EP0342917A2 - Detergent composition - Google Patents

Detergent composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0342917A2
EP0342917A2 EP19890304919 EP89304919A EP0342917A2 EP 0342917 A2 EP0342917 A2 EP 0342917A2 EP 19890304919 EP19890304919 EP 19890304919 EP 89304919 A EP89304919 A EP 89304919A EP 0342917 A2 EP0342917 A2 EP 0342917A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
alkyl
chains
surfactant
sulphate
sodium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP19890304919
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0342917B1 (en
EP0342917A3 (en
EP0342917B2 (en
Inventor
Michael Hull
Dennis Giles
Reginald Vear Scowen
Bryan Cecil Smith
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10637052&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0342917(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0342917A2 publication Critical patent/EP0342917A2/en
Publication of EP0342917A3 publication Critical patent/EP0342917A3/en
Publication of EP0342917B1 publication Critical patent/EP0342917B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0342917B2 publication Critical patent/EP0342917B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/38Cationic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/83Mixtures of non-ionic with anionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/12Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
    • C11D1/14Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof derived from aliphatic hydrocarbons or mono-alcohols
    • C11D1/146Sulfuric acid esters
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/37Mixtures of compounds all of which are anionic
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/72Ethers of polyoxyalkylene glycols

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a detergent composition, in particular to a detergent composition for washing fabrics.
  • Fabric washing compositions contain, as an essential ingredient, a surfactant system whose role is to assist in the removal of soil from the fabric and its suspension in the wash liquor.
  • Suitable detergent active materials fall into a number of classes, including anionic, nonionic and cationic materials and marketed products contain materials selected from one or more of these classes.
  • anionic detergent active materials are the alkyl benzene sulphonates and these provide satisfactory results especially at high temperatures.
  • anionic surfactants There has been a desire to find alternative anionic surfactants for use in circumstances when alkyl benzene sulphonates are undesirable, but generally speaking the performance of other anionic detergent active materials is unsatisfactory.
  • anionic surfactants are the primary alcohol sulphates (PAS) otherwise known as alkyl sulphates.
  • PAS primary alcohol sulphates
  • the PAS derived from tallow fat has been recommended for use.
  • GB 1399966 discloses a detergent composition in which the surfactant system is a mixture of sodium tallow alkyl sulphate and a nonionic detergent active material.
  • tallow PAS suffers from the disadvantage that its performance at low temperatures is poor. With the trend towards lower wash temperatures this becomes a serious disadvantage.
  • PAS's have been proposed in the art.
  • GB 1399966 also discloses the possibility of using the PAS derived from coconut oil.
  • coconut PAS can perform better than tallow PAS at low temperatures, but under such circumstances its performance at higher temperatures is significantly poorer than the tallow derived material.
  • the replacement of tallow PAS by coconut PAS is not an attractive option.
  • An objective of the present invention is to provide a surfactant system based on PAS and which is able to give a good combination of performance levels at a range of temperatures.
  • the spread of chain lengths may be characterised by the presence of alkyl chains of twelve and eighteen carbon atoms in amounts or a ratio which does not occur when the alkyl chains come from a single natural source.
  • a detergent composition for washing fabrics the composition containing a surfactant system comprising an anionic surfactant the major ingredient of which is alkyl sulphate of mixed alkyl chain length such that at least 10% by weight of the alkyl chains present in the alkyl sulphate are C12 chains, at least 20% by weight of said alkyl chains are C18 chains and the weight ratio of C12 alkyl chains to C18 alkyl chains is in the range 9:4 to 1:6, preferably 2:1 to 1:5.
  • a surfactant system comprising an anionic surfactant the major ingredient of which is alkyl sulphate of mixed alkyl chain length such that at least 10% by weight of the alkyl chains present in the alkyl sulphate are C12 chains, at least 20% by weight of said alkyl chains are C18 chains and the weight ratio of C12 alkyl chains to C18 alkyl chains is in the range 9:4 to 1:6, preferably 2:1 to 1:5.
  • the percentages of C12 and C18 alkyl are typically 53% and 12%, amounting to a ratio over 3:1 (and indeed over 4:1) while in a tallow feedstock the alkyl chains can be 70% C18 alkyl with C12 almost entirely absent.
  • compositions of this invention preferably at least 15% by weight of the alkyl chains present in the alkyl sulphate are C12 while the C18 alkyl chains are at least 25% by weight of the alkyl chains in the alkyl sulphate.
  • the alkyl sulphate of mixed chain lengths is over 50% of the anionic surfactant present. Of course it may constitute the whole of the anionic surfactant present. Preferred is that the alkyl sulphate is at least 60% or even at least 80% of the anionic surfactant present.
  • Alkyl sulphates are also known as sulphated fatty alcohol salts.
  • the alkyl sulphates which are particularly envisaged for this invention, are normally produced from natural alcohols, such as those produced by reducing the glycerides of naturally occurring fats and oils.
  • Natural alcohols rich in C12 alkyl chains include those derived from babassu, coconut, ouri-coury and palm kernel while alcohols rich in C18 chains include those derived from beef tallow, kapok, olive, peanut, sesame, tall oil and teaseed.
  • Natural alcohols may be hardened, in which case unsaturated alkyl chains will be absent.
  • PAS from unhardened materials such as unhardened tallow alcohol, may be employed so that unsaturated chains are present.
  • C18 unsaturated chains will normally be oleyl but further unsaturation may be present e.g. linoleic chains may be present.
  • alkyl and unsaturated chains may be present. These chains will normally have between 8 and 18 carbon atoms. Materials which contain more than a small amount, i.e. more than about 2%, of chains containing more than 18 carbon atoms or less than 8 carbon atoms are less preferred.
  • PAS derived from a mixture of tallow and coconut in the weight ratio of from 3:1 to 1:3, most preferably from 2:1 to 1:2.
  • water-soluble salts of these anionic surfactants specifically the alkali metal (sodium or potassium) salts thereof.
  • compositions according to the invention include from 2% to 50%, such as from 4% to 30% by weight of the surfactant system.
  • compositions of the invention also preferably contain a nonionic surfactant.
  • a nonionic surfactant has an HLB of less than 10.5, although there is benefit even if the nonionic surfactant has an HLB greater than this.
  • Suitable nonionic surfactants which may be used are the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide.
  • Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C6 - C22) phenols-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of aliphatic (C8 - C18) primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylenediamine.
  • alkylene oxide adducts of fatty materials are used as the nonionic surfactants
  • the number of alkylene oxide groups per molecule has a considerable effect upon the HLB of the nonionic surfactant.
  • the chain length and nature of the fatty material is also influential, and thus the preferred number of alkylene oxide groups per molecule depends upon the nature and chain length of the fatty material.
  • the weight ratio between the anionic surfactant and the nonionic surfactant lies between 10:1 and 1:4, most preferably between 4:1 and 1:2.
  • the surfactant system may include other surfactant materials in addition to the specified alkyl sulphate and the above mentioned nonionic materials. These other surfactant materials may be selected from other anionic detergent active materials, zwitterionic or amphoteric detergent active materials or mixtures thereof.
  • the level of any such further surfactant materials will not exceed 50% of the composition. It is preferably not more than 40% of the total amount of surfactant in the composition, and may perhaps be not over 5% by weight of the whole composition.
  • the other anionic detergent active materials which may be present may be the usual water-soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals.
  • Suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl (C9 - C20) benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl (C10 - C15) benzene sulphonates; sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum; sodium coconut oil fatty monoglyceride sulphates and sulphonates; sodium and potassium salts of sulphuric acid esters of higher (C8 to C18) fatty alcohol-ethylene oxide reaction products; the reaction products of fatty acids such as coconut fatty acids esterified with isethionic acid and neutralised with sodium hydroxide; sodium and potassium salts of fatty acid amides of methyl taurine; alkane monosulphonates such as those derived by reacting alpha-olefins (C8-C20) with sodium bisulphite and those derived from reacting paraffins with SO2 and
  • compositions of the invention may contain a detergency builder material, this may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in the wash liquor and will preferably provide the compositions with other beneficial properties such as the generation of an alkaline pH and the suspension of soil removed from the fabric.
  • the amount of builder material in a composition of this invention may in particular be from 15% to 60% by weight of the composition.
  • Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders when present, include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, metaphosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates.
  • Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, orthophosphates and hexametaphosphates.
  • non-phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders when present, include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline and amorphous aluminosilicates. Specific examples include sodium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), potassium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), sodium and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.
  • organic detergency builders when present, include the alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and polyhydroxysulphonates. Specific examples include sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids and citric acid.
  • compositions according to the invention be alkaline, that is at the concentration of 1 g/l in distilled water at 25°C the pH should be at least 8, preferably at least 10.
  • the compositions may include a water-soluble alkaline salt. This salt may be a detergency builder or a non-building alkaline material.
  • ingredients which may be present in the composition include fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials, lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, peracid bleach precursors, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such as trichloroisocyanuric acid, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually present in very minor amounts, fluorescent agents, perfumes including deodorant perfumes, enzymes such as proteases, cellulases, amylases and lipase, germicides and colourants.
  • fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials
  • lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids
  • lather depressants oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perbor
  • the detergent compositions according to the invention may be prepared by a number of different methods according to their physical form.
  • they may be prepared by dry-mixing or coagglomeration.
  • a preferred physical form is a granule incorporating a detergency builder salt and this is most conveniently manufactured by spray-drying at least part of the composition.
  • a slurry is prepared containing the heat-insensitive components of the composition such as the surfactant system, builder material and filler salt.
  • the slurry is spray-dried to form base powder granules with which any solid heat-sensitive ingredients may be mixed, such ingredients including bleaches and enzymes.
  • the specified nonionic surfactants can be liquified by melting or solvent dissolution and sprayed onto the base powder granules, rather than including them in the slurry for spray-drying.
  • wash liquors were prepared in water having a hardness of 25° FH (equivalent to a free calcium ion concentration of 2.5 x 10 ⁇ 3 molar).
  • the wash liquor contained the equivalent of 6 g/l of a composition containing (by weight): Specified anionic surfactant 9% Specified nonionic surfactant 4% Sodium tripolyphosphate 23% Sodium carbonate 6% Sodium alkaline silicate 5.5% Sodium sulphate 30.8% Sodium chloride 2.93% Water balance
  • the sodium chloride was included as being equivalent in ionic strength to 5% sodium perborate monohydrate which would be present in practice.
  • the bleach is left out of these experiments in order to avoid confusion between detergency and bleaching effect in the interpretation of the results.
  • the wash liquors were used to wash a fabric load at liquor to cloth ratio of 50:1.
  • the load included a number of polyester monitors to which had previously been applied an amount of C14 tagged triolein. Measurement of the level of tagged triolein after washing, using standard radio­tracer techniques, gives an indication of the degree of detergency, i.e. soil removal, obtained.
  • wash time was 20 minutes with an agitation of 70 rpm. Washes were isothermal at temperatures as specified below.
  • the anionic surfactants used were as set out in the following table: Chain Length Distribution (%) Surfactant ⁇ C8 C12 C18 ⁇ C18 Origin ELFAN 2801 0 53 12 0 Coconut ELFAN KT5501 0 27 38 0 Coco/tallow mix SULFOPON T552 0 0 70 0 Tallow 1 - ex Akzo 2 - ex Henkel
  • nonionic surfactant was SYNPERONIC A7 (ex ICI) which is principally C13/C15 alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 7 moles of ethylene oxide. This nonionic surfactant has an HLB of 11.7.
  • nonionic surfactant was a mixture of 1 part SYNPERONIC A7 with 3 parts of SYNPERONIC A3, which is a similar material in which the alcohol is ethoxylated with an average of 3 moles ethylene oxide per molecule.
  • This nonionic surfactant mixture has an HLB of approximately 9.0.
  • Examples 1 to 3 were repeated but the levels and proportions of the surfactants were varied. The variations in composition and the results are set out in the list below in which "A3" and "A7” denote SYNPERONIC A3 and SYNPERONIC A7.
  • the wash temperature was 30°C in each instance, as with Examples 1 to 3.
  • wash liquors were prepared in water of 30°FH (equivalent to a free calcium ion concentration of 3.0 x 10 ⁇ 3 molar).
  • the wash liquor contained the equivalent of 6g/l of a composition containing (by weight): Specified surfactant 13% Zeolite 24% Polyacrylate 4% Sodium sulphate 20.6% Sodium carbonate 12% Water balance
  • Each wash liquor composition was employed to launder several test cloths in a Tergotometer, in a heat-up cycle to 60°C. After laundering the increase in reflectance of the test cloths was measured.
  • test cloths employed had various stains as follows: EMPA-104 : Stain of Indian ink and olive oil. WFK-10C : Stain predominantly wool fat, with minor amounts of kaolin, carbon black and iron oxide. PC-9 : Stain of ground nut oil, Indian ink and iron oxide.
  • the specified surfactant(s) consisted of some or all of hardened tallow alcohol sulphate (TAS) and/or coconut alcohol sulphate (CAS) and mixtures with nonionic surfactant (NI) which was SYNPERONIC A3, i.e. C13/C15 fatty alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 3 moles of ethylene oxide per molecule.
  • TAS hardened tallow alcohol sulphate
  • CAS coconut alcohol sulphate
  • NI nonionic surfactant
  • wash liquors were prepared in water having a hardness of 25° FH.
  • the wash liquors contained the equivalent of 6 g/l of a composition containing (by weight): Ingredient % by weight Specified anionic 9 SYNPERONIC A7 1 SYNPERONIC A3 3 Zeolite 26.6 Sodium sulphate 19.5 Sodium carbonate 14.0 Sodium silicate 1.3 Sodium chloride 3.0 Moisture balance to 100%
  • Example 32 the anionic surfactant was ELFAN KT550.
  • Example 33 the anionic surfactant was PAS derived from myristyl alcohol (i.e. C14 alcohol). The wash liquors were tested as in Examples 1 to 6, although a different grade of polyester was used for the test cloths.
  • This composition was used to wash a variety of stained fabrics under a variety of conditions, results being assessed by measuring the reflectance of treated monitors.
  • the anionic surfactants used were tallow PAS, coconut PAS and a 50/50 mixture of the two.

Abstract

A detergent composition for washing fabrics contains a surfactant system in which the major anionic surfactant is an alkyl sulphate of mixed alkyl chain length such that at least 10% by weight of the alkyl chains present in the alkyl sulphate are C₁₂ chains, at least 20% by weight of said alkyl chains are C₁₈ chains and the ratio of C₁₂ alkyl chains to C₁₈ alkyl chains is in the range 9:4 to 1:6.
Preferably nonionic surfactant of low HLB value (i.e. less than 10.5) is also present.

Description

  • This invention relates to a detergent composition, in particular to a detergent composition for washing fabrics.
  • Fabric washing compositions contain, as an essential ingredient, a surfactant system whose role is to assist in the removal of soil from the fabric and its suspension in the wash liquor. Suitable detergent active materials fall into a number of classes, including anionic, nonionic and cationic materials and marketed products contain materials selected from one or more of these classes.
  • The most widely used anionic detergent active materials are the alkyl benzene sulphonates and these provide satisfactory results especially at high temperatures. There has been a desire to find alternative anionic surfactants for use in circumstances when alkyl benzene sulphonates are undesirable, but generally speaking the performance of other anionic detergent active materials is unsatisfactory.
  • Among such alternative anionic surfactants are the primary alcohol sulphates (PAS) otherwise known as alkyl sulphates. The PAS derived from tallow fat has been recommended for use. Thus, GB 1399966 (The Procter & Gamble Company) discloses a detergent composition in which the surfactant system is a mixture of sodium tallow alkyl sulphate and a nonionic detergent active material. However, tallow PAS suffers from the disadvantage that its performance at low temperatures is poor. With the trend towards lower wash temperatures this becomes a serious disadvantage.
  • Other PAS's have been proposed in the art. Thus, for example, GB 1399966 referred to above, also discloses the possibility of using the PAS derived from coconut oil. We have appreciated that under some circumstances coconut PAS can perform better than tallow PAS at low temperatures, but under such circumstances its performance at higher temperatures is significantly poorer than the tallow derived material. Thus, while the consumer expects a single product to perform satisfactorily both at high and low temperatures, the replacement of tallow PAS by coconut PAS is not an attractive option.
  • An objective of the present invention is to provide a surfactant system based on PAS and which is able to give a good combination of performance levels at a range of temperatures.
  • We have found that this can be achieved with a PAS which has a wider spread of alkyl chain lengths than is the case when either tallow alone or coconut alone is the source of the alkyl chains. Use of a PAS derived from a mixture of sources can perform better than tallow PAS at low temperatures and better than coconut PAS at higher temperatures. Under some circumstances there is better performance than with either tallow or coconut PAS. Even though these may give better performance at certain temperatures, use of PAS with a wider spread of alkyl chain lengths can give good performance over a wider temperature range.
  • The spread of chain lengths may be characterised by the presence of alkyl chains of twelve and eighteen carbon atoms in amounts or a ratio which does not occur when the alkyl chains come from a single natural source.
  • Thus, according to a first aspect of this invention there is provided a detergent composition for washing fabrics, the composition containing a surfactant system comprising an anionic surfactant the major ingredient of which is alkyl sulphate of mixed alkyl chain length such that at least 10% by weight of the alkyl chains present in the alkyl sulphate are C₁₂ chains, at least 20% by weight of said alkyl chains are C₁₈ chains and the weight ratio of C₁₂ alkyl chains to C₁₈ alkyl chains is in the range 9:4 to 1:6, preferably 2:1 to 1:5.
  • For comparison in a coconut feedstock the percentages of C₁₂ and C₁₈ alkyl are typically 53% and 12%, amounting to a ratio over 3:1 (and indeed over 4:1) while in a tallow feedstock the alkyl chains can be 70% C₁₈ alkyl with C₁₂ almost entirely absent.
  • In compositions of this invention, preferably at least 15% by weight of the alkyl chains present in the alkyl sulphate are C₁₂ while the C₁₈ alkyl chains are at least 25% by weight of the alkyl chains in the alkyl sulphate.
  • As stated, the alkyl sulphate of mixed chain lengths is over 50% of the anionic surfactant present. Of course it may constitute the whole of the anionic surfactant present. Preferred is that the alkyl sulphate is at least 60% or even at least 80% of the anionic surfactant present.
  • Alkyl sulphates are also known as sulphated fatty alcohol salts. The alkyl sulphates, which are particularly envisaged for this invention, are normally produced from natural alcohols, such as those produced by reducing the glycerides of naturally occurring fats and oils.
  • Natural alcohols rich in C₁₂ alkyl chains include those derived from babassu, coconut, ouri-coury and palm kernel while alcohols rich in C₁₈ chains include those derived from beef tallow, kapok, olive, peanut, sesame, tall oil and teaseed.
  • Natural alcohols may be hardened, in which case unsaturated alkyl chains will be absent. However PAS from unhardened materials, such as unhardened tallow alcohol, may be employed so that unsaturated chains are present. C₁₈ unsaturated chains will normally be oleyl but further unsaturation may be present e.g. linoleic chains may be present.
  • In addition to the C₁₂ and C₁₈ chains in the PAS materials useful in the present invention, other alkyl and unsaturated chains may be present. These chains will normally have between 8 and 18 carbon atoms. Materials which contain more than a small amount, i.e. more than about 2%, of chains containing more than 18 carbon atoms or less than 8 carbon atoms are less preferred.
  • From the point of view of ready availability, it is preferred to use a PAS derived from a mixture of tallow and coconut in the weight ratio of from 3:1 to 1:3, most preferably from 2:1 to 1:2.
  • It is preferred to use the water-soluble salts of these anionic surfactants, specifically the alkali metal (sodium or potassium) salts thereof.
  • Preferred compositions according to the invention include from 2% to 50%, such as from 4% to 30% by weight of the surfactant system.
  • The compositions of the invention also preferably contain a nonionic surfactant. We have found it to be of advantage if such a nonionic surfactant has an HLB of less than 10.5, although there is benefit even if the nonionic surfactant has an HLB greater than this.
  • Suitable nonionic surfactants which may be used are the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C₆ - C₂₂) phenols-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of aliphatic (C₈ - C₁₈) primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylenediamine.
  • When alkylene oxide adducts of fatty materials are used as the nonionic surfactants, the number of alkylene oxide groups per molecule has a considerable effect upon the HLB of the nonionic surfactant. The chain length and nature of the fatty material is also influential, and thus the preferred number of alkylene oxide groups per molecule depends upon the nature and chain length of the fatty material.
  • We have found it of advantage that the weight ratio between the anionic surfactant and the nonionic surfactant lies between 10:1 and 1:4, most preferably between 4:1 and 1:2.
  • The surfactant system may include other surfactant materials in addition to the specified alkyl sulphate and the above mentioned nonionic materials. These other surfactant materials may be selected from other anionic detergent active materials, zwitterionic or amphoteric detergent active materials or mixtures thereof.
  • The level of any such further surfactant materials will not exceed 50% of the composition. It is preferably not more than 40% of the total amount of surfactant in the composition, and may perhaps be not over 5% by weight of the whole composition.
  • The other anionic detergent active materials which may be present may be the usual water-soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Examples of suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl (C₉ - C₂₀) benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl (C₁₀ - C₁₅) benzene sulphonates; sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum; sodium coconut oil fatty monoglyceride sulphates and sulphonates; sodium and potassium salts of sulphuric acid esters of higher (C₈ to C₁₈) fatty alcohol-ethylene oxide reaction products; the reaction products of fatty acids such as coconut fatty acids esterified with isethionic acid and neutralised with sodium hydroxide; sodium and potassium salts of fatty acid amides of methyl taurine; alkane monosulphonates such as those derived by reacting alpha-olefins (C₈-C₂₀) with sodium bisulphite and those derived from reacting paraffins with SO₂ and Cl₂ and then hydrolysing with a base to produce a random sulphate. A further anionic detergent active which may be included is soap, especially soap with a high proportion of unsaturated acyl chains.
  • The compositions of the invention may contain a detergency builder material, this may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in the wash liquor and will preferably provide the compositions with other beneficial properties such as the generation of an alkaline pH and the suspension of soil removed from the fabric. The amount of builder material in a composition of this invention may in particular be from 15% to 60% by weight of the composition.
  • Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, metaphosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, orthophosphates and hexametaphosphates.
  • Examples of non-phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline and amorphous aluminosilicates. Specific examples include sodium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), potassium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), sodium and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.
  • Examples of organic detergency builders, when present, include the alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and polyhydroxysulphonates. Specific examples include sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids and citric acid.
  • It is preferred that the compositions according to the invention be alkaline, that is at the concentration of 1 g/l in distilled water at 25°C the pH should be at least 8, preferably at least 10. To this end the compositions may include a water-soluble alkaline salt. This salt may be a detergency builder or a non-building alkaline material.
  • Apart from the ingredients already mentioned, a number of optional ingredients may also be present.
  • Examples of other ingredients which may be present in the composition include fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials, lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, peracid bleach precursors, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such as trichloroisocyanuric acid, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually present in very minor amounts, fluorescent agents, perfumes including deodorant perfumes, enzymes such as proteases, cellulases, amylases and lipase, germicides and colourants.
  • The detergent compositions according to the invention may be prepared by a number of different methods according to their physical form. In the case of granular products they may be prepared by dry-mixing or coagglomeration. A preferred physical form is a granule incorporating a detergency builder salt and this is most conveniently manufactured by spray-drying at least part of the composition. In this process a slurry is prepared containing the heat-insensitive components of the composition such as the surfactant system, builder material and filler salt. The slurry is spray-dried to form base powder granules with which any solid heat-sensitive ingredients may be mixed, such ingredients including bleaches and enzymes. The specified nonionic surfactants can be liquified by melting or solvent dissolution and sprayed onto the base powder granules, rather than including them in the slurry for spray-drying. The invention will now be described in more detail in the following non-limiting examples.
  • EXAMPLES 1 TO 6
  • Wash liquors were prepared in water having a hardness of 25° FH (equivalent to a free calcium ion concentration of 2.5 x 10⁻³ molar). The wash liquor contained the equivalent of 6 g/l of a composition containing (by weight):
    Specified anionic surfactant 9%
    Specified nonionic surfactant 4%
    Sodium tripolyphosphate 23%
    Sodium carbonate 6%
    Sodium alkaline silicate 5.5%
    Sodium sulphate 30.8%
    Sodium chloride 2.93%
    Water balance
  • The sodium chloride was included as being equivalent in ionic strength to 5% sodium perborate monohydrate which would be present in practice. The bleach is left out of these experiments in order to avoid confusion between detergency and bleaching effect in the interpretation of the results.
  • The wash liquors were used to wash a fabric load at liquor to cloth ratio of 50:1. The load included a number of polyester monitors to which had previously been applied an amount of C¹⁴ tagged triolein. Measurement of the level of tagged triolein after washing, using standard radio­tracer techniques, gives an indication of the degree of detergency, i.e. soil removal, obtained.
  • The wash time was 20 minutes with an agitation of 70 rpm. Washes were isothermal at temperatures as specified below.
  • The anionic surfactants used were as set out in the following table:
    Chain Length Distribution (%)
    Surfactant <C₈ C₁₂ C₁₈ <C₁₈ Origin
    ELFAN 280¹ 0 53 12 0 Coconut
    ELFAN KT550¹ 0 27 38 0 Coco/tallow mix
    SULFOPON T55² 0 0 70 0 Tallow
    1 - ex Akzo
    2 - ex Henkel
  • In Examples 1 to 6 the nonionic surfactant was SYNPERONIC A7 (ex ICI) which is principally C₁₃/C₁₅ alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 7 moles of ethylene oxide. This nonionic surfactant has an HLB of 11.7.
  • The results obtained were as follows:
    Example No Anionic Wash Temperature % Soil Removal
    1 ELFAN 280 30°C 24.9
    2 ELFAN KT550 30°C 30.0
    3 SULFOPON T55 30°C 24.9
    4 ELFAN 280 60°C 30.5
    5 ELFAN KT550 60°C 36.3
    6 SULFOPON T55 60°C 46.7
  • From these results it is apparent that at 60°C ELFAN KT550 outperforms the coconut only derived PAS, ELFAN 280. At the lower temperature of 30°C, ELFAN KT550 outperforms both the coconut only and the tallow derived materials.
  • EXAMPLES 7 TO 12
  • Examples 1 to 6 were repeated, except that the nonionic surfactant was a mixture of 1 part SYNPERONIC A7 with 3 parts of SYNPERONIC A3, which is a similar material in which the alcohol is ethoxylated with an average of 3 moles ethylene oxide per molecule. This nonionic surfactant mixture has an HLB of approximately 9.0.
  • The results were as follows:
    Example No Anionic Wash Temperature % Soil Removal
    7 ELFAN 280 30°C 39.0
    8 ELFAN KT550 30°C 38.7
    9 SULFOPON T55 30°C 30.4
    10 ELFAN 280 60°C 44.6
    11 ELFAN KT550 60°C 49.8
    12 SULFOPON T55 60°C 54.4
  • From these results it is apparent, as with Examples 1 to 6, that at 60°C ELFAN KT550 outperforms the coconut only derived PAS, ELFAN 280. At the lower temperature, ELFAN KT550 outperforms the tallow only derived PAS, SULFOPON T55, while not being significantly different in performance to the coconut only derived material.
  • A comparison of the results in Examples 7 to 12 with those in Examples 1 to 6 demonstrates the preference for utilising a nonionic surfactant with a lower HLB.
  • EXAMPLES 13 TO 24
  • Examples 1 to 3 were repeated but the levels and proportions of the surfactants were varied. The variations in composition and the results are set out in the list below in which "A3" and "A7" denote SYNPERONIC A3 and SYNPERONIC A7. The wash temperature was 30°C in each instance, as with Examples 1 to 3.
    Example No Anionic Nonionic % Soil Removal
    13 12% ELFAN 280 1.33% A7 + 4% A3 42.9
    14 12% ELFAN KT550 1.33% A7 + 4% A3 43.7
    15 12% SULFOPON T55 1.33% A7 + 4% A3 34.5
    16 9% ELFAN 280 2% A7 + 3% A3 37.3
    17 9% ELFAN KT550 2% A7 + 3% A3 36.8
    18 9% SULFOPON T55 2% A7 + 3% A3 32.3
    19 9% ELFAN 280 3% A7 + 3% A3 35.2
    20 9% ELFAN KT550 3% A7 + 3% A3 37.2
    21 9% SULFOPON T55 3% A7 + 3% A3 33.0
    22 9% ELFAN 280 4% A7 + 3% A3 34.3
    23 9% ELFAN KT550 4% A7 + 3% A3 36.1
    24 9% SULFOPON T55 4% A7 + 3% A3 33.2
  • It will be seen that in every case, the ELFAN KT550 outperformed the all tallow SULFOPON T55 and came close to or surpassed the all coconut ELFAN 280. In every case, this amounts to a soil removal which is better than the average of the figures for the all coconut and all tallow derived materials.
  • EXAMPLES 25 TO 31
  • Wash liquors were prepared in water of 30°FH (equivalent to a free calcium ion concentration of 3.0 x 10⁻³ molar). The wash liquor contained the equivalent of 6g/l of a composition containing (by weight):
    Specified surfactant 13%
    Zeolite 24%
    Polyacrylate 4%
    Sodium sulphate 20.6%
    Sodium carbonate 12%
    Water balance
  • Each wash liquor composition was employed to launder several test cloths in a Tergotometer, in a heat-up cycle to 60°C. After laundering the increase in reflectance of the test cloths was measured.
  • The test cloths employed had various stains as follows:
    EMPA-104 : Stain of Indian ink and olive oil.
    WFK-10C : Stain predominantly wool fat, with minor amounts of kaolin, carbon black and iron oxide.
    PC-9 : Stain of ground nut oil, Indian ink and iron oxide.
  • The specified surfactant(s) consisted of some or all of hardened tallow alcohol sulphate (TAS) and/or coconut alcohol sulphate (CAS) and mixtures with nonionic surfactant (NI) which was SYNPERONIC A3, i.e. C₁₃/C₁₅ fatty alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 3 moles of ethylene oxide per molecule.
  • Results were as follows:
    Example No Surfactant(s) Increase in Reflectance
    WFK-10C PC-9 EMPA-104
    25 100% TAS 0% CAS 17.1 18.9 21.5
    26 60% TAS 40% CAS 21.8 19.3 24.3
    27 40% TAS 60% CAS 23.7 19.7 22.2
    28 0% TAS 100% CAS 18.4 17.9 20.6
    29 20% NI 80% TAS 0% CAS 20.0 19.8 17.9
    30 20% NI 40% TAS 40% CAS 24.6 21.0 20.3
    31 20% NI 0% TAS 80% CAS 19.2 18.9 16.9
  • It will be seen that in each case the mixture of hardened tallow based and coconut based surfactants gave better detergency than either of them used alone.
  • EXAMPLES 32 AND 33
  • Wash liquors were prepared in water having a hardness of 25° FH. The wash liquors contained the equivalent of 6 g/l of a composition containing (by weight):
    Ingredient % by weight
    Specified anionic 9
    SYNPERONIC A7 1
    SYNPERONIC A3 3
    Zeolite 26.6
    Sodium sulphate 19.5
    Sodium carbonate 14.0
    Sodium silicate 1.3
    Sodium chloride 3.0
    Moisture balance to 100%
  • For Example 32 the anionic surfactant was ELFAN KT550. For Example 33 the anionic surfactant was PAS derived from myristyl alcohol (i.e. C₁₄ alcohol). The wash liquors were tested as in Examples 1 to 6, although a different grade of polyester was used for the test cloths.
  • Soil removal results were:
    Example 32 (ELFAN KT550) 28.1%
    Example 33 (C₁₄ PAS) 26.0%
  • EXAMPLE 34
  • The following formulation was prepared by spray drying a slurry of some of the ingredients to form a base powder and then subsequently spraying on some of the nonionic surfactant and post dosing the remaining ingredients.
    Ingredients Parts by weight
    Base powder
    Anionic (see below) 9.0
    SYNPERONIC A7 1.0
    Zeolite 26.6
    Sodium sulphate 19.5
    Sodium carbonate 2.0
    Moisture and miscellaneous 13.7 71.8
    Spray-on
    SYNPERONIC A3 1.0 1.0
    Post-dose
    Sodium silicate 1.3
    Sodium perborate monohydrate 8.0
    SYNPERONIC A3 2.0
    TAED granules 2.8
    Antifoam 3.0
    Enzyme 0.6
    Perfume 0.3
    Sodium carbonate 12.0 30.0
    Total 102.8
  • This composition was used to wash a variety of stained fabrics under a variety of conditions, results being assessed by measuring the reflectance of treated monitors. The anionic surfactants used were tallow PAS, coconut PAS and a 50/50 mixture of the two.
  • The benefits observed in previous Examples were again observed in this case also. Thus the 50/50 mixture generally gave better performance than the coconut PAS alone, while on a number of stains (notably dirty motor oil, and make-up on white cotton) the mixture out-performed both alternatives.

Claims (9)

1. A detergent composition for washing fabrics, the composition containing a surfactant system comprising an anionic surfactant the major ingredient of which is an alkyl sulphate of mixed alkyl chain length such that at least 10% by weight of the alkyl chains present in the alkyl sulphate are C₁₂ chains, at least 20% by weight of said alkyl chains are C₁₈ chains and the ratio of C₁₂ alkyl chains to C₁₈ alkyl chains is in the range 9:4 to 1:6.
2. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the said weight ratio is in the range 2:1 to 1:5.
3. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the alkyl sulphate of mixed chain length is at least 60% of the anionic surfactant.
4. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the alkyl sulphate of mixed chain length is at least 80% of the anionic surfactant.
5. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein at least 15% by weight of the alkyl chains are C₁₂ chains while at least 25% are C₁₈ chains.
6. A detergent composition according to claim 1 or claim 3 in which the alkyl sulphate is a mixture of tallow alkyl sulphate and coconut alkyl sulphate in a weight ratio of 3:1 to 1:3 preferably from 2:1 to 1:2.
7. A detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims which additionally contains a nonionic surfactant.
8. A detergent composition according to claim 7 in which the nonionic surfactant has an HLB of less than 10.5.
9. A detergent composition according to claim 7 or claim 8 in which the weight ratio of alkyl sulphate to nonionic surfactant is in the range 10:1 to 1:4.
EP89304919A 1988-05-17 1989-05-16 Detergent composition Expired - Lifetime EP0342917B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB888811672A GB8811672D0 (en) 1988-05-17 1988-05-17 Detergent composition
GB8811672 1988-05-17

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0342917A2 true EP0342917A2 (en) 1989-11-23
EP0342917A3 EP0342917A3 (en) 1990-09-12
EP0342917B1 EP0342917B1 (en) 2000-03-22
EP0342917B2 EP0342917B2 (en) 2006-10-25

Family

ID=10637052

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89304919A Expired - Lifetime EP0342917B2 (en) 1988-05-17 1989-05-16 Detergent composition

Country Status (14)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0342917B2 (en)
JP (1) JPH0813984B2 (en)
KR (1) KR960000198B1 (en)
AU (1) AU611292B2 (en)
BR (1) BR8902281A (en)
CA (1) CA1335488C (en)
DE (1) DE68929184T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2143454T5 (en)
GB (1) GB8811672D0 (en)
IN (1) IN168406B (en)
MY (1) MY105084A (en)
OA (1) OA09118A (en)
TR (1) TR23981A (en)
ZA (1) ZA893682B (en)

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0439316A2 (en) * 1990-01-22 1991-07-31 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
WO1992009676A1 (en) * 1990-12-03 1992-06-11 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Solid washing agents
US5298183A (en) * 1990-06-06 1994-03-29 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Soap powder compositions
WO1994013770A1 (en) * 1992-12-09 1994-06-23 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Water-soluble surfactant mixtures for liquid washing products
US5397507A (en) * 1990-08-03 1995-03-14 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for the production of washing- and cleaning-active granules
WO1995008616A1 (en) * 1993-09-23 1995-03-30 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Detergent mixtures and washing or cleaning agents with improved solvent properties
WO1995029981A1 (en) * 1994-05-02 1995-11-09 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Heterogeneous surface-active granulates
US5490954A (en) * 1993-07-05 1996-02-13 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Detergent composition or component containing anionic surfactant and process for its preparation
DE4432365A1 (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-03-14 Henkel Kgaa Anhydrous surfactant mixtures
EP0708633A1 (en) * 1993-07-12 1996-05-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Surfactant system
US5597794A (en) * 1990-07-05 1997-01-28 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for the production of detergent surfactant granules comprising a recycle step
EP0802957A1 (en) * 1995-01-12 1997-10-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition
WO1998018889A2 (en) * 1996-10-30 1998-05-07 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Anhydric surfactant mixtures
US6008181A (en) * 1996-04-16 1999-12-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Mid-Chain branched Alkoxylated Sulfate Surfactants
US6015781A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-01-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing selected mid-chain branched surfactants
US6046152A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-04-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid cleaning compositions containing selected mid-chain branched surfactants
US6060443A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-05-09 The Procter & Gamble Company Mid-chain branched alkyl sulfate surfactants
US6093856A (en) * 1996-11-26 2000-07-25 The Procter & Gamble Company Polyoxyalkylene surfactants
US6166262A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-12-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Surfactant manufacture
US6228829B1 (en) 1997-10-14 2001-05-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent compositions comprising mid-chain branched surfactants
US6242406B1 (en) 1997-10-10 2001-06-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Mid-chain branched surfactants with cellulose derivatives
US6281181B1 (en) 1997-10-14 2001-08-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Light-duty liquid or gel dishwashing detergent compositions comprising mid-chain branched surfactants
US6335312B1 (en) 1997-10-14 2002-01-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Personal cleansing compositions comprising mid-chain branched surfactants
US6448213B1 (en) 1997-10-10 2002-09-10 Procter & Gamble Company Mixed surfactant system
DE19500644B4 (en) * 1995-01-12 2010-09-09 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Spray-dried detergent or component thereof

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5000991B2 (en) * 2006-11-28 2012-08-15 三洋化成工業株式会社 Cleaning agent for electronics materials
CN106715663A (en) 2014-09-08 2017-05-24 宝洁公司 Detergent compositions containing a branched surfactant
WO2016040248A2 (en) 2014-09-08 2016-03-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing a branched surfactant

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1582765A (en) * 1967-11-08 1969-10-10
US3598747A (en) * 1963-05-01 1971-08-10 Ethyl Corp Alcohol mixtures adapted for use in making detergent sulfates
JPS4823643B1 (en) * 1968-04-13 1973-07-16

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PH10800A (en) * 1972-10-31 1977-09-07 Procter & Gamble Detergent composition
JPS62240397A (en) * 1986-04-11 1987-10-21 花王株式会社 Detergent composition
JPS62273300A (en) * 1986-05-21 1987-11-27 花王株式会社 Detergent composition

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3598747A (en) * 1963-05-01 1971-08-10 Ethyl Corp Alcohol mixtures adapted for use in making detergent sulfates
FR1582765A (en) * 1967-11-08 1969-10-10
JPS4823643B1 (en) * 1968-04-13 1973-07-16

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPIL Week 7329, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; AN 73-41306U & JP-B-48 023 643 (NIKS CO.) 16 July 1973 *

Cited By (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0439316A3 (en) * 1990-01-22 1992-03-04 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
EP0439316A2 (en) * 1990-01-22 1991-07-31 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
US5298183A (en) * 1990-06-06 1994-03-29 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Soap powder compositions
US5597794A (en) * 1990-07-05 1997-01-28 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for the production of detergent surfactant granules comprising a recycle step
US5397507A (en) * 1990-08-03 1995-03-14 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Process for the production of washing- and cleaning-active granules
US5399297A (en) * 1990-12-03 1995-03-21 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Solid detergents
WO1992009676A1 (en) * 1990-12-03 1992-06-11 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Solid washing agents
WO1994013770A1 (en) * 1992-12-09 1994-06-23 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Water-soluble surfactant mixtures for liquid washing products
US5490954A (en) * 1993-07-05 1996-02-13 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Detergent composition or component containing anionic surfactant and process for its preparation
EP0708633A4 (en) * 1993-07-12 1999-04-07 Procter & Gamble Surfactant system
EP0708633A1 (en) * 1993-07-12 1996-05-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Surfactant system
WO1995008616A1 (en) * 1993-09-23 1995-03-30 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Detergent mixtures and washing or cleaning agents with improved solvent properties
US5668100A (en) * 1993-09-23 1997-09-16 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Detergent mixtures and detergents or cleaning formulations with improved dissolving properties
US5824633A (en) * 1994-05-02 1998-10-20 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Heterogeneous surfactant granules
WO1995029981A1 (en) * 1994-05-02 1995-11-09 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Heterogeneous surface-active granulates
WO1996008550A1 (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-03-21 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Anhydrous surfactant mixtures
DE4432365A1 (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-03-14 Henkel Kgaa Anhydrous surfactant mixtures
EP0802957A1 (en) * 1995-01-12 1997-10-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition
EP0802957A4 (en) * 1995-01-12 1999-11-24 Procter & Gamble Detergent composition
DE19500644B4 (en) * 1995-01-12 2010-09-09 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Spray-dried detergent or component thereof
US6015781A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-01-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing selected mid-chain branched surfactants
US6008181A (en) * 1996-04-16 1999-12-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Mid-Chain branched Alkoxylated Sulfate Surfactants
US6087309A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-07-11 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid cleaning compositions containing selected mid-chain branched surfactants
US6046152A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-04-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid cleaning compositions containing selected mid-chain branched surfactants
US6320080B2 (en) 1996-04-16 2001-11-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Branched surfactant manufacture
US6133222A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-10-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing selected mid-chain branched surfactants
US6166262A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-12-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Surfactant manufacture
US6060443A (en) * 1996-04-16 2000-05-09 The Procter & Gamble Company Mid-chain branched alkyl sulfate surfactants
US6326348B1 (en) 1996-04-16 2001-12-04 The Procter & Gamble Co. Detergent compositions containing selected mid-chain branched surfactants
WO1998018889A2 (en) * 1996-10-30 1998-05-07 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Anhydric surfactant mixtures
WO1998018889A3 (en) * 1996-10-30 1998-06-18 Henkel Kgaa Anhydric surfactant mixtures
US6174849B1 (en) 1996-10-30 2001-01-16 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Water-free surfactant mixtures containing alcohol sulfates
US6093856A (en) * 1996-11-26 2000-07-25 The Procter & Gamble Company Polyoxyalkylene surfactants
US6242406B1 (en) 1997-10-10 2001-06-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Mid-chain branched surfactants with cellulose derivatives
US6448213B1 (en) 1997-10-10 2002-09-10 Procter & Gamble Company Mixed surfactant system
US6281181B1 (en) 1997-10-14 2001-08-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Light-duty liquid or gel dishwashing detergent compositions comprising mid-chain branched surfactants
US6335312B1 (en) 1997-10-14 2002-01-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Personal cleansing compositions comprising mid-chain branched surfactants
US6228829B1 (en) 1997-10-14 2001-05-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent compositions comprising mid-chain branched surfactants

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TR23981A (en) 1991-01-14
AU3475889A (en) 1989-11-23
OA09118A (en) 1991-10-31
JPH0218498A (en) 1990-01-22
ES2143454T5 (en) 2007-06-16
ES2143454T3 (en) 2000-05-16
GB8811672D0 (en) 1988-06-22
EP0342917B1 (en) 2000-03-22
EP0342917A3 (en) 1990-09-12
KR960000198B1 (en) 1996-01-03
DE68929184T2 (en) 2000-08-24
ZA893682B (en) 1991-01-30
MY105084A (en) 1994-08-30
DE68929184T3 (en) 2007-02-15
DE68929184D1 (en) 2000-04-27
CA1335488C (en) 1995-05-09
AU611292B2 (en) 1991-06-06
KR890017348A (en) 1989-12-15
IN168406B (en) 1991-03-30
EP0342917B2 (en) 2006-10-25
JPH0813984B2 (en) 1996-02-14
BR8902281A (en) 1990-01-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0342917B1 (en) Detergent composition
CA2034666C (en) Detergent composition
EP0377261B1 (en) Detergent composition
US4970028A (en) Composition for softening fabrics
EP1558717B1 (en) Laundry detergent composition
JPH0559394A (en) Detergent composition
AU624577B2 (en) Detergent compositions
GB2236538A (en) Detergent compositions
CA1331856C (en) Detergent compositions containing an alkylbenzene sulphonate and alcohol ethoxysulphate surfactant system
US6689735B2 (en) Detergent compositions
EP0336740B1 (en) Detergent composition
CA1318471C (en) Composition for softening fabrics
EP0346993A2 (en) Liquid detergent compositions
EP0423968A1 (en) Detergent composition
AU621374B2 (en) Liquid detergent compositions
EP0330337A1 (en) Detergent composition
EP0328361A2 (en) Detergent composition
EP0297373A2 (en) Granulated magnesium monoperoxyphthalate coated with fatty acid for prevention of dye damage of bleach sensitive fabrics
JPH0753999A (en) High-bulk-density granular detergent composition
JPH09501977A (en) Spray dry cleaning or cleaning composition or components thereof
EP0306493A1 (en) Detergent composition
GB2221694A (en) Detergent composition
CZ104097A3 (en) Washing and cleaning agent

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900731

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNILEVER PLC

Owner name: UNILEVER N.V.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19930506

APAA Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFN

APAB Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPE

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000322

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 20000322

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20000322

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000322

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68929184

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20000427

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2143454

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Effective date: 20001220

Opponent name: HENKEL KGAA

Effective date: 20001215

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: HENKEL KGAA * 20001220 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPAN

Effective date: 20001215

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20061025

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

ET3 Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: DC2A

Date of ref document: 20070123

Kind code of ref document: T5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20080526

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080630

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20080528

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20080529

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20090515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20090518

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090518

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090515

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080519

Year of fee payment: 20