US20020063008A1 - Accident sensor - Google Patents
Accident sensor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020063008A1 US20020063008A1 US09/985,950 US98595001A US2002063008A1 US 20020063008 A1 US20020063008 A1 US 20020063008A1 US 98595001 A US98595001 A US 98595001A US 2002063008 A1 US2002063008 A1 US 2002063008A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- motor
- triggering
- safety system
- accident sensor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003973 paint Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
- B60R21/0136—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to actual contact with an obstacle, e.g. to vehicle deformation, bumper displacement or bumper velocity relative to the vehicle
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R13/00—Elements for body-finishing, identifying, or decorating; Arrangements or adaptations for advertising purposes
- B60R13/04—External Ornamental or guard strips; Ornamental inscriptive devices thereon
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R19/00—Wheel guards; Radiator guards, e.g. grilles; Obstruction removers; Fittings damping bouncing force in collisions
- B60R19/02—Bumpers, i.e. impact receiving or absorbing members for protecting vehicles or fending off blows from other vehicles or objects
- B60R19/44—Bumper guards
- B60R19/445—Guard strips
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01H—MEASUREMENT OF MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OR ULTRASONIC, SONIC OR INFRASONIC WAVES
- G01H17/00—Measuring mechanical vibrations or ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, not provided for in the preceding groups
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
- B60R2021/01302—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over monitoring vehicle body vibrations or noise
Definitions
- the invention relates to an accident sensor for detecting an impact.
- the accident sensors currently used are designed as so-called acceleration sensors. In the event of an accident, they detect the acceleration or deceleration that occurs' upon impact. If the acceleration or deceleration exceeds a critical value, motorvehicle safety devices, such as seat-belt tighteners or airbags, are triggered.
- motorvehicle safety devices such as seat-belt tighteners or airbags.
- a plurality of acceleration sensors is mounted to the motor vehicle, with each acceleration sensor detecting the acceleration or deceleration in one spatial direction for detecting a front or side impact, as well as rolling of the vehicle.
- a disadvantage of these sensors is that an acceleration sensor is required for each spatial direction. Also, such sensors cannot determine the site of the impact. These systems do not directly determine the impact and the associated deformation of the motor vehicle, but only the acceleration or deceleration resulting from the deformation.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,914 discloses an impact-detection device that responds to acoustical oscillations in the bearing parts of the vehicle body.
- the acoustical signals are converted into electrical signals by one or more piezoelectric force sensors that is or are connected to one or more acoustical waveguides.
- the latter comprise thin steel tubes that extend from the central installation point of the sensor(s) into the regions of the body that are at risk for impact, and serve there in the acoustical coupling with bearing parts that are spot-welded at numerous locations.
- the signals are processed by a microprocessor.
- the signal processing constitutes the basis of the determination of an impact situation that would require the triggering of the passenger-restraint system.
- a disadvantage of this system is that the sound waves are contained in a complicated tubular waveguide system, and transported from there to a central piezo-element that converts the sound waves into a voltage signal. This voltage signal is then conducted further to a microprocessor. Not only is the processing of the tubular system complex and costly, but it is not possible to ascertain the origin of the signal with this apparatus. It only recognizes the severity of the accident. The sensor cannot identify the site of the deformation.
- DE 37 29 019 A1 describes a device for triggering a safety apparatus.
- a system is shifted in position for differentiating an impact against an obstacle from other, corresponding noises and disturbances under critical driving conditions.
- the accident sensor acoustically, electrically or optically detects the material deformation occurring upon impact in a plastic part mounted to the exterior of the motor vehicle.
- the accident sensor can detect the precise accident site on the motor vehicle. Furthermore, this solution is very inexpensive and simple in comparison to other accident sensors. Hence, the safety apparatuses can be triggered more purposefully at no additional cost.
- the plastic part is disposed around the entire motor vehicle and serves simultaneously as a bumper and/or a scratch guard. Moreover, the deformation site on the motor vehicle can be determined, particularly based on the signal course and the determination of the transit time due to the spatial orientation of the signal receivers.
- FIG. 1 a motor vehicle having a peripheral plastic layer
- FIG. 2A the measurement of the beam path in the plastic
- FIG. 2B the optical accident detection based on a change in beam path
- FIG. 3A the sound measurement on the plastic
- FIG. 3B the acoustical accident detection based on material crackling
- FIG. 4A plastic coated with a piezofilm
- FIG. 4B the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm
- FIG. 5 a profile layer
- FIG. 6 a graphic representation of accident
- FIG. 7 7 A and 7 B: show a sensor integral with the plastic part.
- FIG. 1 shows a motor vehicle 1 having a peripheral plastic layer 2 .
- the illustrated motor vehicle 1 is completely or partially encompassed by plastic 2 in the impact regions.
- the plastic 2 encompassing the motor vehicle 1 in the lower region in the application example serves as a scratch guard and, in a minor rear-end collision or in the entrance or exit of a parking space, as impact protection for preventing damage to the paint or the body.
- This plastic 2 which is the first part to be damaged in most accidents, is or contains at least one part of the accident sensor.
- the plastic covering 2 can be disposed around the entire vehicle 1 or only part of it. In any event, however, the plastic covering 2 serves numerous purposes.
- the nature of the plastic 2 is such that it generates a structure-borne-sound signal during the deformation, or its radiation transparency changes, or it generates an electrical signal by means of an integrated piezo-layer.
- An advantage here is that plastic typically possesses far better structure-borne-sound properties than metal.
- the plastic protective covering 2 on the motor vehicle 1 can be used simultaneously as a deformation-measuring element that acoustically transmits a material crackling that is typical for a specific degree of deformation, or optically or electrically transmits a different signal.
- the deformation site can be determined based on the transit times required by the signal from the deformation site to the signal receiver. If the plastic is provided with profiles, for example, the structure-borne-sound signal generated during the deformation is more intensive and its measurement is less ambiguous, more exact and therefore more useful.
- the plastic covering 2 can also comprise numerous layers possessing different properties, such as transparency or those of a piezo-layer.
- FIG. 2A illustrates the principle of the measurement of the radiation or the beam path 5 in the plastic 2 .
- This figure shows a radiation-transparent plastic 2 disposed around a motor vehicle, as described in connection with FIG. 1. It is not crucial whether the entire plastic part 2 is radiation-transparent, or at least one radiation-transparent layer is disposed on or in the plastic.
- the structure further includes a radiation source 3 and a radiation detector 4 .
- the radiation detector 4 measures the quantity of radiation or light that is transported from the radiation or light source via the light guide.
- the light guide should be shielded such that no radiation that is incident from the outside can reach the radiation detector 4 . As long as the plastic part 2 is not damaged, the same quantity of light will reach the radiation detector 4 .
- FIG. 2B shows the optical accident detection based on the change in beam path in the event that the plastic 2 and, particularly, the light guide are damaged.
- the beam path 5 changes, and the quantity of radiation that reaches the radiation receiver 4 is reduced.
- the radiation transmitted by the radiation or light source 3 takes a different path from the one shown in FIG. 2A.
- both the distribution and the quantity of the radiation detected by the radiation detector 4 change.
- these parameters change constantly until the deformation process has ended.
- the change in the quantity of radiation over time, and the change in the radiation distribution over time allow conclusions to be reached regarding the origin of the damage to the plastic.
- An evaluation electronics not shown, and as disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, determine the severity and source of the accident and the deformation site on the motor vehicle.
- FIG. 3A shows the acoustical sound measurement on the plastic.
- a microphone 6 particularly a structure-borne-sound sensor, a directional microphone or another acoustical receiver, is disposed in the motor vehicle. The receiver is oriented toward the plastic 2 . The sensitivity of the acoustical receiver lies in the range of the frequency spectrum of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling of the plastic 2 .
- the acoustical receivers 4 detect the acoustical signals generated through the deformation of the plastic 2 . One or more receivers can be used for this purpose. The receivers can project in different spatial directions for using the transit time to determine the exact accident site. The signal is then conducted further via evaluation electronics 13 . DE 37 29 019 describes an example of this type of electronics.
- FIG. 3B shows the acoustical accident detection through the measurement of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling.
- Structure-borne sound is generated during the deformation 10 of the plastic 2 .
- This initiates a material crackling 7 in the ultrasonic range, which can be measured in the frequency range of 60 Hz to 100 Hz.
- a microphone 6 detects the intensity, phase position, damping and transit time in the material crackling specific for this plastic 2 .
- Evaluation electronics not shown here, and disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, can use this data to determine the severity and origin of the accident, and the deformation site on the motor vehicle.
- FIG. 4A shows the plastic 2 coated with a piezofilm 8 .
- a piezofilm 8 is applied to the plastic 2 or integrated with, the plastic 2 .
- the piezofilm 8 generates an electrical or optical signal under pressure or the effect of a mechanical force.
- a receiver for detecting the electrical or optical signal is not shown in the figure because it is disposed directly on the plastic in an optical detection arrangement, as shown in FIG. 2A, or, in an electrical detection arrangement, at an arbitrary location that is electrically connected to the piezofilm.
- FIG. 4B shows the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm.
- this piezofilm generates voltage signals or discharge flashes 11 , which can be picked up by a detector. These signals are then conducted further to an evaluation unit, not shown, and evaluated there.
- An example of such an evaluation circuit is disclosed in DE 37 29 019.
- FIG. 5 shows different profiles 9 . These profiles can be worked into the plastic and/or the light guide for generating a better structure-borne-sound signal. If the piezofilm is applied to the plastic provided with profiles, more voltage signals or discharge flashes are generated due to mechanical stresses than in an application to a smooth base structure.
- FIG. 6 illustrates the graphic representation of an accident.
- the diagram shows the so-called material crackling.
- the amplitude, or intensity, indicates the degree of the deformation. Different accident characteristics can be derived from the phase position and damping.
- the deformation site can be calculated through the determination of the transit time required by the sound signal for traveling from the deformed plastic to the microphone.
- FIGS. 7A and 7B show the sensors 6 integrated with the plastic part 2 .
- the deformable first part 2 in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3 A, 3 B, 4 A and 4 B each constitutes a signal transmitting medium. After the signal is created during impact, the deformable first part transmits the acoustical, optical, or electrical signal over the medium to the receiver.
- the deformable first part can either be distinct from or integral with the medium.
- the deformable first part can be the plastic part and/or the continuous medium for transmitting a signal.
- the first part can be a distinct member attached to the plastic part.
- the impact site can be determined based on the signal course over the medium.
- Any suitable evaluation unit for example, a microprocessor, can be provided for this function.
Abstract
An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system. A deformable, first part and a second part that acoustically detects a deformation at the first part is provided. The deformable, first part includes a plastic part or is integrated with a plastic part disposed around the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal. The first part generates an acoustical structure-borne signal when it is deformed. The second part includes a structure-borne signal sensor that receives the acoustical signal and conducts said signal further to an evaluation unit.
Description
- This is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/319,952 filed Sep. 14, 1999.
- The invention relates to an accident sensor for detecting an impact.
- The accident sensors currently used are designed as so-called acceleration sensors. In the event of an accident, they detect the acceleration or deceleration that occurs' upon impact. If the acceleration or deceleration exceeds a critical value, motorvehicle safety devices, such as seat-belt tighteners or airbags, are triggered. Usually, a plurality of acceleration sensors is mounted to the motor vehicle, with each acceleration sensor detecting the acceleration or deceleration in one spatial direction for detecting a front or side impact, as well as rolling of the vehicle.
- A disadvantage of these sensors is that an acceleration sensor is required for each spatial direction. Also, such sensors cannot determine the site of the impact. These systems do not directly determine the impact and the associated deformation of the motor vehicle, but only the acceleration or deceleration resulting from the deformation.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,914 discloses an impact-detection device that responds to acoustical oscillations in the bearing parts of the vehicle body. The acoustical signals are converted into electrical signals by one or more piezoelectric force sensors that is or are connected to one or more acoustical waveguides. The latter comprise thin steel tubes that extend from the central installation point of the sensor(s) into the regions of the body that are at risk for impact, and serve there in the acoustical coupling with bearing parts that are spot-welded at numerous locations. The signals are processed by a microprocessor. The signal processing constitutes the basis of the determination of an impact situation that would require the triggering of the passenger-restraint system.
- A disadvantage of this system is that the sound waves are contained in a complicated tubular waveguide system, and transported from there to a central piezo-element that converts the sound waves into a voltage signal. This voltage signal is then conducted further to a microprocessor. Not only is the processing of the tubular system complex and costly, but it is not possible to ascertain the origin of the signal with this apparatus. It only recognizes the severity of the accident. The sensor cannot identify the site of the deformation.
- DE 37 29 019 A1 describes a device for triggering a safety apparatus. In this case, due to the association of sound and/or structure-borne-sound sensors, a system is shifted in position for differentiating an impact against an obstacle from other, corresponding noises and disturbances under critical driving conditions.
- It is the object of the invention to provide an accident sensor that indicates the deformation of a motor vehicle upon impact against an obstacle, can be mounted simply and inexpensively, and identifies the deformation site on the motor vehicle.
- In accordance with the invention, the object is accomplished by the features disclosed herein. The accident sensor acoustically, electrically or optically detects the material deformation occurring upon impact in a plastic part mounted to the exterior of the motor vehicle.
- The advantages attained with the invention are that, first, the accident sensor can detect the precise accident site on the motor vehicle. Furthermore, this solution is very inexpensive and simple in comparison to other accident sensors. Hence, the safety apparatuses can be triggered more purposefully at no additional cost.
- Advantageous modifications of the invention ensue. The plastic part is disposed around the entire motor vehicle and serves simultaneously as a bumper and/or a scratch guard. Moreover, the deformation site on the motor vehicle can be determined, particularly based on the signal course and the determination of the transit time due to the spatial orientation of the signal receivers.
- The figures illustrate embodiments of the invention. They show in:
- FIG. 1: a motor vehicle having a peripheral plastic layer;
- FIG. 2A: the measurement of the beam path in the plastic;
- FIG. 2B: the optical accident detection based on a change in beam path;
- FIG. 3A: the sound measurement on the plastic;
- FIG. 3B: the acoustical accident detection based on material crackling;
- FIG. 4A: plastic coated with a piezofilm;
- FIG. 4B: the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm;
- FIG. 5: a profile layer;
- FIG. 6: a graphic representation of accident; and
- FIG. 7:7A and 7B: show a sensor integral with the plastic part.
- FIG. 1 shows a motor vehicle1 having a peripheral
plastic layer 2. The illustrated motor vehicle 1 is completely or partially encompassed byplastic 2 in the impact regions. Theplastic 2 encompassing the motor vehicle 1 in the lower region in the application example serves as a scratch guard and, in a minor rear-end collision or in the entrance or exit of a parking space, as impact protection for preventing damage to the paint or the body. Thisplastic 2, which is the first part to be damaged in most accidents, is or contains at least one part of the accident sensor. Theplastic covering 2 can be disposed around the entire vehicle 1 or only part of it. In any event, however, the plastic covering 2 serves numerous purposes. - The nature of the
plastic 2 is such that it generates a structure-borne-sound signal during the deformation, or its radiation transparency changes, or it generates an electrical signal by means of an integrated piezo-layer. An advantage here is that plastic typically possesses far better structure-borne-sound properties than metal. Thus, the plastic protective covering 2 on the motor vehicle 1 can be used simultaneously as a deformation-measuring element that acoustically transmits a material crackling that is typical for a specific degree of deformation, or optically or electrically transmits a different signal. The deformation site can be determined based on the transit times required by the signal from the deformation site to the signal receiver. If the plastic is provided with profiles, for example, the structure-borne-sound signal generated during the deformation is more intensive and its measurement is less ambiguous, more exact and therefore more useful. - The plastic covering2 can also comprise numerous layers possessing different properties, such as transparency or those of a piezo-layer.
- FIG. 2A illustrates the principle of the measurement of the radiation or the
beam path 5 in theplastic 2. This figure shows a radiation-transparent plastic 2 disposed around a motor vehicle, as described in connection with FIG. 1. It is not crucial whether the entireplastic part 2 is radiation-transparent, or at least one radiation-transparent layer is disposed on or in the plastic. The structure further includes aradiation source 3 and aradiation detector 4. Theradiation detector 4 measures the quantity of radiation or light that is transported from the radiation or light source via the light guide. The light guide should be shielded such that no radiation that is incident from the outside can reach theradiation detector 4. As long as theplastic part 2 is not damaged, the same quantity of light will reach theradiation detector 4. - FIG. 2B shows the optical accident detection based on the change in beam path in the event that the
plastic 2 and, particularly, the light guide are damaged. During thedeformation 10 of theplastic 2, thebeam path 5 changes, and the quantity of radiation that reaches theradiation receiver 4 is reduced. The radiation transmitted by the radiation orlight source 3 takes a different path from the one shown in FIG. 2A. Thus, both the distribution and the quantity of the radiation detected by theradiation detector 4 change. During thedeformation 10 of theplastic 2, these parameters change constantly until the deformation process has ended. The change in the quantity of radiation over time, and the change in the radiation distribution over time, allow conclusions to be reached regarding the origin of the damage to the plastic. An evaluation electronics, not shown, and as disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, determine the severity and source of the accident and the deformation site on the motor vehicle. - FIG. 3A shows the acoustical sound measurement on the plastic. A
microphone 6, particularly a structure-borne-sound sensor, a directional microphone or another acoustical receiver, is disposed in the motor vehicle. The receiver is oriented toward theplastic 2. The sensitivity of the acoustical receiver lies in the range of the frequency spectrum of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling of theplastic 2. Theacoustical receivers 4 detect the acoustical signals generated through the deformation of theplastic 2. One or more receivers can be used for this purpose. The receivers can project in different spatial directions for using the transit time to determine the exact accident site. The signal is then conducted further via evaluation electronics 13. DE 37 29 019 describes an example of this type of electronics. - FIG. 3B shows the acoustical accident detection through the measurement of the structure-borne sound, particularly the material crackling. Structure-borne sound is generated during the
deformation 10 of theplastic 2. This initiates amaterial crackling 7 in the ultrasonic range, which can be measured in the frequency range of 60 Hz to 100 Hz. Amicrophone 6 detects the intensity, phase position, damping and transit time in the material crackling specific for thisplastic 2. Evaluation electronics, not shown here, and disclosed in DE 37 29 019, for example, can use this data to determine the severity and origin of the accident, and the deformation site on the motor vehicle. - FIG. 4A shows the plastic2 coated with a
piezofilm 8. In this embodiment, apiezofilm 8 is applied to theplastic 2 or integrated with, theplastic 2. Thepiezofilm 8 generates an electrical or optical signal under pressure or the effect of a mechanical force. Further included in this arrangement is a receiver for detecting the electrical or optical signal. This receiver is not shown in the figure because it is disposed directly on the plastic in an optical detection arrangement, as shown in FIG. 2A, or, in an electrical detection arrangement, at an arbitrary location that is electrically connected to the piezofilm. - FIG. 4B shows the electromagnetic accident detection based on the destruction of the piezofilm. During the
deformation 10 or destruction, this piezofilm generates voltage signals or discharge flashes 11, which can be picked up by a detector. These signals are then conducted further to an evaluation unit, not shown, and evaluated there. An example of such an evaluation circuit is disclosed in DE 37 29 019. - FIG. 5 shows different profiles9. These profiles can be worked into the plastic and/or the light guide for generating a better structure-borne-sound signal. If the piezofilm is applied to the plastic provided with profiles, more voltage signals or discharge flashes are generated due to mechanical stresses than in an application to a smooth base structure.
- FIG. 6 illustrates the graphic representation of an accident. The diagram shows the so-called material crackling. The amplitude, or intensity, indicates the degree of the deformation. Different accident characteristics can be derived from the phase position and damping. Furthermore, the deformation site can be calculated through the determination of the transit time required by the sound signal for traveling from the deformed plastic to the microphone.
- FIGS. 7A and 7B show the
sensors 6 integrated with theplastic part 2. - The deformable
first part 2 in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4A and 4B each constitutes a signal transmitting medium. After the signal is created during impact, the deformable first part transmits the acoustical, optical, or electrical signal over the medium to the receiver. - In each of the embodiments discussed above, the deformable first part can either be distinct from or integral with the medium. For example, the deformable first part can be the plastic part and/or the continuous medium for transmitting a signal. Alternatively, the first part can be a distinct member attached to the plastic part.
- In each of the embodiments discussed above, the impact site can be determined based on the signal course over the medium. Any suitable evaluation unit, for example, a microprocessor, can be provided for this function.
Claims (19)
1. An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that acoustically detects a deformation at the first part,
wherein the deformable, first part comprises a plastic part or is integrated with a plastic part disposed around the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal,
wherein the first part generates an acoustical structure-borne signal when it is deformed, and
wherein the second part comprises a structure-borne signal sensor that receives the acoustical signal and conducts said signal further to an evaluation unit.
2. An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that optically detects the deformation at the first part;
wherein the first part comprises a radiation-transparent plastic part that is penetrated by a defined quantity of light, is disposed on the exterior of the motor vehicle, and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal;
wherein a light beam path in the first part and the defined quantity of light change when the first part is deformed, said light being a signal; and
wherein the second part comprises a radiation-sensitive detector that detects said signal.
3. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that electromagnetically detects the deformation at the first part;
wherein the deformable, first part comprises a plastic part that is disposed on the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal, wherein said continuous medium generates pressure waves during the deformation; and
wherein the second part comprises a piezofilm that receives the pressure waves and converts said pressure waves into an electrical signal, and conducts said electrical signal further to an evaluation unit.
4. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1 , wherein the first part serves simultaneously as a bumper and a scratch guard for the motor-vehicle.
5. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a signal course between the impact site and a signal detector and a transit time elapsed between the signal being generated at the impact site and the signal being detected.
6. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of acoustical receivers.
7. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2 , wherein the first part serves simultaneously as a bumper and a scratch guard for the motor-vehicle.
8. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3 , wherein the first part serves simultaneously as a bumper and a scratch guard for the motor-vehicle.
9. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a signal course and a transit time between the impact site and a signal detection.
10. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a signal course and a transit time between the impact site and a signal detection.
11. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of acoustical receivers.
12. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of acoustical receivers.
13. An accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system, comprising:
a deformable, first part and a second part that detects a deformation at the first part,
wherein the first part comprises a plastic part or is integrated into a plastic part disposed around the exterior of the motor vehicle and includes a continuous medium for transmitting a signal representing a deformation of the first part for detection by the second part.
14. The accident sensor according to claim 13 , wherein the continuous signal transmitting medium comprises a medium for transmitting an acoustical signal, the plastic part generates an acoustical structure-borne-sound when it is deformed that is transmitted over the medium, and the second part comprises a structure-borne-sound sensor that receives the acoustical signal and conducts it further to an evaluation unit.
15. The accident sensor according to claim 13 , wherein the continuous signal transmitting medium comprises a radiation transparent medium defining a beam path that is penetrated by a defined quantity of light, wherein the beam path and thus the defined quantity of light change when the plastic part is deformed, and the second part comprises a radiation-sensitive detector that detects the quantity of light, which has changed due to the deformation.
16. The accident sensor according to claim 13 , wherein the continuous signal transmitting medium comprises a medium for transmitting an electromagnetic signal, the plastic part includes means for generating an electromagnetic signal under pressure, and the second part includes a detector for detecting the electromagnetic signal transmitted over the medium by said generating means.
17. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 1 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of optical receivers.
18. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 2 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of optical receivers.
19. The accident sensor for triggering a motor-vehicle safety system according to claim 3 , further comprising an evaluation unit which determines an impact site on the motor vehicle based on a spatial orientation of optical receivers.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/985,950 US20020063008A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2001-11-06 | Accident sensor |
US10/759,097 US6902025B2 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2004-01-20 | Accident sensor |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19745309A DE19745309A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 1997-10-14 | Collision sensor for vehicles |
US31995299A | 1999-09-14 | 1999-09-14 | |
DE19745309.0.1 | 1999-10-14 | ||
US09/985,950 US20020063008A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2001-11-06 | Accident sensor |
Related Parent Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP1998/006266 Continuation-In-Part WO1999019175A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 1998-10-01 | Accident sensor consisting of a deformable part of the vehicle |
US09319952 Continuation-In-Part | 1998-10-01 | ||
US31995299A Continuation-In-Part | 1997-10-14 | 1999-09-14 |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/759,097 Division US6902025B2 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2004-01-20 | Accident sensor |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020063008A1 true US20020063008A1 (en) | 2002-05-30 |
Family
ID=32738522
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/985,950 Abandoned US20020063008A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2001-11-06 | Accident sensor |
US10/759,097 Expired - Fee Related US6902025B2 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2004-01-20 | Accident sensor |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/759,097 Expired - Fee Related US6902025B2 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2004-01-20 | Accident sensor |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20020063008A1 (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2004033261A1 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2004-04-22 | Acts - Advanced Car Technology Systems Gmbh & Co. Kg | Sensor device and method for detecting an external impact load on a vehicle |
US20050278082A1 (en) * | 2004-06-10 | 2005-12-15 | David Weekes | Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents |
US20060180380A1 (en) * | 2005-02-11 | 2006-08-17 | Trw Automotive U.S. Llc | Sensor assembly including a sensing channel having a void and an associated method |
EP1604870A3 (en) * | 2004-06-11 | 2008-05-21 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Hybrid impact sensor |
CN100436201C (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2008-11-26 | 株式会社电装 | Pedestrian detecting device and correlation method |
US20100217473A1 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2010-08-26 | Benteler Automobiltechnik Gmbh | Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component |
US20120239247A1 (en) * | 2011-03-16 | 2012-09-20 | General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for active mitigation of sudden accelerative forces in vehicles |
CN102951098A (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2013-03-06 | 奥迪股份公司 | Method and device for welding a bitumen membrane rolled out on a base |
US20150091718A1 (en) * | 2013-09-30 | 2015-04-02 | Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. | Method for recognising and classifying damage incidents on motor vehicles and a device for the same |
US20160045835A1 (en) * | 2013-04-03 | 2016-02-18 | Shin-Kyu Choi | Transformable toy car |
US20160239921A1 (en) * | 2015-02-16 | 2016-08-18 | Autoclaims Direct Inc. | Apparatus and methods for estimating an extent of property damage |
WO2019109316A1 (en) | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-13 | Boe Technology Group Co., Ltd. | Display panel, display apparatus, and method of fabricating display panel |
WO2020089410A1 (en) * | 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-07 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Low impact crash detection for a vehicle |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2006044370A (en) * | 2004-08-02 | 2006-02-16 | Denso Corp | Occupant protection system |
DE102004043597A1 (en) * | 2004-09-06 | 2006-03-09 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Device for detecting a collision of a vehicle with an obstacle |
US20060162984A1 (en) * | 2005-01-25 | 2006-07-27 | Trw Automotive U.S. Llc | Crash sensor for sensing an impact to a vehicle in response to reduced light intensity and an associated method |
US20080183313A1 (en) * | 2007-01-29 | 2008-07-31 | Johan Lundquist | System, device and method for steering a mobile terminal |
US9491420B2 (en) | 2009-09-20 | 2016-11-08 | Tibet MIMAR | Vehicle security with accident notification and embedded driver analytics |
DE102017200961A1 (en) * | 2017-01-20 | 2018-07-26 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Acoustic warning signal detection for motor vehicles |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4346914A (en) * | 1980-12-17 | 1982-08-31 | General Motors Corporation | Acoustic emission automotive crash sensor |
DE3729019A1 (en) | 1987-08-31 | 1989-03-16 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | DEVICE FOR RELEASING A SAFETY DEVICE |
US4964485A (en) * | 1989-04-18 | 1990-10-23 | Backstop, Inc. | Back-up safety device and method |
US5261505A (en) * | 1990-03-05 | 1993-11-16 | Rolls-Royce Dsv Limited | Collision detector for a vehicle |
GB9004916D0 (en) | 1990-03-05 | 1990-05-02 | Stresswave Tech | A collision detector for a vehicle |
JP2895667B2 (en) * | 1991-08-13 | 1999-05-24 | 株式会社日本自動車部品総合研究所 | Collision detection sensor |
DE4241382A1 (en) | 1991-12-20 | 1993-06-24 | Volkswagen Ag | Collision sensor for deployment of vehicular occupant restraint - requires inner contact with flank protector in door to occur soon after impact on outer contact |
DE4237404A1 (en) | 1992-11-05 | 1994-05-11 | Base Ten Systems Electronics G | Vehicle side airbag trigger control - involves measuring degree and rate of deformation of strut or plate using pref. electric strain gauge |
DE9215382U1 (en) | 1992-11-11 | 1994-03-17 | Siemens Ag | Sound detector mounted in a vehicle |
DE9215383U1 (en) | 1992-11-11 | 1994-03-17 | Siemens Ag | Sensor evaluating optical signals |
DE4308353C1 (en) | 1993-03-16 | 1994-08-25 | Siemens Ag | Sensor, which can be mounted on a vehicle, for detecting a mechanical change in shape |
DE4407763B4 (en) | 1994-03-09 | 2005-07-21 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | sensor |
DE19602990B4 (en) | 1995-02-04 | 2005-10-06 | Volkswagen Ag | Device for detecting a crash impact of a vehicle |
DE19537383B4 (en) | 1995-10-07 | 2005-09-22 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Safety device for vehicle occupants |
US5826903A (en) * | 1997-02-14 | 1998-10-27 | Schiller; Norman H. | Air bag deployment trigger sensor with sacrificial waveguide |
DE19732302B4 (en) | 1997-07-26 | 2006-12-28 | Volkswagen Ag | Trim strip and bumper with collision sensor arrangement for motor vehicles |
-
2001
- 2001-11-06 US US09/985,950 patent/US20020063008A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2004
- 2004-01-20 US US10/759,097 patent/US6902025B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2004033261A1 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2004-04-22 | Acts - Advanced Car Technology Systems Gmbh & Co. Kg | Sensor device and method for detecting an external impact load on a vehicle |
US20080060450A1 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2008-03-13 | Michael Bischoff | Sensor Device and Method for Detecting an External Impact Load on a Vehicle |
CN100436201C (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2008-11-26 | 株式会社电装 | Pedestrian detecting device and correlation method |
US20050278082A1 (en) * | 2004-06-10 | 2005-12-15 | David Weekes | Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents |
EP1604870A3 (en) * | 2004-06-11 | 2008-05-21 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Hybrid impact sensor |
WO2006013476A2 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-09 | David Weekes | Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents |
WO2006013476A3 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-04-06 | David Weekes | Systems and methods for verification and resolution of vehicular accidents |
US20060180380A1 (en) * | 2005-02-11 | 2006-08-17 | Trw Automotive U.S. Llc | Sensor assembly including a sensing channel having a void and an associated method |
US7445073B2 (en) | 2005-02-11 | 2008-11-04 | Trw Automotive U.S. Llc | Sensor assembly including a sensing channel having a void and an associated method |
US8239089B2 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2012-08-07 | Benteler Automobiltechnik Gmbh | Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component |
US20100217473A1 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2010-08-26 | Benteler Automobiltechnik Gmbh | Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component |
US20120239247A1 (en) * | 2011-03-16 | 2012-09-20 | General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for active mitigation of sudden accelerative forces in vehicles |
US9073476B2 (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2015-07-07 | Audi Ag | Multifunctional strip for motor vehicle |
CN102951098A (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2013-03-06 | 奥迪股份公司 | Method and device for welding a bitumen membrane rolled out on a base |
US20130214915A1 (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2013-08-22 | Audi Ag | Multifunctional strip for motor vehicle |
US20160045835A1 (en) * | 2013-04-03 | 2016-02-18 | Shin-Kyu Choi | Transformable toy car |
US10307684B2 (en) * | 2013-04-03 | 2019-06-04 | Shin-Kyu Choi | Transformable toy car |
US20150091718A1 (en) * | 2013-09-30 | 2015-04-02 | Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. | Method for recognising and classifying damage incidents on motor vehicles and a device for the same |
US9704309B2 (en) * | 2013-09-30 | 2017-07-11 | Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. | Method for recognising and classifying damage incidents on motor vehicles and a device for the same |
US20160239921A1 (en) * | 2015-02-16 | 2016-08-18 | Autoclaims Direct Inc. | Apparatus and methods for estimating an extent of property damage |
WO2019109316A1 (en) | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-13 | Boe Technology Group Co., Ltd. | Display panel, display apparatus, and method of fabricating display panel |
WO2020089410A1 (en) * | 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-07 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Low impact crash detection for a vehicle |
US11938880B2 (en) | 2018-11-01 | 2024-03-26 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Low impact crash detection for a vehicle |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20040144587A1 (en) | 2004-07-29 |
US6902025B2 (en) | 2005-06-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6902025B2 (en) | Accident sensor | |
US6337653B1 (en) | Vehicle impact detection sensor system | |
US5281780A (en) | Impact detector | |
JP2001508730A (en) | Accident sensor | |
US7671723B2 (en) | Device for activating an actuator system for protecting a pedestrian | |
US6169479B1 (en) | Vehicular deformation sensor system | |
KR100524467B1 (en) | Device for protecting motor vehicle occupants | |
US6099030A (en) | Occupant protection system | |
EP1350682B1 (en) | Collision detecting device and passive safety system | |
US5118134A (en) | Method and apparatus for protecting motor vehicle occupants | |
US6204756B1 (en) | Diagnostics for vehicle deformation sensor system | |
US7541917B2 (en) | Obstacle discrimination device and obstacle discrimination method | |
US8401739B2 (en) | Device for activating a security system in a vehicle | |
US20020134607A1 (en) | Method of impact detection for a motor vehicle | |
US6799653B2 (en) | Device for side impact detection for a motor vehicle | |
US4988862A (en) | Optical occupant restraint activation sensor | |
GB2347539A (en) | Vehicle impact detection apparatus | |
JPH08509184A (en) | Adjustable collision discrimination system with occupant position detection means | |
US20070035113A1 (en) | Device for determining a relative speed between a vehicle and an impact object | |
US8239089B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component | |
JP2007526841A (en) | Multi-function front sensor | |
US20100097597A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting deformations on a vehicle component | |
KR20010086137A (en) | Device for measuring distance | |
US5394328A (en) | Method for activating an occupanct restraint in a vehicle | |
US5826903A (en) | Air bag deployment trigger sensor with sacrificial waveguide |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CONTI TEMIC MICROELECTRONIC GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPIES, HANS;REEL/FRAME:012553/0420 Effective date: 20020128 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |