US20020082713A1 - Prosthetic foot - Google Patents
Prosthetic foot Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020082713A1 US20020082713A1 US09/742,077 US74207700A US2002082713A1 US 20020082713 A1 US20020082713 A1 US 20020082713A1 US 74207700 A US74207700 A US 74207700A US 2002082713 A1 US2002082713 A1 US 2002082713A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- prosthetic foot
- joint
- foot according
- hindfoot
- motion
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2/60—Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
- A61F2/66—Feet; Ankle joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2/60—Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
- A61F2/66—Feet; Ankle joints
- A61F2/6607—Ankle joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2002/5001—Cosmetic coverings
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2/60—Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
- A61F2/66—Feet; Ankle joints
- A61F2002/6614—Feet
- A61F2002/6621—Toes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2/60—Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
- A61F2/66—Feet; Ankle joints
- A61F2002/6614—Feet
- A61F2002/6642—Heels
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/50—Prostheses not implantable in the body
- A61F2/60—Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
- A61F2/66—Feet; Ankle joints
- A61F2002/6614—Feet
- A61F2002/665—Soles
Definitions
- a prosthetic foot that mimics the human foot in function is disclosed.
- the prosthetic foot has hindfoot triplanar motion capability, biplanar midfoot and forefoot motion capabilities and high low dynamic response characteristics for improving gait and comfort qualities of the amputee in walking, running and jumping activities.
- the human foot is a complex comprised of twenty-six separate bones.
- the bones of the foot articulate with one another to create joints.
- the joints of the foot through these articulations, allow movement to occur.
- the motion capability of a particular joint is dependent upon bony articulations, ligamentous reinforcements and muscular control.
- Motion capability of specific joints of the foot has been studied quite extensively through history. These scientific studies have identified fourteen different axes of rotations of all the joints of the human foot. They have through thoughtful analysis determined how these axes of rotations and motion capabilities function in human gait and running and jumping activities.
- the prosthetic foot of the present invention has been made in light of these scientific studies with a view toward providing an improved prosthetic foot that mimics the human foot in function in order to provide the amputee with normal human gait characteristics and improve the quality of life of the amputee.
- a prosthetic foot according to the present invention comprises a forefoot portion, a midfoot portion and a hindfoot portion, wherein the hindfoot portion includes first and second joints permitting closed kinetic chain motion of the prosthetic foot in gait.
- the first joint has a joint axis oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion about the first joint axis which is at least primarily in the sagittal plane.
- the second joint has a joint axis oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion about the second joint axis which is at least primarily in the frontal and transverse planes.
- the first and second joints are formed integrally with the hindfoot portion by respective struts of resilient material of the hindfoot portion.
- the forefoot, midfoot and hindfoot portions of the prosthetic foot are formed of a single piece of plastic as by molding and/or machining.
- the first joint in the hindfoot portion mimics an ankle joint and the second joint mimics a subtalar joint to allow the foot to function like a normal foot.
- the subtalar joint in the hindfoot portion of the disclosed embodiment constitutes a means for permitting triplanar closed kinetic chain motion of the prosthetic foot in gait.
- This triplanar motion capability improves the foot staying plantar grade during the stance phase of gait. It also decreases residual limb to socket shear forces associated with motion in the transverse plane.
- the plantar surface of the midfoot portion has a longitudinal arch which is formed with a concavity having a longitudinal axis that is deviated in the frontal plane 25°-42° from the transverse plane to create frontal and sagittal plane motion capabilities.
- the medial aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity is larger in radius and more proximal than the lateral aspect of the concavity.
- the longitudinal arch is shaped to create a high low dynamic response capability of the foot in gait such that the medial aspect of the longitudinal arch has a relatively higher dynamic response capability and the lateral aspect of the longitudinal arch has a relatively lower dynamic response capability.
- the posterior of the forefoot portion of the prosthetic foot includes at least one expansion joint hole extending through the forefoot portion between dorsal and plantar surfaces thereof.
- An expansion joint extends forward from the expansion joint hole to the anterior edge of the forefoot portion to form plural expansion struts which create improved biplanar motion capability of the forefoot portion.
- Concavities and convexities are utilized on surface areas of the one piece body of the prosthetic foot with the longitudinal axis orientations thereof being selected to create dynamic response and motion capabilities which mimic the human foot.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view, from the right front and slightly above, of a right prosthetic foot according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a lateral side view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1 located within a cosmetic covering of the foot, shown in dashed lines, and in position for connection with an adjoining prosthesis on the amputee's leg, also shown in dashed lines.
- FIG. 3 is a medial side view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 4 is a top view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic view of the ankle joint axis of the prosthetic foot as projected on the frontal plane wherein it is seen that the ankle joint axis is deviated from the transverse plane by an angle ⁇ with the medial more proximal than the lateral.
- FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of the ankle joint strut taken along the section VII-VII in FIG. 3.
- FIG. 8 is a schematic view of the ankle joint axis of the prosthetic foot as projected on the sagittal plane wherein it is seen that the ankle joint axis is deviated from the transverse plane by an angle ⁇ with the anterior more proximal than the posterior.
- FIG. 9 is a schematic view of the subtalar joint axis of the prosthetic foot as projected on the sagittal plane showing the subtalar joint axis making an angle ⁇ with the transverse plane with the anterior more proximal than the posterior.
- FIG. 10 is a schematic view of the subtalar joint of the prosthetic foot as projected on the frontal plane with the axis making an angle ⁇ with the transverse plane with the medial more proximal than the lateral.
- FIG. 11 is an enlarged top dorsal view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1 wherein shading lines have been added to show the locations of concavities and convexities on the dorsal surface of the body of the foot for effecting motion of the foot in gait.
- FIG. 12 is an enlarged, bottom plantar view of the body of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1 to which lines have been added to show mid-stance contact areas of the foot on a level surface in gait and to which shading lines have been added to depict concavities on the plantar surface of the body for effecting motion of the foot in gait.
- FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view through a lower portion of the midfoot portion of the body of the prosthetic foot taken along the line XIII-XIII in FIG. 2 showing the inclination of the longitudinal arch at angle ⁇ with the transverse plane with the medial more proximal than the lateral.
- FIG. 14 is a side view of an integrally formed metal attachment device for the prosthetic foot.
- FIG. 15 is a top view of the device in FIG. 14.
- FIG. 16 is a top view of the lower attachment plate of the device of FIG. 14.
- a prosthetic foot 1 of the invention comprises a body 2 formed of a resilient, semi-rigid material, plastic in the disclosed embodiment, which is formed with forefoot, midfoot and hindfoot portions 2 A, 2 B and 2 C, respectively.
- a cosmetic covering 3 of the foot surrounds the body 2 as depicted in FIG. 2.
- the body 2 in the disclosed embodiment is formed by molding or by pouring the material of the body into a negative mold.
- other processes could be employed to form the body 2 such as machining the body from a solid piece of resilient, semi-rigid material, or by using a combination of molding and machining, for example.
- the plastic of body 2 is an elastomer, polyurethane in the illustrated example but other plastics or composite materials could be used.
- the body 2 of the foot is shaped and designed to simulate a human foot's hindfoot triplanar, forefoot biplanar and hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot dynamic response windless effect motion capabilities as discussed herein.
- the rear foot triplanar motion capability is achieved by the hindfoot portion 2 C which includes first and second joints 4 and 5 permitting closed kinetic chain motion of the prosthetic foot in gait.
- the first joint 4 acts as an ankle joint.
- the second joint 5 acts as a subtalar joint.
- the ankle joint axis of rotation 4 A is oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion 2 C about the joint axis 4 A which is at least primarily in the sagittal plane. More particularly, the ankle joint axis 4 A is preferably externally rotated an angle ⁇ of 8° to 30° from a line drawn normal to the long axis X-X of the foot, see FIG. 4.
- the ankle joint axis 4 A also deviates from the transverse plane an angle ⁇ of 8° with the medial more proximal than the lateral, see FIG. 6. This ankle joint axis of rotation orientation allows the prosthetic foot to mimic human foot ankle joint sagittal and frontal plane motion capabilities.
- the ankle joint 4 and subtalar joint 5 are formed integrally with the hindfoot portion 2 C by respective struts 4 B and 5 B of the resilient material of the hindfoot portion.
- the struts are each elongated in the direction of their respective joint axis.
- the anterior and posterior side surfaces of the ankle joint strut 4 B and the medial and lateral side surfaces of the subtalar joint strut 5 B are concavely curved for transferring and absorbing forces in motion of the hindfoot portion about the ankle and subtalar joint axes.
- the concavely curved anterior side surface of the strut 4 B is formed by the periphery of a hole 6 which extends through the hindfoot portion 2 C along the anterior side of the strut 4 B.
- the diameter d 1 of hole 6 in foot 1 is 5 ⁇ 8 inch but this can vary dependent upon the overall size of the body 2 of the foot 1 .
- Anterior to the hole 6 is a gap 7 which permits the motion of the hindfoot portion 2 C about the joint axis 4 A.
- the height 8 of gap 7 is selected so that a lower surface of the body 2 adjacent the gap 7 acts as a stop against an opposing upper surface defining the gap to limit the amount of motion of the hindfoot portion 2 C about the ankle joint axis 4 A in dorsiflexion.
- the wider the anterior gap the more potential for dorsiflexion range of motion.
- the hole 6 in the illustrated embodiment extends in a direction parallel to the joint axis 4 A.
- the posterior aspect of the ankle joint strut 4 B of the hindfoot portion 2 C is a concavity having a diameter d 2 of 11 ⁇ 2-2 inches in the example embodiment but this can vary and is determined by the overall size of the body 2 . For example, for an infant or small child's foot the diameter d 2 would be smaller.
- the proximal aspect of concavity 9 preferably extends in a direction parallel to the ankle joint axis 4 A.
- the distal aspect of concavity 9 can extend in a direction parallel to the ankle joint axis 4 A or extends in a direction parallel to the frontal plane. This curvature is necessary to absorb shock and to allow freer plantarflexion range of motion about the ankle joint.
- the width w and thickness t of the plastic ankle strut 4 B can be varied as can the density, durometer and other properties of the material utilized.
- the density, durometer and other properties of the material utilized For example, an above the knee prosthetic foot needs different motion characteristics than a below the knee prosthetic foot.
- a heel lever creates flexion torque and that a toe lever creates extension torque.
- the motion requirements are different for above the knee and below the knee prosthetic feet.
- an above the knee prosthetic foot may have a different posterior ankle joint concavity radius of curvature and it may be formed of a less dense material. This in effect, would decrease the heel lever and the resultant flexion torque associated with it.
- the ankle joint axis 4 A as projected on a sagittal plane is inclined from the transverse plane an angle ⁇ with the anterior being more proximal than the posterior, see FIG. 8.
- the angle ⁇ in the enclosed embodiment is the same as the angle ⁇ in FIG. 6, 8°.
- the subtalar joint 5 in the prosthetic foot 1 is spaced below and extends in a different direction than the ankle joint 4 .
- the subtalar joint axis 5 A extends along the subtalar joint strut 5 B and is oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion 2 C about the joint axis 5 A in all three of the frontal, transverse and sagittal planes, although primarily in the front and transverse planes.
- the joint axis 5 A runs in the hindfoot portion 2 C from posterior, plantar and lateral to anterior, dorsal and medial.
- the joint axis 5 A as projected on a transverse plane is inclined at an angle ⁇ 1 of 9° to 23° with the longitudinal axis of the foot, X-X in FIG. 4.
- the angle ⁇ 1 is 23° in the example embodiment.
- the angle ⁇ is 30° in the disclosed embodiment.
- the subtalar joint 5 is bounded medially and laterally by respective holes 10 and 11 which extend parallel to the joint axis 5 A.
- the diameter d 3 of the holes is variable depending on the overall size of the body 2 . It is ⁇ fraction (3/16) ⁇ inch in the example embodiment.
- Medial and lateral gaps 12 and 13 extend along the subtalar joint outwardly from the holes 10 and 11 , respectively, to the periphery of the body 2 of the foot to permit the motion of the hindfoot portion 2 C about the subtalar joint axis 5 A.
- the height 14 of the medial gap 12 and the height 15 of the lateral gap 13 are selected so that a lower surface of the hindfoot portion 2 C defining each gap acts as a stop against the opposing upper surface defining the gap to limit the amount of bending or rotational motion of the hindfoot portion about the joint axis 5 A in eversion and inversion in gait.
- the height of the medial gap 14 is preferably greater than, such as twice that of the lateral gap 15 .
- the height 14 is 1 ⁇ 8 inch and height 15 is ⁇ fraction (1/16) ⁇ inch in the example embodiment.
- the joint axis 5 A as projected on the frontal plane, as seen in the direction of arrow A in FIG. 2, is inclined an angle ⁇ to the transverse plane with the medial being more proximal than the lateral, see FIG. 10.
- the subtalar joint axis of rotation 5 A in the prosthetic foot 1 mimics the human foot's subtalar joint in function.
- the significance of the longitudinal axis of rotation 5 A of the joint 5 being oriented externally 9-23° from the long axis of the foot is in allowing medial and lateral or frontal plane motion capability.
- the amount of possible frontal plane motion of the prosthetic foot at the joint 5 is dictated by the height of the medial and lateral subtalar joint gaps 14 and 15 .
- the medial gap 14 of prosthetic foot 1 is, as noted above, preferably twice as wide as the lateral gap 15 to allow a greater range of inversion than eversion.
- the axis is twice as close to the horizontal plane as to the vertical plane and twice as much motion of the foot occurs in the frontal plane as in the transverse plane with a given rotation of the leg about its longitudinal axis.
- the importance of transverse plane motion capability at the subtalar joint 5 is for transverse plane torque absorption, for reduction of shear forces at the residual limb to socket interface and for avoiding the need to add a separate torque absorber to the prosthetic foot.
- the average transverse plane rotation of the lower leg of a person in gait is 19°.
- the subtalar joint is the mechanism in the human foot, and also in the prosthetic foot 1 , which allows these 19° of rotation to occur. Closed kinetic chain motion of the subtalar joint 5 in the foot 1 remains inversion with supination and eversion with pronation in the frontal plane.
- the subtalar joint functional range of motion in gait is 6° total motion. In the case only 6° of frontal plane motion is needed in the prosthetic foot 1 , it is possible to incline the oblique axis of the joint 5 toward the upper end of the range 30°-45° to derive a comfort benefit.
- the hindfoot portion 2 C of the foot 1 is also formed with a heel 16 with a posterior lateral corner 17 which is more posterior and lateral than the medial corner of the heel to encourage hindfoot eversion during the initial contact phase of gait.
- the posterior aspect of the heel 16 is a duck-tail shaped torsion bar with the lateral posterior corner 17 thereof offset a distance 1 1 of 1 ⁇ 2 to 3 ⁇ 4 inch more posterior than the medial corner.
- the use of a smaller angle ⁇ of 16°, for example, or a more medial positioning of the subtalar joint strut 5 B as discussed later also causes the heel corner 17 to be offset a distance of 1 2 of 1 ⁇ 2 inch more lateral than the projected axis of the subtalar joint.
- This 1 ⁇ 2 inch lateral offset predisposes the rear foot at heel strike to cause the subtalar joint to evert.
- This initial contact subtalar joint eversion acts as a shock absorber to dampen the impact of the heel strike.
- the shape of the posterior lateral corner of the foot in the sagittal plane is curved upwardly, see FIGS. 2 and 3, with a radius of curvature of 11 ⁇ 2 to 3 inches in the disclosed embodiment.
- This radius of the curvature can vary depending on the overall size of the foot. This large radius of curvature allows the posterior lateral corner to deflect proximally at heel strike which also acts as a shock absorber.
- the density of plastic in the posterior aspect of the body 2 of the foot 1 could also be selected to be less than that in the rest of the body of the foot to create even more shock absorption capability.
- the top 23 of the hindfoot portion 2 C of the prosthetic foot 1 is made flat and has a metal attachment device 18 embedded into the plastic.
- the metal device 18 is made of stainless steel in shoe 1 , but other high strength, light weight metal alloys, such as Ti alloys, could be used utilized.
- the device 18 permits attachment of the prosthetic foot to a prosthetic component 24 secured to a person's limb above the foot as schematically depicted in FIG. 2.
- the lower part 19 of the attachment device 18 is embedded into the material of the hindfoot portion 2 C during molding. Preferably, this lower part 19 has several holes therethrough to aid in anchoring the device in the molded elastomer of body 2 at the time of molding.
- the attachment device comprises an upper pyramid attachment plate 20 connected in spaced relation to a lower attachment plate 19 by a plurality of fasteners 21 as shown in the drawings.
- the upper and lower attachment plates and connecting elements could be formed integrally as shown in FIG. 14.
- the attachment device 18 is located in the hindfoot portion 2 C along the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot 1 as shown in the drawings.
- the metal attachment device 18 ′ in FIG. 14 comprises integrally formed lower attachment plate 19 ′, upper pyramid attachment plate 20 ′ and connecting struts 21 ′.
- the lower plate 19 ′ is formed with an 1 ⁇ 8 inch proximal offset 41 on the anterior leaf and medial and lateral offsets 42 and 43 , respectively.
- Medial and lateral holes 44 and 45 and anterior and posterior holes 46 and 47 help anchor the device in the plastic body 2 during molding.
- a line C-C through the holes 44 and 45 is 8° externally rotated from a normal to the sagittal plane X-X with the medial being further anterior than the lateral.
- the line C-C is preferably offset posteriorally a distance X′ from the middle or equal orientation D-D so that the holes 44 and 45 fall in the middle of the ankle joint axis strut 4 B.
- the posterior offset of holes 44 and 45 , together with posterior hole 47 counter the toe lever length.
- the dorsal surface of the midfoot portion 2 B anterior to the gap 7 is formed with a dorsal concavity 25 which allows the midfoot portion 2 B and forefoot portion 2 A to dorsiflex as weight is transferred to the anterior portions of the prosthetic foot in gait.
- a metatarsal arch convexity 26 is provided on the dorsal surface of the midfoot portion 2 B anterior and medial from the dorsal concavity 25 .
- the dorsal aspect of the midfoot portion 2 B and forefoot portion 2 A is formed with a concavity 27 which mimics in function the fifth ray axis of motion of the human foot. See the different shadings in FIG.
- the concavity 27 has its longitudinal axis Y-Y oriented at an angle Y of 35° to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot with the medial being more anterior than the lateral to mimic in function the fifth ray axis of motion in gait as an oblique lower gear axis of the rotation of the second to fifth metatarsals in the human foot.
- the angle ⁇ could be less than 35°, but is preferably within the range of 20° to 35°.
- the plantar surface of the body 2 of foot 1 has a longitudinal arch 28 , see FIG. 12, which, in the vicinity of locations corresponding to the navicular medially and the base of the fourth metatarsal laterally of the human foot, includes a concavity 29 with its longitudinal axis oriented normal to the axis Z-Z, the first ray axis of motion in the human foot to mimic the function thereof, see FIG. 12 where the concavity location is shown by shadings added to the drawing of the plantar surface of the body 2 of foot 1 .
- the axis Z-Z in the example embodiment is at an angle ⁇ of 45° to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot with the medial more posterior than the lateral.
- the angle ⁇ could be less than 45°, but is preferably within the range of 30° to 45°. Use of angles for ⁇ and ⁇ at the lower end of the specified ranges will decrease the difference between the high and low gear principles. The latter may be utilized on high activity level amputees, for example.
- the plantar surface of the foot 1 in the anterior portion of the longitudinal arch concavity further includes a generally annular metatarsal arch concavity or cupping area 30 delineating the posterior surface of a forefoot plantar surface contact area which has been outlined at 31 as shown in FIG. 12. A hindfoot contact area is outlined at 31 ′.
- the longitudinal arch 28 itself is formed with a concavity having a longitudinal axis A-A, FIG. 12, that as projected on the frontal plane is deviated at an angle ⁇ of 25° to 42°, see FIG. 13, with the medial higher than the lateral to create frontal and sagittal plane motion capabilities as with the midtarsal joints in the human foot.
- the medial aspect 32 of the longitudinal arch concavity is larger in radius and more proximal than the lateral aspect 33 of the concavity.
- the anterior aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity has its longitudinal axis B-B orientated at an angle ⁇ of 35° to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot with the medial being more anterior than the lateral.
- the middle aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity has its longitudinal axis A-A orientation normal to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot.
- the longitudinal arch 28 is provided with this three-dimensional fan shape for causing specific motion outcomes of the foot in gait.
- the anterior longitudinal arch concavity blends with the first ray and metatarsal arch concavities 29 and 30 . This blending of shapes causes the anterior longitudinal arch concavity to be more anteriorally and medially oriented for improving the high gear dynamic response capability of body 2 .
- the posterior aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity has its longitudinal axis C-C deviated an angle k of 30° to the frontal plane with the medial side being more posterior than the lateral, see FIG. 12.
- the midfoot portion 2 B is formed of a semi-rigid material as noted above and the longitudinal arch 28 of the resilient body 2 is shaped to create a dynamic response capability of the foot in gait such that the medial aspect 32 of the longitudinal arch has a relatively higher dynamic response capability than that of the lateral aspect 33 of the longitudinal arch.
- biplanar motion potential exists in the midfoot portion 2 B corresponding to that in the midtarsal region of the human foot where motion occurs in the frontal and sagittal planes enabling the forefoot to remain plantar grade while accommodating the positions of the rearfoot during gait.
- the oblique axes of the midfoot portion 2 B are supinated in the propulsive phase of gait.
- the windless effect of the plantar aponeurosis activated with heel lift aids supination of these oblique axes during propulsion.
- Only 4-6° of frontal plane motion in gait is needed to keep the foot plantar grade.
- the longitudinal arch area of the prosthetic foot 1 is shaped specific to achieve superior functional motion outcomes.
- the longitudinal arch deviation from the sagittal plane as discussed above enhances the frontal plane motion and dynamic response characteristics of the foot 1 .
- the proximal section of the midfoot portion 2 B is made flat to accept the forces of the anterior ankle joint dorsiflexion stop adjacent gap 7 .
- the midfoot portion 2 B is thicker than the forefoot portion 2 A.
- the medial aspect 32 and 26 of the midfoot portion is thicker than the lateral aspect 33 and 27 .
- the bottom of the foot 1 is made to accommodate 3 ⁇ 8 inch or 3 ⁇ 4 inch heel heights.
- the plantar surface of the body 2 in the region of the forefoot and midfoot junction has the metatarsal concavity or cup area 30 as noted above. This cup area functions to create contact on the outside edges of the cup.
- This raised area 31 runs parallel to the axis of motion, Y-Y in FIG. 11 of the fifth ray.
- the forefoot portion 2 A of the body 2 has two expansion joints 34 and 35 cut into the posterior end of the forefoot.
- the medial expansion joint 34 runs longitudinally to just past the posterior point of ground contact on the plantar surface of the midfoot portion into the cupped recessed area 30 , where it terminates in an expansion joint hole 36 .
- the lateral expansion joint 35 runs further posterior into the forefoot than the medial expansion joint 34 where it terminates in an expansion joint hole 37 .
- the two expansion joints function as do the high and lower gears in the human foot.
- a straight line B-B connecting the two expansion joint holes 36 and 37 is deviated at an angle ⁇ of 35° externally from the long axis of the foot.
- the forefoot portion 2 A functions to allow biplanar forefoot motions to occur.
- the expansion joints 34 and 35 independently allow the forefoot to dorsiflex and invert and plantar flex and evert.
- This biplanar motion capability keeps the forefoot plantar grade on uneven terrain.
- the foot 1 mimics the human foot in this regard.
- the hindfoot portion 2 C changes position, the forefoot and midfoot portions need to change positions in the opposite direction. This counter twisting keeps the foot plantar grade.
- the prosthetic foot 1 worn by the amputee acts as a closed chain prosthetic device which responds to the ground forces created in human gait.
- the posterior lateral heel strikes the ground.
- the design of the posterior lateral heel area is offset as discussed above to transfer weight via the duck tail shaped extension which deflects upwardly to absorb the heel lever forces which create flexion torque of the calf shank. Further enhancement of this torque absorption and improved shock absorption characteristics of the foot 1 are provided by the posterior concavity 9 and the lateral offset l 2 of the heel to the axis of rotation of the subtalar joint 5 such that with force application the subtalar joint is made to evert.
- This eversion acts as a shock absorber to dampen the initial contact weight transfer phase of gait.
- force application is posterior to the axis of rotation 4 A of the prosthetic ankle joint 4 causing the ankle joint to plantar flex and the midfoot and forefoot portions 2 B and 2 C of the foot to be lowered to the ground.
- the subtalar joint 5 allows movement in the foot 1 to occur in what corresponds to the three cardinal planes of human motion, namely the transverse, frontal and sagittal planes.
- This triplanar motion capability is achieved because of the orientation of the prosthetic foot's subtalar joint axis of rotation 5 A which is deviated from the transverse, frontal and sagittal planes as discussed above. This orientation allows motion capability in the three planes.
- the sagittal plane component is less than that in the frontal and transverse planes.
- the decreased sagittal plane motion of the subtalar joint 5 is compensated for by the ankle joint 4 which is located just proximal to the subtalar joint.
- the subtalar joint's ability to allow motion to occur in the transverse plane is of significance as in the stance phase of gait, the lower extremity primarily through the subtalar joint must absorb 19° of transverse plane motion transferred through the tibia and fibula, to the ankle joint and then to the subtalar joint.
- the subtalar joint 5 acts as a mitered hinge and transfers this motion into the hindfoot and midfoot portions 2 C and 2 B. This motion is absorbed in the midfoot dynamic response qualities and in the midfoot-forefoot biplanar motion capabilities. As a result, improved plantar surface weight bearing characteristics are achieved.
- the weight is then transferred into the ankle joint 4 .
- the anterior dorsiflexion gap 7 engages and further dorsiflexion motion is arrested. That is, the motion is arrested by the opposing surfaces defining the anterior ankle joint gap coming together.
- the larger the gap 7 the more dorsiflexion motion potential.
- the weight transfer to the anterior ankle joint stop adjacent gap 7 is of significance.
- the weight is thereby transferred into the midfoot portion 2 B of the foot 1 .
- the area of the longitudinal arch 28 of the foot 1 is loaded and it responds with its concavity expanding and absorbing these vertical forces. The result is more shock absorption qualities and dynamic response capabilities.
- the proximal medial longitudinal arch area is much larger in radius than the lateral distal.
- the medial has increased expansion potential and higher dynamic response than the distal lateral longitudinal concavity of the arch.
- the weight transfer moves even more anterior in the prosthetic foot 1 approaching the medial aspect of the first ray longitudinal axis of rotation, Z-Z in FIG. 12, the weight transfer is approaching the middle frontal plane of the foot.
- the plantar and dorsal surfaces of the prosthetic foot are designed to allow or encourage specific motions to occur. More specifically, the first ray axis of rotation Z-Z and the motion capability associated with this axis in the human foot are mimicked in the prosthetic foot 1 by the plantar surface of the forefoot portion 2 A being shaped into the concavity 29 .
- the longitudinal axis Z-Z of the concavity 29 is oriented to be parallel to the longitudinal axis of rotation of the first ray in the human foot. This orientation is 45° internally rotated to the long axis of the foot, see angle ⁇ in FIG. 12.
- the motion outcome from force application to this concavity and its degree specific orientation is vertical shock absorption and improved dynamic response capabilities.
- the first ray concavity 29 , as well as the longitudinal arch concavity 28 create dynamic response capabilities. These dynamic response capabilities are exhibited by the ground forces transferring weight to the sides of the concavities and the concavities expanding.
- concavity expansion occurs in the prosthetic foot 1 during gait and once the force is removed, the foot 1 springs back into its original shape which releases stored energy.
- the ankle and subtalar joints 4 and 5 in the prosthetic foot 1 also have the potential to produce a dynamic response capability. For example, as the ankle joint 4 plantar flexes and the anterior dorsiflexion gap 7 spreads and the posterior concavity 9 compresses, energy is stored in the ankle joint strut 4 B. The strut 4 B will return to its normal position once the vertical forces are removed.
- the interrelationship between the midfoot's plantar and dorsal shapes are significant in understanding the dynamic response capabilities that exist.
- the medial and lateral surface shapes are shape specific and these shapes provide functional movement outcomes.
- the lateral dorsal fifth ray concavity 27 is compressed, allowing less resisted motion potential. This relates to a low gear principle.
- the medial midfoot plantar and dorsal surface areas as previously described (first ray in function) respond to force application by expanding. Expansion has increased resistance qualities and as a result dynamic response capabilities are enhanced. This enhanced dynamic response capability is associated with a high gear principle.
- the high gear and low gear principles relate to gait acceleration, deceleration and speed components.
- the high gear improved dynamic response capabilities can be utilized in gait acceleration and deceleration phases.
- a low gear principle relates more to the speed of gait, rather than the aforementioned acceleration and deceleration.
- the low gear component of the prosthetic foot 1 will allow the amputee to ambulate with less energy expenditure while walking at slower speeds. This decrease in energy expenditure is associated with two principles, namely the length of the toe levers as these toe lever lengths relate to extension torque of the calf shank, and to the dynamic response characteristics of the medial and lateral areas of the prosthetic foot.
- the high gear has a longer toe lever than the low gear.
- the ability to efficiently overcome a long toe lever is less.
- the body's center of gravity shifts more laterally during slow walking in the stance phase of gait.
- the patient's calf shank can be positioned to move into the low or high gear sections of the midfoot and forefoot areas. If the amputee wearing the foot 1 is accelerating or decelerating, he will utilize the higher gear function once reaching a comfortable gait speed.
- the amputee will seek an area of the forefoot 2 A which allows the comfortable gait speed to continue.
- the force transfer will occur more medial if the amputee wants more dynamic response characteristics or more lateral for less dynamic response characteristics.
- the prosthetic foot 1 the amputee has a choice of functional movement outcomes.
- the function of the fifth ray axis of rotation Y-Y in foot 1 is important. As weight is transferred anterior and laterally to the prosthetic foot 1 , the fifth ray longitudinal axis Y-Y allows motion to occur perpendicular to its longitudinal axis orientation. Additionally, the two expansion joint holes 36 and 37 are positioned to encourage forefoot motions that are positioned on the fifth ray's longitudinal axis of rotation and, as a consequence, improved biplanar motion capabilities are created. The low gear and high gear effects referred to above are also enhanced. As a result, the prosthetic foot gait characteristics are improved and human gait is mimicked.
- the biplanar forefoot qualities of the prosthetic foot 1 are enhanced by the expansion joints and expansion joint holes as referred to above.
- the two expansion joint holes are strategically placed to create specific motion capabilities. That is, the two holes longitudinally, as projected on the sagittal plane are oriented at angle b of 45° from the line B-B parallel to the frontal plane, see FIG. 2. This orientation acts as a mitered hinge much like the mitered hinge of the subtalar joint. Improved biplanar motion capabilities are the result.
- the plantar surface weight bearing surface 31 of the forefoot portion 2 A and 31 ′ of the hindfoot portion 2 C are also design and shape specific.
- the plantar surface expansion joint holes 36 and 37 are located in the metatarsal arch area 30 .
- the weight is borne on the expansion joint struts 38 , 39 and 40 .
- weight-bearing surface on the plantar aspect of the foot 1 contacts the ground, weight is borne by the expansion struts, causing a suspended web effect. This allows a tremendous amount of forming ability, while maintaining the structural stability needed for a sound stable foot. With the improved biplanar forefoot motion capabilities of the prosthetic foot, human gait is improved.
- the prosthetic foot 1 is shaped and designed to create specific motion outcomes.
- the dorsal and plantar aspects of the aforementioned region of the body 2 are shaped in an upwardly extending arch, see FIG. 2.
- the dorsal aspect concavity is oriented to flow into the fifth ray concavity 27 . This melding of shapes, one into another, makes for a smooth transition between late stance phase and swing phase of gait.
- the upwardly shaped ray region functions as dorsiflexed toes in the aforementioned gait sequence.
- the prosthetic foot of the invention has been described in connection with one specific embodiment, alternative embodiments are possible.
- the height of the ankle joint in the prosthetic foot is 3-31 ⁇ 2 inches. This height could be made larger and the ankle joint's orientation moved more proximal.
- This alternate orientation of the ankle joint allows the oblique axis of the subtalar joint to approach and be changed from 29-30°, to an angle of 42-45°, for example.
- the 30° orientation in the disclosed embodiment provides increased inversion and eversion (frontal plane motion) and decreased abduction and adduction (transverse plane motion).
- a 45° oblique subtalar joint axis will allow equal transverse and frontal plane motions.
- the net effect of this latter orientation would be to decrease inversion/eversion frontal plane motion and increase abduction and adduction of the foot as compared with the foot of the example embodiment.
- This increase in abduction and adduction would be resisted by the ground reaction forces and as a consequence there would be a decrease in the inversion and eversion capabilities and an increase in transverse plane motions.
- Another possible variation would be to shift the subtalar joint strut more medial in the foot 1 and thus increase the lateral offset 1 1 in FIG. 4. This would predispose the subtalar joint to increased eversion in the initial contact phase of gait. The net effect would be improved shock absorption capabilities.
- the two expansion joint holes sagittal plane orientation could be changed from that in the illustrated embodiment. These holes could be deviated medially or laterally in the frontal plane. The result of a non-sagittal orientation of these two holes is expansion joints and expansion struts which move in a more medial and lateral direction.
- the two expansion joint holes dorsal ends were deviated laterally 20-30° from the sagittal plane, the three expansion joint struts when acted upon by the ground reaction forces are predisposed to encourage dorsiflexion and adduction.
- Orienting the dorsal aspect of the expansion joint holes deviated 20-30° medially from the sagittal plane would encourage dorsiflexion and abduction of the struts.
- the lateral expansion joint hole's dorsal aspect could be deviated medially from the sagittal plane 35°.
- This orientation will predispose the lateral expansion joint strut to move easier into dorsiflexion and abduction—an improved low gear effect.
- the medial expansion joint hole's dorsal aspect could be deviated 45° laterally from the sagittal plane. This orientation would predispose the medial expansion strut to move into dorsiflexion and adduction.
- the net effect is to improve the motion capability of the medial expansion joint strut as its motion is related to the high gear effect.
- a still further alternate embodiment of the prosthetic foot is to have a single expansion joint and expansion joint hole so that only medial and lateral expansion joint struts are formed. This would increase the stiffness of the forefoot and decrease its biplanar motion capabilities. As previously discussed, this single expansion joint hole design could be deviated from the sagittal plane as described. An expansion joint or joints could also be provided in the heel area of the foot to improve the plantar surface of the heel staying plantar grade on uneven surfaces. The ankle joint could also be moved below the subtalar joint in the prosthetic foot. This would allow an increase in the inclination of the subtalar joint without affecting the overall height of the foot—a benefit in a low profile version of the prosthetic foot.
- the body 2 of the prosthetic foot 1 can also be molded as a hybrid type foot using materials of different densities and durometers in the forefoot and midfoot portions 2 A and 2 B as well as in the hindfoot portion 2 C.
- the physical properties, as well as the design characteristics of the foot create its dynamic response capabilities.
Abstract
Description
- A prosthetic foot that mimics the human foot in function is disclosed. The prosthetic foot has hindfoot triplanar motion capability, biplanar midfoot and forefoot motion capabilities and high low dynamic response characteristics for improving gait and comfort qualities of the amputee in walking, running and jumping activities.
- Those in the field of prosthetics have in the past manufactured prosthetic feet which permit varying degrees of motion capability. Most of the known prosthetic feet utilize metal hinges with rubber bumpers to enable this motion capability. These components are sources for mechanical failures and wear. The known prosthetic feet are also generally expensive to produce and maintain. None of the conventional prosthetic feet mimic human gait characteristics, e.g., while known designs allow some motion capability, the conventional prosthetic feet do not reflect humanoid characteristics. These characteristics relate to the biomechanical function of the human foot and ankle joint in gait. The prior art prosthetic feet have not achieved true human gait characteristics because their design features do not mimic the human foot.
- The human foot is a complex comprised of twenty-six separate bones. The bones of the foot articulate with one another to create joints. The joints of the foot, through these articulations, allow movement to occur. The motion capability of a particular joint is dependent upon bony articulations, ligamentous reinforcements and muscular control. Motion capability of specific joints of the foot has been studied quite extensively through history. These scientific studies have identified fourteen different axes of rotations of all the joints of the human foot. They have through thoughtful analysis determined how these axes of rotations and motion capabilities function in human gait and running and jumping activities. The prosthetic foot of the present invention has been made in light of these scientific studies with a view toward providing an improved prosthetic foot that mimics the human foot in function in order to provide the amputee with normal human gait characteristics and improve the quality of life of the amputee.
- A prosthetic foot according to the present invention comprises a forefoot portion, a midfoot portion and a hindfoot portion, wherein the hindfoot portion includes first and second joints permitting closed kinetic chain motion of the prosthetic foot in gait. The first joint has a joint axis oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion about the first joint axis which is at least primarily in the sagittal plane. The second joint has a joint axis oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion about the second joint axis which is at least primarily in the frontal and transverse planes. In the disclosed, preferred embodiment, the first and second joints are formed integrally with the hindfoot portion by respective struts of resilient material of the hindfoot portion. More particularly, the forefoot, midfoot and hindfoot portions of the prosthetic foot are formed of a single piece of plastic as by molding and/or machining. The first joint in the hindfoot portion mimics an ankle joint and the second joint mimics a subtalar joint to allow the foot to function like a normal foot.
- The subtalar joint in the hindfoot portion of the disclosed embodiment constitutes a means for permitting triplanar closed kinetic chain motion of the prosthetic foot in gait. This triplanar motion capability improves the foot staying plantar grade during the stance phase of gait. It also decreases residual limb to socket shear forces associated with motion in the transverse plane.
- The plantar surface of the midfoot portion has a longitudinal arch which is formed with a concavity having a longitudinal axis that is deviated in the
frontal plane 25°-42° from the transverse plane to create frontal and sagittal plane motion capabilities. The medial aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity is larger in radius and more proximal than the lateral aspect of the concavity. The longitudinal arch is shaped to create a high low dynamic response capability of the foot in gait such that the medial aspect of the longitudinal arch has a relatively higher dynamic response capability and the lateral aspect of the longitudinal arch has a relatively lower dynamic response capability. - The posterior of the forefoot portion of the prosthetic foot includes at least one expansion joint hole extending through the forefoot portion between dorsal and plantar surfaces thereof. An expansion joint extends forward from the expansion joint hole to the anterior edge of the forefoot portion to form plural expansion struts which create improved biplanar motion capability of the forefoot portion. Concavities and convexities are utilized on surface areas of the one piece body of the prosthetic foot with the longitudinal axis orientations thereof being selected to create dynamic response and motion capabilities which mimic the human foot.
- These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the disclosed, preferred embodiment, taken with the accompanying drawings.
- The foregoing and a better understanding of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of an example embodiment and the claims when read in connection with the accompanying drawings, all forming a part of the disclosure of this invention. While the foregoing and following written and illustrated disclosure focuses on an example embodiment of the invention, it should be clearly understood that the same is by way of illustration and example only and the invention is not limited thereto. The spirit and scope of the present invention are limited only by the terms of the appended claims.
- The following represents brief descriptions of the drawings, wherein:
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view, from the right front and slightly above, of a right prosthetic foot according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a lateral side view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1 located within a cosmetic covering of the foot, shown in dashed lines, and in position for connection with an adjoining prosthesis on the amputee's leg, also shown in dashed lines.
- FIG. 3 is a medial side view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 4 is a top view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic view of the ankle joint axis of the prosthetic foot as projected on the frontal plane wherein it is seen that the ankle joint axis is deviated from the transverse plane by an angle β with the medial more proximal than the lateral.
- FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of the ankle joint strut taken along the section VII-VII in FIG. 3.
- FIG. 8 is a schematic view of the ankle joint axis of the prosthetic foot as projected on the sagittal plane wherein it is seen that the ankle joint axis is deviated from the transverse plane by an angle θ with the anterior more proximal than the posterior.
- FIG. 9 is a schematic view of the subtalar joint axis of the prosthetic foot as projected on the sagittal plane showing the subtalar joint axis making an angle ψ with the transverse plane with the anterior more proximal than the posterior.
- FIG. 10 is a schematic view of the subtalar joint of the prosthetic foot as projected on the frontal plane with the axis making an angle ω with the transverse plane with the medial more proximal than the lateral.
- FIG. 11 is an enlarged top dorsal view of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1 wherein shading lines have been added to show the locations of concavities and convexities on the dorsal surface of the body of the foot for effecting motion of the foot in gait.
- FIG. 12 is an enlarged, bottom plantar view of the body of the prosthetic foot of FIG. 1 to which lines have been added to show mid-stance contact areas of the foot on a level surface in gait and to which shading lines have been added to depict concavities on the plantar surface of the body for effecting motion of the foot in gait.
- FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view through a lower portion of the midfoot portion of the body of the prosthetic foot taken along the line XIII-XIII in FIG. 2 showing the inclination of the longitudinal arch at angle ε with the transverse plane with the medial more proximal than the lateral.
- FIG. 14 is a side view of an integrally formed metal attachment device for the prosthetic foot.
- FIG. 15 is a top view of the device in FIG. 14.
- FIG. 16 is a top view of the lower attachment plate of the device of FIG. 14.
- Referring now to the drawings, a
prosthetic foot 1 of the invention comprises abody 2 formed of a resilient, semi-rigid material, plastic in the disclosed embodiment, which is formed with forefoot, midfoot andhindfoot portions 2A, 2B and 2C, respectively. A cosmetic covering 3 of the foot surrounds thebody 2 as depicted in FIG. 2. Thebody 2 in the disclosed embodiment is formed by molding or by pouring the material of the body into a negative mold. However, other processes could be employed to form thebody 2 such as machining the body from a solid piece of resilient, semi-rigid material, or by using a combination of molding and machining, for example. The plastic ofbody 2 is an elastomer, polyurethane in the illustrated example but other plastics or composite materials could be used. Thebody 2 of the foot is shaped and designed to simulate a human foot's hindfoot triplanar, forefoot biplanar and hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot dynamic response windless effect motion capabilities as discussed herein. - The rear foot triplanar motion capability is achieved by the hindfoot portion2C which includes first and
second joints first joint 4 acts as an ankle joint. The second joint 5 acts as a subtalar joint. The ankle joint axis ofrotation 4A is oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion 2C about thejoint axis 4A which is at least primarily in the sagittal plane. More particularly, the anklejoint axis 4A is preferably externally rotated an angle α of 8° to 30° from a line drawn normal to the long axis X-X of the foot, see FIG. 4. The anklejoint axis 4A also deviates from the transverse plane an angle β of 8° with the medial more proximal than the lateral, see FIG. 6. This ankle joint axis of rotation orientation allows the prosthetic foot to mimic human foot ankle joint sagittal and frontal plane motion capabilities. - Motion in the open chain cannot occur in the prosthetic foot because of the lack of muscular control. However, in closed kinetic chain motion, dorsiflexion with abduction appears as forward movement of the leg on the foot with internal rotation of the leg. Plantar flexion with adduction appears as backward movement of the leg on the foot with external rotation of the leg. Ground reaction forces create these motions by way of the
prosthetic foot 1. - The
ankle joint 4 and subtalar joint 5 are formed integrally with the hindfoot portion 2C byrespective struts 4B and 5B of the resilient material of the hindfoot portion. The struts are each elongated in the direction of their respective joint axis. The anterior and posterior side surfaces of the ankle joint strut 4B and the medial and lateral side surfaces of the subtalarjoint strut 5B are concavely curved for transferring and absorbing forces in motion of the hindfoot portion about the ankle and subtalar joint axes. The concavely curved anterior side surface of the strut 4B is formed by the periphery of ahole 6 which extends through the hindfoot portion 2C along the anterior side of the strut 4B. The diameter d1 ofhole 6 infoot 1 is ⅝ inch but this can vary dependent upon the overall size of thebody 2 of thefoot 1. - Anterior to the
hole 6 is agap 7 which permits the motion of the hindfoot portion 2C about thejoint axis 4A. The height 8 ofgap 7 is selected so that a lower surface of thebody 2 adjacent thegap 7 acts as a stop against an opposing upper surface defining the gap to limit the amount of motion of the hindfoot portion 2C about the anklejoint axis 4A in dorsiflexion. The wider the anterior gap, the more potential for dorsiflexion range of motion. Thehole 6 in the illustrated embodiment extends in a direction parallel to thejoint axis 4A. - The posterior aspect of the ankle joint strut4B of the hindfoot portion 2C is a concavity having a diameter d2 of 1½-2 inches in the example embodiment but this can vary and is determined by the overall size of the
body 2. For example, for an infant or small child's foot the diameter d2 would be smaller. The proximal aspect ofconcavity 9 preferably extends in a direction parallel to the anklejoint axis 4A. The distal aspect ofconcavity 9 can extend in a direction parallel to the anklejoint axis 4A or extends in a direction parallel to the frontal plane. This curvature is necessary to absorb shock and to allow freer plantarflexion range of motion about the ankle joint. To create ankle joint motion capability, the width w and thickness t of the plastic ankle strut 4B, see FIG. 7, can be varied as can the density, durometer and other properties of the material utilized. For example, an above the knee prosthetic foot needs different motion characteristics than a below the knee prosthetic foot. - It is well understood in the prosthetic profession that a heel lever creates flexion torque and that a toe lever creates extension torque. As a consequence, the motion requirements are different for above the knee and below the knee prosthetic feet. As a result, an above the knee prosthetic foot may have a different posterior ankle joint concavity radius of curvature and it may be formed of a less dense material. This in effect, would decrease the heel lever and the resultant flexion torque associated with it. The ankle
joint axis 4A as projected on a sagittal plane is inclined from the transverse plane an angle θ with the anterior being more proximal than the posterior, see FIG. 8. The angle θ in the enclosed embodiment is the same as the angle β in FIG. 6, 8°. - The subtalar joint5 in the
prosthetic foot 1 is spaced below and extends in a different direction than theankle joint 4. The subtalarjoint axis 5A extends along the subtalarjoint strut 5B and is oriented for permitting motion of the hindfoot portion 2C about thejoint axis 5A in all three of the frontal, transverse and sagittal planes, although primarily in the front and transverse planes. Thejoint axis 5A runs in the hindfoot portion 2C from posterior, plantar and lateral to anterior, dorsal and medial. Preferably, thejoint axis 5A as projected on a transverse plane is inclined at an angle Δ1 of 9° to 23° with the longitudinal axis of the foot, X-X in FIG. 4. The angle Δ1 is 23° in the example embodiment. Thejoint axis 5A as projected on a sagittal plane (the oblique axis of joint 5), as seen in the direction of arrow B in FIG. 1, makes an angle ψ of 29° to 45° with respect to the transverse plane, see FIG. 9. The angle ψ is 30° in the disclosed embodiment. - The subtalar joint5 is bounded medially and laterally by
respective holes joint axis 5A. The diameter d3 of the holes is variable depending on the overall size of thebody 2. It is {fraction (3/16)} inch in the example embodiment. Medial andlateral gaps holes body 2 of the foot to permit the motion of the hindfoot portion 2C about the subtalarjoint axis 5A. Theheight 14 of themedial gap 12 and theheight 15 of thelateral gap 13 are selected so that a lower surface of the hindfoot portion 2C defining each gap acts as a stop against the opposing upper surface defining the gap to limit the amount of bending or rotational motion of the hindfoot portion about thejoint axis 5A in eversion and inversion in gait. The height of themedial gap 14 is preferably greater than, such as twice that of thelateral gap 15. Theheight 14 is ⅛ inch andheight 15 is {fraction (1/16)} inch in the example embodiment. Thejoint axis 5A as projected on the frontal plane, as seen in the direction of arrow A in FIG. 2, is inclined an angle ω to the transverse plane with the medial being more proximal than the lateral, see FIG. 10. - The subtalar joint axis of
rotation 5A in theprosthetic foot 1 mimics the human foot's subtalar joint in function. The significance of the longitudinal axis ofrotation 5A of the joint 5 being oriented externally 9-23° from the long axis of the foot is in allowing medial and lateral or frontal plane motion capability. The amount of possible frontal plane motion of the prosthetic foot at the joint 5 is dictated by the height of the medial and lateral subtalarjoint gaps medial gap 14 ofprosthetic foot 1 is, as noted above, preferably twice as wide as thelateral gap 15 to allow a greater range of inversion than eversion. - The curvature on the medial and lateral sides of the
strut 5B provided by theholes foot 1 will result in near equal rotation (in the case ψ is 45°) of the horizontal segment. This orientation will improve transverse and frontal plane motion capability. When the angle ψ of the oblique axis of the subtalar joint 5 is 30° instead of 45°, the axis is twice as close to the horizontal plane as to the vertical plane and twice as much motion of the foot occurs in the frontal plane as in the transverse plane with a given rotation of the leg about its longitudinal axis. The importance of transverse plane motion capability at the subtalar joint 5 is for transverse plane torque absorption, for reduction of shear forces at the residual limb to socket interface and for avoiding the need to add a separate torque absorber to the prosthetic foot. - The average transverse plane rotation of the lower leg of a person in gait is 19°. The subtalar joint is the mechanism in the human foot, and also in the
prosthetic foot 1, which allows these 19° of rotation to occur. Closed kinetic chain motion of the subtalar joint 5 in thefoot 1 remains inversion with supination and eversion with pronation in the frontal plane. The subtalar joint functional range of motion in gait is 6° total motion. In the case only 6° of frontal plane motion is needed in theprosthetic foot 1, it is possible to incline the oblique axis of the joint 5 toward the upper end of therange 30°-45° to derive a comfort benefit. - The hindfoot portion2C of the
foot 1 is also formed with aheel 16 with a posteriorlateral corner 17 which is more posterior and lateral than the medial corner of the heel to encourage hindfoot eversion during the initial contact phase of gait. As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the posterior aspect of theheel 16 is a duck-tail shaped torsion bar with thelateral posterior corner 17 thereof offset adistance 1 1 of ½ to ¾ inch more posterior than the medial corner. The use of a smaller angle Δ of 16°, for example, or a more medial positioning of the subtalarjoint strut 5B as discussed later also causes theheel corner 17 to be offset a distance of 1 2 of ½ inch more lateral than the projected axis of the subtalar joint. This ½ inch lateral offset predisposes the rear foot at heel strike to cause the subtalar joint to evert. This initial contact subtalar joint eversion acts as a shock absorber to dampen the impact of the heel strike. In addition, the shape of the posterior lateral corner of the foot in the sagittal plane is curved upwardly, see FIGS. 2 and 3, with a radius of curvature of 1½ to 3 inches in the disclosed embodiment. This radius of the curvature can vary depending on the overall size of the foot. This large radius of curvature allows the posterior lateral corner to deflect proximally at heel strike which also acts as a shock absorber. The density of plastic in the posterior aspect of thebody 2 of thefoot 1 could also be selected to be less than that in the rest of the body of the foot to create even more shock absorption capability. - The top23 of the hindfoot portion 2C of the
prosthetic foot 1 is made flat and has a metal attachment device 18 embedded into the plastic. The metal device 18 is made of stainless steel inshoe 1, but other high strength, light weight metal alloys, such as Ti alloys, could be used utilized. The device 18 permits attachment of the prosthetic foot to aprosthetic component 24 secured to a person's limb above the foot as schematically depicted in FIG. 2. Thelower part 19 of the attachment device 18 is embedded into the material of the hindfoot portion 2C during molding. Preferably, thislower part 19 has several holes therethrough to aid in anchoring the device in the molded elastomer ofbody 2 at the time of molding. In the disclosed example embodiment, the attachment device comprises an upperpyramid attachment plate 20 connected in spaced relation to alower attachment plate 19 by a plurality offasteners 21 as shown in the drawings. Alternatively, the upper and lower attachment plates and connecting elements could be formed integrally as shown in FIG. 14. The attachment device 18 is located in the hindfoot portion 2C along the longitudinal axis X-X of thefoot 1 as shown in the drawings. - The metal attachment device18′ in FIG. 14 comprises integrally formed
lower attachment plate 19′, upperpyramid attachment plate 20′ and connectingstruts 21′. Thelower plate 19′ is formed with an ⅛ inch proximal offset 41 on the anterior leaf and medial andlateral offsets posterior holes plastic body 2 during molding. A line C-C through the holes 44 and 45 is 8° externally rotated from a normal to the sagittal plane X-X with the medial being further anterior than the lateral. The line C-C is preferably offset posteriorally a distance X′ from the middle or equal orientation D-D so that the holes 44 and 45 fall in the middle of the ankle joint axis strut 4B. The posterior offset of holes 44 and 45, together withposterior hole 47 counter the toe lever length. These features can also be used on the device 18 where fasteners join separate upper andlower attachment plates - The dorsal surface of the
midfoot portion 2B anterior to thegap 7 is formed with adorsal concavity 25 which allows themidfoot portion 2B and forefoot portion 2A to dorsiflex as weight is transferred to the anterior portions of the prosthetic foot in gait. A metatarsalarch convexity 26 is provided on the dorsal surface of themidfoot portion 2B anterior and medial from thedorsal concavity 25. In addition, the dorsal aspect of themidfoot portion 2B and forefoot portion 2A is formed with aconcavity 27 which mimics in function the fifth ray axis of motion of the human foot. See the different shadings in FIG. 11 depicting the locations ofconcavities convexity 26 on the dorsal surface ofbody 2. Theconcavity 27 has its longitudinal axis Y-Y oriented at an angle Y of 35° to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot with the medial being more anterior than the lateral to mimic in function the fifth ray axis of motion in gait as an oblique lower gear axis of the rotation of the second to fifth metatarsals in the human foot. The angle γ could be less than 35°, but is preferably within the range of 20° to 35°. - The plantar surface of the
body 2 offoot 1 has alongitudinal arch 28, see FIG. 12, which, in the vicinity of locations corresponding to the navicular medially and the base of the fourth metatarsal laterally of the human foot, includes aconcavity 29 with its longitudinal axis oriented normal to the axis Z-Z, the first ray axis of motion in the human foot to mimic the function thereof, see FIG. 12 where the concavity location is shown by shadings added to the drawing of the plantar surface of thebody 2 offoot 1. The axis Z-Z in the example embodiment is at an angle Σ of 45° to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot with the medial more posterior than the lateral. The angle Σ could be less than 45°, but is preferably within the range of 30° to 45°. Use of angles for γ and Σ at the lower end of the specified ranges will decrease the difference between the high and low gear principles. The latter may be utilized on high activity level amputees, for example. The plantar surface of thefoot 1 in the anterior portion of the longitudinal arch concavity further includes a generally annular metatarsal arch concavity or cuppingarea 30 delineating the posterior surface of a forefoot plantar surface contact area which has been outlined at 31 as shown in FIG. 12. A hindfoot contact area is outlined at 31′. - The
longitudinal arch 28 itself is formed with a concavity having a longitudinal axis A-A, FIG. 12, that as projected on the frontal plane is deviated at an angle ε of 25° to 42°, see FIG. 13, with the medial higher than the lateral to create frontal and sagittal plane motion capabilities as with the midtarsal joints in the human foot. Themedial aspect 32 of the longitudinal arch concavity is larger in radius and more proximal than thelateral aspect 33 of the concavity. The anterior aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity has its longitudinal axis B-B orientated at an angle η of 35° to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot with the medial being more anterior than the lateral. The middle aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity has its longitudinal axis A-A orientation normal to the longitudinal axis X-X of the foot. - The
longitudinal arch 28 is provided with this three-dimensional fan shape for causing specific motion outcomes of the foot in gait. The anterior longitudinal arch concavity blends with the first ray and metatarsalarch concavities body 2. The posterior aspect of the longitudinal arch concavity has its longitudinal axis C-C deviated an angle k of 30° to the frontal plane with the medial side being more posterior than the lateral, see FIG. 12. - The
midfoot portion 2B is formed of a semi-rigid material as noted above and thelongitudinal arch 28 of theresilient body 2 is shaped to create a dynamic response capability of the foot in gait such that themedial aspect 32 of the longitudinal arch has a relatively higher dynamic response capability than that of thelateral aspect 33 of the longitudinal arch. As a result of this and the aforementioned features of thefoot 1, biplanar motion potential exists in themidfoot portion 2B corresponding to that in the midtarsal region of the human foot where motion occurs in the frontal and sagittal planes enabling the forefoot to remain plantar grade while accommodating the positions of the rearfoot during gait. The oblique axes of themidfoot portion 2B are supinated in the propulsive phase of gait. The windless effect of the plantar aponeurosis activated with heel lift aids supination of these oblique axes during propulsion. Only 4-6° of frontal plane motion in gait is needed to keep the foot plantar grade. The prosthetic foot's physical properties, as well as its surface shapes, dictate motion potential outcomes. The longitudinal arch area of theprosthetic foot 1 is shaped specific to achieve superior functional motion outcomes. The longitudinal arch deviation from the sagittal plane as discussed above enhances the frontal plane motion and dynamic response characteristics of thefoot 1. - The proximal section of the
midfoot portion 2B is made flat to accept the forces of the anterior ankle joint dorsiflexion stopadjacent gap 7. Themidfoot portion 2B is thicker than the forefoot portion 2A. Themedial aspect lateral aspect foot 1 is made to accommodate ⅜ inch or ¾ inch heel heights. The plantar surface of thebody 2 in the region of the forefoot and midfoot junction has the metatarsal concavity orcup area 30 as noted above. This cup area functions to create contact on the outside edges of the cup. This raisedarea 31 runs parallel to the axis of motion, Y-Y in FIG. 11 of the fifth ray. - The forefoot portion2A of the
body 2 has twoexpansion joints area 30, where it terminates in an expansionjoint hole 36. The lateral expansion joint 35 runs further posterior into the forefoot than themedial expansion joint 34 where it terminates in an expansionjoint hole 37. As a result, the two expansion joints function as do the high and lower gears in the human foot. As seen in FIG. 12, a straight line B-B connecting the two expansion joint holes 36 and 37 is deviated at an angle η of 35° externally from the long axis of the foot. Since the distance from the ankle joint to the oblique axis B-B is shorter on the lateral side than the medial side, this axis is used first on heel lift before the shift to the high-gear function. The function across the high-gear or medial side, push-off results in a pronated forefoot-to-rear foot position and increased weight bearing under the medial forefoot. Thus, the forefoot portion 2A functions to allow biplanar forefoot motions to occur. - More specifically, the
expansion joints foot 1 mimics the human foot in this regard. As the hindfoot portion 2C changes position, the forefoot and midfoot portions need to change positions in the opposite direction. This counter twisting keeps the foot plantar grade. - The
prosthetic foot 1 worn by the amputee acts as a closed chain prosthetic device which responds to the ground forces created in human gait. In the initial contact phase of gait, the posterior lateral heel strikes the ground. The design of the posterior lateral heel area is offset as discussed above to transfer weight via the duck tail shaped extension which deflects upwardly to absorb the heel lever forces which create flexion torque of the calf shank. Further enhancement of this torque absorption and improved shock absorption characteristics of thefoot 1 are provided by theposterior concavity 9 and the lateral offset l2 of the heel to the axis of rotation of the subtalar joint 5 such that with force application the subtalar joint is made to evert. This eversion acts as a shock absorber to dampen the initial contact weight transfer phase of gait. In addition, force application is posterior to the axis ofrotation 4A of the prosthetic ankle joint 4 causing the ankle joint to plantar flex and the midfoot andforefoot portions 2B and 2C of the foot to be lowered to the ground. - With reference to the plantar
weight bearing surfaces prosthetic foot 1. As weight is transferred through the hindfoot portion 2C, the subtalar joint 5 allows movement in thefoot 1 to occur in what corresponds to the three cardinal planes of human motion, namely the transverse, frontal and sagittal planes. This triplanar motion capability is achieved because of the orientation of the prosthetic foot's subtalar joint axis ofrotation 5A which is deviated from the transverse, frontal and sagittal planes as discussed above. This orientation allows motion capability in the three planes. The sagittal plane component is less than that in the frontal and transverse planes. The decreased sagittal plane motion of the subtalar joint 5 is compensated for by the ankle joint 4 which is located just proximal to the subtalar joint. - The subtalar joint's ability to allow motion to occur in the transverse plane is of significance as in the stance phase of gait, the lower extremity primarily through the subtalar joint must absorb 19° of transverse plane motion transferred through the tibia and fibula, to the ankle joint and then to the subtalar joint. The subtalar joint5 acts as a mitered hinge and transfers this motion into the hindfoot and
midfoot portions 2C and 2B. This motion is absorbed in the midfoot dynamic response qualities and in the midfoot-forefoot biplanar motion capabilities. As a result, improved plantar surface weight bearing characteristics are achieved. Before foot flat in the stance phase of gait, as the weight transfer line moves anteriorly in the foot and approaches theankle joint 4, the ground reaction forces cause the ankle joint to plantar flex until the entire foot hits the ground. This plantar flexion motion is achieved by the ankle jointanterior gap 7 spreading or opening further and by the posterior anklejoint concavity 9 compressing. - Once the
foot 1 is flat on the ground, the weight is then transferred into theankle joint 4. As the weight transfer moves more anteriorly in the foot, theanterior dorsiflexion gap 7 engages and further dorsiflexion motion is arrested. That is, the motion is arrested by the opposing surfaces defining the anterior ankle joint gap coming together. The larger thegap 7, the more dorsiflexion motion potential. The weight transfer to the anterior ankle joint stopadjacent gap 7 is of significance. The weight is thereby transferred into themidfoot portion 2B of thefoot 1. As a consequence, the area of thelongitudinal arch 28 of thefoot 1 is loaded and it responds with its concavity expanding and absorbing these vertical forces. The result is more shock absorption qualities and dynamic response capabilities. - The proximal medial longitudinal arch area is much larger in radius than the lateral distal. As a consequence, the medial has increased expansion potential and higher dynamic response than the distal lateral longitudinal concavity of the arch. As the weight transfer moves even more anterior in the
prosthetic foot 1 approaching the medial aspect of the first ray longitudinal axis of rotation, Z-Z in FIG. 12, the weight transfer is approaching the middle frontal plane of the foot. - The plantar and dorsal surfaces of the prosthetic foot are designed to allow or encourage specific motions to occur. More specifically, the first ray axis of rotation Z-Z and the motion capability associated with this axis in the human foot are mimicked in the
prosthetic foot 1 by the plantar surface of the forefoot portion 2A being shaped into theconcavity 29. The longitudinal axis Z-Z of theconcavity 29 is oriented to be parallel to the longitudinal axis of rotation of the first ray in the human foot. This orientation is 45° internally rotated to the long axis of the foot, see angle Σ in FIG. 12. - The motion outcome from force application to this concavity and its degree specific orientation is vertical shock absorption and improved dynamic response capabilities. The
first ray concavity 29, as well as the longitudinalarch concavity 28 create dynamic response capabilities. These dynamic response capabilities are exhibited by the ground forces transferring weight to the sides of the concavities and the concavities expanding. Thus, concavity expansion occurs in theprosthetic foot 1 during gait and once the force is removed, thefoot 1 springs back into its original shape which releases stored energy. - The ankle and
subtalar joints prosthetic foot 1 also have the potential to produce a dynamic response capability. For example, as the ankle joint 4 plantar flexes and theanterior dorsiflexion gap 7 spreads and theposterior concavity 9 compresses, energy is stored in the ankle joint strut 4B. The strut 4B will return to its normal position once the vertical forces are removed. - Thus, dynamic responses of the
prosthetic foot 1 in response to ground reaction forces are associated with expansion and compression of concavities and convexities and to a lesser degree with movement that occurs and the design features of a specific joint's strut. Thestruts 4B and 5B constitute the middle pivot points ofclass 1 levers in the hindfoot portion 2C. The ankle and subtalar joint struts each have energy storing capabilities. The physical properties, as well as the design characteristics, create the dynamic response capabilities. Force application will cause movement to occur. Once the force is removed, the physical properties of the strut make it return to its original resting shape and as a consequence dynamic response has occurred. While the prosthetic foot's first ray axis and fifth ray axis are not distinct joint axes, the shape and design of the surface features of thebody 2 of the prosthetic foot dictate functional motion capabilities such that these specific motions are encouraged to occur as discussed above. - The interrelationship between the midfoot's plantar and dorsal shapes are significant in understanding the dynamic response capabilities that exist. In this area of the
prosthetic foot 1, the medial and lateral surface shapes are shape specific and these shapes provide functional movement outcomes. In gait, the lateral dorsalfifth ray concavity 27 is compressed, allowing less resisted motion potential. This relates to a low gear principle. The medial midfoot plantar and dorsal surface areas as previously described (first ray in function) respond to force application by expanding. Expansion has increased resistance qualities and as a result dynamic response capabilities are enhanced. This enhanced dynamic response capability is associated with a high gear principle. - The high gear and low gear principles relate to gait acceleration, deceleration and speed components. The high gear improved dynamic response capabilities can be utilized in gait acceleration and deceleration phases. A low gear principle relates more to the speed of gait, rather than the aforementioned acceleration and deceleration. The low gear component of the
prosthetic foot 1 will allow the amputee to ambulate with less energy expenditure while walking at slower speeds. This decrease in energy expenditure is associated with two principles, namely the length of the toe levers as these toe lever lengths relate to extension torque of the calf shank, and to the dynamic response characteristics of the medial and lateral areas of the prosthetic foot. - The high gear has a longer toe lever than the low gear. When the amputee walks slowly, less momentum and inertia are created. The ability to efficiently overcome a long toe lever is less. The body's center of gravity shifts more laterally during slow walking in the stance phase of gait. With the improved frontal plane motion capabilities of the
prosthetic foot 1, the patient's calf shank can be positioned to move into the low or high gear sections of the midfoot and forefoot areas. If the amputee wearing thefoot 1 is accelerating or decelerating, he will utilize the higher gear function once reaching a comfortable gait speed. The amputee will seek an area of the forefoot 2A which allows the comfortable gait speed to continue. The force transfer will occur more medial if the amputee wants more dynamic response characteristics or more lateral for less dynamic response characteristics. With theprosthetic foot 1, the amputee has a choice of functional movement outcomes. - Improved overall amputee gait patterns are the result of such selective control. As the weight transfer moves even further anteriorly in the
prosthetic foot 1, the axis of the fifth ray is replicated by the arrangement of the two expansion joint holes 36 and 37 and by the shape and design of the plantar and dorsal surfaces of thebody 2 of the foot. That is, the dorsal aspect of thebody 2 about the fifth ray's axis of rotation Y-Y is shaped into a concavity, 27. This concavity encourages motion to occur perpendicular to the longitudinal axis orientation Y-Y. It is known that in normal gate the calf shank, tibia and fibula do not progress solely in the sagittal plane. It is known that at midstance, the knee or calf shank migrates laterally and frontal plane motions also occur. This is exhibited in the human knee by the larger surface area of the medial femoral condyle. - The function of the fifth ray axis of rotation Y-Y in
foot 1 is important. As weight is transferred anterior and laterally to theprosthetic foot 1, the fifth ray longitudinal axis Y-Y allows motion to occur perpendicular to its longitudinal axis orientation. Additionally, the two expansion joint holes 36 and 37 are positioned to encourage forefoot motions that are positioned on the fifth ray's longitudinal axis of rotation and, as a consequence, improved biplanar motion capabilities are created. The low gear and high gear effects referred to above are also enhanced. As a result, the prosthetic foot gait characteristics are improved and human gait is mimicked. - The biplanar forefoot qualities of the
prosthetic foot 1 are enhanced by the expansion joints and expansion joint holes as referred to above. The two expansion joint holes are strategically placed to create specific motion capabilities. That is, the two holes longitudinally, as projected on the sagittal plane are oriented at angle b of 45° from the line B-B parallel to the frontal plane, see FIG. 2. This orientation acts as a mitered hinge much like the mitered hinge of the subtalar joint. Improved biplanar motion capabilities are the result. - The plantar surface
weight bearing surface 31 of theforefoot portion 2A and 31′ of the hindfoot portion 2C are also design and shape specific. The plantar surface expansion joint holes 36 and 37 are located in themetatarsal arch area 30. As a consequence, as weight is transferred onto the area of thefoot 1 equivalent to the metatarsal heads, the weight is borne on the expansion joint struts 38, 39 and 40. As the weight-bearing surface on the plantar aspect of thefoot 1 contacts the ground, weight is borne by the expansion struts, causing a suspended web effect. This allows a tremendous amount of forming ability, while maintaining the structural stability needed for a sound stable foot. With the improved biplanar forefoot motion capabilities of the prosthetic foot, human gait is improved. - As the weight transfer in gait moves even further anteriorly into the region of the expansion joint struts and ray area, the
prosthetic foot 1 is shaped and designed to create specific motion outcomes. The dorsal and plantar aspects of the aforementioned region of thebody 2 are shaped in an upwardly extending arch, see FIG. 2. The dorsal aspect concavity is oriented to flow into thefifth ray concavity 27. This melding of shapes, one into another, makes for a smooth transition between late stance phase and swing phase of gait. The upwardly shaped ray region functions as dorsiflexed toes in the aforementioned gait sequence. - Although the prosthetic foot of the invention has been described in connection with one specific embodiment, alternative embodiments are possible. For example, there is a spatial relationship of the height of the ankle joint in the prosthetic foot and how this height effects the potential orientation of the oblique axis of the subtalar joint strut in the foot. In the disclosed embodiment, the height of the hindfoot (plantar surface to pyramid attachment surface) is 3-3½ inches. This height could be made larger and the ankle joint's orientation moved more proximal. This alternate orientation of the ankle joint allows the oblique axis of the subtalar joint to approach and be changed from 29-30°, to an angle of 42-45°, for example. The 30° orientation in the disclosed embodiment provides increased inversion and eversion (frontal plane motion) and decreased abduction and adduction (transverse plane motion). With the alternate embodiment having an ankle joint that is positioned more proximal, a 45° oblique subtalar joint axis will allow equal transverse and frontal plane motions. The net effect of this latter orientation would be to decrease inversion/eversion frontal plane motion and increase abduction and adduction of the foot as compared with the foot of the example embodiment. This increase in abduction and adduction would be resisted by the ground reaction forces and as a consequence there would be a decrease in the inversion and eversion capabilities and an increase in transverse plane motions.
- Another possible variation would be to shift the subtalar joint strut more medial in the
foot 1 and thus increase the lateral offset 1 1 in FIG. 4. This would predispose the subtalar joint to increased eversion in the initial contact phase of gait. The net effect would be improved shock absorption capabilities. Further, the two expansion joint holes sagittal plane orientation could be changed from that in the illustrated embodiment. These holes could be deviated medially or laterally in the frontal plane. The result of a non-sagittal orientation of these two holes is expansion joints and expansion struts which move in a more medial and lateral direction. For example, if the two expansion joint holes dorsal ends were deviated laterally 20-30° from the sagittal plane, the three expansion joint struts when acted upon by the ground reaction forces are predisposed to encourage dorsiflexion and adduction. Orienting the dorsal aspect of the expansion joint holes deviated 20-30° medially from the sagittal plane would encourage dorsiflexion and abduction of the struts. In addition, it is possible to orient the two expansion joint holes so that one hole is deviated medially and the other hole is deviated laterally. For example, the lateral expansion joint hole's dorsal aspect could be deviated medially from thesagittal plane 35°. This orientation will predispose the lateral expansion joint strut to move easier into dorsiflexion and abduction—an improved low gear effect. The medial expansion joint hole's dorsal aspect could be deviated 45° laterally from the sagittal plane. This orientation would predispose the medial expansion strut to move into dorsiflexion and adduction. The net effect is to improve the motion capability of the medial expansion joint strut as its motion is related to the high gear effect. - A still further alternate embodiment of the prosthetic foot is to have a single expansion joint and expansion joint hole so that only medial and lateral expansion joint struts are formed. This would increase the stiffness of the forefoot and decrease its biplanar motion capabilities. As previously discussed, this single expansion joint hole design could be deviated from the sagittal plane as described. An expansion joint or joints could also be provided in the heel area of the foot to improve the plantar surface of the heel staying plantar grade on uneven surfaces. The ankle joint could also be moved below the subtalar joint in the prosthetic foot. This would allow an increase in the inclination of the subtalar joint without affecting the overall height of the foot—a benefit in a low profile version of the prosthetic foot.
- The
body 2 of theprosthetic foot 1 can also be molded as a hybrid type foot using materials of different densities and durometers in the forefoot andmidfoot portions 2A and 2B as well as in the hindfoot portion 2C. The physical properties, as well as the design characteristics of the foot create its dynamic response capabilities. - This concludes the description of the example embodiment and possible variations or alternative embodiments. However, it should be understood that numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art that will fall within the spirit and scope of the principles of this invention. More particularly, reasonable variations and modifications are possible in the component parts and/or arrangements of the subject combination arrangement within the scope of the foregoing disclosure, the drawings, and the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Claims (71)
Priority Applications (11)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/742,077 US6443995B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2000-12-22 | Prosthetic foot |
US09/917,660 US6743260B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-07-31 | Prosthetic foot |
CNB200510135833XA CN100548241C (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-12-21 | False foot |
CNB018228208A CN1243521C (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-12-21 | Prosthetic foot |
PCT/US2001/048954 WO2002051342A1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-12-21 | Prosthetic foot |
JP2002552491A JP4195611B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-12-21 | Artificial foot |
RU2003122526/14A RU2286749C2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-12-21 | Foot's prosthetic appliance |
EP01992168A EP1343442A4 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-12-21 | Prosthetic foot |
CA002432681A CA2432681A1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-12-21 | Prosthetic foot |
US10/790,177 US6936074B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2004-03-02 | Prosthetic foot |
US10/864,643 US7108723B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2004-06-10 | Prosthetic foot |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/742,077 US6443995B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2000-12-22 | Prosthetic foot |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/820,895 Continuation-In-Part US6562075B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-03-30 | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US09/917,660 Continuation-In-Part US6743260B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-07-31 | Prosthetic foot |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020082713A1 true US20020082713A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 |
US6443995B1 US6443995B1 (en) | 2002-09-03 |
Family
ID=24983394
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/742,077 Expired - Fee Related US6443995B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2000-12-22 | Prosthetic foot |
US09/917,660 Expired - Fee Related US6743260B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-07-31 | Prosthetic foot |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/917,660 Expired - Fee Related US6743260B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2001-07-31 | Prosthetic foot |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6443995B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100548241C (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050267603A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-01 | Lecomte Christophe G | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US20060167563A1 (en) * | 2005-01-25 | 2006-07-27 | Johnson Christopher L | Sub-malleolar non-articulating prosthetic foot with improved dorsiflexion |
US20070203585A1 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | Wilson Michael T | Prosthetic foot with composite heel |
US20080228288A1 (en) * | 2007-03-13 | 2008-09-18 | Ronald Harry Nelson | Composite Prosthetic Foot |
US20090210091A1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2009-08-20 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Legged mobile robot and control system thereof |
US20090234463A1 (en) * | 2008-03-14 | 2009-09-17 | Wilson Michael T | Prosthetic foot with flexible ankle portion |
US20100004757A1 (en) * | 2008-07-01 | 2010-01-07 | Ossur Hf | Smooth rollover insole for prosthetic foot |
US20110213471A1 (en) * | 2010-02-26 | 2011-09-01 | össur hf | Prosthetic foot with a curved split |
US8961618B2 (en) | 2011-12-29 | 2015-02-24 | össur hf | Prosthetic foot with resilient heel |
USD795433S1 (en) | 2015-06-30 | 2017-08-22 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Prosthetic foot cover |
USD797292S1 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2017-09-12 | össur hf | Prosthetic foot plate |
US10251762B2 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2019-04-09 | Victhom Laboratory Inc. | Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications |
USD915596S1 (en) | 2018-04-10 | 2021-04-06 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Prosthetic foot with tapered fasteners |
Families Citing this family (70)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6511512B2 (en) * | 1998-04-10 | 2003-01-28 | Ossur Hf | Active shock module prosthesis |
US7686848B2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2010-03-30 | Freedom Innovations, Llc | Prosthetic foot with energy transfer |
US6443995B1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-09-03 | Barry W. Townsend | Prosthetic foot |
US7410503B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2008-08-12 | Bioquest Prosthetics Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US6562075B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2003-05-13 | Barry W. Townsend | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US7611543B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2009-11-03 | Bioquest Prosthetics, Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
EP1343442A4 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2008-09-24 | Barry W Townsend | Prosthetic foot |
US8070829B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2011-12-06 | Bioquest Prosthetics Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US7578852B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2009-08-25 | Bioquest Prosthetics, Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance and improved vertical load/shock absorption |
US7429272B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2008-09-30 | Bioquest Prosthetics Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US8236062B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2012-08-07 | Bioquest Prosthetics Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US7507259B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2009-03-24 | Bioquest Prosthetics, Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US7374578B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2008-05-20 | Bioquest Prosthetics, Llc | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US20070213841A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2007-09-13 | Townsend Barry W | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US7736394B2 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2010-06-15 | Victhom Human Bionics Inc. | Actuated prosthesis for amputees |
US6793683B1 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2004-09-21 | Aldo A. Laghi | Prosthetic foot with medial/lateral stabilization |
EP2535024B2 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2019-01-16 | Victhom Human Bionics Inc. | Actuated prosthesis for above-knee amputees |
US8007544B2 (en) | 2003-08-15 | 2011-08-30 | Ossur Hf | Low profile prosthetic foot |
US8574314B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2013-11-05 | Bioquest Prosthetics Llc | Resilient prosthetic and orthotic components which incorporate a plurality of sagittally oriented struts |
US6969408B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-11-29 | Ossur Engineering, Inc. | Low profile active shock module prosthesis |
US7462201B2 (en) * | 2003-10-21 | 2008-12-09 | Freedom Innovations, Llc | Prosthetic foot with an adjustable ankle and method |
US7815689B2 (en) | 2003-11-18 | 2010-10-19 | Victhom Human Bionics Inc. | Instrumented prosthetic foot |
US20050107889A1 (en) * | 2003-11-18 | 2005-05-19 | Stephane Bedard | Instrumented prosthetic foot |
WO2005079712A2 (en) | 2004-02-12 | 2005-09-01 | össur hf | System and method for motion-controlled foot unit |
US7896927B2 (en) | 2004-02-12 | 2011-03-01 | össur hf. | Systems and methods for actuating a prosthetic ankle based on a relaxed position |
US20050283257A1 (en) * | 2004-03-10 | 2005-12-22 | Bisbee Charles R Iii | Control system and method for a prosthetic knee |
WO2005087144A2 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2005-09-22 | össur hf | Control system and method for a prosthetic knee |
EP1732482A2 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2006-12-20 | Tensegrity Prosthetics, Inc. | Tensegrity joints for prosthetic, orthotic, and robotic devices |
EP1729697A4 (en) * | 2004-04-01 | 2010-01-27 | Barry W Townsend | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance |
US7581454B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2009-09-01 | össur hf | Method of measuring the performance of a prosthetic foot |
US8128709B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2012-03-06 | össur hf | Functional foot cover |
DE102004037877B4 (en) * | 2004-08-04 | 2010-04-29 | Bauerfeind Ag | Foot prosthesis |
EP1848380B1 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2015-04-15 | Össur hf | Systems and methods for processing limb motion |
EP1843823B1 (en) | 2005-02-02 | 2016-10-26 | Össur hf | Prosthetic and orthotic systems usable for rehabilitation |
CN101155557B (en) | 2005-02-02 | 2012-11-28 | 奥瑟Hf公司 | Sensing systems and methods for monitoring gait dynamics |
US8801802B2 (en) | 2005-02-16 | 2014-08-12 | össur hf | System and method for data communication with a mechatronic device |
SE528516C2 (en) | 2005-04-19 | 2006-12-05 | Lisa Gramnaes | Combined active and passive leg prosthesis system and a method for performing a movement cycle with such a system |
US8852292B2 (en) | 2005-09-01 | 2014-10-07 | Ossur Hf | System and method for determining terrain transitions |
US7531006B2 (en) | 2005-09-01 | 2009-05-12 | össur hf | Sensing system and method for motion-controlled foot unit |
US8048172B2 (en) | 2005-09-01 | 2011-11-01 | össur hf | Actuator assembly for prosthetic or orthotic joint |
US8172909B2 (en) * | 2005-12-22 | 2012-05-08 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Modular prosthetic foot |
US7824446B2 (en) | 2006-12-06 | 2010-11-02 | Freedom Innovations, Llc | Prosthetic foot with longer upper forefoot and shorter lower forefoot |
GB0701662D0 (en) | 2006-12-14 | 2007-03-07 | Blatchford & Sons Ltd | A lower limb prosthesis |
US7985265B2 (en) | 2006-12-14 | 2011-07-26 | Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Limited | Prosthetic ankle and foot combination |
US7727285B2 (en) | 2007-01-30 | 2010-06-01 | Freedom Innovations, Llc | Prosthetic foot with variable medial/lateral stiffness |
US7819926B1 (en) | 2007-08-29 | 2010-10-26 | Keith Longino | Prosthetic foot and ankle |
US7794506B2 (en) | 2007-09-18 | 2010-09-14 | Freedom Innovations, Llc | Multi-axial prosthetic ankle |
US8628585B2 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2014-01-14 | Blatchford Products Limited | Lower limb prosthesis |
WO2009120637A1 (en) | 2008-03-24 | 2009-10-01 | Ossur Hf | Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same |
US8034121B2 (en) | 2008-04-18 | 2011-10-11 | Freedom Innovations, Llc | Prosthetic foot with two leaf-springs joined at heel and toe |
US8821589B2 (en) * | 2008-05-13 | 2014-09-02 | Jerome R. Rifkin | Joints for prosthetic, orthotic and/or robotic devices |
US20120116540A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2012-05-10 | Northwestern University | Prosthetic foot and method of making |
US7686025B1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2010-03-30 | Dowling Anthony R | Beach cane flip-flop system |
US20110015762A1 (en) * | 2009-07-14 | 2011-01-20 | Tensegrity Prosthetics Inc. | Joints for prosthetic, orthotic and/or robotic devices |
EP2620126A1 (en) * | 2010-02-19 | 2013-07-31 | Tensegrity Prosthetics Inc. | Joints for prosthetic, orthotic and/or robotic devices |
US8500825B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2013-08-06 | Freedom Innovations, Llc | Prosthetic foot with floating forefoot keel |
EP2621414B1 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2019-03-13 | Össur HF | Prosthetic and orthotic devices and methods and systems for controlling the same |
US9265626B1 (en) * | 2011-05-31 | 2016-02-23 | össur hf | Height-adjustable threaded shock absorbing module and associated coupling member |
JP6071210B2 (en) * | 2011-08-01 | 2017-02-01 | 伸也 佐藤 | Cane tip and cane |
US9017419B1 (en) | 2012-03-09 | 2015-04-28 | össur hf | Linear actuator |
US9259343B2 (en) | 2012-07-06 | 2016-02-16 | Newman Technologies LLC | Device for mitigating plantar fasciitis |
CN102991601B (en) * | 2012-12-09 | 2015-02-11 | 郑州轻工业学院 | Two-degree-of-freedom humanoid ankle joint |
EP2961355B1 (en) | 2013-02-26 | 2018-08-22 | Össur hf | Prosthetic foot with enhanced stability and elastic energy return |
US9949850B2 (en) | 2015-09-18 | 2018-04-24 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Magnetic locking mechanism for prosthetic or orthotic joints |
WO2017214351A1 (en) | 2016-06-08 | 2017-12-14 | University Of Washington | Pivot-flex foot |
EP3518834B1 (en) | 2016-12-01 | 2021-08-04 | Össur Iceland EHF | Prosthetic feet having heel height adjustability |
US11446164B1 (en) | 2017-09-15 | 2022-09-20 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Variable stiffness mechanisms |
US10980648B1 (en) | 2017-09-15 | 2021-04-20 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Variable stiffness mechanism and limb support device incorporating the same |
US11759336B2 (en) | 2018-07-10 | 2023-09-19 | Comité International De La Croix-Rouge (Cicr) | Prosthetic foot |
CN112206084B (en) * | 2020-10-09 | 2021-07-16 | 吉林大学 | Rigidity gradient change artificial foot plate with human body arch three-dimensional curvature characteristics |
Family Cites Families (143)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE379849C (en) | 1923-08-30 | Adolf Schwager | Artificial foot | |
US2899685A (en) | 1959-08-18 | bourcier de carbon | ||
US951989A (en) | 1908-07-09 | 1910-03-15 | James E Hanger | Artificial limb. |
US1013828A (en) | 1911-08-11 | 1912-01-02 | Harvey Sherman Thomas | Stilt. |
US1071230A (en) | 1912-06-14 | 1913-08-26 | James E Hanger | Artificial limb. |
US1128018A (en) | 1914-10-06 | 1915-02-09 | Clyde L Mcfarland | Extension-foot. |
US1151144A (en) | 1914-12-19 | 1915-08-24 | John E Wofe | Artificial foot. |
GB120445A (en) | 1917-11-10 | 1918-11-11 | Charles Albert Blatchford | Improvements in or connected with Artificial Limbs. |
GB120462A (en) | 1917-11-24 | 1918-11-14 | Paul Schranz | Improvements in and relating to Artificial Feet. |
US1294632A (en) | 1918-08-10 | 1919-02-18 | Robert Bradley Dickson | Artificial limb. |
DE325171C (en) | 1919-08-19 | 1920-09-10 | Julius Fuchs Dr | Artificial foot |
US1352943A (en) | 1920-02-09 | 1920-09-14 | Dodge Lewis | Pneumatic foot |
US1424264A (en) | 1921-12-28 | 1922-08-01 | Shrodes George Hamilton | Artificial limb |
DE389252C (en) | 1923-05-23 | 1924-02-04 | Adolf Soehlmann | Artificial foot |
GB275902A (en) | 1927-04-26 | 1927-08-18 | Adolf Kaletta | Improvements in artificial feet |
GB306313A (en) | 1928-04-02 | 1929-02-21 | Johan Philip Dahllof | Improvements in and relating to artificial feet |
US1804915A (en) | 1929-01-07 | 1931-05-12 | John A Collins | Artificial limb |
US2036830A (en) | 1934-08-13 | 1936-04-07 | James F Rowley | Artificial foot |
US2075583A (en) | 1935-08-31 | 1937-03-30 | Lange Gottlieb | Foot for artificial limbs |
US2126654A (en) | 1937-01-19 | 1938-08-09 | Morris Lonnis Austin | Pneumatic foot for artificial limbs |
US2197093A (en) | 1939-01-19 | 1940-04-16 | George Edwards | Artificial foot |
US2379538A (en) | 1942-09-09 | 1945-07-03 | Meierhofer Max | Joint for leg supports and artificial limbs in general |
US2357893A (en) | 1943-06-14 | 1944-09-12 | Noel F Harrington | Ankle joint for artificial limbs |
US2440075A (en) | 1946-04-24 | 1948-04-20 | Campbell Edwards Pneumatic Art | Ankle joint and reinforcing member for pneumatic feet |
GB621576A (en) | 1946-07-10 | 1949-04-12 | Andre Marcell Desoutter | Improvements in and relating to artificial limbs |
US2543908A (en) | 1946-09-24 | 1951-03-06 | Guzey George | Artificial leg |
US2453969A (en) | 1947-04-03 | 1948-11-16 | Edwin C Carter | Artificial limb |
US2605475A (en) * | 1947-05-06 | 1952-08-05 | Wingfoot Corp | Prosthetic device |
US2619652A (en) | 1947-09-18 | 1952-12-02 | A J Hosmer Corp | Artificial limb |
US2475372A (en) | 1947-12-11 | 1949-07-05 | John G Catranis | Artificial foot(two-link) |
US2620485A (en) | 1948-09-27 | 1952-12-09 | Greissinger Georg | Artificial foot with ankle-joint |
US2570735A (en) | 1949-03-18 | 1951-10-09 | Carl A Weise | Flexible joint for artificial limbs |
DE807214C (en) | 1949-05-23 | 1951-06-25 | Hans Langenohl | Prosthetic foot |
US2556525A (en) | 1949-10-08 | 1951-06-12 | William M Drennon | Artificial limb joint |
DE883331C (en) | 1950-06-27 | 1956-05-03 | I Adolf Dipl-Ing Kirchner | Reinforced concrete rib ceiling |
US2692392A (en) | 1951-04-05 | 1954-10-19 | Modern Limb Supply Co Inc | Artificial limb |
US2699554A (en) | 1953-07-07 | 1955-01-18 | Comelli Peter | Artificial limb |
DE963849C (en) | 1954-02-04 | 1957-05-16 | Hermann Steiner | Double wire insert for doll limbs |
DE1179328B (en) | 1957-04-13 | 1964-10-08 | Wilhelm Gundermann | Articulated joint for artificial feet |
DE1211354B (en) | 1960-08-11 | 1966-02-24 | Paul Kleylein | Artificial foot |
GB1052350A (en) | 1964-10-23 | |||
US3335428A (en) | 1964-11-02 | 1967-08-15 | Goodrich Co B F | Resilient prosthetic foot made from elastic polymers of different hardness |
US3538516A (en) | 1966-10-20 | 1970-11-10 | Rubery Owen & Co Ltd | Adjustable artificial leg for temporary use |
US3438587A (en) | 1967-08-04 | 1969-04-15 | American Air Filter Co | Method for making a filamentous mat |
US3707731A (en) | 1971-06-09 | 1973-01-02 | R Morgan | Artificial leg |
US3754286A (en) | 1972-01-21 | 1973-08-28 | M Ryan | Artificial foot having ankle flexible mount |
DE2241971A1 (en) | 1972-08-25 | 1974-03-07 | Ladislaus Veres | ARTIFICIAL FOOT |
US3833941A (en) | 1973-02-28 | 1974-09-10 | Wagner S Orthopedic Supply Co | Molded sach foot |
GB1371996A (en) | 1973-05-08 | 1974-10-30 | Blatchford & Sons Ltd | Artificial leg and foot assembly |
GB1432481A (en) | 1973-05-31 | 1976-04-14 | Hanger & Co Ltd J E | Symes ankle joint |
DE2341887C3 (en) | 1973-08-18 | 1981-04-30 | IPOS Gesellschaft für integrierte Prothesen-Entwicklung und orthopädie-technischen Service mbH & Co KG, 2120 Lüneburg | Artificial foot for a prosthetic leg |
GB1454913A (en) | 1974-02-26 | 1976-11-10 | Blatchford & Sons Ltd | Artificial limbs |
US3889301A (en) | 1974-05-06 | 1975-06-17 | Bonner Marion K | Therapeutic stump treating air sac prosthesis |
DE2444177B2 (en) | 1974-09-16 | 1979-05-03 | Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Kg, 3428 Duderstadt | Connection between a cosmetic cover and a prosthesis part |
SU605613A1 (en) | 1975-04-21 | 1978-05-05 | Центральный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Протезирования И Протезостроения | Lower limb prosthesis |
DE7522922U (en) | 1975-07-18 | 1976-01-22 | Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Kg, 3428 Duderstadt | Connection between a cosmetic cover and a foot part of a skeletal prosthesis |
SE410271B (en) | 1976-04-28 | 1979-10-08 | Landstingens Inkopscentral | PROTESTS FOR AMPUTED LOWER LEGS WITH INSPIRED INSERT |
US4091472A (en) | 1976-12-27 | 1978-05-30 | Daher Reinhard L | Prosthetic foot |
SU806023A1 (en) | 1977-04-21 | 1981-02-23 | Ленинградский Научно-Исследовательскийинститут Протезирования | Artificial foot |
SU778732A1 (en) | 1977-08-30 | 1980-12-05 | Центральный Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Научно-Исследовательский Институт Протезирования И Протезостроения | Artificial foot |
US4161042A (en) | 1977-10-25 | 1979-07-17 | Bhn, Inc. | Adjustable prosthetic limb |
US4177525A (en) | 1977-11-09 | 1979-12-11 | Ohio Willow Wood Co., Inc. | Reinforced artificial foot and method of making |
US4180872A (en) | 1977-11-28 | 1980-01-01 | Chaikin Neal S | Waterproof prosthetic foot and method of making same |
SE423485B (en) | 1978-07-27 | 1982-05-10 | Torsten Lars Evert Pettersson | SET AND APPARATUS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF LOWER BODIES |
GB2027592B (en) | 1978-08-03 | 1982-12-22 | Hanger & Co Ltd J E | Artificial limbs |
SE423486B (en) | 1978-10-12 | 1982-05-10 | Landstingens Inkopscentral | PROTES FOR AMPUTATED BODY |
US4225982A (en) | 1978-12-04 | 1980-10-07 | Cochrane Ian W | Molded syme foot with attached stump socket |
US4360931A (en) | 1979-06-12 | 1982-11-30 | Hampton Ralph C | Prosthetic ankle |
US4328594A (en) | 1980-02-13 | 1982-05-11 | Campbell John W | Prosthetic foot |
GB2092451B (en) | 1980-03-03 | 1984-05-02 | Blatchford Chas A & Sons Ltd | Improvements in artificial limbs |
US4306320A (en) | 1980-05-09 | 1981-12-22 | Delp Larry D | Prosthetic foot |
DE3167157D1 (en) | 1980-05-28 | 1984-12-20 | Roberto Serri | Articulated prosthesis for the lower extremity |
DE3127897A1 (en) | 1980-07-16 | 1982-05-19 | Vessa Ltd., Alton, Hampshire | "METHOD FOR PRODUCING A LEG PROSTHESIS AND LEG PROSTHESES PRODUCED BY THIS PROCESS" |
GB2085351B (en) | 1980-09-26 | 1985-02-20 | Blatchford Chas A And Sons Ltd | A method of making an artificial limb component |
SU997204A1 (en) | 1981-02-17 | 1983-02-15 | Институт Электродинамики Ан Усср | Converter of dc voltage to single-phase ac voltage with amplitude-pulse modulation |
US4459709A (en) | 1981-11-16 | 1984-07-17 | U.S. Manufacturing Company | Artificial limb prosthesis |
SE8201389L (en) | 1982-03-05 | 1983-09-06 | Holmgren Ortoped | A prosthetic foot |
GB2124493B (en) | 1982-08-02 | 1986-07-02 | Hanger & Co Ltd J E | An artificial leg for occasional use |
DE3309777C2 (en) | 1983-03-18 | 1986-03-13 | Otto Bock, Orthopaedische Industrie Kg, 3428 Duderstadt | Artificial foot |
US4547913A (en) | 1983-07-11 | 1985-10-22 | Flex Foot, Inc. | Composite prosthetic foot and leg |
US4645509A (en) | 1984-06-11 | 1987-02-24 | Model & Instrument Development Corporation | Prosthetic foot having a cantilever spring keel |
US5181932A (en) | 1989-04-13 | 1993-01-26 | Phillips L Van | Foot prosthesis having auxiliary ankle construction |
US4822363A (en) | 1985-08-01 | 1989-04-18 | Phillips L Van | Modular composite prosthetic foot and leg |
CA1246301A (en) | 1985-11-15 | 1988-12-13 | Guy G. Martel | Above knee leg prosthesis |
US4636220A (en) | 1986-01-14 | 1987-01-13 | John W. Campbell | Adjustable prosthetic foot |
GB8605026D0 (en) | 1986-02-28 | 1986-04-09 | Hanger & Co Ltd J E | Artificial foot |
US4652266A (en) | 1986-03-07 | 1987-03-24 | Kingsley Mfg. Co. | Molded elastomeric prosthetic foot having energy-storing articulated keel |
US4676800A (en) | 1986-06-02 | 1987-06-30 | Chen Sen J | Adjustable device for artificial limbs |
US4865612A (en) | 1986-07-28 | 1989-09-12 | The Ohio Willow Wood Company, Inc. | Prosthetic foot |
SU1465045A1 (en) | 1986-11-03 | 1989-03-15 | Киевское Специальное Экспериментальное Конструкторско-Технологическое Бюро Министерства Социального Обеспечения Усср | Prosthesis for shin stump |
SU1465046A1 (en) | 1987-01-12 | 1989-03-15 | Ленинградский научно-исследовательский институт протезирования | Shin prosthesis |
SU1477401A1 (en) | 1987-01-21 | 1989-05-07 | Центральный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Протезирования И Протезостроения | Lower limb prosthesis for children |
US4938777A (en) | 1987-06-11 | 1990-07-03 | Donjoy Corporation | Ankle orthosis |
US4792340A (en) | 1987-07-27 | 1988-12-20 | Ernest M. Burgess | Prosthetic ankle |
SU1488490A1 (en) | 1987-09-15 | 1989-06-23 | Norilsk Gorno Metall | Method of mining thick disturbed mineral deposits |
US4800569A (en) | 1987-11-30 | 1989-01-24 | General Electric Company | Reflector design for a slab laser |
US4892554A (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1990-01-09 | Robinson David L | Prosthetic foot |
US5112356A (en) | 1988-03-04 | 1992-05-12 | Chas A. Blatchford & Sons Limited | Lower limb prosthesis with means for restricting dorsi-flexion |
DE8804228U1 (en) | 1988-03-29 | 1988-05-05 | Ipos Gmbh & Co Kg, 2120 Lueneburg, De | |
US5219365A (en) | 1988-03-31 | 1993-06-15 | Sabolich, Inc. | Prosthetic foot |
US4959073A (en) | 1988-06-06 | 1990-09-25 | John Merlette | Foot prosthesis and method of making same |
US4911724A (en) | 1988-07-26 | 1990-03-27 | J&J Orthotics Inc. | Energy responsive prosthetic leg |
SU1600759A1 (en) | 1988-09-20 | 1990-10-23 | Центральный Научно-Исследовательский Институт Протезирования И Протезостроения | Talocrural joint of lower extremity prosthesis |
FR2638087B1 (en) | 1988-10-21 | 1997-04-30 | Proteor Sa | PROSTHESIS FOR LEG AMPUTATION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF |
US5066305A (en) | 1988-10-25 | 1991-11-19 | Model & Instrument Development Corporation | Prosthetic foot having a low profile cantilever spring keel |
US5037444A (en) | 1989-01-05 | 1991-08-06 | Phillips L Van | Prosthetic foot |
US4923475A (en) | 1989-02-21 | 1990-05-08 | Gosthnian Barry M | Inflatable limb prosthesis with preformed inner surface |
US4938776A (en) | 1989-05-12 | 1990-07-03 | Masinter Robert A | Integrated ankle and foot prosthetic system |
DE3918810A1 (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1990-12-13 | Bock Orthopaed Ind | JOINTLESS PROSTHESIC FOOT |
DE8908356U1 (en) | 1989-07-08 | 1989-11-16 | Ipos Gmbh & Co Kg, 2120 Lueneburg, De | |
US4994086A (en) | 1989-08-09 | 1991-02-19 | United States Manufacturing Company | Universal modular frame for above-knee endoskeletal prosthesis |
US5019109A (en) | 1990-03-09 | 1991-05-28 | Voisin Jerome P | Multi-axial rotation system for artificial ankle |
US5108454A (en) | 1990-03-14 | 1992-04-28 | Rothschild's Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. | Below-the-knee prosthesis and method of making the same |
FR2661087B1 (en) | 1990-04-23 | 1992-08-14 | Proteor Sa | MONOBLOCK FRAME PROSTHESIS FOR LEG AMPUTATION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME. |
US5116384A (en) | 1990-08-31 | 1992-05-26 | Syncor, Ltd. | Prosthetic foot |
DE4038063C2 (en) | 1990-11-29 | 1995-04-20 | Bock Orthopaed Ind | Articulated prosthetic foot |
US5071435A (en) | 1990-12-20 | 1991-12-10 | Albert Fuchs | Extendible bone prosthesis |
US5181933A (en) | 1991-02-28 | 1993-01-26 | Phillips L Van | Split foot prosthesis |
US5899944A (en) | 1991-02-28 | 1999-05-04 | Phillips; Van L. | Prosthetic foot incorporating compressible members |
US5116385A (en) * | 1991-05-06 | 1992-05-26 | Universite De Montreal | Medio-lateral control enhancing, cantilever-spring type prosthetic foot |
US5158570A (en) | 1991-05-10 | 1992-10-27 | College Park Industries, Inc. | Prosthetic foot with improved ankle and elastomeric heel pad |
US5258038A (en) | 1991-05-10 | 1993-11-02 | College Park Industries, Inc. | Prosthetic foot with ankle joint and toe member |
US5367790A (en) | 1991-07-08 | 1994-11-29 | Gamow; Rustem I. | Shoe and foot prosthesis with a coupled spring system |
US5219364A (en) | 1991-09-12 | 1993-06-15 | Wright & Filippis, Inc. | Continuous one-piece prosthesis |
US5156631A (en) | 1991-09-16 | 1992-10-20 | John Merlette | Foot and leg prosthesis and method of making same |
US5376140A (en) | 1992-01-03 | 1994-12-27 | Ryan; Michael W. | Prosthetic foot |
DE4209974C1 (en) * | 1992-03-27 | 1993-04-15 | Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz- Und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesellschaft, 3408 Duderstadt, De | |
US5376139A (en) * | 1992-09-21 | 1994-12-27 | Pitkin; Mark R. | Artificial foot and ankle |
US5443527A (en) * | 1993-03-31 | 1995-08-22 | Wilson Michael T | Prosthetic food and three-way ankle joint |
TW267940B (en) | 1993-03-31 | 1996-01-11 | Phillips L Van | |
US5695526A (en) | 1993-10-12 | 1997-12-09 | Wilson Michael T | One-piece mechanically differentiated prosthetic foot and associated ankle joint with syme modification |
JP3303486B2 (en) | 1993-12-17 | 2002-07-22 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Method for producing exhaust gas purifying catalyst |
US5509937A (en) * | 1994-01-14 | 1996-04-23 | Universite De Montreal | Prosthetic foot with enhanced heel control |
US5425781A (en) | 1994-01-14 | 1995-06-20 | Universite De Montreal | Ankle connector for prosthetic foot |
TW386434U (en) | 1994-08-15 | 2000-04-01 | L Van Phillips | Prosthesis with foam block ankle |
US5769896A (en) * | 1994-09-30 | 1998-06-23 | Brent Rosendahl | Prosthetic foot with ankle |
US5993487A (en) | 1994-12-29 | 1999-11-30 | Wright & Filippis | Integrated keel-pylon prosthesis |
US5571212A (en) * | 1995-01-10 | 1996-11-05 | M+Ind (Model & Instrument Development Corporation | Prosthetic ankle joint for pivotally connecting a residual limb to a prosthetic foot |
FR2745488B1 (en) | 1996-03-04 | 1998-07-31 | Corima | REACTIVE FOOT PROSTHESIS |
US5766264A (en) * | 1996-08-30 | 1998-06-16 | United States Manufacturing Company | Multi-axis prosthetic ankle joint |
WO1998053769A1 (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1998-12-03 | College Park Industries, Inc. | Prosthetic foot assembly having improved resilient cushions and components |
US5913901A (en) * | 1998-05-26 | 1999-06-22 | Lacroix; Barry | Ankle joint prosthesis |
US6443995B1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-09-03 | Barry W. Townsend | Prosthetic foot |
-
2000
- 2000-12-22 US US09/742,077 patent/US6443995B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2001
- 2001-07-31 US US09/917,660 patent/US6743260B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-12-21 CN CNB200510135833XA patent/CN100548241C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8583283B2 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2013-11-12 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Legged mobile robot and control system thereof |
US20090210091A1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2009-08-20 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Legged mobile robot and control system thereof |
US7998221B2 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2011-08-16 | össur hf | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US20160067059A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2016-03-10 | össur hf | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US9668887B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2017-06-06 | össur hf | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US20090306792A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2009-12-10 | Õssur hf. | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US20050267603A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-01 | Lecomte Christophe G | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US7846213B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2010-12-07 | össur hf. | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US9132022B2 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2015-09-15 | össur hf | Foot prosthesis with resilient multi-axial ankle |
US20060167563A1 (en) * | 2005-01-25 | 2006-07-27 | Johnson Christopher L | Sub-malleolar non-articulating prosthetic foot with improved dorsiflexion |
US7871443B2 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2011-01-18 | Wilson Michael T | Prosthetic foot with composite heel |
US20070203585A1 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | Wilson Michael T | Prosthetic foot with composite heel |
US20080228288A1 (en) * | 2007-03-13 | 2008-09-18 | Ronald Harry Nelson | Composite Prosthetic Foot |
US20090234463A1 (en) * | 2008-03-14 | 2009-09-17 | Wilson Michael T | Prosthetic foot with flexible ankle portion |
US8118879B2 (en) | 2008-03-14 | 2012-02-21 | Wilson Michael T | Prosthetic foot with flexible ankle portion |
US20100004757A1 (en) * | 2008-07-01 | 2010-01-07 | Ossur Hf | Smooth rollover insole for prosthetic foot |
US8685109B2 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2014-04-01 | össur hf | Smooth rollover insole for prosthetic foot |
US9168158B2 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2015-10-27 | össur hf | Smooth rollover insole for prosthetic foot |
US8486156B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2013-07-16 | össur hf | Prosthetic foot with a curved split |
US20110213471A1 (en) * | 2010-02-26 | 2011-09-01 | össur hf | Prosthetic foot with a curved split |
US10251762B2 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2019-04-09 | Victhom Laboratory Inc. | Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications |
US11185429B2 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2021-11-30 | Victhom Laboratory Inc. | Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications |
US8961618B2 (en) | 2011-12-29 | 2015-02-24 | össur hf | Prosthetic foot with resilient heel |
USD797292S1 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2017-09-12 | össur hf | Prosthetic foot plate |
US9999524B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2018-06-19 | össur hf | Prosthetic feet and foot covers |
US11147692B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2021-10-19 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Prosthetic feet and foot covers |
USD795433S1 (en) | 2015-06-30 | 2017-08-22 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Prosthetic foot cover |
USD915596S1 (en) | 2018-04-10 | 2021-04-06 | Össur Iceland Ehf | Prosthetic foot with tapered fasteners |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1781464A (en) | 2006-06-07 |
US6743260B2 (en) | 2004-06-01 |
US6443995B1 (en) | 2002-09-03 |
US20020082712A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 |
CN100548241C (en) | 2009-10-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6443995B1 (en) | Prosthetic foot | |
US7108723B2 (en) | Prosthetic foot | |
US6936074B2 (en) | Prosthetic foot | |
ES2364815T3 (en) | PROTEIN FOOT WITH ADJUSTABLE CAPACITY. | |
KR20010018891A (en) | Sole of shoes | |
US7429272B2 (en) | Prosthetic foot with tunable performance | |
Schlafly et al. | Biomimetic prosthetic device | |
Bhuyan et al. | Design of a Prosthetic Ankle Complex: A Study in Biomimetic System Design | |
Allard et al. | Medio-lateral function in a computer-aided-design of a flexible foot prosthesis |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BIOQUEST PROSTHETICS LLC,CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TOWNSEND, BARRY W.;CLAUDINO, BYRON KENT;REEL/FRAME:019147/0637 Effective date: 20070319 Owner name: BIOQUEST PROSTHETICS LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TOWNSEND, BARRY W.;CLAUDINO, BYRON KENT;REEL/FRAME:019147/0637 Effective date: 20070319 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20140903 |