EP1327204A4 - Interactive searching system and method - Google Patents

Interactive searching system and method

Info

Publication number
EP1327204A4
EP1327204A4 EP01961094A EP01961094A EP1327204A4 EP 1327204 A4 EP1327204 A4 EP 1327204A4 EP 01961094 A EP01961094 A EP 01961094A EP 01961094 A EP01961094 A EP 01961094A EP 1327204 A4 EP1327204 A4 EP 1327204A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
results
user
space
database
answer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP01961094A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1327204A1 (en
Inventor
Ltd Celebros
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Celebros Ltd
Original Assignee
Ltd Celebros
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from IL140241A external-priority patent/IL140241A/en
Application filed by Ltd Celebros filed Critical Ltd Celebros
Publication of EP1327204A1 publication Critical patent/EP1327204A1/en
Publication of EP1327204A4 publication Critical patent/EP1327204A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/338Presentation of query results
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/332Query formulation
    • G06F16/3325Reformulation based on results of preceding query
    • G06F16/3326Reformulation based on results of preceding query using relevance feedback from the user, e.g. relevance feedback on documents, documents sets, document terms or passages
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00Machine learning

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for efficiently searching within a database.
  • the invention is directed to uses related to large databases, such as those used to search over the Internet.
  • the user may receive a large number of results in which the name of the product o its description contains a series of letters that fit the criteria used by the user, though these results are totally irrelevant.
  • the search results do not contain all the products that are relevant for the user, but which are not identified by the exact text that the user has entered as a search criterion.
  • the term "item”, as used herein, is meant to indicate any searchable matter, including words, text paragraphs, documents, etc., and is not limited to any particular, physical or otherwise, type of item.
  • the invention is directed to an interactive method for searching a database comprising the steps of:
  • a search criterion analyzing said search criterion to determine additional search criteria related thereto or stemming therefrom; - generating a results space comprising results selected from an existing database, which results are retrieved using the user's search criterion and the additional search criteria;
  • Step i) above the user can also insert additional text that will also be treated as information usable to divide the results space.
  • the method further comprises repeating the step of restricting the number of results in the results space, until a predetermined number of total results is reached. According to another preferred embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises repeating the step of restricting the number of results in the results space, until the user decides that the total number of results obtained is that from which he wishes to choose.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrate an example of a search
  • Fig. 6 (A and B) is a simplified, schematic flow-chart illustrating
  • criterion is "shoe”.
  • this key-word may be related to
  • the system searches in the database for matching products/results
  • This related concept may be a
  • the system analyzes this results space . (online, or beforehand),
  • Stages 5-7 are repeated (stage 5 being performed each time on the
  • the user may choose a product, or may argue that the product that
  • the system also acts as a learning system, and adapts its own
  • FIG. 6 A and
  • DB means "database”.

Abstract

The invention is directed to an interactive method for searching a database to locate desired items, even if the key words used as search criteria are not used to identify the item in the database. Another purpose of this invention is providing a method, which, at the same time, reduces the results list based on user's response to a set of questions.

Description

INTERACTIVE SEARCHING SYSTEM AND METHOD
Field of the Invention The invention relates to a method for efficiently searching within a database. Particularly, the invention is directed to uses related to large databases, such as those used to search over the Internet.
Background of the Invention Searching items over the Internet may be a difficult and frustrating process, because of the many different names by which an item can be found, and the relatively inefficient restriction methods employed by search engines to limit the number of results of a given search. In addition, a specific text can be found in a large number of irrelevant results. This is particularly true in the field of e-commerce. A specific product that is sold on the Internet (or outside it) may be known by many names. There is no unique name that relates a given product to its name. A search that is based only on the text of the product name, or even on the text of its specifications/categories, does not solve the above mentioned problems. On the one hand, the user may receive a large number of results in which the name of the product o its description contains a series of letters that fit the criteria used by the user, though these results are totally irrelevant. (For example - the user searches for a television, and obtains results dealing with a television table). On the other hand, the search results do not contain all the products that are relevant for the user, but which are not identified by the exact text that the user has entered as a search criterion.
The art has so far failed to provide an efficient solution to the abovementioned problems, although many attempts have been made, and several different search engines exist.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a method and a system which overcome the aforementioned problems of the prior art.
It is another purpose of this invention to provide a simple interactive method by means of which the items actually desired by the user may be speedily located in a database that contains them, even if the keywords used as search criteria are not used to identify the item ion the database. The term "item", as used herein, is meant to indicate any searchable matter, including words, text paragraphs, documents, etc., and is not limited to any particular, physical or otherwise, type of item.
It is yet another purpose of this invention to provide a method which, at the same time, amplifies and reduces the results list, to enable the user to locate the desired item, if it exists in the searched database, even if it is not directly retrievable by the search criterion used by the user.
Other purposes and advantages of this invention will appear as the description proceeds. Summary of the Invention
The invention is directed to an interactive method for searching a database comprising the steps of:
- receiving a search criterion from a user, or if no search criterion is provided, querying the user so as to generate a results space as hereinafter defined;
- if a search criterion is provided, analyzing said search criterion to determine additional search criteria related thereto or stemming therefrom; - generating a results space comprising results selected from an existing database, which results are retrieved using the user's search criterion and the additional search criteria;
- restricting the number of results in the results space by: i) asking the user questions having two or more possible answers, each possible answer dividing the results space into different segments; and ii) removing from the results space results which fall outside the segment of the results space that matches the user's answer.
In this Step i) above, the user can also insert additional text that will also be treated as information usable to divide the results space.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises repeating the step of restricting the number of results in the results space, until a predetermined number of total results is reached. According to another preferred embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises repeating the step of restricting the number of results in the results space, until the user decides that the total number of results obtained is that from which he wishes to choose.
Of course, the user is not obliged to provide a positive answer to a given question, and in the case that he chooses not to answer a question, a further question is asked without previously segmenting the results space.
All the above characteristics and advantages of the invention will be better understood through the following illustrative and non-limitative
description of preferred embodiments, with reference to the appended
drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
- Figs. 1 through 5 schematically illustrate an example of a search,
according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; and
Fig. 6 (A and B) is a simplified, schematic flow-chart illustrating
the interaction of the user with the system.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments
Looking at the figures, the following steps illustrate the invention: The user inserts a search criterion. In the example of Fig. 1 the search
criterion (key word) is "shoe". Of course, this key-word may be related to
many different products that the user is searching.
2. The system searches in the database for matching products/results,
which contains the text that the user had inserted. The result of this
search will be referred to as "results space". The searched database might
be, for example, the catalog of one or more stores.
3. The system expands the results space by adding other results (from
the database), that although not containing the text the user had
inserted, contain a related concept. This related concept may be a
synonym, a similar context, etc. An algorithm that uses thesauruses,
adaptive historical knowledge, self-conclusion engine etc, performs this
expansion. Providing such algorithms, in order to expand the results
space, if of course within the scope of the skilled person, and therefore is not described herein in detail, for the sake of brevity.
4. The results space, generated in Steps 2 and 3 above, is shown in
Fig. 2.
5. The system analyzes this results space . (online, or beforehand),
using methods such as NLP, neural networks, pattern recognition, classification etc., which are well known to the skilled person. The result
of this analysis is a segmenting question, which divide the results space in the most efficient way. For example, in a multiple choice question, with X possible answers, each answer divides the results space to as close as
possible to 1/x.
6. An example of question, with 2 possible answers (i.e., "Is it bigger
than a basketball?"), is shown in Fig. 2.
7. After the user answers the question, the results space is reduced, and he all the matching results/products are displayed to him (as shown
in Fig. 2). The user may choose not to answer a specific question (for
example, when he does not know the answer). In this case, he clicks the
button that says "I don't know", and the system chooses another question.
Alternativelt- it is also possible to present the user with several questions, and to ask him to choose which question he would like to answer.
8. Stages 5-7 are repeated (stage 5 being performed each time on the
new space result), until the user asks to stop, or until the system cannot
generate more questions, or until there is a sufficiently small number of
results. The whole process is illustrated in Figs. 2-5.
9. The user may choose a product, or may argue that the product that
he wants, does not appear on the list. In this case, the system will present
him other products that do not match all the answers of the user, but
match some of them. If he chooses a product from the new list, the system
will inform him about any contradiction between his answers and the knowledge of the system. 10. The system also acts as a learning system, and adapts its own
information used to carry out the process, according to the result (i.e.
product) that the user has chosen. This is done, for example, by correcting
the correlations between the chosen product and the questions that the
user has answered.
A process of the type described above, according to a preferred
embodiment of the invention, is schematically illustrated in Fig. 6 (A and
B), and is self-explanatory. In the figure "DB" means "database".
As will be apparent to the skilled person, the invention provides two novel
and substantial improvements over the prior art:
1. The processes of expansion and reduction of the database, that enable
the user to locate exactly what he wants, assuming it exists on the
database, even if he doesn't know its exact name; and
2. The interaction with the user, in which the "user is led to the product in
which he is interested, in the most efficient way.
While embodiments of the invention have been described by way of illustration, it will be understood that the invention can be carried out by persons skilled in the art with many modifications, variations and adaptations, without departing from its spirit or exceeding the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. An interactive method for searching a database comprising the steps of: - receiving a search criterion from a user {not mandatory};
- analyzing said search criterion to determine additional search criteria related thereto or stemming therefrom;
- generating a results space comprising results selected from an existing database, which results are retrieved using the user's search criterion and the additional search criteria;
- restricting the number of results in the results space by: i) asking the user questions having two or more possible answers, each possible answer dividing the results space into different segments; and ii) removing from the results space results which fall outside the segment of the results space that matches the user's answer.
2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising repeating the step of restricting the number of results in the results space, until a predetermined number of total results is reached.
3. A method according to claim 1, further comprising repeating the step of restricting the number of results in the results space, until the user decides that the total number of results obtained is that from which he wishes to choose.
4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the user is not obliged to provide a positive answer to a given question, whereby a further question is asked without previously segmenting the results space.
5. An interactive method for searching a database, essentially as described and illustrated.
EP01961094A 2000-08-24 2001-08-22 Interactive searching system and method Withdrawn EP1327204A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US22735600P 2000-08-24 2000-08-24
US227356P 2000-08-24
IL14024100 2000-12-11
IL140241A IL140241A (en) 2000-12-11 2000-12-11 Interactive searching system and method
PCT/IL2001/000786 WO2002048912A1 (en) 2000-08-24 2001-08-22 Interactive searching system and method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1327204A1 EP1327204A1 (en) 2003-07-16
EP1327204A4 true EP1327204A4 (en) 2009-06-03

Family

ID=26323993

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01961094A Withdrawn EP1327204A4 (en) 2000-08-24 2001-08-22 Interactive searching system and method

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1327204A4 (en)
DE (1) DE01961094T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2002048912A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8001152B1 (en) 2007-12-13 2011-08-16 Zach Solan Method and system for semantic affinity search

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999066427A1 (en) * 1998-06-15 1999-12-23 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and method for refining search queries

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5642502A (en) * 1994-12-06 1997-06-24 University Of Central Florida Method and system for searching for relevant documents from a text database collection, using statistical ranking, relevancy feedback and small pieces of text
US5867799A (en) * 1996-04-04 1999-02-02 Lang; Andrew K. Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs
US5987457A (en) * 1997-11-25 1999-11-16 Acceleration Software International Corporation Query refinement method for searching documents

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999066427A1 (en) * 1998-06-15 1999-12-23 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and method for refining search queries

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
COOPER J W ET AL: "OBIWAN-a visual interface for prompted query refinement", SYSTEM SCIENCES, 1998., PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-FIRST HAWAII INTERNA TIONAL CONFERENCE ON KOHALA COAST, HI, USA 6-9 JAN. 1998, LOS ALAMITOS, CA, USA,IEEE COMPUT. SOC, US, vol. 2, 6 January 1998 (1998-01-06), pages 277 - 285, XP010262890, ISBN: 978-0-8186-8255-1 *
ROUSSINOV D G ET AL: "Information navigation by clustering and summarizing query results", SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2000. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATI ONAL CONFERENCE ON JAN 4-7, 2000, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA,IEEE, 4 January 2000 (2000-01-04), pages 797 - 806, XP010545315, ISBN: 978-0-7695-0493-3 *
See also references of WO0248912A1 *
ZAMIR O ET AL: "Grouper: a dynamic clustering interface to Web search results", COMPUTER NETWORKS, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS B.V., AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 31, no. 11-16, 17 May 1999 (1999-05-17), pages 1361 - 1374, XP004304560, ISSN: 1389-1286 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE01961094T1 (en) 2005-10-20
EP1327204A1 (en) 2003-07-16
WO2002048912A1 (en) 2002-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Agichtein et al. Learning search engine specific query transformations for question answering
Kraaij et al. Viewing stemming as recall enhancement
US7003519B1 (en) Method of thematic classification of documents, themetic classification module, and search engine incorporating such a module
US6167397A (en) Method of clustering electronic documents in response to a search query
US6701309B1 (en) Method and system for collecting related queries
US6560588B1 (en) Method and apparatus for identifying items of information from a multi-user information system
US7392238B1 (en) Method and apparatus for concept-based searching across a network
US20040249808A1 (en) Query expansion using query logs
US7330811B2 (en) Method and system for adapting synonym resources to specific domains
US6741959B1 (en) System and method to retrieving information with natural language queries
EP1209582A2 (en) Document retrieval method and system and computer readable storage medium
JP2002297651A (en) Method and system for information retrieval, and program
US10586174B2 (en) Methods and systems for finding and ranking entities in a domain specific system
US6622139B1 (en) Information retrieval apparatus and computer-readable recording medium having information retrieval program recorded therein
US6363374B1 (en) Text proximity filtering in search systems using same sentence restrictions
CN108228637B (en) Automatic response method and system for natural language client
US6618722B1 (en) Session-history-based recency-biased natural language document search
JP2002132812A (en) Method and system for answering question and recording medium with recorded question answering program
JP2001076010A (en) Database-dividing method, and program storage device and recording medium with program recorded therein
JPH113335A (en) Question and answer managing device
EP2579189A1 (en) Method and apparatus for generating an explanation for a recommendation
JP5915274B2 (en) Information search method, program, and information search apparatus
US20040049496A1 (en) Interactive searching system and method
CN108810640B (en) Television program recommendation method
EP1327204A1 (en) Interactive searching system and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030312

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

DET De: translation of patent claims
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CELEBROS LTD.

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: CELEBROS LTD.

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20090508

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090717

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20091128