US20010031506A1 - Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer - Google Patents

Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010031506A1
US20010031506A1 US09/854,272 US85427201A US2001031506A1 US 20010031506 A1 US20010031506 A1 US 20010031506A1 US 85427201 A US85427201 A US 85427201A US 2001031506 A1 US2001031506 A1 US 2001031506A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
structures
dummy
semiconductor wafer
active
test
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US09/854,272
Other versions
US6458606B2 (en
Inventor
Marina Plat
Luigi Capodieci
Scott Bell
Todd Lukanc
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US09/854,272 priority Critical patent/US6458606B2/en
Publication of US20010031506A1 publication Critical patent/US20010031506A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6458606B2 publication Critical patent/US6458606B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L22/00Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment; Reliability measurements, i.e. testing of parts without further processing to modify the parts as such; Structural arrangements therefor
    • H01L22/30Structural arrangements specially adapted for testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment, or specially adapted for reliability measurements
    • H01L22/34Circuits for electrically characterising or monitoring manufacturing processes, e. g. whole test die, wafers filled with test structures, on-board-devices incorporated on each die, process control monitors or pad structures thereof, devices in scribe line

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the production of semiconductor wafers and test wafers used in developing the semiconductor wafer.
  • the present invention relates to reducing variations in the etch bias and slope profile of structures formed at various locations across the test wafer.
  • Integrated circuits are formed on semiconductor wafers typically made from silicon.
  • the wafers are substantially round and typically have a diameter of approximately six to eight inches. Since a single integrated circuit die is often no more than 1 cm 2 , a great many integrated circuit die can be formed on a single semiconductor wafer. After the semiconductor wafer has been processed to form a number of integrated circuit die on its surface, the wafer is cut along “scribe lines” to separate the integrated circuit die for subsequent packaging and use.
  • lithography refers to processes for pattern transfer between various media.
  • the basic photo-lithography system consists of a light source, a photomask (also known as “reticle”) containing the pattern to be transferred to the wafer, a collection of lenses, and a means for aligning existing patterns on the wafer with patterns on the mask.
  • Exposing a resist on the wafer to light of an appropriate wavelength through the reticle causes modifications in the molecular structure of the resist polymers to allow for transfer of the pattern from the photomask to the resist.
  • the modification to the molecular structure allows a resist developer to dissolve and remove the resist in the exposed areas, presuming a positive resist is used. If a negative resist is used, the developer removes the resist in the unexposed areas.
  • one or more etching steps take place which ultimately allow for transferring the desired pattern to the wafer.
  • an etchant is applied over the patterned resist.
  • the etchant comes into contact with the underlying feature layer by passing through the openings in the resist formed during the resist exposure and development steps.
  • the etchant serves to etch away those regions of the feature layer which correspond to the openings in the resist, thereby effectively transferring the pattern in the resist to the feature layer.
  • the resist is removed and another etchant may be applied over the patterned feature layer to transfer the pattern to the wafer or another layer in a similar manner.
  • the resolution of an etching process is a measure of the accuracy of pattern transfer, which can be quantified by an etch bias quantity.
  • Bias refers to the difference in lateral dimension between the etched image and the mask image.
  • B stands for the etch bias
  • d m is the length of a particular critical dimension (CD) as measured along the mask image made in the resist before any etching of the device feature layer
  • d f represents the final length of the CD measured along the bottom surface of the etched layer.
  • a zero-bias process produces a vertical edge profile coincident with the edge of the mask.
  • the etched device feature layer and the patterned resist would all be precisely aligned.
  • This case represents the extreme of anisotropic etching. Achieving an anisotropic etch can be very important in the manufacture of some devices. However, as a practical matter, a perfectly anisotropic etch is difficult to achieve in many instances.
  • FIG. 1 a depicts a semiconductor device 20 under construction having a device feature layer 24 which has been formed upon semiconductor substrate 22 .
  • a photoresist layer 28 has been formed over the device feature layer 24 and patterned by well-known photolithographic means, and the photoresist 28 has a dimension of d m which is measured from above.
  • the physical or chemical etch of the device feature layer 24 is ready to occur.
  • This etching gives a structure such as that seen in FIG. 1 b , viewed from above, where the device feature layer 24 has been formed having the dimension d f , which is reduced from the dm dimension.
  • the dimension of d m shown in FIG. 1 b is presented for comparison purposes only.
  • FIG. 1 c illustrates in profile the result of etching the feature layer 24 depicted in FIG. 1 b in which a measurable etch bias exists.
  • the feature layer 24 includes sloped edges 26 due to the imperfect anisotropic etch.
  • the sloped edges 26 define a slope profile or slope effect of the feature layer 24 which is proportional to the etch bias.
  • structures shall refer to any line or other formation etched into or onto a test wafer or final wafer.
  • the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for controlling the critical dimensions of those structures produced on sparsely populated areas of a test wafer so they more accurately depict the actual critical dimensions found for such structures on a densely populated final wafer.
  • the present invention provides for adding dummy structures on a test reticle in those areas having sparsely populated test circuits. In this manner, the test wafer will be formed having uniformly densely populated regions similar to the conditions under which the final wafer is produced. The dummy structures are added so as to not interfere with the active structures which form the test circuits.
  • the pattern transferred to the test wafer is substantially uniformly patterned with a dense population of structures which is approximately representative of the density of the final wafer to be ultimately produced.
  • critical dimension measurements such as etch bias and slope profile of active structures formed at any region of the test wafer will more closely approximate the critical dimension measurements of corresponding active structures formed on the final wafer.
  • the etch bias and slope profile differences between conventional densely and sparsely populated areas is substantially minimized. As such, more predictable and uniformly applicable measurements can be obtained from any region of the test wafer.
  • a method for designing a test wafer includes the steps of determining a feature of an integrated circuit to be tested, forming a test reticle, the test reticle including active patterns for forming the feature on the test wafer, adding dummy patterns on the test reticle in a manner predetermined to emulate a density of patterns in a region of a reticle used to produce the feature on the integrated circuit, and forming the test wafer using the test reticle.
  • a method for controlling critical dimension variations among active structures disposed at various locations on a semiconductor wafer is provided.
  • the active structures form components of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer.
  • the method includes the step of forming on the semiconductor wafer the active structures and a dummy structure.
  • a semiconductor wafer in accordance with another aspect of the present invention, includes a substrate, a plurality of active structures formed on the substrate, the active structures forming components of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer, and a dummy structure formed on the substrate.
  • a reticle for use as a mask in forming a pattern on a semiconductor wafer includes an optical transmissive plate, and a patterned film disposed on the plate, the patterned film having active pattern portions and dummy pattern portions, the active pattern portions corresponding to portions of the patterned film which form active structures on the semiconductor wafer, the active structures being used as part of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer.
  • FIG. 1 a is a cross sectional view of a semiconductor device depicting a resist layer dimension used in calculating critical dimensions
  • FIG. 1 b is a top view of the semiconductor device of FIG. 1 a after having the resist layer removed;
  • FIG. 1 c is a cross sectional view of the semiconductor device of FIG. 1 a depicting the slope profile of a patterned feature layer following etching;
  • FIG. 2 is an overview of a photo-lithography process in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of a portion of a test wafer having a plurality of test die formed therein in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 4 is a top view of a test reticle in a conventional system having densely and sparsely populated regions
  • FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating how etch bias varies between structures formed in densely populated areas verus sparsely populated areas
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of one type of dummy structure which may be added to the test reticle in order to uniformly populate the test reticle in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart describing the steps of forming and analyzing a test wafer in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a top view of a test reticle after having added dummy structures in accordance with the present invention.
  • test wafer 20 is used to produce and test circuits which will ultimately be formed on a final wafer.
  • the test wafer 20 is divided up into a number of test die 25 which are separated by scribe lines 30 .
  • the scribe lines 30 may be either positive mesa type lines or negative lines and allows for separating the individual test die 25 from one another after completing production of the test wafer 20 .
  • each test die is produced to have an identical circuit, however, it will be appreciated that test die having various circuit configurations could alternatively be produced.
  • the test wafer 20 is shown to include a semiconductor substrate 22 having a feature layer 35 formed thereon and a photo-resist 40 (hereinafter “resist 40 ”) formed over the feature layer 35 .
  • the feature layer 25 may, for example, be a film layer or a layer of polysilicon.
  • the resist 40 is the present embodiment is a positive resist, however negative resist could alternatively be used.
  • the system 10 includes an illumination source 50 that provides an appropriate amount of optical energy for transforming the resist 40 .
  • a test reticle 55 is provided between the light source and the wafer 20 to serve as a test mask in transferring a desired pattern through an optical subsystem 60 to the resist 40 as described in more detail below.
  • the test reticle 55 includes a glass or quartz plate 56 with a chrome layer 57 patterned thereon.
  • the pattern formed on the test reticle 55 is provided using conventional techniques known in the art.
  • the test reticle 55 may be patterned by forming a layer of photo-resist over the chrome layer 57 and patterning the photo-resist using electron beam.
  • the chrome layer 57 is then etched and the photo-resist removed thereby leaving behind the desired pattern. It will be appreciated that other known reflective or transmissive type reticles and corresponding pattern transfer systems could be used. Further, it will be appreciated that while the system 10 utilizes projection type printing, other printing techniques such as contact printing or proximity could alternatively be used.
  • active structures shall mean structures which form a part of the active or operational circuits produced on a wafer.
  • active structures may be a line that forms part of a an SRAM or transistor circuit on the wafer.
  • CD's related to etch bias and the slope profile of a line vary depending on whether the surrounding region is densely or sparsely populated.
  • structures formed in sparsely populated regions have greater slope profiles and greater negative etch bias than structures formed in densely populated regions.
  • FIG. 4 there is shown a conventional test reticle 55 in which the test reticle 55 is divided up into four identical regions 65 for patterning four corresponding test die 25 (FIG. 3) on the test wafer 20 .
  • Dividing lines 70 between each of the four regions 65 correspond to the scribe lines 30 (FIG. 3) formed on the wafer 20 .
  • the density of test patterns at any region along the test reticle 55 is representatively depicted by the frequency of occurrence of the square blocks 75 . Accordingly, as seen in FIG.
  • conventional test reticles 55 include both densely populated regions 80 such as that near the center of each region 65 , and sparsely populated regions 85 such as that near the edges of the test reticle 55 and near the dividing lines 70 .
  • the densely populated regions 80 may include patterns for forming MRAM or SRAM on the test wafer 20 while the sparsely populated regions 85 may include a small circuit incorporated into a test tile. While the present embodiment depicts the test reticle 55 to include four regions 65 , it will be appreciated that the test reticle 55 may include any number of regions.
  • a graph 90 shows the change in line width between a line formed in the densely populated die area and a line formed in a sparsely populated scribe area for various lots of wafers produced over a course of time.
  • the various lots of wafers may be produced over the course of one to three days.
  • the y-axis shown in FIG. 5 corresponds to the change in line widths, in nano-meters, between the structures formed in the densely and sparsely populated regions, and the x-axis corresponds to a given lot number.
  • the measured change between the densely and sparsely populated regions can vary significantly from one lot to the next. It was determined that such variations could be minimized by populating each region of the wafer with a uniform density of structures.
  • the present invention provides for adding dummy structures in those areas of the test die 25 which would otherwise be sparsely populated.
  • the present invention provides for adding an adequate number of dummy structures so as to approximate the actual density of structures included at each region of a final die.
  • a dummy structure 100 of the type which could be used in conjunction with the present invention is initially formed in the test reticle 55 and transferred to the wafer 20 using photo-lithography.
  • the dummy structure 100 of the present embodiment includes a cross pattern of horizontal and vertical lines 105 , 110 , respectively.
  • each line 105 , 110 is approximately one to two microns in width and 10 to 20 microns in length.
  • each of the dummy structure lines 105 , 110 is situated so they do not contact any active structure and preferably are at least 10 microns away from any active structure on the test wafer 20 . In this manner the dummy structure 110 does not interfere with the active structures used in to form the circuits in the test wafer.
  • a dummy structure of a particular pattern and dimension for exemplary purposes
  • any size and any pattern of dummy structures could alternatively be used.
  • a dummy structure could include one or more lines which is/are oriented horizontally, vertically, bent, or otherwise.
  • the dummy structures will be sized and patterned to adequately populate sparsely populated regions of a test die to more closely emulate the density of a final die of a final wafer.
  • step 150 a determination is made as to a feature of an integrated circuit which is to be tested.
  • the feature may be a series of transistors which are to perform a specific function on a final wafer.
  • step 153 a layout of the active structures needed to reproduce and test the selected feature is determined. Based on the layout showing the density of active structures on each test die, a determination is made as to the layout of additional dummy structures to be formed on the test die.
  • the dummy structures are added to the layout in a manner predetermined to emulate the density of structures formed in a region of the selected feature on the final wafer. For example, if the region surrounding the selected feature on the final wafer is densely populated, then the dummy structures are added to form a correspondingly densely populated region around the feature being tested.
  • a test reticle 130 is produced in step 160 .
  • the active and dummy patterns which respectively correspond to the active structures and dummy structures to be produced on the test wafer are patterned onto the test reticle 130 .
  • the regions of the test reticle 130 having the dummy structures formed thereon is representatively depicted by the dashed square blocks 135 .
  • the regions of the test reticle 130 having active patterns formed thereon are depicted by solid squares 75 .
  • the overall density of patterns formed in each region 65 of the test reticle 130 is substantially uniform so as to emulate in a predetermine manner the density of patterns formed in a region of a reticle used to produce the selected feature on the integrated circuit. For example, if a reticle used to produce the selected feature included a densely populated pattern around the selected feature, then dummy patterns would be correspondingly added to the test reticle 130 to produce a similar density of patterns.
  • step 165 the pattern formed on the test reticle is transferred to the test wafer 20 .
  • Formation of both the active structures and dummy structures 100 on the test wafer 20 is accomplished using conventional photo-lithographic pattern transfer techniques.
  • the pattern formed in the test reticle 130 which now includes dummy patterns for forming dummy structures 100 and active patters for forming active structures, is transferred to the resist 40 during exposure of the resist 40 to radiation from the illumination source 50 .
  • the underlying feature layer 35 is etched using conventional etching techniques.
  • step 170 the etch bias and slope profile of each active structure formed on the test wafer 20 is determined and analyzed using conventional techniques known in the art. Because the dummy structures have been added to provide uniformity in density across regions of densely populated active structures and sparsely populated active structures, etch bias and slope profile differences among structures formed on the test wafer is substantially reduced. Also, since the density of the overall structures formed on the test wafer 20 emulates the density of a final wafer, the critical dimension measurements obtained from the etched layers associated with the test wafer 20 are representative of the actual critical dimension measurements which would result from formation of a corresponding circuit on the final wafer.

Abstract

Test wafers used in the production of semiconductor wafers include a plurality of active structures which form operational circuitry of the test wafer. The active structures are densely populated in some areas of the test wafer and sparsely populated in other areas of the test wafer. It has been observed that critical dimensions such as etch bias and slope profiles of identical structures vary depending on whether the structure is formed in a densely or sparsely populated region. Dummy structures are formed on the test wafer so as to uniformly distribute the density of structures across the test wafer.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to the production of semiconductor wafers and test wafers used in developing the semiconductor wafer. In particular, the present invention relates to reducing variations in the etch bias and slope profile of structures formed at various locations across the test wafer. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Integrated circuits are formed on semiconductor wafers typically made from silicon. The wafers are substantially round and typically have a diameter of approximately six to eight inches. Since a single integrated circuit die is often no more than 1 cm[0002] 2, a great many integrated circuit die can be formed on a single semiconductor wafer. After the semiconductor wafer has been processed to form a number of integrated circuit die on its surface, the wafer is cut along “scribe lines” to separate the integrated circuit die for subsequent packaging and use.
  • Formation of integrated circuits on the wafer is accomplished using photolithography. In general, lithography refers to processes for pattern transfer between various media. The basic photo-lithography system consists of a light source, a photomask (also known as “reticle”) containing the pattern to be transferred to the wafer, a collection of lenses, and a means for aligning existing patterns on the wafer with patterns on the mask. [0003]
  • Exposing a resist on the wafer to light of an appropriate wavelength through the reticle causes modifications in the molecular structure of the resist polymers to allow for transfer of the pattern from the photomask to the resist. The modification to the molecular structure allows a resist developer to dissolve and remove the resist in the exposed areas, presuming a positive resist is used. If a negative resist is used, the developer removes the resist in the unexposed areas. [0004]
  • Once the resist on the wafer has been developed, one or more etching steps take place which ultimately allow for transferring the desired pattern to the wafer. For example, in order to etch a device feature layer disposed between the resist and substrate, an etchant is applied over the patterned resist. The etchant comes into contact with the underlying feature layer by passing through the openings in the resist formed during the resist exposure and development steps. Thus, the etchant serves to etch away those regions of the feature layer which correspond to the openings in the resist, thereby effectively transferring the pattern in the resist to the feature layer. In subsequent steps, the resist is removed and another etchant may be applied over the patterned feature layer to transfer the pattern to the wafer or another layer in a similar manner. [0005]
  • The resolution of an etching process is a measure of the accuracy of pattern transfer, which can be quantified by an etch bias quantity. Bias refers to the difference in lateral dimension between the etched image and the mask image. In the formula most commonly used at present, two parameters give the bias according to the equation B=(d[0006] m-df), where B stands for the etch bias, dm is the length of a particular critical dimension (CD) as measured along the mask image made in the resist before any etching of the device feature layer, and df represents the final length of the CD measured along the bottom surface of the etched layer.
  • A zero-bias process produces a vertical edge profile coincident with the edge of the mask. In other words the etched device feature layer and the patterned resist would all be precisely aligned. In this case, there is no etching of the device feature layer or the resist in the lateral direction, and the pattern is perfectly transferred. This case represents the extreme of anisotropic etching. Achieving an anisotropic etch can be very important in the manufacture of some devices. However, as a practical matter, a perfectly anisotropic etch is difficult to achieve in many instances. [0007]
  • Referring now to FIGS. 1[0008] a-1 c, the concept of etch bias is shown in more detail. FIG. 1a depicts a semiconductor device 20 under construction having a device feature layer 24 which has been formed upon semiconductor substrate 22. Previous to this step, a photoresist layer 28 has been formed over the device feature layer 24 and patterned by well-known photolithographic means, and the photoresist 28 has a dimension of dm which is measured from above.
  • At this stage, the physical or chemical etch of the [0009] device feature layer 24 is ready to occur. This etching gives a structure such as that seen in FIG. 1b, viewed from above, where the device feature layer 24 has been formed having the dimension df, which is reduced from the dm dimension. From FIG. 1b, the etch bias may be taken as B=(dm-df). The dimension of dm shown in FIG. 1b is presented for comparison purposes only.
  • FIG. 1[0010] c illustrates in profile the result of etching the feature layer 24 depicted in FIG. 1b in which a measurable etch bias exists. As can be seen, following etching, the feature layer 24 includes sloped edges 26 due to the imperfect anisotropic etch. The sloped edges 26 define a slope profile or slope effect of the feature layer 24 which is proportional to the etch bias.
  • While eliminating etch bias and minimizing the slope effect is of concern, the ability to anticipate the effect that the etch bias and slope profile will have on a final integrated circuit is also of significant importance. For example, during development of wafers, often times test die and test circuits are produced so that discrete functions may be tested prior to development of a final wafer. For example, for a single die on a final wafer there may be on the order of twenty test die produced on test wafers prior to integrating the desired circuit onto the final wafer. During production and testing of these test die, it is advantageous to measure the etch bias and slope profile on the structures created so that appropriate calculations can be made as to how these may effect the final wafer. Hereinafter, “structures” shall refer to any line or other formation etched into or onto a test wafer or final wafer. By having advanced knowledge regarding the expected critical dimensions of a given structure, the ability to integrate such a structure into a wafer without interfering with adjacent lines can be better accessed. As etch bias, slope effect, and other critical dimension measurements made during the testing phase play a significant factor in determining the overall integration of the final wafer structure, accurate and representative measurements are highly desirable. [0011]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It has been observed that the critical dimensions of structures produced on a test wafer vary depending on whether the structure in located in a densely populated area of the wafer or a sparsely populated area of the wafer. For instance, as a result of etching, structures located in densely populated regions of a wafer were found to have a smaller etch bias than those structures located in sparsely populated areas. Because final wafers ultimately formed from the test wafers are highly integrated and have a dense population of circuits, such wafers typically do not include sparsely populated regions as in the test wafers. Accordingly, conventional critical dimension measurements of those structures located in sparsely populated regions of a test wafer do not always provide accurate and representative data regarding what the critical dimensions of such structures will be when integrated into a densely populated region. [0012]
  • The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for controlling the critical dimensions of those structures produced on sparsely populated areas of a test wafer so they more accurately depict the actual critical dimensions found for such structures on a densely populated final wafer. In order to do so, the present invention provides for adding dummy structures on a test reticle in those areas having sparsely populated test circuits. In this manner, the test wafer will be formed having uniformly densely populated regions similar to the conditions under which the final wafer is produced. The dummy structures are added so as to not interfere with the active structures which form the test circuits. [0013]
  • By adding an appropriate amount of dummy structures, the pattern transferred to the test wafer is substantially uniformly patterned with a dense population of structures which is approximately representative of the density of the final wafer to be ultimately produced. In this manner, critical dimension measurements such as etch bias and slope profile of active structures formed at any region of the test wafer will more closely approximate the critical dimension measurements of corresponding active structures formed on the final wafer. Also, as a result of forming a substantially even distribution of structures on the test wafer, the etch bias and slope profile differences between conventional densely and sparsely populated areas is substantially minimized. As such, more predictable and uniformly applicable measurements can be obtained from any region of the test wafer. [0014]
  • Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, a method for designing a test wafer is provided. The method includes the steps of determining a feature of an integrated circuit to be tested, forming a test reticle, the test reticle including active patterns for forming the feature on the test wafer, adding dummy patterns on the test reticle in a manner predetermined to emulate a density of patterns in a region of a reticle used to produce the feature on the integrated circuit, and forming the test wafer using the test reticle. [0015]
  • In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method for controlling critical dimension variations among active structures disposed at various locations on a semiconductor wafer is provided. The active structures form components of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer. The method includes the step of forming on the semiconductor wafer the active structures and a dummy structure. [0016]
  • In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a semiconductor wafer is provided. The semiconductor wafer includes a substrate, a plurality of active structures formed on the substrate, the active structures forming components of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer, and a dummy structure formed on the substrate. [0017]
  • In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a reticle for use as a mask in forming a pattern on a semiconductor wafer is provided. The reticle includes an optical transmissive plate, and a patterned film disposed on the plate, the patterned film having active pattern portions and dummy pattern portions, the active pattern portions corresponding to portions of the patterned film which form active structures on the semiconductor wafer, the active structures being used as part of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer. [0018]
  • To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention then, comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative embodiments of the invention. These embodiments are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed and the present invention is intended to include all such embodiments and their equivalents. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings. [0019]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the annexed drawings: [0020]
  • FIG. 1[0021] a is a cross sectional view of a semiconductor device depicting a resist layer dimension used in calculating critical dimensions;
  • FIG. 1[0022] b is a top view of the semiconductor device of FIG. 1a after having the resist layer removed;
  • FIG. 1[0023] c is a cross sectional view of the semiconductor device of FIG. 1a depicting the slope profile of a patterned feature layer following etching;
  • FIG. 2 is an overview of a photo-lithography process in accordance with the present invention; [0024]
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of a portion of a test wafer having a plurality of test die formed therein in accordance with the present invention; [0025]
  • FIG. 4 is a top view of a test reticle in a conventional system having densely and sparsely populated regions; [0026]
  • FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating how etch bias varies between structures formed in densely populated areas verus sparsely populated areas; [0027]
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of one type of dummy structure which may be added to the test reticle in order to uniformly populate the test reticle in accordance with the present invention; [0028]
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart describing the steps of forming and analyzing a test wafer in accordance with the present invention; and [0029]
  • FIG. 8 is a top view of a test reticle after having added dummy structures in accordance with the present invention.[0030]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention will now be described with respect to the accompanying drawings in which like numbered elements represent like parts. [0031]
  • Referring initially to FIG. 2, a photo-[0032] lithographic system 10 for printing a test wafer 20 is depicted. The test wafer 20 is used to produce and test circuits which will ultimately be formed on a final wafer. As best seen in FIG. 3, in the present embodiment, the test wafer 20 is divided up into a number of test die 25 which are separated by scribe lines 30. As is conventional, the scribe lines 30 may be either positive mesa type lines or negative lines and allows for separating the individual test die 25 from one another after completing production of the test wafer 20. In the present embodiment, each test die is produced to have an identical circuit, however, it will be appreciated that test die having various circuit configurations could alternatively be produced.
  • Referring back to FIG. 2, at this stage in the development cycle the [0033] test wafer 20 is shown to include a semiconductor substrate 22 having a feature layer 35 formed thereon and a photo-resist 40 (hereinafter “resist 40”) formed over the feature layer 35. The feature layer 25 may, for example, be a film layer or a layer of polysilicon. The resist 40 is the present embodiment is a positive resist, however negative resist could alternatively be used.
  • In order to pattern the resist [0034] 40, the system 10 includes an illumination source 50 that provides an appropriate amount of optical energy for transforming the resist 40. A test reticle 55 is provided between the light source and the wafer 20 to serve as a test mask in transferring a desired pattern through an optical subsystem 60 to the resist 40 as described in more detail below. The test reticle 55 includes a glass or quartz plate 56 with a chrome layer 57 patterned thereon. The pattern formed on the test reticle 55 is provided using conventional techniques known in the art. For example, the test reticle 55 may be patterned by forming a layer of photo-resist over the chrome layer 57 and patterning the photo-resist using electron beam. The chrome layer 57 is then etched and the photo-resist removed thereby leaving behind the desired pattern. It will be appreciated that other known reflective or transmissive type reticles and corresponding pattern transfer systems could be used. Further, it will be appreciated that while the system 10 utilizes projection type printing, other printing techniques such as contact printing or proximity could alternatively be used.
  • The inventors of the present invention have observed that the critical dimensions (CD) of active structures produced on a test wafer vary depending on whether the active structure in located in a densely populated area of the wafer or a sparsely populated area of the wafer. Hereinafter “active structures” shall mean structures which form a part of the active or operational circuits produced on a wafer. For example, active structures may be a line that forms part of a an SRAM or transistor circuit on the wafer. It has been found that CD's related to etch bias and the slope profile of a line vary depending on whether the surrounding region is densely or sparsely populated. In particular, it has been found that structures formed in sparsely populated regions have greater slope profiles and greater negative etch bias than structures formed in densely populated regions. [0035]
  • For instance, referring to FIG. 4 there is shown a [0036] conventional test reticle 55 in which the test reticle 55 is divided up into four identical regions 65 for patterning four corresponding test die 25 (FIG. 3) on the test wafer 20. Dividing lines 70 between each of the four regions 65 correspond to the scribe lines 30 (FIG. 3) formed on the wafer 20. The density of test patterns at any region along the test reticle 55 is representatively depicted by the frequency of occurrence of the square blocks 75. Accordingly, as seen in FIG. 4, conventional test reticles 55 include both densely populated regions 80 such as that near the center of each region 65, and sparsely populated regions 85 such as that near the edges of the test reticle 55 and near the dividing lines 70. For example, the densely populated regions 80 may include patterns for forming MRAM or SRAM on the test wafer 20 while the sparsely populated regions 85 may include a small circuit incorporated into a test tile. While the present embodiment depicts the test reticle 55 to include four regions 65, it will be appreciated that the test reticle 55 may include any number of regions.
  • Referring now to FIG. 5 a [0037] graph 90 shows the change in line width between a line formed in the densely populated die area and a line formed in a sparsely populated scribe area for various lots of wafers produced over a course of time. For example the various lots of wafers may be produced over the course of one to three days. In particular, the y-axis shown in FIG. 5 corresponds to the change in line widths, in nano-meters, between the structures formed in the densely and sparsely populated regions, and the x-axis corresponds to a given lot number. As can be seen from the graph 90, during the course of producing various lots, the measured change between the densely and sparsely populated regions can vary significantly from one lot to the next. It was determined that such variations could be minimized by populating each region of the wafer with a uniform density of structures.
  • Unlike the individual test die [0038] 25 produced during the testing phase, the actual die of a final semiconductor wafer is typically densely populated with active structures across the entire die. In conventional systems, the etch bias and slope profiles determined with respect to structures included in sparsely populated regions of the test wafer 20 was not fully representative of the actual etch bias likely to occur on the densely populated die on a completed wafer. Accordingly, the present invention provides for adding dummy structures in those areas of the test die 25 which would otherwise be sparsely populated. In particular, the present invention provides for adding an adequate number of dummy structures so as to approximate the actual density of structures included at each region of a final die.
  • Referring now to FIG. 6, there is depicted a [0039] dummy structure 100 of the type which could be used in conjunction with the present invention. As will be described in more detail below, a patter corresponding to the dummy structure 100 is initially formed in the test reticle 55 and transferred to the wafer 20 using photo-lithography. The dummy structure 100 of the present embodiment includes a cross pattern of horizontal and vertical lines 105, 110, respectively. In the present embodiment, each line 105, 110 is approximately one to two microns in width and 10 to 20 microns in length. Further, each of the dummy structure lines 105, 110 is situated so they do not contact any active structure and preferably are at least 10 microns away from any active structure on the test wafer 20. In this manner the dummy structure 110 does not interfere with the active structures used in to form the circuits in the test wafer.
  • While the present embodiment provides a dummy structure of a particular pattern and dimension for exemplary purposes, it will be appreciated that any size and any pattern of dummy structures could alternatively be used. For instance, a dummy structure could include one or more lines which is/are oriented horizontally, vertically, bent, or otherwise. In general, the dummy structures will be sized and patterned to adequately populate sparsely populated regions of a test die to more closely emulate the density of a final die of a final wafer. [0040]
  • Referring now to FIG. 7, a flow chart showing the steps taken to produce and evaluate a [0041] test wafer 20 in accordance with the present invention is shown. In step 150, a determination is made as to a feature of an integrated circuit which is to be tested. For example, the feature may be a series of transistors which are to perform a specific function on a final wafer. Next, in step 153, a layout of the active structures needed to reproduce and test the selected feature is determined. Based on the layout showing the density of active structures on each test die, a determination is made as to the layout of additional dummy structures to be formed on the test die. As discussed above, the dummy structures are added to the layout in a manner predetermined to emulate the density of structures formed in a region of the selected feature on the final wafer. For example, if the region surrounding the selected feature on the final wafer is densely populated, then the dummy structures are added to form a correspondingly densely populated region around the feature being tested.
  • Once the layout of both the active and dummy structures is determined, a [0042] test reticle 130 is produced in step 160. In order to form the test reticle 130, the active and dummy patterns which respectively correspond to the active structures and dummy structures to be produced on the test wafer are patterned onto the test reticle 130. For example, referring to FIG. 8, in the present embodiment the regions of the test reticle 130 having the dummy structures formed thereon is representatively depicted by the dashed square blocks 135. The regions of the test reticle 130 having active patterns formed thereon are depicted by solid squares 75. Thus, as can be seen, the overall density of patterns formed in each region 65 of the test reticle 130 is substantially uniform so as to emulate in a predetermine manner the density of patterns formed in a region of a reticle used to produce the selected feature on the integrated circuit. For example, if a reticle used to produce the selected feature included a densely populated pattern around the selected feature, then dummy patterns would be correspondingly added to the test reticle 130 to produce a similar density of patterns.
  • Next, in [0043] step 165, the pattern formed on the test reticle is transferred to the test wafer 20. Formation of both the active structures and dummy structures 100 on the test wafer 20 is accomplished using conventional photo-lithographic pattern transfer techniques. In particular, the pattern formed in the test reticle 130, which now includes dummy patterns for forming dummy structures 100 and active patters for forming active structures, is transferred to the resist 40 during exposure of the resist 40 to radiation from the illumination source 50. Once transferred to the resist 40, the underlying feature layer 35 is etched using conventional etching techniques.
  • In [0044] step 170, the etch bias and slope profile of each active structure formed on the test wafer 20 is determined and analyzed using conventional techniques known in the art. Because the dummy structures have been added to provide uniformity in density across regions of densely populated active structures and sparsely populated active structures, etch bias and slope profile differences among structures formed on the test wafer is substantially reduced. Also, since the density of the overall structures formed on the test wafer 20 emulates the density of a final wafer, the critical dimension measurements obtained from the etched layers associated with the test wafer 20 are representative of the actual critical dimension measurements which would result from formation of a corresponding circuit on the final wafer.
  • The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. For example, while the preferred embodiments described adding a sufficient number of dummy structures to uniformly and densely populate a test wafer, it will be appreciated that such uniformity and density is not required. In particular, if a final production wafer included both densely and sparsely populated regions, then only a sufficient number of dummy structures which correspondingly provided densely and sparsely populated regions of a test wafer may be used. Additionally, while the embodiments disclosed herein refer to developing a test wafer, it will be appreciated that such dummy structures could also be added to production of a final wafer in order to obtain uniform critical dimension control. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications alterations, and equivalents thereof and is limited only by the scope of the following claims. [0045]

Claims (29)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for designing a test wafer, comprising the steps of:
determining a feature of an integrated circuit to be tested;
forming a test reticle, the test reticle including active patterns for forming the feature on the test wafer;
adding dummy patterns on the test reticle in a manner predetermined to emulate a density of patterns in a region of a reticle used to produce the feature on the integrated circuit; and
forming the test wafer using the test reticle.
2. The method of
claim 1
, wherein the step of forming the test wafer creates both active structures and dummy structures on the test wafer.
3. The method of
claim 2
, further comprising the step of determining the etch bias of at least one of the active structures.
4. The method of
claim 2
, wherein at least a portion of the dummy structures form a cross pattern.
5. The method of
claim 2
, wherein the dummy structures are two microns or less in width and 20 microns or less in length.
6. The method of
claim 2
, wherein the dummy structures are at least 10 microns away from any of the active structures.
7. The method of
claim 1
, wherein the dummy patterns are added so as to densely populate the test reticle.
8. A method for controlling critical dimension variations among active structures disposed at various locations on a semiconductor wafer, the active structures forming components of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer, the method including the step of:
forming on the semiconductor wafer the active structures and a dummy structure.
9. The method of
claim 8
, wherein the step of:
forming the active structure and the dummy structure includes the steps of forming an active pattern and a dummy pattern on a reticle, the active pattern corresponding to the active structures formed on the semiconductor wafer and the dummy pattern corresponding to the dummy structure formed on the semiconductor wafer; and
photo-lithographically transferring the active pattern and the dummy pattern to the semiconductor wafer.
