US20050152739A1 - Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050152739A1 US20050152739A1 US11/069,403 US6940305A US2005152739A1 US 20050152739 A1 US20050152739 A1 US 20050152739A1 US 6940305 A US6940305 A US 6940305A US 2005152739 A1 US2005152739 A1 US 2005152739A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- contact surface
- flexible
- contact
- link
- articulated arm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16M—FRAMES, CASINGS OR BEDS OF ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS, NOT SPECIFIC TO ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; SUPPORTS
- F16M11/00—Stands or trestles as supports for apparatus or articles placed thereon Stands for scientific apparatus such as gravitational force meters
- F16M11/20—Undercarriages with or without wheels
- F16M11/24—Undercarriages with or without wheels changeable in height or length of legs, also for transport only, e.g. by means of tubes screwed into each other
- F16M11/40—Undercarriages with or without wheels changeable in height or length of legs, also for transport only, e.g. by means of tubes screwed into each other by means of coilable or bendable legs or spiral shaped legs
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B1/00—Instruments for performing medical examinations of the interior of cavities or tubes of the body by visual or photographical inspection, e.g. endoscopes; Illuminating arrangements therefor
- A61B1/00147—Holding or positioning arrangements
- A61B1/00149—Holding or positioning arrangements using articulated arms
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/02—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/50—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16L—PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16L11/00—Hoses, i.e. flexible pipes
- F16L11/14—Hoses, i.e. flexible pipes made of rigid material, e.g. metal or hard plastics
- F16L11/18—Articulated hoses, e.g. composed of a series of rings
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16M—FRAMES, CASINGS OR BEDS OF ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS, NOT SPECIFIC TO ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; SUPPORTS
- F16M11/00—Stands or trestles as supports for apparatus or articles placed thereon Stands for scientific apparatus such as gravitational force meters
- F16M11/02—Heads
- F16M11/04—Means for attachment of apparatus; Means allowing adjustment of the apparatus relatively to the stand
- F16M11/06—Means for attachment of apparatus; Means allowing adjustment of the apparatus relatively to the stand allowing pivoting
- F16M11/12—Means for attachment of apparatus; Means allowing adjustment of the apparatus relatively to the stand allowing pivoting in more than one direction
- F16M11/14—Means for attachment of apparatus; Means allowing adjustment of the apparatus relatively to the stand allowing pivoting in more than one direction with ball-joint
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16M—FRAMES, CASINGS OR BEDS OF ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS, NOT SPECIFIC TO ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; SUPPORTS
- F16M13/00—Other supports for positioning apparatus or articles; Means for steadying hand-held apparatus or articles
- F16M13/02—Other supports for positioning apparatus or articles; Means for steadying hand-held apparatus or articles for supporting on, or attaching to, an object, e.g. tree, gate, window-frame, cycle
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/50—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms
- A61B90/57—Accessory clamps
- A61B2090/571—Accessory clamps for clamping a support arm to a bed or other supports
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16M—FRAMES, CASINGS OR BEDS OF ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS, NOT SPECIFIC TO ENGINES, MACHINES OR APPARATUS PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; SUPPORTS
- F16M2200/00—Details of stands or supports
- F16M2200/02—Locking means
- F16M2200/021—Locking means for rotational movement
- F16M2200/022—Locking means for rotational movement by friction
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T403/00—Joints and connections
- Y10T403/32—Articulated members
- Y10T403/32008—Plural distinct articulation axes
- Y10T403/32032—Plural ball and socket
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T403/00—Joints and connections
- Y10T403/32—Articulated members
- Y10T403/32008—Plural distinct articulation axes
- Y10T403/32041—Universal
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T403/00—Joints and connections
- Y10T403/32—Articulated members
- Y10T403/32254—Lockable at fixed position
- Y10T403/32262—At selected angle
- Y10T403/32311—Ball and socket
Definitions
- the present invention relates to articulating load bearing flexible arms, particularly suited for use as surgical tissue stabilizers, and more particularly to increasing the stiffness of such an articulating column when in the locked configuration.
- Flexible arms or, as they are often called, articulable columns have many uses. For example, they are often used for positioning tools, article supports, or for locking measuring apparatus. In surgery, it is common practice to mount them as adjustable supporting brackets on a side rail of an operating table to support retractors, endoscopes and other surgical devices.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,949,927 discloses an articulable column and, more particularly, describes prior art columns of the ball and socket type which are flexible in their normal state and which, by application of tension from a central cable, become rigid.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,727,569 teaches that the tissue stabilizer is attached to the wall of the heart by drawing a vacuum in an array of suction cups. With one or more such devices attached to the wall of the heart, the site at which the repair is to take place can be held fixed while the heart continues to beat.
- a tissue stabilizer is often supported using a lockable articulating column, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,348,259.
- a lockable articulating column is described as a flexible, articulable column having a central tensioning cable strung through a series of ball and socket members.
- Each socket member has a conical opening with internal teeth engagable with a ball made of an elastomeric polymer.
- FIG. 1 is an elevational view illustrating a tissue stabilizer supported from the side rail of an operating table by a bracket as found in the prior art of U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,425.
- the assembly in FIG. 1 includes vertical post 10 attached to side-rail 12 of an operating table (not shown) by a clamp 14 .
- the post 10 often has plural facets, which cooperate with the clamp to prevent rotation of the post relative to the clamp.
- a tension block 16 mounted at the top of post 10 , comprises a mounting block 18 and a rotatable member 20 .
- a flexible arm 24 is connected to the side of mounting block 18 opposite to the side having the rotatable member 20 .
- Flexible arm 24 comprises a series of articulating elements connected to one another by ball-and-socket joints. The number of ball and socket members may be increased or decreased depending on the use of the articulating column.
- the flexible arm 24 has a clamp assembly 26 mounted at its other end. The clamp assembly 26 holds the shank 28 of tissue stabilizer 30 .
- tensioned mounting block 18 has an internal passage receiving a screw 32 .
- Affixed to the screw is a transverse pin riding in slots formed in opposite sides of mounting block 18 .
- the engagement of the pin with the slots prevents the screw from rotating relative to mounting block 18 .
- the threads of the screw engage internal threads in a rotatable member 20 , which also has an internal shoulder that can engage with the screw's head.
- the tension cable is often a braided structure made of metal specifically built to withstand cyclical tensile fatigue.
- the cable may be pre-stretched to minimize further elongation of the cable caused by the application of tension.
- Turning the rotatable member 20 often supports cable tensions in the range of 5 to 1000 lbs.
- Plastic links have a significant problem when used in a surgical theatre, they often cannot be reused due to difficulties in cleaning them.
- plastic link components were found by the inventors to undergo deflections of up to a factor of 1000% for plastics such as polyethylene when tensioned.
- Metallic link components typically deflect by less than 50%. This difference in the materials turns out to require an entirely different approach to determining useful metallic links and their contact surfaces.
- the percentages used above were percent elongation derived from the reference: Materials Science and Engineering, 3 rd Edition, W. Callister copyright 1985, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- the flexible, articulating arm 24 as shown in FIG. 2 , comprises a series of elements, preferably made of stainless steel. Each element has a convex, spherical surface at one end and a concave, spherical surface at the other end.”
- the bracket is characterized by an interference fit between the spherical balls and their sockets.
- the diameter of each ball is preferably larger than the diameter of the socket into which it fits.
- the sockets are hemispherical or almost hemispherical, and their walls are sufficiently flexible to allow the balls to enter them. The very small difference in diameter, and the flexibility of the socket walls, allows the balls and sockets to be engaged over an area of contact.
- area of contact and ‘area contact,’ mean contact between a ball and a socket over a substantial area in a common sphere, greater than approximately 20% of the total surface area of the sphere, and is distinguishable from ‘line contact,’ which is contact between a ball and socket over a circular line or a narrow band having an area which is substantially less than 20% of the total area of the sphere corresponding to the larger of the ball or socket.
- the area of contact extends from the periphery of the socket to the envelope of the perimeter of the cable opening in the concave spherical surface and the circle defining the end of the convex spherical surface adjacent to the cable opening therein.
- the contact area is preferably approximately 30% to 40% of the total surface area of a corresponding sphere.”
- metallic link contact surfaces behave differently. This is due to the inherently lower interface friction of semi-smooth metallic mating convex and concave surfaces. Friction forces are directly proportional to these distributed contact forces. While two mating spherical surfaces would produce a large contact area, the distributed contact forces are relatively low because they are widely dispersed.
- the inventors know of no disclosure or teaching that provides for an effective metallic link for use in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm. What is needed is such an effective metallic link.
- the invention addresses the needs discussed in the background.
- the invention increases the stiffness of flexible arm linkage assemblies, by increasing the friction between link contacts when in a locked configuration.
- One embodiment of the invention includes a flexible arm linkage assembly provided with a tensioning cable.
- the linkage assembly includes a first link with a first contact surface composed of a first contact material, and a second link with a second contact surface composed of a second, differing contact material.
- a high friction coupling between the first link and the second link is created by the first contact surface contacting the second contact surface when induced by the tensioning cable.
- Each of the contact materials is primarily composed of a respective metallic compound, providing a higher coefficient of friction between the two contacting surfaces than would result from both contacting surfaces being composed of the same contacting material.
- the contacting materials are primarily composed of metallic compounds.
- a flexible arm including the invention provides an increased range of motion and better stabilization of surgical instruments.
- the contacting metallic compounds are further preferred to be primarily composed of alloys including at least one of iron, copper and titanium.
- the contacting metallic compounds are still further preferred to be at least two of the following: stainless steel, titanium, and nitinol, which will refer herein to Ni—Ti alloys.
- Metallic links have a significant advantage when used in a surgery, they can be sterilized and reused many times. Using metal linkage assemblies reduces the waste products and lowers the costs associated with the use of flexible arms.
- the invention includes increasing the overall metallic link to metallic link friction as a result of optimized contact geometry between the links, based upon the metallic composition of the contacting link surfaces.
- Another embodiment of the invention includes optimization of metallic bead to metallic bead contact friction comprising the following steps. Maximizing the coefficient of friction between the first contact material of the first contact surface and second contact material of the second contact surface by selecting the first and second contact materials. Determining a ball diameter and conical angle to maximize frictional forces in static equilibrium based upon the coefficient of friction.
- the inventors found that determining the ball diameter and conical angle maximizing static frictional forces required optimizing away from maximized contact area for a number of metals, including alloys of at least titanium, and iron, and in particular, stainless steel.
- the inventors further experimentally proved that they could make an even better joint using contact materials of stainless steel and titanium for the respective contact surfaces based upon the optimized interface geometry.
- the joint formed from the stainless steel contacting titanium beads had greatly improved stiffness over anything the inventors know of.
- the invention includes methods of providing linkage assemblies using metallic links, as well as the linkage assembly and flexible arm as products of these methods.
- the invention provides a flexible arm, also known as an articulating column, with the strength to stabilize devices holding a beating or stopped heart for an incision or the operation of a scope.
- FIG. 1 is an elevational view illustrating a tissue stabilizer supported from the side rail of an operating table by a bracket as found in the prior art of U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,425;
- FIG. 2 illustrates a flexible arm including a linkage assembly 1000 in accord with the invention providing increased stiffness when experimentally compared with several alternatives;
- FIG. 3A illustrates a metallic linkage assembly as taught by the prior art
- FIG. 3B illustrates a metallic linkage assembly 1000 of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 3C illustrates a preferred metallic linkage assembly 1000 of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4 illustrates experimental results obtained by testing a first link coupling to a second link as illustrated in FIGS. 3A to 3 C, each under 200 pound tension;
- FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate two links of FIG. 3B coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a spherical concave surface;
- FIG. 5C illustrates two stainless steel links of FIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a conical concave surface;
- FIG. 5D illustrates two links of FIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex titanium surface contacting a conical concave stainless steel surface;
- FIG. 6A is an exploded view of item 16 and the rotatable member 20 of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 6B shows the present invention with an alternate retraction mechanism 330 ;
- FIG. 7A shows a close-up of the ergonomically designed handle 20 of FIGS. 2 and 6 A.
- FIGS. 7B, 7C , and 7 D illustrate handles for other commercially available articulating columns.
- the invention increases the stiffness of flexible arm linkage assemblies, by increasing the friction between link contacts, when in a locked configuration operating similarly to existing plastic based linkage assemblies.
- the invention includes a flexible arm linkage assembly provided with a tensioning cable.
- the linkage assembly includes a first link with a first contact surface composed of a first contact material, and a second link with a second contact surface composed of a second, differing contact material. A high friction coupling between the first link and the second link is created by the first contact surface contacting the second contact surface when induced by the tensioning cable.
- Each of the contact materials is primarily composed of a respective metallic compound, or compounds, providing a higher coefficient of friction between the two contacting surfaces than would result from both contacting surfaces being composed of the same contacting material.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a flexible arm including a linkage assembly 1000 in accord with the invention providing increased stiffness when experimentally compared with several alternatives.
- FIG. 3A illustrates a metallic linkage assembly as taught by the prior art.
- FIG. 3B illustrates a metallic linkage assembly 1000 of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 3C illustrates a preferred metallic linkage assembly 1000 of FIG. 2 .
- linkage assembly 1000 includes a link 130 -T coupling with link 110 -S and link 100 coupling with link 110 -S.
- a link 110 -S will refer to a link shape 110 composed primarily of stainless steel.
- a link 110 -T will refer to a link shape 110 composed primarily of titanium.
- a link may employ two or more distinct metallic compounds, typically one for each contact surface. Note that it is also within the scope of the invention to use separate materials within a link for the contact surfaces, as well as for the body joining the two contact surfaces.
- a link 110 -TS refers to a link possessing a concave surface primarily composed of a titanium alloy, and a convex surface primarily composed of a stainless steel alloy.
- a link 110 -ST refers to a link possessing a concave surface primarily composed of a stainless steel alloy, and a convex surface primarily composed of a titanium alloy. The concave and convex surfaces both support a tensioning cable traversing through their link.
- the concave and convex surfaces preferably embody shapes, which for their materials, maximize static friction as well as kinetic friction when contacting each other under tension.
- Each linkage shape includes at least one contact surface, which contact couples to a neighboring contact surface of another link.
- Links 100 and 130 each have exactly one contact surface, which are convex and concave, respectively.
- Links 110 and 120 each have two contact surfaces, one concave and the other convex.
- the invention includes linkage assemblies provided with a tensioning cable and including the following.
- a first link forming a first contact surface composed of a first contact material.
- a second link forming a second contact surface composed of a second contact material.
- the tensioning cable traversing through the first link and the second link.
- a high friction coupling between the first link and the second link is created by the first contact surface contacting the second contact surface when induced by the tensioning cable.
- the first contact material is distinct from the second contact material.
- Each of the contact materials is primarily composed of a respective metallic compound.
- the first contact surface, composed of the first contact material, contacting the second contact surface, composed of the second contact material has a higher friction coefficient than results from composing both contact surfaces of either contact materials. This higher friction coefficient is preferably greater than 0.3.
- each of the respective metallic compounds is primarily composed of at least one alloy containing at least one member of the collection comprising: iron, copper, and titanium.
- alloys containing at least one member of the collection comprising: iron, copper, and titanium.
- other materials including other metals and alloys may be useable.
- each of the respective metallic compounds is primarily composed of an alloy belonging to the collection comprising: stainless steel, titanium, and nitinol.
- FIG. 4 illustrates experimental results obtained by testing a first link coupling to a second link as illustrated in FIGS. 3A to 3 C, each under 200 pound tension.
- FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate two links of FIG. 3B coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a spherical concave surface.
- the spherical convex surface 112 connects with the semi-spherical concave surface 124 .
- the diameters of the two surfaces are preferably slightly different, with the convex semi-spherical 112 diameter being larger than the semi-spherical diameter of the interfacing concave surface 124 .
- Convex surface 112 and concave surface 124 form an interference fit when the two surfaces contact each other under tension.
- the wall of link 120 -S is sufficiently thin and resilient where the two surfaces come together to provide an area contact between the first link and the second link.
- FIG. 5C illustrates two stainless steel links of FIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a conical concave surface.
- FIG. 5D illustrates two links of FIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex titanium surface contacting a conical concave stainless steel surface.
- the spherical convex surface 112 - 2 connects with the conical concave surface 114 - 1 .
- the diameters of the two surfaces are preferably slightly different, with the convex semi-spherical 112 - 2 diameter being larger than the conical diameter of the interfacing concave surface 114 - 1 .
- Convex surface 112 - 2 and concave surface 114 - 1 form an interference fit when the two surfaces contact each other under tension.
- the wall of link 110 -S 1 is sufficiently thin and resilient where the two surfaces come together to provide an area of contact with each other. Percentages referenced in this paragraph were percent elongation. Taken from Reference: Materials Science and Engineering, 3rd Edition, W. Callister copyright 1985
- the spherical convex surface 112 -T connects with the conical concave surface 114 -S.
- the diameters of the two surfaces are preferably slightly different, with the convex semi-spherical 112 -T diameter being larger than the conical diameter of the interfacing concave surface 114 -S.
- Convex surface 112 -T and concave surface 114 -S form an interference fit when the two surfaces contact each other under tension.
- the wall of link 110 -S 1 is sufficiently thin and resilient where the two surfaces come together to provide an of area contact with each other.
- the circular edge of the opening of each link is preferably concentric with the center of the imaginary sphere in which the surface lies when the links are fully engaged with each other.
- the edge is rounded to avoid a sharp edge that could damage the tensioning cable.
- the rounded edge has a very small radius of curvature to maximize the contact area of the mating convex and concave surfaces. The fact that the edge is rounded instead of sharp has negligible effect on the contact area.
- the diameters of the convex and mating concave link surfaces may preferably vary over the length of the linkage assembly. This supports the need for increased strength and/or stiffness at the proximal end of the articulating arm near tension block 18 , where the applied mechanical moment is greatest. The applied moment is greatest at the proximal end of the flexible arm because the moment arm to the point of loading is greatest. Often, the flexible arm is oriented at the proximal end in a way that amplifies this effect.
- the joints at the proximal end of the arm are preferably larger in diameter. This increases their rotational inertia, or resistance to rotation, in addition to providing greater frictional contact area than smaller distal beads located furthest from tension block 18 .
- the greatest load-bearing link is usually the most proximal link. This link is sunk into the body of the articulating column providing a mechanical lock, prohibiting rotation of this link.
- Distal links which need not provide such a great magnitude of resistance to angular displacement, due to the smaller applied moment, are preferably smaller in diameter to facilitate a lighter, less obtrusive design. This is useful in a surgery, where any protruding object may catch on fabric, tape, etc., distracting the surgical personnel.
- Links preferably do not deform more than 0.01% from their relaxed circumference when fully loaded. This small deformation is achieved specifically because of the use of metal materials of the joint elements. A plastic bead would have to be impracticably thick to achieve this constraint.
- the interference fit of the balls and sockets of the link and more importantly, the significant area of contact between them, together provide the rigidity necessary for tissue stabilization in heart surgery.
- These features also allow the bracket to be adjusted easily and locked into its rigid condition by the application of a moderate force on the cable.
- the rigidity of the arm can be substantially improved by improving the friction coefficient between links by differing selected materials between the links. This can be accomplished by fabricating adjacent articulating elements of differing materials, or by using coatings or other modifications to the contacting surfaces.
- the bottom curve 200 shows the performance of an existing link.
- the second curve 210 is the performance of first link interface from a competitive device made of plastic.
- the third curve 220 shows the performance of an improved high friction coupling of metallic contact surfaces in accord with certain aspects of the invention.
- the tensioning cable induces contact between the first contact surface and the second contact surface providing a maximal static friction combined with a maximal kinetic friction between the first link and the second link through a contact region.
- the experimental data present by curve 220 uses a contact region is smaller than a maximal contact region obtained from altering at least one member of the collection comprising the first contact surface and the second contact surface.
- Such alterations include relatively small changes in the shapes and relative sizes of one or both contact surfaces.
- the top curve 230 shows the performance of the preferred high friction coupling.
- the tensioning cable induces contact between the first contact surface and the second contact surface providing a maximal static friction combined with a maximal kinetic friction between the first link and the second link through a contact region as found in curve 220 .
- the contact materials are stainless steel and titanium.
- the applied moment can be thought of as the amount of torque that the arm can resist before undergoing angular displacement.
- curve 200 for Device 1 begins to move around 2 in-lbs, whereas the Ti—SS links with the preferred contact surfaces begin to move up around 25 in-lbs.
- the inventors analyzed the forces on the contact surfaces of a pair of coupling links. This led to an insight regarding the parameters governing the static equilibrium conditions. The static equilibrium equations were solved for the maximum moment that could be supported prior to slippage at the interface. The inventors found the influence of the friction was very nonlinear.
- the friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is preferably greater than 0.3.
- the friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is further preferred greater than 0.35.
- the friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is further preferred greater than 0.375.
- the friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is further preferred greater than 0.3875.
- the flexibility of an articulating column using the invention allows for an attached retractor to reach all portions of an organ, such as the heart. This is because of the small bend radius that has been made possible by the invention.
- the flexibility afforded by the small bend radius is possible because of the geometry and rigidity of the joints keeping the same stabilization of the organ as prior art device requiring greater bend radii.
- Proximal links have a larger conical angle, afforded by their larger overall size. This increases the range of motion of the column by increasing the range of motion of the proximal links near to tension block 18 .
- Smaller distal links have smaller conical angles, but also smaller distance from the articulating surface to the center of rotation, creating a uniform range of motion throughout the device.
- the tension cable traverses freely through the links when the links are rotated to the extent of their articulating surfaces. This supports the range of motion being limited by the link design rather than the cable.
- the rigidity of the articulating column can be attributed to increased friction resulting from a combination of geometric and materials factors.
- the geometry of the two metallic contacting surfaces preferably acts to amplify the contact forces that are produced by applying tension to the tensioning cable.
- the spherical convex surface of one link preferably mates with a conical concave surface of another link.
- This mismatch produces larger contact forces distributed over a smaller relative area.
- the radius of curvature of the convex surface is preferably large enough such to provide an adequate amount of contact area, further increasing the frictional forces.
- a transition link that joins two links of different diameter may have spherical surfaces on both the convex and concave contact surfaces to facilitate the transition within the confined space. These geometric factors compliment the material selection, designed to increase the coefficient of friction between links.
- Certain preferred flexible arms are fixed to the body of the clamp 18 , and the terminal element, or in some embodiments several terminal elements, may be fixed to a surgical device. In alternate embodiments all joints may be flexible.
- FIG. 6A is an exploded view of item 16 and the rotatable member 20 of FIG. 2 .
- the mechanism that supports the articulating column attaches to the supporting structure using a “C” bracket 304 and a tension block 18 applies tension to the supporting structure.
- This connection mechanism is both secure and is capable of a rapid disconnect.
- the tension block 16 is forced down by a screw mechanism that is driven by turning handle 300 .
- the advantage of this pivoted handle is that the screw mechanism does not extend further than 3 mm past the upper surface of the clamp for a profile suitable for less invasive surgery.
- FIG. 6B shows the present invention with an alternate retraction mechanism 330 .
- FIG. 7A shows a close-up of the ergonomically designed handle 20 of FIGS. 2 and 6 A.
- handle 20 has a helical angle suited for right-handed people to oppose the thumb when tightening the handle. Also shown is a better view of clamp apparatus 16 . Tension block 18 is driven towards “C” bracket 304 by screw 302 when turning pivot handle 300 .
- This exemplary embodiment is not the only attachment means to support an articulating column including the invention's linkage assembly 1000 . Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other attachments are possible and may be considered as alternate embodiments of the present invention.
- FIGS. 7B, 7C , and 7 D illustrate handles for other commercially available articulating columns.
- the present invention allows an articulating column with a greater range of motion or smaller flexible radius of curvature. This can be attributed to the conical angles used in the convex surfaces of each articulating bead, through which the tension cable passes.
- the proximal 4 beads have a conical angle of 40 degrees where as the remaining distal beads have a conical angle of 25 degrees.
- the larger conical angle allows for increased flexibility because the cable has more space to bend.
- the flexible arms may use different support attachment mechanisms and different retractors for connection to the articulating column.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/268,397, filed Oct. 9, 2002, which claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/327,990 filed Oct. 9, 2001, the specifications and drawings of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
- The present invention relates to articulating load bearing flexible arms, particularly suited for use as surgical tissue stabilizers, and more particularly to increasing the stiffness of such an articulating column when in the locked configuration.
- Flexible arms or, as they are often called, articulable columns, have many uses. For example, they are often used for positioning tools, article supports, or for locking measuring apparatus. In surgery, it is common practice to mount them as adjustable supporting brackets on a side rail of an operating table to support retractors, endoscopes and other surgical devices.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,949,927 discloses an articulable column and, more particularly, describes prior art columns of the ball and socket type which are flexible in their normal state and which, by application of tension from a central cable, become rigid.
- Recent developments in heart surgery require stronger and more rigid adjustable brackets. In particular, a procedure has been introduced for carrying out cardiac bypass surgery without stopping the patient's heart. In this procedure, a device called a “tissue stabilizer” is used.
- A specific prior art example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,727,569 teaches that the tissue stabilizer is attached to the wall of the heart by drawing a vacuum in an array of suction cups. With one or more such devices attached to the wall of the heart, the site at which the repair is to take place can be held fixed while the heart continues to beat.
- A tissue stabilizer is often supported using a lockable articulating column, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,348,259. A lockable articulating column is described as a flexible, articulable column having a central tensioning cable strung through a series of ball and socket members. Each socket member has a conical opening with internal teeth engagable with a ball made of an elastomeric polymer. When the cable is tensioned, the sockets move toward each other and the balls become indented by the teeth of the socket. The column becomes rigid when the central cable is tensioned. Releasing the tension returns the column to the flexible state.
-
FIG. 1 is an elevational view illustrating a tissue stabilizer supported from the side rail of an operating table by a bracket as found in the prior art of U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,425. - The assembly in
FIG. 1 includesvertical post 10 attached to side-rail 12 of an operating table (not shown) by aclamp 14. Thepost 10 often has plural facets, which cooperate with the clamp to prevent rotation of the post relative to the clamp. Atension block 16, mounted at the top ofpost 10, comprises amounting block 18 and arotatable member 20. - In
FIG. 1 , one end of aflexible arm 24 is connected to the side ofmounting block 18 opposite to the side having therotatable member 20.Flexible arm 24 comprises a series of articulating elements connected to one another by ball-and-socket joints. The number of ball and socket members may be increased or decreased depending on the use of the articulating column. Theflexible arm 24 has aclamp assembly 26 mounted at its other end. Theclamp assembly 26 holds theshank 28 oftissue stabilizer 30. - Typically, tensioned
mounting block 18 has an internal passage receiving a screw 32. Affixed to the screw is a transverse pin riding in slots formed in opposite sides ofmounting block 18. The engagement of the pin with the slots prevents the screw from rotating relative to mountingblock 18. The threads of the screw engage internal threads in arotatable member 20, which also has an internal shoulder that can engage with the screw's head. - The tension cable is often a braided structure made of metal specifically built to withstand cyclical tensile fatigue. The cable may be pre-stretched to minimize further elongation of the cable caused by the application of tension. Turning the
rotatable member 20 often supports cable tensions in the range of 5 to 1000 lbs. - Plastic links have a significant problem when used in a surgical theatre, they often cannot be reused due to difficulties in cleaning them. Metallic links, if feasible, would be easier to clean, reducing a costly form of surgical waste.
- While there are references in the cited prior art to metal links in a flexible arm linkage assembly dating back to 1990, the inventors have only found plastic links actually in the market. The references in the cited prior art will be discussed in the next few paragraphs.
- Prior art, plastic link components were found by the inventors to undergo deflections of up to a factor of 1000% for plastics such as polyethylene when tensioned. Metallic link components typically deflect by less than 50%. This difference in the materials turns out to require an entirely different approach to determining useful metallic links and their contact surfaces. The percentages used above were percent elongation derived from the reference: Materials Science and Engineering, 3rd Edition, W. Callister copyright 1985, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,949,927 teaches in
FIG. 6 and its associated discussion about a link integrating a ball and rod made of aluminum. The inventors found that this link was inoperable, due to a low coefficient of friction. By having the low coefficient of friction, such links slipped easily, far below the point of usefulness. - U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,425 teaches (
FIG. 2 , Col. 4, lines 7-11) “The flexible,articulating arm 24, as shown inFIG. 2 , comprises a series of elements, preferably made of stainless steel. Each element has a convex, spherical surface at one end and a concave, spherical surface at the other end.” - In the Summary of U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,425 (Column 2, lines 35-57), “The bracket is characterized by an interference fit between the spherical balls and their sockets. The diameter of each ball is preferably larger than the diameter of the socket into which it fits. The sockets are hemispherical or almost hemispherical, and their walls are sufficiently flexible to allow the balls to enter them. The very small difference in diameter, and the flexibility of the socket walls, allows the balls and sockets to be engaged over an area of contact. The terms ‘area of contact’ and ‘area contact,’ mean contact between a ball and a socket over a substantial area in a common sphere, greater than approximately 20% of the total surface area of the sphere, and is distinguishable from ‘line contact,’ which is contact between a ball and socket over a circular line or a narrow band having an area which is substantially less than 20% of the total area of the sphere corresponding to the larger of the ball or socket. The area of contact extends from the periphery of the socket to the envelope of the perimeter of the cable opening in the concave spherical surface and the circle defining the end of the convex spherical surface adjacent to the cable opening therein. The contact area is preferably approximately 30% to 40% of the total surface area of a corresponding sphere.”
- The inventors found that U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,425 was both contradictory and inoperable in its teaching regarding metallic link components. First, maximizing the stainless steel contact area actually reduces the frictional force needed for stiffness. The disclosure from the Summary was appropriate for a plastic link component, but failed to account for the physical characteristics of stainless steel as well as alloys of iron and titanium, which do not deflect anywhere near as much as plastics.
- Unlike, the prior art plastic articulating columns that are highly textured and consequently need only low tensile loads for fair rigidity, metallic link contact surfaces behave differently. This is due to the inherently lower interface friction of semi-smooth metallic mating convex and concave surfaces. Friction forces are directly proportional to these distributed contact forces. While two mating spherical surfaces would produce a large contact area, the distributed contact forces are relatively low because they are widely dispersed.
- Note that a link will also be known herein as a bead.
- The inventors know of no disclosure or teaching that provides for an effective metallic link for use in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm. What is needed is such an effective metallic link.
- In summary, there is a need for increased stiffness in articulating joints, particularly in flexible arm linkage assemblies. There is a need for reusable links within a surgery, leading to needing metallic, reusable links. And there is a need for reusable links providing increased stiffness in flexible arm linkage assemblies.
- The invention addresses the needs discussed in the background. The invention increases the stiffness of flexible arm linkage assemblies, by increasing the friction between link contacts when in a locked configuration.
- One embodiment of the invention includes a flexible arm linkage assembly provided with a tensioning cable. The linkage assembly includes a first link with a first contact surface composed of a first contact material, and a second link with a second contact surface composed of a second, differing contact material. A high friction coupling between the first link and the second link is created by the first contact surface contacting the second contact surface when induced by the tensioning cable.
- Each of the contact materials is primarily composed of a respective metallic compound, providing a higher coefficient of friction between the two contacting surfaces than would result from both contacting surfaces being composed of the same contacting material. The contacting materials are primarily composed of metallic compounds.
- A flexible arm including the invention provides an increased range of motion and better stabilization of surgical instruments.
- The contacting metallic compounds are further preferred to be primarily composed of alloys including at least one of iron, copper and titanium. The contacting metallic compounds are still further preferred to be at least two of the following: stainless steel, titanium, and nitinol, which will refer herein to Ni—Ti alloys.
- Metallic links have a significant advantage when used in a surgery, they can be sterilized and reused many times. Using metal linkage assemblies reduces the waste products and lowers the costs associated with the use of flexible arms.
- The invention includes increasing the overall metallic link to metallic link friction as a result of optimized contact geometry between the links, based upon the metallic composition of the contacting link surfaces.
- Another embodiment of the invention includes optimization of metallic bead to metallic bead contact friction comprising the following steps. Maximizing the coefficient of friction between the first contact material of the first contact surface and second contact material of the second contact surface by selecting the first and second contact materials. Determining a ball diameter and conical angle to maximize frictional forces in static equilibrium based upon the coefficient of friction.
- The inventors found that determining the ball diameter and conical angle maximizing static frictional forces required optimizing away from maximized contact area for a number of metals, including alloys of at least titanium, and iron, and in particular, stainless steel.
- Using stainless steel for both contact surfaces, the inventors experimentally proved that they had discovered the first practical metallic link for flexible arms, providing significant improvement in the mechanical stiffness of the joint over typical plastic link components. This new metallic link used the interface geometry that resulted from their new approach to interface geometry determination.
- The inventors further experimentally proved that they could make an even better joint using contact materials of stainless steel and titanium for the respective contact surfaces based upon the optimized interface geometry. The joint formed from the stainless steel contacting titanium beads had greatly improved stiffness over anything the inventors know of.
- The invention includes methods of providing linkage assemblies using metallic links, as well as the linkage assembly and flexible arm as products of these methods.
- The invention provides a flexible arm, also known as an articulating column, with the strength to stabilize devices holding a beating or stopped heart for an incision or the operation of a scope.
-
FIG. 1 is an elevational view illustrating a tissue stabilizer supported from the side rail of an operating table by a bracket as found in the prior art of U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,425; -
FIG. 2 illustrates a flexible arm including alinkage assembly 1000 in accord with the invention providing increased stiffness when experimentally compared with several alternatives; -
FIG. 3A illustrates a metallic linkage assembly as taught by the prior art; -
FIG. 3B illustrates ametallic linkage assembly 1000 ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 3C illustrates a preferredmetallic linkage assembly 1000 ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 4 illustrates experimental results obtained by testing a first link coupling to a second link as illustrated inFIGS. 3A to 3C, each under 200 pound tension; -
FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate two links ofFIG. 3B coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a spherical concave surface; -
FIG. 5C illustrates two stainless steel links ofFIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a conical concave surface; -
FIG. 5D illustrates two links ofFIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex titanium surface contacting a conical concave stainless steel surface; -
FIG. 6A is an exploded view ofitem 16 and therotatable member 20 ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 6B shows the present invention with analternate retraction mechanism 330; -
FIG. 7A shows a close-up of the ergonomically designedhandle 20 ofFIGS. 2 and 6 A; and -
FIGS. 7B, 7C , and 7D, illustrate handles for other commercially available articulating columns. - Various embodiments built in accord with the invention will be discussed. The invention increases the stiffness of flexible arm linkage assemblies, by increasing the friction between link contacts, when in a locked configuration operating similarly to existing plastic based linkage assemblies.
- The invention includes a flexible arm linkage assembly provided with a tensioning cable. The linkage assembly includes a first link with a first contact surface composed of a first contact material, and a second link with a second contact surface composed of a second, differing contact material. A high friction coupling between the first link and the second link is created by the first contact surface contacting the second contact surface when induced by the tensioning cable.
- Each of the contact materials is primarily composed of a respective metallic compound, or compounds, providing a higher coefficient of friction between the two contacting surfaces than would result from both contacting surfaces being composed of the same contacting material.
-
FIG. 2 illustrates a flexible arm including alinkage assembly 1000 in accord with the invention providing increased stiffness when experimentally compared with several alternatives. -
FIG. 3A illustrates a metallic linkage assembly as taught by the prior art. -
FIG. 3B illustrates ametallic linkage assembly 1000 ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 3C illustrates a preferredmetallic linkage assembly 1000 ofFIG. 2 . - In
FIG. 2 ,linkage assembly 1000 includes a link 130-T coupling with link 110-S and link 100 coupling with link 110-S. As used herein a link 110-S will refer to alink shape 110 composed primarily of stainless steel. A link 110-T will refer to alink shape 110 composed primarily of titanium. - A link may employ two or more distinct metallic compounds, typically one for each contact surface. Note that it is also within the scope of the invention to use separate materials within a link for the contact surfaces, as well as for the body joining the two contact surfaces.
- A link 110-TS refers to a link possessing a concave surface primarily composed of a titanium alloy, and a convex surface primarily composed of a stainless steel alloy. Note that a link 110-ST refers to a link possessing a concave surface primarily composed of a stainless steel alloy, and a convex surface primarily composed of a titanium alloy. The concave and convex surfaces both support a tensioning cable traversing through their link.
- The concave and convex surfaces preferably embody shapes, which for their materials, maximize static friction as well as kinetic friction when contacting each other under tension.
- In
FIGS. 2, 3B , and 3C, there are four linkage shapes used, 100, 110, 120 and 130. Each linkage shape includes at least one contact surface, which contact couples to a neighboring contact surface of another link.Links Links - The invention includes linkage assemblies provided with a tensioning cable and including the following. A first link forming a first contact surface composed of a first contact material. A second link forming a second contact surface composed of a second contact material. The tensioning cable traversing through the first link and the second link.
- In certain embodiments, a high friction coupling between the first link and the second link is created by the first contact surface contacting the second contact surface when induced by the tensioning cable. The first contact material is distinct from the second contact material. Each of the contact materials is primarily composed of a respective metallic compound. The first contact surface, composed of the first contact material, contacting the second contact surface, composed of the second contact material, has a higher friction coefficient than results from composing both contact surfaces of either contact materials. This higher friction coefficient is preferably greater than 0.3.
- Preferably, each of the respective metallic compounds is primarily composed of at least one alloy containing at least one member of the collection comprising: iron, copper, and titanium. However, other materials including other metals and alloys may be useable.
- Further preferred, each of the respective metallic compounds is primarily composed of an alloy belonging to the collection comprising: stainless steel, titanium, and nitinol.
-
FIG. 4 illustrates experimental results obtained by testing a first link coupling to a second link as illustrated inFIGS. 3A to 3C, each under 200 pound tension. -
FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate two links ofFIG. 3B coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a spherical concave surface. - In
FIGS. 5A and 5B , the sphericalconvex surface 112 connects with the semi-sphericalconcave surface 124. The diameters of the two surfaces are preferably slightly different, with the convex semi-spherical 112 diameter being larger than the semi-spherical diameter of the interfacingconcave surface 124.Convex surface 112 andconcave surface 124 form an interference fit when the two surfaces contact each other under tension. The wall of link 120-S is sufficiently thin and resilient where the two surfaces come together to provide an area contact between the first link and the second link. -
FIG. 5C illustrates two stainless steel links ofFIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex surface contacting a conical concave surface. -
FIG. 5D illustrates two links ofFIG. 3C coupling with each other through a spherical convex titanium surface contacting a conical concave stainless steel surface. - In
FIG. 5C , the spherical convex surface 112-2 connects with the conical concave surface 114-1. The diameters of the two surfaces are preferably slightly different, with the convex semi-spherical 112-2 diameter being larger than the conical diameter of the interfacing concave surface 114-1. Convex surface 112-2 and concave surface 114-1 form an interference fit when the two surfaces contact each other under tension. The wall of link 110-S1 is sufficiently thin and resilient where the two surfaces come together to provide an area of contact with each other. Percentages referenced in this paragraph were percent elongation. Taken from Reference: Materials Science and Engineering, 3rd Edition, W. Callister copyright 1985 - In
FIG. 5D , the spherical convex surface 112-T connects with the conical concave surface 114-S. The diameters of the two surfaces are preferably slightly different, with the convex semi-spherical 112-T diameter being larger than the conical diameter of the interfacing concave surface 114-S. Convex surface 112-T and concave surface 114-S form an interference fit when the two surfaces contact each other under tension. The wall of link 110-S1 is sufficiently thin and resilient where the two surfaces come together to provide an of area contact with each other. - In
FIGS. 5A to 5D, the circular edge of the opening of each link is preferably concentric with the center of the imaginary sphere in which the surface lies when the links are fully engaged with each other. The edge is rounded to avoid a sharp edge that could damage the tensioning cable. The rounded edge has a very small radius of curvature to maximize the contact area of the mating convex and concave surfaces. The fact that the edge is rounded instead of sharp has negligible effect on the contact area. - The diameters of the convex and mating concave link surfaces may preferably vary over the length of the linkage assembly. This supports the need for increased strength and/or stiffness at the proximal end of the articulating arm near
tension block 18, where the applied mechanical moment is greatest. The applied moment is greatest at the proximal end of the flexible arm because the moment arm to the point of loading is greatest. Often, the flexible arm is oriented at the proximal end in a way that amplifies this effect. - The joints at the proximal end of the arm are preferably larger in diameter. This increases their rotational inertia, or resistance to rotation, in addition to providing greater frictional contact area than smaller distal beads located furthest from
tension block 18. - The greatest load-bearing link is usually the most proximal link. This link is sunk into the body of the articulating column providing a mechanical lock, prohibiting rotation of this link.
- Distal links which need not provide such a great magnitude of resistance to angular displacement, due to the smaller applied moment, are preferably smaller in diameter to facilitate a lighter, less obtrusive design. This is useful in a surgery, where any protruding object may catch on fabric, tape, etc., distracting the surgical personnel.
- Links preferably do not deform more than 0.01% from their relaxed circumference when fully loaded. This small deformation is achieved specifically because of the use of metal materials of the joint elements. A plastic bead would have to be impracticably thick to achieve this constraint.
- Generally, the interference fit of the balls and sockets of the link, and more importantly, the significant area of contact between them, together provide the rigidity necessary for tissue stabilization in heart surgery. These features also allow the bracket to be adjusted easily and locked into its rigid condition by the application of a moderate force on the cable.
- However, the rigidity of the arm can be substantially improved by improving the friction coefficient between links by differing selected materials between the links. This can be accomplished by fabricating adjacent articulating elements of differing materials, or by using coatings or other modifications to the contacting surfaces.
- In the experimental data provided in
FIG. 4 , the links ofFIGS. 3A to 3C, each used essentially one metallic compound. - In
FIG. 4 , thebottom curve 200 shows the performance of an existing link. - In
FIG. 4 , thesecond curve 210 is the performance of first link interface from a competitive device made of plastic. - In
FIG. 4 , thethird curve 220 shows the performance of an improved high friction coupling of metallic contact surfaces in accord with certain aspects of the invention. The tensioning cable induces contact between the first contact surface and the second contact surface providing a maximal static friction combined with a maximal kinetic friction between the first link and the second link through a contact region. - The experimental data present by
curve 220, uses a contact region is smaller than a maximal contact region obtained from altering at least one member of the collection comprising the first contact surface and the second contact surface. Such alterations include relatively small changes in the shapes and relative sizes of one or both contact surfaces. - In
FIG. 4 , thetop curve 230 shows the performance of the preferred high friction coupling. The tensioning cable induces contact between the first contact surface and the second contact surface providing a maximal static friction combined with a maximal kinetic friction between the first link and the second link through a contact region as found incurve 220. Additionally, the contact materials are stainless steel and titanium. - The applied moment can be thought of as the amount of torque that the arm can resist before undergoing angular displacement.
- The important point on these curves is where a device begins to deviate from vertical, not where it plateaus. For instance,
curve 200 for Device 1 begins to move around 2 in-lbs, whereas the Ti—SS links with the preferred contact surfaces begin to move up around 25 in-lbs. - The inventors analyzed the forces on the contact surfaces of a pair of coupling links. This led to an insight regarding the parameters governing the static equilibrium conditions. The static equilibrium equations were solved for the maximum moment that could be supported prior to slippage at the interface. The inventors found the influence of the friction was very nonlinear.
- The friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is preferably greater than 0.3. The friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is further preferred greater than 0.35. The friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is further preferred greater than 0.375. The friction coefficient of the contacting metallic surface is further preferred greater than 0.3875. An analysis performed by the inventors indicates that a flexible arm with a friction coefficient of 0.4 would be twice as stiff as one with a friction coefficient of 0.3.
- The flexibility of an articulating column using the invention allows for an attached retractor to reach all portions of an organ, such as the heart. This is because of the small bend radius that has been made possible by the invention. The flexibility afforded by the small bend radius is possible because of the geometry and rigidity of the joints keeping the same stabilization of the organ as prior art device requiring greater bend radii.
- The flexibility of an articulating column using this invention is increased over existing designs due to the conical angle at the convex and concave surfaces of the respective links.
- Proximal links have a larger conical angle, afforded by their larger overall size. This increases the range of motion of the column by increasing the range of motion of the proximal links near to
tension block 18. - Smaller distal links have smaller conical angles, but also smaller distance from the articulating surface to the center of rotation, creating a uniform range of motion throughout the device.
- For all links, the tension cable traverses freely through the links when the links are rotated to the extent of their articulating surfaces. This supports the range of motion being limited by the link design rather than the cable.
- The rigidity of the articulating column can be attributed to increased friction resulting from a combination of geometric and materials factors.
- The geometry of the two metallic contacting surfaces preferably acts to amplify the contact forces that are produced by applying tension to the tensioning cable.
- In the case of certain embodiments of the invention, the spherical convex surface of one link preferably mates with a conical concave surface of another link. This mismatch produces larger contact forces distributed over a smaller relative area. With metals, the magnitude of these contact forces must exceed a threshold for static frictional forces to meet conditions of static equilibrium under a given applied moment. The radius of curvature of the convex surface is preferably large enough such to provide an adequate amount of contact area, further increasing the frictional forces.
- A transition link that joins two links of different diameter may have spherical surfaces on both the convex and concave contact surfaces to facilitate the transition within the confined space. These geometric factors compliment the material selection, designed to increase the coefficient of friction between links.
- Certain preferred flexible arms are fixed to the body of the
clamp 18, and the terminal element, or in some embodiments several terminal elements, may be fixed to a surgical device. In alternate embodiments all joints may be flexible. -
FIG. 6A is an exploded view ofitem 16 and therotatable member 20 ofFIG. 2 . - In
FIG. 6A , the mechanism that supports the articulating column attaches to the supporting structure using a “C”bracket 304 and atension block 18 applies tension to the supporting structure. This connection mechanism is both secure and is capable of a rapid disconnect. - In
FIG. 6A , thetension block 16 is forced down by a screw mechanism that is driven by turninghandle 300. The advantage of this pivoted handle is that the screw mechanism does not extend further than 3mm past the upper surface of the clamp for a profile suitable for less invasive surgery. -
FIG. 6B shows the present invention with analternate retraction mechanism 330. - This and other attachments to an articulating column are possible and those skilled in the art can make suitable modifications for attachment of at least a variety of medical tools. The usefulness of the invention is not limited in scope to medical applications. The scope of the invention is intended to cover any linkage assembly of a flexible arm needing improved rigidity.
-
FIG. 7A shows a close-up of the ergonomically designedhandle 20 ofFIGS. 2 and 6 A. - In
FIG. 7A , handle 20 has a helical angle suited for right-handed people to oppose the thumb when tightening the handle. Also shown is a better view ofclamp apparatus 16.Tension block 18 is driven towards “C”bracket 304 byscrew 302 when turningpivot handle 300. This exemplary embodiment is not the only attachment means to support an articulating column including the invention'slinkage assembly 1000. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other attachments are possible and may be considered as alternate embodiments of the present invention. -
FIGS. 7B, 7C , and 7D, illustrate handles for other commercially available articulating columns. - The present invention allows an articulating column with a greater range of motion or smaller flexible radius of curvature. This can be attributed to the conical angles used in the convex surfaces of each articulating bead, through which the tension cable passes.
- In
FIG. 7A , the proximal 4 beads have a conical angle of 40 degrees where as the remaining distal beads have a conical angle of 25 degrees. The larger conical angle allows for increased flexibility because the cable has more space to bend. - Although exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described in detail above, many additional modifications are possible without departing materially from the novel teachings and advantages of the invention.
- For example, different dissimilar metals may be considered for different friction coefficients, different contact surfaces achieving similar static equilibrium requirements, to create the flexible arm linkage assemblies. The flexible arms may use different support attachment mechanisms and different retractors for connection to the articulating column.
Claims (37)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/069,403 US20050152739A1 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2005-02-28 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
US11/145,096 US20050226682A1 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2005-06-02 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US32799001P | 2001-10-09 | 2001-10-09 | |
US10/268,397 US6860668B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2002-10-09 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
US11/069,403 US20050152739A1 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2005-02-28 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/268,397 Continuation US6860668B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2002-10-09 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/145,096 Continuation-In-Part US20050226682A1 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2005-06-02 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050152739A1 true US20050152739A1 (en) | 2005-07-14 |
Family
ID=23279014
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/268,397 Expired - Fee Related US6860668B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2002-10-09 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
US11/069,403 Abandoned US20050152739A1 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2005-02-28 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/268,397 Expired - Fee Related US6860668B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2002-10-09 | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6860668B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002347855A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE10297328T5 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003030830A2 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080121765A1 (en) * | 2006-11-29 | 2008-05-29 | Fetzer Peter E | Surgical instrument support |
US20100280325A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-04 | Tamer Ibrahim | Retractors and surgical systems including the same |
US20100317925A1 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2010-12-16 | Banchieri Michael J | Suction-assisted tissue stabilizers |
US20110028792A1 (en) * | 2009-07-28 | 2011-02-03 | Tamer Ibrahim | Tissue retractors with fluid evacuation/infusion and/or light emission capability |
US9486296B2 (en) | 2010-07-08 | 2016-11-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Surgical assembly with flexible arm |
Families Citing this family (65)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2004506469A (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2004-03-04 | アトリテック, インコーポレイテッド | Expandable implantable device for filtering blood flow from the atrial appendage |
WO2003030830A2 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2003-04-17 | Endoscopic Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
US7749227B2 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2010-07-06 | Greatbatch Medical S.A. | Precision assembleable surgical tool handle with limited-play interconnect mechanism |
US8840663B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2014-09-23 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Repositionable heart valve method |
US20120041550A1 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2012-02-16 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Methods and Apparatus for Endovascular Heart Valve Replacement Comprising Tissue Grasping Elements |
US8343213B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2013-01-01 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Leaflet engagement elements and methods for use thereof |
US7988724B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2011-08-02 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Systems and methods for delivering a medical implant |
US8182528B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2012-05-22 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Locking heart valve anchor |
EP2526895B1 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2014-01-29 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Repositionable heart valve |
US8579962B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2013-11-12 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for performing valvuloplasty |
US7381219B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2008-06-03 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Low profile heart valve and delivery system |
US20050137694A1 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2005-06-23 | Haug Ulrich R. | Methods and apparatus for endovascularly replacing a patient's heart valve |
US8828078B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2014-09-09 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for endovascular heart valve replacement comprising tissue grasping elements |
US7445631B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2008-11-04 | Sadra Medical, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for endovascularly replacing a patient's heart valve |
US11278398B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2022-03-22 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for endovascular heart valve replacement comprising tissue grasping elements |
US20070170318A1 (en) * | 2004-04-27 | 2007-07-26 | Intersurgical, Inc. | Ventilator breathing tube support arm |
DE102005003632A1 (en) | 2005-01-20 | 2006-08-17 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Catheter for the transvascular implantation of heart valve prostheses |
US7569071B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2009-08-04 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Venous valve, system, and method with sinus pocket |
US20070213813A1 (en) | 2005-12-22 | 2007-09-13 | Symetis Sa | Stent-valves for valve replacement and associated methods and systems for surgery |
US8224485B2 (en) | 2006-05-24 | 2012-07-17 | Titan Medical Inc. | Snaking robotic arm with movable shapers |
US20080047064A1 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2008-02-28 | Theran Michael E | Surgical equipment supporting frames and attachments for same |
US7896915B2 (en) | 2007-04-13 | 2011-03-01 | Jenavalve Technology, Inc. | Medical device for treating a heart valve insufficiency |
US9044318B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2015-06-02 | Jenavalve Technology Gmbh | Stent for the positioning and anchoring of a valvular prosthesis |
ES2903231T3 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2022-03-31 | Jenavalve Tech Inc | Stent for positioning and anchoring a valve prosthesis at an implantation site in a patient's heart |
JP5607639B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2014-10-15 | サドラ メディカル インコーポレイテッド | Medical devices and systems |
US8062218B2 (en) * | 2009-02-27 | 2011-11-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Surgical access instrument |
US20110022078A1 (en) * | 2009-07-23 | 2011-01-27 | Cameron Dale Hinman | Articulating mechanism |
US20110038064A1 (en) * | 2009-07-30 | 2011-02-17 | Ilo Kristo Xhunga | Flexible Arms of Low Footprint and High Weight-bearing |
DE102009058198A1 (en) * | 2009-12-15 | 2011-06-16 | Sms Siemag Ag | Nozzle device and strand guiding device with the nozzle device |
JP2013526388A (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2013-06-24 | イエナバルブ テクノロジー インク | Artificial heart valve, and transcatheter delivery prosthesis comprising an artificial heart valve and a stent |
EP2613737B2 (en) | 2010-09-10 | 2023-03-15 | Symetis SA | Valve replacement devices, delivery device for a valve replacement device and method of production of a valve replacement device |
US8819983B2 (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2014-09-02 | Jeff Tate | Systems, methods, and apparatus for securing a recording device to a hunting apparatus |
EP2520251A1 (en) | 2011-05-05 | 2012-11-07 | Symetis SA | Method and Apparatus for Compressing Stent-Valves |
US8840077B2 (en) * | 2011-08-24 | 2014-09-23 | Coopersurgical, Inc. | Table-mounted surgical instrument stabilizers |
KR101833347B1 (en) | 2012-02-06 | 2018-02-28 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Link unit, arm module and apparatus for surgery having the same |
US9832980B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2017-12-05 | Carter J. Kovarik | Selectively bendable remote gripping tool |
US9901245B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2018-02-27 | Carter J. Kovarik | Selectively bendable remote gripping tool |
US11083475B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2021-08-10 | Carter J. Kovarik | Medical device to remove an obstruction from a body lumen, vessel or organ |
US10226266B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2019-03-12 | Carter J. Kovarik | Selectively bendable remote gripping tool |
US9883941B2 (en) | 2012-06-19 | 2018-02-06 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Replacement heart valve |
US9463022B2 (en) * | 2012-12-17 | 2016-10-11 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Llc | Motor driven rotary input circular stapler with lockable flexible shaft |
DE112014001466T5 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2015-12-03 | Pro Med Instruments Gmbh | Flexible arm and method of use |
JP6563394B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2019-08-21 | イェーナヴァルヴ テクノロジー インコーポレイテッド | Radially foldable frame for an artificial valve and method for manufacturing the frame |
US10675203B2 (en) | 2014-10-07 | 2020-06-09 | Allem Medical Systems, Inc. | Sterile limb connectors and methods |
WO2016126524A1 (en) | 2015-02-03 | 2016-08-11 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Prosthetic heart valve having tubular seal |
US10426617B2 (en) | 2015-03-06 | 2019-10-01 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Low profile valve locking mechanism and commissure assembly |
US9581190B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2017-02-28 | Hilel Richman | Adjustable support arm |
US10709555B2 (en) | 2015-05-01 | 2020-07-14 | Jenavalve Technology, Inc. | Device and method with reduced pacemaker rate in heart valve replacement |
EP3454795B1 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2023-01-11 | JenaValve Technology, Inc. | Heart valve prosthesis delivery system for delivery of heart valve prosthesis with introducer sheath and loading system |
US10201416B2 (en) | 2016-05-16 | 2019-02-12 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Replacement heart valve implant with invertible leaflets |
WO2018102680A1 (en) * | 2016-12-01 | 2018-06-07 | General Electric Company | Protection of flexible members |
JP7094965B2 (en) | 2017-01-27 | 2022-07-04 | イエナバルブ テクノロジー インク | Heart valve imitation |
EP3634311A1 (en) | 2017-06-08 | 2020-04-15 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Heart valve implant commissure support structure |
WO2019028161A1 (en) | 2017-08-01 | 2019-02-07 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical implant locking mechanism |
US10939996B2 (en) | 2017-08-16 | 2021-03-09 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Replacement heart valve commissure assembly |
WO2019067529A1 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2019-04-04 | Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation | Articulating stabilizer arm with adjustable length |
WO2019144071A1 (en) | 2018-01-19 | 2019-07-25 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical device delivery system with feedback loop |
EP3740160A2 (en) | 2018-01-19 | 2020-11-25 | Boston Scientific Scimed Inc. | Inductance mode deployment sensors for transcatheter valve system |
EP3749252A1 (en) | 2018-02-07 | 2020-12-16 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical device delivery system with alignment feature |
EP3758651B1 (en) | 2018-02-26 | 2022-12-07 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Embedded radiopaque marker in adaptive seal |
CN112399836A (en) | 2018-05-15 | 2021-02-23 | 波士顿科学国际有限公司 | Replacement heart valve commissure assemblies |
US11241310B2 (en) | 2018-06-13 | 2022-02-08 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Replacement heart valve delivery device |
WO2020123486A1 (en) | 2018-12-10 | 2020-06-18 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical device delivery system including a resistance member |
US11439504B2 (en) | 2019-05-10 | 2022-09-13 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Replacement heart valve with improved cusp washout and reduced loading |
US11864746B2 (en) | 2021-07-21 | 2024-01-09 | Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation | Articulating stabilizer arm with disposable and reusable subassemblies |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4706659A (en) * | 1984-12-05 | 1987-11-17 | Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Flexible connecting shaft for intramedullary reamer |
US4949927A (en) * | 1989-10-17 | 1990-08-21 | John Madocks | Articulable column |
US5348259A (en) * | 1992-02-10 | 1994-09-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Flexible, articulable column |
US5624381A (en) * | 1994-08-09 | 1997-04-29 | Kieturakis; Maciej J. | Surgical instrument and method for retraction of an anatomic structure defining an interior lumen |
US5727569A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1998-03-17 | Cardiothoracic Systems, Inc. | Surgical devices for imposing a negative pressure to fix the position of cardiac tissue during surgery |
US5885271A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1999-03-23 | Millennium Cardiac Strategies, Inc. | Device for regional immobilization of a compliant body |
US5899425A (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 1999-05-04 | Medtronic, Inc. | Adjustable supporting bracket having plural ball and socket joints |
US6254532B1 (en) * | 1998-05-22 | 2001-07-03 | Coroneo Inc. | Surgical apparatus and method |
US6361493B1 (en) * | 1997-09-17 | 2002-03-26 | Origin Medsystems, Inc. | Device to permit offpump beating heart coronary bypass surgery |
US6506149B2 (en) * | 1999-09-07 | 2003-01-14 | Origin Medsystems, Inc. | Organ manipulator having suction member supported with freedom to move relative to its support |
US6758808B2 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2004-07-06 | Cardiothoracic System, Inc. | Surgical instruments for stabilizing a localized portion of a beating heart |
US6860668B2 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2005-03-01 | Endoscopic Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
US6974411B2 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2005-12-13 | Neoguide Systems, Inc. | Endoscope with single step guiding apparatus |
US6994669B1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2006-02-07 | Heartport, Inc. | Apparatus and method for cardiac surgery |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR1255099A (en) * | 1960-01-22 | 1961-03-03 | Soft, hardenable upper | |
GB2166190A (en) * | 1984-07-06 | 1986-04-30 | Microsurgical Administrative S | Clamping arrangements |
CA2397147A1 (en) * | 2000-01-10 | 2001-07-19 | Medivas, Llc | Flexible stabilizer arm for forcibly holding an object against a surface |
-
2002
- 2002-10-09 WO PCT/US2002/032368 patent/WO2003030830A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-10-09 US US10/268,397 patent/US6860668B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-10-09 DE DE10297328T patent/DE10297328T5/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-10-09 AU AU2002347855A patent/AU2002347855A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2005
- 2005-02-28 US US11/069,403 patent/US20050152739A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4706659A (en) * | 1984-12-05 | 1987-11-17 | Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Flexible connecting shaft for intramedullary reamer |
US4949927A (en) * | 1989-10-17 | 1990-08-21 | John Madocks | Articulable column |
US5348259A (en) * | 1992-02-10 | 1994-09-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Flexible, articulable column |
US5624381A (en) * | 1994-08-09 | 1997-04-29 | Kieturakis; Maciej J. | Surgical instrument and method for retraction of an anatomic structure defining an interior lumen |
US5727569A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1998-03-17 | Cardiothoracic Systems, Inc. | Surgical devices for imposing a negative pressure to fix the position of cardiac tissue during surgery |
US5885271A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1999-03-23 | Millennium Cardiac Strategies, Inc. | Device for regional immobilization of a compliant body |
US5899425A (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 1999-05-04 | Medtronic, Inc. | Adjustable supporting bracket having plural ball and socket joints |
US6361493B1 (en) * | 1997-09-17 | 2002-03-26 | Origin Medsystems, Inc. | Device to permit offpump beating heart coronary bypass surgery |
US6254532B1 (en) * | 1998-05-22 | 2001-07-03 | Coroneo Inc. | Surgical apparatus and method |
US6994669B1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2006-02-07 | Heartport, Inc. | Apparatus and method for cardiac surgery |
US6506149B2 (en) * | 1999-09-07 | 2003-01-14 | Origin Medsystems, Inc. | Organ manipulator having suction member supported with freedom to move relative to its support |
US6974411B2 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2005-12-13 | Neoguide Systems, Inc. | Endoscope with single step guiding apparatus |
US6758808B2 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2004-07-06 | Cardiothoracic System, Inc. | Surgical instruments for stabilizing a localized portion of a beating heart |
US6860668B2 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2005-03-01 | Endoscopic Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080121765A1 (en) * | 2006-11-29 | 2008-05-29 | Fetzer Peter E | Surgical instrument support |
US8486090B2 (en) | 2006-11-29 | 2013-07-16 | Peter E. Fetzer | Surgical instrument support |
US20100280325A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-04 | Tamer Ibrahim | Retractors and surgical systems including the same |
US20100317925A1 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2010-12-16 | Banchieri Michael J | Suction-assisted tissue stabilizers |
US20110028792A1 (en) * | 2009-07-28 | 2011-02-03 | Tamer Ibrahim | Tissue retractors with fluid evacuation/infusion and/or light emission capability |
US8696556B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2014-04-15 | Endoscopic Technologies, Inc. | Tissue retractors with fluid evacuation/infusion and/or light emission capability |
US9486296B2 (en) | 2010-07-08 | 2016-11-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Surgical assembly with flexible arm |
US10238409B2 (en) | 2010-07-08 | 2019-03-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Surgical assembly with flexible arm |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE10297328T5 (en) | 2005-01-05 |
US6860668B2 (en) | 2005-03-01 |
WO2003030830A2 (en) | 2003-04-17 |
US20030165352A1 (en) | 2003-09-04 |
WO2003030830A3 (en) | 2003-10-16 |
AU2002347855A1 (en) | 2003-04-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6860668B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm | |
US20050226682A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for improved stiffness in the linkage assembly of a flexible arm | |
US5899425A (en) | Adjustable supporting bracket having plural ball and socket joints | |
US20100280325A1 (en) | Retractors and surgical systems including the same | |
US7182731B2 (en) | Support arm for cardiac surgery | |
US6017306A (en) | Clamp assembly for use with orthopaedic retractor frame assembly | |
US20030083555A1 (en) | Segmented arm support system and method for stabilizing tissue | |
US8080036B2 (en) | Pedicle screw | |
US8449577B2 (en) | Spine fixator | |
US8926669B2 (en) | Modular polyaxial pedicle screw system | |
JP4856717B2 (en) | Screw and rod fixing assembly and element | |
US6210413B1 (en) | Connecting apparatus using shape-memory technology | |
US20110028792A1 (en) | Tissue retractors with fluid evacuation/infusion and/or light emission capability | |
US8394133B2 (en) | Dynamic fixation assemblies with inner core and outer coil-like member | |
US7311664B2 (en) | Apparatus for temporarily engaging body tissue | |
US20190231396A1 (en) | Polyaxial bone screw | |
US20090234389A1 (en) | Interspinous spinal fixation apparatus | |
US10993746B2 (en) | Head to head transverse connector | |
US20130030477A1 (en) | Receiving part for connecting a shank of a bone anchoring element to a rod and bone anchoring device with such a receiving part | |
US8419771B2 (en) | Implantable spinal fixation crosslink | |
US20020099268A1 (en) | Surgical instruments for stabilizing a localized portion of a beating heart | |
US20050080320A1 (en) | Multiple-blade retractor | |
US20200205860A1 (en) | Spinal distraction system | |
US20080312509A1 (en) | Surgical Clamp For Cylindrical Stock | |
US20100317925A1 (en) | Suction-assisted tissue stabilizers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:IBRAHIM, TAMER;GEYSTER, STEVE;GLEESON, JAMES;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016349/0899;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030211 TO 20030513 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021076/0248 Effective date: 20080611 Owner name: OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION, VIRGINIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021076/0248 Effective date: 20080611 Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK,CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021076/0248 Effective date: 20080611 Owner name: OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION,VIRGINIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021076/0248 Effective date: 20080611 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SAINTS CAPITAL VI, L.P., CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021118/0539 Effective date: 20080617 Owner name: SAINTS CAPITAL VI, L.P.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021118/0539 Effective date: 20080617 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SAINTS CAPITAL VI, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:021603/0209 Effective date: 20080926 Owner name: ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SAINTS CAPITAL VI, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:021603/0209 Effective date: 20080926 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:023586/0251 Effective date: 20091125 Owner name: ENDOSCOPIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:023586/0251 Effective date: 20091125 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |