EP0479146B1 - Use of propylene glycol monomethyl ether for dry cleaning - Google Patents
Use of propylene glycol monomethyl ether for dry cleaning Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0479146B1 EP0479146B1 EP19910116518 EP91116518A EP0479146B1 EP 0479146 B1 EP0479146 B1 EP 0479146B1 EP 19910116518 EP19910116518 EP 19910116518 EP 91116518 A EP91116518 A EP 91116518A EP 0479146 B1 EP0479146 B1 EP 0479146B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- solvent
- water
- dry cleaning
- soluble
- propylene glycol
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06L—DRY-CLEANING, WASHING OR BLEACHING FIBRES, FILAMENTS, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR MADE-UP FIBROUS GOODS; BLEACHING LEATHER OR FURS
- D06L1/00—Dry-cleaning or washing fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods
- D06L1/02—Dry-cleaning or washing fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods using organic solvents
Definitions
- This invention relates to the use of a solvent consisting of propylene glycol monomethyl ether and water for dry cleaning.
- 1,1,1-Trichloroethane and perchloroethylene which have been used in the prior art as solvents for dry cleaning, have the problem of polluting underground water, while some kinds of chlorofluorcarbons have the problem of destroying the ozone layer, and therefore there is currently a great need for rapid investigation of alternative substances.
- US-A-3,701,627 discloses a process for chemical cleaning of textiles with a solvent mixture consisting essentially of a halogenated hydrocarbon, an alcohol (optionally ethyleneglycol monomethylether) and water.
- JP-A-62 201977 reports a liquid for erasing a printing on a cloth, e.g., a hotel name, a hospital name etc. printed on various linens used in hospitals, hotels etc.
- the liquid is propyleneglycol monomethylether in combination with a reductive or oxidative bleaching agent such as hypochlorite, oxalic acid or citric acid.
- the present inventor has previously investigated the dry cleaning capabilities of 81 kinds of solvents (Journal of the Japan Research Association for textile End-use 27, 8 (1986), 352 - 359), but there was no solvent which met all requirements.
- a solvent for dry cleaning must meet several requirements such as detergency, handleability, safety, etc. More specifically, detergency is measured according to "solubility" and "dispersibility" of various types of soil, including oil-soluble soils such as skin fat, fat and oil, oil mist, etc.; water-soluble soils such as sweat, water-soluble foods; dirts such as sludge, dust, etc., the degree of "counter-contamination", that is, soil washed from clothing migrating back from the cleaning liquid to the clothing, and the degree of small surface tension of the solvent penetrating into the clothing and between the soils.
- oil-soluble soils such as skin fat, fat and oil, oil mist, etc.
- water-soluble soils such as sweat, water-soluble foods
- dirts such as sludge, dust, etc.
- counter-contamination that is, soil washed from clothing migrating back from the cleaning liquid to the clothing, and the degree of small surface tension of the solvent penetrating into the clothing and between the
- "handleability” is measured by easy drying of the article to be washed, long life, easy distillation and recovery of the solvent, suitability for machines with no corrosion of metals, easy workability and management with low odor, no remaining odor on the article to be washed, etc.
- "Safety” is measured by the degree of collapse of form of the article to be washed, denaturation of the article to be washed such as by yellow discoloration, run-off of dye, dissolution of auxiliary items such as buttons, high ignition point and flash point, low toxicity, etc.
- PM Propylene glycol monomethyl ether
- the present invention relates to dry cleaning by using a solvent consisting of PM and water.
- the water content is not more than 50 %, preferably 0.4 % to 25 % with respect to the total volume of the solvent for dry cleaning. It is preferable that the water content is not more than 25 %, since the shrinkage of a weft of a cotton remains by 5 %. It will be seen from the various test results described below that PM has vast possibilities.
- PM has both oil solubility and water solubility, and therefore is as effective on oil-soluble soils as the solvent of the prior art, and exhibits relatively better solubility for water-soluble soils, although inferior to water.
- the chlorine type solvents of the prior art use soap to aid in dissolving performance for water-soluble soils
- PM exhibited good detergency for water-soluble soils on its own.
- PM has a surface tension of 27.7, which is greater than that of petroleum (18 - 19) and CFC-113 (17.3), and comparable to perchloroethylene (32.3) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (25.6).
- a solvent with little counter-contamination is good in the finishing of dry cleaning, and can clean even with a liquid containing a great deal of contamination, and the number of distillations may be economically reduced.
- Counter-contamination is determined in consideration of the type of contamination (solute), the solvent and the kind of clothing, and therefore, the following test was carried out: as the water-soluble solute soy sauce (0.5 ml) and coffee (0.5 g) were used; as the dispersible solute carbon black (0.04 g) was used; as the oil-soluble solute waste oil after prolonged usage of gear oil (2 g) was used and, as the miscible solute, distillation residue of cleaning (0.04g) was employed.
- the test was conducted by immersing and stirring a cloth strip of 2.5 x 2.5 cm in 75 ml of a solvent containing each solute dissolved therein, and soaking it for 5 minutes. After air drying the reflectance of each cloth strip was measured by UV-200, and counter-contamination ratio was determined using the following formula. The results are shown in Table 2.
- Soy sauce is precipitated with a chlorine type solvent to float as a sol.
- the sol is hydrophilic, and therefore firmly adheres onto cotton, having a hydrophilic surface. It did not adhere to the wool or polyester, which have hydrophobic surfaces.
- soy sauce was completely dissolved in water and PM, no dying or counter-contamination was exhibited.
- Coffee In a chlorine type solvent and PM, the solute floats as solid fine particles. The particles adhered selectively with perchloroethylene and CFC-113. They did not adhere with trichloroethane and PM. On the other hand, dyeability was great with water.
- Carbon black This was not dissolved, but rather dispersed in all of the solvents, and there was no significant difference depending on the solvent.
- Waste oil This was completely dissolved in a chlorine type solvent, without counter-contamination. On the other hand, in water and PM the oil floated like a sol in the solution and since the sol is lipophilic it adhered onto the wool and polyester which have lipophilic surfaces.
- Distillation residue This is a mixture of water-soluble, dispersible and oil-soluble residues and further contains a soap for charge and therefore may be considered to approximate the conditions of practical dry cleaning.
- a chlorine type solvent counter-contamination on wool and cotton was marked, while the results with water were good. With PM, the results were between those of water and chlorine type solvents.
- PM exhibits low counter-contamination for all kinds of contamination and clothing, and therefore can be evaluated as an excellent solvent for dry cleaning.
- a specific feature of dry cleaning is that water absorptive fibres are prevented from form collapsing or shrinkage of washed products by swelling resulting from water washing. Shrinkage of the clothing when washed with PM or mixtures consisting of PM and water was tested.
- the flash point of PM is 36 to 38 °C and readiness of combustion is approximately equal to that of petroleum solvents.
- the flash point of a mixture with 50% water is 62 to 64 °C, showing that elevation of the flash point can be effected by mixing with water.
- test strip 1 x 2 cm each of iron, aluminium, and stainless steel was dipped in the solvent at room temperature for one week and then taken out and left to stand in air for 3 months for judgement of the degree of oxidation. In PM no change was observed at all for any of the test strips.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
- Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
Description
- This invention relates to the use of a solvent consisting of propylene glycol monomethyl ether and water for dry cleaning. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane and perchloroethylene, which have been used in the prior art as solvents for dry cleaning, have the problem of polluting underground water, while some kinds of chlorofluorcarbons have the problem of destroying the ozone layer, and therefore there is currently a great need for rapid investigation of alternative substances.
- US-A-3,701,627 discloses a process for chemical cleaning of textiles with a solvent mixture consisting essentially of a halogenated hydrocarbon, an alcohol (optionally ethyleneglycol monomethylether) and water.
JP-A-62 201977 reports a liquid for erasing a printing on a cloth, e.g., a hotel name, a hospital name etc. printed on various linens used in hospitals, hotels etc. The liquid is propyleneglycol monomethylether in combination with a reductive or oxidative bleaching agent such as hypochlorite, oxalic acid or citric acid. - The present inventor has previously investigated the dry cleaning capabilities of 81 kinds of solvents (Journal of the Japan Research Association for textile End-use 27, 8 (1986), 352 - 359), but there was no solvent which met all requirements.
- A solvent for dry cleaning must meet several requirements such as detergency, handleability, safety, etc. More specifically, detergency is measured according to "solubility" and "dispersibility" of various types of soil, including oil-soluble soils such as skin fat, fat and oil, oil mist, etc.; water-soluble soils such as sweat, water-soluble foods; dirts such as sludge, dust, etc., the degree of "counter-contamination", that is, soil washed from clothing migrating back from the cleaning liquid to the clothing, and the degree of small surface tension of the solvent penetrating into the clothing and between the soils. On the other hand, "handleability" is measured by easy drying of the article to be washed, long life, easy distillation and recovery of the solvent, suitability for machines with no corrosion of metals, easy workability and management with low odor, no remaining odor on the article to be washed, etc. "Safety" is measured by the degree of collapse of form of the article to be washed, denaturation of the article to be washed such as by yellow discoloration, run-off of dye, dissolution of auxiliary items such as buttons, high ignition point and flash point, low toxicity, etc.
- Propylene glycol monomethyl ether (hereinafter referred to as PM) has been known in the art as a solvent for home use (Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 20400/1988), solvent for floor use (Japanese Unexamined Patent Publications Nos. 112699/1988 and 168498/1988), but not yet as a solvent for dry cleaning. The present inventor has found that PM is suitable as a solvent for dry cleaning from the standpoint of the various criteria mentioned above to accomplish the present invention.
- The present invention relates to dry cleaning by using a solvent consisting of PM and water. In one embodiment, the water content is not more than 50 %, preferably 0.4 % to 25 % with respect to the total volume of the solvent for dry cleaning. It is preferable that the water content is not more than 25 %, since the shrinkage of a weft of a cotton remains by 5 %. It will be seen from the various test results described below that PM has vast possibilities.
- Water, perchloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, CFC-113 and PM were each employed as solvent, a distillation residue of a cleaning factory was used as the oil-soluble soil and instant coffee powder as the water-soluble soil solutes. The test was conducted by adding 5 ml of the above solvent to 0.5 g of the above solute in a test tube, leaving it to stand at 30 °C for 72 hours, and thereafter examining solubility with the naked eye.
Table 1 Solute Water Perchloro ethylene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane CFC-113 PM Oil-soluble X ○ ○ ○ ○ Water-soluble ○ X X X Δ ○: highly soluble, Δ: soluble, X: insoluble - From Table 1, it can be seen that PM has both oil solubility and water solubility, and therefore is as effective on oil-soluble soils as the solvent of the prior art, and exhibits relatively better solubility for water-soluble soils, although inferior to water. In other words, while the chlorine type solvents of the prior art use soap to aid in dissolving performance for water-soluble soils, PM exhibited good detergency for water-soluble soils on its own. Also, PM has a surface tension of 27.7, which is greater than that of petroleum (18 - 19) and CFC-113 (17.3), and comparable to perchloroethylene (32.3) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (25.6).
- A solvent with little counter-contamination is good in the finishing of dry cleaning, and can clean even with a liquid containing a great deal of contamination, and the number of distillations may be economically reduced.
- Counter-contamination is determined in consideration of the type of contamination (solute), the solvent and the kind of clothing, and therefore, the following test was carried out: as the water-soluble solute soy sauce (0.5 ml) and coffee (0.5 g) were used; as the dispersible solute carbon black (0.04 g) was used; as the oil-soluble solute waste oil after prolonged usage of gear oil (2 g) was used and, as the miscible solute, distillation residue of cleaning (0.04g) was employed. The test was conducted by immersing and stirring a cloth strip of 2.5 x 2.5 cm in 75 ml of a solvent containing each solute dissolved therein, and soaking it for 5 minutes. After air drying the reflectance of each cloth strip was measured by UV-200, and counter-contamination ratio was determined using the following formula.
- From Table 2, the following facts can be seen.
- Soy sauce: Soy sauce is precipitated with a chlorine type solvent to float as a sol. The sol is hydrophilic, and therefore firmly adheres onto cotton, having a hydrophilic surface. It did not adhere to the wool or polyester, which have hydrophobic surfaces. On the other hand, since the soy sauce was completely dissolved in water and PM, no dying or counter-contamination was exhibited.
- Coffee: In a chlorine type solvent and PM, the solute floats as solid fine particles. The particles adhered selectively with perchloroethylene and CFC-113. They did not adhere with trichloroethane and PM. On the other hand, dyeability was great with water.
- Carbon black: This was not dissolved, but rather dispersed in all of the solvents, and there was no significant difference depending on the solvent.
- Waste oil: This was completely dissolved in a chlorine type solvent, without counter-contamination. On the other hand, in water and PM the oil floated like a sol in the solution and since the sol is lipophilic it adhered onto the wool and polyester which have lipophilic surfaces.
- Distillation residue: This is a mixture of water-soluble, dispersible and oil-soluble residues and further contains a soap for charge and therefore may be considered to approximate the conditions of practical dry cleaning. In a chlorine type solvent counter-contamination on wool and cotton was marked, while the results with water were good. With PM, the results were between those of water and chlorine type solvents.
- From the results as described above, PM exhibits low counter-contamination for all kinds of contamination and clothing, and therefore can be evaluated as an excellent solvent for dry cleaning.
- A specific feature of dry cleaning is that water absorptive fibres are prevented from form collapsing or shrinkage of washed products by swelling resulting from water washing. Shrinkage of the clothing when washed with PM or mixtures consisting of PM and water was tested.
- In a cup for laundermeter in which 10 steel balls and 100 ml of solvent were placed test cloths with a thread mark of 10 x 10 cm attached at the centre of the cloth strips of 12 cm x 12 cm of cotton, hemp, wool were added sheet by sheet, soaked at normal temperature for 45 minutes, then dried by flat drying, after which the length between the thread marks was measured. The results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 PM 100% PM 75% + water 25% PM 50% + water 50% Cotton Warp 10.00 cm 10.00 cm 10.00 cm Weft 9.95 9.95 9.90 Hemp Warp 10.00 10.00 10.00 Weft 10.00 9.95 9.95 Wool Warp 10.00 10.00 10.00 Weft 9.90 9.80 9.80 - As can be seen from Table 3, weft shrinkage was within 2%, but what is to be noted is that there was no great shrinkage at all even when water was added at 50%. This is due to the good hydratability of PM. In the case of 1,1,1-trichloroethane, perchloroethylene, when the water in the article to be washed mixes with the solvent, the water cannot be hydrated with the solvent and may cause the article to shrink, but PM will not give rise to such shrinkage, as shown in Table 3. However, it is preferred that the water content is not more than 25% in order that the shrinkage in any direction of the cotton does not exceed 5%.
- The flash point of PM is 36 to 38 °C and readiness of combustion is approximately equal to that of petroleum solvents. However, the flash point of a mixture with 50% water is 62 to 64 °C, showing that elevation of the flash point can be effected by mixing with water.
- In the dry cleaning process, if a long time is required for the drying of the article to be washed, work efficiency will be markedly lowered. This test was conducted by piling 4 sheets of cotton cloths of 5 x 5 cm, adding by drops 0.125 g of each solvent and measuring the vaporization rate of the solvent. The results compared the vaporization rates of the respective solvents with that of perchloroethylene (1) as shown in Table 4.
Table 4 Perchloroethylene 1,1,1-trichloroethane CFC-113 PM Using cotton cloth 1 3.929 14.643 0.386 Solvent alone 1 4.444 13.667 0.244 - Although PM alone is slow to vaporize, the difference is not so great when accompanied with the article to be washed such as cotton cloth. Slow vaporization rate in the case of solvent alone is desirable, because natural loss of the solvent during storage is small.
- A test strip 1 x 2 cm each of iron, aluminium, and stainless steel was dipped in the solvent at room temperature for one week and then taken out and left to stand in air for 3 months for judgement of the degree of oxidation. In PM no change was observed at all for any of the test strips.
- The PM of the present invention has the following advantages when used as a solvent for dry cleaning:
- (1) It is effective for washing both oil-soluble and water-soluble contaminants.
- (2) Counter-contamination is little.
- (3) No soap is required.
- (4) The life of the solvent is long.
- (5) There is no corrosion of cleaning machine, etc.
- (6) Mixing with water is possible.
Claims (6)
- Use of a solvent consisting of propylene glycol monomethyl ether and water for dry cleaning.
- Use according to claim 1, wherein water is present in a concentration of 0.4 to 50 vol.% of the solvent.
- Use according to claim 2, wherein water is present in a concentration of 25 vol.% of the solvent.
- Process for dry cleaning comprising soaking an article to be washed with a solvent consisting of propylene glycol monomethyl ether and water and drying said article thereafter.
- Process according to claim 4, wherein the solvent contains water in a concentration of 0.4 to 50 vol.%, preferably 0.4 to 25 vol.%, of the solvent.
- Process according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the article is soaked with said solvent for 5 to 45 minutes.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP26300290A JP2970933B2 (en) | 1990-10-02 | 1990-10-02 | Cleaning agent for dry cleaning |
JP263002/90 | 1990-10-02 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0479146A2 EP0479146A2 (en) | 1992-04-08 |
EP0479146A3 EP0479146A3 (en) | 1992-11-19 |
EP0479146B1 true EP0479146B1 (en) | 1996-12-18 |
Family
ID=17383531
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19910116518 Expired - Lifetime EP0479146B1 (en) | 1990-10-02 | 1991-09-27 | Use of propylene glycol monomethyl ether for dry cleaning |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0479146B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2970933B2 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69123683T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2097173T3 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6670317B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2003-12-30 | Procter & Gamble Company | Fabric care compositions and systems for delivering clean, fresh scent in a lipophilic fluid treatment process |
US6706076B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-03-16 | Procter & Gamble Company | Process for separating lipophilic fluid containing emulsions with electric coalescence |
US6818021B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-11-16 | Procter & Gamble Company | Domestic fabric article refreshment in integrated cleaning and treatment processes |
US6840963B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-01-11 | Procter & Gamble | Home laundry method |
US6840069B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-01-11 | Procter & Gamble Company | Systems for controlling a drying cycle in a drying apparatus |
US6855172B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2005-02-15 | Dry, Inc. | Dry-cleaning article, composition and methods |
US6855173B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-02-15 | Procter & Gamble Company | Use of absorbent materials to separate water from lipophilic fluid |
US6930079B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-08-16 | Procter & Gamble Company | Process for treating a lipophilic fluid |
US6939837B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-09-06 | Procter & Gamble Company | Non-immersive method for treating or cleaning fabrics using a siloxane lipophilic fluid |
US7345016B2 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2008-03-18 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Photo bleach lipophilic fluid cleaning compositions |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6036727A (en) * | 1995-06-05 | 2000-03-14 | Creative Products Resource, Inc. | Anhydrous dry-cleaning compositions containing polysulfonic acid, and dry-cleaning kits for delicate fabrics |
US5712237A (en) * | 1995-11-27 | 1998-01-27 | Stevens; Edwin B. | Composition for cleaning textiles |
US7008458B2 (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2006-03-07 | Hayday William A | Biodegradable ether dry cleaning solvent |
US6273919B1 (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2001-08-14 | Rynex Holdings Ltd. | Biodegradable ether dry cleaning solvent |
US5888250A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 1999-03-30 | Rynex Holdings Ltd. | Biodegradable dry cleaning solvent |
AU3713800A (en) | 1999-02-26 | 2000-09-14 | Rynex Holdings, Ltd. | Solvent purifying system |
CA2369435A1 (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2000-10-26 | Daniel C. Conrad | Method and composition for reduced water damage laundry care |
DE60030305T2 (en) * | 1999-10-15 | 2007-08-23 | Timothy L. Plainfield Racette | CLEANING SYSTEM WITH AN ORGANIC AND UNDER PRESSURE LIQUID SOLVENT |
US6673764B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-01-06 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Visual properties for a wash process using a lipophilic fluid based composition containing a colorant |
US6691536B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-02-17 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Washing apparatus |
US6706677B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-03-16 | Procter & Gamble Company | Bleaching in conjunction with a lipophilic fluid cleaning regimen |
US6564591B2 (en) | 2000-07-21 | 2003-05-20 | Procter & Gamble Company | Methods and apparatus for particulate removal from fabrics |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR1544834A (en) * | 1967-09-29 | 1968-11-08 | Geigy Ag J R | Cleansing compositions |
DE2004232C3 (en) * | 1970-01-30 | 1978-10-05 | Henkel Kgaa, 4000 Duesseldorf | Process for dry cleaning of textiles |
JPH0689281B2 (en) * | 1985-04-02 | 1994-11-09 | 株式会社リコー | Ink cleaner for printing machine |
JPS62201977A (en) * | 1986-02-28 | 1987-09-05 | Toyo Ink Mfg Co Ltd | Print erasing liquid |
-
1990
- 1990-10-02 JP JP26300290A patent/JP2970933B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1991
- 1991-09-27 DE DE1991623683 patent/DE69123683T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1991-09-27 EP EP19910116518 patent/EP0479146B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-09-27 ES ES91116518T patent/ES2097173T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6855172B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2005-02-15 | Dry, Inc. | Dry-cleaning article, composition and methods |
US8398721B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2013-03-19 | Dry, Inc. | Dry-cleaning article, composition and methods |
US7959686B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2011-06-14 | Dry, Inc. | Dry-cleaning article, composition and methods |
US7744654B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2010-06-29 | Dry, Inc. | Dry-cleaning article, composition and methods |
US7446083B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2008-11-04 | Dry, Inc. | Dry-cleaning article, composition and methods |
US7300467B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2007-11-27 | Dry, Inc. | Dry-cleaning article, composition and methods |
US6840963B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-01-11 | Procter & Gamble | Home laundry method |
US6855173B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-02-15 | Procter & Gamble Company | Use of absorbent materials to separate water from lipophilic fluid |
US6930079B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-08-16 | Procter & Gamble Company | Process for treating a lipophilic fluid |
US6939837B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-09-06 | Procter & Gamble Company | Non-immersive method for treating or cleaning fabrics using a siloxane lipophilic fluid |
US6998377B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2006-02-14 | Procter & Gamble Company | Process for treating a lipophilic fluid |
US7063750B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2006-06-20 | The Procter & Gamble Co. | Domestic fabric article refreshment in integrated cleaning and treatment processes |
US6840069B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2005-01-11 | Procter & Gamble Company | Systems for controlling a drying cycle in a drying apparatus |
US6670317B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2003-12-30 | Procter & Gamble Company | Fabric care compositions and systems for delivering clean, fresh scent in a lipophilic fluid treatment process |
US7704937B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2010-04-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Composition comprising an organosilicone/diol lipophilic fluid for treating or cleaning fabrics |
US6828292B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-12-07 | Procter & Gamble Company | Domestic fabric article refreshment in integrated cleaning and treatment processes |
US6818021B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-11-16 | Procter & Gamble Company | Domestic fabric article refreshment in integrated cleaning and treatment processes |
US6706076B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2004-03-16 | Procter & Gamble Company | Process for separating lipophilic fluid containing emulsions with electric coalescence |
US7345016B2 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2008-03-18 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Photo bleach lipophilic fluid cleaning compositions |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH04142398A (en) | 1992-05-15 |
JP2970933B2 (en) | 1999-11-02 |
EP0479146A3 (en) | 1992-11-19 |
DE69123683D1 (en) | 1997-01-30 |
EP0479146A2 (en) | 1992-04-08 |
ES2097173T3 (en) | 1997-04-01 |
DE69123683T2 (en) | 1997-05-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0479146B1 (en) | Use of propylene glycol monomethyl ether for dry cleaning | |
EP0435943B2 (en) | USE OF (C-1 to C-5) ALKYL ESTERS OF ALIPHATIC (C-8 to C-22) MONOCARBOXYLIC ACIDS FOR REMOVING INKS AND THE LIKE FROM OFFSET PRINTING MACHINES | |
ES2312449T3 (en) | SOLVENT FOR DRY CLEANING THAT I WILL UNDERSTAND BIODEGRADABLE ETER. | |
US4664721A (en) | Printing screen cleaning and reclaiming compositions | |
US6645930B1 (en) | Clean room wipes for neutralizing caustic chemicals | |
US5380453A (en) | Composition comprising alkyl esters of aliphatic (C8 -C22) monocarboxylic acids and oil in water emulsifier | |
US5814163A (en) | Composition and process for cleaning inks form various surfaces including printing plates | |
DE2004232C3 (en) | Process for dry cleaning of textiles | |
EP0081355B1 (en) | Method and use of a composition for cleaning and/or reclaiming printing screens | |
JP4820294B2 (en) | Fiber scouring composition and fiber scouring method | |
JPS5861194A (en) | Dry cleaning method and cleaning agent therefor | |
JP3433156B2 (en) | Pre-moistened cleaning wiper | |
US5792278A (en) | Process for cleaning inks from various surfaces including printing plates | |
DE60016944T2 (en) | LIQUID CLEANING COMPOUND COMPOSITIONS HAVING HIGH AMINO OXIDE CONTENT | |
JP3311934B2 (en) | Cleaning method | |
US5634947A (en) | Method for cleaning clothes with propylene glycol monomethyl ether | |
JPH1018177A (en) | Highly concentrated scouring agent composition | |
US5308550A (en) | Cleaning, wetting agent and solvent | |
US4193765A (en) | Drycleaning assembly and method for removing impurities and residual moisture from an organic drycleaning solvent | |
JP3209306B2 (en) | How to wash clothing | |
JP2006257162A (en) | Pretreatment agent for drycleaning, and pretreatment method for drycleaning | |
DE4238424A1 (en) | Cleaning wetting and solvent | |
DE2161602C3 (en) | Use of reaction products as emulsifiers for dry cleaning and solvent fulling | |
CA2013051A1 (en) | Liquid for cleaning off ink from printing machines | |
JPH06136581A (en) | Detergent composition |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19930503 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19931220 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69123683 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19970130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: BUECHEL & PARTNER AG PATENTBUERO |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: 0403;36MIFSTUDIO CONS. BREVETTUALE S.R.L |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2097173 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19990920 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 19990921 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19990922 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 19990923 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 19990928 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 19990930 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20000918 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000927 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000928 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 20000929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000930 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000930 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000930 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20001006 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: MIHAMA CORP. Effective date: 20000930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20010401 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20000927 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 91116518.1 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20010401 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020501 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20011011 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050927 |