US20050017723A1 - Evaluation of fracture geometries in rock formations - Google Patents

Evaluation of fracture geometries in rock formations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050017723A1
US20050017723A1 US10/872,116 US87211604A US2005017723A1 US 20050017723 A1 US20050017723 A1 US 20050017723A1 US 87211604 A US87211604 A US 87211604A US 2005017723 A1 US2005017723 A1 US 2005017723A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fracture
borehole
fluid
electric
formation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/872,116
Inventor
Vladimir Entov
Yury Gordeev
Chekhonin Evgeny Mikhailovich
Marc Thiercelin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schlumberger Technology Corp filed Critical Schlumberger Technology Corp
Assigned to SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION reassignment SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHEKHONIN, EVGENY MIKHAILOVICH, GORDEEV, YURY NIKOLAEVICH, THIERCELIN, MARK JEAN, ENTOV, VLADIMIR MORDUKHOVICH
Publication of US20050017723A1 publication Critical patent/US20050017723A1/en
Priority to US11/763,584 priority Critical patent/US7819181B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • E21B49/008Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells by injection test; by analysing pressure variations in an injection or production test, e.g. for estimating the skin factor
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V3/00Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/18Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging
    • G01V3/26Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified either by the surrounding earth formation or by the detecting device

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for evaluating the shape or geometry of hydraulic fractures in rock formations. It can be advantageously applied to determine the shapes of fractures surrounding oil well boreholes.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is generally used to stimulate production of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon wells. Hydraulic fractures are created in subterranean formations by injecting high viscosity fluid (also referred to as fracturing fluid) at a high flow rate into well boreholes. The tensile fractures thus-created can be about 100 m long. The fracturing procedure generally takes from about 30 minutes to 4 hours.
  • high viscosity fluid also referred to as fracturing fluid
  • the fracturing fluid usually contains proppants, small particles which are added to the fluid to keep the fracture open once the injection is stopped and pressure is released. These particles can be sand grain or ceramic grains.
  • the width of the fracture during propagation is about 1 cm, and 4 mm once closed on proppant
  • the fracture should be contained within the reservoir formation and not propagate in the adjacent layers. It should also be of sufficient length and width. Evaluation of the geometry of the fracture is therefore an important step to ensure treatment optimization.
  • Fracture geometries can be evaluated utilizing various techniques and methodologies. The mostly widely used is a method of indirect evaluation based on analysis of a pressure response during the fracture treatment and subsequent production. The method is described, for example, in Reservoir Stimulation, Third Edition, M. J. Economides and K. G. Nolte (Ed.), Chichester, UK, Wiley, (2000). This approach provides, however, only very general information about fracture length and fracture width and does not provide any information about the exact fracture geometry. More reliable acoustic fracture imaging technology for field applications can be based on event location using passive acoustic emission. Such technology is described, for example, in A practical guide to hydraulic fracture diagnostic technologies, by D. Barree, M. K. Fisher and R. A.
  • Woodroof, paper SPE 77442 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Tex., USA, 28 September to Oct. 2, 2002.
  • Acoustic emission events generated by micro-earthquakes around the fracture during hydraulic fracturing are recorded by an array of geophones or accelerators placed in adjacent boreholes.
  • the micro-earthquakes may be caused by the high stress concentration ahead of the fracture or by the decrease of stress around the fracture following fracturing fluid leak-off into the formation.
  • the events can be analyzed to provide some information about the source mechanism (energy, displacement field, stress drop, source size, etc.). However, they do not provide direct quantitative information on the main fracture.
  • the approach is commonly used in the field and is particularly suited for the estimation of fracture azimuth and dip, but not for an accurate determination of the position of the fracture tip.
  • Another disadvantage of the approach is that the micro-earthquakes are spread around the fracture and produce a cloud of events, which do not allow a precise determination of fracture geometry.
  • tiltmeter mapping also discussed in the paper by D. Barree, et al. referenced above. This technique involves monitoring the deformation pattern in the rock surrounding the fracture. An array of tiltmeters measures the gradient of the displacement (tilt) field versus time. The induced deformation field is primarily a function of fracture azimuth, dip, depth to fracture middle point and total fracture volume. The shape of the induced deformation field is almost completely independent of reservoir mechanical properties, if the rock is homogeneous, and in-situ stress state.
  • the electrokinetic effect is based on the generation of electric current by fluid flow through porous media. Its primary cause is the difference in mobility of ions, some of which are fixed at the surface of the solid skeleton (matrix) of the porous medium, while dissolved counter ions can move with the pore fluid, or force it to move, if an electric field is applied.
  • the present invention provides a method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
  • determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values, e.g. as a function of the positions and/or times of the measurements.
  • fracture covers a single fracture or a plurality of related fractures all caused by the same fracturing event.
  • the present invention provides a method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
  • determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values, e.g. as a function of the positions and/or times of the measurements.
  • Particular embodiments of this aspect of the present invention provide a method of evaluating a shape of hydraulic fractures in a rock formation, in which method: at least one borehole is provided; given fluid is injected into at least one of the provided boreholes at a pressure allowing the fluid to create fractures around the borehole and to propagate into the created fractures and further into the formation through fracture faces; electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of the fluid into the fractures and further into the formation through fracture faces are measured downhole; and the shape of the fractures is determined using values of either or both of the measured fields as a function of either or both of the position and time of the measurements.
  • the present invention provides a method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
  • determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values, e.g. as a function of the positions and/or times of the measurements.
  • Particular embodiments of this aspect of the present invention provide a method of evaluating a shape of hydraulic fractures in a rock formation, in which method: at least one borehole is provided, given fluid is injected into at least one of the provided boreholes at a pressure allowing the fluid to create fractures around the borehole and propagate into the created fractures and further into the formation through fracture faces; pressure in the borehole used for the injection is lowered to a value allowing the fluid to propagate back from the formation into the fractures through the fracture faces; electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the back propagation of the fluid from the formation is measured downhole; and the shape of the fractures is determined using values of either or both of the measured fields as a function of either or both of the position and time of the measurements.
  • the step of measuring downhole the values of the electric and/or magnetic fields may be performed inside a further borehole or boreholes.
  • the method allows the measurement of electric or magnetic fields to be performed inside one of the provided boreholes while the fluid which induces these fields is injected into another of the provided boreholes and propagates into the fractures and further into the formation from the fracture faces around this another of the provided boreholes.
  • the method may further comprise the step of:
  • the method may further comprise: providing a forward model of electric and/or magnetic field distributions for a given fracture shape and injection pressure by calculating such distributions as a function of a measurement position and/or time; measuring downhole the electric and/or magnetic fields at the same positions and/or times as used for providing the forward model to provide observed electric and/or magnetic field distributions; and evaluating the shape of fractures in the rock formations by minimizing errors between the forward model distribution(s) and the observed distribution(s).
  • a further aspect of the invention provides a computer system which is operatively configured to determine the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a subterranean rock formation from measured values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the forward or back propagation of a fracturing fluid between the fracture and the rock formation.
  • the invention also provides an apparatus for evaluating a shape of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, the apparatus comprising:
  • a rig for injecting a fracturing fluid into a borehole at a pressure allowing the injected fluid to create a fracture and propagate into the created fracture around the borehole;
  • At least one downhole tool for measuring electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of said fluid into the fracture through the fracture faces and by the propagation of this fluid back into the formation from the fracture;
  • the invention also provides an apparatus for evaluating a shape of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, the apparatus comprising means for injecting a given fluid into at least one borehole at a pressure allowing the injected fluid to create fractures and propagate into the created fractures around the borehole; at least one downhole tool for measuring electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of said fluid into the fractures and by the leaking-off of this fluid into the formation from the fracture face; and means, such as a computer system, for determining a shape of the fractures using values of either or both of the measured fields as a function of measurement position and time.
  • the or each downhole tool may be movable along the borehole.
  • the means for injecting the given fluid may be a surface pump.
  • the apparatus itself may further comprise: at least one memory unit for storing expected values of the electric and/or magnetic fields for a given fracture shape and injection pressure according to a measurement position and/or time; means for evaluating the location of the downhole tool in the borehole; at least one processing unit for selecting electric and/or magnetic field values measured by the downhole tool at the positions and/or times for which the values are stored in the memory unit, and for minimizing errors between the stored and selected values; and means for outputting data on the evaluated shape of the fractures in the rock formation.
  • FIG. 1 a is a schematic diagrams respectively showing a borehole with a movable sensor arrangement
  • FIG. 1 b is a schematic diagram showing a borehole with a fixed sensor arrangement
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a borehole with perforated casing and cemented sensors
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment for two boreholes according to the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing another embodiment according to the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing yet another embodiment according to the invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an apparatus according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing a formation comprising three layers
  • FIGS. 9 a and b are three-dimensional plots showing distributions of electric potential as a function of horizontal position coordinates and depth.
  • FIG. 1 a is a schematic view of a borehole 1 with a sensor arrangement (associated with a downhole tool) 21 which comprises electric field sensors 2 and magnetic field sensors 3 .
  • the electric field sensors 2 are voltage electrodes which contact the borehole and the magnetic field sensor 3 is a magnetometer, such as a high-precision nuclear magnetic resonance device of the type provided, for example, by Schlumberger. Examples of suitable electrodes and magnetometers are described in: U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,051 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,441,618 for electrodes behind casing; EP0544583 and EP0715187 for electrodes on a wireline tool in openhole; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,597,178B1 and Etchecopar et al.
  • the sensor arrangement 21 is movable along the borehole by means of a drive 5 , thus providing measurement of electric and magnetic fields in different parts of the borehole.
  • measurement processing means 4 is outside the borehole.
  • the sensor arrangement comprises two voltage electrodes and one magnetic field sensor 3 , but the number of sensors may be selected depending on the particular implementation requirements.
  • FIG. 1 b shows a fixed sensor arrangement 22 which comprises a plurality of electric field sensors 2 and magnetic field sensors 3 .
  • the number and spacing of the sensors along the borehole may be such as to provide measurements above and below the predicted positions of formation 23 boundaries. It will be apparent to those skilled in art that the locations of sensors 2 and 3 in the fixed arrangement may be adjusted as required.
  • the apparatus comprises pump 6 connected by channel 11 to the borehole 1 .
  • the pump 6 is also connected to a reservoir 12 which is filled with fracturing fluid 7 .
  • Fracturing fluid 7 may be water based or oil based, and is generally either a high viscosity (crossed-linked or uncrossed-linked) polymer fluid, or a surfactant-based fracturing fluid.
  • the sensor arrangement may be either movable or fixed as described above.
  • the surface pump 6 may be also be provided with a pressure controlling unit (not shown) to continuously increase or decrease the pressure in the borehole.
  • the pump 6 injects fluid 7 into the borehole 1 through channel 11 .
  • Fluid 7 is injected at a pressure which is high enough to fracture the formation, whereby movement of the fluid into the borehole occurs. Fractures are create around the borehole and the fluid propagate through the faces of these fractures into formation 23 around the oil borehole. Propagation of fluid 7 into the formation is indicated schematically by arrows 24 .
  • Measurement processing means 4 processes the signals received from the sensors 2 and 3 to provide their output in a suitable form, i.e. as intermediate information for further processing or as final information. Output received from the processing means 4 allows evaluation of the fracture shape or geometry.
  • FIG. 3 where borehole 1 has casing 25 with perforations 8 .
  • the casing can be made of different materials, but the most commonly used casing material is steel.
  • the magnetic field measurement should be made in an open (uncased) section of the borehole or in a cased section if the casing does not strongly disturb the magnetic field (a composite casing, for example).
  • the electric field is also measured in an open or non-metallic cased section of the borehole.
  • the electric field can be successfully measured by sensors embedded in the cemented outer annulus 26 with which the casing is insulated, as shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the method according to the invention can be implemented using a different borehole located near the first borehole 1 .
  • the implementation of such a method is shown schematically in FIG. 4 .
  • Fracturing fluid 7 is injected by pump 6 into the borehole 1 which has casing 25 with perforations 8 .
  • Another borehole 9 in which is placed the sensor arrangement 21 , is located near the first borehole 1 .
  • the sensor arrangement 21 comprises voltage electrodes 2 in contact with the borehole and a high precision magnetometer 3 .
  • Such devices can measure the induced electric and magnetic fields up to about 100 to 500 meters from the borehole in which the fluid is injected.
  • a number of boreholes located around the borehole 1 within a range of about 500 meters can each be used for receiving a movable sensor arrangement 21 or a fixed arrangement 22 and obtaining corresponding measurements.
  • Measurable electric and magnetic fields are induced not only by the flow of pressurized injected fluid into rock formations surrounding the borehole, but also by backflow of the fracturing fluid, i.e. when it retreats into the borehole from the created fractures.
  • This situation takes place when the pressure inside the borehole 1 is reduced, for example by means of valve 10 , to a value equal or below the pressure of the fracturing fluid 7 in the formations and fractures.
  • This backflow is schematically shown in FIG. 5 by the reversal of arrows 24 .
  • Such back propagation of fluid 7 induces measurable electric and magnetic fields which can be detected by electric field sensors 2 and magnetic field sensors 3 .
  • the signals from the sensors are supplied to measurement processing means 4 as described above with reference to FIG. 2 .
  • FIG. 6 shows schematically an example of the invention, in which the borehole 1 is cased and the casing 25 has perforations 8 .
  • Cemented annulus 26 is provided around the casing 25 and a number of electric field sensors 2 are embedded in the annulus 26 .
  • Magnetic field sensors 3 are attached to a sensor arrangement 27 which is either movably or fixedly located in another borehole 9 situated from the borehole 1 at a distance allowing the sensors 3 to detect the magnetic field induced by fracturing liquid flowing back from fractures into the borehole 1 when valve 10 reduces the pressure inside the borehole 1 .
  • the signals from the sensors are supplied to measurement processing means 4 as described above with reference to FIG. 2 .
  • a number of sensor arrangements 21 or 27 may be movably or fixedly located in boreholes surrounding the borehole 1 in which fracturing fluid 7 is injected or flowing back from the created fractures. Such combinations may allow measurements to be taken simultaneously in a ring around the borehole 1 .
  • a sensor arrangement 21 or 27 can be placed sequentially in the boreholes encircling borehole 1 .
  • fixed and movable sensor arrangements 21 or 27 may be located in one and the same borehole.
  • FIG. 7 A general block diagram of an exemplary apparatus for implementing the method is shown in FIG. 7 .
  • signals from sensors 2 and 3 and from drive 13 are supplied to converting unit 14 .
  • Converting unit 14 outputs the signals in a form suitable for their further processing and storing in digital form in random-access memory (RAM) 16 and in data/program memory (DPM) 19 .
  • DPM 19 stores programs for implementing modelling calculations.
  • Processing unit 15 receives data from RAM 16 and performs calculations to produce output information and signals to control pump 6 , valve 10 and drive 13 by means of controlling unit 18 .
  • Output information from processing unit 15 is stored in RAM 16 and DPM 19 .
  • Output data may also be monitored at display unit 20 . Synchronization and internal timing for the described units is provided by a clocking unit 17 .
  • the method of the invention may be implemented by providing a forward model of an electric or magnetic field distribution for a given fracture shape and downhole pressure and evaluating the shape of fractures in the rock formations by minimizing errors between the forward model of electric and magnetic field distributions and the corresponding downhole measured distributions.
  • the forward model provides field distributions based on the following equations.
  • the electrokinetic effect involves the generation of an electric current by fluid flow through porous media (the reverse effect involves inducing flow through the application of an electric field). Its primary cause is the difference in mobility of ions, some of which are fixed at the surface of the solid skeleton (matrix) of the porous medium, while dissolved counter ions move with the pore fluid (or force it to move, if an electric field is applied).
  • the forward model of electric field and magnetic field distributions is calculated by solving the equations above taking account of conservation laws, boundary conditions, symmetry consideration and Fourier transform used.
  • the model cam also take into account the influence of several formation layers.
  • the formation is composed of three layers S 1 , S 2 and S 3 , as shown in FIG. 8 , and the electric conductivities of the layers, which have been previously measured with conventional resistivity wireline logs, are respectively about 0.001, 0.1 and 0.001 in Siemens/m.
  • the fracture is entirely in the reservoir (i.e. layer S 2 ) and is of height H and length 2 L as shown in FIG. 8 .
  • FIGS. 9 a and 9 b show the expected electric potential predicted by the forward model as a function of X* and Y* at two different measurement depths (Z*).
  • the distributions shown in these figures have characteristic lengths related to the fracture length and fracture height, and an anisotropy related to fracture direction.
  • the real distributions of electric and magnetic fields induced by fracturing fluid flow in the borehole and fractures are revealed by downhole measuring these fields at the same positions and times of measuring as used for calculating the forward model of the electric or magnetic field distributions.
  • the measured distributions are also referred to as “observed electric or magnetic field distributions”.
  • the orientation, length and height of the fracture are adjusted in the forward model until minimization of the difference between the forward model values and the measured values is achieved. In this way, the orientation, length and height of the fracture can be determined.

Abstract

A method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation comprises the steps of: obtaining measured values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the forward or back propagation of a fracturing fluid between the fracture and the rock formation; and determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the shape or geometry of hydraulic fractures in rock formations. It can be advantageously applied to determine the shapes of fractures surrounding oil well boreholes.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Hydraulic fracturing is generally used to stimulate production of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon wells. Hydraulic fractures are created in subterranean formations by injecting high viscosity fluid (also referred to as fracturing fluid) at a high flow rate into well boreholes. The tensile fractures thus-created can be about 100 m long. The fracturing procedure generally takes from about 30 minutes to 4 hours.
  • In order to create a high conductivity drain in the formation, the fracturing fluid usually contains proppants, small particles which are added to the fluid to keep the fracture open once the injection is stopped and pressure is released. These particles can be sand grain or ceramic grains. The width of the fracture during propagation is about 1 cm, and 4 mm once closed on proppant
  • To be efficient, the fracture should be contained within the reservoir formation and not propagate in the adjacent layers. It should also be of sufficient length and width. Evaluation of the geometry of the fracture is therefore an important step to ensure treatment optimization.
  • Fracture geometries can be evaluated utilizing various techniques and methodologies. The mostly widely used is a method of indirect evaluation based on analysis of a pressure response during the fracture treatment and subsequent production. The method is described, for example, in Reservoir Stimulation, Third Edition, M. J. Economides and K. G. Nolte (Ed.), Chichester, UK, Wiley, (2000). This approach provides, however, only very general information about fracture length and fracture width and does not provide any information about the exact fracture geometry. More reliable acoustic fracture imaging technology for field applications can be based on event location using passive acoustic emission. Such technology is described, for example, in A practical guide to hydraulic fracture diagnostic technologies, by D. Barree, M. K. Fisher and R. A. Woodroof, paper SPE 77442, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Tex., USA, 28 September to Oct. 2, 2002. Acoustic emission events generated by micro-earthquakes around the fracture during hydraulic fracturing are recorded by an array of geophones or accelerators placed in adjacent boreholes. The micro-earthquakes may be caused by the high stress concentration ahead of the fracture or by the decrease of stress around the fracture following fracturing fluid leak-off into the formation. In the best cases, the events can be analyzed to provide some information about the source mechanism (energy, displacement field, stress drop, source size, etc.). However, they do not provide direct quantitative information on the main fracture. The approach is commonly used in the field and is particularly suited for the estimation of fracture azimuth and dip, but not for an accurate determination of the position of the fracture tip. Another disadvantage of the approach is that the micro-earthquakes are spread around the fracture and produce a cloud of events, which do not allow a precise determination of fracture geometry.
  • Yet another technique for evaluating hydraulic fracture shapes is tiltmeter mapping, also discussed in the paper by D. Barree, et al. referenced above. This technique involves monitoring the deformation pattern in the rock surrounding the fracture. An array of tiltmeters measures the gradient of the displacement (tilt) field versus time. The induced deformation field is primarily a function of fracture azimuth, dip, depth to fracture middle point and total fracture volume. The shape of the induced deformation field is almost completely independent of reservoir mechanical properties, if the rock is homogeneous, and in-situ stress state.
  • Disadvantages of this technique are first of all in that surface tiltmeters cannot accurately resolve fracture length and height due to the depth of the fracture below the surface. Also the measurement distance is large compared to the fracture dimensions, so there is a blurring of the fracture source edges. Although downhole tiltmeters placed in the treatment borehole can provide better information on fracture height they still cannot resolve fracture length.
  • The electrokinetic effect is based on the generation of electric current by fluid flow through porous media. Its primary cause is the difference in mobility of ions, some of which are fixed at the surface of the solid skeleton (matrix) of the porous medium, while dissolved counter ions can move with the pore fluid, or force it to move, if an electric field is applied.
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 5,519,322 the effect is used to measure the permeability of a formation surrounding a borehole by measuring the magnetic field generated by the flow of fluid injected into the formation. The permeability measured in this way provides information on the capacity of the reservoir to produce oils.
  • A need exists to provide approaches for evaluating shapes of hydraulic fractures in rock formations, which approaches mitigate or even exclude disadvantages and deficiencies explained above.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for evaluating fracture geometries in rock formations surrounding oil boreholes. An insight of the inventors was that the electrokinetic effect could be used to make such evaluations.
  • Thus, in general terms, the present invention provides a method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
  • obtaining measured values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the forward or back propagation of a fracturing fluid between the fracture and the rock formation; and
  • determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values, e.g. as a function of the positions and/or times of the measurements.
  • The term “fracture” as used herein covers a single fracture or a plurality of related fractures all caused by the same fracturing event.
  • In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
  • injecting into a borehole a fracturing fluid at a pressure allowing the fluid to create a fracture in a formation surrounding the borehole and to propagate into the fracture and further into the formation through the fracture faces;
  • measuring downhole the values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of the fluid into the fracture and further into the formation; and
  • determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values, e.g. as a function of the positions and/or times of the measurements.
  • Particular embodiments of this aspect of the present invention provide a method of evaluating a shape of hydraulic fractures in a rock formation, in which method: at least one borehole is provided; given fluid is injected into at least one of the provided boreholes at a pressure allowing the fluid to create fractures around the borehole and to propagate into the created fractures and further into the formation through fracture faces; electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of the fluid into the fractures and further into the formation through fracture faces are measured downhole; and the shape of the fractures is determined using values of either or both of the measured fields as a function of either or both of the position and time of the measurements.
  • In a second related aspect, the present invention provides a method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
  • injecting into a borehole a fracturing fluid at a pressure allowing the fluid to create a fracture in a formation surrounding the borehole and to propagate into the fractures and further into the formation through the fracture faces;
  • lowering the pressure in the borehole such that the fluid propagates back from the formation into the fracture;
  • measuring downhole the values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the back propagation of the fluid from the formation into the fracture; and
  • determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values, e.g. as a function of the positions and/or times of the measurements.
  • Particular embodiments of this aspect of the present invention provide a method of evaluating a shape of hydraulic fractures in a rock formation, in which method: at least one borehole is provided, given fluid is injected into at least one of the provided boreholes at a pressure allowing the fluid to create fractures around the borehole and propagate into the created fractures and further into the formation through fracture faces; pressure in the borehole used for the injection is lowered to a value allowing the fluid to propagate back from the formation into the fractures through the fracture faces; electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the back propagation of the fluid from the formation is measured downhole; and the shape of the fractures is determined using values of either or both of the measured fields as a function of either or both of the position and time of the measurements.
  • The following optional features relate to both of these aspects.
  • The step of measuring downhole the values of the electric and/or magnetic fields may be performed inside a further borehole or boreholes. In relation to the particular embodiments mentioned above, for at least two provided boreholes the method allows the measurement of electric or magnetic fields to be performed inside one of the provided boreholes while the fluid which induces these fields is injected into another of the provided boreholes and propagates into the fractures and further into the formation from the fracture faces around this another of the provided boreholes.
  • The method may further comprise the step of:
  • providing a model from which expected values of the electric and/or magnetic field at the positions and/or times of the measured values can be calculated for adjustable fracture geometries and injection pressures;
  • wherein the geometry of the fracture is determined by adjusting the model to minimize the differences between the expected and measured values. In relation to the particular embodiments mentioned above, the method may further comprise: providing a forward model of electric and/or magnetic field distributions for a given fracture shape and injection pressure by calculating such distributions as a function of a measurement position and/or time; measuring downhole the electric and/or magnetic fields at the same positions and/or times as used for providing the forward model to provide observed electric and/or magnetic field distributions; and evaluating the shape of fractures in the rock formations by minimizing errors between the forward model distribution(s) and the observed distribution(s).
  • A further aspect of the invention provides a computer system which is operatively configured to determine the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a subterranean rock formation from measured values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the forward or back propagation of a fracturing fluid between the fracture and the rock formation.
  • Thus, in certain embodiments, the invention also provides an apparatus for evaluating a shape of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, the apparatus comprising:
  • a rig for injecting a fracturing fluid into a borehole at a pressure allowing the injected fluid to create a fracture and propagate into the created fracture around the borehole;
  • at least one downhole tool for measuring electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of said fluid into the fracture through the fracture faces and by the propagation of this fluid back into the formation from the fracture; and
  • a computer system according to this aspect of the invention, for determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values of the electric and/or magnetic fields.
  • In certain other embodiments, the invention also provides an apparatus for evaluating a shape of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, the apparatus comprising means for injecting a given fluid into at least one borehole at a pressure allowing the injected fluid to create fractures and propagate into the created fractures around the borehole; at least one downhole tool for measuring electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of said fluid into the fractures and by the leaking-off of this fluid into the formation from the fracture face; and means, such as a computer system, for determining a shape of the fractures using values of either or both of the measured fields as a function of measurement position and time.
  • In relation to the apparatus embodiments, the or each downhole tool may be movable along the borehole. The means for injecting the given fluid may be a surface pump. The apparatus itself may further comprise: at least one memory unit for storing expected values of the electric and/or magnetic fields for a given fracture shape and injection pressure according to a measurement position and/or time; means for evaluating the location of the downhole tool in the borehole; at least one processing unit for selecting electric and/or magnetic field values measured by the downhole tool at the positions and/or times for which the values are stored in the memory unit, and for minimizing errors between the stored and selected values; and means for outputting data on the evaluated shape of the fractures in the rock formation.
  • Further aspects of the invention provide: (i) a computer program for determining the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a subterranean rock formation from measured values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the forward or back propagation of a fracturing fluid between the fracture and the rock formation; and (ii) a computer program product carrying such a program.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the following drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 a is a schematic diagrams respectively showing a borehole with a movable sensor arrangement, and FIG. 1 b is a schematic diagram showing a borehole with a fixed sensor arrangement;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment according to the invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a borehole with perforated casing and cemented sensors;
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment for two boreholes according to the invention;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing another embodiment according to the invention;
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing yet another embodiment according to the invention;
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an apparatus according to one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing a formation comprising three layers;
  • FIGS. 9 a and b are three-dimensional plots showing distributions of electric potential as a function of horizontal position coordinates and depth.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 a is a schematic view of a borehole 1 with a sensor arrangement (associated with a downhole tool) 21 which comprises electric field sensors 2 and magnetic field sensors 3. The electric field sensors 2 are voltage electrodes which contact the borehole and the magnetic field sensor 3 is a magnetometer, such as a high-precision nuclear magnetic resonance device of the type provided, for example, by Schlumberger. Examples of suitable electrodes and magnetometers are described in: U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,051 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,441,618 for electrodes behind casing; EP0544583 and EP0715187 for electrodes on a wireline tool in openhole; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,597,178B1 and Etchecopar et al. (1993), Harnessing Paleomagnetics for Logging, Oilfield Review, October 1993, Volume 5, Number 3 for magnetometers. The sensor arrangement 21 is movable along the borehole by means of a drive 5, thus providing measurement of electric and magnetic fields in different parts of the borehole. In this example, measurement processing means 4 is outside the borehole. The sensor arrangement comprises two voltage electrodes and one magnetic field sensor 3, but the number of sensors may be selected depending on the particular implementation requirements.
  • FIG. 1 b shows a fixed sensor arrangement 22 which comprises a plurality of electric field sensors 2 and magnetic field sensors 3. The number and spacing of the sensors along the borehole may be such as to provide measurements above and below the predicted positions of formation 23 boundaries. It will be apparent to those skilled in art that the locations of sensors 2 and 3 in the fixed arrangement may be adjusted as required.
  • An example of the invention is shown in the schematic diagram of FIG. 2. In addition to the sensor arrangement which is placed in the borehole 1, the apparatus comprises pump 6 connected by channel 11 to the borehole 1. The pump 6 is also connected to a reservoir 12 which is filled with fracturing fluid 7. Fracturing fluid 7 may be water based or oil based, and is generally either a high viscosity (crossed-linked or uncrossed-linked) polymer fluid, or a surfactant-based fracturing fluid. The sensor arrangement may be either movable or fixed as described above. The surface pump 6 may be also be provided with a pressure controlling unit (not shown) to continuously increase or decrease the pressure in the borehole.
  • The pump 6 injects fluid 7 into the borehole 1 through channel 11. Fluid 7 is injected at a pressure which is high enough to fracture the formation, whereby movement of the fluid into the borehole occurs. Fractures are create around the borehole and the fluid propagate through the faces of these fractures into formation 23 around the oil borehole. Propagation of fluid 7 into the formation is indicated schematically by arrows 24.
  • Propagation of fluid 7 into the fractures and the formation induces both electric and magnetic fields which are detected by electric field sensors 2 and magnetic field sensor 3. Measurement processing means 4 then processes the signals received from the sensors 2 and 3 to provide their output in a suitable form, i.e. as intermediate information for further processing or as final information. Output received from the processing means 4 allows evaluation of the fracture shape or geometry.
  • Many boreholes used for oil production are cased inside, the casing being perforated to allow produced oil to enter the borehole. Such situation is shown in FIG. 3 where borehole 1 has casing 25 with perforations 8. The casing can be made of different materials, but the most commonly used casing material is steel. However, to provide reliable and accurate measurements by magnetic field sensors, the magnetic field measurement should be made in an open (uncased) section of the borehole or in a cased section if the casing does not strongly disturb the magnetic field (a composite casing, for example).
  • It is preferable, but not essential, that the electric field is also measured in an open or non-metallic cased section of the borehole. However, if necessary the electric field can be successfully measured by sensors embedded in the cemented outer annulus 26 with which the casing is insulated, as shown in FIG. 3.
  • In situations when the casing 25 does not allow the sensor arrangement to be successfully used within the borehole, the method according to the invention can be implemented using a different borehole located near the first borehole 1. The implementation of such a method is shown schematically in FIG. 4. Fracturing fluid 7 is injected by pump 6 into the borehole 1 which has casing 25 with perforations 8. Another borehole 9, in which is placed the sensor arrangement 21, is located near the first borehole 1. As described above, the sensor arrangement 21 comprises voltage electrodes 2 in contact with the borehole and a high precision magnetometer 3. Such devices can measure the induced electric and magnetic fields up to about 100 to 500 meters from the borehole in which the fluid is injected. If necessary, a number of boreholes located around the borehole 1 within a range of about 500 meters can each be used for receiving a movable sensor arrangement 21 or a fixed arrangement 22 and obtaining corresponding measurements.
  • Measurable electric and magnetic fields are induced not only by the flow of pressurized injected fluid into rock formations surrounding the borehole, but also by backflow of the fracturing fluid, i.e. when it retreats into the borehole from the created fractures. This situation takes place when the pressure inside the borehole 1 is reduced, for example by means of valve 10, to a value equal or below the pressure of the fracturing fluid 7 in the formations and fractures. This backflow is schematically shown in FIG. 5 by the reversal of arrows 24. Such back propagation of fluid 7 induces measurable electric and magnetic fields which can be detected by electric field sensors 2 and magnetic field sensors 3. The signals from the sensors are supplied to measurement processing means 4 as described above with reference to FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 6 shows schematically an example of the invention, in which the borehole 1 is cased and the casing 25 has perforations 8. Cemented annulus 26 is provided around the casing 25 and a number of electric field sensors 2 are embedded in the annulus 26. Magnetic field sensors 3 are attached to a sensor arrangement 27 which is either movably or fixedly located in another borehole 9 situated from the borehole 1 at a distance allowing the sensors 3 to detect the magnetic field induced by fracturing liquid flowing back from fractures into the borehole 1 when valve 10 reduces the pressure inside the borehole 1. The signals from the sensors are supplied to measurement processing means 4 as described above with reference to FIG. 2.
  • The above examples described with references to FIG. 1 to 6 may be implemented in various combinations, for example, a number of sensor arrangements 21 or 27 may be movably or fixedly located in boreholes surrounding the borehole 1 in which fracturing fluid 7 is injected or flowing back from the created fractures. Such combinations may allow measurements to be taken simultaneously in a ring around the borehole 1. As an alternative, a sensor arrangement 21 or 27 can be placed sequentially in the boreholes encircling borehole 1. In further embodiments fixed and movable sensor arrangements 21 or 27 may be located in one and the same borehole.
  • A general block diagram of an exemplary apparatus for implementing the method is shown in FIG. 7. In the exemplary apparatus, signals from sensors 2 and 3 and from drive 13 are supplied to converting unit 14. Converting unit 14 outputs the signals in a form suitable for their further processing and storing in digital form in random-access memory (RAM) 16 and in data/program memory (DPM) 19. DPM 19 stores programs for implementing modelling calculations. Processing unit 15 receives data from RAM 16 and performs calculations to produce output information and signals to control pump 6, valve 10 and drive 13 by means of controlling unit 18. Output information from processing unit 15 is stored in RAM 16 and DPM 19. Output data may also be monitored at display unit 20. Synchronization and internal timing for the described units is provided by a clocking unit 17.
  • The method of the invention may be implemented by providing a forward model of an electric or magnetic field distribution for a given fracture shape and downhole pressure and evaluating the shape of fractures in the rock formations by minimizing errors between the forward model of electric and magnetic field distributions and the corresponding downhole measured distributions.
  • The forward model provides field distributions based on the following equations. The electrokinetic effect involves the generation of an electric current by fluid flow through porous media (the reverse effect involves inducing flow through the application of an electric field). Its primary cause is the difference in mobility of ions, some of which are fixed at the surface of the solid skeleton (matrix) of the porous medium, while dissolved counter ions move with the pore fluid (or force it to move, if an electric field is applied).
  • Macroscopically, the flow and electric current are described by the equations: u = - k η f p + β ψ ( 1 ) j = - S ( ψ - C p ) , C = α S ( 2 )
    in which k is the reservoir permeability, ηf is the reservoir fluid conductivity, p is the fluid pressure, ψ is the electrokinetic potential, S is the rock electric conductivity, and C is the electro-kinetic coupling coefficient.
  • The Onsager relation holds between the coupling coefficients C and β:
    β=α≡Cs  (3)
  • The magnetic field generated by the flow-induced current can be evaluated generally using Biot-Savart's law. However, for the specific case considered, it is more convenient to use an expression for the magnetic induction vector B in terms of the vector potential A:
    B=[∇×A]  (4)
    where the vector potential satisfies the equation (in SI units):
    ΔA=−μj  (5)
  • The forward model of electric field and magnetic field distributions is calculated by solving the equations above taking account of conservation laws, boundary conditions, symmetry consideration and Fourier transform used. The model cam also take into account the influence of several formation layers.
  • An example application is illustrated below during production from a reservoir. The formation is composed of three layers S1, S2 and S3, as shown in FIG. 8, and the electric conductivities of the layers, which have been previously measured with conventional resistivity wireline logs, are respectively about 0.001, 0.1 and 0.001 in Siemens/m. The fracture is entirely in the reservoir (i.e. layer S2) and is of height H and length 2L as shown in FIG. 8. The following dimensionless parameters are used:
    H*=H/L
    X*=x/L
    Y*=y/L
    Z*=z/L  (6)
  • FIGS. 9 a and 9 b show the expected electric potential predicted by the forward model as a function of X* and Y* at two different measurement depths (Z*). The distributions shown in these figures have characteristic lengths related to the fracture length and fracture height, and an anisotropy related to fracture direction.
  • The real distributions of electric and magnetic fields induced by fracturing fluid flow in the borehole and fractures are revealed by downhole measuring these fields at the same positions and times of measuring as used for calculating the forward model of the electric or magnetic field distributions. The measured distributions are also referred to as “observed electric or magnetic field distributions”. The orientation, length and height of the fracture are adjusted in the forward model until minimization of the difference between the forward model values and the measured values is achieved. In this way, the orientation, length and height of the fracture can be determined.
  • While the invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments described above, many equivalent modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art when given this disclosure. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention set forth above are considered to be illustrative and not limiting. Various changes to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
  • All the references mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims (10)

1. A method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
obtaining measured values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the forward or back propagation of a fracturing fluid between the fracture and the rock formation; and
determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values.
2. A method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
injecting into a borehole a fracturing fluid at a pressure allowing the fluid to create a fracture in a formation surrounding the borehole and to propagate into the fracture and further into the formation through the fracture faces;
measuring downhole the values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of the fluid into the fracture and further into the formation; and
determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values.
3. A method of evaluating the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, comprising the steps of:
injecting into a borehole a fracturing fluid at a pressure allowing the fluid to create a fracture in a formation surrounding the borehole and to propagate into the fractures and further into the formation through the fracture faces;
lowering the pressure in the borehole such that the fluid propagates back from the formation into the fracture;
measuring downhole the values of electric and/or magnetism fields induced by the back propagation of the fluid from the formation into the fracture; and
determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values.
4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the step of measuring the values of the electric and/or magnetic fields is performed inside a further borehole or boreholes.
5. The method according to claim 3, wherein the step of measuring the values of the electric and/or magnetic fields is performed inside a further borehole or boreholes.
6. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of:
providing a model from which expected values of the electric and/or magnetic field at the positions and/or times of the measured values can be calculated for adjustable fracture geometries and injection pressures;
wherein the geometry of the fracture is determined by adjusting the model to minimize the differences between the expected and measured values.
7. A method according to claim 2, further comprising the step of:
providing a model from which expected values of the electric and/or magnetic field at the positions and/or times of the measured values can be calculated for adjustable fracture geometries and injection pressures;
wherein the geometry of the fracture is determined by adjusting the model to minimize the differences between the expected and measured values.
8. A method according to claim 3, further comprising the step of:
providing a model from which expected values of the electric and/or magnetic field at the positions and/or times of the measured values can be calculated for adjustable fracture geometries and injection pressures;
wherein the geometry of the fracture is determined by adjusting the model to minimize the differences between the expected and measured values.
9. A computer system which is operatively configured to determine the geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a subterranean rock formation from measured values of electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the forward or back propagation of a fracturing fluid between the fracture and the rock formation.
10. An apparatus for evaluating a shape of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation, the apparatus comprising:
a rig for injecting a fracturing fluid into a borehole at a pressure allowing the injected fluid to create a fracture and propagate into the created fracture around the borehole;
at least one downhole tool for measuring electric and/or magnetic fields induced by the propagation of said fluid into the fracture through the fracture faces and by the propagation of this fluid back into the formation from the fracture; and
a computer system according to claim 9, for determining the geometry of the fracture from the measured values of the electric and/or magnetic fields.
US10/872,116 2003-07-25 2004-06-18 Evaluation of fracture geometries in rock formations Abandoned US20050017723A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/763,584 US7819181B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2007-06-15 Method and an apparatus for evaluating a geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
RU2003123596/03A RU2324813C2 (en) 2003-07-25 2003-07-25 Method and device for determining shape of cracks in rocks
RU2003123596 2003-07-25

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/763,584 Continuation-In-Part US7819181B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2007-06-15 Method and an apparatus for evaluating a geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050017723A1 true US20050017723A1 (en) 2005-01-27

Family

ID=32768747

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/872,116 Abandoned US20050017723A1 (en) 2003-07-25 2004-06-18 Evaluation of fracture geometries in rock formations
US11/763,584 Expired - Fee Related US7819181B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2007-06-15 Method and an apparatus for evaluating a geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/763,584 Expired - Fee Related US7819181B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2007-06-15 Method and an apparatus for evaluating a geometry of a hydraulic fracture in a rock formation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US20050017723A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2404253B (en)
RU (1) RU2324813C2 (en)

Cited By (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050056418A1 (en) * 2003-09-17 2005-03-17 Nguyen Philip D. System and method for sensing data in a well during fracturing
WO2005089404A2 (en) * 2004-03-16 2005-09-29 Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. System and method for combined microseismic and tiltmeter analysis
US20060023567A1 (en) * 2004-04-21 2006-02-02 Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. Microseismic fracture mapping using seismic source timing measurements for velocity calibration
US20060086497A1 (en) * 2004-10-27 2006-04-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wireless Communications Associated With A Wellbore
US20070024464A1 (en) * 2004-10-27 2007-02-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wireless Communications Associated with a Wellbore
US20080164037A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-07-10 Schlumberger Technology Corp. Mitigation of localized stress in tubulars
US20090288820A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2009-11-26 Oxane Materials, Inc. Method Of Manufacture And The Use Of A Functional Proppant For Determination Of Subterranean Fracture Geometries
CN102155254A (en) * 2011-02-28 2011-08-17 中国矿业大学 Method for extracting gas in low air permeability coal layer by pulse fracture anti-reflection
CN103244103A (en) * 2013-05-20 2013-08-14 中国石油大学(华东) Nano-magnetic-fluid-based hydraulic fracturing fracture real-time monitoring system and nano-magnetic-fluid-based hydraulic fracturing fracture real-timemonitoring method
CN103485759A (en) * 2013-09-10 2014-01-01 中国石油大学(北京) Oil-gas well hydraulically-created-fracture expansion visualization experiment method and oil-gas well hydraulically-created-fracture expansion visualization experiment device
US20140145716A1 (en) * 2011-07-12 2014-05-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nmr tracking of injected fluids
US8773132B2 (en) 2011-01-05 2014-07-08 Conocophillips Company Fracture detection via self-potential methods with an electrically reactive proppant
US8931553B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2015-01-13 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
CN104677778A (en) * 2014-12-22 2015-06-03 中国石油大学(华东) Device and method for evaluating temporarily freezing plugging properties of coalbed methane in process of fracturing
CN104777039A (en) * 2014-11-13 2015-07-15 中国石油大学(华东) Experimental device for research on rock high temperature thermal rupture under stress effect
US9133699B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2015-09-15 Conocophillips Company Electrical methods fracture detection via 4D techniques
US9134456B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2015-09-15 Conocophillips Company Electrical methods seismic interface box
US20160160634A1 (en) * 2014-10-31 2016-06-09 Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen System for non-invasive controlling of underground storages and method for detecting leakages in underground storages
US9434875B1 (en) 2014-12-16 2016-09-06 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically-conductive proppant and methods for making and using same
CN105986798A (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-10-05 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for evaluating applicability of arc pulse fracturing technology
CN106170605A (en) * 2014-03-05 2016-11-30 卡博陶粒有限公司 Proppant in induced breakage is positioned and the system and method for imaging
US9551210B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2017-01-24 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Systems and methods for removal of electromagnetic dispersion and attenuation for imaging of proppant in an induced fracture
US9618652B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2017-04-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events
US9678236B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2017-06-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture characterization by interferometric drillbit imaging, time reversal imaging of fractures using drill bit seismics, and monitoring of fracture generation via time reversed acoustics and electroseismics
US20170218748A1 (en) * 2014-05-19 2017-08-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nuclear magnetic resonance sensors embedded in cement
US10352145B2 (en) 2011-03-11 2019-07-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events
CN110186643A (en) * 2019-05-10 2019-08-30 中国地质大学(武汉) A method of monitoring crack rock unsaturation is with vapor transport rule
US10422208B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2019-09-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Stacked height growth fracture modeling
US10488546B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2019-11-26 Conocophillips Company Autonomous electrical methods node
US10502042B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2019-12-10 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Electric blender system, apparatus and method for use in fracturing underground formations using liquid petroleum gas
US10544667B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2020-01-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Modeling of interaction of hydraulic fractures in complex fracture networks
US10724353B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-07-28 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Dual pump VFD controlled system for electric fracturing operations
US10767465B1 (en) * 2011-08-09 2020-09-08 National Technology & Engineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc Simulating current flow through a well casing and an induced fracture
US11008505B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2021-05-18 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant
US20210334434A1 (en) * 2020-04-24 2021-10-28 Southwest Petroleum University Optimization method for dense cutting, temporary plugging and fracturing in shale horizontal well stage
US11255173B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2022-02-22 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Mobile, modular, electrically powered system for use in fracturing underground formations using liquid petroleum gas
US11708752B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2023-07-25 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc Multiple generator mobile electric powered fracturing system
US11955782B1 (en) 2022-12-16 2024-04-09 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc System and method for fracturing of underground formations using electric grid power

Families Citing this family (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030205376A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-11-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment
US7944211B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2011-05-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Characterization of formations using electrokinetic measurements
US8006754B2 (en) * 2008-04-05 2011-08-30 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Proppants containing dispersed piezoelectric or magnetostrictive fillers or mixtures thereof, to enable proppant tracking and monitoring in a downhole environment
US8797037B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2014-08-05 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean feature
US8841914B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2014-09-23 Baker Hughes Incorporated Electrolocation apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean feature
US8253417B2 (en) * 2008-04-11 2012-08-28 Baker Hughes Incorporated Electrolocation apparatus and methods for mapping from a subterranean well
US8689875B2 (en) * 2008-05-19 2014-04-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Formation treatment using electromagnetic radiation
US8006755B2 (en) * 2008-08-15 2011-08-30 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Proppants coated by piezoelectric or magnetostrictive materials, or by mixtures or combinations thereof, to enable their tracking in a downhole environment
US8427162B2 (en) * 2008-08-25 2013-04-23 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and method for detection of position of a component in an earth formation
IT1391797B1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2012-01-27 Eni Spa METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING THE GEOMETRY OF UNDERGROUND FRACTURES
EP2361394B1 (en) 2008-11-24 2022-01-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. A high frequency dielectric measurement tool
US8490693B2 (en) * 2009-02-17 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Determining fracture orientation using wellbore acoustic radial profiles
US9567819B2 (en) 2009-07-14 2017-02-14 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acoustic generator and associated methods and well systems
WO2011022012A1 (en) * 2009-08-20 2011-02-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture characterization using directional electromagnetic resistivity measurements
CN102763006B (en) 2010-02-20 2014-11-26 贝克休斯公司 Apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean variables
US20120193092A1 (en) * 2011-01-31 2012-08-02 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for tracking the location of fracturing fluid in a subterranean formation
US9068431B2 (en) * 2012-04-30 2015-06-30 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Flow sensing apparatus and methods for use in oil and gas wells
CA2877147A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-03 Schlumberger Canada Limited Electromagnetic imaging of proppant in induced fractures
US20140374091A1 (en) * 2013-06-20 2014-12-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Electromagnetic Imaging Of Proppant In Induced Fractures
WO2014025565A1 (en) * 2012-08-07 2014-02-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of magnetic liquids for imaging and mapping porous subterranean formations
WO2014032003A1 (en) * 2012-08-24 2014-02-27 Schlumberger Canada Limited System and method for performing stimulation operations
MX363972B (en) 2012-10-11 2019-04-10 Halliburton Energy Services Inc Fracture sensing system and method.
US10100635B2 (en) * 2012-12-19 2018-10-16 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Wired and wireless downhole telemetry using a logging tool
US10870793B2 (en) * 2013-01-04 2020-12-22 Carbo Ceramics, Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for energizing and detecting same in a single wellbore
CN103114848B (en) * 2013-01-18 2015-09-30 西南石油大学 A kind of formation fracture Space Reconstruction method measured based on rock core
US9377552B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2016-06-28 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and method for detecting a fracture in a rock formation using an electromagnetic source
US9097097B2 (en) * 2013-03-20 2015-08-04 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method of determination of fracture extent
CN103267979B (en) * 2013-05-20 2015-03-18 中国石油大学(华东) Reservoir stratum fracture detection system and detection method based on nanometer magnetofluid
MX368203B (en) * 2013-07-02 2019-09-24 Schlumberger Technology Bv Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events.
US9890627B2 (en) 2013-12-13 2018-02-13 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and methods for controlled fracturing in formations
CN103712897B (en) * 2014-01-07 2014-11-05 西南石油大学 Sand-carrying performance test device for fracturing liquid by adopting high-speed photography and digital image technologies
US9932809B2 (en) * 2014-03-07 2018-04-03 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracture geometry evaluation
US9529112B2 (en) 2014-04-11 2016-12-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Resistivity of chemically stimulated reservoirs
CA2945000C (en) 2014-04-24 2018-08-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture growth monitoring using em sensing
RS64824B1 (en) 2014-06-05 2023-12-29 Geoquest Systems Bv Method for improved design of hydraulic fracture height in a subterranean laminated rock formation
US20160024914A1 (en) * 2014-07-23 2016-01-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Monitoring matrix acidizing operations
GB2548044A (en) * 2014-12-30 2017-09-06 Halliburton Energy Services Inc Through-casing fiber optic magnetic induction system for formation monitoring
BR112017010748A2 (en) 2014-12-30 2018-01-09 Halliburton Energy Services Inc "system and method of monitoring a formation, and, sensor device".
US10718883B2 (en) 2014-12-30 2020-07-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Subterranean formation characterization using microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices
US10030497B2 (en) 2015-02-10 2018-07-24 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Method of acquiring information of hydraulic fracture geometry for evaluating and optimizing well spacing for multi-well pad
RU2668602C1 (en) * 2015-03-30 2018-10-02 Шлюмберже Текнолоджи Б.В. Determination of parameters of bottomhole fracture part of fracture with use of electromagnetic welding of bottomhole fracture part of fracture filled with conductive proppant
US10253598B2 (en) 2015-05-07 2019-04-09 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Diagnostic lateral wellbores and methods of use
US9988900B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2018-06-05 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Method of geometric evaluation of hydraulic fractures by using pressure changes
CN106501090B (en) * 2016-09-26 2019-02-15 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Crack characterizing method for hydraulic fracturing simulated experiment
FR3060636B1 (en) * 2016-12-20 2019-05-24 IFP Energies Nouvelles PROCESS FOR MONITORING SALINITY IN A SUBTERRANEAN FORMATION
CA3049959A1 (en) * 2017-01-13 2018-07-19 Board Of Regents, University Of Texas System Modular electrode tool for improved hydraulic fracture diagnostics
CN108664677B (en) * 2017-04-01 2021-08-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Oil and gas well production data analysis method
CN109098707B (en) * 2017-06-21 2022-02-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Vertical well fracture network fracturing adaptability evaluation method for gravel rock oil reservoir and vertical well fracture network fracturing method for gravel rock oil reservoir
CN110318743B (en) * 2018-03-30 2022-06-21 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Fracturing simulation test method and device for thin interbed shale oil reservoir
US11401803B2 (en) 2019-03-15 2022-08-02 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Determining fracture surface area in a well

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4427944A (en) * 1980-07-07 1984-01-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System for permeability logging by measuring streaming potentials
US5151658A (en) * 1989-12-29 1992-09-29 Chinetsu Gijutsu Kaihatsu Kabushiki Kaisha Three-dimensional detection system for detecting fractures and their distributions in the earth crust utilizing an artificial magnetic field and magnetic particle tracer
US5519322A (en) * 1994-02-22 1996-05-21 Compagnie Generale De Geophysique Magnetic field method and apparatus for evaluating in situ and/or measuring the premeability of a rock formation
US5642051A (en) * 1993-11-17 1997-06-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for surveying and monitoring a reservoir penetrated by a well including fixing electrodes hydraulically isolated within a well
US6330914B1 (en) * 1998-11-17 2001-12-18 Golder Sierra Llc Method and apparatus for tracking hydraulic fractures in unconsolidated and weakly cemented soils and sediments
US6441618B2 (en) * 2000-02-04 2002-08-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for monitoring the advance of seawater into fresh water aquifers near coastal cities
US6462549B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2002-10-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system for electroseismic monitoring of microseismicity
US6597178B1 (en) * 2002-10-18 2003-07-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sensor for detecting the magnetic field in the area of downhole casing
US6622093B1 (en) * 1999-09-28 2003-09-16 Science And Technology Agency National Research Institute For Earth Science And Disaster Prevention Method and system for predicting rapid motion in earth's crust on basis of electromagnetic field observation

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3496768A (en) * 1968-07-09 1970-02-24 Exxon Production Research Co Detection of movement of liquids in the earth
NO812051L (en) * 1980-07-07 1982-01-08 Schlumberger Ltd PROCEDURE AND APPARATUS FOR EXAMINING PERMEABILITY OF BASIC FORMATION
FR2684453B1 (en) 1991-11-28 1994-03-11 Schlumberger Services Petroliers METHOD AND DEVICE FOR LOGGING WITH ANNULAR AND AZIMUTAL ELECTRODES.
FR2727464A1 (en) 1994-11-29 1996-05-31 Schlumberger Services Petrol ELECTRICAL DIAGRAPHIC SENSOR AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
US5841280A (en) * 1997-06-24 1998-11-24 Western Atlas International, Inc. Apparatus and method for combined acoustic and seismoelectric logging measurements
US8302687B2 (en) * 2004-06-18 2012-11-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus for measuring streaming potentials and determining earth formation characteristics
US7520324B2 (en) * 2004-06-18 2009-04-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Completion apparatus for measuring streaming potentials and determining earth formation characteristics
US7388380B2 (en) * 2004-06-18 2008-06-17 Schlumberger Technology While-drilling apparatus for measuring streaming potentials and determining earth formation characteristics and other useful information
US7944211B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2011-05-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Characterization of formations using electrokinetic measurements

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4427944A (en) * 1980-07-07 1984-01-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System for permeability logging by measuring streaming potentials
US5151658A (en) * 1989-12-29 1992-09-29 Chinetsu Gijutsu Kaihatsu Kabushiki Kaisha Three-dimensional detection system for detecting fractures and their distributions in the earth crust utilizing an artificial magnetic field and magnetic particle tracer
US5642051A (en) * 1993-11-17 1997-06-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for surveying and monitoring a reservoir penetrated by a well including fixing electrodes hydraulically isolated within a well
US5519322A (en) * 1994-02-22 1996-05-21 Compagnie Generale De Geophysique Magnetic field method and apparatus for evaluating in situ and/or measuring the premeability of a rock formation
US6330914B1 (en) * 1998-11-17 2001-12-18 Golder Sierra Llc Method and apparatus for tracking hydraulic fractures in unconsolidated and weakly cemented soils and sediments
US6462549B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2002-10-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system for electroseismic monitoring of microseismicity
US6622093B1 (en) * 1999-09-28 2003-09-16 Science And Technology Agency National Research Institute For Earth Science And Disaster Prevention Method and system for predicting rapid motion in earth's crust on basis of electromagnetic field observation
US6441618B2 (en) * 2000-02-04 2002-08-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for monitoring the advance of seawater into fresh water aquifers near coastal cities
US6597178B1 (en) * 2002-10-18 2003-07-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sensor for detecting the magnetic field in the area of downhole casing

Cited By (76)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6978831B2 (en) * 2003-09-17 2005-12-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. System and method for sensing data in a well during fracturing
US20050056418A1 (en) * 2003-09-17 2005-03-17 Nguyen Philip D. System and method for sensing data in a well during fracturing
WO2005089404A3 (en) * 2004-03-16 2006-05-26 Pinnacle Technologies Inc System and method for combined microseismic and tiltmeter analysis
EA010524B1 (en) * 2004-03-16 2008-10-30 Пинэкл Текнолоджиз, Инк. System and method for combined microseismic and tiltmeter analysis
WO2005089404A2 (en) * 2004-03-16 2005-09-29 Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. System and method for combined microseismic and tiltmeter analysis
US20060081412A1 (en) * 2004-03-16 2006-04-20 Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. System and method for combined microseismic and tiltmeter analysis
US7660194B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2010-02-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Microseismic fracture mapping using seismic source timing measurements for velocity calibration
US20110141846A1 (en) * 2004-04-21 2011-06-16 Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. Microseismic fracture mapping using seismic source timing measurements for velocity calibration
US20060023567A1 (en) * 2004-04-21 2006-02-02 Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. Microseismic fracture mapping using seismic source timing measurements for velocity calibration
US7347271B2 (en) 2004-10-27 2008-03-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wireless communications associated with a wellbore
US20070024464A1 (en) * 2004-10-27 2007-02-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wireless Communications Associated with a Wellbore
US7477160B2 (en) 2004-10-27 2009-01-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wireless communications associated with a wellbore
US20060086497A1 (en) * 2004-10-27 2006-04-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wireless Communications Associated With A Wellbore
US7757775B2 (en) * 2007-01-09 2010-07-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Mitigation of localized stress in tubulars
US20080164037A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-07-10 Schlumberger Technology Corp. Mitigation of localized stress in tubulars
US9803135B2 (en) 2008-05-20 2017-10-31 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of manufacture and the use of a functional proppant for determination of subterranean fracture geometries
US20090288820A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2009-11-26 Oxane Materials, Inc. Method Of Manufacture And The Use Of A Functional Proppant For Determination Of Subterranean Fracture Geometries
US8168570B2 (en) 2008-05-20 2012-05-01 Oxane Materials, Inc. Method of manufacture and the use of a functional proppant for determination of subterranean fracture geometries
US9678236B2 (en) 2010-04-27 2017-06-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture characterization by interferometric drillbit imaging, time reversal imaging of fractures using drill bit seismics, and monitoring of fracture generation via time reversed acoustics and electroseismics
US9134456B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2015-09-15 Conocophillips Company Electrical methods seismic interface box
US10488546B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2019-11-26 Conocophillips Company Autonomous electrical methods node
US9133699B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2015-09-15 Conocophillips Company Electrical methods fracture detection via 4D techniques
US8773132B2 (en) 2011-01-05 2014-07-08 Conocophillips Company Fracture detection via self-potential methods with an electrically reactive proppant
CN102155254A (en) * 2011-02-28 2011-08-17 中国矿业大学 Method for extracting gas in low air permeability coal layer by pulse fracture anti-reflection
US10352145B2 (en) 2011-03-11 2019-07-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events
US11613979B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2023-03-28 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Mobile, modular, electrically powered system for use in fracturing underground formations using liquid petroleum gas
US11939852B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2024-03-26 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system
US11708752B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2023-07-25 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc Multiple generator mobile electric powered fracturing system
US10895138B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2021-01-19 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Multiple generator mobile electric powered fracturing system
US11391133B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2022-07-19 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system
US11391136B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2022-07-19 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system
US11255173B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2022-02-22 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Mobile, modular, electrically powered system for use in fracturing underground formations using liquid petroleum gas
US10876386B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-12-29 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Dual pump trailer mounted electric fracturing system
US10851634B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-12-01 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Dual pump mobile electrically powered system for use in fracturing underground formations
US11913315B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2024-02-27 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc Fracturing blender system and method using liquid petroleum gas
US11187069B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2021-11-30 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Multiple generator mobile electric powered fracturing system
US10837270B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-11-17 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc VFD controlled motor mobile electrically powered system for use in fracturing underground formations for electric fracturing operations
US10774630B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-09-15 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Control system for electric fracturing operations
US10724353B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-07-28 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Dual pump VFD controlled system for electric fracturing operations
US10718194B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-07-21 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Control system for electric fracturing operations
US10718195B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-07-21 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system
US10689961B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-06-23 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Multiple generator mobile electric powered fracturing system
US11851998B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2023-12-26 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system
US10502042B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2019-12-10 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Electric blender system, apparatus and method for use in fracturing underground formations using liquid petroleum gas
US11002125B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2021-05-11 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Control system for electric fracturing operations
US10648312B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2020-05-12 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Dual pump trailer mounted electric fracturing system
US10982521B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2021-04-20 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system
US20140145716A1 (en) * 2011-07-12 2014-05-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nmr tracking of injected fluids
US9658359B2 (en) * 2011-07-12 2017-05-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. NMR tracking of injected fluids
US10767465B1 (en) * 2011-08-09 2020-09-08 National Technology & Engineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc Simulating current flow through a well casing and an induced fracture
US10544667B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2020-01-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Modeling of interaction of hydraulic fractures in complex fracture networks
US10422208B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2019-09-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Stacked height growth fracture modeling
US9618652B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2017-04-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events
US11118438B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2021-09-14 Typhon Technology Solutions, Llc Turbine driven electric fracturing system and method
US10538695B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2020-01-21 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
US11008505B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2021-05-18 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant
US11162022B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2021-11-02 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
US8931553B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2015-01-13 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
CN103244103A (en) * 2013-05-20 2013-08-14 中国石油大学(华东) Nano-magnetic-fluid-based hydraulic fracturing fracture real-time monitoring system and nano-magnetic-fluid-based hydraulic fracturing fracture real-timemonitoring method
CN103485759A (en) * 2013-09-10 2014-01-01 中国石油大学(北京) Oil-gas well hydraulically-created-fracture expansion visualization experiment method and oil-gas well hydraulically-created-fracture expansion visualization experiment device
US20180210108A1 (en) * 2014-03-05 2018-07-26 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Systems and methods for locating and imaging proppant in an induced fracture
CN106170605A (en) * 2014-03-05 2016-11-30 卡博陶粒有限公司 Proppant in induced breakage is positioned and the system and method for imaging
US10578762B2 (en) * 2014-03-05 2020-03-03 Carbo Ceramics, Inc. Systems and methods for locating and imaging proppant in an induced fracture
US11143014B2 (en) * 2014-05-19 2021-10-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nuclear magnetic resonance sensors embedded in cement
US20170218748A1 (en) * 2014-05-19 2017-08-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nuclear magnetic resonance sensors embedded in cement
US9551210B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2017-01-24 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Systems and methods for removal of electromagnetic dispersion and attenuation for imaging of proppant in an induced fracture
US10514478B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2019-12-24 Carbo Ceramics, Inc Systems and methods for removal of electromagnetic dispersion and attenuation for imaging of proppant in an induced fracture
US20160160634A1 (en) * 2014-10-31 2016-06-09 Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen System for non-invasive controlling of underground storages and method for detecting leakages in underground storages
CN104777039A (en) * 2014-11-13 2015-07-15 中国石油大学(华东) Experimental device for research on rock high temperature thermal rupture under stress effect
US10167422B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2019-01-01 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically-conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically-conductive proppant
US9434875B1 (en) 2014-12-16 2016-09-06 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically-conductive proppant and methods for making and using same
CN104677778A (en) * 2014-12-22 2015-06-03 中国石油大学(华东) Device and method for evaluating temporarily freezing plugging properties of coalbed methane in process of fracturing
CN105986798A (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-10-05 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for evaluating applicability of arc pulse fracturing technology
CN110186643A (en) * 2019-05-10 2019-08-30 中国地质大学(武汉) A method of monitoring crack rock unsaturation is with vapor transport rule
US20210334434A1 (en) * 2020-04-24 2021-10-28 Southwest Petroleum University Optimization method for dense cutting, temporary plugging and fracturing in shale horizontal well stage
US11955782B1 (en) 2022-12-16 2024-04-09 Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), Llc System and method for fracturing of underground formations using electric grid power

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0413873D0 (en) 2004-07-21
RU2003123596A (en) 2005-02-10
RU2324813C2 (en) 2008-05-20
GB2404253A (en) 2005-01-26
GB2404253B (en) 2005-06-08
US7819181B2 (en) 2010-10-26
US20070256830A1 (en) 2007-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20050017723A1 (en) Evaluation of fracture geometries in rock formations
Haimson et al. ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation—part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF)
Molz et al. Development and application of borehole flowmeters for environmental assessment
Meier et al. An evaluation of Jacob's method for the interpretation of pumping tests in heterogeneous formations
Wiese et al. Hydraulic characterisation of the Stuttgart formation at the pilot test site for CO2 storage, Ketzin, Germany
Sharma et al. Slick water and hybrid fracs in the Bossier: Some lessons learnt
US9790788B2 (en) Apparatus and method for predicting properties of earth formations
US10126448B2 (en) Formation measurements using downhole noise sources
US20240061140A1 (en) Determination of geologic permeability correlative with magnetic permeability measured in-situ
Lacy Comparison of hydraulic-fracture orientation techniques
Djuraev et al. A review on conceptual and practical oil and gas reservoir monitoring methods
Warpinski Hydraulic fracture diagnostics
Haddad et al. Geomechanical and hydrogeological evaluation of a shallow hydraulic fracture at the Devine Fracture Pilot Site, Medina County, Texas
US9932809B2 (en) Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracture geometry evaluation
Malik et al. Microfracturing in Tight Rocks: A Delaware Basin Case Study
Miller et al. In-situ stress profiling and prediction of hydraulic fracture azimuth for the West Texas Canyon Sands formation
Branagan et al. Propagation of a Hydraulic Fracture into a Remote Observation Wellbore Results of C-Sand Experimentation at the GRI/DOE M-Site Project
Holditch et al. Prefracture and Postfracture Formation Evaluation Necessary To Characterize the Three-Dimensional Shape of a Hydraulic Fracture
Sadeghvishkaei Modelling of geomechanics for informed hydraulic fracturing operations
Meehan Hydraulically-fractured wells in heterogeneous reservoirs: Interaction, interference, and optimization
RU2453873C2 (en) Apparatus for measuring filtration potential and determining underground formation characteristics
Atkinson et al. The Department of Energy’s western gas sands project Multi-Well Experiment
Liu Optimizing hydraulic fracture spacing and lateral well spacing in tight/unconventional resource development through fully coupling stress shadowing effects and fluid flow–An integrated approach
Berumen et al. Integrated Reservoir Geomechanics Techniques in the Burgos Basin México: An Improved Gas Reservoirs Management
Skomorowski Modelling of Multistage Hydraulic Fracture Operations in Unconventional Resources–The Application of Geomechanics and Field Data to the Optimization of Fracture Spacing and Production

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ENTOV, VLADIMIR MORDUKHOVICH;GORDEEV, YURY NIKOLAEVICH;CHEKHONIN, EVGENY MIKHAILOVICH;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015129/0131;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040624 TO 20040701

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION