US20030203357A1 - Mixed cell diagnostic systems - Google Patents

Mixed cell diagnostic systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030203357A1
US20030203357A1 US10/382,713 US38271303A US2003203357A1 US 20030203357 A1 US20030203357 A1 US 20030203357A1 US 38271303 A US38271303 A US 38271303A US 2003203357 A1 US2003203357 A1 US 2003203357A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
cell
cells
virus
cell type
culture
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/382,713
Inventor
Yung Huang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/382,713 priority Critical patent/US20030203357A1/en
Publication of US20030203357A1 publication Critical patent/US20030203357A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/48Hydrolases (3) acting on peptide bonds (3.4)
    • C12N9/50Proteinases, e.g. Endopeptidases (3.4.21-3.4.25)
    • C12N9/64Proteinases, e.g. Endopeptidases (3.4.21-3.4.25) derived from animal tissue
    • C12N9/6421Proteinases, e.g. Endopeptidases (3.4.21-3.4.25) derived from animal tissue from mammals
    • C12N9/6424Serine endopeptidases (3.4.21)
    • C12N9/6454Dibasic site splicing serine proteases, e.g. kexin (3.4.21.61); furin (3.4.21.75) and other proprotein convertases
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/569Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for microorganisms, e.g. protozoa, bacteria, viruses
    • G01N33/56983Viruses
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S435/00Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
    • Y10S435/975Kit

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen.
  • the present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents.
  • the first method uses identification of virus-induced cytopathic effect (CPE) as an endpoint for virus detection.
  • CPE virus-induced cytopathic effect
  • the second method utilizes molecular methods to identify the presence of virus before CPE is evident in the infected cultures.
  • Both methods utilize cell cultures, which may present problems for small laboratories with limited expertise in cell culturing methods, space, funding, equipment, and supplies. Depending upon the cells used, cell cultures can be difficult to maintain and often require the efforts of skilled laboratorians. In addition, cell cultures require equipment such as cell culture hoods, inverted microscopes (for observation of cells), incubators with CO 2 lines, and other equipment not readily available in many laboratories.
  • CPE-based tests often require long incubation times, as virus-induced CPE only becomes evident after multiple rounds of viral replication and spread of virus to neighboring cells (i.e., the cells are “permissive” for viral infection). Virus spread results in the destruction of the cells surrounding the cell originally infected. CPE-based tests have been traditionally conducted in tubes or flasks containing a single cell type that is adhered or anchored to the sides and/or bottom of the tube or flask. As the virus must infect a cell, replicate, and spread to neighboring cells in which the process is repeated, results can be delayed for at least 28 days.
  • results are often not available for 7-28 days after inoculation of the cell culture with the virus suspension (See e.g., Leland, Clinical Virology , W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia [1996], pp. 60-65).
  • the time necessary to establish visible CPE is dependent upon the rate of viral replication, which can vary among cell types and viruses. Thus, the amount of time needed to detect virus in a sample can greatly vary.
  • pre-CPE tests require only entry of the virus into a susceptible host cell and detectable expression of at least one early virus-specific antigen or nucleic acid. Detection of the virus-specific analyte or other indicator is accomplished by a number of methods (e.g., labeled antibodies, the polymerase chain reaction [PCR], or the use of other reporters, such as the ELVISTM system). Expression of early viral genes has been shown to be very rapid in many virus-host cell systems in vitro. Thus, use of pre-CPE based virus tests significantly reduces the time required to detect and identify viruses in clinical specimens.
  • Pre-CPE detection of virus is often accomplished by using monolayers of adherent cells grown on 12 mm round coverslips contained in 1 dram shell vials (i.e., the “shell vial” method or technique).
  • the shell vial technique uses centrifugation of the specimen to force viral introduction into cells and enhance viral isolation.
  • These vials are prepared by dispensing cells into sterile shell vials containing coverslips. The vial are incubated in an upright position until the cells form a monolayer on the coverslip.
  • the culture medium is decanted from the vial, processed sample (i.e., the clinical specimen) is added to the cell monolayer, and the vial is centrifuged at low speed, often for one hour.
  • the vials are then incubated for the desired period of time. At the end of the incubation period, the coverslips are stained using an antigen detection method (e.g., immunofluorescence) or the cells are evaluated via molecular diagnostic techniques.
  • an antigen detection method e.g., immunofluorescence
  • shell vials are also commonly used for the detection and identification of Chlamydia, as other methods available for the detection and identification of these organisms are quite cumbersome, as well as time and reagent-consuming (See e.g., Wiedbrauk and Johnston, supra, pp. 64-76).
  • pre-CPE testing methods The major advantage of these pre-CPE testing methods is that rapid test results are often possible.
  • One major disadvantage to pre-CPE testing of shell vial cultures is that this type of test is feasible and cost-effective only if one or a few viral agents are sought for identification, and if a high proportion of specimens are likely to be positive (See e.g., Schmidt and Emmons, “General Principles of Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Viral, Rickettsial, and Chlamydial Infections,” in Schmidt and Emmons (eds.), Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections , American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., [1989], at p. 4).
  • HSV herpes simplex virus
  • the physician will obtain a specimen from the affected region (i.e., a vesicle) and order a CPE or a pre-CPE virus test on a single, HSV-susceptible cell line.
  • CPE herpes simplex virus
  • pre-CPE virus test on a single, HSV-susceptible cell line.
  • These cell lines are often supplied either in tubes, shell vials, or multi-well plates (e.g., microtiter plates).
  • confirmation of the presence of HSV in the sample can be accomplished using one or more of the many analytical methods (e.g., immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase, nucleic acid probes, or substrates for virus-induced reporter genes).
  • analytical methods e.g., immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase, nucleic acid probes, or substrates for virus-induced reporter genes.
  • CMV cytomegalovirus
  • a single cell line e.g., human fibroblast cell lines, such as lung [MRC-5 cells] or foreskin [HFF] cells
  • the cells are grown to confluency on the coverslip within the vial, the sample is added to the vial, the vial is incubated for 24-48 hours or longer, and an immunofluorescent method is used to detect expression of CMV early antigen.
  • rhinoviruses and corona viruses are responsible for a large proportion of upper respiratory infections. Once these viruses reach the upper respiratory mucosa, they attach to and infect epithelial cells. Typically, these infections last only a few days and self-resolve.
  • Other respiratory viruses such as the influenzas, parainfluenzas, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and various adenoviruses attach to and infect ciliated, columnar epithelial cells. The virus-infected cells lyse, resulting in the release of enzymes and activate complement, resulting in a local mononuclear inflammatory response. Normal airway clearance mechanisms fail because of the failure of the epithelial cells to function normally.
  • adenovirus may travel via the blood to the lymphoid tissues in all areas of the body, causing systemic infection or disease.
  • Standard clinical virology practice is to inoculate multiple tubes of cell cultures with the specimen (e.g., throat swab, nasopharyngeal swab, or sputum specimen) as the tropism of each type of virus for specific cell types is often very narrow (i.e., only one type of virus may grow optimally on a single cell type). This narrow tropism of virus for a limited number of cell types creates at least two major practical problems for both CPE and pre-CPE virus testing.
  • the specimen e.g., throat swab, nasopharyngeal swab, or sputum specimen
  • primary monkey kidney cells are currently the cell line of choice for isolation of influenza viruses.
  • the manufacture of these cells requires the quarantine of source animals for long periods prior to sacrifice and cell culture preparation.
  • This quarantine period is used to monitor the animals for good health and allows time to test the animals for infection by endogenous simian viruses such as foamy virus, SV5, and SV40.
  • the quarantine period also greatly reduces, but does not eliminate, the possibility that the monkeys are infected with Monkey B Virus, a herpesvirus that is highly fatal to humans.
  • Monkey B Virus a herpesvirus that is highly fatal to humans.
  • there are other problems related to the use of monkeys for the production of primary cell cultures including the reduction in the stock of suitable animals due to importation concerns and monkey population considerations.
  • shell vial technology using single cell types in multiple units is still currently used to detect respiratory viruses, as it is a proven method.
  • detection of RSV in 16 hours using shell vials containing only HEp-2 cells yielded more positives than antigen detection methods applied directly to the clinical specimen, and as many positives as conventional cell cultures (Smith et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 29:463-465 [1991]).
  • Isolation of other respiratory viruses has also been possible with shell vial cultures containing a monolayer of a single cell type.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable for the detection of viruses using CPE-based and pre-CPE methods.
  • the preferred embodiments encompass mixed cell cultures which contain at least two different cell types.
  • the mixed cell cultures contain two different cell types, while in other embodiments, the mixed cell cultures contain three or more different cell types.
  • the present invention encompass compositions in which at least two cell types are mixed together in one container (e.g., flask, tube, shell vial, or any other container suitable for the growth of cells).
  • each cell type within these mixed cell cultures retains its susceptibility to viruses and other intracellular parasites as if it was in a single cell culture (i.e., a cell culture that contains only one cell type, as known in the art).
  • the mixed cell cultures of the present invention remain viable for as long as required for their use in diagnostic assays.
  • the cell types included within mixed cell cultures are present in approximately the same ratio (i.e., for a two cell type mixed, there is a 50:50 ratio of cell types).
  • the present invention be limited to any particular ratio of cell types in mixed culture, as various detection systems may be optimized using different ratios. For example, in some circumstances, a two cell mixture of 45:55, 40:60, or even 35:75, may be more suited than a 50:50 ratio.
  • the present invention also provides methods and compositions suitable for the detection and identification of non-viral obligate intracellular and intracellular parasites, such as members of the Chlamydiales and Ricketsiales.
  • compositions comprising a cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein the cell culture comprises at least two cell types susceptible to infection by at least one intracellular parasite.
  • the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type.
  • the first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and the second cell type consists of mink lung cells.
  • the first cell type consists of mink lung cells and the second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells.
  • the first cell type consists of human lung carcinoma cells and the second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells.
  • the first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and the second cell type consists of human embryonic lung cells.
  • the cell type consists of human epidermoid laryngeal carcinoma cells and the second cell type consists of McCoy cells.
  • the first cell type consists of mink lung cells and the second cell type consists of human diploid lung cells.
  • the present invention also provides methods for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of providing a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and a mixed cell culture comprising at least two cell types; inoculating the mixed cell culture with the sample to produce an inoculated culture; and observing the inoculated culture for the presence of the one or more intracellular parasites.
  • the intracellular parasite is a virus.
  • the virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses.
  • the virus is an enterovirus.
  • the enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of poliovirus, Coxsackie viruses and echoviruses (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains.
  • the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A.
  • the virus is a herpes virus.
  • the herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella-Zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, Human Herpes Virus 6, Human Herpes Virus 7, and Human Herpes Virus 8.
  • the intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia. In still other particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is C. trachomatis.
  • the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type.
  • the first cell type is a mink lung cell
  • the second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.
  • the first cell type is a buffalo green monkey kidney cell and the second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.
  • the first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and the second cell type is a mink lung cell.
  • the first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and the second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type.
  • the present invention also provides methods for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of providing: a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and a mixed cell culture comprising a first cell type and a second cell type; inoculating the mixed cell culture with the sample to produce an inoculated culture; and observing the inoculated culture for the presence of the one or more intracellular parasites.
  • the intracellular parasite is a virus.
  • the virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses.
  • the virus is an enterovirus.
  • the enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of poliovirus, Coxsackie viruses and echoviruses (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains.
  • the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A.
  • the virus is a herpes virus.
  • the herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella-Zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, Human Herpes Virus 6, Human Herpes Virus 7, and Human Herpes Virus 8.
  • the intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia. In still other particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is C. trachomatis.
  • the present invention further provides methods for the detection of influenza virus, comprising the steps of providing a sample suspected of containing influenza virus, and mink lung cells; inoculating the mink lung cells with the sample; and detecting the presence of the influenza within the mink lung cells.
  • the mink lung cells are Mv1Lu cells.
  • the influenza virus is selected from the group consisting of Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C.
  • the present invention provides methods for the detection of infectious virus in a specimen comprising the steps of: a) providing a specimen suspected of containing a virus, a cell line permissive for infection by the virus, and a genetically engineered cell line containing an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a promoter sequence derived from the virus, wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and wherein the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of the virus; b) mixing together the permissive cell line and the genetically engineered cell line to create a mixed cell culture; c) inoculating the mixed cell culture with the specimen under conditions which permit the infection of the mixed cell culture by the virus; and d) detecting the expression of the reporter gene and thereby detecting the presence of virus in the specimen.
  • the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 80-99% of the permissive cell line and 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line. In other preferred embodiments, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of equal proportions of the cell types used in the mixture.
  • the genetically engineered cell line contains an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a herpesvirus inducible promoter operably linked to a reporter gene selected from the group comprising the Escherichia coli lacZ gene and a luciferase gene.
  • the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP10LacZ.
  • the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP6LacZ.
  • the reporter gene be limited to the lacZ and luciferase genes. Indeed, it is contemplated that any suitable reporter gene known to those in the art will be useful in the method of the present invention.
  • the permissive cell line is permissive for infection with herpesvirus.
  • the permissive cell line is MRC-5.
  • the method of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) of interest.
  • a test sample e.g., from a clinical specimen
  • effects unrelated to the expression of the reporter gene will be detectable, including but not limited to CPE.
  • the present invention also provides methods for the typing of infectious herpesvirus in specimens, comprising the steps of: a) providing a specimen suspected of containing one or more members of the herpesvirus family, a cell line permissive for infection by one or more members of the herpesvirus family, a genetically engineered cell line containing an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a promoter sequence derived from a member of the herpesvirus family wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of herpesvirus and wherein the expression of the reporter gene varies in a distinguishable manner as a result of the presence of different members of the herpesvirus family; b) mixing together the permissive cell line and the genetically engineered cell line to create a mixed cell culture; c) inoculating this mixed cell culture with the specimen under conditions which permit the infection of the mixed cell culture by members of the herpesvirus family, wherein
  • this pattern of expression will be observable by various assisted and non-assisted methods, including visual observation by eye, spectrophotometric observation, etc. It is not intended that the detection of distinguishable pattern(s) be limited to any particular method of detection.
  • the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 80-99% of the permissive cell line and 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line.
  • the cell types are in approximate equal proportions in the mixed cell cultures.
  • the present invention it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular herpesvirus.
  • the member of the herpesvirus family detected and typed using the method of the present invention is selected from the group comprising HSV-1, HSV-2, CMV, VZV, EBV, and human herpes viruses such as HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8.
  • herpesviruses may be detected and typed in one specimen. In this manner, co-infection with multiple herpesviruses may be diagnosed. For example, it is contemplated that mixed infections with HSV-1 and HSV-2 may be detectable and the infections distinguished using the methods of the present invention.
  • the reporter gene comprises E. coli lacZ gene.
  • the reporter gene it is not intended that the reporter gene be limited to lacZ. Indeed, it is contemplated that any reporter gene may be used in this method.
  • the detection of the reporter gene is accomplished through the use of histochemical staining. It is contemplated that one member of the herpesvirus family will produce an histochemically pattern of expression that is distinguishable from the histochemical patterns produced by other members of the herpesvirus family. In this manner, it is possible to use the methods of the present invention to distinguish infection with one herpesvirus from infection with another herpesvirus.
  • the method of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) of interest.
  • the pattern of expression present in a test sample e.g., from a clinical specimen
  • control samples known to be positive and/or negative for the virus(es) of interest e.g., from a clinical specimen
  • effects unrelated to the expression of the reporter gene will be detectable, including but not limited to CPE. These effects, alone and in combination with reporter gene expression may be used to detect the presence of viral infection, as well as provide information to distinguish between viruses.
  • the present invention provides a composition comprising a mixed cell culture, wherein the mixed cell culture comprises the combination of a genetically engineered cell line transformed with a promoter sequence from a virus, wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and wherein expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of virus, and a non-engineered cell line which is permissive for virus infection.
  • the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line and 80-99% of the permissive cell line.
  • the cell types are in approximate equal proportions in the mixed cell cultures.
  • the genetically engineered cell line component may comprise a promoter for a gene that encodes ribonucleotide reductase.
  • the promoter may comprise genes that encode one or more subunits of ribonucleotide reductase.
  • the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP10LacZ, while in another particularly preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP6LacZ.
  • the genetically engineered cell line comprises an E. coli lacZ gene positioned 3′ to a virus inducible promoter. It is contemplated that this lacZ gene be positioned immediately 3′ to this virus-inducible promoter. However, it is not intended that these sequences will be contiguous. Indeed, it is contemplated only that the reporter and promoter genes are operably linked. Furthermore, it is contemplated that the composition will comprise promoter sequences from any virus, including but not limited to members of the herpesvirus family. It is also contemplated that the non-engineered cell line be permissive for infection by any number of viruses, including but not limited to members of the herpesvirus family.
  • the composition includes a genetically engineered cell line which includes a promoter for a gene that encodes a ribonucleotide reductase large subunit and the virus is a member of the herpesvirus family selected from the group consisting of HSV-1, HSV-2, CMV, VZV, EBV, HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8.
  • the genetically engineered cell line component contains an ICP10 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-2, while in another preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line comprises an ICP6 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-1.
  • reporter gene expression be accomplished through the use of various methods, including, but not limited to colorimetric, fluorimetric or luminometric assays or assay systems.
  • the reporter gene encodes ⁇ -galactosidase.
  • the present invention also provides a kit for assaying for the presence of infectious herpesvirus in a specimen.
  • the kit includes: a) a supply of a mixed cell line comprised of a cell line of genetically engineered mammalian cells susceptible to infection by herpesvirus, wherein the cell line contains an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a virus promoter sequence operably linked to a reporter gene, and where the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of virus in the specimen; and a cell line permissive for virus; and b) a supply of reagents to detect the expression of the reporter gene.
  • promoter sequences present within the genetically engineered cell line be limited to any particular virus or virus family. It is contemplated that any virus promoter will be useful in the kit of the present invention. However, in one preferred embodiment, herpesvirus promoter sequences are present in the genetically engineered cell line.
  • the promoter encodes either a complete ribonucleotide reductase enzyme, or in the alternative, subunits of ribonucleotide reductase.
  • the promoter sequence contains a promoter for a gene that encodes a ribonucleotide reductase large subunit and the herpesvirus is a herpesvirus family member selected from the group consisting of HSV-1, HSV-2, CMV, VZV, EBV, HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8.
  • the kit will be limited to this list of herpesviruses. Indeed, it is contemplated that any herpesvirus may be detected using the present kit.
  • the promoter sequence contains an ICP10 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-2, while in an alternative preferred embodiment, the promoter sequence contains an ICP6 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-1.
  • the promoter sequence present in the genetically engineered cell line comprises an E. coli lacZ gene that is operably linked to a herpesvirus inducible promoter.
  • the genetically engineered mammalian cells are BHKICP10LacZ cells, while in an alternative embodiment, the cells are BHKICP6LacZ cells.
  • the reporter gene encodes ⁇ -galactosidase.
  • the reporter gene will encode any number of enzymes that are amenable to detection by various methods, including but not limited to such methods as colorimetric, fluorimetric or luminometric assay systems.
  • the reagents provided for the detection of reporter gene expression may include, but are not limited to, solutions of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- ⁇ -D-galactopyranoside, o-nitrophenyl-galactopyranoside solution, and fluorescein di- ⁇ -D-galactopyranoside.
  • kit of the present invention may also include additional components, such as materials suitable for positive and negative controls and instructions for use. It is not intended that the kit of the present invention be limited to the mixed cell line and reagents for the detection of reporter gene expression. It is also intended that the kit will be useful for detection of viral effects on cells other than and unrelated to reporter gene expression. For example, it is contemplated that the kit may be useful for detection of CPE.
  • the present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen.
  • the present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for the detection of several different viruses, as well as other intracellular organisms present in clinical and other specimens in a single cell culture unit comprised of a mixture of cells grown in a manner to co-exist as a monolayer of relatively equivalent ratio and demonstrating complementary susceptibilities to a wider range of viruses and/or other organisms than could be detected by each individual cell line.
  • the viral assays involve inoculating a cell mixture with a specimen suspected of containing a virus, allowing a sufficient period of time for the virus infectious cycle to proceed, followed by the detection and/or quantification of the number of virus-infected cells to determine the number of infectious virions in the specimen.
  • This detection step may be accomplished using any number of available confirmation methods, including specific viral antigen detection using antigen-specific antibodies, nucleic acid probes, and reporter gene detection.
  • the assay also provides reliable methods and compositions for the quantification of the number of infectious virions present in a sample.
  • the methods and compositions of the present invention are sufficiently sensitive that the presence of a single virion in a specimen may be detected.
  • the present invention also provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of various cell types traditionally used in single cell assays.
  • the cells are mixed to produce mixed monolayer cell cultures.
  • One such mixed cell culture includes mink lung (e.g., Mv1Lu) cells co-cultivated with human mucoepidermoid cells (e.g., NCI-H292; also referred to as “H292” cells).
  • This cell mixture is susceptible to viruses such as influenza A, influenza B, RSV, parainfluenza types 1, 2, and 3, adenovirus, and CMV (i.e., the group of viruses most commonly associated with respiratory virus disease).
  • buffalo green monkey kidney cells are co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells for the detection and identification of enteroviruses, such as poliovirus, echoviruses and Coxsackie B virus (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains.
  • enteroviruses such as poliovirus, echoviruses and Coxsackie B virus (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains.
  • enteroviruses such as poliovirus, echoviruses and Coxsackie B virus (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains.
  • enteroviruses such as poliovirus, echoviruses and Coxsackie B virus (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains.
  • enteroviruses such as poliovirus, echoviruses and Coxsackie B virus (e.g.,
  • the present invention also provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of different cell types traditionally used in single cell assays that are co-cultivated with genetically engineered cells.
  • the genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line that is susceptible to infection by a virus, the cell line having been stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter and a gene coding for an enzyme, the expression of the enzyme being dependent upon the presence of the virus.
  • Such genetically engineered cells are, for example, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,418,132, herein incorporated by reference.
  • a cell mixture includes human lung fibroblasts (e.g., MRC-5 cells) co-cultivated with a stable baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell line, the genome of which has been engineered to contain the E. coli lacZ gene behind (i.e., 3′ to) an inducible HSV promoter, HSV-1 ICP6 promoter (BHK/ICP6LacZ-5 cells are available from the ATCC as CRL-12072).
  • BHK/ICP6LacZ-5 cells are available from the ATCC as CRL-12072
  • This cell mixture is susceptible to infection by CMV and HSV types 1 and 2.
  • the present invention provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of different types of genetically engineered cells.
  • the genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line that is susceptible to infection by a virus, the cell line having been stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter and a gene coding for an enzyme, the expression of the enzyme being dependent upon the presence of the virus.
  • the second genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line susceptible to viral infection, which is stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter, and a gene encoding a second enzyme (i.e., an enzyme that is different from that associated with the first cell line), in which the expression of the second enzyme is dependent upon the presence of a second virus.
  • a second enzyme i.e., an enzyme that is different from that associated with the first cell line
  • a cell mixture is prepared in which engineered BHK cells (e.g., BHK/ICP6/LacZ-5 cells) are co-cultivated with a stable mink lung cell line (Mv1Lu), the genome of which has been engineered to contain the an inducible CMV promoter (the CMV UL45 promoter); these cells are referred to as “MLID5” cells, and are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/846,026, herein incorporated by reference.
  • This cell mixture is susceptible to infection by CMV and HSV virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), with CMV infecting the genetically engineered BHK cells, and HSV-1 and HSV-2 preferentially infecting the mink lung cells.
  • the present invention contemplates the use of genetically engineered cells (e.g., mink lung cells) in which the cell genome is engineered to contain the firefly luciferase gene behind (i.e., 3′ to) an inducible CMV promoter; these cells are also described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/846,026.
  • genetically engineered cells e.g., mink lung cells
  • the present invention be limited to any particular cell types or cell lines, nor is it intended that the present invention be limited to any particular combinations of cells. It is also not intended that the present invention be limited in terms of the genetically engineered cells.
  • kits for assaying samples for the presence of infectious viruses In these kits, mixed cell cultures are provided which facilitate the detection and identification of particular virus groups (e.g., viruses associated with respiratory infections/diseases).
  • virus groups e.g., viruses associated with respiratory infections/diseases.
  • co-cultivated cells are supplied either frozen or dispensed (i.e., ready for use) in shell vials, tubes, or multiwell plates. These cells are susceptible to infection by the virus group of interest as indicated by the sample type.
  • the kits also include reagents necessary to detect expression of viral antigens or virus-induced reporter gene expression.
  • One of the several advantages of the present invention is that it provides rapid and sensitive assay systems for the detection and identification of a single virus type from a multiplicity of possibilities, in a single mixed cell unit that is suitable for diagnostic assay.
  • the present invention eliminates the need for multiple cell lines cultured in individual containers, provides reliable results in 1-3 days following inoculation of the cell cultures, rather than 1-28 days, eliminates the necessity of working with primary cell cultures, provides an efficient screening method for grouping and preliminary identification of viruses, and provides assay systems that are highly specific for viruses capable of inducing reporter gene expression.
  • the present invention clearly fulfills a need that has been heretofore unmet in the field of diagnostic virology.
  • sample and “specimen” in the present specification and claims are used in their broadest sense. On the one hand, they are meant to include a specimen or culture. On the other hand, they are meant to include both biological and environmental samples. These terms encompasses all types of samples obtained from humans and other animals, including but not limited to, body fluids such as urine, blood, fecal matter, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), semen, sputum, and saliva, as well as solid tissue. These terms also refers to swabs and other sampling devices which are commonly used to obtain samples for culture of microorganisms.
  • body fluids such as urine, blood, fecal matter, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), semen, sputum, and saliva, as well as solid tissue.
  • CSF cerebrospinal fluid
  • saliva as well as solid tissue.
  • Biological samples may be animal, including human, fluid or tissue, food products and ingredients such as dairy items, vegetables, meat and meat by-products, and waste.
  • Environmental samples include environmental material such as surface matter, soil, water, and industrial samples, as well as samples obtained from food and dairy processing instruments, apparatus, equipment, disposable, and non-disposable items. These examples are not to be construed as limiting the sample types applicable to the present invention.
  • a sample suspected of containing microorganisms may (or may not) first be subjected to an enrichment means to create a “pure culture” of microorganisms.
  • enrichment means or “enrichment treatment”
  • the present invention contemplates (i) conventional techniques for isolating a particular microorganism of interest away from other microorganisms by means of any culture medium and/or technique, and (ii) novel techniques for isolating particular microorganisms away from other microorganisms. It is not intended that the present invention be limited only to one enrichment step or type of enrichment means.
  • the term “organism” and “microorganism,” are used to refer to any species or type of microorganism, including but not limited to viruses and bacteria, including rickettsia and chlamydia. Thus, the term encompasses, but is not limited to DNA and RNA viruses, as well as organisms within the orders Rickettsiales and Chlamydiales.
  • culture refers to any sample or specimen which is suspected of containing one or more microorganisms.
  • “Pure cultures” are cultures in which the organisms present are only of one strain of a particular genus and species. This is in contrast to “mixed cultures,” which are cultures in which more than one genus and/or species of microorganism are present.
  • cell type refers to any cell, regardless of its source or characteristics.
  • cell line refers to cells that are cultured in vitro, including primary cell lines, finite cell lines, continuous cell lines, and transformed cell lines.
  • primary cell culture refers to cell cultures that have been directly obtained from animal or insect tissue. These cultures may be derived from adults as well as fetal tissue.
  • the term “finite cell lines,” refer to cell cultures that are capable of a limited number of population doublings prior to senescence.
  • continuous cell lines refer to cell cultures that have undergone a “crisis” phase during which a population of cells in a primary or finite cell line apparently ceases to grow, but yet a population of cells emerges with the general characteristics of a reduced cell size, higher growth rate, higher cloning efficiency, increased tumorigenicity, and a variable chromosomal complement. These cells often result from spontaneous transformation in vitro. These cells have an indefinite lifespan.
  • transformed cell lines refers to cell cultures that have been transformed into continuous cell lines with the characteristics as described above.
  • Transformed cell lines can be derived directly from tumor tissue and also by in vitro transformation of cells with whole virus (e.g., SV40 or EBV), or DNA fragments derived from a transforming virus using vector systems.
  • whole virus e.g., SV40 or EBV
  • hybridomas refers to cells produced by fusing two cell types together. Commonly used hybridomas include those created by the fusion of antibody-secreting B cells from an immunized animal, with a malignant myeloma cell line capable of indefinite growth in vitro. These cells are cloned and used to prepare monoclonal antibodies.
  • the term “mixed cell culture,” refers to a mixture of two types of cells.
  • the cells are cell lines that are not genetically engineered, while in other preferred embodiments the cells are genetically engineered cell lines.
  • the one or more of the cell types is re “permissive” (i.e., virus is capable of replication and spread from cell to cell within the culture).
  • the present invention encompasses any combination of cell types suitable for the detection, identification, and/or quantitation of viruses in samples, including mixed cell cultures in which all of the cell types used are not genetically engineered, mixtures in which one or more of the cell types are genetically engineered and the remaining cell types are not genetically engineered, and mixtures in which all of the cell types are genetically engineered.
  • the term “suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites,” refers to cell cultures that can be successfully used to detect the presence of an intracellular parasite in a sample.
  • the cell cultures are capable of maintaining their susceptibility to infection and/or support replication of the intracellular parasite. It is not intended that the present invention be limited to a particular cell type or intracellular parasite.
  • the term “susceptible to infection” refers to the ability of a cell to become infected with virus or another intracellular organism. Although it encompasses “permissive” infections, it is not intended that the term be so limited, as it is intended that the term encompass circumstances in which a cell is infected, but the organism does not necessarily replicate and/or spread from the infected cell to other cells.
  • the phrase “viral proliferation,” as used herein describes the spread or passage of infectious virus from a permissive cell type to additional cells of either a permissive or susceptible character.
  • the terms “monolayer,” “monolayer culture,” and “monolayer cell culture,” refer to cells that have adhered to a substrate and grow in as a layer that is one cell in thickness.
  • Monolayers may be grown in any format, including but not limited to flasks, tubes, coverslips (e.g., shell vials), roller bottles, etc. Cells may also be grown attached to microcarriers, including but not limited to beads.
  • Suspension refers to cells that survive and proliferate without being attached to a substrate. Suspension cultures are typically produced using hematopoietic cells, transformed cell lines, and cells from malignant tumors.
  • culture media refers to media that are suitable to support the growth of cells in vitro (i.e., cell cultures). It is not intended that the term be limited to any particular culture medium. For example, it is intended that the definition encompass outgrowth as well as maintenance media. Indeed, it is intended that the term encompass any culture medium suitable for the growth of the cell cultures of interest.
  • intracellular parasite refers to any organism which requires an intracellular environment for its survival and/or replication.
  • Obligate intracellular parasites include viruses, as well as many other organisms, including certain bacteria (e.g., most members of the orders Rickettsiales [e.g., Coxiella, Rickettsia and Ehrlichia] and Chlamydiales [e.g., C. trachomatis, C. psittaci ], etc).
  • intracellular parasite refers to any organism that may be found within the cells of a host animal, including but not limited to obligate intracellular parasites briefly described above.
  • intracellular parasites include organisms such as Brucella, Listeria, Mycobacterium (e.g., M. tuberculosis and M. leprae ), and Plasmodium, as well as Rochalimea.
  • the term “antimicrobial,” is used in reference to any compound which inhibits the growth of, or kills microorganisms. It is intended that the term be used in its broadest sense, and includes, but is not limited to compounds such as antibiotics which are produced naturally or synthetically. It is also intended that the term includes compounds and elements that are useful for inhibiting the growth of, or killing microorganisms.
  • chromogenic compound refers to any compound useful in detection systems by their light absorption or emission characteristics.
  • the term is intended to encompass any enzymatic cleavage products, soluble, as well as insoluble, which are detectable either visually or with optical machinery. Included within the designation “chromogenic” are all enzymatic substrates which produce an end product which is detectable as a color change.
  • colors such as indigo, blue, red, yellow, green, orange, brown, etc.
  • fluorochromic or fluorogenic compounds which produce colors detectable with fluorescence (e.g., the yellow-green of fluorescein, the red of rhodamine, etc.). It is intended that such other indicators as dyes (e.g., pH) and luminogenic compounds be encompassed within this definition.
  • pH indicator encompasses all compounds commonly used for detection of pH changes, including, but not limited to phenol red, neutral red, bromthymol blue, bromcresol purple, bromcresol green, bromchlorophenol blue, m-cresol purple, thymol blue, bromcresol purple, xylenol blue, methyl red, methyl orange, and cresol red.
  • redox indicator encompasses all compounds commonly used for detection of oxidation/reduction potentials (i.e., “eH”) including, but not limited to various types or forms of tetrazolium, resazurin, and methylene blue.
  • inoculating suspension or “inoculant,” is used in reference to a suspension which may be inoculated with organisms to be tested. It is not intended that the term “inoculating suspension,” be limited to a particular fluid or liquid substance.
  • inoculating suspensions may be comprised of water, saline, or an aqueous solution. It is also contemplated that an inoculating suspension may include a component to which water, saline or any aqueous material is added. It is contemplated in one embodiment, that the component comprises at least one component useful for the intended microorganism. It is not intended that the present invention be limited to a particular component.
  • kit is used in reference to a combination of reagents and other materials.
  • the term “primary isolation,” refers to the process of culturing organisms directly from a sample.
  • the term “isolation,” refers to any cultivation of organisms, whether it be primary isolation or any subsequent cultivation, including “passage,” or “transfer,” of stock cultures of organisms for maintenance and/or use.
  • Presumptive diagnosis refers to a preliminary diagnosis which gives some guidance to the treating physician as to the etiologic organism involved in the patient's disease. Presumptive diagnoses are often based on “presumptive identifications,” which as used herein refer to the preliminary identification of a microorganism.
  • the term “definitive diagnosis,” is used to refer to a final diagnosis in which the etiologic agent of the patient's disease has been identified.
  • the term “definitive identification” is used in reference to the final identification of an organism to the genus and/or species level.
  • recombinant DNA molecule refers to a DNA molecule which is comprised of segments of DNA joined together by means of molecular biological techniques.
  • DNA molecules are said to have “5′ ends” and “3′ ends” because mononucleotides are reacted to make oligonucleotides in a manner such that the 5′ phosphate of one mononucleotide pentose ring is attached to the 3′ oxygen of its neighbor in one direction via a phosphodiester linkage.
  • an end of an oligonucleotides is referred to as the “5′ end” if its 5′ phosphate is not linked to the 3′ oxygen of a mononucleotide pentose ring and as the “3′ end” if its 3′ oxygen is not linked to a 5′ phosphate of a subsequent mononucleotide pentose ring.
  • a nucleic acid sequence even if internal to a larger oligonucleotide, also may be said to have 5′ and 3′ ends.
  • discrete elements are referred to as being “upstream” or 5′ of the “downstream” or 3′ elements.
  • promoter and enhancer elements which direct transcription of a linked gene are generally located 5′ or upstream of the coding region (enhancer elements can exert their effect even when located 3′ of the promoter element and the coding region). Transcription termination and polyadenylation signals are located 3′ or downstream of the coding region.
  • an oligonucleotide having a nucleotide sequence encoding a gene refers to a DNA sequence comprising the coding region of a gene or, in other words, the DNA sequence which encodes a gene product.
  • the coding region may be present in either a cDNA or genomic DNA form.
  • Suitable control elements such as enhancers, promoters, splice junctions, polyadenylation signals, etc. may be placed in close proximity to the coding region of the gene if needed to permit proper initiation of transcription and/or correct processing of the primary RNA transcript.
  • the coding region utilized in the vectors of the present invention may contain endogenous enhancers and/or promoters, splice junctions, intervening sequences, polyadenylation signals, etc. or a combination of both endogenous and exogenous control elements.
  • transcription unit refers to the segment of DNA between the sites of initiation and termination of transcription and the regulatory elements necessary for the efficient initiation and termination.
  • a segment of DNA comprising an enhancer/promoter, a coding region, and a termination and polyadenylation sequence comprises a transcription unit.
  • regulatory element refers to a genetic element which controls some aspect of the expression of nucleic acid sequences.
  • a promoter is a regulatory element which facilitates the initiation of transcription of an operably linked coding region.
  • Other regulatory elements are splicing signals, polyadenylation signals, termination signals, etc. (defined infra).
  • reporter gene construct refers to a recombinant DNA molecule containing a sequence encoding the product of a reporter gene and appropriate nucleic acid sequences necessary for the expression of the operably linked coding sequence in a particular host organism.
  • Eukaryotic cells are known to utilize promoters, enhancers, and termination and polyadenylation signals.
  • reporter gene refers to an oligonucleotide having a sequence encoding a gene product (typically an enzyme) which is easily and quantifiably assayed when a construct comprising the reporter gene sequence operably linked to a heterologous promoter and/or enhancer element is introduced into cells containing (or which can be made to contain) the factors necessary for the activation of the promoter and/or enhancer elements.
  • a gene product typically an enzyme
  • reporter genes include but are not limited to bacterial genes encoding ⁇ -galactosidase (lacZ), the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) genes, firefly luciferase genes and genes encoding ⁇ -glucuronidase (GUS).
  • Transcriptional control signals in eukaryotes comprise “promoter” and “enhancer” elements. Promoters and enhancers consist of short arrays of DNA sequences that interact specifically with cellular proteins involved in transcription (Maniatis, et al., Science 236:1237 [1987]). Promoter and enhancer elements have been isolated from a variety of eukaryotic sources including genes in yeast, insect and mammalian cells and viruses (analogous control elements [i.e., promoters, are also found in prokaryotes]). The selection of a particular promoter and enhancer depends on what cell type is to be used to express the protein of interest.
  • eukaryotic promoters and enhancers have a broad host range while others are functional in a limited subset of cell types (for review see Voss, et al, Trends Biochem. Sci., 11:287 [1986], and Maniatis, et al., supra [1987]).
  • the SV40 early gene enhancer is very active in a wide variety of cell types from many mammalian species and has been widely used for the expression of proteins in mammalian cells (Dijkema, et al., EMBO J. 4:761 [1985]).
  • promoter/enhancer elements active in a broad range of mammalian cell types are those from the human elongation factor 1 ⁇ gene (Uetsuki et al., J. Biol. Chem., 264:5791 [1989]; Kim et al, Gene 91:217 [1990]; and Mizushima and Nagata, Nuc. Acids. Res., 18:5322 [1990]) and the long terminal repeats of the Rous sarcoma virus (Gorman et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:6777 [1982]), and the human cytomegalovirus (Boshart et al, Cell 41:521 [1985]).
  • promoter/enhancer denotes a segment of DNA which contains sequences capable of providing both promoter and enhancer functions (for example, the long terminal repeats of retroviruses contain both promoter and enhancer functions).
  • the enhancer/promoter may be “endogenous,” or “exogenous,” or “heterologous.”
  • An endogenous enhancer/promoter is one which is naturally linked with a given gene in the genome.
  • An exogenous (heterologous) enhancer/promoter is one which is placed in juxtaposition to a gene by means of genetic manipulation (i.e., molecular biological techniques).
  • Splicing signals mediate the removal of introns from the primary RNA transcript and consist of a splice donor and acceptor site (Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York [1989], pp. 16.7-16.8).
  • a commonly used splice donor and acceptor site is the splice junction from the 16S RNA of SV40.
  • Efficient expression of recombinant DNA sequences in eukaryotic cells requires signals directing the efficient termination and polyadenylation of the resulting transcript. Transcription termination signals are generally found downstream of the polyadenylation signal and are a few hundred nucleotides in length.
  • the term “poly A site,” or “poly A sequence,” as used herein denotes a DNA sequence which directs both the termination and polyadenylation of the nascent RNA transcript. Efficient polyadenylation of the recombinant transcript is desirable as transcripts lacking a poly A tail are unstable and are rapidly degraded.
  • the poly A signal utilized in an expression vector may be “heterologous” or “endogenous.”
  • An endogenous poly A signal is one that is found naturally at the 3′ end of the coding region of a given gene in the genome.
  • a heterologous poly A signal is one which is isolated from one genre and placed 3′ of another gene.
  • a commonly used heterologous poly A signal is the SV40 poly A signal.
  • the SV40 poly A signal is contained on a 237 bp BamHI/BclI restriction fragment and directs both termination and polyadenylation (Sambrook, supra, at 16.6-16.7). This 237 bp fragment is contained within a 671 bp BamHI/PstI restriction fragment.
  • genetically engineered cell line refers to a cell line that contains heterologous DNA introduced into the cell line by means of molecular biological techniques (i.e., recombinant DNA technology).
  • stable transfection refers to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the transfected cell.
  • stable transfectant refers to a cell which has stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA.
  • stable transfection refers to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the transfected cell.
  • stable transfectant refers to a cell which has stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA.
  • selectable marker refers to the use of a gene which encodes an enzymatic activity that confers resistance to an antibiotic or drug upon the cell in which the selectable marker is expressed. Selectable markers may be “dominant”; a dominant selectable marker encodes an enzymatic activity which can be detected in any mammalian cell line.
  • dominant selectable markers examples include the bacterial aminoglycoside 3′ phosphotransferase gene (also referred to as the neo gene) which confers resistance to the drug G418 in mammalian cells, the bacterial hygromycin G phosphotransferase (hyg) gene which confers resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin and the bacterial xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase gene (also referred to as the gpt gene) which confers the ability to grow in the presence of mycophenolic acid.
  • Other selectable markers are not dominant in that their use must be in conjunction with a cell line that lacks the relevant enzyme activity.
  • non-dominant selectable markers examples include the thymidine kinase (tk) gene which is used in conjunction with tk cell lines, the CAD gene which is used in conjunction with CAD-deficient cells and the mammalian hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) gene which is used in conjunction with hprt cell lines.
  • tk thymidine kinase
  • CAD CAD-deficient cells
  • hprt mammalian hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase
  • nucleic acid molecule encoding refers to the order or sequence of deoxyribonucleotides along a strand of deoxyribonucleic acid. The order of these deoxyribonucleotides determines the order of amino acids along the polypeptide (protein) chain. The DNA sequence thus codes for the amino acid sequence.
  • CPE cytopathic effect
  • changes in cellular structure i.e., a pathologic effect
  • Common cytopathic effects include cell destruction, syncytia (i.e., fused giant cells) formation, cell rounding vacuole formation, and formation of inclusion bodies.
  • CPE results from actions of a virus on permissive cells that negatively affect the ability of the permissive cellular host to preform its required functions to remain viable.
  • CPE is evident when cells, as part of a confluent monolayer, show regions of non-confluence after contact with a specimen that contains a virus.
  • the observed microscopic effect is generally focal in nature and the foci is initiated by a single virion.
  • CPE may be observed throughout the monolayer after a sufficient period of incubation.
  • Cells demonstrating viral induced CPE usually change morphology to a rounded shape, and over a prolonged period of time can die and be released form their anchorage points in the monolayer.
  • the area is called a viral plaque, which appears as a hole in the monolayer. Cytopathic effects are readily discernable and distinguishable by those skilled in the art.
  • ONPG represents o-Nitrophenyl- ⁇ -D-Galactopyranoside.
  • ONPG is a substrate for the enzyme ⁇ -galactosidase ( ⁇ -gal).
  • ⁇ -gal ⁇ -galactosidase
  • X-gal represents the chemical compound 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- ⁇ -D-galactopyranoside, a substrate for the enzyme ⁇ -galactosidase.
  • the reaction between X-gal and ⁇ -galactosidase results in the formation of a blue precipitate which is visually discernable.
  • hybridization is the annealing of two complementary DNA molecules whose base sequences match according to the rules of base pairing. DNA hybridization is used to identify or quantify an unknown or “target” DNA by hybridization to a known DNA or “probe.”
  • the probe is typically labeled with a reporter molecule such as 125 I, a radioisotope which can be detected and quantified with a gamma counter.
  • plaque reduction assay or “PRA,” as used herein describes a standard method used to determine efficacy of anti-viral drugs by enumerating a decrease in plaque formation in a cell monolayer exposed to a drug.
  • a “plaque” is a defined area of “CPE.” It is usually the result of infection of the cell monolayer with a single infectious virus which then replicates and spreads to adjacent cells of the monolayer.
  • a plaque may also be referred to as a “focus of viral infection.”
  • the term “permissive” as used herein describes the sequence of interactive events between a virus and its putative host cell. The process begins with viral. adsorption to the host cell surface and ends with release of infectious virions. A cell is “permissive” if it readily permits the spread of virus to other cells. Many methods are available for the determination of the permissiveness of a given cell line, including, but not limited to plaque reduction assays, comparisons of the production and/or quantitation of viral proteins based on results obtained from gel electrophoresis, relative comparisons using hybridization analysis to analyze DNA or RNA content, etc.
  • permissive describes the extent that a permissive or non-permissive host cell can adsorb and be penetrated by a virus.
  • a cell line may be susceptible without being permissive in that it can be penetrated but not release virions.
  • a permissive cell line however must be susceptible.
  • seed on describes the act of transferring an aqueous solution of suspended cells into a vessel containing cells-adhered to a surface, after which the vessel is stored for a sufficient period of time to allow the suspended cells or “seeds” to settle out by gravity and attach in a relatively uniform manner to the adhered cells and become integrated into the final cell monolayer as a mixture.
  • a “mixed cell monolayer,” results from the “seed on” process.
  • seed in describes the mixing of two or more aqueous solutions of suspended tissue culture cells, each cell suspension having different cellular properties, and transfer of such mixture of cells into a vessel which is stored for a sufficient period of time to allow the suspended cells to settle out by gravity and attach in a relatively uniform manner such that the distribution of any single cell type is indicative of the relative ratio of the cells in the original mixture.
  • starts refers to the reporter cells which represent a primary infection of virus.
  • the virus infects a reporter cell (a genetically engineered cell) and induces the expression of the reporter gene.
  • a reporter cell can be non-permissive (i.e. permissiveness of the reporter cells is not required) and still produce starts.
  • the ATCC numbers of the cells are indicated in the following Table.
  • HBSS Hank's Balanced Salt Solution
  • trypsin 0.125% in HBSS, without calcium or magnesium
  • trypsin-EDTA 0.25% in 1 mM EDTA in HBSS, without calcium or magnesium
  • Ten volumes of cell culture medium was added to each trypsinized cell suspension and the cells were repeatedly pipetted in order to produce near-single cell suspensions (i.e., without cell aggregates).
  • Each trypsinized cell suspension was diluted in an adequate volume of culture medium to produce an optical density of cell suspension suitable to produce a confluent monolayer of cells within 2-3 days of incubation in a 96-well microtiter plate.
  • 0.2 ml of suspension was used to inoculate each well.
  • the final cell preparations ranged from a final optical density at 500 nm of 0.012 OD units/ml for CV-1 cells to 0.03 OD units/ml for HEp-2 cells.
  • Cell mixture monolayers were produced by co-planting two distinct cell types at an equal volame of each diluted cell suspension (i.e., 0.1 ml of each cell type was used to inoculate each well of a 96-well microtiter plate). The cells were allowed to attach to the well surface by gravity for 30-60 minutes, and the inoculated microtiter plates were incubated for up to three days at 36° C. in 5% CO 2 with 95% relative humidity.
  • Examples of monolayers that produced this appearance were mink lung cells co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells, mink lung cells co-cultivated by buffalo green monkey kidney (BGMK) cells, and human lung carcinoma A549 cells co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells.
  • mixed cell cultures were used to detect various respiratory viruses including Influenza A, RSV, adenoviruses, parainfluenza viruses, and Influenza B, present in clinical specimens.
  • the mixed cells used in these experiments were Mv1Lu (mink lung cells) and NCI-H292 (human mucoepidermoid cells).
  • Confluent T-225 flasks of Mv1Lu and H292 cells were prepared in EMEM with HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 ⁇ g/ml gentamicin.
  • the cells were harvested by first rinsing them in 30 ml HBSS without magnesium and calcium. The cells were then dissociated from the flask by brief exposure (i.e., until the cells lifted from the bottom of the flask) to 7 ml trypsin-EDTA solution as described in Example 1. Then, 30 ml media was added to the cells to prepare a cell suspension concentrate. The optical density of each cell suspension was determined at 500 nm, using 3 ml of cells.
  • the OD reading was 0.2/ml for both the Mv1Lu and H292 cells.
  • rhesus monkey kidney cells PRMK
  • A549 cells A549 cells
  • MDCK cells MDCK cells
  • each cell suspension concentrate was determined to be 0.2 OD units/ml
  • 5.2 ml of the Mv1Lu and 8.7 ml H292 cell suspensions were added to 86.1 ml of culture medium, in order to provide an acceptable working ratio of each cell type (i.e., it was a preparation of diluted mixed cells).
  • This ratio was devised in order to achieve a confluent monolayer, in which each cell type covered a substantially equivalent surface area within 1-3 days post-planting of the diluted mixed cells. Prior to dispensing, care was taken to prepare homogenous suspensions of diluted mixed cells.
  • the mixed cells were dispensed at 0.75 ml per glass shell vial (i.e., glass vial containing a sterile glass coverslip). After planting, the vials were allowed to sit for 60 minutes at ambient temperature so that the cells could settle by gravity and produce a more optimum cell distribution of each cell type. The mixed cells were then incubated for 1-3 days at 36° C. in 5% CO 2 , at 95% relative humidity. Subsequently, the shell vials were stored at ambient temperature to maintain each cell type at substantively equivalent surface ratios for up to 10 days from achieving confluency.
  • glass vial i.e., glass vial containing a sterile glass coverslip
  • Nasopharyngeal specimens submitted to a diagnostic virology laboratory were obtained from patients exhibiting influenza-like symptoms. The specimens were centrifuged to produce a cell pellet for direct antigen testing, and a specimen supernatant for inoculation of various cell cultures. The cell pellet was resuspended in phosphate buffer to prepare a cell suspension and 25 ⁇ l portions of the cell suspension were spotted onto a glass slide and dried. Each spot of cells on the slide were then fixed with fixative (e.g., acetone), and incubated for 30 minutes with individual antibody solutions (Bartel's) capable of recognizing various respiratory viruses, including influenza A and RSV, as well as other respiratory viruses.
  • fixative e.g., acetone
  • a second antibody solution containing fluorescein (FITC) labelled goat anti-mouse antibodies and counterstain (Bartel's) was added to cover each cell spot on the slides, and incubated for an additional 30 minutes at 35-37° C.
  • the counterstain in the FITC-goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red under fluorescence. Slides prepared from the nasopharyngeal specimens were observed for positive (i.e., virus-infected), apple green staining fluorescent cells, using epifluorescence at 100-400 ⁇ magnification.
  • 0.2 ml aliquots of the specimen supernatant were inoculated onto various cell cultures prepared in shell vials containing glass coverslips.
  • the cell cultures included primary rhesus monkey kidney cells (PRMK; ViroMed or BioWhittaker), Mv1Lu cells (Diagnostic Hybrids) HEp-2 cells (Diagnostic Hybrids), MDCK, A549, and H292 cells, as single cell monolayers, as well as mixed cell monolayers of Mv1Lu and H292 cells, produced as described above.
  • each inoculated shell vial was centrifuged for 60 minutes at 700 ⁇ g, and then incubated for 1-3 days at 36° C., in appropriate culture medium (e.g., EMEM containing 0.5 to 2% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin [100 Units/100 ⁇ g per ml of medium each]). After incubation, the culture medium was decanted, and the cells were fixed to the glass coverslip with a solution of acetone and methanol (50:50, v/v).
  • appropriate culture medium e.g., EMEM containing 0.5 to 2% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin [100 Units/100 ⁇ g per ml of medium each]. After incubation, the culture medium was decanted, and the cells were fixed to the glass coverslip with a solution of acetone and methanol (50:50, v/v).
  • An antibody solution (Chemicon or Bartel's) containing a pool of monoclonal antibodies to multiple respiratory viruses, including Influenza A and RSV, as well as other respiratory viruses was added to cover each coverslip. The coverslips were then incubated for 30 minutes at 35-37° C. The antibody solution was then removed and the coverslips were rinsed with PBS.
  • a second antibody solution containing fluorescein (FITC) labelled goat anti-mouse antibodies and counterstain (Bartel's) was added to cover each coverslip, and incubated for an additional 30 minutes at 35-37° C.
  • the counterstain in the FITC-goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red under fluorescence.
  • Shell vial coverslips prepared from the nasopharyngeal specimens i.e., inoculated cultures
  • positive i.e., virus-infected
  • apple green staining i.e., apple green staining
  • fluorescent cells i.e., inoculated cells
  • H292 cells are either not susceptible to this strain of Influenza A, or are significantly less susceptible, such that infection is not detectable. Additionally, in some cases (i.e., in specimens with low virus titers), the culture systems were more sensitive than the direct antigen detection method.
  • the single PRMK cell cultures i.e., the “gold standard” cells used to detect Influenza A
  • the numbers of infected cells and the total of number of positive specimens were lower than those identified as positive by the mixed cell monolayers.
  • both the MDCK and PRMK cells missed one low titer specimen positive for Influenza A by direct antigen testing (IFA), and one other specimen that was also positive for Influenza A by IFA, while the Mv1Lu cells detected the virus in all of the samples determined to be positive based on direct antigen detection (IFA).
  • IFA direct antigen testing
  • H292 cells are susceptible to RSV infection, while Mv1Lu cells are not susceptible (or are significantly less susceptible, such that infection is not detectable).
  • HEp-2 cells i.e., the “gold standard” cells used to detect RSV
  • the performance of HEp-2 cells was generally less sensitive than that of the Mv1Lu and H292 mixed cell monolayers, or the H292 single cell monolayers.
  • Adenoviruses identified from five clinical specimens based on direct antigen testing (IFA) were detected in the H292 and cell culture mixes, while the PRMK cells missed two of the low titer specimens (i.e., there were two false negatives).
  • IFA direct antigen testing
  • H292 and the mixed cultures were more sensitive than PRMK for detection of adenoviruses.
  • A549 cells may provide slightly more positive cells
  • the 292 cells, mixed cell cultures, and A549 cells detected an equal number of positive specimens.
  • the Towne strain of HCMV was amplified in MRC-5 cells to a titer of greater than 10 6 /ml, and frozen at ⁇ 85° C. in EMEM containing 10% FBS.
  • Serial dilutions of HCMV were prepared and inoculated into single monolayers of mink lung (Mv1Lu) cells, MRC-5 cells, and mixed cell monolayers of Mv1Lu and H292 cells.
  • Each infected cell culture system was centrifuged for 60 minutes at 700 ⁇ g, and then incubated for 24 hours at 36° C. in 5% CO 2 , in appropriate culture medium (e.g., EMEM containing 10% FBS).
  • the culture medium was removed and the cells were fixed to the glass coverslip using a solution of 80% acetone in water.
  • a sufficient amount of HCMV antibody solution (Chemicon) was added to cover each coverslip and incubated for 30 minutes at 35-37° C.
  • the antibody solution was removed, and the coverslip was rinsed with PBS.
  • a second antibody solution consisting of FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antiserum was added to cover each coverslip and incubated an additional 30 minutes at 35-37° C.
  • the specimens were then observed under epifluorescence at 100-400 ⁇ magnification for positive (i.e., CMV-infected), nuclear staining, fluorescent cells.
  • the counterstain in the FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red, when excited by fluorescent light. Fluorescent, apple green nuclear stain was observed in the Mv1Lu single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers, but not in the H292 cells, as the Mv1Lu cells are susceptible to HCMV infection, while H292 cells are not (or the H292 cells are significantly less sensitive).
  • the MRC-5 cells i.e., the “gold standard” cells for detection of HCMV
  • Confluent T-225 flasks of BGMK and H292 cells were prepared in EMEM with 25 mM HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 ⁇ g/ml gentamicin.
  • the cells were harvested by first rinsing in 30 ml HBSS without magnesium and calcium, and were then dissociated from the flasks by a brief treatment of 7 ml trypsin-EDTA solution (as described in Example 1). Then, an additional 30 ml of culture medium (EMEM with HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 ⁇ g/ml gentamicin) was added to the suspension to produce a cell suspension concentrate. The optical density at 500 nm was determined for each suspension, using 3 ml of cells. Typically, the OD reading was 0.2/ml for both the BGMK and H292 cell suspensions.
  • the media present in the vials were removed and fresh media added. Then, 0.2 ml of specimen was inoculated into each vial. The inoculated vials were centrifuged at 700 ⁇ g for 45-60 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, the vials were incubated at 37° C. for 1-3 days, and viral presence was detected using immunofluorescent staining.
  • the medium was removed from each vial and the cells were fixed on the coverslip with acetone.
  • the coverslip was removed from each vial, and stained with 25 ⁇ l primary antibody (mouse monoclonal antibody directed against enteroviruses [Dako]), for 30 minutes at 37° C. After washing with PBS, 25 ⁇ l of the FITC-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (Dako) was used as a secondary antibody for staining, and incubated at 37° C. for 30 minutes. After another wash, the coverslips were mounted on slides and observed under fluorescence. The presence of one or more specific fluorescent-stained cells on the coverslip was considered to be a positive.
  • the counterstain in the FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells, and appears red upon exposure to fluorescent light.
  • fluorescent, apple green stain was observed in many of the BGMK cells in the BGMK single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers primarily in the BGMK cells, but not in as many H292 cells, as BGMK cells are more susceptible to Coxsackie B virus infection.
  • H292 cells are not as susceptible (or the H292 cells are significantly less susceptible).
  • the “gold standard” cell line i.e., PRMK cells) did not exhibit the same number of infected cells as the mixed cell monolayers.
  • CPE cell-specific virus mediated cytopathic effect
  • mixed cell cultures are used to detect herpes simplex virus (HSV) and HCMV, using a mixed cell monolayer of genetically engineered baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells (e.g., ATCC #CCL-12072) and Mv1Lu cells.
  • BHK genetically engineered baby hamster kidney
  • the BHK and Mv1Lu cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced. These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above. The cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with virus or clinical samples, incubated, and fixed, as described above.
  • HCMV is detected in the Mv1Lu cells, using antibody as described in Example 3 above, and HSV (HSV-1 and HSV-2) are identified using a ⁇ -galactosidase staining kit (i.e., detecting the reporter gene induced by the virus infecting the genetically engineered BHK cells).
  • mixed cell cultures are used to detect a panel of respiratory viruses.
  • three cell types are combined so as to produce a mixed cell culture that is capable of detecting at least three viruses.
  • A549, H292, and mink lung (e.g., Mv1Lu) cells cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced.
  • the cells are diluted such that the mixed cells in culture will be in approximately the same proportions (i.e., 1:1:1).
  • These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above.
  • the cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with virus or clinical samples, incubated, and fixed, as described above.
  • influenza viruses e.g., Influenza A and B.
  • mink lung cells e.g., Mv1Lu
  • McCoy cells useful for the detection of C. trachomatis.
  • McCoy cells and mink lung (e.g., Mv1Lu) cells cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced.
  • the cells are diluted such that the mixed cells in culture will be in approximately the same proportions.
  • These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above.
  • the cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with samples (e.g., clinical samples), incubated, and fixed, as described above.
  • the organisms capable of infecting these cells are detected and identified using the methods described in Example 2 above.
  • the presence of virus and/or C. trachomatis may be detected by other methods, such as the observation of CPE, animal inoculation, etc.
  • the mixed cell culture assay systems of this Example or any of the preceding examples be limited to any particular method of microorganism detection, identification, and/or quantitation.

Abstract

The present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and, more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen. The present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen. The present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Despite recent advances in methods for the detection of viruses using molecular methods, the detection and identification of these organisms in cell culture remains the “gold standard” by which most viral diseases are definitively diagnosed and the method against which newer methods are compared (See e.g., Wiedbrauk and Johnston, [0002] Manual of Clinical Virology, Raven Press, Inc., New York, N.Y. [1993], pp. 1-17). Cell cultures are also used for the detection and identification of other intracellular parasites, especially obligate intracellular parasites such as Chlamydia and Rickettsia.
  • There are two general types of cell culture methods used for virus identification. The first method uses identification of virus-induced cytopathic effect (CPE) as an endpoint for virus detection. The second method utilizes molecular methods to identify the presence of virus before CPE is evident in the infected cultures. Both methods utilize cell cultures, which may present problems for small laboratories with limited expertise in cell culturing methods, space, funding, equipment, and supplies. Depending upon the cells used, cell cultures can be difficult to maintain and often require the efforts of skilled laboratorians. In addition, cell cultures require equipment such as cell culture hoods, inverted microscopes (for observation of cells), incubators with CO[0003] 2 lines, and other equipment not readily available in many laboratories.
  • CPE-Based Tests [0004]
  • CPE-based tests often require long incubation times, as virus-induced CPE only becomes evident after multiple rounds of viral replication and spread of virus to neighboring cells (i.e., the cells are “permissive” for viral infection). Virus spread results in the destruction of the cells surrounding the cell originally infected. CPE-based tests have been traditionally conducted in tubes or flasks containing a single cell type that is adhered or anchored to the sides and/or bottom of the tube or flask. As the virus must infect a cell, replicate, and spread to neighboring cells in which the process is repeated, results can be delayed for at least 28 days. Indeed, results are often not available for 7-28 days after inoculation of the cell culture with the virus suspension (See e.g., Leland, [0005] Clinical Virology, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia [1996], pp. 60-65). The time necessary to establish visible CPE is dependent upon the rate of viral replication, which can vary among cell types and viruses. Thus, the amount of time needed to detect virus in a sample can greatly vary.
  • Pre-CPE Tests [0006]
  • In contrast to CPE-based tests, pre-CPE tests require only entry of the virus into a susceptible host cell and detectable expression of at least one early virus-specific antigen or nucleic acid. Detection of the virus-specific analyte or other indicator is accomplished by a number of methods (e.g., labeled antibodies, the polymerase chain reaction [PCR], or the use of other reporters, such as the ELVIS™ system). Expression of early viral genes has been shown to be very rapid in many virus-host cell systems in vitro. Thus, use of pre-CPE based virus tests significantly reduces the time required to detect and identify viruses in clinical specimens. [0007]
  • Pre-CPE detection of virus is often accomplished by using monolayers of adherent cells grown on 12 mm round coverslips contained in 1 dram shell vials (i.e., the “shell vial” method or technique). The shell vial technique uses centrifugation of the specimen to force viral introduction into cells and enhance viral isolation. These vials are prepared by dispensing cells into sterile shell vials containing coverslips. The vial are incubated in an upright position until the cells form a monolayer on the coverslip. For shell vial inoculation, the culture medium is decanted from the vial, processed sample (i.e., the clinical specimen) is added to the cell monolayer, and the vial is centrifuged at low speed, often for one hour. After centrifugation, fresh culture medium is added to each vial. The vials are then incubated for the desired period of time. At the end of the incubation period, the coverslips are stained using an antigen detection method (e.g., immunofluorescence) or the cells are evaluated via molecular diagnostic techniques. [0008]
  • In addition to viruses, shell vials are also commonly used for the detection and identification of Chlamydia, as other methods available for the detection and identification of these organisms are quite cumbersome, as well as time and reagent-consuming (See e.g., Wiedbrauk and Johnston, supra, pp. 64-76). [0009]
  • The major advantage of these pre-CPE testing methods is that rapid test results are often possible. One major disadvantage to pre-CPE testing of shell vial cultures is that this type of test is feasible and cost-effective only if one or a few viral agents are sought for identification, and if a high proportion of specimens are likely to be positive (See e.g., Schmidt and Emmons, “General Principles of Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Viral, Rickettsial, and Chlamydial Infections,” in Schmidt and Emmons (eds.), [0010] Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., [1989], at p. 4).
  • Clinical Specimens [0011]
  • For example, the presence of skin vesicles in the genital area of a patient is highly suspicious for infection by herpes simplex virus (HSV). Typically, the physician will obtain a specimen from the affected region (i.e., a vesicle) and order a CPE or a pre-CPE virus test on a single, HSV-susceptible cell line. These cell lines are often supplied either in tubes, shell vials, or multi-well plates (e.g., microtiter plates). After inoculation of the cell line and an appropriate incubation time, confirmation of the presence of HSV in the sample can be accomplished using one or more of the many analytical methods (e.g., immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase, nucleic acid probes, or substrates for virus-induced reporter genes). [0012]
  • For detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV), shell vials containing cells from a single cell line (e.g., human fibroblast cell lines, such as lung [MRC-5 cells] or foreskin [HFF] cells) are often used. The cells are grown to confluency on the coverslip within the vial, the sample is added to the vial, the vial is incubated for 24-48 hours or longer, and an immunofluorescent method is used to detect expression of CMV early antigen. [0013]
  • Accurate differential diagnosis is significantly more difficult in virus diseases due to respiratory, gastrointestinal, genital, or parenteral routes of transmission because many pathogenic viruses are capable of eliciting similar symptoms or the infection is sub-clinical (i.e., the signs and symptoms are not readily apparent). [0014]
  • Of the respiratory viruses, rhinoviruses and corona viruses are responsible for a large proportion of upper respiratory infections. Once these viruses reach the upper respiratory mucosa, they attach to and infect epithelial cells. Typically, these infections last only a few days and self-resolve. Other respiratory viruses, such as the influenzas, parainfluenzas, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and various adenoviruses attach to and infect ciliated, columnar epithelial cells. The virus-infected cells lyse, resulting in the release of enzymes and activate complement, resulting in a local mononuclear inflammatory response. Normal airway clearance mechanisms fail because of the failure of the epithelial cells to function normally. These cells may also slough off. Cell debris from dead and dying cells often obstructs airways, and the host becomes very susceptible to secondary bacterial infection and/or superinfection. All of these viruses may progress to lower respiratory involvement and pneumonia. After replication in the respiratory epithelial cells, adenovirus may travel via the blood to the lymphoid tissues in all areas of the body, causing systemic infection or disease. [0015]
  • Standard clinical virology practice is to inoculate multiple tubes of cell cultures with the specimen (e.g., throat swab, nasopharyngeal swab, or sputum specimen) as the tropism of each type of virus for specific cell types is often very narrow (i.e., only one type of virus may grow optimally on a single cell type). This narrow tropism of virus for a limited number of cell types creates at least two major practical problems for both CPE and pre-CPE virus testing. [0016]
  • First, primary monkey kidney cells are currently the cell line of choice for isolation of influenza viruses. The manufacture of these cells requires the quarantine of source animals for long periods prior to sacrifice and cell culture preparation. This quarantine period is used to monitor the animals for good health and allows time to test the animals for infection by endogenous simian viruses such as foamy virus, SV5, and SV40. The quarantine period also greatly reduces, but does not eliminate, the possibility that the monkeys are infected with Monkey B Virus, a herpesvirus that is highly fatal to humans. In addition, there are other problems related to the use of monkeys for the production of primary cell cultures, including the reduction in the stock of suitable animals due to importation concerns and monkey population considerations. [0017]
  • Second, additional continuous cell lines are required in order to detect respiratory viruses other than influenza virus. Thus, multiple cell lines are used in order to diagnose the viral infection/disease of each patient. The need for multiple units of individual cell lines is compounded in methods using pre-CPE tests for detection and identification of respiratory viruses. Pre-CPE testing for respiratory viruses requires the expenditure of significant labor in handling coverslips, the added expense of molecular reagents used with multiple cell lines for both positive and negative specimens, and the significant labor associated with microscopically reading each of the multiple cell lines inoculated in the panel of cell lines. [0018]
  • However, despite these drawbacks, shell vial technology using single cell types in multiple units (tubes, shell vials, etc.), is still currently used to detect respiratory viruses, as it is a proven method. For example, detection of RSV in 16 hours using shell vials containing only HEp-2 cells yielded more positives than antigen detection methods applied directly to the clinical specimen, and as many positives as conventional cell cultures (Smith et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 29:463-465 [1991]). Isolation of other respiratory viruses has also been possible with shell vial cultures containing a monolayer of a single cell type. For example, using vials of primary monkey kidney cells and A549 cells incubated for 40 hours, 83% of adenoviruses, 94% of influenza B, and 80% of parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3 were identified (Rabalais et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 30:1505-1508 [1992]). In another report, 50% of adenoviruses, 94% of influenza A viruses, 100% of influenza B viruses, and 100% of parainfluenza viruses, in shell vials of primary rhesus monkey kidney cells, and 92% of RSV in shell vials of HEp-2 cells incubated for 2-4 days (See e.g., Olsen et al, J. Clin. Microbiol., 31:422-425 [1993]; and Leland, [0019] Clinical Virology, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pa. [1996], at p. 85-86).
  • Although these methods provide relatively rapid results (i.e., as opposed to the long incubation periods often necessary for CPE tests), there remains a need in clinical and reference virology laboratories for cell culture methods and compositions for the reliable detection and identification of viruses in a single, easy-to-manipulate unit that provides rapid detection and identification in a cost-effective manner, while also providing the sensitivity of a diagnostic assay system. [0020]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen. The present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents. [0021]
  • In particular, the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable for the detection of viruses using CPE-based and pre-CPE methods. The preferred embodiments encompass mixed cell cultures which contain at least two different cell types. In some preferred embodiments, the mixed cell cultures contain two different cell types, while in other embodiments, the mixed cell cultures contain three or more different cell types. Thus, it is intended that the present invention encompass compositions in which at least two cell types are mixed together in one container (e.g., flask, tube, shell vial, or any other container suitable for the growth of cells). Importantly, each cell type within these mixed cell cultures retains its susceptibility to viruses and other intracellular parasites as if it was in a single cell culture (i.e., a cell culture that contains only one cell type, as known in the art). In addition, the mixed cell cultures of the present invention remain viable for as long as required for their use in diagnostic assays. In particularly preferred embodiments, the cell types included within mixed cell cultures are present in approximately the same ratio (i.e., for a two cell type mixed, there is a 50:50 ratio of cell types). However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular ratio of cell types in mixed culture, as various detection systems may be optimized using different ratios. For example, in some circumstances, a two cell mixture of 45:55, 40:60, or even 35:75, may be more suited than a 50:50 ratio. [0022]
  • The present invention also provides methods and compositions suitable for the detection and identification of non-viral obligate intracellular and intracellular parasites, such as members of the Chlamydiales and Ricketsiales. [0023]
  • The present invention also contemplates compositions comprising a cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein the cell culture comprises at least two cell types susceptible to infection by at least one intracellular parasite. In some preferred embodiments of the composition, the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type. In some embodiments, the first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and the second cell type consists of mink lung cells. In other embodiments, the first cell type consists of mink lung cells and the second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells. In yet other embodiments, the first cell type consists of human lung carcinoma cells and the second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells. In still other embodiments, the first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and the second cell type consists of human embryonic lung cells. In further embodiments, the cell type consists of human epidermoid laryngeal carcinoma cells and the second cell type consists of McCoy cells. In additional embodiments, the first cell type consists of mink lung cells and the second cell type consists of human diploid lung cells. [0024]
  • In some preferred embodiments, the cell types of the composition are susceptible to respiratory viruses, including but not limited to influenza viruses of any type (e.g., Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C) and/or strain, RSV, cytomegalovirus, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses. In yet other embodiments, the cell types of the composition are susceptible to enteroviruses, including but not limited to any type and/or strain of echovirus, poliovirus, and Coxsackie virus (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruses, it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A. [0025]
  • The present invention also provides methods for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of providing a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and a mixed cell culture comprising at least two cell types; inoculating the mixed cell culture with the sample to produce an inoculated culture; and observing the inoculated culture for the presence of the one or more intracellular parasites. [0026]
  • In some embodiments of the method, the intracellular parasite is a virus. In some particularly preferred embodiments, the virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses. In yet other embodiments of the methods, the virus is an enterovirus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of poliovirus, Coxsackie viruses and echoviruses (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruses, it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A. In still other preferred embodiments, the virus is a herpes virus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella-Zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, Human Herpes Virus 6, Human Herpes Virus 7, and Human Herpes Virus 8. In yet other preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia. In still other particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is [0027] C. trachomatis.
  • In some preferred embodiments of the methods, the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type. In some preferred embodiments, the first cell type is a mink lung cell, and the second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell. In other preferred embodiments, the first cell type is a buffalo green monkey kidney cell and the second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell. In yet another alternative embodiment, the first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and the second cell type is a mink lung cell. In still other embodiments, the first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and the second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type. [0028]
  • It is contemplated that the methods of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) and/or other intracellular organism of interest. [0029]
  • The present invention also provides methods for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of providing: a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and a mixed cell culture comprising a first cell type and a second cell type; inoculating the mixed cell culture with the sample to produce an inoculated culture; and observing the inoculated culture for the presence of the one or more intracellular parasites. [0030]
  • In some particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is a virus. In some particularly preferred embodiments, the virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses. In yet other embodiments of the methods, the virus is an enterovirus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of poliovirus, Coxsackie viruses and echoviruses (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruses, it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A. In still other preferred embodiments, the virus is a herpes virus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella-Zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, Human Herpes Virus 6, Human Herpes Virus 7, and Human Herpes Virus 8. In yet other preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia. In still other particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is [0031] C. trachomatis.
  • In some preferred embodiments of the methods, the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type. In some preferred embodiments, the first cell type is a mink lung cell, and the second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell. In other preferred embodiments, the first cell type is a buffalo green monkey kidney cell and the second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell. In yet another alternative embodiment, the first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and the second cell type is a mink lung cell. In still other embodiments, the first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and the second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type. [0032]
  • It is contemplated that the methods of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) and/or other intracellular organism of interest. [0033]
  • The present invention further provides methods for the detection of influenza virus, comprising the steps of providing a sample suspected of containing influenza virus, and mink lung cells; inoculating the mink lung cells with the sample; and detecting the presence of the influenza within the mink lung cells. In particularly preferred embodiments, the mink lung cells are Mv1Lu cells. In alternative embodiments, the influenza virus is selected from the group consisting of Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C. [0034]
  • It is contemplated that the methods of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) and/or other intracellular organism of interest. [0035]
  • In one embodiment, the present invention provides methods for the detection of infectious virus in a specimen comprising the steps of: a) providing a specimen suspected of containing a virus, a cell line permissive for infection by the virus, and a genetically engineered cell line containing an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a promoter sequence derived from the virus, wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and wherein the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of the virus; b) mixing together the permissive cell line and the genetically engineered cell line to create a mixed cell culture; c) inoculating the mixed cell culture with the specimen under conditions which permit the infection of the mixed cell culture by the virus; and d) detecting the expression of the reporter gene and thereby detecting the presence of virus in the specimen. In one preferred embodiment, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 80-99% of the permissive cell line and 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line. In other preferred embodiments, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of equal proportions of the cell types used in the mixture. [0036]
  • In one embodiment of the method, the genetically engineered cell line contains an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a herpesvirus inducible promoter operably linked to a reporter gene selected from the group comprising the [0037] Escherichia coli lacZ gene and a luciferase gene. In one preferred embodiment of the method, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP10LacZ. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP6LacZ. However, it is not intended that the reporter gene be limited to the lacZ and luciferase genes. Indeed, it is contemplated that any suitable reporter gene known to those in the art will be useful in the method of the present invention.
  • It is also contemplated that various permissive cell lines will be useful in the method of the present invention. In one embodiment, the permissive cell line is permissive for infection with herpesvirus. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the permissive cell line is MRC-5. [0038]
  • It is contemplated that the method of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) of interest. Thus, for mixed cultures in which genetically engineered cell lines are used, it is contemplated that the pattern of reporter gene expression present in a test sample (e.g., from a clinical specimen) will be compared to the patterns of reporter gene expression in control samples known to be positive and/or negative for the virus(es) of interest. It is also contemplated that effects unrelated to the expression of the reporter gene will be detectable, including but not limited to CPE. These effects, alone and in combination with the reporter gene expression may be used to detect the presence of viral infection. [0039]
  • The present invention also provides methods for the typing of infectious herpesvirus in specimens, comprising the steps of: a) providing a specimen suspected of containing one or more members of the herpesvirus family, a cell line permissive for infection by one or more members of the herpesvirus family, a genetically engineered cell line containing an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a promoter sequence derived from a member of the herpesvirus family wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of herpesvirus and wherein the expression of the reporter gene varies in a distinguishable manner as a result of the presence of different members of the herpesvirus family; b) mixing together the permissive cell line and the genetically engineered cell line to create a mixed cell culture; c) inoculating this mixed cell culture with the specimen under conditions which permit the infection of the mixed cell culture by members of the herpesvirus family, wherein the infection results in a distinguishable pattern of expression by the reporter gene; d) detecting the expression of the reporter gene and thereby detecting the presence of one or more members of the herpesvirus family in the specimen; and e) identifying the presence of a specific member of the herpesvirus family based upon the resulting distinguishable pattern. It is contemplated that this pattern of expression will be observable by various assisted and non-assisted methods, including visual observation by eye, spectrophotometric observation, etc. It is not intended that the detection of distinguishable pattern(s) be limited to any particular method of detection. [0040]
  • In a preferred embodiment of the typing method of the present invention, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 80-99% of the permissive cell line and 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line. In yet other preferred embodiments, the cell types are in approximate equal proportions in the mixed cell cultures. As with the first method described, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular herpesvirus. In one particular embodiment, the member of the herpesvirus family detected and typed using the method of the present invention is selected from the group comprising HSV-1, HSV-2, CMV, VZV, EBV, and human herpes viruses such as HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8. It is intended that one or more herpesviruses may be detected and typed in one specimen. In this manner, co-infection with multiple herpesviruses may be diagnosed. For example, it is contemplated that mixed infections with HSV-1 and HSV-2 may be detectable and the infections distinguished using the methods of the present invention. [0041]
  • In one embodiment of the typing method, the reporter gene comprises [0042] E. coli lacZ gene. However, it is not intended that the reporter gene be limited to lacZ. Indeed, it is contemplated that any reporter gene may be used in this method. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the detection of the reporter gene is accomplished through the use of histochemical staining. It is contemplated that one member of the herpesvirus family will produce an histochemically pattern of expression that is distinguishable from the histochemical patterns produced by other members of the herpesvirus family. In this manner, it is possible to use the methods of the present invention to distinguish infection with one herpesvirus from infection with another herpesvirus.
  • It is contemplated that the method of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) of interest. Thus, it is contemplated that the pattern of expression present in a test sample (e.g., from a clinical specimen) will be compared to the patterns of expression in control samples known to be positive and/or negative for the virus(es) of interest. It is also contemplated that effects unrelated to the expression of the reporter gene will be detectable, including but not limited to CPE. These effects, alone and in combination with reporter gene expression may be used to detect the presence of viral infection, as well as provide information to distinguish between viruses. [0043]
  • In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a composition comprising a mixed cell culture, wherein the mixed cell culture comprises the combination of a genetically engineered cell line transformed with a promoter sequence from a virus, wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and wherein expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of virus, and a non-engineered cell line which is permissive for virus infection. [0044]
  • In one embodiment of the composition, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line and 80-99% of the permissive cell line. In yet other preferred embodiments, the cell types are in approximate equal proportions in the mixed cell cultures. In one preferred embodiment of the composition, the genetically engineered cell line component may comprise a promoter for a gene that encodes ribonucleotide reductase. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the promoter may comprise genes that encode one or more subunits of ribonucleotide reductase. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP10LacZ, while in another particularly preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP6LacZ. In an alternative embodiment of the composition, the genetically engineered cell line comprises an [0045] E. coli lacZ gene positioned 3′ to a virus inducible promoter. It is contemplated that this lacZ gene be positioned immediately 3′ to this virus-inducible promoter. However, it is not intended that these sequences will be contiguous. Indeed, it is contemplated only that the reporter and promoter genes are operably linked. Furthermore, it is contemplated that the composition will comprise promoter sequences from any virus, including but not limited to members of the herpesvirus family. It is also contemplated that the non-engineered cell line be permissive for infection by any number of viruses, including but not limited to members of the herpesvirus family.
  • In one preferred embodiment, the composition includes a genetically engineered cell line which includes a promoter for a gene that encodes a ribonucleotide reductase large subunit and the virus is a member of the herpesvirus family selected from the group consisting of HSV-1, HSV-2, CMV, VZV, EBV, HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8. However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular herpesvirus. In one preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line component contains an ICP10 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-2, while in another preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line comprises an ICP6 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-1. [0046]
  • It is contemplated that the detection of reporter gene expression be accomplished through the use of various methods, including, but not limited to colorimetric, fluorimetric or luminometric assays or assay systems. In one preferred embodiment, the reporter gene encodes β-galactosidase. [0047]
  • In one embodiment, the composition includes a genetically engineered cell line that is a mammalian cell line susceptible to infection by virus. In one preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line comprises baby hamster kidney cells (e.g., cell lines derived from BHK cells). In one embodiment, the composition includes a permissive cell line that is permissive to infection by herpesviruses, including but not limited to HSV-1 and HSV-2. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the permissive cell line is MRC-5. It is not intended that the composition of the present invention be limited to detection of viral infection based on the expression of the reporter gene, as effects such as CPE may also be detectable. [0048]
  • The present invention also provides a kit for assaying for the presence of infectious herpesvirus in a specimen. The kit includes: a) a supply of a mixed cell line comprised of a cell line of genetically engineered mammalian cells susceptible to infection by herpesvirus, wherein the cell line contains an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a virus promoter sequence operably linked to a reporter gene, and where the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of virus in the specimen; and a cell line permissive for virus; and b) a supply of reagents to detect the expression of the reporter gene. It is not intended that the promoter sequences present within the genetically engineered cell line be limited to any particular virus or virus family. It is contemplated that any virus promoter will be useful in the kit of the present invention. However, in one preferred embodiment, herpesvirus promoter sequences are present in the genetically engineered cell line. [0049]
  • It is contemplated that various promoter sequences will be useful in the kit of the present invention. However, in a preferred embodiment, the promoter encodes either a complete ribonucleotide reductase enzyme, or in the alternative, subunits of ribonucleotide reductase. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the promoter sequence contains a promoter for a gene that encodes a ribonucleotide reductase large subunit and the herpesvirus is a herpesvirus family member selected from the group consisting of HSV-1, HSV-2, CMV, VZV, EBV, HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8. However, it is not intended that the kit will be limited to this list of herpesviruses. Indeed, it is contemplated that any herpesvirus may be detected using the present kit. In one particularly preferred embodiment of the kit, the promoter sequence contains an ICP10 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-2, while in an alternative preferred embodiment, the promoter sequence contains an ICP6 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-1. [0050]
  • In one preferred embodiment of the kit, the promoter sequence present in the genetically engineered cell line comprises an [0051] E. coli lacZ gene that is operably linked to a herpesvirus inducible promoter. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered mammalian cells are BHKICP10LacZ cells, while in an alternative embodiment, the cells are BHKICP6LacZ cells.
  • In one preferred embodiment, the reporter gene encodes β-galactosidase. However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular reporter gene. It is also contemplated that the reporter gene will encode any number of enzymes that are amenable to detection by various methods, including but not limited to such methods as colorimetric, fluorimetric or luminometric assay systems. In one preferred embodiment of the kit, the reagents provided for the detection of reporter gene expression may include, but are not limited to, solutions of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside, o-nitrophenyl-galactopyranoside solution, and fluorescein di-β-D-galactopyranoside. However, it is not intended to limit the kit to these assay systems, as other systems (e.g., radiometric assay systems) may be useful. [0052]
  • It is contemplated that the kit of the present invention may also include additional components, such as materials suitable for positive and negative controls and instructions for use. It is not intended that the kit of the present invention be limited to the mixed cell line and reagents for the detection of reporter gene expression. It is also intended that the kit will be useful for detection of viral effects on cells other than and unrelated to reporter gene expression. For example, it is contemplated that the kit may be useful for detection of CPE. [0053]
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen. The present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents. [0054]
  • The present invention provides methods and compositions for the detection of several different viruses, as well as other intracellular organisms present in clinical and other specimens in a single cell culture unit comprised of a mixture of cells grown in a manner to co-exist as a monolayer of relatively equivalent ratio and demonstrating complementary susceptibilities to a wider range of viruses and/or other organisms than could be detected by each individual cell line. For example, the viral assays involve inoculating a cell mixture with a specimen suspected of containing a virus, allowing a sufficient period of time for the virus infectious cycle to proceed, followed by the detection and/or quantification of the number of virus-infected cells to determine the number of infectious virions in the specimen. This detection step may be accomplished using any number of available confirmation methods, including specific viral antigen detection using antigen-specific antibodies, nucleic acid probes, and reporter gene detection. The assay also provides reliable methods and compositions for the quantification of the number of infectious virions present in a sample. In addition, the methods and compositions of the present invention are sufficiently sensitive that the presence of a single virion in a specimen may be detected. [0055]
  • The present invention also provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of various cell types traditionally used in single cell assays. In preferred embodiments, the cells are mixed to produce mixed monolayer cell cultures. One such mixed cell culture includes mink lung (e.g., Mv1Lu) cells co-cultivated with human mucoepidermoid cells (e.g., NCI-H292; also referred to as “H292” cells). This cell mixture is susceptible to viruses such as influenza A, influenza B, RSV, parainfluenza types 1, 2, and 3, adenovirus, and CMV (i.e., the group of viruses most commonly associated with respiratory virus disease). In other mixed cultures, buffalo green monkey kidney cells (BGMK) are co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells for the detection and identification of enteroviruses, such as poliovirus, echoviruses and Coxsackie B virus (e.g., Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruses, it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A. [0056]
  • The present invention also provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of different cell types traditionally used in single cell assays that are co-cultivated with genetically engineered cells. In particularly preferred embodiments, the genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line that is susceptible to infection by a virus, the cell line having been stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter and a gene coding for an enzyme, the expression of the enzyme being dependent upon the presence of the virus. Such genetically engineered cells are, for example, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,418,132, herein incorporated by reference. In one preferred embodiment, a cell mixture includes human lung fibroblasts (e.g., MRC-5 cells) co-cultivated with a stable baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell line, the genome of which has been engineered to contain the [0057] E. coli lacZ gene behind (i.e., 3′ to) an inducible HSV promoter, HSV-1 ICP6 promoter (BHK/ICP6LacZ-5 cells are available from the ATCC as CRL-12072). This cell mixture is susceptible to infection by CMV and HSV types 1 and 2.
  • In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of different types of genetically engineered cells. In particularly preferred embodiments, the genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line that is susceptible to infection by a virus, the cell line having been stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter and a gene coding for an enzyme, the expression of the enzyme being dependent upon the presence of the virus. The second genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line susceptible to viral infection, which is stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter, and a gene encoding a second enzyme (i.e., an enzyme that is different from that associated with the first cell line), in which the expression of the second enzyme is dependent upon the presence of a second virus. In one preferred embodiment, a cell mixture is prepared in which engineered BHK cells (e.g., BHK/ICP6/LacZ-5 cells) are co-cultivated with a stable mink lung cell line (Mv1Lu), the genome of which has been engineered to contain the an inducible CMV promoter (the CMV UL45 promoter); these cells are referred to as “MLID5” cells, and are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/846,026, herein incorporated by reference. This cell mixture is susceptible to infection by CMV and HSV virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), with CMV infecting the genetically engineered BHK cells, and HSV-1 and HSV-2 preferentially infecting the mink lung cells. In another embodiment, the present invention contemplates the use of genetically engineered cells (e.g., mink lung cells) in which the cell genome is engineered to contain the firefly luciferase gene behind (i.e., 3′ to) an inducible CMV promoter; these cells are also described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/846,026. However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular cell types or cell lines, nor is it intended that the present invention be limited to any particular combinations of cells. It is also not intended that the present invention be limited in terms of the genetically engineered cells. [0058]
  • The following Table provides a matrix which indicates the ability of various cells to form single, confluent monolayers, as well as co-cultivated, confluent, mixed cell monolayers. [0059]
    TABLE 1
    Cell Cultures
    NCI-
    MRC-5 CV-1 BGMK McCoy BHK* A549 HEp-2 Mv1Lu H292
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    MRC-5 A ++ + No + + + + + +
    CV-1 B ++ No + + + + + +
    BGMK C ++ + + + + + +
    McCoy D ++ + + Yes + +
    BHK* E ++ + + + +
    A549 F ++ + + +
    HEp-2 G ++ + +
    Mv1Lu H ++ +
    NCI- I ++
    H292
  • In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides kits for assaying samples for the presence of infectious viruses. In these kits, mixed cell cultures are provided which facilitate the detection and identification of particular virus groups (e.g., viruses associated with respiratory infections/diseases). In the kits, co-cultivated cells are supplied either frozen or dispensed (i.e., ready for use) in shell vials, tubes, or multiwell plates. These cells are susceptible to infection by the virus group of interest as indicated by the sample type. In preferred embodiments, the kits also include reagents necessary to detect expression of viral antigens or virus-induced reporter gene expression. [0060]
  • One of the several advantages of the present invention is that it provides rapid and sensitive assay systems for the detection and identification of a single virus type from a multiplicity of possibilities, in a single mixed cell unit that is suitable for diagnostic assay. Thus, the present invention eliminates the need for multiple cell lines cultured in individual containers, provides reliable results in 1-3 days following inoculation of the cell cultures, rather than 1-28 days, eliminates the necessity of working with primary cell cultures, provides an efficient screening method for grouping and preliminary identification of viruses, and provides assay systems that are highly specific for viruses capable of inducing reporter gene expression. Thus, the present invention clearly fulfills a need that has been heretofore unmet in the field of diagnostic virology. [0061]
  • Definitions [0062]
  • The terms “sample” and “specimen” in the present specification and claims are used in their broadest sense. On the one hand, they are meant to include a specimen or culture. On the other hand, they are meant to include both biological and environmental samples. These terms encompasses all types of samples obtained from humans and other animals, including but not limited to, body fluids such as urine, blood, fecal matter, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), semen, sputum, and saliva, as well as solid tissue. These terms also refers to swabs and other sampling devices which are commonly used to obtain samples for culture of microorganisms. [0063]
  • Biological samples may be animal, including human, fluid or tissue, food products and ingredients such as dairy items, vegetables, meat and meat by-products, and waste. Environmental samples include environmental material such as surface matter, soil, water, and industrial samples, as well as samples obtained from food and dairy processing instruments, apparatus, equipment, disposable, and non-disposable items. These examples are not to be construed as limiting the sample types applicable to the present invention. [0064]
  • Whether biological or environmental, a sample suspected of containing microorganisms may (or may not) first be subjected to an enrichment means to create a “pure culture” of microorganisms. By “enrichment means” or “enrichment treatment,” the present invention contemplates (i) conventional techniques for isolating a particular microorganism of interest away from other microorganisms by means of any culture medium and/or technique, and (ii) novel techniques for isolating particular microorganisms away from other microorganisms. It is not intended that the present invention be limited only to one enrichment step or type of enrichment means. For example, it is within the scope of the present invention, following subjecting a sample to a conventional enrichment means, to subject the resultant preparation to further purification such that a pure culture of a strain of a species of interest is produced. This pure culture may then be analyzed by the medium and method of the present invention. [0065]
  • As used herein, the term “organism” and “microorganism,” are used to refer to any species or type of microorganism, including but not limited to viruses and bacteria, including rickettsia and chlamydia. Thus, the term encompasses, but is not limited to DNA and RNA viruses, as well as organisms within the orders Rickettsiales and Chlamydiales. [0066]
  • As used herein, the term “culture,” refers to any sample or specimen which is suspected of containing one or more microorganisms. “Pure cultures” are cultures in which the organisms present are only of one strain of a particular genus and species. This is in contrast to “mixed cultures,” which are cultures in which more than one genus and/or species of microorganism are present. [0067]
  • As used herein, the term “cell type,” refers to any cell, regardless of its source or characteristics. [0068]
  • As used herein, the term “cell line,” refers to cells that are cultured in vitro, including primary cell lines, finite cell lines, continuous cell lines, and transformed cell lines. [0069]
  • As used herein, the terms “primary cell culture,” and “primary culture,” refer to cell cultures that have been directly obtained from animal or insect tissue. These cultures may be derived from adults as well as fetal tissue. [0070]
  • As used herein, the term “finite cell lines,” refer to cell cultures that are capable of a limited number of population doublings prior to senescence. [0071]
  • As used herein, the term “continuous cell lines,” refer to cell cultures that have undergone a “crisis” phase during which a population of cells in a primary or finite cell line apparently ceases to grow, but yet a population of cells emerges with the general characteristics of a reduced cell size, higher growth rate, higher cloning efficiency, increased tumorigenicity, and a variable chromosomal complement. These cells often result from spontaneous transformation in vitro. These cells have an indefinite lifespan. [0072]
  • As used herein, the term “transformed cell lines,” refers to cell cultures that have been transformed into continuous cell lines with the characteristics as described above. Transformed cell lines can be derived directly from tumor tissue and also by in vitro transformation of cells with whole virus (e.g., SV40 or EBV), or DNA fragments derived from a transforming virus using vector systems. [0073]
  • As used herein, the term “hybridomas,” refers to cells produced by fusing two cell types together. Commonly used hybridomas include those created by the fusion of antibody-secreting B cells from an immunized animal, with a malignant myeloma cell line capable of indefinite growth in vitro. These cells are cloned and used to prepare monoclonal antibodies. [0074]
  • As used herein, the term “mixed cell culture,” refers to a mixture of two types of cells. In some preferred embodiments, the cells are cell lines that are not genetically engineered, while in other preferred embodiments the cells are genetically engineered cell lines. In some embodiments, the one or more of the cell types is re “permissive” (i.e., virus is capable of replication and spread from cell to cell within the culture). The present invention encompasses any combination of cell types suitable for the detection, identification, and/or quantitation of viruses in samples, including mixed cell cultures in which all of the cell types used are not genetically engineered, mixtures in which one or more of the cell types are genetically engineered and the remaining cell types are not genetically engineered, and mixtures in which all of the cell types are genetically engineered. [0075]
  • As used herein, the term “suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites,” refers to cell cultures that can be successfully used to detect the presence of an intracellular parasite in a sample. In preferred embodiments, the cell cultures are capable of maintaining their susceptibility to infection and/or support replication of the intracellular parasite. It is not intended that the present invention be limited to a particular cell type or intracellular parasite. [0076]
  • As used herein, the term “susceptible to infection” refers to the ability of a cell to become infected with virus or another intracellular organism. Although it encompasses “permissive” infections, it is not intended that the term be so limited, as it is intended that the term encompass circumstances in which a cell is infected, but the organism does not necessarily replicate and/or spread from the infected cell to other cells. The phrase “viral proliferation,” as used herein describes the spread or passage of infectious virus from a permissive cell type to additional cells of either a permissive or susceptible character. [0077]
  • As used herein, the terms “monolayer,” “monolayer culture,” and “monolayer cell culture,” refer to cells that have adhered to a substrate and grow in as a layer that is one cell in thickness. Monolayers may be grown in any format, including but not limited to flasks, tubes, coverslips (e.g., shell vials), roller bottles, etc. Cells may also be grown attached to microcarriers, including but not limited to beads. [0078]
  • As used herein, the term “suspension,” and “suspension culture,” refers to cells that survive and proliferate without being attached to a substrate. Suspension cultures are typically produced using hematopoietic cells, transformed cell lines, and cells from malignant tumors. [0079]
  • As used herein, the terms “culture media,” and “cell culture media,” refers to media that are suitable to support the growth of cells in vitro (i.e., cell cultures). It is not intended that the term be limited to any particular culture medium. For example, it is intended that the definition encompass outgrowth as well as maintenance media. Indeed, it is intended that the term encompass any culture medium suitable for the growth of the cell cultures of interest. [0080]
  • As used herein, the term “obligate intracellular parasite,” (or “obligate intracellular organism) refers to any organism which requires an intracellular environment for its survival and/or replication. Obligate intracellular parasites include viruses, as well as many other organisms, including certain bacteria (e.g., most members of the orders Rickettsiales [e.g., Coxiella, Rickettsia and Ehrlichia] and Chlamydiales [e.g., [0081] C. trachomatis, C. psittaci], etc). The term “intracellular parasite,” refers to any organism that may be found within the cells of a host animal, including but not limited to obligate intracellular parasites briefly described above. For example, intracellular parasites include organisms such as Brucella, Listeria, Mycobacterium (e.g., M. tuberculosis and M. leprae), and Plasmodium, as well as Rochalimea.
  • As used herein, the term “antimicrobial,” is used in reference to any compound which inhibits the growth of, or kills microorganisms. It is intended that the term be used in its broadest sense, and includes, but is not limited to compounds such as antibiotics which are produced naturally or synthetically. It is also intended that the term includes compounds and elements that are useful for inhibiting the growth of, or killing microorganisms. [0082]
  • As used herein, the terms “chromogenic compound,” and “chromogenic substrate,” refer to any compound useful in detection systems by their light absorption or emission characteristics. The term is intended to encompass any enzymatic cleavage products, soluble, as well as insoluble, which are detectable either visually or with optical machinery. Included within the designation “chromogenic” are all enzymatic substrates which produce an end product which is detectable as a color change. This includes, but is not limited to any color, as used in the traditional sense of “colors,” such as indigo, blue, red, yellow, green, orange, brown, etc., as well as fluorochromic or fluorogenic compounds, which produce colors detectable with fluorescence (e.g., the yellow-green of fluorescein, the red of rhodamine, etc.). It is intended that such other indicators as dyes (e.g., pH) and luminogenic compounds be encompassed within this definition. [0083]
  • As used herein, the commonly used meaning of the terms “pH indicator,” “redox indicator,” and “oxidation-reduction indicator,” are intended. Thus, “pH indicator,” encompasses all compounds commonly used for detection of pH changes, including, but not limited to phenol red, neutral red, bromthymol blue, bromcresol purple, bromcresol green, bromchlorophenol blue, m-cresol purple, thymol blue, bromcresol purple, xylenol blue, methyl red, methyl orange, and cresol red. The terms “redox indicator,” and “oxidation-reduction indicator,” encompasses all compounds commonly used for detection of oxidation/reduction potentials (i.e., “eH”) including, but not limited to various types or forms of tetrazolium, resazurin, and methylene blue. [0084]
  • As used herein, the term “inoculating suspension,” or “inoculant,” is used in reference to a suspension which may be inoculated with organisms to be tested. It is not intended that the term “inoculating suspension,” be limited to a particular fluid or liquid substance. For example, inoculating suspensions may be comprised of water, saline, or an aqueous solution. It is also contemplated that an inoculating suspension may include a component to which water, saline or any aqueous material is added. It is contemplated in one embodiment, that the component comprises at least one component useful for the intended microorganism. It is not intended that the present invention be limited to a particular component. [0085]
  • As used herein, the term “kit,” is used in reference to a combination of reagents and other materials. [0086]
  • As used herein, the term “primary isolation,” refers to the process of culturing organisms directly from a sample. As used herein, the term “isolation,” refers to any cultivation of organisms, whether it be primary isolation or any subsequent cultivation, including “passage,” or “transfer,” of stock cultures of organisms for maintenance and/or use. [0087]
  • As used herein, the term “presumptive diagnosis,” refers to a preliminary diagnosis which gives some guidance to the treating physician as to the etiologic organism involved in the patient's disease. Presumptive diagnoses are often based on “presumptive identifications,” which as used herein refer to the preliminary identification of a microorganism. [0088]
  • As used herein, the term “definitive diagnosis,” is used to refer to a final diagnosis in which the etiologic agent of the patient's disease has been identified. The term “definitive identification” is used in reference to the final identification of an organism to the genus and/or species level. [0089]
  • The term “recombinant DNA molecule,” as used herein refers to a DNA molecule which is comprised of segments of DNA joined together by means of molecular biological techniques. [0090]
  • DNA molecules are said to have “5′ ends” and “3′ ends” because mononucleotides are reacted to make oligonucleotides in a manner such that the 5′ phosphate of one mononucleotide pentose ring is attached to the 3′ oxygen of its neighbor in one direction via a phosphodiester linkage. Therefore, an end of an oligonucleotides is referred to as the “5′ end” if its 5′ phosphate is not linked to the 3′ oxygen of a mononucleotide pentose ring and as the “3′ end” if its 3′ oxygen is not linked to a 5′ phosphate of a subsequent mononucleotide pentose ring. As used herein, a nucleic acid sequence, even if internal to a larger oligonucleotide, also may be said to have 5′ and 3′ ends. In either a linear or circular DNA molecule, discrete elements are referred to as being “upstream” or 5′ of the “downstream” or 3′ elements. This terminology reflects the fact that transcription proceeds in a 5′ to 3′ fashion along the DNA strand. The promoter and enhancer elements which direct transcription of a linked gene are generally located 5′ or upstream of the coding region (enhancer elements can exert their effect even when located 3′ of the promoter element and the coding region). Transcription termination and polyadenylation signals are located 3′ or downstream of the coding region. [0091]
  • The term “an oligonucleotide having a nucleotide sequence encoding a gene,” refers to a DNA sequence comprising the coding region of a gene or, in other words, the DNA sequence which encodes a gene product. The coding region may be present in either a cDNA or genomic DNA form. Suitable control elements such as enhancers, promoters, splice junctions, polyadenylation signals, etc. may be placed in close proximity to the coding region of the gene if needed to permit proper initiation of transcription and/or correct processing of the primary RNA transcript. Alternatively, the coding region utilized in the vectors of the present invention may contain endogenous enhancers and/or promoters, splice junctions, intervening sequences, polyadenylation signals, etc. or a combination of both endogenous and exogenous control elements. [0092]
  • The term “transcription unit,” as used herein refers to the segment of DNA between the sites of initiation and termination of transcription and the regulatory elements necessary for the efficient initiation and termination. For example, a segment of DNA comprising an enhancer/promoter, a coding region, and a termination and polyadenylation sequence comprises a transcription unit. [0093]
  • The term “regulatory element,” as used herein refers to a genetic element which controls some aspect of the expression of nucleic acid sequences. For example, a promoter is a regulatory element which facilitates the initiation of transcription of an operably linked coding region. Other regulatory elements are splicing signals, polyadenylation signals, termination signals, etc. (defined infra). [0094]
  • The terms “reporter gene construct,” or “reporter gene vector,” as used herein refers to a recombinant DNA molecule containing a sequence encoding the product of a reporter gene and appropriate nucleic acid sequences necessary for the expression of the operably linked coding sequence in a particular host organism. Eukaryotic cells are known to utilize promoters, enhancers, and termination and polyadenylation signals. [0095]
  • The term “reporter gene,” refers to an oligonucleotide having a sequence encoding a gene product (typically an enzyme) which is easily and quantifiably assayed when a construct comprising the reporter gene sequence operably linked to a heterologous promoter and/or enhancer element is introduced into cells containing (or which can be made to contain) the factors necessary for the activation of the promoter and/or enhancer elements. Examples of reporter genes include but are not limited to bacterial genes encoding β-galactosidase (lacZ), the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) genes, firefly luciferase genes and genes encoding β-glucuronidase (GUS). [0096]
  • Transcriptional control signals in eukaryotes comprise “promoter” and “enhancer” elements. Promoters and enhancers consist of short arrays of DNA sequences that interact specifically with cellular proteins involved in transcription (Maniatis, et al., Science 236:1237 [1987]). Promoter and enhancer elements have been isolated from a variety of eukaryotic sources including genes in yeast, insect and mammalian cells and viruses (analogous control elements [i.e., promoters, are also found in prokaryotes]). The selection of a particular promoter and enhancer depends on what cell type is to be used to express the protein of interest. Some eukaryotic promoters and enhancers have a broad host range while others are functional in a limited subset of cell types (for review see Voss, et al, Trends Biochem. Sci., 11:287 [1986], and Maniatis, et al., supra [1987]). For example, the SV40 early gene enhancer is very active in a wide variety of cell types from many mammalian species and has been widely used for the expression of proteins in mammalian cells (Dijkema, et al., EMBO J. 4:761 [1985]). Two other examples of promoter/enhancer elements active in a broad range of mammalian cell types are those from the human elongation factor 1α gene (Uetsuki et al., J. Biol. Chem., 264:5791 [1989]; Kim et al, Gene 91:217 [1990]; and Mizushima and Nagata, Nuc. Acids. Res., 18:5322 [1990]) and the long terminal repeats of the Rous sarcoma virus (Gorman et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:6777 [1982]), and the human cytomegalovirus (Boshart et al, Cell 41:521 [1985]). [0097]
  • The term “promoter/enhancer,” denotes a segment of DNA which contains sequences capable of providing both promoter and enhancer functions (for example, the long terminal repeats of retroviruses contain both promoter and enhancer functions). The enhancer/promoter may be “endogenous,” or “exogenous,” or “heterologous.” An endogenous enhancer/promoter is one which is naturally linked with a given gene in the genome. An exogenous (heterologous) enhancer/promoter is one which is placed in juxtaposition to a gene by means of genetic manipulation (i.e., molecular biological techniques). [0098]
  • The presence of “splicing signals,” on an expression vector often results in higher levels of expression of the recombinant transcript. Splicing signals mediate the removal of introns from the primary RNA transcript and consist of a splice donor and acceptor site (Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York [1989], pp. 16.7-16.8). A commonly used splice donor and acceptor site is the splice junction from the 16S RNA of SV40. [0099]
  • Efficient expression of recombinant DNA sequences in eukaryotic cells requires signals directing the efficient termination and polyadenylation of the resulting transcript. Transcription termination signals are generally found downstream of the polyadenylation signal and are a few hundred nucleotides in length. The term “poly A site,” or “poly A sequence,” as used herein denotes a DNA sequence which directs both the termination and polyadenylation of the nascent RNA transcript. Efficient polyadenylation of the recombinant transcript is desirable as transcripts lacking a poly A tail are unstable and are rapidly degraded. The poly A signal utilized in an expression vector may be “heterologous” or “endogenous.” An endogenous poly A signal is one that is found naturally at the 3′ end of the coding region of a given gene in the genome. A heterologous poly A signal is one which is isolated from one genre and placed 3′ of another gene. A commonly used heterologous poly A signal is the SV40 poly A signal. The SV40 poly A signal is contained on a 237 bp BamHI/BclI restriction fragment and directs both termination and polyadenylation (Sambrook, supra, at 16.6-16.7). This 237 bp fragment is contained within a 671 bp BamHI/PstI restriction fragment. [0100]
  • The term “genetically engineered cell line,” refers to a cell line that contains heterologous DNA introduced into the cell line by means of molecular biological techniques (i.e., recombinant DNA technology). [0101]
  • The term “stable transfection,” or “stably transfected,” refers to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the transfected cell. The term “stable transfectant,” refers to a cell which has stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA. [0102]
  • The term “stable transfection” (or “stably transfected”), refers to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the transfected cell. The term “stable transfectant,” refers to a cell which has stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA. [0103]
  • The term “selectable marker,” as used herein refers to the use of a gene which encodes an enzymatic activity that confers resistance to an antibiotic or drug upon the cell in which the selectable marker is expressed. Selectable markers may be “dominant”; a dominant selectable marker encodes an enzymatic activity which can be detected in any mammalian cell line. Examples of dominant selectable markers include the bacterial aminoglycoside 3′ phosphotransferase gene (also referred to as the neo gene) which confers resistance to the drug G418 in mammalian cells, the bacterial hygromycin G phosphotransferase (hyg) gene which confers resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin and the bacterial xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase gene (also referred to as the gpt gene) which confers the ability to grow in the presence of mycophenolic acid. Other selectable markers are not dominant in that their use must be in conjunction with a cell line that lacks the relevant enzyme activity. Examples of non-dominant selectable markers include the thymidine kinase (tk) gene which is used in conjunction with tk cell lines, the CAD gene which is used in conjunction with CAD-deficient cells and the mammalian hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) gene which is used in conjunction with hprt cell lines. A review of the use of selectable markers in mammalian cell lines is provided in Sambrook et al., supra at pp.16.9-16.15. [0104]
  • The terms “nucleic acid molecule encoding,” “DNA sequence encoding,” and “DNA encoding,” refer to the order or sequence of deoxyribonucleotides along a strand of deoxyribonucleic acid. The order of these deoxyribonucleotides determines the order of amino acids along the polypeptide (protein) chain. The DNA sequence thus codes for the amino acid sequence. [0105]
  • The terms “confluent” or “confluency” as used herein in reference to an adherent cell line define a condition wherein cells throughout a culture are in contact with each other creating what appears to be a continuous sheet or “monolayer” of cells. [0106]
  • The terms “cytopathic effect” or “CPE” as used herein describe changes in cellular structure (i.e., a pathologic effect) resulting from external agents such viruses. Common cytopathic effects include cell destruction, syncytia (i.e., fused giant cells) formation, cell rounding vacuole formation, and formation of inclusion bodies. CPE results from actions of a virus on permissive cells that negatively affect the ability of the permissive cellular host to preform its required functions to remain viable. In in vitro cell culture systems, CPE is evident when cells, as part of a confluent monolayer, show regions of non-confluence after contact with a specimen that contains a virus. The observed microscopic effect is generally focal in nature and the foci is initiated by a single virion. However, depending upon viral load in the sample, CPE may be observed throughout the monolayer after a sufficient period of incubation. Cells demonstrating viral induced CPE usually change morphology to a rounded shape, and over a prolonged period of time can die and be released form their anchorage points in the monolayer. When many cells reach the point of focal destruction, the area is called a viral plaque, which appears as a hole in the monolayer. Cytopathic effects are readily discernable and distinguishable by those skilled in the art. [0107]
  • The abbreviation “ONPG,” represents o-Nitrophenyl-β-D-Galactopyranoside. ONPG is a substrate for the enzyme β-galactosidase (β-gal). The reaction between ONPG and β-gal produces a yellow product which can be quantified spectrophotometrically at 405 nm. [0108]
  • The abbreviation “X-gal,” represents the chemical compound 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside, a substrate for the enzyme β-galactosidase. The reaction between X-gal and β-galactosidase results in the formation of a blue precipitate which is visually discernable. [0109]
  • The term “hybriwix,” represents a product of Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc., Athens, Ohio which allows for quantification of certain viral DNA in an infected monolayer of cells by DNA hybridization. “DNA hybridization” is the annealing of two complementary DNA molecules whose base sequences match according to the rules of base pairing. DNA hybridization is used to identify or quantify an unknown or “target” DNA by hybridization to a known DNA or “probe.” The probe is typically labeled with a reporter molecule such as [0110] 125I, a radioisotope which can be detected and quantified with a gamma counter.
  • The phrase “plaque reduction assay,” or “PRA,” as used herein describes a standard method used to determine efficacy of anti-viral drugs by enumerating a decrease in plaque formation in a cell monolayer exposed to a drug. A “plaque” is a defined area of “CPE.” It is usually the result of infection of the cell monolayer with a single infectious virus which then replicates and spreads to adjacent cells of the monolayer. A plaque may also be referred to as a “focus of viral infection.” [0111]
  • The term “permissive” as used herein describes the sequence of interactive events between a virus and its putative host cell. The process begins with viral. adsorption to the host cell surface and ends with release of infectious virions. A cell is “permissive” if it readily permits the spread of virus to other cells. Many methods are available for the determination of the permissiveness of a given cell line, including, but not limited to plaque reduction assays, comparisons of the production and/or quantitation of viral proteins based on results obtained from gel electrophoresis, relative comparisons using hybridization analysis to analyze DNA or RNA content, etc. [0112]
  • The term “susceptible,” as used herein describes the extent that a permissive or non-permissive host cell can adsorb and be penetrated by a virus. A cell line may be susceptible without being permissive in that it can be penetrated but not release virions. A permissive cell line however must be susceptible. [0113]
  • The phrase “seed on,” as used herein describes the act of transferring an aqueous solution of suspended cells into a vessel containing cells-adhered to a surface, after which the vessel is stored for a sufficient period of time to allow the suspended cells or “seeds” to settle out by gravity and attach in a relatively uniform manner to the adhered cells and become integrated into the final cell monolayer as a mixture. A “mixed cell monolayer,” results from the “seed on” process. [0114]
  • The phrase “seed in,” as used herein describes the mixing of two or more aqueous solutions of suspended tissue culture cells, each cell suspension having different cellular properties, and transfer of such mixture of cells into a vessel which is stored for a sufficient period of time to allow the suspended cells to settle out by gravity and attach in a relatively uniform manner such that the distribution of any single cell type is indicative of the relative ratio of the cells in the original mixture. [0115]
  • The term “starts,” as used herein refers to the reporter cells which represent a primary infection of virus. The virus infects a reporter cell (a genetically engineered cell) and induces the expression of the reporter gene. A reporter cell can be non-permissive (i.e. permissiveness of the reporter cells is not required) and still produce starts.[0116]
  • EXPERIMENTAL
  • The following examples are provided in order to demonstrate and further illustrate certain preferred embodiments and aspects of the present invention and are not to be construed as limiting the scope thereof. [0117]
  • In the experimental disclosure which follows, the following abbreviations apply: eq (equivalents); M (Molar); μM (micromolar); N (Normal); mol (moles); mmol (millimoles); μmol (micromoles); nmol (nanomoles); g (grams); mg (milligrams); μg (micrograms); ng (nanograms); l or L (liters); ml (milliliters); μl (microliters); cm (centimeters); mm (millimeters); μm (micrometers); nm (nanometers); ×g (times gravity); ° C. (degrees Centigrade); FBS (fetal bovine serum); PBS (phosphate buffered saline; HEPES (N-[2-hydroxyethyl]piperazine-N′-[2-ethanesulfonic ethanesulfonic acid]); HBSS (Hank's Balanced Salt Solution); MEM (Minimal Essential Medium); EMEM (Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium); BBL (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.); DIFCO (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.); U.S. Biochemical (U.S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland, Ohio); Chemicon (Chemicon, Inc., Temecula, Calif.); Dako (Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, Calif.); Fisher (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.); Sigma (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.); ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.); Bartel's (Bartels, Issaquah, Wash.); and BioWhittaker (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, Md.). [0118]
  • The cells used during the development of the present invention and described in the following Examples, were obtained from the ATCC, with the exception being that the BGMK and PRMK cells were obtained from BioWhittaker, and the MRC-5 cells were obtained from both ATCC and BioWhittaker. The ATCC numbers of the cells are indicated in the following Table. [0119]
    TABLE 2
    ATCC Cell Lines
    Cell Line ATCC Number
    BHK/ICP6LacZ-5 CCL-12072
    A549 CCL-185
    CV-1 CCL-70
    HEp-2 CCL-23
    hs27 HEF; CRL-1634
    Mv1Lu CCL-64
    McCoy CCL-1696
    NCI-H292 CCL-1848
    MRC-5 CCL-171
    WI-38 CCL-75
    Vero CCL-81
    MDCK (NBL-2) CCL-34
    BHK21 CCL-10
    HEL299 CCL-137
    HeLa CCL-2
  • Example 1
  • Co-Cultivation of Cells [0120]
  • In this Example, mixed cell cultures were established in which single, dimorphic cell sheets were produced at confluency. [0121]
  • In these experiments, all of the cell lines were cultured to confluency in sterile polystyrene flasks in EMEM (Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium) with 25 mM HEPES, 7% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin (100 Units/100 μg per ml of medium each). [0122]
  • Cells to be cultured were harvested by first rinsing source cell monolayers with Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) without magnesium or calcium. Depending upon the cell line, the cells were dissociated by adding trypsin (0.125% in HBSS, without calcium or magnesium) or trypsin-EDTA (0.25% in 1 mM EDTA in HBSS, without calcium or magnesium), or directly to the cell monolayer, and incubating for approximately 5 minutes at ambient temperature. Ten volumes of cell culture medium was added to each trypsinized cell suspension and the cells were repeatedly pipetted in order to produce near-single cell suspensions (i.e., without cell aggregates). Each trypsinized cell suspension was diluted in an adequate volume of culture medium to produce an optical density of cell suspension suitable to produce a confluent monolayer of cells within 2-3 days of incubation in a 96-well microtiter plate. For single cell monolayers (i.e., one cell type per well), 0.2 ml of suspension was used to inoculate each well. For example, the final cell preparations ranged from a final optical density at 500 nm of 0.012 OD units/ml for CV-1 cells to 0.03 OD units/ml for HEp-2 cells. [0123]
  • Cell mixture monolayers were produced by co-planting two distinct cell types at an equal volame of each diluted cell suspension (i.e., 0.1 ml of each cell type was used to inoculate each well of a 96-well microtiter plate). The cells were allowed to attach to the well surface by gravity for 30-60 minutes, and the inoculated microtiter plates were incubated for up to three days at 36° C. in 5% CO[0124] 2 with 95% relative humidity.
  • Periodically during incubation, single and mixed monolayers were checked for overall viability. The mixed cell culture monolayers were also checked for the ability of the cell lines to co-exist and develop as a single cell sheet (i.e., a single monolayer), with two distinct cell morphologies (i.e., dimorphic cell sheets), at an approximately equal density of each cell type. At confluency, the cells were treated with a methylene blue staining solution to fix the cells and stain them a light blue in order to provide contrast for visualization using light microscopy. [0125]
  • Some of the mixed monolayers successfully grew as a mixed cell monolayer adhered to the well surfaces, exhibiting a smooth, evenly distributed monolayer. These mixed cultures were designated as “morphologic category 1.” In these cultures, each cell type could be easily distinguished and appeared to survive well in a mixed monolayer, giving the appearance of a single cell distribution. Mixed monolayers composed of HEp-2 and McCoy cells displayed this morphology. [0126]
  • Some of the mixed monolayers successfully grew as a mixed monolayer adhered to the well surfaces, but exhibited two distinct morphologies at confluency. These mixed cultures were designated as “morphologic category 2.” In these cultures, separate, distinct patches of each cell line co-existed within the monolayer, giving the appearance of oil mixing with water. Although an understanding of the mechanism is not necessary in order to use the present invention, it is likely that this appearance is most likely the result of contact inhibition between two specific cell types. The relative sizes of the patches was found primarily to be a function of how evenly the cells were distributed at cell planting. The more even the cell distribution at planting, the patches or islands were smaller as the monolayer reached confluency. Examples of monolayers that produced this appearance were mink lung cells co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells, mink lung cells co-cultivated by buffalo green monkey kidney (BGMK) cells, and human lung carcinoma A549 cells co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells. [0127]
  • However, some cells types could not produce a mixed cell monolayer, when mixed at relatively equal cell numbers at planting in the same culture medium. In some of these cultures, only one of the cell types was found to be viable (i.e., the culture was effectively a single cell type). Examples of mixed cell cultures that were found to be unsuitable for the production of mixed monolayers include human embryonic lung fibroblasts (MRC-5 cells) co-cultivated with BGMK cells. In this mixture, the MRC-5 cells become toxic and form aggregates of dead cells soon after planting. Thus, at confluency, the monolayer only contains one functional, viable cell type, the BGMK cells. Thus, this cell mixture was found to be unsuitable for producing mixed cell monolayers as the cells failed to form mixed cell monolayers of either a smooth or dimorphic morphologic type. [0128]
  • Example 2
  • Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Mixed Cell Cultures [0129]
  • In this Example, mixed cell cultures were used to detect various respiratory viruses including Influenza A, RSV, adenoviruses, parainfluenza viruses, and Influenza B, present in clinical specimens. The mixed cells used in these experiments were Mv1Lu (mink lung cells) and NCI-H292 (human mucoepidermoid cells). [0130]
  • Cell Lines [0131]
  • Confluent T-225 flasks of Mv1Lu and H292 cells were prepared in EMEM with HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 μg/ml gentamicin. The cells were harvested by first rinsing them in 30 ml HBSS without magnesium and calcium. The cells were then dissociated from the flask by brief exposure (i.e., until the cells lifted from the bottom of the flask) to 7 ml trypsin-EDTA solution as described in Example 1. Then, 30 ml media was added to the cells to prepare a cell suspension concentrate. The optical density of each cell suspension was determined at 500 nm, using 3 ml of cells. Typically, the OD reading was 0.2/ml for both the Mv1Lu and H292 cells. In addition to the Mv1Lu and H292 cells, rhesus monkey kidney cells (PRMK), A549 cells, and MDCK cells were used in the present Example. These additional cell lines were prepared in single cell cultures as known in the art. [0132]
  • Mixed Cell Cultures [0133]
  • When each cell suspension concentrate was determined to be 0.2 OD units/ml, 5.2 ml of the Mv1Lu, and 8.7 ml H292 cell suspensions were added to 86.1 ml of culture medium, in order to provide an acceptable working ratio of each cell type (i.e., it was a preparation of diluted mixed cells). This ratio was devised in order to achieve a confluent monolayer, in which each cell type covered a substantially equivalent surface area within 1-3 days post-planting of the diluted mixed cells. Prior to dispensing, care was taken to prepare homogenous suspensions of diluted mixed cells. The mixed cells were dispensed at 0.75 ml per glass shell vial (i.e., glass vial containing a sterile glass coverslip). After planting, the vials were allowed to sit for 60 minutes at ambient temperature so that the cells could settle by gravity and produce a more optimum cell distribution of each cell type. The mixed cells were then incubated for 1-3 days at 36° C. in 5% CO[0134] 2, at 95% relative humidity. Subsequently, the shell vials were stored at ambient temperature to maintain each cell type at substantively equivalent surface ratios for up to 10 days from achieving confluency.
  • Samples and Processing [0135]
  • Nasopharyngeal specimens submitted to a diagnostic virology laboratory were obtained from patients exhibiting influenza-like symptoms. The specimens were centrifuged to produce a cell pellet for direct antigen testing, and a specimen supernatant for inoculation of various cell cultures. The cell pellet was resuspended in phosphate buffer to prepare a cell suspension and 25 μl portions of the cell suspension were spotted onto a glass slide and dried. Each spot of cells on the slide were then fixed with fixative (e.g., acetone), and incubated for 30 minutes with individual antibody solutions (Bartel's) capable of recognizing various respiratory viruses, including influenza A and RSV, as well as other respiratory viruses. A second antibody solution containing fluorescein (FITC) labelled goat anti-mouse antibodies and counterstain (Bartel's) was added to cover each cell spot on the slides, and incubated for an additional 30 minutes at 35-37° C. The counterstain in the FITC-goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red under fluorescence. Slides prepared from the nasopharyngeal specimens were observed for positive (i.e., virus-infected), apple green staining fluorescent cells, using epifluorescence at 100-400× magnification. [0136]
  • In addition, 0.2 ml aliquots of the specimen supernatant were inoculated onto various cell cultures prepared in shell vials containing glass coverslips. The cell cultures included primary rhesus monkey kidney cells (PRMK; ViroMed or BioWhittaker), Mv1Lu cells (Diagnostic Hybrids) HEp-2 cells (Diagnostic Hybrids), MDCK, A549, and H292 cells, as single cell monolayers, as well as mixed cell monolayers of Mv1Lu and H292 cells, produced as described above. [0137]
  • Each inoculated shell vial was centrifuged for 60 minutes at 700×g, and then incubated for 1-3 days at 36° C., in appropriate culture medium (e.g., EMEM containing 0.5 to 2% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin [100 Units/100 μg per ml of medium each]). After incubation, the culture medium was decanted, and the cells were fixed to the glass coverslip with a solution of acetone and methanol (50:50, v/v). An antibody solution (Chemicon or Bartel's) containing a pool of monoclonal antibodies to multiple respiratory viruses, including Influenza A and RSV, as well as other respiratory viruses was added to cover each coverslip. The coverslips were then incubated for 30 minutes at 35-37° C. The antibody solution was then removed and the coverslips were rinsed with PBS. A second antibody solution containing fluorescein (FITC) labelled goat anti-mouse antibodies and counterstain (Bartel's) was added to cover each coverslip, and incubated for an additional 30 minutes at 35-37° C. The counterstain in the FITC-goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red under fluorescence. Shell vial coverslips prepared from the nasopharyngeal specimens (i.e., inoculated cultures) were observed for positive (i.e., virus-infected), apple green staining, fluorescent cells, using epifluorescence at 100-400× magnification. [0138]
  • Results [0139]
  • Some specimens demonstrated a positive direct antigen reaction on the cell spot incubated with Influenza A monoclonal antibody. These specimens also demonstrated fluorescent staining on the single cell Mv1Lu coverslip and the Mv1Lu/H292 mixed cell coverslip, but no or very little fluorescence on the single cell H292 coverslip. The H292 cells are either not susceptible to this strain of Influenza A, or are significantly less susceptible, such that infection is not detectable. Additionally, in some cases (i.e., in specimens with low virus titers), the culture systems were more sensitive than the direct antigen detection method. Also, while the single PRMK cell cultures (i.e., the “gold standard” cells used to detect Influenza A) were positive for the presence of Influenza A, with many specimens, the numbers of infected cells and the total of number of positive specimens were lower than those identified as positive by the mixed cell monolayers. [0140]
  • In addition, both the MDCK and PRMK cells missed one low titer specimen positive for Influenza A by direct antigen testing (IFA), and one other specimen that was also positive for Influenza A by IFA, while the Mv1Lu cells detected the virus in all of the samples determined to be positive based on direct antigen detection (IFA). [0141]
  • Some specimens demonstrated a positive direct antigen reaction on the cell spot incubated with RSV monoclonal antibody. These specimens also demonstrated fluorescent staining on the single cell H292 coverslip and the MV1Lu/H292 mixed cell coverslip, but no or very little fluorescence on the single cell MV1Lu coverslip. H292 cells are susceptible to RSV infection, while Mv1Lu cells are not susceptible (or are significantly less susceptible, such that infection is not detectable). In addition to the mixed cell cultures, HEp-2 cells (i.e., the “gold standard” cells used to detect RSV) were also observed for the presence of RSV; the performance of HEp-2 cells was generally less sensitive than that of the Mv1Lu and H292 mixed cell monolayers, or the H292 single cell monolayers. These results with Influenza A tested in mink lung cells was very surprising, as the detection of Influenza A using these cells has previously not been described. [0142]
  • Adenoviruses identified from five clinical specimens based on direct antigen testing (IFA) were detected in the H292 and cell culture mixes, while the PRMK cells missed two of the low titer specimens (i.e., there were two false negatives). Thus, H292 and the mixed cultures were more sensitive than PRMK for detection of adenoviruses. While the A549 cells may provide slightly more positive cells, the 292 cells, mixed cell cultures, and A549 cells detected an equal number of positive specimens. [0143]
  • Parainfluenza viruses were also detected in the H292 and mixed cell cultures, while the PRMK cells missed one low titer specimen. [0144]
  • These results clearly show that the mixed cell cultures were equal in sensitivity to the single cell (H292 and Mv1Lu) cultures. Thus, the mixed cells provide savings in material, time, space, and labor, while providing the same level of sensitivity in the detection of respiratory viruses as single cell cultures presently commonly used in diagnostic virology laboratories. [0145]
  • Influenza B Specimens [0146]
  • In addition to the samples discussed above, various dilutions of multiple Influenza B strains obtained from the ATCC were tested in MDCK, Mv1Lu, and PRMK cells. The following table provides the results of these experiments. In this Table, “MD” refers to the “Maryland” strain, “HK” refers to the “Hong Kong” strain, “TW” refers to the “Taiwan” strain, and “MA” refers to the “Massachusetts” strain. [0147]
    TABLE 3
    Comparison of Influenza B Virus Detection From
    Prototype Viruses by MDCK, ML, and PRMK Cells
    Influenza B Virus Cell Line
    Virus Strain Dilution MDCK Mv1Lu PRMK
    MD 10−4 + + +
    10−5 + + +
    10−6 +
    HK 10−4 + + +
    10−5 + +
    10−6
    TW 10−4 + + +
    10−5 + + +
    10−6
    MA 10−4 + + +
    10−5 + + +
    10−6 + + +
  • There results indicate that Mv1Lu, MDCK, and PRMK are comparable for the detection of multiple Influenza B virus strains. Thus, these cell lines were identified as good candidates for mixed cell cultures, as well as single cell cultures for the identification of this virus. [0148]
  • Example 3
  • Detection of CMV in Mixed Cell Cultures [0149]
  • In this Example, cell cultures of Mv1Lu and NCI-H292 cells were used to detect the presence of cytomegalovirus (HCMV). [0150]
  • The Towne strain of HCMV (ATCC #VR977) was amplified in MRC-5 cells to a titer of greater than 10[0151] 6/ml, and frozen at −85° C. in EMEM containing 10% FBS. Serial dilutions of HCMV were prepared and inoculated into single monolayers of mink lung (Mv1Lu) cells, MRC-5 cells, and mixed cell monolayers of Mv1Lu and H292 cells. Each infected cell culture system was centrifuged for 60 minutes at 700×g, and then incubated for 24 hours at 36° C. in 5% CO2, in appropriate culture medium (e.g., EMEM containing 10% FBS). The culture medium was removed and the cells were fixed to the glass coverslip using a solution of 80% acetone in water. A sufficient amount of HCMV antibody solution (Chemicon) was added to cover each coverslip and incubated for 30 minutes at 35-37° C. The antibody solution was removed, and the coverslip was rinsed with PBS. A second antibody solution consisting of FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antiserum was added to cover each coverslip and incubated an additional 30 minutes at 35-37° C. The specimens were then observed under epifluorescence at 100-400× magnification for positive (i.e., CMV-infected), nuclear staining, fluorescent cells.
  • As described in previous Examples, the counterstain in the FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red, when excited by fluorescent light. Fluorescent, apple green nuclear stain was observed in the Mv1Lu single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers, but not in the H292 cells, as the Mv1Lu cells are susceptible to HCMV infection, while H292 cells are not (or the H292 cells are significantly less sensitive). The MRC-5 cells (i.e., the “gold standard” cells for detection of HCMV) performed about the same as the mixed cell monolayer, as these cultures had a similar number of infected cells as the cells in the mixed monolayer. [0152]
  • Example 4
  • Detection of Enteroviruses in Mixed Cell Cultures [0153]
  • In this Example, mixed cell cultures were used to detect the enteroviruses, Coxsackie B virus and Echovirus. In these experiments, a mixed cell monolayer of BGMK and NCI-H292 cells were used. [0154]
  • Confluent T-225 flasks of BGMK and H292 cells were prepared in EMEM with 25 mM HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 μg/ml gentamicin. The cells were harvested by first rinsing in 30 ml HBSS without magnesium and calcium, and were then dissociated from the flasks by a brief treatment of 7 ml trypsin-EDTA solution (as described in Example 1). Then, an additional 30 ml of culture medium (EMEM with HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 μg/ml gentamicin) was added to the suspension to produce a cell suspension concentrate. The optical density at 500 nm was determined for each suspension, using 3 ml of cells. Typically, the OD reading was 0.2/ml for both the BGMK and H292 cell suspensions. [0155]
  • Next, 3 ml of BGMK cell suspension and 8 ml of H292 cell suspension (both suspensions were at 0.2 OD units/ml) were then added to 29 ml of the culture medium (25 mM HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 μg/ml gentamicin) to provide an acceptable working ratio of each cell type in a diluted mixed cell suspension. This ratio was intended to achieve a confluent monolayer consisting of each cell type covering substantially equivalent surface area within 1-3 days post-planting of the diluted mixed cells. Care was exercised to prepare a homogenous suspension of diluted mixed cells prior to dispensing 0.75 ml to each of 100 glass shell vials, each of which contained a sterile glass coverslip. The vials were allowed to sit for 60 minutes post-planting at ambient temperature to allow the cells to settle by gravity and produce a more optimum cell distribution. The vials were then were moved to an incubator for incubation at 36° C. for 1-3 days in 5% CO[0156] 2, at 95% relative humidity.
  • Stock virus suspensions and clinical specimens shown to contain Coxsackie B virus or echovirus were used to infect BGMK/H292 cell mixtures, as well as single cell monolayers of BGMK, H292, MRC-5, and PRMK cells. For clinical samples, throat swab, nasopharyngeal swab, sputum, stool, and rectal swabs were collected from patients, placed in viral transport medium, and filtered through 0.45 μm filter to remove possible bacterial and fungal contaminants prior to inoculation of cell cultures. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected from patients was placed in viral transport medium, and used directly for inoculation of cells. For inoculation of shell vials, the media present in the vials were removed and fresh media added. Then, 0.2 ml of specimen was inoculated into each vial. The inoculated vials were centrifuged at 700×g for 45-60 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, the vials were incubated at 37° C. for 1-3 days, and viral presence was detected using immunofluorescent staining. [0157]
  • For staining, the medium was removed from each vial and the cells were fixed on the coverslip with acetone. The coverslip was removed from each vial, and stained with 25 μl primary antibody (mouse monoclonal antibody directed against enteroviruses [Dako]), for 30 minutes at 37° C. After washing with PBS, 25 μl of the FITC-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (Dako) was used as a secondary antibody for staining, and incubated at 37° C. for 30 minutes. After another wash, the coverslips were mounted on slides and observed under fluorescence. The presence of one or more specific fluorescent-stained cells on the coverslip was considered to be a positive. As described in previous Examples, the counterstain in the FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells, and appears red upon exposure to fluorescent light. For Coxsackie B virus detection, fluorescent, apple green stain was observed in many of the BGMK cells in the BGMK single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers primarily in the BGMK cells, but not in as many H292 cells, as BGMK cells are more susceptible to Coxsackie B virus infection. For some types of Coxsackie B virus isolates, H292 cells are not as susceptible (or the H292 cells are significantly less susceptible). The “gold standard” cell line (i.e., PRMK cells) did not exhibit the same number of infected cells as the mixed cell monolayers. [0158]
  • For detection of echovirus, fluorescent, apple green stain was observed in many H292 cells in the H292 single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers, primarily in the H292 cells, but not in as many BGMK cells, as H292 cells are more susceptible to echovirus infection, while BGMK cells are not as susceptible (or the BGMK cells are significantly less sensitive). The “gold standard” line (i.e., MRC-5 cells) performed, but did not appear to have as many infected cells as the mixed cell monolayers. In the case of the BGMK/H292 mixed cell monolayers infected with high titer samples of enteroviruses, cell-specific virus mediated cytopathic effect (CPE) was evident (i.e., the CPE was observed in BGMK cells when Coxsackie B virus was present at high titer, and CPE was observed in H292 cells when echovirus was present at high titer). [0159]
  • Example 5
  • Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus and HCMV in Mixed Cell Cultures [0160]
  • In this Example, mixed cell cultures are used to detect herpes simplex virus (HSV) and HCMV, using a mixed cell monolayer of genetically engineered baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells (e.g., ATCC #CCL-12072) and Mv1Lu cells. [0161]
  • The BHK and Mv1Lu cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced. These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above. The cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with virus or clinical samples, incubated, and fixed, as described above. [0162]
  • HCMV is detected in the Mv1Lu cells, using antibody as described in Example 3 above, and HSV (HSV-1 and HSV-2) are identified using a β-galactosidase staining kit (i.e., detecting the reporter gene induced by the virus infecting the genetically engineered BHK cells). [0163]
  • Example 6
  • Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Mixed Cell Cultures [0164]
  • In this Example, mixed cell cultures are used to detect a panel of respiratory viruses. In these experiments, three cell types are combined so as to produce a mixed cell culture that is capable of detecting at least three viruses. [0165]
  • First, A549, H292, and mink lung (e.g., Mv1Lu) cells cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced. In preferred embodiments, the cells are diluted such that the mixed cells in culture will be in approximately the same proportions (i.e., 1:1:1). These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above. The cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with virus or clinical samples, incubated, and fixed, as described above. [0166]
  • The viruses capable of infecting these cells are detected and identified using the methods described in Example 2 above. In these mixed cell cultures, the 292 cells are used to detect the presence of parainfluenza viruses and RSV, while the A549 cells are used to detect the presence of adenoviruses, and the mink lung cells are used to detect the presence of influenza viruses (e.g., Influenza A and B). [0167]
  • Example 7
  • Detection of HSV and Chlamydia in Mixed Cell Cultures [0168]
  • In this Example, mixed cell cultures are provided which allow the detection of two organisms commonly associated with sexually transmitted diseases. In these experiments, mink lung cells (e.g., Mv1Lu) useful for the detection of HSV are mixed with McCoy cells useful for the detection of [0169] C. trachomatis.
  • First, McCoy cells and mink lung (e.g., Mv1Lu) cells cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced. In preferred embodiments, the cells are diluted such that the mixed cells in culture will be in approximately the same proportions. These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above. The cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with samples (e.g., clinical samples), incubated, and fixed, as described above. [0170]
  • The organisms capable of infecting these cells (e.g., HSV infects the mink lung cells, while [0171] C. trachomatis infects the McCoy cells) are detected and identified using the methods described in Example 2 above. As with the other mixed cell culture systems, the presence of virus and/or C. trachomatis may be detected by other methods, such as the observation of CPE, animal inoculation, etc. Thus, it is not intended that the mixed cell culture assay systems of this Example or any of the preceding examples be limited to any particular method of microorganism detection, identification, and/or quantitation.
  • From the above, it is clear that the present invention provides many advantages over presently used methods in diagnostic microbiology. [0172]
  • All publications and patents mentioned in the above specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the described method and system of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in diagnostic microbiology and virology, cell culture, and/or related fields are intended to be within the scope of the following claims. [0173]

Claims (36)

What is claimed is:
1. A composition comprising a cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said cell culture comprises at least two cell types and wherein said cell types are susceptible to infection by at least one intracellular parasite.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein said cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type.
3. The composition of claim 2, wherein said first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and said second cell type consists of mink lung cells.
4. The composition of claim 2, wherein said first cell type consists of mink lung cells and said second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells.
5. The composition of claim 2, wherein said first cell type consists of human lung carcinoma cells and said second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells.
6. The composition of claim 2, wherein said first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and said second cell type consists of human embryonic lung cells.
7. The composition of claim 2, wherein said first cell type consists of human epidermoid laryngeal carcinoma cells and said second cell type consists of McCoy cells.
8. The composition of claim 2, wherein said first cell type consists of mink lung cells and said second cell type consists of human diploid lung cells.
9. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of:
a) providing:
i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and
ii) a mixed cell culture comprising at least two cell types;
b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and
c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said intracellular parasite is a virus.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein said virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein said cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said first cell type is a mink lung cell, and said second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.
14. The method of claim 10, wherein said virus is an enterovirus.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein said enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of Coxsackie viruses and echoviruses.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein said first cell type is a buffalo green monkey kidney cell and said second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.
17. The method of claim 10, wherein said virus is a herpes virus.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein said herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella-Zoster Virus, Epstein-Barr Virus, Human Herpes Virus 6, Human Herpes Virus 7, and Human Herpes Virus 8.
19. The method of claim 11, wherein said first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and said second cell type is a mink lung cell.
20. The method of claim 11, wherein said first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and said second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type.
21. The method of claim 9, wherein said intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia.
22. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of:
a) providing:
i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and
ii) a mixed cell culture comprising a first cell type and a second cell type;
b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and
c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein said intracellular parasite is a virus.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein said virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses.
25. The method of claim 22, wherein said first cell type is a mink lung cell, and said second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.
26. The method of claim 23, wherein said virus is an enterovirus.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein said enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of Coxsackie viruses, echoviruses, and polioviruses.
28. The method of claim 22, wherein said first cell type is a buffalo green monkey kidney cell and said second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.
29. The method of claim 23, wherein said virus is a herpes virus.
30. The method of claim 29, wherein said herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of herpes simplex type 1, herpes simplex type 2, and cytomegalovirus.
31. The method of claim 22, wherein said first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and said second cell type is a mink lung cell.
32. The method of claim 22, wherein said first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and said second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type.
33. The method of claim 22, wherein said intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia.
34. A method for the detection of influenza virus, comprising the steps of
a) providing a sample suspected of containing influenza virus, and mink lung cells;
b) inoculating said mink lung cells with said sample; and
c) detecting the presence of said influenza within said mink lung cells.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein said mink lung cells are Mv1Lu cells.
36. The method of claim 34, wherein said influenza virus is selected from the group consisting of Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C.
US10/382,713 2002-04-25 2003-03-05 Mixed cell diagnostic systems Abandoned US20030203357A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/382,713 US20030203357A1 (en) 2002-04-25 2003-03-05 Mixed cell diagnostic systems

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/133,910 US6610474B1 (en) 2002-04-25 2002-04-25 Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses
US10/382,713 US20030203357A1 (en) 2002-04-25 2003-03-05 Mixed cell diagnostic systems

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/133,910 Continuation US6610474B1 (en) 2002-04-25 2002-04-25 Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030203357A1 true US20030203357A1 (en) 2003-10-30

Family

ID=27754313

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/133,910 Expired - Fee Related US6610474B1 (en) 2002-04-25 2002-04-25 Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses
US10/382,713 Abandoned US20030203357A1 (en) 2002-04-25 2003-03-05 Mixed cell diagnostic systems
US10/474,759 Expired - Fee Related US6991899B2 (en) 2002-04-25 2003-04-17 Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/133,910 Expired - Fee Related US6610474B1 (en) 2002-04-25 2002-04-25 Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/474,759 Expired - Fee Related US6991899B2 (en) 2002-04-25 2003-04-17 Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (3) US6610474B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1497468B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2005523709A (en)
AT (1) ATE428810T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003228607B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2483747A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60327190D1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003091459A1 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060008810A1 (en) * 2004-07-06 2006-01-12 Focus Technologies, Inc. Methods and compositions for detecting rhinoviruses
US20090098527A1 (en) * 2006-09-12 2009-04-16 Fischer Gerald W Biological organism identification product and methods
US20090312285A1 (en) * 2007-10-01 2009-12-17 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system and methods of use
US20110077547A1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2011-03-31 Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc Spectroscopic Method And System For Assessing Tissue Temperature
US8080645B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2011-12-20 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics Llc Biological specimen collection/transport compositions and methods
US8097419B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2012-01-17 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics Llc Compositions and method for rapid, real-time detection of influenza A virus (H1N1) swine 2009
US8652782B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2014-02-18 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Compositions and methods for detecting, identifying and quantitating mycobacterial-specific nucleic acids
US8821885B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2014-09-02 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Immunogenic compositions and methods
US9481912B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2016-11-01 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Compositions and methods for detecting and identifying nucleic acid sequences in biological samples
US9580758B2 (en) 2013-11-12 2017-02-28 Luc Montagnier System and method for the detection and treatment of infection by a microbial agent associated with HIV infection
US9598462B2 (en) 2012-01-26 2017-03-21 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Composite antigenic sequences and vaccines
US9683256B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2017-06-20 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system
US9976136B2 (en) 2015-05-14 2018-05-22 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Rapid methods for the extraction of nucleic acids from biological samples
US10004799B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2018-06-26 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Composite antigenic sequences and vaccines
US11041215B2 (en) 2007-08-24 2021-06-22 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc PCR ready compositions and methods for detecting and identifying nucleic acid sequences
US11041216B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2021-06-22 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Compositions and methods for detecting and quantifying nucleic acid sequences in blood samples

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6610474B1 (en) * 2002-04-25 2003-08-26 University Hospitals Of Cleveland Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses
US20100233674A1 (en) * 2002-04-25 2010-09-16 University Hospitals Of Cleveland Cells for detection and production of influenza and parainfluenza viruses
US7150965B2 (en) * 2003-04-17 2006-12-19 University Hospitals Of Cleveland Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses
US7129042B2 (en) * 2003-11-03 2006-10-31 Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc. Compositions and methods for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
WO2010036760A1 (en) 2008-09-24 2010-04-01 Medimmune, Llc Methods for cultivating cells, propagating and purifying viruses
EP3249406A1 (en) * 2016-05-27 2017-11-29 PerkinElmer Cellular Technologies Germany GmbH Method for determining the number of infection focuses of a cell culture
CN115015549B (en) * 2022-07-14 2023-01-13 深圳市卫光生物制品股份有限公司 Test method for rabies vaccine inactivation verification

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6610474B1 (en) * 2002-04-25 2003-08-26 University Hospitals Of Cleveland Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5939253A (en) 1996-04-26 1999-08-17 Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc. Compositions and methods for detecting viral infection
US20020082224A1 (en) * 1997-01-14 2002-06-27 Douglas J. Jolly Non-immunogenic prodrugs and selectable markers for use in gene therapy
US6168915B1 (en) 1998-04-24 2001-01-02 Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc. Mixed cell diagnostic systems

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6610474B1 (en) * 2002-04-25 2003-08-26 University Hospitals Of Cleveland Cells for detection of influenza and parainfluenza viruses

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8318423B2 (en) 2004-07-06 2012-11-27 Focus Diagnostics, Inc. Methods and compositions for detecting rhinoviruses
US20060008810A1 (en) * 2004-07-06 2006-01-12 Focus Technologies, Inc. Methods and compositions for detecting rhinoviruses
US8119338B2 (en) 2004-07-06 2012-02-21 Focus Diagnostics, Inc. Methods and compositions for detecting rhinoviruses
US20090098527A1 (en) * 2006-09-12 2009-04-16 Fischer Gerald W Biological organism identification product and methods
US9481912B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2016-11-01 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Compositions and methods for detecting and identifying nucleic acid sequences in biological samples
US9080204B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2015-07-14 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Compositions and methods for rapid, real-time detection of influenza a virus (H1N1) Swine 2009
US8097419B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2012-01-17 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics Llc Compositions and method for rapid, real-time detection of influenza A virus (H1N1) swine 2009
US8652782B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2014-02-18 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Compositions and methods for detecting, identifying and quantitating mycobacterial-specific nucleic acids
US11041215B2 (en) 2007-08-24 2021-06-22 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc PCR ready compositions and methods for detecting and identifying nucleic acid sequences
US8821885B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2014-09-02 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Immunogenic compositions and methods
US9388220B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2016-07-12 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Immunogenic compositions and methods
US10596250B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2020-03-24 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Methods of treating and preventing influenza infections
US10004799B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2018-06-26 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Composite antigenic sequences and vaccines
US9777045B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2017-10-03 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Immunogenic compositions and methods
US8080645B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2011-12-20 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics Llc Biological specimen collection/transport compositions and methods
US8293467B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2012-10-23 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system and methods of use
US9212399B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2015-12-15 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system and method of use
US8084443B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2011-12-27 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system and methods of use
US9416416B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2016-08-16 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection/transport compositions and methods
US11041216B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2021-06-22 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Compositions and methods for detecting and quantifying nucleic acid sequences in blood samples
US20090312285A1 (en) * 2007-10-01 2009-12-17 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system and methods of use
US8415330B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2013-04-09 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system and method of use
US9683256B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2017-06-20 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system
US8669240B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2014-03-11 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics, Llc Biological specimen collection and transport system and method of use
US20110077547A1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2011-03-31 Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc Spectroscopic Method And System For Assessing Tissue Temperature
US8376955B2 (en) * 2009-09-29 2013-02-19 Covidien Lp Spectroscopic method and system for assessing tissue temperature
US9598462B2 (en) 2012-01-26 2017-03-21 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Composite antigenic sequences and vaccines
US10525066B2 (en) 2013-11-12 2020-01-07 Luc Montagnier System and method for the detection and treatment of infection by a microbial agent associated with HIV infection
US9580758B2 (en) 2013-11-12 2017-02-28 Luc Montagnier System and method for the detection and treatment of infection by a microbial agent associated with HIV infection
US9976136B2 (en) 2015-05-14 2018-05-22 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Rapid methods for the extraction of nucleic acids from biological samples
US10087439B1 (en) 2015-05-14 2018-10-02 Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc Rapid methods for the extraction of nucleic acids from biological samples

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6610474B1 (en) 2003-08-26
JP2005523709A (en) 2005-08-11
EP1497468A1 (en) 2005-01-19
AU2003228607B2 (en) 2006-08-24
EP1497468A4 (en) 2005-09-14
AU2003228607A1 (en) 2003-11-10
WO2003091459A1 (en) 2003-11-06
CA2483747A1 (en) 2003-11-06
ATE428810T1 (en) 2009-05-15
DE60327190D1 (en) 2009-05-28
US20040234947A1 (en) 2004-11-25
EP1497468B1 (en) 2009-04-15
US6991899B2 (en) 2006-01-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6573080B2 (en) Mixed cell diagnostic systems
AU2009212981B2 (en) Mixed cell systems for the detection of viruses
CA2561701C (en) Mixed cell diagnostic systems
US20030203357A1 (en) Mixed cell diagnostic systems
AU2001259653A1 (en) Mixed cell systems for the detection of viruses
US9689018B2 (en) Mixed cell diagnostic systems for detection of respiratory, herpes and enteric viruses
AU2006203168B2 (en) Mixed cell diagnostic systems
AU2006203283B2 (en) Mixed cell systems for the detection of viruses
CA2535867A1 (en) Mixed cell diagnostic systems
AU2005228412B2 (en) Mixed cell diagnostic systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION