EP0488430A2 - Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating - Google Patents

Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0488430A2
EP0488430A2 EP91202181A EP91202181A EP0488430A2 EP 0488430 A2 EP0488430 A2 EP 0488430A2 EP 91202181 A EP91202181 A EP 91202181A EP 91202181 A EP91202181 A EP 91202181A EP 0488430 A2 EP0488430 A2 EP 0488430A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cobalt
solution
salt
conversion coating
substrate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP91202181A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0488430B1 (en
EP0488430A3 (en
Inventor
Matthias P. Schriever
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Boeing Co
Original Assignee
Boeing Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Boeing Co filed Critical Boeing Co
Publication of EP0488430A2 publication Critical patent/EP0488430A2/en
Publication of EP0488430A3 publication Critical patent/EP0488430A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0488430B1 publication Critical patent/EP0488430B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/68Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous solutions with pH between 6 and 8
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/82After-treatment
    • C23C22/83Chemical after-treatment

Definitions

  • This environmental-quality invention is in the field of chemical conversion coatings formed on metal substrates, for example, on aluminum substrates. More particularly, one aspect of the invention is a new type of oxide coating (which I refer to as a "cobalt conversion coating") which is chemically formed on metal substrates.
  • the invention enhances the quality of the environment of mankind by contributing to the maintenance of air and water quality.
  • chemical conversion coatings are formed chemically by causing the surface of the metal to be "converted" into a tightly adherent coating, all or part of which consists of an oxidized form of the substrate metal.
  • Chemical conversion coatings can provide high corrosion resistance as well as strong bonding affinity for paint.
  • the industrial application of paint (organic finishes) to metals generally requires the use of a chemical conversion coating, particularly when the performance demands are high.
  • aluminum protects itself against corrosion by forming a natural oxide coating, the protection is not complete.
  • aluminum alloys particularly the high-copper 2000-series aluminum alloys, such as alloy 2024-T3, corrode much more rapidly than pure aluminum.
  • the first is by anodic oxidation (anodization) in which the aluminum component is immersed in a chemical bath, such as a chromic or sulfuric acid bath, and an electric current is passed through the aluminum component and the chemical bath.
  • a chemical bath such as a chromic or sulfuric acid bath
  • an electric current is passed through the aluminum component and the chemical bath.
  • the resulting conversion coating on the surface of the aluminum component offers resistance to corrosion and a bonding surface for organic finishes.
  • the second type of process is by chemically producing a conversion coating, which is commonly referred to as a chemical conversion coating, by subjecting the aluminum component to a chemical solution, such as a chromic acid solution, but without using an electric current in the process.
  • a chemical solution such as a chromic acid solution
  • the chemical solution may be applied by immersion application, by manual application, or by spray application.
  • the resulting conversion coating on the surface of the aluminum component offers resistance to corrosion and a bonding surface for organic finishes.
  • the present invention relates to this second type of process for producing chemical conversion coatings.
  • the chemical solution may be applied by immersion application, by various types of manual application, or by spray application.
  • chromic acid process for forming chemical conversion coatings on aluminum substrates is described in various embodiments in Ostrander et al. U.S. Patent 2,796,370 and Ostrander et al. U.S. Patent 2,796,371, in military process specification MIL-C-5541, and in Boeing Process Specification BAC 5719.
  • These chromic acid chemical conversion baths contain hexavalent chromium, fluorides, and cyanides, all of which present significant environmental as well as health and safety problems.
  • chromic acid conversion bath such as ALODINE 1200
  • Cr03 - "chromic acid” hexavalent chromium
  • NaF - sodium fluoride KBF4 - potassium tetrafluoroborate
  • K2ZrF6 - potassium hexafluorozirconate K3Fe(CN)6 - potassium ferricyanide
  • HNO3 - nitric acid for pH control
  • Chromic acid conversion films as formed on aluminum substrates, meet a 168 hours corrosion resistance criterion, but they primarily serve as a surface substrate for paint adhesion. Because of their relative thinness and low coating weights (40-150 milligrams/ft2), chromic acid conversion coatings do not cause a fatigue life reduction in the aluminum structure.
  • FIGS. 1-20 are photomicrographs (scanning electron microscope operated at 20 KV) of aluminum alloy 2024-T3 test panels with cobalt conversion coatings made by the invention.
  • FIGS. 1-16 show surface views and fracture views of unsealed cobalt conversion coatings.
  • the photomicrographs of FIGS. 1-16 reveal a highly porous surface oxide (unsealed cobalt conversion coatings) with a thickness range of about 0.12 to 0.14 micron (1200 to 1400 Angstroms).
  • FIGS. 1-4 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 20 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution.
  • FIGS. 5-8 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 30 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution.
  • FIGS. 9-12 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 50 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution.
  • FIGS. 13-16 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 60 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution. There were only minor differences in oxide coating thickness between these immersion times. This suggests that at any given bath operating temperature, the oxide structure becomes self limiting.
  • FIGS. 17-20 show surface views and fracture views of a sealed cobalt conversion coating.
  • FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a cobalt conversion coating 130 of the invention.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 130.
  • the top of oxide coating 130 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles.
  • the porosity of oxide coating 130 gives excellent paint adhesion results.
  • This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 20 minutes.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 1.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 130.
  • FIG. 2 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 1.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of a cobalt conversion coating 130 of the invention.
  • the fractured cross section of the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 132.
  • This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 20 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 130.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 4 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 3 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 130 of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 3.
  • the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 132.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • Oxide coating 130 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 5 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing another cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 150.
  • the top of oxide coating 150 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles.
  • This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 30 minutes.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 6 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 5.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 150.
  • FIG. 6 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 5.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 7 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention.
  • the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 152.
  • This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 30 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 150.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 8 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 7 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 7.
  • the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 152.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • Oxide coating 150 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 9 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a cobalt conversion coating 190 of the invention.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 190.
  • the top of oxide coating 190 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles.
  • This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 50 minutes.
  • the oblong object indicated by reference numeral 192 is an impurity, believed to be a piece of oxidized material, on top of oxide coating 190.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 10 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 9.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 190.
  • FIG. 10 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 9.
  • the roundish object indicated by reference numeral 192a is an unidentified impurity on top of oxide coating 190.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 11 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of a cobalt conversion coating 190 of the invention.
  • the fractured cross section of the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 194.
  • This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 50 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 190.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 12 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 11 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 190 of the invention.
  • FIG. 12 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 11.
  • the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 194.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • Oxide coating 190 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 13 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing a cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 230.
  • the top of oxide coating 230 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles.
  • This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 60 minutes.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 14 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 13.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 230.
  • FIG. 14 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 13.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 15 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention.
  • the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 232.
  • This test panel was immersed in the coating bath for 60 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 230.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 16 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 15 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention.
  • FIG. 16 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 15.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • Oxide coating 150 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 17 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing a sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of sealed oxide coating 270.
  • This test panel was immersed in a sealing solution for 20 minutes.
  • Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating, the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of immersion in a sealing solution.
  • the partial sealing of the oxide coating gives reduced paint adhesion results, but excellent corrosion resistance performance.
  • the whitish areas identified by reference numeral 274 are believed to be impurities from the sealing solution.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 18 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 17.
  • the photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of sealed oxide coating 270.
  • FIG. 18 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 17.
  • Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating, the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of immersion in a sealing solution.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 19 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention.
  • the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 272. This test panel was immersed in the sealing bath for 20 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 270.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 20 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 19 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention.
  • FIG. 20 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 19.
  • the white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • Sealed oxide coating 270 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • the first class is a cobalt conversion coating consisting of an oxide structure in unsealed condition and suitable for use in service where paint adhesion is especially important.
  • the second class is a cobalt conversion coating consisting of an oxide structure in sealed condition and suitable for use in service where bare metal corrosion resistance performance is desired.
  • cobalt coordination complexes are formed where the portion of the complex which includes the ligand (the bracketed portion in equations (1)-(5)) is negatively charged, i.e., (8) [Co(NO2)6]3 ⁇ and the complete complex is (9) Me3[Co(NO2)6] where Me corresponds to Na, K, or Li (alkali metal ions).
  • This cobalt nitrite complex bath chemistry (equation (1)) has a distinct advantage over the previously described cobalt hexammine complex chemistry (equation (6)) in that pH control of the cobalt hexanitrite complex bath is not required.
  • cobalt-III hexanitrite complexes are capable of forming oxide structures on aluminum substrates.
  • the oxidizing ability of the cobalt-III hexanitrite complex is believed to be responsible for the formation of the observed oxide films (which I refer to as "cobalt conversion coatings") on aluminum substrates.
  • the formation of oxide structures has been confirmed by instrumental analysis (Auger analysis and electron microscopy) of the coating.
  • the photomicrographs in FIGS. 1-20 illustrate the appearance of the cobalt conversion coating of the invention.
  • cobalt salts and metal nitrite salts are operable for cobalt complexing.
  • cobalt-II salts which are operable in water solution are: cobalt nitrate, Co(NO3)2 ⁇ 6H2O; cobalt chloride, CoCl2 ⁇ 6H2O; cobaltous sulfate, CoSO4; cobaltous acetate, Co(CH3COO)2 ⁇ 4H2O; and cobaltous basic carbonate, 2CoCO3 ⁇ Co(OH)2 ⁇ H2O.
  • a nitrite salt such as NaNO2, KNO2, or LiNO2.
  • cobalt-II salts may be used if they possess a minimum solubility in water or in a water solution containing a metal nitrite salt.
  • the minimum solubility needed is 25 grams per 100 ml of water at 20°C (68°F) or 25 grams per 100 ml of water solution containing a metal nitrite salt at 20°C (68°F).
  • the preferred reactants are Co(NO3)2 ⁇ 6H2O and NaNO2, since cobalt nitrite complexes formed with potassium or lithium nitrite are of limited solubility and will eventually drop out of an aqueous solution.
  • a preferred chemical additive is an oxidizer, preferably hydrogen peroxide, H2O2.
  • the function of the oxidizer is to oxidize the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III ions. Care must be taken that an excess amount of chemical oxidizer is not used because an excess would have the undesired effect of oxidizing the nitrite ions in solution to nitrate ions.
  • the stream of air flowing into the tank functions as an oxidizer, so the presence of hydrogen peroxide is not essential for operability.
  • the hydrogen peroxide increases the rate of oxidation of the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III ions and therefore is useful for commercial practice of the invention in that the solution becomes operational in a shorter period of time.
  • reaction accelerator chemical such as sodium bromide (NaBr) or sodium iodide (NaI) may be added to the solution.
  • NaBr sodium bromide
  • NaI sodium iodide
  • the reaction accelerator was found to have the effect of accelerating the formation of the oxide conversion coatings on aluminum alloy substrates as compared to solutions of cobalt-III hexanitrite complexes which did not contain this additive. The presence of the accelerator is not essential for operability. The accelerator increases the rate of formation of the oxide conversion coatings on aluminum alloys and therefore is useful for commercial practice of the invention.
  • the preferred chemical reactants and additives are: Cobalt nitrate Co(N03)2 ⁇ 6H2O Sodium nitrite NaNO2 Hydrogen peroxide (oxidizer) H2O2 Sodium iodide (accelerator) NaI
  • the concentration of dissolved cobalt-II salt used may be from about 0.1 moles per gallon of final solution up to the saturation limit of the cobalt-II salt employed.
  • the concentration of dissolved metal nitrite salt may be from about 0.6 to 12 moles per gallon of final solution.
  • the concentration of oxidizer, such as hydrogen peroxide may be from complete omission up to about 0.5 moles per gallon of final solution. As stated above, an excess amount of hydrogen peroxide has undesired effects.
  • the concentration of accelerator salt, such as NaI may be from complete omission up to the solubility limit of the accelerator in the solution.
  • the pH of the bath may be from about 7.0 to 7.2.
  • the temperature of the bath may be from about 68°F to 150°F; below 100°F coating formation is very slow; above 150°F gradual decomposition of the cobalt-III hexanitrite complex occurs.
  • the immersion time may be from about 3 minutes to 60 minutes.
  • the cobalt conversion coating should be applied after all trimming and fabrication have been completed. Parts, where solution entrapment is possible, should not be subjected to immersion alkaline cleaning or immersion deoxidizing; manual cleaning and manual deoxidizing procedures should be used to obtain water break-free surfaces before applying cobalt conversion treatment.
  • a water break-free surface is a surface which maintains a continuous water film for a period of at least 30 seconds after having been sprayed or immersion rinsed in clean water at a temperature below 100°F.
  • Vapor degrease may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5408, emulsion clean in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5763, or solvent clean in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5750 if parts are greasy or oily. Parts with open faying surfaces or spot-welded joints where solution entrapment is possible should be immersed in cold water (or in hot and cold water) for 2 minutes after precleaning.
  • Alkaline clean and rinse may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5744 or Boeing Process Specification BAC 5749 except for parts with open faying surfaces or spot welded joints, in which case, rinsing should be for at least 10 minutes using agitation with multiple immersions (a minimum of four times) followed by manual spray rinsing as required to prevent solution entrapment.
  • Deoxidize and rinse may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5765 except for parts where solution entrapment is possible, which parts may be rinsed using the method described above under "Alkaline Cleaning". Castings may be deoxidized by either of the following methods:
  • Example 1 Component Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution Control Limits Cobalt(ous) nitrate, Co(NO3)2 ⁇ 6H20 (hexahydrate) 85 gm (about 0.29 mole) 75-95 gm/gal Sodium nitrite, NaNO2 242 gm (about 3.51 moles) 227-246 gm/gal Sodium Iodide, NaI 90 gm (about 0.60 moles) 83-99 gm/gal Hydrogen peroxide, H2O2 (30 vol. %) 30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H202) Water balance Temperature 120 ⁇ 5° F pH 7.0 - 7.2
  • Example 2 The formulation of Example 1, with a molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt of about 12 to 1, is useful for producing oxide coatings exhibiting high paint adhesion in unsealed condition.
  • Example 2 Component Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution Control Limits Cobalt(ous) chloride, CoCl2 ⁇ 6H20 (hexahydrate) 69 gm (about 0.29 mole) Sodium nitrite, NaN02 242 gm (about 3.51 moles) Sodium iodide, NaI 90 gm (about 0.60 moles) Hydrogen peroxide, H2O2 (30 vol. %) 30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H2O2) Water balance Temperature 120-150°F pH 7.0 - 7.2
  • Example 2 The formulation of Example 2, also having a molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt of about 12 to 1, is useful for producing oxide coatings possessing high paint adhesion properties in unsealed condition.
  • Example 3 Component Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution Control Limits Cobalt acetate, Co(CH3COO)2 ⁇ 4H20 73 gm (about 0.29 moles) Sodium nitrite, NaNO2 242 gm (about 3.51 moles) Sodium iodide, NaI (accelerator) 90 gm (about 0.60 moles) Hydrogen peroxide, H2O2 (30 vol. %) 30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H2O2) Water balance Temperature 120-150°F pH 7.0 - 7.2
  • any 2-valent soluble cobalt salt may be reacted with any soluble nitrite salt to form 3-valent cobalt hexanitrite complexes.
  • this type of complexing is not restricted to nitrites only.
  • cyanide salts were used (i.e., sodium cyanide, NaCN) to form hexacyano complexes of the type shown below (10) Me3[Co(CN)6 ] and have yielded satisfactory conversion coatings on aluminum alloys.
  • cyanide complexes will not be used because of environmental considerations.
  • Nickel sulfate NiS04 ⁇ 6H20 (hexahydrate) 152 gm (about 0.58 moles) 144-159 gm Ammonium nitrate, NH4NO3 114 gm (about 1.42 moles) 105-121 gm Manganese acetate, Mn(CH3COO)2 ⁇ 4H2O 76 gm (about 0.31 moles) 68-84 gm Operating temperature 185 ⁇ 5° F
  • the immersion time in the sealing solution may be about 10-30 minutes, with 15 minutes being preferred.
  • the sealing solution is believed to seal the cobalt conversion coating by a hydration mechanism.
  • FIGS. 17-20, particularly FIG. 18, show a sealed cobalt conversion coating 270.
  • Other sealing solutions which may be employed are as follows:
  • Solutions 1-3 are not preferred because they lose their effectiveness over a period of time, whereas the solution in Example 4 has a long life.
  • a continuous operating temperature range of the cobalt conversion tank of 120-140°F yields optimum results with respect to coating performance on aluminum alloy substrates.
  • Optimum paint adhesion is obtained when the tank is operated at or near 120°F, while optimum corrosion resistance performance is given at 140°F in combination with the subsequent seal process.
  • Immersion times in the cobalt conversion tank have an effect on the oxide coating thickness as measured by the coating weight (in unsealed condition) ranging from 40 to 60 mg/ft2.
  • An optimum immersion time for maximum paint adhesion is 15 minutes and for maximum corrosion resistance performance is 30 minutes.
  • Salt spray corrosion resistance of cobalt conversion coatings produced by the above processes varies over a wide range, depending on reactant selection, immersion times, and bath operating temperatures. Preferred results are obtained when the formulation of Example 1 is utilized at immersion times of 30 minutes. In this way, sealed oxide coatings have been produced with 168 hrs. of salt spray corrosion resistance when sealed with the seal solution as described herein and tested in accordance with ASTM B117.
  • Paint adhesion tests were conducted using aircraft paints qualified to Boeing Material Specification BMS 10-11 (a highly crosslinked epoxy primer) and BMS 10-60 (a highly crosslinked urethane topcoat).
  • BMS 10-11 a highly crosslinked epoxy primer
  • BMS 10-60 a highly crosslinked urethane topcoat
  • corrosion resistance and paint adhesion performance properties have an inverse relationship. In general, where corrosion resistance is at a maximum, paint adhesion is at a minimum, and vice versa.
  • the optional post-conversion step consisting of immersion into a heated solution (at 185 ⁇ 5°F) of NiS04/NH4NO3/Mn-acetate minimizes this problem by maintaining sufficient paint adhesion values while maintaining high corrosion resistance properties.
  • ESCA electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (also known as XPS or X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy).)
  • the cobalt conversion coating consists of a mixture of oxides, namely, aluminum oxide, Al2O3, as the largest volume percent, and cobalt oxides, CoO, Co3O4, and Co2O3.
  • the term "largest volume percent” means that the volume of this oxide exceeds the volume of any other oxide which is present, but the term “largest volume percent” does not necessarily imply that the volume of this oxide is more than 50 volume percent.
  • the data further shows that in the lower portion of the oxide coating (that is, next to the aluminum substrate), the largest volume percent is Al2O3.
  • the middle portion of the oxide coating is a mixture of CoO, Co3O4, Co2O3, and Al2O3.
  • the data shows that in the top portion of the oxide coating, the largest volume percent is a mixture of Co3O4 and Co2O3.
  • FIGS. 1-4 show a cobalt conversion coating 130 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 20 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution.
  • FIGS. 5-8 show a cobalt conversion coating 150 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 30 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution.
  • FIGS. 9-12 show a cobalt conversion coating 190 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 50 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution.
  • FIGS. 1-4 show a cobalt conversion coating 130 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 20 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution.
  • FIGS. 5-8 show a cobalt conversion coating 150 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 30 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution.
  • FIGS. 9-12 show a cobalt conversion coating 190 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 50 minute immersion in a typical cobalt
  • FIGS. 13-16 show a cobalt conversion coating 230 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 60 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution. Comparing FIGS. 1-4, FIGS. 5-8, FIGS. 9-12, and FIGS. 13-16, there does not appear to be any significant structural difference between coating 130, coating 150, coating 190, and coating 230. This suggests that at any given bath operating temperature, the oxide coating becomes self limiting.
  • the top surface of the cobalt conversion coating as shown in FIGS. 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, and 14 is porous and bears a resemblance to chow mein noodles. This oxide structure provides appreciable surface area and porosity for good paint adhesion.
  • FIGS. 17-20 show sealed cobalt conversion coating 270.
  • the cobalt conversion coating was formed on the substrate and then the coating was partially sealed by immersion in a sealing solution.
  • FIG. 18 shows the partially sealed structure of coating 270.
  • Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating, the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of immersion in a sealing solution. The partial sealing of the oxide coating gives reduced paint adhesion results, but excellent corrosion resistance performance.

Abstract

(A.) A process for forming a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, thereby imparting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties. The invention was developed as a replacement for the prior art chromic acid process. The process includes the steps of: (a) providing a cobalt conversion solution comprising an aqueous solution having a pH of about 7.0 to 7.2 and containing a soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of the cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution to the saturation limit of the cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex; and (b) contacting the substrate with the solution for a sufficient amount of time, whereby the cobalt conversion coating is formed. The substrate may be aluminum or aluminum alloy, as well as magnesium and its alloys, Cd plated substrates, and Zn plated substrates. The cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex may be present in the form of Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] wherein Me is one or more of Na, K, and Li.
(B.) A chemical conversion coating solution for producing the cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, the solution being an aqueous solution having a pH of about 7.0 to 7.2 and containing a soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of the cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution to the saturation limit of the cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex. The cobalt conversion solution may be prepared by a bath makeup sequence including the steps of: (a) dissolving a metal nitrite salt; (b) dissolving an accelerator such as NaI; (c) dissolving a cobalt-II salt; and (d) then adding an oxidizer such as H₂O₂.
(C.) A coated article exhibiting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties, the article including: (a) a metal substrate; and (b) a cobalt conversion coating formed on the substrate, the cobalt conversion coating including aluminum oxide Al₂O₃ as the largest volume percent, and cobalt oxides CoO, Co₃O₄, and Co₂O₃.

Description

    Cross-reference to Related Application
  • This application is a continuation-in-part of copending application Serial No. 07/525,800, filed May 17, 1990 entitled "Non-Chromated Oxide Coating For Aluminum Substrates", which application is incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1) Field of the Invention
  • This environmental-quality invention is in the field of chemical conversion coatings formed on metal substrates, for example, on aluminum substrates. More particularly, one aspect of the invention is a new type of oxide coating (which I refer to as a "cobalt conversion coating") which is chemically formed on metal substrates. The invention enhances the quality of the environment of mankind by contributing to the maintenance of air and water quality.
  • 2) Description of the Related Art
  • In general, chemical conversion coatings are formed chemically by causing the surface of the metal to be "converted" into a tightly adherent coating, all or part of which consists of an oxidized form of the substrate metal. Chemical conversion coatings can provide high corrosion resistance as well as strong bonding affinity for paint. The industrial application of paint (organic finishes) to metals generally requires the use of a chemical conversion coating, particularly when the performance demands are high.
  • Although aluminum protects itself against corrosion by forming a natural oxide coating, the protection is not complete. In the presence of moisture and electrolytes, aluminum alloys, particularly the high-copper 2000-series aluminum alloys, such as alloy 2024-T3, corrode much more rapidly than pure aluminum.
  • In general, there are two types of processes for treating aluminum to form a beneficial conversion coating. The first is by anodic oxidation (anodization) in which the aluminum component is immersed in a chemical bath, such as a chromic or sulfuric acid bath, and an electric current is passed through the aluminum component and the chemical bath. The resulting conversion coating on the surface of the aluminum component offers resistance to corrosion and a bonding surface for organic finishes.
  • The second type of process is by chemically producing a conversion coating, which is commonly referred to as a chemical conversion coating, by subjecting the aluminum component to a chemical solution, such as a chromic acid solution, but without using an electric current in the process. The chemical solution may be applied by immersion application, by manual application, or by spray application. The resulting conversion coating on the surface of the aluminum component offers resistance to corrosion and a bonding surface for organic finishes. The present invention relates to this second type of process for producing chemical conversion coatings. The chemical solution may be applied by immersion application, by various types of manual application, or by spray application.
  • One widely-used chromic acid process for forming chemical conversion coatings on aluminum substrates is described in various embodiments in Ostrander et al. U.S. Patent 2,796,370 and Ostrander et al. U.S. Patent 2,796,371, in military process specification MIL-C-5541, and in Boeing Process Specification BAC 5719. These chromic acid chemical conversion baths contain hexavalent chromium, fluorides, and cyanides, all of which present significant environmental as well as health and safety problems. The constituents of a typical chromic acid conversion bath, such as ALODINE 1200, are as follows: Cr0₃ - "chromic acid" (hexavalent chromium); NaF - sodium fluoride; KBF₄ - potassium tetrafluoroborate; K₂ZrF₆ - potassium hexafluorozirconate; K₃Fe(CN)₆ - potassium ferricyanide; and, HNO₃ - nitric acid (for pH control).
  • Many aluminum structural parts, as well as Cd plated, Zn plated, Zn-Ni plated, and steel parts, throughout the aircraft and aerospace industry are currently being treated using this chromic acid process technology. Chromic acid conversion films, as formed on aluminum substrates, meet a 168 hours corrosion resistance criterion, but they primarily serve as a surface substrate for paint adhesion. Because of their relative thinness and low coating weights (40-150 milligrams/ft²), chromic acid conversion coatings do not cause a fatigue life reduction in the aluminum structure.
  • However, environmental regulations in the United States, particularly in California, and in other countries are drastically reducing the allowed levels of hexavalent chromium compounds in effluents and emissions from metal finishing processes. Accordingly, chemical conversion processes employing hexavalent chromium compounds must be replaced. The present invention, which does not employ hexavalent chromium compounds, is intended to replace the previously used chromic acid process for forming conversion coatings on aluminum substrates.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
    • (A.) In one aspect, the invention is a process for forming a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, thereby imparting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties. The invention was developed as a replacement for the prior art chromic acid process.
      In a broad sense, the invention is a process for forming a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, the process comprising the steps of:
      • (a) providing a cobalt conversion solution comprising an aqueous solution of a soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex (hereafter referred to as cobalt-III complex), the concentration of the cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution up to the saturation limit of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex; and
      • (b) contacting the metal substrate with the solution for a sufficient amount of time, whereby the cobalt conversion coating is formed.

      The substrate may be aluminum or aluminum alloy, as well as magnesium and its alloys, Cd plated substrates, and Zn plated substrates. The cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex may be present in the form of Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] wherein Me corresponds to Na, K, or Li.
    • (B.) In another aspect, the invention is a chemical conversion coating solution. In a broad sense, the invention is a chemical conversion coating solution for producing a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, the solution comprising an aqueous solution of a soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution up to the saturation limit of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex. The substrate may be aluminum or aluminum alloy, as well as magnesium and its alloys, Cd plated substrates, and Zn plated substrates. The cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex may be present in the form of Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] wherein Me corresponds to Na, K, or Li.
      The cobalt conversion solution may be prepared by a bath makeup sequence including the steps of: (a) dissolving a metal nitrite salt; (b) dissolving an accelerator such as NaI; (c) dissolving a cobalt-II salt; and (d) then adding an oxidizer such as H₂O₂.
    • (C.) In yet another aspect, the invention is a coated article exhibiting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties, the article including: (a) a metal substrate; and (b) a cobalt conversion coating formed on the substrate, the cobalt conversion coating including aluminum oxide Al₂O₃ as the largest volume percent, and one or more cobalt oxides from the group consisting of CoO, Co₃O₄, and Co₂O₃. The substrate may be aluminum or aluminum alloy, as well as magnesium and its alloys, Cd plated substrates, and Zn plated substrates.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The figures herein are photomicrographs of images produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) of coatings on aluminum alloy test panels. FIGS. 1-20 are photomicrographs (scanning electron microscope operated at 20 KV) of aluminum alloy 2024-T3 test panels with cobalt conversion coatings made by the invention. FIGS. 1-16 show surface views and fracture views of unsealed cobalt conversion coatings. The photomicrographs of FIGS. 1-16 reveal a highly porous surface oxide (unsealed cobalt conversion coatings) with a thickness range of about 0.12 to 0.14 micron (1200 to 1400 Angstroms). FIGS. 1-4 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 20 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution. FIGS. 5-8 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 30 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution. FIGS. 9-12 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 50 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution. FIGS. 13-16 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 60 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution. There were only minor differences in oxide coating thickness between these immersion times. This suggests that at any given bath operating temperature, the oxide structure becomes self limiting. FIGS. 17-20 show surface views and fracture views of a sealed cobalt conversion coating.
  • FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a cobalt conversion coating 130 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 130. The top of oxide coating 130 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. The porosity of oxide coating 130 gives excellent paint adhesion results. This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 20 minutes. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 1. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 130. FIG. 2 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 1. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of a cobalt conversion coating 130 of the invention. The fractured cross section of the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 132. This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 20 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 130. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 4 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 3 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 130 of the invention. FIG. 4 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 3. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 132. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 130 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 5 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing another cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 150. The top of oxide coating 150 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 30 minutes. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 6 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 5. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 150. FIG. 6 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 5. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 7 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 152. This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 30 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 150. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 8 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 7 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention. FIG. 8 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 7. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 152. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 150 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 9 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a cobalt conversion coating 190 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 190. The top of oxide coating 190 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 50 minutes. The oblong object indicated by reference numeral 192 is an impurity, believed to be a piece of oxidized material, on top of oxide coating 190. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 10 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 9. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 190. FIG. 10 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 9. The roundish object indicated by reference numeral 192a is an unidentified impurity on top of oxide coating 190. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 11 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of a cobalt conversion coating 190 of the invention. The fractured cross section of the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 194. This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 50 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 190. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 12 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 11 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 190 of the invention. FIG. 12 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 11. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 194. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 190 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 13 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing a cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 230. The top of oxide coating 230 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. This test panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 60 minutes. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 14 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 13. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 230. FIG. 14 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 13. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 15 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 232. This test panel was immersed in the coating bath for 60 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 230. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 16 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 15 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention. FIG. 16 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 15. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 150 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • FIG. 17 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing a sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of sealed oxide coating 270. This test panel was immersed in a sealing solution for 20 minutes. Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating, the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of immersion in a sealing solution. The partial sealing of the oxide coating gives reduced paint adhesion results, but excellent corrosion resistance performance. The whitish areas identified by reference numeral 274 are believed to be impurities from the sealing solution. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 18 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 17. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of sealed oxide coating 270. FIG. 18 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 17. Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating, the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of immersion in a sealing solution. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 19 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side view of a fractured cross section of sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 272. This test panel was immersed in the sealing bath for 20 minutes. To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating 270. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
  • FIG. 20 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 19 showing a side view of a fractured cross section of sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention. FIG. 20 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of FIG. 19. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Sealed oxide coating 270 has a vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • I have invented two classes of cobalt conversion coatings. The first class is a cobalt conversion coating consisting of an oxide structure in unsealed condition and suitable for use in service where paint adhesion is especially important. The second class is a cobalt conversion coating consisting of an oxide structure in sealed condition and suitable for use in service where bare metal corrosion resistance performance is desired.
  • A considerable amount of empirical research was conducted in order to arrive at the present invention. A variety of multivalent compounds was investigated, used either by themselves or in combination with alkalies, acids, or fluorides. Among these compounds were vanadates, molybdates, cerates, ferrates and a variety of borates. While film deposition of compounds containing these elements on aluminum alloy substrates has been achieved, none afforded any appreciable corrosion protection nor paint adhesion.
  • A significant increase in corrosion protection was observed, however, when aluminum substrates were immersed in aqueous solutions of simple cobalt-II (Co²+) salts heated to 180°F; This led to an investigation of a number of cobalt-II and cobalt-III (Co³+) reactions, in particular as described in copending application Serial No. 07/525,800 filed May 17, 1990.
  • When 2-valent cobalt salts are dissolved into an aqueous solution of MeNO₂ (where Me = Na, K, or Li) (alkali metal ions), in the presence of an oxidizing agent, such as H₂O₂, then 3-valent cobalt nitrite complexes are formed:



            (1)   2 CoX₂ + 12 MeNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 Mex + 2 MeOH



    where X₂ = (NO₃)₂, Cl₂, (CH₃COO)₂ (acetate), S0₄, Br₂, (CN)₂, (SCN)₂, CO₃. From an environmental standpoint, the cyanide and thiocyanate salts are not preferred. In particular, the following bath chemistries were prepared and tested:



            (2)   2 Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O + 12 NaNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Na₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 NaNO₃ + 2 NaOH





            (3)   2 Co(N0₃)₂·6H₂O + 12 KNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 K₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 KNO₃ + 2 KOH





            (4)   2 Co(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O + 12 NaNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Na₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 CH₃COONa + 2 NaOH





            (5)   2 CoCl₂·6H₂O + 12 NaNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Na₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 NaCl + 2 NaOH



  • These 3-valent cobalt nitrite complexes were found to produce brightly iridescent oxide coatings on aluminum substrates.
  • The chemistry described in copending application Serial Number 07/525,800 involved the chemistry of an aqueous solution containing a cobalt-II salt such as CoX₂ (where X₂ = Cl₂, Br₂, (NO₃)₂, (CN)₂, (SCN)₂, PO₄, SO₄, (CH₃COO)₂, CO₃) and the corresponding ammonium salt NH₄X in the presence of ammonium hydroxide (ammonia) to form a cobalt-III hexammine coordination complex, for example:
    Figure imgb0001
  • It should be noted that the above cobalt hexammine chemistry in equation (6) involves a cobalt coordination complex where the portion of the complex which includes the ligand (the bracketed portion in equation (6)) is positively charged, i.e.,



            (7)   [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺


  • In the cobalt hexanitrite chemistry subsequently developed and described herein, cobalt coordination complexes are formed where the portion of the complex which includes the ligand (the bracketed portion in equations (1)-(5)) is negatively charged, i.e.,



            (8)   [Co(NO₂)₆]³⁻



    and the complete complex is



            (9)   Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆]



    where Me corresponds to Na, K, or Li (alkali metal ions).
  • This cobalt nitrite complex bath chemistry (equation (1)) has a distinct advantage over the previously described cobalt hexammine complex chemistry (equation (6)) in that pH control of the cobalt hexanitrite complex bath is not required.
  • It was discovered that when aluminum alloy substrates (such as alloy 2024-T3) are immersed in an aqueous solution containing the cobalt-III nitrite complexes above, bright iridescent coatings are formed on the aluminum alloy, which give excellent corrosion resistance properties.
  • It is surprising that cobalt-III hexanitrite complexes are capable of forming oxide structures on aluminum substrates. The oxidizing ability of the cobalt-III hexanitrite complex is believed to be responsible for the formation of the observed oxide films (which I refer to as "cobalt conversion coatings") on aluminum substrates. The formation of oxide structures has been confirmed by instrumental analysis (Auger analysis and electron microscopy) of the coating. The photomicrographs in FIGS. 1-20 illustrate the appearance of the cobalt conversion coating of the invention.
  • Initial bath formulations were made up using Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O and NaNO₂. Reaction quantities were used in accordance with stoichiometric amounts as shown in equation (2) above.
  • It became apparent during experimentation with this initial formulation that a number of parameters are important from the standpoint of bath chemistry and uniform formation of oxide coating films. These parameters are: chemical reactant selection; chemical reactant concentrations; bath makeup sequence; temperature; and immersion time. It should be noted that pH control is not a factor.
  • Chemical Reactant Selection
  • Regarding reactant selection, a wide variety of cobalt salts and metal nitrite salts are operable for cobalt complexing. Among the cobalt-II salts which are operable in water solution are: cobalt nitrate, Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O; cobalt chloride, CoCl₂·6H₂O; cobaltous sulfate, CoSO₄; cobaltous acetate, Co(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O; and cobaltous basic carbonate, 2CoCO₃·Co(OH)₂·H₂O. Each of the foregoing cobalt-II salts may be reacted with a nitrite salt such as NaNO₂, KNO₂, or LiNO₂.
  • Furthermore, other cobalt-II salts may be used if they possess a minimum solubility in water or in a water solution containing a metal nitrite salt. The minimum solubility needed is 25 grams per 100 ml of water at 20°C (68°F) or 25 grams per 100 ml of water solution containing a metal nitrite salt at 20°C (68°F).
  • It may also be noted that for aluminum and aluminum alloys the preferred reactants are Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O and NaNO₂, since cobalt nitrite complexes formed with potassium or lithium nitrite are of limited solubility and will eventually drop out of an aqueous solution.
  • A preferred chemical additive is an oxidizer, preferably hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂. The function of the oxidizer is to oxidize the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III ions. Care must be taken that an excess amount of chemical oxidizer is not used because an excess would have the undesired effect of oxidizing the nitrite ions in solution to nitrate ions. The stream of air flowing into the tank functions as an oxidizer, so the presence of hydrogen peroxide is not essential for operability. The hydrogen peroxide increases the rate of oxidation of the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III ions and therefore is useful for commercial practice of the invention in that the solution becomes operational in a shorter period of time.
  • Furthermore, it may also be noted that a reaction accelerator chemical such as sodium bromide (NaBr) or sodium iodide (NaI) may be added to the solution. (NaI is preferred.) The reaction accelerator was found to have the effect of accelerating the formation of the oxide conversion coatings on aluminum alloy substrates as compared to solutions of cobalt-III hexanitrite complexes which did not contain this additive. The presence of the accelerator is not essential for operability. The accelerator increases the rate of formation of the oxide conversion coatings on aluminum alloys and therefore is useful for commercial practice of the invention.
  • Thus the preferred chemical reactants and additives are:
    Cobalt nitrate Co(N0₃)₂·6H₂O
    Sodium nitrite NaNO₂
    Hydrogen peroxide (oxidizer) H₂O₂
    Sodium iodide (accelerator) NaI
  • Chemical Reactant Concentration, pH, Temperature, And Immersion Time
  • With respect to chemical reactant concentrations, the concentration of dissolved cobalt-II salt used may be from about 0.1 moles per gallon of final solution up to the saturation limit of the cobalt-II salt employed. The concentration of dissolved metal nitrite salt may be from about 0.6 to 12 moles per gallon of final solution. The concentration of oxidizer, such as hydrogen peroxide, may be from complete omission up to about 0.5 moles per gallon of final solution. As stated above, an excess amount of hydrogen peroxide has undesired effects. The concentration of accelerator salt, such as NaI, may be from complete omission up to the solubility limit of the accelerator in the solution. The pH of the bath may be from about 7.0 to 7.2. The temperature of the bath may be from about 68°F to 150°F; below 100°F coating formation is very slow; above 150°F gradual decomposition of the cobalt-III hexanitrite complex occurs. The immersion time may be from about 3 minutes to 60 minutes.
  • Preferred Bath Preparation Sequence
    • 1. A stainless steel tank fitted with air agitation plumbing and heating coils is filled to 3/4 with deionized water at a temperature of 68°F to 90°F. Air agitation is commenced to a gentle bubble. (The tank may be equipped with a filter unit to remove any solid impurities (dust, aluminum silt, etc.) during processing.)
    • 2. A quantity of nitrite salt (NaN0₂ is preferred) is added and completely dissolved. Stainless steel baskets may be used to hold the nitrite salt granules suspended in the water while dissolving. The preferred concentration of nitrite salt is about 3.6 moles per gallon of final solution. The amount used is based on the mole ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt which will produce an oxide coating exhibiting high paint adhesion properties. The preferred molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt is about 12 to 1.
    • 3. A quantity of sodium iodide (the conversion coating reaction accelerator) may now be added. The concentration of this additive may be from no addition up to the solubility limit, however the preferred quantity is 80-100 gm per gallon of final solution.
    • 4. The cobalt-II salt is now added and dissolved. The preferred concentration is about 0.3 moles per gallon of final solution. This concentration of the cobalt salt, when added to a solution already containing 3.6 moles per gallon of nitrite salt, achieves the preferred molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt of 12 to 1. Moderate air agitation is maintained.
    • 5. A quantity of hydrogen peroxide H₂O₂ is now slowly added. The preferred amount is 0.3 to 0.5 moles of H₂O₂ (30 to 50 ml of H₂O₂ (30 volume %)) per gallon of final solution. The tank is filled to the final volume with deionized water. Air agitation of this solution is maintained for 12-16 hours at a temperature of 68-90°F and then the solution is heated to preferably 120 ± 5°F. The use of H₂O₂ is preferred for fast and consistent cobalt-III hexanitrite complex formation. The solution is now ready for operation.
    • 6. Optionally, a second stainless steel tank (to be used for a coating seal step) is prepared with air agitation plumbing and heating coils and is filled 3/4 with deionized water. This post-cobalt conversion coating step serves as an oxide coating sealer to promote corrosion resistance performance. The tank is heated to 180 ± 5°F with air agitation.
    • 7. A quantity of ammonium nitrate, NH₄NO₃, is added to the seal tank and dissolved. The preferred amount is 114 gm (1.42 moles) per gallon of final solution. Stir as necessary to dissolve.
    • 8. A quantity of nickel sulfate, NiSO₄·6H₂O, and a quantity of manganese acetate, Mn(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O, are added to the seal tank and dissolved. The preferred amount of nickel sulfate is 152 gm (0.58 moles) per gallon of final solution. The preferred amount of manganese acetate is 76 gm (0.31 moles) per gallon of final solution. Stir as necessary to dissolve.
    • 9. The seal tank is then filled to final volume with deionized water. No further air agitation is needed.
    Preferred Overall Processing Sequences
  • The preferred overall processing sequences may be summarized as follows:
    Figure imgb0002
  • General Notes With Respect To The Above Process Flow Charts
  • The cobalt conversion coating should be applied after all trimming and fabrication have been completed. Parts, where solution entrapment is possible, should not be subjected to immersion alkaline cleaning or immersion deoxidizing; manual cleaning and manual deoxidizing procedures should be used to obtain water break-free surfaces before applying cobalt conversion treatment. A water break-free surface is a surface which maintains a continuous water film for a period of at least 30 seconds after having been sprayed or immersion rinsed in clean water at a temperature below 100°F.
  • Thorough rinsing and draining throughout processing is necessary as each solution should be completely removed to avoid interference with the performance of the next solution in the sequence. Parts should be processed from one step to the next without delay and without allowing the parts to dry. When it is necessary to handle wet parts, wear clean latex rubber gloves. After conversion coating, handle dry parts only with clean fabric gloves. For processing systems which require part clamping, the number and size of contact points should be kept to a minimum as necessary for adequate mechanical support.
  • Precleaning
  • Vapor degrease may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5408, emulsion clean in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5763, or solvent clean in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5750 if parts are greasy or oily. Parts with open faying surfaces or spot-welded joints where solution entrapment is possible should be immersed in cold water (or in hot and cold water) for 2 minutes after precleaning.
  • Masking And Racking
  • Areas which do not require cobalt conversion coatings should be masked with maskants. Dissimilar metal inserts (except chromium, nickel or cobalt alloy or plating, CRES, or titanium) and non-aluminum coated plasma flame sprayed area should be masked off.
  • Alkaline Cleaning
  • Alkaline clean and rinse may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5744 or Boeing Process Specification BAC 5749 except for parts with open faying surfaces or spot welded joints, in which case, rinsing should be for at least 10 minutes using agitation with multiple immersions (a minimum of four times) followed by manual spray rinsing as required to prevent solution entrapment.
  • Deoxidizing
  • Deoxidize and rinse may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5765 except for parts where solution entrapment is possible, which parts may be rinsed using the method described above under "Alkaline Cleaning". Castings may be deoxidized by either of the following methods:
    • a. Deoxidize in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5765, Solution 37, 38 or 39.
    • b. Dry abrasive blast castings in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5748, Type II, Class 1 and rinse.
    Examples
  • Examples of specific solution formulations within the scope of the invention are as follows:
    Example 1.
    Component Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution Control Limits
    Cobalt(ous) nitrate, Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂0 (hexahydrate) 85 gm (about 0.29 mole) 75-95 gm/gal
    Sodium nitrite, NaNO₂ 242 gm (about 3.51 moles) 227-246 gm/gal
    Sodium Iodide, NaI 90 gm (about 0.60 moles) 83-99 gm/gal
    Hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂ (30 vol. %) 30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H₂0₂)
    Water balance
    Temperature 120 ± 5° F
    pH 7.0 - 7.2
  • The formulation of Example 1, with a molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt of about 12 to 1, is useful for producing oxide coatings exhibiting high paint adhesion in unsealed condition.
    Example 2.
    Component Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution Control Limits
    Cobalt(ous) chloride, CoCl₂·6H₂0 (hexahydrate) 69 gm (about 0.29 mole)
    Sodium nitrite, NaN0₂ 242 gm (about 3.51 moles)
    Sodium iodide, NaI 90 gm (about 0.60 moles)
    Hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂ (30 vol. %) 30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H₂O₂)
    Water balance
    Temperature 120-150°F
    pH 7.0 - 7.2
  • The formulation of Example 2, also having a molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt of about 12 to 1, is useful for producing oxide coatings possessing high paint adhesion properties in unsealed condition.
    Example 3.
    Component Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution Control Limits
    Cobalt acetate, Co(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂0 73 gm (about 0.29 moles)
    Sodium nitrite, NaNO₂ 242 gm (about 3.51 moles)
    Sodium iodide, NaI (accelerator) 90 gm (about 0.60 moles)
    Hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂ (30 vol. %) 30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H₂O₂)
    Water balance
    Temperature 120-150°F
    pH 7.0 - 7.2
  • It should be noted that in all of the above examples hydrogen peroxide H₂O₂ (30 vol. %) is employed to convert the 2-valent cobalt salt into the 3-valent cobalt hexanitrite complex. While air bubbling (aeration) of the solution alone will convert a sufficient quantity of cobalt-II salt to cobalt-III complex, the procedure will be time consuming and complete conversion may never be obtained.
  • In principle, any 2-valent soluble cobalt salt may be reacted with any soluble nitrite salt to form 3-valent cobalt hexanitrite complexes. Furthermore, this type of complexing, as shown in formula (8) above, is not restricted to nitrites only. For research purposes, cyanide salts were used (i.e., sodium cyanide, NaCN) to form hexacyano complexes of the type shown below



            (10)   Me₃[Co(CN)₆

    ]

    and have yielded satisfactory conversion coatings on aluminum alloys. However, cyanide complexes will not be used because of environmental considerations.
  • As mentioned above, in order to produce cobalt conversion coatings with maximum corrosion resistance performance (168 hrs. salt spray corrosion resistance, when tested in accordance with ASTM B117) it is necessary to subject the cobalt conversion coating to a sealing step. For this purpose, a number of sealing solutions were found to be useful, however, the sealing solution formulation below is preferred.
    Example 4.
    Component Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution Control Limits
    Nickel sulfate, NiS0₄·6H₂0 (hexahydrate) 152 gm (about 0.58 moles) 144-159 gm
    Ammonium nitrate, NH₄NO₃ 114 gm (about 1.42 moles) 105-121 gm
    Manganese acetate, Mn(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O 76 gm (about 0.31 moles) 68-84 gm
    Operating temperature 185 ± 5° F
  • The immersion time in the sealing solution may be about 10-30 minutes, with 15 minutes being preferred. The sealing solution is believed to seal the cobalt conversion coating by a hydration mechanism. FIGS. 17-20, particularly FIG. 18, show a sealed cobalt conversion coating 270. Other sealing solutions which may be employed are as follows:
  • Solution 1:
    Boric acid, H₃BO₃, 50 gm/gal. Cobalt sulfate, CoSO₄·7H20, 25 gm/gal. Ammonium acetate, CH₃COONH₄, 25 gm/gal.
    Solution 2:
    Boric acid, H₃BO₃, 30 gm/gal. Sodium borate, Na₂B₄O₇, 30 gm/gal. Sodium nitrite, NaNO₂, 30 gm/gal. Ammonium vanadate, NH₄VO₃, 5 gm/gal.
    Solution 3:
    Cobalt sulfate, CoSO₄·7H₂O, 25 gm/gal. Ammonium vanadate, NH₄VO₃, 5 gm/gal. Boric acid, H₃BO₃, 50 gm/gal.
  • Solutions 1-3 are not preferred because they lose their effectiveness over a period of time, whereas the solution in Example 4 has a long life.
  • Cobalt Conversion Coating: Solution Temperature And Immersion Time
  • The two process parameters of solution temperature and immersion time have been found to be important as relating to cobalt conversion coating performance.
  • A continuous operating temperature range of the cobalt conversion tank of 120-140°F yields optimum results with respect to coating performance on aluminum alloy substrates. Optimum paint adhesion is obtained when the tank is operated at or near 120°F, while optimum corrosion resistance performance is given at 140°F in combination with the subsequent seal process. Immersion times in the cobalt conversion tank have an effect on the oxide coating thickness as measured by the coating weight (in unsealed condition) ranging from 40 to 60 mg/ft². An optimum immersion time for maximum paint adhesion is 15 minutes and for maximum corrosion resistance performance is 30 minutes.
  • Corrosion Resistance
  • Salt spray corrosion resistance of cobalt conversion coatings produced by the above processes varies over a wide range, depending on reactant selection, immersion times, and bath operating temperatures. Preferred results are obtained when the formulation of Example 1 is utilized at immersion times of 30 minutes. In this way, sealed oxide coatings have been produced with 168 hrs. of salt spray corrosion resistance when sealed with the seal solution as described herein and tested in accordance with ASTM B117.
  • Paint Adhesion
  • Paint adhesion tests were conducted using aircraft paints qualified to Boeing Material Specification BMS 10-11 (a highly crosslinked epoxy primer) and BMS 10-60 (a highly crosslinked urethane topcoat). General trends observed with the present cobalt conversion coatings are consistent with conventional chromic acid conversion coatings, i.e., corrosion resistance and paint adhesion performance properties have an inverse relationship. In general, where corrosion resistance is at a maximum, paint adhesion is at a minimum, and vice versa.
  • However, the optional post-conversion step consisting of immersion into a heated solution (at 185 ± 5°F) of NiS0₄/NH₄NO₃/Mn-acetate minimizes this problem by maintaining sufficient paint adhesion values while maintaining high corrosion resistance properties.
  • Oxide Coating Analyses
  • ESCA surface analysis, using a Perkin-Elmer Model 550 surface analyzer, and Auger oxide profiles, using the same machine (in a different operating mode), have been performed in order to characterize the cobalt conversion coatings of the invention. (ESCA = electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (also known as XPS or X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy).)
  • These analyses show that the cobalt conversion coating consists of a mixture of oxides, namely, aluminum oxide, Al₂O₃, as the largest volume percent, and cobalt oxides, CoO, Co₃O₄, and Co₂O₃. The term "largest volume percent" means that the volume of this oxide exceeds the volume of any other oxide which is present, but the term "largest volume percent" does not necessarily imply that the volume of this oxide is more than 50 volume percent.
  • The data further shows that in the lower portion of the oxide coating (that is, next to the aluminum substrate), the largest volume percent is Al₂O₃. The middle portion of the oxide coating is a mixture of CoO, Co₃O₄, Co₂O₃, and Al₂O₃. And the data shows that in the top portion of the oxide coating, the largest volume percent is a mixture of Co₃O₄ and Co₂O₃.
  • Additional characterization of the cobalt conversion coatings of the invention may be found above in the "Brief Description Of The Drawings", in FIGS. 1-20, and in the descriptions of FIGS. 1-20. FIGS. 1-4 show a cobalt conversion coating 130 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 20 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution. FIGS. 5-8 show a cobalt conversion coating 150 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 30 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution. FIGS. 9-12 show a cobalt conversion coating 190 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 50 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution. FIGS. 13-16 show a cobalt conversion coating 230 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a 60 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution. Comparing FIGS. 1-4, FIGS. 5-8, FIGS. 9-12, and FIGS. 13-16, there does not appear to be any significant structural difference between coating 130, coating 150, coating 190, and coating 230. This suggests that at any given bath operating temperature, the oxide coating becomes self limiting. The top surface of the cobalt conversion coating, as shown in FIGS. 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, and 14 is porous and bears a resemblance to chow mein noodles. This oxide structure provides appreciable surface area and porosity for good paint adhesion.
  • FIGS. 17-20 show sealed cobalt conversion coating 270. The cobalt conversion coating was formed on the substrate and then the coating was partially sealed by immersion in a sealing solution. In particular, FIG. 18 shows the partially sealed structure of coating 270. Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating, the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of immersion in a sealing solution. The partial sealing of the oxide coating gives reduced paint adhesion results, but excellent corrosion resistance performance.
  • Other Methods Of Application
  • The above examples illustrate producing cobalt conversion coatings by immersion application. The same principles apply to producing the conversion coating by manual application and by spray application.
  • The patents, specifications, and other publications referenced above are incorporated herein by reference.
  • As will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention is addressed, the present invention may be embodied in forms other than those specifically disclosed above, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of the invention. The particular embodiments of the invention described above and the particular details of the processes described are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the present invention is as set forth in the appended claims rather than being limited to the examples set forth in the foregoing description. Any and all equivalents are intended to be embraced by the claims.

Claims (48)

  1. A process for forming a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, said process comprising the steps of:
    (a) providing a cobalt conversion solution comprising an aqueous solution of a soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution to the saturation limit of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex; and
    (b) contacting said metal substrate with said solution for a sufficient amount of time, whereby said cobalt conversion coating is formed.
  2. The process of claim 1, wherein said soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex is a soluble cobalt-III hexanitrite complex.
  3. The process of claim 2, wherein said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex is present in the form of Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] wherein Me is one or more selected from the group comprising Na, K, and Li.
  4. The process of claims 1-3, wherein said cobalt conversion solution has a pH of about 7.0 to 7.2.
  5. The process of claims 1-4, wherein said cobalt conversion solution has a temperature of about 20°C (68°F) to 66°C (150°F).
  6. The process of claims 1-5, wherein said substrate is contacted with said cobalt conversion solution for a time of about 3 minutes to 60 minutes.
  7. The process of claims 1-6, wherein said substrate is aluminum or aluminum alloy.
  8. The process of claims 1-7, wherein said cobalt conversion solution comprises an aqueous solution prepared by reacting a cobalt-II salt with a metal nitrite salt, wherein the concentration of said cobalt-II salt is from about 0.1 moles per gallon of final solution to the saturation limit of the cobalt-II salt employed and the concentration of said metal nitrite salt is from about 0.6 to 12 moles per gallon of final solution.
  9. The process of claim 8, wherein said cobalt-II salt is a cobalt-II salt which has a minimum solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water at 20°C (68°F) or a minimum solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water solution containing a metal nitrite salt at 20°C (68°F).
  10. The process of claim 8 or 9, wherein said cobalt-II salt is CoX₂, wherein X₂ is one or more selected from the group comprising (NO₃)₂, Cl₂, (CH₃COO)₂ (acetate), SO₄, Br₂, (CH)₂, (SCN)₂, or CO₃.
  11. The process of claims 8-10, wherein said metal nitrite salt is MeNO₂ wherein Me is one or more selected from the group comprising Na, K or Li.
  12. The process of claims 8-11, wherein an oxidizer is added to said cobalt conversion solution to oxidize the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III ions.
  13. The process of claim 12, wherein said oxidizer is hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂.
  14. The process of claim 13, wherein hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂, in the amount of 0.3 to 0.5 moles per gallon of final solution is added to said cobalt conversion solution.
  15. The process of claims 8-14, wherein a reaction accelerator is added to said cobalt conversion solution to accelerate the formation of said cobalt conversion coating on said substrate.
  16. The process of claim 15, wherein said reaction accelerator is selected from the group comprising sodium iodide, NaI, and sodium bromide, NaBr.
  17. The process of claim 16, wherein sodium iodide, NaI, in the amount of 83 to 99 grams per gallon of final solution is added to said cobalt conversion solution.
  18. The process of claims 8-17, wherein said cobalt conversion solution is prepared by a bath makeup sequence comprising:
    (a) adding and dissolving said metal nitrite salt;
    (b) then adding and dissolving a reaction accelerator;
    (c) then adding and dissolving said cobalt-II salt; and
    (d) then adding an oxidizer to the solution.
  19. The process of claims 8-18, wherein said solution is prepared by reacting said cobalt-II salt with said metal nitrite salt, wherein the molar ratio of said metal nitrite salt to cobalt salt is about 6 to 1 to 14 to 1.
  20. The process of claims 8-19, comprising the additional step of contacting said coated substrate with an aqueous sealing solution comprising nickel sulfate, NiSO₄.6H₂O, ammonium nitrate, NH₄NO₃, and manganese acetate, Mn(CH₃COO)₂.4H₂O.
  21. The process of claims 1-20, wherein a cobalt conversion solution is provided comprising an aqueous solution prepared by reacting cobalt nitrate, Co(NO₃)₂.6H₂O, with sodium nitrite, NaNO₂, wherein the concentration of said cobalt nitrate is from about 75 to 95 grams per gallon of final solution and the concentration of said sodium nitrite is from about 227 to 246 grams per gallon of final solution.
  22. The process of claim 21, wherein said cobalt conversion solution is prepared by a batch makeup sequence comprising:
    (a) adding and dissolving said sodium nitrite;
    (b) then adding and dissolving sodium iodide, NaI;
    (c) the adding and dissolving said cobalt nitrate; and
    (d) then adding said hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂, to the solution.
  23. The process of claim 21 or 22, wherein said cobalt conversion solution has a temperature of about 48 ± 5°C (120 ± 5°F).
  24. The process of claims 21-23, wherein said substrate is contacted with said cobalt conversion solution for a time of about 15 minutes to 30 minutes.
  25. A chemical conversion coating solution for producing a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, said solution comprising an aqueous solution of a soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution to the saturation limit of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex.
  26. The solution of claim 25, wherein said soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex is a soluble cobalt-III hexanitrite complex.
  27. The solution of claim 26, wherein said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex is present in the form of Me₃[Co(No₂)₆] wherein Me is one or more selected from the group consisting of Na, K, and Li.
  28. The solution of claim 26 or 27, wherein said solution is prepared by reacting a cobalt-II salt with a metal nitrite salt, wherein the concentration of said cobalt-II salt is from about 0.1 moles per gallon of final solution to the saturation limit of the cobalt-II salt employed and the concentration of said metal nitrite salt is from about 0.6 to 12 moles per gallon of final solution.
  29. The solution of claim 28, wherein said cobalt-II salt is a cobalt-II salt which has a minimum solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water at 20°C (68°F) or a minimum solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water solution containing a metal nitrite salt at 20°C (68°F).
  30. The solution of claim 28 or 29, wherein said cobalt-II salt is CoX₂ wherein X₂ is one or more selected from the group comprising (NO₃)₂, Cl₂, (CH₃COO)₂ (acetate), SO₄, Br₂, (CN)₂, (SCN)₂, or CO₃.
  31. The solution of claims 28-30, wherein said metal nitrite salt is MeNO₂ wherein Me is one or more selected from the group comprising Na, K, and Li.
  32. The solution of claims 25-31, wherein an oxidizer is added to said solution to oxidize the cobalt-II ions to cobalt-III ions.
  33. The solution of claim 32, wherein said oxidizer is hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂.
  34. The solution of claims 25-33, wherein a reaction accelerator is added to said cobalt conversion solution to accelerate the formation of said cobalt conversion coating on said substrate.
  35. The solution of claim 34, wherein said reaction accelerator is selected form the group consisting of sodium iodide, NaI, or sodium bromide, NaBr.
  36. The solution of claims 32-35, wherein said cobalt conversion solution is prepared by a bath makeup sequence comprising the steps of:
    (a) adding and dissolving said metal nitrite salt;
    (b) then adding and dissolving said reaction accelerator;
    (c) then adding and dissolving said cobalt-II salt; and
    (d) then adding said oxidizer to the solution.
  37. The solution of claims 28-36, wherein said solution is prepared by reacting said cobalt-II salt with said metal nitrite salt, wherein the molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt is about 6 to 1 to 14 to 1.
  38. The solution of claims 25-37, wherein said solution has a pH of about 7.0 to 7.2.
  39. The solution of claims 25-38, wherein said solution has a temperature of about 20°C (68°F) to 66°C (150°F).
  40. The solution of claims 25-39, wherein said substrate is aluminum or aluminum alloy.
  41. The solution of claims 28-40, wherein said cobalt-III hexanitrite complex is sodium cobalt-III hexanitrite complex, said cobalt-II salt is cobalt-II nitrate, said metal nitrite salt is sodium nitrite, and said solution has a temperature of about 48 ± 5°C (120 ± 5°F).
  42. A coated article obtained in a process of claims 1-24 or by using the solution of claim 25-41.
  43. A coated article exhibiting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties, said article comprising:
    (a) a metal substrate; and
    (b) a cobalt conversion coating formed on said substrate, said cobalt conversion coating comprising aluminum oxide Al₂O₃ as the largest volume percent, and one or more cobalt oxides from the group consisting of CoO, Co₃O₄, and Co₂O₃.
  44. The article of claim 42 or 43, wherein
    (a) in the portion of said cobalt conversion coating adjacent said substrate, the largest volume percent of said coating consists essentially of Al₂O₃;
    (b) in the top portion of said cobalt conversion coating, the largest volume percent of said coating consists essentially of a mixture of Co₃O₄ and Co₂O₃; and
    (c) in the portion of said cobalt conversion coating therebetween, said coating consists essentially of a mixture of CoO, Co₃O₄, Co₂O₃, and Al₂O₃.
  45. The article of claims 42-44, wherein said cobalt conversion coating has a thickness of about 0.12 to 0.14 micron.
  46. The article of claims 42-43, wherein the top of said cobalt conversion coating is porous and has the appearance of chow mein noodles.
  47. The article of claims 42-46, wherein said cobalt conversion coating is sealed.
  48. The article of claims 42-47 exhibiting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties, said substrate being aluminum or aluminum alloy.
EP91202181A 1990-11-30 1991-08-27 Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating Expired - Lifetime EP0488430B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US621132 1984-06-15
US62113290A 1990-11-30 1990-11-30

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0488430A2 true EP0488430A2 (en) 1992-06-03
EP0488430A3 EP0488430A3 (en) 1992-12-16
EP0488430B1 EP0488430B1 (en) 1997-06-11

Family

ID=24488866

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91202181A Expired - Lifetime EP0488430B1 (en) 1990-11-30 1991-08-27 Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating

Country Status (13)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0488430B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3194607B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE154401T1 (en)
AU (1) AU650494B2 (en)
BR (1) BR9105184A (en)
CA (1) CA2056159C (en)
DE (1) DE69126507T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0488430T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2104655T3 (en)
GR (1) GR3024046T3 (en)
HK (1) HK1006861A1 (en)
MX (1) MX9102254A (en)
NZ (1) NZ240779A (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0523288A1 (en) * 1991-07-19 1993-01-20 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
WO1994000619A1 (en) * 1992-06-25 1994-01-06 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5298092A (en) * 1990-05-17 1994-03-29 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5378293A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-01-03 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5411606A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-05-02 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5468307A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-11-21 Schriever; Matthias P. Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5472524A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-12-05 The Boeing Company Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating method and coated articles
WO1996005335A1 (en) * 1994-08-09 1996-02-22 The Boeing Company Improved non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
EP0826792A1 (en) * 1996-09-02 1998-03-04 Cfpi Industries Bath and process for phosphating metal substrates, concentrates for preparing the bath and metal substrates treated according to the process
US5843617A (en) * 1996-08-20 1998-12-01 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company Thermal bleaching of infrared dyes
US5873953A (en) * 1996-12-26 1999-02-23 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US6022425A (en) * 1994-06-10 2000-02-08 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Conversion coating and process and solution for its formation
EP1009867A1 (en) * 1997-05-16 2000-06-21 Henkel Corporation Lithium and vanadium containing sealing composition and process therewith
US6206982B1 (en) 1994-11-11 2001-03-27 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Process and solution for providing a conversion coating on a metal surface
US6315823B1 (en) 1998-05-15 2001-11-13 Henkel Corporation Lithium and vanadium containing sealing composition and process therewith
US6503565B1 (en) 1993-09-13 2003-01-07 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Metal treatment with acidic, rare earth ion containing cleaning solution
WO2003060191A2 (en) * 2002-01-04 2003-07-24 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection conversion coatinges absed on cobalt
US6755917B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2004-06-29 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Process and solution for providing a conversion coating on a metallic surface II
US6773516B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2004-08-10 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Process and solution for providing a conversion coating on a metallic surface I
US7235142B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2007-06-26 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection rinses and seals based on cobalt
US7291217B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2007-11-06 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection pigments based on rare earth elements
US7537663B2 (en) 2002-07-24 2009-05-26 University Of Dayton Corrosion-inhibiting coating
US7789958B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2010-09-07 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection pigments based on manganese

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6432225B1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2002-08-13 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
JP4934984B2 (en) * 2005-03-31 2012-05-23 大日本印刷株式会社 Method for producing metal oxide film

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3905838A (en) * 1974-04-10 1975-09-16 Hikaru Ito Bath for treating aluminum and aluminum alloys to form oxide film nonelectrolytically thereon and method for the treatment
US4381203A (en) * 1981-11-27 1983-04-26 Amchem Products, Inc. Coating solutions for zinc surfaces
EP0405340A1 (en) * 1989-06-27 1991-01-02 Henkel Corporation Improved surface blackening treatment for zinciferous surfaces
WO1991011542A2 (en) * 1990-01-30 1991-08-08 Henkel Corporation Surface treatment method and composition for zinc coated steel sheet
EP0458020A1 (en) * 1990-05-17 1991-11-27 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3905838A (en) * 1974-04-10 1975-09-16 Hikaru Ito Bath for treating aluminum and aluminum alloys to form oxide film nonelectrolytically thereon and method for the treatment
US4381203A (en) * 1981-11-27 1983-04-26 Amchem Products, Inc. Coating solutions for zinc surfaces
EP0405340A1 (en) * 1989-06-27 1991-01-02 Henkel Corporation Improved surface blackening treatment for zinciferous surfaces
WO1991011542A2 (en) * 1990-01-30 1991-08-08 Henkel Corporation Surface treatment method and composition for zinc coated steel sheet
EP0458020A1 (en) * 1990-05-17 1991-11-27 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PASCAL 'Nouveau Traité de Chimie Minérale' 1959 , MASSON & CIE , PARIS,FR Volume XVIII, Pages 680-681 : COBALTINITRITES *

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5468307A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-11-21 Schriever; Matthias P. Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5472524A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-12-05 The Boeing Company Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating method and coated articles
US5298092A (en) * 1990-05-17 1994-03-29 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5378293A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-01-03 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5411606A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-05-02 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5415687A (en) * 1990-05-17 1995-05-16 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5551994A (en) * 1990-05-17 1996-09-03 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
EP0523288A1 (en) * 1991-07-19 1993-01-20 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
WO1994000619A1 (en) * 1992-06-25 1994-01-06 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
AU687740B2 (en) * 1992-06-25 1998-03-05 Boeing Company, The Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US6503565B1 (en) 1993-09-13 2003-01-07 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Metal treatment with acidic, rare earth ion containing cleaning solution
US6022425A (en) * 1994-06-10 2000-02-08 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Conversion coating and process and solution for its formation
WO1996005335A1 (en) * 1994-08-09 1996-02-22 The Boeing Company Improved non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US6206982B1 (en) 1994-11-11 2001-03-27 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Process and solution for providing a conversion coating on a metal surface
US5843617A (en) * 1996-08-20 1998-12-01 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company Thermal bleaching of infrared dyes
US6068709A (en) * 1996-09-02 2000-05-30 Cfpi Industries Bath and process for the phosphatization of metallic substrates, concentrates for the preparation of said bath and metallic substrates having been subjected to a treatment by said bath and process
FR2752851A1 (en) * 1996-09-02 1998-03-06 Cfpi Ind BATH AND METHOD FOR PHOSPHATION OF METAL SUBSTRATES, CONCENTRATED FOR THE PREPARATION OF SUCH BATH, AND METALLIC SUBSTRATES TREATED WITH SUCH BATH AND METHOD
EP0826792A1 (en) * 1996-09-02 1998-03-04 Cfpi Industries Bath and process for phosphating metal substrates, concentrates for preparing the bath and metal substrates treated according to the process
US5873953A (en) * 1996-12-26 1999-02-23 The Boeing Company Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
EP1009867A1 (en) * 1997-05-16 2000-06-21 Henkel Corporation Lithium and vanadium containing sealing composition and process therewith
EP1009867A4 (en) * 1997-05-16 2000-08-09 Henkel Corp Lithium and vanadium containing sealing composition and process therewith
US6315823B1 (en) 1998-05-15 2001-11-13 Henkel Corporation Lithium and vanadium containing sealing composition and process therewith
US6755917B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2004-06-29 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Process and solution for providing a conversion coating on a metallic surface II
US6773516B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2004-08-10 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Process and solution for providing a conversion coating on a metallic surface I
WO2003060191A3 (en) * 2002-01-04 2003-12-18 Univ Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection conversion coatinges absed on cobalt
WO2003060191A2 (en) * 2002-01-04 2003-07-24 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection conversion coatinges absed on cobalt
US7235142B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2007-06-26 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection rinses and seals based on cobalt
US7291217B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2007-11-06 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection pigments based on rare earth elements
US7294211B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2007-11-13 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection conversion coats based on cobalt
US7407711B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2008-08-05 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection conversion coats based on rare earth elements
US7422793B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2008-09-09 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection rinses and seals based on rare earth elements
US7833331B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2010-11-16 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection pigments based on cobalt
US7537663B2 (en) 2002-07-24 2009-05-26 University Of Dayton Corrosion-inhibiting coating
US7789958B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2010-09-07 University Of Dayton Non-toxic corrosion-protection pigments based on manganese

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX9102254A (en) 1992-06-01
EP0488430B1 (en) 1997-06-11
NZ240779A (en) 1994-11-25
DE69126507D1 (en) 1997-07-17
AU8822591A (en) 1992-06-04
HK1006861A1 (en) 1999-03-19
ATE154401T1 (en) 1997-06-15
CA2056159A1 (en) 1992-05-31
AU650494B2 (en) 1994-06-23
ES2104655T3 (en) 1997-10-16
JPH059745A (en) 1993-01-19
DK0488430T3 (en) 1998-01-05
JP3194607B2 (en) 2001-07-30
GR3024046T3 (en) 1997-10-31
CA2056159C (en) 2001-07-03
EP0488430A3 (en) 1992-12-16
BR9105184A (en) 1992-07-21
DE69126507T2 (en) 1997-09-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0488430A2 (en) Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating
EP0458020B1 (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
EP0776384B1 (en) Improved non-chromated oxide coating for aluminium substrates
US5472524A (en) Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating method and coated articles
EP0646187B1 (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5411606A (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5873953A (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
EP0523288B1 (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5378293A (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
EP1230424B1 (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
US5468307A (en) Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates
KR100305009B1 (en) Method for forming a non-chromate oxide coating for an aluminum substrate
KR100327142B1 (en) Method for forming cobalt conversion coating on metal substrate, chemical conversion coating solution and article manufactured by the above method
RU2130977C1 (en) Method of forming cobalt oxide conversion coating and aqueous solution for preparing cobalt oxide conversion coating
NZ245684A (en) Solution and process for producing a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate
NO310154B1 (en) Process for preparing a corrosion resistant and adhesion-promoting coating on a substrate, as well as aqueous chemical bath for use in the process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930615

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19930719

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 154401

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19970615

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ARNOLD & SIEDSMA AG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69126507

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19970717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: FG4A

Free format text: 3024046

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2104655

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20100812

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20100915

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20100810

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20100812

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20100915

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20100823

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20100824

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20100825

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20100812

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20100719

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100825

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20100812

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20100818

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69126507

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69126507

Country of ref document: DE

BE20 Be: patent expired

Owner name: THE *BOEING CY

Effective date: 20110827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V4

Effective date: 20110827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EUP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20110826

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110826

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20120110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110828

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20110828