US20010004095A1 - Flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter - Google Patents
Flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010004095A1 US20010004095A1 US09/734,641 US73464100A US2001004095A1 US 20010004095 A1 US20010004095 A1 US 20010004095A1 US 73464100 A US73464100 A US 73464100A US 2001004095 A1 US2001004095 A1 US 2001004095A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- flight control
- values
- control system
- commands
- assistance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot
- G05D1/08—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw
- G05D1/0808—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft
- G05D1/0858—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft specially adapted for vertical take-off of aircraft
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter.
- a jack is generally mounted in the control linkage and receives commands from said automatic pilot, these being added to the commands representative of the position of the flight controls.
- the position of said flight controls no longer corresponds directly to the axis command applied to the rotor(s).
- This axis command is in fact in this case the result of the sum of the commands representing the position of the flight controls and of the commands generated by said automatic pilot.
- document FR-2 756 252 discloses a flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter, equipped with an assisted flight control system, which, in a simple and precise way, allows the pilot to be at least partially provided with feedback regarding said control margins left on the various flight controls while at the same time acknowledging the flight control assistance afforded by said assisted flight control system.
- At least one flight control which can be moved between extreme positions by a pilot of said aircraft, first commands being representative of the position of said flight control
- an assisted flight control system generating assistance values representing second commands
- a limitation system associated with said assisted flight control system and comprising a limiter which is intended to limit said assistance values according to the position of said flight control, to limited values (transmitted to said first means as second commands) so that, particularly when said flight control is brought near to one of said extreme positions, said limited values are zero and therefore said control commands approximately correspond to said first commands.
- the pilot can ascertain the control margin remaining for the positions of the flight control, for which this information is important, namely essentially for positions close to said extreme positions;
- the flight control assistance (that is to say the assistance afforded in the form of said second commands) is acknowledged to the greatest possible extent, that is to say particularly when the remaining control margin is sufficient for the pilot not to have precise feedback on it.
- the object of the present invention is to overcome these drawbacks.
- the present invention relates to a flight control system comprising a limitation system which makes it possible to bring about a damped transition at the boundaries of the limit of authority generated by said limitation system.
- At least one flight control which can be moved by a pilot of said aircraft, first commands being representative of the position of said flight control
- an assisted flight control system generating assistance values representing second commands
- a limitation system associated with said assisted flight control system and comprising a limiter which is intended to limit said assistance values according to the position of said flight control, to first limited values;
- said limitation system additionally comprises:
- third means for calculating second limited values corresponding to the sum of said first limited values and of said damping values, and for transmitting the second limited values thus calculated as second commands to said first means.
- This damping is performed according to the amplitude and, as will be seen below, the dynamics of the assistance (assistance values) determined by the assisted flight control system.
- the present invention makes it possible, in the medium term (and to within the dynamics of said control supplement), to provide a solution to the problem of providing feedback regarding the proportion of axis control remaining, while at the same time improving the continuity and significance of the assistance, at the boundaries of the limit of authority.
- said second means comprise:
- a filtering means which filters this difference to remove the low-frequency signals from it so as to obtain said damping values, which allows the dynamic part of the control supplement to be acknowledged.
- time constant of said filtering means determines the significance of the damping of the limit of authority.
- said limiter is formed in such a way as to limit the assistance values, by continuous limitation functions, generating minimum limitation when said flight control is brought near to its central position, and maximum limitation when said flight control is brought near to one of its extreme positions.
- At least some of said limitation functions may advantageously have variable values dependent on the value of parameters, such as the angular velocity of the aircraft, for example, which can be measured thereon.
- said assisted flight control system when the aircraft is equipped with an automatic pilot, preferably corresponds to said automatic pilot of the aircraft;
- said assisted flight control system and said limitation system are preferably incorporated into said flight control device.
- FIG. 1 is a synoptic diagram of a flight control system according to the invention, mounted on a helicopter equipped with an electrical flight control device.
- FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates a limitation system according to the invention and relating to just one control axis of a flight control system.
- FIG. 1 Said flight control system according to the invention and depicted diagrammatically in FIG. 1 is mounted on board a rotary-wing aircraft, in this particular instance a helicopter He that is to be flown, although, for drawing clarity reasons, the helicopter He has been depicted on a small scale, outside said flight control system in this FIG. 1.
- the helicopter He has a main rotor RP intended to provide lift and forward travel, and a tail rotor RQ intended to provide balance and control the yawing of the helicopter He.
- This exemplary embodiment of the flight control system for a helicopter shown diagrammatically in FIG. 1, comprises an electrical flight control device CDVE receiving a quantity of information and emitting control commands.
- CDVE electrical flight control device
- a collective pitch lever LCo associated with a transducer TCo converting the movements of said lever into an electrical signal sent to the device CDVE by a link e 1 ;
- a cyclic pitch stick MCy associated with a transducer TCy, converting movements of said stick into an electrical signal sent to the device CDVE by a link e 2 ;
- a rudder Pal associated with a position sensor TPal converting the movements of said rudder into an electrical signal sent to the device CDVE by a link e 3 ;
- a number n of sensors Cl to Cn mounted on board the helicopter and, in the form of electrical signals, delivering a quantity of information regarding the status of said helicopter He, such as the air speed, angular velocities, angular accelerations, attitude, load factors, etc., said information being sent to the device CDVE by the links El to En; and
- a command combiner MO receiving, via links S 1 to S 4 , the control commands formulated by the device CDVE from the signals sent by the links e 1 to e 3 and E 1 to En, as specified hereinbelow, and sending control commands via links s 1 to s 3 to the servocontrols of the main rotor RP and, via the link s 4 , to the servocontrol of the tail rotor RQ.
- said command combiner MO is generally incorporated into said electrical flight control device CDVE.
- said electrical flight control device CDVE determines, using a built-in algorithm illustrated by a calculation means CAL, the control commands for said rotors RP and RQ, acknowledging simultaneously:
- the device CDVE constitutes an assisted flight control system because, when calculating the control commands, it acknowledges not only the flight commands generated by the pilots, but also the actual status of the helicopter and in consequence determines optimized control commands which differ from the commands given by the pilots via the flight controls, this being in particular with a view to stabilizing the helicopter He and to optimizing the adherence to parameters, such as heading for example (or alternatively attitude, speed, etc.).
- the device CDVE comprises a limitation system SL incorporated into and associated with said calculation means CAL, as illustrated by a link 1 .
- Said limitation system SL comprises a limiter 3 which is intended to limit the importance of the information calculated from the sensors C 1 to Cn and relating to the status of the helicopter He in the control commands applied to the rotors RP and RQ according to the position of the flight controls LCo, MCy and/or Pal.
- said limiter 3 performs maximum limitation on the commands relating to information regarding the status of the helicopter He so as to obtain correspondence between the positions of said flight controls LCo, MCy and Pal and the respective axis controls applied to the rotors RP, RQ: whereas
- said limiter 3 performs minimum limitation so that the flight control system acknowledges the flight control assistance provided to the greatest possible extent.
- said flight control system determines the control commands for each of the axes of control of the rotors RP and RQ of the helicopter He, namely respectively for flight control in terms of collective pitch, roll, yaw and pitch, from:
- FIG. 2 in a simplified and schematic way, merely represents that part of the flight control system that applies to roll control, therefore merely represents the cyclic pitch stick MCy which can be moved sideways to control roll.
- MCy cyclic pitch stick
- Said first and second commands are transmitted, via links e 2 and e 2 A respectively, to a summing means 2 which sums said commands and sends the results via a link si to the servocontrols for the main rotor RP, via the command combiner, controlling the rolling of the helicopter He.
- said limitation system SL which, as depicted in FIG. 2, comprises the limiter 3 which, in the way described hereinbelow, limits the assistance values (received via a link 4 from the assisted flight control system and intended in particular to stabilize the aircraft), additionally comprises, in order to damp the transition at the boundaries of the limitation it generates:
- means 5 , 6 for determining the damping values representative of the difference between said assistance values received by the duplicated link 4 from the assisted flight control system and said first limited values received by a link 7 from the limiter 3 ;
- means 8 in this particular instance a summer, for calculating second limited values corresponding to the sum of said first limited values received by the duplicated link 7 and of said damping values received by a link 9 , and for transmitting the second limited values thus calculated, as second commands, to the summer 2 via the link e 2 A.
- said summer 8 superposes on the limited assistance control (first limited values), a supplement obtained from the difference between the overall assistance control (assistance values) and said limited assistance control (first limited values), which makes it possible to damp the transition of the control commands at the boundaries of the limit of authority generated by said limiter 3 .
- the present invention makes it possible, in the medium term (and to within the dynamics of said control supplement) to provide a solution to the problem of providing feedback regarding the proportion of axis control remaining, while at the same time improving the continuity and significance of the assistance at the boundaries of the limit of authority.
- said means 5 , 6 in order to determine the damping values, comprise:
- a calculation means 5 for calculating the difference between said assistance values and said first limited values
- a filtering means 6 which is connected by a link 10 to said calculation means 5 and which filters this difference, in order to remove from it the low-frequency signals so as to obtain said damping values transmitted by the link 9 to the summer 8 .
- the time constant of said filtering means 6 determines the importance of the damping on the limit of authority.
- This time constant may, in addition, vary dynamically, for example as a function of the difference transmitted by the link 10 , so as to optimize a compromise between providing feedback regarding the proportion of axis control remaining and the significance of the assistance at the boundaries of the limit of authority.
- said assisted flight control system and said limitation system SL are preferably (although not exclusively) incorporated into said flight control device CDVE.
- the present invention may also be applied, in an example which has not been depicted, to an aircraft fitted with an automatic pilot.
- said assisted flight control system preferably corresponds to said automatic pilot of the aircraft.
- said first commands are generated by a transducer associated with said flight control and converting the movement of said flight control into an electrical signal;
- said first commands are generated via a linkage and a jack which are associated with said flight control.
- said limiter 3 is formed in such a way as to limit the assistance values using continuous limitation functions, giving rise to minimum limitation when the flight control LCo, MCy or Pal considered is brought near to its central position, and maximum limitation when said flight control LCo, MCy or Pal is brought near to one of its extreme positions, as illustrated very diagrammatically at 11 in FIG. 2.
- At least some of said limitation functions may have variable values depending on the value of parameters, such as the angular velocity of the helicopter He, for example, which can be measured on said helicopter He.
- said limiter 3 may just as easily employ limitation functions which are entirely asymmetric and more generally variable, particularly according to the flight configuration of the helicopter He.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter.
- It is known that in a helicopter which has no assisted flight control system such as, for example, an electric flight control device (CDVE) or an automatic pilot, there is a correspondence between, on the one hand, the position of the flight controls, for example the collective pitch lever, the cyclic pitch stick or the rudder, which can be actuated by a pilot of the aircraft and, on the other hand, the axis command applied to the helicopter rotor(s) in response to actuation of at least one of said flight controls. This correspondence allows the pilot to estimate in particular what proportion of control he still has along each axis. This estimate is generally used by the pilot to evaluate his margin for maneuver.
- By contrast, when the helicopter is equipped with an assisted flight control system of the aforementioned type, which has an action on helicopter stability, on the decoupling or on the adherence to flight parameters such as attitude or heading, the aforementioned correspondence is no longer present, as specified hereinbelow.
- Thus, for example, in the case of a helicopter equipped with an automatic pilot, a jack is generally mounted in the control linkage and receives commands from said automatic pilot, these being added to the commands representative of the position of the flight controls. In consequence, the position of said flight controls no longer corresponds directly to the axis command applied to the rotor(s). This axis command is in fact in this case the result of the sum of the commands representing the position of the flight controls and of the commands generated by said automatic pilot.
- A similar situation is encountered in an aircraft equipped with an electrical flight control device (CDVE). In this case, a computer replaces the aforementioned linkage and jack and formulates an overall axis control command including the commands from the pilots and the commands from the assisted control device.
- Current evolutions in flight control systems are tending to exacerbate the aforementioned problem because, particularly for safety and flight quality reasons, the assisted flight control systems such as the aforementioned ones are having an increasing influence and benefit, thus requiring an increasing amount of authority. This actually entails being able to generate higher authority than is currently used in conventional equipment.
- So, in order to be able to give the aircraft pilot feedback regarding the control margin remaining on each of the flight controls, document FR-2 756 252 discloses a flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter, equipped with an assisted flight control system, which, in a simple and precise way, allows the pilot to be at least partially provided with feedback regarding said control margins left on the various flight controls while at the same time acknowledging the flight control assistance afforded by said assisted flight control system.
- To achieve this, that known flight control system comprises:
- at least one flight control which can be moved between extreme positions by a pilot of said aircraft, first commands being representative of the position of said flight control;
- an assisted flight control system generating assistance values representing second commands;
- first means for determining control commands for at least one rotor of the aircraft from the sum of said first and second commands, and
- a limitation system associated with said assisted flight control system and comprising a limiter which is intended to limit said assistance values according to the position of said flight control, to limited values (transmitted to said first means as second commands) so that, particularly when said flight control is brought near to one of said extreme positions, said limited values are zero and therefore said control commands approximately correspond to said first commands.
- Thus, by virtue of this known flight control system:
- the pilot can ascertain the control margin remaining for the positions of the flight control, for which this information is important, namely essentially for positions close to said extreme positions; and
- the flight control assistance (that is to say the assistance afforded in the form of said second commands) is acknowledged to the greatest possible extent, that is to say particularly when the remaining control margin is sufficient for the pilot not to have precise feedback on it.
- However, in the case of a flight control system such as this comprising a system for limiting the authority, a problem is encountered when the boundaries limiting the authority are reached, because at said boundaries, there is an abrupt change from a control law incorporating the flight control assistance (when the second commands are not limited) to a “pseudo-direct” control law with no stabilization (with second commands limited so that the control commands then correspond exclusively to said first commands increased by the value of said limit on the second commands, which depends on the position of the control) and with a different feel, and vice versa. The transition at said boundaries of the limit of authority is therefore far too abrupt, which in particular leads to problems of flying comfort and accuracy.
- The object of the present invention is to overcome these drawbacks. The present invention relates to a flight control system comprising a limitation system which makes it possible to bring about a damped transition at the boundaries of the limit of authority generated by said limitation system.
- To this end, according to the invention, said flight control system of the type particularly comprising:
- at least one flight control which can be moved by a pilot of said aircraft, first commands being representative of the position of said flight control;
- an assisted flight control system generating assistance values representing second commands;
- a limitation system associated with said assisted flight control system and comprising a limiter which is intended to limit said assistance values according to the position of said flight control, to first limited values; and
- first means for determining said control commands from the sum of said first and second commands,
- is noteworthy in that said limitation system additionally comprises:
- second means for determining damping values representative of the difference between said assistance values and said first limited values; and
- third means for calculating second limited values corresponding to the sum of said first limited values and of said damping values, and for transmitting the second limited values thus calculated as second commands to said first means.
- Thus, as far as the assistance afforded by said assisted flight control system and limited by said limiter is concerned, a supplement obtained from the difference between the overall assistance control (assistance values) and said limited assistance control (first limited values) is superposed by virtue of the invention on the limited assistance control (first limited values), which makes it possible to damp the transition in the control commands at the boundaries of the limit of authority generated by said limitation system.
- This damping is performed according to the amplitude and, as will be seen below, the dynamics of the assistance (assistance values) determined by the assisted flight control system.
- In consequence, the present invention makes it possible, in the medium term (and to within the dynamics of said control supplement), to provide a solution to the problem of providing feedback regarding the proportion of axis control remaining, while at the same time improving the continuity and significance of the assistance, at the boundaries of the limit of authority.
- Advantageously, said second means comprise:
- a calculation means which calculates the difference between said assistance values and said first limited values; and
- a filtering means which filters this difference to remove the low-frequency signals from it so as to obtain said damping values, which allows the dynamic part of the control supplement to be acknowledged.
- It will be noted that the time constant of said filtering means determines the significance of the damping of the limit of authority.
- As a preference, said limiter is formed in such a way as to limit the assistance values, by continuous limitation functions, generating minimum limitation when said flight control is brought near to its central position, and maximum limitation when said flight control is brought near to one of its extreme positions.
- In addition, in order to optimize the efficiency of the present invention, at least some of said limitation functions may advantageously have variable values dependent on the value of parameters, such as the angular velocity of the aircraft, for example, which can be measured thereon.
- Moreover:
- when the aircraft is equipped with an automatic pilot, said assisted flight control system preferably corresponds to said automatic pilot of the aircraft; and
- when the aircraft is fitted with an electrical or optical flight control device, said assisted flight control system and said limitation system are preferably incorporated into said flight control device.
- The figures of the appended drawing will make it easy to understand how the invention may be achieved. In these figures, identical references denote similar elements.
- FIG. 1 is a synoptic diagram of a flight control system according to the invention, mounted on a helicopter equipped with an electrical flight control device.
- FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates a limitation system according to the invention and relating to just one control axis of a flight control system.
- Said flight control system according to the invention and depicted diagrammatically in FIG. 1 is mounted on board a rotary-wing aircraft, in this particular instance a helicopter He that is to be flown, although, for drawing clarity reasons, the helicopter He has been depicted on a small scale, outside said flight control system in this FIG. 1. In the example depicted, the helicopter He has a main rotor RP intended to provide lift and forward travel, and a tail rotor RQ intended to provide balance and control the yawing of the helicopter He.
- This exemplary embodiment of the flight control system for a helicopter, shown diagrammatically in FIG. 1, comprises an electrical flight control device CDVE receiving a quantity of information and emitting control commands. For this purpose, in the example depicted, the following are associated in the known way with said device CDVE:
- a collective pitch lever LCo, associated with a transducer TCo converting the movements of said lever into an electrical signal sent to the device CDVE by a link e1;
- a cyclic pitch stick MCy, associated with a transducer TCy, converting movements of said stick into an electrical signal sent to the device CDVE by a link e2;
- a rudder Pal, associated with a position sensor TPal converting the movements of said rudder into an electrical signal sent to the device CDVE by a link e3;
- a number n of sensors Cl to Cn, mounted on board the helicopter and, in the form of electrical signals, delivering a quantity of information regarding the status of said helicopter He, such as the air speed, angular velocities, angular accelerations, attitude, load factors, etc., said information being sent to the device CDVE by the links El to En; and
- a command combiner MO receiving, via links S1 to S4, the control commands formulated by the device CDVE from the signals sent by the links e1 to e3 and E1 to En, as specified hereinbelow, and sending control commands via links s1 to s3 to the servocontrols of the main rotor RP and, via the link s4, to the servocontrol of the tail rotor RQ. Although this has been depicted independently in FIG. 1, for the purpose of simplifying the drawing, said command combiner MO is generally incorporated into said electrical flight control device CDVE.
- In the known way, said electrical flight control device CDVE determines, using a built-in algorithm illustrated by a calculation means CAL, the control commands for said rotors RP and RQ, acknowledging simultaneously:
- information representing the respective positions of the aforementioned controls, namely the collective pitch lever LCo, the cyclic pitch stick MCy and the rudder Pal, which can be actuated by a pilot of the helicopter He; and
- information delivered by the sensors C1 to Cn relating to the status of said helicopter He.
- Thus formed, the device CDVE constitutes an assisted flight control system because, when calculating the control commands, it acknowledges not only the flight commands generated by the pilots, but also the actual status of the helicopter and in consequence determines optimized control commands which differ from the commands given by the pilots via the flight controls, this being in particular with a view to stabilizing the helicopter He and to optimizing the adherence to parameters, such as heading for example (or alternatively attitude, speed, etc.).
- In addition, in order to allow the pilot to estimate the control margin remaining on each flight control, the device CDVE comprises a limitation system SL incorporated into and associated with said calculation means CAL, as illustrated by a
link 1. - Said limitation system SL comprises a
limiter 3 which is intended to limit the importance of the information calculated from the sensors C1 to Cn and relating to the status of the helicopter He in the control commands applied to the rotors RP and RQ according to the position of the flight controls LCo, MCy and/or Pal. - More specifically, although not exclusively:
- in the areas of control or of movement of said flight controls LCo, MCy and Pal, for which awareness of the axis control margins remaining is important, if not to say essential, to flight control (that is to say essentially at the extreme positions of said flight controls), said
limiter 3 performs maximum limitation on the commands relating to information regarding the status of the helicopter He so as to obtain correspondence between the positions of said flight controls LCo, MCy and Pal and the respective axis controls applied to the rotors RP, RQ: whereas - in the other areas of control, particularly in the areas of control where flight control assistance is needed (particularly for central positions of the flight controls), said
limiter 3 performs minimum limitation so that the flight control system acknowledges the flight control assistance provided to the greatest possible extent. - Thus, whenever necessary, precise and effective feedback on the control margins remaining is provided, while at the same time acknowledging as much as possible the flight control assistance afforded by said assisted flight control system CDVE.
- To simplify and sum up, said flight control system determines the control commands for each of the axes of control of the rotors RP and RQ of the helicopter He, namely respectively for flight control in terms of collective pitch, roll, yaw and pitch, from:
- first commands representative of the position of said flight controls. To do this, FIG. 2, in a simplified and schematic way, merely represents that part of the flight control system that applies to roll control, therefore merely represents the cyclic pitch stick MCy which can be moved sideways to control roll. Of course, the features of the invention which are specified hereinbelow in respect of roll control are also valid for control in terms of collective pitch, yaw and pitching; and
- second commands relating to assistance values which are limited by the
limiter 3 to first limited values. - Said first and second commands are transmitted, via links e2 and e2A respectively, to a summing
means 2 which sums said commands and sends the results via a link si to the servocontrols for the main rotor RP, via the command combiner, controlling the rolling of the helicopter He. - According to the invention, said limitation system SL which, as depicted in FIG. 2, comprises the
limiter 3 which, in the way described hereinbelow, limits the assistance values (received via alink 4 from the assisted flight control system and intended in particular to stabilize the aircraft), additionally comprises, in order to damp the transition at the boundaries of the limitation it generates: - means5, 6 for determining the damping values representative of the difference between said assistance values received by the duplicated
link 4 from the assisted flight control system and said first limited values received by alink 7 from thelimiter 3; and - means8, in this particular instance a summer, for calculating second limited values corresponding to the sum of said first limited values received by the duplicated
link 7 and of said damping values received by alink 9, and for transmitting the second limited values thus calculated, as second commands, to thesummer 2 via the link e2A. - Thus, by virtue of the invention, said
summer 8 superposes on the limited assistance control (first limited values), a supplement obtained from the difference between the overall assistance control (assistance values) and said limited assistance control (first limited values), which makes it possible to damp the transition of the control commands at the boundaries of the limit of authority generated by saidlimiter 3. - This damping is achieved according to the amplitude and, as will be seen hereinbelow, the dynamics of the assistance (assistance values) determined by the assisted flight control system.
- In consequence, the present invention makes it possible, in the medium term (and to within the dynamics of said control supplement) to provide a solution to the problem of providing feedback regarding the proportion of axis control remaining, while at the same time improving the continuity and significance of the assistance at the boundaries of the limit of authority.
- As can be seen in FIG. 2, said means5, 6, in order to determine the damping values, comprise:
- a calculation means5 for calculating the difference between said assistance values and said first limited values; and
- a filtering means6 which is connected by a
link 10 to said calculation means 5 and which filters this difference, in order to remove from it the low-frequency signals so as to obtain said damping values transmitted by thelink 9 to thesummer 8. - This filtering makes it possible to acknowledge the dynamic part of the control supplement.
- The time constant of said filtering means6 determines the importance of the damping on the limit of authority. This time constant may, in addition, vary dynamically, for example as a function of the difference transmitted by the
link 10, so as to optimize a compromise between providing feedback regarding the proportion of axis control remaining and the significance of the assistance at the boundaries of the limit of authority. - Of course, the higher the time constant, the greater the damping. So, as far as the dynamic variation is concerned:
- if the difference transmitted by the
link 10 is great (the assistance values significantly exceed their limitations), the pilot is no longer assisted in estimating the control margins. He must then quickly reduce (damp) this difference in order not to be too far off the limitations; - by contrast, if this difference is sufficiently low, that is to say if the position is sufficiently far from the end stops, it can be let through without being filtered too quickly, in order to obtain better flight quality of the aircraft He,
- which explains the aforementioned compromise between:
- on the one hand, the provision of feedback regarding the axis control proportion remaining, in instances where it is beneficial to have zero difference; and
- on the other hand, the significance of the assistance, in instances where it is beneficial to have a difference which passes fully to the control.
- It will be noted that when the aircraft He is equipped with an electrical flight control device CDVE, as depicted in FIG. 1, said assisted flight control system and said limitation system SL are preferably (although not exclusively) incorporated into said flight control device CDVE.
- However, the present invention may also be applied, in an example which has not been depicted, to an aircraft fitted with an automatic pilot. In this case, said assisted flight control system preferably corresponds to said automatic pilot of the aircraft. In addition:
- in a first embodiment not depicted, said first commands are generated by a transducer associated with said flight control and converting the movement of said flight control into an electrical signal; and
- in a second embodiment not depicted, said first commands are generated via a linkage and a jack which are associated with said flight control.
- In consequence, even in the case of an automatic pilot, the associated flight control system has the aforementioned overall characteristics in accordance with the invention.
- In one particular embodiment, said
limiter 3 is formed in such a way as to limit the assistance values using continuous limitation functions, giving rise to minimum limitation when the flight control LCo, MCy or Pal considered is brought near to its central position, and maximum limitation when said flight control LCo, MCy or Pal is brought near to one of its extreme positions, as illustrated very diagrammatically at 11 in FIG. 2. - In addition, in order to optimize the effectiveness of the limit of authority, at least some of said limitation functions may have variable values depending on the value of parameters, such as the angular velocity of the helicopter He, for example, which can be measured on said helicopter He.
- Of course, said
limiter 3 may just as easily employ limitation functions which are entirely asymmetric and more generally variable, particularly according to the flight configuration of the helicopter He.
Claims (9)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR9915875 | 1999-12-16 | ||
FR9915875A FR2802656B1 (en) | 1999-12-16 | 1999-12-16 | FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR ROTATING AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT, ESPECIALLY FOR HELICOPTERS |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010004095A1 true US20010004095A1 (en) | 2001-06-21 |
US6367741B2 US6367741B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 |
Family
ID=9553329
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/734,641 Expired - Lifetime US6367741B2 (en) | 1999-12-16 | 2000-12-13 | Flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6367741B2 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2802656B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6527225B1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2003-03-04 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Method for performing an automated category a takeoff |
FR2841532B1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-12-17 | Airbus France | AIRCRAFT WITH ACTIVE WINGER TURN CONTROL |
FR2876468B1 (en) * | 2004-10-08 | 2007-08-17 | Eurocopter France | AUTOMATIC HELICOPTER CONTROL SYSTEM |
US9304516B2 (en) | 2011-01-14 | 2016-04-05 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Flight control laws for vertical flight path |
US11092136B2 (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2021-08-17 | Raytheon Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for optimal speed protection for power turbine governing |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4168045A (en) * | 1978-02-28 | 1979-09-18 | United Technologies Corporation | Speed and collective pitch bias of helicopter longitudinal cyclic pitch |
US4492907A (en) * | 1982-06-28 | 1985-01-08 | Rockwell International Corporation | Combined series and parallel servo control for aircraft |
EP0601000B1 (en) * | 1991-08-28 | 1997-01-29 | United Technologies Corporation | Vertical control system for rotary wing aircraft |
US5141177A (en) * | 1991-08-28 | 1992-08-25 | United Technologies Corporation | Model following control system |
US5310136A (en) * | 1992-05-19 | 1994-05-10 | United Technologies Corporation | Helicopter integrated fire and flight control having constraint limiting control |
FR2728536A1 (en) * | 1994-12-22 | 1996-06-28 | Eurocopter France | PALIERIER SYSTEM WITH GRADIENT OF EFFORT FOR HELICOPTER |
FR2741855B1 (en) * | 1995-12-05 | 1998-01-30 | Eurocopter France | CYCLIC SLEEVE SYSTEM FOR SPEED STABILITY OF A HELICOPTER |
FR2756252B1 (en) * | 1996-11-22 | 1999-01-22 | Eurocopter France | FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR ROTATING AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT, ESPECIALLY FOR A HELICOPTER |
-
1999
- 1999-12-16 FR FR9915875A patent/FR2802656B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2000
- 2000-12-13 US US09/734,641 patent/US6367741B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR2802656A1 (en) | 2001-06-22 |
US6367741B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 |
FR2802656B1 (en) | 2002-02-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7108232B2 (en) | Helicopter force-feel and stability augmentation system with parallel servo-actuator | |
US6158695A (en) | Method of speed protection and flare compensation for use with aircraft pitch control system | |
CN108536159B (en) | Rotorcraft control mode transition smoothing | |
US7427046B2 (en) | Optimized method of controlling yaw for rotary-wing aircraft, and a system for implementing it | |
EP0742142B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing unwanted sideways motion in the aft cabin and roll-yaw upsets of an airplane due to atmospheric turbulence and wind gusts | |
US20210302959A1 (en) | Aircraft control mode transition smoothing | |
US4168045A (en) | Speed and collective pitch bias of helicopter longitudinal cyclic pitch | |
JP3308532B2 (en) | High-speed turning adjustment method for rotary wing aircraft | |
US4213584A (en) | Helicopter hover stability and cruise gust effect alleviation | |
JP4714221B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for improving aircraft braking performance on the ground | |
CA1158219A (en) | Multi-axis force stick, self-trimmed aircraft flight control system | |
US20120053735A1 (en) | Apparatus and Method for Controlling a Force-Activated Controller | |
US6259975B1 (en) | Flight control system for an aircraft particularly for a helicopter | |
US9862500B2 (en) | Method of determining the longitudinal air speed and the longitudinal ground speed of a rotary wing aircraft depending on its exposure to the wind | |
EP0743244B1 (en) | Autopilot/flight director overspeed protection system | |
US9493234B2 (en) | Method and a system for determining an angular velocity in turning for a rotary wing aircraft | |
US20090014595A1 (en) | Electrical control system for an aircraft steering vane | |
CN112623192A (en) | Automatic trim control method for rudder of airplane | |
US6070829A (en) | Flight control system for rotary-wing aircraft, especially for a helicopter | |
US6367741B2 (en) | Flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, particularly for a helicopter | |
US6142413A (en) | Device for control of an aerodynamic steering surface of a helicopter | |
US6622065B2 (en) | Flight control device for an aircraft, in particular for a helicopter | |
US5738310A (en) | Rudder bar system with force gradient for a helicopter | |
US5746398A (en) | Force-gradient cyclic stick system for a helicopter | |
US6338454B1 (en) | Aircraft flight control device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EUROCOPTER, FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MEZAN, SERGE;REEL/FRAME:011362/0029 Effective date: 20001124 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, FRANCE Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:EUROCOPTER;REEL/FRAME:034663/0976 Effective date: 20140107 |