US20050089552A1 - Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering - Google Patents

Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050089552A1
US20050089552A1 US10/990,199 US99019904A US2005089552A1 US 20050089552 A1 US20050089552 A1 US 20050089552A1 US 99019904 A US99019904 A US 99019904A US 2005089552 A1 US2005089552 A1 US 2005089552A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
matrix
cells
fibers
fiber
ligament
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/990,199
Inventor
Gregory Altman
David Kaplan
Rebecca Horan
David Horan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Allergan Inc
Tufts University
Original Assignee
Tissue Regeneration Inc
Tufts University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tissue Regeneration Inc, Tufts University filed Critical Tissue Regeneration Inc
Priority to US10/990,199 priority Critical patent/US20050089552A1/en
Publication of US20050089552A1 publication Critical patent/US20050089552A1/en
Assigned to SERICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. reassignment SERICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TISSUE REGENERATION, INC.
Priority to US12/770,570 priority patent/US20100209405A1/en
Assigned to NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT reassignment NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT CONFIRMATORY LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON
Assigned to ALLERGAN, INC. reassignment ALLERGAN, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SERICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Priority to US13/074,282 priority patent/US20110189773A1/en
Priority to US13/751,514 priority patent/US20130197194A1/en
Priority to US14/514,742 priority patent/US20150104514A1/en
Assigned to NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH - DIRECTOR DEITR reassignment NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH - DIRECTOR DEITR CONFIRMATORY LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TUFTS UNIVERSITY
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/70Web, sheet or filament bases ; Films; Fibres of the matrix type containing drug
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/08Muscles; Tendons; Ligaments
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/12Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells
    • A61K35/28Bone marrow; Haematopoietic stem cells; Mesenchymal stem cells of any origin, e.g. adipose-derived stem cells
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • A61K38/16Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/17Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/14Macromolecular materials
    • A61L27/22Polypeptides or derivatives thereof, e.g. degradation products
    • A61L27/227Other specific proteins or polypeptides not covered by A61L27/222, A61L27/225 or A61L27/24
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/3604Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix characterised by the human or animal origin of the biological material, e.g. hair, fascia, fish scales, silk, shellac, pericardium, pleura, renal tissue, amniotic membrane, parenchymal tissue, fetal tissue, muscle tissue, fat tissue, enamel
    • A61L27/3608Bone, e.g. demineralised bone matrix [DBM], bone powder
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/3641Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix characterised by the site of application in the body
    • A61L27/3645Connective tissue
    • A61L27/3662Ligaments, tendons
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/38Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
    • A61L27/3804Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by specific cells or progenitors thereof, e.g. fibroblasts, connective tissue cells, kidney cells
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/38Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
    • A61L27/3804Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by specific cells or progenitors thereof, e.g. fibroblasts, connective tissue cells, kidney cells
    • A61L27/3821Bone-forming cells, e.g. osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoprogenitor cells
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/38Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
    • A61L27/3804Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by specific cells or progenitors thereof, e.g. fibroblasts, connective tissue cells, kidney cells
    • A61L27/3834Cells able to produce different cell types, e.g. hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, marrow stromal cells, embryonic stem cells
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/38Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
    • A61L27/3839Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells characterised by the site of application in the body
    • A61L27/3843Connective tissue
    • A61L27/386Ligaments, tendons
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/36Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
    • A61L27/38Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells
    • A61L27/3895Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix containing added animal cells using specific culture conditions, e.g. stimulating differentiation of stem cells, pulsatile flow conditions
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/40Composite materials, i.e. containing one material dispersed in a matrix of the same or different material
    • A61L27/44Composite materials, i.e. containing one material dispersed in a matrix of the same or different material having a macromolecular matrix
    • A61L27/48Composite materials, i.e. containing one material dispersed in a matrix of the same or different material having a macromolecular matrix with macromolecular fillers
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P19/00Drugs for skeletal disorders
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P19/00Drugs for skeletal disorders
    • A61P19/04Drugs for skeletal disorders for non-specific disorders of the connective tissue
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P21/00Drugs for disorders of the muscular or neuromuscular system
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P9/00Drugs for disorders of the cardiovascular system
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/435Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • C07K14/43504Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates
    • C07K14/43513Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates from arachnidae
    • C07K14/43518Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates from arachnidae from spiders
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N5/00Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
    • C12N5/06Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
    • C12N5/0602Vertebrate cells
    • C12N5/0652Cells of skeletal and connective tissues; Mesenchyme
    • C12N5/066Tenocytes; Tendons, Ligaments
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N5/00Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
    • C12N5/06Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
    • C12N5/0602Vertebrate cells
    • C12N5/0652Cells of skeletal and connective tissues; Mesenchyme
    • C12N5/0662Stem cells
    • C12N5/0663Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC)
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/12Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2430/00Materials or treatment for tissue regeneration
    • A61L2430/10Materials or treatment for tissue regeneration for reconstruction of tendons or ligaments
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2533/00Supports or coatings for cell culture, characterised by material
    • C12N2533/50Proteins
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/249921Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/29Coated or structually defined flake, particle, cell, strand, strand portion, rod, filament, macroscopic fiber or mass thereof
    • Y10T428/2913Rod, strand, filament or fiber
    • Y10T428/298Physical dimension
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/20Coated or impregnated woven, knit, or nonwoven fabric which is not [a] associated with another preformed layer or fiber layer or, [b] with respect to woven and knit, characterized, respectively, by a particular or differential weave or knit, wherein the coating or impregnation is neither a foamed material nor a free metal or alloy layer
    • Y10T442/2549Coating or impregnation is chemically inert or of stated nonreactance
    • Y10T442/2566Organic solvent resistant [e.g., dry cleaning fluid, etc.]

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to a matrix or scaffold used in the production of bioengineered tissue, particularly ligaments and tendons. More particularly, the invention relates to a novel silk-fiber-based matrix upon which pluripotent cells may be seeded ex vivo and which proliferate and differentiate thereon into an anterior cruciate ligament for implantation into a recipient in need thereof.
  • the ACL serves as a primary stabilizer of anterior tibial translation and as a secondary stabilizer of valgus-varus knee angulation, and is often susceptible to rupture or tear resulting from a flexion-rotation-valgus force associated with sports injuries and traffic accidents. Ruptures or tears often result in severe limitations in mobility, pain and discomfort, and the loss of an ability to participate in sports and exercise. Failures of the ACL are classified in three categories: (1) ligamentous (ligament fibers pull apart due to tensile stress), (2) failure at the bone-ligament interface without bone fracture, and (3) failure at the bone-ligament interface with bone fracture at the attachment site of bone and ligament. The most common type of ACL failure is the first category, ligamentous.
  • ACL has poor healing capabilities.
  • Total surgical replacement and reconstruction are required when injury to the ACL involves significant tear or rupture.
  • Four options have been utilized for repair or replacement of a damaged ACL: (1) autografts, (2) allografts, (3) xenografts, and (4) synthetic prostheses (degradable and non-degradable). To date, no surgical repair procedure has been shown to restore knee function completely, and novel treatment options would likely benefit a large number of patients.
  • a tendon gap model based on pre-stressed collagen sutures seeded with mesenchymal stem cells provided improved repair of large tendon defects (Young et al., 1998).
  • Goulet et al. modified the collagen-fibroblast system by using ligament fibroblasts in non-cross-linked collagen, with bone anchors to pre-stress the tissue and facilitate surgical implantation (Goulet et al., Tendons and Ligaments. In Principles of Tissue Engineering, Ed. R. Lanza, R. Langer, W. Chick. R. G. Landes Co. pp 633-643, R. G. Lanz Co. and Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif. (1997)).
  • Passive tension produced by growing the new ligament in a vertical position induced fibroblast elongation and the alignment of the cells and surrounding extracellular matrix.
  • Silk has been shown to offer new options for the design of biomaterials and tissue-engineering scaffolds with a wide range of mechanical properties (Sofia, S., et al., J. Biol. Mat. Res. 54: 139-148 (2001).
  • the dragline silk from the orb weaving spider, Nephilia clavipes has the highest strength of any natural fiber, and rivals the mechanical properties of synthetic high performance fibers.
  • Silks also resist failure in compression, are stable at high physiological temperatures, and are insoluble in aqueous and organic solvents.
  • silks have been studied as a model for the study of structure-function relationships of fibrous proteins. The manipulation of silk genes, both native and artificial versions, has provided insight into silk protein expression, assembly, and properties.
  • Tissue engineering can potentially provide improved clinical options in orthopaedic medicine through the in vitro generation of biologically based functional tissues for transplantation at the time of injury or disease. Further, adult stem cells are becoming increasingly recognized for their potential to generate different cell types and thereby function effectively in vitro or in vivo in tissue repair. (Sussman, M. Nature 410: 640 (2001). The knee joint geometry and kinematics and the resultant effects on ACL structure must be incorporated into the construct design if a tissue engineered ACL generated in vivo is to successfully stabilize the knee and function in vivo. A mismatch in the ACL structure-function relationship would result in graft failure.
  • tissue culture bioengineered anterior cruciate ligaments have failed to address one or more of the following issues: (1) the lack of a readily available cell or tissue source, (2) the unique structure (e.g., crimp pattern, peripheral helical pattern and isometric fiber organization) of an ACL, and (3) the necessary remodeling time in vivo for progenitor cells to differentiate and/or autologous cells to infiltrate the graft, thus extending the time a patient must incur a destabilized knee and rehabilitation.
  • the development of a matrix for generating more fully functional bioengineered anterior cruciate ligaments would greatly benefit the specific field of knee reconstructive surgery, and would also provide wider benefits to the overall field of in vitro tissue generation and replacement surgery.
  • the present invention provides a novel silk-fiber-based matrix for producing ligaments and tendons ex vivo. More specifically, the present invention is directed to engineering mechanically and biologically functional anterior cruciate ligament using a novel silk-fiber-based matrix that may be seeded with pluripotent cells, such as bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs).
  • BMSCs bone marrow stromal cells
  • the mechanically and biologically autologous or allogenic anterior cruciate ligament comprised of the novel matrix and pluripotent cells may be prepared within a bioreactor environment to induce de novo ligament tissue formation in vitro prior to implantation.
  • the novel silk-fiber-based matrix supports BMSC differentiation towards ligament lineage without the need for directed mechanical stimulation during culture within a bioreactor. The inventors believe that mechanical stimulation will serve only to enhance the differentiation and tissue development process.
  • the present invention also provides a method for the generation of tissue engineered ACL ex vivo using the novel silk-fiber-based matrix that comprises the steps of seeding pluripotent stem cells in the silk-fiber-based matrix, anchoring the seeded matrix by attachment to at least two anchors, and culturing the cells within the matrix under conditions appropriate for cell growth and regeneration.
  • the culturing step may comprise the additional step of subjecting the matrix to one or more mechanical forces via movement of one or both of the attached anchors.
  • pluripotent cells, and more particularly bone marrow stromal cells are used.
  • Suitable anchor materials comprise any materials to which the matrix can attach (either temporarily or permanently), and which supports ligament and tendon tissue growth or bone tissue growth at the anchors.
  • Anchor materials include hydroxyappatite, demineralized bone, and bone (allogenic or autologous).
  • Anchor materials may also include titanium, stainless steel, high density polyethylene, Dacron and Teflon, amongst other materials.
  • Goinopra coral which has been treated to convert the calcium carbonate to calcium phosphate has also been used as an anchor material.
  • the mechanical forces to which the matrix may be subjected mimic mechanical stimuli experienced by an anterior cruciate ligament in vivo. This is accomplished by delivering the appropriate combination of tension, compression, torsion and shear, to the matrix.
  • the bioengineered ligament which is produced according to the present invention is advantageously characterized by a cellular orientation and/or matrix crimp pattern in the direction of applied mechanical forces, and also by the production of ligament and tendon specific markers including collagen type I, collagen type III, and fibronectin proteins along the axis of mechanical load produced by the mechanical forces or stimulation, if such forces are applied.
  • the ligament or tendon is characterized by the presence of fiber bundles which are arranged into a helical organization.
  • Another aspect of the present invention is a method for producing a wide range of ligament and tendon types ex vivo using the novel silk-fiber-based matrix, and an adaptation of the method for producing an anterior cruciate ligament by adapting the matrix (e.g., geometry, organization, composition)(see Example 1) and anchor size to reflect the size of the specific type of ligament or tendon to be produced (e.g., posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint), and also adapting the specific combination of forces applied, to mimic the mechanical stimuli experienced in vivo by the specific type of ligament or tendon to be produced.
  • the matrix e.g., geometry, organization, composition
  • anchor size e.g., medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or tempo
  • Similar adaptations of this method can be made to produce other tissues ex vivo from pluripotent stem cells, by adapting additional matrix compositions, geometries, organizations, and the mechanical forces applied during cell culture to mimic stresses experienced in vivo by the specific tissue type to be produced.
  • the methods of the present invention can be further modified to incorporate other stimuli experienced in vivo by the particular developing tissue. Some examples of other stimuli include chemical stimuli and electro-magnetic stimuli.
  • tissue is intended to take on its generally recognized biological/medical definition to those of skill in the art.
  • tissue is defined in Stedman's Medical Dictionary as:
  • ligaments or tendons which are produced by the methods of the present invention.
  • Some examples of ligaments or tendons that can be produced include anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint.
  • Other tissues that may be produced by methods of the present invention include cartilage (both articular and meniscal), bone, muscle, skin and blood vessels.
  • FIG. 1A is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of single native silk fiber having a sericin coating
  • FIG. 1B illustrates SEM of the silk fiber of FIG. 1A extracted for 60 min at 37° C.
  • FIG. 1C illustrates SEM of the silk fiber of FIG. 1A extracted for 60 min at 90° C. and illustrating complete removal of the sericin coating
  • FIG. 1D is a chart showing ultimate tensile strength (UTS) as a function of extraction conditions
  • FIG. 2A illustrates a single cord of Matrix 1 having a wire-rope geometry composed of two levels of twisting hierarchy.
  • Matrix 1 When six cords are used in parallel (e.g., Matrix 1 ), the matrix has mechanical properties similar to a native ACL.
  • FIG. 2B illustrates a single cord of Matrix 2 having a wire-rope geometry composed of three levels of twisting hierarchy.
  • Matrix 2 When six cords are used in parallel (e.g., Matrix 2 ), the matrix has mechanical properties similar to a native ACL.
  • FIG. 4A illustrates SEM of extracted silk fibroin prior to seeding with cells
  • FIG. 4B illustrates SEM of bone marrow stromal cells seeded and attached on silk fibroin immediately post seeding
  • FIG. 4C illustrates SEM of bone marrow cells attached and spread on silk fibroin 1 day post seeding
  • FIG. 4D illustrates SEM of bone marrow stromal cells seeded on silk fibroin 14 days post seeding forming an intact cell-extracellular matrix sheet
  • FIG. 5A illustrates a 3 cm length of the silk fibroin cord illustrated in FIG. 2A and seeded with bone marrow stromal cells, cultured for 14 days in a static environment and stained with MTT to show even cell coverage of the matrix following the growth period;
  • FIG. 5B illustrates a control strand of silk fibroin cord 3 cm in length stained with MTT
  • FIG. 6A is a chart illustrating bone marrow stromal cell proliferation on silk fibroin Matrix 1 determined by total cellular DNA over 21 day culture period indicating a significant increase in cell proliferation after 21 days of culture;
  • FIG. 6B is a bar graph illustrating bone marrow stromal cell proliferation on silk fibroin Matrix 2 determined by total cellular DNA over 14 day culture period indicating a significant increase in cell proliferation after 14 days of culture;
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the ultimate tensile strength of a 30 silk fiber extracted construct which is either seeded with bone marrow stromal cells or non-seeded over 21 days of culture in physiological growth conditions;
  • FIG. 8 illustrates gel eletrophoretic analysis of RT-PCR amplification of selected markers over time.
  • the gel shows upregulation in both collagen types I and III expression levels normalized to the housekeeping gene, GAPDH by bone marrow stromal cell grown on Matrix 2 over 14 days in culture.
  • Collagen type II (as a marker for cartilage)
  • bone sialoprotein (as a marker of bone tissue formation) were not detected indicating a ligament specific differentiation response by the BMSCs when cultured with Matrix 2 .
  • FIG. 9 illustrates a single cord of Matrix 1 (not seeded at the time of implantation) following six weeks of implantation in vivo and used to reconstruct the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in a rabbit model.
  • A shows Matrix 1 fibroin fibers surrounded by progenitor host cells and tissue ingrowth into the matrix and around the individual fibroin fibers visualized by hematoxylin and eosin staining;
  • B shows collagenous tissue ingrowth into the matrix and around the individual fibroin fibers visualized by trichrome staining; and
  • Collagen type II (as a marker for cartilage) and bone sialoprotein (as a marker of bone tissue formation) were not detected indicating a ligament specific differentiation response; and
  • FIG. 11 illustrates real-time quantitative RT-PCR at 14 days which yielded a transcript ratio of collagen I to collagen III, normalized to GAPDH, of 8.9:1.
  • the present invention is directed to a novel silk-fiber-based matrix upon which pluripotent cells may be seeded and which proliferate and differentiate into ligament and tendon fibroblasts resulting in the formation of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), or other ligaments, tendons or tissues.
  • ACL anterior cruciate ligament
  • the novel silk-fiber-based matrix is designed having fibers in a wire-rope (twisted or braided-like) geometry, which exhibits mechanical properties identical to a natural anterior cruciate ligament (see Table 1, infra) and where simple variations in matrix organization and geometry can result in the formation of any desired ligament or tendon tissue (see Table 2, infra).
  • the present invention is also based on the finding that pluripotent bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) isolated and cultured as described in Example 1, seeded on the silk-fiber-based matrix, and cultured in a bioreactor under static conditions will undergo ligament and tendon specific differentiation forming viable tissue.
  • BMSCs bone marrow stromal cells
  • histomorphological properties of a bioengineered tissue produced in vitro generated from pluripotent cells within a matrix are affected by the direct application of mechanical force to the matrix during tissue generation.
  • One aspect of the present invention relates to a matrix comprised of silk fibers having a wire-rope (twisted or braided-like) geometry, as illustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
  • Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 were selected such that the silk prostheses are similar to the ACL biomechanical properties in ultimate tensile strength, linear stiffness, yield point and % elongation at break, serving as a solid starting point for the development of a tissue engineered ACL.
  • the ability to generate two matrices with differing geometries both resulting in mechanical properties which mimic properties of the ACL indicates that an infinite number of geometrical configurations exist to achieve the desired mechanical properties.
  • an alternative geometry for any desired ligament or tendon tissue may comprise any number, combination or organization of cords, strands, bundles, groups and fibers (see Table 2, infra) that result in a matrix construct with applicable mechanical properties that mimic those of the ligament or tendon desired.
  • one (1) ACL prosthesis may have any number of cords in parallel ranging from a single cord to an infinite number of cords provided there is a means of anchoring the final matrix in vitro or in vivo.
  • twisting levels where a single level is defined as either a group, bundle, strand or cord
  • the invention is not, however, limited with respect to the wire-rope geometry as described, and any geometry or combinations of geometries (e.g., parallel, twisted, braided, mesh-like) can be used that results in matrix mechanical properties similar to the ACL (i.e., >2000 N ultimate tensile strength, between 100-600 N/mm linear stiffness for a native ACL or commonly used replacement graft such as the patellar tendon with length between 26-30 mm) or to the desired ligament and tendon that is to be produced.
  • the number of fibers and geometry of both Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 were selected to generate mechanically appropriate ACL matrices, or other desired ligament or tendon matrices (e.g., posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)).
  • PCL posterior cruciate ligament
  • a single cord of the six-cord Matrix 1 construct was used to reconstruct the medial collateral ligament (MC) in a rabbit (see FIG. 9 ).
  • the mechanical properties of the silk six-cord constructs of Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 are described in Table 1 and in FIG. 3 . Additional geometries and their relating mechanical properties are listed in Table 2 as an example of the large degree of design freedom that would result in a matrix applicable in ACL tissue engineering in accordance with the present invention. TABLE 1 UTS Stiffness Yield Pt.
  • Matrix 1 and 2 have been developed as shown in example 1; Matrix 3 would yield a single bundle prosthesis, Matrix 4 would yield a 2 strand prosthesis, Matrix 5 would yield a 3 cord prosthesis, Matrix 6 is another variation of a 6 cord prosthesis, and Matrix 7 will yield a 12 cord prosthesis.
  • the silk-fiber based matrix is comprised solely of silk.
  • Types and sources of silk include the following: silks from silkworms, such as Bombyx mori and related species; silks from spiders, such as Nephila clavipes; silks from genetically engineered bacteria, yeast mammalian cells, insect cells, and transgenic plants and animals; silks obtained from cultured cells from silkworms or spiders; native silks; cloned full or partial sequences of native silks; and silks obtained from synthetic genes encoding silk or silk-like sequences.
  • the native silk fibroin obtained from the Bombyx mori silkworms are coated with a glue-like protein called sericin, which typically is extracted from the fibers before the fibers which make up the matrix are seeded with cells.
  • the matrix may be comprised of a composite of: (1) silk and collagen fibers (2) silk and collagen foams, meshes, or sponges, or a composite of (3) silk fibroin fibers and silk foams, meshes, or sponges, (4) silk and biodegradable polymers (e.g., cellulose, cotton, gelatin, poly lactide, poly glycolic, poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly caproloactone, polyamides, polyanhydrides, polyaminoacids, polyortho esters, poly acetals, proteins, degradable polyurethanes, polysaccharides, polycyanoacrylates, Glycosamino glycans—e.g., chrondroitin sulfate, heparin, etc., Polysaccharides—native, reprocessed or genetically engineered versions—e.g.
  • biodegradable polymers e.g., cellulose, cotton, gelatin, poly lactide, poly
  • FIG. 10 illustrates the ability of collagen fibers to support BMSC growth and ligament specific differentiation.
  • the matrix of the present invention may also be treated to enhance cell proliferation and/or tissue differentiation thereon.
  • Exemplary matrix treatments for enhancing cell proliferation and tissue differentiation include, but are not limited to, metals, irradiation, crosslinking, chemical surface modifications (e.g. RGD (arg-gly-asp) peptide coating, fibronectin coating, coupling growth factors), and physical surface modifications.
  • a second aspect of the present invention relates to a mechanically and biologically functional ACL formed from a novel silk-fiber-based matrix and autologous or allogenic (depending on the recipient of the tissue) bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) seeded on the matrix.
  • the silk-fiber-based matrix induces stromal cell differentiation towards ligament lineage without the need for any mechanical stimulation during bioreactor cultivation.
  • BMSCs seeded on the silk-fiber-based matrix and grown in a petri dish begin to attach and spread (see FIG. 4 ), proliferate covering the matrix (see FIGS. 5 and 6 ) and differentiate as shown by the expression of ligament specific markers (see FIG. 8 ). Markers for cartilage (collagen type II) and for bone (bone sialoprotein) were not expressed (see FIG. 8 ). Data illustrating the expression of ligament specific markers is set forth in Example 2.
  • the present invention relates to a method for producing an ACL ex vivo.
  • Cells capable of differentiating into ligament cells are grown under conditions which simulate the movements and forces experienced by an ACL in vivo through the course of embryonic development into mature ligament function. This is accomplished by the following steps: under sterile conditions, pluripotent cells are seeded within a three dimensional silk-fiber-based matrix to which cells can adhere and which is advantageously of cylindrical shape.
  • the three dimensional silk-fiber based matrix used in the method serves as a preliminary matrix, which is supplemented and possibly even replaced by extracellular matrix components produced by the differentiating cells.
  • Use of the novel silk-fiber-based matrix may enhance or accelerate the development of the ACL.
  • novel silk-fiber-based matrix which has specific mechanical properties (e.g., increased tensile strength) that can withstand strong forces prior to reinforcement from cellular extracellular matrix components.
  • Other advantageous properties of the novel silk-fiber based preliminary matrix include, without limitation, biocompatibility and susceptibility to biodegradation.
  • the pluripotent cells may be seeded within the preliminary matrix either pre- or post-matrix formation, depending upon the particular matrix used and the method of matrix formation. Uniform seeding is preferable. In theory, the number of cells seeded does not limit the final ligament produced, however optimal seeding may increase the rate of generation. Optimal seeding amounts will depend on the specific culture conditions. In one embodiment, the matrix is seeded with from about 0.05 to 5 times the physiological cell density of a native ligament.
  • pluripotent cells are used in the method. Such cells have the ability to differentiate into a wide variety of cell types in response to the proper differentiation signals and to express ligament specific markers. More specifically, the method requires the use of cells that have the ability to differentiate into cells of ligament and tendon tissue. In a preferred embodiment, bone marrow stromal cells are used. If the resulting bioengineered ligament is to be transplanted into a patient, the cells should be derived from a source that is compatible with the intended recipient. Although the recipient will generally be a human, applications in veterinary medicine also exist. In one embodiment, the cells are obtained from the recipient (autologous), although compatible donor cells may also be used to make allogenic ligaments.
  • allogenic ligaments e.g., using cells from another human such as bone marrow stromal cells isolated from donated bone marrow or ACL fibroblasts isolated from donated ACL tissue
  • human anterior cruciate ligament fibroblast cells isolated from intact donor ACL tissue e.g. cadaveric or from total knee transplantations
  • ruptured ACL tissue e.g., harvested at the time of surgery from a patient undergoing ACL reconstruction
  • bone marrow stromal cells e.g., using cells from another human such as bone marrow stromal cells isolated from donated bone marrow or ACL fibroblasts isolated from donated ACL tissue
  • ruptured ACL tissue e.g., harvested at the time of surgery from a patient undergoing ACL reconstruction
  • bone marrow stromal cells e.g., harvested at the time of surgery from a patient undergoing ACL reconstruction
  • ligaments or tendons including, but not limited to, the posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint other than ACL, cartilage, bone and other tissues may be engineered with the matrix in accordance with the method of the present invention.
  • the cells to be seeded on the matrix are selected in accordance with the tissue to be produced (e.g., pluripotent or of the desired tissue type).
  • Cells seeded on the matrix in accordance with the present invention may be autologous or allogenic. The use of autologous cells effectively creates an allograft or autograft for implantation in a recipient.
  • Bone marrow stromal cells are a type of pluripotent cell, and are also referred to in the art as mesenchymal stem cells or simply as stromal cells.
  • the source of these cells can be autologous or allogenic.
  • the present invention also contemplates the use of adult or embryonic stem or pluripotent cells, in so long as the proper environment (either in vivo or in vitro), seeded on the silk-fiber based matrix, can recapitulate an ACL or any other desired ligament or tissue in extracellular matrix composition (e.g., protein, glycoprotein content) organization, structure or function.
  • Fibroblast cells are also contemplated by the present invention for seeding on the inventive matrix. Since fibroblast cells are often not referred to as pluripotent cells, fibroblasts are intended to include mature human ACL fibroblasts (autologous or allogenic) isolated from ACL tissue, fibroblasts from other ligament tissue, fibroblasts from tendon tissue, from netonatal foreskin, from umbilical cord blood, or from any cell, whether mature or pluripotent, mature dedifferentiated, or genetically engineered, such that when cultured in the proper environment (either in vivo or in vitro), and seeded on the silk-fiber based matrix, can recapitulate an ACL or any other desired ligament or tissue in extracellular matrix composition (e.g., protein, glycoprotein content), organization, structure or function.
  • extracellular matrix composition e.g., protein, glycoprotein content
  • the faces of the matrix cylinder are each attached to anchors, through which a range of forces are to be applied to the matrix. To facilitate force delivery to the matrix, it is preferable that the entire surface of each respective face of the matrix contact the face of the respective anchors.
  • Anchors with a shape which reflects the site of attachment e.g., cylindrical
  • Anchors with a shape which reflects the site of attachment are best suited for use in this method.
  • the anchors must be made of a material suitable for matrix attachment, and the resulting attachment should be strong enough to endure the stress of the mechanical forces applied.
  • the anchors be of a material which is suitable for the attachment of extracellular matrix which is produced by the differentiating cells.
  • the anchors support bony tissue in-growth (either in vitro or in vivo) while anchoring the developing ligament.
  • suitable anchor material include, without limitation, hydroxyappatite, Goinopra coral, demineralized bone, bone (allogenic or autologous).
  • Anchor materials may also include titanium, stainless steel, high density polyethylene, Dacron and Teflon.
  • anchor material may be created or further enhanced by infusing a selected material with a factor which promotes either ligament matrix binding or bone matrix binding or both.
  • infuse is considered to include any method of application which appropriately distributes the factor onto the anchor (e.g., coating, permeating, contacting).
  • factors include without limitation, laminin, fibronectin, any extracellular matrix protein that promotes adhesion, silk, factors which contain arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) peptide binding regions or the RGD peptides themselves.
  • Growth factors or bone morphogenic protein can also be used to enhance anchor attachment.
  • anchors may be pre-seeded with cells (e.g., stem cells, ligament cells, osteoblasts, osteogenic progenitor cells) which adhere to the anchors and bind the matrix, to produce enhanced matrix attachment both in vitro and in vivo.
  • cells e.g., stem cells, ligament cells, osteoblasts, osteogenic progenitor cells
  • An exemplary anchor system is disclosed in applicant's co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 09/_______.
  • the matrix is attached to the anchors via contact with the anchor face or alternatively by actual penetration of the matrix material through the anchor material. Because the force applied to the matrix via the anchors dictates the final ligament produced, the size of the final ligament produced is, in part, dictated by the size of the attachment site of the anchor.
  • an anchor of appropriate size to the desired final ligament should be used.
  • a preferred anchor shape for the formation of an ACL is a cylinder. However, one of skill in the art will appreciate that other anchor shapes and sizes will also function adequately.
  • anchors have an appropriate size and composition for direct insertion into bone tunnels in the femur and tibia of a recipient of the bioengineered ligament.
  • anchors may be used only temporarily during in vitro culture, and then removed when the matrix alone is implanted in vivo.
  • the novel silk-fiber-based matrix is seeded with BMSCs and cultured in a bioreactor.
  • Two types of growth environments currently exist that may be used in accordance with this invention: (1) the in vitro bioreactor apparatus system, and (2) the in vivo knee joint, which serves as a “bioreactor” as it provides the physiologic environment including progenitor cells and stimuli (both chemical and physical) necessary for the development of a viable ACL given a matrix with proper biocompatible and mechanical properties.
  • the bioreactor apparatus provides optimal culture conditions for the formation of a ligament in terms of differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production, and which thus provides the ligament with optimal mechanical and biological properties prior to implantation in a recipient.
  • ECM extracellular matrix
  • a petri dish may be considered to be the bioreactor within which conditions appropriate for cell growth and regeneration exist, i.e., a static environment.
  • cells may also be cultured on the matrix without the application of any mechanical forces, i.e., in a static environment.
  • any mechanical forces i.e., in a static environment.
  • the silk-fiber based matrix alone, with no in vitro applied mechanical forces or stimulation when seeded and cultured with BMSCs, induces the cells to proliferate and express ligament and tendon specific markers (See Example 2 and FIG. 8 ).
  • the knee joint may serve as a physiological growth and development environment that can provide the cells and the correct environmental signals (chemical and physical) to the matrix such that an ACL technically develops.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates the effects of the medial collateral knee joint environment on medial collateral ligament (MCL) development when only a non-seeded silk-based matrix with appropriate MCL mechanical properties is implanted for 6 weeks in vivo.
  • MCL medial collateral ligament
  • the applied mechanical stimulation was shown to influence the morphology, and cellular organization of the progenitor cells within the resulting tissue.
  • the extracellular matrix components secreted by the cells and organization of the extracellular matrix throughout the tissue was also significantly influenced by the forces applied to the matrix during tissue generation.
  • the cells and extracellular matrix aligned along the axis of load, reflecting the in vivo organization of a native ACL which is also along the various load axes produced from natural knee joint movement and function.
  • the matrix alone may be implanted in vivo, seeded with ACL cells from the patient and exposed in vivo to mechanical signaling via the patient.
  • the cells When the matrix is seeded with cells prior to implantation, the cells are cultured within the matrix under conditions appropriate for cell growth and differentiation. During the culture process, the matrix may be subjected to one or more mechanical forces via movement of one or both of the attached anchors. The mechanical forces of tension, compression, torsion and shear, and combinations thereof, are applied in the appropriate combinations, magnitudes, and frequencies to mimic the mechanical stimuli experienced by an ACL in vivo.
  • Matrix strength is expected to change through the course of tissue development. Therefore, mechanical forces or strains applied will increase, decrease or remain constant in magnitude, duration, frequency and variety over the period of ligament generation, to appropriately correspond to matrix strength at the time of application.
  • the connection of the tibia and femur by the ACL between provides six degrees of freedom when considering the motions of the two bones relative to each other: the tibia can move in the three directions and can rotate relative to the axes for each of these three directions.
  • the knee is restricted from achieving the full ranges of these six degrees of freedom due to the presence of ligaments and capsulear fibers and the knee surfaces themselves (Biden et al., Experimental methods used to evaluate knee ligament function. In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function. Injury and Repair, Ed. D. Daniel et al. Raven Press, pp. 135-151 (1990)). Small translational movements are also possible.
  • the attachment sites of the ACL are responsible for its stabilizing roles in the knee joint.
  • the ACL functions as a primary stabilizer of anterior-tibial translation, and as a secondary stabilizer of valgus-varus angulation, and tibial rotation (Shoemaker et al., The limits of knee motion. In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury and Repair, Ed. D. Daniel et al. Raven Press, pp. 1534-161 (1990)). Therefore, the ACL is responsible for stabilizing the knee in three of the six possible degrees of freedom. As a result, the ACL has developed a specific fiber organization and overall structure to perform these stabilizing functions. The present invention simulates these conditions in vitro to produce a tissue with similar structure and fiber organization.
  • the extent of mechanical stresses experienced by the ACL can be similarly summarized.
  • the ACL undergoes cyclic loads of about 400 N between one and two million cycles per year (Chen et al., J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 14: 567-586 (1980). It is also critical to consider linear stiffness ( ⁇ 182 N/mm), ultimate deformation (100% of ACL) and energy absorbed at failure (12.8 N-m) (Woo et al., The tensile properties of human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACL graft tissues. In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury and Repair, Ed. D. Daniel et al. Raven Press, pp. 279-289 (1990)) when developing an ACL surgical replacement.
  • the different mechanical forces that may be applied include, without limitation, tension, compression, torsion, and shear. These forces are applied in combinations which simulate forces experienced by an ACL in the course of natural knee joint movements and function. These movements include, without limitation, knee joint extension and flexion as defined in the coronal and sagittal planes, and knee joint flexion. Optimally, the combination of forces applied mimics the mechanical stimuli experienced by an anterior cruciate ligament in vivo as accurately as is experimentally possible. Varying the specific regimen of force application through the course of ligament generation is expected to influence the rate and outcome of tissue development, with optimal conditions to be determined empirically. Potential variables in the regimen include, without limitation: (1) strain rate, (2) percent strain, (3) type of strain, e.g.
  • the fiber bundles of a native ligament are arranged into a helical organization.
  • the mode of attachment and the need for the knee joint to rotate ⁇ 140° of flexion has resulted in the native ACL inheriting a 90° twist and with the peripheral fiber bundles developing a helical organization.
  • This unique biomechanical feature allows the ACL to sustain extremely high loading.
  • this helical organization of fibers allows anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior fibers to remain relatively isometric in respect to one another for all degrees of flexion, thus load can be equally distributed to all fiber bundles at any degree of knee joint flexion stabilizing the knee throughout all ranges of joint motion.
  • mechanical forces that simulate a combination of knee joint flexion and knee joint extension are applied to the developing ligament to produce an engineered ACL which possesses this same helical organization.
  • the mechanical apparatus used in the experiments presented in the Examples below provides control over strain and strain rates (both translational and rotational). The mechanical apparatus will monitor the actual load experienced by the growing ligaments, serving to ‘teach’ the ligaments over time through monitoring and increasing the loading regimes.
  • the bioengineered ligament produced by these methods is characterized by cellular orientation and/or a matrix crimp pattern in the direction of the mechanical forces applied during generation.
  • the ligament is also characterized by the production/presence of extracellular matrix components (e.g., collagen type I, and type III, fibronectin, and tenascin-C proteins) along the axis of mechanical load experienced during culture.
  • extracellular matrix components e.g., collagen type I, and type III, fibronectin, and tenascin-C proteins
  • the ligament fiber bundles are arranged into a helical organization, as discussed above.
  • the above methods using the novel silk-fiber-based matrix are not limited to the production of an ACL, but can also be used to produce other ligaments and tendons found in the knee (e.g., posterior cruciate ligament) or other parts of the body (e.g., hand, wrist, ankle, elbow, jaw and shoulder), such as for example, but not limited to posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint. All moveable joints in a human body have specialized ligaments which connect the articular extremities of the bones in the joint.
  • Each ligament in the body has a specific structure and organization which is dictated by its function and environment.
  • the various ligaments of the body, their locations and functions are listed in Anatomy, Descriptive and Surgical (Gray, H., Eds. Pick, T. P., Howden, R., Bounty Books, New York (1977)), the pertinent contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the above described method for producing an ACL ex vivo can be adapted to produce bioengineered ligaments and tendons ex vivo which simulates any ligament or tendon in the body.
  • the specific type of ligament or tendon to be produced is predetermined prior to tissue generation since several aspects of the method vary with the specific conditions experienced in vivo by the native ligament or tendon.
  • the mechanical forces to which the developing ligament or tendon is subjected during cell culture are determined for the particular ligament or tendon type being cultivated.
  • the specific conditions can be determined by those skilled in the art by studying the native ligament or tendon and its environment and function.
  • One or more mechanical forces experienced by the ligament or tendon in vivo are applied to the matrix during culture of the cells in the matrix. The skilled practitioner will recognize that a ligament or tendon which is superior to those currently available can be produced by the application of a subset of forces experienced by the native ligament or tendon.
  • Another aspect of the present invention relates to the production of other tissue types ex vivo using methods similar to those described above for the generation of ligaments or tendons ex vivo.
  • the above described methods can also be applied to produce a range of engineered tissue products which involve mechanical deformation as a major part of their function, such as muscle (e.g., smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle), bone, cartilage, vertebral discs, and some types of blood vessels.
  • Bone marrow stomal cells possess the ability to differentiate into these as well as other tissues.
  • the geometry of the silk-based matrix or composite matrix can easily be adapted to the correct anatomical geometrical configuration of the desired tissue type. For example, silk fibroin fibers can be reformed in a cylindrical tube to recreate arteries.
  • the results presented in the Examples below indicate that growth in an environment which mimics the specific mechanical environment of a given tissue type will induce the appropriate cell differentiation to produce a bioengineered tissue which significantly resembles native tissue.
  • the ranges and types of mechanical deformation of the matrix can be extended to produce a wide range of tissue structural organization.
  • the cell culture environment reflects the in vivo environment experienced by the native tissue and the cells it contains, throughout the course of embryonic development to mature function of the cells within the native tissue, as accurately as possible.
  • Factors to consider when designing specific culture conditions to produce a given tissue include, without limitation, the matrix composition, the method of cell immobilization, the anchoring method of the matrix or tissue, the specific forces applied, and the cell culture medium.
  • the specific regimen of mechanical stimulation depends upon the tissue type to be produced, and is established by varying the application of mechanical forces (e.g., tension only, torsion only, combination of tension and torsion, with and without shear, etc.), the force amplitude (e.g., angle or elongation), the frequency and duration of the application, and the duration of the periods of stimulation and rest.
  • mechanical forces e.g., tension only, torsion only, combination of tension and torsion, with and without shear, etc.
  • the force amplitude e.g., angle or elongation
  • the frequency and duration of the application e.g., angle or elongation
  • the method for producing the specific tissue type ex vivo is an adaptation of the above described method for producing an ACL.
  • Components involved include pluripotent cells, a three-dimensional matrix to which cells can adhere, and a plurality of anchors which have a face suitable for matrix attachment.
  • the pluripotent cells preferably bone marrow stromal cells
  • the number of cells seeded is also not viewed as limiting, however, seeding the matrix with a high density of cells may accelerate tissue generation.
  • the specific forces applied are to be determined for each tissue type produced through examination of native tissue and the mechanical stimuli experienced in vivo.
  • a given tissue type experiences characteristic forces which are dictated by location and function of the tissue within the body. For instance, cartilage is known to experience a combination of shear and compression/tension in vivo, bone experiences compression. Determination of the specific mechanical stimuli experienced in vivo by a given tissue is within the means of one of skill in the art.
  • Additional stimuli can also be incorporated into the above described methods for producing bioengineered ligaments, tendons and other tissues.
  • Cell differentiation is known to be influenced by chemical stimuli from the environment, often produced by surrounding cells, such as secreted growth or differentiation factors, cell-cell contact, chemical gradients, and specific pH levels, to name a few.
  • Other more unique stimuli are experienced by more specialized types of tissues (e.g., the electrical stimulation of cardiac muscle).
  • tissue specific stimuli e.g., 1-10 ng/ml transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF- ⁇ 1) independently or in concert with the appropriate mechanical forces is expected to facilitate differentiation of the cells into a tissue which more closely approximates the specific natural tissue.
  • Tissues produced by the above described methods provide an unlimited pool of tissue equivalents for surgical implantation into a compatible recipient, particularly for replacement or repair of damaged tissue.
  • Engineered tissues may also be utilized for in vitro studies of normal or pathological tissue function, e.g., for in vitro testing of cell- and tissue-level responses to molecular, mechanical, or genetic manipulations.
  • tissues based on normal or transfected cells can be used to assess tissue responses to biochemical or mechanical stimuli, identify the functions of specific genes or gene products that can be either over-expressed or knocked-out, or to study the effects of pharmacological agents.
  • engineered tissues such as ligaments and tendons also has the potential for applications such as harvesting bone marrow stomal cells from individuals at high risk for tissue injury (e.g., ACL rupture) prior to injury. These cells could be either stored until needed or seeded into the appropriate matrix and cultured and differentiated in vitro under mechanical stimuli to produce a variety of bioengineered prosthetic tissues to be held in reserve until needed by the donor.
  • tissue injury e.g., ACL rupture
  • bioengineered living tissue prosthetics that better match the biological environment in vivo, provide the required physiological loading to sustain for example, the dynamic equilibrium of a normal, fully functional ligament, should reduce rehabilitation time for a recipient of a prosthesis from months to weeks, particularly if the tissue is pre-grown and stored. Benefits include a more rapid regain of functional activity, shorter hospital stays, and fewer problems with tissue rejections and failures.
  • the present invention is not intended to be limited to a silk-fiber-based matrix for producing ACL, and other ligaments and tendons, as well as other tissues, such as cartilage, bone, skin and blood vessels are contemplated by the present invention by utilizing the novel silk-fiber based matrix seeded with the appropriate cells and exposed to the appropriate mechanical stimulation if necessary, for proliferating and differentiating into the desired ligament, tendon or tissue.
  • the present invention is not limited to using bone marrow stromal cells for seeding on the matrix, and other progenitor, pluripotent and stem cells, such as those in bone, muscle and skin for example, may also be used to differentiate into ligaments and other tissues.
  • Raw Bombyx mori silkworm fibers shown in FIG. 1A , were extracted to remove sericin, the glue-like protein coating the native silk fibroin (see FIG. 1A -C).
  • the appropriate number of fibers per group were arranged in parallel and extracted in an aqueous solution of 0.02M Na 2 CO 3 and 0.3% (w/v) Ivory soap solution for 60 min at 90° C., then rinsed thoroughly with water to extract the glue-like sericin proteins.
  • Costello's equation for a three-strand wire rope was derived to predict mechanical properties of the silk-fiber-based matrix.
  • the derived model is a series of equations that when combined, take into account extracted silk fiber material properties and desired matrix geometrical hierarchy to compute the overall strength and stiffness of the matrix as a function of pitch angle for a given level of geometrical hierarchy
  • Geometrical hierarchy may be defined as the number of twisting levels in a given matrix level.
  • Each level e.g., group, bundle, strand, cord, ligament
  • Each level is further defined by the number of groups of fibers twisted about each other and the number of fibers in each group of the first level twisted where the first level is define as a group, the second level as a bundle, the third as a strand and the fourth as a cord, the fifth as the ligament).
  • each group of multiple fibers act as a single fiber with an effective radius determined by the number of individual fibers and their inherent radius, i.e., the model discounts friction between the individual fibers due to its limited role in given a relatively high pitch angle.
  • the number of fibers and geometries were selected such that the silk prostheses are similar to the ACL biomechanical properties in UTS, linear stiffness, yield point and % elongation at break (see Table 2, supra), thus serving as a solid starting point for the development of a tissue engineered ACL.
  • Fatigue analyses were performed using a servohydraulic Instron 8511 tension/compression system with Wavemaker software on single cords of both Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 .
  • Data was extrapolated to represent the 6-cord ACL prostheses, which is shown in FIGS. 3B and 3D .
  • FIGS. 1 A-C Complete sericin removal was observed after 60 min at 90° C. as determined by SEM (see FIGS. 1 A-C). Removal of sericin from silk fibers altered the ultrastructure of the fibers, resulting in a smoother fiber surface and the underlying silk fibroin was revealed (shown in FIGS. 1 A-C), with average diameter ranging between 20-40 ⁇ m. The fibroin exhibited a significant 15.2% decrease in ultimate tensile strength (1.033+/ ⁇ 0.042 N/fiber to 0.876+/ ⁇ 0.1 N/fiber) (p ⁇ 0.05, paired Students t-test) (see FIG. 1D ). The mechanical properties of the optimized silk matrices (see FIG. 2 ) are summarized in Table 1 above and in FIG.
  • Bone Marrow Stromal Cells pluripotent cells capable of differentiating into osteogenic, chondrogenic, tendonogenic, adipogenic and myogenic lineages, were chosen since the formation of the appropriate conditions can direct their differentiation into the desired ligament fibroblast cell line (Markolf et al., J. Bone Joint Surg. 71A: 887-893 (1989); Caplan et al., Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue repair. In The Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Current and Future Concepts, Ed. D. W. Jackson et al., Raven Press, Ltd, New York (1993); Young et al., J. Orthopaedic Res. 16: 406-413 (1998)).
  • BMSC Bone Marrow Stromal Cells
  • Human BMSCs were isolated from bone marrow from the iliac crest of consenting donors ⁇ 25 years of age by a commercial vendor (Cambrex, Walkersville, Md.). Twenty-two milliliters of human marrow was aseptically aspirated into a 25 ml syringe containing three milliliters of heparinized (1000 units per milliliter) saline solution. The heparinized marrow solution was shipped overnight on ice to the laboratory for bone marrow stromal cells isolation and culture.
  • DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium
  • FBS fetal bovine serum
  • P/S fetal bovine serum
  • bFGF basic fibroblast growth factor
  • BMSCs were selected based on their ability to adhere to the tissue culture plastic; non-adherent hematopoietic cells were removed during medium replacement after 9-12 days in culture. Medium was changed twice per week thereafter. When primary BMSC became near confluent (12-14 days), they were detached using 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA and replated at 5 ⁇ 10 3 cells/cm 2 . First passage (P1) hBMSCs were trypsinized and frozen in 8% DMSO/10% FBS/DMEM for future use.
  • Frozen P1 hBMSCs were defrosted, replated at 5 ⁇ 10 3 cells/cm 2 (P2), trypsinized when near confluency, and used for matrix seeding.
  • Sterilized (ethylene oxide) silk matrices (specifically single cords of Matrix 1 & 2 , bundles of 30 parallel extracted silk fibers and wire-ropes of collage fibers) were seeded with cells in customized seeding chambers (1 ml total volume) machined in Teflon blocks to minimize cell-medium volume and increase cell-matrix contact. Seeded matrices, following a 4 hour incubation period with the cell slurry (3.3 ⁇ 10 6 BMSCs/ml) were transferred into a petri dish contain an appropriate amount of cell culture medium for the duration of the experiments.
  • ultimate tensile strength was measured as a function of cultivation period in physiological growth conditions, i.e., in cell culture medium.
  • Groups of 30 parallel silk fibers 3 cm in length were extracted, seeded with hBMSCs, and cultured on the fibroin over 21 days at 37° C. and 5% CO 2 .
  • Non-seeded control groups were cultured in parallel.
  • Silk fibroin UTS was determined as a function of culture duration for seeded and non-seeded groups.
  • BMSCs readily attached and grew on the silk and collagen matrices after 1 day in culture (See FIG. 4A -C and FIG. 10A ), and formed cellular extensions to bridge neighboring fibers. As shown in FIG. 4D and FIG. 10B , a uniform cells sheet covering the construct was observed at 14 and 21 days of culture, respectively. MTT analysis confirmed complete matrix coverage by seeded BMSCs after 14 days in culture (see FIG. 5 ). Total DNA quantification of cells grown on Matrix 1 (see FIG. 6A ) and Matrix 2 (see FIG. 6B ) confirmed that BMSCs proliferated and grew on the silk construct with the highest amount of DNA measured after 21 and 14 days, respectively, in culture.
  • Both BMSC seeded or non-seeded extracted control silk fibroin groups of 30 fibers maintained their mechanical integrity as a function of culture period over 21 days (see FIG. 7 ).
  • RT-PCR analysis of BMSCs seeded on cords of Matrix 2 indicated that both collagen I & III were upregulated over 14 days in culture ( FIG. 8 ).
  • Collagen type II and bone sialoprotein (as indicators of cartilage and bone specific differentiation, respectively) were either not detectable or negligibly expressed over the cultivation period.
  • Real-time quantitative RT-PCR at 14 days yielded a transcript ratio of collagen I to collagen III, normalized to GAPDH, of 8.9:1 (see FIG. 11 ).
  • the high ratio of collagen I to collagen III indicates that the response is not wound healing or scar tissue formation (as is observed with high levels of collagen type III), but rather ligament specific; the relative ratio of collagen I to collagen III in a native ACL is ⁇ 6.6:1 (Amiel et al., In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. 1990).
  • the bioreactor is capable of applying independent but concurrent cyclic multi-dimensional strains (e.g., translation, rotation) to the developing ligaments. After a 7 to 14 day static rest period (time post seeding), the rotational and translation strain rates and linear and rotational deformation are kept constant for 1 to 4 weeks.
  • independent but concurrent cyclic multi-dimensional strains e.g., translation, rotation
  • Translational strain (3.3%-10%, 1-3 mm) and rotational strain (25%, 90°) are concurrently applied at a frequency of 0.0167 Hz (one full cycle of stress and relaxation per minute) to the silk-based matrices seeded with BMSCs; an otherwise identical set of bioreactors with seeded matrices without mechanical loading serve as controls.
  • the ligaments are exposed to the constant cyclic strains for the duration of the experiment days.
  • ligament samples both the mechanically challenged as well as the controls (static) are characterized for: (1) general histomorphological appearance (by visual inspection); (2) cell distribution (image processing of histological and MTT stained sections); (3) cell morphology and orientation (histological analysis); and (4) the production of tissue specific markers (RT-PCR, immunostaining).
  • BMSCs align along the long axis of the fiber, take on a spheroid morphology similar to ligament/tendon fibroblasts and upregulate ligament/tendon specific markers.
  • Newly formed extracellular matrix is expected to align along the lines of load as well as the long axis of the matrix.
  • Directed mechanical stimulation is expected to enhance ligament development and formation in vitro in a bioreactor resulting from BMSCs seeded on the novel silk-based matrix.
  • the longitudinal orientation of cells and newly formed matrix is similar to ligament fibroblasts found within an ACL in vivo (Woods et al. Amer. J. Sports Med. 19: 48-55 (1991)). Furthermore, mechanical stimulation maintains the correct expression ratio between collagen I transcripts and collagen type III transcripts (e.g., >7:1) indicating the presence of newly formed ligament tissue versus scare tissue formation.
  • the above results will indicate that the mechanical apparatus and bioreactor system provide a suitable environment (e.g., multi-dimensional strains) for in vitro formation of tissue engineered ligaments starting from bone marrow stromal cells and the novel silk-based matrix.
  • the culture conditions used in these preliminary experiments can be further expanded to more accurately reflect the physiological environment of a ligament (e.g. increasing the different types of mechanical forces) for the in vitro creation of functional equivalents of native ACL for potential clinical use.
  • a ligament e.g. increasing the different types of mechanical forces
  • These methods are not limited to the generation of a bioengineered ACL.
  • any type of ligament in the body can be produced ex vivo by the methods of the present invention.

Abstract

The present invention provides a novel silk-fiber-based matrix having a wire-rope geometry for use in producing a ligament or tendon, particularly an anterior cruciate ligament, ex vivo for implantation into a recipient in need thereof. The invention further provides the novel silk-fiber-based matrix which is seeded with pluripotent cells that proliferate and differentiate on the matrix to form a ligament or tendon ex vivo. Also disclosed is a bioengineered ligament comprising the silk-fiber-based matrix seeded with pluripotent cells that proliferate and differentiate on the matrix to form the ligament or tendon. A method for producing a ligament or tendon ex vivo comprising the novel silk-fiber-based matrix is also disclosed.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed to a matrix or scaffold used in the production of bioengineered tissue, particularly ligaments and tendons. More particularly, the invention relates to a novel silk-fiber-based matrix upon which pluripotent cells may be seeded ex vivo and which proliferate and differentiate thereon into an anterior cruciate ligament for implantation into a recipient in need thereof.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Every year, hundreds of thousands of Americans sprain, tear, or rupture ligaments and tendons of the knee, elbow, hand, shoulder, wrist and jaw (Langer et al., Science 260: 920-926 (1993)). Of particular importance is the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. More than 200,000 people in the U.S. alone, will tear or rupture their anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) each year (Albright et al., 1999. Chapter 42-Knee and Leg:Soft-Tissue Trauma. In Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 6. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons). ). The ACL serves as a primary stabilizer of anterior tibial translation and as a secondary stabilizer of valgus-varus knee angulation, and is often susceptible to rupture or tear resulting from a flexion-rotation-valgus force associated with sports injuries and traffic accidents. Ruptures or tears often result in severe limitations in mobility, pain and discomfort, and the loss of an ability to participate in sports and exercise. Failures of the ACL are classified in three categories: (1) ligamentous (ligament fibers pull apart due to tensile stress), (2) failure at the bone-ligament interface without bone fracture, and (3) failure at the bone-ligament interface with bone fracture at the attachment site of bone and ligament. The most common type of ACL failure is the first category, ligamentous.
  • It is widely known throughout the medical community that the ACL has poor healing capabilities. Total surgical replacement and reconstruction are required when injury to the ACL involves significant tear or rupture. Four options have been utilized for repair or replacement of a damaged ACL: (1) autografts, (2) allografts, (3) xenografts, and (4) synthetic prostheses (degradable and non-degradable). To date, no surgical repair procedure has been shown to restore knee function completely, and novel treatment options would likely benefit a large number of patients.
  • The problems associated with the use of synthetic ACL replacements, along with the limited availability of the donor tissue, have motivated research towards the development of functional and biocompatible equivalents of native tissues. This shift from synthetic to biologically-based ACL replacements first applied in early studies in which collagenous ACL prostheses were prepared as composite structures consisting of reconstituted type I collagen fibers in a collagen I matrix with polymethylmethacrylate bone fixation plugs, and used as anterior cruciate ligament replacement tissues in rabbits (Dunn et al., Am. J. Sports Medicine 20: 507-515 (1992)). Subsequent studies incorporated active biological components into the process, such as ligament fibroblasts seeded on cross-linked collagen fiber scaffolds that were used as ligament analogs (Dunn et al., J. Biomedical Materials Res. 29: 1363-1371 (1995); Dunn, M. G., Materials Res. Soc. Bulletin, November: 43-46 (1996)), and suggested that structures approximating native ligaments can be generated.
  • A tendon gap model, based on pre-stressed collagen sutures seeded with mesenchymal stem cells provided improved repair of large tendon defects (Young et al., 1998). Goulet et al. modified the collagen-fibroblast system by using ligament fibroblasts in non-cross-linked collagen, with bone anchors to pre-stress the tissue and facilitate surgical implantation (Goulet et al., Tendons and Ligaments. In Principles of Tissue Engineering, Ed. R. Lanza, R. Langer, W. Chick. R. G. Landes Co. pp 633-643, R. G. Lanz Co. and Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif. (1997)). Passive tension produced by growing the new ligament in a vertical position induced fibroblast elongation and the alignment of the cells and surrounding extracellular matrix.
  • Silk has been shown to offer new options for the design of biomaterials and tissue-engineering scaffolds with a wide range of mechanical properties (Sofia, S., et al., J. Biol. Mat. Res. 54: 139-148 (2001). For example, the dragline silk from the orb weaving spider, Nephilia clavipes, has the highest strength of any natural fiber, and rivals the mechanical properties of synthetic high performance fibers. Silks also resist failure in compression, are stable at high physiological temperatures, and are insoluble in aqueous and organic solvents. In recent years, silks have been studied as a model for the study of structure-function relationships of fibrous proteins. The manipulation of silk genes, both native and artificial versions, has provided insight into silk protein expression, assembly, and properties. Thus, biocompatibility, the ability to engineer the materials with specific and impressive mechanical properties, and a diverse range of surface chemistries for modification or decoration suggests that silk may provide an important class of biomaterial. Recent studies by the inventors of the present invention have demonstrated the successful attachment and growth of fibroblasts on silk films from silkworm silk of Bombyx mori.
  • Tissue engineering can potentially provide improved clinical options in orthopaedic medicine through the in vitro generation of biologically based functional tissues for transplantation at the time of injury or disease. Further, adult stem cells are becoming increasingly recognized for their potential to generate different cell types and thereby function effectively in vitro or in vivo in tissue repair. (Sussman, M. Nature 410: 640 (2001). The knee joint geometry and kinematics and the resultant effects on ACL structure must be incorporated into the construct design if a tissue engineered ACL generated in vivo is to successfully stabilize the knee and function in vivo. A mismatch in the ACL structure-function relationship would result in graft failure.
  • To date, no human clinical trials have been reported with tissue culture bioengineered anterior cruciate ligaments. This is due to the fact that each approach has failed to address one or more of the following issues: (1) the lack of a readily available cell or tissue source, (2) the unique structure (e.g., crimp pattern, peripheral helical pattern and isometric fiber organization) of an ACL, and (3) the necessary remodeling time in vivo for progenitor cells to differentiate and/or autologous cells to infiltrate the graft, thus extending the time a patient must incur a destabilized knee and rehabilitation. The development of a matrix for generating more fully functional bioengineered anterior cruciate ligaments would greatly benefit the specific field of knee reconstructive surgery, and would also provide wider benefits to the overall field of in vitro tissue generation and replacement surgery.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a novel silk-fiber-based matrix for producing ligaments and tendons ex vivo. More specifically, the present invention is directed to engineering mechanically and biologically functional anterior cruciate ligament using a novel silk-fiber-based matrix that may be seeded with pluripotent cells, such as bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). The mechanically and biologically autologous or allogenic anterior cruciate ligament comprised of the novel matrix and pluripotent cells may be prepared within a bioreactor environment to induce de novo ligament tissue formation in vitro prior to implantation. Surprisingly, it has now been found that the novel silk-fiber-based matrix supports BMSC differentiation towards ligament lineage without the need for directed mechanical stimulation during culture within a bioreactor. The inventors believe that mechanical stimulation will serve only to enhance the differentiation and tissue development process.
  • The present invention also provides a method for the generation of tissue engineered ACL ex vivo using the novel silk-fiber-based matrix that comprises the steps of seeding pluripotent stem cells in the silk-fiber-based matrix, anchoring the seeded matrix by attachment to at least two anchors, and culturing the cells within the matrix under conditions appropriate for cell growth and regeneration. The culturing step may comprise the additional step of subjecting the matrix to one or more mechanical forces via movement of one or both of the attached anchors. In a preferred embodiment for producing an ACL, pluripotent cells, and more particularly bone marrow stromal cells, are used. Suitable anchor materials comprise any materials to which the matrix can attach (either temporarily or permanently), and which supports ligament and tendon tissue growth or bone tissue growth at the anchors. Preferred anchor materials include hydroxyappatite, demineralized bone, and bone (allogenic or autologous). Anchor materials may also include titanium, stainless steel, high density polyethylene, Dacron and Teflon, amongst other materials. Goinopra coral which has been treated to convert the calcium carbonate to calcium phosphate has also been used as an anchor material. In a preferred embodiment, the mechanical forces to which the matrix may be subjected mimic mechanical stimuli experienced by an anterior cruciate ligament in vivo. This is accomplished by delivering the appropriate combination of tension, compression, torsion and shear, to the matrix.
  • The bioengineered ligament which is produced according to the present invention is advantageously characterized by a cellular orientation and/or matrix crimp pattern in the direction of applied mechanical forces, and also by the production of ligament and tendon specific markers including collagen type I, collagen type III, and fibronectin proteins along the axis of mechanical load produced by the mechanical forces or stimulation, if such forces are applied. In a preferred embodiment, the ligament or tendon is characterized by the presence of fiber bundles which are arranged into a helical organization.
  • Another aspect of the present invention is a method for producing a wide range of ligament and tendon types ex vivo using the novel silk-fiber-based matrix, and an adaptation of the method for producing an anterior cruciate ligament by adapting the matrix (e.g., geometry, organization, composition)(see Example 1) and anchor size to reflect the size of the specific type of ligament or tendon to be produced (e.g., posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint), and also adapting the specific combination of forces applied, to mimic the mechanical stimuli experienced in vivo by the specific type of ligament or tendon to be produced. Similar adaptations of this method, and which are considered to be a part of the invention, can be made to produce other tissues ex vivo from pluripotent stem cells, by adapting additional matrix compositions, geometries, organizations, and the mechanical forces applied during cell culture to mimic stresses experienced in vivo by the specific tissue type to be produced. The methods of the present invention can be further modified to incorporate other stimuli experienced in vivo by the particular developing tissue. Some examples of other stimuli include chemical stimuli and electro-magnetic stimuli.
  • As used herein, the term “tissue” is intended to take on its generally recognized biological/medical definition to those of skill in the art. As a non-limiting example, “tissue” is defined in Stedman's Medical Dictionary as:
      • [A] collection of similar cells and the intercellular substances surrounding them. There are four basic tissues in the body: 1) epithelium; 2) the connective tissues, including blood, bone, and cartilage; 3) muscle tissue; and 4) nerve tissue.
  • Another aspect of the present invention relates to the specific ligaments or tendons which are produced by the methods of the present invention. Some examples of ligaments or tendons that can be produced include anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint. Other tissues that may be produced by methods of the present invention include cartilage (both articular and meniscal), bone, muscle, skin and blood vessels.
  • The above description sets forth rather broadly the more important features of the present invention in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be understood, and in order that the present contributions to the art may be better appreciated. Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed solely for the purposes of illustration and not as a definition of the limits of the invention, for which reference should be made to the appended claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1A is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of single native silk fiber having a sericin coating;
  • FIG. 1B illustrates SEM of the silk fiber of FIG. 1A extracted for 60 min at 37° C.;
  • FIG. 1C illustrates SEM of the silk fiber of FIG. 1A extracted for 60 min at 90° C. and illustrating complete removal of the sericin coating;
  • FIG. 1D is a chart showing ultimate tensile strength (UTS) as a function of extraction conditions;
  • FIG. 2A illustrates a single cord of Matrix 1 having a wire-rope geometry composed of two levels of twisting hierarchy. When six cords are used in parallel (e.g., Matrix 1), the matrix has mechanical properties similar to a native ACL.
  • FIG. 2B illustrates a single cord of Matrix 2 having a wire-rope geometry composed of three levels of twisting hierarchy. When six cords are used in parallel (e.g., Matrix 2), the matrix has mechanical properties similar to a native ACL.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates load-elongation curves (N=5) for Matrix 1 formed from six parallel silk fibroin cords illustrated in FIG. 2A.
  • FIG. 3B is a chart of cycles to failure at UTS, 1680N, and 1200N loads (n=5 for each load) illustrating Matrix 1 fatigue data. Regression analysis of Matrix 1 fatigue data, when extrapolated to physiological load levels (400 N) to predicite number of cycles to failure in vivo, indicates a matrix life of 3.3 million cycles;
  • FIG. 3C illustrates load-elongation curves for Matrix 2 (N=3) formed from six parallel silk fibroin cords as illustrated in FIG. 2B;
  • FIG. 3D is a chart of cycles to failure at UTS, 2280N, 2100N and 1800N loads (N=3 for each load) illustrating Matrix 2 fatigue data. Regression analysis of Matrix 2 fatigue data, when extrapolated to physiological load levels (400 N) to predicite number of cycles to failure in vivo, indicates a matrix life of greater than 10 million cycles;
  • FIG. 4A illustrates SEM of extracted silk fibroin prior to seeding with cells;
  • FIG. 4B illustrates SEM of bone marrow stromal cells seeded and attached on silk fibroin immediately post seeding;
  • FIG. 4C illustrates SEM of bone marrow cells attached and spread on silk fibroin 1 day post seeding;
  • FIG. 4D illustrates SEM of bone marrow stromal cells seeded on silk fibroin 14 days post seeding forming an intact cell-extracellular matrix sheet;
  • FIG. 5A illustrates a 3 cm length of the silk fibroin cord illustrated in FIG. 2A and seeded with bone marrow stromal cells, cultured for 14 days in a static environment and stained with MTT to show even cell coverage of the matrix following the growth period;
  • FIG. 5B illustrates a control strand of silk fibroin cord 3 cm in length stained with MTT;
  • FIG. 6A is a chart illustrating bone marrow stromal cell proliferation on silk fibroin Matrix 1 determined by total cellular DNA over 21 day culture period indicating a significant increase in cell proliferation after 21 days of culture;
  • FIG. 6B is a bar graph illustrating bone marrow stromal cell proliferation on silk fibroin Matrix 2 determined by total cellular DNA over 14 day culture period indicating a significant increase in cell proliferation after 14 days of culture;
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the ultimate tensile strength of a 30 silk fiber extracted construct which is either seeded with bone marrow stromal cells or non-seeded over 21 days of culture in physiological growth conditions;
  • FIG. 8 illustrates gel eletrophoretic analysis of RT-PCR amplification of selected markers over time. The gel shows upregulation in both collagen types I and III expression levels normalized to the housekeeping gene, GAPDH by bone marrow stromal cell grown on Matrix 2 over 14 days in culture. Collagen type II (as a marker for cartilage) and bone sialoprotein (as a marker of bone tissue formation) were not detected indicating a ligament specific differentiation response by the BMSCs when cultured with Matrix 2.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates a single cord of Matrix 1 (not seeded at the time of implantation) following six weeks of implantation in vivo and used to reconstruct the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in a rabbit model. (A) shows Matrix 1 fibroin fibers surrounded by progenitor host cells and tissue ingrowth into the matrix and around the individual fibroin fibers visualized by hematoxylin and eosin staining; (B) shows collagenous tissue ingrowth into the matrix and around the individual fibroin fibers visualized by trichrome staining; and
  • FIG. 10 illustrates bone marrow stromal cells seeded and grown on collagen fibers for (A) 1 day and (B) 21 days; (C) RT-PCR and gel electrophoretic analysis of collagen I and III expression vs. the housekeeping gene GAPDH: a=Collagen I, day 14; b=Collagen I, day 18; c=Collagen III, day 14; d=Collagen III, day 18; e=GAPDH, day 14; f=GAPDH, day 18. Collagen type II (as a marker for cartilage) and bone sialoprotein (as a marker of bone tissue formation) were not detected indicating a ligament specific differentiation response; and
  • FIG. 11 illustrates real-time quantitative RT-PCR at 14 days which yielded a transcript ratio of collagen I to collagen III, normalized to GAPDH, of 8.9:1.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed to a novel silk-fiber-based matrix upon which pluripotent cells may be seeded and which proliferate and differentiate into ligament and tendon fibroblasts resulting in the formation of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), or other ligaments, tendons or tissues. The novel silk-fiber-based matrix is designed having fibers in a wire-rope (twisted or braided-like) geometry, which exhibits mechanical properties identical to a natural anterior cruciate ligament (see Table 1, infra) and where simple variations in matrix organization and geometry can result in the formation of any desired ligament or tendon tissue (see Table 2, infra).
  • The present invention is also based on the finding that pluripotent bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) isolated and cultured as described in Example 1, seeded on the silk-fiber-based matrix, and cultured in a bioreactor under static conditions will undergo ligament and tendon specific differentiation forming viable tissue. In addition, the histomorphological properties of a bioengineered tissue produced in vitro generated from pluripotent cells within a matrix are affected by the direct application of mechanical force to the matrix during tissue generation. This discovery provides important new insights into the relationship between mechanical stress, biochemical and cell immobilization methods and cell differentiation, and has applications in producing a wide variety of ligaments, tendons and tissues in vitro from pluripotent cells.
  • One aspect of the present invention relates to a matrix comprised of silk fibers having a wire-rope (twisted or braided-like) geometry, as illustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B.
  • As described in the Examples below, mechanical properties of the silk fibroin (as illustrated in FIG. 1A-C) were characterized and geometries for forming applicable matrices for ACL engineering were derived using a theoretical computational model (see FIG. 1D). A six-cord construct was chosen for use as an ACL replacement to increase matrix surface area and to enhance support for tissue in-growth. Two of several optimal construct geometrical hierarchies have been determined to comprise the following: Matrix 1: 1 ACL prosthesis=6 parallel cords; 1 cord=3 twisted strands (3 twists/cm); 1 strand=6 twisted bundles (3 twists/cm); 1 bundle=30 parallel washed fibers; and Matrix 2: 1 ACL matrix=6 parallel cords; 1 cord=3 twisted strands (2 twists/cm); 1 strand=3 twisted bundles (2.5 twists/cm); 1 bundle=3 groups (3 twists/cm); 1 group=15 parallel extracted silk fibroin fibers. The number of fibers and geometries for Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 were selected such that the silk prostheses are similar to the ACL biomechanical properties in ultimate tensile strength, linear stiffness, yield point and % elongation at break, serving as a solid starting point for the development of a tissue engineered ACL. The ability to generate two matrices with differing geometries both resulting in mechanical properties which mimic properties of the ACL indicates that an infinite number of geometrical configurations exist to achieve the desired mechanical properties. One skilled in the art will recognize that an alternative geometry for any desired ligament or tendon tissue may comprise any number, combination or organization of cords, strands, bundles, groups and fibers (see Table 2, infra) that result in a matrix construct with applicable mechanical properties that mimic those of the ligament or tendon desired. For example, one (1) ACL prosthesis may have any number of cords in parallel ranging from a single cord to an infinite number of cords provided there is a means of anchoring the final matrix in vitro or in vivo. One skilled in the art would also recognize that no limit exists to the number of twisting levels (where a single level is defined as either a group, bundle, strand or cord) for a given geometry providing the matrix results in the desired mechanical properties. Furthermore, one skilled in the art would realize the large degree of freedom in designing the matrix geometry and organization in engineering an ACL prosthesis, and will therefore understand the utility of the developed theoretical computational model to predict the matrix design of a desired ligament or tendon tissue (see Example 1). One skilled in the art would, therefore, recognize that a variation in geometry (i.e., the number of cords used to make a prosthesis or number of fibers in a group) could be used to generate matrices applicable to most ligaments and tendons. For example, for smaller ligaments or tendons of the hand, the geometry and organization used to generate a single cord of Matrix 1(or two cords or three cords, etc.) may be appropriate given the matrix's organization results in mechanical properties suitable for the particular physiological environment.
  • The invention is not, however, limited with respect to the wire-rope geometry as described, and any geometry or combinations of geometries (e.g., parallel, twisted, braided, mesh-like) can be used that results in matrix mechanical properties similar to the ACL (i.e., >2000 N ultimate tensile strength, between 100-600 N/mm linear stiffness for a native ACL or commonly used replacement graft such as the patellar tendon with length between 26-30 mm) or to the desired ligament and tendon that is to be produced. The number of fibers and geometry of both Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 were selected to generate mechanically appropriate ACL matrices, or other desired ligament or tendon matrices (e.g., posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)). For example, a single cord of the six-cord Matrix 1 construct was used to reconstruct the medial collateral ligament (MC) in a rabbit (see FIG. 9). The mechanical properties of the silk six-cord constructs of Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 are described in Table 1 and in FIG. 3. Additional geometries and their relating mechanical properties are listed in Table 2 as an example of the large degree of design freedom that would result in a matrix applicable in ACL tissue engineering in accordance with the present invention.
    TABLE 1
    UTS Stiffness Yield Pt. Elongation
    (N) (N/mm) (N) (%)
    Silk 2337 +/− 72 354 +/− 26 1262 +/− 36 38.6 +/− 2.4
    matrix
    1
    Silk 3407 +/− 63 580 +/− 40  1647 +/− 214 29 +/− 4
    Matrix
    2
    Human  2160 +/− 1574  242 +/− 284 ˜1200 ˜26-32%
    ACL

    Mechanical properties for two different cords based on a cord length of 3 cm.
  • TABLE 2
    Twisting Level
    (# of twists/cm) Matrix 1 Matrix 2 Matrix 3 Matrix 4 Matrix 5 Matrix 6 Matrix 7
    # fibers per group 30 15 1300 180 20 10 15
    (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
    # groups per bundle 6 3 3 3 6 6 3
    (3) (3) (2) (3.5) (3) (3) (3)
    # bundles per strand 3 6 1 3 3 3 3
    (3) (2.5) (0) (2) (2) (2.5) (2.5)
    # strands per cord 6 3 2 3 3 3
    (0) (2.0) (0) (1) (2) (2)
    # cords per ACL 6 3 6 12
    (0) (0) (0) (0)
    UTS (N) 2337 3407 2780 2300 2500 2300 3400
    Stiffness (N/mm) 354 580 300 350 550 500 550

    Examples of several geometry hierarchies that would result in suitable mechanical properties for replacement of the ACL.

    Note:

    Matrix 1 and 2 have been developed as shown in example 1; Matrix 3 would yield a single bundle prosthesis, Matrix 4 would yield a 2 strand prosthesis, Matrix 5 would yield a 3 cord prosthesis, Matrix 6 is another variation of a 6 cord prosthesis, and Matrix 7 will yield a 12 cord prosthesis.
  • Advantageously, the silk-fiber based matrix is comprised solely of silk. Types and sources of silk include the following: silks from silkworms, such as Bombyx mori and related species; silks from spiders, such as Nephila clavipes; silks from genetically engineered bacteria, yeast mammalian cells, insect cells, and transgenic plants and animals; silks obtained from cultured cells from silkworms or spiders; native silks; cloned full or partial sequences of native silks; and silks obtained from synthetic genes encoding silk or silk-like sequences. In their raw form, the native silk fibroin obtained from the Bombyx mori silkworms are coated with a glue-like protein called sericin, which typically is extracted from the fibers before the fibers which make up the matrix are seeded with cells.
  • In an alternative embodiment, the matrix may be comprised of a composite of: (1) silk and collagen fibers (2) silk and collagen foams, meshes, or sponges, or a composite of (3) silk fibroin fibers and silk foams, meshes, or sponges, (4) silk and biodegradable polymers (e.g., cellulose, cotton, gelatin, poly lactide, poly glycolic, poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly caproloactone, polyamides, polyanhydrides, polyaminoacids, polyortho esters, poly acetals, proteins, degradable polyurethanes, polysaccharides, polycyanoacrylates, Glycosamino glycans—e.g., chrondroitin sulfate, heparin, etc., Polysaccharides—native, reprocessed or genetically engineered versions—e.g. hyaluronic acid, alginates, xanthans, pectin, chitosan, chitin, and the like, Elastin—native, reprocessed or genetically engineered and chemical versions, Collagens—native, reprocessed or genetically engineered versions), or (5) silk and non-biodegradable polymers (e.g., polyamide, polyester, polystyrene, polypropylene, polyacrylate, polyvinyl, polycarbonate, polytetrafluorethylene, or nitrocellulose material. The composite generally enhances the matrix properties such as porosity, degradability, and also enhances cell seeding, proliferation, differentiation or tissue development. FIG. 10 illustrates the ability of collagen fibers to support BMSC growth and ligament specific differentiation.
  • The matrix of the present invention may also be treated to enhance cell proliferation and/or tissue differentiation thereon. Exemplary matrix treatments for enhancing cell proliferation and tissue differentiation include, but are not limited to, metals, irradiation, crosslinking, chemical surface modifications (e.g. RGD (arg-gly-asp) peptide coating, fibronectin coating, coupling growth factors), and physical surface modifications.
  • A second aspect of the present invention relates to a mechanically and biologically functional ACL formed from a novel silk-fiber-based matrix and autologous or allogenic (depending on the recipient of the tissue) bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) seeded on the matrix. The silk-fiber-based matrix induces stromal cell differentiation towards ligament lineage without the need for any mechanical stimulation during bioreactor cultivation. BMSCs seeded on the silk-fiber-based matrix and grown in a petri dish begin to attach and spread (see FIG. 4), proliferate covering the matrix (see FIGS. 5 and 6) and differentiate as shown by the expression of ligament specific markers (see FIG. 8). Markers for cartilage (collagen type II) and for bone (bone sialoprotein) were not expressed (see FIG. 8). Data illustrating the expression of ligament specific markers is set forth in Example 2.
  • In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for producing an ACL ex vivo. Cells capable of differentiating into ligament cells are grown under conditions which simulate the movements and forces experienced by an ACL in vivo through the course of embryonic development into mature ligament function. This is accomplished by the following steps: under sterile conditions, pluripotent cells are seeded within a three dimensional silk-fiber-based matrix to which cells can adhere and which is advantageously of cylindrical shape. The three dimensional silk-fiber based matrix used in the method serves as a preliminary matrix, which is supplemented and possibly even replaced by extracellular matrix components produced by the differentiating cells. Use of the novel silk-fiber-based matrix may enhance or accelerate the development of the ACL. For instance, the novel silk-fiber-based matrix which has specific mechanical properties (e.g., increased tensile strength) that can withstand strong forces prior to reinforcement from cellular extracellular matrix components. Other advantageous properties of the novel silk-fiber based preliminary matrix include, without limitation, biocompatibility and susceptibility to biodegradation.
  • The pluripotent cells may be seeded within the preliminary matrix either pre- or post-matrix formation, depending upon the particular matrix used and the method of matrix formation. Uniform seeding is preferable. In theory, the number of cells seeded does not limit the final ligament produced, however optimal seeding may increase the rate of generation. Optimal seeding amounts will depend on the specific culture conditions. In one embodiment, the matrix is seeded with from about 0.05 to 5 times the physiological cell density of a native ligament.
  • One or more types of pluripotent cells are used in the method. Such cells have the ability to differentiate into a wide variety of cell types in response to the proper differentiation signals and to express ligament specific markers. More specifically, the method requires the use of cells that have the ability to differentiate into cells of ligament and tendon tissue. In a preferred embodiment, bone marrow stromal cells are used. If the resulting bioengineered ligament is to be transplanted into a patient, the cells should be derived from a source that is compatible with the intended recipient. Although the recipient will generally be a human, applications in veterinary medicine also exist. In one embodiment, the cells are obtained from the recipient (autologous), although compatible donor cells may also be used to make allogenic ligaments. For example, when making allogenic ligaments (e.g., using cells from another human such as bone marrow stromal cells isolated from donated bone marrow or ACL fibroblasts isolated from donated ACL tissue), human anterior cruciate ligament fibroblast cells isolated from intact donor ACL tissue ( e.g. cadaveric or from total knee transplantations), ruptured ACL tissue (e.g., harvested at the time of surgery from a patient undergoing ACL reconstruction) or bone marrow stromal cells may be used. The determination of compatibility is within the means of the skilled practitioner.
  • In alternative embodiments of the present invention, ligaments or tendons including, but not limited to, the posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint other than ACL, cartilage, bone and other tissues may be engineered with the matrix in accordance with the method of the present invention. In this manner, the cells to be seeded on the matrix are selected in accordance with the tissue to be produced (e.g., pluripotent or of the desired tissue type). Cells seeded on the matrix in accordance with the present invention may be autologous or allogenic. The use of autologous cells effectively creates an allograft or autograft for implantation in a recipient.
  • As recited, to form an ACL, cells, which are advantageously bone marrow stromal cells, are seeded on the matrix. Bone marrow stromal cells are a type of pluripotent cell, and are also referred to in the art as mesenchymal stem cells or simply as stromal cells. As recited, the source of these cells can be autologous or allogenic. The present invention also contemplates the use of adult or embryonic stem or pluripotent cells, in so long as the proper environment (either in vivo or in vitro), seeded on the silk-fiber based matrix, can recapitulate an ACL or any other desired ligament or tissue in extracellular matrix composition (e.g., protein, glycoprotein content) organization, structure or function.
  • Fibroblast cells are also contemplated by the present invention for seeding on the inventive matrix. Since fibroblast cells are often not referred to as pluripotent cells, fibroblasts are intended to include mature human ACL fibroblasts (autologous or allogenic) isolated from ACL tissue, fibroblasts from other ligament tissue, fibroblasts from tendon tissue, from netonatal foreskin, from umbilical cord blood, or from any cell, whether mature or pluripotent, mature dedifferentiated, or genetically engineered, such that when cultured in the proper environment (either in vivo or in vitro), and seeded on the silk-fiber based matrix, can recapitulate an ACL or any other desired ligament or tissue in extracellular matrix composition (e.g., protein, glycoprotein content), organization, structure or function.
  • The faces of the matrix cylinder are each attached to anchors, through which a range of forces are to be applied to the matrix. To facilitate force delivery to the matrix, it is preferable that the entire surface of each respective face of the matrix contact the face of the respective anchors. Anchors with a shape which reflects the site of attachment (e.g., cylindrical) are best suited for use in this method. Once assembled, the cells in the anchored matrix are cultured under conditions appropriate for cell growth and regeneration. The matrix is subjected to one or more mechanical forces applied through the attached anchors (e.g., via movement of one or both of the attached anchors) during the course of culture. The mechanical forces are applied over the period of culture to mimic conditions experienced by the native ACL, or other tissues in vivo.
  • The anchors must be made of a material suitable for matrix attachment, and the resulting attachment should be strong enough to endure the stress of the mechanical forces applied. In addition, it is preferable that the anchors be of a material which is suitable for the attachment of extracellular matrix which is produced by the differentiating cells. The anchors support bony tissue in-growth (either in vitro or in vivo) while anchoring the developing ligament. Some examples of suitable anchor material include, without limitation, hydroxyappatite, Goinopra coral, demineralized bone, bone (allogenic or autologous). Anchor materials may also include titanium, stainless steel, high density polyethylene, Dacron and Teflon.
  • Alternatively, anchor material may be created or further enhanced by infusing a selected material with a factor which promotes either ligament matrix binding or bone matrix binding or both. The term infuse is considered to include any method of application which appropriately distributes the factor onto the anchor (e.g., coating, permeating, contacting). Examples of such factors include without limitation, laminin, fibronectin, any extracellular matrix protein that promotes adhesion, silk, factors which contain arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) peptide binding regions or the RGD peptides themselves. Growth factors or bone morphogenic protein can also be used to enhance anchor attachment. In addition, anchors may be pre-seeded with cells (e.g., stem cells, ligament cells, osteoblasts, osteogenic progenitor cells) which adhere to the anchors and bind the matrix, to produce enhanced matrix attachment both in vitro and in vivo.
  • An exemplary anchor system is disclosed in applicant's co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 09/______. The matrix is attached to the anchors via contact with the anchor face or alternatively by actual penetration of the matrix material through the anchor material. Because the force applied to the matrix via the anchors dictates the final ligament produced, the size of the final ligament produced is, in part, dictated by the size of the attachment site of the anchor. One of skill in the art will appreciate that an anchor of appropriate size to the desired final ligament should be used. A preferred anchor shape for the formation of an ACL is a cylinder. However, one of skill in the art will appreciate that other anchor shapes and sizes will also function adequately. In a preferred embodiment, anchors have an appropriate size and composition for direct insertion into bone tunnels in the femur and tibia of a recipient of the bioengineered ligament.
  • In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, anchors may be used only temporarily during in vitro culture, and then removed when the matrix alone is implanted in vivo.
  • In another embodiment, the novel silk-fiber-based matrix is seeded with BMSCs and cultured in a bioreactor. Two types of growth environments currently exist that may be used in accordance with this invention: (1) the in vitro bioreactor apparatus system, and (2) the in vivo knee joint, which serves as a “bioreactor” as it provides the physiologic environment including progenitor cells and stimuli (both chemical and physical) necessary for the development of a viable ACL given a matrix with proper biocompatible and mechanical properties. The bioreactor apparatus provides optimal culture conditions for the formation of a ligament in terms of differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production, and which thus provides the ligament with optimal mechanical and biological properties prior to implantation in a recipient. Additionally, when the silk-fiber based matrix is seeded and cultured with cells in vitro, a petri dish may be considered to be the bioreactor within which conditions appropriate for cell growth and regeneration exist, i.e., a static environment.
  • In accordance with the one embodiment of present invention, cells may also be cultured on the matrix without the application of any mechanical forces, i.e., in a static environment. For example, the silk-fiber based matrix alone, with no in vitro applied mechanical forces or stimulation, when seeded and cultured with BMSCs, induces the cells to proliferate and express ligament and tendon specific markers (See Example 2 and FIG. 8). The knee joint may serve as a physiological growth and development environment that can provide the cells and the correct environmental signals (chemical and physical) to the matrix such that an ACL technically develops. Therefore, the knee joint (as its own form of bioreactor) plus the matrix (either non-seeded, seeded and not differentiated in vitro, or seeded and differentiated in vitro prior to implantation) will result in the development of an ACL, or other desired tissue depending upon the cell type seeded on the matrix and the anatomical location of matrix implantation. FIG. 9 illustrates the effects of the medial collateral knee joint environment on medial collateral ligament (MCL) development when only a non-seeded silk-based matrix with appropriate MCL mechanical properties is implanted for 6 weeks in vivo. Whether the cells are cultured in a static environment with no mechanical stimulation applied, or in a dynamic environment, such as in a bioreactor apparatus, conditions appropriate for cell growth and regeneration are advantageously present for the engineering of the desired ligament or tissue.
  • In the experiments described in the Examples section below, the applied mechanical stimulation was shown to influence the morphology, and cellular organization of the progenitor cells within the resulting tissue. The extracellular matrix components secreted by the cells and organization of the extracellular matrix throughout the tissue was also significantly influenced by the forces applied to the matrix during tissue generation. During in vitro tissue generation, the cells and extracellular matrix aligned along the axis of load, reflecting the in vivo organization of a native ACL which is also along the various load axes produced from natural knee joint movement and function. These results suggest that the physical stimuli experienced in nature by cells of developing tissue, such as the ACL, play a significant role in progenitor cell differentiation and tissue formation. They further indicate that this role can be effectively duplicated in vitro by mechanical manipulation to produce a similar tissue. The more closely the forces produced by mechanical manipulation resemble the forces experienced by an ACL in vivo, the more closely the resultant tissue will resemble a native ACL.
  • When mechanical stimulation is applied in vitro to the matrix via a bioreactor, there exists independent but concurrent control over both cyclic and rotation strains as applied to one anchor with respect to the other anchor. In an alternative embodiment, the matrix alone may be implanted in vivo, seeded with ACL cells from the patient and exposed in vivo to mechanical signaling via the patient.
  • When the matrix is seeded with cells prior to implantation, the cells are cultured within the matrix under conditions appropriate for cell growth and differentiation. During the culture process, the matrix may be subjected to one or more mechanical forces via movement of one or both of the attached anchors. The mechanical forces of tension, compression, torsion and shear, and combinations thereof, are applied in the appropriate combinations, magnitudes, and frequencies to mimic the mechanical stimuli experienced by an ACL in vivo.
  • Various factors will influence the amount of force which can be tolerated by the matrix (e.g., matrix composition, cell density). Matrix strength is expected to change through the course of tissue development. Therefore, mechanical forces or strains applied will increase, decrease or remain constant in magnitude, duration, frequency and variety over the period of ligament generation, to appropriately correspond to matrix strength at the time of application.
  • When producing an ACL, the more accurate the intensity and combination of stimuli applied to the matrix during tissue development, the more the resulting ligament will resemble a native ACL. Two issues must be considered regarding the natural function of the ACL when devising the in vitro mechanical force regimen that closely mimics the in vivo environment: (1) the different types of motion experienced by the ACL and the responses of the ACL to knee joint movements and (2) the extent of the mechanical stresses experienced by the ligament. Specific combinations of mechanical stimuli are generated from the natural motions of the knee structure and transmitted to the native ACL.
  • To briefly describe the motions of the knee, the connection of the tibia and femur by the ACL between provides six degrees of freedom when considering the motions of the two bones relative to each other: the tibia can move in the three directions and can rotate relative to the axes for each of these three directions. The knee is restricted from achieving the full ranges of these six degrees of freedom due to the presence of ligaments and capular fibers and the knee surfaces themselves (Biden et al., Experimental methods used to evaluate knee ligament function. In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function. Injury and Repair, Ed. D. Daniel et al. Raven Press, pp. 135-151 (1990)). Small translational movements are also possible. The attachment sites of the ACL are responsible for its stabilizing roles in the knee joint. The ACL functions as a primary stabilizer of anterior-tibial translation, and as a secondary stabilizer of valgus-varus angulation, and tibial rotation (Shoemaker et al., The limits of knee motion. In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury and Repair, Ed. D. Daniel et al. Raven Press, pp. 1534-161 (1990)). Therefore, the ACL is responsible for stabilizing the knee in three of the six possible degrees of freedom. As a result, the ACL has developed a specific fiber organization and overall structure to perform these stabilizing functions. The present invention simulates these conditions in vitro to produce a tissue with similar structure and fiber organization.
  • The extent of mechanical stresses experienced by the ACL can be similarly summarized. The ACL undergoes cyclic loads of about 400 N between one and two million cycles per year (Chen et al., J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 14: 567-586 (1980). It is also critical to consider linear stiffness (˜182 N/mm), ultimate deformation (100% of ACL) and energy absorbed at failure (12.8 N-m) (Woo et al., The tensile properties of human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACL graft tissues. In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury and Repair, Ed. D. Daniel et al. Raven Press, pp. 279-289 (1990)) when developing an ACL surgical replacement.
  • The Examples section below details the production of a prototype bioengineered anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ex vivo. Mechanical forces mimicking a subset of the mechanical stimuli experienced by a native ACL in vivo (rotational deformation and linear deformation) were applied in combination, and the resulting ligament which was formed was studied to determine the effects of the applied forces on tissue development. Exposure of the developing ligament to physiological loading during in vitro formation induced the cells to adopt a defined orientation along the axes of load, and to generate extracellular matrices along the axes as well. These results indicate that the incorporation of complex multi-dimensional mechanical forces into the regime to produce a more complex network of load axes that mimics the environment of the native ACL, will produce a bioengineered ligament which more closely resembles a native ACL.
  • The different mechanical forces that may be applied include, without limitation, tension, compression, torsion, and shear. These forces are applied in combinations which simulate forces experienced by an ACL in the course of natural knee joint movements and function. These movements include, without limitation, knee joint extension and flexion as defined in the coronal and sagittal planes, and knee joint flexion. Optimally, the combination of forces applied mimics the mechanical stimuli experienced by an anterior cruciate ligament in vivo as accurately as is experimentally possible. Varying the specific regimen of force application through the course of ligament generation is expected to influence the rate and outcome of tissue development, with optimal conditions to be determined empirically. Potential variables in the regimen include, without limitation: (1) strain rate, (2) percent strain, (3) type of strain, e.g. translation and rotation, (4) frequency, (5) number of cycles within a given regime, (6) number of different regimes, (7) duration at extreme points of ligament deformation, (8) force levels, and (9) different force combinations. It will be recognized by one of skill in the art that a potentially unlimited number of variations exist. In a preferred embodiment the regimen of mechanical forces applied produces helically organized fibers similar to those of the native ligament, described below.
  • The fiber bundles of a native ligament are arranged into a helical organization. The mode of attachment and the need for the knee joint to rotate ˜140° of flexion has resulted in the native ACL inheriting a 90° twist and with the peripheral fiber bundles developing a helical organization. This unique biomechanical feature allows the ACL to sustain extremely high loading. In the functional ACL, this helical organization of fibers allows anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior fibers to remain relatively isometric in respect to one another for all degrees of flexion, thus load can be equally distributed to all fiber bundles at any degree of knee joint flexion stabilizing the knee throughout all ranges of joint motion. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, mechanical forces that simulate a combination of knee joint flexion and knee joint extension are applied to the developing ligament to produce an engineered ACL which possesses this same helical organization. The mechanical apparatus used in the experiments presented in the Examples below provides control over strain and strain rates (both translational and rotational). The mechanical apparatus will monitor the actual load experienced by the growing ligaments, serving to ‘teach’ the ligaments over time through monitoring and increasing the loading regimes.
  • Another aspect of the present invention relates to the bioengineered anterior cruciate ligament produced by the above described methods. The bioengineered ligament produced by these methods is characterized by cellular orientation and/or a matrix crimp pattern in the direction of the mechanical forces applied during generation. The ligament is also characterized by the production/presence of extracellular matrix components (e.g., collagen type I, and type III, fibronectin, and tenascin-C proteins) along the axis of mechanical load experienced during culture. In a preferred embodiment, the ligament fiber bundles are arranged into a helical organization, as discussed above.
  • The above methods using the novel silk-fiber-based matrix are not limited to the production of an ACL, but can also be used to produce other ligaments and tendons found in the knee (e.g., posterior cruciate ligament) or other parts of the body (e.g., hand, wrist, ankle, elbow, jaw and shoulder), such as for example, but not limited to posterior cruciate ligament, rotator cuff tendons, medial collateral ligament of the elbow and knee, flexor tendons of the hand, lateral ligaments of the ankle and tendons and ligaments of the jaw or temporomandibular joint. All moveable joints in a human body have specialized ligaments which connect the articular extremities of the bones in the joint. Each ligament in the body has a specific structure and organization which is dictated by its function and environment. The various ligaments of the body, their locations and functions are listed in Anatomy, Descriptive and Surgical (Gray, H., Eds. Pick, T. P., Howden, R., Bounty Books, New York (1977)), the pertinent contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. By determining the physical stimuli experienced by a given ligament or tendon, and incorporating forces which mimic these stimuli, the above described method for producing an ACL ex vivo can be adapted to produce bioengineered ligaments and tendons ex vivo which simulates any ligament or tendon in the body.
  • The specific type of ligament or tendon to be produced is predetermined prior to tissue generation since several aspects of the method vary with the specific conditions experienced in vivo by the native ligament or tendon. The mechanical forces to which the developing ligament or tendon is subjected during cell culture are determined for the particular ligament or tendon type being cultivated. The specific conditions can be determined by those skilled in the art by studying the native ligament or tendon and its environment and function. One or more mechanical forces experienced by the ligament or tendon in vivo are applied to the matrix during culture of the cells in the matrix. The skilled practitioner will recognize that a ligament or tendon which is superior to those currently available can be produced by the application of a subset of forces experienced by the native ligament or tendon. However, optimally, the full range of in vivo forces will be applied to the matrix in the appropriate magnitudes and combinations to produce a final product which most closely resembles the native ligament or tendon. These forces include, without limitation, the forces described above for the production of an ACL. Because the mechanical forces applied vary with ligament or tendon type, and the final size of the ligament or tendon will be influenced by the anchors used, optimal anchor composition, size and matrix attachment sites are to be determined for each type of ligament or tendon by the skilled practitioner. The type of cells seeded on the matrix is obviously determined based on the type of ligament or tendon to be produced.
  • Another aspect of the present invention relates to the production of other tissue types ex vivo using methods similar to those described above for the generation of ligaments or tendons ex vivo. The above described methods can also be applied to produce a range of engineered tissue products which involve mechanical deformation as a major part of their function, such as muscle (e.g., smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle), bone, cartilage, vertebral discs, and some types of blood vessels. Bone marrow stomal cells possess the ability to differentiate into these as well as other tissues. The geometry of the silk-based matrix or composite matrix can easily be adapted to the correct anatomical geometrical configuration of the desired tissue type. For example, silk fibroin fibers can be reformed in a cylindrical tube to recreate arteries.
  • The results presented in the Examples below indicate that growth in an environment which mimics the specific mechanical environment of a given tissue type will induce the appropriate cell differentiation to produce a bioengineered tissue which significantly resembles native tissue. The ranges and types of mechanical deformation of the matrix can be extended to produce a wide range of tissue structural organization. Preferably, the cell culture environment reflects the in vivo environment experienced by the native tissue and the cells it contains, throughout the course of embryonic development to mature function of the cells within the native tissue, as accurately as possible. Factors to consider when designing specific culture conditions to produce a given tissue include, without limitation, the matrix composition, the method of cell immobilization, the anchoring method of the matrix or tissue, the specific forces applied, and the cell culture medium. The specific regimen of mechanical stimulation depends upon the tissue type to be produced, and is established by varying the application of mechanical forces (e.g., tension only, torsion only, combination of tension and torsion, with and without shear, etc.), the force amplitude (e.g., angle or elongation), the frequency and duration of the application, and the duration of the periods of stimulation and rest.
  • The method for producing the specific tissue type ex vivo is an adaptation of the above described method for producing an ACL. Components involved include pluripotent cells, a three-dimensional matrix to which cells can adhere, and a plurality of anchors which have a face suitable for matrix attachment. The pluripotent cells (preferably bone marrow stromal cells) are seeded in the three dimensional matrix by means to uniformly immobilize the cells within the matrix. The number of cells seeded is also not viewed as limiting, however, seeding the matrix with a high density of cells may accelerate tissue generation.
  • The specific forces applied are to be determined for each tissue type produced through examination of native tissue and the mechanical stimuli experienced in vivo. A given tissue type experiences characteristic forces which are dictated by location and function of the tissue within the body. For instance, cartilage is known to experience a combination of shear and compression/tension in vivo, bone experiences compression. Determination of the specific mechanical stimuli experienced in vivo by a given tissue is within the means of one of skill in the art.
  • Additional stimuli (e.g., chemical stimuli, electro-magnetic stimuli) can also be incorporated into the above described methods for producing bioengineered ligaments, tendons and other tissues. Cell differentiation is known to be influenced by chemical stimuli from the environment, often produced by surrounding cells, such as secreted growth or differentiation factors, cell-cell contact, chemical gradients, and specific pH levels, to name a few. Other more unique stimuli are experienced by more specialized types of tissues (e.g., the electrical stimulation of cardiac muscle). The application of such tissue specific stimuli (e.g., 1-10 ng/ml transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) independently or in concert with the appropriate mechanical forces is expected to facilitate differentiation of the cells into a tissue which more closely approximates the specific natural tissue.
  • Tissues produced by the above described methods provide an unlimited pool of tissue equivalents for surgical implantation into a compatible recipient, particularly for replacement or repair of damaged tissue. Engineered tissues may also be utilized for in vitro studies of normal or pathological tissue function, e.g., for in vitro testing of cell- and tissue-level responses to molecular, mechanical, or genetic manipulations. For example, tissues based on normal or transfected cells can be used to assess tissue responses to biochemical or mechanical stimuli, identify the functions of specific genes or gene products that can be either over-expressed or knocked-out, or to study the effects of pharmacological agents. Such studies will likely provide more insight into ligament, tendon and tissue development, normal and pathological function, and eventually lead toward fully functional tissue engineered replacements, based in part on already established tissue engineering approaches, new insights into cell differentiation and tissue development, and the use of mechanical regulatory signals in conjunction with cell-derived and exogenous biochemical factors to improve structural and functional tissue properties.
  • The production of engineered tissues such as ligaments and tendons also has the potential for applications such as harvesting bone marrow stomal cells from individuals at high risk for tissue injury (e.g., ACL rupture) prior to injury. These cells could be either stored until needed or seeded into the appropriate matrix and cultured and differentiated in vitro under mechanical stimuli to produce a variety of bioengineered prosthetic tissues to be held in reserve until needed by the donor. The use of bioengineered living tissue prosthetics that better match the biological environment in vivo, provide the required physiological loading to sustain for example, the dynamic equilibrium of a normal, fully functional ligament, should reduce rehabilitation time for a recipient of a prosthesis from months to weeks, particularly if the tissue is pre-grown and stored. Benefits include a more rapid regain of functional activity, shorter hospital stays, and fewer problems with tissue rejections and failures.
  • It is to be understood that the present invention is not intended to be limited to a silk-fiber-based matrix for producing ACL, and other ligaments and tendons, as well as other tissues, such as cartilage, bone, skin and blood vessels are contemplated by the present invention by utilizing the novel silk-fiber based matrix seeded with the appropriate cells and exposed to the appropriate mechanical stimulation if necessary, for proliferating and differentiating into the desired ligament, tendon or tissue.
  • Additionally, the present invention is not limited to using bone marrow stromal cells for seeding on the matrix, and other progenitor, pluripotent and stem cells, such as those in bone, muscle and skin for example, may also be used to differentiate into ligaments and other tissues.
  • The invention is further defined by reference to the following examples. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many modifications, both to the materials and methods, may be practiced without departing from the purpose and interest of the invention.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1
  • a. Preparation of Silk Films
  • Raw Bombyx mori silkworm fibers, shown in FIG. 1A, were extracted to remove sericin, the glue-like protein coating the native silk fibroin (see FIG. 1A-C). The appropriate number of fibers per group were arranged in parallel and extracted in an aqueous solution of 0.02M Na2CO3 and 0.3% (w/v) Ivory soap solution for 60 min at 90° C., then rinsed thoroughly with water to extract the glue-like sericin proteins.
  • b. Preparation of and Properties of the Silk-Fiber Based Matrix Construct
  • Costello's equation for a three-strand wire rope was derived to predict mechanical properties of the silk-fiber-based matrix. The derived model is a series of equations that when combined, take into account extracted silk fiber material properties and desired matrix geometrical hierarchy to compute the overall strength and stiffness of the matrix as a function of pitch angle for a given level of geometrical hierarchy
  • The material properties of a single silk fiber include fiber diameter, modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, and the ultimate tensile strength (UTS). Geometrical hierarchy may be defined as the number of twisting levels in a given matrix level. Each level (e.g., group, bundle, strand, cord, ligament) is further defined by the number of groups of fibers twisted about each other and the number of fibers in each group of the first level twisted where the first level is define as a group, the second level as a bundle, the third as a strand and the fourth as a cord, the fifth as the ligament).
  • The model assumes that each group of multiple fibers act as a single fiber with an effective radius determined by the number of individual fibers and their inherent radius, i.e., the model discounts friction between the individual fibers due to its limited role in given a relatively high pitch angle.
  • Two applicable geometries (Matrix 1 and Matrix 2) of the many matrix geometrical configurations (see Table 2, supra) computed to yield mechanical properties mimicking those of a native ACL were derived for more detailed analysis. A six-cord construct was selected for use as the ACL replacement. Matrix configurations are as follows: Matrix 1: 1 ACL prosthesis=6 parallel cords; 1 cord=3 twisted strands (3 twists/cm); 1 strand=6 twisted bundles (3 twists/cm); 1 bundle=30 parallel washed fibers; and Matrix 2: 1 ACL matrix=6 parallel cords; 1 cord=3 twisted strands (2 twists/cm); 1 strand=3 twisted bundles (2.5 twists/cm); 1 bundle=3 groups (3 twists/cm); 1 group=15 parallel extracted silk fibroin fibers. The number of fibers and geometries were selected such that the silk prostheses are similar to the ACL biomechanical properties in UTS, linear stiffness, yield point and % elongation at break (see Table 2, supra), thus serving as a solid starting point for the development of a tissue engineered ACL.
  • Mechanical properties of the silk fibroin were characterized using a servohydralic Instron 8511 tension/compression system with Fast-Track software (see FIG. 1D). Single pull-to-failure and fatigue analysis were performed on single silk fibers, extracted fibroin and organized cords. Fibers and fibroin were organized in both parallel and wire-rope geometries (Matrix 1 (see FIG. 2A) and Matrix 2 (see FIG. 2B)) for characterization. Single pull to failure testing was performed at a strain rate of 100%/sec; force elongation histograms were generated and data analyzed using Instron Series IX software. Both Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 yielded similar mechanical and fatigue properties to the ACL in UTS, linear stiffness, yield point and % elongation at break (see Table 2 and FIG. 3).
  • Fatigue analyses were performed using a servohydraulic Instron 8511 tension/compression system with Wavemaker software on single cords of both Matrix 1 and Matrix 2. Data was extrapolated to represent the 6-cord ACL prostheses, which is shown in FIGS. 3B and 3D. Cord ends were embedded in an epoxy mold to generate a 3 cm long construct between anchors. Cycles to failure at UTS, 1,680N and 1,200N (N=5 for each load) for Matrix 1 (see FIG. 3B) and at UTS, 2280N, 2100N and 1800N loads (n=3 for each load) for Matrix 2 (see FIG. 3D) were determined using a H-sine wave function at 1 Hz generated by Wavemaker 32 version 6.6 (Instron, Canton, Mass.). Fatigue testing was conducted in a neutral phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution at room temperature.
  • Results
  • Complete sericin removal was observed after 60 min at 90° C. as determined by SEM (see FIGS. 1A-C). Removal of sericin from silk fibers altered the ultrastructure of the fibers, resulting in a smoother fiber surface and the underlying silk fibroin was revealed (shown in FIGS. 1A-C), with average diameter ranging between 20-40 μm. The fibroin exhibited a significant 15.2% decrease in ultimate tensile strength (1.033+/−0.042 N/fiber to 0.876+/−0.1 N/fiber) (p<0.05, paired Students t-test) (see FIG. 1D). The mechanical properties of the optimized silk matrices (see FIG. 2) are summarized in Table 1 above and in FIG. 3A (for Matrix 1) and in FIG. 3C (for Matrix 2). It is evident from these results that the optimized silk matrices exhibited values comparable to those of native ACL, which have been reported to have an average ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of ˜2100 N, stiffness of ˜250 N/nm, yield point ˜2100 N and 33% elongation at break (See Woo, S L-Y, et al., The Tensile Properties of Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) and ACL Graft Tissue in Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury and Repair, 279-289, Ed. D. Daniel et al., Raven Press 1990).
  • Regression analysis of matrix fatigue data, shown in FIG. 3B for Matrix 1 and in FIG. 3D for Matrix 2, when extrapolated to physiological load levels (400 N) predict the number of cycles to failure in vivo, indicate a matrix life of 3.3 million cycles for Matrix 1 and a life of >10 million cycles for Matrix 2. The wire rope matrix design utilizing washed silk fibers resulted in a matrix with physiologically equivalent structural properties, confirming its suitability as a scaffold for ligament tissue engineering
  • Example 2 Cell Isolation and Culture
  • Bone Marrow Stromal Cells (BMSC), pluripotent cells capable of differentiating into osteogenic, chondrogenic, tendonogenic, adipogenic and myogenic lineages, were chosen since the formation of the appropriate conditions can direct their differentiation into the desired ligament fibroblast cell line (Markolf et al., J. Bone Joint Surg. 71A: 887-893 (1989); Caplan et al., Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue repair. In The Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Current and Future Concepts, Ed. D. W. Jackson et al., Raven Press, Ltd, New York (1993); Young et al., J. Orthopaedic Res. 16: 406-413 (1998)).
  • Human BMSCs were isolated from bone marrow from the iliac crest of consenting donors ≦25 years of age by a commercial vendor (Cambrex, Walkersville, Md.). Twenty-two milliliters of human marrow was aseptically aspirated into a 25 ml syringe containing three milliliters of heparinized (1000 units per milliliter) saline solution. The heparinized marrow solution was shipped overnight on ice to the laboratory for bone marrow stromal cells isolation and culture. Upon arrival from the vendor, the twenty-five milliliter aspirates were resuspended in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/L streptomycin (P/S), and 1 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (Life Technologies, Rockville, Md.) and plated at 8-10 microliters of aspirate/cm2 in tissue culture flasks. Fresh medium was added to the marrow apirates twice a week for up to nine days of culture. BMSCs were selected based on their ability to adhere to the tissue culture plastic; non-adherent hematopoietic cells were removed during medium replacement after 9-12 days in culture. Medium was changed twice per week thereafter. When primary BMSC became near confluent (12-14 days), they were detached using 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA and replated at 5×103 cells/cm2. First passage (P1) hBMSCs were trypsinized and frozen in 8% DMSO/10% FBS/DMEM for future use.
  • Silk Matrix Cell Seeding
  • Frozen P1 hBMSCs were defrosted, replated at 5×103 cells/cm2 (P2), trypsinized when near confluency, and used for matrix seeding. Sterilized (ethylene oxide) silk matrices (specifically single cords of Matrix 1 & 2, bundles of 30 parallel extracted silk fibers and wire-ropes of collage fibers) were seeded with cells in customized seeding chambers (1 ml total volume) machined in Teflon blocks to minimize cell-medium volume and increase cell-matrix contact. Seeded matrices, following a 4 hour incubation period with the cell slurry (3.3×106 BMSCs/ml) were transferred into a petri dish contain an appropriate amount of cell culture medium for the duration of the experiments.
  • To determine the degradation rate of the silk fibroin, ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was measured as a function of cultivation period in physiological growth conditions, i.e., in cell culture medium. Groups of 30 parallel silk fibers 3 cm in length were extracted, seeded with hBMSCs, and cultured on the fibroin over 21 days at 37° C. and 5% CO2. Non-seeded control groups were cultured in parallel. Silk fibroin UTS was determined as a function of culture duration for seeded and non-seeded groups.
  • Results
  • The response of bone marrow stromal cells to the silk matrix was also examined.
  • BMSCs readily attached and grew on the silk and collagen matrices after 1 day in culture (See FIG. 4A-C and FIG. 10A), and formed cellular extensions to bridge neighboring fibers. As shown in FIG. 4D and FIG. 10B, a uniform cells sheet covering the construct was observed at 14 and 21 days of culture, respectively. MTT analysis confirmed complete matrix coverage by seeded BMSCs after 14 days in culture (see FIG. 5). Total DNA quantification of cells grown on Matrix 1 (see FIG. 6A) and Matrix 2 (see FIG. 6B) confirmed that BMSCs proliferated and grew on the silk construct with the highest amount of DNA measured after 21 and 14 days, respectively, in culture.
  • Both BMSC seeded or non-seeded extracted control silk fibroin groups of 30 fibers, maintained their mechanical integrity as a function of culture period over 21 days (see FIG. 7).
  • RT-PCR analysis of BMSCs seeded on cords of Matrix 2 indicated that both collagen I & III were upregulated over 14 days in culture (FIG. 8). Collagen type II and bone sialoprotein (as indicators of cartilage and bone specific differentiation, respectively) were either not detectable or negligibly expressed over the cultivation period. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR at 14 days yielded a transcript ratio of collagen I to collagen III, normalized to GAPDH, of 8.9:1 (see FIG. 11). The high ratio of collagen I to collagen III indicates that the response is not wound healing or scar tissue formation (as is observed with high levels of collagen type III), but rather ligament specific; the relative ratio of collagen I to collagen III in a native ACL is ˜6.6:1 (Amiel et al., In Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. 1990).
  • Example 3
  • Studies are conducted to provide insight into the influence of directed multi-dimensional mechanical stimulation on ligament formation from bone marrow stromal cells in the bioreactor system. The bioreactor is capable of applying independent but concurrent cyclic multi-dimensional strains (e.g., translation, rotation) to the developing ligaments. After a 7 to 14 day static rest period (time post seeding), the rotational and translation strain rates and linear and rotational deformation are kept constant for 1 to 4 weeks. Translational strain (3.3%-10%, 1-3 mm) and rotational strain (25%, 90°) are concurrently applied at a frequency of 0.0167 Hz (one full cycle of stress and relaxation per minute) to the silk-based matrices seeded with BMSCs; an otherwise identical set of bioreactors with seeded matrices without mechanical loading serve as controls. The ligaments are exposed to the constant cyclic strains for the duration of the experiment days.
  • Following the culture period, ligament samples, both the mechanically challenged as well as the controls (static) are characterized for: (1) general histomorphological appearance (by visual inspection); (2) cell distribution (image processing of histological and MTT stained sections); (3) cell morphology and orientation (histological analysis); and (4) the production of tissue specific markers (RT-PCR, immunostaining).
  • Mechanical stimulation markedly affects the morphology and organization of the BMSCs and newly developed extracellular matrix, the distribution of cells along the matrix, and the upregulation of a ligament-specific differentiation cascade; BMSCs align along the long axis of the fiber, take on a spheroid morphology similar to ligament/tendon fibroblasts and upregulate ligament/tendon specific markers. Newly formed extracellular matrix is expected to align along the lines of load as well as the long axis of the matrix. Directed mechanical stimulation is expected to enhance ligament development and formation in vitro in a bioreactor resulting from BMSCs seeded on the novel silk-based matrix. The longitudinal orientation of cells and newly formed matrix is similar to ligament fibroblasts found within an ACL in vivo (Woods et al. Amer. J. Sports Med. 19: 48-55 (1991)). Furthermore, mechanical stimulation maintains the correct expression ratio between collagen I transcripts and collagen type III transcripts (e.g., >7:1) indicating the presence of newly formed ligament tissue versus scare tissue formation. The above results will indicate that the mechanical apparatus and bioreactor system provide a suitable environment (e.g., multi-dimensional strains) for in vitro formation of tissue engineered ligaments starting from bone marrow stromal cells and the novel silk-based matrix.
  • The culture conditions used in these preliminary experiments can be further expanded to more accurately reflect the physiological environment of a ligament (e.g. increasing the different types of mechanical forces) for the in vitro creation of functional equivalents of native ACL for potential clinical use. These methods are not limited to the generation of a bioengineered ACL. By applying the appropriate magnitude and variety of forces experienced in vivo, any type of ligament in the body can be produced ex vivo by the methods of the present invention.

Claims (34)

1. A fiber construct comprising sericin-extracted silkworm fibroin fibers, wherein the fibers have a diameter of about 20 to about 40 μm and an average ultimate tensile strength of at least about 0.67 N/fiber.
2. The fiber construct of claim 1, wherein the fibers are organized in parallel.
3. The fiber construct of claim 1, wherein the fibers are organized in a helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry.
4. The fiber construct of claim 1, wherein the fibers comprise a coating and/or surface modification that promotes cellular attachment and/or tissue differentiation and proliferation thereon.
5. The fiber construct of claim 4, wherein said coating and/or surface modification comprises an arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) peptide.
6. The fiber construct of claim 4, wherein said coating and/or surface modification comprises a growth factor.
7. The fiber construct of claim 1, wherein the construct comprises a group of at least one to about 1300 fibroin fibers.
8. The fiber construct of claim 7, wherein the construct further comprises at least two groups forming a bundle.
9. The fiber construct of claim 8, wherein the construct further comprises at least two bundles forming a strand.
10. The fiber construct of claim 9, wherein the construct further comprises at least two strands forming a cord.
11. The fiber construct of claim 7, wherein the group comprises fibroin fibers organized in a parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry.
12. The fiber construct of claim 8, wherein the bundle comprises groups organized in a parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry.
13. The fiber construct of claim 9, wherein the strand comprises bundles organized in a parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry.
14. The fiber construct of claim 10, wherein the cord comprises strands organized in a parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry.
15. The fiber construct of claim 1, wherein the construct has an average ultimate tensile strength of at least about 6.67 N.
16. The fiber construct of claim 1, further comprising cells.
17. The fiber construct of claim 16, wherein the cells are selected from the group consisting of stem cells, muscle cells, bone marrow stromal cells, pluripotent cells, or fibroblast cells.
18. A method for producing a sericin-extracted silk-fibroin fiber construct comprising: contacting at least one silkworm fibroin fiber with an aqueous solution of Na2Co3 and detergent to extract sericin from the fiber.
19. A method for producing a sericin-extracted silk-fibroin fiber construct comprising:
a. arranging at least 2 silkworm fibroin fibers to form a group; and
b. contacting the group with an aqueous solution of Na2Co3 and detergent to extract sericin from the fibers.
20. A method for producing a sericin-extracted silk-fibroin fiber construct comprising:
a. arranging at least 2 groups of silkworm fibroin fibers to form a bundle; and
b. contacting the bundle with an aqueous solution of Na2Co3 and detergent to extract sericin from the fibers.
21. A method for producing a sericin-extracted silk-fibroin fiber construct comprising:
a. arranging at least 2 bundles of silkworm fibroin fibers to form a strand; and
b. contacting the strand with an aqueous solution of Na2Co3 and detergent to extract sericin from the fibers.
22. A method for producing a sericin-extracted silk-fibroin fiber construct comprising:
a. arranging at least 2 strands of silkworm fibroin fibers to form a cord; and
b. contacting the cord with an aqueous solution of Na2Co3 and detergent to extract sericin from the fibers.
23. The method as in one of claims 18-22, wherein the sericin is extracted at a temperature no greater than about 90° C.
24. The method as in one of claims 18-22, further comprising the step of coating the fibroin fibers with a coating and/or surface modifier that promotes cellular attachment and/or tissue proliferation on the fibers.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein said coating and/or surface modifier comprises an arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) peptide.
26. The method of claim 24, wherein said coating and/or surface modifier comprises a growth factor.
27. The method of claim 19, wherein said group comprises up to 1300 fibroin fibers.
28. The method of claim 18, further comprising the step of placing the fiber in a twisted, helical, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry.
29. The method of claim 19, wherein the fibers are organized in a parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry.
30. The method of claim 20, wherein the groups are organized in a parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry forming a bundle.
31. The method of claim 21, wherein the bundles are organized in a parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry forming a strand.
32. The method of claim 22, wherein the strands are organized in a in parallel, helical, wire rope, twisted, braided, mesh-like or cabled geometry forming a cord.
33. The method as in any of claims 18-22, further comprising:
a. contacting the construct with cells; and
b. culturing the construct under conditions suitable for cell growth and regeneration.
34. The method of claim 33, wherein the cells are stem cells, muscle cells, bone marrow stromal cells, pluripotent cells, or fibroblast cells.
US10/990,199 2001-11-16 2004-11-16 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering Abandoned US20050089552A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/990,199 US20050089552A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2004-11-16 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US12/770,570 US20100209405A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2010-04-29 Sericin extracted silkworm fibroin fibers
US13/074,282 US20110189773A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-29 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US13/751,514 US20130197194A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2013-01-28 Spider silk based matrix
US14/514,742 US20150104514A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2014-10-15 Implantable silk-based tissue prostheses

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/008,924 US6902932B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2001-11-16 Helically organized silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US10/990,199 US20050089552A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2004-11-16 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/008,924 Continuation US6902932B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2001-11-16 Helically organized silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering

Related Child Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/770,570 Continuation US20100209405A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2010-04-29 Sericin extracted silkworm fibroin fibers
US13/074,282 Division US20110189773A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-29 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US13/751,514 Continuation US20130197194A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2013-01-28 Spider silk based matrix

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050089552A1 true US20050089552A1 (en) 2005-04-28

Family

ID=21734509

Family Applications (17)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/008,924 Expired - Lifetime US6902932B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2001-11-16 Helically organized silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US10/800,134 Abandoned US20040224406A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2004-03-11 Immunoneutral silk-fiber-based medical devices
US10/990,199 Abandoned US20050089552A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2004-11-16 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US12/770,588 Abandoned US20100256756A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2010-04-29 Sericin extracted fabrics
US12/770,570 Abandoned US20100209405A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2010-04-29 Sericin extracted silkworm fibroin fibers
US13/071,380 Expired - Fee Related US8633027B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-24 Knitted biodegradable silk fabric comprising yarn promoting ingrowth of cells and methods of making
US13/071,396 Expired - Lifetime US8628791B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-24 Method of forming an implantable knitted fabric comprising silk fibroin fibers
US13/074,282 Abandoned US20110189773A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-29 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US13/456,860 Expired - Fee Related US8685426B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-04-26 Methods for making biocompatible, implantable, substantially sericin free silk fabric
US13/561,911 Abandoned US20120289981A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/561,847 Abandoned US20120296352A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/561,808 Expired - Fee Related US8623398B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Method for generating connective tissue by implanting a biodegradable silk fabric
US13/561,949 Expired - Fee Related US9066884B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/561,885 Abandoned US20120294906A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/751,514 Abandoned US20130197194A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2013-01-28 Spider silk based matrix
US14/137,712 Expired - Fee Related US9089501B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2013-12-20 Sericin extracted fabrics
US14/514,742 Abandoned US20150104514A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2014-10-15 Implantable silk-based tissue prostheses

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/008,924 Expired - Lifetime US6902932B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2001-11-16 Helically organized silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US10/800,134 Abandoned US20040224406A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2004-03-11 Immunoneutral silk-fiber-based medical devices

Family Applications After (14)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/770,588 Abandoned US20100256756A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2010-04-29 Sericin extracted fabrics
US12/770,570 Abandoned US20100209405A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2010-04-29 Sericin extracted silkworm fibroin fibers
US13/071,380 Expired - Fee Related US8633027B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-24 Knitted biodegradable silk fabric comprising yarn promoting ingrowth of cells and methods of making
US13/071,396 Expired - Lifetime US8628791B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-24 Method of forming an implantable knitted fabric comprising silk fibroin fibers
US13/074,282 Abandoned US20110189773A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2011-03-29 Silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
US13/456,860 Expired - Fee Related US8685426B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-04-26 Methods for making biocompatible, implantable, substantially sericin free silk fabric
US13/561,911 Abandoned US20120289981A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/561,847 Abandoned US20120296352A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/561,808 Expired - Fee Related US8623398B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Method for generating connective tissue by implanting a biodegradable silk fabric
US13/561,949 Expired - Fee Related US9066884B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/561,885 Abandoned US20120294906A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2012-07-30 Sericin extracted fabrics
US13/751,514 Abandoned US20130197194A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2013-01-28 Spider silk based matrix
US14/137,712 Expired - Fee Related US9089501B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2013-12-20 Sericin extracted fabrics
US14/514,742 Abandoned US20150104514A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2014-10-15 Implantable silk-based tissue prostheses

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (17) US6902932B2 (en)
EP (2) EP1448765A4 (en)
JP (3) JP4737932B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2002366083A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2467195C (en)
WO (1) WO2003043486A2 (en)

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040224406A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2004-11-11 Tissue Regeneration, Inc. Immunoneutral silk-fiber-based medical devices
US20050143296A1 (en) * 2003-02-28 2005-06-30 Kozo Tsubouchi Extraction and utilization of cell growth-promoting peptides from silk protein
US20070191849A1 (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-08-16 Elattrache Neal S Method for double row fixation of tendon to bone
US20080119936A1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2008-05-22 Mount Sinai Hospital Intervertebral disc
US20110008437A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-01-13 Altman Gregory H Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110009960A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2011-01-13 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic fabric structure
US20110052695A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-03-03 Allergan, Inc. Drug delivery platforms comprising silk fibroin hydrogels and uses thereof
US20110111031A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-05-12 Guang-Liang Jiang Drug Delivery Platforms Comprising Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110129531A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-06-02 Allergan, Inc. Dermal Fillers Comprising Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110184227A1 (en) * 2009-09-11 2011-07-28 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
US20110190886A1 (en) * 2010-01-29 2011-08-04 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Braided tertiary nanofibrous structure for ligament, tendon, and muscle tissue implant
US20110224703A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2011-09-15 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device having diagonal yarns and method of manufacturing the same
EP2395014A2 (en) 2005-10-05 2011-12-14 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization Silk proteins
WO2013142901A1 (en) 2012-03-26 2013-10-03 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Silk polypeptides
US8674077B2 (en) 2009-08-26 2014-03-18 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Processes for producing silk dope
US8746014B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2014-06-10 Allergan, Inc. Method for making a knitted mesh
US9204953B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2015-12-08 Allergan, Inc. Biocompatible surgical scaffold with varying stretch
US9308070B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2016-04-12 Allergan, Inc. Pliable silk medical device
US9326840B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2016-05-03 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
US9394348B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2016-07-19 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Collagen-like silk genes
US9616114B1 (en) 2014-09-18 2017-04-11 David Gordon Bermudes Modified bacteria having improved pharmacokinetics and tumor colonization enhancing antitumor activity
US11129906B1 (en) 2016-12-07 2021-09-28 David Gordon Bermudes Chimeric protein toxins for expression by therapeutic bacteria
US11180535B1 (en) 2016-12-07 2021-11-23 David Gordon Bermudes Saccharide binding, tumor penetration, and cytotoxic antitumor chimeric peptides from therapeutic bacteria
US11801043B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2023-10-31 Arthrex, Inc. Suture anchor for knotless fixation of tissue

Families Citing this family (171)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6755863B2 (en) * 1999-10-08 2004-06-29 Bret A. Ferree Rotator cuff repair using engineered tissues
US7435260B2 (en) * 1999-08-13 2008-10-14 Ferree Bret A Use of morphogenetic proteins to treat human disc disease
JP2001163899A (en) * 1999-12-09 2001-06-19 Natl Inst Of Sericultural & Entomological Science Method for producing functional silk fibroin and its use
US7195642B2 (en) 2001-03-13 2007-03-27 Mckernan Daniel J Method and apparatus for fixing a graft in a bone tunnel
JP4638735B2 (en) * 2002-06-24 2011-02-23 タフツ ユニバーシティー Silk biomaterial and method of using the same
US7744597B2 (en) * 2002-06-26 2010-06-29 Lifenet Health Device and process for producing fiber products and fiber products produced thereby
US7498040B2 (en) 2005-10-12 2009-03-03 Lifenet Health Compositions for repair of defects in osseous tissues, and methods of making the same
US20040078090A1 (en) 2002-10-18 2004-04-22 Francois Binette Biocompatible scaffolds with tissue fragments
WO2004051519A1 (en) * 2002-12-03 2004-06-17 Shima Seiki Manufacturing Limited Simulation method and simulation system of image of twisted threads
US7842780B2 (en) 2003-01-07 2010-11-30 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk fibroin materials and use thereof
CA2562415C (en) 2003-04-10 2015-10-27 Tufts University Concentrated aqueous silk fibroin solutions free of organic solvents and uses thereof
US7494811B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2009-02-24 Lifenet Health In vitro growth of tissues suitable to the formation of bone and bone forming tissue formed thereby
DE10322024A1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Symetis Ag Bioreactor for manufacturing a tissue prosthesis, in particular a heart valve
WO2005000483A1 (en) * 2003-06-06 2005-01-06 Tufts University Method for forming inorganic coatings
US8226715B2 (en) * 2003-06-30 2012-07-24 Depuy Mitek, Inc. Scaffold for connective tissue repair
US10583220B2 (en) 2003-08-11 2020-03-10 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Method and apparatus for resurfacing an articular surface
US7699879B2 (en) 2003-10-21 2010-04-20 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing dynamizable translations to orthopedic implants
WO2005065079A2 (en) * 2003-11-10 2005-07-21 Angiotech International Ag Medical implants and fibrosis-inducing agents
WO2005044142A2 (en) * 2003-11-10 2005-05-19 Angiotech International Ag Intravascular devices and fibrosis-inducing agents
US20050136764A1 (en) * 2003-12-18 2005-06-23 Sherman Michael C. Designed composite degradation for spinal implants
US11395865B2 (en) 2004-02-09 2022-07-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Scaffolds with viable tissue
GB0405045D0 (en) * 2004-03-05 2004-04-07 Spinox Ltd Composite materials
AT500837A1 (en) * 2004-04-08 2006-04-15 Bobacz Klaus Dr METHOD FOR GENERATING CORTICULATING CELLS
US6932840B1 (en) * 2004-09-08 2005-08-23 Absolute Breast Solutions Implant device
DE602005013979D1 (en) * 2004-09-14 2009-05-28 Neurotex Ltd METHOD AND DEVICE FOR INCREASED GROWTH OF PERIPHERAL NERVES AND NERVE TISSUE
KR100762928B1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2007-10-04 재단법인서울대학교산학협력재단 Nonwoven Nanofibrous Membranes of Silk Fibroin for Guided Bone Tissue Regeneration and Their Preparation Method
BRPI0608186A2 (en) 2005-02-18 2011-01-04 Synthasome Inc synthetic structure for soft tissue repair
JP2009529923A (en) * 2005-04-08 2009-08-27 スツロックス リミテッド Resorbable implantable device
US8354501B2 (en) 2005-08-02 2013-01-15 Trustees Of Tufts College Methods for stepwise deposition of silk fibroin coatings
GB0516846D0 (en) * 2005-08-17 2005-09-21 Knight David P Meniscal repair device
DE102005042455A1 (en) * 2005-09-06 2007-04-12 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover neural implant
CN100382772C (en) * 2005-09-28 2008-04-23 南通大学 Medical nerve transplant containing silk element and preparing method
US7899533B2 (en) * 2005-10-25 2011-03-01 Medtronic, Inc. System and method of AV interval selection in an implantable medical device
KR100700324B1 (en) * 2005-11-07 2007-03-29 주식회사 웰스킨 Culture method for matrix comprising collagen improving porous and tensile strength by stimulation-system
US20080038236A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2008-02-14 Artecel Sciences, Inc. Biocompatible scaffolds and adipose-derived stem cells
US20090169628A1 (en) 2006-10-17 2009-07-02 Armark Authentication Technologies, Llc Article and method for focused delivery of therapeutic and/or diagnostic materials
US9011439B2 (en) * 2006-11-20 2015-04-21 Poly-Med, Inc. Selectively absorbable/biodegradable, fibrous composite constructs and applications thereof
WO2008071226A1 (en) * 2006-12-11 2008-06-19 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Implant of cross-linked spider silk threads
EP2111240B1 (en) * 2006-12-27 2012-08-08 Shriners Hospitals for Children Methods of making high-strength ndga polymerized collagen fibers and related medical devices and constructs
WO2008095052A2 (en) * 2007-01-30 2008-08-07 Loma Vista Medical, Inc., Biological navigation device
JP5643515B2 (en) * 2007-02-14 2014-12-17 シンササム,インコーポレイテッド Implants and methods for soft tissue repair
AU2008219006B2 (en) 2007-02-20 2013-04-18 Shriners Hospitals For Children In vivo hydraulic fixation including bio-rivets using biocompatible expandable fibers
EP2129772B1 (en) 2007-02-27 2016-07-27 Trustees Of Tufts College Tissue-engineered silk organs
CA2682701A1 (en) * 2007-03-20 2008-09-25 Serica Technologies, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
US9549809B2 (en) * 2007-04-21 2017-01-24 Kyon Ag ACL prosthesis and anchor therefor
EP2607477B1 (en) 2007-05-03 2020-09-23 The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc. Multipotent stem cells and uses thereof
US8574567B2 (en) * 2007-05-03 2013-11-05 The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. Multipotent stem cells and uses thereof
DK2211876T3 (en) 2007-05-29 2015-01-12 Tufts College PROCESS FOR silk fibroin-GELATION USING sonication
CN101332315A (en) * 2007-06-29 2008-12-31 上海国睿生命科技有限公司 Tissue engineering tendon and vitro construction method thereof
WO2009023615A1 (en) * 2007-08-10 2009-02-19 Trustees Of Tufts College Tubular silk compositions and methods of use thereof
FR2921675B1 (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-03-19 Univ Claude Bernard Lyon HYALURONIC ACID FILAMENT AND PROCESS FOR OBTAINING SAME
EP2249886A4 (en) * 2008-02-07 2013-05-22 Tufts College 3-dimensional silk hydroxyapatite compositions
WO2009105246A2 (en) * 2008-02-22 2009-08-27 Mimedx, Inc. Biostaples suitable for wrist, hand and other ligament replacements or repairs
US20110014153A1 (en) 2008-03-27 2011-01-20 Kathleen Derwin Reinforced tissue graft
WO2012047338A2 (en) 2010-06-28 2012-04-12 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Reinforced tissue graft
US20130116799A1 (en) 2008-03-27 2013-05-09 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Reinforced tissue graft
WO2009140588A1 (en) * 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk polymer-based adenosine release: therapeutic potential for epilepsy
EP2291143B1 (en) * 2008-05-16 2020-07-08 Mimedx, Inc. Medical constructs of twisted lengths of collagen fibers and methods of making same
US8501172B2 (en) * 2008-09-26 2013-08-06 Trustees Of Tufts College pH-induced silk gels and uses thereof
US20100078848A1 (en) * 2008-09-29 2010-04-01 Armark Authentication Technologies, Llc Spinneret and method of spinning fiber
MX2011003618A (en) 2008-10-09 2011-06-16 Tufts College Modified silk films containing glycerol.
CA2740008C (en) * 2008-10-09 2017-01-31 Mimedx, Inc. Methods of making biocomposite medical constructs and related constructs including artificial tissues, vessels and patches
GB2464348A (en) * 2008-10-17 2010-04-21 Spintec Engineering Gmbh Applying a liquid protein onto a permeable surface, and silk mono-filament having specific properties
GB0820492D0 (en) 2008-11-07 2008-12-17 Sportcell Cell compositions and uses thereof
JP5392758B2 (en) * 2008-11-14 2014-01-22 国立大学法人東京農工大学 Artificial blood vessel manufacturing method
WO2010057142A2 (en) 2008-11-17 2010-05-20 Trustees Of Tufts College Surface modification of silk fibroin matrices with poly(ethylene glycol) useful as anti adhesion barriers and anti thrombotic materials
DE102008059731A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-02 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover Method and device for stimulating cells
US20120150204A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2012-06-14 Allergan, Inc. Implantable silk prosthetic device and uses thereof
US20130317526A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2013-11-28 Allergan, Inc. Silk medical device
US20100291214A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-11-18 Armark Authentication Technologies, Llc Three-dimensional microfiber extrudate structure and process for forming three-dimensional microfiber extrudate structure
AU2010206374B2 (en) 2009-01-23 2013-01-17 Gloriana Therapeutics Sarl Improved cell lines and their use in encapsulated cell biodelivery
EP2210971A1 (en) 2009-01-26 2010-07-28 Politecnico Di Milano Silk fibroin textile structures as biomimetic prosthetics for the regeneration of tissues and ligaments
WO2010099463A2 (en) 2009-02-27 2010-09-02 University Of Pittsburgh-Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education Joint bioscaffolds
US20100291384A1 (en) * 2009-05-15 2010-11-18 Armark Authentication Technologies, Llc Fiber having non-uniform composition and method for making same
CA2762903C (en) * 2009-05-22 2013-07-30 Soft Tissue Regeneration, Inc. Mechanically competent scaffold for ligament and tendon regeneration
IN2012DN00445A (en) 2009-07-14 2015-05-15 Tufts College
US20110015735A1 (en) * 2009-07-16 2011-01-20 Artimplant Ab Implant for soft tissue reconstruction
KR101116237B1 (en) * 2009-08-12 2012-03-09 서울대학교산학협력단 Nanofibrous silk nerve conduit for the regeneration of injured nerve and preparation method thereof
CA2775706A1 (en) 2009-09-28 2011-03-31 Trustees Of Tufts College Drawn silk egel fibers and methods of making same
CA2774643A1 (en) 2009-09-29 2011-04-07 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk nanospheres and microspheres and methods of making same
WO2011051983A1 (en) * 2009-10-28 2011-05-05 Dmd Solofra S.P.A. In vitro bioengineered animal tissue fiber and its use in the textile industry
JP5654499B2 (en) * 2010-01-20 2015-01-14 独立行政法人科学技術振興機構 Production method of supramolecular fiber
WO2011109691A2 (en) 2010-03-05 2011-09-09 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk-based ionomeric compositions
KR101151358B1 (en) * 2010-03-17 2012-06-08 동국대학교 산학협력단 Composite Scaffold Containing Silk and Collagen and Preparation Method Thereof
CN103181025A (en) 2010-04-12 2013-06-26 塔夫茨大学 Silk electronic components
WO2012004635A1 (en) * 2010-07-05 2012-01-12 Achira Labs Pvt. Ltd. Methods of making a diagnostic composition and compositions therefrom
US8894992B2 (en) * 2010-08-19 2014-11-25 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and soft tissue replacement methods
US8883139B2 (en) * 2010-08-19 2014-11-11 Allergan Inc. Compositions and soft tissue replacement methods
US8889123B2 (en) * 2010-08-19 2014-11-18 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and soft tissue replacement methods
US9005605B2 (en) * 2010-08-19 2015-04-14 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and soft tissue replacement methods
US8697057B2 (en) 2010-08-19 2014-04-15 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and soft tissue replacement methods
US9566365B2 (en) 2010-09-01 2017-02-14 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk fibroin and polyethylene glycol-based biomaterials
WO2012031282A2 (en) 2010-09-03 2012-03-08 Tufts University/Trustees Of Tufts College Plasmonic nanoparticle-doped silk materials
WO2012047682A2 (en) 2010-09-27 2012-04-12 Tufts University Trustees Of Tufts College Silk-based piezoelectric materials
CA2812707C (en) 2010-09-27 2020-02-18 Nsgene A/S Implantable cell device with supportive and radial diffusive scaffolding
EP4218891A1 (en) 2010-10-19 2023-08-02 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk fibroin-based microneedles and methods of making the same
CA2823123A1 (en) 2010-12-27 2012-07-05 Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. Ultrasonic cavitation derived stromal or mesenchymal vascular extracts and cells derived therefrom obtained from adipose tissue and use thereof
JP2012171124A (en) * 2011-02-18 2012-09-10 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Pipe making member and method of regenerating existing pipe
WO2013105997A2 (en) 2011-02-23 2013-07-18 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and improved soft tissue replacement methods
CA2829339C (en) 2011-03-08 2018-10-16 Mimedx, Inc. Collagen fiber ribbons with integrated fixation sutures and methods of making the same
US10335519B2 (en) 2011-04-20 2019-07-02 Trustees Of Tufts College Dynamic silk coatings for implantable devices
WO2012150487A1 (en) 2011-05-05 2012-11-08 Achira Labs Pvt. Ltd. Low-cost diagnostic devices
ES2431539T3 (en) * 2011-06-07 2013-11-26 Gessner Ag Textile substrate from a plurality of different disposable and / or recyclable materials, use of a textile substrate of this type and process for processing a textile substrate of this type
US9694106B2 (en) 2011-07-11 2017-07-04 Mimedx Group, Inc. Synthetic collagen threads for cosmetic uses including skin wrinkle treatments and associated methods
GB201113856D0 (en) 2011-08-11 2011-09-28 Oxford Biomaterials Ltd Medical device
CA2855880C (en) * 2011-11-02 2021-01-05 Mimedx Group, Inc. Implantable collagen devices and related methods and systems of making same
WO2013130156A2 (en) 2011-12-05 2013-09-06 Tufts University Signal enhancement by silk photonic crystals
CN102488926B (en) * 2011-12-16 2013-10-30 东华大学 Tissue engineering scaffold for urethra reconstruction and preparation method thereof
BR112014016154A8 (en) 2011-12-29 2017-07-04 Tufts College functionalization of biomaterials to control responses to regeneration and inflammation
EP2811987B1 (en) 2012-02-06 2021-01-20 Children's Medical Center Corporation Multi-layer biomaterial for tissue regeneration and wound healing
WO2013118125A1 (en) * 2012-02-09 2013-08-15 Ramot At Tel-Aviv University Ltd. Composites comprising collagen extracted from sarcophyton sp. coral
EP2814527A1 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-12-24 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and improved soft tissue replacement methods
WO2013123270A1 (en) 2012-02-16 2013-08-22 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and improved soft tissue replacement methods
EP2814510A1 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-12-24 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and improved soft tissue replacement methods
WO2013123274A1 (en) 2012-02-16 2013-08-22 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and improved soft tissue replacement methods
ES2763336T3 (en) * 2012-02-28 2020-05-28 Incorpracyl Tech Ltd Tissue support structure
WO2013152265A1 (en) * 2012-04-06 2013-10-10 Trustees Of Tufts College Methods of producing and using silk microfibers
EP2841010B1 (en) 2012-04-24 2023-08-23 Harvard Apparatus Regenerative Technology, Inc. Supports for engineered tissue scaffolds
AU2013331359B2 (en) 2012-10-16 2018-04-19 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Tools and methods for treatment of pelvic conditions
KR101746311B1 (en) 2012-10-30 2017-06-27 더 클리브랜드 클리닉 파운데이션 Reinforced tissue graft
ES2618404T3 (en) 2012-10-30 2017-06-21 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Reinforced tissue graft
US20160270902A1 (en) * 2012-11-13 2016-09-22 Universitat Zurich Device for fixation of a flexible element, particularly a natural or synthetical ligament or tendon, to a bone
CN102940263A (en) * 2012-11-16 2013-02-27 陆超 Quick processing method of smoked and cured products
WO2014099895A1 (en) * 2012-12-17 2014-06-26 Atex Technologies, Inc. Medical textile and methods of making the same
WO2014110300A1 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-07-17 Harvard Apparatus Regenerative Technology Synthetic scaffolds
US10464361B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-11-05 Tufts University Silk water lithography
US11009792B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2021-05-18 Tufts University All water-based nanopatterning
US20150056261A1 (en) * 2013-08-22 2015-02-26 Allergan, Inc. Silk medical devices
JP6556122B2 (en) 2013-09-17 2019-08-07 ボルト スレッズ インコーポレイテッド Methods and compositions for synthesizing improved silk fibers
WO2015048344A2 (en) * 2013-09-27 2015-04-02 Tufts University Silk/platelet composition and use thereof
EA202091160A1 (en) 2013-09-30 2020-11-30 Силк Терапьютикс, Инк. COMPOSITIONS FROM FRAGMENTS OF SILK PROTEINS AND PRODUCTS MADE FROM THEM
EP3865144A1 (en) 2013-12-20 2021-08-18 The General Hospital Corporation Methods and assays relating to circulating tumor cells
US10595986B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2020-03-24 Robert D. Rehnke Internal long term absorbable matrix brassiere and tissue engineering scaffold
US11883275B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2024-01-30 Bard Shannon Limited In vivo tissue engineering devices, methods and regenerative and cellular medicine employing scaffolds made of absorbable material
US9913711B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2018-03-13 Robert D. Rehnke Internal long term absorbable matrix brassiere
US11638640B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2023-05-02 Bard Shannon Limited In vivo tissue engineering devices, methods and regenerative and cellular medicine employing scaffolds made of absorbable material
CN104117095B (en) * 2014-07-29 2015-12-30 复旦大学附属华山医院 Strontium/fibroin bionic coating modifies the preparation method of artificial ligament
CN104215773B (en) * 2014-08-22 2016-06-29 武汉高华细胞技术有限公司 A kind of method identifying mesenchymal stem cells MSCs activity
CN105670990B (en) * 2014-08-22 2019-12-10 中国人民解放军第二军医大学 Preparation method and application of tissue engineering material for promoting directional differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells
WO2016067189A1 (en) 2014-10-27 2016-05-06 Silk Biomaterials S.R.L. Process for the production of a hybrid structure consisting of coupled silk fibroin microfibers and nanofibers, hybrid structure thus obtained and its use as implantable medical device
WO2016085963A1 (en) 2014-11-25 2016-06-02 Garino Jonathan P Cruciate replacing artificial knee
EP3226835A4 (en) 2014-12-02 2018-09-26 Silk Therapeutics, Inc. Silk performance apparel and products and methods of preparing the same
GB201501134D0 (en) 2015-01-23 2015-03-11 Vollrath Friedrich W L Raw material for bio-spinning casting
US10064736B2 (en) 2015-06-25 2018-09-04 University of Central Oklahoma Engineered intervertebral disc (IVD) for degenerated disc disease
US11512425B2 (en) 2015-07-14 2022-11-29 Evolved By Nature, Inc. Silk performance apparel and products and methods of preparing the same
WO2017132405A1 (en) * 2016-01-26 2017-08-03 Sofregen Medical Ireland Limited Pliable silk medical device
US10953133B2 (en) 2016-02-23 2021-03-23 University of Central Oklahoma Process to create 3D tissue scaffold using electrospun nanofiber matrix and photosensitive hydrogel
WO2017165889A2 (en) * 2016-03-25 2017-09-28 Biorez, Inc. Complex braided scaffolds for improved tissue regeneration
US10945831B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2021-03-16 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Asymmetric tissue graft
USD856517S1 (en) 2016-06-03 2019-08-13 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Asymmetric tissue graft
CA3035839A1 (en) * 2016-09-14 2018-03-22 Bolt Threads, Inc. Long uniform recombinant protein fibers
WO2018081159A1 (en) * 2016-10-24 2018-05-03 Trustees Of Tufts College Biomimetic multilayer compositions
EP3565596A4 (en) 2017-01-05 2020-12-16 Brown University Methods and compositions relating to anti-chi3l1 antibody reagents
CN108384717A (en) 2017-02-03 2018-08-10 财团法人工业技术研究院 Cell culture vector module and cell culture system
RU2653428C1 (en) * 2017-03-17 2018-05-08 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение "Федеральный научный центр трансплантологии и искусственных органов имени академика В.И. Шумакова" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации (ФГБУ "ФНЦТИО им. ак. В.И. Шумакова" Минздрава России) Method for manufacturing natural silk-based textile biodegradable scaffolds
CN106866825B (en) * 2017-03-23 2020-10-27 南阳师范学院 Silkworm internal reference protein GAPDH polyclonal antibody and preparation method thereof
RU2653434C1 (en) * 2017-04-11 2018-05-08 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение "Приволжский федеральный медицинский исследовательский центр" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации Method for creating a bioresorbable cellular scaffold based on fibrin of blood plasma
WO2018204303A1 (en) 2017-05-01 2018-11-08 The Children's Medical Center Coporation Methods and compositions relating to anti-pd1 antibody reagents
US11390988B2 (en) 2017-09-27 2022-07-19 Evolved By Nature, Inc. Silk coated fabrics and products and methods of preparing the same
US11883276B2 (en) 2018-03-12 2024-01-30 Bard Shannon Limited In vivo tissue engineering devices, methods and regenerative and cellular medicine employing scaffolds made of absorbable material
JP7372678B2 (en) * 2018-04-03 2023-11-01 Spiber株式会社 Molded object and its manufacturing method
USD895812S1 (en) 2018-09-07 2020-09-08 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Soft tissue repair graft
US10813743B2 (en) 2018-09-07 2020-10-27 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Soft tissue repair grafts and processes for preparing and using same
CN109793927A (en) * 2019-01-24 2019-05-24 中国人民解放军军事科学院军事医学研究院 The preparation method of silk fibroin porous scaffold based on extracellular derivative matrix modification
WO2020247594A1 (en) 2019-06-04 2020-12-10 Cocoon Biotech Inc. Silk-based products, formulations, and methods of use
JP2023519161A (en) 2020-03-23 2023-05-10 バード シャノン リミテッド In vivo tissue engineering devices, methods and regenerative and cell therapy using scaffolds made of absorbable materials
EP4196569A1 (en) * 2020-08-12 2023-06-21 Trustees of Tufts College Cultured tissue and bioreactor systems and methods for production thereof
WO2022155410A1 (en) 2021-01-15 2022-07-21 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods and compositions relating to anti-mfsd2a antibodies
US20220331400A1 (en) * 2021-04-14 2022-10-20 Cocoon Biotech Inc. Methods of making stable silk fibroin formulations
CN113355279A (en) * 2021-06-07 2021-09-07 深圳市中佳生物医疗科技有限公司 Preparation method of human ligament fibroblast
CN113663128B (en) * 2021-09-29 2022-05-10 东华大学 High-strength composite coating artificial ligament and preparation method and application thereof

Citations (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US848605A (en) * 1905-07-15 1907-03-26 Peter Schmid Process for ungumming silk.
US1709662A (en) * 1925-10-30 1929-04-16 Celanese Corp Process of degumming
US1815279A (en) * 1927-11-29 1931-07-21 Takamine Ferment Company Process of degumming silk
US1828736A (en) * 1930-02-03 1931-10-27 Carbide & Carbon Chem Corp Degumming silk
US1896494A (en) * 1929-03-16 1933-02-07 Twitchell Process Company Process of degumming silk
US1927022A (en) * 1931-12-17 1933-09-19 Humberto L Bueno Art of treating natural and artificial silk and agents therefor
US1990588A (en) * 1928-11-14 1935-02-12 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Artificial fibroin thread
US2040949A (en) * 1933-01-11 1936-05-19 Celanese Corp Degumming of silk
US4141207A (en) * 1977-09-02 1979-02-27 Shigesaburo Mizushima Process for producing curl shrunk silk yarn
US4461298A (en) * 1982-07-26 1984-07-24 Ethicon, Inc. Composite sutures of silk and hydrophobic thermoplastic elastomers
US4865031A (en) * 1985-07-12 1989-09-12 Keeffe Paul J O Fabric and method of use for treatment of scars
US5252285A (en) * 1992-01-27 1993-10-12 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for making silk fibroin fibers
US5456697A (en) * 1987-08-26 1995-10-10 United States Surgical Corporation Cabled core and braided suture made therefrom
US5736399A (en) * 1994-03-09 1998-04-07 Research Development Corporation Of Japan Medium-penetrating cell culture carrier, a culturing method and a device using this carrier
US5951506A (en) * 1996-01-23 1999-09-14 Japan As Represented By National Institute Of Sericultural Ans Entomological Science Wound covering material
US5965125A (en) * 1995-10-25 1999-10-12 Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. Hybrid matrix implants and explants
US5994099A (en) * 1997-12-31 1999-11-30 The University Of Wyoming Extremely elastic spider silk protein and DNA coding therefor
US6287340B1 (en) * 1999-05-14 2001-09-11 Trustees Of Tufts College Bioengineered anterior cruciate ligament
US6303136B1 (en) * 1998-04-13 2001-10-16 Neurotech S.A. Cells or tissue attached to a non-degradable filamentous matrix encapsulated by a semi-permeable membrane
US6302922B1 (en) * 1996-02-23 2001-10-16 Sumitomo Corporation Process for manufacturing woven or knit fabrics having excellent shrink and crease resistance and shape stability by using sericin fixed yarns of raw silks and the woven or knit fabrics manufactured by the same process
US6440740B1 (en) * 1997-11-18 2002-08-27 Japan As Represented By Director General Of National Institute Of Sericultural And Entomological Science, Ministry Of Agriculture, Forestry And Fisheries Material for activating epidermal cell multiplication
US6530956B1 (en) * 1998-09-10 2003-03-11 Kevin A. Mansmann Resorbable scaffolds to promote cartilage regeneration
US20040005363A1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2004-01-08 National Institute Of Agrobiological Sciences Biodegradable biopolymers, method for their preparation and functional materials constituted by these biopolymers
US7285637B2 (en) * 2000-10-02 2007-10-23 Consorzio Per Gli Studi Universitari Method for the preparation of a non-woven silk fibroin fabrics

Family Cites Families (114)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US849605A (en) 1905-06-14 1907-04-09 Peerless Machinery Co Method of covering eyelets with a flexible material.
US846805A (en) * 1906-02-02 1907-03-12 William Vogel & Brothers Stereoscope.
US1921022A (en) * 1931-07-25 1933-08-08 Bell Telephone Labor Inc Submarine cable signaling system
US2193188A (en) * 1938-06-16 1940-03-12 American Cyanamid Co Noncapillary silk suture and method of preparing the same
US3595276A (en) * 1969-01-21 1971-07-27 Rolls Royce Method and apparatus for introducing a weft thread into a sheet of warp threads
US4118842A (en) * 1977-07-08 1978-10-10 Champion International Corporation Weave-de-weave process
US4792336A (en) * 1986-03-03 1988-12-20 American Cyanamid Company Flat braided ligament or tendon implant device having texturized yarns
US5250077A (en) * 1987-04-28 1993-10-05 Kanebo Co., Ltd. Silk fiber having good abrasion resistance and good light resistance and methods for the preparation thereof
US5606019A (en) * 1987-10-29 1997-02-25 Protien Polymer Technologies, Inc. Synthetic protein as implantables
US5120829A (en) * 1989-03-20 1992-06-09 La Jolla Cancer Research Foundation Hydrophobic attachment site for adhesion peptides
US5245012A (en) * 1990-04-19 1993-09-14 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Method to achieve solubilization of spider silk proteins
US5989894A (en) * 1990-04-20 1999-11-23 University Of Wyoming Isolated DNA coding for spider silk protein, a replicable vector and a transformed cell containing the DNA
US5171505A (en) * 1990-11-28 1992-12-15 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for spinning polypeptide fibers
EP0513803A2 (en) * 1991-05-17 1992-11-19 Japan Vilene Company, Ltd. Carrier for immobilization of animal cells, process for manufacture thereof, and methods for cultivation
JPH06245989A (en) * 1993-02-24 1994-09-06 Nippon Shoji Kk Suture yarn for operation and its production
FR2720266B1 (en) * 1994-05-27 1996-12-20 Cogent Sarl Prosthetic fabric.
RU2076740C1 (en) * 1994-07-27 1997-04-10 Станислав Сергеевич Сапоровский Method of quality increase of silk surgery thread
US5700559A (en) * 1994-12-16 1997-12-23 Advanced Surface Technology Durable hydrophilic surface coatings
GB9510624D0 (en) * 1995-05-25 1995-07-19 Ellis Dev Ltd Textile surgical implants
US5643043A (en) 1995-05-31 1997-07-01 Pflum; Trish Winsche Brassiere for female athletes
JPH0931798A (en) * 1995-07-07 1997-02-04 Toru Takada Silk velvet fabric or knitted fabric and its production
US5569273A (en) 1995-07-13 1996-10-29 C. R. Bard, Inc. Surgical mesh fabric
US5771716A (en) 1995-09-18 1998-06-30 Schlussel; Edward Warp-knitted loop net fabric
US5800514A (en) * 1996-05-24 1998-09-01 Meadox Medicals, Inc. Shaped woven tubular soft-tissue prostheses and methods of manufacturing
AU728480B2 (en) * 1996-08-07 2001-01-11 Hospital For Sick Children, The Self-aligning peptides derived from elastin and other fibrous proteins
FR2755846B1 (en) * 1996-11-20 1998-12-31 Jacques Philippe Laboureau PRE-ORIENT PROSTHETIC LIGAMENT AND METHOD OF MAKING
US6146418A (en) * 1997-02-28 2000-11-14 Berman; Mark Body implant and method of implanting
EP0920875A1 (en) * 1997-06-18 1999-06-09 JAPAN as repr. by DIR. GENERAL of NATIONAL INST. OF SERICULTURAL & ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE MINISTRY OF AGR, FORESTRY & FISHERI Wound covering material containing silk fibroin and silk sericin as the main components and process for producing the same
FR2766698B1 (en) 1997-08-01 1999-11-05 Cogent Sarl ADJUSTED THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROSTHETIC FABRIC
US6042592A (en) * 1997-08-04 2000-03-28 Meadox Medicals, Inc. Thin soft tissue support mesh
US6090116A (en) 1997-10-03 2000-07-18 D'aversa; Margaret M. Knitted surgical mesh
JP2955653B2 (en) * 1998-02-16 1999-10-04 農林水産省蚕糸・昆虫農業技術研究所長 Silk protein / collagen composite and method for producing the same
US6110590A (en) * 1998-04-15 2000-08-29 The University Of Akron Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same
FR2779937B1 (en) 1998-06-23 2000-08-11 Sofradim Production ADJUSTED ISOELASTIC PROSTHETIC FABRIC
WO2000016822A1 (en) * 1998-09-21 2000-03-30 The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. Compositions and methods for tissue repair
AU2477300A (en) 1998-12-11 2000-06-26 Gerald W. Johnson Solid filled implants
US6287316B1 (en) 1999-03-26 2001-09-11 Ethicon, Inc. Knitted surgical mesh
GB9912240D0 (en) 1999-05-27 1999-07-28 Smith & Nephew Implantable medical devices
JP3362778B2 (en) 1999-06-03 2003-01-07 独立行政法人農業生物資源研究所 Method for producing ultrafine crystalline silk powder
ATE334639T1 (en) * 1999-06-08 2006-08-15 Ethicon Inc SURGICAL KNITTED FABRIC
US6506394B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2003-01-14 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Delivery of a botanical extract to a treated substrate for transfer to skin
DE19942611C1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2001-07-05 Ethicon Gmbh Reinforced flat implant
IT1309453B1 (en) * 1999-10-01 2002-01-23 Consorzio Per Gli Studi Uni BIOARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATE FOR THE REALIZATION OF FABRICS AND ORGANIANIMALS, IN PARTICULAR HUMAN.
DE19954166A1 (en) 1999-11-10 2001-05-17 Inst Textil & Faserforschung Flat implant, method for its production and use in surgery
JP2001163899A (en) 1999-12-09 2001-06-19 Natl Inst Of Sericultural & Entomological Science Method for producing functional silk fibroin and its use
US6228132B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2001-05-08 Innovative Products Process for modifying silk
US6620917B1 (en) * 2000-01-20 2003-09-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Method for the purification and aqueous fiber spinning of spider silks and other structural proteins
JP2003533468A (en) * 2000-02-28 2003-11-11 ゲル−デル テクノロジーズ,インコーポレイティド Protein matrix materials, production and their production and use
DE10019604C2 (en) * 2000-04-20 2002-06-27 Ethicon Gmbh implant
US6729356B1 (en) * 2000-04-27 2004-05-04 Endovascular Technologies, Inc. Endovascular graft for providing a seal with vasculature
US6730016B1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2004-05-04 Acorn Cardiovascular, Inc. Cardiac disease treatment and device
DE50100974D1 (en) * 2000-06-14 2003-12-18 Voest Alpine Ind Anlagen DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TREATING A HYDROCARBON WASTE
US6683275B2 (en) * 2000-06-23 2004-01-27 Memex Optical Media Solutions Ag Method and apparatus for fabricating phase-change recording medium
DE10046119A1 (en) * 2000-09-15 2002-03-28 Inst Textil & Faserforschung Medical bioresorbable implant, method of manufacture and use
GB0024903D0 (en) * 2000-10-11 2000-11-22 Ellis Dev Ltd A textile prothesis
JP2002128691A (en) * 2000-10-24 2002-05-09 National Institute Of Agrobiological Sciences Sericin-containing raw material, method for producing the same and method for using the same
US20020156437A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-10-24 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Removal of targeted proteases with proteinaceous wound dressings containing growth factors
US6783554B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2004-08-31 Atrium Medical Corporation Pile mesh prosthesis
US6827743B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2004-12-07 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Woven orthopedic implants
WO2002072931A1 (en) * 2001-03-14 2002-09-19 Japan As Represented By President Of Tokyo University Of Agriculture And Technology Method for producing fiber and film of silk and silk-like material
GB0108181D0 (en) * 2001-04-02 2001-05-23 Xiros Plc Silk-based fibre
FR2830434B1 (en) 2001-10-05 2004-01-02 Sofradim Production THREE-DIMENSIONAL TRICOT WALL REINFORCEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT
US20110009960A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2011-01-13 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic fabric structure
US6902932B2 (en) * 2001-11-16 2005-06-07 Tissue Regeneration, Inc. Helically organized silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
EP1472394A1 (en) * 2002-01-09 2004-11-03 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Polypeptide fibers and processes for making them
DK200200483A (en) 2002-04-02 2003-10-03 Tytex As Bra, especially useful for breastfeeding
JP3973483B2 (en) 2002-05-08 2007-09-12 Ykk株式会社 Elastic warp knitted fabric
JP4638735B2 (en) * 2002-06-24 2011-02-23 タフツ ユニバーシティー Silk biomaterial and method of using the same
US7824701B2 (en) * 2002-10-18 2010-11-02 Ethicon, Inc. Biocompatible scaffold for ligament or tendon repair
US7842780B2 (en) * 2003-01-07 2010-11-30 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk fibroin materials and use thereof
ES2368843T3 (en) 2003-03-11 2011-11-22 Allergan, Inc. BIOCOMPATIBLE SILK FABRIC IMPLANT.
US7115388B2 (en) * 2003-03-14 2006-10-03 National Institute Of Agrobiological Sciences Production of functional polypeptides originating from silk protein and use thereof
FR2859624B1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2005-12-02 Sofradim Production PROTHETIC KNIT WITH VARIABLE PROPERTIES
WO2005065079A2 (en) * 2003-11-10 2005-07-21 Angiotech International Ag Medical implants and fibrosis-inducing agents
US7293433B1 (en) 2004-03-02 2007-11-13 Atex Technologies, Inc. Warp knit fabrics useful for medical articles and methods of making same
WO2005123114A2 (en) 2004-06-11 2005-12-29 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk-based drug delivery system
US8007531B2 (en) 2004-08-06 2011-08-30 Frank Robert E Implantable prosthesis for positioning and supporting a breast implant
US7476249B2 (en) * 2004-08-06 2009-01-13 Frank Robert E Implantable prosthesis for positioning and supporting a breast implant
JP2008530518A (en) * 2004-12-24 2008-08-07 パクセンス インコーポレーティッド System and method for monitoring environmental conditions
AU2006226961A1 (en) 2005-03-22 2006-09-28 Tyco Healthcare Group, Lp Mesh implant
JP2009529923A (en) * 2005-04-08 2009-08-27 スツロックス リミテッド Resorbable implantable device
US8709023B2 (en) * 2007-07-17 2014-04-29 Poly-Med, Inc. Absorbable / biodegradable composite yarn constructs and applications thereof
DE102005030614B4 (en) 2005-06-30 2014-05-08 Biotissue Ag Cell-free graft, its use, process for its preparation, matrix thus produced with gel and process for the preparation of this matrix with gel
US7429206B2 (en) 2006-01-18 2008-09-30 Judith Perry Upper body undergarment
US20080038236A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2008-02-14 Artecel Sciences, Inc. Biocompatible scaffolds and adipose-derived stem cells
EP2068766B1 (en) 2006-07-31 2011-10-19 Organogenesis, Inc. Mastopexy and breast reconstruction prostheses
AU2007303137B2 (en) 2006-10-03 2014-04-10 Sinclair Pharmaceuticals Limited Minimally invasive tissue support
US7614258B2 (en) 2006-10-19 2009-11-10 C.R. Bard, Inc. Prosthetic repair fabric
US8192760B2 (en) * 2006-12-04 2012-06-05 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Methods and compositions for treating tissue using silk proteins
JP5643515B2 (en) 2007-02-14 2014-12-17 シンササム,インコーポレイテッド Implants and methods for soft tissue repair
CA2682701A1 (en) 2007-03-20 2008-09-25 Serica Technologies, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
WO2009023615A1 (en) 2007-08-10 2009-02-19 Trustees Of Tufts College Tubular silk compositions and methods of use thereof
WO2009039373A1 (en) * 2007-09-19 2009-03-26 Ethicon, Inc. Naturally contoured, preformed, three dimensional mesh device for breast implant support
US9381273B2 (en) * 2008-01-31 2016-07-05 Yissum Research Development Company Of The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem Scaffolds with oxygen carriers, and their use in tissue regeneration
US20100023029A1 (en) * 2008-07-23 2010-01-28 Bodyaesthetic Research Center, Inc. Mesh Device for Immediate Breast Construction and Uses Thereof
EP2992856A1 (en) 2008-12-15 2016-03-09 Allergan, Inc. A prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
US9204953B2 (en) * 2008-12-15 2015-12-08 Allergan, Inc. Biocompatible surgical scaffold with varying stretch
US9326840B2 (en) * 2008-12-15 2016-05-03 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
US9204954B2 (en) * 2008-12-15 2015-12-08 Allergan, Inc. Knitted scaffold with diagonal yarn
EP2210971A1 (en) 2009-01-26 2010-07-28 Politecnico Di Milano Silk fibroin textile structures as biomimetic prosthetics for the regeneration of tissues and ligaments
US20120052124A1 (en) 2009-03-04 2012-03-01 Trustees Of Tufts College Silk fibroin systems for antibiotic delivery
US20100249924A1 (en) * 2009-03-27 2010-09-30 Allergan, Inc. Bioerodible matrix for tissue involvement
RU2538688C2 (en) 2009-07-06 2015-01-10 Колопласт А/С Biodegradable frame for soft tissue regeneration and use thereof
US8986377B2 (en) * 2009-07-21 2015-03-24 Lifecell Corporation Graft materials for surgical breast procedures
US8197542B2 (en) * 2009-09-02 2012-06-12 Hilton Becker Self supporting implant in a human body and method for making the same without capsular contracture
US20120226352A1 (en) 2009-09-02 2012-09-06 Hilton Becker Self supporting and forming breast implant and method for forming and supporting an implant in a human body
US20110106249A1 (en) * 2009-09-02 2011-05-05 Hilton Becker Self supporting and forming breast implant and method for forming and supporting an implant in a human body
US8202317B2 (en) * 2009-09-02 2012-06-19 Hilton Becker Self supporting and forming breast implant and method for forming and supporting an implant in a human body
EP2475330A1 (en) 2009-09-11 2012-07-18 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
CA2775706A1 (en) 2009-09-28 2011-03-31 Trustees Of Tufts College Drawn silk egel fibers and methods of making same
US9510925B2 (en) 2010-02-02 2016-12-06 Covidien Lp Surgical meshes
US20110282365A1 (en) 2010-05-14 2011-11-17 Ahmad Robert Hadba Surgical Implants
US20120184974A1 (en) 2010-06-03 2012-07-19 Hilton Becker Supporting and Forming Transitional Material for Use in Supporting Prosthesis Devices, Implants and to Provide Structure in a Human Body
US20110301717A1 (en) 2010-06-03 2011-12-08 Hilton Becker Supporting and Forming Transitional Material for Use in Supporting Prosthesis Devices, Implants and to Provide Structure in a Human Body

Patent Citations (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US848605A (en) * 1905-07-15 1907-03-26 Peter Schmid Process for ungumming silk.
US1709662A (en) * 1925-10-30 1929-04-16 Celanese Corp Process of degumming
US1815279A (en) * 1927-11-29 1931-07-21 Takamine Ferment Company Process of degumming silk
US1990588A (en) * 1928-11-14 1935-02-12 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Artificial fibroin thread
US1896494A (en) * 1929-03-16 1933-02-07 Twitchell Process Company Process of degumming silk
US1828736A (en) * 1930-02-03 1931-10-27 Carbide & Carbon Chem Corp Degumming silk
US1927022A (en) * 1931-12-17 1933-09-19 Humberto L Bueno Art of treating natural and artificial silk and agents therefor
US2040949A (en) * 1933-01-11 1936-05-19 Celanese Corp Degumming of silk
US4141207A (en) * 1977-09-02 1979-02-27 Shigesaburo Mizushima Process for producing curl shrunk silk yarn
US4461298A (en) * 1982-07-26 1984-07-24 Ethicon, Inc. Composite sutures of silk and hydrophobic thermoplastic elastomers
US4865031A (en) * 1985-07-12 1989-09-12 Keeffe Paul J O Fabric and method of use for treatment of scars
US5456697A (en) * 1987-08-26 1995-10-10 United States Surgical Corporation Cabled core and braided suture made therefrom
US5252285A (en) * 1992-01-27 1993-10-12 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for making silk fibroin fibers
US5736399A (en) * 1994-03-09 1998-04-07 Research Development Corporation Of Japan Medium-penetrating cell culture carrier, a culturing method and a device using this carrier
US5965125A (en) * 1995-10-25 1999-10-12 Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. Hybrid matrix implants and explants
US5951506A (en) * 1996-01-23 1999-09-14 Japan As Represented By National Institute Of Sericultural Ans Entomological Science Wound covering material
US6302922B1 (en) * 1996-02-23 2001-10-16 Sumitomo Corporation Process for manufacturing woven or knit fabrics having excellent shrink and crease resistance and shape stability by using sericin fixed yarns of raw silks and the woven or knit fabrics manufactured by the same process
US6440740B1 (en) * 1997-11-18 2002-08-27 Japan As Represented By Director General Of National Institute Of Sericultural And Entomological Science, Ministry Of Agriculture, Forestry And Fisheries Material for activating epidermal cell multiplication
US5994099A (en) * 1997-12-31 1999-11-30 The University Of Wyoming Extremely elastic spider silk protein and DNA coding therefor
US6303136B1 (en) * 1998-04-13 2001-10-16 Neurotech S.A. Cells or tissue attached to a non-degradable filamentous matrix encapsulated by a semi-permeable membrane
US6530956B1 (en) * 1998-09-10 2003-03-11 Kevin A. Mansmann Resorbable scaffolds to promote cartilage regeneration
US6287340B1 (en) * 1999-05-14 2001-09-11 Trustees Of Tufts College Bioengineered anterior cruciate ligament
US7285637B2 (en) * 2000-10-02 2007-10-23 Consorzio Per Gli Studi Universitari Method for the preparation of a non-woven silk fibroin fabrics
US20040005363A1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2004-01-08 National Institute Of Agrobiological Sciences Biodegradable biopolymers, method for their preparation and functional materials constituted by these biopolymers

Cited By (56)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080119936A1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2008-05-22 Mount Sinai Hospital Intervertebral disc
US8163554B2 (en) 2000-06-29 2012-04-24 Mount Sinai Hospital Intervertebral disc
US20110167602A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2011-07-14 Allergan, Inc. Immunoneutral silk-fiber-based medical devices
US8685426B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2014-04-01 Allergan, Inc. Methods for making biocompatible, implantable, substantially sericin free silk fabric
US8623398B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2014-01-07 Allergan, Inc. Method for generating connective tissue by implanting a biodegradable silk fabric
US8628791B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2014-01-14 Allergan, Inc. Method of forming an implantable knitted fabric comprising silk fibroin fibers
US20110171453A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2011-07-14 Allergan, Inc. Immunoneutral silk-fiber-based medical devices
US8633027B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2014-01-21 Allergan, Inc. Knitted biodegradable silk fabric comprising yarn promoting ingrowth of cells and methods of making
US20110009960A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2011-01-13 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic fabric structure
US20040224406A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2004-11-11 Tissue Regeneration, Inc. Immunoneutral silk-fiber-based medical devices
US9089501B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2015-07-28 Allergan, Inc. Sericin extracted fabrics
US9066884B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2015-06-30 Allergan, Inc. Sericin extracted fabrics
US20050143296A1 (en) * 2003-02-28 2005-06-30 Kozo Tsubouchi Extraction and utilization of cell growth-promoting peptides from silk protein
US7193038B2 (en) * 2003-02-28 2007-03-20 National Institute Of Agrobiological Sciences Extraction and utilization of cell growth-promoting peptides from silk protein
US11801043B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2023-10-31 Arthrex, Inc. Suture anchor for knotless fixation of tissue
US11844512B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2023-12-19 Arthrex, Inc. Suture anchor for knotless fixation of tissue
US9409959B2 (en) 2005-10-05 2016-08-09 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Silk proteins
US8481681B2 (en) 2005-10-05 2013-07-09 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Silk proteins
EP2395014A2 (en) 2005-10-05 2011-12-14 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization Silk proteins
US8771351B2 (en) 2006-02-01 2014-07-08 Arthrex, Inc. Method for double row fixation of tendon to bone
US20070191849A1 (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-08-16 Elattrache Neal S Method for double row fixation of tendon to bone
US8012174B2 (en) * 2006-02-01 2011-09-06 Arthrex, Inc. Method for double row fixation of tendon to bone
US8419794B2 (en) 2006-02-01 2013-04-16 Arthrex, Inc. Method for double row fixation of tendon to bone
US9308070B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2016-04-12 Allergan, Inc. Pliable silk medical device
US9326840B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2016-05-03 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
US20110224703A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2011-09-15 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device having diagonal yarns and method of manufacturing the same
US9204953B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2015-12-08 Allergan, Inc. Biocompatible surgical scaffold with varying stretch
US9204954B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2015-12-08 Allergan, Inc. Knitted scaffold with diagonal yarn
US9078731B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2015-07-14 Allergan, Inc. Method for making a knitted mesh
US8746014B2 (en) 2008-12-15 2014-06-10 Allergan, Inc. Method for making a knitted mesh
US8288347B2 (en) 2009-04-20 2012-10-16 Allergan, Inc. Dermal fillers comprising silk fibroin hydrogels and uses thereof
US20110129531A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-06-02 Allergan, Inc. Dermal Fillers Comprising Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110008406A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-01-13 Altman Gregory H Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110111031A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-05-12 Guang-Liang Jiang Drug Delivery Platforms Comprising Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110189292A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-08-04 Allergan, Inc. Dermal fillers comprising silk fibroin hydrogels and uses thereof
US20110052695A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-03-03 Allergan, Inc. Drug delivery platforms comprising silk fibroin hydrogels and uses thereof
US20110020409A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-01-27 Altman Gregory H Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110008436A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-01-13 Altman Gregory H Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US20110014263A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-01-20 Altman Gregory H Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US9150668B2 (en) 2009-04-20 2015-10-06 Allergan, Inc. Silk fibroin hydrogels and uses thereof
US20110008437A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-01-13 Altman Gregory H Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US8420077B2 (en) 2009-04-20 2013-04-16 Allergan, Inc. Silk fibroin hydrogels and uses thereof
US20110014287A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2011-01-20 Altman Gregory H Silk Fibroin Hydrogels and Uses Thereof
US8674077B2 (en) 2009-08-26 2014-03-18 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Processes for producing silk dope
US20110184227A1 (en) * 2009-09-11 2011-07-28 Allergan, Inc. Prosthetic device and method of manufacturing the same
US20110190886A1 (en) * 2010-01-29 2011-08-04 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Braided tertiary nanofibrous structure for ligament, tendon, and muscle tissue implant
US9394348B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2016-07-19 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Collagen-like silk genes
WO2013142901A1 (en) 2012-03-26 2013-10-03 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Silk polypeptides
US9616114B1 (en) 2014-09-18 2017-04-11 David Gordon Bermudes Modified bacteria having improved pharmacokinetics and tumor colonization enhancing antitumor activity
US10449237B1 (en) 2014-09-18 2019-10-22 David Gordon Bermudes Modified bacteria having improved pharmacokinetics and tumor colonization enhancing antitumor activity
US10729731B1 (en) 2014-09-18 2020-08-04 David Gordon Bermudes Modified bacteria having improved pharmacokinetics and tumor colonization enhancing antitumor activity
US10828356B1 (en) 2014-09-18 2020-11-10 David Gordon Bermudes Modified bacteria having improved pharmacokinetics and tumor colonization enhancing antitumor activity
US11633435B1 (en) 2014-09-18 2023-04-25 David Gordon Bermudes Modified bacteria having improved pharmacokinetics and tumor colonization enhancing antitumor activity
US11813295B1 (en) 2014-09-18 2023-11-14 Theobald Therapeutics LLC Modified bacteria having improved pharmacokinetics and tumor colonization enhancing antitumor activity
US11129906B1 (en) 2016-12-07 2021-09-28 David Gordon Bermudes Chimeric protein toxins for expression by therapeutic bacteria
US11180535B1 (en) 2016-12-07 2021-11-23 David Gordon Bermudes Saccharide binding, tumor penetration, and cytotoxic antitumor chimeric peptides from therapeutic bacteria

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1448765A2 (en) 2004-08-25
US8685426B2 (en) 2014-04-01
US20120296443A1 (en) 2012-11-22
US20110189773A1 (en) 2011-08-04
US20120296351A1 (en) 2012-11-22
EP1448765A4 (en) 2006-11-29
US8628791B2 (en) 2014-01-14
US20040224406A1 (en) 2004-11-11
US6902932B2 (en) 2005-06-07
US20120289981A1 (en) 2012-11-15
US20150104514A1 (en) 2015-04-16
CA2467195A1 (en) 2003-05-30
US8633027B2 (en) 2014-01-21
US20100209405A1 (en) 2010-08-19
US20130197194A1 (en) 2013-08-01
JP4737932B2 (en) 2011-08-03
AU2002366083A8 (en) 2003-06-10
JP2010075717A (en) 2010-04-08
US20120294906A1 (en) 2012-11-22
US20140105951A1 (en) 2014-04-17
WO2003043486A2 (en) 2003-05-30
JP2005529631A (en) 2005-10-06
EP2319547A3 (en) 2011-08-24
US9066884B2 (en) 2015-06-30
US20100256756A1 (en) 2010-10-07
JP5179459B2 (en) 2013-04-10
AU2002366083A1 (en) 2003-06-10
US20120296352A1 (en) 2012-11-22
US9089501B2 (en) 2015-07-28
US20110167602A1 (en) 2011-07-14
CA2467195C (en) 2013-05-07
JP2011152429A (en) 2011-08-11
US20110171453A1 (en) 2011-07-14
US20120210547A1 (en) 2012-08-23
US20030100108A1 (en) 2003-05-29
EP2319547A2 (en) 2011-05-11
WO2003043486A3 (en) 2003-11-06
US8623398B2 (en) 2014-01-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6902932B2 (en) Helically organized silk fibroin fiber bundles for matrices in tissue engineering
JP4815554B2 (en) Medical device based on immune neutral silk fiber
EP1185211B1 (en) Bioengineered anterior cruciate ligament
Goulet et al. Tendons and ligaments
JP2013533761A (en) Prosthetic fabric structure
EP1363685B1 (en) Connective tissue substitutes, method of preparation and uses thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SERICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:TISSUE REGENERATION, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020483/0473

Effective date: 20061026

AS Assignment

Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF

Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON;REEL/FRAME:025914/0033

Effective date: 20110303

AS Assignment

Owner name: ALLERGAN, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SERICA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025948/0412

Effective date: 20110314

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH - DIRECTOR DEITR, MA

Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:TUFTS UNIVERSITY;REEL/FRAME:041269/0273

Effective date: 20170215