US20050222278A1 - Transportable gas to liquid plant - Google Patents
Transportable gas to liquid plant Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050222278A1 US20050222278A1 US11/088,287 US8828705A US2005222278A1 US 20050222278 A1 US20050222278 A1 US 20050222278A1 US 8828705 A US8828705 A US 8828705A US 2005222278 A1 US2005222278 A1 US 2005222278A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- liquid hydrocarbon
- transportable
- production facility
- synthetic liquid
- hydrocarbon production
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B35/00—Vessels or similar floating structures specially adapted for specific purposes and not otherwise provided for
- B63B35/44—Floating buildings, stores, drilling platforms, or workshops, e.g. carrying water-oil separating devices
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02B—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
- E02B17/00—Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
- E02B17/02—Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor placed by lowering the supporting construction to the bottom, e.g. with subsequent fixing thereto
- E02B17/021—Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor placed by lowering the supporting construction to the bottom, e.g. with subsequent fixing thereto with relative movement between supporting construction and platform
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B35/00—Vessels or similar floating structures specially adapted for specific purposes and not otherwise provided for
- B63B2035/002—Vessels or similar floating structures specially adapted for specific purposes and not otherwise provided for for inland waters, e.g. for use on canals or rivers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B35/00—Vessels or similar floating structures specially adapted for specific purposes and not otherwise provided for
- B63B35/44—Floating buildings, stores, drilling platforms, or workshops, e.g. carrying water-oil separating devices
- B63B2035/4473—Floating structures supporting industrial plants, such as factories, refineries, or the like
Definitions
- This invention relates to gas-to-liquid (GTL) technology, and more particularly to GTL processes practiced on a mobile or transportable platform.
- the invention further relates to a transportable GTL facility which is capable of accessing stranded gas reserves.
- stranded gas means natural gas that cannot be economically delivered to market using current gas transportation methods or current commercial GTL processes.
- Stranded gas includes associated and flared/vented gas, and gas that is re-injected purely for regulatory compliance rather than for reservoir-pressure maintenance.
- Some of the factors that determine when a pipeline is profitable include resource volume, transport route, pipeline distance, regulatory environment, market size and demand growth. Excess reserves may be considered stranded where a paltry delivery rate is required to avoid oversupply of local markets. Negative economics may also arise from technical complexity or expense associated with recovering and/or gathering the gas.
- GTL Fischer-Tropsch
- FT Fischer-Tropsch
- GTL gas-to-liquid
- FT Fischer-Tropsch
- synthesis gas or syngas, which is composed primarily of H 2 and CO
- Fischer-Tropsch catalyst to produce heavier hydrocarbons.
- Possible Fischer-Tropsch end products include kerosene, naphtha, waxes, liquid paraffins and lubes, synthetic diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel.
- Stranded natural gas may be used as a raw feedstock for GTL operations, thereby monetizing otherwise worthless gas.
- the GTL barge provided by the invention is designed to develop natural gas assets in the 0.5-5.0 TCF range where there is currently no infrastructure to produce and transport the stranded reserves since the fields are not large enough to economically support an LNG facility. By employing the barge, the owner/operator of the field gets the added benefit of being able to book the reserves.
- the GTL barge includes a syngas generating section and a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reaction section.
- the GTL barge is an inland barge and, therefore, not ocean-going.
- the GTL barge is designed to be transportable to or near a gas formation by lift ship or other dry haul method.
- Product upgrading may also be included in the GTL barge, either integrated on the GTL inland barge or located near the GTL barge, such as on a separate barge or on-shore.
- the transportable GTL inland barge enables an exploration and production company to produce and thus monetize stranded gas fields.
- the GTL barge focuses on gas reserves in or near shallow water or onshore gas reserves that are near the coastline or other navigable waterway.
- the GTL barge is ideally suited to process associated rich gas that might otherwise be flared or re-injected.
- Estimated worldwide flared gas is about 10 billion ft 3 per day.
- a single GTL barge may be designed to produce approximately 20,000 barrels per day (bpd) of total liquid products, including approximately 12,000 bpd of GTL products.
- the natural gas has about 2 gpm propane and higher carbon number natural gas liquid (“NGL”); the combined NGL and GTL products are about 8700 bpd of clean diesel fuel, 7300 bpd of naphtha, and 4400 bpd of LPG.
- NGL propane and higher carbon number natural gas liquid
- the mobility and/or transportability of a GTL plant enables the operator to mitigate long-term project and financial risk by having the ability to relocate the barge.
- the GTL barges may be constructed in shipyards.
- the GTL barge is used where it is within a distance from a gas reserve to-which it would be economically feasible to build a pipeline to transport natural gas feed to the barge.
- the products from the barge may be either synthetic crude or upgraded products, including for example, transportation fuels.
- the reserves may be accumulated by pipeline or by compressed natural gas (“CNG”) to supply feedstock to a single GTL barge.
- CNG compressed natural gas
- a single syncrude upgrading section may serve such barges and the upgrading section may be located on one of the barges, a separate barge or a separate location.
- a shuttle barge may be used to carry syncrude to the product upgrading unit.
- the GTL barge is constructed on an inland barge.
- inland barge means a barge which is transportable by lift ship or other form of barge dry haul and which is not suitable for towing or operation at sea or in any waters having wave action greater than that of Sea State 0 (as defined by Pierson—Moskowitz Sea Spectrum). It should be noted that the Sea State 0 is based upon wind speeds of around three (3) knots.
- the term inland barge will include designs which may withstand wind loads of about 120 kilometers per hour or greater. The inland barge, however, may be towed within inland waters, such as rivers, lakes and intercoastal waterways.
- the inland barge is installed and then operated only in calm water. “Installed” is defined as either freely floating in confining moorings or fixed in a non-floating arrangement. Confining moorings will allow the barge to float on a water body allowing only uniform vertical motion with essentially no lateral or twisting motion. In some embodiments, a barge having jacking legs may be used and installation of the jacking legs installs the barge.
- the term “calm water” means near shore, such as on pylons, beached, or in a natural or man-made inlet which may or may not be dammed and/or drained, or on a fixed platform if off-shore.
- calm water may also include inland waterways, such as rivers, lakes, ship channels, bayous, and intercoastal waterways which are protected from substantial natural wave action.
- Other methods of securing the barge in calm water include use of a flotation jacket surrounding the outer perimeter of the barge, anchoring, or installation of legs under the barge.
- GTL barge and “GTL inland barge” are synonymous.
- inland barges are not intended for offshore use unless installed on a fixed platform.
- the term “inland barge” does not include ocean-going vessels which are mobile under their own power. Rather, the inland barge is transported via dry haul lift ship to a location within a commercially practical distance from an appropriate natural gas reserve. Commercially practical distances are those in which a pipeline from the reserve to the barge may be constructed while maintaining the total cost of synthetic crude or hydrocarbon product production within competitive market limits. Such distances vary according to the structure of the intervening terrain as well as other production and market factors, such as then current market prices for the hydrocarbon products to be produced and local labor costs.
- the GTL barge may be split into numerous sections, for example, a natural gas purification section, a natural gas liquid recovery section; a syngas production section; a Fischer-Tropsch Reaction (“FTR”) section; and a product separation/upgrading section.
- These sections may or may not be modules as equipment from one section may be intermingled with equipment from another section.
- each section may be substantially self-contained and located substantially separately from the other sections.
- the two methods are steam reforming, wherein one or more light hydrocarbons such as methane are reacted with steam over a catalyst to form carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and partial oxidation, wherein one or more light hydrocarbons are combusted or reacted sub-stoichiometrically to produce synthesis gas.
- the basic steam reforming reaction of methane is represented by the following formula: CH 4 +H 2 O+Catalyst ⁇ CO+3H 2
- the steam reforming reaction is endothermic and a catalyst containing nickel is often utilized.
- the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio of the synthesis gas produced by steam reforming of methane is approximately 3:1.
- Partial oxidation is the non-catalytic, sub-stoichiometric combustion of light hydrocarbons such as methane to produce the synthesis gas.
- the basic reaction is represented as follows: CH 4 +1 ⁇ 2O 2 ⁇ CO+2H 2
- the partial oxidation reaction is typically carried out using high purity oxygen.
- High purity oxygen can be quite expensive.
- the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio of synthesis gas produced by the partial oxidation of methane is approximately 2:1.
- a combination of partial oxidation and steam reforming known as autothermal reforming, wherein air is used as a source of oxygen for the partial oxidation reaction has also been used for producing synthesis gas heretofore.
- Autothermal reforming is a combination of partial oxidation and steam reforming where the exothermic heat of the partial oxidation supplies the necessary heat for the endothermic steam reforming reaction.
- the autothermal reforming process can be carried out in a relatively inexpensive refractory lined carbon steel vessel whereby low cost is typically involved.
- the autothermal process generally results in a lower hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio in the synthesis gas than does steam reforming alone. That is, as stated above, the steam reforming reaction with methane results in a ratio of about 3:1 while the partial oxidation of methane results in a ratio of about 2:1.
- the optimum, ratio for the hydrocarbon synthesis reaction carried out at low or medium pressure over a cobalt catalyst is 2:1.
- the feed to the autothermal reforming process is a mixture of light hydrocarbons such as a natural gas stream, some form of additional control is desired to maintain the ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the synthesis gas at the optimum ratio of about 2:1.
- the syngas production section of the GTL barge is an Autothermal Reforming unit (“ATR”).
- ATR Autothermal Reforming unit
- the ATR section is any capable of producing a synthesis gas to be utilized in the associated Fischer-Tropsch reaction section.
- ATR may take different forms but generally is comprised of a vessel having a reforming catalyst (e.g. nickel-containing catalyst) therein which converts the air/steam/natural gas to a synthesis gas.
- Syngas useful in producing a Fischer-Tropsch product may contain hydrogen, carbon monoxide and nitrogen with H 2 :CO ratios from about 0.8:1 to about 3.0:1.
- Operating conditions and parameters of an autothermal reactor for producing a syngas useful in the process of the invention are well known to those skilled in the art. Such operating conditions and parameters include but are not limited to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,155,039, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/497,177.
- an autothermal reforming process is utilized wherein the ATR is fed natural gas and air-derived oxygen.
- air-derived oxygen refers to oxygen obtained from air by means other than a cryogenic air separation plant.
- air may be passed through a selective membrane through which oxygen is selectively absorbed and/or passed.
- membranes are known in the art, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,518. Included in such membranes are those commonly referred to as mixed conductor ceramic membranes, oxygen ion transport membranes, and ionic/mixed conductor membranes.
- Fischer-Tropsch reactors are well known in the art and basically are comprised of a vessel containing an appropriate catalyst (e.g. cobalt-containing catalyst) therein.
- Fischer-Tropsch catalysts include, for example, cobalt, iron, ruthenium as well as other Group IVA, Group VIII and Group VIIB transition metals or combinations of such metals, to prepare both saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons.
- catalysts which are used in converting a synthesis gas depending on the product desired; e.g., see U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,169,120 and 6,239,184.
- the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst may include a support, such as a metal-oxide support, including for example, silica, alumina, silica-alumina or titanium oxides.
- a cobalt (Co) catalyst on transition alumina may be used.
- the Co concentration on the support may be between about 5 wt % and about 40 wt %.
- Certain catalyst promoters and stabilizers, which are known in the art, may optionally be used.
- Stabilizers include Group IIA or Group IIIB metals, while the promoters may include elements from Group IVA, Group VIII or Group VIIB.
- the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and reaction conditions may be selected to be optimal for desired reaction products, such as for hydrocarbons of certain chain lengths or number of carbon atoms.
- reactor configurations may be employed for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: fixed bed, slurry bed reactor, ebullating bed, fluidizing bed, or continuously stirred tank reactor (“CSTR”).
- the FTR may be operated at a pressure from about 100 psia to about 800 psia and a temperature from about 300° F. to about 6000 F.
- the reactor gas hourly space velocity (“GHSV”) may be from about 1000 hr ⁇ 1 to about 15000 hr ⁇ .
- Operating conditions and parameters of the FTR useful in the process of the invention are well known to those skilled in the art. Such operating conditions and parameters include but are not limited to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,124.
- air based systems have a significant advantage with a mobile or transportable system.
- the product separation/upgrading section includes equipment for processing the syncrude products from the FT section to fuel-grade products, namely diesel and naphtha.
- the upgrading equipment may be installed on the GTL barge or may be located on an adjacent platform, barge or onshore facility. Preferably, products are not stored on the barge but rather transported to a separate location, such as a floating storage offloading unit (FSO) farther out from the shore to—hold the product.
- FSO floating storage offloading unit
- the FSO may be a reconditioned single hull tanker.
- Product upgrading equipment may include distillation tower(s) as well as hydroprocessing and hydrocracking reactors.
- the utilities section supplies the utilities for all the processes.
- Utilities supplied may include water, steam, power, and miscellaneous equipment; such as a flare.
- the flare is a ground flare and may be located on an auxiliary deck or separate from the GTL barge, such as on shore or on a separate barge or platform.
Abstract
A transportable GTL processing facility constructed on an inland barge is provided. Also provided is a process for producing liquid hydrocarbons from natural gas utilizing a transportable GTL processing facility. The facility and process may be used to access and convert stranded natural gas in an economical fashion into liquid hydrocarbons. Further provided is a transportable GTL processing facility and process for producing liquid hydrocarbons wherein the liquid hydrocarbons are upgraded into transportation fuels and other locally usable materials.
Description
- This application claims priority to Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/557,638, filed on Mar. 30, 2004.
- Not applicable
- Not applicable.
- This invention relates to gas-to-liquid (GTL) technology, and more particularly to GTL processes practiced on a mobile or transportable platform. The invention further relates to a transportable GTL facility which is capable of accessing stranded gas reserves.
- Of the estimated 5,500 TCF of natural gas reserves worldwide, nearly one-half is stranded, with over 50% of those reserves being offshore. For our purpose, the term “stranded gas” means natural gas that cannot be economically delivered to market using current gas transportation methods or current commercial GTL processes. Stranded gas includes associated and flared/vented gas, and gas that is re-injected purely for regulatory compliance rather than for reservoir-pressure maintenance. Some of the factors that determine when a pipeline is profitable include resource volume, transport route, pipeline distance, regulatory environment, market size and demand growth. Excess reserves may be considered stranded where a paltry delivery rate is required to avoid oversupply of local markets. Negative economics may also arise from technical complexity or expense associated with recovering and/or gathering the gas.
- One method of producing stranded gas is to process it through a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) gas-to-liquid (GTL) system. GTL is an application of the basic Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process, wherein synthesis gas (or syngas, which is composed primarily of H2 and CO) is reacted in the presence of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst to produce heavier hydrocarbons. Possible Fischer-Tropsch end products include kerosene, naphtha, waxes, liquid paraffins and lubes, synthetic diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel. Stranded natural gas may be used as a raw feedstock for GTL operations, thereby monetizing otherwise worthless gas.
- The GTL barge provided by the invention is designed to develop natural gas assets in the 0.5-5.0 TCF range where there is currently no infrastructure to produce and transport the stranded reserves since the fields are not large enough to economically support an LNG facility. By employing the barge, the owner/operator of the field gets the added benefit of being able to book the reserves. The GTL barge includes a syngas generating section and a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reaction section. The GTL barge is an inland barge and, therefore, not ocean-going. The GTL barge is designed to be transportable to or near a gas formation by lift ship or other dry haul method. Product upgrading may also be included in the GTL barge, either integrated on the GTL inland barge or located near the GTL barge, such as on a separate barge or on-shore.
- The transportable GTL inland barge enables an exploration and production company to produce and thus monetize stranded gas fields. The GTL barge focuses on gas reserves in or near shallow water or onshore gas reserves that are near the coastline or other navigable waterway.
- The GTL barge is ideally suited to process associated rich gas that might otherwise be flared or re-injected. Estimated worldwide flared gas is about 10 billion ft3 per day. A single GTL barge, for example, may be designed to produce approximately 20,000 barrels per day (bpd) of total liquid products, including approximately 12,000 bpd of GTL products. Assuming the natural gas has about 2 gpm propane and higher carbon number natural gas liquid (“NGL”); the combined NGL and GTL products are about 8700 bpd of clean diesel fuel, 7300 bpd of naphtha, and 4400 bpd of LPG. The mobility and/or transportability of a GTL plant enables the operator to mitigate long-term project and financial risk by having the ability to relocate the barge. The GTL barges may be constructed in shipyards.
- The GTL barge is used where it is within a distance from a gas reserve to-which it would be economically feasible to build a pipeline to transport natural gas feed to the barge. The products from the barge may be either synthetic crude or upgraded products, including for example, transportation fuels.
- Where there are two or more reserves located fairly close to each other, the reserves may be accumulated by pipeline or by compressed natural gas (“CNG”) to supply feedstock to a single GTL barge. Where two or snore barges are located in a region, a single syncrude upgrading section may serve such barges and the upgrading section may be located on one of the barges, a separate barge or a separate location. A shuttle barge may be used to carry syncrude to the product upgrading unit.
- In one embodiment of the invention, the GTL barge is constructed on an inland barge. As defined herein, the term “inland barge” means a barge which is transportable by lift ship or other form of barge dry haul and which is not suitable for towing or operation at sea or in any waters having wave action greater than that of Sea State 0 (as defined by Pierson—Moskowitz Sea Spectrum). It should be noted that the Sea State 0 is based upon wind speeds of around three (3) knots. However, as used herein, the term inland barge will include designs which may withstand wind loads of about 120 kilometers per hour or greater. The inland barge, however, may be towed within inland waters, such as rivers, lakes and intercoastal waterways. The inland barge is installed and then operated only in calm water. “Installed” is defined as either freely floating in confining moorings or fixed in a non-floating arrangement. Confining moorings will allow the barge to float on a water body allowing only uniform vertical motion with essentially no lateral or twisting motion. In some embodiments, a barge having jacking legs may be used and installation of the jacking legs installs the barge. As used herein, the term “calm water” means near shore, such as on pylons, beached, or in a natural or man-made inlet which may or may not be dammed and/or drained, or on a fixed platform if off-shore. The term “calm water” may also include inland waterways, such as rivers, lakes, ship channels, bayous, and intercoastal waterways which are protected from substantial natural wave action. Other methods of securing the barge in calm water include use of a flotation jacket surrounding the outer perimeter of the barge, anchoring, or installation of legs under the barge. As used herein, the terms “GTL barge” and “GTL inland barge” are synonymous.
- As the term is defined herein, inland barges are not intended for offshore use unless installed on a fixed platform. Similarly, the term “inland barge” does not include ocean-going vessels which are mobile under their own power. Rather, the inland barge is transported via dry haul lift ship to a location within a commercially practical distance from an appropriate natural gas reserve. Commercially practical distances are those in which a pipeline from the reserve to the barge may be constructed while maintaining the total cost of synthetic crude or hydrocarbon product production within competitive market limits. Such distances vary according to the structure of the intervening terrain as well as other production and market factors, such as then current market prices for the hydrocarbon products to be produced and local labor costs.
- The GTL barge may be split into numerous sections, for example, a natural gas purification section, a natural gas liquid recovery section; a syngas production section; a Fischer-Tropsch Reaction (“FTR”) section; and a product separation/upgrading section. These sections may or may not be modules as equipment from one section may be intermingled with equipment from another section. Alternatively, each section may be substantially self-contained and located substantially separately from the other sections.
- For the production of syngas, two basic methods have been employed. The two methods are steam reforming, wherein one or more light hydrocarbons such as methane are reacted with steam over a catalyst to form carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and partial oxidation, wherein one or more light hydrocarbons are combusted or reacted sub-stoichiometrically to produce synthesis gas.
- The basic steam reforming reaction of methane is represented by the following formula:
CH4+H2O+Catalyst→CO+3H2 - The steam reforming reaction is endothermic and a catalyst containing nickel is often utilized. The hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio of the synthesis gas produced by steam reforming of methane is approximately 3:1.
- Partial oxidation is the non-catalytic, sub-stoichiometric combustion of light hydrocarbons such as methane to produce the synthesis gas. The basic reaction is represented as follows:
CH4+½O2→CO+2H2 - The partial oxidation reaction is typically carried out using high purity oxygen. High purity oxygen can be quite expensive. The hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio of synthesis gas produced by the partial oxidation of methane is approximately 2:1.
- In some situations these approaches may be combined. A combination of partial oxidation and steam reforming, known as autothermal reforming, wherein air is used as a source of oxygen for the partial oxidation reaction has also been used for producing synthesis gas heretofore. Autothermal reforming is a combination of partial oxidation and steam reforming where the exothermic heat of the partial oxidation supplies the necessary heat for the endothermic steam reforming reaction. The autothermal reforming process can be carried out in a relatively inexpensive refractory lined carbon steel vessel whereby low cost is typically involved.
- The autothermal process generally results in a lower hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio in the synthesis gas than does steam reforming alone. That is, as stated above, the steam reforming reaction with methane results in a ratio of about 3:1 while the partial oxidation of methane results in a ratio of about 2:1. The optimum, ratio for the hydrocarbon synthesis reaction carried out at low or medium pressure over a cobalt catalyst is 2:1. When the feed to the autothermal reforming process is a mixture of light hydrocarbons such as a natural gas stream, some form of additional control is desired to maintain the ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the synthesis gas at the optimum ratio of about 2:1.
- In some embodiments the syngas production section of the GTL barge is an Autothermal Reforming unit (“ATR”). The ATR section is any capable of producing a synthesis gas to be utilized in the associated Fischer-Tropsch reaction section. As will be understood in the art, ATR may take different forms but generally is comprised of a vessel having a reforming catalyst (e.g. nickel-containing catalyst) therein which converts the air/steam/natural gas to a synthesis gas. Syngas useful in producing a Fischer-Tropsch product may contain hydrogen, carbon monoxide and nitrogen with H2:CO ratios from about 0.8:1 to about 3.0:1. Operating conditions and parameters of an autothermal reactor for producing a syngas useful in the process of the invention are well known to those skilled in the art. Such operating conditions and parameters include but are not limited to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,155,039, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/497,177.
- In some embodiments of the invention, an autothermal reforming process is utilized wherein the ATR is fed natural gas and air-derived oxygen. The term “air-derived oxygen” as used herein refers to oxygen obtained from air by means other than a cryogenic air separation plant. For example, air may be passed through a selective membrane through which oxygen is selectively absorbed and/or passed. Such membranes are known in the art, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,518. Included in such membranes are those commonly referred to as mixed conductor ceramic membranes, oxygen ion transport membranes, and ionic/mixed conductor membranes.
- The syngas may be optionally preheated before it is delivered to the Fischer-Tropsch reactor. As will be understood in the art, Fischer Tropsch reactors are well known in the art and basically are comprised of a vessel containing an appropriate catalyst (e.g. cobalt-containing catalyst) therein. Fischer-Tropsch catalysts include, for example, cobalt, iron, ruthenium as well as other Group IVA, Group VIII and Group VIIB transition metals or combinations of such metals, to prepare both saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons. There are several known catalysts which are used in converting a synthesis gas depending on the product desired; e.g., see U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,169,120 and 6,239,184. The Fischer-Tropsch catalyst may include a support, such as a metal-oxide support, including for example, silica, alumina, silica-alumina or titanium oxides. For example, a cobalt (Co) catalyst on transition alumina may be used. The Co concentration on the support may be between about 5 wt % and about 40 wt %. Certain catalyst promoters and stabilizers, which are known in the art, may optionally be used. Stabilizers include Group IIA or Group IIIB metals, while the promoters may include elements from Group IVA, Group VIII or Group VIIB. The Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and reaction conditions may be selected to be optimal for desired reaction products, such as for hydrocarbons of certain chain lengths or number of carbon atoms. Any of the following reactor configurations may be employed for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: fixed bed, slurry bed reactor, ebullating bed, fluidizing bed, or continuously stirred tank reactor (“CSTR”). The FTR may be operated at a pressure from about 100 psia to about 800 psia and a temperature from about 300° F. to about 6000 F. The reactor gas hourly space velocity (“GHSV”) may be from about 1000 hr−1 to about 15000 hr−. Operating conditions and parameters of the FTR useful in the process of the invention are well known to those skilled in the art. Such operating conditions and parameters include but are not limited to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,124.
- Given the safety issues of dealing with pure oxygen, air based systems have a significant advantage with a mobile or transportable system. The use of air instead of pure oxygen for generating synthesis gas in a mobile or transportable process wherein hydrocarbon processing equipment is necessarily located in relatively close proximity to any air or oxygen-handling equipment significantly raises safety, may be less capital-intensive and may reduce the size of the plant and facilities.
- The product separation/upgrading section includes equipment for processing the syncrude products from the FT section to fuel-grade products, namely diesel and naphtha. The upgrading equipment may be installed on the GTL barge or may be located on an adjacent platform, barge or onshore facility. Preferably, products are not stored on the barge but rather transported to a separate location, such as a floating storage offloading unit (FSO) farther out from the shore to—hold the product. The FSO may be a reconditioned single hull tanker. Product upgrading equipment may include distillation tower(s) as well as hydroprocessing and hydrocracking reactors.
- The utilities section supplies the utilities for all the processes. Utilities supplied may include water, steam, power, and miscellaneous equipment; such as a flare. In a preferred embodiment, the flare is a ground flare and may be located on an auxiliary deck or separate from the GTL barge, such as on shore or on a separate barge or platform.
Claims (23)
1. A transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility comprising:
a liquid hydrocarbon synthesis facility comprising:
a synthesis gas generator; and
a Fischer-Tropsch reactor for receiving and processing a synthesis gas produced by the synthesis gas generator and producing a predominantly liquid hydrocarbon product.
wherein the synthesis gas generator and Fischer-Tropsch reactor are constructed on an inland barge.
2. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 1 further comprising:
a ground flare.
3. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 1 wherein the inland barge comprises two or more decks including a lowermost deck and wherein no hydrocarbon processing equipment is located beneath a lowermost deck.
4. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 2 wherein the ground flare is placed on an auxiliary deck.
5. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 2 wherein the ground flare is located on land accessible to the inland barge by piping.
6. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 1 wherein the hydrocarbon synthesis facility further comprises a product upgrading unit
7. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 6 wherein the upgrading unit comprises one or more units selected from the group of hydrocracking unit, hydrotreating unit, and hydrodewaxing unit.
8. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 1 further comprising a natural gas liquid production unit for extracting propane and higher carbon number hydrocarbons from a natural gas stream before the natural gas is fed into the synthesis gas generator.
9. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 1 further comprising a natural gas liquid production unit for extracting propane and higher carbon number hydrocarbons from a tail gas stream from a Fischer-Tropsch reactor.
10. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 1 wherein the synthesis gas generator is an autothermal reformer.
11. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 1 further comprising an associated utility section.
12. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 11 wherein utility components are located between hydrocarbon vessels and/or process equipment and ignition sources.
13. The transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility of claim 10 wherein the autothermal reformer is fed natural gas from a stranded natural gas reserve and air or oxygen-enriched air.
14. A process for producing synthetic liquid hydrocarbons from natural gas at or near calm water comprising the steps of:
dry hauling a mobile synthetic liquid hydrocarbon production facility to or near the calm water location;
installing the mobile hydrocarbon production facility so that it is not freely floating;
connecting the mobile hydrocarbon production facility to a source of natural gas; and
synthesizing heavier hydrocarbons from the natural gas.
15. The process of claim 14 further comprising the step of transferring the produced heavier hydrocarbon product to an FSO.
16. The process of claim 14 wherein the heavier hydrocarbon product is synthetic crude.
17. The process of claim 14 further comprising the step of upgrading the heavier hydrocarbon product into a transportation fuel.
18. The process of claim 15 wherein the FSO is a reconditioned single hull tanker.
19. The process of claim 14 wherein the heavier hydrocarbon is predominantly a liquid hydrocarbon.
20. The process of claim 14 wherein the transportable liquid hydrocarbon facility is constructed on an inland barge.
21. The process of claim 14 wherein the transportable synthetic liquid hydrocarbon facility is dry hauled by use of a lift ship.
22. The transportable facility of claim 1 wherein air-derived oxygen is fed to the synthesis gas generator.
23. The process of claim 14 wherein the calm water location has wave action of no greater than that of Sea State 0.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/088,287 US20050222278A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2005-03-24 | Transportable gas to liquid plant |
US11/353,916 US20070021513A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2006-02-14 | Transportable gas-to-liquid plant |
US11/855,619 US20080161427A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2007-09-14 | Transportable gas-to-liquidd plant |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US55763804P | 2004-03-30 | 2004-03-30 | |
US11/088,287 US20050222278A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2005-03-24 | Transportable gas to liquid plant |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/353,916 Continuation-In-Part US20070021513A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2006-02-14 | Transportable gas-to-liquid plant |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050222278A1 true US20050222278A1 (en) | 2005-10-06 |
Family
ID=34963873
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/088,287 Abandoned US20050222278A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2005-03-24 | Transportable gas to liquid plant |
US11/855,619 Abandoned US20080161427A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2007-09-14 | Transportable gas-to-liquidd plant |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/855,619 Abandoned US20080161427A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2007-09-14 | Transportable gas-to-liquidd plant |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20050222278A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005097949A1 (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050106086A1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2005-05-19 | Tomlinson H. L. | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process |
WO2006058107A1 (en) * | 2004-11-22 | 2006-06-01 | Syntroleum Corporation | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process |
US20060189702A1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2006-08-24 | Tomlinson H L | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process |
US20070021513A1 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2007-01-25 | Kenneth Agee | Transportable gas-to-liquid plant |
US20070254968A1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2007-11-01 | Syntroleum Corporation | Method of delivery, replacement, and removal of fischer-tropsch catalyst |
WO2009145807A1 (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2009-12-03 | Kyrogen Usa, Llc | Tracking feedstock production with micro scale gtl units |
WO2010005453A2 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-14 | Kyrogen Usa, Llc | Remote micro-scale gtl products for uses in oil- and gas-field and pipeline applications |
US20100036181A1 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2010-02-11 | Community Power Corporation | Conversion of biomass feedstocks into hydrocarbon liquid transportation fuels |
DE102013111897A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-21 | Karlsruher Institut für Technologie | Plant for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas |
US20150344787A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Portable GTL Systems, LLC | Portable fuel synthesizer |
US9295966B1 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2016-03-29 | Jacob G. Appelbaum | System and method for cleaning hydrocarbon contaminated water and converting lower molecular weight gaseous hydrocarbon mixtures into higher molecular weight highly-branched hydrocarbons using electron beam combined with electron beam-sustained non-thermal plasma discharge |
WO2019147810A1 (en) * | 2018-01-24 | 2019-08-01 | Nw Innovation Works | Near-shore floating methanol conversion ship and export terminal |
US11952769B2 (en) | 2018-03-02 | 2024-04-09 | Modular Plant Solutions Llc | Modular process plant structural system |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7655135B2 (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2010-02-02 | Syntroleum Corporation | Process for removing solid particles from a hydroprocessing feed |
WO2014168843A1 (en) | 2013-04-12 | 2014-10-16 | Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods for floating dockside liquefaction of natural gas |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5236385A (en) * | 1992-02-07 | 1993-08-17 | California R&D Center, Inc. | Mechanical doll assembly capable of simulating sleep |
US6155039A (en) * | 1996-06-21 | 2000-12-05 | Syntroleum Corporation | Synthesis gas production system and method |
US6169120B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-01-02 | Syntroleum Corporation | Extended catalyst life two stage hydrocarbon synthesis process |
US6172124B1 (en) * | 1996-07-09 | 2001-01-09 | Sybtroleum Corporation | Process for converting gas to liquids |
US6239184B1 (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2001-05-29 | Syntroleum Corporation | Extended catalyst life Fischer-Tropsch process |
US6262131B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2001-07-17 | Syntroleum Corporation | Structured fischer-tropsch catalyst system and method |
US6344491B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2002-02-05 | Syntroleum Corporation | Method for operating a fischer-tropsch process using a high pressure autothermal reactor as the pressure source for the process |
US6406518B1 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2002-06-18 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Gas separation process using ceramic membrane and regenerators |
US20020155043A1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2002-10-24 | Yakobson Dennis L. | Plasma reforming/Fischer-Tropsch synthesis |
US20050043418A1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2005-02-24 | Syntroleum Corporation | Gas-to-liquid process |
US20050066577A1 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2005-03-31 | Syntroleum Corporation | Process for production of synthesis gas using an oxygen-containing gas |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NO953797L (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1997-03-26 | Norske Stats Oljeselskap | Process and plant for treating a brönnström produced from an offshore oil field |
GB0112786D0 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2001-07-18 | Bp Exploration Operating | Process |
-
2005
- 2005-03-24 WO PCT/US2005/009961 patent/WO2005097949A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-03-24 US US11/088,287 patent/US20050222278A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-09-14 US US11/855,619 patent/US20080161427A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5236385A (en) * | 1992-02-07 | 1993-08-17 | California R&D Center, Inc. | Mechanical doll assembly capable of simulating sleep |
US6155039A (en) * | 1996-06-21 | 2000-12-05 | Syntroleum Corporation | Synthesis gas production system and method |
US6172124B1 (en) * | 1996-07-09 | 2001-01-09 | Sybtroleum Corporation | Process for converting gas to liquids |
US6262131B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2001-07-17 | Syntroleum Corporation | Structured fischer-tropsch catalyst system and method |
US20010021724A1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2001-09-13 | Syntroleum Corporation | Structured Fischer-Tropsch catalyst system and method |
US20020155043A1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2002-10-24 | Yakobson Dennis L. | Plasma reforming/Fischer-Tropsch synthesis |
US6344491B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2002-02-05 | Syntroleum Corporation | Method for operating a fischer-tropsch process using a high pressure autothermal reactor as the pressure source for the process |
US6169120B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-01-02 | Syntroleum Corporation | Extended catalyst life two stage hydrocarbon synthesis process |
US6239184B1 (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2001-05-29 | Syntroleum Corporation | Extended catalyst life Fischer-Tropsch process |
US6406518B1 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2002-06-18 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Gas separation process using ceramic membrane and regenerators |
US20050043418A1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2005-02-24 | Syntroleum Corporation | Gas-to-liquid process |
US20050066577A1 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2005-03-31 | Syntroleum Corporation | Process for production of synthesis gas using an oxygen-containing gas |
Cited By (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050106086A1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2005-05-19 | Tomlinson H. L. | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process |
US20060189702A1 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2006-08-24 | Tomlinson H L | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process |
WO2007095570A3 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2008-04-17 | Syntroleum Corp | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process |
US20070021513A1 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2007-01-25 | Kenneth Agee | Transportable gas-to-liquid plant |
WO2006058107A1 (en) * | 2004-11-22 | 2006-06-01 | Syntroleum Corporation | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process |
WO2007095571A1 (en) * | 2006-02-14 | 2007-08-23 | Syntroleum Corporation | Transportable gas to liquid plant |
US20070254968A1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2007-11-01 | Syntroleum Corporation | Method of delivery, replacement, and removal of fischer-tropsch catalyst |
WO2009145807A1 (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2009-12-03 | Kyrogen Usa, Llc | Tracking feedstock production with micro scale gtl units |
US20090299795A1 (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2009-12-03 | Kyrogen Usa, Llc | Tracking feedstock production with micro scale gas-to-liquid units |
US8293805B2 (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2012-10-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Tracking feedstock production with micro scale gas-to-liquid units |
WO2010005453A2 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-14 | Kyrogen Usa, Llc | Remote micro-scale gtl products for uses in oil- and gas-field and pipeline applications |
WO2010005453A3 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-08-12 | Kyrogen Usa, Llc | Remote micro-scale gtl products for uses in oil- and gas-field and pipeline applications |
EP2318341A1 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2011-05-11 | Community Power Corporation | Conversion of biomass feedstocks into hydrocarbon liquid transportation fuels |
US9481616B2 (en) | 2008-08-08 | 2016-11-01 | Community Power Corporation | Conversion of biomass feedstocks into hydrocarbon liquid transportation fuels |
EP2318341A4 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2012-11-21 | Afognak Native Corp | Conversion of biomass feedstocks into hydrocarbon liquid transportation fuels |
US8624069B2 (en) | 2008-08-08 | 2014-01-07 | Afognak Native Corporation | Conversion of biomass feedstocks into hydrocarbon liquid transportation fuels |
US20100036181A1 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2010-02-11 | Community Power Corporation | Conversion of biomass feedstocks into hydrocarbon liquid transportation fuels |
US10343133B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2019-07-09 | Jacob G. Appelbaum | System and method for cleaning hydrocarbon contaminated water |
US9295966B1 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2016-03-29 | Jacob G. Appelbaum | System and method for cleaning hydrocarbon contaminated water and converting lower molecular weight gaseous hydrocarbon mixtures into higher molecular weight highly-branched hydrocarbons using electron beam combined with electron beam-sustained non-thermal plasma discharge |
US9908094B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2018-03-06 | Jacob G. Appelbaum | System and method for converting gaseous hydrocarbon mixtures into highly-branched hydrocarbons using electron beam combined with electron beam-sustained non-thermal plasma discharge |
US10933397B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2021-03-02 | Jacob G. Appelbaum | System and method for cleaning hyrocarbon contaminated water |
DE102013111897A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-21 | Karlsruher Institut für Technologie | Plant for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas |
DE102013111897B4 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2020-10-22 | Karlsruher Institut für Technologie | Plant for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas |
US20150344787A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Portable GTL Systems, LLC | Portable fuel synthesizer |
US9790434B2 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2017-10-17 | Portable GTL Systems, LLC | Portable fuel synthesizer |
WO2019147810A1 (en) * | 2018-01-24 | 2019-08-01 | Nw Innovation Works | Near-shore floating methanol conversion ship and export terminal |
US11952769B2 (en) | 2018-03-02 | 2024-04-09 | Modular Plant Solutions Llc | Modular process plant structural system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005097949A1 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
US20080161427A1 (en) | 2008-07-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20050222278A1 (en) | Transportable gas to liquid plant | |
US20070021513A1 (en) | Transportable gas-to-liquid plant | |
WO2006057664A1 (en) | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process | |
EP1390328B1 (en) | Fischer-tropsch synthesis process carried out on a floatable structure | |
CA2232867A1 (en) | Treatment of a well stream from an offshore oil field | |
GB2342919A (en) | Disposal of Associated Gases from Offshore Oilfields | |
AU2002307957A1 (en) | Fischer-Tropsch synthesis process carried out on a floatable structure | |
US20070254968A1 (en) | Method of delivery, replacement, and removal of fischer-tropsch catalyst | |
US20080188576A1 (en) | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process | |
Kim et al. | GTL FPSO—an alternative solution to offshore stranded gas | |
US9822311B2 (en) | Method for preparing synthetic fuel from natural gas of stranded gas field and associated gas from oil and gas fields by GTL-FPSO process | |
GB2276353A (en) | Floating methanol production complex | |
KR101670870B1 (en) | Methanol Production Method And System Using GTL Production Process | |
US20160168489A1 (en) | Method and system for gtl production in fpso | |
Saavedra | Application of Gas Industrial Technologies Offshore | |
US20210046399A1 (en) | Near-Shore Floating Methanol Conversion Ship and Export Terminal | |
WO2006058107A1 (en) | Movable gas-to-liquid system and process | |
Van Loenhout et al. | Commercialization of Stranded Gas With a Combined Oil and GTL FPSO | |
Kwon et al. | GTL FPSO & Modular GTL as Potential Solutions for Developing Offshore Oil & Gas Fields | |
KR101597557B1 (en) | FT GTL apparatus for producing a single synthetic syncrude product and method thereof | |
EP3112250A1 (en) | Ft gtl apparatus and method for producing single synthetic crude oil | |
KR101948521B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for preparing synthetic fuel using natural gas | |
Abdel-Kreem et al. | The role of GTL technology as an option to exploit natural gas resources | |
Ravavarapu et al. | Offshore Fischer-Tropsch economics | |
MXPA98002328A (en) | Method and system for the treatment of a well current from a mar aden petrolifero deposit |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SYNTROLEUM CORPORATION, OKLAHOMA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AGEE, KENNETH;INGA, JUAN;HUTTON, WILLIAM JOHN;REEL/FRAME:016847/0669;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050413 TO 20050418 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: REG SYNTHETIC FUELS, LLC, IOWA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SYNTROLEUM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:033430/0470 Effective date: 20140725 |