US20020082462A1 - Process for production of paraxylene - Google Patents
Process for production of paraxylene Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020082462A1 US20020082462A1 US10/062,097 US6209702A US2002082462A1 US 20020082462 A1 US20020082462 A1 US 20020082462A1 US 6209702 A US6209702 A US 6209702A US 2002082462 A1 US2002082462 A1 US 2002082462A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- paraxylene
- unit
- zeolite membrane
- isomerisation
- ethylbenzene
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C15/00—Cyclic hydrocarbons containing only six-membered aromatic rings as cyclic parts
- C07C15/02—Monocyclic hydrocarbons
- C07C15/067—C8H10 hydrocarbons
- C07C15/08—Xylenes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C7/00—Purification; Separation; Use of additives
- C07C7/005—Processes comprising at least two steps in series
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P20/00—Technologies relating to chemical industry
- Y02P20/50—Improvements relating to the production of bulk chemicals
- Y02P20/52—Improvements relating to the production of bulk chemicals using catalysts, e.g. selective catalysts
Abstract
This invention relates to a process and a chemical plant for the production primarily of paraxylene. In particular the process and chemical plant utilize zeolite membranes for enhanced paraxylene production.
Description
- This invention relates to a process and a chemical plant for the production of paraxylene. In particular the process and chemical plant utilise zeolite membranes for enhanced paraxylene production.
- In the petrochemical production chain one of the most important streams is the C6 to C8 aromatics stream which is a source of raw materials for high value downstream products. From this stream, benzene, toluene and the C8 aromatics which are particularly valuable may be obtained. The C8 aromatics are orthoxylene, metaxylene, paraxylene and ethylbenzene. Paraxylene is often the most desirable of the xylenes; however because the boiling points of ethylbenzene, ortho-, meta- and paraxylene (hereinafter collectively referred to as “C8 aromatics”) are close, they are difficult to separate by fractional distillation. As a consequence various alternative methods of separating paraxylene from C8 aromatics have been developed. The most common of such methods are fractional crystallisation which utilises the difference in freezing points between ethylbenzene, ortho-, meta- and paraxylene, and selective adsorption which commonly utilises zeolite materials to selectively adsorb paraxylene from C8 aromatics streams; the adsorbed paraxylene is recovered after desorbing from the zeolite. When either of these processes are used paraxylene can be recovered in high yields from the C8 aromatics stream. The resulting filtrate from the crystallisation process or the raffinate from the adsorption process are depleted in paraxylene and contain relatively high proportions of ethylbenzene, ortho-, and metaxylene. These streams are typically subjected to further processing downstream of the crystallisation or adsorption process.
- Typically one of the additional downstream processes is an isomerisation process which is used to increase the proportion of paraxylene in paraxylene depleted streams from such processes as fractional crystallisation or selective adsorption. The xylenes, which are predominately ortho- and metaxylene, can be contacted with an isomerisation catalyst under appropriate temperature and pressure which results in the conversion of some of the ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene. It is also usually necessary to convert some of the ethylbenzene to prevent it from building up to high concentrations. A catalyst can be selected to enable conversion of ethylbenzene to benzene, and/or to orthoxylene through a C8 naphthene intermediate and/or to C10 aromatics and benzene via transalkylation. It may be that the catalyst for conversion of ethylbenzene to orthoxylene is also a xylenes isomerisation catalyst in which case the orthoxylene from the ethylbenzene is converted to an equilibrium mixture of xylenes.
- Prior art processes for making paraxylene have typically included combinations of isomerization with fractional crystallisation and/or adsorption separation. The problem with this combination is that despite improvements in catalyst performance the isomerisation technology is only able to produce equilibrium or near-equilibrium mixtures of xylenes and may also be relatively inefficient for the conversion of ethylbenzene to benzene or xylenes. The consequence of this is that big recycles of the xylenes stream back through these processes are needed to ensure the conversion of the C8 aromatics stream to paraxylene is maximised with or without the additional recovery if desired of orthoxylene and/or metaxylene. There is a need therefore for improved processes and chemical plants for the production of paraxylene from C8 aromatics streams, which in particular address the problems associated with large recycles and/or low ethylbenzene conversions.
- Zeolite membranes have been described in the prior art, for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,699,892, 5,100,596, EP 0481658, EP 0481659, EP 0481660, WO 92/13631, WO 93/00155, WO 94/01209, and WO 9425151. However the prior art does not describe how to use such membranes in actual C8 aromatics processing in the petrochemical cycle nor does the prior art describe how to use such membranes in combination with existing processes to significantly enhance their paraxylene production capability.
- The present invention is therefore directed to a chemical plant and process which offers an improvement over the prior art for the production of paraxylene from C8 aromatics streams. The present invention resides in the specific application of a zeolite membrane unit and process in a paraxylene or paraxylene with orthoxylene and/or metaxylene recovery process. This invention utilises zeolite membranes to continuously separate paraxylene and/or ethylbenzene from xylenes, or to isomerise ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene and/or ethylbenzene to xylenes and simultaneously or subsequently separate paraxylene from the xylenes mixture. The use of a zeolite membrane unit and process in for example a process for paraxylene recovery provides for a significant improvement in paraxylene production when compared to conventional paraxylene recovery processes.
- Accordingly the present invention provides a process for recovering paraxylene from a C8 aromatics stream containing paraxylene and at least one other isomer of xylene, ethylbenzene, or mixtures thereof which process comprises:
- (a) recovering by means of a paraxylene separation process in a paraxylene recovery unit a portion of said paraxylene from at least a portion of said C8 aromatics stream to produce a first stream having a reduced paraxylene content and containing at least a portion of said other isomers of xylene, said ethylbenzene, or mixtures thereof;
- (b) passing at least a portion of said first stream directly or indirectly to a zeolite membrane unit comprising a zeolite membrane and optionally isomerisation catalyst under isomerization conditions, such that the permeate withdrawn through the zeolite membrane and from the zeolite membrane unit is enriched in is paraxylene when compared to the feed to the zeolite membrane unit and
- (c) feeding the permeate directly or indirectly back to the paraxylene separation process.
- Preferably there is an additional step between (a) and (b) wherein at least a portion of said first stream is subjected to an isomerisation process in an isomerisation unit to produce an isomerate having an enriched paraxylene content compared to that of the first stream; and it is at least a portion of this isomerate stream which is passed to the zeolite membrane unit. Most preferably the permeate withdrawn from the zeolite membrane unit is enriched in paraxylene compared to the equilibrium concentration of paraxylene in a xylenes equilibrium mixture.
- The present invention further provides for a paraxylene recovery plant comprising:
- (a) paraxylene recovery unit, and
- (b) a zeolite membrane unit comprising a zeolite membrane and optionally isomerisation catalyst.
- Preferably the paraxylene recovery plant comprises an isomerisation unit in addition to the paraxylene recovery unit and zeolite membrane unit.
- The paraxylene recovery unit uses separation technology to produce a paraxylene enriched stream and a paraxylene depleted stream. Such separation technology includes for example the known processes of fractional crystallisation, or selective adsorption using for example molecular sieve adsorbers. The paraxylene recovery unit may therefore be a fractional crystallisation unit which utilises the difference in freezing points between ethylbenzene, ortho-, meta- and paraxylene or it may be a selective adsorption unit which commonly utilises zeolite materials to selectively adsorb paraxylene from C8 aromatics streams; the adsorbed paraxylene is recovered after desorbing from the zeolite. The paraxylene recovery unit may also be a combination of such separation units, or may incorporate other less commonly used techniques such as fractional distillation.
- Fractional crystallisation units are well known in the art and are described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,120,911. Commercially available processes include the crystallisation isofining process, direct contact CO2 crystallisers, scraped drum crystallisers, and continuous countercurrent crystallisation processes. The crystalliser may operate for example in the manner described in Machell et. al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,662,013. Commercial fractional crystallisation processes typically recover about 60% to 68% of the paraxylene from the feed to the paraxylene recovery unit when this feed is an equilibrium or near equilibrium mixture of xylenes and ethylbenzene. The reason for this is that they are limited by the formation of a eutectic between paraxylene and metaxylene. However the actual recovery depends on the composition of the feed with higher recoveries possible when the paraxylene content of the feed is higher than the xylenes equilibrium content.
- Selective adsorption units are also well known in the art and are described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,706,812, 3,732,325, 4,886,929, and references cited therein, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Commercially available processes include UOP PAREX™, and IFP-Chevron ELUXYL™ processes. Commercial molecular sieve selective adsorption processes may recover higher levels of paraxylene than fractional crystallisation processes; typically they recover over 90% or more typically over 95% of the paraxylene from the feed to the paraxylene recovery unit.
- The paraxylene recovery unit produces a paraxylene enriched stream that usually comprises over 99% and may even be as high as 99.9% paraxylene. The exact amount depends on the process used and the design and operating conditions of the specific plant. The balance in this stream being ethylbenzene, ortho-, and metaxylene, toluene, and C9 aromatics, paraffin's, naphthenes and possibly small amounts of other materials. The paraxylene recovery also produces a paraxylene depleted stream containing the balance of ethylbenzene, ortho-, and metaxylene, toluene, C9 aromatics, paraffins, etc. along with any paraxylene fed to the paraxylene recovery unit that is not removed in the paraxylene rich stream. It is this paraxylene depleted stream which is then fed to the isomerisation unit and/or zeolite membrane unit.
- The C8 aromatics stream which is used as the feed for the paraxylene separation unit may come from a variety of sources in the petrochemical plant. One possible source is from naphtha reforming. Examples of such processes include Exxon POWERFORMING™, UOP Platforming™, IFP Aromizing™. Another possible source is pyrolysis gasoline from steam cracking processes although this is likely to be a minor source of such streams. A further possible source is the UOP Cyclar process for conversion of C3/C4 hydrocarbon streams to aromatics (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,563, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference). A further possible source is from toluene disproportionation and/or C9 aromatics transalkylation. Examples of such processes include UOP TATORAY™, TORAY TAC9™, Mobil Selective Toluene Disproportionation™ (MSTDP), Mobil Toluene Disproportionation™ (MTDP), IFP Xylenes PLUS™ and FINA T2BX™. There are other possible sources of C8 aromatics streams. The source of C8 aromatics stream for the process of the present invention is not critical and may be a single stream or may be a combination of streams from any of the above processes.
- The isomerisation unit may be any of the well known units in the art such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,236,996, 4,163,028, 4,188,282, 4,224,141, 4,218,573, 4,236,996, 4,899,011, 3,856,872 and Re. 30,157, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- The isomerisation catalyst may be any of the well known catalysts for isomerisation units in the art. There are primarily two types of catalyst system which are used in isomerisation units. The choice of catalyst has an impact on the overall yield and structure of the aromatics complex and also on the plant design and economics. The first type of catalyst is designed to convert ethylbenzene to xylenes and to isomerise the paraxylene depleted feed stock to a near equilibrium xylene composition. This type of catalyst system is generally the choice for aromatics producers whose objective is to maximise para and ortho-xylene production from a fixed quantity of feed stock. A second catalyst system is also designed to isomerise the para xylene depleted feed stock; however rather than converting ethylbenzene to xylenes, this catalyst system dealkylates the ethylbenzene to produce benzene. This catalyst system is often employed when the benzene requirements are high relative to ortho and para xylene production or when feed stock availability is not a limiting factor.
- Examples of processes and catalyst systems which include the capability of converting ethylbenzene to benzene are the Mobil MHTI (Mobil High Temperature Isomerisation) process and catalyst (see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,856,871 and 4,638,105, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference), the Mobil MHAI (Mobil High Activity Isomerisation) process and catalyst, the AMOCO AMSAC process and catalyst and the UOP ISOMAR™ I-100 process and catalyst.
- Examples of processes and catalyst systems which include the capability of converting ethylbenzene to xylenes are the IFP/ENGELHARD Octafining and Octafining II processes and catalyst, and the UOP ISOMAR™ I-9 process and catalyst. Other processes include catalysts capable of converting ethylbenzene to C10 aromatics. Other processes do not include ethylbenzene conversion.
- Isomerization units typically use a zeolite or mordenite type catalyst. Isomerization catalysts known to promote conversion of ortho and metaxylene to paraxylene include metal promoted molecular sieves such as for example Pt Promoted ZSM-5, Pt promoted Mordenite and metal promoted borosilicates etc. Commercial examples are Mobil MHAI and ISOMAR™ I-9 catalyst.
- The isomerization reactor is arranged and effective to isomerise ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene at these conditions and also advantageously to convert ethylbenzene to benzene and/or xylenes. The term “arranged and effective” is used in this application to denote that conditions in a process unit are as described in this specification to include the temperatures, pressures, space velocities, reaction time, other reactants, and any other process conditions necessary to achieve the desired reaction, conversion or separation that is the normal function of that process unit.
- Operating temperatures are typically in the range of 400 to 900° F. and pressures in the range of 25 to 500 PSIG. The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) based on hydrocarbon feed typically ranges from 0.5 to 20. Most isomerization catalyst systems require a source of hydrogen which can be introduced to the isomerization reactor to promote the isomerization reaction that converts ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene, to assist in the conversion of ethylbenzene to benzene and or xylenes and assists also in the prevention of coking of the isomerisation catalyst.
- In one aspect of the present invention the zeolite membrane unit is used to selectively separate paraxylene and/or ethylbenzene from a stream which comprises ethylbenzene and an equilibrium or near equilibrium mixture of xylenes. In this aspect the zeolite membrane unit may be located downstream of an isomerisation unit and does not have an isomerisation catalyst in combination with the membrane.
- In a further aspect of the present invention, a zeolite membrane unit utilises an isomerisation catalyst in combination with the membrane to isomerise ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene in co-operation with the selective separation function of the membrane and may also include the catalytic conversion of ethylbenzene to benzene or xylenes.
- In this aspect of the present invention the zeolite membrane may itself be rendered catalytically active for the isomerisation reaction or an appropriate isomerisation catalyst may be located proximate to the membrane. By proximate to the membrane is meant that the catalyst is arranged and effective to isomerise the ortho- and/or metaxylene and/or ethylbenzene in the material in the zeolite membrane unit but upstream of the zeolite membrane to produce paraxylene. The exact amount of paraxylene which is required to be produced by the isomerisation process in the zeolite membrane unit depends in part on the properties of the zeolite membrane used. If the membrane for example has high flux and/or high selectivity for paraxylene then it may be possible or even desirable for the isomerisation reaction to produce and maintain paraxylene at a none equilibrium concentration compared to its concentration in an equilibrium xylene mixture whilst the membrane selectively removes paraxylene from the upstream material and into the permeate. However the isomerisation catalyst in the zeolite membrane unit should ideally be arranged and effective to produce and maintain paraxylene, upstream of the membrane and inside the zeolite membrane unit, at 50% or more, preferably 80% or more, and most preferably 90% or more of the paraxylene equilibrium concentration whilst the membrane selectively removes paraxylene from the upstream side of the membrane and into the permeate. Depending on membrane properties it may be desirable and preferable to maintain the paraxylene concentration at or near to equilibrium for xylenes isomerisation whilst the membrane selectively removes paraxylene from the retentate into the permeate. Thus the isomerisation catalyst causes the ortho- and metaxylene to convert to paraxylene and the paraxylene selectively permeates through the zeolite membrane to be produced as a permeate stream. Ortho- and metaxylene less readily pass through the zeolite membrane and tend to stay on the upstream side in the retentate stream where they can be further isomerised. The permeate stream from xylenes isomerisation unit may be fractionated to remove materials boiling below and above the boiling point of xylenes e.g. benzene, toluene and C9+ aromatics and then transferred to the paraxylene recovery unit. If the zeolite membrane unit is particularly efficient at isomerisation and separation there may theoretically be no retentate stream as there would be no paraxylene depleted stream to reject. In practice there will however likely be impurities and heavier aromatic compounds such as C9 aromatics which remain in the retentate stream and must be purged from the zeolite membrane unit for further treatment. Thus in the zeolite membrane unit there is a dynamic and coupled process of isomerisation and separation of xylenes. If the catalytic function is also capable of converting ethylbenzene to benzene or xylenes then any ethylbenzene which enters into the retentate stream of the unit is also involved in this dynamic process with the resulting xylenes entering into the xylenes isomerisation reactions or the resulting benzene passing through the membrane into the permeate stream. In this aspect the zeolite membrane unit may be downstream of an isomerisation unit or may be used in place of an isomerisation unit.
- In a further aspect the zeolite membrane is used to selectively separate ethylbenzene with a small amount of paraxylene from a paraxylene depleted feedstream as is typically found after a paraxylene separation process. In this aspect the zeolite membrane unit is located between the paraxylene separation unit and an ethylbenzene isomerisation unit. The feed to the isomerisation unit is enriched in ethylbenzene and improves the efficiency of the ethylbenzene isomerisation process in this unit. The output from this isomerisation unit is enriched in paraxylene and passes into a conventional paraxylene isomerisation unit along with the retentate from the zeolite membrane unit. In such a process the paraxylene isomerisation unit is required to convert lower levels of ethylbenzene and therefore may be operated at lower temperatures and may in fact be a liquid phase isomerisation unit which has no ethylbenzene conversion activity. The overall effect of this use of the zeolite membrane is to enhance the conversion of ethylbenzene to useful xylenes and to significantly reduce the xylene losses which usually occur due to the use of high temperature isomerisation units such as ISOMAR™ or MHTI™. A further modification of this aspect of the present invention is to include a catalytic function into the zeolite membrane unit. This catalytic function may be for ethylbenzene conversion and may be located within the membrane itself. This catalytic function may advantageously be located proximate to the membrane on the permeate side of the zeolite membrane. The function of this catalyst is to catalyse the conversion of ethylbenzene to xylenes. The effect of this is to deplete the concentration of ethylbenzene on the permeate side of the membrane and in doing so sets up a concentration gradient across the membrane which increases the quantity of ethylbenzene transferred from the retentate stream into the permeate stream. If the ethylbenzene conversion catalyst in the zeolite membrane unit is particularly efficient there may be no need for the ethylbenzene isomerisation unit which is located downstream of the zeolite membrane unit. In a further embodiment a second zeolite membrane unit for selective paraxylene separation or for selective paraxylene separation and isomerisation, may be located downstream of the paraxylene isomerisation unit. The permeate stream from xylenes isomerisation unit or the second zeolite membrane unit if present may be fractionated to remove materials boiling below and above the boiling point of xylenes e.g. benzene, toluene and C9+ aromatics and then transferred to the paraxylene recovery unit. Optionally, the retentate stream may be combined with the permeate stream and the combined streams fractionated and transferred to the paraxylene recovery unit for recovery of a paraxylene rich stream.
- Examples of zeolite membranes which may be used in zeolite membrane units for the present invention are described in the following documents. U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,478, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference, describes the direct synthesis of zeolite membranes. The membranes produced in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,478 were discussed in “Synthesis and Characterisation of a Pure Zeolite Membrane,” J. G. Tsikoyiannis and W. Haag, Zeolites (Vol. 12, p. 126., 1992). Such membranes are free standing and are not affixed or attached as layers to any supports. Zeolite membranes have also been grown on supports. See e.g. “High temperature stainless steel supported zeolite (MFI) membranes: Preparation, Module, Construction and Permeation Experiments,” E. R. Geus, H. vanBekkum, J. A. Moulyin, Microporous Materials, Vol. 1, p. 137, 1993; Netherlands Patent Application 91011048; European Patent Application 91309239.1 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,099,692, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Other literature describing supported inorganic crystalline molecular sieve layers includes U.S. Pat. No. 4,699,892; J. C. Jansen et at, Proceedings of 9th International Zeolite Conference 1992 (in which lateral and axial orientations of the crystals with respect to the support surface are described), J. Shi et al, Synthesis of Self-supporting Zeolite Films, 15th Annual Meeting of the British Zeolite Association, 1992, Poster Presentation (in which oriented Gmelinite crystal layers are described); and S. Feng et al, Nature, Apr. 28, 1994, p 834 (which discloses an oriented zeolite X analogue layer), the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- Further examples of zeolite membranes which may be used in zeolite membrane units for the present invention are described in the following documents; International Application WO 94/25151, U.S. Ser. No. 267,760 filed Jul. 8, 1994, PCT US95/08512, PCT US95/08514, PCT US95/08513, PCT EP95/02704 and WO94/01209, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In our earlier International Application WO 94/25151 we have described a supported inorganic layer comprising optionally contiguous particles of a crystalline molecular sieve, the mean particle size being within the range of from 20 nm to 1 μm. The support is advantageously porous. When the pores of the support are covered to the extent that they are effectively closed, and the support is continuous, a molecular sieve membrane results; such membranes have the advantage that they may perform catalysis and separation simultaneously if desired. Preferred zeolite membranes are those which are prepared by the Inverted In-Situ-Crystallisation (I-ISC) process, or by using a GEL layer and a Low Alkaline synthesis solution using the Inverted In-Situ-Crystallisation process (GEL-LAI-ISC), or by using a Seeding Layer and a Low-Alkaline-synthesis solution using the Inverted In-Situ Crystallisation (S-LAI-ISC). These processes are described in U.S. Ser. No. 267,760 filed Jul. 8, 1994, PCT US95/08512, PCT US95/08514, PCT US95/08513 and PCT EP95/02704. Zeolite compositions fabricated using the above described LAI-ISC, GEL-LAI-ISC or S-LAI-ISC techniques can have dense zeolite layers in which the zeolite crystals are intergrown such that non-selective permeation pathways in these as-synthesised zeolite layers are virtually non-existent. The zeolite membranes described above may be incorporated into the zeolite membrane unit in the form of a module such as that described in WO94/01209. It is envisaged that the zeolite membrane unit will contain at least one zeolite membrane which may or may not be catalytically active. If the membrane is not catalytically active for the desired process a suitable catalyst may be used in combination with the membrane. This catalyst may be located on the upstream side of the membrane or the downstream side of the membrane depending on the process and the nature and purpose of the catalyst. In one embodiment one or more membranes may be arranged with one or more catalysts to provide alternating membrane and catalyst regions in the zeolite membrane unit. In this arrangement the feedstream to the unit may for example pass through a membrane region with the retentate flowing to a catalyst containing region and then through a second membrane region to a second catalyst region. The exact number of membrane and catalyst regions will depend on the nature of the separations and catalyst processes desired. The separation and catalyst process may be substantially the same for each combination of catalyst and membrane or may be different.
- It should be understood that two or more zeolite membrane units with or without isomerisation catalyst in close proximity to the zeolite membrane in each unit may be used in the processes of the present invention. Reference to zeolite membrane unit in this specification should also be taken to include embodiments where two or more zeolite membrane units may be used in sequence to each other with or without any further intervening processes or process units.
- The zeolite membrane unit may be installed downstream of an existing xylenes isomerization reactor or installed as a replacement of an isomerization reactor in an existing paraxylene recovery process. The zeolite membrane unit may be added to an existing process solely for separation of paraxylene from xylenes, or for both isomerization and separation. The most preferred option is to have the zeolite membrane unit downstream of a xylenes isomerisation unit and for the zeolite membrane unit to comprise a zeolite membrane and an isomerisation catalyst so that it performs both isomerisation of xylenes, and selective separation of paraxylene; optionally it also catalyses conversion of ethylbenzene to xylenes or benzene. If the zeolite membrane unit catalyses conversion of ethylbenzene to xylenes or benzene then this may allow less conversion of ethylbenzene in the conventional isomerisation unit with less xylene losses due to the lower operating temperature which would be required in the conventional isomerisation unit.
- It is preferred that the zeolite membrane unit is incorporated into a conventional xylene recovery loop such as that shown in FIG. 1 and discussed below. The xylene recovery process is referred to as a “loop” because xylenes not converted to paraxylene are recycled to the isomerization unit that is usually a part of the xylene recovery loop again and again until the xylenes are converted to paraxylene and removed from the loop via the paraxylene separation unit. In such a loop orthoxylene may also be a product which is removed from the loop in the xylene splitter if desired. Orthoxylene can sometimes be generated by the isomerisation unit if the feed to that unit has a less than equilibrium orthoxylene concentration.
- As indicated above the fresh feed for the xylene recovery loop may come from a variety of sources in the petrochemical cycle. Fresh feed from, for example, a reformer, which is introduced to the xylene recovery loop is usually fractionated before introduction to the paraxylene separation unit to remove materials boiling below the boiling point of xylenes, and may optionally also be fractionated to remove at least part of the material boiling above the boiling point of xylenes. If lower boiling materials are not removed from the fresh feed, it is introduced to a detoluenizer tower (“DETOL”) which removes toluene and lighter materials by distillation. The feed is then introduced to either a xylene rerun tower or splitter. A xylene rerun tower removes C9+ aromatics from the feed. A xylene splitter tower in addition removes at least part of the orthoxylene for subsequent recovery as orthoxylene product in an orthoxylene rerun tower. The fresh feed in a xylenes loop is combined with a recycle stream which comes from the xylene isomerisation unit or in the present invention from the zeolite membrane unit. The overhead stream from the xylene rerun tower or splitter is typically a mixture of compounds which includes 0 to 10 wt % non aromatics, 0 to 5 wt % toluene, 5 to 20 wt % ethylbenzene, 0 to 10 wt % C8 naphthenes, and 70 to 95 wt % xylenes. The exact composition will depend on the fresh feed and the nature of the catalysts used in the isomerisation unit and in the zeolite membrane unit. It should be appreciated that the fresh feed to the xylenes recovery loop could be a combination of two or more feeds such as those discussed above. Thus it could be a combination of a feed from a naphtha reformer with that from a TATORAY™ or MSTDP™ unit.
- It should be understood that in the present description when reference is made to a feed to, or material upstream of the membrane, in a zeolite membrane unit being at equilibrium in xylenes this means that it can be a mixture of xylenes which are at the typical respective concentrations for an equilibrium mixture of xylenes as known in the art. In the same context by near equilibrium is meant a composition comprising xylenes in which one or more of the xylenes present are at their none equilibrium concentration with respect to the other xylenes present and includes mixtures where one or more of the xylene isomers are present at a concentration which is greater than their equilibrium concentration. Ideally in such mixtures the paraxylene should be present at 50% or more, preferably 80% or more and most preferably at 90% or more of the paraxylene equilibrium concentration.
- Other objects and features of the invention are described in the following detailed description wherein reference is made to the accompanying figures.
- FIG. 1 shows conventional xylenes loop comprising a paraxylene separation unit and an isomerisation unit.
- FIG. 2 shows a xylene purification loop utilising a zeolite membrane unit.
- FIG. 3 is a xylene purification loop utilising a zeolite membrane unit downstream of an isomerization unit.
- FIG. 4 shows a xylene purification loop utilising an isomerization unit upstream of a zeolite membrane unit without isomerisation catalyst and used for separating a paraxylene enriched stream that is transferred to a paraxylene recovery unit.
- FIG. 5 shows a xylene purification loop having an isomerization unit upstream from a zeolite membrane unit without isomerisation catalyst and used for separating a paraxylene enriched stream that is then transferred to a xylene splitter.
- FIG. 6 shows a xylene purification loop which utilises an ethylbenzene membrane separation unit upstream of an ethylbenzene isomerisation unit which is upstream of an xylene isomerisation unit.
- In FIG. 1 fresh feed containing xylenes is introduced to a
xylene splitter 2 throughfresh feed line 1. A bottom stream 3 is withdrawn from thexylene splitter 2 containing materials having boiling points above xylenes and possibly containing orthoxylene. Anoverhead stream 4 is withdrawn from the xylene splitter containing xylenes and ethylbenzene. Theoverhead stream 4 is fed toparaxylene recovery unit 5. Xylenes are separated inparaxylene recovery unit 5 to yield a paraxylenerich stream 6 and a paraxylene poor stream 7. The paraxylene recovery unit normally uses fractional crystallisation and/or molecular sieve separation to separate paraxylene fromother stream 4 components. The paraxylene poor stream 7 is then introduced to an isomerization (ISOM)unit 8 which contains an isomerization catalyst arranged and effective to promote isomerization of ortho and metaxylene to paraxylene and the conversion of ethylbenzenes to benzene and/or xylenes or other compounds. Theisomerate 9 from theisomerisation unit 8 is then introduced tostabiliser 10.Stabiliser 10 separates five carbon and lighter compounds fromstream 9 through differences in boiling points. Five carbon and lighter compounds are withdrawn fromstabiliser 10 throughline 11 and six carbon and heavier compounds are withdrawn fromstabiliser 10 throughline 12. The stream inline 12 is introduced to aDETOL unit 13 to remove toluene and lighter compounds throughline 14. Xylenes and heavier materials are withdrawn fromDETOL unit 13 throughline 15 and introduced toxylene splitter 2. Normallyfresh feed 2 and the xylenes withdrawn from theDETOL 13 throughline 15 are passed through clay treaters which in order to simplify the figures are not shown in FIGS. 1 to 6. As an alternative to thesplitter 2 described in FIG. 1 a rerun tower may be used. It is to be understood that when reference is made to a splitter in this specification that this reference also encompasses the use of a rerun tower in place of the splitter. For the purposes of this application the description “splitter” shall be used when substantial orthoxylene is removed in the bottoms and “rerun” shall be used when it is not. - There are a number of disadvantages associated with this conventional process arrangement for paraxylene recovery. The first is that this combination of process steps requires a significant recycle through the loop in order to remove the maximum possible amounts of paraxylene. This is primarily due to the fact that the isomerisation unit and processes are only able to produce equilibrium or near equilibrium mixture of xylenes for the recycle in the isomerate. A typical concentration of paraxylene in the isomerate from such a unit is 22 wt %. Another problem is that in most isomerisation processes there are xylenes losses of up to 4% or higher. Thus with repeated recycles this loss of xylenes to undesirable products may be significant.
- FIG. 2 shows a xylene purification loop according to the present invention. Fresh feed containing xylenes is introduced to a
xylene splitter 21 throughfresh feed line 20. Abottom stream 22 is withdrawn fromxylene splitter 21 containing materials having boiling points above xylenes and possibly containing orthoxylene. Anoverhead stream 23 is withdrawn from the xylene splitter containing xylenes and ethylbenzene. Theoverhead stream 23 is fed toparaxylene recovery unit 24. Xylenes are separated inparaxylene recovery unit 24 to yield a paraxylenerich stream 25 and a paraxylenepoor stream 26. The paraxylene recovery unit normally uses fractional crystallisation and/or molecular sieve separation to separate paraxylene fromother stream 23 components. The paraxylenepoor stream 26 is then introduced tozeolite membrane unit 27.Zeolite membrane unit 27 includes catalyst arranged and effective to promote isomerization of ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene and the conversion of ethylbenzenes to benzene and/or xylenes or other compounds. The zeolite membrane also selectively permits permeation of paraxylene through the membrane relative to ortho- and metaxylene. A stream enriched in paraxylene is withdrawn fromzeolite membrane unit 27 aspermeate stream 28. The remaining material inretentate stream 29 should ideally be at equilibrium or near equilibrium in xylenes. Thepermeate stream 28 andretentate stream 29 may be treated separately (not shown in FIG. 2) or combined to form combinedfeed 30 and introduced tostabiliser 31.Stabiliser 31 separates five carbon and lighter compounds fromstream 30 through differences in boiling points. Five carbon and lighter compounds are withdrawn fromstabiliser 31 throughline 32 and six carbon and heavier compounds are withdrawn fromstabiliser 31 throughline 33. The stream inline 33 is introduced to aDETOL unit 34 to remove toluene and lighter compounds throughline 35. Xylenes and heavier materials are withdrawn fromDETOL unit 34 throughline 36 and introduced toxylene splitter 21. In addition it is also possible to introduce all or some of the fresh feed directly into thezeolite membrane unit 27 as indicated atline 37. This would have the advantage of further increasing the concentration of paraxylene in the paraxylene recovery unit feed, because a higher proportion of that feed would be derived from the zeolite membrane unit product rather than from the fresh feed having only an equilibrium or near equilibrium paraxylene concentration. However this approach requires a larger zeolite membrane unit, and may require a larger retentate stream to purge heavy aromatics brought in with the fresh feed, so there is an economic optimum for each application regarding how much, if any of the fresh feed to route directly to the zeolite membrane unit. For example in a retrofit situation where the paraxylene recovery unit capacity is limiting the plant production rate, it would likely be advantageous to route at least a portion of fresh feed to the zeolite membrane unit. - This embodiment of the present invention has a significant advantage over the conventional process as described in FIG. 1. The zeolite membrane unit produces a permeate with a greater than equilibrium amount of paraxylene and a retentate which has an equilibrium or near equilibrium concentration. The combined products will have a higher paraxylene content than is possible with the conventional isomerisation unit, which is limited by equilibrium. When those streams are recycled to the paraxylene recovery unit via the xylene splitter the paraxylene concentration is increased there, increasing per pass paraxylene recovery and reducing recycle which is a problem with conventional processes. In this embodiment the zeolite membrane unit is required to relatively efficiently isomerise xylenes and convert ethylbenzene and requires a zeolite membrane which has selectivity for paraxylene and exhibits acceptable flux through the membrane. Such membranes may be prepared using the LAI-ISC, S-LAI-ISC and GEL-LAI-ISC methods described above.
- The particularly preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 3. Fresh feed containing xylenes is introduced to
xylene splitter 41 throughfresh feed line 40. A bottom stream containing 9 carbon and heavier compounds and possibly containing orthoxylene is withdrawn from xylene splitter throughline 42. An overhead stream containing xylenes and ethylbenzene is withdrawn fromxylene splitter 41 throughline 43 and introduced toparaxylene recovery unit 44. Paraxylene is recovered in a paraxylenerich stream 45 while ortho- and metaxylene are recovered in paraxylenepoor stream 46. The paraxylenepoor stream 46 is introduced to anisomerization unit 47 which contains an isomerization catalyst arranged and effective to promote isomerization of ortho and metaxylene to paraxylene and the conversion of ethylbenzenes to benzene and/or xylenes or other compounds. Isomerised product is withdrawn throughline 48 and introduced to zeolite membrane unit 49 containing zeolite membrane, catalyst that both isomerises ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene and in which unit there is selective permeation of paraxylene through the zeolite membrane relative to ortho- and metaxylene. It should be noted that in this embodiment the catalyst may be incorporated into the membrane or the membrane itself may be catalytically active or rendered catalytically active or preferably it may be located on the upstream or inlet side of the membrane but in close proximity to the membrane. A stream enriched in paraxylene is withdrawn fromzeolite membrane unit 50 throughpermeate stream 51. The remaining material leaves inretentate stream 52.Permeate stream 51 andretentate stream 52 may be treated differently (not shown in FIG. 3) or they may be combined inline 53 and introduced tostabiliser 54.Stabiliser 54 separates five carbon and lighter compounds fromstream 53 through differences in boiling points. Five carbon and lighter compounds are withdrawn fromstabiliser 54 throughline 55 and six carbon and heavier compounds are withdrawn fromstabiliser 54 throughline 56. The stream inline 56 is introduced to aDETOL unit 57 to remove toluene and lighter compounds throughline 58. Xylenes and heavier materials are withdrawn fromDETOL unit 57 throughline 59 and introduced toxylene splitter 41. In addition it is also possible for some or all of the fresh feed to be introduced to theisomerisation unit 47 or to thezeolite membrane unit 50 or to both as indicated atlines 60 and/or 61. The reason for using such a split feed has already been discussed above in relation to FIG. 2. Diverting fresh feed to either the isomerisation unit vialine 60 or the zeolite membrane unit vialine 61 would have similar benefits in terms of reduced xylene loop recycle. Usingline 61 reduces flow through the isomerisation unit versus that required ifline 60 is used. However it may still be advantageous to utiliseline 60 since then it would combine with the feed inline 46 and could use the same pumps and/or reactor preheating equipment. This may be particularly advantageous if the zeolite membrane unit and the isomerisation unit operate under similar conditions where isomerisation unit effluent flows directly to the zeolite membrane unit without the need for heating, cooling and/or pressure change. In that situation, stream 53 would typically be cooled by transferring its heat to the isomerisation unit feed to provide at least part of the reactor preheat. Such feed/effluent heat exchange systems usually work at their most efficient when feed and effluent flow rates are approximately the same. The optimum distribution of fresh feed amongstlines - This particularly preferred embodiment not only has significant advantages over the prior art process of FIG. 1 but also has some significant advantages over that of FIG. 2. The combination of the isomerisation unit and the zeolite membrane unit downstream of the isomerisation unit enables the beneficial attributes of both units to be combined for maximum paraxylene production. The embodiment in FIG. 2 requires a particularly efficient zeolite membrane unit, as the feed to this unit which is derived from the paraxylene recovery unit is significantly depleted in paraxylene. The paraxylene content may be as low as 1% or less with the balance being mainly ortho- and metaxylene, ethylbenzene and minor amounts of other materials. This means that the zeolite membrane unit must be able to quickly isomerise this feed to produce the required amount of paraxylene on the upstream side of the membrane which exact concentration of paraxylene depends on the membrane properties and in some case will need to be an equilibrium or near equilibrium mixture of xylenes to achieve maximum efficiency in the process. Furthermore the zeolite membrane unit must also efficiently convert ethylbenzene or this will build up in the xylenes loop. The use of an isomerisation unit in combination with the zeolite membrane unit in FIG. 3 overcomes these deficiencies with the embodiment of FIG. 2. Firstly the isomerate from the isomerisation unit is already enriched in paraxylene and is typically at equilibrium or near equilibrium with respect to xylenes. This means that the zeolite membrane unit only has to maintain the isomerate in or near this state to enable the membrane to work efficiently. Secondly because the isomerisation unit has the capability of ethylbenzene conversion, the ability of the zeolite membrane unit to destroy ethylbenzene, although desirable is not critical. Typically promoting xylenes equilibrium is easier that destroying ethylbenzene. The negative aspect of xylene losses which normally occur in the isomerisation unit is offset by the greatly reduced recycle needed when using the zeolite membrane unit in this embodiment. Also if the zeolite membrane unit does have at least some ethylbenzene conversion capability the isomerisation unit does not have to do as much of this conversion. This would allow for the isomerisation unit to be operated under milder conditions and therefore result in less xylenes loss in the isomerisation unit. Also because there is no need to for the feed to the zeolite membrane unit to be brought to equilibrium in this unit, as is required with some membranes when used in FIG. 2 embodiment, it may need significantly less catalyst and be significantly smaller in size compared to the zeolite membrane unit which is required for FIG. 2. In the particularly preferred embodiment of FIG. 3 when a membrane of selectivity of 5 for paraxylene/(ortho- and metaxylene) and a flux of greater than 10 Kg/m2/day is used the predicted level of paraxylene in the feed leaving the zeolite membrane unit compared to the isomerate leaving the isomerisation unit is 55 wt % compared to 22 wt % (the equilibrium concentration if about 10 wt % non-xylenes are present). This provides for an overall increase in paraxylene production in the cycle of 50% or more. Suitable membranes for use in a zeolite membrane unit to provide such improved performance are described for example in U.S. Ser. No. 267,760 filed Jul. 8, 1994, PCT US95/08512, PCT US95/08514, PCT US95/08513 and PCT EP95/02704.
- FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of the invention using a zeolite membrane to separate paraxylene from a xylene stream. Fresh feed containing xylenes is introduced to
xylene splitter 101 throughfresh feed line 100. Compounds boiling above xylenes and possibly including orthoxylene are withdrawn throughbottom stream 102 and xylene and lighter boiling compounds are withdrawn asoverhead stream 103.Overhead stream 103 is introduced toisomerization unit 104 throughintermediate line 105. Theisomerization unit 104 converts ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene and promotes the conversion of ethylbenzenes to benzene and/or xylenes or other compounds. Unconverted ortho- and metaxylene along with paraxylene are withdrawn fromisomerization unit 104 throughline 106 and introduced tostabiliser 107. 5 carbon and lighter boiling compounds are withdrawn fromstabiliser 107 throughline 108 with the balance of material withdrawn throughline 109 and introduced toDETOL unit 110. Toluene and lighter boiling compounds are withdrawn fromDETOL unit 110 throughline 111 and xylenes are withdrawn throughline 112 and introduced tozeolite membrane unit 113.Zeolite membrane unit 113 comprises a zeolite membrane that is arranged and effective to permit selective permeation of paraxylene relative to ortho- and metaxylene. Most paraxylene is withdrawn throughpermeate stream 114 and introduced toparaxylene recovery unit 115. Most ortho- and metaxylene are withdrawn fromzeolite membrane unit 113 throughretentate stream 116 and introduced toxylene splitter 101. Theparaxylene recovery unit 115 separates paraxylene from ortho- metaxylene. Paraxylene is withdrawn through paraxylenerich stream 117 and the balance of ortho- and metaxylene are withdrawn through paraxylenepoor stream 118. Paraxylenepoor stream 118 is introduced toisomerization reactor 104 throughline 105. Alternatively all or part ofoverhead stream 103 may be directed to thezeolite membrane unit 113 vialine stream 103 depends on an economic balance amongst several parameters, namely isomerisation unit, per pass xylenes losses and ethylbenzene conversion and the zeolite membrane unit's relative selectivity between paraxylene and ethylbenzene.Routing steam 103 tozeolite membrane unit 113 has the advantage of avoiding whatever xylenes losses it would have incurred if it had been passed through theisomerisation unit 104. However there is a potential risk in this instance that ethylbenzene will build up in the xylenes loop. For example ifzeolite membrane unit 113 ensured that all the ethylbenzene was retained in theretentate 116 the ethylbenzene would be retained in the xylenes loop without removal or destruction and would build up indefinitely as additional ethylbenzene is brought into the loop in the fresh feed. However if the selectivity of the zeolite membrane in the unit was such that a substantial portion of the ethylbenzene permeated through the membrane and intostream 114 then that portion of the ethylbenzene would pass to theisomerisation unit 104 vialines stream 103 passes to the zeolite membrane unit and the remainder flows to the isomerisation unit. In this case the flow to the isomerisation unit acts as a purge to prevent the build up of ethylbenzene to unacceptable levels if the amount permeating through the membrane in the membrane unit is insufficient. The optimal balance should be determined for each specific application and will depend on the membrane properties and the properties of the xylenes isomerisation catalyst amongst others. - Another embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 5 wherein xylenes are introduced to
xylene splitter 201 throughfresh feed line 200. Compounds boiling above the boiling point of xylenes and possibly some of the orthoxylene are withdrawn fromxylene splitter 201 throughbottoms line 202, xylenes and ethylbenzene are withdrawn throughoverhead stream 203 and introduced toparaxylene recovery unit 204. Paraxylene is withdrawn through paraxylenerich stream 205 and ortho- and metaxylene are withdrawn through paraxylenepoor stream 206. Paraxylenepoor stream 206 is introduced to anisomerization unit 207 throughline 208.Isomerization unit 207 isomerises ortho- and metaxylene to paraxylene and promotes the conversion of ethylbenzene to benzene and/or xylenes or other compounds. The isomerate is withdrawn throughline 209. The isomerate mixture which contains a near equilibrium mixture of ortho-, meta- and paraxylene is introduced tostabiliser 210 throughline 209. 5 carbon and lighter compounds are withdrawn throughline 211 and heavier boiling compounds are withdrawn throughline 212 and introduced toDETOL unit 213. Toluene and lighter boiling compounds are withdrawn throughline 214; xylenes and heavier materials are withdrawn from theDETOL unit 213 throughline 215. Xylenes and heavier materials inline 215 are introduced tozeolite membrane unit 216 which comprises a zeolite membrane arranged and effective to permit selective permeation of paraxylene there through. Most paraxylene is withdrawn throughline 217 and introduced toxylene splitter 201. Ortho- and metaxylene are withdrawn asretentate stream 218 and reintroduced toisomerization unit 207 throughline 208. However it will likely be necessary to purge a portion of this stream toxylene splitter 201 vialine 219 to avoid an excessive build up of C9+ aromatics as they will tend to stay in the retentate and not be removed in the stabiliser or DETOL units. - A further embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 6. In this embodiment the zeolite membrane unit has as its primary function the separation of ethylbenzene from a paraxylene depleted stream so that this may be passed into an ethylbenzene isomerisation unit. Thus a feed comprising xylenes and
ethylbenzene 300 is passed to a xylenere-run fractionation sequence 312 and into aparaxylene recovery unit 301 vialine 315. Paraxylene is withdrawn through paraxylenerich stream 302 and ortho- and metaxylene and ethylbenzene are withdrawn through paraxylenepoor stream 303. Paraxylenepoor stream 303 is introduced to azeolite membrane unit 304 comprising a zeolite membrane which permits selective permeation of ethylbenzene and possibly paraxylene through the zeolite membrane relative to ortho- and metaxylene. Most of the ethylbenzene and possibly most of the paraxylene is withdrawn from thezeolite membrane unit 304 throughpermeate stream 305 and most of the ortho- and metaxylene are withdrawn throughretentate stream 306.Permeate stream 305 passes into anethylbenzene isomerisation unit 307.Ethylbenzene isomerization unit 307 isomerises ethylbenzene to xylenes. The ethylbenzene isomerate is withdrawn throughline 308. Theretentate 306 andethylbenzene isomerate 308 are combined to provide aunified feed 309 to theisomerisation unit 310 which may be a liquid phase xylenes isomerisation unit operating at 200° C. The xylenes isomerate passes from theisomerisation unit 310 throughline 311 to a xylenere-run fractionation sequence 312 which produces aheavy stream 313, alights stream 314 and axylenes recycle 315. The lights stream may be further treated to a fractionation process to produce a C8 naphthene recycle 316 to the ethylbenzene isomerisation unit 307 (shown as dotted lines in the figure). A possible addition to the process described in FIG. 6 is the inclusion of a zeolite membrane unit after theisomerisation unit 310 but before the xylenere-run fractionation sequence 312. This additional zeolite membrane unit would further enrich thestream 311 in paraxylene. - In this embodiment for a given membrane the predicted recovery of ethylbenzene on the permeate side of the membrane is 44 wt % compared to a normal ethylbenzene concentration of 6 to 7 wt %. The ethylbenzene conversion across the ethylbenzene isomerisation unit is 85% which compares favourably with a conventional process where the per pass conversion is 42%. Because a much smaller portion of the xylene loop is subjected to the severe conditions of the ethylbenzene isomerisation unit there are lower overall xylene losses. Also because the xylenes isomerisation unit conditions are less severe than in a combined ethylbenzene/xylenes isomerisation unit the losses of xylenes in this unit are significantly lower; 1% compared to 3 to 4%. This results in an overall yield for paraxylene for this embodiment of 94.5% compared to 84.5% for the conventional xylene loop without zeolite membrane unit. An additional advantage of this embodiment is that the amount of hydrogen circulation is dramatically reduced as the ethylbenzene conversion is in a separate reactor and hydrogen is not required for the xylenes isomerisation unit. This may result in a significant savings on the cost of operating a paraxylene recovery process according to this embodiment compared to the conventional xylenes loop.
Claims (21)
1. A process for recovering paraxylene from a C8 aromatics stream containing paraxylene and at least one other isomer of xylene, ethylbenzene, or mixtures thereof which process comprises:
(a) recovering by means of a paraxylene separation process in a paraxylene recovery unit a portion of said paraxylene from at least a portion of said C8 aromatics stream to produce a first stream having a reduced paraxylene content and containing a portion of said other isomers of xylene, said ethylbenzene, or mixtures thereof;
(b) passing at least a portion of said first stream directly or indirectly to a zeolite membrane unit comprising a zeolite membrane and optionally isomerisation catalyst under isomerization conditions, such that the permeate withdrawn through the zeolite membrane and from the zeolite membrane unit is enriched in paraxylene when compared to the feed to the zeolite membrane unit and
(c) feeding the permeate directly or indirectly back to the paraxylene separation process.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least a portion of said first stream is subjected to an isomerisation process in an isomerisation unit to produce an isomerate having an enriched paraxylene content compared to that of first stream; and at least a portion of the isomerate is passed to the zeolite membrane unit.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the permeate withdrawn from the zeolite membrane unit is enriched in paraxylene compared to the equilibrium concentration of paraxylene in a xylenes equilibrium mixture.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the paraxylene recovery unit comprises a fractional crystallisation unit.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the paraxylene recovery unit comprises an adsorption separation unit.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the paraxylene recovery unit comprises an adsorption separation unit in combination with a fractional crystallisation unit.
7. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the zeolite membrane unit isomerises metaxylene and orthoxylene to paraxylene.
8. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the zeolite membrane unit converts ethylbenzene to benzene and/or xylenes and/or C10 aromatics.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the zeolite membrane unit comprises a zeolite membrane which is active as an isomerization catalyst.
10. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the C8 aromatics feed (fresh feed) is additionally or alternatively introduced to the process directly to the isomerisation unit, directly to the zeolite membrane unit or both.
11. A process for recovering paraxylene from a C8 aromatics stream containing paraxylene and at least one other isomer of xylene, ethylbenzene, or mixtures thereof which process comprises:
(a) recovering by means of a paraxylene separation process in a paraxylene recovery unit a portion of said paraxylene from at least a portion of said C8 aromatics stream to produce a first stream having a reduced paraxylene content and containing a portion of said other isomers of xylene, said ethylbenzene, or mixtures thereof;
(b) passing at least a portion of said first stream directly or indirectly to a zeolite membrane unit comprising a zeolite membrane and optionally isomerisation catalyst under isomerization conditions, such that the permeate withdrawn through the zeolite membrane and from the zeolite membrane unit is enriched in ethylbenzene compared to the retentate;
(c) subjecting at least a portion of said permeate to an ethylbenzene isomerisation process in an ethylbenzene isomerisation unit to produce an isomerate having an enriched paraxylene content compared to that of the permeate;
(d) feeding the isomerate optionally combined with the retentate back to the paraxylene separation process.
12. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the isomerate from (c) optionally combined with the retentate is subjected to a further isomerisation process in a second isomerisation unit to produce a second isomerate having an enriched paraxylene content compared to the feed to the second isomerisation unit and feeding the second isomerate back to the paraxylene separation process.
13. A process as claimed in claim 11 which further comprises a zeolite membrane unit after (c) which produces a permeate enriched in paraxylene compared to the isomerate or second isomerate.
14. A process as claimed in claim 13 wherein the zeolite membrane unit introduced after (c) further comprises a xylenes isomerisation catalyst.
15. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein there is present ethylbenzene isomerisation catalyst either as part of the zeolite membrane or downstream of the zeolite membrane but in close proximity to the membrane or both.
16. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the isomerisation catalyst in the zeolite membrane unit is located in close proximity to the membrane and on the permeate side of the membrane.
17. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 11 wherein the zeolite membrane unit comprises two or more alternating zones of catalyst and zeolite membrane.
18. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 11 wherein there are two or more zeolite membrane units with or without isomerisation catalyst arranged sequentially to each other.
19. A paraxylene recovery plant comprising:
(a) paraxylene recovery unit and
(b) a zeolite membrane unit comprising a zeolite membrane and optionally isomerisation catalyst
20. A plant as claimed in claim 19 which further comprises an isomerisation unit.
21. A process as claimed in claim 1 which comprises a zeolite membrane which has been prepared by either the LAI-ISC, S-LAI-ISC or GEL-LAI-ISC processes.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/062,097 US20020082462A1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 2002-01-31 | Process for production of paraxylene |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/591,064 US6376733B1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1996-01-25 | Process for production of paraxylene |
US10/062,097 US20020082462A1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 2002-01-31 | Process for production of paraxylene |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/591,064 Division US6376733B1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1996-01-25 | Process for production of paraxylene |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020082462A1 true US20020082462A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 |
Family
ID=24364911
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/591,064 Expired - Fee Related US6376733B1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1996-01-25 | Process for production of paraxylene |
US10/062,097 Abandoned US20020082462A1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 2002-01-31 | Process for production of paraxylene |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/591,064 Expired - Fee Related US6376733B1 (en) | 1996-01-25 | 1996-01-25 | Process for production of paraxylene |
Country Status (15)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6376733B1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP0880488B1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP2001513748A (en) |
KR (2) | KR19990081992A (en) |
CN (2) | CN1083822C (en) |
AU (2) | AU713422B2 (en) |
BR (2) | BR9707071A (en) |
CA (2) | CA2244181A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69709061T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2167705T3 (en) |
ID (1) | ID17271A (en) |
RU (2) | RU2184106C2 (en) |
TW (2) | TW399040B (en) |
WO (2) | WO1997027161A1 (en) |
ZA (2) | ZA97629B (en) |
Cited By (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050045029A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-03 | Colling Craig W. | Selective separation of fluid compounds utilizing a membrane separation process |
US20060047145A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047163A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | De Vreede Marcel | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047162A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047154A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047153A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047158A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047146A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047148A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047155A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047157A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047159A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047143A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047147A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047144A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047161A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047156A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047142A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047151A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047150A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047160A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060081500A1 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2006-04-20 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for processing naphtha |
US20060116530A1 (en) * | 2004-11-29 | 2006-06-01 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060205976A1 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20070155986A1 (en) * | 2006-01-04 | 2007-07-05 | Wonders Alan G | Oxidation system employing internal structure for enhanced hydrodynamics |
US20070292320A1 (en) * | 2006-01-04 | 2007-12-20 | Eastman Chemical Company | Oxidation System with Internal Secondary Reactor |
US20090149686A1 (en) * | 2007-10-18 | 2009-06-11 | Philibert Leflaive | Process for separation of c8 aromatic compounds with limited recycling |
US7884232B2 (en) | 2005-06-16 | 2011-02-08 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7902396B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2011-03-08 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
WO2013180888A1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2013-12-05 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Phenol removal in paraxylene recovery process |
WO2014035626A1 (en) * | 2012-08-31 | 2014-03-06 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Xylene isomerization process and catalyst therefor |
US9266796B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2016-02-23 | Uop Llc | Systems and methods for producing desired xylene isomers |
US10647641B2 (en) | 2018-07-20 | 2020-05-12 | Scg Chemicals Co., Ltd. | Process for the separation of ethylbenzene from other C8 aromatic compounds |
WO2020205354A1 (en) | 2019-03-29 | 2020-10-08 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Mel-type zeolite for converting aromatic hydrocarbons, process for making and catalytic composition comprising said zeolite |
WO2020205357A1 (en) | 2019-03-29 | 2020-10-08 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Novel zeolite, process for making same, and use thereof in converting aromatic hydrocarbons |
US10843983B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2020-11-24 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and systems for producing para-xylene from C8-containing compositions |
US10975006B2 (en) | 2018-07-20 | 2021-04-13 | Scg Chemicals Co., Ltd. | Integrated processes for para-xylene production |
Families Citing this family (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AR038957A1 (en) | 2001-08-15 | 2005-02-02 | Pharmacia Corp | COMBINATION THERAPY FOR CANCER TREATMENT |
JP4860851B2 (en) | 2001-09-19 | 2012-01-25 | 日本碍子株式会社 | Zeolite laminated composite and zeolite membrane reactor using the same |
US7122496B2 (en) * | 2003-05-01 | 2006-10-17 | Bp Corporation North America Inc. | Para-xylene selective adsorbent compositions and methods |
US7381858B2 (en) * | 2004-01-30 | 2008-06-03 | Bp Corporation North America Inc. | Xylene process using perm-selective separations |
US7358414B2 (en) * | 2004-01-30 | 2008-04-15 | Miller Jeffrey T | Para-xylene process using perm-selective separations |
WO2007127049A2 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2007-11-08 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Process for producing para-xylene |
WO2008033200A1 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2008-03-20 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Process for producing para-xylene |
US7687674B2 (en) | 2006-12-28 | 2010-03-30 | Uop Llc | Low temperature process for recovering and producing para-xylene and heat exchange network therefore |
CN103288569B (en) * | 2007-04-04 | 2015-09-23 | 埃克森美孚化学专利公司 | The method and apparatus that p-Xylol is produced |
CN101653715B (en) * | 2008-08-20 | 2012-01-04 | 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所 | Process for improving chemical reaction conversion rate by utilizing FAU-type molecular sieve membrane |
WO2010062583A1 (en) * | 2008-10-27 | 2010-06-03 | Rosemount, Inc. | Multivariable fluid flow measurement device with fast response flow calculation |
CN102375414A (en) * | 2010-08-23 | 2012-03-14 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for automatically controlling p-xylene adsorption and concentration device |
EP2686077B1 (en) | 2011-03-16 | 2020-06-24 | Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. | Improved exercise table |
US9199199B2 (en) | 2012-10-05 | 2015-12-01 | Uop Llc | Separation membrane |
SG11201502727YA (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2015-05-28 | Gtc Technology Us Llc | Processes and systems for obtaining aromatics from catalytic cracking hydrocarbons |
JP6455923B2 (en) * | 2014-11-25 | 2019-01-23 | 学校法人早稲田大学 | Method for producing para-xylene |
US9527007B2 (en) * | 2015-05-29 | 2016-12-27 | Uop Llc | Processes and apparatuses for separating streams to provide a transalkylation feed stream in an aromatics complex |
TWI746476B (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2021-11-21 | 美商艾克頌美孚硏究工程公司 | Separation of mixed xylenes |
US10906851B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2021-02-02 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Process for recovering para-xylene |
WO2018118208A1 (en) * | 2016-12-21 | 2018-06-28 | Uop Llc | Composition of matter and structure of zeolite uzm-55 and use in isomerization of aromatic molecules |
CN108484888A (en) * | 2018-01-23 | 2018-09-04 | 浙江省现代纺织工业研究院 | A kind of preparation method of inorganic modified paraxylene |
KR102267466B1 (en) | 2019-09-25 | 2021-06-22 | 고려대학교 산학협력단 | Hierarchically-Structured Mesopore-containing Membrane, Method of Fabricating the Same and Method of Separating Xylene Using the Same |
CN110538480A (en) * | 2019-09-25 | 2019-12-06 | 上海电气集团股份有限公司 | condensing system and condensing method |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5110478A (en) * | 1990-06-05 | 1992-05-05 | Mobil Oil Corp. | Catalytic conversion over membrane composed of a pure molecular sieve |
US5716527A (en) * | 1994-07-08 | 1998-02-10 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Zeolite membrane with a selectivity enhancing coating |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3504048A (en) | 1968-04-05 | 1970-03-31 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Hydrocarbon separation process |
US3548017A (en) * | 1968-09-25 | 1970-12-15 | Texaco Inc | Xylene isomerization process |
US3701813A (en) * | 1970-11-12 | 1972-10-31 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Production of aromatics |
US4101595A (en) * | 1977-05-02 | 1978-07-18 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Conversion of ethyl benzene to para xylene |
US4101597A (en) * | 1977-06-23 | 1978-07-18 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Recovery of p-xylene and benzene from eight carbon atom aromatic fractions |
NL8800889A (en) | 1988-04-07 | 1989-11-01 | Peter Cornelis Van Der Kuip | MATRIX MEMBRANE. |
US5069794A (en) * | 1990-06-05 | 1991-12-03 | Mobil Oil Corp. | Separation of mixture components over membrane composed of a pure molecular sieve |
US5100596A (en) * | 1990-06-05 | 1992-03-31 | Mobil Oil Corp. | Synthesis of membrane composed of a pure molecular sieve |
US5019263A (en) * | 1990-06-05 | 1991-05-28 | Mobil Oil Corp. | Membrane composed of a pure molecular sieve |
US5474681A (en) * | 1992-03-31 | 1995-12-12 | Inrad | Synthesis of inorganic membranes |
US5618435A (en) * | 1992-03-31 | 1997-04-08 | Inrad | Synthesis of inorganic membranes including metals |
EP0695215B2 (en) | 1993-04-23 | 2002-03-27 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Process for the manufacture of molecular sieve layers |
WO1996001686A1 (en) | 1994-07-08 | 1996-01-25 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | A zeolite containing composition with a selectivity enhancing coating |
-
1996
- 1996-01-25 US US08/591,064 patent/US6376733B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1997
- 1997-01-22 JP JP52655097A patent/JP2001513748A/en active Pending
- 1997-01-22 WO PCT/EP1997/000317 patent/WO1997027161A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-22 CA CA002244181A patent/CA2244181A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-01-22 EP EP97901600A patent/EP0880488B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-01-22 KR KR1019980705710A patent/KR19990081992A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-22 CA CA002244179A patent/CA2244179A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-01-22 CN CN97192679A patent/CN1083822C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-01-22 ES ES97901600T patent/ES2167705T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-01-22 EP EP97901599A patent/EP0880489A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1997-01-22 AU AU15451/97A patent/AU713422B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-01-22 WO PCT/EP1997/000316 patent/WO1997027162A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-22 JP JP09520770A patent/JP2000515849A/en active Pending
- 1997-01-22 RU RU98116067/04A patent/RU2184106C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-01-22 BR BR9707071A patent/BR9707071A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-01-22 CN CN97192680A patent/CN1083823C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-01-22 KR KR1019980705749A patent/KR19990082029A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-22 BR BR9707074A patent/BR9707074A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-22 AU AU15450/97A patent/AU719231B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-01-22 DE DE69709061T patent/DE69709061T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-01-22 RU RU98116220/04A patent/RU2186757C2/en active
- 1997-01-24 ZA ZA97629A patent/ZA97629B/en unknown
- 1997-01-24 ZA ZA97630A patent/ZA97630B/en unknown
- 1997-01-27 ID IDP970235A patent/ID17271A/en unknown
- 1997-03-24 TW TW086103687A patent/TW399040B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-03-24 TW TW086103688A patent/TW370523B/en active
-
2002
- 2002-01-31 US US10/062,097 patent/US20020082462A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5110478A (en) * | 1990-06-05 | 1992-05-05 | Mobil Oil Corp. | Catalytic conversion over membrane composed of a pure molecular sieve |
US5716527A (en) * | 1994-07-08 | 1998-02-10 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Zeolite membrane with a selectivity enhancing coating |
Cited By (69)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060081500A1 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2006-04-20 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for processing naphtha |
US7459072B2 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2008-12-02 | Basf Aktiengesellschaft | Method for processing naphtha |
US6986802B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-01-17 | Bp Corporation North America Inc. | Selective separation of fluid compounds utilizing a membrane separation process |
US20050045029A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-03 | Colling Craig W. | Selective separation of fluid compounds utilizing a membrane separation process |
US20090155143A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2009-06-18 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized Liquid-Phase Oxidation |
US20060047156A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047153A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047158A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047146A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20090317306A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2009-12-24 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized Liquid-Phase Oxidation |
US20060047155A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047157A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047159A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047143A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047147A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047144A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047161A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7659427B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2010-02-09 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047142A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047151A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047150A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047160A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047162A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US8470257B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2013-06-25 | Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. De C.V. | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US8178054B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2012-05-15 | Grupo Petrotemex, S. A. DE C. V. | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US8114356B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2012-02-14 | Grupo Pretrotemex, S.A. de C.V. | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20070185347A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2007-08-09 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7977505B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2011-07-12 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20070292323A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2007-12-20 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized Liquid-Phase Oxidation |
US7683210B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2010-03-23 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20080031789A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2008-02-07 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized Liquid-Phase Oxidation |
US20080194864A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2008-08-14 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047163A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | De Vreede Marcel | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20090136398A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2009-05-28 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized Liquid-Phase Oxidation |
US7960581B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2011-06-14 | Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. De C.V. | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047145A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047148A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060047154A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-02 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20070293697A1 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2007-12-20 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized Liquid-Phase Oxidation |
US7910769B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2011-03-22 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7692037B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2010-04-06 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7741515B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2010-06-22 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7910071B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2011-03-22 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7902396B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2011-03-08 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7901636B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2011-03-08 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US8501986B2 (en) | 2004-11-29 | 2013-08-06 | Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. De C.V. | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060116530A1 (en) * | 2004-11-29 | 2006-06-01 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7692036B2 (en) | 2004-11-29 | 2010-04-06 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20060205976A1 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Wonders Alan G | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US7884232B2 (en) | 2005-06-16 | 2011-02-08 | Eastman Chemical Company | Optimized liquid-phase oxidation |
US20070292320A1 (en) * | 2006-01-04 | 2007-12-20 | Eastman Chemical Company | Oxidation System with Internal Secondary Reactor |
US20070155986A1 (en) * | 2006-01-04 | 2007-07-05 | Wonders Alan G | Oxidation system employing internal structure for enhanced hydrodynamics |
US9227891B2 (en) | 2007-10-18 | 2016-01-05 | Ifp Bnergies Nouvelles | Process for separation of C8 aromatic compounds with limited recycling |
US20090149686A1 (en) * | 2007-10-18 | 2009-06-11 | Philibert Leflaive | Process for separation of c8 aromatic compounds with limited recycling |
US9434661B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2016-09-06 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Phenol removal in paraxylene recovery process |
US9205401B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2015-12-08 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Phenol removal in paraxylene recovery process |
US9012711B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2015-04-21 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Phenol removal in paraxylene recovery process |
WO2013180888A1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2013-12-05 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Phenol removal in paraxylene recovery process |
US9266794B1 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2016-02-23 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Xylene isomerization process and catalyst therefor |
WO2014035626A1 (en) * | 2012-08-31 | 2014-03-06 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Xylene isomerization process and catalyst therefor |
US9193645B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2015-11-24 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Xylene isomerization process and catalyst therefor |
US9266796B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2016-02-23 | Uop Llc | Systems and methods for producing desired xylene isomers |
US10647641B2 (en) | 2018-07-20 | 2020-05-12 | Scg Chemicals Co., Ltd. | Process for the separation of ethylbenzene from other C8 aromatic compounds |
US10975006B2 (en) | 2018-07-20 | 2021-04-13 | Scg Chemicals Co., Ltd. | Integrated processes for para-xylene production |
US10843983B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2020-11-24 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and systems for producing para-xylene from C8-containing compositions |
US11111192B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2021-09-07 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and systems for producing para-xylene from C8-containing compositions |
US11453624B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-09-27 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and systems for producing para-xylene from C8-containing compositions |
WO2020205354A1 (en) | 2019-03-29 | 2020-10-08 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Mel-type zeolite for converting aromatic hydrocarbons, process for making and catalytic composition comprising said zeolite |
WO2020205357A1 (en) | 2019-03-29 | 2020-10-08 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Novel zeolite, process for making same, and use thereof in converting aromatic hydrocarbons |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BR9707071A (en) | 1999-07-20 |
RU2184106C2 (en) | 2002-06-27 |
KR19990081992A (en) | 1999-11-15 |
KR19990082029A (en) | 1999-11-15 |
EP0880488B1 (en) | 2001-12-12 |
CA2244179A1 (en) | 1997-07-31 |
EP0880489A1 (en) | 1998-12-02 |
RU2186757C2 (en) | 2002-08-10 |
ZA97629B (en) | 1998-07-24 |
DE69709061T2 (en) | 2002-07-11 |
TW399040B (en) | 2000-07-21 |
TW370523B (en) | 1999-09-21 |
AU1545097A (en) | 1997-08-20 |
BR9707074A (en) | 1999-07-20 |
ID17271A (en) | 1997-12-18 |
CA2244181A1 (en) | 1997-07-31 |
CN1212676A (en) | 1999-03-31 |
AU1545197A (en) | 1997-08-20 |
ES2167705T3 (en) | 2002-05-16 |
ZA97630B (en) | 1998-07-24 |
DE69709061D1 (en) | 2002-01-24 |
WO1997027161A1 (en) | 1997-07-31 |
CN1083822C (en) | 2002-05-01 |
WO1997027162A1 (en) | 1997-07-31 |
JP2001513748A (en) | 2001-09-04 |
JP2000515849A (en) | 2000-11-28 |
AU713422B2 (en) | 1999-12-02 |
US6376733B1 (en) | 2002-04-23 |
CN1083823C (en) | 2002-05-01 |
AU719231B2 (en) | 2000-05-04 |
CN1212677A (en) | 1999-03-31 |
EP0880488A1 (en) | 1998-12-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6376733B1 (en) | Process for production of paraxylene | |
JP5351391B2 (en) | High energy efficient process for producing para-xylene | |
US7915471B2 (en) | Method for producing paraxylene comprising an adsortion step and two isomerization steps | |
EP2013157B1 (en) | Process for producing para-xylene | |
KR100881876B1 (en) | Pressure swing adsorption process for separating para-xylene and ethylbenzene from mixed c8 aromatics | |
US10059644B2 (en) | Process and apparatus for the production of para-xylene | |
JP6527960B2 (en) | Process and apparatus for producing paraxylene | |
US10265688B2 (en) | Method and catalyst system for improving benzene purity in a xylenes isomerization process | |
JP5127231B2 (en) | Para-xylene process using permselective separation | |
US10300404B2 (en) | Process for the recovering of paraxylene | |
JP7441615B2 (en) | Method for producing paraxylene using a process in a simulated moving bed and a process of fractionation via a trifractionator | |
CN110437026B (en) | Method and device for reverse separation of aromatic compounds | |
US11040304B1 (en) | Method of recovering paraxylene in a pressure swing adsorption unit with varying hydrogen purge flow direction |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |