CA2502196C - Fracture stimulation process for carbonate reservoirs - Google Patents

Fracture stimulation process for carbonate reservoirs Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2502196C
CA2502196C CA2502196A CA2502196A CA2502196C CA 2502196 C CA2502196 C CA 2502196C CA 2502196 A CA2502196 A CA 2502196A CA 2502196 A CA2502196 A CA 2502196A CA 2502196 C CA2502196 C CA 2502196C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
fracture
fluid
formation
fracture stimulation
stimulation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA2502196A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2502196A1 (en
Inventor
Christopher Fredd
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Schlumberger Canada Ltd
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Canada Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schlumberger Canada Ltd filed Critical Schlumberger Canada Ltd
Publication of CA2502196A1 publication Critical patent/CA2502196A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2502196C publication Critical patent/CA2502196C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/62Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
    • C09K8/72Eroding chemicals, e.g. acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/62Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
    • C09K8/66Compositions based on water or polar solvents

Abstract

A new process of fracture stimulating a carbonate reservoir in a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation is described. During the process, the composition and reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid that is injected into the formation surrounding a wellbore is varied from a lower reactive fluid to a higher reactive fluid. The process is designed to stimulate the fracture starting from the tip of the fracture and progressing along the fracture back to the wellbore. The reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid is increased to maintain optimum stimulation conditions for the formation of conductive flow channels along the faces of the fracture. An optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number, Ff , is used (generally integrated into a fracture simulator computer program) to regulate the fluid composition by reactivity and flow rate, based on formation and fluid parameters.

Description

Fracture Stimulation Process for Carbonate Reservoirs BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[oooi] This invention relates to a new process of fracturing a carbonate reservoir in a subterranean formation to stimulate the 'production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation. During the process, the composition and reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid that is injected into the formation surrounding a wellbore is varied from a lower reactivity fluid to a higher reactivity fluid. The new process is designed to 'effectively stimulate the fracture starting from the tip of the fracture and progressing back to the wellbore.

Fracture stimulation, commonly referred to as fracture acidizing, or acid fracturing, when acid is the stimulation fluid, is a stimulation technique commonly used to increase the productivity of hydrocarbon fluids from subterranean formations. Fracture acidizing is used in carbonate reservoirs. The technique typically involves the injection of acid, usually aqueous hydrochloric acid (HCQ), through a wellbore and into the formation at pressures sufficient to fracture the formation or open existing fractures. The acid etches the fracture faces, resulting in the formation of conductive flow paths.
Frequently, the treatments are not effective. The depth of stimulation is typically limited by rapid consumption of acid near the wellbore and loss of acid through the fracture faces (commonly referred to as fluid leakoff or fluid loss). Fluid leakoff is a dynamic process that is influenced significantly by the formation of wormholes that form in the porous walls of the fracture. Wormholes are highly conductive flow channels that form approximately normal to the fracture. These wormholes divert fluid from the fracture, consume large amounts of reactant from the fracture stimulation fluid, and provide no benefit to the conductivity of the fracture. By "conductivity of the fracture"
is meant the capability of formation fluids to migrate or flow through the conductive etched flow channels that are formed by the reaction of the fluid with components of the formation along the faces of the fracture. The formation fluids, of course, migrate or flow through CONFIRMATION COPY

such conductive etched flow channels to the wellbore where they are produced to the surface and recovered. The creation of such conductive etched flow channels in the formation is easily evidenced by enhanced production of formation fluids from the well, and such channels can also be visually observed in the laboratory using conventional acid conductivity tests on core samples.
[0002] Fracture stimulation fluid systems, such as emulsified HCl, have been devised which tend to provide deeper penetration of live acid. The effectiveness, defined based on the depth of live acid penetration, of such systems in fracture acidizing treatments is enhanced because the rate of dissolution and rate of wormhole propagation are decreased relative to straight HCI. However, near wellbore conductivity is typically low due to insufficient dissolution or etching of the fracture faces that, in turn, is caused by an initial cool-down effect and fracture geometry in the near wellbore vicinity. Thus, a method of increasing both the length and conductivity of the conductive etched flow channels is required to improve the effectiveness of fracture stimulation treatments.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0003] A novel process of fracture stimulation has now been discovered to stimulate. the production of hydrocarbon fluids from carbonate reservoirs in subterranean formations penetrated by a wellbore. The new process comprises injecting a fracture stimulation fluid into and through a wellbore and into the carbonate reservoir under pumping conditions that are selected and controlled to maintain an optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number, Ff, of about 0.1 to about 0.3 during the fracturing process. The fracture stimulation efficiency number in the present invention is selected and controlled such that the fracture is effectively stimulated starting from the tip of the fracture and progressing back along the fracture to the wellbore. The fracture stimulation fluid compositions and treatment conditions used to maintain the optimum fracture efficiency number can be conveniently regulated by varying the reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid from a composition of low reactivity to one of higher reactivity during the process.

CONFIRMATION COPY

The flow rate and/or viscosity of the fracture fluid can also be varied to control the rate of mass transfer of the reactants and products in accordance with an optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number, based on formation and fluid parameters. The new fracturing process can provide deep penetration,of live reactant along the fracture, reduce the rate of wormhole formation to control fluid loss, and efficiently create highly conductive etch patterns on the fracture faces.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0004] Figure 1 illustrates the typical etching patterns obtained in targeted stimulation regions as the stimulation region changes from the near-tip of the fracture to the wellbore in a three-stage treatment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[00051 As used herein, a "fracture stimulation fluid" is a fluid containing one or more components that chemically react to dissolve or otherwise solubilize the carbonate component of the rock in the subterranean formation. The chemically reactive components of the fracture stimulation fluid are referred to below as "reactants" and the dissolved or solubilized materials generated by contact of the fracture stimulation fluid with the carbonate-containing rock are referred to below as "products." An example of a fracture stimulation fluid useful in the present invention is one whose composition is changed during the fracture acidizing process from a sodium acetate/acetic acid mixture initially, to acetic acid, to a blend of acetic acid and hydrochloric acid, and then to hydrochloric acid; this. change could be done incrementally in three stages or by continuously injecting a blend of the acids. In this example, the acids (acetic acid and hydrochloric acid) are "reactants" and the' "products" obtained by contacting the fluid with a carbonate-containing rock formation would be carbon dioxide, water, and inorganic salts. The reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid is increased during the treatment process to maintain a fracture stimulation efficiency number sufficient to optimize the creation of conductive etched flow channels in the formation. An optimum CONFIRMATION COPY

fracture stimulation efficiency number, Ff , is used (generally integrated into a fracture simulator computer program) to regulate the fluid composition by reactivity and flow rate, based on formation and fluid parameters. "Conductive etched flow channels" are channels that are formed by the flow and reaction of a fracture stimulation fluid along the faces of a fracture through which hydrocarbon fluids and other formation fluids can then flow from various points along the fracture to the wellbore.

[00061 The novel process typically, and preferably, starts with a conventional pad fracturing stage to generate the fracture or open an existing fracture or fractures in the carbonate-containing subterranean rock formation. Once generated, a low reactivity fracture fluid is injected to stimulate the near-tip region of the fracture.
The reactivity of the stimulation. fluid is then subsequently increased (incrementally or continuously) to stimulate the targeted stimulation region, which changes from the near-tip region of the fracture to the wellbore as the stimulation treatment progresses. With this approach, excessive wormhole formation and reactant consumption are minimized between the wellbore and the targeted stimulation region. The reactivity of the fluid is selected such that the rate of dissolution of the carbonate in the subterranean rock formation is sufficiently influenced by the rate of mass transfer to result in the formation of,.
conductive etched flow channels in the targeted stimulation region of the fractured formation.

[00071 The flow rate in the targeted stimulation region increases as the treatment progresses (because it is moved closer to the wellbore) and the reactivity of the fluid is increased to maintain a fracture stimulation efficiency number sufficient to optimize the creation of conductive etched channels in the face of the formation. The reactivity of the stimulation fluid can be controlled by varying the rate of reaction, the rate of mass transfer, or both. For example, the rate of reaction can be decreased by changing the type of fracture stimulation fluid, by changing the. form of the fluid from a solution to an emulsion, by adding appropriate salts (which change the equilibrium constant for the surface reaction), or by increasing the pH of the fracture stimulation fluid.
The rate of reaction can also be decreased by changing the physical processing conditions (e.g., by reducing the pump flow rate and/or pumping pressure, or by cooling the fracture CONFIRMATION COPY

stimulation fluid using external cooling means or internal cooling means (e.g., pumping a large pad stage, by adding nitrogen or other gas that is inert in the process).

[0008] Another example of the present fracture stimulation treatment involves injecting a continuously changing blend of acetic acid (HAc) and hydrochloric acid (HC1) through a wellbore and into a carbonate reservoir in a subterranean formation. In this example, the two acids are simultaneously injected into the formation with the flow rates gradually changing from the total pump rate (Q) to zero and from zero to Q for HAc and HC1, respectively (that is, from straight HAc to blends of HAc/HCl to straight HCQ). Examples of other suitable fracture fluid systems are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Fluid 1 Fluid 2 (relatively low reactivity) (relatively high reactivity) Acetic Acid Hydrochloric Acid .Acetic Acid with Sodium Acetate Acetic Acid Acetic Acid with Sodium Acetate Acetic Acid with Sodium Acetate (high sodium acetate concentration) (low sodium acetate concentration) EDTA, pH 12 EDTA, pH 4 HEDTA, pH 12 HEDTA, pH 4 Emulsified HCl (high surfactant Emulsified HCl (low surfactant concentration) concentration) Emulsified HCl (strong surfactant) Emulsified HCl (weak surfactant) Emulsified HCl (high oil content) Emulsified HCl (low oil content) [0010] As the information in Table 1 illustrates, the fluid of lower reactivity can be and preferably is in most situations an aqueous acid (such as formic acid, acetic acid, and the like), emulsified acid, or a chelating agent (e.g., an aminopolycarboxylic acid, such as N-hydroxyethyl- N, N', N'-ethylenediaminetriacetic acid ("HEDTA") or a sodium (Na), potassium (K) or ammonium (NH4') salt thereof at a basic pH) while the fluid of higher reactivity can be and usually is an aqueous acid (such as acetic acid, hydrochloric acid), CONFIRMATION COPY

an aqueous chelating agent (e.g., HEDTA at an acidic pH), or the like. The chelating agents useful herein are a known class of materials having many members. The class of chelating agents includes, for example, aminopolycarboxylic acids and phosphonic acids and sodium, potassium and ammonium salts thereof. HEDTA and HEIDA
(hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid) are useful in the present process; the free acids and their Na, K, NH4+ salts (and Ca salts) are soluble in strong acid as well as at high pH, so they may be more readily used at any pH and in combination with any other reactive fluids (e.g., HC1). Other aminopolycarboxylic acid members, including EDTA, NTA.
(nitrilotriacetic acid), DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), and CDTA
(cyclohexylenediaminetetraacetic acid) are also suitable. At low pH these latter acids and their salts may be less soluble. Examples of suitable phosphonic acids and their salts, include ATMP: aminotri(methylenephosphonic acid); HEDP: 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-phosphonic acid; HDTMPA: hexamethylenediaminetetra(methylenephosphonic acid);
DTPMPA: diethylenediaminepentamethylenephosphonic acid; and 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid. All these phosphonic acids are available from Solutia, Inc., St.
Louis, MO, USA, as DEQUEST (Registered Trademark of Solutia) phosphonates.
Such materials are known in the oilfield. Prior art treatments did not, however, inject such fluids into the formation in such a manner as to maintain an optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number and they were not as effective as the methods of the subject invention in creating conductive etched flow channels in the formation.

[00111 The creation of conductive etched flow channels in the formation is optimized by controlling the mass transfer variables (generally, the diffusivity, viscosity and flow rate) and surface reaction variables (generally, the surface reaction rate and equilibrium constant for the surface reaction) of the stimulation fluid so as to maintain an optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number (i.e., from about 0.1 to about 0.3) during the fracturing process. That number is determined by the mathematical relationship set forth in the optimum stimulation efficiency number, Ff , set forth in equation (1) below.

[0012] The formation of conductive etched flow channels along the face of a fracture occurs when the rate of dissolution is influenced by the rate of mass transfer and there exist local variations in the flow rate. Variations in the flow rate may be caused by local CONFIRMATION COPY

variations in the fracture width (because of variations in mechanical properties of the rock and/or stresses in the formation) and the presence of surface asperities that form tortuous and confining flow paths. The result is local variations in the rate of dissolution, which cause differential etching and eventually the formation of conductive etched flow channels. Variations in mineralogy, which may also lead to local variations in the rate of dissolution, have historically been the primary, if not the only, reported means of obtaining sufficient differential etching during fracture acidizing. These variations contribute to differential etching if local dissolution is sufficiently influenced by the kinetics of the surface reaction for at least one of the mineral types present along the fracture faces.

[0013] The structure of the etched pattern that forms along a fracture is dependent on the rates of mass transfer and surface reaction. Hence, the structure varies with flow rate and type of fracture stimulation fluid used and the mineral system in the targeted stimulation region of the formation. At low flow rates (and/or rapid reaction rates), rapid reactant consumption results in near-wellbore dissolution. This etched pattern provides limited penetration and closes under closure stress due to low surface strength. At intermediate injection and/or reaction rates, conductive etched flow channels are formed.
These channels penetrate deep along the fracture (far away from the well-bore) and result in large areas of undissolved rock that effectively support closure stresses and maintain the channels open when the fracture closes. At high flow rates (and/or low reaction rates), uniform dissolution occurs as the reactant penetrates deep along the fracture.
A uniform dissolution pattern does not provide sufficient dissolution or differential etching to maintain conductivity after fracture closure. However, by varying the flow rate and/or reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid in accordance with the present invention, conductive etched flow channels are formed along the face of the fracture and the formation of such channels is optimized by maintaining an optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number during the fracturing process. This is illustrated in Figure 1.

[0014] The effectiveness of a stimulation fluid for providing the optimum dissolution etch pattern is given by a fracture stimulation efficiency number, Ff, which as used in the present fracture stimulation process is defined as:

CONFIRMATION COPY

Ff =Daf +~f (1) [0015] where Daf is the Damkohler number in the fracture andf is a dimensionless fracture fluid loss term. The fracture Damkohler number, Daf, is defined as:

2hLK
Daf = Q
(2) [0016] where Q is the local flow rate in the fracture, h and L are the height and length of the fracture, respectively, and K is the overall dissolution rate constant.
The overall dissolution rate constant depends on the sum of mass transfer and reaction resistances in series, which for a first-order surface reaction is given by the equation:

l+
vKeq K- 1 1 1.
K,vkrTKeq K3 (3) [0017] where Kl and K3 are the mass-transfer coefficients for the reactants and products, respectively, kr is the surface reaction rate constant, Keq is the effective equilibrium constant of the reaction, and v is the stoichiometric ratio of reactants consumed to products produced. The values of kr and Keq depend on the specific fluid-mineral system and are typically a strong function of temperature. For non-first-order reactions, a pseudo-first-order surface reaction rate expression can be used as described, for example, in the Appendix to Chapter 16 entitled "Advances in Understanding and Predicting Wormhole Formation," by Christopher N. Fredd, (e.g., at page A16-4), and Chapter 17 entitled "Carbonate Acidizing Design," authored by J. A. Robert and C. W.
Crowe, of the text "Reservoir Stimulation," Third Edition, Edited by Michael J. Economides and Kenneth G. Nolte, John Wiley-& Sons (2000). The mass transfer coefficients (K1 and K3) can be determined from published correlations. An example ' of a mass transfer correlation for flow between parallel plates is given by:

CONFIRMATION COPY

DeSh K.0 =
w (4) [00181 where De is the effective diffusivity of the reactants (for K1) or products (for K3), w is the fracture width, and Sh is the Sherwood number for slot flow, which can be expressed as:

Sh = 0.33 Re0.5Sc '333 Re < 1800 (5a) Sh = 0.0011 Rel.15Sc '333 1800 < Re < 7000 (5b) Sh = 0.026 Re '8Sc '333 Re > 7000 (5c) [00191 where Re = Q p/h/,u is the Reynolds number and Sc = ,.11p/De is the Schmidt number, where ,u is the fluid viscosity and p is the fluid density. See, for example, Cussler, E. L., "Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems," Cambridge University Press, New York (1984); and Navarrete et al., "Emulsified Acid Enhances Well Production in High-Temperature Carbonate Formations," SPE 50612, presented at the .1998 SPE
European Petroleum Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, October 20-22,1998.
The correlations in equations (5a), (5b) and (5c) are valid for laminar, transitional, and turbulent flow, respectively. These expressions do not account for convection normal to the fracture face (i.e., fluid leakoff). The mass transfer coefficients can be adjusted to include fluid leakoff using an equation such as:

K = v`
(r 1 (6) e`vii mt/

[0020] where v, is the fluid loss or leakoff velocity. By calculating Ic based on mass transfer coefficients corrected using equation (6), the effects of fluid leakoff are included in the optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number, Ff.

The dimensionless fracture fluid loss term (~f) is given by:
2hLv, K
Q (I- Kl (7) CONFIRMATION COPY

[0021] The fracture fluid loss term indicates the amount of fracture stimulation fluid lost from the fracture because of leakoff, but it does not provide an indication of how effectively reactants are consumed within the fracture. The fracture Damkohler number indicates the amount of reactants consumed on the walls of the fracture as opposed to being transported along the fracture.

[0022] The preferred fracture stimulation treatment according to the present invention begins with a conventional pad stage to generate the fracture. The pad fluid can be, and usually is, a gelled aqueous fluid, such as water or brine thickened with a viscoelastic surfactant or a water soluble or dispersible polymer such as guar, hydroxypropylguar or the like. The pad fluid can contain various additives, such as fluid loss additives, crosslinking agents, and the like. Thereafter, a fracture stimulation fluid varying in reactivity from low reactivity to high reactivity is injected through the wellbore and into the formation at a rate and pressure at least sufficient to fracture the subterranean formation or extend the fracture further into the formation. The fracture stimulation fluid can be a chelating agent such as an alkylenepolyarninepolycarboxylic acid (e.g., N,N,N',N'-ethylenediaminetetaacetic acid ("EDTA") or N-hydroxethyl-N,N',N'-ethylenediaminetriacetic acid ("HEDTA"), or a suitable salt thereof (e.g., an ammonium salt)) or a single acid or a mixture of acids or an acid with an appropriate salt, as illustrated in Table 1. The reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid can be varied by adjusting the concentration of acid and/or salt (e.g., acid salts) or changing the pH. The acid salts influence the effective equilibrium constant for the surface reaction and an increased amount of the appropriate salt will lower the reactivity of the fluid. Similarly the lower pH fluids are more acidic and more reactive than the fluids with a higher pH.
To illustrate, by the addition of acid salts (e.g., sodium acetate) to the corresponding acid (e.g., acetic acid), the user can usually lower the reactivity of the acid component of a fracture stimulation fluid. The composition of the acid fracture stimulation fluid can be varied continuously or incrementally during the fracturing treatment, at the convenience of the user. The fracture stimulation fluid may contain various additives (such as, for example, corrosion inhibitors, iron control agents, surfactants, and the like).

CONFIRMATION COPY

[0023] A spacer fluid can (optionally) be injected periodically throughout the treatment to create differential etching due to viscous fingering of the subsequently injected fluid through the spacer fluid, to provide cool down, or to reduce fluid leakoff.
Viscous fingering can provide a secondary differential etching mechanism in addition to the etching pattern caused by conducting the fracturing process at the optimum fracture stimulation efficiency.number, in accordance with the present process. For example, a fracture acidizing treatment according to the present invention can utilize the sequential injection of. a gelled aqueous pad of guar thickened water, acetic acid (e.g., 10%), a spacer fluid (e.g., guar thickened water), a mixture of hydrochloric acid and acetic acid, a spacer fluid (e.g., guar thickened water), and aqueous hydrochloric acid (e.g., 28%). The spacer fluid can contain various additives, such as diverting agents, buffering agents, and the like; such additives are well known in the art.

[0024] Similarly, the procedural techniques for pumping fracture stimulation fluids down a wellbore to fracture a subterranean formation are well known. The person that designs such fracturing treatments is the person of ordinary skill to whom this disclosure is directed. That person has available many useful tools to help design and implement the fracturing treatments, one of which is a computer program commonly referred to as a fracture simulation model (a.k.a., fracture models, fracture simulators, fracture placement models). Most if not all commercial service companies that provide fracturing services to the oilfield have one or more fracture simulation models that their treatment designers use. One commercial fracture simulation model that is widely used by several service companies is known as FracCADETM. This commercial computer program is a fracture design, prediction, and treatment-monitoring program that was designed by Schlumberger, Ltd. All of the various fracture simulation models use information available to the treatment designer concerning the formation to be treated and the various treatment fluids (and additives) in the calculations, and the program output is a pumping schedule that is used to pump the fracture stimulation fluids into the wellbore. The text "Reservoir Stimulation," Third Edition, Edited by Michael J. Economides and Kenneth G. Nolte, Published by John Wiley & Sons, (2000), is an excellent reference book for fracturing and other well treatments; it discusses fracture simulation models in Chapter 5 CONFIRMATION COPY

(page'5-25) and the Appendix for Chapter 5 (page A-15)).

[0025] Typical design procedures of the invention for varying the fracture fluid reactivity (and fixed injection rate) are as follows:

[0026]
1. Obtain the required formation and fracture parameters, including the surface injection flow rate required for fracturing, Qo, the fracture geometry (w, H, and L), the reservoir temperature, and any additional parameters that are required by a fracture simulator such as FracCADE.

[0027]

2. Select the desired distance from the welibore for fracture stimulation (must be less than or equal to the initial fracture length). This value will represent the location of the initial targeted stimulation region.
[0028]

3. Calculate the local leakoff velocity (vl), taking into account the current depth of wormhole penetration (e.g., use the wormhole fluid-loss coefficient introduced by Hill et aL,"The Effect of Wormholing on the Fluid-Loss Coefficient in Acid Fracturing", SPE Production Engineering, pages 257-263, November 1995).

[0029]

4. Calculate the flow rate as a function of position along the length of the fracture (Q) based on the surface injection rate and the leakoff velocity.

[0030]
5. Back-calculate the current optimum overall dissolution rate constant (x) from the flow rate in the targeted stimulation region (determined in step 4), the fracture stimulation efficiency number, Ff, defined in equation (1), the optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number of about 0.1 to about 0.3, and generally about 0.2, and the current fracture geometry. This represent the fluid properties required to achieve the optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number in the targeted stimulation region.

[0031]
6. Select a stimulation fluid with the appropriate properties (i.e., ,u, p, Def Dpe, kr, and Keq) such that the current overall dissolution rate constant calculated in step 5 can be obtained in the fracture. The appropriate fluid properties may be obtained by combining various fluid types or by adding materials (such as chemical retarders, emulsifying agents, salts, etc.) to the fluid system. If the overall dissolution rate constant (x) for the selected fluid is too high, changes in reactivity may be achieved by adding specific salts, changing the fluid pH, changing the type of stimulation fluid, or the like.

[0032]
7. Calculate the amount of dissolution (etched width) and the local depth of wormhole penetration for the stimulation fluid selected in step 6.

[0033]
8. Update the fracture geometry. Note: FracCADE and the other current commercial fracture simulation models will do this step 8 automatically, albeit in a simplified manner that does not include the effects of differential etching.

CONFIRMATION COPY

[0034]
9. Repeat steps 3 through 8 until the tip of the current targeted stimulation region has the desired etched width.

[0035]
10. Move the targeted stimulation region towards the wellbore, such that all regions beyond the targeted stimulation region have been adequately stimulated.

[0036]
11. Repeat steps 3 through 10 until the entire length of the fracture has been fracture stimulated.

[0037] The output of this design procedure defines the optimum fluid properties for any particular time during the fracture stimulation treatment. Analogous design procedures can be used when the injection rate is varied during the treatment to maintain the optimum fracture stimulation number, Ff , of from about 0.1 to about 0.3, and preferably about 0.2. This process could involve fixing the fracture stimulation fluid properties and adjusting the injection rate, Q, in steps 5 and 6.

[0038] Although the methods have been described here for, and are most typically used for, hydrocarbon production, they may also be used in injection wells and for production of other fluids, such as water or brine.

EXAMPLES OF THE INVENTION

[0039] Example 1. A fracture acidizing treatment with variable reaction kinetics was simulated for a limestone formation at 200 F (93 C). The simulation model assumed a well depth of 13,000 feet (3,962 meters); a fracture length of 800 feet (244 meters); a fracture height of 50 feet (15.24 meters); and a fracture width at the wellbore of 0.2 inch CONFIRMATION COPY

(5.08 millimeters). The stimulation fluid was 10% aqueous acetic acid (HAc) injected at 30 barrels per minute (4.77 kiloliters/minute), and the fluid reactivity was controlled by varying the concentration of sodium acetate (NaAc) in the fracture stimulation fluid.
Increasing the concentration of NaAc causes a decrease in the overall rate of dissolution (C. N. Fredd and H. S. Fogler, "The Kinetics of Calcite Dissolution in Acetic Acid Solutions," Chem. Eng. Sci., 53 (22), pages 3863-3874 (Oct. 1998)). To maintain the optimum fracture stimulation efficiency number of 0.2, the required overall dissolution rate constant, K, for a tip-to-wellbore treatment varied from an initial value of 1.E-0.3 to 6.E-03 over a seven (7) stage treatment wherein the concentration of sodium acetate (NaAc) in 10% aqueous acetic acid (HAc)' decreased (and the reactivity of the fluid increased) as the treatment progressed from stage 1 through stage 7. The required reactivity increases by about an order of magnitude over the 7-stage course of the treatment. The variable kinetics treatment creates conductive etched flow channels (at the optimum fracture stimulation number, 0.2) that penetrate about 300 feet (91.44 meters).
In contrast, it was calculated, using similar assumed values, that a conventional treatment with emulsified hydrochloric acid would effectively penetrate to only about half that depth, and that a similar fracture acidizing treatment with either 15% or 28%
HCl would not create conductive etched flow channels in the formation but would tend to dissolve the formation and penetrate only about 75 feet (22.86 meters) into the formation.

CONFIRMATION COPY

Claims (12)

CLAIMS:
1. A fracturing process to stimulate the production of hydrocarbon fluids from a carbonate reservoir in a subterranean formation which comprises a) selecting, using a simulation model, pumping conditions for a fracture stimulation fluid to obtain an optimum fracture efficiency number, F f, of about 0.1 to about 0.3, b) injecting said fracture stimulation fluid into and through a wellbore into the carbonate reservoir containing hydrocarbon fluids under said pumping conditions, and c) controlling said pumping conditions to maintain said fracture efficiency number during the fracturing process.
2. The fracturing process according to claim 1 further wherein the step of injecting a fracture stimulation fluid is preceded by the step of injecting an aqueous pad fluid.
3. The process defined by claim 1 or 2 wherein the reactivity of the fracture stimulation fluid is increased to maintain mass transfer limitations sufficient to optimize the creation of conductive flow channels in the carbonate-bearing subterranean rock formation.
4. The process defined by any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the reactivity of the fluid is selected using a simulation model such that the rate of dissolution of the carbonate in the subterranean rock formation is sufficiently influenced by the rate of mass transfer to result in the formation of conductive etched flow channels in the targeted stimulation region of the fractured formation.
5. The fracturing process defined by any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the flow rate of the injected fracture stimulation fluid into the formation is decreased as the process progresses.
6. The process defined by any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the fracture stimulation fluid is varied from a lower reactive fluid to a higher reactive fluid.
7. The process defined by any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the fracture stimulation fluid is an aqueous fluid that comprises acetic acid and/or hydrochloric acid.
16 18. The process defined by any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the composition of the fracture stimulation fluid changes during the course of the process from a sodium acetate/acetic acid mixture initially, to acetic acid, to a blend of acetic acid and hydrochloric acid, and then to hydrochloric acid.
9. The process defined by any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the composition of the fracture stimulation fluid comprises an aminopolycarboxylic acid or phosphonic acid chelant, or a salt thereof, as at least one of the reactive components of the fracture stimulation fluid.
10. The process defined by any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the pH of the fluid transitions during the course of the process from a basic pH to an acidic pH.
11. The process defined by any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the fracture stimulation fluid comprises an emulsified hydrochloric acid, and wherein said emulsified acid contains a surfactant in an amount that varies during the process from a high surfactant concentration to a low surfactant concentration.
12. The process according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein F f is about 0.2.
CA2502196A 2002-10-17 2003-09-23 Fracture stimulation process for carbonate reservoirs Expired - Fee Related CA2502196C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/065,441 2002-10-17
US10/065,441 US6749022B1 (en) 2002-10-17 2002-10-17 Fracture stimulation process for carbonate reservoirs
PCT/EP2003/010591 WO2004035988A1 (en) 2002-10-17 2003-09-23 Fracture stimulation process for carbonate reservoirs

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2502196A1 CA2502196A1 (en) 2004-04-29
CA2502196C true CA2502196C (en) 2011-07-12

Family

ID=32106046

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA2502196A Expired - Fee Related CA2502196C (en) 2002-10-17 2003-09-23 Fracture stimulation process for carbonate reservoirs

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US6749022B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1552107B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE359430T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003287948A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2502196C (en)
DE (1) DE60313199D1 (en)
DK (1) DK1552107T3 (en)
EA (1) EA006335B1 (en)
MX (1) MXPA05003782A (en)
NO (1) NO20051730L (en)
WO (1) WO2004035988A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (58)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7114567B2 (en) * 2003-01-28 2006-10-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Propped fracture with high effective surface area
US7561998B2 (en) * 2005-02-07 2009-07-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Modeling, simulation and comparison of models for wormhole formation during matrix stimulation of carbonates
US8693405B2 (en) 2005-10-27 2014-04-08 Qualcomm Incorporated SDMA resource management
FR2898382B1 (en) * 2006-03-10 2008-04-18 Inst Francais Du Petrole METHOD FOR MODELING AND SIMULATING ON LARGE SCALE THE STIMULATION OF CARBONATE WELLS
US7712524B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2010-05-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Measuring a characteristic of a well proximate a region to be gravel packed
US7793718B2 (en) * 2006-03-30 2010-09-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Communicating electrical energy with an electrical device in a well
US8056619B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2011-11-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Aligning inductive couplers in a well
RU2486336C2 (en) * 2007-11-01 2013-06-27 Лоджинд Б.В. Method of formation breakdown simulation and its estimation, and computer-read carrier
US8121790B2 (en) * 2007-11-27 2012-02-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Combining reservoir modeling with downhole sensors and inductive coupling
DK2229423T3 (en) 2008-01-09 2017-08-28 Akzo Nobel Nv APPLICATION OF AN ACID Aqueous SOLUTION CONTAINING A CHELATING AGENT AS AN OIL FIELD CHEMICAL
US7950455B2 (en) 2008-01-14 2011-05-31 Baker Hughes Incorporated Non-spherical well treating particulates and methods of using the same
US9074454B2 (en) * 2008-01-15 2015-07-07 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Dynamic reservoir engineering
US20110067871A1 (en) * 2008-05-22 2011-03-24 Burdette Jason A Methods For Regulating Flow In Multi-Zone Intervals
US8293696B2 (en) * 2009-02-06 2012-10-23 Ecolab, Inc. Alkaline composition comprising a chelant mixture, including HEIDA, and method of producing same
US8082992B2 (en) * 2009-07-13 2011-12-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of fluid-controlled geometry stimulation
US8494827B2 (en) * 2009-09-25 2013-07-23 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method of predicting natural fractures and damage in a subsurface region
US8839850B2 (en) 2009-10-07 2014-09-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Active integrated completion installation system and method
US9249559B2 (en) 2011-10-04 2016-02-02 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Providing equipment in lateral branches of a well
US9644476B2 (en) 2012-01-23 2017-05-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Structures having cavities containing coupler portions
US9175560B2 (en) 2012-01-26 2015-11-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Providing coupler portions along a structure
US9938823B2 (en) 2012-02-15 2018-04-10 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Communicating power and data to a component in a well
US9405867B2 (en) 2012-06-07 2016-08-02 Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. Hydraulic fracture simulation with an extended finite element method
US10036234B2 (en) 2012-06-08 2018-07-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Lateral wellbore completion apparatus and method
US9418184B2 (en) * 2013-07-25 2016-08-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Determining flow through a fracture junction in a complex fracture network
US9482079B2 (en) * 2013-08-30 2016-11-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Determining acid injection treatment parameters
US20150075797A1 (en) * 2013-09-16 2015-03-19 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Well treatment
US20150330199A1 (en) * 2014-05-15 2015-11-19 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method for enhancing acidizing treatment of a formation having a high bottom hole temperature
US10132147B2 (en) * 2014-07-02 2018-11-20 Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc System and method for modeling and design of pulse fracturing networks
WO2016028564A1 (en) * 2014-08-22 2016-02-25 Schlumberger Canada Limited Methods for monitoring fluid flow and transport in shale gas reservoirs
CA2996044C (en) * 2015-09-23 2021-01-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions including acidic chelator for treatment of subterranean formations including one or more fractures
CA2997704A1 (en) 2015-10-15 2017-04-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Diverter fluid
US20170267909A1 (en) * 2016-03-17 2017-09-21 Baker Hughes Incorporated Methods and Materials for Improving Wellbore Stability in Laminated Tight Carbonate Source-Rock Formations
CN106522935B (en) * 2016-12-26 2019-04-26 西南石油大学 Test the method for determining the distribution of carbonate rock hydrocarbon reservoir acid fracturing fracture condudtiviy
EP3619179A1 (en) 2017-05-02 2020-03-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Synthetic source rocks
CN109931045B (en) * 2017-12-18 2021-08-31 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Self-supporting acid fracturing method of double-seam system
US10871061B2 (en) 2018-01-10 2020-12-22 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Treatment of kerogen in subterranean zones
CA3084971C (en) * 2018-01-16 2023-07-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Modeling fracture closure processes in hydraulic fracturing simulators
US11520070B2 (en) * 2018-02-01 2022-12-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Effective medium theory of acidized carbonate matrix resistivity employed to calculate the apparent geometric parameters of the wormholes
US10520407B2 (en) 2018-03-01 2019-12-31 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Nano-indentation tests to characterize hydraulic fractures
US11573159B2 (en) 2019-01-08 2023-02-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Identifying fracture barriers for hydraulic fracturing
WO2021016515A1 (en) 2019-07-24 2021-01-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Oxidizing gasses for carbon dioxide-based fracturing fluids
US11492541B2 (en) 2019-07-24 2022-11-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Organic salts of oxidizing anions as energetic materials
CN110609974B (en) * 2019-09-09 2022-09-16 西南石油大学 Acid fracturing fracture dynamic fluid loss calculation method considering wormhole expansion
CN113008750B (en) * 2019-12-19 2023-02-24 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for determining acid-etched fracture conductivity
WO2021138355A1 (en) 2019-12-31 2021-07-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Viscoelastic-surfactant fracturing fluids having oxidizer
US11352548B2 (en) 2019-12-31 2022-06-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Viscoelastic-surfactant treatment fluids having oxidizer
US11339321B2 (en) 2019-12-31 2022-05-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Reactive hydraulic fracturing fluid
US11268373B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-03-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Estimating natural fracture properties based on production from hydraulically fractured wells
US11365344B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-06-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation
US11473001B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-10-18 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation
US11473009B2 (en) 2020-01-17 2022-10-18 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Delivery of halogens to a subterranean formation
US11549894B2 (en) 2020-04-06 2023-01-10 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Determination of depositional environments
CN113494284B (en) * 2020-04-07 2023-06-30 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining hydraulic fracturing parameters of deep shale gas reservoir and storage medium
US11578263B2 (en) 2020-05-12 2023-02-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Ceramic-coated proppant
CN113818854B (en) * 2020-06-18 2023-08-08 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Composite acid fracturing method for improving diversion capacity of ultra-deep carbonate reservoir and application thereof
US11542815B2 (en) 2020-11-30 2023-01-03 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Determining effect of oxidative hydraulic fracturing
US11885790B2 (en) 2021-12-13 2024-01-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Source productivity assay integrating pyrolysis data and X-ray diffraction data
US11697759B1 (en) 2022-03-03 2023-07-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Inducing subterranean formation complexity

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3452818A (en) * 1968-01-10 1969-07-01 Exxon Production Research Co Acid fracturing process
US4100079A (en) * 1977-02-25 1978-07-11 Calgon Corporation Polymers for acid thickening
US5238067A (en) * 1992-05-18 1993-08-24 Mobil Oil Corporation Improved means of fracture acidizing carbonate formations
US6196318B1 (en) 1999-06-07 2001-03-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for optimizing acid injection rate in carbonate acidizing process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EA200500664A1 (en) 2005-08-25
AU2003287948A1 (en) 2004-05-04
ATE359430T1 (en) 2007-05-15
DK1552107T3 (en) 2007-08-20
CA2502196A1 (en) 2004-04-29
NO20051730L (en) 2005-05-13
EA006335B1 (en) 2005-12-29
US6749022B1 (en) 2004-06-15
DE60313199D1 (en) 2007-05-24
MXPA05003782A (en) 2005-06-08
EP1552107A1 (en) 2005-07-13
WO2004035988A1 (en) 2004-04-29
EP1552107B1 (en) 2007-04-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2502196C (en) Fracture stimulation process for carbonate reservoirs
EP1604095B1 (en) Propped fracture with high effective surface area
CA2547185C (en) Method for treating a subterranean formation
CA2860087C (en) A method of increasing efficiency in a hydraulic fracturing operation
US7784544B2 (en) Method of treating a subterranean formation using a rheology model for fluid optimization
US8691734B2 (en) Method of fracturing with phenothiazine stabilizer
Pournik et al. Effect of acid spending on etching and acid-fracture conductivity
CN106634922A (en) Self generated gas foam oil-displacing agent liquid and application and injection increase and yield increase method thereof
CA2849248C (en) Method of fracturing with phenothiazine stabilizer
US8327935B2 (en) Methods of use of a salt solution of monovalent and divalent cations in hydraulic fracturing
CN108559481A (en) A kind of low leak-off acidification oil well blockages relieving fluid and preparation method thereof
US7086469B2 (en) Increasing reaction efficiency of acetic acid
EP2158289B1 (en) Methods for stimulating oil or gas production
Bergstrom et al. Results of acid-in-oil emulsion stimulations of carbonate formations
US5979556A (en) Slow acidizing of geological formations
CN105370260B (en) A kind of spontaneous hydrochloric acid acidization tool suitable for carbonate reservoir
Fedorov et al. Gel Treatment of Injectors–Theory and Practice
GB2199408A (en) Method for controlling the viscosity of a fluid
NZ621852B2 (en) Compositions and methods of treating high temperature subterranean formations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKLA Lapsed

Effective date: 20170925