US20020063008A1 - Accident sensor - Google Patents

Accident sensor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020063008A1
US20020063008A1 US09/985,950 US98595001A US2002063008A1 US 20020063008 A1 US20020063008 A1 US 20020063008A1 US 98595001 A US98595001 A US 98595001A US 2002063008 A1 US2002063008 A1 US 2002063008A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
signal
motor
triggering
safety system
accident sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/985,950
Inventor
Hans Spies
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Conti Temic Microelectronic GmbH
Original Assignee
Conti Temic Microelectronic GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE19745309A external-priority patent/DE19745309A1/en
Application filed by Conti Temic Microelectronic GmbH filed Critical Conti Temic Microelectronic GmbH
Priority to US09/985,950 priority Critical patent/US20020063008A1/en
Assigned to CONTI TEMIC MICROELECTRONIC GMBH reassignment CONTI TEMIC MICROELECTRONIC GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SPIES, HANS
Publication of US20020063008A1 publication Critical patent/US20020063008A1/en
Priority to US10/759,097 priority patent/US6902025B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R21/0136Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to actual contact with an obstacle, e.g. to vehicle deformation, bumper displacement or bumper velocity relative to the vehicle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R13/00Elements for body-finishing, identifying, or decorating; Arrangements or adaptations for advertising purposes
    • B60R13/04External Ornamental or guard strips; Ornamental inscriptive devices thereon
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R19/00Wheel guards; Radiator guards, e.g. grilles; Obstruction removers; Fittings damping bouncing force in collisions
    • B60R19/02Bumpers, i.e. impact receiving or absorbing members for protecting vehicles or fending off blows from other vehicles or objects
    • B60R19/44Bumper guards
    • B60R19/445Guard strips
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01HMEASUREMENT OF MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OR ULTRASONIC, SONIC OR INFRASONIC WAVES
    • G01H17/00Measuring mechanical vibrations or ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, not provided for in the preceding groups
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R2021/01302Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over monitoring vehicle body vibrations or noise

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an accident sensor for detecting an impact.
  • the accident sensors currently used are designed as so-called acceleration sensors. In the event of an accident, they detect the acceleration or deceleration that occurs' upon impact. If the acceleration or deceleration exceeds a critical value, motorvehicle safety devices, such as seat-belt tighteners or airbags, are triggered.
  • motorvehicle safety devices such as seat-belt tighteners or airbags.
  • a plurality of acceleration sensors is mounted to the motor vehicle, with each acceleration sensor detecting the acceleration or deceleration in one spatial direction for detecting a front or side impact, as well as rolling of the vehicle.
  • a disadvantage of these sensors is that an acceleration sensor is required for each spatial direction. Also, such sensors cannot determine the site of the impact. These systems do not directly determine the impact and the associated deformation of the motor vehicle, but only the acceleration or deceleration resulting from the deformation.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,914 discloses an impact-detection device that responds to acoustical oscillations in the bearing parts of the vehicle body.
  • the acoustical signals are converted into electrical signals by one or more piezoelectric force sensors that is or are connected to one or more acoustical waveguides.
  • the latter comprise thin steel tubes that extend from the central installation point of the sensor(s) into the regions of the body that are at risk for impact, and serve there in the acoustical coupling with bearing parts that are spot-welded at numerous locations.
  • the signals are processed by a microprocessor.
  • the signal processing constitutes the basis of the determination of an impact situation that would require the triggering of the passenger-restraint system.
  • a disadvantage of this system is that the sound waves are contained in a complicated tubular waveguide system, and transported from there to a central piezo-element that converts the sound waves into a voltage signal. This voltage signal is then conducted further to a microprocessor. Not only is the processing of the tubular system complex and costly, but it is not possible to ascertain the origin of the signal with this apparatus. It only recognizes the severity of the accident. The sensor cannot identify the site of the deformation.
  • DE 37 29 019 A1 describes a device for triggering a safety apparatus.
  • a system is shifted in position for differentiating an impact against an obstacle from other, corresponding noises and disturbances under critical driving conditions.
  • the accident sensor acoustically, electrically or optically detects the material deformation occurring upon impact in a plastic part mounted to the exterior of the motor vehicle.
  • the accident sensor can detect the precise accident site on the motor vehicle. Furthermore, this solution is very inexpensive and simple in comparison to other accident sensors. Hence, the safety apparatuses can be triggered more purposefully at no additional cost.
  • the plastic part is disposed around the entire motor vehicle and serves simultaneously as a bumper and/or a scratch guard. Moreover, the deformation site on the motor vehicle can be determined, particularly based on the signal course and the determination of the transit time due to the spatial orientation of the signal receivers.
  • FIG. 1 a motor vehicle having a peripheral plastic layer
  • FIG. 2A the measurement of the beam path in the plastic
  • FIG. 2B the optical accident detection based on a change in beam path
  • FIG. 3A the sound measurement on the plastic
  • FIG. 3B the acoustical accident detection based on material crackling
  • FIG. 4A plastic coated with a piezofilm
  • FIG. 4B the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm
  • FIG. 5 a profile layer
  • FIG. 6 a graphic representation of accident
  • FIG. 7 7 A and 7 B: show a sensor integral with the plastic part.
  • FIG. 1 shows a motor vehicle 1 having a peripheral plastic layer 2 .
  • the illustrated motor vehicle 1 is completely or partially encompassed by plastic 2 in the impact regions.
  • the plastic 2 encompassing the motor vehicle 1 in the lower region in the application example serves as a scratch guard and, in a minor rear-end collision or in the entrance or exit of a parking space, as impact protection for preventing damage to the paint or the body.
  • This plastic 2 which is the first part to be damaged in most accidents, is or contains at least one part of the accident sensor.
  • the plastic covering 2 can be disposed around the entire vehicle 1 or only part of it. In any event, however, the plastic covering 2 serves numerous purposes.
  • the nature of the plastic 2 is such that it generates a structure-borne-sound signal during the deformation, or its radiation transparency changes, or it generates an electrical signal by means of an integrated piezo-layer.
  • An advantage here is that plastic typically possesses far better structure-borne-sound properties than metal.
  • the plastic protective covering 2 on the motor vehicle 1 can be used simultaneously as a deformation-measuring element that acoustically transmits a material crackling that is typical for a specific degree of deformation, or optically or electrically transmits a different signal.
  • the deformation site can be determined based on the transit times required by the signal from the deformation site to the signal receiver. If the plastic is provided with profiles, for example, the structure-borne-sound signal generated during the deformation is more intensive and its measurement is less ambiguous, more exact and therefore more useful.
  • the plastic covering 2 can also comprise numerous layers possessing different properties, such as transparency or those of a piezo-layer.
  • FIG. 2A illustrates the principle of the measurement of the radiation or the beam path 5 in the plastic 2 .
  • This figure shows a radiation-transparent plastic 2 disposed around a motor vehicle, as described in connection with FIG. 1. It is not crucial whether the entire plastic part 2 is radiation-transparent, or at least one radiation-transparent layer is disposed on or in the plastic.
  • the structure further includes a radiation source 3 and a radiation detector 4 .
  • the radiation detector 4 measures the quantity of radiation or light that is transported from the radiation or light source via the light guide.
  • the light guide should be shielded such that no radiation that is incident from the outside can reach the radiation detector 4 . As long as the plastic part 2 is not damaged, the same quantity of light will reach the radiation detector 4 .
  • FIG. 2B shows the optical accident detection based on the change in beam path in the event that the plastic 2 and, particularly, the light guide are damaged.
  • the beam path 5 changes, and the quantity of radiation that reaches the radiation receiver 4 is reduced.
  • the radiation transmitted by the radiation or light source 3 takes a different path from the one shown in FIG. 2A.
  • both the distribution and the quantity of the radiation detected by the radiation detector 4 change.
  • these parameters change constantly until the deformation process has ended.
  • the change in the quantity of radiation over time, and the change in the radiation distribution over time allow conclusions to be reached regarding the origin of the damage to the plastic.
  • An evaluation electronics not shown, and as disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, determine the severity and source of the accident and the deformation site on the motor vehicle.
  • FIG. 3A shows the acoustical sound measurement on the plastic.
  • a microphone 6 particularly a structure-borne-sound sensor, a directional microphone or another acoustical receiver, is disposed in the motor vehicle. The receiver is oriented toward the plastic 2 . The sensitivity of the acoustical receiver lies in the range of the frequency spectrum of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling of the plastic 2 .
  • the acoustical receivers 4 detect the acoustical signals generated through the deformation of the plastic 2 . One or more receivers can be used for this purpose. The receivers can project in different spatial directions for using the transit time to determine the exact accident site. The signal is then conducted further via evaluation electronics 13 . DE 37 29 019 describes an example of this type of electronics.
  • FIG. 3B shows the acoustical accident detection through the measurement of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling.
  • Structure-borne sound is generated during the deformation 10 of the plastic 2 .
  • This initiates a material crackling 7 in the ultrasonic range, which can be measured in the frequency range of 60 Hz to 100 Hz.
  • a microphone 6 detects the intensity, phase position, damping and transit time in the material crackling specific for this plastic 2 .
  • Evaluation electronics not shown here, and disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, can use this data to determine the severity and origin of the accident, and the deformation site on the motor vehicle.
  • FIG. 4A shows the plastic 2 coated with a piezofilm 8 .
  • a piezofilm 8 is applied to the plastic 2 or integrated with, the plastic 2 .
  • the piezofilm 8 generates an electrical or optical signal under pressure or the effect of a mechanical force.
  • a receiver for detecting the electrical or optical signal is not shown in the figure because it is disposed directly on the plastic in an optical detection arrangement, as shown in FIG. 2A, or, in an electrical detection arrangement, at an arbitrary location that is electrically connected to the piezofilm.
  • FIG. 4B shows the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm.
  • this piezofilm generates voltage signals or discharge flashes 11 , which can be picked up by a detector. These signals are then conducted further to an evaluation unit, not shown, and evaluated there.
  • An example of such an evaluation circuit is disclosed in DE 37 29 019.
  • FIG. 5 shows different profiles 9 . These profiles can be worked into the plastic and/or the light guide for generating a better structure-borne-sound signal. If the piezofilm is applied to the plastic provided with profiles, more voltage signals or discharge flashes are generated due to mechanical stresses than in an application to a smooth base structure.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the graphic representation of an accident.
  • the diagram shows the so-called material crackling.
  • the amplitude, or intensity, indicates the degree of the deformation. Different accident characteristics can be derived from the phase position and damping.
  • the deformation site can be calculated through the determination of the transit time required by the sound signal for traveling from the deformed plastic to the microphone.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B show the sensors 6 integrated with the plastic part 2 .
  • the deformable first part 2 in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3 A, 3 B, 4 A and 4 B each constitutes a signal transmitting medium. After the signal is created during impact, the deformable first part transmits the acoustical, optical, or electrical signal over the medium to the receiver.
  • the deformable first part can either be distinct from or integral with the medium.
  • the deformable first part can be the plastic part and/or the continuous medium for transmitting a signal.
  • the first part can be a distinct member attached to the plastic part.
  • the impact site can be determined based on the signal course over the medium.
  • Any suitable evaluation unit for example, a microprocessor, can be provided for this function.

Abstract

An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system. A deformable, first part and a second part that acoustically detects a deformation at the first part is provided. The deformable, first part includes a plastic part or is integrated with a plastic part disposed around the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal. The first part generates an acoustical structure-borne signal when it is deformed. The second part includes a structure-borne signal sensor that receives the acoustical signal and conducts said signal further to an evaluation unit.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/319,952 filed Sep. 14, 1999.[0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to an accident sensor for detecting an impact. [0002]
  • The accident sensors currently used are designed as so-called acceleration sensors. In the event of an accident, they detect the acceleration or deceleration that occurs' upon impact. If the acceleration or deceleration exceeds a critical value, motorvehicle safety devices, such as seat-belt tighteners or airbags, are triggered. Usually, a plurality of acceleration sensors is mounted to the motor vehicle, with each acceleration sensor detecting the acceleration or deceleration in one spatial direction for detecting a front or side impact, as well as rolling of the vehicle. [0003]
  • A disadvantage of these sensors is that an acceleration sensor is required for each spatial direction. Also, such sensors cannot determine the site of the impact. These systems do not directly determine the impact and the associated deformation of the motor vehicle, but only the acceleration or deceleration resulting from the deformation. [0004]
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,914 discloses an impact-detection device that responds to acoustical oscillations in the bearing parts of the vehicle body. The acoustical signals are converted into electrical signals by one or more piezoelectric force sensors that is or are connected to one or more acoustical waveguides. The latter comprise thin steel tubes that extend from the central installation point of the sensor(s) into the regions of the body that are at risk for impact, and serve there in the acoustical coupling with bearing parts that are spot-welded at numerous locations. The signals are processed by a microprocessor. The signal processing constitutes the basis of the determination of an impact situation that would require the triggering of the passenger-restraint system. [0005]
  • A disadvantage of this system is that the sound waves are contained in a complicated tubular waveguide system, and transported from there to a central piezo-element that converts the sound waves into a voltage signal. This voltage signal is then conducted further to a microprocessor. Not only is the processing of the tubular system complex and costly, but it is not possible to ascertain the origin of the signal with this apparatus. It only recognizes the severity of the accident. The sensor cannot identify the site of the deformation. [0006]
  • DE 37 29 019 A1 describes a device for triggering a safety apparatus. In this case, due to the association of sound and/or structure-borne-sound sensors, a system is shifted in position for differentiating an impact against an obstacle from other, corresponding noises and disturbances under critical driving conditions. [0007]
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is the object of the invention to provide an accident sensor that indicates the deformation of a motor vehicle upon impact against an obstacle, can be mounted simply and inexpensively, and identifies the deformation site on the motor vehicle. [0008]
  • In accordance with the invention, the object is accomplished by the features disclosed herein. The accident sensor acoustically, electrically or optically detects the material deformation occurring upon impact in a plastic part mounted to the exterior of the motor vehicle. [0009]
  • The advantages attained with the invention are that, first, the accident sensor can detect the precise accident site on the motor vehicle. Furthermore, this solution is very inexpensive and simple in comparison to other accident sensors. Hence, the safety apparatuses can be triggered more purposefully at no additional cost. [0010]
  • Advantageous modifications of the invention ensue. The plastic part is disposed around the entire motor vehicle and serves simultaneously as a bumper and/or a scratch guard. Moreover, the deformation site on the motor vehicle can be determined, particularly based on the signal course and the determination of the transit time due to the spatial orientation of the signal receivers.[0011]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The figures illustrate embodiments of the invention. They show in: [0012]
  • FIG. 1: a motor vehicle having a peripheral plastic layer; [0013]
  • FIG. 2A: the measurement of the beam path in the plastic; [0014]
  • FIG. 2B: the optical accident detection based on a change in beam path; [0015]
  • FIG. 3A: the sound measurement on the plastic; [0016]
  • FIG. 3B: the acoustical accident detection based on material crackling; [0017]
  • FIG. 4A: plastic coated with a piezofilm; [0018]
  • FIG. 4B: the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm; [0019]
  • FIG. 5: a profile layer; [0020]
  • FIG. 6: a graphic representation of accident; and [0021]
  • FIG. 7: [0022] 7A and 7B: show a sensor integral with the plastic part.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 shows a motor vehicle [0023] 1 having a peripheral plastic layer 2. The illustrated motor vehicle 1 is completely or partially encompassed by plastic 2 in the impact regions. The plastic 2 encompassing the motor vehicle 1 in the lower region in the application example serves as a scratch guard and, in a minor rear-end collision or in the entrance or exit of a parking space, as impact protection for preventing damage to the paint or the body. This plastic 2, which is the first part to be damaged in most accidents, is or contains at least one part of the accident sensor. The plastic covering 2 can be disposed around the entire vehicle 1 or only part of it. In any event, however, the plastic covering 2 serves numerous purposes.
  • The nature of the [0024] plastic 2 is such that it generates a structure-borne-sound signal during the deformation, or its radiation transparency changes, or it generates an electrical signal by means of an integrated piezo-layer. An advantage here is that plastic typically possesses far better structure-borne-sound properties than metal. Thus, the plastic protective covering 2 on the motor vehicle 1 can be used simultaneously as a deformation-measuring element that acoustically transmits a material crackling that is typical for a specific degree of deformation, or optically or electrically transmits a different signal. The deformation site can be determined based on the transit times required by the signal from the deformation site to the signal receiver. If the plastic is provided with profiles, for example, the structure-borne-sound signal generated during the deformation is more intensive and its measurement is less ambiguous, more exact and therefore more useful.
  • The plastic covering [0025] 2 can also comprise numerous layers possessing different properties, such as transparency or those of a piezo-layer.
  • FIG. 2A illustrates the principle of the measurement of the radiation or the [0026] beam path 5 in the plastic 2. This figure shows a radiation-transparent plastic 2 disposed around a motor vehicle, as described in connection with FIG. 1. It is not crucial whether the entire plastic part 2 is radiation-transparent, or at least one radiation-transparent layer is disposed on or in the plastic. The structure further includes a radiation source 3 and a radiation detector 4. The radiation detector 4 measures the quantity of radiation or light that is transported from the radiation or light source via the light guide. The light guide should be shielded such that no radiation that is incident from the outside can reach the radiation detector 4. As long as the plastic part 2 is not damaged, the same quantity of light will reach the radiation detector 4.
  • FIG. 2B shows the optical accident detection based on the change in beam path in the event that the [0027] plastic 2 and, particularly, the light guide are damaged. During the deformation 10 of the plastic 2, the beam path 5 changes, and the quantity of radiation that reaches the radiation receiver 4 is reduced. The radiation transmitted by the radiation or light source 3 takes a different path from the one shown in FIG. 2A. Thus, both the distribution and the quantity of the radiation detected by the radiation detector 4 change. During the deformation 10 of the plastic 2, these parameters change constantly until the deformation process has ended. The change in the quantity of radiation over time, and the change in the radiation distribution over time, allow conclusions to be reached regarding the origin of the damage to the plastic. An evaluation electronics, not shown, and as disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, determine the severity and source of the accident and the deformation site on the motor vehicle.
  • FIG. 3A shows the acoustical sound measurement on the plastic. A [0028] microphone 6, particularly a structure-borne-sound sensor, a directional microphone or another acoustical receiver, is disposed in the motor vehicle. The receiver is oriented toward the plastic 2. The sensitivity of the acoustical receiver lies in the range of the frequency spectrum of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling of the plastic 2. The acoustical receivers 4 detect the acoustical signals generated through the deformation of the plastic 2. One or more receivers can be used for this purpose. The receivers can project in different spatial directions for using the transit time to determine the exact accident site. The signal is then conducted further via evaluation electronics 13. DE 37 29 019 describes an example of this type of electronics.
  • FIG. 3B shows the acoustical accident detection through the measurement of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling. Structure-borne sound is generated during the [0029] deformation 10 of the plastic 2. This initiates a material crackling 7 in the ultrasonic range, which can be measured in the frequency range of 60 Hz to 100 Hz. A microphone 6 detects the intensity, phase position, damping and transit time in the material crackling specific for this plastic 2. Evaluation electronics, not shown here, and disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, can use this data to determine the severity and origin of the accident, and the deformation site on the motor vehicle.
  • FIG. 4A shows the plastic [0030] 2 coated with a piezofilm 8. In this embodiment, a piezofilm 8 is applied to the plastic 2 or integrated with, the plastic 2. The piezofilm 8 generates an electrical or optical signal under pressure or the effect of a mechanical force. Further included in this arrangement is a receiver for detecting the electrical or optical signal. This receiver is not shown in the figure because it is disposed directly on the plastic in an optical detection arrangement, as shown in FIG. 2A, or, in an electrical detection arrangement, at an arbitrary location that is electrically connected to the piezofilm.
  • FIG. 4B shows the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm. During the [0031] deformation 10 or destruction, this piezofilm generates voltage signals or discharge flashes 11, which can be picked up by a detector. These signals are then conducted further to an evaluation unit, not shown, and evaluated there. An example of such an evaluation circuit is disclosed in DE 37 29 019.
  • FIG. 5 shows different profiles [0032] 9. These profiles can be worked into the plastic and/or the light guide for generating a better structure-borne-sound signal. If the piezofilm is applied to the plastic provided with profiles, more voltage signals or discharge flashes are generated due to mechanical stresses than in an application to a smooth base structure.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the graphic representation of an accident. The diagram shows the so-called material crackling. The amplitude, or intensity, indicates the degree of the deformation. Different accident characteristics can be derived from the phase position and damping. Furthermore, the deformation site can be calculated through the determination of the transit time required by the sound signal for traveling from the deformed plastic to the microphone. [0033]
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B show the [0034] sensors 6 integrated with the plastic part 2.
  • The deformable [0035] first part 2 in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4A and 4B each constitutes a signal transmitting medium. After the signal is created during impact, the deformable first part transmits the acoustical, optical, or electrical signal over the medium to the receiver.
  • In each of the embodiments discussed above, the deformable first part can either be distinct from or integral with the medium. For example, the deformable first part can be the plastic part and/or the continuous medium for transmitting a signal. Alternatively, the first part can be a distinct member attached to the plastic part. [0036]
  • In each of the embodiments discussed above, the impact site can be determined based on the signal course over the medium. Any suitable evaluation unit, for example, a microprocessor, can be provided for this function. [0037]

Claims (19)

1. An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that acoustically detects a deformation at the first part,
wherein the deformable, first part comprises a plastic part or is integrated with a plastic part disposed around the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal,
wherein the first part generates an acoustical structure-borne signal when it is deformed, and
wherein the second part comprises a structure-borne signal sensor that receives the acoustical signal and conducts said signal further to an evaluation unit.
2. An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that optically detects the deformation at the first part;
wherein the first part comprises a radiation-transparent plastic part that is penetrated by a defined quantity of light, is disposed on the exterior of the motor vehicle, and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal;
wherein a light beam path in the first part and the defined quantity of light change when the first part is deformed, said light being a signal; and
wherein the second part comprises a radiation-sensitive detector that detects said signal.
3. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that electromagnetically detects the deformation at the first part;
wherein the deformable, first part comprises a plastic part that is disposed on the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal, wherein said continuous medium generates pressure waves during the deformation; and
wherein the second part comprises a piezofilm that receives the pressure waves and converts said pressure waves into an electrical signal, and conducts said electrical signal further to an evaluation unit.
4. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1, wherein the first part serves simultaneously as a bumper and a scratch guard for the motor-vehicle.
5. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a signal course between the impact site and a signal detector and a transit time elapsed between the signal being generated at the impact site and the signal being detected.
6. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of acoustical receivers.
7. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2, wherein the first part serves simultaneously as a bumper and a scratch guard for the motor-vehicle.
8. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3, wherein the first part serves simultaneously as a bumper and a scratch guard for the motor-vehicle.
9. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a signal course and a transit time between the impact site and a signal detection.
10. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a signal course and a transit time between the impact site and a signal detection.
11. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of acoustical receivers.
12. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of acoustical receivers.
13. An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that detects a deformation at the first part,
wherein the first part comprises a plastic part or is integrated into a plastic part disposed around the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal representing a deformation of the first part for detection by the second part.
14. The accident sensor according to claim 13, wherein the continuous signal transmitting medium comprises a medium for transmitting an acoustical signal, the plastic part generates an acoustical structure-borne-sound when it is deformed that is transmitted over the medium, and the second part comprises a structure-borne-sound sensor that receives the acoustical signal and conducts it further to an evaluation unit.
15. The accident sensor according to claim 13, wherein the continuous signal transmitting medium comprises a radiation transparent medium defining a beam path that is penetrated by a defined quantity of light, wherein the beam path and thus the defined quantity of light change when the plastic part is deformed, and the second part comprises a radiation-sensitive detector that detects the quantity of light, which has changed due to the deformation.
16. The accident sensor according to claim 13, wherein the continuous signal transmitting medium comprises a medium for transmitting an electromagnetic signal, the plastic part includes means for generating an electromagnetic signal under pressure, and the second part includes a detector for detecting the electromagnetic signal transmitted over the medium by said generating means.
17. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of optical receivers.
18. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of optical receivers.
19. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3, further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of optical receivers.
US09/985,950 1997-10-14 2001-11-06 Accident sensor Abandoned US20020063008A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/985,950 US20020063008A1 (en) 1997-10-14 2001-11-06 Accident sensor
US10/759,097 US6902025B2 (en) 1997-10-14 2004-01-20 Accident sensor

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19745309A DE19745309A1 (en) 1997-10-14 1997-10-14 Collision sensor for vehicles
US31995299A 1999-09-14 1999-09-14
DE19745309.0.1 1999-10-14
US09/985,950 US20020063008A1 (en) 1997-10-14 2001-11-06 Accident sensor

Related Parent Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP1998/006266 Continuation-In-Part WO1999019175A1 (en) 1997-10-14 1998-10-01 Accident sensor consisting of a deformable part of the vehicle
US09319952 Continuation-In-Part 1998-10-01
US31995299A Continuation-In-Part 1997-10-14 1999-09-14

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/759,097 Division US6902025B2 (en) 1997-10-14 2004-01-20 Accident sensor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020063008A1 true US20020063008A1 (en) 2002-05-30

Family

ID=32738522

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/985,950 Abandoned US20020063008A1 (en) 1997-10-14 2001-11-06 Accident sensor
US10/759,097 Expired - Fee Related US6902025B2 (en) 1997-10-14 2004-01-20 Accident sensor

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/759,097 Expired - Fee Related US6902025B2 (en) 1997-10-14 2004-01-20 Accident sensor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20020063008A1 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004033261A1 (en) * 2002-09-25 2004-04-22 Acts - Advanced Car Technology Systems Gmbh & Co. Kg Sensor device and method for detecting an external impact load on a vehicle
US20050278082A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 David Weekes Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents
US20060180380A1 (en) * 2005-02-11 2006-08-17 Trw Automotive U.S. Llc Sensor assembly including a sensing channel having a void and an associated method
EP1604870A3 (en) * 2004-06-11 2008-05-21 Robert Bosch GmbH Hybrid impact sensor
CN100436201C (en) * 2004-03-18 2008-11-26 株式会社电装 Pedestrian detecting device and correlation method
US20100217473A1 (en) * 2008-10-17 2010-08-26 Benteler Automobiltechnik Gmbh Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component
US20120239247A1 (en) * 2011-03-16 2012-09-20 General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for active mitigation of sudden accelerative forces in vehicles
CN102951098A (en) * 2011-08-23 2013-03-06 奥迪股份公司 Method and device for welding a bitumen membrane rolled out on a base
US20150091718A1 (en) * 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. Method for recognising and classifying damage incidents on motor vehicles and a device for the same
US20160045835A1 (en) * 2013-04-03 2016-02-18 Shin-Kyu Choi Transformable toy car
US20160239921A1 (en) * 2015-02-16 2016-08-18 Autoclaims Direct Inc. Apparatus and methods for estimating an extent of property damage
WO2019109316A1 (en) 2017-12-07 2019-06-13 Boe Technology Group Co., Ltd. Display panel, display apparatus, and method of fabricating display panel
WO2020089410A1 (en) * 2018-11-01 2020-05-07 Robert Bosch Gmbh Low impact crash detection for a vehicle

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006044370A (en) * 2004-08-02 2006-02-16 Denso Corp Occupant protection system
DE102004043597A1 (en) * 2004-09-06 2006-03-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Device for detecting a collision of a vehicle with an obstacle
US20060162984A1 (en) * 2005-01-25 2006-07-27 Trw Automotive U.S. Llc Crash sensor for sensing an impact to a vehicle in response to reduced light intensity and an associated method
US20080183313A1 (en) * 2007-01-29 2008-07-31 Johan Lundquist System, device and method for steering a mobile terminal
US9491420B2 (en) 2009-09-20 2016-11-08 Tibet MIMAR Vehicle security with accident notification and embedded driver analytics
DE102017200961A1 (en) * 2017-01-20 2018-07-26 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Acoustic warning signal detection for motor vehicles

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4346914A (en) * 1980-12-17 1982-08-31 General Motors Corporation Acoustic emission automotive crash sensor
DE3729019A1 (en) 1987-08-31 1989-03-16 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm DEVICE FOR RELEASING A SAFETY DEVICE
US4964485A (en) * 1989-04-18 1990-10-23 Backstop, Inc. Back-up safety device and method
US5261505A (en) * 1990-03-05 1993-11-16 Rolls-Royce Dsv Limited Collision detector for a vehicle
GB9004916D0 (en) 1990-03-05 1990-05-02 Stresswave Tech A collision detector for a vehicle
JP2895667B2 (en) * 1991-08-13 1999-05-24 株式会社日本自動車部品総合研究所 Collision detection sensor
DE4241382A1 (en) 1991-12-20 1993-06-24 Volkswagen Ag Collision sensor for deployment of vehicular occupant restraint - requires inner contact with flank protector in door to occur soon after impact on outer contact
DE4237404A1 (en) 1992-11-05 1994-05-11 Base Ten Systems Electronics G Vehicle side airbag trigger control - involves measuring degree and rate of deformation of strut or plate using pref. electric strain gauge
DE9215382U1 (en) 1992-11-11 1994-03-17 Siemens Ag Sound detector mounted in a vehicle
DE9215383U1 (en) 1992-11-11 1994-03-17 Siemens Ag Sensor evaluating optical signals
DE4308353C1 (en) 1993-03-16 1994-08-25 Siemens Ag Sensor, which can be mounted on a vehicle, for detecting a mechanical change in shape
DE4407763B4 (en) 1994-03-09 2005-07-21 Robert Bosch Gmbh sensor
DE19602990B4 (en) 1995-02-04 2005-10-06 Volkswagen Ag Device for detecting a crash impact of a vehicle
DE19537383B4 (en) 1995-10-07 2005-09-22 Robert Bosch Gmbh Safety device for vehicle occupants
US5826903A (en) * 1997-02-14 1998-10-27 Schiller; Norman H. Air bag deployment trigger sensor with sacrificial waveguide
DE19732302B4 (en) 1997-07-26 2006-12-28 Volkswagen Ag Trim strip and bumper with collision sensor arrangement for motor vehicles

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004033261A1 (en) * 2002-09-25 2004-04-22 Acts - Advanced Car Technology Systems Gmbh & Co. Kg Sensor device and method for detecting an external impact load on a vehicle
US20080060450A1 (en) * 2002-09-25 2008-03-13 Michael Bischoff Sensor Device and Method for Detecting an External Impact Load on a Vehicle
CN100436201C (en) * 2004-03-18 2008-11-26 株式会社电装 Pedestrian detecting device and correlation method
US20050278082A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 David Weekes Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents
EP1604870A3 (en) * 2004-06-11 2008-05-21 Robert Bosch GmbH Hybrid impact sensor
WO2006013476A2 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-02-09 David Weekes Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents
WO2006013476A3 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-04-06 David Weekes Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents
US20060180380A1 (en) * 2005-02-11 2006-08-17 Trw Automotive U.S. Llc Sensor assembly including a sensing channel having a void and an associated method
US7445073B2 (en) 2005-02-11 2008-11-04 Trw Automotive U.S. Llc Sensor assembly including a sensing channel having a void and an associated method
US8239089B2 (en) * 2008-10-17 2012-08-07 Benteler Automobiltechnik Gmbh Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component
US20100217473A1 (en) * 2008-10-17 2010-08-26 Benteler Automobiltechnik Gmbh Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component
US20120239247A1 (en) * 2011-03-16 2012-09-20 General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for active mitigation of sudden accelerative forces in vehicles
US9073476B2 (en) * 2011-08-23 2015-07-07 Audi Ag Multifunctional strip for motor vehicle
CN102951098A (en) * 2011-08-23 2013-03-06 奥迪股份公司 Method and device for welding a bitumen membrane rolled out on a base
US20130214915A1 (en) * 2011-08-23 2013-08-22 Audi Ag Multifunctional strip for motor vehicle
US20160045835A1 (en) * 2013-04-03 2016-02-18 Shin-Kyu Choi Transformable toy car
US10307684B2 (en) * 2013-04-03 2019-06-04 Shin-Kyu Choi Transformable toy car
US20150091718A1 (en) * 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. Method for recognising and classifying damage incidents on motor vehicles and a device for the same
US9704309B2 (en) * 2013-09-30 2017-07-11 Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. Method for recognising and classifying damage incidents on motor vehicles and a device for the same
US20160239921A1 (en) * 2015-02-16 2016-08-18 Autoclaims Direct Inc. Apparatus and methods for estimating an extent of property damage
WO2019109316A1 (en) 2017-12-07 2019-06-13 Boe Technology Group Co., Ltd. Display panel, display apparatus, and method of fabricating display panel
WO2020089410A1 (en) * 2018-11-01 2020-05-07 Robert Bosch Gmbh Low impact crash detection for a vehicle
US11938880B2 (en) 2018-11-01 2024-03-26 Robert Bosch Gmbh Low impact crash detection for a vehicle

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040144587A1 (en) 2004-07-29
US6902025B2 (en) 2005-06-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6902025B2 (en) Accident sensor
US6337653B1 (en) Vehicle impact detection sensor system
US5281780A (en) Impact detector
JP2001508730A (en) Accident sensor
US7671723B2 (en) Device for activating an actuator system for protecting a pedestrian
US6169479B1 (en) Vehicular deformation sensor system
KR100524467B1 (en) Device for protecting motor vehicle occupants
US6099030A (en) Occupant protection system
EP1350682B1 (en) Collision detecting device and passive safety system
US5118134A (en) Method and apparatus for protecting motor vehicle occupants
US6204756B1 (en) Diagnostics for vehicle deformation sensor system
US7541917B2 (en) Obstacle discrimination device and obstacle discrimination method
US8401739B2 (en) Device for activating a security system in a vehicle
US20020134607A1 (en) Method of impact detection for a motor vehicle
US6799653B2 (en) Device for side impact detection for a motor vehicle
US4988862A (en) Optical occupant restraint activation sensor
GB2347539A (en) Vehicle impact detection apparatus
JPH08509184A (en) Adjustable collision discrimination system with occupant position detection means
US20070035113A1 (en) Device for determining a relative speed between a vehicle and an impact object
US8239089B2 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component
JP2007526841A (en) Multi-function front sensor
US20100097597A1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component
KR20010086137A (en) Device for measuring distance
US5394328A (en) Method for activating an occupanct restraint in a vehicle
US5826903A (en) Air bag deployment trigger sensor with sacrificial waveguide

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CONTI TEMIC MICROELECTRONIC GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPIES, HANS;REEL/FRAME:012553/0420

Effective date: 20020128

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION