US20040254729A1 - Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles - Google Patents
Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040254729A1 US20040254729A1 US10/823,391 US82339104A US2004254729A1 US 20040254729 A1 US20040254729 A1 US 20040254729A1 US 82339104 A US82339104 A US 82339104A US 2004254729 A1 US2004254729 A1 US 2004254729A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- vehicle
- potential collision
- collision
- severity
- probability
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/86—Combinations of radar systems with non-radar systems, e.g. sonar, direction finder
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/87—Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R2021/0104—Communication circuits for data transmission
- B60R2021/01081—Transmission medium
- B60R2021/01088—Transmission medium wireless
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
- B60R21/0134—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to imminent contact with an obstacle, e.g. using radar systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/932—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles using own vehicle data, e.g. ground speed, steering wheel direction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9322—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles using additional data, e.g. driver condition, road state or weather data
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates generally to pre-collision warning/detection systems for road vehicles. More particularly, it relates to a system for robustly assessing the expected severity of a potential collision of two vehicles.
- pre-collision warning/detection systems do not distinguish between two vehicles which are about the same size but which have significantly different mass and hence have critically different collision characteristics. Consequently, such pre-collision warning/detection systems are limited to (1) pre-arming of non-resettable devices, such as airbags, so that they can be deployed more rapidly in cases where the potential subsequent collision is sufficiently severe to warrant deployment, and (2) triggering non-aggressive resettable safety devices that do not interfere with the vehicle driving function, such as extendible/retractable bumpers and extendible/retractable knee bolster systems. There is a need for pre-collision warning/detection systems which not only give warning of an imminent or nearly imminent potential collision but also predict the severity of the potential collision.
- One aspect of the invention is a method for predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles.
- the method includes determining a probability of a potential collision of the vehicles.
- Vehicle condition-defining signals are exchanged between the vehicles when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value.
- the vehicle condition-defining signals include a first vehicle condition-defining signal developed on board the first vehicle and a second vehicle condition-defining signal developed onboard the second vehicle.
- the method further includes predicting onboard the first vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle based upon input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- a severity of the potential collision for the second vehicle is predicted onboard the second vehicle based upon input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method of predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles.
- the method includes determining onboard the first vehicle a probability of a potential collision of the vehicle.
- a vehicle condition-defining signal is developed in response to one or more of first vehicle geographic position data, first vehicle onboard sensor data, first stored vehicle identification data, and first vehicle pre-collision sensor data.
- the method also includes predicting onboard the first vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle.
- Input to the prediction includes one or more of the first vehicle geographic position data, the first vehicle on-board sensor data, the first stored vehicle identification data, and the first vehicle pre-collision sensor data.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles.
- the method includes determining a probability of the potential collision of the vehicles and exchanging vehicle condition-defining signals between the first and second vehicles when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value.
- the vehicle condition-defining signals include a first vehicle condition-defining signal and a second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- a severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle is predicted based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- a severity of the potential collision for the second vehicle is predicted based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- a further aspect of the invention is a computer program product for predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles.
- the computer program product includes a storage medium readable by a processing circuit for performing a method that includes determining a probability of a potential collision of the vehicles. The method also includes exchanging vehicle condition-defining signals between the vehicles when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value.
- a first vehicle condition-defining signal is developed onboard the first vehicle and a second vehicle condition-defining signal is developed onboard the second vehicle.
- Onboard the first vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle is predicted based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- the method also predicts onboard the second vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the second vehicle based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- Another aspect of the invention is an apparatus for use onboard a first vehicle for predicting severity of a potential collision of the first vehicle and a second vehicle.
- the apparatus includes means for determining a probability of a potential collision between the first and second vehicles.
- the apparatus also includes means responsive to the determining for transmitting a first vehicle condition-defining signal developed onboard the first vehicle to the second vehicle when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value.
- the apparatus further includes means for receiving from the second vehicle a second vehicle condition-defining signal developed onboard the second vehicle.
- the apparatus also includes means for processing the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal for predicting the severity of the potential collision.
- FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram which shows a collision severity prediction system installed in a first road vehicle
- FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a collision severity prediction system which is identical to that of FIG. 1 but is installed in a second road vehicle.
- a method which predicts the severity of an imminent or nearly imminent potential collision of two vehicles.
- the prediction is based upon robust vehicle condition-defining information about both vehicles.
- the vehicle condition-defining information about both vehicles is developed after it is detected that the collision is likely to occur and/or imminent.
- all or a subset of the vehicle condition-defining information for each vehicle is continuously developed while the vehicle is in operation and available for use in the prediction.
- the prediction of potential collision severity is developed so that occupant safety devices can be deployed in accordance with the predicted potential collision severity.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram representation of a collision severity prediction system 10 A which is installed in a vehicle A
- FIG. 2 is block diagram of an identical collision severity prediction system 10 B installed in vehicle B.
- the collision severity prediction system 10 A will be described with reference to FIG. 1; the description is applicable also to the collision severity prediction system 10 B.
- the corresponding components of systems 10 A and 10 B are identified by the same reference characters except that a prime symbol is added to the reference characters in system 10 B.
- the system 10 A comprises, in general, a computer system 2 , a pre-collision sensor 12 and a communication system 6 which communicates with vehicle B.
- the pre-collision sensor 12 supplies the computer system 2 with closing speed, range, position and, optionally, the angle of approach between vehicles A and B.
- the computer system 2 also receives collision-related vehicle information (e.g., from onboard sensors 22 ) that may include data such as, but not limited to, vehicle collision characteristics, number of occupants, number of belted occupants, mass of the occupants, loaded mass of the vehicle, vehicle speed, tire inflation pressure, tire wear state, road friction, anti-lock brake system (ABS) operation, vehicle stability enhancement system (VSES) operation, braking pressure, amount of vehicle pitch and roll, yaw, engine status, driver demanded throttle and torque, transmission status, engine operation data, heading, and the operating status of the brakes, steering wheel and the like.
- This collision related vehicle information is referred to collectively as pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 .
- the computer system 2 predicts the severity of an imminent potential collision based upon the signals received from the pre-collision sensor 12 and the signals 4 . It also develops control signals 15 for occupant protection devices 16 .
- the pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 may also be utilized to perform vehicle path prediction.
- the steering wheel position, the yaw rate in combination with the vehicle speed, and/or GPS data in conjunction with a map preview application may be utilized to predict the path of the vehicle.
- the computer system 2 comprises a vehicle dynamics computer 20 and a pre-collision processing computer 14 .
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 receives the pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 and operates on the signals to develop vehicle A condition-defining signals 17 .
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 receives vehicle B condition-defining signals 17 ′ via the vehicle A communication system 6 .
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 processes the vehicle A and vehicle B condition-defining signals 17 and 17 ′ to develop vehicle A collision-defining data signals 21 which are applied to the pre-collision processing computer 14 .
- the pre-collision processing computer 14 receives pre-collision sensor data 13 from the pre-collision sensor 12 and generates an alert or handshake signal 27 to initiate communication with vehicle B.
- the pre-collision processing computer 14 processes the collision-defining data signals 21 to assess the severity of the impending potential collision and to generate control signals 15 for controlling deployment of the occupant protection devices 16 .
- the pre-collision sensor data 13 is utilized by the pre-collision processing computer 14 to determine if the probability of a collision between vehicle A and vehicle B is over a threshold value.
- the threshold value may be pre-selected and/or it may vary during the operation of the vehicle based on factors such as vehicle speed, outside air temperature, whether the vehicle is in park and driver characteristics such as workload and driver state.
- the threshold value represents an imminent potential collision or a nearly imminent potential collision. If the probability of the potential collision is over the threshold value, then the pre-collision processing computer 14 generates an alert or handshake signal 27 to initiate communication with vehicle B.
- the communication system 6 of vehicle A comprises transmitter 28 for transmitting signals to vehicle B and comprises receiver 24 for receiving signals from vehicle B.
- the transmitter and receiver operate in the manner of either a transceiver or a transponder.
- the pre-collision sensor 12 in the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 1 generates pre-collision sensor data 13 including closing speed, position, and range signals and, optionally, the angle of approach between vehicles A and B.
- These signals are used to produce the pre-collision sensor data 13 when the sensed conditions indicate that a potential collision of the vehicles A and B is imminent.
- the pre-collision sensor data 13 is applied to the pre-collision processing computer 14 .
- the pre-collision sensor 12 is suitably a collision-sensing system of the type using radar or lidar or of the type using ultrasonics or vision based, or a combination (fusion).
- the pre-collision sensor 12 is designed, such that if it survives a collision, it retains the ability to detect a second subsequent impact.
- the collision-sensing system itself should be capable of measurements in the near range of 0 to at least 20 meters, preferably more, for use in assessing potential collision severity. Radar systems, lidar systems, vision systems and also ultrasonic systems are known having this capability.
- the pre-collision sensor 12 utilizes any technology (or combination of technologies) known in the art for determining the presence of other vehicles, including, but not limited to: ultra wide-band radar, pulsed radar, continuous wave radar, near radar, far radar, vision and image processing, near and far infrared systems, short range sensors, mid range sensors and long range sensors.
- Alternative exemplary embodiments of the present invention utilize one or more pre-collision sensors 12 that cover a full three hundred and sixty degrees around the vehicle to cover all possible angles of approach. In addition to increasing visibility to possible potential collisions, this may also be utilized to coordinate the deployment of occupant protection devices for the predicted impacts. The coordination may include determining an order of predicted occurrences in multi-vehicle impacts. A full three hundred and sixty degree view around the vehicle may also be utilized to alert vehicles within a pre-selected or varying radius of the vehicle to the impending potential collision and the potential need by them and/or their operators to start taking evasive action in order to not be involved in subsequent related impacts (i.e., initiate a collision avoidance function).
- the pre-collision processing computer 14 is a digital computer which computes an assessment of the severity of an imminent potential collision based upon collision-defining data signals 21 from the vehicle dynamics computer 20 which represent the relative speed, angle and location of impact, energy levels of the vehicles and, if available, crush forces associated with predicted locations of impact. Based upon the data signals 21 , the pre-collision processing computer 14 computes a prediction of the severity of an imminent potential collision and produces control signals 15 for controlling actuation of occupant protection devices 16 which may include but are not limited to airbags, seat belts, extendible/retractable bumpers and knee bolsters. In alternate exemplary embodiments of the present invention, additional occupant protection devices 16 may be armed and/or extra deployment capacity may be reserved to cover instances where there is a possibility of a second impact subsequent to, and possibly resulting from, the occurrence of the first impact.
- the pre-collision processing computer 14 is operative in response to the pre-collision sensor data 13 from the pre-collision sensor 12 to generate a handshake signal 27 which is applied to the transmitter 28 for transmission to vehicle B. This initiates transmission from vehicle B of a return handshake signal 27 ′ (generated by the pre-collision processing computer 14 ′) to vehicle A which is supplied by the receiver 24 to the pre-collision processing computer 14 .
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 is activated to exchange vehicle condition-defining signals 17 and 17 ′ with vehicle dynamics computer 20 ′.
- the pre-collision sensor data 13 is utilized by the pre-collision processing computer 14 to determine if the probability of a potential collision between vehicle A and vehicle B is over a threshold value that may be pre-selected or varying based on driver, environmental and/or vehicle characteristics. If the probability of the collision is over the threshold value, then the pre-collision processing computer 14 generates an alert or handshake signal 27 to initiate communication with vehicle B.
- a three hundred and sixty degree view around the vehicle may be utilized to detect impacts involving multiple vehicles.
- impacts involving multiple vehicles When impacts involving multiple vehicles are detected as being imminent, the individual impact events may be ordered in terms of predicted timing and severity. A prioritization selection process is then utilized to deploy those occupant protection devices predicted to have the greatest overall effect.
- Other embodiments include deploying occupant protection devices 16 early which may allow them to be deployed less aggressively. Occupant protection devices 16 may also be deployed for a longer period of time than in events in which only a single impact is predicted, in order to cover the full duration of the multiple impacts.
- the prediction capability in events involving single impacts may be extended to predicting the vehicle trajectory after impact and thus the prediction of additional subsequent impacts (including for example rollover) resulting from the change in trajectory due to the first impact.
- additional subsequent impacts including for example rollover
- calculation of the potential collision related change in vehicle trajectory is within the capability of commercially available accident reconstruction programs.
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 is a digital computer which receives the pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 and develops the collision-defining data signals 21 which are supplied to the pre-collision processing computer 14 .
- the pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 are supplied from a vehicle identification read only memory (ROM) (referred to as stored vehicle identification data 26 ), onboard sensors 22 and, optionally, a global positioning system (GPS) 18 .
- ROM vehicle identification read only memory
- GPS global positioning system
- the vehicle A condition-defining signals 17 are applied to transmitter 28 which transmits the signals to the receiver 24 ′ of vehicle B and thence the signals 17 are applied to the vehicle dynamics computer 20 ′.
- vehicle A sends vehicle condition-defining signals 17 to the receiver 24 ′ of vehicle B without waiting for the return handshake 27 ′ from vehicle B.
- Vehicle dynamics computer 20 also receives the vehicle B condition-defining signals 17 ′ which are transmitted from vehicle B and applied to the receiver 24 and thence to the vehicle dynamics computer 20 .
- the vehicle B condition-defining signals 17 ′ contain collision-related information of the same type as that which is contained in the vehicle A condition-defining signals 17 .
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 processes the vehicle condition-defining signals 17 and 17 ′ of vehicles A and B and develops the collision-defining data signals 21 representing the relative speed, energy levels of the two vehicles, location of impact and, subject to data availability, crush forces that will be generated at such locations.
- the pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 in the illustrative embodiment are supplied from the vehicle identification read only memory (ROM) (referred to as stored vehicle identification data 26 ), onboard sensors 22 and optionally a GPS 18 .
- ROM vehicle identification read only memory
- the stored vehicle identification data 26 defines characteristics of vehicle A related to the collision worthiness of the vehicle. Such characteristics may include mass, dimensions, bumper height, vehicle height, height of the vehicle center of gravity, and collision pulse of the vehicle.
- Vehicle identification signals 25 such as stored vehicle identification data 26 are read from the ROM into the vehicle dynamics computer 20 .
- the GPS 18 supplies GPS signals 19 which enable the vehicle dynamics computer to develop position, heading and speed of the vehicle.
- a map database may take the GPS data point and compare it to a map to provide information about what permanent objects are located around the vehicle.
- the on-board sensors 22 in the illustrative embodiment supply the vehicle dynamics computer 20 with vehicle onboard sensor data 23 representing information such as speed, acceleration, yaw rate, steering wheel position, braking status, throttle position, and transmission status.
- the communication system 6 comprises receiver 24 and transmitter 28 .
- the receiver 24 and the transmitter 28 are preferably coupled in a manner so as to operate as a transceiver with the common antenna 30 .
- the transmitter 28 receives signals 27 from the pre-collision processing computer 14 and also receives signals 17 from the vehicle dynamics computer 20 and transmits output signals 29 which are received by the receiver 24 ′ of the collision severity prediction system 10 B of vehicle B.
- the input signals to the transmitter 28 include the handshake signal 27 and the vehicle A condition-defining signal 17 from the vehicle dynamics computer 20 .
- the receiver 24 is adapted to receive input signals including a handshake signal and the condition-defining signal 17 ′ transmitted by the collision severity prediction system 10 B of vehicle B.
- the process of exchanging information must be accomplished within a matter of milliseconds, such as a maximum period of 10 to 20 milliseconds.
- the transmitter 28 and receiver 24 are designed, such that if they survive a collision, they retain the ability to communicate in the event of a second subsequent impact.
- exchanging information between the vehicles can be done, once an imminent potential collision has been detected, by using a satellite-based system.
- the satellite-based system is the commercially available ONSTAR system from General Motors Corporation.
- ONSTAR is a registered trademark of General Motors Corporation.
- transponder system using a frequency band exclusively reserved for vehicle collision safety systems.
- information is exchanged by a signal transmission from one vehicle to the other which triggers the automatic return of a signal transmission by a transponder on the other vehicle.
- Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be modified to utilize Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved bands for vehicle to vehicle communication and for vehicle to infrastructure communication.
- FCC Federal Communications Commission
- the occupant protection devices 16 include but are not limited to non-resettable devices such as air bags and resettable safety devices such as extendable and retractable bumpers, extendable and retractable knee bolster systems, and seat belt pre-tensioning systems. The timing and extent of deployment of each of these devices is controlled by control signals 15 .
- the pre-collision sensor 12 of vehicle A is the first to transmit a pre-collision sensor data 13 when a potential collision of the vehicles is imminent.
- the pre-collision processing computer 14 supplies a handshake signal 27 to the transmitter 28 , and the signal is detected by the receiver 24 ′ of vehicle B. This causes the transmitter 28 ′ of vehicle B to send a return handshake signal 27 ′ which is detected by receiver 24 of vehicle A and applied to the pre-collision processing computer 14 . This establishes communication between the vehicles with vehicle A having pre-empted the initiation of information exchange between them.
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 of vehicle A responds to the return handshake signal by applying the vehicle A condition-defining signals 17 to the transmitter 28 which sends it to vehicle B which, in turn, applies the signal to the vehicle dynamics computer 20 ′ of vehicle B.
- vehicle B Immediately after vehicle B sends the return handshake signal, it also sends the vehicle B condition-defining signals 17 ′ to vehicle A which applies those signals to the vehicle dynamics computer 20 .
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 of vehicle A processes the vehicle A and vehicle B condition-defining signals 17 and 17 ′ and develops the collision-defining data signals 21 which are applied to the pre-collision processing computer 14 of vehicle A.
- the pre-collision processing computer 14 processes the collision-defining data signals 21 to predict the severity of the imminent potential collision and to develop control signals 15 which determine the timing and extent of deployment of the associated occupant protection devices 16 .
- the vehicle dynamics computer 20 ′ processes the vehicle A condition-defining signals 17 and the vehicle B condition-defining signals 17 ′ and develops the collision-defining data signals 21 ′ which are applied to the pre-collision computer 14 ′.
- the pre-collision processing computer 14 ′ predicts the severity of the imminent potential collision and develops the control signals 15 ′ which determine the timing and extent of deployment of the associated occupant protection devices 16 ′.
- Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be integrated and/or linked with collision avoidance systems (with larger range detect and broadcast capabilities than necessarily required by the collision imminence detection/broadcast system) so that as the probability of successful avoidance decreases, the system switches from collision avoidance as its primary function to information exchange and collision preparation.
- Utilizing an integrated system allows information from devices, such as sensors and detectors, to be shared between the various functions.
- stages of operation move from tracking to collision avoidance to warning (probability of a collision increasing) to collision imminence.
- the output of this system may be utilized to send data (e.g., warnings) to workload estimator systems on other vehicles within a broadcast radius.
- short and mid-range sensors are integrated with one or more long range sensors such as an adaptive cruise control sensor, a blind zone detection sensor, and/or a side object detection sensor for earlier detection of surrounding vehicles.
- An exemplary embodiment of the present invention is a method of predicting the severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles.
- a probability of a potential collision is compared to a threshold value to determine, or detect, when the probability of the potential collision is greater than the threshold value.
- the determination is made by the pre-collision processing computer 14 in response to input data such as pre-collision sensor data 13 and pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 .
- the threshold value may be a threshold representing an imminent potential collision, a nearly imminent potential collision or alternatively that a vehicle is within a pre-selected or varying radius of the vehicle.
- a potential collision is imminent when the estimated percentage chance, or probability, that the potential collision will occur is greater than a first threshold value (e.g., 90%, 99%, 99.9%) and the potential collision is nearly imminent when the probability is greater than a second threshold value (e.g., 70%, 80%, 90%).
- a first threshold value e.g. 90%, 99%, 99.9%
- a second threshold value e.g. 70%, 80%, 90%
- the amount of lead-time between the prediction of a potential collision and the actual collision may be increased. This may allow for more actions to be taken to mitigate the impact of the potential collision, but may also lead to a greater number of false collision predictions (i.e., more instances where the collision does not occur after being predicted).
- the determination that a potential collision is nearly imminent may be utilized by the pre-collision processing computer 14 to prepare occupant protection devices for the possibility of a potential collision.
- occupant protection devices may be set to particular values and/or deployed (e.g., select airbag inflation level, change knee bolster position) in response to receiving the prediction of a nearly imminent potential collision. Additional reversible protection devices and irreversible protection devices may then be deployed when (and if) a determination is made that the potential collision is imminent. This may be implemented by having more than one threshold value with different events occurring based on which threshold value has been exceeded by the probability of the potential collision. Any implementation that allows different actions to be initiated based on the probability of the potential collision may be utilized by exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
- Input to calculating the probability includes pre-collision sensor data 13 that is collected by the one or more pre-collision sensors 12 .
- the pre-collision sensor data 13 includes data such as closing speed, range, position, and optionally angle of approach.
- Various algorithms may be utilized to determine the probability of the potential collision occurring. The probability of the potential collision increases as the distance between the two vehicles decreases and as the estimated time until the potential collision decreases.
- Input to calculating the probability may also include driver state data such as the estimated alertness of the driver, the attentiveness of the driver (e.g., is driver tuning radio and/or talking on a phone) and the gaze direction of the driver. The probability of the potential collision may be increased or decreased based on the driver state data.
- the probability of the potential collision may be increased or decreased based on environmental data. Any data that is available to the pre-collision processing computer 14 may be utilized in calculating the probability. Input to determining that the probability of the potential collision of the vehicles is greater than the threshold value may include the probability of the potential collision occurring, a rate of change of the probability of the potential collision occurring, or both. A high rate of change (increase) of the probability may indicate that the potential collision is inminent or nearly imminent. In addition, it may be determined that the probability is greater than the threshold value if the first vehicle is less than a particular distance from the second vehicle, if the vehicles are closing in on each other and/or the estimated time until the potential collision is less than a pre-determined amount of time.
- Vehicle condition-defining signals are exchanged between vehicle A and vehicle B once it has been determined that the probability of a potential collision of the vehicles is greater than the threshold value.
- the vehicle condition defining signals include a first vehicle condition-defining signal 17 developed onboard the first vehicle and a second vehicle condition-defining signal 17 ′ developed onboard the second vehicle.
- the vehicle condition defining signals are developed from data that includes pre-collision sensor data 13 and pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 such as vehicle geographic position data (e.g., from a GPS 18 ), from vehicle onboard sensors 22 and stored vehicle identification data 26 calculated/developed on continuous basis.
- the vehicle condition-defining signals may be developed on a continuous basis onboard each vehicle and ready for exchange as soon as the potential collision is greater than a threshold value. Alternatively, the vehicle condition-defining signals may be developed in response to determining that that a potential collision is greater than a threshold value.
- the stored vehicle identification data 26 may include data such as front bumper height, vehicle height, height of the vehicle center of gravity, frame height, and the load distribution on the face of a rigid barrier in a frontal impact, where the load distribution is determined based on a simulation or actually measured in a crash test.
- the stored vehicle identification data 26 may include data such as rear bumper height, vehicle height, height of the vehicle center of gravity, frame height, and the load distribution on the face of a rigid barrier in a rear impact, where the load distribution is determined based on a simulation or actually measured in a crash test.
- the stored vehicle identification data 26 may include data such as rocker height, door beam height, and lateral stiffness of the vehicle corresponding to an estimated bumper location of a striking vehicle, where the lateral stiffness is obtained through a simulation or actually measured in a crash test.
- data from onboard sensors 22 may include data such as tire inflation pressure, tire wear state, road friction, anti-lock brake system operation, vehicle stability enhancement system operation, braking pressure, amount of vehicle pitch and roll, yaw, engine status, engine operation data, environmental data, and any other available information that could be useful to the predicting the severity of the potential collision.
- Environmental data may include information such as time of day, outside air temperature, current weather conditions, rain, and slush covered pavement surface. Time of day may be utilized to indicate whether the outside light level is daylight, nighttime or dusk.
- an estimate of the order of potential collision occurrence is performed. In this manner, the vehicle may selectively deploy or set a control on occupant protection devices 16 based on an expected order of potential collision occurrence.
- occupant protection devices 16 may be deployed or controls may be set on occupant protection devices 16 .
- the occupant protection devices 16 may be controlled based on driver and/or passenger (front and back) characteristics such as position, size, weight and seat belt buckle status.
- the estimated percentage chance of the potential collision may be broadcast to other vehicles within a pre-specified radius or to a mobile application service (e.g., an ONSTAR system that is commercially available from General Motors Corporation, where ONSTAR is a registered trademark of General Motors Corporation) to alert them of the impending potential collision.
- a mobile application service e.g., an ONSTAR system that is commercially available from General Motors Corporation, where ONSTAR is a registered trademark of General Motors Corporation
- a method of and apparatus for predicting the severity of an imminent or nearly imminent potential collision of two vehicles is described above.
- the prediction of severity is early enough so that the timing and extent of deployment of occupant protection devices 16 can be controlled in accordance with the predicted potential collision severity.
- the embodiments of the invention may be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes.
- Embodiments of the invention may also be embodied in the form of computer program code containing instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention.
- An embodiment of the present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention.
- the computer program code segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/355,688, filed on Jan. 31, 2003. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/355,688 is a continuation of U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 6,571,161, filed on Jan. 22, 2001. Both U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/355,688 and U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 6,571,161 are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
- The present disclosure relates generally to pre-collision warning/detection systems for road vehicles. More particularly, it relates to a system for robustly assessing the expected severity of a potential collision of two vehicles.
- Currently-available pre-collision warning/detection systems do not distinguish between two vehicles which are about the same size but which have significantly different mass and hence have critically different collision characteristics. Consequently, such pre-collision warning/detection systems are limited to (1) pre-arming of non-resettable devices, such as airbags, so that they can be deployed more rapidly in cases where the potential subsequent collision is sufficiently severe to warrant deployment, and (2) triggering non-aggressive resettable safety devices that do not interfere with the vehicle driving function, such as extendible/retractable bumpers and extendible/retractable knee bolster systems. There is a need for pre-collision warning/detection systems which not only give warning of an imminent or nearly imminent potential collision but also predict the severity of the potential collision.
- One aspect of the invention is a method for predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles. The method includes determining a probability of a potential collision of the vehicles. Vehicle condition-defining signals are exchanged between the vehicles when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value. The vehicle condition-defining signals include a first vehicle condition-defining signal developed on board the first vehicle and a second vehicle condition-defining signal developed onboard the second vehicle. The method further includes predicting onboard the first vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle based upon input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal. A severity of the potential collision for the second vehicle is predicted onboard the second vehicle based upon input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method of predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles. The method includes determining onboard the first vehicle a probability of a potential collision of the vehicle. A vehicle condition-defining signal is developed in response to one or more of first vehicle geographic position data, first vehicle onboard sensor data, first stored vehicle identification data, and first vehicle pre-collision sensor data. The method also includes predicting onboard the first vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle. Input to the prediction includes one or more of the first vehicle geographic position data, the first vehicle on-board sensor data, the first stored vehicle identification data, and the first vehicle pre-collision sensor data.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles. The method includes determining a probability of the potential collision of the vehicles and exchanging vehicle condition-defining signals between the first and second vehicles when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value. The vehicle condition-defining signals include a first vehicle condition-defining signal and a second vehicle condition-defining signal. A severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle is predicted based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal. A severity of the potential collision for the second vehicle is predicted based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- A further aspect of the invention is a computer program product for predicting severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles. The computer program product includes a storage medium readable by a processing circuit for performing a method that includes determining a probability of a potential collision of the vehicles. The method also includes exchanging vehicle condition-defining signals between the vehicles when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value. A first vehicle condition-defining signal is developed onboard the first vehicle and a second vehicle condition-defining signal is developed onboard the second vehicle. Onboard the first vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle is predicted based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal. The method also predicts onboard the second vehicle a severity of the potential collision for the second vehicle based on input that includes the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal.
- Another aspect of the invention is an apparatus for use onboard a first vehicle for predicting severity of a potential collision of the first vehicle and a second vehicle. The apparatus includes means for determining a probability of a potential collision between the first and second vehicles. The apparatus also includes means responsive to the determining for transmitting a first vehicle condition-defining signal developed onboard the first vehicle to the second vehicle when the probability of the potential collision is greater than a threshold value. The apparatus further includes means for receiving from the second vehicle a second vehicle condition-defining signal developed onboard the second vehicle. The apparatus also includes means for processing the first vehicle condition-defining signal and the second vehicle condition-defining signal for predicting the severity of the potential collision.
- Referring to the exemplary drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several FIGURES:
- FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram which shows a collision severity prediction system installed in a first road vehicle, and
- FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a collision severity prediction system which is identical to that of FIG. 1 but is installed in a second road vehicle.
- In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a method is provided which predicts the severity of an imminent or nearly imminent potential collision of two vehicles. The prediction is based upon robust vehicle condition-defining information about both vehicles. The vehicle condition-defining information about both vehicles is developed after it is detected that the collision is likely to occur and/or imminent. Alternatively, all or a subset of the vehicle condition-defining information for each vehicle is continuously developed while the vehicle is in operation and available for use in the prediction. Further, the prediction of potential collision severity is developed so that occupant safety devices can be deployed in accordance with the predicted potential collision severity. Referring now to the drawings, there is shown an illustrative embodiment of the invention which is adapted for use in controlling the deployment of passenger protection devices in land vehicles. It will be appreciated, as the description proceeds, that the invention is useful in a wide variety of applications and may be implemented in many different ways.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram representation of a collision
severity prediction system 10A which is installed in a vehicle A, and FIG. 2 is block diagram of an identical collisionseverity prediction system 10B installed in vehicle B. The collisionseverity prediction system 10A will be described with reference to FIG. 1; the description is applicable also to the collisionseverity prediction system 10B. The corresponding components ofsystems system 10B. - An overview of the collision
severity prediction system 10A will be given before the system is described in detail. Thesystem 10A comprises, in general, acomputer system 2, apre-collision sensor 12 and acommunication system 6 which communicates with vehicle B. Thepre-collision sensor 12 supplies thecomputer system 2 with closing speed, range, position and, optionally, the angle of approach between vehicles A and B. Thecomputer system 2 also receives collision-related vehicle information (e.g., from onboard sensors 22) that may include data such as, but not limited to, vehicle collision characteristics, number of occupants, number of belted occupants, mass of the occupants, loaded mass of the vehicle, vehicle speed, tire inflation pressure, tire wear state, road friction, anti-lock brake system (ABS) operation, vehicle stability enhancement system (VSES) operation, braking pressure, amount of vehicle pitch and roll, yaw, engine status, driver demanded throttle and torque, transmission status, engine operation data, heading, and the operating status of the brakes, steering wheel and the like. This collision related vehicle information is referred to collectively as pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4. Thecomputer system 2 predicts the severity of an imminent potential collision based upon the signals received from thepre-collision sensor 12 and thesignals 4. It also develops control signals 15 foroccupant protection devices 16. - The pre-collision vehicle condition signals4 may also be utilized to perform vehicle path prediction. For example, the steering wheel position, the yaw rate in combination with the vehicle speed, and/or GPS data in conjunction with a map preview application (located onboard the vehicle or remote to the vehicle) may be utilized to predict the path of the vehicle.
- The
computer system 2 comprises avehicle dynamics computer 20 and apre-collision processing computer 14. Thevehicle dynamics computer 20 receives the pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 and operates on the signals to develop vehicle A condition-definingsignals 17. Also, thevehicle dynamics computer 20 receives vehicle B condition-definingsignals 17′ via the vehicleA communication system 6. Thevehicle dynamics computer 20 processes the vehicle A and vehicle B condition-definingsignals pre-collision processing computer 14. - When a potential collision is imminent, or nearly imminent, the
pre-collision processing computer 14 receivespre-collision sensor data 13 from thepre-collision sensor 12 and generates an alert orhandshake signal 27 to initiate communication with vehicle B. Thepre-collision processing computer 14 processes the collision-defining data signals 21 to assess the severity of the impending potential collision and to generatecontrol signals 15 for controlling deployment of theoccupant protection devices 16. In an alternate exemplary embodiment of the present invention, thepre-collision sensor data 13 is utilized by thepre-collision processing computer 14 to determine if the probability of a collision between vehicle A and vehicle B is over a threshold value. The threshold value may be pre-selected and/or it may vary during the operation of the vehicle based on factors such as vehicle speed, outside air temperature, whether the vehicle is in park and driver characteristics such as workload and driver state. In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the threshold value represents an imminent potential collision or a nearly imminent potential collision. If the probability of the potential collision is over the threshold value, then thepre-collision processing computer 14 generates an alert orhandshake signal 27 to initiate communication with vehicle B. - The
communication system 6 of vehicle A comprisestransmitter 28 for transmitting signals to vehicle B and comprisesreceiver 24 for receiving signals from vehicle B. Preferably, the transmitter and receiver operate in the manner of either a transceiver or a transponder. - The individual stages of collision-sensing
prediction system 10A will now be described further in regard to function and implementation. Since the required functions of each individual stage can be realized by known designs using readily-available components, details of circuitry and structure will not be given. However, it will be helpful to provide further description, especially in respect to the function of each individual stage and the functional relationship among the different stages. - The
pre-collision sensor 12 in the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 1 generatespre-collision sensor data 13 including closing speed, position, and range signals and, optionally, the angle of approach between vehicles A and B. - These signals are used to produce the
pre-collision sensor data 13 when the sensed conditions indicate that a potential collision of the vehicles A and B is imminent. Thepre-collision sensor data 13 is applied to thepre-collision processing computer 14. - The
pre-collision sensor 12 is suitably a collision-sensing system of the type using radar or lidar or of the type using ultrasonics or vision based, or a combination (fusion). In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, thepre-collision sensor 12 is designed, such that if it survives a collision, it retains the ability to detect a second subsequent impact. The collision-sensing system itself should be capable of measurements in the near range of 0 to at least 20 meters, preferably more, for use in assessing potential collision severity. Radar systems, lidar systems, vision systems and also ultrasonic systems are known having this capability. In alternate exemplary embodiments of the present invention, thepre-collision sensor 12 utilizes any technology (or combination of technologies) known in the art for determining the presence of other vehicles, including, but not limited to: ultra wide-band radar, pulsed radar, continuous wave radar, near radar, far radar, vision and image processing, near and far infrared systems, short range sensors, mid range sensors and long range sensors. - Alternative exemplary embodiments of the present invention utilize one or more
pre-collision sensors 12 that cover a full three hundred and sixty degrees around the vehicle to cover all possible angles of approach. In addition to increasing visibility to possible potential collisions, this may also be utilized to coordinate the deployment of occupant protection devices for the predicted impacts. The coordination may include determining an order of predicted occurrences in multi-vehicle impacts. A full three hundred and sixty degree view around the vehicle may also be utilized to alert vehicles within a pre-selected or varying radius of the vehicle to the impending potential collision and the potential need by them and/or their operators to start taking evasive action in order to not be involved in subsequent related impacts (i.e., initiate a collision avoidance function). - The
pre-collision processing computer 14 is a digital computer which computes an assessment of the severity of an imminent potential collision based upon collision-defining data signals 21 from thevehicle dynamics computer 20 which represent the relative speed, angle and location of impact, energy levels of the vehicles and, if available, crush forces associated with predicted locations of impact. Based upon the data signals 21, thepre-collision processing computer 14 computes a prediction of the severity of an imminent potential collision and produces control signals 15 for controlling actuation ofoccupant protection devices 16 which may include but are not limited to airbags, seat belts, extendible/retractable bumpers and knee bolsters. In alternate exemplary embodiments of the present invention, additionaloccupant protection devices 16 may be armed and/or extra deployment capacity may be reserved to cover instances where there is a possibility of a second impact subsequent to, and possibly resulting from, the occurrence of the first impact. - When a potential collision is imminent, or nearly imminent, the
pre-collision processing computer 14 is operative in response to thepre-collision sensor data 13 from thepre-collision sensor 12 to generate ahandshake signal 27 which is applied to thetransmitter 28 for transmission to vehicle B. This initiates transmission from vehicle B of areturn handshake signal 27′ (generated by thepre-collision processing computer 14′) to vehicle A which is supplied by thereceiver 24 to thepre-collision processing computer 14. Upon receipt of thereturn handshake signal 17′, thevehicle dynamics computer 20 is activated to exchange vehicle condition-definingsignals vehicle dynamics computer 20′. In an alternate exemplary embodiment of the present invention, thepre-collision sensor data 13 is utilized by thepre-collision processing computer 14 to determine if the probability of a potential collision between vehicle A and vehicle B is over a threshold value that may be pre-selected or varying based on driver, environmental and/or vehicle characteristics. If the probability of the collision is over the threshold value, then thepre-collision processing computer 14 generates an alert orhandshake signal 27 to initiate communication with vehicle B. - In alternate exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a three hundred and sixty degree view around the vehicle may be utilized to detect impacts involving multiple vehicles. When impacts involving multiple vehicles are detected as being imminent, the individual impact events may be ordered in terms of predicted timing and severity. A prioritization selection process is then utilized to deploy those occupant protection devices predicted to have the greatest overall effect. Other embodiments include deploying
occupant protection devices 16 early which may allow them to be deployed less aggressively.Occupant protection devices 16 may also be deployed for a longer period of time than in events in which only a single impact is predicted, in order to cover the full duration of the multiple impacts. In addition, the prediction capability in events involving single impacts may be extended to predicting the vehicle trajectory after impact and thus the prediction of additional subsequent impacts (including for example rollover) resulting from the change in trajectory due to the first impact. For example, calculation of the potential collision related change in vehicle trajectory is within the capability of commercially available accident reconstruction programs. - The
vehicle dynamics computer 20 is a digital computer which receives the pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 and develops the collision-defining data signals 21 which are supplied to thepre-collision processing computer 14. The pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 are supplied from a vehicle identification read only memory (ROM) (referred to as stored vehicle identification data 26),onboard sensors 22 and, optionally, a global positioning system (GPS) 18. The information obtained from these sources taken with that from thepre-collision sensor 12 is sufficient for thevehicle dynamics computer 20 to develop the vehicle A condition-definingsignals 17. - The vehicle A condition-defining
signals 17 are applied totransmitter 28 which transmits the signals to thereceiver 24′ of vehicle B and thence thesignals 17 are applied to thevehicle dynamics computer 20′. In an alternative exemplary embodiment of the present invention, vehicle A sends vehicle condition-definingsignals 17 to thereceiver 24′ of vehicle B without waiting for thereturn handshake 27′ from vehicle B. -
Vehicle dynamics computer 20 also receives the vehicle B condition-definingsignals 17′ which are transmitted from vehicle B and applied to thereceiver 24 and thence to thevehicle dynamics computer 20. The vehicle B condition-definingsignals 17′ contain collision-related information of the same type as that which is contained in the vehicle A condition-definingsignals 17. - The
vehicle dynamics computer 20 processes the vehicle condition-definingsignals - The pre-collision vehicle condition signals4 in the illustrative embodiment are supplied from the vehicle identification read only memory (ROM) (referred to as stored vehicle identification data 26),
onboard sensors 22 and optionally aGPS 18. - The stored
vehicle identification data 26 defines characteristics of vehicle A related to the collision worthiness of the vehicle. Such characteristics may include mass, dimensions, bumper height, vehicle height, height of the vehicle center of gravity, and collision pulse of the vehicle. Vehicle identification signals 25 such as storedvehicle identification data 26 are read from the ROM into thevehicle dynamics computer 20. - The
GPS 18 supplies GPS signals 19 which enable the vehicle dynamics computer to develop position, heading and speed of the vehicle. In addition, a map database may take the GPS data point and compare it to a map to provide information about what permanent objects are located around the vehicle. - The on-
board sensors 22 in the illustrative embodiment supply thevehicle dynamics computer 20 with vehicleonboard sensor data 23 representing information such as speed, acceleration, yaw rate, steering wheel position, braking status, throttle position, and transmission status. - In the illustrative embodiment of the invention, the
communication system 6 comprisesreceiver 24 andtransmitter 28. Thereceiver 24 and thetransmitter 28 are preferably coupled in a manner so as to operate as a transceiver with thecommon antenna 30. Thetransmitter 28 receivessignals 27 from thepre-collision processing computer 14 and also receivessignals 17 from thevehicle dynamics computer 20 and transmits output signals 29 which are received by thereceiver 24′ of the collisionseverity prediction system 10B of vehicle B. The input signals to thetransmitter 28 include thehandshake signal 27 and the vehicle A condition-definingsignal 17 from thevehicle dynamics computer 20. Thereceiver 24 is adapted to receive input signals including a handshake signal and the condition-definingsignal 17′ transmitted by the collisionseverity prediction system 10B of vehicle B. The process of exchanging information must be accomplished within a matter of milliseconds, such as a maximum period of 10 to 20 milliseconds. In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, thetransmitter 28 andreceiver 24 are designed, such that if they survive a collision, they retain the ability to communicate in the event of a second subsequent impact. - In an alternative communication system (not shown), information is exchanged between vehicles using the
pre-collision sensor 12 and modulating its emitted carrier wave to represent the information to be exchanged. - As another alternative, exchanging information between the vehicles can be done, once an imminent potential collision has been detected, by using a satellite-based system. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the satellite-based system is the commercially available ONSTAR system from General Motors Corporation. ONSTAR is a registered trademark of General Motors Corporation.
- Another alternative is a transponder system using a frequency band exclusively reserved for vehicle collision safety systems. In a transponder system, information is exchanged by a signal transmission from one vehicle to the other which triggers the automatic return of a signal transmission by a transponder on the other vehicle.
- Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be modified to utilize Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved bands for vehicle to vehicle communication and for vehicle to infrastructure communication.
- The
occupant protection devices 16 include but are not limited to non-resettable devices such as air bags and resettable safety devices such as extendable and retractable bumpers, extendable and retractable knee bolster systems, and seat belt pre-tensioning systems. The timing and extent of deployment of each of these devices is controlled by control signals 15. - It will be understood that the full benefits of this invention will be realized when both vehicles involved in an impending potential collision are equipped with the collision
severity prediction system 10A. Accordingly, the operation will now be described in the situation in which the two vehicles A and B are involved. - In the case where the two vehicles A and B are closing on each other, it will be assumed that the
pre-collision sensor 12 of vehicle A is the first to transmit apre-collision sensor data 13 when a potential collision of the vehicles is imminent. Thepre-collision processing computer 14 supplies ahandshake signal 27 to thetransmitter 28, and the signal is detected by thereceiver 24′ of vehicle B. This causes thetransmitter 28′ of vehicle B to send areturn handshake signal 27′ which is detected byreceiver 24 of vehicle A and applied to thepre-collision processing computer 14. This establishes communication between the vehicles with vehicle A having pre-empted the initiation of information exchange between them. Thevehicle dynamics computer 20 of vehicle A responds to the return handshake signal by applying the vehicle A condition-definingsignals 17 to thetransmitter 28 which sends it to vehicle B which, in turn, applies the signal to thevehicle dynamics computer 20′ of vehicle B. Immediately after vehicle B sends the return handshake signal, it also sends the vehicle B condition-definingsignals 17′ to vehicle A which applies those signals to thevehicle dynamics computer 20. - The
vehicle dynamics computer 20 of vehicle A processes the vehicle A and vehicle B condition-definingsignals pre-collision processing computer 14 of vehicle A. Thepre-collision processing computer 14 processes the collision-defining data signals 21 to predict the severity of the imminent potential collision and to developcontrol signals 15 which determine the timing and extent of deployment of the associatedoccupant protection devices 16. - Similarly, in vehicle B, the
vehicle dynamics computer 20′ processes the vehicle A condition-definingsignals 17 and the vehicle B condition-definingsignals 17′ and develops the collision-defining data signals 21′ which are applied to thepre-collision computer 14′. Thepre-collision processing computer 14′ predicts the severity of the imminent potential collision and develops the control signals 15′ which determine the timing and extent of deployment of the associatedoccupant protection devices 16′. - Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be integrated and/or linked with collision avoidance systems (with larger range detect and broadcast capabilities than necessarily required by the collision imminence detection/broadcast system) so that as the probability of successful avoidance decreases, the system switches from collision avoidance as its primary function to information exchange and collision preparation. Utilizing an integrated system allows information from devices, such as sensors and detectors, to be shared between the various functions. In an integrated system, stages of operation move from tracking to collision avoidance to warning (probability of a collision increasing) to collision imminence. The output of this system may be utilized to send data (e.g., warnings) to workload estimator systems on other vehicles within a broadcast radius. The workload estimator systems could then act to focus the vehicle operator's attention on the potential collision that is becoming more imminent through actions such as turning off the radio, broadcasting a collision warning/avoidance action needed message to the operator, and tightening seatbelts. In alternate exemplary embodiments, short and mid-range sensors are integrated with one or more long range sensors such as an adaptive cruise control sensor, a blind zone detection sensor, and/or a side object detection sensor for earlier detection of surrounding vehicles.
- An exemplary embodiment of the present invention is a method of predicting the severity of a potential collision of first and second vehicles. A probability of a potential collision is compared to a threshold value to determine, or detect, when the probability of the potential collision is greater than the threshold value. The determination is made by the
pre-collision processing computer 14 in response to input data such aspre-collision sensor data 13 and pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4. The threshold value may be a threshold representing an imminent potential collision, a nearly imminent potential collision or alternatively that a vehicle is within a pre-selected or varying radius of the vehicle. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a potential collision is imminent when the estimated percentage chance, or probability, that the potential collision will occur is greater than a first threshold value (e.g., 90%, 99%, 99.9%) and the potential collision is nearly imminent when the probability is greater than a second threshold value (e.g., 70%, 80%, 90%). - By determining if a potential collision is nearly imminent, the amount of lead-time between the prediction of a potential collision and the actual collision may be increased. This may allow for more actions to be taken to mitigate the impact of the potential collision, but may also lead to a greater number of false collision predictions (i.e., more instances where the collision does not occur after being predicted). The determination that a potential collision is nearly imminent may be utilized by the
pre-collision processing computer 14 to prepare occupant protection devices for the possibility of a potential collision. Based on knowledge about the nearly imminent potential collision (e.g., predicted severity, possible places of impact), occupant protection devices may be set to particular values and/or deployed (e.g., select airbag inflation level, change knee bolster position) in response to receiving the prediction of a nearly imminent potential collision. Additional reversible protection devices and irreversible protection devices may then be deployed when (and if) a determination is made that the potential collision is imminent. This may be implemented by having more than one threshold value with different events occurring based on which threshold value has been exceeded by the probability of the potential collision. Any implementation that allows different actions to be initiated based on the probability of the potential collision may be utilized by exemplary embodiments of the present invention. - Input to calculating the probability includes
pre-collision sensor data 13 that is collected by the one or morepre-collision sensors 12. Thepre-collision sensor data 13 includes data such as closing speed, range, position, and optionally angle of approach. Various algorithms may be utilized to determine the probability of the potential collision occurring. The probability of the potential collision increases as the distance between the two vehicles decreases and as the estimated time until the potential collision decreases. Input to calculating the probability may also include driver state data such as the estimated alertness of the driver, the attentiveness of the driver (e.g., is driver tuning radio and/or talking on a phone) and the gaze direction of the driver. The probability of the potential collision may be increased or decreased based on the driver state data. In addition, the probability of the potential collision may be increased or decreased based on environmental data. Any data that is available to thepre-collision processing computer 14 may be utilized in calculating the probability. Input to determining that the probability of the potential collision of the vehicles is greater than the threshold value may include the probability of the potential collision occurring, a rate of change of the probability of the potential collision occurring, or both. A high rate of change (increase) of the probability may indicate that the potential collision is inminent or nearly imminent. In addition, it may be determined that the probability is greater than the threshold value if the first vehicle is less than a particular distance from the second vehicle, if the vehicles are closing in on each other and/or the estimated time until the potential collision is less than a pre-determined amount of time. - Vehicle condition-defining signals are exchanged between vehicle A and vehicle B once it has been determined that the probability of a potential collision of the vehicles is greater than the threshold value. The vehicle condition defining signals include a first vehicle condition-defining
signal 17 developed onboard the first vehicle and a second vehicle condition-definingsignal 17′ developed onboard the second vehicle. As described previously, the vehicle condition defining signals are developed from data that includespre-collision sensor data 13 and pre-collision vehicle condition signals 4 such as vehicle geographic position data (e.g., from a GPS 18), from vehicleonboard sensors 22 and storedvehicle identification data 26 calculated/developed on continuous basis. The vehicle condition-defining signals may be developed on a continuous basis onboard each vehicle and ready for exchange as soon as the potential collision is greater than a threshold value. Alternatively, the vehicle condition-defining signals may be developed in response to determining that that a potential collision is greater than a threshold value. - When a frontal impact is predicted, the stored
vehicle identification data 26 may include data such as front bumper height, vehicle height, height of the vehicle center of gravity, frame height, and the load distribution on the face of a rigid barrier in a frontal impact, where the load distribution is determined based on a simulation or actually measured in a crash test. When a rear impact is predicted, the storedvehicle identification data 26 may include data such as rear bumper height, vehicle height, height of the vehicle center of gravity, frame height, and the load distribution on the face of a rigid barrier in a rear impact, where the load distribution is determined based on a simulation or actually measured in a crash test. When a side impact is predicted, the storedvehicle identification data 26 may include data such as rocker height, door beam height, and lateral stiffness of the vehicle corresponding to an estimated bumper location of a striking vehicle, where the lateral stiffness is obtained through a simulation or actually measured in a crash test. - As described previously, data from
onboard sensors 22 may include data such as tire inflation pressure, tire wear state, road friction, anti-lock brake system operation, vehicle stability enhancement system operation, braking pressure, amount of vehicle pitch and roll, yaw, engine status, engine operation data, environmental data, and any other available information that could be useful to the predicting the severity of the potential collision. Environmental data may include information such as time of day, outside air temperature, current weather conditions, rain, and slush covered pavement surface. Time of day may be utilized to indicate whether the outside light level is daylight, nighttime or dusk. - Onboard the first vehicle (e.g., vehicle A), a prediction is made about the severity of the potential collision for the first vehicle based on input such as the first vehicle condition-defining
signal 17 and the second vehicle condition-definingsignal 17′. Similarly, onboard the second vehicle (e.g., vehicle B), a prediction is made about the severity of the potential collision for the second vehicle based on input such as the first vehicle condition-definingsignal 17 and the second vehicle condition-definingsignal 17′. In addition, where more than one vehicle is predicted to be in a potential collision with either the first or second vehicle, an estimate of the order of potential collision occurrence is performed. In this manner, the vehicle may selectively deploy or set a control onoccupant protection devices 16 based on an expected order of potential collision occurrence. Based on the predicted severity,occupant protection devices 16 may be deployed or controls may be set onoccupant protection devices 16. In addition, theoccupant protection devices 16 may be controlled based on driver and/or passenger (front and back) characteristics such as position, size, weight and seat belt buckle status. In an alternate exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the estimated percentage chance of the potential collision may be broadcast to other vehicles within a pre-specified radius or to a mobile application service (e.g., an ONSTAR system that is commercially available from General Motors Corporation, where ONSTAR is a registered trademark of General Motors Corporation) to alert them of the impending potential collision. - A method of and apparatus for predicting the severity of an imminent or nearly imminent potential collision of two vehicles is described above. The prediction of severity is early enough so that the timing and extent of deployment of
occupant protection devices 16 can be controlled in accordance with the predicted potential collision severity. - As described above, the embodiments of the invention may be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes. Embodiments of the invention may also be embodied in the form of computer program code containing instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. An embodiment of the present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the computer program code segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.
- While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another.
Claims (53)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/823,391 US20040254729A1 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2004-04-13 | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles |
US13/204,343 US8321092B2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2011-08-05 | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/355,688 US20030139867A1 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2003-01-31 | Pre-crash assessment of crash severity for road vehicles |
US10/823,391 US20040254729A1 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2004-04-13 | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/355,688 Continuation-In-Part US20030139867A1 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2003-01-31 | Pre-crash assessment of crash severity for road vehicles |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/204,343 Division US8321092B2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2011-08-05 | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040254729A1 true US20040254729A1 (en) | 2004-12-16 |
Family
ID=46301181
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/823,391 Abandoned US20040254729A1 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2004-04-13 | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles |
US13/204,343 Expired - Lifetime US8321092B2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2011-08-05 | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/204,343 Expired - Lifetime US8321092B2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2011-08-05 | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20040254729A1 (en) |
Cited By (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050096825A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | Soo-Hyuk Lee | Apparatus and method for preventing vehicle collision using radio communication |
US20050270225A1 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2005-12-08 | Setsuo Tokoro | Obstacle recognition system and obstacle recognition method |
US20060119472A1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2006-06-08 | Shoichi Tsuboi | Driving support apparatus and driving support method |
US20060129292A1 (en) * | 2004-12-10 | 2006-06-15 | Hitomi Ohkubo | Vehicle driving support system |
US20060149462A1 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2006-07-06 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicular control object determination system and vehicular travel locus estimation system |
US20070052530A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2007-03-08 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Method and device for reducing damage caused by an accident |
US20070106474A1 (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2007-05-10 | Denso Corporation | Collision determination system for vehicle |
US20070228748A1 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2007-10-04 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Supplemental side impact protection system for automotive vehicle |
US20070276565A1 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2007-11-29 | Alfred Kuttenberger | Restraint System with Impact Recognition, Taking into Account Environmental Influences |
US20070290535A1 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2007-12-20 | Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc. | Vehicle Safety Seat |
US20080140287A1 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-12 | Man Seok Yang | System and method for informing vehicle accident using telematics device |
US20080162002A1 (en) * | 2004-04-23 | 2008-07-03 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Safety Device For a Motor Vehicle |
US20080167885A1 (en) * | 2007-01-10 | 2008-07-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system to automatically generate a clearance request to deivate from a flight plan |
US20090109559A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2009-04-30 | Price Vernon D | Side mounted vehicle mirror with integral object |
US20090132112A1 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2009-05-21 | Frank Ewerhart | Plausibilization of Sensor Signals in the Event of a Collision |
US20090192687A1 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2009-07-30 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle Path Control for Autonomous Braking System |
US7866427B2 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2011-01-11 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Vehicle multi-stage integrated brake assist for a collision preparation system |
US20110010034A1 (en) * | 2009-07-07 | 2011-01-13 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Autonomous control for vehicle pedal mis-apply situations |
US20110025489A1 (en) * | 2009-08-03 | 2011-02-03 | Kenichi Shimoda | Vehicle-Surrounding Image Display Apparatus And Vehicle-Surrounding Image Display Method |
US20110082623A1 (en) * | 2009-10-05 | 2011-04-07 | Jianbo Lu | System for vehicle control to mitigate intersection collisions and method of using the same |
CN102085842A (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-08 | 福特全球技术公司 | Motor vehicle and method of operating occupant safety system of the same |
WO2011071826A1 (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-16 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Analyzing data from networked radar detectors |
US20110169625A1 (en) * | 2010-01-14 | 2011-07-14 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Combining driver and environment sensing for vehicular safety systems |
US20120008129A1 (en) * | 2007-11-07 | 2012-01-12 | Magna Electronics, Inc. | Object detection system |
US20120158249A1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2012-06-21 | Automotive Parts and Accessory Systems R&D Centre Limited | Vehicle safety enhancement systems and methods |
US20120214485A1 (en) * | 2009-08-26 | 2012-08-23 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Systems and Methods for Emergency Arming of a Network Access Device |
US20130030657A1 (en) * | 2011-07-25 | 2013-01-31 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Active safety control for vehicles |
CN103204121A (en) * | 2012-01-16 | 2013-07-17 | 福特全球技术公司 | Radar Based Multifunctional Safety System |
US20130211687A1 (en) * | 2010-10-23 | 2013-08-15 | Daimier Ag | Method for Operating a Brake Assist Device and Brake Assist Device for a Vehicle |
US20130325210A1 (en) * | 2011-04-06 | 2013-12-05 | Kollmorgen Saro AB | Collision avoiding method and associated system |
US20140028490A1 (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2014-01-30 | National Chiao Tung University | Motion parameter estimating method, angle estimating method and determination method |
US8708366B2 (en) * | 2012-05-29 | 2014-04-29 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Vehicle side impact detection using vehicle yaw |
US20140200738A1 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2014-07-17 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle accident history recorder |
US20140200768A1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2014-07-17 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle travel assisting device |
US20140236462A1 (en) * | 2011-12-29 | 2014-08-21 | Jennifer Healey | Navigation systems that enhance driver awareness |
US20140303883A1 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2014-10-09 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Object path prediction method, apparatus, and program, and automatic operation system |
US8970422B2 (en) | 2009-12-22 | 2015-03-03 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Radar detector that interfaces with a mobile communication device |
GB2520493A (en) * | 2013-11-20 | 2015-05-27 | Univ Coventry | Active buckling control |
DE102015102837A1 (en) | 2014-03-10 | 2015-09-10 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Method for controlling a vehicle lane during autonomous braking |
US9132773B2 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2015-09-15 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Mobile communication system and method for analyzing alerts associated with vehicular travel |
CN105109433A (en) * | 2015-08-24 | 2015-12-02 | 广西大学 | Car side-direction anticollision system |
US20160023599A1 (en) * | 2014-07-28 | 2016-01-28 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for warning loss of control of a vehicle using vehicle-to-vehicle communications |
US20160059855A1 (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2016-03-03 | Honda Research Institute Europe Gmbh | Method and system for post-collision manoeuvre planning and vehicle equipped with such system |
US20160257203A1 (en) * | 2013-10-08 | 2016-09-08 | Audi Ag | Crash detection when a motor vehicle is at a standstill |
US20160264134A1 (en) * | 2014-07-30 | 2016-09-15 | Komatsu Ltd. | Transporter vehicle and transporter vehicle control method |
US9659496B2 (en) | 2015-02-10 | 2017-05-23 | Ridar Systems LLC | Proximity awareness system for motor vehicles |
US20170254880A1 (en) * | 2016-03-04 | 2017-09-07 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic range setting for vehicular radars |
US9848114B2 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2017-12-19 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Vehicle camera system |
US10026324B2 (en) | 2014-11-04 | 2018-07-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for enhanced adoptive validation of ATC clearance requests |
US20180222387A1 (en) * | 2017-02-07 | 2018-08-09 | Shenzhen Xiaofeida Electronic Co., Ltd | Blind Zone Monitoring Method, License Plate Frame Device with Blind Zone Monitoring Function and Rearview Mirror |
CN108521010A (en) * | 2018-02-11 | 2018-09-11 | 航天东方红卫星有限公司 | A kind of varied angle load test supporting tool |
US10124802B2 (en) * | 2016-08-20 | 2018-11-13 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Controlled vehicle deceleration based on a selected vehicle driving mode |
US10173674B2 (en) | 2016-06-15 | 2019-01-08 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Traction based systems and methods |
US10197665B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2019-02-05 | Escort Inc. | Radar false alert reduction |
US20190057607A1 (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2019-02-21 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Radio apparatus, processing apparatus and processing system |
US10677888B2 (en) | 2015-09-28 | 2020-06-09 | Escort Inc. | Radar detector with multi-band directional display and enhanced detection of false alerts |
US11008013B2 (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2021-05-18 | Hyundai Motor Company | Vehicle and method of controlling an airbag of a vehicle |
CN115123131A (en) * | 2022-07-08 | 2022-09-30 | 浙江吉利控股集团有限公司 | Vehicle safety electronic control method, device, equipment and storage medium |
US11590984B2 (en) * | 2019-10-14 | 2023-02-28 | Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems Llc | Control system for operator controlled vehicle subsystems |
Families Citing this family (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11180025B2 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2021-11-23 | Invently Automotive Inc. | Electric vehicle power management system |
US11351863B2 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2022-06-07 | Invently Automotive Inc. | Vehicle power management system |
US11207980B2 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2021-12-28 | Invently Automotive Inc. | Vehicle power management system responsive to traffic conditions |
US11214144B2 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2022-01-04 | Invently Automotive Inc. | Electric vehicle power management system |
US11186175B2 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2021-11-30 | Invently Automotive Inc. | Vehicle power management system |
US11345236B2 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2022-05-31 | Invently Automotive Inc. | Electric vehicle power management system |
DE102011084204A1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-04-11 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for activating safety actuators of a motor vehicle |
US9235766B2 (en) * | 2011-10-20 | 2016-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimizing the detection of objects in images |
US20130194108A1 (en) * | 2012-01-30 | 2013-08-01 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | System, Method, Control Device and Program for Vehicle Collision Avoidance Using Cellular Communication |
US20130278441A1 (en) * | 2012-04-24 | 2013-10-24 | Zetta Research and Development, LLC - ForC Series | Vehicle proxying |
US9252896B2 (en) | 2012-12-10 | 2016-02-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Efficient means of broadcast and relaying information between wireless terminals |
US9448137B2 (en) * | 2013-03-28 | 2016-09-20 | Jtekt Corporation | Test system |
US9718425B2 (en) | 2013-08-14 | 2017-08-01 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Crash detection |
US10031522B2 (en) | 2015-05-27 | 2018-07-24 | Dov Moran | Alerting predicted accidents between driverless cars |
EP3304520B1 (en) * | 2015-05-27 | 2023-09-20 | Dov Moran | Alerting predicted accidents between driverless cars |
US9841762B2 (en) | 2015-05-27 | 2017-12-12 | Comigo Ltd. | Alerting predicted accidents between driverless cars |
DE102016225437A1 (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2018-06-21 | Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus, method and computer program for a vehicle for providing an accident report about an accident to an emergency call center |
US10137850B2 (en) * | 2017-01-11 | 2018-11-27 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Vehicle bumper collision indicator |
US11386498B1 (en) | 2017-09-06 | 2022-07-12 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Using historical data for subrogation on a distributed ledger |
US10891694B1 (en) * | 2017-09-06 | 2021-01-12 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Using vehicle mode for subrogation on a distributed ledger |
US11416942B1 (en) | 2017-09-06 | 2022-08-16 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Using a distributed ledger to determine fault in subrogation |
US10872381B1 (en) | 2017-09-06 | 2020-12-22 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Evidence oracles |
US11400834B2 (en) | 2018-02-02 | 2022-08-02 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Adjusting interior configuration of a vehicle based on external environment data |
US11485254B2 (en) | 2018-04-09 | 2022-11-01 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | System and method for adjusting an interior configuration of a vehicle in response to a vehicular accident |
US11046266B1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2021-06-29 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | System and method for dampening impact to a vehicle |
US10836401B1 (en) | 2018-07-13 | 2020-11-17 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Dynamic limiting of vehicle operation based on interior configurations |
US10953830B1 (en) * | 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-23 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Adjusting interior configuration of a vehicle based on vehicle contents |
US10858011B1 (en) | 2018-07-13 | 2020-12-08 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Dynamic safe storage of vehicle content |
US11661055B2 (en) * | 2019-05-24 | 2023-05-30 | Preact Technologies, Inc. | Close-in collision detection combining high sample rate near-field sensors with advanced real-time parallel processing to accurately determine imminent threats and likelihood of a collision |
US11802959B2 (en) | 2020-01-22 | 2023-10-31 | Preact Technologies, Inc. | Vehicle driver behavior data collection and reporting |
CN112116829B (en) * | 2020-09-22 | 2021-08-31 | 广东交通职业技术学院 | Driving anti-collision early warning system and method |
EP4339038A1 (en) * | 2022-09-15 | 2024-03-20 | Volvo Car Corporation | Method for controlling airbag activation device and airbag activation device |
Citations (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3097354A (en) * | 1960-05-31 | 1963-07-09 | Pulse | |
US4714925A (en) * | 1984-12-31 | 1987-12-22 | Emx International Limited | Loop data link |
US5143897A (en) * | 1990-02-27 | 1992-09-01 | Kabelmetal Electro Gmbh | Flexible, high temperature superconductive cables |
US5226389A (en) * | 1992-11-04 | 1993-07-13 | Eaton Corporation | Direct acting tappet |
US5270708A (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1993-12-14 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Accident information providing system for automotive vehicle |
US5289182A (en) * | 1991-10-16 | 1994-02-22 | Ii Bc-Sys | Electronic anti-collison device carried on board a vehicle |
US5317309A (en) * | 1990-11-06 | 1994-05-31 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Dual mode electronic identification system |
US5325302A (en) * | 1990-10-15 | 1994-06-28 | Bvr Technologies, Ltd. | GPS-based anti-collision warning system |
US5508920A (en) * | 1994-10-25 | 1996-04-16 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Crash discriminator responsive to early-crush and multiple-hit scenarios |
US5540461A (en) * | 1992-04-14 | 1996-07-30 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Procedure and device for protecting vehicle occupants |
US5546311A (en) * | 1993-10-28 | 1996-08-13 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Intercommunication system for vehicle |
US5563589A (en) * | 1993-12-10 | 1996-10-08 | Thomson-Csf | Remote identification device |
US5684474A (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1997-11-04 | Gilon; Shmuel | Collision avoidance detector |
US5748477A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1998-05-05 | Takata Corporation | Vehicle collision control system |
US5787377A (en) * | 1990-08-24 | 1998-07-28 | Kanto Seiki Co. Ltd. | Air-bag control circuit |
US5785347A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 1998-07-28 | Siemens Automotive Corporation | Occupant sensing and crash behavior system |
US5835007A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 1998-11-10 | Delco Electronics Corporation | Method and apparatus for crash sensing using anticipatory sensor inputs |
US5841367A (en) * | 1990-11-07 | 1998-11-24 | Giovanni; Caico | Electronic equipment for prevention of collisions between vehicles |
US5845000A (en) * | 1992-05-05 | 1998-12-01 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Optical identification and monitoring system using pattern recognition for use with vehicles |
US5847661A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 1998-12-08 | Intelligent Ideation, Inc. | Vehicle data acquisition system |
US5913910A (en) * | 1995-11-09 | 1999-06-22 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Control device and method for a vehicle running safely |
US5964817A (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 1999-10-12 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Impact characterizing deployment control method for an automotive restraint system |
US5983161A (en) * | 1993-08-11 | 1999-11-09 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method |
US5999871A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1999-12-07 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Control method for variable level airbag inflation |
US6012008A (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 2000-01-04 | Scully; Robert L. | Method and apparatus for predicting a crash and reacting thereto |
US6087928A (en) * | 1995-10-31 | 2000-07-11 | Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. | Predictive impact sensing system for vehicular safety restraint systems |
US6163755A (en) * | 1996-02-27 | 2000-12-19 | Thinkware Ltd. | Obstacle detection system |
US6226389B1 (en) * | 1993-08-11 | 2001-05-01 | Jerome H. Lemelson | Motor vehicle warning and control system and method |
US6226372B1 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2001-05-01 | Securelogix Corporation | Tightly integrated cooperative telecommunications firewall and scanner with distributed capabilities |
US6317691B1 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2001-11-13 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Collision avoidance system utilizing machine vision taillight tracking |
US20020017415A1 (en) * | 1998-12-14 | 2002-02-14 | Trw Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for anticipating a vehicle crash event |
US6405132B1 (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 2002-06-11 | Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. | Accident avoidance system |
US20020183929A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-12-05 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle environment monitoring system |
US20030006889A1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2003-01-09 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Positional data utilizing inter-vehicle communication method and traveling control apparatus |
US6571161B2 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2003-05-27 | General Motors Corporation | Pre-crash assessment of crash severity for road vehicles |
US20050107954A1 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2005-05-19 | Ibrahim Nahla | Vehicle navigation, collision avoidance and control system |
US20050205331A1 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-22 | Mr. Polchai Phanumphai | Automatic Driver's Aide |
US20070087756A1 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2007-04-19 | Hoffberg Steven M | Multifactorial optimization system and method |
US7295925B2 (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 2007-11-13 | Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. | Accident avoidance systems and methods |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6720920B2 (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 2004-04-13 | Intelligent Technologies International Inc. | Method and arrangement for communicating between vehicles |
JPH094332A (en) | 1995-06-19 | 1997-01-07 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg Co <3M> | Article fixture and article fitting method using said fixture |
JP3745484B2 (en) | 1997-02-12 | 2006-02-15 | 株式会社小松製作所 | Vehicle monitoring device |
US20060106538A1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2006-05-18 | Browne Alan L | Cooperative collision mitigation |
-
2004
- 2004-04-13 US US10/823,391 patent/US20040254729A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2011
- 2011-08-05 US US13/204,343 patent/US8321092B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3097354A (en) * | 1960-05-31 | 1963-07-09 | Pulse | |
US4714925A (en) * | 1984-12-31 | 1987-12-22 | Emx International Limited | Loop data link |
US5143897A (en) * | 1990-02-27 | 1992-09-01 | Kabelmetal Electro Gmbh | Flexible, high temperature superconductive cables |
US5787377A (en) * | 1990-08-24 | 1998-07-28 | Kanto Seiki Co. Ltd. | Air-bag control circuit |
US5325302A (en) * | 1990-10-15 | 1994-06-28 | Bvr Technologies, Ltd. | GPS-based anti-collision warning system |
US5317309A (en) * | 1990-11-06 | 1994-05-31 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Dual mode electronic identification system |
US5841367A (en) * | 1990-11-07 | 1998-11-24 | Giovanni; Caico | Electronic equipment for prevention of collisions between vehicles |
US5270708A (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1993-12-14 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Accident information providing system for automotive vehicle |
US5289182A (en) * | 1991-10-16 | 1994-02-22 | Ii Bc-Sys | Electronic anti-collison device carried on board a vehicle |
US5540461A (en) * | 1992-04-14 | 1996-07-30 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Procedure and device for protecting vehicle occupants |
US5845000A (en) * | 1992-05-05 | 1998-12-01 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Optical identification and monitoring system using pattern recognition for use with vehicles |
US5226389A (en) * | 1992-11-04 | 1993-07-13 | Eaton Corporation | Direct acting tappet |
US6275773B1 (en) * | 1993-08-11 | 2001-08-14 | Jerome H. Lemelson | GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method |
US5983161A (en) * | 1993-08-11 | 1999-11-09 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method |
US6226389B1 (en) * | 1993-08-11 | 2001-05-01 | Jerome H. Lemelson | Motor vehicle warning and control system and method |
US5546311A (en) * | 1993-10-28 | 1996-08-13 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Intercommunication system for vehicle |
US5563589A (en) * | 1993-12-10 | 1996-10-08 | Thomson-Csf | Remote identification device |
US5508920A (en) * | 1994-10-25 | 1996-04-16 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Crash discriminator responsive to early-crush and multiple-hit scenarios |
US5748477A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1998-05-05 | Takata Corporation | Vehicle collision control system |
US5684474A (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1997-11-04 | Gilon; Shmuel | Collision avoidance detector |
US6087928A (en) * | 1995-10-31 | 2000-07-11 | Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. | Predictive impact sensing system for vehicular safety restraint systems |
US5913910A (en) * | 1995-11-09 | 1999-06-22 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Control device and method for a vehicle running safely |
US6163755A (en) * | 1996-02-27 | 2000-12-19 | Thinkware Ltd. | Obstacle detection system |
US5847661A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 1998-12-08 | Intelligent Ideation, Inc. | Vehicle data acquisition system |
US5999871A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1999-12-07 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Control method for variable level airbag inflation |
US5785347A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 1998-07-28 | Siemens Automotive Corporation | Occupant sensing and crash behavior system |
US5835007A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 1998-11-10 | Delco Electronics Corporation | Method and apparatus for crash sensing using anticipatory sensor inputs |
US6012008A (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 2000-01-04 | Scully; Robert L. | Method and apparatus for predicting a crash and reacting thereto |
US6405132B1 (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 2002-06-11 | Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. | Accident avoidance system |
US7295925B2 (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 2007-11-13 | Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. | Accident avoidance systems and methods |
US5964817A (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 1999-10-12 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Impact characterizing deployment control method for an automotive restraint system |
US6226372B1 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2001-05-01 | Securelogix Corporation | Tightly integrated cooperative telecommunications firewall and scanner with distributed capabilities |
US20020017415A1 (en) * | 1998-12-14 | 2002-02-14 | Trw Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for anticipating a vehicle crash event |
US20030006889A1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2003-01-09 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Positional data utilizing inter-vehicle communication method and traveling control apparatus |
US6317691B1 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2001-11-13 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Collision avoidance system utilizing machine vision taillight tracking |
US6571161B2 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2003-05-27 | General Motors Corporation | Pre-crash assessment of crash severity for road vehicles |
US20030139867A1 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2003-07-24 | General Motors Corporation | Pre-crash assessment of crash severity for road vehicles |
US20020183929A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-12-05 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle environment monitoring system |
US20050107954A1 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2005-05-19 | Ibrahim Nahla | Vehicle navigation, collision avoidance and control system |
US7317987B2 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2008-01-08 | Ibrahim Nahla | Vehicle navigation, collision avoidance and control system |
US20050205331A1 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-22 | Mr. Polchai Phanumphai | Automatic Driver's Aide |
US20070087756A1 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2007-04-19 | Hoffberg Steven M | Multifactorial optimization system and method |
Cited By (110)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7881842B2 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2011-02-01 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Restraint system with impact recognition, taking into account environmental influences |
US20070276565A1 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2007-11-29 | Alfred Kuttenberger | Restraint System with Impact Recognition, Taking into Account Environmental Influences |
US20050096825A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | Soo-Hyuk Lee | Apparatus and method for preventing vehicle collision using radio communication |
US20070052530A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2007-03-08 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Method and device for reducing damage caused by an accident |
US7418345B2 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2008-08-26 | Continental Teves Ag & Co., Ohg | Method and device for reducing damage caused by an accident |
US20080162002A1 (en) * | 2004-04-23 | 2008-07-03 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Safety Device For a Motor Vehicle |
US20050270225A1 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2005-12-08 | Setsuo Tokoro | Obstacle recognition system and obstacle recognition method |
US7570198B2 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2009-08-04 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Obstacle recognition system and obstacle recognition method |
US20110224862A1 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2011-09-15 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicular control object determination system and vehicular travel locus estimation system |
US20060149462A1 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2006-07-06 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicular control object determination system and vehicular travel locus estimation system |
US7974778B2 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2011-07-05 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicular control object determination system and vehicular travel locus estimation system |
US8165797B2 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2012-04-24 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicular control object determination system and vehicular travel locus estimation system |
US20090109559A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2009-04-30 | Price Vernon D | Side mounted vehicle mirror with integral object |
US7976092B2 (en) | 2004-10-19 | 2011-07-12 | Indiana Mills & Manufacturing Inc. | Vehicle safety seat |
US20070290535A1 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2007-12-20 | Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc. | Vehicle Safety Seat |
US20110018316A1 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2011-01-27 | Meredith Jeffery W | Vehicle safety seat |
US7432799B2 (en) | 2004-11-09 | 2008-10-07 | Alpine Electronics, Inc. | Driving support apparatus and driving support method |
US20060119472A1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2006-06-08 | Shoichi Tsuboi | Driving support apparatus and driving support method |
US20060129292A1 (en) * | 2004-12-10 | 2006-06-15 | Hitomi Ohkubo | Vehicle driving support system |
US8150575B2 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2012-04-03 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Plausibilization of sensor signals in the event of a collision |
US20090132112A1 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2009-05-21 | Frank Ewerhart | Plausibilization of Sensor Signals in the Event of a Collision |
US7881865B2 (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2011-02-01 | Denso Corporation | Collision determination system for vehicle |
US20070106474A1 (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2007-05-10 | Denso Corporation | Collision determination system for vehicle |
US20140303883A1 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2014-10-09 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Object path prediction method, apparatus, and program, and automatic operation system |
US10102750B2 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2018-10-16 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Object path prediction method, apparatus, and program, and automatic operation system |
US20080061566A1 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2008-03-13 | Sean Ryan | Supplemental side impact protection system for automotive vehicle |
US20070228748A1 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2007-10-04 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Supplemental side impact protection system for automotive vehicle |
US8235432B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2012-08-07 | Ford Global Technologies | Supplemental side impact protection system for automotive vehicle |
US20080140287A1 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-12 | Man Seok Yang | System and method for informing vehicle accident using telematics device |
US8423272B2 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2013-04-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system to automatically generate a clearance request to deviate from a flight plan |
US20080167885A1 (en) * | 2007-01-10 | 2008-07-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system to automatically generate a clearance request to deivate from a flight plan |
US8229659B2 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2012-07-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system to automatically generate a clearance request to deviate from a flight plan |
US7979199B2 (en) * | 2007-01-10 | 2011-07-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system to automatically generate a clearance request to deviate from a flight plan |
US11346951B2 (en) | 2007-11-07 | 2022-05-31 | Magna Electronics Inc. | Object detection system |
US10295667B2 (en) | 2007-11-07 | 2019-05-21 | Magna Electronics Inc. | Object detection system |
US9383445B2 (en) | 2007-11-07 | 2016-07-05 | Magna Electronics Inc. | Object detection system |
US20120008129A1 (en) * | 2007-11-07 | 2012-01-12 | Magna Electronics, Inc. | Object detection system |
US8767186B2 (en) * | 2007-11-07 | 2014-07-01 | Magna Electronics Inc. | Object detection system |
US8126626B2 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2012-02-28 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Vehicle path control for autonomous braking system |
US20090192687A1 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2009-07-30 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle Path Control for Autonomous Braking System |
DE102009006299A1 (en) | 2008-01-30 | 2010-02-11 | GM Global Technology Operations, Inc., Detroit | Vehicle travel control system for autonomous braking |
US7866427B2 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2011-01-11 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Vehicle multi-stage integrated brake assist for a collision preparation system |
US20110010034A1 (en) * | 2009-07-07 | 2011-01-13 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Autonomous control for vehicle pedal mis-apply situations |
US8255121B2 (en) | 2009-07-07 | 2012-08-28 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Autonomous control for vehicle pedal mis-apply situations |
US20110025489A1 (en) * | 2009-08-03 | 2011-02-03 | Kenichi Shimoda | Vehicle-Surrounding Image Display Apparatus And Vehicle-Surrounding Image Display Method |
US8294563B2 (en) | 2009-08-03 | 2012-10-23 | Alpine Electronics, Inc. | Vehicle-surrounding image display apparatus and vehicle-surrounding image display method |
US20120214485A1 (en) * | 2009-08-26 | 2012-08-23 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Systems and Methods for Emergency Arming of a Network Access Device |
US8577550B2 (en) * | 2009-10-05 | 2013-11-05 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System for vehicle control to mitigate intersection collisions and method of using the same |
US20110082623A1 (en) * | 2009-10-05 | 2011-04-07 | Jianbo Lu | System for vehicle control to mitigate intersection collisions and method of using the same |
US10142535B2 (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2018-11-27 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Vehicle camera system |
US8527151B2 (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2013-09-03 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Side impact safety system with blind-spot detection radar data fusion |
US20110137528A1 (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-09 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Side Impact Safety System with Blind-Spot Detection Radar Data Fusion |
CN102085842A (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-08 | 福特全球技术公司 | Motor vehicle and method of operating occupant safety system of the same |
US9132773B2 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2015-09-15 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Mobile communication system and method for analyzing alerts associated with vehicular travel |
WO2011071826A1 (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-16 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Analyzing data from networked radar detectors |
US10298832B2 (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2019-05-21 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Vehicle camera system |
US8842004B2 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2014-09-23 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Analyzing data from networked radar detectors |
CN102753988A (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2012-10-24 | 科布拉电子有限公司 | Analyzing data from networked radar detectors |
US9848114B2 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2017-12-19 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Vehicle camera system |
US9135818B2 (en) | 2009-12-22 | 2015-09-15 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Radar detector that interfaces with a mobile communication device |
US8970422B2 (en) | 2009-12-22 | 2015-03-03 | Cobra Electronics Corporation | Radar detector that interfaces with a mobile communication device |
US8384534B2 (en) * | 2010-01-14 | 2013-02-26 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Combining driver and environment sensing for vehicular safety systems |
US20110169625A1 (en) * | 2010-01-14 | 2011-07-14 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Combining driver and environment sensing for vehicular safety systems |
US20130211687A1 (en) * | 2010-10-23 | 2013-08-15 | Daimier Ag | Method for Operating a Brake Assist Device and Brake Assist Device for a Vehicle |
US9079571B2 (en) * | 2010-10-23 | 2015-07-14 | Daimler Ag | Method for operating a brake assist device and brake assist device for a vehicle |
US20120158249A1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2012-06-21 | Automotive Parts and Accessory Systems R&D Centre Limited | Vehicle safety enhancement systems and methods |
US8725346B2 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2014-05-13 | Hong Kong Productivity Council | Collision severity determination system and method |
US20130325210A1 (en) * | 2011-04-06 | 2013-12-05 | Kollmorgen Saro AB | Collision avoiding method and associated system |
US8838292B2 (en) * | 2011-04-06 | 2014-09-16 | Kollmorgen Särö Ab | Collision avoiding method and associated system |
US9014915B2 (en) * | 2011-07-25 | 2015-04-21 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Active safety control for vehicles |
US20130030657A1 (en) * | 2011-07-25 | 2013-01-31 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Active safety control for vehicles |
US20140236462A1 (en) * | 2011-12-29 | 2014-08-21 | Jennifer Healey | Navigation systems that enhance driver awareness |
US20160123750A1 (en) * | 2011-12-29 | 2016-05-05 | Intel Corporation | Navigation Systems that Enhance Driver Awareness |
CN103204121A (en) * | 2012-01-16 | 2013-07-17 | 福特全球技术公司 | Radar Based Multifunctional Safety System |
US8708366B2 (en) * | 2012-05-29 | 2014-04-29 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Vehicle side impact detection using vehicle yaw |
US20140028490A1 (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2014-01-30 | National Chiao Tung University | Motion parameter estimating method, angle estimating method and determination method |
US9134407B2 (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2015-09-15 | National Chiao Tung University | Motion parameter estimating method, angle estimating method and determination method |
US20140200768A1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2014-07-17 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle travel assisting device |
US8862326B2 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2014-10-14 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle travel assisting device |
US20150051789A1 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2015-02-19 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle accident history recorder |
US8935013B2 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2015-01-13 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle accident history recorder |
US20140200738A1 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2014-07-17 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle accident history recorder |
US8996199B2 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2015-03-31 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle accident history recorder |
US10197665B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2019-02-05 | Escort Inc. | Radar false alert reduction |
US10059207B2 (en) * | 2013-10-08 | 2018-08-28 | Audi Ag | Crash detection when a motor vehicle is at a standstill |
US20160257203A1 (en) * | 2013-10-08 | 2016-09-08 | Audi Ag | Crash detection when a motor vehicle is at a standstill |
GB2520493A (en) * | 2013-11-20 | 2015-05-27 | Univ Coventry | Active buckling control |
US9789831B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2017-10-17 | Coventry University | Method of managing collisions between a plurality of vehicles and vehicle applying such a method |
DE102015102837A1 (en) | 2014-03-10 | 2015-09-10 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Method for controlling a vehicle lane during autonomous braking |
US20190057607A1 (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2019-02-21 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Radio apparatus, processing apparatus and processing system |
US20160023599A1 (en) * | 2014-07-28 | 2016-01-28 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for warning loss of control of a vehicle using vehicle-to-vehicle communications |
US9682654B2 (en) * | 2014-07-28 | 2017-06-20 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for warning loss of control of a vehicle using vehicle-to-vehicle communications |
US9902397B2 (en) * | 2014-07-30 | 2018-02-27 | Komatsu Ltd. | Transporter vehicle and transporter vehicle control method |
US20160264134A1 (en) * | 2014-07-30 | 2016-09-15 | Komatsu Ltd. | Transporter vehicle and transporter vehicle control method |
US9566981B2 (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2017-02-14 | Honda Research Institute Europe Gmbh | Method and system for post-collision manoeuvre planning and vehicle equipped with such system |
US20160059855A1 (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2016-03-03 | Honda Research Institute Europe Gmbh | Method and system for post-collision manoeuvre planning and vehicle equipped with such system |
US10026324B2 (en) | 2014-11-04 | 2018-07-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for enhanced adoptive validation of ATC clearance requests |
US10169991B2 (en) | 2015-02-10 | 2019-01-01 | Ridar Systems LLC | Proximity awareness system for motor vehicles |
US9659496B2 (en) | 2015-02-10 | 2017-05-23 | Ridar Systems LLC | Proximity awareness system for motor vehicles |
CN105109433A (en) * | 2015-08-24 | 2015-12-02 | 广西大学 | Car side-direction anticollision system |
US10677888B2 (en) | 2015-09-28 | 2020-06-09 | Escort Inc. | Radar detector with multi-band directional display and enhanced detection of false alerts |
US20170254880A1 (en) * | 2016-03-04 | 2017-09-07 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic range setting for vehicular radars |
US10509121B2 (en) * | 2016-03-04 | 2019-12-17 | Uatc, Llc | Dynamic range setting for vehicular radars |
US10173674B2 (en) | 2016-06-15 | 2019-01-08 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Traction based systems and methods |
US10124802B2 (en) * | 2016-08-20 | 2018-11-13 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Controlled vehicle deceleration based on a selected vehicle driving mode |
US20180222387A1 (en) * | 2017-02-07 | 2018-08-09 | Shenzhen Xiaofeida Electronic Co., Ltd | Blind Zone Monitoring Method, License Plate Frame Device with Blind Zone Monitoring Function and Rearview Mirror |
CN108521010A (en) * | 2018-02-11 | 2018-09-11 | 航天东方红卫星有限公司 | A kind of varied angle load test supporting tool |
US11008013B2 (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2021-05-18 | Hyundai Motor Company | Vehicle and method of controlling an airbag of a vehicle |
US11590984B2 (en) * | 2019-10-14 | 2023-02-28 | Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems Llc | Control system for operator controlled vehicle subsystems |
CN115123131A (en) * | 2022-07-08 | 2022-09-30 | 浙江吉利控股集团有限公司 | Vehicle safety electronic control method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8321092B2 (en) | 2012-11-27 |
US20110295467A1 (en) | 2011-12-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8321092B2 (en) | Pre-collision assessment of potential collision severity for road vehicles | |
US6571161B2 (en) | Pre-crash assessment of crash severity for road vehicles | |
US6944543B2 (en) | Integrated collision prediction and safety systems control for improved vehicle safety | |
US6519519B1 (en) | Passive countermeasure methods | |
US6721659B2 (en) | Collision warning and safety countermeasure system | |
US7260461B2 (en) | Method for operating a pre-crash sensing system with protruding contact sensor | |
US20060106538A1 (en) | Cooperative collision mitigation | |
US7034668B2 (en) | Threat level identification and quantifying system | |
US7253724B2 (en) | Vehicle pre-impact sensing and control system with driver response feedback | |
US6442484B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for pre-crash threat assessment using spheroidal partitioning | |
KR100708922B1 (en) | Crash-safe vehicle control system | |
US7138938B1 (en) | System and method for preemptively sensing an object and selectively operating both a collision countermeasure system and a parking assistance system aboard an automotive vehicle | |
US6452535B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for impact crash mitigation | |
CN111137281A (en) | Vehicle and control method of vehicle | |
US6480102B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for activating a crash countermeasure in response to the road condition | |
US20070296565A1 (en) | Method for Initiating Safety Measures for a Motor Vehicle | |
GB2412471A (en) | Activation of a passive restraint system | |
US6502034B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for activating a crash countermeasure using a transponder and adaptive cruise control | |
US6609057B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for activating a crash countermeasure using a transponder having various modes of operation | |
GB2435536A (en) | Vehicle safely system that tries to prevent and reduce the severity of an accident or crash, then sends an emergency message after a crash. | |
CN110386136B (en) | Automatic collision mitigation system for vehicle and method thereof | |
US6609066B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for activating a crash countermeasure in response to the braking capability of a vehicle | |
US6658355B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for activating a crash countermeasure | |
US20060050148A1 (en) | Device for the classification of a least one object by means of an environmental sensor | |
Zolock et al. | The use of stationary object radar sensor data from advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) in accident reconstruction |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BROWNE, ALAN L.;WOOD, FRANCIS D.;ALTAN, OSMAN D.;REEL/FRAME:015020/0010;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040419 TO 20040505 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022102/0533 Effective date: 20050119 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022102/0533 Effective date: 20050119 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0610 Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0610 Effective date: 20081231 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECU Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0446 Effective date: 20090409 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SEC Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0446 Effective date: 20090409 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0429 Effective date: 20090709 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0429 Effective date: 20090709 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0468 Effective date: 20090814 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0468 Effective date: 20090814 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0052 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0052 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023162/0001 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST,MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023162/0001 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:025245/0442 Effective date: 20100420 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST;REEL/FRAME:025311/0770 Effective date: 20101026 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025327/0001 Effective date: 20101027 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025780/0902 Effective date: 20101202 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |