US20040085159A1 - Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams - Google Patents

Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040085159A1
US20040085159A1 US10/286,375 US28637502A US2004085159A1 US 20040085159 A1 US20040085159 A1 US 20040085159A1 US 28637502 A US28637502 A US 28637502A US 2004085159 A1 US2004085159 A1 US 2004085159A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
focused ion
resonator
ion beam
electromechanical device
tuning
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10/286,375
Other versions
US6922118B2 (en
Inventor
Randall Kubena
Richard Joyce
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HRL Laboratories LLC
Original Assignee
HRL Laboratories LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by HRL Laboratories LLC filed Critical HRL Laboratories LLC
Priority to US10/286,375 priority Critical patent/US6922118B2/en
Assigned to HRL LABORATORIES, LLC reassignment HRL LABORATORIES, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KUBENA, RANDALL L., JOYCE, RICHARD J.
Publication of US20040085159A1 publication Critical patent/US20040085159A1/en
Priority to US11/148,389 priority patent/US7282834B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6922118B2 publication Critical patent/US6922118B2/en
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03HIMPEDANCE NETWORKS, e.g. RESONANT CIRCUITS; RESONATORS
    • H03H3/00Apparatus or processes specially adapted for the manufacture of impedance networks, resonating circuits, resonators
    • H03H3/007Apparatus or processes specially adapted for the manufacture of impedance networks, resonating circuits, resonators for the manufacture of electromechanical resonators or networks
    • H03H3/0072Apparatus or processes specially adapted for the manufacture of impedance networks, resonating circuits, resonators for the manufacture of electromechanical resonators or networks of microelectro-mechanical resonators or networks
    • H03H3/0076Apparatus or processes specially adapted for the manufacture of impedance networks, resonating circuits, resonators for the manufacture of electromechanical resonators or networks of microelectro-mechanical resonators or networks for obtaining desired frequency or temperature coefficients
    • H03H3/0077Apparatus or processes specially adapted for the manufacture of impedance networks, resonating circuits, resonators for the manufacture of electromechanical resonators or networks of microelectro-mechanical resonators or networks for obtaining desired frequency or temperature coefficients by tuning of resonance frequency

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for tuning an electromechanical device. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for tuning a MEMS device in real time using a focused ion beam (FIB) without degrading the performance of the device.
  • FIB focused ion beam
  • MEMS devices require that their mechanical resonant frequencies are matched to system requirements or to other on-chip frequencies. Examples of these requirements are UHF resonators for RF signal processing, channel selection, and “on-resonant” operation of arrays of resonators for chemical or biological sensors. Each resonator should be tuned to the pre-selected frequency used in order to properly receive the signal. In the case of resonators to be used with chemical or biological sensors, an array of resonators with frequencies in the 100 MHz to 1 GHz range should ideally have nearly matched resonant frequencies since differential detection of small changes in the frequencies due to molecular attachment are more easily measured without large offsets in frequency.
  • the electrostatic bias technique has a limited tuning range since the bias voltages applied to the resonators deflect the structure of the resonators and cannot be raised to high levels due to limitations on the electronics. Additionally, this biasing technique can lead to drift over time and temperature, if the biasing source changes with time or temperature. Furthermore, the electrostatic bias technique can lead to additional energy losses to the support circuitry and therefore a low overall Q of the system. Moreover, electrostatic tuning cannot mass balance a system to minimize momentum losses to the support structure. Hence, a method to mechanically tune a MEMS resonator both for frequency adjustment and for Q optimization is desired.
  • laser assisted etching techniques have been utilized to mechanically tune MEMS gyros.
  • the Draper double tuning fork gyro is an example of a device tuned with this technique.
  • laser assisted etching has less spatial resolution for nanometer structures and cannot control the removal of material on a sub-monolayer scale.
  • laser systems can cause damage or drift of the structure due to heating effects, and require additional equipment for accurately removing material on the micron scale. This is discussed in M. Weinberg, J. Connely, A. Kourepenis, D.
  • the tuning and adjustment time must be on the order of 1 second for high throughput. If the adjustment time is significantly larger than 1 second per device, the cost of manufacturing will be increased. Since air damping can affect the parameters of MEMS resonators, the tuning technique must be performed in a reasonably good vacuum (10 ⁇ 4 to 10 ⁇ 6 Torr) for most MEMS devices. Therefore, there is a need for a method which can reliably tune many MEMS devices in a short period of time in a vacuum. This can be best accomplished by tuning a small or “nano” MEMS device on a wafer before packaging, using a sub-micrometer vector scan beam system emitting a focused ion beam.
  • the present invention solves the aforementioned problems and meets the aforementioned needs by providing a method for tuning a small or “nano” electromechanical device, such as a MEMS device with feature sizes on the order of less than several hundred micrometers, in real-time using focused-ion-beam (FIB) micromachining.
  • FIB micromachining involves bombarding a device in a vacuum with a beam of heavy ions. When the ions collide with the MEMS device, the ions remove material from the MEMS device through sputtering. The amount of material removed from the device can be controlled by adjusting the number of ions which bombard the MEMS device or the energy of the ions in the beam. The ion dose can be controlled by scanning the focused ion beam across the scan field line using electrostatic deflection of the beam.
  • FIB micromachining produces no substantial heating of the substrate.
  • FIB micromachining Since FIB micromachining has excellent spatial resolution (in the nanometer regime) for removing small regions of material, it is ideally suited for “nano” resonator MEMS device applications, i.e. high frequency (>1 MHz) devices. In addition, FIB micromachining provides a clean and well controlled method of removing sub-monolayer thickness of material from a MEMS device.
  • the method of the present invention is preferably useful for high frequency (>1 MHz), resonators. In many cases only 1 millisecond of micromachining is needed to correct common lithography or deposition variations and produce a 1% change in the resonant frequency. Lower frequency resonators that are considerably larger than 100 micrometers in linear dimensions will require longer exposure times to the FIB for a given percentage change in characteristics, and therefore their manufacturing costs will increase.
  • a MEMS device is preferably placed in a depressurized system in order to reduce ion scattering from air molecules. While in the depressurized system, the MEMS device may or may not be operating, but it is preferred that the MEMS device is operating. If the device is operating the output of the device can be monitored as the FIB is removing material from the device. Once the pressure is taken down to a certain level ( ⁇ 10 ⁇ 4 torr), the focused ion beam is directed at the MEMS device to remove a portion of at least one layer of the MEMS device with high spatial accuracy.
  • the modifications on MEMS device by use of FIB micromachining is stable over time. This provides the ability to tune the resonant frequency or the Q, with high precision.
  • a further object of the present invention is to provide a circuit card containing buffer electronics which is coupled to the MEMS device.
  • the FIB micromachining method according to the present invention can be performed in-situ in real-time while the MEMS device is operating without degrading the performance of the MEMS device.
  • the output frequency of the device can be monitored in real time so that when the desired resonant frequency is achieved, the FIB micromachining stops.
  • the active layers are material which, when in contact with a specific chemical or biological agent, will bond with that agent. This bond increases the mass of the MEMS device, thereby changing the resonant frequency, indicating the presence of that specific chemical or biological agent.
  • the plurality of MEMS devices may be exposed to the focused ion beam in order to ensure that each MEMS device in the plurality of MEMS devices has roughly the same resonant frequency for input into differential detectors.
  • the present invention provides a vacuum transport system which is coupled to the depressurized system in which the FIB micromachining is performed. After the plurality of wafers are tuned, the vacuum transport system couples the tuned wafer to a wafer bonding system, where the wafers are bonded with a capping wafer. This allows the resonator to be tuned and packaged in-situ.
  • the present invention provides a method which can quickly and cleanly tune a MEMS device. Furthermore, the method of the present invention can be readily implemented in a system which can automate the tuning process for many devices.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of the system used according to a first embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 shows an example of a MEMS device tuned using the present invention
  • FIG. 3 shows a graph of the change in resonant frequency of the MEMS device in FIG. 2 after FIB micromachining
  • FIG. 4 shows a system according to a second embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 5 shows a system used according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 show a system for tuning a plurality of MEMS devices using the present invention, and packaging the MEMS devices in-situ.
  • the MEMS device could be any resonator.
  • the resonator can, for example, be shaped like a tuning fork, microstrip, or any other bulk or surface acoustic wave device. Because FIB micromachining is ideal for submicron applications, such micromachining is preferably used for tuning resonators with a resonant frequency roughly greater than 1 MHz. Resonators having resonant frequencies less than 1 MHz can have linear dimensions orders of magnitude larger than the micron scale, and therefore, tuning would require the removal of significant amounts of material.
  • FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment of the present invention.
  • a generic resonator 101 is placed inside a specimen chamber 102 as shown in FIG. 1.
  • the specimen chamber 102 contains a cylinder 103 which houses a liquid metal (LM) source 110 for emitting a focused ion beam 108 .
  • LM liquid metal
  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other types of focused ion beam sources may also be used.
  • one such specimen chamber 102 containing a LM source for emitting a focused ion beam 108 is the FIB Micron from the FEI company.
  • the focused ion beam 108 is used to remove material from the resonator 101 , thus tuning the resonator 101 .
  • the resonator 101 is electrically coupled with leads 106 to buffer electronics located on a circuit card 104 .
  • the resonator 101 can be comprised of silicon, aluminum-nitride, silicon-carbide, gallium-nitride, quartz, or other variations of semiconductor material.
  • the resonator 101 preferably has a resonant frequency greater than 1 MHz, and preferably has linear dimensions no greater than 100 micrometers.
  • the circuit card 104 is located no more than a few centimeters from the resonator 101 , and is preferably within a few millimeters of the resonator 101 .
  • the buffer electronics on the circuit card 104 may also be coupled to a measuring device 124 such as an oscilloscope located outside of the specimen chamber 102 .
  • the buffer electronics on the circuit card 104 act as a low impedance buffer to isolate the resonator 101 from any stray charges associated with the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the buffer electronics on the circuit card 104 may contain an oscillator circuit or similar circuit which can drive the resonator 101 .
  • the circuitry driving the buffer electronics on the circuit card 104 located outside the specimen chamber 102 are, for example, connected to the circuit card 104 by means of a connecting device 114 such as RG174 coaxial cable.
  • the portion of the RG174 coaxial cable located inside the specimen chamber is preferably removed of the outer jacket to prevent charge build up when the specimen chamber 102 is depressurized and the focused ion beam 108 is operating.
  • the connecting device 114 is also coupled to the measuring device 124 to simultaneously measure the output frequency of the resonator 101 , while the resonator 101 is exposed to the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the specimen chamber 102 is depressurized to preferably 10 ⁇ 4 to 10 ⁇ 6 Torr using a turbo pump or similar device. Pressures greater than 10 ⁇ 4 Torr could create problems in properly measuring the output frequency of the resonator 101 .
  • the resonator 101 is exposed to the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the focused ion beam 108 has a beam current in the range of 1 picoamp-1 microamp, but is preferably less than 0.1 nanoamps.
  • the focused ion beam 108 preferably has a beam current density of 5-10 Amps/cm 2 and a preferred beam diameter at segment 112 in the range of 5 nanometers-1000 nanometers.
  • the dosage of ions in the focused ion beam 108 is preferably on the order of 10 11 -10 17 ions/cm 2 .
  • a sputtering yield is the amount of atoms removed from the resonator 101 by each ion of the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the focused ion beam 108 is preferably comprised of Ga + ions, and the Ga + ions preferably have energy in the range of 5 keV-30 keV.
  • Other ions from silicon, aluminum, copper, boron, germanium, or other commercially available elements may also be used.
  • a resonator 101 having the shape of a tuning fork as shown in FIG. 2 can, for example, be tuned using the aforementioned method.
  • the resonator 101 is preferably comprised of quartz.
  • the resonator 101 has tuning pads 103 , preferably comprised of gold, located at the tips 105 of the resonator 101 . By ablating a portion or all of the tuning pads 103 , the resonant frequency of the resonator 101 can be adjusted.
  • Limiting the energy of the Ga + ions to a range of 5 keV-30 keV will limit the penetration of the Ga+ions into the tuning pads 103 to less than 10 nanometers. This will prevent Ga+ions from completely penetrating the tuning pads 103 and entering the resonator 101 .
  • the x-axis of the graph represents the thickness of the tuning pads 103
  • the y-axis represents the resonant frequency.
  • the resonant frequency is about 1 GHz.
  • the resonant frequency is about 1.08 GHz.
  • the graph of FIG. 3 clearly shows that the resonant frequency of the resonator 101 can be adjusted by ablating the tuning pads 103 . It can be noted that the resonator 101 does not need to have tuning pads 103 to tune the resonant frequency. A portion of the resonator 101 may be ablated to tune the device.
  • FIG. 4 shows a second embodiment of the present invention where a piezoelectric drive element 122 , such as a speaker, is provided.
  • Piezoelectric drive element 122 powers the resonator 101 using acoustic inertial forces.
  • the piezoelectric drive element 122 is powered by a source outside the specimen chamber 102 , not shown in the figure. In some instances electrically powering the resonator 101 may distort the frequency spectrum of the resonator 101 , and as such, acoustic power is preferred for powering the resonator 101 .
  • the piezoelectric drive element 122 allows the detection of mass imbalances in the resonator 101 .
  • the piezoelectric element 122 is driven by circuitry outside the specimen chamber 102 and may be connected to the circuitry using the connecting device 114 discussed in the first embodiment.
  • the piezoelectric drive element 122 preferably has a frequency output of DC to about 10-20 kHz. Mass imbalances result when the mass of the resonator 101 is not equally balanced. Mass imbalances can have direct adverse effect on the Q factor of the resonator 101 , which is a measure of how well the resonator 101 responds to its resonant frequency and filters out other frequencies. When these mass imbalances are detected, they may then be corrected using the focused ion beam 108 and computer software to monitor where mass has been removed, and where it needs to be removed in order to balance the resonator 101 .
  • the piezoelectric drive element 122 can help achieve the desired resonant frequency and the Q, without distorting the frequency spectrum of the resonator 101 .
  • the circuit card 104 coupled with leads 106 to the resonator 101 , is still used to detect the output frequency of the resonator 101 .
  • a system which can be used in conjunction with the focused ion beam micromachining technique discussed in the first and second embodiments, to tune an array of resonators to have closely matched resonant frequencies for detecting chemical and biological agents.
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary model of the system.
  • the MEMS devices are preferably resonators 201 and may be comprised of silicon; aluminum-nitride, silicon-carbide, gallium-nitride, quartz, or other variations of semiconductor material.
  • the resonators 201 are comprised of quartz.
  • the resonators 201 are provided on a support surface 203 , and are located beneath a plurality of nozzles 205 on a printhead 207 .
  • the printhead 207 is part of a commercial ink-jet based proximal nano-doser.
  • the basic evaluation kit available from Ink Jet Technologies is an example of an ink-jet based proximal nano-doser that is commercially available for this application.
  • the printhead 207 has terminals 208 which are electrically controlled by a computer, and allow the nozzles 205 to dispense a specific amount of an active layer 209 onto the resonators 201 , as schematically shown by means of droplets 210 .
  • the active layer 209 is a material, which when in the presence of a certain chemical or biological agent, will bond to that chemical or biological agent, thereby changing the mass of the resonator 201 .
  • the active layer 209 may consist of amphiphiles such as dimyristylphosphatidylchlorine or dimyristylphosphatidylserine for detecting chemical agents such as ethanol, methanol, benzene, n-octane, n-butanole, or toluene. Certain polymers may be used to detect TNT, and metal hydrides may be used to detect hydrogen.
  • active layers may consist of certain antibodies or oligonucleotides having a functionalized 5′ hexyl spacer with a thiol group for detecting biological agents. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that several types of active layers may be used for detecting different chemical and biological agents.
  • each resonator 201 placed on the surface 203 in a given run will receive equal amounts of an active layer 209 .
  • This also helps to alleviate frequency deviations between the resonators 201 caused by deviations in the amount of the active layer 209 which is dispensed on each resonator 201 .
  • each resonator 201 may be placed in the specimen chamber 102 described in the first embodiment, preferably coupled to the circuit card 104 and exposed to the focused ion beam 108 .
  • Using focused ion beam micromachining to ablate a portion of the resonator 201 will reduce frequency deviations between the individual resonators 201 . This will ensure that each resonator 201 is tuned to optimal performance and large offsets in frequencies between resonators will not saturate the front-end electronics.
  • a fourth embodiment of the present invention provides a system for tuning and packaging a plurality of resonators in-situ without breaking the vacuum of the specimen chamber. Shown in FIG. 6 is an exemplary system which accomplishes this goal.
  • FIG. 6 shows on its left side a wafer 302 on which a plurality of resonators 304 are mounted.
  • the wafer 302 is located on an XYZ-stage 308 in chamber 102 , described in the first embodiment.
  • the XYZ-stage 308 is used to move the wafer 302 and the plurality of resonators 304 in the XY-plane.
  • the specimen chamber 102 also comprises a wafer probe card 312 , and the liquid metal source 110 emitting the focused ion beam 108 discussed in the first embodiment.
  • the wafer probe card 312 is connected to the XYZ-stage 308 such that the wafer probe card 312 may move in the z-plane.
  • the wafer probe card 312 may be located between the plurality of resonators 304 and the focused ion beam 108 as shown in FIG. 6, or may be located below the wafer 302 as shown in FIG. 7. In the embodiments of FIG. 6, the wafer probe card 312 is positioned such that the focused ion beam 108 may travel through the hole 324 in the wafer probe card 312 .
  • the focused ion beam 108 is directed at a specific resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 located directly beneath the hole 324 in the wafer probe card 312 .
  • the function of the wafer probe card 312 is similar to the function of the circuit card 104 discussed in the first and second embodiments.
  • the wafer probe card 312 has contacts 314 which connect to the resonator being tuned.
  • the wafer probe card 312 provides power so that the resonator may be operating while simultaneously being tuned by the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the wafer probe card 312 also measures the output frequency of the resonator, so that the resonator is exposed to the focused ion beam 108 until the desired resonant frequency is achieved.
  • a camera 316 is also provided. After a resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 has been tuned using the focused ion beam 108 , the contacts 314 are removed from the tuned resonator by moving the XYZ-stage 308 in the Z-direction. Then the XYZ-stage 308 moves the wafer 302 in the XY-direction so as to position the next resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 to be tuned beneath the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the wafer 302 contains a series of registration marks which can be viewed by the camera 316 . The registration marks correspond to the position of each resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 on the wafer 302 .
  • the camera 316 observes the registration marks and indicates when a resonator is located beneath the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the contacts 314 of the wafer probe card 312 are connected to the resonator to be tuned using the XYZ-stage 308 .
  • the resonator is then exposed to the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the system shown in FIG. 7 is similar to that shown in FIG. 6 except the wafer probe card 312 is located beneath the wafer 302 and does not contain a hole.
  • the wafer 302 contains a series of vias (not shown) filled with metal which connect the plurality of resonators 304 to the bottom side of the wafer 302 .
  • the contacts 314 of the wafer probe card 312 can then contact the metal filled vias to power the plurality of resonators 304 and measure the resonant frequency, while the resonator is exposed to the focused ion beam 108 .
  • the specimen chamber 102 shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 may also be connected to a vacuum transport system 318 for transporting the tuned plurality of resonators 304 to a bonding chamber 320 .
  • the bonding chamber 320 uses a capping wafer 322 to package the plurality of tuned resonators 304 in-situ using various bonding techniques such as anodic, thermal compression, eutectic, or solder sealing.
  • the vacuum transport system 318 and the bonding chamber 320 manufactured by Electronic Vision or Karltreu are commercially available products which accomplish this goal.

Abstract

A method for tuning an electromechanical device such as a MEMS device is disclosed. The method comprises operating a MEMS device in a depressurized system and using FIB micromachining to remove a portion of the MEMS device. Additionally, a method for tuning a plurality of MEMS devices by depositing an active layer and then removing a portion of the active layer using FIB micromachining. Also, a method for tuning a MEMS device and vacuum packaging the MEMS device in situ are provided.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present document is related to the application document entitled “Microgyro Tuning Using Focused Ion Beams” U.S. Ser. No. ______ which is filed on even date herewith. The contents of this related application are hereby incorporated by reference herein. [0001]
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for tuning an electromechanical device. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for tuning a MEMS device in real time using a focused ion beam (FIB) without degrading the performance of the device. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Many MEMS devices require that their mechanical resonant frequencies are matched to system requirements or to other on-chip frequencies. Examples of these requirements are UHF resonators for RF signal processing, channel selection, and “on-resonant” operation of arrays of resonators for chemical or biological sensors. Each resonator should be tuned to the pre-selected frequency used in order to properly receive the signal. In the case of resonators to be used with chemical or biological sensors, an array of resonators with frequencies in the 100 MHz to 1 GHz range should ideally have nearly matched resonant frequencies since differential detection of small changes in the frequencies due to molecular attachment are more easily measured without large offsets in frequency. In some digital radio applications, thousands of individual channels in the 100 MHz range should be matched to the broadcast frequencies with an accuracy of several kilohertz. Since fabrication tolerances are typically about 1% for most IC fabrication techniques, processing errors from etching and lithography techniques can far exceed the resonant linewidths or channel accuracy required for high Q oscillators. Therefore, etching and lithography do not provide the accuracy necessary for high frequency MEMS resonators. [0003]
  • Previously, most MEMS resonators have been tuned using electrostatic biases applied to the resonators, thus lowering the resonant frequency through a negative spring effect. This technique has been used for a nickel (Ni) ring gyro reported at the “Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop,” Hilton Head, S.C., Jun. 13-16, 1994, pp. 213-220. [0004]
  • However, the electrostatic bias technique has a limited tuning range since the bias voltages applied to the resonators deflect the structure of the resonators and cannot be raised to high levels due to limitations on the electronics. Additionally, this biasing technique can lead to drift over time and temperature, if the biasing source changes with time or temperature. Furthermore, the electrostatic bias technique can lead to additional energy losses to the support circuitry and therefore a low overall Q of the system. Moreover, electrostatic tuning cannot mass balance a system to minimize momentum losses to the support structure. Hence, a method to mechanically tune a MEMS resonator both for frequency adjustment and for Q optimization is desired. [0005]
  • In order to solve the problems associated with tuning MEMS devices using electrostatic biases, laser assisted etching techniques have been utilized to mechanically tune MEMS gyros. The Draper double tuning fork gyro is an example of a device tuned with this technique. However, laser assisted etching has less spatial resolution for nanometer structures and cannot control the removal of material on a sub-monolayer scale. In addition, laser systems can cause damage or drift of the structure due to heating effects, and require additional equipment for accurately removing material on the micron scale. This is discussed in M. Weinberg, J. Connely, A. Kourepenis, D. Sargent, “Microelectromechanical Instrument and Systems Development at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.” Also, laser assisted etching and chemically assisted etching systems can produce debris which may prevent the MEMS structure from moving or cause reactions with metals or other device features of the MEMS structure. This is discussed in Amy Duwell, Marcie Weinstein, John Gorman, Jeff Borenstein, Paul Ward, “Quality Factors of MEMS Gyros And The Role Of Thermoelastic Damping.”[0006]
  • In general, for commercial high volume applications, the tuning and adjustment time must be on the order of 1 second for high throughput. If the adjustment time is significantly larger than 1 second per device, the cost of manufacturing will be increased. Since air damping can affect the parameters of MEMS resonators, the tuning technique must be performed in a reasonably good vacuum (10[0007] −4 to 10−6 Torr) for most MEMS devices. Therefore, there is a need for a method which can reliably tune many MEMS devices in a short period of time in a vacuum. This can be best accomplished by tuning a small or “nano” MEMS device on a wafer before packaging, using a sub-micrometer vector scan beam system emitting a focused ion beam.
  • Therefore, a need arises to provide a method which can reliably and cleanly tune a MEMS device in real time with sub-micron accuracy. Furthermore, there is a need for a method which can reliably tune many MEMS devices in a short period of time in a vacuum. [0008]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention solves the aforementioned problems and meets the aforementioned needs by providing a method for tuning a small or “nano” electromechanical device, such as a MEMS device with feature sizes on the order of less than several hundred micrometers, in real-time using focused-ion-beam (FIB) micromachining. FIB micromachining involves bombarding a device in a vacuum with a beam of heavy ions. When the ions collide with the MEMS device, the ions remove material from the MEMS device through sputtering. The amount of material removed from the device can be controlled by adjusting the number of ions which bombard the MEMS device or the energy of the ions in the beam. The ion dose can be controlled by scanning the focused ion beam across the scan field line using electrostatic deflection of the beam. [0009]
  • The advantage of FIB micromachining over laser techniques is that 1) FIB micromachining is a clean process that produces virtually no debris; 2) FIB micromachining has submicron resolution and registration accuracy; 3) FIB micromachining allows the removal of very precise amounts of material; and 4) FIB micromachining produces no substantial heating of the substrate. [0010]
  • Since FIB micromachining has excellent spatial resolution (in the nanometer regime) for removing small regions of material, it is ideally suited for “nano” resonator MEMS device applications, i.e. high frequency (>1 MHz) devices. In addition, FIB micromachining provides a clean and well controlled method of removing sub-monolayer thickness of material from a MEMS device. [0011]
  • As the dimensions of MEMS structures are reduced, the frequency of oscillations typically increases. Accordingly, the method of the present invention is preferably useful for high frequency (>1 MHz), resonators. In many cases only 1 millisecond of micromachining is needed to correct common lithography or deposition variations and produce a 1% change in the resonant frequency. Lower frequency resonators that are considerably larger than 100 micrometers in linear dimensions will require longer exposure times to the FIB for a given percentage change in characteristics, and therefore their manufacturing costs will increase. [0012]
  • In order to perform FIB micromachining in accordance with the present invention, a MEMS device is preferably placed in a depressurized system in order to reduce ion scattering from air molecules. While in the depressurized system, the MEMS device may or may not be operating, but it is preferred that the MEMS device is operating. If the device is operating the output of the device can be monitored as the FIB is removing material from the device. Once the pressure is taken down to a certain level (≦10[0013] −4 torr), the focused ion beam is directed at the MEMS device to remove a portion of at least one layer of the MEMS device with high spatial accuracy. The modifications on MEMS device by use of FIB micromachining is stable over time. This provides the ability to tune the resonant frequency or the Q, with high precision.
  • A further object of the present invention is to provide a circuit card containing buffer electronics which is coupled to the MEMS device. By preferably coupling buffer electronics to conductive regions on the MEMS device in the depressurized system, the FIB micromachining method according to the present invention can be performed in-situ in real-time while the MEMS device is operating without degrading the performance of the MEMS device. Furthermore, the output frequency of the device can be monitored in real time so that when the desired resonant frequency is achieved, the FIB micromachining stops. [0014]
  • It is also an object of the present invention to provide a method by which a plurality of MEMS devices can be simultaneously covered with active layers of material for detecting chemical and biological agents. The active layers are material which, when in contact with a specific chemical or biological agent, will bond with that agent. This bond increases the mass of the MEMS device, thereby changing the resonant frequency, indicating the presence of that specific chemical or biological agent. After the active layers are deposited, the plurality of MEMS devices may be exposed to the focused ion beam in order to ensure that each MEMS device in the plurality of MEMS devices has roughly the same resonant frequency for input into differential detectors. [0015]
  • It is also an object of the present invention to provide a system for tuning a plurality of MEMS devices and packaging the MEMS devices in-situ. The present invention provides a vacuum transport system which is coupled to the depressurized system in which the FIB micromachining is performed. After the plurality of wafers are tuned, the vacuum transport system couples the tuned wafer to a wafer bonding system, where the wafers are bonded with a capping wafer. This allows the resonator to be tuned and packaged in-situ. [0016]
  • As a result, the present invention provides a method which can quickly and cleanly tune a MEMS device. Furthermore, the method of the present invention can be readily implemented in a system which can automate the tuning process for many devices.[0017]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of the system used according to a first embodiment of the present invention; [0018]
  • FIG. 2 shows an example of a MEMS device tuned using the present invention; [0019]
  • FIG. 3 shows a graph of the change in resonant frequency of the MEMS device in FIG. 2 after FIB micromachining; [0020]
  • FIG. 4 shows a system according to a second embodiment of the present invention; [0021]
  • FIG. 5 shows a system used according to a third embodiment of the present invention; and [0022]
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 show a system for tuning a plurality of MEMS devices using the present invention, and packaging the MEMS devices in-situ.[0023]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. [0024]
  • First Embodiment [0025]
  • A method and apparatus for tuning an electromechanical device such as a MEMS device according to a first and preferred embodiment of the present invention are described with reference to FIGS. [0026] 1-3. The MEMS device could be any resonator. The resonator can, for example, be shaped like a tuning fork, microstrip, or any other bulk or surface acoustic wave device. Because FIB micromachining is ideal for submicron applications, such micromachining is preferably used for tuning resonators with a resonant frequency roughly greater than 1 MHz. Resonators having resonant frequencies less than 1 MHz can have linear dimensions orders of magnitude larger than the micron scale, and therefore, tuning would require the removal of significant amounts of material. This would require a significant amount of time as FIB micromachining is typically used for removing small amounts of material. However, those skilled in the art will realize that this technique is applicable for tuning resonators having linear dimensions orders of magnitude larger than the micron scale, and having resonant frequencies less than 1 MHz.
  • FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment of the present invention. A [0027] generic resonator 101 is placed inside a specimen chamber 102 as shown in FIG. 1. The specimen chamber 102 contains a cylinder 103 which houses a liquid metal (LM) source 110 for emitting a focused ion beam 108. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other types of focused ion beam sources may also be used. For example, one such specimen chamber 102 containing a LM source for emitting a focused ion beam 108 is the FIB Micron from the FEI company. The focused ion beam 108 is used to remove material from the resonator 101, thus tuning the resonator 101. The resonator 101 is electrically coupled with leads 106 to buffer electronics located on a circuit card 104. The resonator 101 can be comprised of silicon, aluminum-nitride, silicon-carbide, gallium-nitride, quartz, or other variations of semiconductor material. The resonator 101 preferably has a resonant frequency greater than 1 MHz, and preferably has linear dimensions no greater than 100 micrometers. The circuit card 104 is located no more than a few centimeters from the resonator 101, and is preferably within a few millimeters of the resonator 101. The buffer electronics on the circuit card 104 may also be coupled to a measuring device 124 such as an oscilloscope located outside of the specimen chamber 102.
  • The buffer electronics on the [0028] circuit card 104 act as a low impedance buffer to isolate the resonator 101 from any stray charges associated with the focused ion beam 108. The buffer electronics on the circuit card 104 may contain an oscillator circuit or similar circuit which can drive the resonator 101. The circuitry driving the buffer electronics on the circuit card 104 located outside the specimen chamber 102 are, for example, connected to the circuit card 104 by means of a connecting device 114 such as RG174 coaxial cable. The portion of the RG174 coaxial cable located inside the specimen chamber is preferably removed of the outer jacket to prevent charge build up when the specimen chamber 102 is depressurized and the focused ion beam 108 is operating. The connecting device 114 is also coupled to the measuring device 124 to simultaneously measure the output frequency of the resonator 101, while the resonator 101 is exposed to the focused ion beam 108.
  • In order to tune the [0029] resonator 101 shown in FIG. 1, the specimen chamber 102 is depressurized to preferably 10−4 to 10−6 Torr using a turbo pump or similar device. Pressures greater than 10−4 Torr could create problems in properly measuring the output frequency of the resonator 101. After the specimen chamber 102 is depressurized, the resonator 101 is exposed to the focused ion beam 108. Typically, the focused ion beam 108 has a beam current in the range of 1 picoamp-1 microamp, but is preferably less than 0.1 nanoamps. The focused ion beam 108 preferably has a beam current density of 5-10 Amps/cm2 and a preferred beam diameter at segment 112 in the range of 5 nanometers-1000 nanometers. The dosage of ions in the focused ion beam 108 is preferably on the order of 1011-1017 ions/cm2. For this dosage of ions and a sputtering yield of 2-3, approximately 2×10−4-2×10−2 monolayers of material are removed from the resonator 101. A sputtering yield is the amount of atoms removed from the resonator 101 by each ion of the focused ion beam 108. The focused ion beam 108 is preferably comprised of Ga+ions, and the Ga+ions preferably have energy in the range of 5 keV-30 keV. Other ions from silicon, aluminum, copper, boron, germanium, or other commercially available elements may also be used.
  • A [0030] resonator 101 having the shape of a tuning fork as shown in FIG. 2 can, for example, be tuned using the aforementioned method. Sections 107, 109, 111, and 119 of the tuning fork preferably have dimensions of l, sections 113 and 117 preferably have dimensions of 2l, and section 115 preferably has dimensions of 5l, where l=0.05 microns. The resonator 101 is preferably comprised of quartz. The resonator 101 has tuning pads 103, preferably comprised of gold, located at the tips 105 of the resonator 101. By ablating a portion or all of the tuning pads 103, the resonant frequency of the resonator 101 can be adjusted. Limiting the energy of the Ga+ions to a range of 5 keV-30 keV will limit the penetration of the Ga+ions into the tuning pads 103 to less than 10 nanometers. This will prevent Ga+ions from completely penetrating the tuning pads 103 and entering the resonator 101.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph of how the resonant frequency of the [0031] resonator 101 shown in FIG. 2 changes as a function of the thickness of the tuning pads 103 when l=0.05 microns. The x-axis of the graph represents the thickness of the tuning pads 103, and the y-axis represents the resonant frequency. As shown in FIG. 3, when the tuning pads 103 have a thickness of about 200 Angstroms, the resonant frequency is about 1 GHz. When the tuning pads 103 are completely ablated, the resonant frequency is about 1.08 GHz. As a consequence, the graph of FIG. 3 clearly shows that the resonant frequency of the resonator 101 can be adjusted by ablating the tuning pads 103. It can be noted that the resonator 101 does not need to have tuning pads 103 to tune the resonant frequency. A portion of the resonator 101 may be ablated to tune the device.
  • Second Embodiment [0032]
  • FIG. 4 shows a second embodiment of the present invention where a [0033] piezoelectric drive element 122, such as a speaker, is provided. Piezoelectric drive element 122 powers the resonator 101 using acoustic inertial forces. The piezoelectric drive element 122 is powered by a source outside the specimen chamber 102, not shown in the figure. In some instances electrically powering the resonator 101 may distort the frequency spectrum of the resonator 101, and as such, acoustic power is preferred for powering the resonator 101. Furthermore, the piezoelectric drive element 122 allows the detection of mass imbalances in the resonator 101. The piezoelectric element 122 is driven by circuitry outside the specimen chamber 102 and may be connected to the circuitry using the connecting device 114 discussed in the first embodiment. The piezoelectric drive element 122 preferably has a frequency output of DC to about 10-20 kHz. Mass imbalances result when the mass of the resonator 101 is not equally balanced. Mass imbalances can have direct adverse effect on the Q factor of the resonator 101, which is a measure of how well the resonator 101 responds to its resonant frequency and filters out other frequencies. When these mass imbalances are detected, they may then be corrected using the focused ion beam 108 and computer software to monitor where mass has been removed, and where it needs to be removed in order to balance the resonator 101. In this way, the piezoelectric drive element 122 can help achieve the desired resonant frequency and the Q, without distorting the frequency spectrum of the resonator 101. However, the circuit card 104, coupled with leads 106 to the resonator 101, is still used to detect the output frequency of the resonator 101.
  • Third Embodiment [0034]
  • According to a third embodiment of the present invention, a system is provided which can be used in conjunction with the focused ion beam micromachining technique discussed in the first and second embodiments, to tune an array of resonators to have closely matched resonant frequencies for detecting chemical and biological agents. [0035]
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary model of the system. In this system several MEMS devices are provided. The MEMS devices are preferably [0036] resonators 201 and may be comprised of silicon; aluminum-nitride, silicon-carbide, gallium-nitride, quartz, or other variations of semiconductor material. In the preferred embodiment, the resonators 201 are comprised of quartz. The resonators 201 are provided on a support surface 203, and are located beneath a plurality of nozzles 205 on a printhead 207. The printhead 207 is part of a commercial ink-jet based proximal nano-doser. The basic evaluation kit available from Ink Jet Technologies is an example of an ink-jet based proximal nano-doser that is commercially available for this application. The printhead 207 has terminals 208 which are electrically controlled by a computer, and allow the nozzles 205 to dispense a specific amount of an active layer 209 onto the resonators 201, as schematically shown by means of droplets 210.
  • The [0037] active layer 209 is a material, which when in the presence of a certain chemical or biological agent, will bond to that chemical or biological agent, thereby changing the mass of the resonator 201. The active layer 209 may consist of amphiphiles such as dimyristylphosphatidylchlorine or dimyristylphosphatidylserine for detecting chemical agents such as ethanol, methanol, benzene, n-octane, n-butanole, or toluene. Certain polymers may be used to detect TNT, and metal hydrides may be used to detect hydrogen. Other active layers may consist of certain antibodies or oligonucleotides having a functionalized 5′ hexyl spacer with a thiol group for detecting biological agents. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that several types of active layers may be used for detecting different chemical and biological agents.
  • By using the [0038] printhead 207 of a proximal nano-doser to selectively dispense active layers 209 on a plurality of resonators 201, it is possible to ensue that each resonator 201 placed on the surface 203 in a given run will receive equal amounts of an active layer 209. This also helps to alleviate frequency deviations between the resonators 201 caused by deviations in the amount of the active layer 209 which is dispensed on each resonator 201.
  • After the [0039] resonators 201 have been coated with an active layer 209, each resonator 201 may be placed in the specimen chamber 102 described in the first embodiment, preferably coupled to the circuit card 104 and exposed to the focused ion beam 108. Using focused ion beam micromachining to ablate a portion of the resonator 201 will reduce frequency deviations between the individual resonators 201. This will ensure that each resonator 201 is tuned to optimal performance and large offsets in frequencies between resonators will not saturate the front-end electronics.
  • Fourth Embodiment [0040]
  • A fourth embodiment of the present invention provides a system for tuning and packaging a plurality of resonators in-situ without breaking the vacuum of the specimen chamber. Shown in FIG. 6 is an exemplary system which accomplishes this goal. [0041]
  • FIG. 6 shows on its left side a [0042] wafer 302 on which a plurality of resonators 304 are mounted. The wafer 302 is located on an XYZ-stage 308 in chamber 102, described in the first embodiment. The XYZ-stage 308 is used to move the wafer 302 and the plurality of resonators 304 in the XY-plane. The specimen chamber 102 also comprises a wafer probe card 312, and the liquid metal source 110 emitting the focused ion beam 108 discussed in the first embodiment. The wafer probe card 312 is connected to the XYZ-stage 308 such that the wafer probe card 312 may move in the z-plane. The wafer probe card 312 may be located between the plurality of resonators 304 and the focused ion beam 108 as shown in FIG. 6, or may be located below the wafer 302 as shown in FIG. 7. In the embodiments of FIG. 6, the wafer probe card 312 is positioned such that the focused ion beam 108 may travel through the hole 324 in the wafer probe card 312.
  • In order to tune the [0043] resonators 304 using the system shown in FIG. 6, the focused ion beam 108 is directed at a specific resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 located directly beneath the hole 324 in the wafer probe card 312. The function of the wafer probe card 312 is similar to the function of the circuit card 104 discussed in the first and second embodiments. The wafer probe card 312 has contacts 314 which connect to the resonator being tuned. The wafer probe card 312 provides power so that the resonator may be operating while simultaneously being tuned by the focused ion beam 108. The wafer probe card 312 also measures the output frequency of the resonator, so that the resonator is exposed to the focused ion beam 108 until the desired resonant frequency is achieved.
  • A [0044] camera 316 is also provided. After a resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 has been tuned using the focused ion beam 108, the contacts 314 are removed from the tuned resonator by moving the XYZ-stage 308 in the Z-direction. Then the XYZ-stage 308 moves the wafer 302 in the XY-direction so as to position the next resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 to be tuned beneath the focused ion beam 108. The wafer 302 contains a series of registration marks which can be viewed by the camera 316. The registration marks correspond to the position of each resonator in the plurality of resonators 304 on the wafer 302. When the XYZ-stage 308 is moving, the camera 316 observes the registration marks and indicates when a resonator is located beneath the focused ion beam 108. As soon as the resonator is beneath the focused ion beam 108, the contacts 314 of the wafer probe card 312 are connected to the resonator to be tuned using the XYZ-stage 308. The resonator is then exposed to the focused ion beam 108.
  • As already indicated, the system shown in FIG. 7 is similar to that shown in FIG. 6 except the [0045] wafer probe card 312 is located beneath the wafer 302 and does not contain a hole. In this system the wafer 302 contains a series of vias (not shown) filled with metal which connect the plurality of resonators 304 to the bottom side of the wafer 302. The contacts 314 of the wafer probe card 312 can then contact the metal filled vias to power the plurality of resonators 304 and measure the resonant frequency, while the resonator is exposed to the focused ion beam 108.
  • The [0046] specimen chamber 102 shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 may also be connected to a vacuum transport system 318 for transporting the tuned plurality of resonators 304 to a bonding chamber 320. The bonding chamber 320 uses a capping wafer 322 to package the plurality of tuned resonators 304 in-situ using various bonding techniques such as anodic, thermal compression, eutectic, or solder sealing. The vacuum transport system 318 and the bonding chamber 320 manufactured by Electronic Vision or Karl Suisse are commercially available products which accomplish this goal.
  • The foregoing description is only illustrative of the invention. Various alternatives and modifications can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variances which fall within the scope of the appended claims. [0047]

Claims (32)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for tuning an electromechanical device having a resonant frequency greater than 1 MHz, comprising the steps of:
providing a specimen chamber;
providing a source in the specimen chamber which emits a focused ion beam;
placing the electromechanical device in the specimen chamber;
depressurizing the specimen chamber;
operating the electromechanical device;
directing the focused ion beam at the operating electromechanical device to ablate a portion of the electromechanical device; and
measuring an output frequency of the electromechanical device during said directing step.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of depressurizing the specimen chamber provides depressurizing the specimen chamber to a pressure no greater than 10−4 Torr.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the focused ion beam has a beam current in the range of 1 picoamp to 1 microamp.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the portion of the focused ion beam contacting the electromechanical device has a beam diameter of 5 nanometers to 1000 nanometers.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the focused ion beam is comprised of a member selected from the group consisting of gallium, silicon, aluminum, copper, boron, and germanium.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the electromechanical device is a resonator having an adjustable resonant frequency.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of operating the electro-mechanical device provides electrically operating the electromechanical device.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of operating the electro-mechanical device provides acoustically operating the electromechanical device.
9. The method of claim 5, wherein the focused ion beam is comprised of gallium.
10. The method of claim 6, wherein the resonator further comprises tuning pads, the step of directing the focused ion beam comprising a step of ablating the pads.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein the resonator is comprised of a member selected from the group consisting of silicon, aluminum-nitride, silicon-carbide, gallium-nitride, and quartz.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein the focused ion beam has energy in the range of 30 keV-50 keV.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of ablating the tuning pads tunes the resonant frequency of the resonator.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the electromechanical device is a MEMS device.
15. A method for tuning electromechanical devices using focused ion beam (FIB) micromachining, comprising the steps of:
providing a plurality of electromechanical devices each electro-mechanical device having an adjustable resonant frequency;
providing a focused ion beam;
depositing an active layer on each electromechanical device of the plurality of electro-mechanical devices, the active layer allowing detection of chemical and biological agents; and
tuning electromechanical devices of the plurality of electromechanical devices with the focused ion beam.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of tuning is performed by removing portions of the electromechanical device with the focused ion beam.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of tuning is performed by removing portions of the active layer with the focused ion beam.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein each electromechanical device of the plurality of electromechanical devices has a resonant frequency greater than 1 MHz.
19. The method of claim 15, wherein the active layer is comprised of member selected from the group consisting of amphiphiles, dimyristylphosphatidylchlorine, dimyristylphosphatidylserine, polymers, metal hydrides, antibodies, and oligonucleotides.
20. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of depositing an active layer is performed with a printhead.
21. The method of claim 15, wherein the electromechanical device is a resonator.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the resonator is comprised of a member selected from the group consisting of silicon, aluminum-nitride, silicon-carbide, gallium-nitride, and quartz.
23. The method of claim 15, wherein the electromechanical device is a MEMS device.
24. An apparatus for tuning a electromechanical device having a resonant frequency greater than 1 MHz, the apparatus comprising:
a specimen chamber;
a focused ion beam located in the specimen chamber and directed at the electro-mechanical device;
power means for providing power to the electromechanical device; and
measuring means to measure the output frequency of the electro-mechanical device while the electromechanical device is powered by the power means.
25. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the power means comprises a circuit card.
26. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the power means comprises a piezoelectric element.
27. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the power means comprises a wafer probe card.
28. The apparatus of claim 24, further comprising a shuttle and wafer bonder for packaging the electromechanical device in situ.
29. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the electromechanical device is a resonator.
30. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising an active layer deposited on the resonator for detecting chemical and biological agents.
31. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the resonator is comprised of a member selected from the group of silicon, aluminum-nitride, silicon-carbide, gallium-nitride, quartz.
32. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the electromechanical device is a MEMS device.
US10/286,375 2002-11-01 2002-11-01 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams Expired - Lifetime US6922118B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/286,375 US6922118B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2002-11-01 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams
US11/148,389 US7282834B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2005-06-07 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/286,375 US6922118B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2002-11-01 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/148,389 Division US7282834B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2005-06-07 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040085159A1 true US20040085159A1 (en) 2004-05-06
US6922118B2 US6922118B2 (en) 2005-07-26

Family

ID=32175437

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/286,375 Expired - Lifetime US6922118B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2002-11-01 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams
US11/148,389 Expired - Fee Related US7282834B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2005-06-07 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/148,389 Expired - Fee Related US7282834B2 (en) 2002-11-01 2005-06-07 Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6922118B2 (en)

Cited By (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040169244A1 (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-09-02 Honeywell International, Inc. Miniature 3-dimensional package for MEMS sensors
US20050151592A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-14 Aaron Partridge Frequency and/or phase compensated microelectromechanical oscillator
US20050242904A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Markus Lutz Method for adjusting the frequency of a MEMS resonator
US20060261915A1 (en) * 2005-05-19 2006-11-23 Markus Lutz Microelectromechanical resonator structure, and method of designing, operating and using same
US20070001783A1 (en) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-04 Markus Lutz MEMS resonator array structure and method of operating and using same
US20070013464A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 Zhiyu Pan In-plane mechanically coupled microelectromechanical tuning fork resonators
US20070034518A1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2007-02-15 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Method of patterning ultra-small structures
US20070052498A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2007-03-08 Zhiyu Pan Breath-mode ring resonator structure, and method of designing, operating and using same
US20070065921A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2007-03-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Methods and products related to producing low molecular weight heparin
US20070075264A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Electron beam induced resonance
WO2007040713A2 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-12 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupled nano-resonating energy emitting structures
US20070101812A1 (en) * 2005-11-10 2007-05-10 Honeywell International, Inc. Miniature package for translation of sensor sense axis
US20070152938A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Resonant structure-based display
US20070152781A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Switching micro-resonant structures by modulating a beam of charged particles
US20070152176A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Selectable frequency light emitter
US20070190794A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2007-08-16 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Conductive polymers for the electroplating
US20070253535A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Source of x-rays
US20070252089A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Charged particle acceleration apparatus and method
US20070257620A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupled nano-resonating energy emitting structures
US20070258720A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Inter-chip optical communication
US20070257738A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Top metal layer shield for ultra-small resonant structures
US20070258675A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Multiplexed optical communication between chips on a multi-chip module
US20070257749A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupling a signal through a window
US20070257199A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Heterodyne receiver using resonant structures
US20070257621A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Plated multi-faceted reflector
US20070262234A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-15 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Stray charged particle removal device
US20070264030A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-15 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Selectable frequency EMR emitter
US20070274365A1 (en) * 2006-05-26 2007-11-29 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Periodically complex resonant structures
US20080001098A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-01-03 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Data on light bulb
US20080073590A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Free electron oscillator
US7656094B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-02-02 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Electron accelerator for ultra-small resonant structures
US7659513B2 (en) 2006-12-20 2010-02-09 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Low terahertz source and detector
US7679067B2 (en) 2006-05-26 2010-03-16 Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. Receiver array using shared electron beam
US7688274B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2010-03-30 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Integrated filter in antenna-based detector
US7710040B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-05-04 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Single layer construction for ultra small devices
US7728702B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-01 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Shielding of integrated circuit package with high-permeability magnetic material
US7732786B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupling energy in a plasmon wave to an electron beam
US7746532B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-29 Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. Electro-optical switching system and method
US7791291B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2010-09-07 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Diamond field emission tip and a method of formation
US7791053B2 (en) 2007-10-10 2010-09-07 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Depressed anode with plasmon-enabled devices such as ultra-small resonant structures
US20100252514A1 (en) * 2009-04-03 2010-10-07 Min-Ju Chung Foldable baseball equipment rack
US7876793B2 (en) 2006-04-26 2011-01-25 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Micro free electron laser (FEL)
US7986113B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2011-07-26 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Selectable frequency light emitter
US7990336B2 (en) 2007-06-19 2011-08-02 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Microwave coupled excitation of solid state resonant arrays
US20120107521A1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2012-05-03 Fei Company Protective Layer For Charged Particle Beam Processing
US8188431B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2012-05-29 Jonathan Gorrell Integration of vacuum microelectronic device with integrated circuit
US8384042B2 (en) 2006-01-05 2013-02-26 Advanced Plasmonics, Inc. Switching micro-resonant structures by modulating a beam of charged particles
US20130147319A1 (en) * 2011-12-12 2013-06-13 International Business Machines Corporation Loading element of a film bulk acoustic resonator
US20150304783A1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2015-10-22 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Radio frequency mems devices for improved wireless performance for hearing assistance devices

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6922118B2 (en) * 2002-11-01 2005-07-26 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams
US7068126B2 (en) * 2004-03-04 2006-06-27 Discera Method and apparatus for frequency tuning of a micro-mechanical resonator
US7198961B2 (en) * 2004-03-30 2007-04-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method for modifying existing micro-and nano-structures using a near-field scanning optical microscope
US8053539B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2011-11-08 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. Siloxanyl materials for molded plastics
US8569538B2 (en) * 2006-06-30 2013-10-29 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Acryloyl materials for molded plastics
US7838698B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2010-11-23 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Hydrolysis-resistant silicone compounds
US9056880B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2015-06-16 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Process for producing hydrolysis-resistant silicone compounds
US20080081850A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Kazuhiko Fujisawa Process for producing hydrolysis-resistant silicone compounds
US20080119627A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-22 Masataka Nakamura Methods for purifying siloxanyl monomers
US8080622B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2011-12-20 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Soluble silicone prepolymers
US7897654B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2011-03-01 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. Silicone prepolymer solutions
US7999635B1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2011-08-16 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Out-of plane MEMS resonator with static out-of-plane deflection
KR101761259B1 (en) 2010-09-17 2017-07-25 창헤 바이오-메디컬 사이언스 (양저우) 컴패니, 리미티드 Micro devices for biomedical applications and uses of the same
US9823209B2 (en) 2010-10-05 2017-11-21 Anpac Bio-Medical Science Co., Ltd. Micro-devices for disease detection
WO2012054758A2 (en) 2010-10-20 2012-04-26 Rapid Diagnostek, Inc. Apparatus and method for measuring binding kinetics with a resonating sensor
US8702997B2 (en) 2011-06-02 2014-04-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Balancing a microelectromechanical system
CN104303056B (en) 2012-03-08 2018-04-06 昌和生物医学科技(扬州)有限公司 For improving the micro element of disease detection
WO2013160800A1 (en) * 2012-04-27 2013-10-31 Indian Institute Of Technology Kanpur System for characterizing focused charged beams
TWI711819B (en) 2012-07-16 2020-12-01 大陸商昌和生物醫學科技(揚州)有限公司 Devices and methods for enhanced detection and identification of diseases
CN107051597B (en) 2013-01-07 2019-08-09 安派科生物医学科技(丽水)有限公司 The disease detection instrument of improvement
EP2967429B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-01-02 ANPAC Bio-Medical Science Co., Ltd. Methods and apparatus for enhanced detection of diseases
KR101654519B1 (en) * 2015-04-14 2016-09-06 서울대학교 산학협력단 Apparatus for manufacturing nano-scale 3-dimensional structure and method thereof
CN114500225B (en) 2018-06-29 2023-07-18 华为技术有限公司 Method, equipment and system for acquiring equipment forwarding information base in network

Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US392650A (en) * 1888-11-13 watrous
US4092588A (en) * 1976-03-05 1978-05-30 Thomson-Csf Method of monitoring the machining by ion bombardment of a piezoelectric wafer
US5226321A (en) * 1990-05-18 1993-07-13 British Aerospace Public Limited Company Vibrating planar gyro
US5407525A (en) * 1992-12-22 1995-04-18 Compagnie D'electronique Et De Piezo-Electricite C.E.P.E. Method of frequency tuning a piezoelectric device and apparatus for the implementation of the method
US5580419A (en) * 1994-03-23 1996-12-03 Trw Inc. Process of making semiconductor device using focused ion beam for resistless in situ etching, deposition, and nucleation
US5646346A (en) * 1994-11-10 1997-07-08 Okada; Kazuhiro Multi-axial angular velocity sensor
US5662782A (en) * 1994-05-26 1997-09-02 Seiko Epson Corporation Method and apparatus for adjusting a resonance frequency of piezoelectric elements
US5665915A (en) * 1992-03-25 1997-09-09 Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. Semiconductor capacitive acceleration sensor
US5783749A (en) * 1995-12-07 1998-07-21 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Vibrating disk type micro-gyroscope
US5894090A (en) * 1996-05-31 1999-04-13 California Institute Of Technology Silicon bulk micromachined, symmetric, degenerate vibratorygyroscope, accelerometer and sensor and method for using the same
US5905202A (en) * 1995-09-01 1999-05-18 Hughes Electronics Corporation Tunneling rotation sensor
US5920012A (en) * 1998-06-16 1999-07-06 Boeing North American Micromechanical inertial sensor
US6009751A (en) * 1998-10-27 2000-01-04 Ljung; Bo Hans Gunnar Coriolis gyro sensor
US6044705A (en) * 1993-10-18 2000-04-04 Xros, Inc. Micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsion bars
US6164134A (en) * 1999-01-29 2000-12-26 Hughes Electronics Corporation Balanced vibratory gyroscope and amplitude control for same
US6232846B1 (en) * 1998-06-12 2001-05-15 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Oscillator module and communications device using the same
US6289733B1 (en) * 1999-05-12 2001-09-18 Hughes Electronics Corporation Planar vibratory gyroscopes
US6367786B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-04-09 California Institute Of Technology Micromachined double resonator
US6570468B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-05-27 Intel Corporation Resonator frequency correction by modifying support structures
US6698287B2 (en) * 2001-08-10 2004-03-02 The Boeing Company Microgyro tuning using focused ion beams

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3879992A (en) * 1970-05-12 1975-04-29 California Inst Of Techn Multiple crystal oscillator measuring apparatus
US3766616A (en) * 1972-03-22 1973-10-23 Statek Corp Microresonator packaging and tuning
CH662421A5 (en) * 1983-07-13 1987-09-30 Suisse Horlogerie Rech Lab PIEZOELECTRIC CONTAMINATION DETECTOR.
US5283037A (en) * 1988-09-29 1994-02-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Chemical sensor utilizing a surface transverse wave device
EP0504730B1 (en) * 1991-03-22 1997-08-27 Seiko Instruments Inc. Electrochemical measurement system
US5728583A (en) * 1993-11-11 1998-03-17 Jeol, Ltd. Determination of abnormal part of blood functions
US5705399A (en) * 1994-05-20 1998-01-06 The Cooper Union For Advancement Of Science And Art Sensor and method for detecting predetermined chemical species in solution
DE4442033C2 (en) 1994-11-25 1997-12-18 Bosch Gmbh Robert Yaw rate sensor
DE59607420D1 (en) 1995-05-31 2001-09-06 Litef Gmbh MICROMECHANICAL RATE RATE SENSOR
DE19641284C1 (en) 1996-10-07 1998-05-20 Inst Mikro Und Informationstec Rotation rate sensor with decoupled orthogonal primary and secondary vibrations
US6114795A (en) * 1997-06-24 2000-09-05 Tdk Corporation Piezoelectric component and manufacturing method thereof
US5932953A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-08-03 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Method and system for detecting material using piezoelectric resonators
US6245590B1 (en) 1999-08-05 2001-06-12 Microvision Inc. Frequency tunable resonant scanner and method of making
US6462460B1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-10-08 Nokia Corporation Method and system for wafer-level tuning of bulk acoustic wave resonators and filters
US6629460B2 (en) 2001-08-10 2003-10-07 The Boeing Company Isolated resonator gyroscope
US6922118B2 (en) * 2002-11-01 2005-07-26 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams
US6975184B2 (en) * 2003-05-30 2005-12-13 Intel Corporation Adjusting the frequency of film bulk acoustic resonators

Patent Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US392650A (en) * 1888-11-13 watrous
US4092588A (en) * 1976-03-05 1978-05-30 Thomson-Csf Method of monitoring the machining by ion bombardment of a piezoelectric wafer
US5226321A (en) * 1990-05-18 1993-07-13 British Aerospace Public Limited Company Vibrating planar gyro
US5665915A (en) * 1992-03-25 1997-09-09 Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. Semiconductor capacitive acceleration sensor
US5407525A (en) * 1992-12-22 1995-04-18 Compagnie D'electronique Et De Piezo-Electricite C.E.P.E. Method of frequency tuning a piezoelectric device and apparatus for the implementation of the method
US6044705A (en) * 1993-10-18 2000-04-04 Xros, Inc. Micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsion bars
US5580419A (en) * 1994-03-23 1996-12-03 Trw Inc. Process of making semiconductor device using focused ion beam for resistless in situ etching, deposition, and nucleation
US5662782A (en) * 1994-05-26 1997-09-02 Seiko Epson Corporation Method and apparatus for adjusting a resonance frequency of piezoelectric elements
US5646346A (en) * 1994-11-10 1997-07-08 Okada; Kazuhiro Multi-axial angular velocity sensor
US5905202A (en) * 1995-09-01 1999-05-18 Hughes Electronics Corporation Tunneling rotation sensor
US5783749A (en) * 1995-12-07 1998-07-21 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Vibrating disk type micro-gyroscope
US5894090A (en) * 1996-05-31 1999-04-13 California Institute Of Technology Silicon bulk micromachined, symmetric, degenerate vibratorygyroscope, accelerometer and sensor and method for using the same
US6232846B1 (en) * 1998-06-12 2001-05-15 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Oscillator module and communications device using the same
US5920012A (en) * 1998-06-16 1999-07-06 Boeing North American Micromechanical inertial sensor
US6009751A (en) * 1998-10-27 2000-01-04 Ljung; Bo Hans Gunnar Coriolis gyro sensor
US6164134A (en) * 1999-01-29 2000-12-26 Hughes Electronics Corporation Balanced vibratory gyroscope and amplitude control for same
US6289733B1 (en) * 1999-05-12 2001-09-18 Hughes Electronics Corporation Planar vibratory gyroscopes
US6367786B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-04-09 California Institute Of Technology Micromachined double resonator
US6570468B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-05-27 Intel Corporation Resonator frequency correction by modifying support structures
US6698287B2 (en) * 2001-08-10 2004-03-02 The Boeing Company Microgyro tuning using focused ion beams

Cited By (74)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070065921A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2007-03-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Methods and products related to producing low molecular weight heparin
US20040169244A1 (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-09-02 Honeywell International, Inc. Miniature 3-dimensional package for MEMS sensors
US6918297B2 (en) * 2003-02-28 2005-07-19 Honeywell International, Inc. Miniature 3-dimensional package for MEMS sensors
US20050151592A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-14 Aaron Partridge Frequency and/or phase compensated microelectromechanical oscillator
US6995622B2 (en) 2004-01-09 2006-02-07 Robert Bosh Gmbh Frequency and/or phase compensated microelectromechanical oscillator
US20060022764A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2006-02-02 Aaron Partridge Frequency and/or phase compensated microelectromechanical oscillator
US20060255881A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2006-11-16 Markus Lutz Method for adjusting the frequency of a MEMS resonator
US20050242904A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Markus Lutz Method for adjusting the frequency of a MEMS resonator
US7758739B2 (en) 2004-08-13 2010-07-20 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Methods of producing structures for electron beam induced resonance using plating and/or etching
US7205867B2 (en) 2005-05-19 2007-04-17 Robert Bosch Gmbh Microelectromechanical resonator structure, and method of designing, operating and using same
US20060261915A1 (en) * 2005-05-19 2006-11-23 Markus Lutz Microelectromechanical resonator structure, and method of designing, operating and using same
US20070001783A1 (en) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-04 Markus Lutz MEMS resonator array structure and method of operating and using same
US7227432B2 (en) 2005-06-30 2007-06-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh MEMS resonator array structure and method of operating and using same
US7595708B2 (en) 2005-06-30 2009-09-29 Robert Bosch Gmbh MEMS resonator array structure
US7319372B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2008-01-15 Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Standford Junior University In-plane mechanically coupled microelectromechanical tuning fork resonators
US20070013464A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 Zhiyu Pan In-plane mechanically coupled microelectromechanical tuning fork resonators
US20070034518A1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2007-02-15 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Method of patterning ultra-small structures
US20070052498A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2007-03-08 Zhiyu Pan Breath-mode ring resonator structure, and method of designing, operating and using same
US7323952B2 (en) 2005-09-02 2008-01-29 Robert Bosch Gmbh Breath-mode ring resonator structure, and method of designing, operating and using same
US7791290B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2010-09-07 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Ultra-small resonating charged particle beam modulator
US7791291B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2010-09-07 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Diamond field emission tip and a method of formation
WO2007040713A2 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-12 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupled nano-resonating energy emitting structures
US7714513B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2010-05-11 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Electron beam induced resonance
WO2007040713A3 (en) * 2005-09-30 2009-04-16 Virgin Islands Microsystems Coupled nano-resonating energy emitting structures
US20070075264A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Electron beam induced resonance
US20070101812A1 (en) * 2005-11-10 2007-05-10 Honeywell International, Inc. Miniature package for translation of sensor sense axis
US7467552B2 (en) 2005-11-10 2008-12-23 Honeywell International Inc. Miniature package for translation of sensor sense axis
US20070152938A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Resonant structure-based display
US8384042B2 (en) 2006-01-05 2013-02-26 Advanced Plasmonics, Inc. Switching micro-resonant structures by modulating a beam of charged particles
US20070152781A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Switching micro-resonant structures by modulating a beam of charged particles
US20070152176A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-05 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Selectable frequency light emitter
US20070190794A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2007-08-16 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Conductive polymers for the electroplating
US7688274B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2010-03-30 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Integrated filter in antenna-based detector
US20070252089A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Charged particle acceleration apparatus and method
US7876793B2 (en) 2006-04-26 2011-01-25 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Micro free electron laser (FEL)
US20070264030A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-15 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Selectable frequency EMR emitter
US20070253535A1 (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Source of x-rays
US7646991B2 (en) 2006-04-26 2010-01-12 Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. Selectable frequency EMR emitter
US20070257620A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupled nano-resonating energy emitting structures
US7746532B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-29 Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. Electro-optical switching system and method
US20070258720A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Inter-chip optical communication
US20070257199A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Heterodyne receiver using resonant structures
US8188431B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2012-05-29 Jonathan Gorrell Integration of vacuum microelectronic device with integrated circuit
US7656094B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-02-02 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Electron accelerator for ultra-small resonant structures
US7986113B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2011-07-26 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Selectable frequency light emitter
US20070257621A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Plated multi-faceted reflector
US20070257738A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Top metal layer shield for ultra-small resonant structures
US7710040B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-05-04 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Single layer construction for ultra small devices
US20070258675A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Multiplexed optical communication between chips on a multi-chip module
US7718977B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-05-18 Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. Stray charged particle removal device
US7723698B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-05-25 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Top metal layer shield for ultra-small resonant structures
US7728702B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-01 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Shielding of integrated circuit package with high-permeability magnetic material
US7728397B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-01 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupled nano-resonating energy emitting structures
US7732786B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupling energy in a plasmon wave to an electron beam
US7741934B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2010-06-22 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupling a signal through a window
US20070257749A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Coupling a signal through a window
US20070262234A1 (en) * 2006-05-05 2007-11-15 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Stray charged particle removal device
US7679067B2 (en) 2006-05-26 2010-03-16 Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. Receiver array using shared electron beam
US20070274365A1 (en) * 2006-05-26 2007-11-29 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Periodically complex resonant structures
US7655934B2 (en) 2006-06-28 2010-02-02 Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. Data on light bulb
US20080001098A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-01-03 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Data on light bulb
US20080073590A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Free electron oscillator
US9263306B2 (en) * 2006-10-31 2016-02-16 Fei Company Protective layer for charged particle beam processing
US20120107521A1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2012-05-03 Fei Company Protective Layer For Charged Particle Beam Processing
US7659513B2 (en) 2006-12-20 2010-02-09 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Low terahertz source and detector
US7990336B2 (en) 2007-06-19 2011-08-02 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Microwave coupled excitation of solid state resonant arrays
US7791053B2 (en) 2007-10-10 2010-09-07 Virgin Islands Microsystems, Inc. Depressed anode with plasmon-enabled devices such as ultra-small resonant structures
US20100252514A1 (en) * 2009-04-03 2010-10-07 Min-Ju Chung Foldable baseball equipment rack
US20150304783A1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2015-10-22 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Radio frequency mems devices for improved wireless performance for hearing assistance devices
US9986347B2 (en) * 2009-09-29 2018-05-29 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Radio frequency MEMS devices for improved wireless performance for hearing assistance devices
US10405110B2 (en) 2009-09-29 2019-09-03 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Radio frequency MEMS devices for improved wireless performance for hearing assistance devices
US11490212B2 (en) 2009-09-29 2022-11-01 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Radio frequency MEMS devices for improved wireless performance for hearing assistance devices
US20130147319A1 (en) * 2011-12-12 2013-06-13 International Business Machines Corporation Loading element of a film bulk acoustic resonator
US8910355B2 (en) * 2011-12-12 2014-12-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method of manufacturing a film bulk acoustic resonator with a loading element

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6922118B2 (en) 2005-07-26
US7282834B2 (en) 2007-10-16
US20050269901A1 (en) 2005-12-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6922118B2 (en) Micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) tuning using focused ion beams
US7716970B2 (en) Scanning probe microscope and sample observation method using the same
JP5606061B2 (en) Oscillating element
US7498589B2 (en) Scanning probe microscope
US20070139140A1 (en) Frequency tuning of film bulk acoustic resonators (FBAR)
US8756710B2 (en) Miniaturized cantilever probe for scanning probe microscopy and fabrication thereof
CN102654481A (en) Microstructure inspecting device, and microstructure inspecting method
WO2004041998A2 (en) Nanomechanichal energy, force, and mass sensors
US9366694B2 (en) Microscope having a multimode local probe, tip-enhanced raman microscope, and method for controlling the distance between the local probe and the sample
US9291600B2 (en) Piezoresistive NEMS array network
EP3931558B1 (en) Photoacoustic spectroscope with a vibrating structure as sound detector
US20040080382A1 (en) Filter using micro-mechanical resonator
Coskun et al. Design, fabrication, and characterization of a piezoelectric AFM cantilever array
JP3075468B2 (en) Electron beam drawing method and electron beam drawing apparatus
US20100058499A1 (en) Cantilever, cantilever system, and probe microscope and adsorption mass sensor including the cantilever system
US20090081828A1 (en) MEMS Fabrication Method
CN104555888A (en) Electromechanical detection device, particularly for gravimetric detection, and method for manufacturing the device
JP6848589B2 (en) Frequency adjustment method of vibrating element, manufacturing method of vibrating element and vibrating element
US8193492B2 (en) Method for exciting a mobile element of a microstructure
Kawai et al. Resonator combined with a piezoelectric actuator for chemical analysis by force microscopy
US10718735B2 (en) Gas detection method, gas detection system, and gas desorption method
US7861315B2 (en) Method for microfabricating a probe with integrated handle, cantilever, tip and circuit
JP2004053399A (en) Exciting type contact sensor, and manufacturing method therefor
Ernst et al. Cmos and nems hybrid architectures
Park Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (cmut) for chemical detection in air

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HRL LABORATORIES, LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KUBENA, RANDALL L.;JOYCE, RICHARD J.;REEL/FRAME:013776/0613;SIGNING DATES FROM 20021210 TO 20021217

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12