US20050177557A1 - Automatic prevention of run-away query execution - Google Patents
Automatic prevention of run-away query execution Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050177557A1 US20050177557A1 US10/936,779 US93677904A US2005177557A1 US 20050177557 A1 US20050177557 A1 US 20050177557A1 US 93677904 A US93677904 A US 93677904A US 2005177557 A1 US2005177557 A1 US 2005177557A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- query
- run
- execution
- plan
- away
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2453—Query optimisation
- G06F16/24534—Query rewriting; Transformation
- G06F16/24549—Run-time optimisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/21—Design, administration or maintenance of databases
- G06F16/217—Database tuning
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99932—Access augmentation or optimizing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99933—Query processing, i.e. searching
- Y10S707/99934—Query formulation, input preparation, or translation
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99941—Database schema or data structure
- Y10S707/99944—Object-oriented database structure
Definitions
- OI7037082001 “METHOD FOR INDEX TUNING OF A SQL STATEMENT, AND INDEX MERGING FOR A MULTI-STATEMENT SQL WORKLOAD, USING A COST-BASED RELATIONAL QUERY OPTIMIZER,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037102001; “SQL STRUCTURE ANALYZER,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037112001; “HIGH-LOAD SQL DRIVEN STATISTICS COLLECTION,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037122001; “AUTOMATIC SQL TUNING ADVISOR,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037132001, all of which are filed Sep. 7, 2004 and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
- This invention is related to the field of electronic database management.
- the generation of optimal execution plans is critical to the performance of applications. For example, a single SQL statement with very poor performance can bring an application down to its knees. Sometimes a poorly performing SQL statement is due to user error, such as a blind query issued with without filtering conditions that would have reduced the amount of data processed. Other times the SQL statement is well formed, but the associated execution plan that is generated by the optimizer is suboptimal.
- the suboptimal plan results in a run-away execution of the query.
- the plan when executed, causes a SQL statement to run for a long time with enormous use of system resources.
- the problem of fixing the execution plan is usually addressed through a manual SQL tuning process. This process involves a tuning expert analyzing the SQL statement as well as its associated execution plan, then determining that the problem lies in the execution plan and not in the way the SQL statement is used (for example, an accidental use of a Cartesian join by not joining one of the tables to any of the other tables in the query).
- the manual SQL analysis process is a time-consuming task.
- the expert performs a manual SQL tuning process to influence the optimizer to generate a good plan.
- the manual SQL tuning process is also a time-consuming and complex task.
- the query governor can be either reactive or proactive.
- an execution-time threshold is set to abort any query whose cumulative execution time exceeds to threshold.
- an optimized-estimated-time threshold is set which is applied to the time optimizer has estimated for the query to run. Any query having an estimated run-time that exceeds the threshold is never run. With either of these methods, there is no attempt made to look at the root cause of the problem.
- Some vendors have used the idea of setting execution-time thresholds at various places in the execution plan to detect a case of run-away query execution. When a threshold is crossed during query execution, the run is aborted and the query sent back to the optimizer for re-optimization. But this method suffers from two drawbacks: setting of the thresholds and monitoring them at runtime incurs overhead, which can be significant and undesirable especially for light-weight queries, and the method of aborting a run and re-optimizing a query can be quite disruptive, especially if the run is aborted right before it was about to complete.
- a run-away query execution is automatically identified by a background process that periodically looks at each of the currently executing queries and compares the current execution time with the execution time estimated by the optimizer.
- Each query execution having a negative execution time difference can be automatically identified as a run-away query execution.
- the query execution plans that result in run-away executions can then be automatically tuned to produce more efficient execution plans.
- FIG. 1 shows an example of a method for performing automatic prevention of run-away query execution.
- FIG. 2 shows example of a system for automatic prevention of run-away queries.
- FIG. 3 represents an illustration of the prevention process.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing an embodiment of automatic run-away query prevention.
- the automatic performance monitoring of query executions identifies run-away query executions, then performs a re-optimization for the corresponding execution plans in a background process.
- the automatic prevention of run-away query executions may abort a current execution of a query run if the automatic process has produced an improved plan in the background, and further, has determined a benefit to aborting the current execution and performing an execution of the new plan.
- This process can be implemented by an automatic SQL tuning optimizer and a SQL tuning base.
- the run-away query execution is identified by a background process that periodically looks at each of the currently executing queries and compares the time spent in executing it so far (current-time) vs. the time the optimizer has estimated the execution to take (estimate-time).
- the top N queries with the largest negative difference (estimate-time ⁇ current-time) may be selected as run-away executions.
- An alternate method of identifying run-away query executions can be based on the current-time, that is, the process can select the top N queries with the longest current execution time as run-away query executions.
- the automatic tuning optimizer in a background process, then optimizes the execution plan for each query having a run-away execution by performing various analyses of the corresponding SQL statement, such as automatic identification and correction of inaccurate statistics, cardinality estimates, and cost estimates related to the statement, for example. If the execution plan built by the ATO is different from the one that is currently executing, the ATO can estimate how much more time the current plan execution is going to take to complete (remaining-time), as well as estimate how much time the new plan will take to execute (new-time). If the new-time is less than the remaining-time then the current plan run may be aborted and replaced with the new plan.
- the ATO uses validated estimates of the cost, selectivity and cardinality, it can compute the total execution time of the new plan much more accurately. Similarly, it can regenerate the original run-away plan that is currently executing with validated estimates to compute its remaining execution time. Because the identification of run-away query executions, and the automatic generation of improved plans for the corresponding queries are performed by the ATO in the background, this automatic process is transparent to the database user.
- a query execution plan is generated for an SQL statement by a query optimizer, 110 .
- the execution plan is executed by an execution engine, 120 .
- the executing plan is monitored, 130 , to detect that the plan is a run-away, or sub-optimal, execution plan.
- the query optimizer can also estimate the amount of time that the execution engine will spend executing the plan. If the actual execution time exceeds the estimated time, then the plan is potentially a run-away plan. Alternatively, the amount of execution time can be compared to a threshold time, such as two hours for example.
- the plan may be a run-away plan.
- the potential run-away plan is further analyzed to determine if the plan actually is a run-away plan, 140 .
- a profile for the SQL statement can be generated to correct or adjust errors in statistics and estimates associated with the plan, and to determine appropriate parameter settings for the statement.
- a new execution plan along with a time estimate for executing the new plan, can be generated using the profile. Also, a revised estimate of the execution time of the run-away execution plan is generated using the profile, 150 . If the new plan can be executed faster than the currently executing run-away plan, then the current plan is identified as a run-away plan. A second comparison of execution times is performed to determine whether to abort the current execution of the run-away plan and executing the new plan, or to allow the run-away plan to run to completion, 160 . If the remaining execution time of the run-away plan is less than the execution time of the new plan, then the current plan is allowed to finish. If the execution time of the new plan is less than the remaining execution time of the currently executing run-away plan, then the run-away plan is aborted and the new plan is executed.
- FIG. 2 An example of a system 200 for automatic prevention of run-away queries is shown in FIG. 2 .
- a query optimizer, 210 receives a SQL statement, and generates an execution plan for the statement, which is executed by execution engine 220 .
- An automatic performance monitor 230 identifies a potential run-away execution plan by observing the elapsed execution time of the plan, for example.
- the corresponding SQL statement is then input into an automatic tuning optimizer 240 , which generates a profile 250 for the SQL statement.
- the profile can contain information related to missing or stale statistics.
- the profile can also include one or more tuning actions that can be used by an optimizer to generate an execution plan for the statement.
- the profile and the statement are received by the query optimizer 210 , which generates a new execution plan, along with an estimated amount of time for executing the plan, based on the profile.
- the query optimizer also revises the estimated amount of time for executing the current plan using the profile.
- the time estimates are analyzed by a cost based plan selector, 260 , which can determine that the current plan is a run-away plan if the corresponding execution time estimate is longer than that of the new plan.
- the plan selector 260 can also cause the execution engine 220 to abort the run-away plan and execute the new plan if the remaining amount of time to execute the run-away plan is more than the amount of time to execute the new plan. Otherwise, the execution engine continues to execute the current plan. In either case, query results 270 are returned by the system.
- a profiling process is performed by the automatic tuning optimizer to produce a set of tuning actions in generating an execution plan for a SQL statement.
- the profiling process verifies that statistics are not missing or stale, validates the estimates made by the query optimizer for intermediate results, and determines the correct optimizer settings.
- Tuning actions are created based on the results of the profiling process, to provide missing statistics for an object, validate intermediate results estimate, and select the best setting for optimizer parameters. Then, the Automatic Tuning Optimizer builds a SQL Profile for these tuning actions.
- the statistics analysis verifies that statistics are not missing or stale.
- the query optimizer logs the types of statistics that are actually used during the plan generation process, in preparation for the verification process. For example, when a SQL statement contains an equality predicate, it logs the column number of distinct values, whereas for a range predicate it logs the minimum and maximum column values information.
- the query optimizer checks if each of these statistics is available on the associated query object (i.e. table, index or materialized view). If the statistic is available then it verifies whether the statistic is up-to-date. To verify the accuracy of a statistic, it samples data from the corresponding query object and compares it to the statistic. If a statistic is found to be missing, the query optimizer will generate auxiliary information to supply the missing statistic. If a statistic is available but stale, it will generate auxiliary information to compensate for staleness.
- One feature of a cost-based query optimizer is its ability to derive the size of intermediate results. For example, the optimizer estimates the number of rows from applying table filters when deciding which join algorithm to pick. One factor that causes the optimizer to generate a sub-optimal plan is wrong estimate of intermediate result sizes.
- Wrong estimates can be caused by a combination of the following factors:
- the data distribution of the column used in the predicate is skewed, and there is no histogram, leading the optimizer to assume a uniform data distribution, or
- the data in column values is correlated but the optimizer is not aware of it, causing the optimizer to assume data independence.
- the Automatic Tuning Optimizer validates the estimates made by the query optimizer, and compensates for missing information or wrong estimates. The validation process may involve running part of the query on a sample of the input data.
- the Automatic Tuning Optimizer uses the past execution history of a SQL statement to determine the correct optimizer settings. For example, if the execution history shows that a SQL statement is only partially executed in the majority of times then the appropriate setting will be to optimize it for first n rows, where n is derived from the execution history. This constitutes a customized parameter setting for the SQL statement. (Note that past execution statistics are available in the Automatic Workload Repository (AWR) presented later).
- FIG. 3 shows the process flow of the creation and use of a SQL Profile.
- the process can have two separate phases: an Automatic SQL Tuning phase, and a regular optimization phase.
- a SQL statement with a run-away execution 310 is selected as an input to the SQL Tuning Advisor, which invokes the Automatic Tuning Optimizer to generate tuning actions, 320 .
- the Automatic Tuning Optimizer generates a SQL Profile, along with other recommendations, 330 .
- a SQL Profile After a SQL Profile is built, it is stored in the data dictionary, once it is accepted by the user, 340 . Later, during the regular optimization phase, a user issues the same SQL statement, 350 .
- the query optimizer finds the matching SQL profiles from the data dictionary, 360 , and uses the SQL profile information to build a well-tuned execution plan, 370 .
- the use of SQL Profiles is completely transparent to the user. The creation and use of a SQL Profile doesn't require changes to the application source code. Therefore, SQL profiling provides a way to tune SQL statements issued from packaged applications where the users have no access to or control over the application source code.
- the automatic prevention of run-away queries can identify a plan that is a potential run-away plan.
- the process analyzes the SQL statement for the plan to determine if the potential run-away plan is caused by a bad plan. For example, the process can create a profile for the statement, use the profile to generate a new plan, and compare the new plan to the old plan to determine if the old plan is a run-away plan.
- the process can also use the profile to determine whether the run-away plan is close to finishing, and therefore should run to completion, or if the run-away plan should be aborted and the new plan should be executed in its place.
- the automatic prevention of run-away query executions eliminates the overhead incurred by conventional methods, such as monitoring of thresholds and aborting a run just before it finishes.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a computer system 400 suitable for implementing an embodiment of automatic prevention of run-away query execution.
- Computer system 400 includes a bus 402 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, which interconnects subsystems and devices, such as processor 404 , system memory 406 (e.g., RAM), static storage device 408 (e.g., ROM), disk drive 410 (e.g., magnetic or optical), communication interface 412 (e.g., modem or ethernet card), display 414 (e.g., CRT or LCD), input device 416 (e.g., keyboard), and cursor control 418 (e.g., mouse or trackball).
- processor 404 system memory 406 (e.g., RAM), static storage device 408 (e.g., ROM), disk drive 410 (e.g., magnetic or optical), communication interface 412 (e.g., modem or ethernet card), display 414 (e.g., CRT or LCD), input device 416 (e.g.,
- computer system 400 performs specific operations by processor 404 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in system memory 406 .
- Such instructions may be read into system memory 406 from another computer readable medium, such as static storage device 408 or disk drive 410 .
- static storage device 408 or disk drive 410 may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention.
- Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as disk drive 410 .
- Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as system memory 406 .
- Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including wires that comprise bus 402 . Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio wave and infrared data communications.
- Computer readable media includes, for example, floppy disk, flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, RAM, PROM, EPROM, FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
- execution of the sequences of instructions to practice the invention is performed by a single computer system 400 .
- two or more computer systems 400 coupled by communication link 420 may perform the sequence of instructions to practice the invention in coordination with one another.
- Computer system 400 may transmit and receive messages, data, and instructions, including program, i.e., application code, through communication link 420 and communication interface 412 .
- Received program code may be executed by processor 404 as it is received, and/or stored in disk drive 410 , or other non-volatile storage for later execution.
Abstract
A run-away query execution is automatically identified by a background process that periodically looks at each of the currently executing queries and compares the current execution time with the execution time estimated by the optimizer. Each query execution having a negative execution time difference can be automatically identified as a run-away query execution. The query execution plans that result in run-away executions can then be automatically tuned to produce more efficient execution plans.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/500,490, filed Sep. 6, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to co-pending applications “SQL TUNING SETS,” Attorney Docket No. OI7036272001; “AUTO-TUNING SQL STATEMENTS,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037042001; “SQL PROFILE,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037052001; “GLOBAL HINTS,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037062001; “SQL TUNING BASE,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037072001; “AUTOMATIC LEARNING OPTIMIZER,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037082001; “METHOD FOR INDEX TUNING OF A SQL STATEMENT, AND INDEX MERGING FOR A MULTI-STATEMENT SQL WORKLOAD, USING A COST-BASED RELATIONAL QUERY OPTIMIZER,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037102001; “SQL STRUCTURE ANALYZER,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037112001; “HIGH-LOAD SQL DRIVEN STATISTICS COLLECTION,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037122001; “AUTOMATIC SQL TUNING ADVISOR,” Attorney Docket No. OI7037132001, all of which are filed Sep. 7, 2004 and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
- This invention is related to the field of electronic database management.
- The generation of optimal execution plans is critical to the performance of applications. For example, a single SQL statement with very poor performance can bring an application down to its knees. Sometimes a poorly performing SQL statement is due to user error, such as a blind query issued with without filtering conditions that would have reduced the amount of data processed. Other times the SQL statement is well formed, but the associated execution plan that is generated by the optimizer is suboptimal.
- The suboptimal plan results in a run-away execution of the query. In other words, the plan, when executed, causes a SQL statement to run for a long time with enormous use of system resources. The problem of fixing the execution plan is usually addressed through a manual SQL tuning process. This process involves a tuning expert analyzing the SQL statement as well as its associated execution plan, then determining that the problem lies in the execution plan and not in the way the SQL statement is used (for example, an accidental use of a Cartesian join by not joining one of the tables to any of the other tables in the query). The manual SQL analysis process is a time-consuming task.
- After this analysis, the expert performs a manual SQL tuning process to influence the optimizer to generate a good plan. This involves the tuning expert adding one or more tuning actions to the statement. These actions may be to identify and collect missing statistics and refresh stale statistics, change the value of some configuration parameter which directly affects the plan generation methodology of the optimizer, add one or more hints to the SQL statement which will give the directives to the optimizer in coming up with the right plan, create a new access path (such as an index) or modify an existing one to help avoid large scans of data. The manual SQL tuning process is also a time-consuming and complex task.
- Many vendors have addressed the problem of run-away query execution by using a query governor control mechanism. The query governor can be either reactive or proactive. In a reactive mode, an execution-time threshold is set to abort any query whose cumulative execution time exceeds to threshold. In a proactive mode, an optimized-estimated-time threshold is set which is applied to the time optimizer has estimated for the query to run. Any query having an estimated run-time that exceeds the threshold is never run. With either of these methods, there is no attempt made to look at the root cause of the problem.
- Some vendors have used the idea of setting execution-time thresholds at various places in the execution plan to detect a case of run-away query execution. When a threshold is crossed during query execution, the run is aborted and the query sent back to the optimizer for re-optimization. But this method suffers from two drawbacks: setting of the thresholds and monitoring them at runtime incurs overhead, which can be significant and undesirable especially for light-weight queries, and the method of aborting a run and re-optimizing a query can be quite disruptive, especially if the run is aborted right before it was about to complete.
- A run-away query execution is automatically identified by a background process that periodically looks at each of the currently executing queries and compares the current execution time with the execution time estimated by the optimizer. Each query execution having a negative execution time difference can be automatically identified as a run-away query execution. The query execution plans that result in run-away executions can then be automatically tuned to produce more efficient execution plans.
-
FIG. 1 shows an example of a method for performing automatic prevention of run-away query execution. -
FIG. 2 shows example of a system for automatic prevention of run-away queries. -
FIG. 3 represents an illustration of the prevention process. -
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing an embodiment of automatic run-away query prevention. - Overview
- The embodiments of the invention are described using the term “SQL”, however, the invention is not limited to just this exact database query language, and indeed may be used in conjunction with other database query languages and constructs.
- The automatic performance monitoring of query executions identifies run-away query executions, then performs a re-optimization for the corresponding execution plans in a background process. The automatic prevention of run-away query executions may abort a current execution of a query run if the automatic process has produced an improved plan in the background, and further, has determined a benefit to aborting the current execution and performing an execution of the new plan.
- This process can be implemented by an automatic SQL tuning optimizer and a SQL tuning base. In one embodiment, the run-away query execution is identified by a background process that periodically looks at each of the currently executing queries and compares the time spent in executing it so far (current-time) vs. the time the optimizer has estimated the execution to take (estimate-time). The top N queries with the largest negative difference (estimate-time−current-time) may be selected as run-away executions. An alternate method of identifying run-away query executions can be based on the current-time, that is, the process can select the top N queries with the longest current execution time as run-away query executions.
- The automatic tuning optimizer (ATO), in a background process, then optimizes the execution plan for each query having a run-away execution by performing various analyses of the corresponding SQL statement, such as automatic identification and correction of inaccurate statistics, cardinality estimates, and cost estimates related to the statement, for example. If the execution plan built by the ATO is different from the one that is currently executing, the ATO can estimate how much more time the current plan execution is going to take to complete (remaining-time), as well as estimate how much time the new plan will take to execute (new-time). If the new-time is less than the remaining-time then the current plan run may be aborted and replaced with the new plan.
- Since the ATO uses validated estimates of the cost, selectivity and cardinality, it can compute the total execution time of the new plan much more accurately. Similarly, it can regenerate the original run-away plan that is currently executing with validated estimates to compute its remaining execution time. Because the identification of run-away query executions, and the automatic generation of improved plans for the corresponding queries are performed by the ATO in the background, this automatic process is transparent to the database user.
- Automatic Identification and Tuning of Run-Away Execution Plans
- The automatic prevention of run-away query executions is performed by a process as shown in
FIG. 1 . A query execution plan is generated for an SQL statement by a query optimizer, 110. The execution plan is executed by an execution engine, 120. The executing plan is monitored, 130, to detect that the plan is a run-away, or sub-optimal, execution plan. For example, in addition to generating the execution plan, the query optimizer can also estimate the amount of time that the execution engine will spend executing the plan. If the actual execution time exceeds the estimated time, then the plan is potentially a run-away plan. Alternatively, the amount of execution time can be compared to a threshold time, such as two hours for example. If the execution plan is still running after two hours, then the plan may be a run-away plan. The potential run-away plan is further analyzed to determine if the plan actually is a run-away plan, 140. For example, a profile for the SQL statement can be generated to correct or adjust errors in statistics and estimates associated with the plan, and to determine appropriate parameter settings for the statement. - Then, a new execution plan, along with a time estimate for executing the new plan, can be generated using the profile. Also, a revised estimate of the execution time of the run-away execution plan is generated using the profile, 150. If the new plan can be executed faster than the currently executing run-away plan, then the current plan is identified as a run-away plan. A second comparison of execution times is performed to determine whether to abort the current execution of the run-away plan and executing the new plan, or to allow the run-away plan to run to completion, 160. If the remaining execution time of the run-away plan is less than the execution time of the new plan, then the current plan is allowed to finish. If the execution time of the new plan is less than the remaining execution time of the currently executing run-away plan, then the run-away plan is aborted and the new plan is executed.
- Automatic Prevention Architecture
- An example of a
system 200 for automatic prevention of run-away queries is shown inFIG. 2 . A query optimizer, 210, receives a SQL statement, and generates an execution plan for the statement, which is executed byexecution engine 220. An automatic performance monitor 230 identifies a potential run-away execution plan by observing the elapsed execution time of the plan, for example. The corresponding SQL statement is then input into an automatic tuning optimizer 240, which generates aprofile 250 for the SQL statement. The profile can contain information related to missing or stale statistics. The profile can also include one or more tuning actions that can be used by an optimizer to generate an execution plan for the statement. The profile and the statement are received by thequery optimizer 210, which generates a new execution plan, along with an estimated amount of time for executing the plan, based on the profile. The query optimizer also revises the estimated amount of time for executing the current plan using the profile. The time estimates are analyzed by a cost based plan selector, 260, which can determine that the current plan is a run-away plan if the corresponding execution time estimate is longer than that of the new plan. Theplan selector 260 can also cause theexecution engine 220 to abort the run-away plan and execute the new plan if the remaining amount of time to execute the run-away plan is more than the amount of time to execute the new plan. Otherwise, the execution engine continues to execute the current plan. In either case, query results 270 are returned by the system. - SQL Profiling
- A profiling process is performed by the automatic tuning optimizer to produce a set of tuning actions in generating an execution plan for a SQL statement. The profiling process verifies that statistics are not missing or stale, validates the estimates made by the query optimizer for intermediate results, and determines the correct optimizer settings. Tuning actions are created based on the results of the profiling process, to provide missing statistics for an object, validate intermediate results estimate, and select the best setting for optimizer parameters. Then, the Automatic Tuning Optimizer builds a SQL Profile for these tuning actions.
- The statistics analysis verifies that statistics are not missing or stale. The query optimizer logs the types of statistics that are actually used during the plan generation process, in preparation for the verification process. For example, when a SQL statement contains an equality predicate, it logs the column number of distinct values, whereas for a range predicate it logs the minimum and maximum column values information. Once the logging of used statistics is complete, the query optimizer checks if each of these statistics is available on the associated query object (i.e. table, index or materialized view). If the statistic is available then it verifies whether the statistic is up-to-date. To verify the accuracy of a statistic, it samples data from the corresponding query object and compares it to the statistic. If a statistic is found to be missing, the query optimizer will generate auxiliary information to supply the missing statistic. If a statistic is available but stale, it will generate auxiliary information to compensate for staleness.
- One feature of a cost-based query optimizer is its ability to derive the size of intermediate results. For example, the optimizer estimates the number of rows from applying table filters when deciding which join algorithm to pick. One factor that causes the optimizer to generate a sub-optimal plan is wrong estimate of intermediate result sizes. Wrong estimates can be caused by a combination of the following factors: The predicate (filter or join) is too complex to use standard statistical methods to derive the number of rows (e.g., the columns are compared thru a complex expression like (a*b)/c=10), The data distribution of the column used in the predicate is skewed, and there is no histogram, leading the optimizer to assume a uniform data distribution, or The data in column values is correlated but the optimizer is not aware of it, causing the optimizer to assume data independence. During SQL Profiling, the Automatic Tuning Optimizer validates the estimates made by the query optimizer, and compensates for missing information or wrong estimates. The validation process may involve running part of the query on a sample of the input data.
- The Automatic Tuning Optimizer uses the past execution history of a SQL statement to determine the correct optimizer settings. For example, if the execution history shows that a SQL statement is only partially executed in the majority of times then the appropriate setting will be to optimize it for first n rows, where n is derived from the execution history. This constitutes a customized parameter setting for the SQL statement. (Note that past execution statistics are available in the Automatic Workload Repository (AWR) presented later).
- The tuning information produced from the statistics, estimates, and settings analyses is stored in a SQL Profile. Once a SQL Profile is created, it is used in conjunction with the existing statistics by the compiler to produce a well-tuned plan for the corresponding SQL statement.
FIG. 3 shows the process flow of the creation and use of a SQL Profile. The process can have two separate phases: an Automatic SQL Tuning phase, and a regular optimization phase. During the Automatic SQL Tuning phase, a SQL statement with a run-away execution 310 is selected as an input to the SQL Tuning Advisor, which invokes the Automatic Tuning Optimizer to generate tuning actions, 320. The Automatic Tuning Optimizer generates a SQL Profile, along with other recommendations, 330. After a SQL Profile is built, it is stored in the data dictionary, once it is accepted by the user, 340. Later, during the regular optimization phase, a user issues the same SQL statement, 350. The query optimizer finds the matching SQL profiles from the data dictionary, 360, and uses the SQL profile information to build a well-tuned execution plan, 370. The use of SQL Profiles is completely transparent to the user. The creation and use of a SQL Profile doesn't require changes to the application source code. Therefore, SQL profiling provides a way to tune SQL statements issued from packaged applications where the users have no access to or control over the application source code. - The automatic prevention of run-away queries can identify a plan that is a potential run-away plan. The process analyzes the SQL statement for the plan to determine if the potential run-away plan is caused by a bad plan. For example, the process can create a profile for the statement, use the profile to generate a new plan, and compare the new plan to the old plan to determine if the old plan is a run-away plan. The process can also use the profile to determine whether the run-away plan is close to finishing, and therefore should run to completion, or if the run-away plan should be aborted and the new plan should be executed in its place. Thus, the automatic prevention of run-away query executions eliminates the overhead incurred by conventional methods, such as monitoring of thresholds and aborting a run just before it finishes.
-
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of acomputer system 400 suitable for implementing an embodiment of automatic prevention of run-away query execution.Computer system 400 includes abus 402 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, which interconnects subsystems and devices, such asprocessor 404, system memory 406 (e.g., RAM), static storage device 408 (e.g., ROM), disk drive 410 (e.g., magnetic or optical), communication interface 412 (e.g., modem or ethernet card), display 414 (e.g., CRT or LCD), input device 416 (e.g., keyboard), and cursor control 418 (e.g., mouse or trackball). - According to one embodiment of the invention,
computer system 400 performs specific operations byprocessor 404 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained insystem memory 406. Such instructions may be read intosystem memory 406 from another computer readable medium, such asstatic storage device 408 ordisk drive 410. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention. - The term “computer readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to
processor 404 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such asdisk drive 410. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such assystem memory 406. Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including wires that comprisebus 402. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio wave and infrared data communications. - Common forms of computer readable media includes, for example, floppy disk, flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, RAM, PROM, EPROM, FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
- In an embodiment of the invention, execution of the sequences of instructions to practice the invention is performed by a
single computer system 400. According to other embodiments of the invention, two ormore computer systems 400 coupled by communication link 420 (e.g., LAN, PTSN, or wireless network) may perform the sequence of instructions to practice the invention in coordination with one another.Computer system 400 may transmit and receive messages, data, and instructions, including program, i.e., application code, throughcommunication link 420 andcommunication interface 412. Received program code may be executed byprocessor 404 as it is received, and/or stored indisk drive 410, or other non-volatile storage for later execution. - In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Claims (17)
1. A method comprising:
automatically identifying an executing query as having a run-away execution plan; and
automatically replacing the run-away execution plan with a tuned execution plan.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein automatically replacing comprises:
automatically generating tuning actions for the query; and
placing the tuning actions in a profile.
3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:
using the profile to revise an execution time of the run-away execution plan.
4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:
receiving the query at an optimizer;
retrieving the profile for the query from the tuning base to the optimizer; and
generating, at the optimizer the tuned execution plan for the query with the profile.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
comparing an execution time of the tuned execution plan with a remaining execution time of the run-away execution plan;
determining that the execution time of the tuned execution plan is less than the remaining execution time of the run-away execution plan; and
executing the tuned execution plan.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the query is a SQL statement.
7. An apparatus comprising:
means for automatically identifying a query with a run-away execution plan; and
means for automatically replacing the run-away query plan with a tuned execution plan.
8. The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein said means for automatically replacing comprises:
means for automatically generating tuning actions for the query; and
means for placing the tuning actions in a profile.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 , further comprising:
means for persistently storing the profile in a tuning base.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 , further comprising:
means for receiving the query at a compiler;
means for retrieving the profile for the query from the tuning base; and
means for generating the tuned execution plan for the query with the profile.
11. The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein said means for automatically identifying comprises:
means for comparing an execution time of the tuned execution plan with an estimated remaining execution time of the run-away query plan; and
means for determining that the execution time of the tuned execution plan is less than the estimated remaining execution time of the run-away query plan.
12. The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein the query is a SQL statement.
13. A computer readable medium storing a computer program of instructions which, when executed by a processing system, cause the system to perform a method comprising:
automatically identifying a query with a run-away execution plan; and
automatically replacing the run-away execution plan with a tuned execution plan.
14. The medium of claim 13 , wherein automatically replacing comprises:
automatically generating tuning actions for the query; and
placing the tuning actions in a profile.
15. The medium of claim 14 , further comprising:
persistently storing the profile in a tuning base.
16. The medium of claim 15 , further comprising:
receiving the query at a compiler;
retrieving the profile for the query from the tuning base; and
generating the tuned execution plan for the query with the profile.
17. The medium of claim 13 , wherein the query is a SQL statement.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/936,779 US20050177557A1 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Automatic prevention of run-away query execution |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US50049003P | 2003-09-06 | 2003-09-06 | |
US10/936,779 US20050177557A1 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Automatic prevention of run-away query execution |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050177557A1 true US20050177557A1 (en) | 2005-08-11 |
Family
ID=34555659
Family Applications (11)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/936,426 Active 2025-11-01 US7634456B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | SQL structure analyzer |
US10/936,205 Active 2025-11-28 US7664730B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Method and system for implementing a SQL profile |
US10/936,469 Active 2026-02-15 US8825629B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Method for index tuning of a SQL statement, and index merging for a multi-statement SQL workload, using a cost-based relational query optimizer |
US10/935,908 Active 2026-03-29 US7805411B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Auto-tuning SQL statements |
US10/936,779 Abandoned US20050177557A1 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Automatic prevention of run-away query execution |
US10/936,427 Abandoned US20050138015A1 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | High load SQL driven statistics collection |
US10/936,781 Active 2025-08-08 US7739263B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Global hints |
US10/936,468 Active 2025-11-22 US8983934B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | SQL tuning base |
US10/936,778 Active 2025-09-22 US7747606B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Automatic SQL tuning advisor |
US10/935,906 Abandoned US20050119999A1 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Automatic learning optimizer |
US10/936,449 Active 2025-07-08 US7664778B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | SQL tuning sets |
Family Applications Before (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/936,426 Active 2025-11-01 US7634456B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | SQL structure analyzer |
US10/936,205 Active 2025-11-28 US7664730B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Method and system for implementing a SQL profile |
US10/936,469 Active 2026-02-15 US8825629B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Method for index tuning of a SQL statement, and index merging for a multi-statement SQL workload, using a cost-based relational query optimizer |
US10/935,908 Active 2026-03-29 US7805411B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Auto-tuning SQL statements |
Family Applications After (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/936,427 Abandoned US20050138015A1 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | High load SQL driven statistics collection |
US10/936,781 Active 2025-08-08 US7739263B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Global hints |
US10/936,468 Active 2025-11-22 US8983934B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | SQL tuning base |
US10/936,778 Active 2025-09-22 US7747606B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Automatic SQL tuning advisor |
US10/935,906 Abandoned US20050119999A1 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | Automatic learning optimizer |
US10/936,449 Active 2025-07-08 US7664778B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2004-09-07 | SQL tuning sets |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (11) | US7634456B2 (en) |
Cited By (47)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050108188A1 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2005-05-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for implementing enhanced query governor functions |
US20050119999A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic learning optimizer |
US20050154740A1 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2005-07-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for a self-healing query access plan |
US20050192937A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic query optimization |
US20050210461A1 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-22 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for performing a rolling upgrade of distributed computer software |
US20060031189A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for data mining for automatic query optimization |
US20070250470A1 (en) * | 2006-04-24 | 2007-10-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Parallelization of language-integrated collection operations |
US20080065590A1 (en) * | 2006-09-07 | 2008-03-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Lightweight query processing over in-memory data structures |
US20080109424A1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2008-05-08 | Paul Reuben Day | Method of Querying Relational Database Management Systems |
US20080178079A1 (en) * | 2007-01-18 | 2008-07-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for a graphical user interface to facilitate tuning sql statements |
US20090049012A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus, system, and method for ensuring query execution plan stability in a database management system |
US20090077016A1 (en) * | 2007-09-14 | 2009-03-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Fully automated sql tuning |
US20090077017A1 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2009-03-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Sql performance analyzer |
US20090094191A1 (en) * | 2007-10-08 | 2009-04-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Exploiting execution feedback for optimizing choice of access methods |
US20090100004A1 (en) * | 2007-10-11 | 2009-04-16 | Sybase, Inc. | System And Methodology For Automatic Tuning Of Database Query Optimizer |
US20090106321A1 (en) * | 2007-10-17 | 2009-04-23 | Dinesh Das | Maintaining and Utilizing SQL Execution Plan Histories |
US20090248621A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Benoit Dageville | Method and mechanism for out-of-the-box real-time sql monitoring |
US20090271360A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | Bestgen Robert J | Assigning Plan Volatility Scores to Control Reoptimization Frequency and Number of Stored Reoptimization Plans |
US20100114868A1 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2010-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query execution plan efficiency in a database management system |
US7788285B2 (en) | 2004-05-14 | 2010-08-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Finer grain dependency tracking for database objects |
US20100223253A1 (en) * | 2009-03-02 | 2010-09-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic query execution plan management and performance stabilization for workloads |
US20100293161A1 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2010-11-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatically avoiding unconstrained cartesian product joins |
US20120144234A1 (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2012-06-07 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Automatic error recovery mechanism for a database system |
US20120173498A1 (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Verifying Correctness of a Database System |
US20120215764A1 (en) * | 2011-02-17 | 2012-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Energy usage and performance query governor |
US20120260341A1 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2012-10-11 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Firewalls for securing customer data in a multi-tenant environment |
US20130262436A1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Obtaining partial results from a database query |
US8566307B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2013-10-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database query governor with tailored thresholds |
US20140095474A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Creating and using data that indicates misestimates of actual costs |
US8903805B2 (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2014-12-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for performing query optimization using a hybrid execution plan |
US20150234701A1 (en) * | 2014-02-18 | 2015-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomous reconfiguration of a failed user action |
US20160196249A1 (en) * | 2015-01-03 | 2016-07-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reprocess Problematic Sections of Input Documents |
US20160224627A1 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2016-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting query access plan obsolescence |
US9740735B2 (en) | 2007-11-07 | 2017-08-22 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Programming language extensions in structured queries |
US20170308575A1 (en) * | 2015-03-16 | 2017-10-26 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and Plan Optimizing Apparatus for Optimizing Query Execution Plan |
US20180060385A1 (en) * | 2016-08-24 | 2018-03-01 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Progressive Processing for Querying System Behavior |
US9916353B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2018-03-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating multiple query access plans for multiple computing environments |
US10108664B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2018-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating multiple query access plans for multiple computing environments |
US20180336247A1 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2018-11-22 | Oracle International Corporation | Estimated query performance |
US20190266272A1 (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2019-08-29 | Sap Se | Optimal ranges for relational query execution plans |
US10621064B2 (en) | 2014-07-07 | 2020-04-14 | Oracle International Corporation | Proactive impact measurement of database changes on production systems |
US10838961B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2020-11-17 | Oracle International Corporation | Prefix compression |
US11100104B2 (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2021-08-24 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Query tuning utilizing optimizer hints |
US11157307B2 (en) * | 2017-05-24 | 2021-10-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Count and transaction identifier based transaction processing |
US20220043822A1 (en) * | 2020-08-04 | 2022-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Shadow experiments for serverless multi-tenant cloud services |
US11327932B2 (en) | 2017-09-30 | 2022-05-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Autonomous multitenant database cloud service framework |
US11386058B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2022-07-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Rule-based autonomous database cloud service framework |
Families Citing this family (276)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL152987A0 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2003-06-24 | Computer Ass Think Inc | System and method for automatically generating database queries |
US8374966B1 (en) | 2002-08-01 | 2013-02-12 | Oracle International Corporation | In memory streaming with disk backup and recovery of messages captured from a database redo stream |
US7130838B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2006-10-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query optimization via a partitioned environment |
US7321888B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2008-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for dynamic join reordering |
US7401069B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2008-07-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Background index bitmapping for faster query performance |
US7552110B2 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2009-06-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for performing a query in a computer system to retrieve data from a database |
US7188098B2 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2007-03-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query transformation for union all view join queries using join predicates for pruning and distribution |
US7562094B1 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2009-07-14 | Precise Software Solutions, Inc. | Object-level database performance management |
US7412439B2 (en) * | 2004-01-07 | 2008-08-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for statistics management |
US7454404B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2008-11-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of addressing query scheduling and system resource requirements |
US7606792B2 (en) * | 2004-03-19 | 2009-10-20 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for efficient evaluation of a query that invokes a table valued function |
US7702627B2 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2010-04-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient interaction among cost-based transformations |
US20050283471A1 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2005-12-22 | Oracle International Corporation | Multi-tier query processing |
US7814042B2 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2010-10-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Selecting candidate queries |
US8046354B2 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2011-10-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for re-evaluating execution strategy for a database query |
US7574424B2 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2009-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodology for parallel schedule generation in a query optimizer |
US20060085375A1 (en) * | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for access plan sampling |
US20060085378A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2006-04-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Schema for physical database tuning |
US20060085484A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2006-04-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Database tuning advisor |
US7529729B2 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2009-05-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for handling improper database table access |
US7831592B2 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2010-11-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for updating database statistics according to query feedback |
US7536379B2 (en) * | 2004-12-15 | 2009-05-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performing a multiple table join operating based on generated predicates from materialized results |
US20060136358A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Database tuning advisor graphical tool |
US7814072B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2010-10-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Management of database statistics |
US20060167845A1 (en) * | 2005-01-25 | 2006-07-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selection of optimal plans for FIRST-N-ROW queries |
US7567968B2 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2009-07-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Integration of a non-relational query language with a relational data store |
US7610264B2 (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2009-10-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for providing a learning optimizer for federated database systems |
US7392266B2 (en) * | 2005-03-17 | 2008-06-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for monitoring usage of components in a database index |
US7765200B2 (en) * | 2005-03-25 | 2010-07-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | SQL query problem determination tool |
US20060230016A1 (en) * | 2005-03-29 | 2006-10-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for statistics over complex objects |
US7640230B2 (en) * | 2005-04-05 | 2009-12-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Query plan selection control using run-time association mechanism |
US7337167B2 (en) * | 2005-04-14 | 2008-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimating a number of rows returned by a recursive query |
US20060242102A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-10-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Relaxation-based approach to automatic physical database tuning |
US7567982B2 (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2009-07-28 | Glynntech, Inc. | Matrix-connected, artificially intelligent address book system |
US8468152B2 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2013-06-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic refresh of a materialized query table in a computer database |
US7475056B2 (en) | 2005-08-11 | 2009-01-06 | Oracle International Corporation | Query processing in a parallel single cursor model on multi-instance configurations, using hints |
US7814091B2 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2010-10-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Multi-tiered query processing techniques for minus and intersect operators |
US20070073761A1 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Continual generation of index advice |
US7877379B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2011-01-25 | Oracle International Corporation | Delaying evaluation of expensive expressions in a query |
US7840032B2 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2010-11-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Street-side maps and paths |
US8073841B2 (en) | 2005-10-07 | 2011-12-06 | Oracle International Corporation | Optimizing correlated XML extracts |
US7634457B2 (en) * | 2005-10-07 | 2009-12-15 | Oracle International Corp. | Function-based index tuning for queries with expressions |
US7475068B2 (en) * | 2005-10-07 | 2009-01-06 | Oracle International Corp. | Globally optimal and greedy heuristics based approach to access structure selection |
US7840553B2 (en) | 2005-10-07 | 2010-11-23 | Oracle International Corp. | Recommending materialized views for queries with multiple instances of same table |
US20070115916A1 (en) * | 2005-11-07 | 2007-05-24 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for optimizing a network based on a performance knowledge base |
CN101131695B (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2010-05-26 | 北京书生国际信息技术有限公司 | Document file library system and its implementing method |
US8180762B2 (en) * | 2005-12-13 | 2012-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database tuning methods |
US7882121B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2011-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Generating queries using cardinality constraints |
US7743052B2 (en) * | 2006-02-14 | 2010-06-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for projecting the effect of maintaining an auxiliary database structure for use in executing database queries |
US8005816B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2011-08-23 | Oracle International Corporation | Auto generation of suggested links in a search system |
US9177124B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2015-11-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Flexible authentication framework |
US8027982B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2011-09-27 | Oracle International Corporation | Self-service sources for secure search |
US8707451B2 (en) | 2006-03-01 | 2014-04-22 | Oracle International Corporation | Search hit URL modification for secure application integration |
US8868540B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2014-10-21 | Oracle International Corporation | Method for suggesting web links and alternate terms for matching search queries |
US8875249B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2014-10-28 | Oracle International Corporation | Minimum lifespan credentials for crawling data repositories |
US8214394B2 (en) | 2006-03-01 | 2012-07-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Propagating user identities in a secure federated search system |
US8433712B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2013-04-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Link analysis for enterprise environment |
US7941419B2 (en) | 2006-03-01 | 2011-05-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Suggested content with attribute parameterization |
US8332430B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2012-12-11 | Oracle International Corporation | Secure search performance improvement |
US20070214129A1 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2007-09-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Flexible Authorization Model for Secure Search |
US20070219973A1 (en) * | 2006-03-15 | 2007-09-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic statement processing in database systems |
US7676450B2 (en) * | 2006-03-15 | 2010-03-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Null aware anti-join |
US7644062B2 (en) * | 2006-03-15 | 2010-01-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Join factorization of union/union all queries |
US7809713B2 (en) * | 2006-03-15 | 2010-10-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient search space analysis for join factorization |
US7945562B2 (en) * | 2006-03-15 | 2011-05-17 | Oracle International Corporation | Join predicate push-down optimizations |
DE102006017076B4 (en) * | 2006-04-10 | 2020-04-23 | Lufthansa Systems Gmbh & Co. Kg | Automatic optimization of query processing in database systems |
US20070250517A1 (en) * | 2006-04-20 | 2007-10-25 | Bestgen Robert J | Method and Apparatus for Autonomically Maintaining Latent Auxiliary Database Structures for Use in Executing Database Queries |
US20070288489A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-13 | Mark John Anderson | Apparatus and Method for Autonomic Index Creation, Modification and Deletion |
US8838574B2 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2014-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic index creation, modification and deletion |
US8838573B2 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2014-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic index creation |
US7730080B2 (en) * | 2006-06-23 | 2010-06-01 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques of rewriting descendant and wildcard XPath using one or more of SQL OR, UNION ALL, and XMLConcat() construct |
US7877373B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2011-01-25 | Oracle International Corporation | Executing alternative plans for a SQL statement |
US8086598B1 (en) | 2006-08-02 | 2011-12-27 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Query optimizer with schema conversion |
US10007686B2 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2018-06-26 | Entit Software Llc | Automatic vertical-database design |
US20080046473A1 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2008-02-21 | Bingjie Miao | Method and System For Using Index Lead Key Self-Join To Take Advantage of Selectivity of Non-Leading Key Columns of an Index |
US7813948B2 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2010-10-12 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented systems and methods for reducing cost flow models |
US8032522B2 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2011-10-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Optimizing parameterized queries in a relational database management system |
US8527502B2 (en) * | 2006-09-08 | 2013-09-03 | Blade Makai Doyle | Method, system and computer-readable media for software object relationship traversal for object-relational query binding |
CN101162462A (en) * | 2006-10-11 | 2008-04-16 | 国际商业机器公司 | Tools and method for making prompt |
US7516128B2 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2009-04-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for cleansing sequence-based data at query time |
US20080126393A1 (en) * | 2006-11-29 | 2008-05-29 | Bossman Patrick D | Computer program product and system for annotating a problem sql statement for improved understanding |
US20080133493A1 (en) * | 2006-12-04 | 2008-06-05 | Michael Bender | Method for maintaining database clustering when replacing tables with inserts |
US7606827B2 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2009-10-20 | Ianywhere Solutions, Inc. | Query optimization using materialized views in database management systems |
US8214807B2 (en) * | 2007-01-10 | 2012-07-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Code path tracking |
US8150790B2 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2012-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Lightweight physical design alerter |
US20080183764A1 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2008-07-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Continuous physical design tuning |
US20080196012A1 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2008-08-14 | Panaya Ltd. | System and methods for static analysis of large computer programs and for presenting the results of the analysis to a user of a computer program |
US20090070744A1 (en) * | 2007-08-28 | 2009-03-12 | Sugarcrm Inc. | CRM SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING DRILLDOWNS, ACLs, SHARED FOLDERS, A TRACKER AND A MODULE BUILDER |
US20080215564A1 (en) * | 2007-03-02 | 2008-09-04 | Jon Bratseth | Query rewrite |
US7860899B2 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2010-12-28 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatically determining a database representation for an abstract datatype |
US8037112B2 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2011-10-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient access of flash databases |
US7870122B2 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2011-01-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Self-tuning index for flash-based databases |
US7996392B2 (en) * | 2007-06-27 | 2011-08-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Changing ranking algorithms based on customer settings |
US8316007B2 (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2012-11-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatically finding acronyms and synonyms in a corpus |
US8812481B2 (en) * | 2007-07-12 | 2014-08-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Management of interesting database statistics |
US8024241B2 (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2011-09-20 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented systems and methods for cost flow analysis |
US7840556B1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2010-11-23 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Managing performance of a database query |
US7689550B2 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2010-03-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Adaptive cursor sharing |
US7702623B2 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2010-04-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Extended cursor sharing |
US8209322B2 (en) * | 2007-08-21 | 2012-06-26 | Oracle International Corporation | Table elimination technique for group-by query optimization |
US20090070300A1 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2009-03-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for Processing Data Queries |
US8776062B2 (en) * | 2007-09-10 | 2014-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining desired job plan based on previous inquiries in a stream processing framework |
US8200645B2 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2012-06-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for executing multiple concurrent index-driven table access operations |
US7836036B2 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2010-11-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for estimating distances between multiple index-driven scan operations |
US8438152B2 (en) * | 2007-10-29 | 2013-05-07 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for bushy tree execution plans for snowstorm schema |
US7996384B2 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2011-08-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query based rule optimization through rule combination |
US20090171936A1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-02 | Sybase, Inc. | System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Accelerating Like Conditions |
US8818987B2 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2014-08-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Converting union commands to union all commands |
US8200518B2 (en) | 2008-02-25 | 2012-06-12 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented systems and methods for partial contribution computation in ABC/M models |
US8239369B2 (en) * | 2008-03-20 | 2012-08-07 | DBSophic, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for enhancing performance of database and environment thereof |
US8140538B2 (en) * | 2008-04-17 | 2012-03-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of data caching for compliance storage systems with keyword query based access |
US9189047B2 (en) | 2008-05-08 | 2015-11-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Organizing databases for energy efficiency |
US8312007B2 (en) * | 2008-05-08 | 2012-11-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating database query plans |
US20090287638A1 (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2009-11-19 | Robert Joseph Bestgen | Autonomic system-wide sql query performance advisor |
US20090313211A1 (en) * | 2008-06-17 | 2009-12-17 | Ahmad Said Ghazal | Pushing joins across a union |
US10983998B2 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2021-04-20 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Query execution plans by compilation-time execution |
US7966313B2 (en) * | 2008-06-26 | 2011-06-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Configuration-parametric query optimization |
US7970755B2 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2011-06-28 | Oracle Int'l. Corp. | Test execution of user SQL in database server code |
US7970776B1 (en) * | 2008-08-06 | 2011-06-28 | Precise Software Solutions Inc. | Apparatus, method and computer readable medium for identifying and quantifying database disk-sort operations |
US7958112B2 (en) | 2008-08-08 | 2011-06-07 | Oracle International Corporation | Interleaving query transformations for XML indexes |
US8667018B2 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2014-03-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for optimizing row level security in database systems |
US8140548B2 (en) * | 2008-08-13 | 2012-03-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Constrained physical design tuning |
US20100114976A1 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2010-05-06 | Castellanos Maria G | Method For Database Design |
US8135702B2 (en) * | 2008-10-27 | 2012-03-13 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Eliminating unnecessary statistics collections for query optimization |
US8041789B1 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2011-10-18 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System using management server for migration of profiles for device bays in between enclosures |
US7668804B1 (en) | 2008-11-04 | 2010-02-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Recommending statistical views using cost/benefit metrics |
US8510290B1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2013-08-13 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Index selection in a multi-system database management system |
US8024286B2 (en) * | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-20 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Independent column detection in selectivity estimation |
US8463806B2 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2013-06-11 | Lexisnexis | Methods and systems for creating and using an adaptive thesaurus |
US8892544B2 (en) * | 2009-04-01 | 2014-11-18 | Sybase, Inc. | Testing efficiency and stability of a database query engine |
US8458167B2 (en) * | 2009-04-01 | 2013-06-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Client-based index advisor |
US8161017B2 (en) * | 2009-04-03 | 2012-04-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enhanced identification of relevant database indices |
US8229952B2 (en) * | 2009-05-11 | 2012-07-24 | Business Objects Software Limited | Generation of logical database schema representation based on symbolic business intelligence query |
US20100287015A1 (en) * | 2009-05-11 | 2010-11-11 | Grace Au | Method for determining the cost of evaluating conditions |
US9836504B2 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2017-12-05 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Query progress estimation based on processed value packets |
US9141664B2 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2015-09-22 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System and method for optimizing queries |
US20110211738A1 (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2011-09-01 | Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware | Identifying a characteristic of an individual utilizing facial recognition and providing a display for the individual |
US9665620B2 (en) | 2010-01-15 | 2017-05-30 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data queries |
US8290931B2 (en) * | 2010-02-22 | 2012-10-16 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Database designer |
US8396873B2 (en) * | 2010-03-10 | 2013-03-12 | Emc Corporation | Index searching using a bloom filter |
US8655894B2 (en) * | 2010-04-26 | 2014-02-18 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for index generation and use |
US8332388B2 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2012-12-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Transformation rule profiling for a query optimizer |
US8688689B2 (en) * | 2010-06-30 | 2014-04-01 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for recommending alternative SQL execution plans |
US9256642B2 (en) | 2010-06-30 | 2016-02-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for recommending parallel execution of SQL statements |
US20120066554A1 (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2012-03-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Application query control with cost prediction |
US8402119B2 (en) | 2010-09-30 | 2013-03-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Real-load tuning of database applications |
US8666970B2 (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2014-03-04 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Query plan enhancement |
US9116955B2 (en) | 2011-05-02 | 2015-08-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data queries |
US9934280B2 (en) * | 2011-05-13 | 2018-04-03 | Entit Software Llc | Join order restrictions |
US20120303633A1 (en) * | 2011-05-26 | 2012-11-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for querying column oriented databases |
US8595238B2 (en) * | 2011-06-22 | 2013-11-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Smart index creation and reconciliation in an interconnected network of systems |
US9626434B2 (en) | 2011-08-30 | 2017-04-18 | Open Text Sa Ulc | Systems and methods for generating and using aggregated search indices and non-aggregated value storage |
US8868546B2 (en) * | 2011-09-15 | 2014-10-21 | Oracle International Corporation | Query explain plan in a distributed data management system |
US9773032B2 (en) * | 2011-09-30 | 2017-09-26 | Bmc Software, Inc. | Provision of index recommendations for database access |
US8983996B2 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2015-03-17 | Yahoo! Inc. | Assisted searching |
CN103164455B (en) * | 2011-12-15 | 2016-08-03 | 百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司 | The optimization method and device of data base |
US9858313B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2018-01-02 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Method and system for generating query-related suggestions |
US9037552B2 (en) | 2011-12-27 | 2015-05-19 | Infosys Limited | Methods for analyzing a database and devices thereof |
US8990186B2 (en) * | 2011-12-28 | 2015-03-24 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Techniques for updating join indexes |
US8825631B2 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2014-09-02 | Wipro Limited | System and method for improved processing of an SQL query made against a relational database |
CN103365885B (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2016-12-14 | 国际商业机器公司 | Method and system for database inquiry optimization |
US8856102B2 (en) | 2012-11-07 | 2014-10-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modifying structured query language statements |
US9280583B2 (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2016-03-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable multi-query optimization for SPARQL |
US9720966B2 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2017-08-01 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Cardinality estimation for optimization of recursive or iterative database queries by databases |
US9146960B2 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2015-09-29 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Adaptive optimization of iterative or recursive query execution by database systems |
US20140201192A1 (en) * | 2013-01-15 | 2014-07-17 | Syscom Computer Engineering Co. | Automatic data index establishment method |
US10592506B1 (en) * | 2013-02-13 | 2020-03-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Query hint specification |
US9336272B1 (en) * | 2013-02-13 | 2016-05-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Global query hint specification |
US9244952B2 (en) | 2013-03-17 | 2016-01-26 | Alation, Inc. | Editable and searchable markup pages automatically populated through user query monitoring |
US9367594B2 (en) | 2013-03-29 | 2016-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining statistics for cost-based optimization of a workflow |
US9779137B2 (en) | 2013-07-09 | 2017-10-03 | Logicblox Inc. | Salient sampling for query size estimation |
US20150019584A1 (en) * | 2013-07-15 | 2015-01-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Self-learning java database connectivity (jdbc) driver |
US20150039555A1 (en) * | 2013-08-02 | 2015-02-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Heuristically modifying dbms environments using performance analytics |
US9262457B2 (en) * | 2013-08-13 | 2016-02-16 | Sybase, Inc. | On-demand hash index |
US9588978B2 (en) | 2013-09-30 | 2017-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Merging metadata for database storage regions based on overlapping range values |
CN103605848A (en) * | 2013-11-19 | 2014-02-26 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Method and device for analyzing paths |
US10824622B2 (en) * | 2013-11-25 | 2020-11-03 | Sap Se | Data statistics in data management systems |
US10268638B2 (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2019-04-23 | Paraccel Llc | Limiting plan choice for database queries using plan constraints |
US10394807B2 (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2019-08-27 | Paraccel Llc | Rewrite constraints for database queries |
CA3092699C (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2023-07-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Source code translation |
CN104714975A (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2015-06-17 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | Dynamic query sentence processing method and device |
US9672288B2 (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2017-06-06 | Yahoo! Inc. | Query suggestions |
US9910860B2 (en) * | 2014-02-06 | 2018-03-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Split elimination in MapReduce systems |
US9870390B2 (en) | 2014-02-18 | 2018-01-16 | Oracle International Corporation | Selecting from OR-expansion states of a query |
US10275504B2 (en) * | 2014-02-21 | 2019-04-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Updating database statistics with dynamic profiles |
US10114874B2 (en) * | 2014-02-24 | 2018-10-30 | Red Hat, Inc. | Source query caching as fault prevention for federated queries |
US10108649B2 (en) * | 2014-02-25 | 2018-10-23 | Internatonal Business Machines Corporation | Early exit from table scans of loosely ordered and/or grouped relations using nearly ordered maps |
US10108622B2 (en) * | 2014-03-26 | 2018-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic regulation of a volatile database table attribute |
US9519687B2 (en) | 2014-06-16 | 2016-12-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Minimizing index maintenance costs for database storage regions using hybrid zone maps and indices |
US10339465B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2019-07-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimized decision tree based models |
US10963810B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2021-03-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Efficient duplicate detection for machine learning data sets |
US10318882B2 (en) | 2014-09-11 | 2019-06-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimized training of linear machine learning models |
US10540606B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2020-01-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Consistent filtering of machine learning data |
US10102480B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2018-10-16 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Machine learning service |
US10169715B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2019-01-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Feature processing tradeoff management |
US11100420B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2021-08-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Input processing for machine learning |
US9886670B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2018-02-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Feature processing recipes for machine learning |
US11182691B1 (en) | 2014-08-14 | 2021-11-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Category-based sampling of machine learning data |
US10089357B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2018-10-02 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for generating partition-based splits in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US10528596B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2020-01-07 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for consistent reads between tasks in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US10380114B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2019-08-13 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for generating rowid range-based splits in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US10078684B2 (en) * | 2014-09-26 | 2018-09-18 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for query processing with table-level predicate pushdown in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US10180973B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2019-01-15 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for efficient connection management in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US10394818B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2019-08-27 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for dynamic database split generation in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US10387421B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2019-08-20 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for generating size-based splits in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US10089377B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2018-10-02 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for data transfer from JDBC to a data warehouse layer in a massively parallel or distributed database environment |
US9779117B1 (en) * | 2014-09-30 | 2017-10-03 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Database partitioning scheme evaluation and comparison |
CN105574031B (en) | 2014-10-16 | 2019-01-04 | 国际商业机器公司 | method and system for database index |
US10019480B2 (en) * | 2014-11-14 | 2018-07-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query tuning in the cloud |
US10437819B2 (en) | 2014-11-14 | 2019-10-08 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Processing queries containing a union-type operation |
US9779133B2 (en) * | 2014-11-25 | 2017-10-03 | Sap Se | Contextual debugging of SQL queries in database-accessing applications |
US10042887B2 (en) * | 2014-12-05 | 2018-08-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query optimization with zone map selectivity modeling |
CN104615696B (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2018-05-01 | 国家电网公司 | A kind of 95598 knowledge base system and building method |
US10417281B2 (en) | 2015-02-18 | 2019-09-17 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Querying a data source on a network |
US10817520B1 (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2020-10-27 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Methods, systems, and computer readable mediums for sharing user activity data |
US10585887B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2020-03-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Multi-system query execution plan |
US9613109B2 (en) | 2015-05-14 | 2017-04-04 | Walleye Software, LLC | Query task processing based on memory allocation and performance criteria |
CN104933190B (en) * | 2015-07-10 | 2018-04-17 | 上海新炬网络信息技术股份有限公司 | A kind of SQL statement performs frequency dynamic adjusting method |
US10229358B2 (en) * | 2015-08-07 | 2019-03-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimizer problem determination |
US20200089679A1 (en) * | 2015-08-07 | 2020-03-19 | Entit Software Llc | Annotated query generator |
US10152509B2 (en) | 2015-09-23 | 2018-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query hint learning in a database management system |
US10216748B1 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2019-02-26 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Segment index access management in a de-duplication system |
US10061801B2 (en) | 2015-10-12 | 2018-08-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customize column sequence in projection list of select queries |
US10599651B2 (en) | 2015-10-21 | 2020-03-24 | Oracle International Corporation | Database system feature management |
US10257275B1 (en) | 2015-10-26 | 2019-04-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Tuning software execution environments using Bayesian models |
US10055459B2 (en) | 2015-11-09 | 2018-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query hint management for a database management system |
US9971831B2 (en) * | 2015-11-25 | 2018-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing complex queries with predicates |
CN108369590B (en) * | 2015-12-11 | 2020-10-09 | 华为技术有限公司 | Recommendation system, device and method for guiding self-service analysis |
CN107102995B (en) * | 2016-02-19 | 2020-02-21 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and device for determining SQL execution plan |
CN107193813B (en) | 2016-03-14 | 2021-05-14 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Data table connection mode processing method and device |
US11074254B2 (en) | 2016-03-23 | 2021-07-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performance management using thresholds for queries of a service for a database as a service |
JP6669571B2 (en) * | 2016-04-19 | 2020-03-18 | 株式会社シスバンク | Tuning apparatus and method for relational database |
US10558458B2 (en) | 2016-06-06 | 2020-02-11 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Query optimizer for CPU utilization and code refactoring |
US10248692B2 (en) * | 2016-06-15 | 2019-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cardinality estimation of a join predicate |
US10409701B2 (en) * | 2016-08-11 | 2019-09-10 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Per-statement monitoring in a database environment |
US11281770B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2022-03-22 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Detection of structured query language (SQL) injection events using simple statistical analysis |
US10817540B2 (en) * | 2016-09-02 | 2020-10-27 | Snowflake Inc. | Incremental clustering maintenance of a table |
US10592508B2 (en) * | 2016-09-13 | 2020-03-17 | The Bank Of New York Mellon | Organizing datasets for adaptive responses to queries |
US10452652B2 (en) | 2016-09-15 | 2019-10-22 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Recommendation platform for structured queries |
US11232102B2 (en) * | 2016-10-17 | 2022-01-25 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Background processing to provide automated database query tuning |
US11151108B2 (en) | 2016-11-21 | 2021-10-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Indexing and archiving multiple statements using a single statement dictionary |
WO2018106141A1 (en) * | 2016-12-06 | 2018-06-14 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | A system and a method for query execution in dbms |
US10740332B2 (en) * | 2017-01-20 | 2020-08-11 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Memory-aware plan negotiation in query concurrency control |
US10664473B2 (en) * | 2017-01-30 | 2020-05-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database optimization based on forecasting hardware statistics using data mining techniques |
CN107688589B (en) * | 2017-02-20 | 2019-02-26 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | The method and device of Database System Optimization |
US10565214B2 (en) | 2017-03-22 | 2020-02-18 | Bank Of America Corporation | Intelligent database control systems with automated request assessments |
CN106991174A (en) * | 2017-04-05 | 2017-07-28 | 广东浪潮大数据研究有限公司 | A kind of optimization method of Smart Rack system databases |
US10242037B2 (en) * | 2017-04-20 | 2019-03-26 | Servicenow, Inc. | Index suggestion engine for relational databases |
US20190057133A1 (en) * | 2017-08-15 | 2019-02-21 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of bounded scans on multi-column keys of a database |
US10198469B1 (en) | 2017-08-24 | 2019-02-05 | Deephaven Data Labs Llc | Computer data system data source refreshing using an update propagation graph having a merged join listener |
US11055285B2 (en) | 2017-09-08 | 2021-07-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Access path optimization |
CN108153808A (en) * | 2017-11-22 | 2018-06-12 | 链家网(北京)科技有限公司 | Big data data warehouse data access method and device |
US11030195B2 (en) * | 2018-01-18 | 2021-06-08 | Fmr Llc | Identifying and mitigating high-risk database queries through ranked variance analysis |
US11010380B2 (en) | 2018-02-13 | 2021-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Minimizing processing using an index when non-leading columns match an aggregation key |
US10824624B2 (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2020-11-03 | Bank Of America Corporation | System for analyzing, optimizing, and remediating a proposed data query prior to query implementation |
US11068460B2 (en) | 2018-08-06 | 2021-07-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Automated real-time index management |
US11226963B2 (en) * | 2018-10-11 | 2022-01-18 | Varada Ltd. | Method and system for executing queries on indexed views |
US11182360B2 (en) * | 2019-01-14 | 2021-11-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Database tuning and performance verification using cloned database |
US11470176B2 (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2022-10-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Efficient and flexible load-balancing for clusters of caches under latency constraint |
US11138266B2 (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2021-10-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Leveraging query executions to improve index recommendations |
EP3719663B1 (en) * | 2019-04-03 | 2022-10-26 | Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering gGmbH | Iterative multi-attribute index selection for large database systems |
US11500755B1 (en) * | 2019-05-01 | 2022-11-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Database performance degradation detection and prevention |
US11334538B2 (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2022-05-17 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | System and method for cardinality estimation feedback loops in query processing |
US11194805B2 (en) | 2019-06-10 | 2021-12-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimization of database execution planning |
US11093223B2 (en) | 2019-07-18 | 2021-08-17 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Automatically converting a program written in a procedural programming language into a dataflow graph and related systems and methods |
US11379410B2 (en) * | 2019-09-13 | 2022-07-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Automated information lifecycle management of indexes |
US11500837B1 (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2022-11-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Automating optimizations for items in a hierarchical data store |
US11256694B2 (en) | 2020-04-27 | 2022-02-22 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Tolerance level-based tuning of query processing |
US11372885B2 (en) * | 2020-05-13 | 2022-06-28 | Sap Se | Replication of complex augmented views |
CN111898371B (en) * | 2020-07-10 | 2022-08-16 | 中国标准化研究院 | Ontology construction method and device for rational design knowledge and computer storage medium |
US11615095B2 (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2023-03-28 | Snowflake Inc. | Automatic pruning cutoff in a database system |
CN113282574B (en) * | 2021-07-26 | 2021-10-22 | 云和恩墨(北京)信息技术有限公司 | SQL optimization-based database operation control method, system and storage medium |
US11748352B2 (en) * | 2021-08-26 | 2023-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamical database system resource balance |
US11537613B1 (en) * | 2021-10-29 | 2022-12-27 | Snowflake Inc. | Merge small file consolidation |
US11593306B1 (en) | 2021-10-29 | 2023-02-28 | Snowflake Inc. | File defragmentation service |
US20230259337A1 (en) * | 2022-02-11 | 2023-08-17 | Bmc Software,Inc. | Application development platform |
Citations (84)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5140685A (en) * | 1988-03-14 | 1992-08-18 | Unisys Corporation | Record lock processing for multiprocessing data system with majority voting |
US5260697A (en) * | 1990-11-13 | 1993-11-09 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Computer with separate display plane and user interface processor |
US5398183A (en) * | 1990-12-10 | 1995-03-14 | Biomedical Systems Corporation | Holter ECG report generating system |
US5408653A (en) * | 1992-04-15 | 1995-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Efficient data base access using a shared electronic store in a multi-system environment with shared disks |
US5481712A (en) * | 1993-04-06 | 1996-01-02 | Cognex Corporation | Method and apparatus for interactively generating a computer program for machine vision analysis of an object |
US5504917A (en) * | 1986-04-14 | 1996-04-02 | National Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing picture generation and control features in a graphical data flow environment |
US5544355A (en) * | 1993-06-14 | 1996-08-06 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and apparatus for query optimization in a relational database system having foreign functions |
US5577240A (en) * | 1994-12-07 | 1996-11-19 | Xerox Corporation | Identification of stable writes in weakly consistent replicated databases while providing access to all writes in such a database |
US5634134A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1997-05-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for determining character and character mode for multi-lingual keyboard based on input characters |
US5737601A (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 1998-04-07 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for peer-to-peer data replication including handling exceptional occurrences |
US5765159A (en) * | 1994-12-29 | 1998-06-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for generating an optimized set of relational queries for fetching data from a relational database management system in response to object queries received from an object oriented environment |
US5781912A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1998-07-14 | Oracle Corporation | Recoverable data replication between source site and destination site without distributed transactions |
US5794229A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1998-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodology for storing a database table by vertically partitioning all columns of the table |
US5806076A (en) * | 1996-10-29 | 1998-09-08 | Oracle Corporation | Tracking dependencies between transactions in a database |
US5860069A (en) * | 1997-04-11 | 1999-01-12 | Bmc Software, Inc. | Method of efficient collection of SQL performance measures |
US5870760A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1999-02-09 | Oracle Corporation | Dequeuing using queue batch numbers |
US5870761A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1999-02-09 | Oracle Corporation | Parallel queue propagation |
US5940826A (en) * | 1997-01-07 | 1999-08-17 | Unisys Corporation | Dual XPCS for disaster recovery in multi-host computer complexes |
US5991765A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1999-11-23 | Birdstep Technology As | System and method for storing and manipulating data in an information handling system |
US6052694A (en) * | 1998-03-18 | 2000-04-18 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for logging database performance characteristics |
US6122640A (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2000-09-19 | Platinum Technology Ip, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reorganizing an active DBMS table |
US6195653B1 (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2001-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for selectively preparing customized reports of query explain data |
US6275818B1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2001-08-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cost based optimization of decision support queries using transient views |
US6321218B1 (en) * | 1999-02-24 | 2001-11-20 | Oracle Corporation | Automatically determining data that is best suited for index tuning |
US6330552B1 (en) * | 1998-09-28 | 2001-12-11 | Compaq | Database query cost model optimizer |
US6349310B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2002-02-19 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Database management system and method for accessing rows in a partitioned table |
US6353818B1 (en) * | 1998-08-19 | 2002-03-05 | Ncr Corporation | Plan-per-tuple optimizing of database queries with user-defined functions |
US6356889B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2002-03-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for determining optimal database materializations using a query optimizer |
US6374257B1 (en) * | 1999-06-16 | 2002-04-16 | Oracle Corporation | Method and system for removing ambiguities in a shared database command |
US6397227B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2002-05-28 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Database management system and method for updating specified tuple fields upon transaction rollback |
US6434545B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-08-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Graphical query analyzer |
US6434568B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-08-13 | Accenture Llp | Information services patterns in a netcentric environment |
US6442748B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-08-27 | Accenture Llp | System, method and article of manufacture for a persistent state and persistent object separator in an information services patterns environment |
US20020120617A1 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2002-08-29 | Fujitsu Limited | Database retrieving method, apparatus and storage medium thereof |
US6460043B1 (en) * | 1998-02-04 | 2002-10-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for operating on data with a conceptual data manipulation language |
US6460027B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2002-10-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic recognition and rerouting of queries for optimal performance |
US6493701B2 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2002-12-10 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodogy providing faster N-ary nested loop joins |
US6496850B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-12-17 | Accenture Llp | Clean-up of orphaned server contexts |
US20020198867A1 (en) * | 2001-06-06 | 2002-12-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Learning from empirical results in query optimization |
US20030018618A1 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2003-01-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Representation for data used in query optimization |
US6513029B1 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2003-01-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Interesting table-subset selection for database workload materialized view selection |
US6529901B1 (en) * | 1999-06-29 | 2003-03-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Automating statistics management for query optimizers |
US20030065648A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2003-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reduce database monitor workload by employing predictive query threshold |
US6560606B1 (en) * | 1999-05-04 | 2003-05-06 | Metratech | Method and apparatus for processing data with multiple processing modules and associated counters |
US20030088541A1 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2003-05-08 | Zilio Daniel C. | Method for recommending indexes and materialized views for a database workload |
US20030093408A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-05-15 | Brown Douglas P. | Index selection in a database system |
US20030110153A1 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2003-06-12 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Database performance monitoring method and tool |
US20030115183A1 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2003-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation and use of access plan statistics |
US20030126143A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2003-07-03 | Nicholas Roussopoulos | Dwarf cube architecture for reducing storage sizes of multidimensional data |
US20030130985A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-07-10 | Volker Driesen | Systems, methods and articles of manufacture for upgrading a database with a shadow system |
US20030135478A1 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2003-07-17 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Method and system for online reorganization of databases |
US20030154216A1 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2003-08-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database optimization apparatus and method |
US6615223B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2003-09-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for data replication |
US20030182276A1 (en) * | 2002-03-19 | 2003-09-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for performance tuning a database query |
US20030187831A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database query optimizer framework with dynamic strategy dispatch |
US20030200537A1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2003-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for using database knowledge to optimize a computer program |
US20030229639A1 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2003-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Runtime query optimization for dynamically selecting from multiple plans in a query based upon runtime-evaluated performance criterion |
US20030229621A1 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2003-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for refreshing a database query |
US20040003004A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Time-bound database tuning |
US20040019587A1 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | You-Chin Fuh | Method and device for processing a query in a database management system |
US20040034643A1 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2004-02-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for real time statistics collection for use in the automatic management of a database system |
US6701345B1 (en) * | 2000-04-13 | 2004-03-02 | Accenture Llp | Providing a notification when a plurality of users are altering similar data in a health care solution environment |
US6714943B1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2004-03-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for tracking dependencies for referential integrity constrained tables |
US6721724B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2004-04-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Validating multiple execution plans for database queries |
US6728720B1 (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 2004-04-27 | Robert Stephen Gerard Lenzie | Identifying preferred indexes for databases |
US6728719B1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2004-04-27 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for dependency tracking for unique constraints |
US20040181521A1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2004-09-16 | Simmen David E. | Query optimization technique for obtaining improved cardinality estimates using statistics on pre-defined queries |
US6804672B1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2004-10-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for dependency tracking |
US20040215626A1 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2004-10-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for improving performance of database queries |
US6816874B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2004-11-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for accessing performance data |
US6839713B1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2005-01-04 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | System and software for database structure in semiconductor manufacturing and method thereof |
US20050033734A1 (en) * | 2003-08-05 | 2005-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performance prediction system with query mining |
US6865567B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2005-03-08 | Basantkumar John Oommen | Method of generating attribute cardinality maps |
US20050097078A1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2005-05-05 | Lohman Guy M. | System, method, and computer program product for progressive query processing |
US20050097091A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-05-05 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL tuning base |
US20050102305A1 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2005-05-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Compressing database workloads |
US6910109B2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2005-06-21 | Intel Corporation | Tracking memory page state |
US6934701B1 (en) * | 2000-01-04 | 2005-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using a stored procedure to access index configuration data in a remote database management system |
US6947927B2 (en) * | 2002-07-09 | 2005-09-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for exploiting statistics on query expressions for optimization |
US6961931B2 (en) * | 2001-01-10 | 2005-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dependency specification using target patterns |
US20050251523A1 (en) * | 2004-05-07 | 2005-11-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Minimizing downtime for application changes in database systems |
US7007013B2 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2006-02-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fast computation of spatial queries in location-based services |
US7031958B2 (en) * | 2003-02-06 | 2006-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Patterned based query optimization |
US7047231B2 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2006-05-16 | Software Engineering Gmbh | Getpage-workload based index optimizer |
Family Cites Families (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US691931A (en) * | 1901-02-15 | 1902-01-28 | Simpson S Bryan | Bookkeeper's stool. |
GB8929158D0 (en) | 1989-12-23 | 1990-02-28 | Int Computers Ltd | Database system |
US5724569A (en) * | 1991-03-29 | 1998-03-03 | Bull S.A. | Apparatus for evaluating database query performance having libraries containing information for modeling the various system components of multiple systems |
DK169356B1 (en) * | 1993-03-19 | 1994-10-10 | Kroyer K K K | Apparatus for preparing a web-shaped fiber product by the dry method |
US5794228A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1998-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with buffer manager providing per page native data compression and decompression |
US5963933A (en) | 1997-06-25 | 1999-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Efficient implementation of full outer join and anti-join |
US5963934A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent compilation of scripting language for query processing systems |
US6243703B1 (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2001-06-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of accessing and displaying subsystem parameters including graphical plan table data |
JP2002510088A (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2002-04-02 | インフォミックス ソフトウェア, インコーポレイテッド | Processing precomputed views |
US6212514B1 (en) * | 1998-07-31 | 2001-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data base optimization method for estimating query and trigger procedure costs |
US6813617B2 (en) * | 1998-10-05 | 2004-11-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Dynamic generation of optimizer hints |
US6763353B2 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2004-07-13 | Vitria Technology, Inc. | Real time business process analysis method and apparatus |
US6366901B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic database statistics maintenance and plan regeneration |
US6334128B1 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2001-12-25 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficiently refreshing sets of summary tables and materialized views in a database management system |
US6496819B1 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2002-12-17 | Oracle Corporation | Rewriting a query in terms of a summary based on functional dependencies and join backs, and based on join derivability |
US7080062B1 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2006-07-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimizing database queries using query execution plans derived from automatic summary table determining cost based queries |
US6598038B1 (en) | 1999-09-17 | 2003-07-22 | Oracle International Corporation | Workload reduction mechanism for index tuning |
US6266658B1 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2001-07-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Index tuner for given workload |
US6366903B1 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2002-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Index and materialized view selection for a given workload |
IL152987A0 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2003-06-24 | Computer Ass Think Inc | System and method for automatically generating database queries |
US6826564B2 (en) * | 2000-07-10 | 2004-11-30 | Fastforward Networks | Scalable and programmable query distribution and collection in a network of queryable devices |
US7272589B1 (en) | 2000-11-01 | 2007-09-18 | Oracle International Corporation | Database index validation mechanism |
US6571233B2 (en) * | 2000-12-06 | 2003-05-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimization of SQL queries using filtering predicates |
US6850925B2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2005-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Query optimization by sub-plan memoization |
US7617201B1 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2009-11-10 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for analyzing statistics in a reporting system |
US7155426B2 (en) | 2001-09-20 | 2006-12-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | SQL debugging using stored procedures |
US6915290B2 (en) | 2001-12-11 | 2005-07-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database query optimization apparatus and method that represents queries as graphs |
US7058622B1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2006-06-06 | Tedesco Michael A | Method, apparatus and system for screening database queries prior to submission to a database |
CA2382714A1 (en) * | 2002-04-19 | 2003-10-19 | Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee | Substituting parameter markers for literals in a database query language statement to promote reuse of previously generated access plans |
US7139778B2 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2006-11-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Linear programming approach to assigning benefit to database physical design structures |
JP2004110219A (en) * | 2002-09-17 | 2004-04-08 | Hitachi Ltd | Data processing system and join processing method |
US7676516B2 (en) | 2002-10-15 | 2010-03-09 | Active-Base Ltd. | System and method for the optimization of database access in data base networks |
US7447676B2 (en) * | 2003-04-21 | 2008-11-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system of collecting execution statistics of query statements |
US7146363B2 (en) | 2003-05-20 | 2006-12-05 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for cardinality estimation based on query execution feedback |
US7174328B2 (en) * | 2003-09-02 | 2007-02-06 | International Business Machines Corp. | Selective path signatures for query processing over a hierarchical tagged data structure |
US7302422B2 (en) | 2004-04-14 | 2007-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query workload statistics collection in a database management system |
US7788285B2 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2010-08-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Finer grain dependency tracking for database objects |
US7353219B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2008-04-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining validity ranges of query plans based on suboptimality |
-
2004
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,426 patent/US7634456B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,205 patent/US7664730B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,469 patent/US8825629B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-07 US US10/935,908 patent/US7805411B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,779 patent/US20050177557A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,427 patent/US20050138015A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,781 patent/US7739263B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,468 patent/US8983934B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,778 patent/US7747606B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-07 US US10/935,906 patent/US20050119999A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-09-07 US US10/936,449 patent/US7664778B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5504917A (en) * | 1986-04-14 | 1996-04-02 | National Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing picture generation and control features in a graphical data flow environment |
US5140685A (en) * | 1988-03-14 | 1992-08-18 | Unisys Corporation | Record lock processing for multiprocessing data system with majority voting |
US5260697A (en) * | 1990-11-13 | 1993-11-09 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Computer with separate display plane and user interface processor |
US5398183A (en) * | 1990-12-10 | 1995-03-14 | Biomedical Systems Corporation | Holter ECG report generating system |
US5634134A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1997-05-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for determining character and character mode for multi-lingual keyboard based on input characters |
US5761660A (en) * | 1992-04-15 | 1998-06-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer program product and program storage device for database access using a shared electronic store in a multi-system environment having shared disks |
US5408653A (en) * | 1992-04-15 | 1995-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Efficient data base access using a shared electronic store in a multi-system environment with shared disks |
US5481712A (en) * | 1993-04-06 | 1996-01-02 | Cognex Corporation | Method and apparatus for interactively generating a computer program for machine vision analysis of an object |
US5794229A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1998-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodology for storing a database table by vertically partitioning all columns of the table |
US5544355A (en) * | 1993-06-14 | 1996-08-06 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and apparatus for query optimization in a relational database system having foreign functions |
US5737601A (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 1998-04-07 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for peer-to-peer data replication including handling exceptional occurrences |
US5577240A (en) * | 1994-12-07 | 1996-11-19 | Xerox Corporation | Identification of stable writes in weakly consistent replicated databases while providing access to all writes in such a database |
US5765159A (en) * | 1994-12-29 | 1998-06-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for generating an optimized set of relational queries for fetching data from a relational database management system in response to object queries received from an object oriented environment |
US5806076A (en) * | 1996-10-29 | 1998-09-08 | Oracle Corporation | Tracking dependencies between transactions in a database |
US5870760A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1999-02-09 | Oracle Corporation | Dequeuing using queue batch numbers |
US5870761A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1999-02-09 | Oracle Corporation | Parallel queue propagation |
US5781912A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1998-07-14 | Oracle Corporation | Recoverable data replication between source site and destination site without distributed transactions |
US5940826A (en) * | 1997-01-07 | 1999-08-17 | Unisys Corporation | Dual XPCS for disaster recovery in multi-host computer complexes |
US5860069A (en) * | 1997-04-11 | 1999-01-12 | Bmc Software, Inc. | Method of efficient collection of SQL performance measures |
US5991765A (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 1999-11-23 | Birdstep Technology As | System and method for storing and manipulating data in an information handling system |
US6195653B1 (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2001-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for selectively preparing customized reports of query explain data |
US6397207B1 (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2002-05-28 | International Business Machines Corp. | System and method for selectively preparing customized reports of query explain data |
US6275818B1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2001-08-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cost based optimization of decision support queries using transient views |
US6460043B1 (en) * | 1998-02-04 | 2002-10-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for operating on data with a conceptual data manipulation language |
US6052694A (en) * | 1998-03-18 | 2000-04-18 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for logging database performance characteristics |
US6353818B1 (en) * | 1998-08-19 | 2002-03-05 | Ncr Corporation | Plan-per-tuple optimizing of database queries with user-defined functions |
US6460027B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2002-10-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic recognition and rerouting of queries for optimal performance |
US6122640A (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2000-09-19 | Platinum Technology Ip, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reorganizing an active DBMS table |
US6330552B1 (en) * | 1998-09-28 | 2001-12-11 | Compaq | Database query cost model optimizer |
US6910109B2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2005-06-21 | Intel Corporation | Tracking memory page state |
US6356889B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2002-03-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for determining optimal database materializations using a query optimizer |
US20030177137A1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2003-09-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Graphical query analyzer |
US6434545B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-08-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Graphical query analyzer |
US6744449B2 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2004-06-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Graphical query analyzer |
US6321218B1 (en) * | 1999-02-24 | 2001-11-20 | Oracle Corporation | Automatically determining data that is best suited for index tuning |
US6560606B1 (en) * | 1999-05-04 | 2003-05-06 | Metratech | Method and apparatus for processing data with multiple processing modules and associated counters |
US6374257B1 (en) * | 1999-06-16 | 2002-04-16 | Oracle Corporation | Method and system for removing ambiguities in a shared database command |
US6529901B1 (en) * | 1999-06-29 | 2003-03-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Automating statistics management for query optimizers |
US6728720B1 (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 2004-04-27 | Robert Stephen Gerard Lenzie | Identifying preferred indexes for databases |
US6349310B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2002-02-19 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Database management system and method for accessing rows in a partitioned table |
US6397227B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2002-05-28 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Database management system and method for updating specified tuple fields upon transaction rollback |
US6865567B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2005-03-08 | Basantkumar John Oommen | Method of generating attribute cardinality maps |
US6496850B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-12-17 | Accenture Llp | Clean-up of orphaned server contexts |
US6442748B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-08-27 | Accenture Llp | System, method and article of manufacture for a persistent state and persistent object separator in an information services patterns environment |
US6434568B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-08-13 | Accenture Llp | Information services patterns in a netcentric environment |
US6816874B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2004-11-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for accessing performance data |
US20040181521A1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2004-09-16 | Simmen David E. | Query optimization technique for obtaining improved cardinality estimates using statistics on pre-defined queries |
US6934701B1 (en) * | 2000-01-04 | 2005-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using a stored procedure to access index configuration data in a remote database management system |
US6615223B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2003-09-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for data replication |
US6721724B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2004-04-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Validating multiple execution plans for database queries |
US6701345B1 (en) * | 2000-04-13 | 2004-03-02 | Accenture Llp | Providing a notification when a plurality of users are altering similar data in a health care solution environment |
US6513029B1 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2003-01-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Interesting table-subset selection for database workload materialized view selection |
US6493701B2 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2002-12-10 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodogy providing faster N-ary nested loop joins |
US6961931B2 (en) * | 2001-01-10 | 2005-11-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dependency specification using target patterns |
US6804672B1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2004-10-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for dependency tracking |
US6728719B1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2004-04-27 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for dependency tracking for unique constraints |
US6714943B1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2004-03-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for tracking dependencies for referential integrity constrained tables |
US20020120617A1 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2002-08-29 | Fujitsu Limited | Database retrieving method, apparatus and storage medium thereof |
US20030018618A1 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2003-01-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Representation for data used in query optimization |
US20030135478A1 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2003-07-17 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Method and system for online reorganization of databases |
US20020198867A1 (en) * | 2001-06-06 | 2002-12-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Learning from empirical results in query optimization |
US20030126143A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2003-07-03 | Nicholas Roussopoulos | Dwarf cube architecture for reducing storage sizes of multidimensional data |
US20030088541A1 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2003-05-08 | Zilio Daniel C. | Method for recommending indexes and materialized views for a database workload |
US6839713B1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2005-01-04 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | System and software for database structure in semiconductor manufacturing and method thereof |
US20030065648A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2003-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reduce database monitor workload by employing predictive query threshold |
US20030093408A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-05-15 | Brown Douglas P. | Index selection in a database system |
US20030110153A1 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2003-06-12 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Database performance monitoring method and tool |
US20030115183A1 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2003-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation and use of access plan statistics |
US20030130985A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-07-10 | Volker Driesen | Systems, methods and articles of manufacture for upgrading a database with a shadow system |
US20030154216A1 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2003-08-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database optimization apparatus and method |
US7047231B2 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2006-05-16 | Software Engineering Gmbh | Getpage-workload based index optimizer |
US20030182276A1 (en) * | 2002-03-19 | 2003-09-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for performance tuning a database query |
US20030187831A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database query optimizer framework with dynamic strategy dispatch |
US20030200537A1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2003-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for using database knowledge to optimize a computer program |
US20030229621A1 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2003-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for refreshing a database query |
US6999958B2 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2006-02-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Runtime query optimization for dynamically selecting from multiple plans in a query based upon runtime-evaluated performance criterion |
US20030229639A1 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2003-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Runtime query optimization for dynamically selecting from multiple plans in a query based upon runtime-evaluated performance criterion |
US20050102305A1 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2005-05-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Compressing database workloads |
US6912547B2 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2005-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Compressing database workloads |
US20040003004A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Time-bound database tuning |
US6947927B2 (en) * | 2002-07-09 | 2005-09-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for exploiting statistics on query expressions for optimization |
US20040019587A1 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | You-Chin Fuh | Method and device for processing a query in a database management system |
US7007013B2 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2006-02-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fast computation of spatial queries in location-based services |
US20040034643A1 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2004-02-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for real time statistics collection for use in the automatic management of a database system |
US7031958B2 (en) * | 2003-02-06 | 2006-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Patterned based query optimization |
US20040215626A1 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2004-10-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for improving performance of database queries |
US20050033734A1 (en) * | 2003-08-05 | 2005-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performance prediction system with query mining |
US20050138015A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-23 | Oracle International Corporation | High load SQL driven statistics collection |
US20050125398A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Global hints |
US20050125393A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-09 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL tuning sets |
US20050125427A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic SQL tuning advisor |
US20050187917A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-08-25 | Oracle International Corporation | Method for index tuning of a SQL statement, and index merging for a multi-statement SQL workload, using a cost-based relational query optimizer |
US20050125452A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-09 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL profile |
US20050120001A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-02 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL structure analyzer |
US20050119999A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic learning optimizer |
US20050120000A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Auto-tuning SQL statements |
US20050097091A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-05-05 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL tuning base |
US20050097078A1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2005-05-05 | Lohman Guy M. | System, method, and computer program product for progressive query processing |
US20050251523A1 (en) * | 2004-05-07 | 2005-11-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Minimizing downtime for application changes in database systems |
Cited By (104)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8825629B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2014-09-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Method for index tuning of a SQL statement, and index merging for a multi-statement SQL workload, using a cost-based relational query optimizer |
US20050119999A1 (en) * | 2003-09-06 | 2005-06-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic learning optimizer |
US7664778B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2010-02-16 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL tuning sets |
US7739263B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2010-06-15 | Oracle International Corporation | Global hints |
US7805411B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2010-09-28 | Oracle International Corporation | Auto-tuning SQL statements |
US7664730B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2010-02-16 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for implementing a SQL profile |
US8983934B2 (en) | 2003-09-06 | 2015-03-17 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL tuning base |
US20080071759A1 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2008-03-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for implementing enhanced query governor functions |
US7774357B2 (en) | 2003-11-13 | 2010-08-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for implementing enhanced query governor functions |
US7340448B2 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2008-03-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for implementing enhanced query governor functions |
US20050108188A1 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2005-05-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for implementing enhanced query governor functions |
US8775412B2 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2014-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for a self-healing query access plan |
US20050154740A1 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2005-07-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for a self-healing query access plan |
US8122010B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2012-02-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic query optimization |
US20080052720A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2008-02-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic Query Optimization |
US20050192937A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic query optimization |
US20050210461A1 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-22 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for performing a rolling upgrade of distributed computer software |
US7757226B2 (en) | 2004-03-17 | 2010-07-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for performing a rolling upgrade of distributed computer software |
US7788285B2 (en) | 2004-05-14 | 2010-08-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Finer grain dependency tracking for database objects |
US20060031189A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for data mining for automatic query optimization |
US8346761B2 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2013-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for data mining for automatic query optimization |
US8788532B2 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2014-07-22 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Firewalls for securing customer data in a multi-tenant environment |
US8799320B2 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2014-08-05 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Firewalls for securing customer data in a multi-tenant environment |
US20120260341A1 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2012-10-11 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Firewalls for securing customer data in a multi-tenant environment |
US20070250470A1 (en) * | 2006-04-24 | 2007-10-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Parallelization of language-integrated collection operations |
US20080065590A1 (en) * | 2006-09-07 | 2008-03-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Lightweight query processing over in-memory data structures |
US8285707B2 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2012-10-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of querying relational database management systems |
US20080109424A1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2008-05-08 | Paul Reuben Day | Method of Querying Relational Database Management Systems |
US20080178079A1 (en) * | 2007-01-18 | 2008-07-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for a graphical user interface to facilitate tuning sql statements |
US7644063B2 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2010-01-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus, system, and method for ensuring query execution plan stability in a database management system |
US20090049012A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus, system, and method for ensuring query execution plan stability in a database management system |
US8903801B2 (en) * | 2007-09-14 | 2014-12-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Fully automated SQL tuning |
US9734200B2 (en) | 2007-09-14 | 2017-08-15 | Oracle International Corporation | Identifying high risk database statements in changing database environments |
US20090077016A1 (en) * | 2007-09-14 | 2009-03-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Fully automated sql tuning |
US9720941B2 (en) | 2007-09-14 | 2017-08-01 | Oracle International Corporation | Fully automated SQL tuning |
US20090077017A1 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2009-03-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Sql performance analyzer |
US8341178B2 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2012-12-25 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL performance analyzer |
US20090094191A1 (en) * | 2007-10-08 | 2009-04-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Exploiting execution feedback for optimizing choice of access methods |
US9213740B2 (en) * | 2007-10-11 | 2015-12-15 | Sybase, Inc. | System and methodology for automatic tuning of database query optimizer |
US20090100004A1 (en) * | 2007-10-11 | 2009-04-16 | Sybase, Inc. | System And Methodology For Automatic Tuning Of Database Query Optimizer |
US20090106321A1 (en) * | 2007-10-17 | 2009-04-23 | Dinesh Das | Maintaining and Utilizing SQL Execution Plan Histories |
US20090106306A1 (en) * | 2007-10-17 | 2009-04-23 | Dinesh Das | SQL Execution Plan Baselines |
US20090106219A1 (en) * | 2007-10-17 | 2009-04-23 | Peter Belknap | SQL Execution Plan Verification |
US8700608B2 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2014-04-15 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL execution plan verification |
US10229158B2 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2019-03-12 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL execution plan verification |
US9189522B2 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2015-11-17 | Oracle International Corporation | SQL execution plan baselines |
US8335767B2 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2012-12-18 | Oracle International Corporation | Maintaining and utilizing SQL execution plan histories |
US8600977B2 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2013-12-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic recognition and capture of SQL execution plans |
US9740735B2 (en) | 2007-11-07 | 2017-08-22 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Programming language extensions in structured queries |
US8577871B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-11-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for out-of-the-box real-time SQL monitoring |
US20090248621A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Benoit Dageville | Method and mechanism for out-of-the-box real-time sql monitoring |
US20090271360A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | Bestgen Robert J | Assigning Plan Volatility Scores to Control Reoptimization Frequency and Number of Stored Reoptimization Plans |
US8060495B2 (en) | 2008-10-21 | 2011-11-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query execution plan efficiency in a database management system |
US20100114868A1 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2010-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query execution plan efficiency in a database management system |
US20100223253A1 (en) * | 2009-03-02 | 2010-09-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic query execution plan management and performance stabilization for workloads |
US8805852B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2014-08-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic query execution plan management and performance stabilization for workloads |
US20100293161A1 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2010-11-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatically avoiding unconstrained cartesian product joins |
US8417690B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2013-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatically avoiding unconstrained cartesian product joins |
US8849797B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2014-09-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database query governor with tailored thresholds |
US8566307B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2013-10-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database query governor with tailored thresholds |
US8903805B2 (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2014-12-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for performing query optimization using a hybrid execution plan |
US8938644B2 (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2015-01-20 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Query execution plan revision for error recovery |
US20120144234A1 (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2012-06-07 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Automatic error recovery mechanism for a database system |
US20120173498A1 (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Verifying Correctness of a Database System |
US9195730B2 (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2015-11-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Verifying correctness of a database system via extended access paths |
US20120215764A1 (en) * | 2011-02-17 | 2012-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Energy usage and performance query governor |
US9158814B2 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2015-10-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Obtaining partial results from a database query |
US20130262436A1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Obtaining partial results from a database query |
US9189524B2 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2015-11-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Obtaining partial results from a database query |
US20140250103A1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2014-09-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Obtaining partial results from a database query |
US9727609B2 (en) | 2012-09-28 | 2017-08-08 | Oracle International Corporation | Triggering hard parses |
US11321317B2 (en) | 2012-09-28 | 2022-05-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Leveraging query-specific statistics in non-equivalent queries |
US9471631B2 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2016-10-18 | Oracle International Corporation | Creating and using data that indicates misestimates of actual costs |
US20140095474A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Creating and using data that indicates misestimates of actual costs |
US9720967B2 (en) | 2012-09-28 | 2017-08-01 | Oracle International Corporation | Adaptive query optimization |
US9678825B2 (en) * | 2014-02-18 | 2017-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomous reconfiguration of a failed user action |
US20150234701A1 (en) * | 2014-02-18 | 2015-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomous reconfiguration of a failed user action |
US10621064B2 (en) | 2014-07-07 | 2020-04-14 | Oracle International Corporation | Proactive impact measurement of database changes on production systems |
US10176157B2 (en) * | 2015-01-03 | 2019-01-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detect annotation error by segmenting unannotated document segments into smallest partition |
US10235350B2 (en) | 2015-01-03 | 2019-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detect annotation error locations through unannotated document segment partitioning |
US20160196249A1 (en) * | 2015-01-03 | 2016-07-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reprocess Problematic Sections of Input Documents |
US20160224688A1 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2016-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting query access plan obsolescence |
US10929397B2 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2021-02-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting query access plan obsolescence |
US9990396B2 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2018-06-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting query access plan obsolescence |
US20180189351A1 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2018-07-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting query access plan obsolescence |
US20160224627A1 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2016-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting query access plan obsolescence |
US10169411B2 (en) * | 2015-02-03 | 2019-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting query access plan obsolescence |
US20170308575A1 (en) * | 2015-03-16 | 2017-10-26 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and Plan Optimizing Apparatus for Optimizing Query Execution Plan |
US10108665B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2018-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating multiple query access plans for multiple computing environments |
US9916353B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2018-03-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating multiple query access plans for multiple computing environments |
US10108664B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2018-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating multiple query access plans for multiple computing environments |
US9916354B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2018-03-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating multiple query access plans for multiple computing environments |
US10885027B2 (en) * | 2016-08-24 | 2021-01-05 | Nec Corporation | Progressive processing for querying system behavior |
US20180060385A1 (en) * | 2016-08-24 | 2018-03-01 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Progressive Processing for Querying System Behavior |
US20180336247A1 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2018-11-22 | Oracle International Corporation | Estimated query performance |
US11372858B2 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2022-06-28 | Oracle International Corporation | Estimated query performance |
US11157307B2 (en) * | 2017-05-24 | 2021-10-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Count and transaction identifier based transaction processing |
US10838961B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2020-11-17 | Oracle International Corporation | Prefix compression |
US11386058B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2022-07-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Rule-based autonomous database cloud service framework |
US11327932B2 (en) | 2017-09-30 | 2022-05-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Autonomous multitenant database cloud service framework |
US20190266272A1 (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2019-08-29 | Sap Se | Optimal ranges for relational query execution plans |
US11080276B2 (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2021-08-03 | Sap Se | Optimal ranges for relational query execution plans |
US11100104B2 (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2021-08-24 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Query tuning utilizing optimizer hints |
US20220043822A1 (en) * | 2020-08-04 | 2022-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Shadow experiments for serverless multi-tenant cloud services |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050138015A1 (en) | 2005-06-23 |
US20050125393A1 (en) | 2005-06-09 |
US8983934B2 (en) | 2015-03-17 |
US20050120001A1 (en) | 2005-06-02 |
US20050097091A1 (en) | 2005-05-05 |
US20050125427A1 (en) | 2005-06-09 |
US7664778B2 (en) | 2010-02-16 |
US7747606B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 |
US20050125398A1 (en) | 2005-06-09 |
US20050119999A1 (en) | 2005-06-02 |
US20050187917A1 (en) | 2005-08-25 |
US7634456B2 (en) | 2009-12-15 |
US7664730B2 (en) | 2010-02-16 |
US8825629B2 (en) | 2014-09-02 |
US7739263B2 (en) | 2010-06-15 |
US20050120000A1 (en) | 2005-06-02 |
US7805411B2 (en) | 2010-09-28 |
US20050125452A1 (en) | 2005-06-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20050177557A1 (en) | Automatic prevention of run-away query execution | |
US7877373B2 (en) | Executing alternative plans for a SQL statement | |
Das et al. | Falcon: Scaling up hands-off crowdsourced entity matching to build cloud services | |
US7860858B2 (en) | Closed-loop predicate analysis | |
Dageville et al. | Automatic sql tuning in oracle 10g | |
US7984024B2 (en) | Statistics management | |
US10229158B2 (en) | SQL execution plan verification | |
US6947927B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for exploiting statistics on query expressions for optimization | |
US7139749B2 (en) | Method, system, and program for performance tuning a database query | |
US7353219B2 (en) | Determining validity ranges of query plans based on suboptimality | |
US7171408B2 (en) | Method of cardinality estimation using statistical soft constraints | |
US7548905B2 (en) | Refreshing an execution plan for a query | |
US5091852A (en) | System for optimizing query processing in a relational database | |
US6263345B1 (en) | Histogram synthesis modeler for a database query optimizer | |
US20070250473A1 (en) | Use of materialized transient views in query optimization | |
US9256643B2 (en) | Technique for factoring uncertainty into cost-based query optimization | |
US20130060753A1 (en) | Optimization Method And Apparatus | |
CN112162983A (en) | Database index suggestion processing method, device, medium and electronic equipment | |
El-Helw et al. | Collecting and maintaining just-in-time statistics | |
US20060167845A1 (en) | Selection of optimal plans for FIRST-N-ROW queries | |
US20070208696A1 (en) | Evaluating materialized views in a database system | |
Henderson et al. | Blutune: Tuning up ibm db2 with ml | |
EP4092543A1 (en) | Index-based, adaptive join size estimation | |
US7647280B1 (en) | Closed-loop estimation of request costs | |
SHAFIQUE et al. | Query Optimization by Using Checkpoints with Plan Reduction Algorithm having Hybrid Architecture |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZIAUDDIN, MOHAMED;DAGEVILLE, BENOIT;YAGOUB, KHALED;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015644/0930;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041227 TO 20050110 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |