EP1240318A1 - Embryonic or stem-like cells produced by cross species nuclear transplantation - Google Patents

Abstract

Method of nuclear transfer involving the transplantation of differentiated donor cell nuclei into enucleated oocytes of a species different from the donor cell, in conjunction with compatible cytoplasm and/or mitochondria (of same species as donor), are provided. The resultant nuclear transfer units are useful for the production of isogenic embryonic stem cells, in particular human isogenic embryonic or stem cells. These embryonic or stem-like cells are useful for producing desired differentiated cells and for introduction, removal or modification, of desired genes, e.g., at specific sites of the genome of such cells by homologous recombination. These cells, which may contain a heterologous gene, are especially useful in cell transplantation therapies and for in vitro study of cell differentiation. Nuclear transfer efficiency is enhanced by introduction of compatible cytoplasm or mitochondrial DNA (same species or similar to donor cell or nucleus). Also, nuclear transfer efficiency can further optionally be enhanced by genetically altering donor cells to inhibit apoptosis, by selecting for a specific cell cycle and/or by culturing under conditions that enhance embryonic growth and development.

Description

EMBRYONIC OR STEM-LIKE CELLS PRODUCED BY CROSS SPECIES NUCLEAR

TRANSPLANTATION

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the production of embryonic or stem-like cells by the transplantation of cell nuclei derived from animal or human cells into enucleated animal oocytes of a species different from the donor nuclei. The present invention more specifically relates to the production of primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells by transplantation of the nucleus of a primate or human cell into an enucleated animal oocyte, e.g., a primate or ungulate oocyte and in a preferred embodiment a bovine enucleated oocyte. The present invention further relates to the use of the resultant embryonic or stemlike cells, preferably primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells for therapy, for diagnostic applications, for the production of differentiated cells which may also be used for therapy or diagnosis, and for the production of transgenic embryonic or transgenic differentiated cells, cell lines, tissues and organs. Also, the embryonic or stem-like cells obtained according to the present invention may themselves be used as nuclear donors in nuclear transplantation or nuclear transfer methods for the production of chimeras or clones, preferably transgenic cloned or chimeric animals. 5 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Methods for deriving embryonic stem (ES) cell lines in vitro from early preimplantation mouse embryos are well known. (See, e.g., Evans et al., Nature, 29:154- 156 (1981); Martin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 78:7634-7638 (1981)). ES cells can be passaged in an undifferentiated state, provided that a feeder layer of fibroblast cells

LO (Evans et al., Id) or a differentiation inhibiting source (Smith et al., Dev. Biol, 121 :1-9

(1987)) is present.

ES cells have been previously reported to possess numerous applications. For example, it has been reported that ES cells can be used as an in vitro model for differentiation, especially for the study of genes which are involved in the regulation of early

L5 development. Mouse ES cells can give rise to germline chimeras when introduced into preimplantation mouse embryos, thus demonstrating their pluripotency (Bradley et al., Nature, 309:255-256 (1984)).

In view of their ability to transfer their genome to the next generation, ES cells have potential utility for germline manipulation of livestock animals by using ES cells

_ 0 with or without a desired genetic modification. Moreover, in the case of livestock animals, e.g., ungulates, nuclei from like preimplantation livestock embryos support the development of enucleated oocytes to term (Smith et al., Biol Reprod., 40:1027-1035 (1989); and Keefer et al., Biol. Reprod., 50:935-939 (1994)). This is in contrast to nuclei from mouse embryos which beyond the eight-cell stage after transfer reportedly do not

25 support the development of enucleated oocytes (Cheong et al, Biol. Reprod., 48:958

(1993)). Therefore, ES cells from livestock animals are highly desirable because they may provide a potential source of totipotent donor nuclei, genetically manipulated or otherwise, for nuclear transfer procedures.

Some research groups have reported the isolation of purportedly pluripotent embryonic cell lines. For example, Notarianni et al., J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl, 43:255-260 5 (1991), report the establishment of purportedly stable, pluripotent cell lines from pig and, sheep blastocysts which exhibit some morphological and growth characteristics similar to that of cells in primary cultures of inner cell masses isolated immunosurgically from sheep blastocysts. (Id.) Also, Notarianni et al., J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl, 41:51-56 (1990) discloses maintenance and differentiation in culture of putative pluripotential embryonic

LO cell lines from pig blastocysts. Further, Gerfen et al., Anim. Biotech, 6(1): 1-14 (1995) disclose the isolation of embryonic cell lines from porcine blastocysts. These cells are stably maintained in mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder layers without the use of conditioned medium. These cells reportedly differentiate into several different cell types during culture (Gerfen et al., Id.).

L5 Further, Saito et al., Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol, 201:134-141 (1992) report bovine embryonic stem cell-like cell lines cultured which survived passages for three, but were lost after the fourth passage. Still further, Handyside et al., Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol, 196:185-190 (1987) disclose culturing of immunosurgically isolated inner cell masses of sheep embryos under conditions which allow for the isolation of mouse ES cell lines

_ 0 derived from mouse ICMs. Handyside et al. (1987) (Id.), report that under such conditions, the sheep ICMs attach, spread, and develop areas of both ES cell-like and endoderm-like cells, but that after prolonged culture only endoderm-like cells are evident. (Id.)

Recently, Cherny et al., Theriogenology, 41:175 (1994) reported purportedly

.5 pluripotent bovine primordial germ cell-derived cell lines maintained in long-term culture. These cells, after approximately seven days in culture, produced ES-like colonies which stain positive for alkaline phosphatase (AP), exhibited the ability to form embryoid bodies, and spontaneously differentiated into at least two different cell types. These cells also reportedly expressed mRNA for the transcription factors OCT4, OCT6 and HES1, a pattern of homeobox genes which is believed to be expressed by ES cells exclusively. Also recently, Campbell et al., Nature, 380:64-68 (1996) reported the production 5 of live lambs following nuclear transfer of cultured embryonic disc (ED) cells from day nine ovine embryos cultured under conditions which promote the isolation of ES cell lines in the mouse. The authors concluded based on their results that ED cells from day nine ovine embryos are totipotent by nuclear transfer and that totipotency is maintained in culture.

L 0 Van Stekelenburg-Hamers et al., Mol. Reprod. Dev., 40:444-454 (1995), reported the isolation and characterization of purportedly permanent cell lines from inner cell mass cells of bovine blastocysts. The authors isolated and cultured ICMs from 8 or 9 day bovine blastocysts under different conditions to determine which feeder cells and culture media are most efficient in supporting the attachment and outgrowth of bovine ICM cells.

L 5 They concluded based on their results that the attachment and outgrowth of cultured ICM cells is enhanced by the use of STO (mouse fibroblast) feeder cells (instead of bovine uterus epithelial cells) and by the use of charcoal-stripped serum (rather than normal serum) to supplement the culture medium. Van Stekelenburg et al reported, however, that their cell lines resembled epithelial cells more than pluripotent ICM cells. (Id)

20 Still further, Smith et al., WO 94/24274, published October 27, 1994, Evans et al,

WO 90/03432, published April 5, 1990, and Wheeler et al, WO 94/26889, published November 24, 1994, report the isolation, selection and propagation of animal stem cells which purportedly may be used to obtain transgenic animals. Also, Evans et al., WO 90/03432, published on April 5, 1990, reported the derivation of purportedly

25 pluripotent embryonic stem cells derived from porcine and bovine species which assertedly are useful for the production of transgenic animals. Further, Wheeler et al, WO 94/26884, published November 24, 1994, disclosed embryonic stem cells which are assertedly useful for the manufacture of chimeric and transgenic ungulates. Thus, based on the foregoing, it is evident that many groups have attempted to produce ES cell lines, e.g., because of their potential application in the production of cloned or transgenic embryos and in nuclear transplantation. The use of ungulate ICM cells for nuclear transplantation has also been reported.

For example, Collas et al., Mol. Reprod. Dev., 38:264-267 (1994) disclose nuclear transplantation of bovine ICMs by microinjection of the lysed donor cells into enucleated mature oocytes. The reference disclosed culturing of embryos in vitro for seven days to produce fifteen blastocysts which, upon transferral into bovine recipients, resulted in four pregnancies and two births. Also, Keefer et al., Biol. Reprod., 50:935-939 (1994), disclose the use of bovine ICM cells as donor nuclei in nuclear transfer procedures, to produce blastocysts which, upon transplantation into bovine recipients, resulted in several live offspring. Further, Sims et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, 90:6143-6147 (1993), disclosed the production of calves by transfer of nuclei from short-term in vitro cultured bovine ICM cells into enucleated mature oocytes.

Also, the production of live lambs following nuclear transfer of cultured embryonic disc cells has been reported (Campbell et al., Nature, 380:64-68 (1996)). Still further, the use of bovine pluripotent embryonic cells in nuclear transfer and the production of chimeric fetuses has also been reported (Stice et al., Biol. Reprod. , 54: 100- 110 (1996)); Collas et al, Mol Reprod. Dev., 38:264-267 (1994).

Further, there have been previous attempts to produce cross species NT units (Wolfe et al., Theriogenology, 33:350 (1990). Specifically, bovine embryonic cells were fused with bison oocytes to produce some cross species NT units possibly having an inner cell mass. However, embryonic cells, not adult cells were used, as donor nuclei in the nuclear transfer procedure. The dogma has been that embryonic cells are more easily reprogrammed than adult cells. This dates back to earlier NT studies in the frog (review by DiBerardino, Differentiation, 17:17-30 (1980)). Also, this study involved very phylogenetically similar animals (cattle nuclei and bison oocytes). By contrast, previously when more diverse species were fused during NT (cattle nuclei into hamster oocytes), no inner cell mass structures were obtained. Further, it has never been previously reported that the inner cell mass cells from NT units could be used to form an 5 ES cell-like colony that could be propagated.

Also, Collas et al (Id), taught the use of granulosa cells (adult somatic cells) to produce bovine nuclear transfer embryos. However, unlike the present invention, these experiments did not involve cross-species nuclear transfer. Also, unlike the present invention ES-like cell colonies were not obtained.

L 0 Recently, U.S. Patent No. 5,843,780, issued to James A. Thomson on December

1, 1998, assigned to the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, purports to disclose a purified preparation of primate embryonic stem cells that are (i) capable of proliferation in an in vitro culture for over one year; (ii) maintain a karyotype in which all chromosomes characteristic of the primate species are present and not noticeably altered

L5 through prolonged culture; (iii) maintains the potential to differentiate into derivatives of endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm tissues throughout culture; and (iv) will not differentiate when cultured on a fibroblast feeder layer. These cells were reportedly negative for the SSEA-1 marker, positive for the SEA-3 marker, positive for the SSEA-4 marker, express alkaline phosphatase activity, are pluripotent, and have karyotypes which

20 include the presence of all the chromosomes characteristic of the primate species and in which none of the chromosomes are altered. Further, these cells are respectfully positive for the TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81 markers. The cells purportedly differentiate into endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm cells when injected into a SCID mouse. Also, purported embryonic stem cell lines derived from human or primate blastocysts are

25 discussed in Thomson et al., Science 282:1145-1147 and Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA

92:7844-7848 (1995). Thus, Thomson disclose what purportedly are non-human primate and human embryonic or stem-like cells and methods for their production. However, there still exists a significant need for methods for producing human embryonic or stem-like cells that are autologous to an intended transplant recipient given their significant therapeutic and

5 diagnostic potential.

In this regard, numerous human diseases have been identified which may be treated by cell transplantation. For example, Parkinson's disease is caused by degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Standard treatment for Parkinson's involves administration of L-DOPA, which temporarily ameliorates the loss of dopamine,

L 0 but causes severe side effects and ultimately does not reverse the progress of the disease.

A different approach to treating Parkinson's, which promises to have broad applicability to treatment of many brain diseases and central nervous system injury, involves transplantation of cells or tissues from fetal or neonatal animals into the adult brain. Fetal neurons from a variety of brain regions can be incorporated into the adult brain. Such

L 5 grafts have been shown to alleviate experimentally induced behavioral deficits, including complex cognitive functions, in laboratory animals. Initial test results from human clinical trials have also been promising. However, supplies of human fetal cells or tissue obtained from miscarriages is very limited. Moreover, obtaining cells or tissues from aborted fetuses is highly controversial.

20 There is currently no available procedure for producing "fetal-like" cells from the patient. Further, allograft tissue is not readily available and both allograft and xenograft tissue are subject to graft rejection. Moreover, in some cases, it would be beneficial to make genetic modifications in cells or tissues before transplantation. However, many cells or tissues wherein such modification would be desirable do not divide well in culture

25 and most types of genetic transformation require rapidly dividing cells.

There is therefore a clear need in the art for a supply of human embryonic or stemlike undifferentiated cells for use in transplants and cell and gene therapies. OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide novel and improved methods for producing embryonic or stem-like cells.

It is a more specific object of the invention to provide a novel method for 5 producing embryonic or stem-like cells which involves transplantation of the nucleus of a mammalian or human cell into an enucleated oocyte of a different species.

It is another specific object of the invention to provide a novel method for producing non-human primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells which involves transplantation of the nucleus of a non-human primate or human cell into an enucleated L o animal or human oocyte, e.g., an ungulate, human or primate enucleated oocyte.

It is another object of the invention to enhance the efficacy of cross-species nuclear transfer by introducing cytoplasm from an oocyte, blastomere or other embryonic cell that is compatible (same species) as the donor cell or nucleus.

It is a more specific object of the invention to enhance the efficacy of cross-species

L5 nuclear transfer by introducing cytoplasm from one or more immature oocytes which cytoplasm is compatible (same or closely related species) as the donor cell or nucleus.

Such immature oocytes optionally may be matured in vitro and/or activated in vitro prior to collection and introduction of cytoplasm into the recipient enucleated oocyte.

It is another object of the invention to enhance the efficacy of cross-species nuclear

20 transfer by incoφorating mitochondrial DNA derived from the same or closely related species (preferably same donor) as the donor cell into the oocyte of a different species that is used for nuclear transfer, before or after enucleation, or into the nuclear transfer unit (after the donor cell has been introduced).

It is still another object of the invention to enhance the efficacy of cross-species

25 nuclear transfer by fusing an enucleated somatic cell (e.g., an enucleated human somatic cell) (karyoplast) with an activated or non-activated, enucleated or non-enucleated oocyte of a different species, e.g., bovine, or by fusion with an activated or unactivated cross- species NT unit which may be cleaved or uncleaved.

It is another object of the invention to provide a novel method for producing lineage-defective non-human primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells which 5 involves transplantation of the nucleus of a non-human primate or human cell, e.g., a human adult cell into an enucleated non-human primate or human oocyte, wherein such cell has been genetically engineered to be incapable of differentiation into a specific cell lineage or has been modified such that the cells are "mortal", and thereby do not give rise to a viable offspring, e.g., by engineering expression of anti-sense or ribozyme telomerase

L O gene.

It is still another object of the invention to enhance efficiency of nuclear transfer and specifically to enhance the development of preimplantation embryos produced by nuclear transfer by genetically engineering donor somatic cells used for nuclear transfer to provide for the expression of genes that enhance embryonic development, e.g., genes

L5 of the MHC I family, and in particular Ped genes such as Q7 and/or Q9.

It is another object of the invention to enhance the production of nuclear transfer embryos, e.g., cross-species nuclear transfer embryos, by the introduction of transgenes before or after nuclear transfer that provide for the expression of an antisense DNA encoding a cell death gene such as BAX, Apaf-1, or capsase, or a portion thereof, or

20 demethylase.

It is yet another object of the invention to enhance the production of nuclear transfer embryos by IVP and more specifically nuclear transfer embryos by genetically altering the donor cell used for nuclear transfer such that it is resistant to apoptosis, e.g., by introduction of a DNA construct that provides for the expression of genes that inhibit 5 apoptosis, e.g., Bcl-2 or Bcl-2 family members and/or by the expression of antisense ribozymes specific to genes that induce apoptosis during early embryonic development. It is still another object of the invention to improve the efficacy of nuclear transfer by improved selection of donor cells of a specific cell cycle stage, e.g., Gl phase, by genetically engineering donor cells such that they express a DNA construct encoding a particular cyclin linked to a detectable marker, e.g., one that encodes a visualizable (e.g., fluorescent tag) marker protein.

It is also an object of the invention to enhance the development of in vitro produced embryos, by culturing such embryos in the presence of one or more protease inhibitors, preferably one or more capsase inhibitors, thereby inhibiting apoptosis.

It is another object of the invention to provide embryonic or stem-like cells produced by transplantation of nucleus of an animal or human cell into an enucleated oocyte of a different species.

It is a more specific object of the invention to provide primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells produced by transplantation of the nucleus of a primate or human cell into an enucleated animal oocyte, e.g., a human, primate or ungulate enucle- ated oocyte.

It is another object of the invention to use such embryonic or stem-like cells for therapy or diagnosis.

It is a specific object of the invention to use such primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells for treatment or diagnosis of any disease wherein cell, tissue or organ fransplantation is therapeutically or diagnostically beneficial.

It is another specific object of the invention to use the embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention for the production of differentiated cells, tissues or organs.

It is a more specific object of the invention to use the primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention for the production of differentiated human cells, tissues or organs. It is another specific object of the invention to use the embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention for the production of genetically engineered embryonic or stem-like cells, which cells may be used to produce genetically engineered or transgenic differentiated human cells, tissues or organs, e.g., having use in gene therapies. It is another specific object of the invention to use the embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention in vitro, e.g. for study of cell differentiation and for assay purposes, e.g. for drug studies.

It is another object of the invention to provide improved methods of transplantation therapy, comprising the usage of isogenic or synegenic cells, tissues or organs produced from the embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention. Such therapies include by way of example freatment of diseases and injuries including Parkinson's, Huntington's, Alzheimer's, ALS, spinal cord injuries, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, diabetes, liver diseases, heart disease, cartilage replacement, burns, vascular diseases, urinary fract diseases, as well as for the treatment of immune defects, bone marrow transplantation, cancer, among other diseases.

It is another object of the invention to use the transgenic or genetically engineered embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention for gene therapy, in particular for the treatment and/or prevention of the diseases and injuries identified, supra. It is another object of the invention to use the embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention or transgenic or genetically engineered embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention as nuclear donors for nuclear transplantation.

It is still another object of the invention to use genetically engineered ES cells produced according to the invention for the production of transgenic animals, e.g., non- human primates, rodents, ungulates, etc. Such transgenic animals can be used to produce, e.g., animal models for study of human diseases, or for the production of desired polypeptides, e.g., therapeutics or nutripharmaceuticals.

With the foregoing and other objects, advantages and features of the invention that will become hereinafter apparent, the nature of the invention may be more clearly understood by reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention and to the appended claims.

BRIEFS DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figure 1 is a photograph of a nuclear transfer (NT) unit produced by transfer of an adult human cell into an enucleated bovine oocyte. Figures 2 to 5 are photographs of embryonic stem-like cells derived from a NT unit such as is depicted in Figure 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a novel method for producing embryonic or stemlike cells, and more specifically non-human primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells by nuclear transfer or nuclear transplantation. In the subject application, nuclear transfer or nuclear fransplantation or NT are used interchangeably.

As discussed supra, the isolation of actual embryonic or stem-like cells by nuclear transfer or nuclear transplantation has never been reported. Rather, previous reported isolation of ES-like cells has been from fertilized embryos. Also, successful nuclear transfer involving cells or DNA of genetically dissimilar species, or more specifically adult cells or DNA of one species (e.g., human) and oocytes of another non-related species has never been reported. Rather, while embryos produced by fusion of cells of closely related species, has been reported, e.g., bovine-goat and bovine-bison, they did not produce ES cells. (Wolfe et al, Theriogenology, 33(1):350 (1990).) Also, there has never been reported a method for producing primate or human ES cells derived from a non-fetal tissue source. Rather, the limited human fetal cells and tissues which are currently available must be obtained or derived from spontaneous abortion tissues and from aborted fetuses.

Also, prior to the present invention, no one obtained embryonic or stem-like cells by cross-species nuclear transplantation. Quite unexpectedly, the present inventors discovered that human embryonic or stem-like cells and cell colonies may be obtained by fransplantation of the nucleus of a human cell, e.g., an adult differentiated human cell, into an enucleated animal oocyte, which is used to produce nuclear transfer (NT) units, the cells of which upon culturing give rise to human embryonic or stem-like cells and cell colonies. This result is highly surprising because it is the first demonstration of effective cross-species nuclear transplantation involving the infroduction of a differentiated donor cell or nucleus into an enucleated oocyte of a genetically dissimilar species, e.g., the fransplantation of cell nuclei from a differentiated animal or human cell, e.g., adult cell, into the enucleated egg of a different animal species, to produce nuclear transfer units containing cells which when cultured under appropriate conditions give rise to embryonic or stem-like cells and cell colonies.

Preferably, the recipient oocyte will be transplanted with a combination of (i) the donor cell or nucleus and (ii) at least one of compatible mitochondrial DNA or compatible cytoplasm. "Compatible" in the present application means that the mitochondrial DNA or cytoplasm is derived from a cell of the same species as the donor cell or nucleus, or a species that is very closely related to the donor cell or nucleus. For instance, if the donor cell or nucleus is a human cell or nucleus, the mitochondrial DNA or cytoplasm will be of human origin or that of a higher primate, e.g., chimpanzee, gorilla, or baboon. Similarly, if the donor cell or nucleus is a bovine cell or nucleus then compatible cytoplasm will be of a closely related ungulate, e.g., buffalo. Most preferably, the compatible mitochondrial DNA and/or cytoplasm will be derived from a cell of the same species as donor and most preferably will be autologous to the donor cell or nucleus.

In a preferred embodiment, the cytoplasm will be derived from immature oocytes or blastomeres, wherein such immature oocytes optionally may be matured in vitro and/or activated in vitro prior to collection of cytoplasm therefrom. Methods of in vitro activating oocytes, including human oocytes, are described infra. Similar, methods of maturing oocytes in vitro have been reported in the literature.

Preferably, the NT units used to produce ES-like cells will be cultured to a size of at least 2 to 400 cells, preferably 4 to 128 cells, and most preferably to a size of at least about 50 cells.

In the present invention, embryonic or stem-like cells refer to cells produced according to the present invention. The present application refers to such cells as stemlike cells rather than stem cells because of the manner in which they are typically produced, i.e., by cross-species nuclear transfer. While these cells are expected to possess similar differentiation capacity as normal stem cells they may possess some insignificant differences because of the manner they are produced. For example, because these stemlike cells may possess the mitochondria of the oocytes used for nuclear fransfer, and they may not behave or be moφhogenetically identical to conventional embryonic stem cells. The present discovery was made based on the observation that nuclear transplantation of the nucleus of an adult human cell, specifically a human epithelial cell obtained from the oral cavity of a human donor, when transferred into an enucleated bovine oocyte, resulted in the formation of nuclear transfer units, the cells of which upon culturing gave rise to human stem-like or embryonic cells and human embryonic or stemlike cell colonies. This result has recently been reproduced by transplantation of keratinocytes from an adult human into an enucleated bovine oocyte with the successful production of a blastocyst and ES cell line. Based thereon, it is hypothesized by the present inventors that bovine oocytes and human oocytes, and likely mammals in general must undergo maturation processes during embryonic development which are sufficiently similar or conserved so as to permit the bovine oocyte to function as an effective substitute or surrogate for a human oocyte. Apparently, oocytes in general comprise factors, likely proteinaceous or nucleic acid in nature, that induce embryonic development under 5 appropriate conditions, and these functions that are the same or very similar in different species. These factors may comprise material RNAs and/or telomerase.

Based on the fact that human cell nuclei can be effectively fransplanted into bovine oocytes, it is reasonable to expect that human cells may be transplanted into oocytes of other non-related species, e.g., other ungulates as well as other animals. In particular,

L 0 other ungulate oocytes should be suitable, e.g. pigs, sheep, horses, goats, etc. Also, oocytes from other sources should be suitable, e.g. oocytes derived from other primates, such as chimpanzees, macaques, baboons, gorilla, Rhesus monkey, amphibians, rodents, rabbits, guinea pigs, etc. Further, using similar methods, it should be possible to transfer human cells or cell nuclei into human oocytes and use the resultant blastocysts to produce

L5 human ES cells.

Therefore, in its broadest embodiment, the present invention involves the transplantation of an animal or human cell nucleus or animal or human cell into an oocyte (preferably enucleated) of an animal species different from the donor nuclei, by injection or fusion, and to optionally further inject into said recipient oocyte compatible

20 mitochondrial DNA and/or cytoplasm, preferably of the same species as the donor cell or nucleus, to produce an NT unit containing cells which may be used to obtain embryonic or stem-like cells and or cell cultures. Enucleation (removal of endogenous oocyte nucleus) may be effected before or after nuclear transfer. For example, the invention may involve the fransplantation of an ungulate cell nucleus or ungulate cell into an enucleated

25 oocyte of another species, e.g., another ungulate or non-ungulate, by injection or fusion, which cells and/or nuclei are combined to produce NT units which are then cultured under conditions suitable to obtain multicellular NT units, preferably comprising at least about 2 to 400 cells, more preferably 4 to 128 cells, and most preferably at least about 50 cells. The cells of such NT units may be used to produce embryonic or stem-like cells or cell colonies upon culturing.

The preferred embodiment of the invention comprises the production of non- 5 human primate or human embryonic or stem-like cells by transplantation of the nucleus of a donor human cell or a human cell into an enucleated human, primate, or non-primate animal oocyte, e.g., an ungulate oocyte, and in a preferred embodiment a bovine enucleated oocyte. Preferably, the enucleated oocyte will also be injected with human cytoplasm (e.g., from at least one immature or mature oocyte or blastomere), or fused L 0 with a karyoplast????? (enucleated human oocyte or blastomere, or that of a higher primate) and/or human mitochondrial DNA.

In general, the embryonic or stem-like cells will be produced by a nuclear fransfer process comprising the following steps:

(i) obtaining desired human or animal cells to be used as a source of donor nuclei L 5 (which may be genetically altered);

(ii) obtaining oocytes from a suitable source, e.g. a mammal and most preferably a primate or an ungulate source, e.g. bovine,

(iii) enucleating said oocytes by removal of endogenous nucleus;

(iv) transferring the human or animal cell or nucleus into the enucleated oocyte 20 of an animal species different than the donor cell or nuclei, e.g., by fusion or injection, wherein steps (iii) and (iv) may be effected in either order;

(v) culturing the resultant NT product or NT unit to produce multiple cell structures (embryoid structures having a discernible inner cell mass); and

(vi) culturing cells obtained from said embryos to obtain embryonic or stem-like 25 cells and stem-like cell colonies.

As noted, the nuclear transfer process preferably will also include the introduction of compatible mitochondrial DNA and/or cytoplasm, i.e., derived from the same species or closely related species to the donor cell or nucleus. This may be effected before, concurrent, or after introduction of the donor cell or nucleus into the recipient oocyte. Preferably, the compatible cytoplasm and/or mitochondrial DNA will be infroduced proximate to infroduction of the donor cell or nucleus into the recipient oocyte, i.e., within about twenty-four hours of such introduction, more preferably within about six hours of such introduction, and most preferably within about two to four hours of such introduction.

Sources of compatible cytoplasm include in particular immature oocytes which can be obtained in large numbers from oocytes. For example, in the case of humans, oocytes can be obtained from ovaries of consenting donors, e.g., women undergoing hysterectomies.

Such immature oocytes optionally will be matured in vitro prior to collection of cytoplasm therefrom. Methods of effecting in vitro maturation of oocytes are described in U.S. Patent 5,945,577, incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. Additionally, such immature oocytes can further optionally be activated in vitro prior to collection of cytoplasm therefrom. Methods for parthenogenetically activating oocytes, including human oocytes, are well known. Exemplary methods for effecting in vitro activation of oocytes are described in U.S. Serial No. 08/888,057, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. Preferred methods for effecting in vitro activation include the use of DMAP and ionomycin, and the use of cycloheximide and ionomycin.

The amount of cytoplasm infroduced into the recipient oocyte preferably will be an amount that increases its cell volume by at most five- fold, preferably no more than about two-fold, and most preferably no more than about one and a half-fold. This may be effected by injecting cytoplasm from compatible oocytes into the recipient oocyte or alternatively by fusing the recipient oocyte of compatible ooplasts (enucleated oocytes of the same or very similar species as the recipient oocyte.) Optionally, all or part of the cytoplasm of the recipient oocyte may be removed to provide more cell volume for the infroduced compatible cytoplasm. With respect thereto, it has been suggested in the literature that maintaining appropriate nucleus/cytoplasm ratios and cell volume is importance to blastocyst formation and development. (Karyikova et al, Reprod, Nutr.

5 Devel 38(6): 665-670)

While the present inventors do not wish to be bound by their belief, it is hypothesized that there are some constituents, e.g., nucleic acid sequences and/or proteins that are present in the cytoplasm of oocytes which facilitate embryogenesis while such factors are believed to be somewhat conserved across phylogenetically diverse species,

L 0 it is theorized that the species differences are significant enough that they may impede the efficiency of cross-species nuclear fransfer. Therefore, the present inventors hope to alleviate such efficacy problems by introducing compatible cytoplasm which should contain constituents of the same or very similar species that promote embryogenesis.

As noted above, cloning efficiency can also be improved by introducing

L5 compatible mitochondrial DNA, i.e., of the same or very similar species as the donor cell or nucleus. This can be effected before, concurrent, or after introduction of the donor cell or nucleus. Essentially, it is another object of the present invention to improve the efficacy of nuclear transfer, e.g., cross-species nuclear fransfer by introducing mitochondrial DNA of the same species or highly similar species as the donor cell or

20 nucleus into the recipient oocyte before or after nuclear transfer, before or after activation, and before or after fusion and cleavage. Preferably, if the donor cell is human, human mitochondrial DNA will be derived from cells of the particular donor, e.g., liver cells and tissue.

Methods for isolating mitochondria are well known in the art. Mitochondria can

25 be isolated from cells in tissue culture, or from tissue. The particular cells or tissue will depend upon the particular species of the donor cell. Examples of cells or tissues that may be used as sources of mitochondria include fibroblasts, epithelium, liver, lung, keratinocyte, stomach, heart, bladder, pancreas, esophageal, lymphocytes, monocytes, mononuclear cells, cumulus cells, uterine cells, placental cells, intestinal cells, hematopoietic cells, oocytes, and tissues containing such cells.

For example, mitochondria can be isolated from tissue culture cells and rat liver. 5 It is anticipated that the same or similar procedures may be used to isolate mitochondria from other cells and tissues, i.e., human cells and tissues. As noted above, preferred source of mitochondria comprises human liver tissue because such cells contain a large number of mitochondria. Those skilled in the art will be able to modify the procedure as necessary, dependent upon the particular cell line or tissue. The isolated DNA can also

L 0 be further purified, if desired, known methods, e.g., density gradient centrifugation.

The resultant isolated mitochondrial DNA will preferably be injected into the recipient oocyte. Preferably, the entire mitochondrial DNA isolated from one or several cells will be infroduced to ensure that the recipient oocyte has a full complement of compatible mitochondrial DNA. Preferably, the mitochondrial DNA will be derived from

L5 an autologous source, i.e., cells or tissues obtained from the human subject who is the source of the donor cell or nucleus, or a person genetically compatible therewith, e.g., close relative. Also, compatible mitochondria can be derived from immature oocytes and introduced together with the compatible cytoplasm.

The specific nuclear transfer or nuclear fransplantation techniques that can be

20 utilized in the present invention have been reported in the literature and are described in various of the references cited in the Background of the Invention. See, in particular, Campbell et al, Theriogenology, 43:181 (1995); Collas et al, Mol. Report Dev., 38:264- 267 (1994); Keefer et al, Biol. Reprod., 50:935-939 (1994); Sims et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, 90:6143-6147 (1993); WO 94/26884; WO 94/24274, and WO 90/03432, wliich

25 are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein. Also, U.S. Patent Nos. 4,944,384 and 5,057,420 describe procedures for bovine nuclear fransplantation. See, also Cibelli et al, Science, Vol. 280:1256-1258 (1998), U.S. Patent No. 5,945,577; WO 97/07669; WO 97/07668, and WO 96/07732, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.

Human or animal cells, preferably mammalian cells, may be obtained and cultured by well known methods. Human and animal cells useful in the present invention include, by way of example, epithelial, neural cells, epidermal cells, keratinocytes, hematopoietic cells, melanocytes, chondrocytes, lymphocytes (B and T lymphocytes), other immune cells, erythrocytes, macrophages, melanocytes, monocytes, mononuclear cells, stem cells, fibroblasts, cardiac muscle cells, and other muscle cells, etc. Moreover, the human cells used for nuclear fransfer may be obtained from different organs, e.g., skin, lung, pancreas, liver, stomach, intestine, heart, reproductive organs, bladder, kidney, urethra and other urinary organs, etc. These are just examples of suitable donor cells.

Suitable donor cells, i.e., cells useful in the subject invention, may be obtained from any cell or organ of the body. This includes all somatic and germ cells. Preferably, the donor cells or nucleus will comprise an actively dividing, i.e., non-quiescent (G_l5 S or M cell cycle), cells as this has been reported to enhance cloning efficacy. Still more preferably, such donor cells will be in the Gl cell cycle. However, quiescent donor cells (G₀) are also within the scope of the present invention. Quiescent cells may be obtained, e.g., appropriate culture conditions, by serum starvation.

The resultant blastocysts may be used to obtain embryonic stem cell lines according to the culturing methods reported by Thomson et al., Science, 282: 1145-1147

(1998) and Thomson et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, 92:7544-7848 (1995), incoφorated by reference in their entirety herein.

Alternatively, the resultant blastocysts having a discernible inner cell mass can be cultured according to the method disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,905,042, incoφorated by reference in its entirety herein. This method essentially comprises culturing of the entire inner cell mass or a portion thereof on a feeder layer, wherein contact with the feeder layer is maintained throughout culturing. This culturing method further comprises selective removal of a portion of the cultured inner cell mass as culturing proceeds, i.e., the outermost portion of the cultured inner cell mass that comprises cells possessing an ES-like appearance. This outermost portion of the cell colony is then introduced onto another feeder layer, typically fetal fibroblasts. This method has been found to provide 5 for the maintenance of non-differentiated (embryonic stem) cells in tissue culture, i.e., cells which exhibit an ES-like moφhology which, upon removal from the feeder layer, differentiate into other cell types.

In the Example which follows, the cells used as donors for nuclear transfer were epithelial cells derived from the oral cavity of a human donor and adult human

L 0 keratinocytes. However, as discussed, the disclosed method is applicable to other human cells or nuclei. Moreover, the cell nuclei may be obtained from both human somatic and germ cells.

It is also possible to arrest donor cells at mitosis before nuclear fransfer, using a suitable technique known in the art. Methods for stopping the cell cycle at various stages

L5 have been thoroughly reviewed in U.S. Patent 5,262,409, which is herein incoφorated by reference. In particular, while cycloheximide has been reported to have an inhibitory effect on mitosis (Bowen and Wilson (1955) J. Heredity, 45:3-9), it may also be employed for improved activation of mature bovine follicular oocytes when combined with electric pulse freatment (Yang et al. (1992) Biol. Reprod., 42 (Suppl. 1): 117).

20 Zygote gene activation is associated with hyperacetylation of Histone H4.

Trichostatin-A has been shown to inhibit histone deacetylase in a reversible manner (Adenot et al, "Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos." Development (Nov. 1997) 124(22): 4615-4625; Yoshida et al. "Trichostatin

25 A and trapoxin: novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function." Bioessays (May, 1995) 17(5): 423-430), as have other compounds. For instance, butyrate is also believed to cause hyper-acetylations of histones by inhibiting histone deacetylase. Generally, butyrate appears to modify gene expression and in almost all cases its addition to cell cultures appears to arrest cell growth. Use of butyrate to arrest cell growth is described in U.S. Patent No. 5,681,718, which is herein incoφorated by reference. Thus, donor cells may be exposed to Trichostatin-A or another appropriate deacetylase inhibitor prior to fusion, or such a compound may be added to the culture media prior to genome activation.

Additionally, demethylation of DNA is thought to be a requirement for proper access of transcription factors to DNA regulatory sequences. Global demethylation of DNA from the eight-cell stage to the blastocyst stage in preimplantation embryos has previously been described (Stein et al., Mol. Reprod. & Dev., 47(4): 421-429). Also, Jaenisch et al. (1997) have reported that 5-azacytidine can be used to reduce the level of DNA methylation in cells, potentially leading to increased access of transcription factors to DNA regulatory sequences. Accordingly, donor cells may be exposed to 5-azacytidine (5-Aza) previous to fusion, or 5-Aza may be added to the culture medium from the 8 cell stage to blastocyst. Alternatively, other known methods for effecting DNA demethylation may be used.

The oocytes used as the recipient for nuclear transfer or for recovery of compatible cytoplasm may be obtained from animals including mammals and amphibians. Suitable mammalian sources for oocytes include sheep, bovines, ovines, pigs, horses, rabbits, goats, guinea pigs, mice, hamsters, rats, primates, humans, etc. In the preferred embodiments, the oocytes will be obtained from primates or ungulates, e.g., a bovine. In the case of human oocytes, a suitable source comprises ovaries obtained from consenting women, e.g., those undergoing hysterectomies. Methods for isolation of oocytes are well known in the art. Essentially, this will comprise isolating oocytes from the ovaries or reproductive tract of a mammal or amphibian, e.g., a bovine. A readily available source of bovine oocytes is slaughterhouse materials.

For the successful use of techniques such as genetic engineering, nuclear transfer and cloning, oocytes preferably are matured in vitro before these cells can be used as recipient cells for nuclear fransfer. This process generally requires collecting immature

(prophase I) oocytes from animal ovaries, e.g., bovine ovaries obtained at a slaughterhouse and maturing the oocytes in a maturation medium prior to fertilization or enucleation until the oocyte attains the metaphase II stage, which in the case of bovine oocytes generally occurs about 18-24 hours post-aspiration. For purposes of the present invention, this period of time is known as the "maturation period." As used herein for calculation of time periods, "aspiration" refers to aspiration of the immature oocyte from ovarian follicles.

Additionally, metaphase II stage oocytes, which have been matured in vivo have been successfully used in nuclear fransfer techniques. For example, mature metaphase II oocytes can be collected surgically from either non-superovulated or superovulated cows or heifers 35 to 48 hours past the onset of estras or past the injection of human chorionic gonadofropin (hCG) or similar hormone. Also, in vivo matured oocytes can be collected from other species, e.g., sheep, horse, goat pig, et al.

The stage of maturation of the oocyte at enucleation and nuclear fransfer has been reported to be significant to the success of NT methods. (See e.g., Prather et al.,

Differentiation, 48, 1-8, 1991). In general, previous successful mammalian embryo cloning practices used metaphase II stage oocyte as the recipient oocyte because at this stage it is believed that the oocyte can be or is sufficiently "activated" to treat the infroduced nucleus as it does a fertilizing sperm. In domestic animals, and especially cattle, the oocyte activation period generally ranges from about 16-52 hours, preferably about

28-42 hours post-aspiration. For example, immature oocytes may be washed in HEPES buffered hamster embryo culture medium (HECM) as described in Seshagine et al., Biol. Reprod., 40, 544- 606, 1989, and then placed into drops of maturation medium consisting of 50 microliters of tissue culture medium (TCM) 199 containing 10% fetal calf serum which contains 5 appropriate gonadotropins such as luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and esfradiol under a layer of lightweight paraffin or silicon at 39°C. After a fixed time maturation period, which typically will range from about 10 to 40 hours, and preferably about 16-18 hours, and which can occur in vivo or in vitro, the oocytes will preferably be enucleated. Prior to enucleation the oocytes will preferably be

L 0 removed and placed in HECM containing 1 milligram per miUiliter of hyaluronidase prior to removal of cumulus cells. This may be effected by repeated pipetting through very fine bore pipettes or by vortexing briefly. The stripped oocytes are then screened for polar bodies, and the selected metaphase II oocytes, as determined by the presence of polar bodies, are then used for nuclear transfer. Enucleation is typically effected at this

L 5 time. However, enucleation may be effected before or after infroduction of donor cell or nucleus because the donor nucleus is readily discernible from endogenous nucleus.

Enucleation may be effected by known methods, such as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,994,384 which is incoφorated by reference herein. For example, metaphase II oocytes are either placed in HECM, optionally containing 7.5 micrograms per miUiliter

20 cytochalasin B, for immediate enucleation, or may be placed in a suitable medium, for example CRlaa, plus 10% estrus cow serum, and then enucleated later, preferably not more than 24 hours later, and more preferably 16-18 hours later.

Enucleation may be accomplished microsurgically using a micropipette to remove the polar body and the adjacent cytoplasm. The oocytes may then be screened to identify

25 those of which have been successfully enucleated. This screening may be effected by staining the oocytes with 1 microgram per miUiliter 33342 Hoechst dye in HECM, and then viewing the oocytes under ultraviolet irradiation for less than 10 seconds. The oocytes that have been successfully enucleated can then be placed in a suitable culture medium.

In the present invention, the recipient oocytes will typically be enucleated at a time ranging from about 10 hours to about 40 hours after the initiation of in vitro maturation, more preferably from about 16 hours to about 24 hours after initiation of in vitro maturation, and most preferably about 16-18 hours after initiation of in vitro maturation. Enucleation may be effected before, simultaneous or after nuclear fransfer. Also, enucleation may be effected before, after or simultaneous to activation.

A single animal or human cell or nucleus derived therefrom which is typically heterologous to the enucleated oocyte will then be transferred into the perivitelline space of the oocyte, typically enucleated, used to produce the NT unit. However, removal of endogenous nucleus may alternatively be effected after nuclear fransfer. The animal or human cell or nucleus and the enucleated oocyte will be used to produce NT units according to methods known in the art. For example, the cells may be fused by elecfro- fusion. Elecfrofusion is accomplished by providing a pulse of electricity that is sufficient to cause a fransient break down of the plasma membrane. This breakdown of the plasma membrane is very short because the membrane reforms rapidly. Essentially, if two adjacent membranes are induced to break down, upon reformation the lipid bilayers intermingle and small channels will open between the two cells. Due to the ther- modynamic instability of such a small opening, it enlarges until the two cells become one.

Reference is made to U.S. Patent 4,997,384, by Prather et al., (incoφorated by reference in its entirety herein) for a further discussion of this process. A variety of elecfrofusion media can be used including e.g., sucrose, mannitol, sorbitol and phosphate buffered solution. Fusion can also be accomplished using Sendai virus as a fusogenic agent (Graham, Wisterlnot. Symp. Monogr., 9, 19, 1969).

Also, in some cases (e.g. with small donor nuclei) it may be preferable to inject the nucleus directly into the oocyte rather than using electroporation fusion. Such techniques are disclosed in Collas and Barnes, Mol. Reprod. Dev., 38:264-267 (1994), and incoφorated by reference in its entirety herein.

Preferably, the human or animal cell and oocyte are elecfrofused in a 500 μm chamber by application of an electrical pulse of 90- 120V for about 15 μsec, about 24 hours after initiation of oocyte maturation. After fusion, the resultant fused NT units are preferably placed in a suitable medium until activation, e.g., one identified infra. Typically activation will be effected shortly thereafter, typically less than 24 hours later, and preferably about 4-9 hours later. However, it is also possible to activate the recipient oocyte before or proximate (simultaneous) to nuclear fransfer, which may or may not be enucleated. For example, activation may be effected from about twelve hours prior to nuclear transfer to about twenty-four hours after nuclear fransfer. More typically, activation is effected simultaneous or shortly after nuclear transfer, e.g., about four to nine hours later.

The NT unit may be activated by known methods. Such methods include, e.g., culturing the NT unit at sub-physiological temperature, in essence by applying a cold, or actually cool temperature shock to the NT unit. This may be most conveniently done by culturing the NT unit at room temperature, which is cold relative to the physiological temperature conditions to which embryos are normally exposed.

Alternatively, activation may be achieved by application of known activation agents. For example, penetration of oocytes by sperm during fertilization has been shown to activate prefusion oocytes to yield greater numbers of viable pregnancies and multiple genetically identical calves after nuclear transfer. Also, treatments such as electrical and chemical shock or cycloheximide freatment may also be used to activate NT embryos after fusion. Suitable oocyte activation methods are the subject of U.S. Patent No. 5,496,720, to Susko-Parrish et al., which is herein incoφorated by reference.

For example, oocyte activation may be effected by simultaneously or sequentially: (i) increasing levels of divalent cations in the oocyte, and (ii) reducing phosphorylation of cellular proteins in the oocyte.

This will generally be effected by introducing divalent cations into the oocyte cytoplasm, e.g., magnesium, strontium, barium or calcium, e.g., in the form of an iono- phore. Other methods of increasing divalent cation levels include the use of electric 5 shock, freatment with ethanol and treatment with caged chelators.

Phosphorylation may be reduced by known methods, e.g., by the addition of kinase inhibitors, e.g., serine-threonine kinase inhibitors, such as 6-dimethylaminopurine, staurosporine, 2-aminopurine, and sphingosine.

Alternatively, phosphorylation of cellular proteins may be inhibited by L o infroduction of a phosphatase into the oocyte, e.g., phosphatase 2A and phosphatase 2B.

Specific examples of activation methods are listed below.

1. Activation by Ionomycin and DMAP

1- Place oocytes in Ionomycin (5 μM) with 2 mM of DMAP for 4 minutes; L5 2- Move the oocytes into culture media with 2 mM of DMAP for 4 hours; 3- Rinse four times and place in culture.

2. Activation by Ionomycin DMAP and Roscovitin

1- Place oocytes in Ionomycin (5 μM) with 2 mM of DMAP for four 20 minutes;

2- Move the oocytes into culture media with 2 mM of DMAP and 200 microM of Roscovitin for three hours;

3- Rinse four times and place in culture.

3. Activation by exposure to Ionomycin followed by cytochalasin and 25 cycloheximide.

1- Place oocytes in Ionomycin (5 microM) for four minutes; 2- Move oocytes to culture media containing 5 μg/ml of cytochalasin B and 5 μg/ml of cycloheximide for five hours;

3- Rinse four times and place in culture. 4. Activation by electrical pulses 1- Place eggs in mannitol media containing 100 μM CaCL₂;

2- Deliver three pulses of 1.0 kVcm^"1 for 20 μsec, each pulse 22 minutes apart;

3- Move oocytes to culture media containing 5 μg/ml of cytochalasin B for three hours. 5. Activation by exposure with ethanol followed by cytochalasin and cycloheximide

1- Place oocytes in 7% ethanol for one minute;

2- Move oocytes to culture media containing 5 μg/ml of cytochalasin B and 5 μg/ml of cycloheximide for five hours; 3- Rinse four times and place in culture.

6. Activation by microinjection of adenophostine

1- Inject oocytes with 10 to 12 picoliters of a solution containing 10 μM of adenophostine;

2- Put oocytes in culture. 7. Activation by microinjection of sperm factor

1- Inject oocytes with 10 to 12 picoliters of sperm factor isolated, e.g., from primates, pigs, bovine, sheep, goats, horses, mice, rats, rabbits or hamsters;

2- Put oocyte in culture. 8. Activation by microinjection of recombinant sperm factor.

9. Activation by Exposure to DMAP followed by Cycloheximide and Cytochalasin B Place oocytes or NT units, typically about 22 to 28 hours post maturation in about 2 mM DMAP for about one hour, followed by incubation for about two to twelve hours, preferably about eight hours, in 5 μg/ml of cytochalasin B and 20 μg/ml cycloheximide. 5 The above activation protocols are exemplary of protocols used for nuclear transfer procedures, e.g., those including the use of primate or human donor cells or oocytes. However, the above activation protocols may be used when either or both the donor cell and nucleus is of ungulate origin, e.g., a sheep, buffalo, horse, goat, bovine, pig and/or wherein the oocyte is of ungulate origin, e.g., sheet, pig, buffalo, horse, goat, bovine, etc., L 0 as well as for other species.

As noted, activation may be effected before, simultaneous, or after nuclear fransfer. In general, activation will be effected about 40 hours prior to nuclear transfer and fusion to about 40 hours after nuclear transfer and fusion, more preferably about 24 hours before to about 24 hours after nuclear transfer and fusion, and most preferably from L5 about 4 to 9 hours before nuclear fransfer and fusion to about 4 to 9 hours after nuclear transfer and fusion. Activation is preferably effected after or proximate to in vitro or in vivo maturation of the oocyte, e.g., approximately simultaneous or within about 40 hours of maturation, more preferably within about 24 hours of maturation.

Activated NT units may be cultured in a suitable in vitro culture medium until the 20 generation of embryonic or stem-like cells and cell colonies. Culture media suitable for culturing and maturation of embryos are well known in the art. Examples of known media, which may be used for bovine embryo culture and maintenance, include Ham's F-10 + 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), Tissue Culture Medium-199 (TCM-199) + 10% fetal calf serum, Tyrodes-Albumin-Lactate-Pyravate (TALP), Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered 25 Saline (PBS), Eagle's and Whitten's media. One of the most common media used for the collection and maturation of oocytes is TCM-199, and 1 to 20% serum supplement including fetal calf serum, newborn serum, estrual cow serum, lamb serum or steer serum. A preferred maintenance medium includes TCM-199 with Earl salts, 10% fetal calf serum, 0.2 Ma pyruvate and 50 μg/ml gentamicin sulphate. Any of the above may also involve co-culture with a variety of cell types such as granulosa cells, oviduct cells, BRL cells and uterine cells and STO cells. 5 In particular, human epithelial cells of the endometrium secrete leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) during the preimplantation and implantation period. Therefore, the addition of LIF to the culture medium could be of importance in enhancing the in vitro development of the reconstructed embryos. The use of LIF for embryonic or stemlike cell cultures has been described in U.S. Patent 5,712,156, which is herein

L 0 incoφorated by reference.

Another maintenance medium is described in U.S. Patent 5,096,822 to Rosenkrans, Jr. et al., which is incoφorated herein by reference. This embryo medium, named CR1, contains the nutritional substances necessary to support an embryo. CR1 contains hemicalcium L-lactate in amounts ranging from 1.0 mM to 10 mM, preferably 1.0 mM

L5 to 5.0 mM. Hemicalcium L-lactate is L-lactate with a hemicalcium salt incoφorated therein.

Also, suitable culture medium for maintaining human embryonic cells in culture are discussed in Thomson et al., Science, 282:1145-1147 (1998) and Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, 92:7844-7848 (1995). Further, the NT units may be cultured in biological

20 fluids such as peritoneal fluid, amniotic fluid, vitreous/aqueous humor and lymph fluid.

Afterward, the cultured NT unit or units are preferably washed and then placed in a suitable media, e.g., the media identified above, such as CRIaa medium, Ham's F-10,

Tissue Culture Media -199 (TCM-199). Tyrodes-Albumin-Lactate-Pyruvate (TALP)

Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), Eagle's or Whitten's, preferably containing

25 about 10% FCS. Such culturing will preferably be effected in well plates which contain a suitable confluent feeder layer. Suitable feeder layers include, by way of example, fibroblasts and epithelial cells, e.g., fibroblasts and uterine epithelial cells derived from ungulates, chicken fibroblasts, murine (e.g., mouse or rat) fibroblasts, STO and SI-m220 feeder cell lines, and BRL cells.

In the preferred embodiment, the feeder cells will comprise mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Means for preparation of a suitable fibroblast feeder layer are described in 5 the example which follows and is well within the skill of the ordinary artisan.

The NT units are cultured on the feeder layer until the NT units reach a size suitable for obtaining cells which may be used to produce embryonic stem-like cells or cell colonies. Preferably, these NT units will be cultured until they reach a size of at least about 2 to 400 cells, more preferably about 4 to 128 cells, and most preferably at least L 0 about 50 cells. The culturing will be effected under suitable conditions, i.e., about 38.5 °C and 5% C0₂, with the culture medium changed in order to optimize growth typically about every 2-5 days, preferably about every 3 days.

In the case of human cell/enucleated bovine oocyte derived NT units, sufficient cells to produce an ES cell colony, typically on the order of about 50 cells, will be L5 obtained about 12 days after initiation of oocyte activation. However, this may vary dependent upon the particular cell used as the nuclear donor, the species of the particular oocyte, and culturing conditions. One skilled in the art can readily ascertain visually when a desired sufficient number of cells has been obtained based on the moφhology of the cultured NT units. 20 In the case of human/human nuclear fransfer embryos, or other embryos produced using non-human primate donor or oocyte, it may be advantageous to use culture medium known to be useful for maintaining human and other primate cells in tissue culture.

Examples of a culture media suitable for human embryo culture include the medium reported in Jones et al, Human Reprod., 13(1):169-177 (1998), the Pl-catalog #99242 25 medium, and the P- 1 catalog #99292 medium, both available from Irvine Scientific, Santa

Ana, California, and those used by Thomson et al. (1998) and (1995), which references are incoφorated by reference in their entirety. Another preferred medium comprises ACM + uridine + glucose + 1000 IU of LIF. Still other examples of suitable media include naturally occurring biological fluids such as peritoneal fluid, vitreous /aqueous humor, amniotic fluid, and lymph fluid.

As discussed above, the cells used in the present invention will preferably 5 comprise mammalian somatic cells, most preferably cells derived from an actively proliferating (non-quiescent) mammalian cell culture. In an especially preferred embodiment, the donor cell will be genetically modified by the addition, deletion or substitution of a desired DNA sequence. For example, the donor cell, e.g., a keratinocyte or fibroblast, e.g., of human, primate or bovine origin, may be transfected or transformed

L0 with a DNA construct that provides for the expression of a desired gene product, e.g., therapeutic polypeptide. Examples thereof include lymphokines, e.g., IGF-I, IGF-II, interferons, colony stimulating factors, connective tissue polypeptides such as collagens, genetic factors, clotting factors, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, etc. Also, desired genes may be "knocked in" or "knocked out" by homologous recombination.

L 5 Also, as discussed above, the donor cells may be modified prior to nuclear transfer, e.g., to effect impaired cell lineage development, enhanced embryonic development and/or inhibition of apoptosis. Examples of desirable modifications are discussed further below.

One aspect of the invention will involve genetic modification of the donor cell,

20 e.g., a human cell, such that it is lineage deficient and therefore when it is used for nuclear fransfer it will be unable to give rise to a viable offspring. This is desirable especially in the context of human nuclear transfer embryos, wherein for ethical reasons, production of a viable embryo may be an unwanted outcome. This can be effected by genetically engineering a human cell such that it is incapable of differentiating into specific cell

25 lineages when used for nuclear transfer. In particular, cells may be genetically modified such that when used as nuclear transfer donors the resultant "embryos" do not contain or substantially lack at least one of mesoderm, endoderm or ectoderm tissue. This can be accomplished by, e.g., knocking out or impairing the expression of one or more mesoderm, endoderm or ectoderm specific genes. Examples thereof include:

Mesoderm: SRF, MESP- 1 , HNF-4, beta-I integrin, MSD;

Endoderm: GATA-6, GATA-4; Ectoderm: RNA helicase A, H beta 58.

The above list is intended to be exemplary and non-exhaustive of known genes which are involved in the development of mesoderm, endoderm and ectoderm. The generation of mesoderm deficient, endoderm deficient and ectoderm deficient cells and embryos has been previously reported in the literature. See, e.g., Arsenian et al, EMBO J., Vol. 17(2):6289-6299 (1998); Saga Y, Meek Dev., Vol. 75(l-2):53-66 (1998);

Holdener et al, Development, Vol. 120(5):1355-1346 (1994); Chen et al, Genes Dev. Vol. 8(20):2466-2477 (1994); Rohwedel et al, .Dev. Biol, 201(2):167-189 (1998) (mesoderm); Morrisey et al, Genes, Dev., Vol. 12(22):3579-3590 (1998); Soudais et al, Development, Vol. 121(11):3877-3888 (1995) (endoderm); and Lee et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 95:(23):13709-13713 (1998); and Radice et al, Development, Vol. 111(3):801-811

(1991) (ectoderm).

In general, a desired somatic cell, e.g., a human keratinocyte, epithelial cell or fibroblast, will be genetically engineered such that one or more genes specific to particular cell lineages are "knocked out" and/or the expression of such genes significantly impaired. This may be effected by known methods, e.g., homologous recombination. A preferred genetic system for effecting "knock-out" of desired genes is disclosed by Capecchi et al, U.S. Patents 5,631,153 and 5,464,764, which reports positive-negative selection (PNS) vectors that enable targeted modification of DNA sequences in a desired mammalian genome. Such genetic modification will result in a cell that is incapable of differentiating into a particular cell lineage when used as a nuclear transfer donor. This genetically modified cell will be used to produce a lineage-defective nuclear transfer embryo, i.e., that does not develop at least one of a functional mesoderm, endoderm or ectoderm. Thereby, the resultant embryos, even if implanted, e.g., into a human uterus, would not give rise to a viable offspring. However, the ES cells that result from such nuclear transfer will still be useful in that they will produce cells of the one or two remaining non-impaired lineage. For example, an ectoderm deficient human nuclear transfer embryo will still give rise to mesoderm and endoderm derived differentiated cells. An ectoderm deficient cell can be produced by deletion and/or impairment of one or both of RNA helicase A or H beta 58 genes. These lineage deficient donor cells may also be genetically modified to express another desired DNA sequence. Thus, the genetically modified donor cell will give rise to a lineage-deficient blastocyst which, when plated, will differentiate into at most two of the embryonic germ layers.

Alternatively, the donor cell can be modified such that it is "immortal". This can be achieved by expressing anti-sense or ribozyme telomerase genes. This can be effected by known genetic methods that will provide for expression of antisense DNA or ribozymes, or by gene knockout. These "immortal" cells, when used for nuclear transfer, will not be capable of differentiating into viable offspring.

Another preferred embodiment of the present invention is the production of nuclear transfer embryos that grow more efficiently in tissue culture. This is advantageous in that it should reduce the requisite time and necessary fusions to produce ES cells and/or offspring (if the blastocysts are to be implanted into a female surrogate). This is desirable also because it has been observed that blastocysts and ES cells resulting from nuclear transfer may have impaired development potential. While these problems may often be alleviated by alteration of tissue culture conditions, an alternative solution is to enhance embryonic development by enhancing expression of genes involved in embryonic development. For example, it has been reported that the gene products of the Ped type, which are members of the MHC I family, are of significant importance to embryonic development. More specifically, it has been reported in the case of mouse preimplantation embryos that the Q7 and Q9 genes are responsible for the "fast growth" phenotype. Therefore, it is anticipated that introduction of DNAs that provide for the expression of these and related genes, or their human or other mammalian counteφarts into donor cells, will give rise to nuclear fransfer embryos that grow more quickly. This is particularly desirable in the context of cross-species nuclear transfer embryos which may develop less efficiently in tissue culture than nuclear transfer embryos produced by fusion of cells or nuclei of the same species.

Preferably, a DNA construct containing the Q7 and/or Q9 gene will be infroduced into donor somatic cells prior to nuclear transfer. For example, an expression construct can be constructed containing a strong constitutive mammalian promoter operably linked to the Q7 and/or Q9 genes, an IRES, one or more suitable selectable markers, e.g,. neomycin, ADA, DHFR, and a poly-A sequence, e.g., bGH polyA sequence. Also, it may be advantageous to further enhance Q7 and Q9 gene expression by the inclusion of insulates. It is anticipated that these genes will be expressed early on in blastocyst development as these genes are highly conserved in different species, e.g., bovines, goats, porcine, dogs, cats, and humans. Also, it is anticipated that donor cells can be engineered to affect other genes that enhance embryonic development. Thus, these genetically modified donor cells should produce blastocysts and preimplantation stage embryos more efficiently.

Still another aspect of the invention involves the construction of donor cells that are resistant to apoptosis, i.e., programmed cell death. It has been reported in the literature that cell death related genes are present in preimplantation stage embryos.

(Adams et al, Science, 281(5381):1322-1326 (1998)). Genes reported to induce apoptosis include, e.g., Bad, Bok, BH3, Bik, Hrk, BNIP3, Bim_L, Bad, Bid, and EGL-1. By contrast, genes that reportedly protect cells from programmed cell death include, by way of example, BcL-XL, Bcl-w, Mcl-1, Al, Nr-13, BHRF-1, LMW5-HL, ORF16, Ks-Bel-2, E1B-19K, and CED-9.

Thus, donor cells can be constructed wherein genes that induce apoptosis are "knocked out" or wherein the expression of genes that protect the cells from apoptosis is enhanced or turned on during embryonic development.

For example, this can be effected by introducing a DNA construct that provides for regulated expression of such protective genes, e.g., Bcl-2 or related genes during embryonic development. Thereby, the gene can be "turned on" by culturing the embryo under specific growth conditions. Alternatively, it can be linked to a constitutive promoter.

More specifically, a DNA construct containing a Bcl-2 gene operably linked to a regulatable or constitutive promoter, e.g., PGK, SV40, CMV, ubiquitin, or beta-actin, an IRES, a suitable selectable marker, and a poly-A sequence can be constructed and introduced into a desired donor mammalian cell, e.g., human keratinocyte or fibroblast.

These donor cells, when used to produce nuclear fransfer embryos, should be resistant to apoptosis and thereby differentiate more efficiently in tissue culture. Thereby, the speed and/or number of suitable preimplantation embryos produced by nuclear transfer can be increased. Another means of accomplishing the same result is to impair the expression of one or more genes that induce apoptosis. This will be effected by knock-out or by the use of antisense or ribozymes against genes that are expressed in and which induce apoptosis early on in embryonic development. Examples thereof are identified above. Cell death genes that may be expressed in the antisense orientation include BAX, Apaf-1, and capsases. Additionally, a transgene may be infroduced that encodes for methylase or demethylase in the sense or antisense orientation. DNAs that encode methylase and demethylase enzymes are well known in the art. Still alternatively, donor cells may be constructed containing both modifications, i.e., impairment of apoptosis-inducing genes and enhanced expression of genes that impede or prevent apoptosis. The construction and selection of genes that affect apoptosis, and cell lines that express such genes, is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,646,008, which patent is incoφorated by reference herein. Many DNAs that promote or inhibit apoptosis have been reported and are the subject of numerous patents.

Another means of enhancing cloning efficiency is to select cells of a particular cell cycle stage as the donor cell. It has been reported that this can have significant effects on nuclear transfer efficiency. (Barnes et al, Mol. Reprod. Devel, 36(1):33-41 (1993). Different methods for selecting cells of a particular cell cycle stage have been reported and include serum starvation (Campbell et al, Nature, 380:64-66 (1996); Wilmut et al, Nature, 385:810-813 (1997), and chemical synchronization (Urbani et al, Exp. Cell Res., 219(1): 159-168 (1995). For example, a particular cyclin DNA may be operably linked to a regulatory sequence, together with a detectable marker, e.g., green fluorescent protein (GFP), followed by the cyclin destruction box, and optionally insulation sequences to enhance cyclin and marker protein expression. Thereby, cells of a desired cell cycle can be easily visually detected and selected for use as a nuclear transfer donor. An example thereof is the cyclin Dl gene in order to select for cells that are in Gl. However, any cyclin gene should be suitable for use in the claimed invention. (See, e.g., King et al, Mol. Biol. Cell, Vol. 7(9): 1343-1357 (1996)).

However, a less invasive or more efficient method for producing cells of a desired cell cycle stage are needed. It is anticipated that this can be effected by genetically modifying donor cells such that they express specific cyclins under detectable conditions. Thereby, cells of a specific cell cycle can be readily discerned from other cell cycles. Cyclins are proteins that are expressed only during specific stages of the cell cycle.

They include cyclin Dl, D2 and D3 in Gl phase, cyclin Bl and B2 in G2/M phase and cyclin E, A and H in S phase. These proteins are easily translated and destroyed in the cytogolcytosol. This "fransient" expression of such proteins is attributable in part to the presence of a "destruction box", which is a short amino acid sequence that is part of the protein that functions as a tag to direct the prompt destruction of these proteins via the ubiquitin pathway. (Adams et al, Science, 281 (5321):1322-1326 (1998)). In the present invention, donor cells will be constructed that express one or more of such cyclin genes under easily detectable conditions, preferably visualizable, e.g., by the use of a fluorescent label. For example, a particular cyclin DNA may be operably linked to a regulatory sequence, together with a detectable marker, e.g., green fluorescent protein (GFP), followed by the cyclin destruction box, and optionally insulation sequences to enhance cyclin and/or marker protein expression. Thereby, cells of a desired cell cycle can be easily visually detected and selected for use as a nuclear transfer donor. An example thereof is the cyclin Dl gene which can be used to select for cells that are in Gl . However, any cyclin gene should be suitable for use in the claimed invention. (See, e.g., King et al, Mol. Biol. Cell, Vol. 7(9): 1343-1357 (1996)). As discussed, the present invention provides different methods for enhancing nuclear transfer efficiency, preferably a cross-species nuclear transfer process. While the present inventors have demonstrated that nuclei or cells of one species when inserted or fused with an enucleated oocyte of a different species can give rise to nuclear transfer embryos that produce blastocysts, which embryos can give rise to ES cell lines, the efficiency of such process is quite low. Therefore, many fusions typically need to be effected to produce a blastocyst the cells of which may be cultured to produce ES cells and ES cell lines. Yet another means for enhancing the development of nuclear transfer embryos in vitro is by optimizing culture conditions. One means of achieving this result will be to culture NT embryos under conditions impede apoptosis. With respect to this embodiment of the invention, it has been found that proteases such as capsases can cause oocyte death by apoptosis similar to other cell types. (See, Jurisicosva et al, Mol. Reprod. Devel, 51(3):243-253 (1998).) It is anticipated that blastocyst development will be enhanced by including in culture media used for nuclear fransfer and to maintain blastocysts or culture preimplantation stage embryos one or more capsase inhibitors. Such inhibitors include by way of example capsase-4 inhibitor I, capsase-3 inhibitor I, capsase-6 inhibitor II, capsase-9 inhibitor II, and capsase- 1 inhibitor I. The amount thereof will be an amount effective to inhibit apoptosis, e.g., 0.00001 to 5.0% by weight of medium; more preferably 0.01% to 1.0% by weight of medium. Thus, the foregoing methods may be used to increase the efficiency of nuclear transfer by enhancing subsequent blastocyst and embryo development in tissue culture. After NT units of the desired size are obtained, the cells are mechanically removed from the zone and are then used to produce embryonic or stem-like cells and cell lines. This is preferably effected by taking the clump of cells which comprise the NT unit, which typically will contain at least about 50 cells, washing such cells, and plating the cells onto a feeder layer, e.g., irradiated fibroblast cells. Typically, the cells used to obtain the stem-like cells or cell colonies will be obtained from the inner most portion of the cultured NT unit which is preferably at least 50 cells in size. However, NT units of smaller or greater cell numbers as well as cells from other portions of the NT unit may also be used to obtain ES-like cells and cell colonies.

It is further envisioned that a longer exposure of donor cell DNA to the oocyte 's cytosol may facilitate the dedifferentiation process. This can be accomplished by re- cloning, i.e., by taking blastomeres from a reconstructed embryo and fusing them with a new enucleated oocyte. Alternatively, the donor cell may be fused with an enucleated oocyte and four to six hours later, without activation, chromosomes removed and fused with a younger oocyte. Activation would occur thereafter. The cells are maintained in the feeder layer in a suitable growth medium, e.g., alpha MEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol (Sigma) and L-glutamine. The growth medium is changed as often as necessary to optimize growth, e.g., about every 2-3 days.

This culturing process results in the formation of embryonic or stem-like cells or cell lines. In the case of human cell/bovine oocyte derived NT embryos, colonies are observed by about the second day of culturing in the alpha MEM medium. However, this time may vary dependent upon the particular nuclear donor cell, specific oocyte and culturing conditions. One skilled in the art can vary the culturing conditions as desired to optimize growth of the particular embryonic or stem-like cells. Other suitable media are disclosed herein. The embryonic or stem-like cells and cell colonies obtained will typically exhibit an appearance similar to embryonic or stem-like cells of the species used as the nuclear cell donor rather than the species of the donor oocyte. For example, in the case of embryonic or stem-like cells obtained by the transfer of a human nuclear donor cell into an enucleated bovine oocyte, the cells exhibit a moφhology more similar to mouse embryonic stem cells than bovine ES-like cells.

More specifically, the individual cells of the human ES-line cell colony are not well defined, and the perimeter of the colony is refractive and smooth in appearance. Further, the cell colony has a longer cell doubling time, about twice that of mouse ES cells. Also, unlike bovine and porcine derived ES cells, the colony does not possess an epithelial-like appearance.

As discussed above, it has been reported by Thomson, in U.S. Patent 5,843,780, that primate stem cells are SSEA-1 (-), SSEA-4 (+), TRA-1-60 (+), TRA-1-81 (+) and alkaline phosphatase (+). It is anticipated that human and primate ES cells produced according to the present methods will exhibit similar or identical marker expression. Alternatively, that such cells are actual human or primate embryonic stem cells will be confirmed based on their capability of giving rise to all of mesoderm, ectoderm and endoderm tissues. This will be demonsfrated by culturing ES cells produced according to the invention under appropriate conditions, e.g., as disclosed by Thomsen,

U.S. Patent 5,843,780, incoφorated by reference in its entirety herein. Alternatively, the fact that the cells produced according to the invention are pluripotent will be confirmed by injecting such cells into an animal, e.g., a SCID mouse, or large agricultural animal, and thereafter obtaining tissues that result from said implanted cells. These implanted ES cells should give rise to all different types of differentiated tissues, i.e., mesoderm, ectoderm, and endodermal tissues.

The resultant embryonic or stem-like cells and cell lines, preferably human embryonic or stem-like cells and cell lines, have numerous therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Most especially, such embryonic or stem-like cells may be used for cell transplantation therapies. Human embryonic or stem-like cells have application in the freatment of numerous disease conditions.

In this regard, it is known that mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells are capable of differentiating into almost any cell type, e.g., hematopoietic stem cells. Therefore, human embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention should possess similar differentiation capacity. The embryonic or stem-like cells according to the invention will be induced to differentiate to obtain the desired cell types according to known methods.

For example, the subject human embryonic or stem-like cells may be induced to differentiate into hematopoietic stem cells, muscle cells, cardiac muscle cells, liver cells, cartilage cells, epithelial cells, urinary fract cells, etc., by culturing such cells in differentiation medium and under conditions which provide for cell differentiation.

Medium and methods which result in the differentiation of embryonic stem cells are known in the art as are suitable culturing conditions.

For example, Palacios et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, 92:7530-7537 (1995) teaches the production of hematopoietic stem cells from an embryonic cell line by subjecting stem cells to an induction procedure comprising initially culturing aggregates of such cells in a suspension culture medium lacking retinoic acid followed by culturing in the same medium containing retinoic acid, followed by transferral of cell aggregates to a substrate which provides for cell attachment.

Moreover, Pedersen, J. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 6:543-552 (1994) is a review article which references numerous articles disclosing methods for in vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells to produce various differentiated cell types including hematopoietic cells, muscle, cardiac muscle, nerve cells, among others.

Further, Bain et al, Dev. Biol, 168:342-357 (1995) teaches in vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells to produce neural cells which possess neuronal properties. These references are exemplary of reported methods for obtaining differentiated cells from embryonic or stem-like cells. These references and in particular the disclosures therein relating to methods for differentiating embryonic stem cells are incoφorated by reference in their entirety herein.

Thus, using known methods and culture medium, one skilled in the art may culture the subject embryonic or stem-like cells to obtain desired differentiated cell types, e.g., neural cells, muscle cells, hematopoietic cells, etc. In addition, the use of inducible Bcl-2 or Bcl-xl might be useful for enhancing in vitro development of specific cell lineages. In vivo, Bcl-2 prevents many, but not all, forms of apoptotic cell death that occur during lymphoid and neural development. A thorough discussion of how Bcl-2 expression might be used to inhibit apoptosis of relevant cell lineages following transfection of donor cells is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,646,008, which is herein incoφorated by reference.

The subject embryonic or stem-like cells may be used to obtain any desired differentiated cell type. Therapeutic usages of such differentiated human cells are unparalleled. For example, human hematopoietic stem cells may be used in medical treatments requiring bone marrow transplantation. Such procedures are used to treat many diseases, e.g., late stage cancers such as ovarian cancer and leukemia, as well as diseases that compromise the immune system, such as AIDS. Hematopoietic stem cells can be obtained, e.g., by fusing adult somatic cells of a cancer or AIDS patient, e.g., epithelial cells or lymphocytes with an enucleated oocyte, e.g., bovine oocyte, obtaining embryonic or stem-like cells as described above, and culturing such cells under conditions which favor differentiation, until hematopoietic stem cells are obtained. Such hematopoietic cells may be used in the treatment of diseases including cancer and AIDS. 5 Alternatively, adult somatic cells from a patient with a neurological disorder may be fused with an enucleated animal oocyte, e.g., a primate or bovine oocyte, human embryonic or stem-like cells obtained therefrom, and such cells cultured under differentiation conditions to produce neural cell lines. Specific diseases treatable by transplantation of such human neural cells include, by way of example, Parkinson's

LO disease, Alzheimer's disease, ALS and cerebral palsy, among others. In the specific case of Parkinson's disease, it has been demonstrated that transplanted fetal brain neural cells make the proper connections with surrounding cells and produce dopamine. This can result in long-term reversal of Parkinson's disease symptoms.

To allow for specific selection of differentiated cells, donor cells may be

L 5 transfected with selectable markers expressed via inducible promoters, thereby permitting selection or enrichment of particular cell lineages when differentiation is induced. For example, CD34-neo may be used for selection of hematopoietic cells, Pwl-neo for muscle cells, Mash-1-neo for sympathetic neurons, Mal-neo for human CNS neurons of the grey matter of the cerebral cortex, etc. Also, the use of matrices to facilitate tissue

2 o development may be beneficial.

The great advantage of the subject invention is that it provides an essentially limitless supply of isogenic or synegenic human cells suitable for transplantation. Therefore, it will obviate the significant problem associated with current transplantation methods, i.e., rejection of the transplanted tissue which may occur because of host- vs-

25 graft or graft- vs-host rejection. Conventionally, rejection is prevented or reduced by the administration of anti-rejection drugs such as cyclosporin. However, such drugs have significant adverse side-effects, e.g., immunosuppression, carcinogenic properties, as well as being very expensive. The present invention should eliminate, or at least greatly reduce, the need for anti-rejection drugs, such as cyclosporine, imulan, FK-506, glucocorticoids, rapamycin, and derivatives thereof.

Other diseases and conditions treatable by isogenic cell therapy include, by way of example, spinal cord injuries, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, diabetes, liver diseases, i.e., hypercholesterolemia, heart diseases, cartilage replacement, burns, foot ulcers, gastrointestinal diseases, vascular diseases, kidney disease, urinary tract disease, and aging related diseases and conditions.

Also, human embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention may be used to produce genetically engineered or transgenic human differentiated cells.

Essentially, this will be effected by introducing a desired gene or genes, which may be heterologous, or removing all or part of an endogenous gene or genes of human embryonic or stem-like cells produced according to the invention, and allowing such cells to differentiate into the desired cell type. A preferred method for achieving such modification is by homologous recombination because such technique can be used to insert, delete or modify a gene or genes at a specific site or sites in the stem-like cell genome.

This methodology can be used to replace defective genes, e.g., defective immune system genes, cystic fibrosis genes, or to introduce genes which result in the expression of therapeutically beneficial proteins such as growth factors, lymphokines, cytokines, enzymes, etc. For example, the gene encoding brain derived growth factor may be infroduced into human embryonic or stem-like cells, the cells differentiated into neural cells and the cells fransplanted into a Parkinson's patient to retard the loss of neural cells during such disease. Previously, cell types fransfected with BDNF varied from primary cells to immortalized cell lines, either neural or non-neural (myoblast and fibroblast) derived cells. For example, astrocytes have been fransfected with BDNF gene using retro viral vectors, and the cells grafted into a rat model of Parkinson's disease (Yoshimoto et al.,

Brain Research, 691:25-36, (1995)).

This ex vivo therapy reduced Parkinson's-like symptoms in the rats up to 45% 32 days after fransfer. Also, the tyrosine hydroxylase gene has been placed into astrocytes with similar results (Lundberg et al., Develop. Neurol., 139:39-53 (1996) and references cited therein).

However, such ex vivo systems have problems. In particular, retro viral vectors currently used are down-regulated in vivo and the transgene is only transiently expressed

(review by Mulligan, Science, 260:926-932 (1993)). Also, such studies used primary cells, astrocytes, which have finite life span and replicate slowly. Such properties adversely affect the rate of fransfection and impede selection of stably fransfected cells.

Moreover, it is almost impossible to propagate a large population of gene targeted primary cells to be used in homologous recombination techniques.

By contrast, the difficulties associated with retroviral systems should be eliminated by the use of human embryonic or stem-like cells. It has been demonsfrated previously by the subject assignee that cattle and pig embryonic cell lines can be fransfected and selected for stable, integration of heterologous DNA. Such methods are described in commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 5,905,042, incoφorated by reference in its entirety.

Therefore, using such methods or other known methods, desired genes may be introduced into the subject human embryonic or stem-like cells, and the cells differentiated into desired cell types, e.g., hematopoietic cells, neural cells, pancreatic cells, cartilage cells, etc.

Genes which may be introduced into the subject embryonic or stem-like cells include, by way of example, epidermal growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, glial derived neurotrophic growth factor, insulin-like growth factor (I and II), neurofrophin-3, neurotroρhin-4/5, ciliary neurotrophic factor, AFT-1, cytokine genes (interleukins, interferons, colony stimulating factors, tumor necrosis factors (alpha and beta), etc.), genes encoding therapeutic enzymes, collagen, human serum albumin, etc.

In addition, it is also possible to use one of the negative selection systems now known in the art for eliminating therapeutic cells from a patient if necessary. For 5 example, donor cells fransfected with the thymidine kinase (TK) gene will lead to the production of embryonic cells containing the TK gene. Differentiation of these cells will lead to the isolation of therapeutic cells of interest which also express the TK gene. Such cells may be selectively eliminated at any time from a patient upon gancyclovir administration. Such a negative selection system is described in U.S. Patent No. L 0 5,698,446, and is herein incoφorated by reference.

The subject embryonic or stem-like cells, preferably human cells, also may be used as an in vitro model of differentiation, in particular for the study of genes which are involved in the regulation of early development.

Also, differentiated cell tissues and organs using the subject embryonic or stem- L 5 like cells may be used in drug studies.

Further, the subject cells may be used to express recombinant DNAs.

Still further, the subject embryonic or stem-like cells may be used as nuclear donors for the production of other embryonic or stem-like cells and cell colonies.

Also, cultured inner cell mass, or stem cells, produced according to the invention 20 may be infroduced into animals, e.g., SCID mice, cows, pigs, e.g., under the renal capsule or intramuscularly and used to produce a teratoma therein. This teratoma can be used to derive different tissue types. Also, the inner cell mass produced by X-species nuclear fransfer may be infroduced together with a biodegradable, biocompatible polymer matrix that provides for the formation of 3-dimensional tissues. After tissue formation, the 25 polymer degrades, ideally just leaving the donor tissue, e.g., cardiac, pancreatic, neural, lung, liver. In some instances, it may be advantageous to include growth factors and proteins that promote angiogenesis. Alternatively, the formation of tissues can be effected totally in vitro, with appropriate culture media and conditions, growth factors, and biodegradable polymer matrices.

In order to more clearly describe the subject invention, the following examples are provided. 5 EXAMPLE 1

MATERIALS AND METHODS Donor Cells for Nuclear Transfer

Epithelial cells were lightly scraped from the inside of the mouth of a consenting adult with a standard glass slide. The cells were washed off the slide into a petri dish

L 0 containing phosphate buffered saline without Ca or Mg. The cells were pipetted through a small-bore pipette to break up cell clumps into a single cell suspension. The cells were then transferred into a microdrop of TL-HEPES medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) under oil for nuclear transfer into enucleated cattle oocytes. Nuclear Transfer Procedures

L5 Basic nuclear transfer procedures have been described previously. Briefly, after slaughterhouse oocytes were matured in vitro the oocytes were stripped of cumulus cells and enucleated with a beveled micropipette at approximately 18 hours post maturation (hpm). Enucleation was confirmed in TL-HEPES medium plus bisbenzimide (Hoechst 33342, 3 μg/ml; Sigma). Individual donor cells were then placed into the perivitelline

20 space of the recipient oocyte. The bovine oocyte cytoplasm and the donor nucleus (NT unit) are fused together using elecfrofusion techniques. One fusion pulse consisting of 90 V for 15 μsec was applied to the NT unit. This occurred at 24 hours post-initiation of maturation (hpm) of the oocytes. The NT units were placed in CRlaa medium until 28 hpm.

25 The procedure used to artificially activate oocytes has been described elsewhere.

NT unit activation was at 28 hpm. A brief description of the activation procedure is as follows: NT units were exposed for four min to ionomycin (5 μM; CalBiochem, La Jolla, CA) in TL-HEPES supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA and then washed for five min in TL- HEPES supplemented with 30 mg/ml BSA. The NT units were then transferred into a microdrop of CRlaa culture medium containing 0.2 mM DMAP (Sigma) and cultured at 38.5 °C 5% C0 for four to five hours. The NT units were washed and then placed in a 5 CRlaa medium plus 10% FCS and 6 mg/ml BSA in four well plates containing a confluent feeder layer of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (described below). The NT units were cultured for three more days at 38.5 °C and 5% C0₂. The culture medium was changed every three days until day 12 after the time of activation. At this time NT units reaching the desired cell number, i.e., about 50 cell number, were mechanically removed

L 0 from the zona and used to produce embryonic cell lines. A photograph of an NT unit obtained as described above is contained in Figure 1. Fibroblast feeder layer

Primary cultures of embryonic fibroblasts were obtained from 14-16 day old murine fetuses. After the head, liver, heart and alimentary tract were aseptically removed,

L5 the embryos were minced and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C in pre-warmed trypsin

EDTA solution (0.05% trypsin/0.02% EDTA; GIBCO, Grand Island, NY). Fibroblast cells were plated in tissue culture flasks and cultured in alpha-MEM medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Hyclone, Logen, UT), penicillin (100 IU/ml) and streptomycin (50 μl/ml). Three to four

20 days after passage, embryonic fibroblasts, in 35 x 10 Nunc culture dishes (Baxter

Scientific, McGaw Park, IL), were irradiated. The irradiated fibroblasts were grown and maintained in a humidified atmosphere with 5% C0₂ in air at 37 °C. The culture plates which had a uniform monolayer of cells were then used to culture embryonic cell lines. Production of embryonic cell line.

25 NT unit cells obtained as described above were washed and plated directly onto irradiated feeder fibroblast cells. These cells included those of the inner portion of the NT unit. The cells were maintained in a growth medium consisting of alpha MEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). Growth medium was exchanged every two to three days. The initial colony was observed by the second day of culture. The colony was propagated and exhibits a similar moφhology to previously disclosed mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Individual cells within the colony are not well defined and the perimeter of the colony is retractile and smooth in appearance. The cell colony appears to have a slower cell doubling time than mouse ES cells. Also, unlike bovine and porcine derived ES cells, the colony does not have an epithelial appearance thus far. Figures 2 through 5 are photographs of ES-like cell colonies obtained as described, supra.

L O Production of Differentiated Human Cells

The human embryonic cells obtained are transferred to a differentiation medium and cultured until differentiated human cell types are obtained.

L5

RESULTS Table 1. Human cells as donor nuclei in NT unit production and development.

TABLE 1

20

25 The one NT unit that developed a structure having greater than 16 cells was plated down onto a fibroblast feeder layer. This structure was attached to the feeder layer and started to propagate forming a colony with a ES cell-like moφhology (See, e.g., Figure 2). Moreover, although the 4 to 16 cell stage structures were not used to try and produce 5 an ES cell colony, it has been previously shown that this stage is capable of producing ES or ES-like cell lines (mouse, Eistetter et al., Devel Growth and Differ., 31:275-282 (1989); Bovine, Stice et al., 1996)). Therefore, it is expected that 4 - 16 cell stage NT units should also give rise to embryonic or stem-like cells and cell colonies.

Also, similar results were obtained upon fusion of an adult human keratinocyte cell

L 0 line with an enucleated bovine oocyte, which was cultured in media comprising ACM, uridine, glucose, and 1000 IU of LIF. Out of 50 reconstructed embryos, 22 cleaved and one developed into a blastocyst at about day 12. This blastocyst was plated and the production of an ES cell line is ongoing.

EXAMPLE 2 L5 A. Mitochondria Isolation Protocol from a Cell

This Example relates to isolation of mitochondria and use thereof to enhance the efficiency of cross-species nuclear transfer. The number of mitochondria per cell varies from cell line to cell line. For example, mouse L cells contain - 100 mitochondria per cell, whereas there are at least twice that number in HeLa cells. The cells are swollen in 20 a hypotonic buffer and ruptured with a few strokes in a Dounce homogenizer using a tight-fitting pestle, and the mitochondria are isolated by differential centrifugation.

The solutions, tubes, and homogenizer should be pre-chilled on ice. All centrifugation steps are at 40 °C. This protocol is based on starting with a washed cell pellet of 1-2 ml. The cell pellet is resuspended in 11 ml of ice-cold RSB and fransferred 25 to a 16 ml Dounce homogenizer.

RSB Buffer RSB (A hypotonic buffer for swelling the tissue culture cells) 10 mM NaCl 1.5 mM MgCl₂ MgCl₂ 5 The cells are allowed to swell for five to ten minutes. The progress of the swelling is maintained using a phase contrast microscope. The swollen cells are replaced, preferably by several strokes with a pestle. Immediately after, 8 ml of 2.5x MS buffer are added to give a final concentration of lx MS. The top of the homogenizer is then covered with Parafilm and mixed by inverting a couple of times. L O 2.5x MS Buffer

525 mM mannitol 175 Mm sucrose 215 mM EDTA pH 7.5 L5 lx MS Buffer

210 mM mannitol 70 mM Sucrose 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5 20 MS Buffer is an iso-osmotic buffer to maintain the tonicity of the organelles and prevent agglutination. Thereafter, the homogenate is transferred to a centrifuge tube for differential centrifugation. The homogenizer is rinsed with a small amount of MS buffer and added to the homogenate. The volume is brought to 30 ml with MS buffer. The homogenate 25 is then centrifuged at 1300 g for five minutes to remove nuclei, unbroken cells, and large membrane fragments. The supernatant is then poured into a clean centrifuge tube. The nuclear spin-down is repeated twice. The supernatant is then transferred to a clean centrifuge tube and a pellet containing the mitochondria is centrifuged at 17,000 g for 15 minutes. The supernatant is discarded and the inside of the tube wiped with a Kimwipe. The mitochondria is washed by re-suspending the pellet in IX MS and repeating the 17,000 g sedimentation. The supernatant is discarded and the pellet is resuspended in a buffer. Mitochondria can be stored at -80 °C for prolonged periods, e.g., up to a year, but preferably will be used shortly thereafter for NT.

This basic protocol can be modified. In particular, it may be desirable to further isolate mitochondrial DNA and us same for NT. In such case, contamination with nuclei, not small organelles, potentially is a problem and the following modifications may be made. For example, the cells may be harvested in stationary growth phase when the fewest cells are actively dividing, and CaCl₂ substituted for MgCl₂ in the RSB to stabilize the nuclear membrane. The washing of the mitochondrial pellet is omitted as is the density gradient purification. Instead, the mitochondrial pellet is simply resuspended and lysed, and the mitochondrial DNA purified from any remaining nuclear DNA. As noted, suitable methods for purifying mitachondria and mitochondrial DNA are well known in the art.

Homogenization works best if the cells are resuspended in at least 5-1 OX the volume of the cell pellet and if the cell suspension fills the homogenizer at least half full. Press the homogenizer pestle straight down the tube, maintaining a firm, steady pressure. The Dounce homogenizer disrupts swollen tissue culture cells by pressure change. As the pestle is pressed down, pressure around the cell increases; when the cell slips past the end of the pestle, the sudden decrease in pressure causes the cell to rupture. If the pestle is very tight fitting, there may be some mechanical breakage as well. B. Isolation of Mitochondria From Tissue A mitochondrial isolation protocol is selected based on the particular tissue. For example, the homogenization buffer should be optimized for the tissue, and the optimal way to homogenize the tissue utilized. Suitable methods are well known in the art. Rat liver is the most frequently used tissue for mitochondrial preparations because it is readily available, is easy to homogenize, and the cells contain a large number of mitochondria (1000-2000 per cell). For example, a motor-driven, Teflon and glass Potter- Elvehjem homogenizer can be used homogenize rat liver. Alternatively, if the tissue is soft enough, a Dounce homogenizer with a loose pestle can be used. The yield and purity of the mitochondrial preparation is influenced by the method of preparation, speed of preparation, and the age and physiological condition of the animal. As noted, methods of purifying mitochondria are well known.

Preferably, the buffer, tubes, and homogenizer will be pre-chilled. Pre-chilling a glass and Teflon type homogenizer creates the proper gap between the tube and pestle.

The centrifugation steps are preferably effected at 40 °C.

Essentially, the process will comprise removal of the liver, taking care not to rupture the gall bladder. This is placed in a beaker on ice and any connective tissue is removed. The tissue is recognized and returned to the beaker, e.g., using very shaφ scissors, a scalpel, or razor blade, mince it into 1-2 slices. The pieces are then rinsed, preferably twice, with homogenization buffer (IX MS) to remove most of the blood, and the tissue transferred to the homogenizer tube. Enough homogenization buffer if added to prepare a 1:10 (w/v) homogenate.

Use of Isolated Mitochondria or Mitochondrial DNA to Enhance NT Efficacy It is theorized by the inventors that the efficacy of cross-species nuclear fransfer may be enhanced by infroduction of mitochondria or mitochondrial DNA at the same species as donor cell or nucleus. Thereupon, the nucleus DNA of resultant NT units will be species compatible.

Mitochondria isolated by the above or other known procedures are incoφorated, typically by injection, into any of the following (in the case of human donor cell/bovine oocyte nuclear fransfer):

(i) non-activated, non-enucleated bovine oocytes; (ii) non-activated, enucleated bovine oocytes; (iii) activated, enucleated bovine oocytes;

(iv) non-activated, fused (with human donor cell or nucleus) bovine oocytes; (v) activated, fused and cleaved reconstructed (cow oocyte/human cell) embryo; or

(vi) activated, fused one cell reconstructed (cow oocyte/human cell) embryo. The same procedures will enhance other cross-species NTs. Essentially, mitochondria will again be infroduced into any of (i)-(vi) of the same species as the donor cell or nucleus, and the oocyte will be of a different species origin. Generally about 1 to 200 picoliters of mitochondrial suspension are injected into any of the above. The infroduction of such mitochondria will result in NT units wherein the mitochondrial and donor DNA are compatible.

EXAMPLE 3 Another method for improving the efficacy of the cross-species nuclear fransfer comprises the fusion of one or more enucleated somatic cells, typically human (of the same species as donor cell or nucleus), with any of the following: (i) non-activated, non-enucleated (e.g., bovine) oocyte; (ii) non-activated, enucleated (e.g., bovine) oocyte; (iii) activated, enucleated (e.g., bovine) oocyte; (iv) non-activated, fused (with human cell) oocyte (typically bovine);

(v) activated, fused and cleaved reconstructed (e.g., cow oocyte/human cell) embryo; (vi) activated, fused one cell reconstructed (cow oocyte/human cell) embryo; or (vii) non-activated, fused (e.g., with human cell) oocyte (typically bovine oocyte). Fusion is preferably effected by electrical pulse or by use of Sendai virus. Methods for producing enucleated cells (e.g., human cells) are known in the art. A preferred protocol is set forth below.

Enucleation Procedures: 5 Methods for the large-scale enucleation of cells with cytochalasin B are well known in the art. Enucleation is preferably effected using the monolayer technique. This method uses small numbers of cells attached to the growth surface of a culture disc and is ideal if limited numbers of donor cells are available. Another suitable procedure, the gradient technique, requires centrifugation of cells through Ficoll gradients and is best L 0 suited for enucleation of large number (>10⁷) of cells.

Monolayer Technique. The monolayer technique is ideal for virtually any cell which grows attached to the growth surface.

Polycarbonate or polypropylene 250-ml wide-mouth centrifuge bottles with screw- top caps are sterilized by autoclaving. The caps preferably are autoclaved separately from L5 the bottle to prevent damage to the centrifuge bottle. The bottle are prepared for the enucleation procedure by the sterile addition of 30 ml DMEM, 2 ml bovine serum, and 0.32 ml cytochalasin B (1 mg/ml) to each. The caps are placed on the bottles, and the bottles are maintained at 37° prior to use.

The cells to be enucleated (from a few hundred to ~ 10⁵ cells) are seeded on a 20 culture dish (35 x 15 mm; Nunc Inc., Naperville, IL). Typically, the cells are grown for at least twenty- four hours on the dishes to promote maximal attachment to the growth surface. Preferably, the cells are prevented from becoming confluent. The culture dish is prepared for centrifugation by wiping the outside of the bottom half of the dish (containing the cells) with 70% (v/v) ethanol for the puφose of sterilization. 25 Alternatively, the dish can be kept sterile during cell culturing by maintaining it within a larger, sterile culture dish. The medium is removed from the dish and the dish (without top) is placed upside down within the centrifuge bottle. The rotor (GSA, DuPont, Wilmington, DE) and centrifuge are preferably pre- warmed to 37° by centrifugation for 30-45 minutes at 8000 φm. The HS-4 swinging- bucket rotor (DuPont) can alternatively be used. The optimal time and speed of centrifugation varies for each cell type. For myoblasts and fibroblasts, the centrifuge 5 bottle with the culture dish is placed in the pre-warmed rotor and centrifuged for approximately 20 minutes (interval between the time when the rotor reaches the desired speed and the time when the centrifuge is turned off). Preferably, speeds of 6500 to 7200 φm are used.

After centrifugation, the centrifuge bottle is removed from the rotor, and the

L0 culture plate is removed from the bottles with forceps. A small amount of medium is maintained in the plate to keep the cells moist in order to maintain cell viability. The outside of the dish, including the top edge, is wiped with a sterile wiper, then moistened with 95% (v/v) ethanol, to remove any medium and to dry it. A sterile top is placed onto the dish. If the enucleated cells are not going to be used immediately, complete culture

L 5 medium (medium supplemented with the appropriate concentration of serum) should be added to the dish, and the cells placed in a C0₂ incubator. The resultant enucleated cells (karyoplast) are fused with any of (i) - (viii) above.

While the present invention has been described and illustrated herein by reference to various specific materials, procedures, and examples, it is understood that the invention

20 is not restricted to the particular material, combinations of materials, and procedures selected for that puφose. Numerous variations of such details can be implied and will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. A method of producing embryonic or stem-like cells comprising the following steps:

(i) inserting a donor differentiated human or mammalian cell or cell

5 nucleus into a recipient animal oocyte, wherein such oocyte is derived from a different animal species than the human or mammalian cell under conditions suitable for the formation of a nuclear transfer (NT) unit, wherein the endogenous oocyte nucleus is removed or inactivated before, concurrent, or after introduction of donor cell or nucleus;

(ii) activating the resultant nuclear transfer unit;

L O (iii) additionally inserting into said oocyte cytoplasm derived from an oocyte or blastomere of the same species as the donor cell or nucleus ("compatible cytoplasm");

(iv) culturing said activated nuclear transfer unit until greater than the 2- cell developmental stage; and 5 (v) culturing cells obtained from said cultured NT units to obtain embryonic or stem-like cells.

2. The method of Claim 1, which further includes introducing mitochondrial DNA of the same species as the donor cell or nucleus into the recipient oocyte

20 ("compatible mitochondria").

3. The method of Claim 1, wherein said cytoplasm is infroduced before, concurrent, or after infroduction of donor cell or nucleus.

25 4. The method of Claim 4, wherein said introduction occurs within about six hours of introduction of the donor cell or nucleus.

5. The method of Claim 4, wherein said oocyte is an immature oocyte

6. The method of Claim 5, wherein said oocyte is an immature human oocyte.

7. The method of Claim 5, wherein said immature human oocyte is matured in vitro prior to isolation of cytoplasm therefrom.

5

8. The method of Claim 4, wherein said immature oocyte is activated in vitro prior to isolation of cytoplasm therefrom.

9. The method of Claim 8, wherein said in vitro activation comprises L 0 contacting said oocyte with a compound that increases calcium levels.

10. The method of Claim 2, wherein all or part of the cytoplasm of the recipient oocyte is removed prior to introduction of cytoplasm from said at least one oocyte or blastomere of the same species as the donor cell or nucleus.

L5

11. The method of Claim 1 , wherein the cell inserted into the enucleated animal oocyte is a human cell.

12. The method of Claim 11 , wherein said human cell is an adult cell.

20

13. The method of Claim 11, wherein said human cell is an epithelial cell, keratinocyte, lymphocyte or fibroblast.

14. The method of Claim 11 , wherein the oocytes are obtained from a mammal.

25

15. The method of Claim 14, wherein the animal oocyte is obtained from an ungulate.

16. The method of Claim 15, wherein said ungulate is selected from the group consisting of bovine, ovine, porcine, equine, caprine, and buffalo.

17. The method of Claim 1, wherein the enucleated oocyte is matured prior to 5 enucleation.

18. The method of Claim 1, wherein the fused nuclear fransfer units are activated in vitro.

LO 19. The method of Claim 1, wherein the activated nuclear fransfer units are cultured on a feeder layer culture.

20. The method of Claim 19, wherein the feeder layer comprises fibroblasts.

L 5 21. The method of Claim 1 , wherein in step (v) cells from a NT unit having 16 cells or more are cultured on a feeder cell layer.

22. The method of Claim 21, wherein said feeder cell layer comprises fibroblasts.

20

23. The method of Claim 22, wherein said fibroblasts comprise mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

24. The method of Claim 1 , wherein the resultant embryonic or stem-like cells 25 are induced to differentiate.

25. The method of Claim 11 , wherein the resultant embryonic or stem-like cells are induced to differentiate.

26. The method of Claim 1, wherein fusion is effected by elecfrofusion.

27. Embryonic or stem-like cells obtained according to the method of Claim 1.

28. Human embryonic or stem-like cells obtained according to the method of Claim 11. O

29. Human embryonic or stem-like cells obtained according to the method of Claim 12.

30. Human embryonic or stem-like cells obtained according to the method of 5 Claim 13.

31. Human embryonic or stem-like cells obtained according to the method of Claim 14.

0 32. Human embryonic or stem-like cells obtained according to the method of

Claim 15.

33. Differentiated human cells obtained by the method of Claim 25.

5 34. The differentiated human cells of Claim 33, which are selected from the group consisting of neural cells, hematopoietic cells, pancreatic cells, muscle cells, cartilage cells, urinary cells, liver cells, spleen cells, reproductive cells, skin cells, intestinal cells, and stomach cells.

35. The differentiated human cells of Claim 33, which contain and express an inserted gene.

36. The method of Claim 1, wherein a desired gene is inserted, removed or modified in said embryonic or stem-like cells.

37. The method of Claim 36, wherein the desired gene encodes a therapeutic enzyme, a growth factor or a cytokine.

38. The method of Claim 37, wherein said embryonic or stem-like cells are human embryonic or stem-like cells.

39. The method of Claim 36, wherein the desired gene is removed, modified or deleted by homologous recombination.

40. The method of Claim 1, wherein the donor cell is genetically modified to impair the development of at least one of endoderm, ectoderm and mesoderm.

41. The method of Claim 1 , wherein the donor cell is genetically modified to increase differentiation efficiency.

42. The method of Claim 40, wherein the cultured nuclear transfer unit is cultured in a media containing at least one capsase inhibitor.

43. The method of Claim 1 , wherein the donor cell expresses a detectable label that is indicative of the expression of a particular cyclin.

44. The method of Claim 40, wherein the donor cell has been modified to alter the expression of a gene selected from the group consisting of SRF, MESP-1, HNF-4, beta-1, integrin, MSD, GATA-6, GATA-4, RNA helicase A, and H beta 58.

45. The method of Claim 41, wherein said donor cell has been genetically modified to introduce a DNA that provides for expression of the Q7 and/or Q9 genes.

46. The method of Claim 45, wherein said gene or genes are operably linked to a regulatable promoter.

L O

47. The method of Claim 1, wherein the donor cell has been genetically modified to inhibit apoptosis.

48. The method of Claim 47, wherein reduced apoptosis is provided by altering L5 expression of one or more genes selected from the group consisting of Bad, Bok, BH3,

Bik, Blk, Hrk, BNIP3, Gim_L, Bid, EGL-1, Bcl-XL, Bcl-w, Mcl-l, Al, Nr-13, BHRF-1, LMW5-HL, ORF16, Ks-Bcl-2, E1B-19K, and CED-9.

49. The method of Claim 48, wherein at least one of said genes is operably 20 linked to an inducible promoter.

50. A mammalian somatic cell that expresses a DNA that encodes a detectable marker, the expression of which is linked to a particular cyclin.

25 51. The cell of Claim 50, wherein the cyclin is selected from the group consisting of cyclin Dl, D2, D3, Bl, B2, E, A and H.

52. The cell of Claim 50, wherein the detectable marker is a fluorescent polypeptide.

53. The cell of Claim 52, wherein said mammalian cell is selected from the group consisting of human, primate, rodent, ungulate, canine, and feline cells.

54. The cell of Claim 52, wherein said cell is a human, bovine or primate cell.