10. The method of
claim 8
, wherein the dummy structure is at least 10 microns away from any of the active structures.
11. The method of
claim 8
wherein a plurality of dummy structures are formed on the semiconductor wafer.
12. The method of
claim 11
, wherein the semiconductor wafer includes regions of densely populated active structures and sparsely populated active structures and the plurality of dummy structures are formed so as to provide a substantially uniform number of structures across the semiconductor wafer.
13. The method of
claim 12
, wherein at least a portion of the sparsely populated regions are located near scribe lines formed on the semiconductor wafer.
14. The method of
claim 11
, wherein at least a portion of the plurality of dummy structures form a cross pattern.
15. The method of
claim 8
, wherein the dummy structure has a width of two microns or less.
16. The method of
claim 15
, wherein the dummy structure has a length of 20 microns or less.
17. The method of
claim 9
, wherein the semiconductor wafer is a test wafer.
18. The method of
claim 17
, wherein the reticle is a test reticle.
19. A semiconductor wafer comprising:
a substrate;
a plurality of active structures formed on the substrate, the active structures forming components of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer; and
a dummy structure formed on the substrate.
20. The semiconductor wafer of
claim 19
, wherein a plurality of dummy structures are formed on the substrate.
21. The method of
claim 20
, wherein the semiconductor wafer includes regions of densely populated active structures and sparsely populated active structures and the plurality of dummy structures are formed so as to provide a substantially uniform number of structures across the substrate.
22. The semiconductor wafer of
claim 20
, wherein each of the plurality of dummy structures is at least 10 microns away from any of the active structures.
23. The semiconductor wafer of
claim 19
, wherein the dummy structure is 20 microns or less in length.
24. The semiconductor wafer of
claim 23
, wherein the dummy structure is 2 microns or less in width.
25. The semiconductor wafer of
claim 19
, wherein the semiconductor wafer is a test wafer.
26. A reticle for use as a mask in forming a pattern on a semiconductor wafer, the reticle comprising:
an optical transmissive plate; and
a patterned film disposed on the plate, the patterned film having active pattern portions and dummy pattern portions, the active pattern portions corresponding to portions of the patterned film which form active structures on the semiconductor wafer, the active structures being used as part of operational circuitry associated with the semiconductor wafer.
27. The reticle of
claim 26
, wherein the dummy pattern portions are at least 10 microns from any of the active pattern portions.
28. The reticle of
claim 26
, wherein the patterned film comprises chromium.
29. The reticle of
claim 26
, wherein the optically transmissive plate comprises at least one of quartz and glass.
US09/854,272 1998-12-01 2001-05-11 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer Expired - Fee Related US6458606B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/854,272 US6458606B2 (en) 1998-12-01 2001-05-11 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/203,616 US6262435B1 (en) 1998-12-01 1998-12-01 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer
US09/854,272 US6458606B2 (en) 1998-12-01 2001-05-11 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/203,616 Division US6262435B1 (en) 1998-12-01 1998-12-01 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010031506A1 true US20010031506A1 (en) 2001-10-18
US6458606B2 US6458606B2 (en) 2002-10-01

Family

ID=22754662

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/203,616 Expired - Fee Related US6262435B1 (en) 1998-12-01 1998-12-01 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer
US09/854,272 Expired - Fee Related US6458606B2 (en) 1998-12-01 2001-05-11 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/203,616 Expired - Fee Related US6262435B1 (en) 1998-12-01 1998-12-01 Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6262435B1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030229868A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-12-11 David White Electronic design for integrated circuits based process related variations
US20060064193A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Tokyo Electron Limited Iso/nested cascading trim control with model feedback updates
US20070157139A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2007-07-05 David White Characterization and verification for integrated circuit designs
US20080027698A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2008-01-31 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Method and System for Handling Process Related Variations for Integrated Circuits Based Upon Reflections
US7383521B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2008-06-03 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Characterization and reduction of variation for integrated circuits
US8589828B2 (en) * 2012-02-17 2013-11-19 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Reduce mask overlay error by removing film deposited on blank of mask

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000349145A (en) * 1999-04-02 2000-12-15 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Semiconductor device
KR100530296B1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2005-11-22 마이크론 테크놀로지, 인크. Methods for making nearly planar dielectric films in integrated circuits
US20040061714A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Microsoft Corporation Logical element tree and method
US7644367B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2010-01-05 Microsoft Corporation User interface automation framework classes and interfaces
US8127252B2 (en) * 2003-11-07 2012-02-28 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for presenting user interface (UI) information
EP1505653A1 (en) * 2003-08-04 2005-02-09 STMicroelectronics S.r.l. Layout method for dummy structures and corresponding integrated circuit
US6967111B1 (en) 2003-08-28 2005-11-22 Altera Corporation Techniques for reticle layout to modify wafer test structure area
JP2006110190A (en) * 2004-10-15 2006-04-27 Toshiba Corp Medical image data analyzing apparatus and method thereof
US7692275B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation Structure and method for device-specific fill for improved anneal uniformity
US7745909B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-06-29 International Business Machines Corporation Localized temperature control during rapid thermal anneal
US7759773B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-07-20 International Business Machines Corporation Semiconductor wafer structure with balanced reflectance and absorption characteristics for rapid thermal anneal uniformity
US7679166B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-03-16 International Business Machines Corporation Localized temperature control during rapid thermal anneal
US20090096066A1 (en) * 2007-10-10 2009-04-16 Anderson Brent A Structure and Method for Device-Specific Fill for Improved Anneal Uniformity
US8003545B2 (en) * 2008-02-14 2011-08-23 Spansion Llc Method of forming an electronic device including forming features within a mask and a selective removal process
US20100041232A1 (en) * 2008-08-12 2010-02-18 Summerfelt Scott R Adjustable dummy fill
SG10201408775SA (en) 2014-12-29 2016-07-28 Globalfoundries Sg Pte Ltd Etch bias control
WO2017114725A1 (en) * 2015-12-31 2017-07-06 Asml Netherlands B.V. Etch-assist features

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5032890A (en) * 1988-01-30 1991-07-16 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor integrated circuit with dummy patterns
DE69231715D1 (en) * 1991-03-04 2001-04-12 At & T Corp Manufacturing process of semiconductor integrated circuits using latent images
JP2895998B2 (en) * 1991-11-22 1999-05-31 富士写真フイルム株式会社 Lens loading device
JPH05267415A (en) * 1992-03-18 1993-10-15 Fujitsu Ltd Semiconductor device
US5372914A (en) 1992-03-24 1994-12-13 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Pattern forming method
US5686171A (en) 1993-12-30 1997-11-11 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Integrated circuit scribe line structures and methods for making same
US5917229A (en) * 1994-02-08 1999-06-29 Prolinx Labs Corporation Programmable/reprogrammable printed circuit board using fuse and/or antifuse as interconnect
US5627624A (en) * 1994-10-31 1997-05-06 Lsi Logic Corporation Integrated circuit test reticle and alignment mark optimization method
US5589706A (en) * 1995-05-31 1996-12-31 International Business Machines Corp. Fuse link structures through the addition of dummy structures
JPH1055946A (en) * 1996-08-08 1998-02-24 Nikon Corp Exposure requirement measuring method
JP3363046B2 (en) * 1997-01-08 2003-01-07 株式会社東芝 Process margin calculation method
US5789300A (en) 1997-02-25 1998-08-04 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method of making IGFETs in densely and sparsely populated areas of a substrate

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080216027A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2008-09-04 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Electronic Design for Integrated Circuits Based on Process Related Variations
US7367008B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2008-04-29 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Adjustment of masks for integrated circuit fabrication
US20030229412A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-12-11 David White Electronic design for integrated circuits based on process related variations
US20030229881A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-12-11 David White Adjustment of masks for integrated circuit fabrication
US20030237064A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-12-25 David White Characterization and verification for integrated circuit designs
US20070157139A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2007-07-05 David White Characterization and verification for integrated circuit designs
US8001516B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2011-08-16 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Characterization and reduction of variation for integrated circuits
US7243316B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2007-07-10 Praesagus, Inc. Test masks for lithographic and etch processes
US7174520B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2007-02-06 Praesagus, Inc. Characterization and verification for integrated circuit designs
US7853904B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2010-12-14 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Method and system for handling process related variations for integrated circuits based upon reflections
US7712056B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2010-05-04 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Characterization and verification for integrated circuit designs
US7962867B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2011-06-14 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Electronic design for integrated circuits based on process related variations
US7353475B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2008-04-01 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Electronic design for integrated circuits based on process related variations
US20080027698A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2008-01-31 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Method and System for Handling Process Related Variations for Integrated Circuits Based Upon Reflections
US7325206B2 (en) * 2002-06-07 2008-01-29 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Electronic design for integrated circuits based process related variations
US7363099B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2008-04-22 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Integrated circuit metrology
US20030229880A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-12-11 David White Test masks for lithographic and etch processes
US7383521B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2008-06-03 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Characterization and reduction of variation for integrated circuits
US20030229868A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-12-11 David White Electronic design for integrated circuits based process related variations
US7209798B2 (en) 2004-09-20 2007-04-24 Tokyo Electron Limited Iso/nested cascading trim control with model feedback updates
WO2006036245A3 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-09-08 Tokyo Electron Ltd Iso/nested cascading trim control with model feedback updates
WO2006036245A2 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-04-06 Tokyo Electron Limited Iso/nested cascading trim control with model feedback updates
US20060064193A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Tokyo Electron Limited Iso/nested cascading trim control with model feedback updates
US8589828B2 (en) * 2012-02-17 2013-11-19 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Reduce mask overlay error by removing film deposited on blank of mask

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6458606B2 (en) 2002-10-01
US6262435B1 (en) 2001-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6458606B2 (en) Etch bias distribution across semiconductor wafer
US10012898B2 (en) EUV mask for monitoring focus in EUV lithography
US7368208B1 (en) Measuring phase errors on phase shift masks
US6063531A (en) Focus monitor structure and method for lithography process
US20120052418A1 (en) Method for optimizing source and mask to control line width roughness and image log slope
CN1862385B (en) System and method for detecting focus change in photolithographic process using test characteristic
US8717539B2 (en) Calibration of optical line shortening measurements
US20050136341A1 (en) Photomask and method of manufacturing the same
US6562639B1 (en) Utilizing electrical performance data to predict CD variations across stepper field
US6255125B1 (en) Method and apparatus for compensating for critical dimension variations in the production of a semiconductor wafer
US20030224252A1 (en) In-line focus monitor structure and method using top-down SEM
JP2003203841A (en) Method for evaluation, correcting manufacturing conditions, and manufacturing semiconductor device
US6741334B2 (en) Exposure method, exposure system and recording medium
US6171739B1 (en) Method of determining focus and coma of a lens at various locations in an imaging field
KR101599097B1 (en) Optical lithography apparatus
US7736844B2 (en) Overlay mark and method of forming the same
US5723238A (en) Inspection of lens error associated with lens heating in a photolithographic system
US20030003385A1 (en) Optical proximity correction
CN1833205B (en) Measuring the effect of flare on line width
US6809824B1 (en) Alignment process for integrated circuit structures on semiconductor substrate using scatterometry measurements of latent images in spaced apart test fields on substrate
CN114077166A (en) Method for obtaining critical dimension rocking curve of photoetching process
US5928820A (en) Method for measuring pattern line width during manufacture of a semiconductor device
US6345210B1 (en) Method of using critical dimension mapping to qualify a reticle used in integrated circuit fabrication
US7867698B2 (en) Reticle system for manufacturing integrated circuit systems
Frasch et al. Feature size control in IC manufacturing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
CC Certificate of correction
REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20061001