EP1258595A2 - Enhanced oil recovery method using CO2 injection - Google Patents

Enhanced oil recovery method using CO2 injection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1258595A2
EP1258595A2 EP02253397A EP02253397A EP1258595A2 EP 1258595 A2 EP1258595 A2 EP 1258595A2 EP 02253397 A EP02253397 A EP 02253397A EP 02253397 A EP02253397 A EP 02253397A EP 1258595 A2 EP1258595 A2 EP 1258595A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oil
carbon dioxide
gas mixture
gas
injection
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP02253397A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1258595A3 (en
Inventor
Ramakrishnan Ramachandran
Kirk Walton Limbach
Shuen-Cheng Hwang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Linde LLC
Original Assignee
BOC Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BOC Group Inc filed Critical BOC Group Inc
Publication of EP1258595A2 publication Critical patent/EP1258595A2/en
Publication of EP1258595A3 publication Critical patent/EP1258595A3/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/16Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
    • E21B43/164Injecting CO2 or carbonated water

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A method for enhancing the recovery of oil from underground formations is disclosed. A gas mixture which contains greater than 50% by volume carbon dioxide, the remainder typically being an inert gas, is injected in the underground formation to lower the oil viscosity and surface tension and increase the oil swelling. Preferably, the gas mixture contains greater than 60% by volume carbon dioxide with a gas mixture containing greater than 70% by volume carbon dioxide preferred.

Description

  • The present invention provides for a method for enhancing the recovery of oil from underground formations. More particularly, the present invention provides for injecting into the oil in the underground formation a gas mixture which contains at least 50% by volume carbon dioxide and the remainder nitrogen or other inert gas.
  • Oil or gas and any water which is contained in the porous rock surrounding the oil or gas in a reservoir or formation are typically under pressure due to the weight of the material above them. As such, they will move to an area of lower pressure and higher elevation such as the well head. After some pressure has been released, the oil may still flow to the surface but it does so more slowly. This movement can be helped along by a mechanical pump such as the grasshopper pumps one often sees. These processes are typically referred to as primary oil recovery. Typically, less than 50% of the oil in the oil formation is recovered by primary techniques. Recovery can be increased by pursuing enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. Typically, these methods are divided into two groups: secondary and tertiary.
  • Secondary EOR generally refers to pumping a fluid, either liquid or gas, into the ground to build back pressure that was dissipated during primary recovery. The most common of these methods is to inject water and is simply called a waterflood.
  • The tertiary recovery schemes typically use chemical interactions or heat to either reduce the oil viscosity so the oil flows more freely or to change the properties of the interface between the oil and the surrounding rock pores so that the oil can flow out of the small pores in the rock and enter larger channels where the oil can be swept by a driving fluid or move by pressure gradient to a production well. The oil may also be swelled so that a portion of the oil emerges from small pores into the channels or larger pores in the rock. Typical of these processes are steam injection, miscible fluid injection and surfactant injection.
  • Thermal techniques employing steam can be utilized in a well to well scheme or also in a single-well technique which is know as the huff and puff method. In this method, steam is injected via a well in a quantity sufficient to heat the subterranean hydrocarbon-bearing formation in the vicinity of the well. The well is then shut in for a soaking period after which it is placed on production. After production has declined, the huff and puff method may again be employed on the same well to again stimulate production.
  • The use of carbon dioxide and its injection into oil reservoirs is known for well to well and single well production enhancement. The carbon dioxide dissolves in the oil easily and causes the oil to swell and reduces the viscosity and surface tension of the oil which in turn leads to additional oil recovery. The carbon dioxide may also be employed with steam such that the steam and carbon dioxide are injected either simultaneously or sequentially, often followed by a soak period, followed by a further injection of carbon dioxide or other fluids.
  • US-A-2 623 596 describes enhanced recovery using gases in an injection well with oil recovery from a separate production well. Enhanced recovery using CO2 and N2 mixtures is discussed with data presented showing oil recovery increasing monotonically as CO2% in the gas mixture is increased. However, the data presented does not demonstrate results when between 85% CO2 and 100% CO2, is employed.
  • US-A-3 295 601 teaches that a slug of gas consisting of carbon dioxide and hydrocarbon gases, preferably of two to four carbon atoms, or nitrogen, air, hydrogen sulfide, flue gases and similar gases in a gas mixture, when injected in a well, establishes a transition zone. This transition zone is then driven through the injection well by a driving fluid which will produce oil from the stratum and reduce viscous fingering. The preferred slug of gas consists of 50% carbon dioxide and a substantial concentration of C2 to C4 hydrocarbon gases such as 10 to 50% by volume. It appears that the remainder of the gases in this gas mixture are selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, air, hydrogen sulfide and flue gases and similar gases would make up the balance in the preferred composition of carbon dioxide and C2 to C4 hydrocarbon gas.
  • US-A-5 725 054 teaches a method for recovering oil from a subterranean formation by injecting into said well a gas mixture which comprises carbon dioxide and a gas selected from the group consisting of methane, nitrogen and mixtures thereof. The gas mixture comprises about 5 to about 50% by volume of carbon dioxide. As noted in the examples, the highest percentages were 50% by volume carbon dioxide.
  • The present inventors have discovered that the use of carbon dioxide in percentages greater than 50%, up to 99%, along with nitrogen or another gas, preferably an inert gas as the remainder of the gas mixture will enhance oil production.
  • The present invention provides a method for enhancing the recovery of oil from an underground formation comprising injecting into the oil a gas mixture comprising at least 50% by volume of carbon dioxide. In addition, the present invention provides a method for lowering the viscosity and surface tension as well as increasing the volume or swelling of the oil in an underground formation comprising injecting into the oil a gas mixture comprising at least 50% by volume carbon dioxide.
  • The gas mixture preferably includes an inert gas. The inert gas is preferably nitrogen. Other inert gases such as helium and argon may also be employed. The present invention also comprises a method for enhancing the recovery of oil from an underground formation comprising injecting into the oil a gas mixture which comprises carbon dioxide and nitrogen. The carbon dioxide is present in the gas mixture in an amount of at least 50% by volume. The introduction of a combination of carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas to the formation provides an unexpected advantage of lower oil viscosity and surface tension than the introduction of carbon dioxide or nitrogen alone. This will also provide greater oil swelling than the use of carbon dioxide or nitrogen alone. The use of nitrogen adds an economic advantage to the mixture as there is lower cost than that for pure carbon dioxide consumption.
  • For purposes of the present invention, oil is defined as being a hydrocarbon which comprises paraffin, aromatic or naphthene constituents or mixtures thereof.
  • The mixture of the carbon dioxide and nitrogen will be injected into the formation containing the oil at a pressure of 100 pounds per square inch to 20,000 pounds per square inch depending upon the depth of the oil reservoir. This injection method allows for use of a WAG (water alternating gas) well-to-well process whereby an injection of gas is followed by a waterflood to drive the oil and enhance production at the well head. This injection method will also work in a huff and puff process. In the huff and puff process, the mixture would be injected into the formation. The formation would then be sealed allowing a soak period of determinate length of time, followed by an improved oil recovery or production period.
  • The mixtures of carbon dioxide and nitrogen may be created by any means. Preferably, a carbon dioxide-rich stream and a nitrogen-rich stream are combined or a hydrocarbon is combusted using air or oxygen-enriched air to produce the carbon dioxide. Other inert gases, when combined with carbon dioxide in an optimum ratio, are believed to minimize oil viscosity and surface tension while increasing swelling.
  • One means for producing the carbon dioxide-rich gas stream involves the use of a power plant or co-generation plant at or near the well site. Oxygen-enriched air and hydrocarbon are combusted to generate power and carbon dioxide-rich gas. The power is used to operate an air separation plant which provides the oxygen for the oxygen enrichment of the power or co-generation plant. Additional nitrogen and/or steam produced may also be used to enhance oil recovery by placing these materials in an injection well either individually or in combination with the carbon dioxide-rich gas stream. The combination of heat and carbon dioxide can further improve recovery and little carbon dioxide would be lost to the aqueous phase as a result.
  • Another means for producing the carbon dioxide is by injection of pure oxygen, oxygen-enriched air or air downhole. For wells that are sufficiently deep enough, the temperature will be sufficient to sustain combustion and produce carbon dioxide. For example, a 8000 foot deep well may have a temperature of 300°F which is hot enough to produce the carbon dioxide necessary for the enhanced oil recovery.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a carbon dioxide-nitrogen mixture with carbon dioxide present greater than 50% by volume is injected into the formation at or near the production well by optimizing the composition of the gas mixture. Due to the varied rates in the uptake of carbon dioxide and nitrogen, a near optimum composition can be maintained in the formation at that injection location. A second mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen would then be injected through injection well(s) located at a distance from the production well. The composition of this gas mixture would be such that the viscosity and surface tension of the oil is higher than that of the oil near or at the production well but still reduced in comparison to the untreated oil. Gas may be fed continuously to the injection well(s) or the well(s) can be shut for a period of at least a day to facilitate the uptake of the gas by the oil.
  • Oil is driven to the production well and fingering or bypass of the gas though the oil is minimized as a result. In this preferred embodiment, more than one remote injection point may be employed such that the viscosity and surface tension of the oil at the remote injection point becomes higher with each injection point further away from the well head injection point by optimizing the content of the carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas mixture. Accordingly, the nitrogen content of the gas mixture will increase as one injects the mixture further from the production well. This gradient will result in a raising of carbon dioxide content above the 50% by volume as one injects at points getting sequentially closer to the production well. In this embodiment, a later possibly intermittent use of carbon dioxide flood, nitrogen flood or water flood to drive the oil to the production well would further improve yields.
  • A preferred composition for use in the methods of the present invention is that of at least 50% by volume carbon dioxide, the remainder being nitrogen or other inert gas including helium, argon or steam. In a more preferred embodiment, greater than 60% carbon dioxide by volume with the remainder being one or more inert gases would comprise the gaseous mixture. In the most preferred embodiment, greater than 75% by volume of the gas mixture would be carbon dioxide and the remainder being inert gases.
  • In an additional embodiment, hydrocarbons can be added to the above described compositions. These hydrocarbons, such as methane, ethane and propane can come from traditional sources but may also come from the associated gas produced during oil production. The hydrocarbons can be separated from oil and reinjected into the ground or may be separated from oil and reinjected into the ground after burning a portion of the hydrocarbon in air, oxygen or oxygen enriched air.
  • The method according to the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which Figure 1 is a graphical representation of the effect of carbon dioxide content of gas on paraffin oil viscosity.
  • Figure 2 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on naphthene oil viscosity.
  • Figure 3 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on aromatic oil viscosity.
  • Figure 4 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on paraffin oil surface tension.
  • Figure 5 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on naphthene oil surface tension.
  • Figure 6 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on aromatic oil surface tension.
  • Figure 7 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on paraffin oil viscosity at various temperatures.
  • Figure 8 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on paraffin oil surface tension at various temperatures.
  • Figure 9 is a graphical representation of carbon dioxide content of gas on paraffin oil volume at various temperatures.
  • Three model oils were studied to explore the potential of mixtures of carbon dioxide and nitrogen for enhanced oil recovery. A simulation was developed based on the Peng-Robinson equation of state for vapor-liquid equilibrium, the Twu model for liquid phase viscosity and a modified form of the Brock and Bird equation for surface tension. The three oils employed in this study were of paraffin, naphthene and aromatic types. A gas mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen with a usage rate of 1 mole per mole of oil was presumed and a small quantity of water was added to the mixture since typically carbon dioxide flooding operations follow water flood procedures or are conducted as in the WAG method alternatively with waterflood. The quantity of water was based on 20% saturation for a typical oil. Pressures in the range of 1,500 psia to 2,500 psia and temperatures in the range of 75°F to 200°F were studied.
  • As shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3, and Tables 1, 2 and 3, the relationship of a paraffin, naphthene and aromatic oil viscosity at 75°F to the percentage of carbon dioxide in the oil recovery gas mixture is demonstrated. It can be seen that greater than 50% carbon dioxide in the gas mixture is advantageous in lowering the oil viscosity relative to the use of 100% carbon dioxide.
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Paraffin Oil Viscosity at Various Pressures and 75 F
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil viscosity at 1500 psia (cP) Oil viscosity at 2000 psia (cP) Oil viscosity at 2500 psia (cP)
    0 0.592 0.571 0.552
    25 0.557 0.534 0.513
    50 0.515 0.49 0.468
    68 0.478 0.453 0.437
    75 0.462 0.443 0.449
    80 0.45 0.451 0.457
    85 0.451 0.46 0.466
    88 0.456 0.465 0.472
    92 0.464 0.472 0.479
    100 0.478 0.487 0.493
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Naphthene Oil Viscosity at Various Pressures and 75 F
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil viscosity at 1500 psia (cP) Oil viscosity at 2000 psia (cP) Oil viscosity at 2500 psia (cP)
    0 1.93 1.87 1.82
    25 1.69 1.62 1.57
    50 1.44 1.38 1.32
    68 1.26 1.19 1.14
    75 1.18 1.12 1.07
    80 1.12 1.06 1.02
    85 1.06 1.01 0.997
    88 1.02 0.993 1.01
    92 0.986 1.01 1.02
    100 1.02 1.04 1.05
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Aromatic Oil Viscosity at Various Pressures and 75 F
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil viscosity at 1500 psia (cP) Oil viscosity at 2000 psia (cP) Oil viscosity at 2500 psia (cP)
    0 0.827 0.811 0.797
    25 0.7566 0.738 0.722
    50 0.679 0.658 0.642
    68 0.615 0.595 0.578
    75 0.587 0.567 0.552
    80 0.566 0.547 0.532
    85 0.544 0.526 0.512
    88 0.529 0.512 0.519
    92 0.51 0.52 0.527
    100 0.527 0.537 0.544
  • Figures 4, 5 and 6 and Tables 4, 5 and 6 show the relationship of a paraffin, naphthene and aromatic oil surface tension at 75°F to the percentage carbon dioxide and the oil recovery gas mixture for three different pressures. As can be seen in Figures 4, 5 and 6, greater than 60% carbon dioxide in the gas mixture is advantageous in reducing surface tension in comparison to the use of pure carbon dioxide.
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Paraffin Oil Surface Tension at Various Pressures and 75 F
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil surface tension at 1500 psia (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 2000 psia (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 2500 psia (dyne/cm)
    0 19.22 18.39 17.65
    25 17.1 16.19 15.41
    50 14.93 13.99 13.21
    68 13.27 12.35 11.8
    75 12.59 11.86 11.86
    80 12.09 11.91 11.9
    85 11.96 11.95 11.95
    88 11.98 11.98 11.98
    92 12.02 12.02 12.02
    100 12.09 12.1 12.1
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Naphthene Oil Surface Tension at Various Pressures and 75 F
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil surface tension at 1500 psia (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 2000 psia (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 2500 psia (dyne/cm)
    0 29.21 28.56 27.96
    25 26.14 25.3 24.59
    50 22.93 21.97 21.23
    68 20.4 19.44 18.73
    75 19.34 18.42 17.72
    80 18.53 17.64 16.97
    85 17.69 16.85 16.59
    88 17.16 16.61 16.62
    92 16.65 16.66 16.66
    100 16.72 16.73 16.73
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Aromatic Oil Surface Tension at Various Pressures and 75 F
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil surface tension at 1500 psia (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 2000 psia (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 2500 psia (dyne/cm)
    0 29.84 29.29 28.79
    25 26.71 25.96 25.33
    50 23.41 22.53 21.87
    68 20.81 19.94 19.28
    75 19.73 18.87 18.25
    80 18.92 18.08 17.48
    85 18.06 17.28 16.72
    88 17.52 16.77 16.76
    92 16.8 16.8 16.8
    100 16.86 16.86 16.86
  • Figures 7 and 8 and Tables 7 and 8 show the relationship of a paraffin oil viscosity and surface tension at various temperatures to the percentage carbon dioxide and the oil recovery gas mixture. As demonstrated in the earlier examples, greater than 50% carbon dioxide in the gas mixture is advantageous in comparison to the use of pure carbon dioxide. Oil viscosity is greatly reduced at around 70 to 80% carbon dioxide while surface tension remains approximately constant at the higher carbon dioxide concentrations.
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Paraffin Oil Viscosity at Various Temperatures and 2000 psia
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil viscosity at 75 F (cP) Oil viscosity at 100 F (cP) Oil viscosity at 125 F (cP) Oil viscosity at 150 F (cP) Oil viscosity at 200 F (cP)
    0 0.571 0.486 0.419 0.365 0.282
    50 0.49 0.429 0.375 0.329 0.257
    75 0.443 0.387 0.341 0.301 0.235
    80 0.451 0.394 0.342 0.298 0.229
    85 0.46 0.402 0.348 0.304 0.23
    88 0.465 0.407 0.352 0.307 0.233
    92 0.472 0.413 0.358 0.312 0.237
    100 0.487 0.426 0.369 0.321 0.244
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Paraffin Oil Surface Tension at Various Temperatures and 2000 psia
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil surface tension at 75 F (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 100 F (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 125 F (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 150 F (dyne/cm) Oil surface tension at 200 F (dyne/cm)
    0 18.39 17.3 16.21 15.13 13
    50 13.99 12.91 12.29 11.63 10.26
    75 11.86 10.53 10.06 9.582 8.574
    80 11.91 10.52 9.887 9.265 8.167
    85 11.95 10.52 9.888 9.266 8.044
    88 11.98 10.52 9.887 9.266 8.046
    92 12.02 10.52 9.888 9.266 8.044
    100 12.1 10.52 9.887 9.265 8.045
  • Figure 9 and Table 9 show the relationship of a paraffin oil relative volume at various temperatures as to the percentage carbon dioxide in the oil recovery gas mixture. The relative volume is taken in comparison to a standard oil volume. Roughly 70% to 99% carbon dioxide in the gas mixture is advantageous in comparison to the use of pure carbon dioxide to maximize swelling in this case. As swelling of the oil increases, the oil will exit small pores within the subterranean formation and can be swept or driven to the production well by use of the various flood techniques.
    Effect of CO2 Content of Gas on Paraffin Oil Relative Volume at Various Temperatures and 2000 psia
    CO2 content of gas (%) Oil relative volume at 75 F Oil relative volume at 100 F Oil relative volume at 125 F Oil relative volume at 150 F Oil relative volume at 200 F
    0 1.036 1.053 1.071 1.090 1.131
    50 1.118 1.135 1.154 1.176 1.235
    75 1.193 1.222 1.244 1.27 1.353
    80 1.188 1.217 1.249 1.287 1.392
    85 1.183 1.211 1.243 1.280 1.398
    88 1.179 1.207 1.239 1.276 1.391
    92 1.175 1.203 1.234 1.271 1.383
    100 1.167 1.194 1.224 1.261 1.366

Claims (15)

  1. A method for enhancing the recovery of oil from an underground formation comprising injecting into said oil a gas mixture comprising at least 50% by volume carbon dioxide.
  2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the remainder of said gas mixture additionally includes one or more of the following: at least one inert gas; at least one hydrocarbon; steam; and air.
  3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the inert gas is one or more of the following: nitrogen, helium, and argon.
  4. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said gas mixture is injected into said oil at the well head.
  5. A method according to claim 4, wherein said gas mixture is injected into a single production well head.
  6. A method according to claim 5, wherein said injection is cyclical.
  7. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said gas mixture is injected into an injection well other than a production well head.
  8. A method according to claim 7, wherein said gas mixture is injected in an alternating pattern with a driving fluid.
  9. A method according to claim 8, wherein said driving fluid is selected from the group consisting of steam, water, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and air.
  10. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said gas mixture is injected into said oil at a pressure ranging from about 100 psi to about 20,000 psi.
  11. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein after injection of said gas mixture said underground formation is sealed for at least one day.
  12. A method according to claim 11, wherein said sealed underground formation is opened and a flood of a material selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, water or brine is driven through said injection point.
  13. A method according to claim 12, wherein said gas mixture is injected into said underground formation in at least two distinct injection points wherein the volume percentage of nitrogen in said mixture is higher at said second injection point than said first injection point and said first injection point is closer to said at least one production well than said second injection point.
  14. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said gas mixture further reduces the viscosity and the surface tension of said oil in said underground formation.
  15. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the gas mixture contains at least 70% by volume of carbon dioxide.
EP02253397A 2001-05-16 2002-05-15 Enhanced oil recovery method using CO2 injection Withdrawn EP1258595A3 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/858,363 US20030037928A1 (en) 2001-05-16 2001-05-16 Enhanced oil recovery
US858363 2001-05-16

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1258595A2 true EP1258595A2 (en) 2002-11-20
EP1258595A3 EP1258595A3 (en) 2004-03-03

Family

ID=25328128

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02253397A Withdrawn EP1258595A3 (en) 2001-05-16 2002-05-15 Enhanced oil recovery method using CO2 injection

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20030037928A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1258595A3 (en)
CN (1) CN1385595A (en)
AU (1) AU4058402A (en)
CA (1) CA2384612A1 (en)
MX (1) MXPA02004535A (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2417739A (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-03-08 Statoil Asa Method of enhancing oil recovery
GB2450442B (en) * 2006-02-27 2011-09-28 Archon Technologies Ltd Oilfield enhanced in situ combustion process
CN101718192B (en) * 2009-12-04 2012-07-18 北京高新利华催化材料制造有限公司 Method for carrying out tertiary oil production on oil field
DE102011110213A1 (en) 2011-08-16 2013-02-21 Thyssenkrupp Uhde Gmbh Method and device for recirculating exhaust gas from a gas turbine with subsequent waste heat boiler
WO2012041926A3 (en) * 2010-09-29 2013-03-28 Statoil Asa Methods for storing carbon dioxide compositions in subterranean geological formations and an apparatus for carrying out the method
CN104632158A (en) * 2013-11-13 2015-05-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Oil well response stage dividing and distinguishing method under carbon dioxide miscible displacement condition
US9267364B2 (en) 2010-06-04 2016-02-23 Dow Global Technologies Llc Oil recovery
US10066469B2 (en) 2016-02-09 2018-09-04 Frank Thomas Graff Multi-directional enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) method
US10519757B2 (en) 2016-02-09 2019-12-31 Frank Thomas Graff, JR. Multi-directional enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) method
WO2021037700A1 (en) 2019-08-23 2021-03-04 Schultes John W Method and a direct reduction plant for producing direct reduced iron

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9605522B2 (en) * 2006-03-29 2017-03-28 Pioneer Energy, Inc. Apparatus and method for extracting petroleum from underground sites using reformed gases
US7506685B2 (en) * 2006-03-29 2009-03-24 Pioneer Energy, Inc. Apparatus and method for extracting petroleum from underground sites using reformed gases
US8561702B2 (en) * 2007-02-10 2013-10-22 Vast Power Portfolio, Llc Hot fluid recovery of heavy oil with steam and carbon dioxide
CN201031676Y (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-03-05 辽河石油勘探局 Boiler flue gas pressurization absorption CO2 gaseous state pouring well oil production device
US7650939B2 (en) * 2007-05-20 2010-01-26 Pioneer Energy, Inc. Portable and modular system for extracting petroleum and generating power
US8616294B2 (en) * 2007-05-20 2013-12-31 Pioneer Energy, Inc. Systems and methods for generating in-situ carbon dioxide driver gas for use in enhanced oil recovery
CN101126312B (en) * 2007-08-17 2013-01-23 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 Fluctuation petroleum exploitation method
US20090140444A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Total Separation Solutions, Llc Compressed gas system useful for producing light weight drilling fluids
US8450536B2 (en) * 2008-07-17 2013-05-28 Pioneer Energy, Inc. Methods of higher alcohol synthesis
US7937948B2 (en) * 2009-09-23 2011-05-10 Pioneer Energy, Inc. Systems and methods for generating electricity from carbonaceous material with substantially no carbon dioxide emissions
US20130206403A1 (en) * 2011-08-09 2013-08-15 Stevan Jovanovic Enhanced oil recovery process
CN102392623B (en) * 2011-10-31 2014-07-23 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Air-drive oil production method for low-permeability reservoir
CN102606117B (en) * 2012-04-05 2014-11-05 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Air and nitrogen alternating displacement exploitation method for mid-deep zone low-permeability thin oil reservoir
US9586827B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2017-03-07 David LeRoy Hagen CO2 producing calciner
AU2017268214A1 (en) 2016-05-17 2018-12-20 Nano Gas Technologies, Inc. Methods of affecting separation
US11193359B1 (en) 2017-09-12 2021-12-07 NanoGas Technologies Inc. Treatment of subterranean formations
CN114427392A (en) * 2020-09-29 2022-05-03 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for exploiting heavy oil reservoir
US20230112608A1 (en) 2021-10-13 2023-04-13 Disruptive Oil And Gas Technologies Corp Nanobubble dispersions generated in electrochemically activated solutions

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2623596A (en) 1950-05-16 1952-12-30 Atlantic Refining Co Method for producing oil by means of carbon dioxide
US3295601A (en) 1964-03-20 1967-01-03 Phillips Petroleum Co Transition zone formation in oil production
US5725054A (en) 1995-08-22 1998-03-10 Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural & Mechanical College Enhancement of residual oil recovery using a mixture of nitrogen or methane diluted with carbon dioxide in a single-well injection process

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3084743A (en) * 1958-09-16 1963-04-09 Jersey Prod Res Co Secondary recovery of petroleum
US4736792A (en) * 1986-12-30 1988-04-12 Texaco Inc. Viscous oil recovery method
US5046561A (en) * 1990-03-12 1991-09-10 Texaco Inc. Application of multiphase generation process in a CO2 flood for high temperature reservoirs
US5285848A (en) * 1992-11-16 1994-02-15 Atlantic Richfield Company Method for improving the recovery of oil from a subterranean formation by solvent concentration grading

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2623596A (en) 1950-05-16 1952-12-30 Atlantic Refining Co Method for producing oil by means of carbon dioxide
US3295601A (en) 1964-03-20 1967-01-03 Phillips Petroleum Co Transition zone formation in oil production
US5725054A (en) 1995-08-22 1998-03-10 Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural & Mechanical College Enhancement of residual oil recovery using a mixture of nitrogen or methane diluted with carbon dioxide in a single-well injection process

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2417739A (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-03-08 Statoil Asa Method of enhancing oil recovery
GB2417739B (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-07-26 Statoil Asa Method
GB2450442B (en) * 2006-02-27 2011-09-28 Archon Technologies Ltd Oilfield enhanced in situ combustion process
CN101718192B (en) * 2009-12-04 2012-07-18 北京高新利华催化材料制造有限公司 Method for carrying out tertiary oil production on oil field
US9267364B2 (en) 2010-06-04 2016-02-23 Dow Global Technologies Llc Oil recovery
WO2012041926A3 (en) * 2010-09-29 2013-03-28 Statoil Asa Methods for storing carbon dioxide compositions in subterranean geological formations and an apparatus for carrying out the method
US9194215B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2015-11-24 Statoil Asa Methods for storing carbon dioxide compositions in subterranean geological formations
WO2013023725A1 (en) 2011-08-16 2013-02-21 Thyssenkrupp Uhde Gmbh Method and device for feeding back exhaust gas from a gas turbine with a downstream waste heat boiler
DE102011110213A1 (en) 2011-08-16 2013-02-21 Thyssenkrupp Uhde Gmbh Method and device for recirculating exhaust gas from a gas turbine with subsequent waste heat boiler
CN104632158A (en) * 2013-11-13 2015-05-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Oil well response stage dividing and distinguishing method under carbon dioxide miscible displacement condition
CN104632158B (en) * 2013-11-13 2017-02-08 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Oil well response stage dividing and distinguishing method under carbon dioxide miscible displacement condition
US10066469B2 (en) 2016-02-09 2018-09-04 Frank Thomas Graff Multi-directional enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) method
US10519757B2 (en) 2016-02-09 2019-12-31 Frank Thomas Graff, JR. Multi-directional enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) method
WO2021037700A1 (en) 2019-08-23 2021-03-04 Schultes John W Method and a direct reduction plant for producing direct reduced iron

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1258595A3 (en) 2004-03-03
AU4058402A (en) 2002-11-21
CA2384612A1 (en) 2002-11-16
CN1385595A (en) 2002-12-18
US20030037928A1 (en) 2003-02-27
MXPA02004535A (en) 2004-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1258595A2 (en) Enhanced oil recovery method using CO2 injection
Alagorni et al. An overview of oil production stages: enhanced oil recovery techniques and nitrogen injection
CA3073023C (en) Unconventional reservoir enhanced or improved oil recovery
CA2459324C (en) Acid gas disposal method
US5025863A (en) Enhanced liquid hydrocarbon recovery process
US4042029A (en) Carbon-dioxide-assisted production from extensively fractured reservoirs
US7624804B2 (en) Method for recovering oil from a gas-lifted oil well penetrating a subterranean oil-bearing formation
US4678036A (en) Miscible oil recovery process
US4136738A (en) Enhanced recovery of oil from a dipping subterranean oil-bearing reservoir using light hydrocarbon and carbon dioxide
AU2002323589A1 (en) Acid gas disposal method
US20150107834A1 (en) Method for producing heavy oil
US4427066A (en) Oil recovery method
US3295601A (en) Transition zone formation in oil production
GB2291082A (en) Plugging an underground formation
US4649997A (en) Carbon dioxide injection with in situ combustion process for heavy oils
US4552216A (en) Method of producing a stratified viscous oil reservoir
US3845821A (en) Recovery of oil by a vertical miscible flood
CN102124184B (en) Producing gaseous hydrocarbons from hydrate capped reservoirs
US4593759A (en) Method for the recovery of viscous oil utilizing mixtures of steam and oxygen
US3759325A (en) Foam for secondary and tertiary recovery
US4643252A (en) Carbon dioxide miscible displacement process
US5363914A (en) Injection procedure for gas mobility control agents
Aditya et al. Comparison of CO2 injection method and water injection in an oil formation
EP2904066B1 (en) A method for recovering oil
CA2599553A1 (en) Method and apparatus to enhance hydrocarbon production from wells

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20040325

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20040609

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20041221