat a patient |
US9126043B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2015-09-08 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Patient handheld device for use with a spinal cord stimulation system |
US9072903B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2015-07-07 | Greatbatch Ltd. | System and method of establishing a protocol for providing electrical stimulation with a stimulation system to treat a patient |
US9375574B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2016-06-28 | Nuvectra Corporation | System and method of providing computer assisted stimulation programming (CASP) |
WO2013023085A2 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2013-02-14 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for stimulation-related volume analysis, creation, and sharing |
US8781592B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2014-07-15 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Identifying an area for electrical stimulation to treat a patient |
US9174048B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2015-11-03 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Positioning leads on patient model using a graphical user interface |
US9358390B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2016-06-07 | Nuvectra Corporation | Configuring electrical stimulation to treat a patient |
US8483836B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2013-07-09 | Greatbatch Ltd. | Automated search to identify a location for electrical stimulation to treat a patient |
WO2013036880A1 (en) | 2011-09-08 | 2013-03-14 | Thacker James R | Selective high frequency spinal cord modulation for inhibiting pain, including cephalic and/or total body pain with reduced side effects, and associated systems and methods |
WO2013052180A2 (en) | 2011-10-05 | 2013-04-11 | University Of Kansas | Methods and associated neural prosthetic devices for bridging brain areas to improve function |
US9549677B2 (en) | 2011-10-14 | 2017-01-24 | Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C. | Seizure detection methods, apparatus, and systems using a wavelet transform maximum modulus algorithm |
DE102012002437B4 (en) * | 2012-02-08 | 2014-08-21 | Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH | Device for calibrating an invasive, electrical and desynchronizing neurostimulation |
US8706237B2 (en) * | 2012-02-19 | 2014-04-22 | Medtronic, Inc. | Brain stimulation response profiling |
US8977335B2 (en) | 2012-03-29 | 2015-03-10 | Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corp. | Intracranial sensing and monitoring device with macro and micro electrodes |
US10448839B2 (en) | 2012-04-23 | 2019-10-22 | Livanova Usa, Inc. | Methods, systems and apparatuses for detecting increased risk of sudden death |
US9604067B2 (en) | 2012-08-04 | 2017-03-28 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Techniques and methods for storing and transferring registration, atlas, and lead information between medical devices |
EP2890454B1 (en) | 2012-08-28 | 2017-11-08 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Point-and-click programming for deep brain stimulation using real-time monopolar review trendlines |
CA2882974C (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2018-10-23 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Feedback controlled coil driver for inductive power transfer |
US11844945B1 (en) * | 2012-09-10 | 2023-12-19 | Great Lakes Neurotechnologies Inc. | Movement disorder therapy system, devices and methods of remotely tuning |
US9289603B1 (en) * | 2012-09-10 | 2016-03-22 | Great Lakes Neuro Technologies Inc. | Movement disorder therapy system, devices and methods, and methods of remotely tuning |
US9238142B2 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2016-01-19 | Great Lakes Neurotechnologies Inc. | Movement disorder therapy system and methods of tuning remotely, intelligently and/or automatically |
US9211417B2 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2015-12-15 | Great Lakes Neurotechnologies Inc | Movement disorder therapy system, devices and methods, and intelligent methods of tuning |
US9792412B2 (en) | 2012-11-01 | 2017-10-17 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for VOA model generation and use |
EP2908904B1 (en) | 2012-11-06 | 2020-09-23 | Saluda Medical Pty Limited | System for controlling electrical conditions of tissue |
US9295840B1 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2016-03-29 | Nevro Corporation | Systems and methods for automatically programming patient therapy devices |
US9731133B1 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2017-08-15 | Nevro Corp. | Systems and methods for systematically testing a plurality of therapy programs in patient therapy devices |
US9895538B1 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2018-02-20 | Nevro Corp. | Systems and methods for deploying patient therapy devices |
US10220211B2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2019-03-05 | Livanova Usa, Inc. | Methods and systems to diagnose depression |
US8918184B1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-12-23 | Medtronic, Inc. | Identification of electrode combination for efficacious electrical stimulation therapy |
WO2014159896A1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2014-10-02 | Duke University | Systems and methods for applying electrical stimulation for optimizing spinal cord stimulation |
EP2968929B1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2018-10-10 | The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Device and system for managing acute and chronic pain |
AU2014232252B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-01-18 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Current sensing multiple output current stimulators with fast turn on time |
US9433789B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-09-06 | Micron Devices Llc | Method, system and apparatus for remote neural modulation brain stimulation and feedback control |
US9044614B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-06-02 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | High voltage monitoring successive approximation analog to digital converter |
WO2014150371A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-25 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | System and method for magnetic stimulation of the central nervous system with a microcoil |
US9056195B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-06-16 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Optimization of cranial nerve stimulation to treat seizure disorderse during sleep |
WO2014145222A2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for delivering sub-threshold therapy to a patient |
CN104602760B (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2017-11-07 | 艾尔弗雷德·E·曼科学研究基金会 | High reliability wire for embedded type device is welded |
CA2910984A1 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2014-11-06 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Implant recharger handshaking system and method |
EP2991726B1 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2018-07-25 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research | Multi-branch stimulation electrode for subcutaneous field stimulation |
US11583680B2 (en) | 2013-05-22 | 2023-02-21 | Deep Brain Innovations LLC | Deep brain stimulator and method of use |
US11229789B2 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2022-01-25 | Neurostim Oab, Inc. | Neuro activator with controller |
JP2016523125A (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2016-08-08 | グラハム エイチ. クリーシー | Local nervous stimulation |
CA2919525C (en) | 2013-07-29 | 2021-07-20 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | High efficiency magnetic link for implantable devices |
US9780596B2 (en) | 2013-07-29 | 2017-10-03 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Microprocessor controlled class E driver |
US11172864B2 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2021-11-16 | Closed Loop Medical Pty Ltd | Monitoring brain neural potentials |
AU2014353891B2 (en) | 2013-11-22 | 2020-02-06 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Method and device for detecting a neural response in a neural measurement |
CN111569263A (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2020-08-25 | 脑深部创新有限责任公司 | Programming system for deep brain stimulator system |
US9585611B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2017-03-07 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Detecting seizures based on heartbeat data |
US9302109B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2016-04-05 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Cranial nerve stimulation to treat depression during sleep |
WO2015168735A1 (en) | 2014-05-05 | 2015-11-12 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Improved neural measurement |
WO2015195306A2 (en) | 2014-06-17 | 2015-12-23 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Systems and methods for determining effective stimulation parameters |
US9959388B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2018-05-01 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems, devices, and methods for providing electrical stimulation therapy feedback |
EP3838331A1 (en) | 2014-07-25 | 2021-06-23 | Saluda Medical Pty Limited | Neural stimulation dosing |
US10272247B2 (en) | 2014-07-30 | 2019-04-30 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for stimulation-related volume analysis, creation, and sharing with integrated surgical planning and stimulation programming |
US10265528B2 (en) | 2014-07-30 | 2019-04-23 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for electrical stimulation-related patient population volume analysis and use |
JP6795491B2 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2020-12-02 | アクソニクス モジュレーション テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド | Implantable lead attachment structure for nerve stimulation to relieve bladder dysfunction and other symptoms |
CA2958197C (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2023-09-26 | Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. | External pulse generator device and associated methods for trial nerve stimulation |
US9700731B2 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2017-07-11 | Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. | Antenna and methods of use for an implantable nerve stimulator |
CN107073257B (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2020-04-10 | 艾克索尼克斯调制技术股份有限公司 | EMG lead positioning and stimulation titration in a neurostimulation system for treating overactive bladder |
EP3180075A4 (en) * | 2014-08-15 | 2018-03-07 | Axonics Modulation Technologies Inc. | Integrated electromyographic clinician programmer for use with an implantable neurostimulator |
US10682521B2 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2020-06-16 | Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. | Attachment devices and associated methods of use with a nerve stimulation charging device |
CN107073258B (en) * | 2014-08-15 | 2020-02-21 | 艾克索尼克斯调制技术股份有限公司 | System and method for neural stimulation electrode configuration based on neural localization |
US10420480B1 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2019-09-24 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Systems and methods for performing neurophysiologic monitoring |
US9974959B2 (en) | 2014-10-07 | 2018-05-22 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems, devices, and methods for electrical stimulation using feedback to adjust stimulation parameters |
WO2016077882A1 (en) | 2014-11-17 | 2016-05-26 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Method and device for detecting a neural response in neural measurements |
US9498628B2 (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2016-11-22 | Medtronic, Inc. | Electrode selection for electrical stimulation therapy |
JP6751089B2 (en) * | 2014-11-26 | 2020-09-02 | セーフオプ サージカル インコーポレイテッド | Systems and devices |
EP3229890B1 (en) | 2014-12-11 | 2020-05-27 | Saluda Medical Pty Limited | Implantable electrode positioning |
US10500399B2 (en) | 2014-12-11 | 2019-12-10 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Method and device for feedback control of neural stimulation |
AU2016205050B2 (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2020-02-27 | Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. | Attachment devices and associated methods of use with a nerve stimulation charging device |
CN107427675B (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2021-10-26 | 艾克索尼克斯股份有限公司 | Patient remote control and associated method for use with a neurostimulation system |
US10918872B2 (en) | 2015-01-19 | 2021-02-16 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Method and device for neural implant communication |
US11077301B2 (en) | 2015-02-21 | 2021-08-03 | NeurostimOAB, Inc. | Topical nerve stimulator and sensor for bladder control |
US9517344B1 (en) | 2015-03-13 | 2016-12-13 | Nevro Corporation | Systems and methods for selecting low-power, effective signal delivery parameters for an implanted pulse generator |
AU2016245335B2 (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2020-11-19 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Electrode to nerve distance estimation |
AU2016268259B2 (en) | 2015-05-26 | 2019-01-31 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for analyzing electrical stimulation and selecting or manipulating volumes of activation |
US10780283B2 (en) | 2015-05-26 | 2020-09-22 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for analyzing electrical stimulation and selecting or manipulating volumes of activation |
JP2018516150A (en) | 2015-05-31 | 2018-06-21 | サルーダ・メディカル・ピーティーワイ・リミテッド | Cranial nerve activity monitoring |
EP3302692A4 (en) | 2015-05-31 | 2019-01-16 | Saluda Medical Pty Limited | Brain neurostimulator electrode fitting |
AU2016269843B2 (en) | 2015-06-01 | 2021-03-04 | Closed Loop Medical Pty Ltd | Motor fibre neuromodulation |
CA2987936A1 (en) | 2015-06-05 | 2016-12-08 | Neuronano Ab | Method and system for improving stimulation of excitable tissue |
GB201511205D0 (en) * | 2015-06-25 | 2015-08-12 | Sky Medical Technology Ltd | Multiple negative electrodes |
WO2017003947A1 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2017-01-05 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for selecting stimulation parameters by targeting and steering |
EP3280490B1 (en) | 2015-06-29 | 2021-09-01 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems for selecting stimulation parameters based on stimulation target region, effects, or side effects |
JP6946261B2 (en) | 2015-07-10 | 2021-10-06 | アクソニクス インコーポレイテッド | Implantable nerve stimulators and methods with internal electronics without ASICs |
AU2016325450A1 (en) * | 2015-09-21 | 2018-05-10 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Automated program optimization |
US10155107B2 (en) | 2015-10-07 | 2018-12-18 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable modular electrode array assembly |
US20180289287A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2018-10-11 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Treatment apparatus and method for treating a gait irregularity of a person |
WO2017062378A1 (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2017-04-13 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | System and methods for clinical effects mapping for directional stimulations leads |
US10561848B2 (en) | 2015-10-13 | 2020-02-18 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Systems and methods for programming and operating deep brain stimulation arrays |
US11318310B1 (en) | 2015-10-26 | 2022-05-03 | Nevro Corp. | Neuromodulation for altering autonomic functions, and associated systems and methods |
US10300277B1 (en) | 2015-12-14 | 2019-05-28 | Nevro Corp. | Variable amplitude signals for neurological therapy, and associated systems and methods |
DE102015122888B4 (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2017-12-21 | Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH | Apparatus and method for effective invasive multi-segment neurostimulation |
US10031580B2 (en) * | 2016-01-13 | 2018-07-24 | Immersion Corporation | Systems and methods for haptically-enabled neural interfaces |
US9517338B1 (en) | 2016-01-19 | 2016-12-13 | Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. | Multichannel clip device and methods of use |
US10195423B2 (en) | 2016-01-19 | 2019-02-05 | Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. | Multichannel clip device and methods of use |
EP3407967B1 (en) | 2016-01-25 | 2021-05-19 | Nevro Corporation | Treatment of congestive heart failure with electrical stimulation, and associated systems |
JP6876363B2 (en) | 2016-01-29 | 2021-05-26 | アクソニクス モジュレーション テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド | Methods and systems for frequency adjustment that optimize the charging of implantable neurostimulators |
US10376704B2 (en) | 2016-02-12 | 2019-08-13 | Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. | External pulse generator device and associated methods for trial nerve stimulation |
AT518532B1 (en) | 2016-03-08 | 2017-11-15 | Dipl Ing Dr Techn Christoph Guger | Apparatus and method for electrostimulation of a subject |
JP6979967B2 (en) | 2016-04-05 | 2021-12-15 | サルーダ・メディカル・ピーティーワイ・リミテッド | Improved feedback control of neuromodulation |
AU2017275585B2 (en) | 2016-06-01 | 2022-03-17 | Duke University | Systems and methods for determining optimal temporal patterns of neural stimulation |
EP3474747A4 (en) | 2016-06-24 | 2020-01-22 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Neural stimulation for reduced artefact |
US10776456B2 (en) | 2016-06-24 | 2020-09-15 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for visual analytics of clinical effects |
WO2018027259A1 (en) | 2016-08-08 | 2018-02-15 | Bionics Institute | Systems and methods for monitoring neural activity |
JP2018023640A (en) * | 2016-08-10 | 2018-02-15 | Smk株式会社 | Muscle training apparatus |
WO2018039670A1 (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2018-03-01 | Spr Therapeutics, Llc | Devices and methods for delivery of electrical current for pain relief |
WO2018044881A1 (en) | 2016-09-02 | 2018-03-08 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for visualizing and directing stimulation of neural elements |
US10780282B2 (en) | 2016-09-20 | 2020-09-22 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for steering electrical stimulation of patient tissue and determining stimulation parameters |
CN109803719B (en) | 2016-10-14 | 2023-05-26 | 波士顿科学神经调制公司 | System and method for closed loop determination of stimulation parameter settings for an electrical simulation system |
WO2018072894A1 (en) | 2016-10-19 | 2018-04-26 | Precisis Ag | Methods and devices for the electrical stimulation of brain tissue via electrodes within cranial bone |
US11540973B2 (en) | 2016-10-21 | 2023-01-03 | Spr Therapeutics, Llc | Method and system of mechanical nerve stimulation for pain relief |
US10426949B2 (en) | 2016-10-26 | 2019-10-01 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Systems and methods for optimizing programming and use of neuromodulation systems |
EP3533486B1 (en) * | 2016-10-31 | 2020-12-09 | Y-Brain Inc | Electrical stimulation apparatus |
JP6834005B2 (en) | 2017-01-03 | 2021-02-24 | ボストン サイエンティフィック ニューロモデュレイション コーポレイション | Systems and methods for selecting MRI-matched stimulus parameters |
EP3519043B1 (en) | 2017-01-10 | 2020-08-12 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for creating stimulation programs based on user-defined areas or volumes |
US10625082B2 (en) | 2017-03-15 | 2020-04-21 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Visualization of deep brain stimulation efficacy |
WO2018187090A1 (en) | 2017-04-03 | 2018-10-11 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for estimating a volume of activation using a compressed database of threshold values |
JP7144450B2 (en) | 2017-05-22 | 2022-09-29 | ディープ・ブレイン・スティムレーション・テクノロジーズ・ピーティーワイ・リミテッド | Systems and methods for monitoring neural activity |
EP3651849B1 (en) | 2017-07-14 | 2023-05-31 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Estimating clinical effects of electrical stimulation |
US10960214B2 (en) | 2017-08-15 | 2021-03-30 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for controlling electrical stimulation using multiple stimulation fields |
US11723579B2 (en) | 2017-09-19 | 2023-08-15 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement |
US20200324108A1 (en) * | 2017-10-10 | 2020-10-15 | Cochlear Limited | Neural stimulator with flying lead electrode |
US10967181B2 (en) * | 2017-10-16 | 2021-04-06 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Apparatus and methods for estimating an electrical stimulation effect on cortical neurons |
WO2019094365A1 (en) | 2017-11-07 | 2019-05-16 | Neurostim Oab, Inc. | Non-invasive nerve activator with adaptive circuit |
US11717686B2 (en) | 2017-12-04 | 2023-08-08 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to facilitate learning and performance |
US11298546B2 (en) * | 2017-12-12 | 2022-04-12 | Duke University | Systems and methods for minimizing response variability of spinal cord stimulation |
US11478603B2 (en) | 2017-12-31 | 2022-10-25 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response |
JP2021513902A (en) | 2018-02-22 | 2021-06-03 | アクソニクス モジュレーション テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド | Nerve Stimulation Leads and Usage for Experimental Nerve Stimulation |
US11364361B2 (en) | 2018-04-20 | 2022-06-21 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | System and method for inducing sleep by transplanting mental states |
US11944820B2 (en) | 2018-04-27 | 2024-04-02 | Saluda Medical Pty Ltd | Neurostimulation of mixed nerves |
EP3784331B1 (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2023-01-18 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Multi-mode electrical stimulation systems and methods of making and using |
WO2019210214A1 (en) | 2018-04-27 | 2019-10-31 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems for visualizing and programming electrical stimulation |
EP3849410A4 (en) | 2018-09-14 | 2022-11-02 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | System and method of improving sleep |
US10905882B2 (en) | 2019-01-22 | 2021-02-02 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for predicting optimal deep brain stimulation parameters |
US11273310B2 (en) | 2019-01-22 | 2022-03-15 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for predicting optimal deep brain stimulation parameters |
US11590352B2 (en) | 2019-01-29 | 2023-02-28 | Nevro Corp. | Ramped therapeutic signals for modulating inhibitory interneurons, and associated systems and methods |
US11642537B2 (en) | 2019-03-11 | 2023-05-09 | Axonics, Inc. | Charging device with off-center coil |
US11160580B2 (en) | 2019-04-24 | 2021-11-02 | Spine23 Inc. | Systems and methods for pedicle screw stabilization of spinal vertebrae |
US11439829B2 (en) | 2019-05-24 | 2022-09-13 | Axonics, Inc. | Clinician programmer methods and systems for maintaining target operating temperatures |
US11848090B2 (en) | 2019-05-24 | 2023-12-19 | Axonics, Inc. | Trainer for a neurostimulator programmer and associated methods of use with a neurostimulation system |
EP3990100A4 (en) | 2019-06-26 | 2023-07-19 | Neurostim Technologies LLC | Non-invasive nerve activator with adaptive circuit |
JP2023506713A (en) | 2019-12-16 | 2023-02-20 | ニューロスティム テクノロジーズ エルエルシー | Noninvasive nerve activator using booster charge delivery |
CN114761074A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2022-07-15 | 波士顿科学神经调制公司 | Automatic determination of input to closed-loop algorithm for stimulation parameter optimization |
US11452874B2 (en) | 2020-02-03 | 2022-09-27 | Medtronic, Inc. | Shape control for electrical stimulation therapy |
US11554264B2 (en) | 2020-04-24 | 2023-01-17 | Medtronic, Inc. | Electrode position detection |
US20220266026A1 (en) * | 2021-02-24 | 2022-08-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Electrode characterization for programming guidance |
Family Cites Families (274)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2716226A (en) | 1951-06-22 | 1955-08-23 | Reiner Electronics Co Inc | Electrical solderless connector |
US2721316A (en) | 1953-06-09 | 1955-10-18 | Joseph D Shaw | Method and means for aiding the blind |
US3628193A (en) | 1969-02-19 | 1971-12-21 | Inst Of Medical Sciences The | Tactile image projection system |
CH507005A (en) | 1969-03-26 | 1971-05-15 | Inst Medicina Farmacie | Device for electrical neurostimulation for the evacuation of the neurogenic urinary bladder |
US3918461A (en) | 1974-01-31 | 1975-11-11 | Irving S Cooper | Method for electrically stimulating the human brain |
US4019518A (en) * | 1975-08-11 | 1977-04-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Electrical stimulation system |
US4030509A (en) * | 1975-09-30 | 1977-06-21 | Mieczyslaw Mirowski | Implantable electrodes for accomplishing ventricular defibrillation and pacing and method of electrode implantation and utilization |
US4125116A (en) | 1977-02-14 | 1978-11-14 | The Johns Hopkins University | Human tissue stimulation electrode structure |
US4140133A (en) | 1977-04-26 | 1979-02-20 | Moskovsky Oblastnoi Nauchno-Issledovatelsky Institut Akusherstva I Ginekolog Ii | Device for pulse current action on central nervous system |
CA1065969A (en) * | 1977-09-28 | 1979-11-06 | Gratien Bouillon | Self-blocking cerebral catheter |
US4214804A (en) * | 1978-09-25 | 1980-07-29 | Daig Corporation | Press fit electrical connection apparatus |
US4431000A (en) * | 1978-11-29 | 1984-02-14 | Gatron Corporation | Transcutaneous nerve stimulator with pseusorandom pulse generator |
US4474186A (en) | 1979-07-17 | 1984-10-02 | Georgetown University | Computerized electro-oculographic (CEOG) system with feedback control of stimuli |
US4308868A (en) * | 1980-05-27 | 1982-01-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Implantable electrical device |
US4328813A (en) * | 1980-10-20 | 1982-05-11 | Medtronic, Inc. | Brain lead anchoring system |
US4340038A (en) * | 1980-12-15 | 1982-07-20 | Pacesetter Systems, Inc. | Magnetic field concentration means and method for an implanted device |
US4390023A (en) * | 1981-04-30 | 1983-06-28 | Medtronic, Inc. | Patterned electrical tissue stimulator |
CA1215128A (en) * | 1982-12-08 | 1986-12-09 | Pedro Molina-Negro | Electric nerve stimulator device |
US4542752A (en) | 1983-04-22 | 1985-09-24 | Cordis Corporation | Implantable device having porous surface with carbon coating |
US4702254A (en) | 1983-09-14 | 1987-10-27 | Jacob Zabara | Neurocybernetic prosthesis |
US4844075A (en) | 1984-01-09 | 1989-07-04 | Pain Suppression Labs, Inc. | Transcranial stimulation for the treatment of cerebral palsy |
US4607639A (en) | 1984-05-18 | 1986-08-26 | Regents Of The University Of California | Method and system for controlling bladder evacuation |
US4590946A (en) * | 1984-06-14 | 1986-05-27 | Biomed Concepts, Inc. | Surgically implantable electrode for nerve bundles |
US4532931A (en) * | 1984-06-29 | 1985-08-06 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Pacemaker with adaptive sensing means for use with unipolar or bipolar leads |
US4646744A (en) | 1984-06-29 | 1987-03-03 | Zion Foundation | Method and treatment with transcranially applied electrical signals |
CA1292285C (en) | 1985-08-21 | 1991-11-19 | Paul H. Stypulkowski | External ear canal electrode to be placed proximate the tympanic membrane and method of stimulating/recording utilizing external ear canal electrode placed proximate the tympanic membrane |
US5054906A (en) | 1986-01-17 | 1991-10-08 | Brimfield Precision, Inc. | Indirectly illuminating ophthalmological speculum |
EP0272318A1 (en) * | 1986-06-16 | 1988-06-29 | Elefant, Mordecai | Method and apparatus for delivering a prescriptive electrical signal |
US4969468A (en) | 1986-06-17 | 1990-11-13 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Electrode array for use in connection with a living body and method of manufacture |
US4869255A (en) | 1987-12-04 | 1989-09-26 | Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corp. | Electrical connection device |
US4865048A (en) | 1987-12-31 | 1989-09-12 | Eckerson Harold D | Method and apparatus for drug free neurostimulation |
US5002053A (en) | 1989-04-21 | 1991-03-26 | University Of Arkansas | Method of and device for inducing locomotion by electrical stimulation of the spinal cord |
DE3914662A1 (en) | 1989-05-03 | 1990-11-08 | Alt Eckhard | DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING ELECTRICAL SIGNALS BETWEEN AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE AND ELECTRICALLY EXPENSIBLE HUMAN TISSUE |
US5024226A (en) * | 1989-08-17 | 1991-06-18 | Critikon, Inc. | Epidural oxygen sensor |
US5063932A (en) | 1989-10-03 | 1991-11-12 | Mieczyslaw Mirowski | Controlled discharge defibrillation electrode |
US5271417A (en) | 1990-01-23 | 1993-12-21 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Defibrillation electrode having smooth current distribution |
US5031618A (en) | 1990-03-07 | 1991-07-16 | Medtronic, Inc. | Position-responsive neuro stimulator |
US5713926A (en) | 1990-04-25 | 1998-02-03 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Implantable intravenous cardiac stimulation system with pulse generator housing serving as optional additional electrode |
US5314458A (en) * | 1990-06-01 | 1994-05-24 | University Of Michigan | Single channel microstimulator |
US5095905A (en) * | 1990-06-07 | 1992-03-17 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable neural electrode |
US5092835A (en) | 1990-07-06 | 1992-03-03 | Schurig Janet L S | Brain and nerve healing power apparatus and method |
US5121754A (en) * | 1990-08-21 | 1992-06-16 | Medtronic, Inc. | Lateral displacement percutaneously inserted epidural lead |
US5618531A (en) | 1990-10-19 | 1997-04-08 | New York University | Method for increasing the viability of cells which are administered to the brain or spinal cord |
US5224491A (en) * | 1991-01-07 | 1993-07-06 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable electrode for location within a blood vessel |
US5299569A (en) * | 1991-05-03 | 1994-04-05 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders by nerve stimulation |
US5215086A (en) | 1991-05-03 | 1993-06-01 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Therapeutic treatment of migraine symptoms by stimulation |
US5269302A (en) * | 1991-05-10 | 1993-12-14 | Somatics, Inc. | Electroconvulsive therapy apparatus and method for monitoring patient seizures |
US5255678A (en) | 1991-06-21 | 1993-10-26 | Ecole Polytechnique | Mapping electrode balloon |
US5750376A (en) | 1991-07-08 | 1998-05-12 | Neurospheres Holdings Ltd. | In vitro growth and proliferation of genetically modified multipotent neural stem cells and their progeny |
US5169384A (en) | 1991-08-16 | 1992-12-08 | Bosniak Stephen L | Apparatus for facilitating post-traumatic, post-surgical, and/or post-inflammatory healing of tissue |
US5304206A (en) | 1991-11-18 | 1994-04-19 | Cyberonics, Inc. | Activation techniques for implantable medical device |
US5358514A (en) | 1991-12-18 | 1994-10-25 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Implantable microdevice with self-attaching electrodes |
US5193540A (en) | 1991-12-18 | 1993-03-16 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Structure and method of manufacture of an implantable microstimulator |
US5184620A (en) * | 1991-12-26 | 1993-02-09 | Marquette Electronics, Inc. | Method of using a multiple electrode pad assembly |
US5406957A (en) * | 1992-02-05 | 1995-04-18 | Tansey; Michael A. | Electroencephalic neurofeedback apparatus for training and tracking of cognitive states |
US5303705A (en) * | 1992-05-01 | 1994-04-19 | Nenov Valeriy I | Evoked 23NA MR imaging of sodium currents in the brain |
US5263967B1 (en) | 1992-05-15 | 2000-12-19 | Brimfield Prec Inc | Medical instrument with dual action drive |
US5476494A (en) | 1992-09-11 | 1995-12-19 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Low pressure neural contact structure |
US5370672A (en) | 1992-10-30 | 1994-12-06 | The Johns Hopkins University | Computer-controlled neurological stimulation system |
US5358513A (en) | 1992-12-09 | 1994-10-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Parameter selection and electrode placement of neuromuscular electrical stimulation apparatus |
SE9203734D0 (en) * | 1992-12-11 | 1992-12-11 | Siemens Elema Ab | defibrillation |
US5537512A (en) | 1993-05-26 | 1996-07-16 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Neural network elements |
US5411540A (en) * | 1993-06-03 | 1995-05-02 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for preferential neuron stimulation |
US5593432A (en) | 1993-06-23 | 1997-01-14 | Neuroware Therapy International, Inc. | Method for neurostimulation for pain alleviation |
US5540736A (en) | 1993-08-02 | 1996-07-30 | Haimovich; Yechiel | Transcranial electrostimulation apparatus having two electrode pairs and independent current generators |
US5417719A (en) | 1993-08-25 | 1995-05-23 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method of using a spinal cord stimulation lead |
US5464446A (en) | 1993-10-12 | 1995-11-07 | Medtronic, Inc. | Brain lead anchoring system |
US5470846A (en) * | 1994-01-14 | 1995-11-28 | Sandyk; Reuven | Treatment of neurological and mental disorders |
US5405375A (en) * | 1994-01-21 | 1995-04-11 | Incontrol, Inc. | Combined mapping, pacing, and defibrillating catheter |
US5697975A (en) | 1994-02-09 | 1997-12-16 | The University Of Iowa Research Foundation | Human cerebral cortex neural prosthetic for tinnitus |
US5562708A (en) | 1994-04-21 | 1996-10-08 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for treatment of atrial fibrillation |
US5769778A (en) * | 1994-04-22 | 1998-06-23 | Somatics, Inc. | Medical magnetic non-convulsive stimulation therapy |
US6152143A (en) | 1994-05-09 | 2000-11-28 | Somnus Medical Technologies, Inc. | Method for treatment of air way obstructions |
US5685313A (en) | 1994-05-31 | 1997-11-11 | Brain Monitor Ltd. | Tissue monitor |
US5601611A (en) * | 1994-08-05 | 1997-02-11 | Ventritex, Inc. | Optical blood flow measurement apparatus and method and implantable defibrillator incorporating same |
US5549655A (en) | 1994-09-21 | 1996-08-27 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for synchronized treatment of obstructive sleep apnea |
US5540734A (en) * | 1994-09-28 | 1996-07-30 | Zabara; Jacob | Cranial nerve stimulation treatments using neurocybernetic prosthesis |
US5722401A (en) * | 1994-10-19 | 1998-03-03 | Cardiac Pathways Corporation | Endocardial mapping and/or ablation catheter probe |
US5522864A (en) * | 1994-10-25 | 1996-06-04 | Wallace; Larry B. | Apparatus and method for ocular treatment |
US5520190A (en) * | 1994-10-31 | 1996-05-28 | Ventritex, Inc. | Cardiac blood flow sensor and method |
US6425852B1 (en) * | 1994-11-28 | 2002-07-30 | Emory University | Apparatus and method for transcranial magnetic brain stimulation, including the treatment of depression and the localization and characterization of speech arrest |
US5545186A (en) | 1995-03-30 | 1996-08-13 | Medtronic, Inc. | Prioritized rule based method and apparatus for diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias |
US5885976A (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1999-03-23 | Sandyk; Reuven | Methods useful for the treatment of neurological and mental disorders related to deficient serotonin neurotransmission and impaired pineal melatonin functions |
US5591216A (en) | 1995-05-19 | 1997-01-07 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method for treatment of sleep apnea by electrical stimulation |
US5772591A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1998-06-30 | Patient Comfort, Inc. | Electrode assembly for signaling a monitor |
US6057846A (en) | 1995-07-14 | 2000-05-02 | Sever, Jr.; Frank | Virtual reality psychophysiological conditioning medium |
US5707334A (en) * | 1995-08-21 | 1998-01-13 | Young; Robert B. | Method of treating amygdala related transitory disorders |
AUPN533195A0 (en) * | 1995-09-07 | 1995-10-05 | Cochlear Pty. Limited | Derived threshold and comfort level for auditory prostheses |
US5782873A (en) * | 1995-10-11 | 1998-07-21 | Trustees Of Boston University | Method and apparatus for improving the function of sensory cells |
US20020169485A1 (en) | 1995-10-16 | 2002-11-14 | Neuropace, Inc. | Differential neurostimulation therapy driven by physiological context |
US6480743B1 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2002-11-12 | Neuropace, Inc. | System and method for adaptive brain stimulation |
US6944501B1 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2005-09-13 | Neurospace, Inc. | Neurostimulator involving stimulation strategies and process for using it |
US6095148A (en) | 1995-11-03 | 2000-08-01 | Children's Medical Center Corporation | Neuronal stimulation using electrically conducting polymers |
EP0867102A4 (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 2000-10-04 | Cochlear Ltd | A feedback system to control electrode voltages in a cochlear stimulator and the like |
US5824030A (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1998-10-20 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Lead with inter-electrode spacing adjustment |
US6463328B1 (en) * | 1996-02-02 | 2002-10-08 | Michael Sasha John | Adaptive brain stimulation method and system |
US6066163A (en) * | 1996-02-02 | 2000-05-23 | John; Michael Sasha | Adaptive brain stimulation method and system |
US5611350A (en) | 1996-02-08 | 1997-03-18 | John; Michael S. | Method and apparatus for facilitating recovery of patients in deep coma |
US6126657A (en) | 1996-02-23 | 2000-10-03 | Somnus Medical Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for treatment of air way obstructions |
US5904916A (en) | 1996-03-05 | 1999-05-18 | Hirsch; Alan R. | Use of odorants to alter learning capacity |
DE59712479D1 (en) | 1996-03-21 | 2005-12-22 | Biotronik Gmbh & Co Kg | Implantable stimulation electrode |
US5628317A (en) | 1996-04-04 | 1997-05-13 | Medtronic, Inc. | Ultrasonic techniques for neurostimulator control |
US5925070A (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1999-07-20 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for adjusting the locus of excitation of electrically excitable tissue |
WO1997037720A1 (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1997-10-16 | Medtronic, Inc. | Living tissue stimulation and recording techniques |
US5702429A (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1997-12-30 | Medtronic, Inc. | Neural stimulation techniques with feedback |
US5713922A (en) * | 1996-04-25 | 1998-02-03 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for adjusting the locus of excitation of neural tissue in the spinal cord or brain |
US5716377A (en) | 1996-04-25 | 1998-02-10 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method of treating movement disorders by brain stimulation |
US5824021A (en) | 1996-04-25 | 1998-10-20 | Medtronic Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing feedback to spinal cord stimulation for angina |
US5683422A (en) | 1996-04-25 | 1997-11-04 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for treating neurodegenerative disorders by electrical brain stimulation |
US6094598A (en) * | 1996-04-25 | 2000-07-25 | Medtronics, Inc. | Method of treating movement disorders by brain stimulation and drug infusion |
US5711316A (en) | 1996-04-30 | 1998-01-27 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method of treating movement disorders by brain infusion |
US5735814A (en) | 1996-04-30 | 1998-04-07 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques of treating neurodegenerative disorders by brain infusion |
US5713923A (en) | 1996-05-13 | 1998-02-03 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for treating epilepsy by brain stimulation and drug infusion |
US5753506A (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 1998-05-19 | Cns Stem Cell Technology, Inc. | Isolation propagation and directed differentiation of stem cells from embryonic and adult central nervous system of mammals |
AU3304997A (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 1998-01-05 | Southern Illinois University | Methods of modulating aspects of brain neural plasticity by vagus nerve stimulation |
US6609031B1 (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 2003-08-19 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Multiprogrammable tissue stimulator and method |
US5782798A (en) | 1996-06-26 | 1998-07-21 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for treating eating disorders by brain stimulation and drug infusion |
US6021352A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 2000-02-01 | Medtronic, Inc, | Diagnostic testing methods and apparatus for implantable therapy devices |
US6246912B1 (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 2001-06-12 | Sherwood Services Ag | Modulated high frequency tissue modification |
US5865842A (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 1999-02-02 | Medtronic, Inc. | System and method for anchoring brain stimulation lead or catheter |
US5797970A (en) | 1996-09-04 | 1998-08-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | System, adaptor and method to provide medical electrical stimulation |
US5843148A (en) | 1996-09-27 | 1998-12-01 | Medtronic, Inc. | High resolution brain stimulation lead and method of use |
US5752979A (en) | 1996-11-01 | 1998-05-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method of controlling epilepsy by brain stimulation |
US6057847A (en) | 1996-12-20 | 2000-05-02 | Jenkins; Barry | System and method of image generation and encoding using primitive reprojection |
US6026326A (en) * | 1997-01-13 | 2000-02-15 | Medtronic, Inc. | Apparatus and method for treating chronic constipation |
US5871517A (en) * | 1997-01-15 | 1999-02-16 | Somatics, Inc. | Convulsive therapy apparatus to stimulate and monitor the extent of therapeutic value of the treatment |
US5948007A (en) | 1997-04-30 | 1999-09-07 | Medtronic, Inc. | Dual channel implantation neurostimulation techniques |
US6042579A (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2000-03-28 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for treating neurodegenerative disorders by infusion of nerve growth factors into the brain |
US5893883A (en) | 1997-04-30 | 1999-04-13 | Medtronic, Inc. | Portable stimulation screening device for screening therapeutic effect of electrical stimulation on a patient user during normal activities of the patient user |
US5975085A (en) | 1997-05-01 | 1999-11-02 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method of treating schizophrenia by brain stimulation and drug infusion |
US6128537A (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 2000-10-03 | Medtronic, Inc | Techniques for treating anxiety by brain stimulation and drug infusion |
US5861017A (en) * | 1997-06-06 | 1999-01-19 | Shriners Hospitals For Children | Portable functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for upper or lower extremity applications |
US5843150A (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1998-12-01 | Medtronic, Inc. | System and method for providing electrical and/or fluid treatment within a patient's brain |
US5941906A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 1999-08-24 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable, modular tissue stimulator |
US5938688A (en) | 1997-10-22 | 1999-08-17 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Deep brain stimulation method |
US6016449A (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2000-01-18 | Neuropace, Inc. | System for treatment of neurological disorders |
US6354299B1 (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2002-03-12 | Neuropace, Inc. | Implantable device for patient communication |
US6597954B1 (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2003-07-22 | Neuropace, Inc. | System and method for controlling epileptic seizures with spatially separated detection and stimulation electrodes |
US6647296B2 (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2003-11-11 | Neuropace, Inc. | Implantable apparatus for treating neurological disorders |
US6427086B1 (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2002-07-30 | Neuropace, Inc. | Means and method for the intracranial placement of a neurostimulator |
US6459936B2 (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2002-10-01 | Neuropace, Inc. | Methods for responsively treating neurological disorders |
US6230049B1 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2001-05-08 | Neuro Pace, Inc. | Integrated system for EEG monitoring and electrical stimulation with a multiplicity of electrodes |
DE19750043A1 (en) | 1997-11-12 | 1999-05-20 | Johann W Prof Dr Bartha | Novel cuff electrode and method for producing it |
US6011996A (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2000-01-04 | Medtronic, Inc | Dual electrode lead and method for brain target localization in functional stereotactic brain surgery |
US6227203B1 (en) * | 1998-02-12 | 2001-05-08 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for controlling abnormal involuntary movements by brain stimulation and drug infusion |
US6631295B2 (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 2003-10-07 | University Of Iowa Research Foundation | System and method for diagnosing and/or reducing tinnitus |
US6221908B1 (en) * | 1998-03-12 | 2001-04-24 | Scientific Learning Corporation | System for stimulating brain plasticity |
US6058331A (en) | 1998-04-27 | 2000-05-02 | Medtronic, Inc. | Apparatus and method for treating peripheral vascular disease and organ ischemia by electrical stimulation with closed loop feedback control |
US6018682A (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2000-01-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable seizure warning system |
US6319241B1 (en) | 1998-04-30 | 2001-11-20 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for positioning therapy delivery elements within a spinal cord or a brain |
US6421566B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2002-07-16 | Medtronic, Inc. | Selective dorsal column stimulation in SCS, using conditioning pulses |
US6006124A (en) | 1998-05-01 | 1999-12-21 | Neuropace, Inc. | Means and method for the placement of brain electrodes |
US5938689A (en) * | 1998-05-01 | 1999-08-17 | Neuropace, Inc. | Electrode configuration for a brain neuropacemaker |
US5886769A (en) | 1998-05-18 | 1999-03-23 | Zolten; A. J. | Method of training and rehabilitating brain function using hemi-lenses |
US6198958B1 (en) * | 1998-06-11 | 2001-03-06 | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring a magnetic resonance image during transcranial magnetic stimulation |
US6104960A (en) | 1998-07-13 | 2000-08-15 | Medtronic, Inc. | System and method for providing medical electrical stimulation to a portion of the nervous system |
US6035236A (en) * | 1998-07-13 | 2000-03-07 | Bionergy Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy |
US7277758B2 (en) * | 1998-08-05 | 2007-10-02 | Neurovista Corporation | Methods and systems for predicting future symptomatology in a patient suffering from a neurological or psychiatric disorder |
US6366813B1 (en) * | 1998-08-05 | 2002-04-02 | Dilorenzo Daniel J. | Apparatus and method for closed-loop intracranical stimulation for optimal control of neurological disease |
JP2002523183A (en) | 1998-08-27 | 2002-07-30 | ノヴァヴィズィオン アーゲー | Method and apparatus for training human vision |
US6190893B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2001-02-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Electroactive materials for stimulation of biological activity of bone marrow stromal cells |
US6569654B2 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2003-05-27 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Electroactive materials for stimulation of biological activity of stem cells |
USRE45616E1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2015-07-21 | Covidien Lp | Multi-channel non-invasive tissue oximeter |
US7062330B1 (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2006-06-13 | Boveja Birinder R | Electrical stimulation adjunct (Add-ON) therapy for urinary incontinence and urological disorders using implanted lead stimulus-receiver and an external pulse generator |
US20060217782A1 (en) | 1998-10-26 | 2006-09-28 | Boveja Birinder R | Method and system for cortical stimulation to provide adjunct (ADD-ON) therapy for stroke, tinnitus and other medical disorders using implantable and external components |
US6253109B1 (en) | 1998-11-05 | 2001-06-26 | Medtronic Inc. | System for optimized brain stimulation |
US6161044A (en) | 1998-11-23 | 2000-12-12 | Synaptic Corporation | Method and apparatus for treating chronic pain syndromes, tremor, dementia and related disorders and for inducing electroanesthesia using high frequency, high intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
US6507755B1 (en) * | 1998-12-01 | 2003-01-14 | Neurometrix, Inc. | Apparatus and method for stimulating human tissue |
US6052624A (en) * | 1999-01-07 | 2000-04-18 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Directional programming for implantable electrode arrays |
WO2000056401A1 (en) * | 1999-03-24 | 2000-09-28 | Milkhaus Foundation For Children | Apparatus and methods for reducing pain and/or retraining muscles |
US6210417B1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2001-04-03 | Medtronic, Inc. | Medical lead positioning and anchoring system |
US6055456A (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2000-04-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Single and multi-polar implantable lead for sacral nerve electrical stimulation |
US6353762B1 (en) * | 1999-04-30 | 2002-03-05 | Medtronic, Inc. | Techniques for selective activation of neurons in the brain, spinal cord parenchyma or peripheral nerve |
US6176242B1 (en) * | 1999-04-30 | 2001-01-23 | Medtronic Inc | Method of treating manic depression by brain infusion |
ATE253957T1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2003-11-15 | Exogen Inc | DEVICE FOR ULTRASONIC TREATMENT OF REFLEXSYMPATHIC DYSTROPHY |
US6505075B1 (en) * | 1999-05-29 | 2003-01-07 | Richard L. Weiner | Peripheral nerve stimulation method |
US6161045A (en) | 1999-06-01 | 2000-12-12 | Neuropace, Inc. | Method for determining stimulation parameters for the treatment of epileptic seizures |
US6633780B1 (en) | 1999-06-07 | 2003-10-14 | The Johns Hopkins University | Cardiac shock electrode system and corresponding implantable defibrillator system |
US6539263B1 (en) * | 1999-06-11 | 2003-03-25 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Feedback mechanism for deep brain stimulation |
US6301493B1 (en) | 1999-07-10 | 2001-10-09 | Physiometrix, Inc. | Reservoir electrodes for electroencephalograph headgear appliance |
US6516227B1 (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2003-02-04 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Rechargeable spinal cord stimulator system |
US6381496B1 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2002-04-30 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Parameter context switching for an implanted device |
US6236892B1 (en) * | 1999-10-07 | 2001-05-22 | Claudio A. Feler | Spinal cord stimulation lead |
US6499488B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2002-12-31 | Winchester Development Associates | Surgical sensor |
US6375666B1 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2002-04-23 | Hans Alois Mische | Methods and devices for treatment of neurological disorders |
US6764498B2 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2004-07-20 | Hans Alois Mische | Methods and devices for treatment of neurological disorders |
US7300449B2 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2007-11-27 | Mische Hans A | Methods and devices for the treatment of neurological and physiological disorders |
WO2001039664A1 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2001-06-07 | The General Hospital Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring indices of brain activity |
US6907280B2 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2005-06-14 | The General Hospital Corporation | Method and apparatus for objectively measuring pain, pain treatment and other related techniques |
WO2001039831A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2001-06-07 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Implantable device programmer |
US6873872B2 (en) * | 1999-12-07 | 2005-03-29 | George Mason University | Adaptive electric field modulation of neural systems |
DE60027459T2 (en) | 1999-12-07 | 2006-12-21 | George Mason University | ADAPTIVE MODULATION OF AN ELECTRIC FIELD FOR NEURAL SYSTEMS |
US6356792B1 (en) * | 2000-01-20 | 2002-03-12 | Electro Core Technologies, Llc | Skull mounted electrode lead securing assembly |
US6907296B1 (en) * | 2000-02-15 | 2005-06-14 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Implantable cardiac lead having convenient implant location identification and method of manufacture |
US6418344B1 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2002-07-09 | Electrocore Techniques, Llc | Method of treating psychiatric disorders by electrical stimulation within the orbitofrontal cerebral cortex |
US6708064B2 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2004-03-16 | Ali R. Rezai | Modulation of the brain to affect psychiatric disorders |
US6487450B1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2002-11-26 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | System and method for preventing Sudden Cardiac Death by nerve sprouting from right stellate ganglion |
US6609030B1 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2003-08-19 | Electrocore Techniques, Llc | Method of treating psychiatric diseases by neuromodulation within the dorsomedial thalamus |
US6473639B1 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2002-10-29 | Neuropace, Inc. | Neurological event detection procedure using processed display channel based algorithms and devices incorporating these procedures |
US6810286B2 (en) * | 2000-03-06 | 2004-10-26 | Medtronic, Inc | Stimulation for delivery of molecular therapy |
US6466822B1 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2002-10-15 | Neuropace, Inc. | Multimodal neurostimulator and process of using it |
US6353754B1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2002-03-05 | Neuropace, Inc. | System for the creation of patient specific templates for epileptiform activity detection |
AU2001268332A1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2001-12-17 | New York University | Diagnosis and treatment of thalamocortical dysrhythmia |
WO2001097906A2 (en) | 2000-06-20 | 2001-12-27 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Apparatus for treatment of mood and/or anxiety disorders by electrical brain stimulation and/or drug infusion |
US6632174B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2003-10-14 | Cognifit Ltd (Naiot) | Method and apparatus for testing and training cognitive ability |
US7146217B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2006-12-05 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a change in a neural-function of a patient |
US7756584B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2010-07-13 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US7236831B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2007-06-26 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US7024247B2 (en) * | 2001-10-15 | 2006-04-04 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing the likelihood of inducing collateral neural activity during neural stimulation threshold test procedures |
US7305268B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2007-12-04 | Northstar Neurscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators |
US20040176831A1 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2004-09-09 | Gliner Bradford Evan | Apparatuses and systems for applying electrical stimulation to a patient |
US7672730B2 (en) | 2001-03-08 | 2010-03-02 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US20030125786A1 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2003-07-03 | Gliner Bradford Evan | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US7831305B2 (en) * | 2001-10-15 | 2010-11-09 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Neural stimulation system and method responsive to collateral neural activity |
US20050021118A1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2005-01-27 | Chris Genau | Apparatuses and systems for applying electrical stimulation to a patient |
US7010351B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2006-03-07 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient |
US6497699B1 (en) * | 2000-08-09 | 2002-12-24 | The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York | Hybrid neuroprosthesis for the treatment of brain disorders |
DE10039240A1 (en) | 2000-08-11 | 2002-02-28 | Hans Ulrich May | Electrotherapeutic device |
US6591138B1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2003-07-08 | Neuropace, Inc. | Low frequency neurostimulator for the treatment of neurological disorders |
JP2002072309A (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2002-03-12 | Canon Inc | Camera and camera system |
US6405079B1 (en) * | 2000-09-22 | 2002-06-11 | Mehdi M. Ansarinia | Stimulation method for the dural venous sinuses and adjacent dura for treatment of medical conditions |
US6871098B2 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2005-03-22 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder with electrical stimulation of the brain internal capsule |
US6529774B1 (en) * | 2000-11-09 | 2003-03-04 | Neuropace, Inc. | Extradural leads, neurostimulator assemblies, and processes of using them for somatosensory and brain stimulation |
US6473634B1 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2002-10-29 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Medical imaging at two temporal resolutions for tumor treatment planning |
US6735475B1 (en) * | 2001-01-30 | 2004-05-11 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Fully implantable miniature neurostimulator for stimulation as a therapy for headache and/or facial pain |
US6788975B1 (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2004-09-07 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Fully implantable miniature neurostimulator for stimulation as a therapy for epilepsy |
US7149586B2 (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2006-12-12 | Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. | Variable pitch electrode array |
US7299096B2 (en) | 2001-03-08 | 2007-11-20 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | System and method for treating Parkinson's Disease and other movement disorders |
WO2002073526A2 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2002-09-19 | Wide Horizon Holdings Inc. | Cerebral programming |
US6839594B2 (en) * | 2001-04-26 | 2005-01-04 | Biocontrol Medical Ltd | Actuation and control of limbs through motor nerve stimulation |
US6684105B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-01-27 | Biocontrol Medical, Ltd. | Treatment of disorders by unidirectional nerve stimulation |
WO2002087410A2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2002-11-07 | Yacov Naisberg | Diagnosis, treatment and research of mental disorders |
US20060241717A1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2006-10-26 | Whitehurst Todd K | Treatment of movement disorders by extra dural motor cortex stimulation |
WO2003026736A2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and implantable apparatus for electrical therapy |
WO2003026738A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for electrically stimulating cells implanted in the nervous system |
US6944497B2 (en) | 2001-10-31 | 2005-09-13 | Medtronic, Inc. | System and method of treating stuttering by neuromodulation |
US7050856B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2006-05-23 | Medtronic, Inc. | Variation of neural-stimulation parameters |
US7110820B2 (en) | 2002-02-05 | 2006-09-19 | Tcheng Thomas K | Responsive electrical stimulation for movement disorders |
US7221981B2 (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2007-05-22 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Electrode geometries for efficient neural stimulation |
US20050154426A1 (en) | 2002-05-09 | 2005-07-14 | Boveja Birinder R. | Method and system for providing therapy for neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders utilizing transcranical magnetic stimulation and pulsed electrical vagus nerve(s) stimulation |
US20050182453A1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2005-08-18 | Whitehurst Todd K. | Treatment of epilepsy by high frequency electrical stimulation and/or drug stimulation |
US7006859B1 (en) * | 2002-07-20 | 2006-02-28 | Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C. | Unitized electrode with three-dimensional multi-site, multi-modal capabilities for detection and control of brain state changes |
US6934580B1 (en) | 2002-07-20 | 2005-08-23 | Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C. | Stimulation methodologies and apparatus for control of brain states |
US20040092809A1 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2004-05-13 | Neurion Inc. | Methods for measurement and analysis of brain activity |
US7471974B2 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2008-12-30 | Brainlab Ag | Method for planning stimulation of hyper/hypometabolic cortical areas |
US20050075679A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2005-04-07 | Gliner Bradford E. | Methods and apparatuses for treating neurological disorders by electrically stimulating cells implanted in the nervous system |
US20040082847A1 (en) * | 2002-10-23 | 2004-04-29 | Mcdermott Kathleen B. | System and methods for identifying brain regions supporting language |
US7236830B2 (en) | 2002-12-10 | 2007-06-26 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for enhancing or optimizing neural stimulation therapy for treating symptoms of Parkinson's disease and/or other movement disorders |
US7302298B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2007-11-27 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc | Methods and systems employing intracranial electrodes for neurostimulation and/or electroencephalography |
US20050075680A1 (en) * | 2003-04-18 | 2005-04-07 | Lowry David Warren | Methods and systems for intracranial neurostimulation and/or sensing |
US7565199B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2009-07-21 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Methods for treating and/or collecting information regarding neurological disorders, including language disorders |
US6959215B2 (en) | 2002-12-09 | 2005-10-25 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Methods for treating essential tremor |
US7596408B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2009-09-29 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable medical device with anti-infection agent |
WO2005000153A2 (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2005-01-06 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating and/or effectuating development, rehabilitation, restoration, and/or recovery of visual function through neural stimulation |
US7065412B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2006-06-20 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable trial neurostimulation device |
US7107104B2 (en) | 2003-05-30 | 2006-09-12 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable cortical neural lead and method |
CA2432810A1 (en) * | 2003-06-19 | 2004-12-19 | Andres M. Lozano | Method of treating depression, mood disorders and anxiety disorders by brian infusion |
AU2004261290A1 (en) * | 2003-08-01 | 2005-02-10 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for applying neural stimulation to a patient |
EP1694403A2 (en) * | 2003-11-20 | 2006-08-30 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Electrical stimulation system, lead, and method providing reduced neuroplasticity effects |
US8093205B2 (en) * | 2003-12-01 | 2012-01-10 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method for treating a stroke by implanting a first therapy delivery element in the CNS and a second therapy delivery element in a damaged tissue of the CNS to promote neurogenesis |
CA2454184A1 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2005-06-23 | Andres M. Lozano | Method and apparatus for treating neurological disorders by electrical stimulation of the brain |
US7107097B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2006-09-12 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Articulated neural electrode assembly |
US7483747B2 (en) * | 2004-07-15 | 2009-01-27 | Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. | Systems and methods for enhancing or affecting neural stimulation efficiency and/or efficacy |
US20050154425A1 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2005-07-14 | Boveja Birinder R. | Method and system to provide therapy for neuropsychiatric disorders and cognitive impairments using gradient magnetic pulses to the brain and pulsed electrical stimulation to vagus nerve(s) |
US7353065B2 (en) * | 2004-09-14 | 2008-04-01 | Neuropace, Inc. | Responsive therapy for psychiatric disorders |
US20060106430A1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2006-05-18 | Brad Fowler | Electrode configurations for reducing invasiveness and/or enhancing neural stimulation efficacy, and associated methods |
US7565200B2 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2009-07-21 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for selecting stimulation sites and applying treatment, including treatment of symptoms of Parkinson's disease, other movement disorders, and/or drug side effects |
US8000795B2 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2011-08-16 | Lozano Andres M | Cognitive function within a human brain |
WO2006083744A1 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2006-08-10 | Medtronic, Inc. | Anchoring of a medical device component adjacent a dura of the brain or spinal cord |
CA2599959A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-08 | Functional Neuroscience Inc. | Method of treating depression, mood disorders and anxiety disorders using neuromodulation |
US20070088403A1 (en) * | 2005-10-19 | 2007-04-19 | Allen Wyler | Methods and systems for establishing parameters for neural stimulation |
US20070088404A1 (en) * | 2005-10-19 | 2007-04-19 | Allen Wyler | Methods and systems for improving neural functioning, including cognitive functioning and neglect disorders |
US20070179558A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2007-08-02 | Gliner Bradford E | Systems and methods for varying electromagnetic and adjunctive neural therapies |
US7949401B2 (en) * | 2006-04-11 | 2011-05-24 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Electromagnetic signal delivery for tissue affected by neuronal dysfunction, degradation, damage, and/or necrosis, and associated systems and methods |
-
2001
- 2001-10-15 US US09/978,134 patent/US7305268B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-10-15 CA CA002463751A patent/CA2463751A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-10-15 EP EP02778536A patent/EP1438100A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-10-15 AU AU2002340189A patent/AU2002340189B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-10-15 WO PCT/US2002/032695 patent/WO2003043690A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2006
- 2006-04-20 US US11/407,684 patent/US20070032834A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2008
- 2008-10-02 US US12/244,610 patent/US7945330B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-11-17 AU AU2008246220A patent/AU2008246220A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2011
- 2011-05-05 US US13/101,306 patent/US8195300B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2012
- 2012-06-04 US US13/487,472 patent/US8412335B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20120253421A1 (en) | 2012-10-04 |
AU2002340189A1 (en) | 2003-06-10 |
EP1438100A1 (en) | 2004-07-21 |
US7305268B2 (en) | 2007-12-04 |
WO2003043690A1 (en) | 2003-05-30 |
US20110208264A1 (en) | 2011-08-25 |
US7945330B2 (en) | 2011-05-17 |
US20090093862A1 (en) | 2009-04-09 |
US8412335B2 (en) | 2013-04-02 |
US20070032834A1 (en) | 2007-02-08 |
AU2008246220A1 (en) | 2008-12-11 |
AU2002340189B2 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
US20040158298A1 (en) | 2004-08-12 |
US8195300B2 (en) | 2012-06-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2002340189B2 (en) | Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators | |
US8929991B2 (en) | Methods for establishing parameters for neural stimulation, including via performance of working memory tasks, and associated kits | |
US8121695B2 (en) | Systems and methods for reducing the likelihood of inducing collateral neural activity during neural stimulation threshold test procedures | |
US8926676B2 (en) | Systems and methods for applying signals, including contralesional signals, to neural populations | |
US7236831B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient | |
JP2021529572A (en) | ECAP control of electrical stimulation therapy | |
JP2021529570A (en) | ECAP control of electrical stimulation therapy | |
US20070088404A1 (en) | Methods and systems for improving neural functioning, including cognitive functioning and neglect disorders | |
EP3337557B1 (en) | Remote access and post program telemonitoring | |
US9808641B2 (en) | System and method for non-invasive neuronal stimulation | |
US20150148710A1 (en) | Ultrasound Modulation of the Brain for Treatment of Stroke, Brain Injury, and Other Neurological Disorders | |
US20220212014A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining tolerance thresholds for neurostimulation | |
WO2024026031A1 (en) | Automated programming based on ecap signals | |
US20110029039A1 (en) | Intracranial Electrical Seizure Therapy (ICEST) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Discontinued |