US20050150720A1 - Automotive dash insulators containing viscoelastic foams - Google Patents
Automotive dash insulators containing viscoelastic foams Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050150720A1 US20050150720A1 US11/034,173 US3417305A US2005150720A1 US 20050150720 A1 US20050150720 A1 US 20050150720A1 US 3417305 A US3417305 A US 3417305A US 2005150720 A1 US2005150720 A1 US 2005150720A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- foam
- sound
- sound insulating
- range
- insulating system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/16—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/162—Selection of materials
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to a sound insulating system. More particularly, the present invention relates to sound insulator systems containing viscoelastic foams.
- NASH Limiting noise, vibration, and harshness
- engine noise typically dominated the overall vehicle noise.
- Other noise sources such as from tires, wind and exhaust have also become as important to reduce as engine noise.
- interior vehicle noise constriction has been a direct result of consumer demands to reduce the noise in the vehicle.
- dashmats are used to reduce noise from the engine to the interior of the vehicle.
- dashmats are placed on or adjacent a substrate, such as a firewall to reduce the amount of noise passing from the engine through the firewall to the vehicle interior.
- a general description of dashmat technology can be found in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0180500 A1, the entire specification of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
- Prior dashmats are typically made of a decoupler, usually made of foam (slab or cast foam) and a barrier, typically made of thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) or ethylene vinyl acetate sheet (EVA). These dashmats are all intended to reduce overall engine compartment noise. Such barrier type dashmats have typically been relatively heavy, in order to produce the desired noise reduction results.
- Foam performance is generally considered to be a function of the foam's transmission loss, absorption, modulus, and damping characteristics.
- lightweight dashmats have been used.
- the lightweight concept utilizes absorptive material, such as shoddy cotton.
- absorptive material such as shoddy cotton.
- the goal of this type of dashmat is to absorb and dissipate the engine noise as it travels from the engine compartment to the vehicle interior.
- These lightweight dashmat systems also decrease the overall weight of the vehicle.
- a general description of these types of lightweight dashmat systems can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,145,617 and 6,296,075, the entire specifications of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
- dashmats that have enhanced transmission loss performance characteristics so as to be operable to reduce both engine compartment noise coming through the firewall and noise that comes into the passenger compartment from other sources during vehicle operation.
- a sound insulating system comprising a sound-absorbing layer including an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.2 to about 1.0, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0.
- a sound insulating system comprising a sound-absorbing layer including an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.2 to about 1.0, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0.
- the system further comprises a barrier layer substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough connected to said sound-absorbing layer.
- a sound insulating system comprising a sound-absorbing layer comprising a viscoelastic foam.
- the viscoelastic foam includes an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.7 to about 1 at frequencies in the range of about 1000 Hz to about 6000 Hz, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.4 to 1.6.
- the system further comprises a barrier layer substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough connected to said viscoelastic foam.
- FIG. 1 is a sectional view of an illustrative sound insulating system, in accordance with the general teachings of the present invention
- FIG. 1A is a sectional view of the sound insulating system depicted in FIG. 1 attached to a substrate, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration comparing the normal incidence absorption coefficient characteristics of the illustrative sound-absorbing layers, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an illustrative test setup to determine elastic modulus and damping of the illustrative sound-absorbing layers, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration comparing the transmission loss characteristics of the sound insulating systems in accordance with the present invention and conventional sound insulting systems;
- FIG. 5 is a graphical illustration comparing the surface weight characteristics of the sound insulating systems in accordance with the present invention and conventional sound insulting systems;
- FIG. 6 is a graphical illustration comparing the transmission loss characteristics of a sound insulating system in accordance with the present invention and a conventional sound insulting system in relationship to a pre-determined target profile, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 7 is a graphical illustration comparing the decibel improvement in average noise reduction characteristics of a sound insulating system of the present invention and conventional sound insulting systems, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 8 is a graph showing damping test results
- FIG. 9 is a graph showing damping test results
- FIG. 10 is a graph showing insertion loss test results.
- FIG. 11 is a graph showing damping test results.
- FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the present invention.
- the sound insulating system 10 preferably comprises a multilayer system.
- the sound insulating system 10 preferably comprises a sound-absorbing layer generally indicated at 12 .
- An optional barrier layer generally indicated at 14 is preferably adjacent to the sound-absorbing layer 12 .
- system 10 is preferably operable to be fastened or otherwise attached, either removably or permanently, to an optional substrate generally indicated at 14 , such as a firewall, as shown in FIG. 1A .
- the substrate 16 is preferably adjacent to the sound-absorbing layer 12 and spaced and opposed from the barrier layer 14 .
- the system 10 preferably provides a multilayer dashmat that is preferably used to reduce noise transmission to the interior of the vehicle through the front-of-dash panel.
- the system 10 preferably reduces noise levels within the vehicle interior through sound absorption.
- the system 10 preferably can be used in the engine compartment to reduce noise exiting the engine compartment to the exterior of the vehicle.
- the system 10 also preferably enhances the sound quality perception for interior and/or exterior environments.
- the system 10 can also be incorporated into other automotive components such as, but not limited to, liners for wheel wells, fenders, engine compartments, door panels, roofs (e.g., headliners), floor body treatments (e.g., carpet backing), trunks and packaging shelves (e.g., package tray liners).
- the system 10 can be incorporated into non-automotive applications.
- the sound-absorbing layer 12 preferably comprises a foam material 18 .
- the foam material 18 preferably comprises viscoelastic foam, more preferably viscoelastic flexible foam, and still more preferably viscoelastic flexible polyurethane foam.
- Viscoelastic foam also referred to as memory or temper foam, is substantially open-celled and is generally characterized by its slow recovery after compression.
- viscoelastic foam in accordance with the present invention in a dashmat system can also possibly be used as a replacement for vibration damping materials, commonly referred to as mastic.
- the foam material 18 can comprise any natural or synthetic foam, both slab and molded.
- the foam material 18 can be open or closed cell or combinations thereof.
- the foam material 18 can comprise latex foam polyolefin, polyurethane, polystyrene, polyester, and combinations thereof.
- the foam material 18 can also comprise recycled foam, foam impregnated fiber mats or micro-cellular elastomer foam.
- the foam material 18 can include organic and/or inorganic fillers.
- additional additives may be incorporated into the foam material 18 , such as, but not limited to, flame retardants, anti-fogging agents, ultraviolet absorbers, thermal stabilizers, pigments, colorants, odor control agents, and the like.
- the foam material 18 has a relatively high absorption coefficient. Without being bound to a particular theory of the operation of the present invention, it is believed that a relatively high absorption coefficient will increase the overall transmission loss through dissipation of the sound within the foam material 18 .
- FIG. 2 shows sound absorption of various foams.
- VE refers to viscoelastic foam.
- PCF is a density measure referring to lb/ft 3 .
- the specific VE foam used was FOAMEX H300-10N.
- the slab foam was Melamine and the cast foam was polyurethane foam.
- the foam material 18 has an absorption coefficient of about 0.2 or greater, more preferably about 0.4 or greater, still more preferably about 0.7 or greater, and most preferably about 1.0. In the most preferred embodiment, the absorption coefficient is in the range of between about 0.7 and 1 at frequencies in the range about 1000 Hz to about 6000 Hz.
- the foam material 18 has a relatively low elastic modulus. Without being bound to a particular theory of the operation of the present invention, it is believed that a relatively low elastic modulus will allow the foam material 18 to contact the substrate 16 (e.g., the firewall or the vehicle's steel structure) more uniformly and prevent flanking noise from entering the vehicle's interior. Thus, it is preferred to have a relatively lower modulus. A lower modulus allows the foam layer 18 to conform more readily to a substrate. If the modulus is too high, the foam 18 will be too stiff and not easily conform to the substrate. However, the modulus should not be so low as to not have structural integrity.
- the minimum modulus would be sufficient for the foam cells to retain their structure.
- the foam material 18 has an elastic modulus in the range of about 4 ⁇ 10 3 Pa to about 1 ⁇ 10 6 Pa.
- the modulus is in the range of about 1 ⁇ 10 4 to about 1 ⁇ 10 5 . These ranges are measured according to test setup shown in FIG. 3 .
- the foam material 18 has a relatively high damping loss factor (tan delta). Without being bound to a particular theory of the operation of the present invention, it is believed that a relatively high damping loss factor helps reduce vibration in the vehicle's steel structure which will increase the overall transmission loss of the dashmat. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the foam material 18 has a damping loss factor (tan delta) of about 0.3 or greater, more preferably about 0.4 or greater, still more preferably about 1.0 or greater.
- the foam material 18 has a damping loss factor (tan delta) in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0, more preferably in the range of about 0.4 to about 2.0, and still more preferably in the range of about 0.4 to about 1.6. These values are measured according to test setup shown in FIG. 3 .
- foam materials that satisfy the above requirements include Dow experimental viscoelastic polyurethane foams #76-16-06 HW, #76-16-08HW, #76-16-10HW, #056-53-01HW, and #056-53-29HW; Foamex 2 pound per cubic foot (pcf) and Foamex H300-10N 3 pcf viscoelastic foams (readily commercially available); Carpenter 2.5 pcf viscoelastic foam (readily commercially available); and Leggett and Platt viscoelastic foams 25010MF and 30010MF (readily commercially available).
- pcf pound per cubic foot
- Foamex H300-10N 3 pcf viscoelastic foams readily commercially available
- Carpenter 2.5 pcf viscoelastic foam readily commercially available
- Leggett and Platt viscoelastic foams 25010MF and 30010MF readily commercially available.
- the thickness of the sound-absorbing layer 12 can vary depending on the particular application. While it is preferred that the thickness be between about 6 mm to about 100 mm, more preferably about 12 mm to about 50 mm, and still more preferably about 12 mm to about 25 mm, it will be appreciated that the thickness can vary, even outside these ranges depending on the particular application.
- the thickness has a bearing on the stiffness of the sound-absorbing layer 12 . It will also be appreciated that the thickness of the sound-absorbing layer 12 can vary and can be non-uniform.
- the sound-absorbing layer 12 can comprise combinations of materials adjacent one another. That is, the sound-absorbing layer 12 can comprise more than one sublayer of either a similar or dissimilar material.
- the normal incidence absorption coefficient of the sound-absorbing layers of the present invention was measured according to ASTM E1050. Referring to FIG. 2 , there is shown the normal incidence absorption coefficient profiles of the three of the sample foams, Dow #76-16-10HW and #76-16-08HW, and Leggett & Platt 30010MF. It should be noted that these three sample foams fall into a preferred range of absorption coefficient, i.e., around the 1000 to 8000 Hz range.
- the damping was measured from the transmissibility using the half power bandwidth technique.
- the barrier layer 14 preferably comprises a relatively thin substantially impermeable layer.
- the barrier layer 14 is substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough.
- the barrier layer 14 comprises a thermoplastic olefin.
- the barrier layer 14 preferably comprises sheets of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, high-impact polystyrene, polyethylene teraphthalate, polyethylene, polypropylene (e.g., filled polypropylene), polyurethane (e.g., molded polyurethane), ethylene vinyl acetate, and the like.
- the barrier layer 14 can also include natural or synthetic fibers for imparting strength.
- the barrier layer 14 is also preferably shape formable and retainable to conform to the sound-absorbing layer 12 and/or the substrate 16 for any particular application. Additionally, the barrier layer 14 may include organic and/or inorganic fillers. Furthermore, additional additives may be incorporated into the barrier layer 14 composition, such as but not limited to flame retardants, anti-fogging agents, ultraviolet absorbers, thermal stabilizers, pigments, colorants, odor control agents, and the like.
- the barrier layer 14 is preferably comprised of about 15 wt. % polypropylene, about 25 wt. % thermoplastic elastomer (e.g., Kraton®, commercially available), about 55 wt. % calcium carbonate filler, and about 5 wt. % additives (e.g., processing aids, colorants, and the like).
- thermoplastic elastomer e.g., Kraton®, commercially available
- additives e.g., processing aids, colorants, and the like.
- the barrier layer 14 preferably has a specific gravity of about 0.9 or greater, more preferably about 1.4 or more, and still more preferably about 1.6 or greater. It is also preferable that the barrier layer 14 have a surface weight of about 0.1 kg/m 2 or greater. It is more preferred that the barrier layer 14 have a surface weight of greater than 0.4 kg/m 2 .
- the barrier layer 14 can have varying thickness. It is preferred that the thickness of the barrier layer be between 0.1 and 50 mm. Again, it is to be understood that the thickness can be varied, even outside the preferred range, depending on the particular application and the thickness can also be non-uniform.
- each barrier layer 14 may comprise more than one sublayer of either a similar or dissimilar material.
- the barrier layer 14 is preferably shape formable and retainable in order to conform the shape of the system 10 to the substrate 16 for any application.
- any suitable fabrication technique may be used. Some such examples include connecting the various layers by heat laminating, or by applying adhesives between the various layers. Such adhesives may be heat activated. The various layers may also be adhered during the process of shape forming by heating the layers and then applying pressure in the forming tool, or by applying adhesive to the layers and then applying pressure in the forming tool.
- the system 10 could also be constructed in a cast foam tool by inserting the barrier layer 14 material, such as a polymer film, into the center section of a mold and then injecting foam, such as viscoelastic polyurethane foam into both sides of the tool.
- the system 10 can also be formed by creating the sound-absorbing layer 12 and barrier layer 14 jointly and/or independently and then securing them by conventional methods, for example, using mechanical fasteners, heat fusing, sonic fusing, and/or adhesives (e.g., glues, tapes, and the like).
- the substrate 16 can be comprised of any number of suitable materials.
- the substrate 16 can be comprised of metals, natural fiber mats, synthetic fiber mats, shoddy pads, flexible polyurethane foam, rigid polyurethane foam, and combinations thereof.
- any number of suitable methods can be employed.
- mechanical fasteners, heat fusing, sonic fusing, and/or adhesives e.g., glues, tapes, and the like.
- the dashmat performance was determined by examining the transmission loss of a 0.8 mm steel panel and dashmat system (i.e., viscoelastic foam sound-absorbing layer and a thermoplastic olefin barrier layer).
- the transmission loss was computed using a simulation method called statistical energy analysis. This analysis utilized the material properties of the foam and other materials in order to compute the transmission loss and other quantities within the frequency range of 100 to 10,000 Hz.
- Foam types (a) traditional lightweight slab foam; (b) Dow viscoelastic foam (formulation #76-16-10HW); and (c) Foamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam; (2) Barrier layer (e.g., thermoplastic olefin) specific gravity: 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6; and (3) Foam thickness: 13 mm and 18 mm. It should be noted that the barrier layer thickness was held constant at 2.4 mm.
- the dashmat construction was simulated according to the typical sound-absorber/barrier layer system, as generally shown in FIG. 1A .
- the transmission loss was computed for each combination of the design variables.
- FIG. 4 there is shown a comparison between configurations using various foam types and various specific gravity barrier layers at 18 mm foam thickness.
- the test procedure is described below.
- changing the foam type to either of the viscoelastic foams improves the transmission loss of the dashmat system, especially in the region of 1000 to 10,000 Hz.
- changing the foam type to either of the viscoelastic foams increases the transmission loss greater than increasing the specific gravity of the barrier layer while using slab foam.
- the target configuration was chosen to be that of 18 mm traditional slab foam with a barrier layer having a 1.4 specific gravity. All other viscoelastic configurations were compared to the performance of this target configuration.
- FIG. 5 there is shown the surface weight of all the viscoelastic foam configurations in comparison to the target surface weight.
- the surface weight i.e., the mass of the dashmat construction divided by the area of the panel
- the surface weight was used to compare the relative weight of each configuration. Lower weight in the dashmat configuration is desirable for improved vehicle fuel economy, engine performance, and the like.
- Three of viscoelastic foam configurations had a lower surface weight than the target. These are: (1) 13 mm Dow viscoelastic foam (formulation #76-16-10HW) with 1.2 specific gravity; (2) 18 mm Foamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam; and (3) 13 mm Foamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam.
- FIG. 6 there is shown two of the viscoelastic foam configurations in comparison to the target configuration. These two configurations demonstrate the viscoelastic foam's ability to increase the dashmat transmission loss with similar or lower weight.
- the three dashmats tested can be described by: (1) Optimized 1.4 specific gravity dashmat, i.e., a dashmat with traditional slab foam with a 1.4 specific gravity barrier layer (e.g., TPO); (2) Optimized 1.8 specific gravity dashmat, i.e., a dashmat with traditional slab foam with a 1.8 specific gravity barrier layer (e.g., TPO); and (3) Optimized 1.4 specific gravity dashmat, i.e., a dashmat with Foamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam with a 1.4 specific gravity barrier layer (e.g., TPO). It is noted that a seal wear issue was identified in 630 Hz for some tests (particularly those showing negative dB improvements).
- FIG. 7 illustrates that the dashmat with the viscoelastic foam in accordance with the present invention performs better up to 2000 Hz as compared to traditional slab foam and similar to the traditional slab foam above 2000 Hz.
- viscoelastic foam increases the damping of vibration on the steel sheet metal to which the system 10 is applied. This reduces the noise radiation into the interior of the vehicle.
- the viscoelastic foam also reduces the vibration motion of the barrier layer 14 through damping. That is, the absorbing layer dampens vibrations to the barrier layer to reduce vibration of said barrier layer. In this manner, the absorbing layer also acts as a vibration-damping layer. This may result in an increase in transmission loss of the system 10 .
- Further viscoelastic foams have good sound absorption properties due to the foam's cell structure and viscoelasticity. It will be appreciated that the viscoelastic foam layer is adapted to be placed against a substrate, such as the component of the vehicle.
- FIG. 8 shows a damping comparison of various samples of foam of equal thickness.
- the first foam listed in the legend is a viscoelastic foam as set forth above but is 2 pcf foam.
- the second foam listed is a slab foam that is 1.2 pcf.
- the weight of the foam sample is also shown.
- the slab foam used comprises Melamine.
- the damping test was performed in a manner known in the art. The sample was excited with vibration. The transfer function is calculated by dividing the acceleration of the plate with the force applied. In this manner, the effect of the force magnitude on the results is eliminated.
- the viscoelastic foam results in lower vibration levels by means of higher damping.
- the viscoelastic foam reduces the vibration motion of the barrier layer 14 through damping. This can increase the transmission loss of the overall system.
- FIG. 9 shows a damping comparison of samples having equal mass. The test was performed in the same manner as set forth above in connection with FIG. 8 .
- FIG. 10 shows the effect on insertion loss by placing the viscoelastic layer against the steel. More specifically, one sample of a system 10 was prepared. The sample consisted of a viscoelastic foam absorbing layer 12 , a HIPS barrier layer 14 and a shoddy absorbing layer 12 . The tests were performed by first placing the shoddy absorber layer adjacent the steel and determining the insertion loss in the same manner as set forth above. Subsequently, the same sample was tested by placing the viscoelastic absorber layer against the steel and determining the insertion loss. The results are shown in FIG. 10 . As can be seen, an increase in insertion loss is achieved when the viscoelastic foam is place against the steel. Thus, it is preferred that the viscoelastic foam layer be placed against the substrate, such as the vehicle component when the system 10 is installed.
- FIG. 11 shows the effect of the damping of the viscoelastic foam on the barrier layer.
- the absorbing layer was a viscoelastic foam.
- the viscoelastic foam is the FOAMEX foam identified above.
- the viscoelastic foam comprises Qylite, also available from FOAMEX.
- the barrier layer in each case was HIPS.
- Frequency response as shown in FIG. 11 means the same thing as the transfer function as shown in FIG. 8 .
- the test to determine the frequency response was the same as set forth above in connection with FIG. 8 .
- a viscoelastic foam absorber layer reduces the motion or vibration of the barrier layer. This results in less noise being transmitted to the interior of the vehicle.
- system 10 can also be used in other applications.
- Such other applications include construction, industrial, appliance, aerospace, truck/bus/rail, entertainment, marine and military applications.
Abstract
Sound insulating systems including viscoelastic foams are described. The sound insulating system includes a sound-absorbing layer. The sound-absorbing layer can include viscoelastic foams. An optional barrier layer is adjacent to the sound-absorbing layer. Additionally, an optional substrate layer is adjacent to the sound-absorbing layer, and is spaced and opposed from the optional barrier layer. The sound insulating system is particularly well adapted to be employed as vehicle dashmats.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/535,933, filed Jan. 12, 2004. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention relates generally to a sound insulating system. More particularly, the present invention relates to sound insulator systems containing viscoelastic foams.
- Automotive makers have endeavored to reduce the overall noise and vibration in vehicles. Limiting noise, vibration, and harshness (i.e., “NVH”) has become an important consideration in vehicle designs. Previously, engine noise typically dominated the overall vehicle noise. Other noise sources, such as from tires, wind and exhaust have also become as important to reduce as engine noise. More recently, interior vehicle noise constriction has been a direct result of consumer demands to reduce the noise in the vehicle.
- Accordingly, significant efforts have been directed to reduction of interior vehicle noise. One of these efforts has been to use a barrier concept, also referred to as a dashmat or dash insulator system. These dashmats are used to reduce noise from the engine to the interior of the vehicle. Typically such dashmats are placed on or adjacent a substrate, such as a firewall to reduce the amount of noise passing from the engine through the firewall to the vehicle interior. A general description of dashmat technology can be found in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0180500 A1, the entire specification of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
- Prior dashmats are typically made of a decoupler, usually made of foam (slab or cast foam) and a barrier, typically made of thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) or ethylene vinyl acetate sheet (EVA). These dashmats are all intended to reduce overall engine compartment noise. Such barrier type dashmats have typically been relatively heavy, in order to produce the desired noise reduction results.
- It is believed that a significant portion of a dashmat's performance relies on the properties of the foam. Foam performance is generally considered to be a function of the foam's transmission loss, absorption, modulus, and damping characteristics.
- More recently, lightweight dashmats have been used. The lightweight concept utilizes absorptive material, such as shoddy cotton. Rather than blocking the engine noise, the goal of this type of dashmat is to absorb and dissipate the engine noise as it travels from the engine compartment to the vehicle interior. These lightweight dashmat systems also decrease the overall weight of the vehicle. A general description of these types of lightweight dashmat systems can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,145,617 and 6,296,075, the entire specifications of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
- The primary function of either type of dashmat is to reduce noise levels in the vehicle's interior. Traditionally, it was believed that blocking the noise in accordance with the mass law provides the best noise transmission loss and noise reduction. Transmission loss and noise reduction are typical measurement parameters used to quantify the performance of the dashmat system.
- Although conventional dashmats have been somewhat successful in reducing noise levels in the vehicle's interior, they have not been completely satisfactory. More specifically, the insulation foam (i.e., the decoupler) has been relatively ineffective in that it does not possess suitable absorptive acoustic properties. Thus, the noise, regardless of origin, is either not blocked, dissipated or otherwise reduced enough as it travels through the dashmat and into the vehicle's interior. Further, earlier insulation foams are less effective at preventing noise due to vibration of the substrate or barrier layer.
- Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide dashmats that have enhanced transmission loss performance characteristics so as to be operable to reduce both engine compartment noise coming through the firewall and noise that comes into the passenger compartment from other sources during vehicle operation.
- According to a first embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a sound insulating system, comprising a sound-absorbing layer including an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.2 to about 1.0, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0.
- According to an alternate embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a sound insulating system, comprising a sound-absorbing layer including an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.2 to about 1.0, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0. The system further comprises a barrier layer substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough connected to said sound-absorbing layer.
- According to an alternate embodiment of the present invention there is provided a sound insulating system, comprising a sound-absorbing layer comprising a viscoelastic foam. The viscoelastic foam includes an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.7 to about 1 at frequencies in the range of about 1000 Hz to about 6000 Hz, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.4 to 1.6. The system further comprises a barrier layer substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough connected to said viscoelastic foam.
- The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a sectional view of an illustrative sound insulating system, in accordance with the general teachings of the present invention; -
FIG. 1A is a sectional view of the sound insulating system depicted inFIG. 1 attached to a substrate, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration comparing the normal incidence absorption coefficient characteristics of the illustrative sound-absorbing layers, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an illustrative test setup to determine elastic modulus and damping of the illustrative sound-absorbing layers, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration comparing the transmission loss characteristics of the sound insulating systems in accordance with the present invention and conventional sound insulting systems; -
FIG. 5 is a graphical illustration comparing the surface weight characteristics of the sound insulating systems in accordance with the present invention and conventional sound insulting systems; -
FIG. 6 is a graphical illustration comparing the transmission loss characteristics of a sound insulating system in accordance with the present invention and a conventional sound insulting system in relationship to a pre-determined target profile, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 7 is a graphical illustration comparing the decibel improvement in average noise reduction characteristics of a sound insulating system of the present invention and conventional sound insulting systems, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 8 is a graph showing damping test results; -
FIG. 9 is a graph showing damping test results; -
FIG. 10 is a graph showing insertion loss test results; and -
FIG. 11 is a graph showing damping test results. - The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
-
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the present invention. As shown inFIG. 1 , there is a sound insulating system, generally shown at 10. Thesound insulating system 10 preferably comprises a multilayer system. Thesound insulating system 10 preferably comprises a sound-absorbing layer generally indicated at 12. An optional barrier layer generally indicated at 14 is preferably adjacent to the sound-absorbinglayer 12. It should be appreciated thatsystem 10 is preferably operable to be fastened or otherwise attached, either removably or permanently, to an optional substrate generally indicated at 14, such as a firewall, as shown inFIG. 1A . Thesubstrate 16 is preferably adjacent to the sound-absorbinglayer 12 and spaced and opposed from thebarrier layer 14. - The
system 10 preferably provides a multilayer dashmat that is preferably used to reduce noise transmission to the interior of the vehicle through the front-of-dash panel. In addition to the noise-blocking feature, thesystem 10 preferably reduces noise levels within the vehicle interior through sound absorption. Additionally, thesystem 10 preferably can be used in the engine compartment to reduce noise exiting the engine compartment to the exterior of the vehicle. Thesystem 10 also preferably enhances the sound quality perception for interior and/or exterior environments. Thesystem 10 can also be incorporated into other automotive components such as, but not limited to, liners for wheel wells, fenders, engine compartments, door panels, roofs (e.g., headliners), floor body treatments (e.g., carpet backing), trunks and packaging shelves (e.g., package tray liners). Furthermore, thesystem 10 can be incorporated into non-automotive applications. - The sound-absorbing
layer 12 preferably comprises afoam material 18. Thefoam material 18 preferably comprises viscoelastic foam, more preferably viscoelastic flexible foam, and still more preferably viscoelastic flexible polyurethane foam. Viscoelastic foam, also referred to as memory or temper foam, is substantially open-celled and is generally characterized by its slow recovery after compression. - The use of viscoelastic foam in accordance with the present invention in a dashmat system can also possibly be used as a replacement for vibration damping materials, commonly referred to as mastic.
- Although viscoelastic foams are preferred in the practice of the present invention, other foams can be used, either alone or in combination, that have the requisite properties to be described herein. Accordingly, the
foam material 18 can comprise any natural or synthetic foam, both slab and molded. Thefoam material 18 can be open or closed cell or combinations thereof. Thefoam material 18 can comprise latex foam polyolefin, polyurethane, polystyrene, polyester, and combinations thereof. Thefoam material 18 can also comprise recycled foam, foam impregnated fiber mats or micro-cellular elastomer foam. Additionally, thefoam material 18 can include organic and/or inorganic fillers. Furthermore, additional additives may be incorporated into thefoam material 18, such as, but not limited to, flame retardants, anti-fogging agents, ultraviolet absorbers, thermal stabilizers, pigments, colorants, odor control agents, and the like. - In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
foam material 18 has a relatively high absorption coefficient. Without being bound to a particular theory of the operation of the present invention, it is believed that a relatively high absorption coefficient will increase the overall transmission loss through dissipation of the sound within thefoam material 18. -
FIG. 2 shows sound absorption of various foams. VE refers to viscoelastic foam. PCF is a density measure referring to lb/ft3. The specific VE foam used was FOAMEX H300-10N. The slab foam was Melamine and the cast foam was polyurethane foam. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, thefoam material 18 has an absorption coefficient of about 0.2 or greater, more preferably about 0.4 or greater, still more preferably about 0.7 or greater, and most preferably about 1.0. In the most preferred embodiment, the absorption coefficient is in the range of between about 0.7 and 1 at frequencies in the range about 1000 Hz to about 6000 Hz. - In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
foam material 18 has a relatively low elastic modulus. Without being bound to a particular theory of the operation of the present invention, it is believed that a relatively low elastic modulus will allow thefoam material 18 to contact the substrate 16 (e.g., the firewall or the vehicle's steel structure) more uniformly and prevent flanking noise from entering the vehicle's interior. Thus, it is preferred to have a relatively lower modulus. A lower modulus allows thefoam layer 18 to conform more readily to a substrate. If the modulus is too high, thefoam 18 will be too stiff and not easily conform to the substrate. However, the modulus should not be so low as to not have structural integrity. - In general, the minimum modulus would be sufficient for the foam cells to retain their structure. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
foam material 18 has an elastic modulus in the range of about 4×103 Pa to about 1×106 Pa. - In another preferred embodiment, the modulus is in the range of about 1×104 to about 1×105. These ranges are measured according to test setup shown in
FIG. 3 . - In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
foam material 18 has a relatively high damping loss factor (tan delta). Without being bound to a particular theory of the operation of the present invention, it is believed that a relatively high damping loss factor helps reduce vibration in the vehicle's steel structure which will increase the overall transmission loss of the dashmat. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, thefoam material 18 has a damping loss factor (tan delta) of about 0.3 or greater, more preferably about 0.4 or greater, still more preferably about 1.0 or greater. - In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
foam material 18 has a damping loss factor (tan delta) in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0, more preferably in the range of about 0.4 to about 2.0, and still more preferably in the range of about 0.4 to about 1.6. These values are measured according to test setup shown inFIG. 3 . - By way of a non-limiting example, foam materials that satisfy the above requirements include Dow experimental viscoelastic polyurethane foams #76-16-06 HW, #76-16-08HW, #76-16-10HW, #056-53-01HW, and #056-53-29HW;
Foamex 2 pound per cubic foot (pcf) and Foamex H300-10N 3 pcf viscoelastic foams (readily commercially available); Carpenter 2.5 pcf viscoelastic foam (readily commercially available); and Leggett and Platt viscoelastic foams 25010MF and 30010MF (readily commercially available). - The thickness of the sound-absorbing
layer 12 can vary depending on the particular application. While it is preferred that the thickness be between about 6 mm to about 100 mm, more preferably about 12 mm to about 50 mm, and still more preferably about 12 mm to about 25 mm, it will be appreciated that the thickness can vary, even outside these ranges depending on the particular application. The thickness has a bearing on the stiffness of the sound-absorbinglayer 12. It will also be appreciated that the thickness of the sound-absorbinglayer 12 can vary and can be non-uniform. - Further, it is to be understood that the sound-absorbing
layer 12 can comprise combinations of materials adjacent one another. That is, the sound-absorbinglayer 12 can comprise more than one sublayer of either a similar or dissimilar material. - The normal incidence absorption coefficient of the sound-absorbing layers of the present invention was measured according to ASTM E1050. Referring to
FIG. 2 , there is shown the normal incidence absorption coefficient profiles of the three of the sample foams, Dow #76-16-10HW and #76-16-08HW, and Leggett & Platt 30010MF. It should be noted that these three sample foams fall into a preferred range of absorption coefficient, i.e., around the 1000 to 8000 Hz range. - The elastic modulus and damping of the sound-absorbing layers of the present invention were measured using a plate, shaker, and two accelerometers. Referring to
FIG. 3 , there is shown a schematic illustration of an illustrative test setup. The transmissibility was measured betweenaccelerometer 1 andaccelerometer 2 and the first resonant frequency of the system is determined. The elastic modulus was then be determined by: -
- wherein:
- E=elastic modulus (Pa)
- ω=angular frequency (rad/s)
- m=plate mass (kg)
- t=foam thickness (m)
- W=plate width (m)
- L=plate length (m)
- wherein:
- The damping was measured from the transmissibility using the half power bandwidth technique.
- The
barrier layer 14 preferably comprises a relatively thin substantially impermeable layer. Thebarrier layer 14 is substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, thebarrier layer 14 comprises a thermoplastic olefin. By way of a non-limiting example, thebarrier layer 14 preferably comprises sheets of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, high-impact polystyrene, polyethylene teraphthalate, polyethylene, polypropylene (e.g., filled polypropylene), polyurethane (e.g., molded polyurethane), ethylene vinyl acetate, and the like. Thebarrier layer 14 can also include natural or synthetic fibers for imparting strength. Thebarrier layer 14 is also preferably shape formable and retainable to conform to the sound-absorbinglayer 12 and/or thesubstrate 16 for any particular application. Additionally, thebarrier layer 14 may include organic and/or inorganic fillers. Furthermore, additional additives may be incorporated into thebarrier layer 14 composition, such as but not limited to flame retardants, anti-fogging agents, ultraviolet absorbers, thermal stabilizers, pigments, colorants, odor control agents, and the like. - In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
barrier layer 14 is preferably comprised of about 15 wt. % polypropylene, about 25 wt. % thermoplastic elastomer (e.g., Kraton®, commercially available), about 55 wt. % calcium carbonate filler, and about 5 wt. % additives (e.g., processing aids, colorants, and the like). - In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
barrier layer 14 preferably has a specific gravity of about 0.9 or greater, more preferably about 1.4 or more, and still more preferably about 1.6 or greater. It is also preferable that thebarrier layer 14 have a surface weight of about 0.1 kg/m2 or greater. It is more preferred that thebarrier layer 14 have a surface weight of greater than 0.4 kg/m2. - As with the absorbing
layer 12, thebarrier layer 14 can have varying thickness. It is preferred that the thickness of the barrier layer be between 0.1 and 50 mm. Again, it is to be understood that the thickness can be varied, even outside the preferred range, depending on the particular application and the thickness can also be non-uniform. - While a
single barrier layer 14 is shown, it is to be understood that multiple barrier layers 14 of varying thickness may be used. Thus, eachbarrier layer 14 may comprise more than one sublayer of either a similar or dissimilar material. - As noted, the
barrier layer 14 is preferably shape formable and retainable in order to conform the shape of thesystem 10 to thesubstrate 16 for any application. In order to combine the sound-absorbinglayer 12 with thebarrier layer 14, any suitable fabrication technique may be used. Some such examples include connecting the various layers by heat laminating, or by applying adhesives between the various layers. Such adhesives may be heat activated. The various layers may also be adhered during the process of shape forming by heating the layers and then applying pressure in the forming tool, or by applying adhesive to the layers and then applying pressure in the forming tool. - The
system 10 could also be constructed in a cast foam tool by inserting thebarrier layer 14 material, such as a polymer film, into the center section of a mold and then injecting foam, such as viscoelastic polyurethane foam into both sides of the tool. Thesystem 10 can also be formed by creating the sound-absorbinglayer 12 andbarrier layer 14 jointly and/or independently and then securing them by conventional methods, for example, using mechanical fasteners, heat fusing, sonic fusing, and/or adhesives (e.g., glues, tapes, and the like). - The
substrate 16 can be comprised of any number of suitable materials. By way of a non-limiting example, thesubstrate 16 can be comprised of metals, natural fiber mats, synthetic fiber mats, shoddy pads, flexible polyurethane foam, rigid polyurethane foam, and combinations thereof. - With respect to fastening or otherwise attaching the sound-absorbing
layer 12 to thesubstrate 16, any number of suitable methods can be employed. By way of a non-limiting example, mechanical fasteners, heat fusing, sonic fusing, and/or adhesives (e.g., glues, tapes, and the like) may be used. - Analysis was conducted in order to demonstrate the performance benefit of using the viscoelastic foam of the present invention in a dashmat over the traditional lightweight slab foam construction. The dashmat performance was determined by examining the transmission loss of a 0.8 mm steel panel and dashmat system (i.e., viscoelastic foam sound-absorbing layer and a thermoplastic olefin barrier layer). The transmission loss was computed using a simulation method called statistical energy analysis. This analysis utilized the material properties of the foam and other materials in order to compute the transmission loss and other quantities within the frequency range of 100 to 10,000 Hz.
- The design variables in the analysis were: (1) Foam types: (a) traditional lightweight slab foam; (b) Dow viscoelastic foam (formulation #76-16-10HW); and (c)
Foamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam; (2) Barrier layer (e.g., thermoplastic olefin) specific gravity: 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6; and (3) Foam thickness: 13 mm and 18 mm. It should be noted that the barrier layer thickness was held constant at 2.4 mm. - The dashmat construction was simulated according to the typical sound-absorber/barrier layer system, as generally shown in
FIG. 1A . The transmission loss was computed for each combination of the design variables. - Referring to
FIG. 4 , there is shown a comparison between configurations using various foam types and various specific gravity barrier layers at 18 mm foam thickness. The test procedure is described below. As shown inFIG. 4 , changing the foam type to either of the viscoelastic foams improves the transmission loss of the dashmat system, especially in the region of 1000 to 10,000 Hz. Furthermore, changing the foam type to either of the viscoelastic foams increases the transmission loss greater than increasing the specific gravity of the barrier layer while using slab foam. - In order to compare the performance of the design variables more effectively, a target configuration was chosen. The target configuration was chosen to be that of 18 mm traditional slab foam with a barrier layer having a 1.4 specific gravity. All other viscoelastic configurations were compared to the performance of this target configuration.
- The samples were placed over a 0.8 mm thick steel plate, and the assembly was inserted into the wall between the reverberation chamber and the semi-anechoic chamber. Noise was generated in the reverberation room using a speaker, and the sound pressure level was measured using four microphones placed at a distance of 1.17 m from the steel plate. An array of twelve microphones was placed in the semi-anechoic chamber at a distance of 0.76 m from the outer foam side of the sample. Noise reduction was calculated using
Equation 1, in accordance with the general protocol of SAE J1400. The result of the noise reduction test is shown inFIG. 4 .
NR=(average SPL 1)−(average SPL 2)Equation 1 -
- Where:
- SPL2=Anechoic Sound Pressure level (dB)
- SPL1=Reverberation Sound Pressure Level (dB)
- Where:
- Referring to
FIG. 5 , there is shown the surface weight of all the viscoelastic foam configurations in comparison to the target surface weight. The surface weight (i.e., the mass of the dashmat construction divided by the area of the panel) was used to compare the relative weight of each configuration. Lower weight in the dashmat configuration is desirable for improved vehicle fuel economy, engine performance, and the like. Three of viscoelastic foam configurations had a lower surface weight than the target. These are: (1) 13 mm Dow viscoelastic foam (formulation #76-16-10HW) with 1.2 specific gravity; (2) 18 mmFoamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam; and (3) 13 mmFoamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam. - Referring to
FIG. 6 , there is shown two of the viscoelastic foam configurations in comparison to the target configuration. These two configurations demonstrate the viscoelastic foam's ability to increase the dashmat transmission loss with similar or lower weight. - Testing was also completed on a GM truck vehicle dash section to determine the noise reduction capability of the viscoelastic foam in comparison to traditional slab foam dashmats. Because transmission loss is difficult to measure for a vehicle section, noise reduction was used instead of transmission loss. The vehicle section was placed in a wall between a reverberation room and an anechoic chamber. Sound pressure level measurements were made in both rooms to compute the noise reduction.
- Referring to
FIG. 7 , there is shown the results from the vehicle dash section testing with three different dashmats. The three dashmats tested can be described by: (1) Optimized 1.4 specific gravity dashmat, i.e., a dashmat with traditional slab foam with a 1.4 specific gravity barrier layer (e.g., TPO); (2) Optimized 1.8 specific gravity dashmat, i.e., a dashmat with traditional slab foam with a 1.8 specific gravity barrier layer (e.g., TPO); and (3) Optimized 1.4 specific gravity dashmat, i.e., a dashmat withFoamex 2 pcf viscoelastic foam with a 1.4 specific gravity barrier layer (e.g., TPO). It is noted that a seal wear issue was identified in 630 Hz for some tests (particularly those showing negative dB improvements). -
FIG. 7 illustrates that the dashmat with the viscoelastic foam in accordance with the present invention performs better up to 2000 Hz as compared to traditional slab foam and similar to the traditional slab foam above 2000 Hz. - The use of viscoelastic foam as the sound-absorbing
layer 12 increases the damping of vibration on the steel sheet metal to which thesystem 10 is applied. This reduces the noise radiation into the interior of the vehicle. The viscoelastic foam also reduces the vibration motion of thebarrier layer 14 through damping. That is, the absorbing layer dampens vibrations to the barrier layer to reduce vibration of said barrier layer. In this manner, the absorbing layer also acts as a vibration-damping layer. This may result in an increase in transmission loss of thesystem 10. Further viscoelastic foams have good sound absorption properties due to the foam's cell structure and viscoelasticity. It will be appreciated that the viscoelastic foam layer is adapted to be placed against a substrate, such as the component of the vehicle. -
FIG. 8 shows a damping comparison of various samples of foam of equal thickness. The first foam listed in the legend is a viscoelastic foam as set forth above but is 2 pcf foam. The second foam listed is a slab foam that is 1.2 pcf. The weight of the foam sample is also shown. The slab foam used comprises Melamine. The damping test was performed in a manner known in the art. The sample was excited with vibration. The transfer function is calculated by dividing the acceleration of the plate with the force applied. In this manner, the effect of the force magnitude on the results is eliminated. As can be seen inFIG. 8 , the viscoelastic foam results in lower vibration levels by means of higher damping. Thus, when used in asystem 10 as the sound-absorbinglayer 12, the viscoelastic foam reduces the vibration motion of thebarrier layer 14 through damping. This can increase the transmission loss of the overall system. -
FIG. 9 shows a damping comparison of samples having equal mass. The test was performed in the same manner as set forth above in connection withFIG. 8 . -
FIG. 10 shows the effect on insertion loss by placing the viscoelastic layer against the steel. More specifically, one sample of asystem 10 was prepared. The sample consisted of a viscoelasticfoam absorbing layer 12, aHIPS barrier layer 14 and a shoddy absorbinglayer 12. The tests were performed by first placing the shoddy absorber layer adjacent the steel and determining the insertion loss in the same manner as set forth above. Subsequently, the same sample was tested by placing the viscoelastic absorber layer against the steel and determining the insertion loss. The results are shown inFIG. 10 . As can be seen, an increase in insertion loss is achieved when the viscoelastic foam is place against the steel. Thus, it is preferred that the viscoelastic foam layer be placed against the substrate, such as the vehicle component when thesystem 10 is installed. -
FIG. 11 shows the effect of the damping of the viscoelastic foam on the barrier layer. In order to test the effect of damping by a viscoelastic-absorbing layer on the barrier, two samples were tested. In each case the absorbing layer was a viscoelastic foam. In the first sample, the viscoelastic foam is the FOAMEX foam identified above. In the second sample, the viscoelastic foam comprises Qylite, also available from FOAMEX. The barrier layer in each case was HIPS. Frequency response as shown inFIG. 11 means the same thing as the transfer function as shown inFIG. 8 . The test to determine the frequency response was the same as set forth above in connection withFIG. 8 . As can be seen from the results shown inFIG. 11 , a viscoelastic foam absorber layer reduces the motion or vibration of the barrier layer. This results in less noise being transmitted to the interior of the vehicle. - It will also be appreciated that, while particularly well suited for automotive applications, the
system 10 can also be used in other applications. Such other applications include construction, industrial, appliance, aerospace, truck/bus/rail, entertainment, marine and military applications. - Although the invention has been described in detail in the foregoing for the purpose of illustration, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention except as it may be limited by the claims.
Claims (19)
1. A sound insulating system, comprising:
a sound-absorbing layer including an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.2 to about 1.0, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0.
2. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 1 wherein said sound-absorbing layer comprises viscoelastic foam.
3. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 2 wherein said viscoelastic foam has a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.4 to 1.6.
4. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 3 wherein said viscoelastic foam has an elastic modulus in the range of about 4×103 Pa to about 1×106 Pa.
5. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 4 further comprising a barrier layer secured to said viscoelastic foam, said barrier layer substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough.
6. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 5 wherein said absorption coefficient of said viscoelastic foam is preferably in the range of about 0.7 to about 1 at frequencies in the range of about 1000 Hz to about 6000 Hz.
7. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 6 further comprising a substrate, said viscoelastic foam secured to said substrate.
8. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 7 wherein said substrate is a metal structure on a vehicle.
9. A sound insulating system, comprising:
a sound-absorbing layer including an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.2 to about 1.0, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.3 to about 2.0; and
a barrier layer substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough connected to said sound-absorbing layer.
10. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 1 wherein said sound-absorbing layer comprises viscoelastic foam.
11. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 10 wherein said viscoelastic foam has a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.4 to 1.6.
12. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 11 wherein said viscoelastic foam has an elastic modulus in the range of about 4×103 Pa to about 1×106 Pa.
13. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 12 wherein said absorption coefficient of said viscoelastic foam is preferably in the range of about 0.7 to about 1 at frequencies in the range of about 1000 Hz to about 6000 Hz.
14. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 13 further comprising a substrate, said viscoelastic foam secured to said substrate.
15. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 14 wherein said substrate is a metal structure on a vehicle.
16. A sound insulating system, comprising:
a sound-absorbing layer comprising a viscoelastic foam including an absorption coefficient in the range of about 0.7 to about 1 at frequencies in the range of about 1000 Hz to about 6000 Hz, and a damping loss factor in the range of about 0.4 to 1.6; and
a barrier layer substantially impermeable to fluid flow therethrough connected to said viscoelastic foam.
17. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 16 wherein said viscoelastic foam has an elastic modulus in the range of about 4×103 Pa to about 1×106 Pa.
18. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 17 further comprising a substrate, said viscoelastic foam secured to said substrate.
19. A sound insulating system as set forth in claim 18 wherein said substrate is a metal structure on a vehicle.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/034,173 US20050150720A1 (en) | 2004-01-12 | 2005-01-12 | Automotive dash insulators containing viscoelastic foams |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US53593304P | 2004-01-12 | 2004-01-12 | |
US11/034,173 US20050150720A1 (en) | 2004-01-12 | 2005-01-12 | Automotive dash insulators containing viscoelastic foams |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050150720A1 true US20050150720A1 (en) | 2005-07-14 |
Family
ID=34794374
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/034,173 Abandoned US20050150720A1 (en) | 2004-01-12 | 2005-01-12 | Automotive dash insulators containing viscoelastic foams |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20050150720A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1706863A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007519556A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20060123475A (en) |
CN (1) | CN100578609C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005069273A1 (en) |
Cited By (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060131100A1 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2006-06-22 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Noise absorbing structure of instrument panel |
US20070042156A1 (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2007-02-22 | Rockwell Anthony L | Die cut insulation blanket and method for producing same |
US20070272285A1 (en) * | 2006-02-27 | 2007-11-29 | Herreman Kevin M | Appliance noise reduction blanket |
US20080001431A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Sound insulation constructions and methods of using the same |
US20080142294A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Noise control system using smart materials |
US20080144849A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Adaptive noise control system |
US20080144852A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Multi-chamber noise control system |
US20080144850A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Indirect acoustic transfer control of noise |
US20100017690A1 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-01-21 | Rylyakov Alexander V | Method and apparatus for low latency proportional path in a digitally controlled system |
US20100018799A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Saint-Gobain Weber France | Acoustic enhancement device for underlayment of a covering |
US20100024851A1 (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2010-02-04 | Rockwell Anthony L | Insulation Element For An Electrical Appliance Such As A Dishwasher |
US20100288582A1 (en) * | 2009-05-13 | 2010-11-18 | May Philip G | Thermally and acoustically insulative vehicle flooring system |
US8133568B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2012-03-13 | Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc | Die cut insulation blanket |
US8449701B2 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2013-05-28 | Dow Global Technologies Llc | Acoustic baffle members and methods for applying acoustic baffles in cavities |
US20140012167A1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-01-09 | Chestmaster Inc. | Wearable thorax percussion device |
US8881864B2 (en) | 2012-10-04 | 2014-11-11 | International Automation Components Group North America, Inc. | Motor vehicle acoustic insulator, methods of manufacture and use thereof |
US20160063985A1 (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2016-03-03 | Isolite Gmbh | Sound absorbers |
US20160194866A1 (en) * | 2013-07-24 | 2016-07-07 | Geko Innovations Limited | Acoustic Panel |
US9968511B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2018-05-15 | Hill-Rom Services Pte. Ltd. | High frequency chest wall oscillation system |
US10510330B2 (en) * | 2014-06-06 | 2019-12-17 | Sika Technology Ag | Device and method for sound deadening a component |
US11471366B2 (en) | 2016-08-22 | 2022-10-18 | Hill-Rom Services Pte. Ltd. | Percussion therapy apparatus and methods thereof |
US11691489B2 (en) | 2019-01-15 | 2023-07-04 | Mazda Motor Corporation | Vehicle door structure |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2542399A1 (en) | 2010-03-03 | 2013-01-09 | Dow Global Technologies LLC | Process for insulating a vehicle cabin |
CN104031235B (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2016-07-13 | 万华化学(北京)有限公司 | A kind of preparation method of visco-elasticity polyurethane sound-absorbing foam |
KR102331665B1 (en) * | 2015-07-14 | 2021-11-25 | 닛토덴코 가부시키가이샤 | Waterproof sound transmitting member |
WO2018187000A1 (en) | 2017-04-03 | 2018-10-11 | Cascade Engineering, Inc. | Acoustic fiber silencer |
DE102018103462A1 (en) * | 2018-02-15 | 2019-08-22 | Adler Pelzer Holding Gmbh | Automotive carpeting |
JP2021041752A (en) * | 2019-09-09 | 2021-03-18 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Soundproof device of soft top of vehicle |
CN112185330B (en) * | 2020-09-07 | 2023-07-25 | 南京航空航天大学 | Cross transverse reinforced arrangement partition plate filled viscoelastic material underwater sound absorption structure |
CN112454921B (en) * | 2020-10-30 | 2022-07-05 | 南通华阁汽车配件有限公司 | Compound automobile sound insulation foam laminating adhesive laminating process |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4056161A (en) * | 1975-10-30 | 1977-11-01 | Tillotson Corporation | Sound attenuation material |
US5009043A (en) * | 1990-07-12 | 1991-04-23 | Herman Miller, Inc. | Acoustic panel |
US5554830A (en) * | 1990-07-19 | 1996-09-10 | Matec Holding Ag | Noise-reducing covering for vehicle interior |
US5586485A (en) * | 1993-08-12 | 1996-12-24 | Robert Krups Gmbh & Co. Kg | Coffee machine |
US5622662A (en) * | 1993-09-28 | 1997-04-22 | Bradford Industries, Inc. | Method for forming a sound attenuation composite |
US5754491A (en) * | 1997-02-24 | 1998-05-19 | Poiesis Research, Inc. | Multi-technology acoustic energy barrier and absorber |
US5922265A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 1999-07-13 | Lear Corporation | Method of forming a motor vehicle dash insulator |
US6033756A (en) * | 1996-12-04 | 2000-03-07 | Pritex Limited | Apparatus for and method of attenuating acoustic energy |
US6296076B1 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2001-10-02 | John J. Hiers | Acoustical insulating barrier and method of making the barrier |
US20020031626A1 (en) * | 1996-05-10 | 2002-03-14 | Yasuyuki Ohira | Method of energy conversion |
US6420049B1 (en) * | 1991-02-07 | 2002-07-16 | Cadillac Products, Inc. | Shield for water and sound |
US6540442B1 (en) * | 1997-03-03 | 2003-04-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | High energy impact absorption fender system using valvular control logic |
US6790520B1 (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 2004-09-14 | Collins & Aikman Products Co. | Vibration dampening laminate |
US7201253B2 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2007-04-10 | Faurecia Automotive Industrie | Soundproofing assembly and a part comprising a wall which if covered with said assembly |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE7720966U1 (en) * | 1977-07-05 | 1977-10-13 | Teroson Gmbh, 6900 Heidelberg | Foam strips |
DE2835329A1 (en) * | 1978-08-11 | 1980-03-06 | Stankiewicz Schallschluck | POLYURETHANE FOAM FOR NOISE REDUCTION APPLICATION |
DE3313624C2 (en) * | 1983-04-12 | 1986-04-03 | Teroson Gmbh, 6900 Heidelberg | Flexible polyurethane foam and its use |
JPH10340087A (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 1998-12-22 | Ikeda Bussan Co Ltd | Soundproofing and heat insulating member |
DE19744747A1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 1999-04-15 | Basf Ag | Process for the production of flexible polyurethane foams |
CA2483709C (en) * | 2002-04-22 | 2009-10-13 | Lydall, Inc. | Gradient density padding material and method of making same |
-
2005
- 2005-01-12 KR KR1020067013957A patent/KR20060123475A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-01-12 EP EP05705846A patent/EP1706863A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-01-12 JP JP2006549688A patent/JP2007519556A/en active Pending
- 2005-01-12 WO PCT/US2005/001524 patent/WO2005069273A1/en active Search and Examination
- 2005-01-12 CN CN200580002219A patent/CN100578609C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-12 US US11/034,173 patent/US20050150720A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4056161A (en) * | 1975-10-30 | 1977-11-01 | Tillotson Corporation | Sound attenuation material |
US5009043A (en) * | 1990-07-12 | 1991-04-23 | Herman Miller, Inc. | Acoustic panel |
US5554830A (en) * | 1990-07-19 | 1996-09-10 | Matec Holding Ag | Noise-reducing covering for vehicle interior |
US6420049B1 (en) * | 1991-02-07 | 2002-07-16 | Cadillac Products, Inc. | Shield for water and sound |
US5586485A (en) * | 1993-08-12 | 1996-12-24 | Robert Krups Gmbh & Co. Kg | Coffee machine |
US5622662A (en) * | 1993-09-28 | 1997-04-22 | Bradford Industries, Inc. | Method for forming a sound attenuation composite |
US20020031626A1 (en) * | 1996-05-10 | 2002-03-14 | Yasuyuki Ohira | Method of energy conversion |
US6033756A (en) * | 1996-12-04 | 2000-03-07 | Pritex Limited | Apparatus for and method of attenuating acoustic energy |
US5754491A (en) * | 1997-02-24 | 1998-05-19 | Poiesis Research, Inc. | Multi-technology acoustic energy barrier and absorber |
US6540442B1 (en) * | 1997-03-03 | 2003-04-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | High energy impact absorption fender system using valvular control logic |
US5922265A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 1999-07-13 | Lear Corporation | Method of forming a motor vehicle dash insulator |
US6790520B1 (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 2004-09-14 | Collins & Aikman Products Co. | Vibration dampening laminate |
US6296076B1 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2001-10-02 | John J. Hiers | Acoustical insulating barrier and method of making the barrier |
US7201253B2 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2007-04-10 | Faurecia Automotive Industrie | Soundproofing assembly and a part comprising a wall which if covered with said assembly |
Cited By (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060131100A1 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2006-06-22 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Noise absorbing structure of instrument panel |
US7431128B2 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2008-10-07 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Noise absorbing structure of instrument panel |
US20070042156A1 (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2007-02-22 | Rockwell Anthony L | Die cut insulation blanket and method for producing same |
US8133568B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2012-03-13 | Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc | Die cut insulation blanket |
US7923092B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2011-04-12 | Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc | Die cut insulation blanket and method for producing same |
US20070272285A1 (en) * | 2006-02-27 | 2007-11-29 | Herreman Kevin M | Appliance noise reduction blanket |
US11110028B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2021-09-07 | Hill-Rom Services Pte. Ltd. | High frequency chest wall oscillation system |
US9968511B2 (en) | 2006-03-15 | 2018-05-15 | Hill-Rom Services Pte. Ltd. | High frequency chest wall oscillation system |
US20080001431A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Sound insulation constructions and methods of using the same |
US9922634B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2018-03-20 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Sound insulation constructions and methods of using the same |
US20080144852A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Multi-chamber noise control system |
US8270627B2 (en) | 2006-12-14 | 2012-09-18 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Adaptive noise control system |
US20080142294A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Noise control system using smart materials |
US8184820B2 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2012-05-22 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Indirect acoustic transfer control of noise |
US20080144849A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Adaptive noise control system |
US8144889B2 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2012-03-27 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Noise control system using smart materials |
US8005235B2 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2011-08-23 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Multi-chamber noise control system |
US20080144850A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Indirect acoustic transfer control of noise |
US20100017690A1 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-01-21 | Rylyakov Alexander V | Method and apparatus for low latency proportional path in a digitally controlled system |
US8066097B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2011-11-29 | Saint-Gobain Weber France | Acoustic enhancement device for underlayment of a covering |
US20100018799A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Saint-Gobain Weber France | Acoustic enhancement device for underlayment of a covering |
WO2010017167A3 (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2010-04-15 | Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc | Insulation element for an electrical appliance such as a dishwasher |
US8205287B2 (en) | 2008-08-04 | 2012-06-26 | Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc | Insulation element for an electrical appliance such as a dishwasher |
US20100024851A1 (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2010-02-04 | Rockwell Anthony L | Insulation Element For An Electrical Appliance Such As A Dishwasher |
WO2010017167A2 (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2010-02-11 | Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc | Insulation element for an electrical appliance such as a dishwasher |
US8449701B2 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2013-05-28 | Dow Global Technologies Llc | Acoustic baffle members and methods for applying acoustic baffles in cavities |
US8535463B2 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2013-09-17 | Dow Global Technologies Llc | Acoustic baffle members and methods for applying acoustic baffles in cavities |
US8151933B2 (en) * | 2009-05-13 | 2012-04-10 | Cvg Management Corporation | Thermally and acoustically insulative vehicle flooring |
US20100288582A1 (en) * | 2009-05-13 | 2010-11-18 | May Philip G | Thermally and acoustically insulative vehicle flooring system |
US9549869B2 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2017-01-24 | Hill-Rom Canado Respiratory Ltd. | Wearable thorax percussion device |
US20140012167A1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-01-09 | Chestmaster Inc. | Wearable thorax percussion device |
US10292890B2 (en) | 2012-06-29 | 2019-05-21 | Hill-Rom Services Pte. Ltd. | Wearable thorax percussion device |
US10980695B2 (en) | 2012-06-29 | 2021-04-20 | Hill-Rom Services Pte. Ltd. | Method of making a wearable thorax percussion device |
US8881864B2 (en) | 2012-10-04 | 2014-11-11 | International Automation Components Group North America, Inc. | Motor vehicle acoustic insulator, methods of manufacture and use thereof |
US20160194866A1 (en) * | 2013-07-24 | 2016-07-07 | Geko Innovations Limited | Acoustic Panel |
US9617728B2 (en) * | 2013-07-24 | 2017-04-11 | Geko Innovations Limited | Acoustic panel |
US10510330B2 (en) * | 2014-06-06 | 2019-12-17 | Sika Technology Ag | Device and method for sound deadening a component |
US20160063985A1 (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2016-03-03 | Isolite Gmbh | Sound absorbers |
US11471366B2 (en) | 2016-08-22 | 2022-10-18 | Hill-Rom Services Pte. Ltd. | Percussion therapy apparatus and methods thereof |
US11691489B2 (en) | 2019-01-15 | 2023-07-04 | Mazda Motor Corporation | Vehicle door structure |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005069273A1 (en) | 2005-07-28 |
CN1910650A (en) | 2007-02-07 |
KR20060123475A (en) | 2006-12-01 |
JP2007519556A (en) | 2007-07-19 |
EP1706863A1 (en) | 2006-10-04 |
CN100578609C (en) | 2010-01-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20050150720A1 (en) | Automotive dash insulators containing viscoelastic foams | |
EP1682385B1 (en) | Sound insulating system | |
RU2549214C1 (en) | Car cabin finishing part that lessens noise | |
KR101624256B1 (en) | Automotive insulating trim part | |
US8360201B2 (en) | Sound absorbing structure and sound chamber | |
JP5890833B2 (en) | Broadband sound absorber | |
KR101550234B1 (en) | Automotive trim part for sound insulation and absorption | |
WO2002083461A1 (en) | Acoustic tile and its use in vehicle sound proofing | |
JP4691388B2 (en) | Ultralight soundproof material | |
EP1466057A1 (en) | Sound attenuating composite articles incorporating scrim material and methods of making same | |
WO2007134391A1 (en) | An acoustic shield | |
JPS61115780A (en) | Partition wall for partitioning engine room and cabin for automobile | |
JP2010517864A (en) | Constrained layer damping for vehicles | |
WO2006027936A1 (en) | Double wall structure | |
CA2460531A1 (en) | Engine intake manifold made of noise barrier composit material | |
GB2418641A (en) | Automobile interior trim sound absorbing components | |
JP3530522B1 (en) | Ultralight soundproofing material | |
JP4704910B2 (en) | Sound absorbing sheet | |
JPH07199956A (en) | Sound insulator | |
WO2024004919A1 (en) | Sound insulation structure and soundproof structure | |
RU2188772C2 (en) | Multilayer noise-damping lining of vehicle body panel | |
JPS63199182A (en) | Structure of dash panel for vehicle | |
JP2024048856A (en) | Sound insulation structure | |
JP2024051555A (en) | Soundproofing structure | |
Mahajan et al. | ‘Specialized noise control materials in the automotive industry |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |