US20050269282A1 - Tamper-evident cap and container neck - Google Patents
Tamper-evident cap and container neck Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050269282A1 US20050269282A1 US11/057,952 US5795205A US2005269282A1 US 20050269282 A1 US20050269282 A1 US 20050269282A1 US 5795205 A US5795205 A US 5795205A US 2005269282 A1 US2005269282 A1 US 2005269282A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- neck
- cap
- skirt portion
- closure
- shoulder
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D41/00—Caps, e.g. crown caps or crown seals, i.e. members having parts arranged for engagement with the external periphery of a neck or wall defining a pouring opening or discharge aperture; Protective cap-like covers for closure members, e.g. decorative covers of metal foil or paper
- B65D41/32—Caps or cap-like covers with lines of weakness, tearing-strips, tags, or like opening or removal devices, e.g. to facilitate formation of pouring openings
- B65D41/34—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers provided with tamper elements formed in, or attached to, the closure skirt
- B65D41/3404—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers provided with tamper elements formed in, or attached to, the closure skirt with ratchet-and-pawl mechanism between the container and the closure skirt or the tamper element
- B65D41/3409—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers provided with tamper elements formed in, or attached to, the closure skirt with ratchet-and-pawl mechanism between the container and the closure skirt or the tamper element the tamper element being integrally connected to the closure by means of bridges
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
- B29C65/00—Joining or sealing of preformed parts, e.g. welding of plastics materials; Apparatus therefor
- B29C65/56—Joining or sealing of preformed parts, e.g. welding of plastics materials; Apparatus therefor using mechanical means or mechanical connections, e.g. form-fits
- B29C65/561—Joining or sealing of preformed parts, e.g. welding of plastics materials; Apparatus therefor using mechanical means or mechanical connections, e.g. form-fits using screw-threads being integral at least to one of the parts to be joined
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
- B29C65/00—Joining or sealing of preformed parts, e.g. welding of plastics materials; Apparatus therefor
- B29C65/56—Joining or sealing of preformed parts, e.g. welding of plastics materials; Apparatus therefor using mechanical means or mechanical connections, e.g. form-fits
- B29C65/58—Snap connection
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
- B29C66/00—General aspects of processes or apparatus for joining preformed parts
- B29C66/50—General aspects of joining tubular articles; General aspects of joining long products, i.e. bars or profiled elements; General aspects of joining single elements to tubular articles, hollow articles or bars; General aspects of joining several hollow-preforms to form hollow or tubular articles
- B29C66/65—General aspects of joining tubular articles; General aspects of joining long products, i.e. bars or profiled elements; General aspects of joining single elements to tubular articles, hollow articles or bars; General aspects of joining several hollow-preforms to form hollow or tubular articles with a relative motion between the article and the welding tool
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D1/00—Containers having bodies formed in one piece, e.g. by casting metallic material, by moulding plastics, by blowing vitreous material, by throwing ceramic material, by moulding pulped fibrous material, by deep-drawing operations performed on sheet material
- B65D1/02—Bottles or similar containers with necks or like restricted apertures, designed for pouring contents
- B65D1/0223—Bottles or similar containers with necks or like restricted apertures, designed for pouring contents characterised by shape
- B65D1/023—Neck construction
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D41/00—Caps, e.g. crown caps or crown seals, i.e. members having parts arranged for engagement with the external periphery of a neck or wall defining a pouring opening or discharge aperture; Protective cap-like covers for closure members, e.g. decorative covers of metal foil or paper
- B65D41/02—Caps or cap-like covers without lines of weakness, tearing strips, tags, or like opening or removal devices
- B65D41/04—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers secured by rotation
- B65D41/0407—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers secured by rotation with integral sealing means
- B65D41/0414—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers secured by rotation with integral sealing means formed by a plug, collar, flange, rib or the like contacting the internal surface of a container neck
- B65D41/0421—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers secured by rotation with integral sealing means formed by a plug, collar, flange, rib or the like contacting the internal surface of a container neck and combined with integral sealing means contacting other surfaces of a container neck
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D41/00—Caps, e.g. crown caps or crown seals, i.e. members having parts arranged for engagement with the external periphery of a neck or wall defining a pouring opening or discharge aperture; Protective cap-like covers for closure members, e.g. decorative covers of metal foil or paper
- B65D41/02—Caps or cap-like covers without lines of weakness, tearing strips, tags, or like opening or removal devices
- B65D41/04—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers secured by rotation
- B65D41/0471—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers secured by rotation with means for positioning the cap on the container, or for limiting the movement of the cap, or for preventing accidental loosening of the cap
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D41/00—Caps, e.g. crown caps or crown seals, i.e. members having parts arranged for engagement with the external periphery of a neck or wall defining a pouring opening or discharge aperture; Protective cap-like covers for closure members, e.g. decorative covers of metal foil or paper
- B65D41/02—Caps or cap-like covers without lines of weakness, tearing strips, tags, or like opening or removal devices
- B65D41/16—Snap-on caps or cap-like covers
- B65D41/17—Snap-on caps or cap-like covers push-on and twist-off
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D41/00—Caps, e.g. crown caps or crown seals, i.e. members having parts arranged for engagement with the external periphery of a neck or wall defining a pouring opening or discharge aperture; Protective cap-like covers for closure members, e.g. decorative covers of metal foil or paper
- B65D41/32—Caps or cap-like covers with lines of weakness, tearing-strips, tags, or like opening or removal devices, e.g. to facilitate formation of pouring openings
- B65D41/34—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers provided with tamper elements formed in, or attached to, the closure skirt
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D41/00—Caps, e.g. crown caps or crown seals, i.e. members having parts arranged for engagement with the external periphery of a neck or wall defining a pouring opening or discharge aperture; Protective cap-like covers for closure members, e.g. decorative covers of metal foil or paper
- B65D41/32—Caps or cap-like covers with lines of weakness, tearing-strips, tags, or like opening or removal devices, e.g. to facilitate formation of pouring openings
- B65D41/34—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers provided with tamper elements formed in, or attached to, the closure skirt
- B65D41/3404—Threaded or like caps or cap-like covers provided with tamper elements formed in, or attached to, the closure skirt with ratchet-and-pawl mechanism between the container and the closure skirt or the tamper element
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2251/00—Details relating to container closures
- B65D2251/0003—Two or more closures
- B65D2251/0006—Upper closure
- B65D2251/0015—Upper closure of the 41-type
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2251/00—Details relating to container closures
- B65D2251/0003—Two or more closures
- B65D2251/0068—Lower closure
- B65D2251/0093—Membrane
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2401/00—Tamper-indicating means
- B65D2401/15—Tearable part of the closure
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2401/00—Tamper-indicating means
- B65D2401/15—Tearable part of the closure
- B65D2401/25—Non-metallic tear-off strips
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2401/00—Tamper-indicating means
- B65D2401/15—Tearable part of the closure
- B65D2401/35—Vertical or axial lines of weakness
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2501/00—Containers having bodies formed in one piece
- B65D2501/0009—Bottles or similar containers with necks or like restricted apertures designed for pouring contents
- B65D2501/0081—Bottles of non-circular cross-section
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2577/00—Packages formed by enclosing articles or materials in preformed containers, e.g. boxes, cartons, sacks, bags
- B65D2577/10—Container closures formed after filling
- B65D2577/20—Container closures formed after filling by applying separate lids or covers
- B65D2577/2041—Pull tabs
- B65D2577/205—Pull tabs integral with the closure
Definitions
- This invention relates to a new and improved container closure and container neck structure and more particularly to a structure wherein the closure is applied with a single one-dimensional axial downward force onto the neck and is held in such position by a tamper-evident band.
- the consumer destroys a frangible connection between the cap and the band during initial removal, preferably by tearing away the band enabling the closure to be unscrewed from the container neck.
- the cap When the cap is used for reclosure purposes, it may be screwed on and screwed off in the same manner as screw caps have heretofore been used.
- Prior snap-on, screw-off structures may be classified under either of the following categories: (1) Those with thread engagement as initially applied; and (2) Those without.
- no-thread initial engagement systems are conceptually simple, careful alignment of the closure and the container is not necessary upon application of the closure, and easy (low force) application is possible since no thread-jumping is required.
- This version can be an aesthetically pleasing, straight wall cap design, and good re-seal is achieved on reclosure because of the torque advantage of threads.
- the disadvantages of such a system are that it may be confusing to the consumer because initial removal is merely by lifting the cap off the neck but subsequent use requires twisting the cap relative to the neck. Further, it is difficult to use the system with a lined closure because of the height relationships between the finish and the cap, and finally the cap must be relatively tall, which forces the use of fine threads, which can be difficult to mold. None of these disadvantages are present in this invention.
- a closure such as Crisci U.S. Pat. No. 4,561,553 has a number of problems.
- the tamper evident feature of the closure may be circumvented by being able to engage the threads of the neck and closure (thereby creating a mechanical advantage) and back off the cap while the tamper-evident band is intact.
- the device is confusing to the consumer since the cap is screwed off during removal only by inwardly distorting the cap skirt. The cap is reapplied as a standard snap cap.
- Full thread engagement as the cap is initially applied has a number of conceptual advantages. Consumer confusion is eliminated since initial removal is by unscrewing.
- a number of seal systems, including foil, full liner, plugs or other linerless seals can be used. However, full engagement systems heretofore have been difficult to achieve in practice.
- a disadvantage of a closure such as Carr U.S. Pat. No. 4,625,875 is that there is no practical, consistent means to orient the cap relative to the container so that, after application, the cap must be turned at least slightly to ensure a tight seal. This defeats the purpose of a push-on cap. Also, the use of a stretch snap-band tamper evident ring excessively increases the application force necessary to seat the cap.
- the present invention provides full thread engagement by reason of unique thread design and, more particularly, a unique tamper-evident band (i.e., lower skirt portion) attached to the upper part of the cap by multiple bridges or by means of a continuous line of weakness between the cap and tear band, as well as a means of orienting closure and bottle threads to achieve registration prior to straight axial application.
- a unique tamper-evident band i.e., lower skirt portion
- the present invention has considerable advantages over prior structures for the reasons above noted, among others.
- the present invention comprises an improved closure or cap and an improved neck finish.
- the cap skirt and neck are provided with mating threads of such shape that the cap may be applied in a simple downward vertical movement, the cap skirt and neck flexing sufficiently to permit the threads to slip past each other.
- the threads may be continuous or interrupted. Also, instead of there being two threads—one on the neck and one on the cap, one external thread may be replaced with a groove.
- the term “helical engagement means” is sometimes used herein to encompass all such screw retention means.
- the cap has a tamper-evident tear band below the skirt which is connected to the skirt by a plurality of bridges or by a continuous line of weakness.
- Ratchet teeth are positioned on the inside of the tamper evident band.
- the container neck below the threads is formed with external ratchet teeth. The mating ratchet teeth of the cap and container neck are engaged by the initial downward movement of the cap relative to the neck. In other words, in order to engage the ratchet teeth it is not necessary to rotate the cap relative to the neck, thereby differing from conventional threaded tamper-evident caps.
- both the neck threads and closure threads must be oriented. Orientation of the container is relatively easy.
- containers are either non-circular or have non-circular features which may be used for proper orientation.
- the closure has a downward projecting tab similar to the tear tab used on push-on tear-off closures.
- the vertical tear tab characteristic of the present closure is an excellent orientation feature. However, other means for orienting the cap and container may be used.
- Thread design is another feature of the invention. A large number of threads per inch of axial height is desirable for two reasons. First, a fine thread may be used and such a thread does not have to be as deep as a coarse thread, and hence the forces required for threads to jump during application are minimized. Secondly, fine threads minimize the height required to achieve a standard design criterion of 360° or more of thread engagement which permits a lighter closure weight.
- a preferred thread for a blow-molded, high density polyethylene bottle is 12 threads per inch and two leads. If bottle finish processing permits, it would be advantageous to design for higher threads per inch and more leads. For example, if the bottle is made with injection blow mold equipment, a very fine bottle thread is possible. In that case, it might be preferable to use, for example, a 16 thread-per-inch, 4 lead, 4 pitch thread. The more leads, the more squarely the cap sets on the neck and the more effectively the closure will be seated by a direct downward, axial application force.
- consumer advantages of quick release and reapplication can be achieved with multiple lead threads.
- the closure should not be removable without some apparent closure characteristic changing. Generally, this requirement is satisfied by incorporating a frangible section which is destroyed during initial closure removal.
- frangible section is a continuous thinned tear line, but in a cap of the present invention, such a system may not be the best choice, although permissible and is disclosed as a modification of the first embodiment of the invention.
- a preferred tamper-evident feature provides a frangible section having a number of frangible connections or bridges between the closure skirt and a tamper-evident ring below the bottom edge of the skirt.
- the preferred approach is to incorporate enough bridges around the circumference such that the combined strength of the bridges prevents unscrewing.
- the tamper evident band must be removed to allow unscrewing.
- Sequential breaking of the many bridges around the circumference simulates a continuous tear.
- a second approach is to incorporate only a few bridges around the circumference of the skirt such that the combined strength of the bridges is not sufficient to prevent unscrewing and the bridges rupture as the cap is initially unscrewed. With this second approach the broken bridges give evidence of opening.
- a major advantage of using bridges rather than a continuous tear strip is that a wide range of material choices is possible. Therefore a multiple bridge simulated tear structure is generally preferred over continuous tear frangible sections and this approach is used in the preferred embodiments of the present invention.
- an uninterrupted horizontal shoulder between the upper and lower portions of the cap is used, which shoulder is formed with a line of weakness.
- the alternative modification eliminates the space between the bridges to create a continuous frangible line. This modification is used successfully only when the cap is formed of a low density polyethylene and is not successfully used with higher density plastic materials.
- One of the advantages of the elimination of the spaced bridges is that of cleanliness in that the continuous shoulder prevents dirt and liquids from contacting any portion of the neck surface above the bottom edge of the cap.
- the closure is first oriented by means of its tear tab and the containers are likewise oriented.
- the closure and bottle are snapped together and the orientation allows registration of both the threads and the ratchets which hold the cap in place until the tamper-evident band is removed.
- Seal of the container may be made with a liner, foil or a linerless feature such as a plug or flap.
- the multiple bridges are collectively sufficiently strong to prevent unscrewing and also resist any tendency of the closure to back off the neck.
- the tear band is removed through sequential breaking of the bridges, thereby simulating a continuous tear strip but allowing the use of such plastic materials as polypropylene and high density polyethylene.
- the system functions as with normal threaded closures.
- the upper and lower portions of the cap skirt are connected by a reduced number of angularly spaced bridges. Merely by twisting the upper skirt portion the bridges may be severed, giving evidence of tampering, and making it possible to unscrew the cap.
- the lower skirt portion which includes tamper-evident features and, more particularly, contains ratchet teeth mating with corresponding teeth on the container neck, is formed with a vertical line of weakness and a tear tab adjacent thereto.
- the lower skirt tears along the vertical line of weakness as well as along the line of weakness between the upper part of the cap and the lower skirt (i.e., tamper-evident band.)
- plastic material may fill some or all of the voids between bridges joining the upper cap to the tamper-evident band. This makes it difficult for some users to remove the tamper-evident band.
- the vertical line of weakness makes it much easier to remove the lower skirt or band. Indeed, the bridges between the upper cap and band may be made thicker or some of the voids between bridges may be eliminated.
- the intact tamper-evident band may create a danger to wildlife if the head of a bird, fish or small animal is entrapped therein. Splitting the band along the vertical line of weakness eliminates this hazard.
- a further feature of the invention is the fact that the cap ratchet lug on the interior of the lower cap skirt is located between two external lugs on the neck finish when the cap is applied so that on application the cap cannot rotate outside of its “tolerance range”, that is, there is an orientation feature of the cap and bottle ratchets for proper engagement.
- the cap may be applied to the neck in two stages (i.e., “double click”).
- double click When the container is filled with milk or certain other liquids, entrapped air or other gases tend to cause foam.
- the thread structure of the present invention makes it possible to press the cap down until one set of threads passes the other. This holds the cap on the neck and holds it properly aligned relative to the neck ratchet. However, the cap is not tight and hence air and gas may escape. Then the cap is pressed down once more to tightly engaged and sealed position. To insure two “clicks” the closure thread has to jump two neck threads during application.
- cap threads extend a full 360° around the cap skirt inner wall (180° each for double lead threads)
- finish threads have to be repetitive at some point of the circumference.
- either the cap threads or the finish thread must be repetitive vertically. I.e., the threads must overlap on either the neck or cap in order to make possible the double click.
- the caps pass down a conveyor overlying the path of the containers and as each container passes the end of the conveyor, a cap drops onto the neck.
- the cap and neck then pass under a roller which preliminarily presses the cap down on the neck.
- One of the features of the thread construction of the present invention is that there is more than one full turn of thread engagement of the threads.
- the roller pushing the cap through the first step or snap prevents the latter from falling off the neck when it is subjected to such action as milk foaming in the interior of the container.
- the cap stays on the bottle, although not being tightly sealed thereto, until the bottle passes under the conventional capping machine belt or pressure plate which fully seats the cap on the neck.
- Still another feature of the invention is an internal shoulder at the intersection of the underside of the disk and the top of the upper cap skirt. This shoulder prevents the cap from being turned or torqued to jump threads or strip the threads.
- the inner plug of the cap tends to push the neck of the bottle outward against the shoulder and the shoulder then prevents turning or stripping. Further, the fit of the shoulder against the neck tends to reduce leakage and rigidifies the cap.
- the cap is provided with a plug or inner skirt which fits inside the bottle neck.
- the length of this plug is related to the positioning of the screw threads on the cap in such manner that the threads of the cap and bottle neck engage before the plug engages the neck. Thus a quarter-turn of each of the double lead threads occurs before the plug contacts the neck. This feature reduces the possibility of cross-threading when the cap is applied to the neck as a reclosure cap.
- FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a cap and neck before assembly, the cap being partially broken away in section to reveal internal construction.
- FIG. 2 is a bottom plan of the cap.
- FIG. 3 is a fragmentary enlarged top plan of the cap.
- FIGS. 4 and 5 are, respectively, enlarged, fragmentary sectional views taken along lines 4 - 4 and 5 - 5 of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 6 is a top plan of the neck.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are, respectively, enlarged fragmentary sectional views taken along lines 7 - 7 and 8 - 8 of
- FIG. 9 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view through an assembled cap and neck taken in the positions of line 4 - 4 of FIGS. 2 and 7 - 7 of FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 10 is a view similar to FIG. 9 taken in the positions of line 5 - 5 of FIGS. 2 and 8 - 8 of FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 10A is a view similar to FIG. 10 of a modification.
- FIGS. 11A, 11B and 11 C are schematic views showing progressive “double click” cap attachment wherein the cap thread has one turn and the neck has multiple threads.
- FIGS. 12A, 12B and 12 C are views similar to FIGS. 11A, 11B and 11 C wherein the neck thread has on turn and the cap thread multiple turns.
- FIG. 13 is a bottom plan view of a cap.
- FIG. 14 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap taken along line 14 - 14 of FIG. 13 .
- FIG. 15 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap taken along line 15 - 15 of FIG. 13 .
- FIG. 16 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 16 - 16 of FIG. 15 .
- FIG. 17 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap applied to a neck.
- FIG. 17A is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap applied to a neck.
- FIG. 18 is a fragmentary, top plan view of a container.
- FIG. 19 is a fragmentary, bottom plan view of an another embodiment of a cap.
- FIG. 20 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 20 - 20 of FIG. 19 .
- FIG. 21 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of a cap, shown partly in cross section.
- FIG. 22 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of a neck.
- FIG. 23 is a fragmentary, top plan view showing the cap applied to a container.
- FIG. 24 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevational view of another embodiment of a cap.
- FIG. 25 is a top plan view of a cap applied to a container.
- FIG. 26 is a fragmentary plan view of a capping machine, showing a cap positioned within the chute.
- FIG. 27 is a partial top plan view of a capping machine, showing a container positioned on the conveyor belt.
- FIG. 28 is a side elevational view of another embodiment of a neck.
- FIG. 29 is a top plan view of the neck of FIG. 28 .
- FIG. 30 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 30 - 30 of FIG. 29 .
- FIG. 31 is a bottom plan view of another embodiment of a cap.
- FIG. 32 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 32 - 32 of FIG. 19 .
- FIG. 33 is view similar to FIG. 32 of another embodiment of a cap.
- FIG. 34 is a perspective view of a cap showing possible upward deformation of the lower skirt portion to the cap.
- FIG. 35 is a side elevational view of a cap and neck before assembly, the cap being partially broken away in section to reveal internal construction.
- FIG. 36 is a fragmentary enlarged bottom plan of the cap.
- FIG. 37 is a fragmentary enlarged top plan of the cap.
- FIG. 38 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 38 - 38 of FIG. 37 .
- FIG. 39 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional views taken along line 39 - 39 of FIG. 37 .
- FIG. 40 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 40 - 40 of FIG. 35 , showing a preferred cross-sectional shape of a line of weakness.
- FIG. 41 is a fragmentary enlarged top plan of an alternative embodiment of a cap of the present invention.
- FIG. 42 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 42 - 42 of FIG. 41 .
- FIG. 43 is an enlarged top view of another alternative embodiment of a cap of the present invention.
- FIG. 44 is a side elevational view of the cap of FIG. 43 .
- FIG. 45 is a fragmentary sectional view taken along line 45 - 45 of FIG. 43 .
- FIG. 46 is perspective view of another cap of the present invention.
- FIG. 47 is a sectional view of the cap of FIG. 46 mounted on a container neck taken substantially along line 47 - 47 .
- Cap 21 hereinafter described in detail, is used with a container neck 22 .
- Neck 22 has a central neck opening 23 and extending outwardly thereof a downward-outward slanted lip flange 24 which terminates in a vertical stretch 28 .
- the exterior of neck 22 is hereinafter described.
- the interior thereof forms no part of the present invention. With a blow-molded bottle finish as illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8 , the interior contour of the neck generally tends to follow that of the exterior. However, it will be understood that other types of bottles may be used and in such instances the internal neck shape may vary from that of the exterior.
- Threads 29 Extending outward of stretch 28 are threads 29 .
- the finish has twelve threads per inch with a double lead, each thread being six pitch and extending slightly in excess of 360° of a full thread.
- the upper terminus 31 of the first thread is vertically displaced approximately 0.166 inch from the lower terminus 32 thereof.
- the upper terminus 33 of the second thread is displaced 180° relative to terminus 31 and its lower terminus 34 is approximately diametrically opposite terminus 32 . It is understood that the threads can be extended greater than 360° to achieve increased thread engagement. Also, additional thread leads and different linear thread density (threads per inch) are permitted and may be advantageously chosen.
- the upper flank 36 of thread 29 slants downwardly and outwardly at approximately 45° while the lower flank 37 slants downwardly and inwardly at an angle of about 10°.
- the thread apex 38 is made with as large a radius as possible.
- a portion 41 of vertical stretch 28 is located below the threads 29 extending down to upper shoulder 42 , which is horizontal.
- one thread may be replaced by a groove.
- threads 29 may be interrupted.
- Below shoulder 42 is locking area wall 46 which slants downward/outward at an angle of about 10°. Wall 46 terminates in lower shoulder 47 which is also approximately horizontal. Outwardly of and below shoulder 47 is a lower vertical stretch 48 which at its lower end merges with the container. Bumper ring segments 49 (here shown as four in number) may be formed in the stretch 48 to facilitate gripping the container during filling and loading and also to provide certain vertical flexibility to the neck during the capping operation.
- teeth 51 On opposite sides of neck 22 projecting out from wall 46 are teeth 51 . As illustrated in FIG. 6 , there are typically three such teeth on one side of the container neck and three teeth on the opposite side. The total extent of the three teeth on each side is approximately 90°. Each tooth has a top surface 52 which can be co-planar with the surface of shoulder 42 . Outer surface 53 slants downward/outward at an angle of approximately 10°, terminating in shoulder 47 .
- the front edges 54 viewed from above in plan as in FIG. 6 (assuming a right-hand thread) are disposed at varying angles from about 45° to about 0° relative to a radial line drawn perpendicular to the vertical axis and are approximately vertical.
- FIGS. 1 to 5 A preferred cap 21 used with the neck structure 22 previously described is illustrated in FIGS. 1 to 5 .
- the cap has a generally flat top disk 61 from the periphery of which depends substantially vertical short upper skirt 62 .
- the lower edge of skirt 62 merges with slanted stretch 63 , which, in turn, merges with vertical stretch 64 .
- An internal shoulder 65 is formed at the intersection of stretches 62 and 63 .
- Members 62 , 63 , 64 have vertical ribs 66 spaced therearound to enable the user to grip the cap.
- Chamfers 67 are preferably formed on the upper edges of ribs 66 .
- the ribs of the cap are thus, in effect, rounded but extend higher. Hence they are more severely gripped by the user when screwing or unscrewing the cap.
- skirt 66 On the interior of skirt 66 are formed threads 71 a and 71 b which are selected to mate with threads 29 a and 29 b of neck 22 .
- the bottom edge 72 of skirt 64 is connected to shoulder 73 and generally downwardly/outwardly slanted lower skirt 74 by a plurality of bridges 76 which in fact constitute the lower edges of ribs 66 .
- the bridges and voids therebetween are sometimes referred to herein as “horizontal lines of weakness”.
- Skirt 74 has a generally horizontal lower edge 77 .
- Teeth 81 spaced and dimensioned to match the teeth 51 of neck 22 are formed on the inside of wall 74 .
- the inner edges 82 of the teeth are positioned close to inner surface 46 after cap application.
- the leading edge 83 of each tooth 81 is formed at an angle of approximately 45° to a radial line, thereby ensuring good interlock with the complementary surface 54 of neck 22 . This angular relationship biases the cap 21 into a more secure locking arrangement with the neck 22 .
- Tear tab 86 extends downwardly from lower edge 77 and an upper side edge thereof merges with a weakened vertically extending line 87 formed in skirt 74 .
- Use of weakened line 87 is optional, but preferably used to prevent the ring-like skirt 74 being a hazard to wildlife and to accomplish the other objects set forth earlier in this description.
- bridges 76 are severed and the vertical weakened line 87 is broken.
- pulling the tab 86 sequentially fractures weakened line 87 and then each of the bridges 76 (i.e., the horizontal weakened line). Removal of the lower skirt 74 removes the ratchet teeth 81 and hence frees the upper portion of the cap so that it can be unscrewed.
- a preferred embodiment shows an inner skirt or plug 91 extending downward from top disk 61 and fitting inside the neck opening 23 .
- the outer bottom edge of skirt 91 is formed with a bevel 92 to facilitate seating of the cap 21 on the neck 22 .
- a circular rib 94 on the underside of disk 61 is located between plug 91 and skirt 62 and engages neck lip flange 24 to provide a secondary seal.
- the threads 71 a , 71 b of cap 21 are double lead and each extends around the circumference of the cap in excess of 180°, i.e., approximately 200°.
- the threads 71 a , 71 b originate very close to the bottom edge 72 of vertical stretch 64 .
- Threads 29 a and 29 b of the neck 22 originate spaced somewhat downwardly from the top on vertical stretch 28 .
- cap 21 is deposited on neck 22 . Because of the fact that the threads 71 b and 71 a are diametrically opposed, the cap 21 tends to rest on the neck 22 approximately horizontally.
- the first step in seating cap 21 is to pass under a roller which pushes the cap 21 downwardly.
- first snap The threads on the cap slip over the uppermost threads on the neck 22 during this first step which may be termed a “first snap”.
- first snap The threads on the cap slip over the uppermost threads on the neck 22 during this first step which may be termed a “first snap”.
- the cap is not fully seated, still resting at least one bottle thread above its fully seated and applied position.
- the first snap action permits some of the air in the container to escape since the cap is not completely sealed on the neck.
- the cap and container pass under a seating belt or pressure plate which forces the cap 21 downward until it is completely seated on the neck 22 , thereby completing the second snap or step.
- the relative axial movement of cap and bottle neck to a fully sealed and seated position must involve a portion of the cap threads jumping at least two neck threads or vice versa.
- the first step in the seating of the cap on the neck brings the teeth 81 of the cap into partial engagement with the teeth 51 of the neck, but within about a 20° tolerance. This permits the aforementioned foaming without allowing cap rotation away from proper orientation.
- the second step of the seating causes the teeth 81 and 51 to fully interengage.
- FIG. 9 Another feature of the invention best shown in FIG. 9 is the function of the shoulder 65 of cap 21 .
- the inner plug 91 tends to push the lip 24 outwardly.
- the shoulder 65 tightly engages the surface 28 and promotes effective sealing.
- FIG. 10A The use of the modification of FIG. 10A is particularly suited when the cap is made of a material such as low density polyethylene.
- An advantage of having a line of weakness rather than separated bridges is that dirt and water cannot enter in the voids between the bridges and collect between the cap and neck.
- FIG. 10A resembles that of the preceding modification and the same reference numeral followed by the subscript a is used to designate corresponding elements.
- each container has a square cross-section or some other variation from a round shape which permits the container neck 22 to be oriented relative to the cap 21 .
- the structure of capping machines is well known in the bottling art.
- the teeth 81 of the cap are in vertical alignment with the gaps between teeth 51 of neck 22 .
- An axially downward force is applied to cap 21 causing it to move down.
- the inner skirt 91 fits inside neck opening 23 .
- the threads 71 a and 71 b slip over the threads 29 a and 29 b , the slanted surfaces 36 facilitating such movement.
- the sealing is preferably in two steps or snap actions.
- the cap 21 is sufficiently resilient so that it expands outward sufficiently to permit the threads to slip.
- the teeth 81 engage between the teeth 51 to fully seat the teeth 81 in place.
- Flange 24 then engages the under side of disk 61 and the outer wall of inner skirt 91 , sealing the container. The engagement of threads 71 and 29 retain the cap tightly to the neck.
- FIGS. 11A, 11B and 11 C illustrate schematically the two-step seating heretofore described.
- the single turn cap thread 71 b rests on the top of the uppermost neck thread.
- FIG. 11B the thread 71 b of the cap has been pushed over neck thread 29 a but the cap is not fully seated. Hence gases may escape from the container.
- FIG. 11C the second click occurs, when thread 71 b seats under thread 29 b.
- FIG. 12A shows a reverse situation wherein thread 29 a on the neck rests under the cap thread 71 b .
- FIG. 12B the first click has occurred and thread 29 a is between threads 71 a and 71 b .
- FIG. 12C shows completion of seating wherein thread 29 a is above threads 71 a and 71 b.
- the user grips the tab 86 and breaks line 87 , then pulls circumferentially around the container causing the lower skirt 74 to be removed, thereby removing the teeth 81 .
- it also permits the user to grip the ribs 66 and unscrew the cap 21 from neck 22 .
- FIG. 1 Another feature of the relationship between the plug 91 and threads 71 a , 71 b is shown. It is desirable that when the portion of the cap 21 above the lower skirt 74 is used as a reclosure cap, that proper seating of the reclosure cap be insured so that the reclosed bottle does not leak.
- the reference letter X is used to designate the vertical distance between the upper edge of threads 71 a and 71 b and the point at which the flange 24 of neck 22 contacts the slanted surface 92 of plug 91 .
- the reference letter Y is used to designate the minimum vertical dimension between the top edge of vertical stretch 28 of neck 22 and the underside of the thread start 31 .
- a feature of the structure is that at some position of the cap the dimension X be greater than the dimension Y.
- the term “thread” is used not only to include external threads but internal ones as well and to include continuous and interrupted threads or other “helical engagement means”.
- the cumulative turn total for multi-lead threads or other such helical engagement means is the sum total of the number of turns of the individual multi-lead threads around either the neck stretch portion or the upper skirt portion.
- “in excess of one turn total” means that the sum total of the number of turns of the individual threads is in excess of 360°.
- At least one vertically extending arc stretch refers to a portion of the upper skirt or neck stretch where the threads overlap or are repetitive vertically, whereby a vertical line drawn within the arc stretch will intersect at least two threads.
- Closure 121 hereinafter described in detail, is used with a container neck 122 .
- the interior of the neck forms no part of the present invention. With a blow-molded bottle finish, the interior contour tends to follow that of the neck exterior. However, it will be understood that other types of bottles may be used, with the internal shape of the neck varying from that of the exterior.
- Neck 122 has a central opening 123 and a downward-outward slanted lip flange 124 terminating in an upper neck stretch 128 .
- Threads 129 extend outward of stretch 128 .
- the finish has twelve threads per inch with a double lead, each thread being six pitch and extending slightly in excess of 360° of a full thread. It is to be understood that the threads may be extended greater than 360° for increased thread engagement. Additionally, the thread leads may be of a different linear thread density (threads per inch).
- the upper flank 136 of thread 129 slants downwardly/outwardly at approximately 45° while the lower flank 137 slants downwardly/inwardly at approximately 10°, permitting the threads on the interior of the cap to slip past the threads on the neck finish.
- the thread apex 138 is made with as large a radius as possible, but being sufficient to insure that the cap must be unscrewed and not pulled from the neck.
- one thread may be replaced by a groove.
- threads 129 may be interrupted, instead of being continuous.
- the container neck includes a tamper-evidencing portion 40 below the upper neck stretch 128 which includes an outward extending shoulder 142 , a locking wall 146 offset outwardly relative to the upper neck stretch 128 , and a lower outward extending shoulder 147 .
- a plurality of upward projecting teeth 151 are formed on the tamper-evidencing portion of the neck.
- a vertical stretch 148 depends from shoulder 147 . To facilitate gripping the container during filling and loading, vertical stretch 148 may be formed with a number of bumper ring segments 149 (here shown as four in number).
- the teeth 151 extend upwardly from the shoulder stretch 147 .
- the teeth are shaped and positioned to cooperate with internal teeth formed on the closure, the interengagement between the teeth resisting unscrewing of the cap from the neck.
- multiple teeth 151 FIG. 18 are formed on either side of neck 122 , with the total extent of the multiple teeth being approximately 90°.
- FIGS. 13 to 17 A cap for use with neck structure 122 is illustrated in FIGS. 13 to 17 .
- the cap has a top 160 from the periphery of which depends downward extending upper skirt 161 .
- the top comprises a generally flat top disk; however, other configurations may be substituted.
- the upper skirt 161 is formed with a generally vertical upper edge 162 which merges with outward-downward slanted stretch 163 , which in turn merges with vertical stretch 164 .
- An internal shoulder 165 is formed at the intersection of stretches 162 and 163 .
- a sealing bead 168 depends from the underside of top 160 .
- the internal shoulder 165 provides an inward projecting portion 161 a of the upper skirt 161 which cooperates with the exterior of the neck stretch 128 . Since the circumference of the upper portion 128 a of neck stretch 128 is greater than the interior circumference of the cap 121 at the inward projecting portion 161 a of the skirt, a tight fit is formed between the inward projecting portion and the neck stretch exterior. The tight fit between the upper skirt portion above thread 171 a and the exterior of the neck stretch 128 above thread 129 a promotes an effective seal between the exterior of the plug 191 and the interior edge 124 a of the lip 124 .
- the upper skirt 161 When the cap 121 is applied to the neck 122 , the upper skirt 161 is biased outward as the inward projecting portion 161 a engages the exterior of the neck stretch 128 . Since the closure is resilient, the inner plug 191 of the cap is urged toward the lip 124 to form a seal between the generally seamless interior edge 124 a of the lip and exterior of the plug 191 . In other words, the inward projecting portion provides a means for biasing the upper skirt and the plug outward to urge the plug into sealing engagement with the lip 124 .
- the fit of the shoulder against the neck tends to reduce leakage and rigidify the cap, preventing the cap from being turned or torqued to jump threads or strip the threads.
- the inner plug 191 of the cap 121 tends to push the neck of the bottle outward against the shoulder and the shoulder then prevents turning or stripping.
- Threads 171 a and 171 b which are selected to mate with threads 129 of neck 122 , are formed on the interior of the skirt.
- the shape of threads 129 a , 129 b , 171 a , and 171 b allow the threads to slip past one another and then interengage.
- threads 171 a and 171 b are double lead and each extend around the circumference of the cap in excess of 180°, for example, approximately 200°.
- cap 121 is deposited on neck 122 . Since threads 171 a , 171 b are diametrically opposed, the cap tends to rest horizontally on neck 122 , facilitating the application of the cap onto the neck with a downward, axial force.
- the closure includes a tamper-evidencing band 170 below the upper skirt portion 161 provided with a plurality of internal ratchet teeth 181 .
- the tamper-evidencing band 170 comprises an annular shoulder 173 below the upper skirt 161 and an outer skirt portion 174 extending downwardly from the shoulder 173 .
- the band 170 is joined to the upper skirt 161 by a frangible section which allows the band 170 to be at least partially torn from the cap.
- the frangible section includes a number of radially spaced bridges 176 interconnecting the shoulder 173 and the upper skirt portion, the bridges being provided by the lower edges of ribs 166 .
- the frangible section may be provided by a line of weakness formed along the intersection of shoulder 173 and upper skirt 161 .
- the shoulder 173 and outer skirt portion 174 divide the band into two sections, with the outer skirt portion being oriented at an angle relative to the annular shoulder.
- the tamper-evidencing band may comprise a single, curved section which extends generally outward and downward from the upper skirt portion. The tamper-evidencing band may also take many other forms.
- the tamper-evidencing band includes a plurality of the internal ratchet teeth 181 depending from the shoulder 173 .
- the generally downwardly depending teeth 181 are positioned to engage teeth 151 when cap 121 is pushed onto neck 122 .
- Teeth 181 include an inclined surface 183 for facilitating the application of the cap to neck 122 and a working surface 184 which cooperates with the working surface of one of the teeth 151 on the neck to resist unscrewing of the closure. As the closure is moved downwardly on the neck, the inclined surface 183 slides along tooth 151 to thereby guide tooth 181 to a position between adjacent ones of teeth 151 .
- Teeth 181 are located on the shoulder in the present embodiment; however, the teeth may alternatively be positioned at other locations on the tamper-evidencing band 170 , such as along the inner surface of outer skirt portion 174 .
- the interlocking engagement between the teeth on the cap with those on the neck prevents twisting of the cap relative to the container while the tamper-evidencing band 170 is intact.
- the band 170 is at least partially removed from the upper skirt 161 to disengage teeth 181 from the teeth 151 on the neck.
- the separation of the tamper-evidencing band 170 from the upper skirt 161 is accomplished by rupturing the bridges 176 . The ruptured bridges warn the consumer that the container has been opened and the contents tampered with.
- a tear tab 186 is connected to the lower edge of the tamper-evidencing band 170 .
- the tear tab provides means for removing the lower band and may additionally be used to orient cap 121 relative to the container prior to application if desired.
- the tamper-evidencing band 170 is formed with a line of weakness adjacent tab 186 , generally indicated by 187 , extending through outer skirt portion 174 and shoulder 173 of the band.
- the line of weakness facilitates removal of the band 170 from the closure, and is another tamper-evidencing feature of the present invention. When initially opening the container, the consumer pulls tab 186 to remove lower band 170 , rupturing line 187 and frangible section 176 .
- FIGS. 19 and 20 A modification of the cap is shown in FIGS. 19 and 20 .
- the modified cap 121 c may be applied to a container having a neck configuration similar to that shown in FIG. 18 .
- the cap 121 c includes a tamper-evidencing band 170 c which includes a number of downward depending teeth 181 c .
- the shoulder 173 c of the band extends horizontally outward from the lower edge of upper skirt portion 161 c , and the outer skirt portion 174 c depends from the shoulder.
- a frangible section composed of a plurality of circumferentially spaced bridges 176 c connects shoulder 173 c to the lower edge of upper skirt 161 c .
- teeth 181 c are dimensioned and positioned to engage the upwardly extending teeth 151 formed on the neck.
- teeth 181 c include a beveled inner surface 183 c .
- inner surface 183 c directs the teeth 181 c into interengagement with teeth 151 .
- the working surface 184 c engages the working surface of one of the teeth 151 on the neck to resist unscrewing of the cap 121 c from the neck.
- Teeth 181 c and teeth 151 cooperate to restrain unscrewing of cap 121 c relative to the neck while the lower skirt remains intact.
- lower band 170 c is removed from upper skirt portion 161 c by rupturing frangible bridges 176 c .
- the modified cap may include a tear tab and a line of weakness extending through the lower skirt, as described with reference to the previously discussed embodiment for facilitating removal of tamper-evidencing band 170 c .
- cap 121 c may be twisted, fracturing the bridges, and unscrewed from the container with lower band 170 c remaining around neck 122 .
- the use of a tear tab and line of weakness is preferred, as it provides a clearer and more obvious indication of tampering, facilitates recycling of the container and substantially eliminates risk of injury to wildlife.
- FIGS. 21 to 23 An alternative modification of the cap 121 d and neck 122 d of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 21 to 23 .
- Neck 122 d is formed with several teeth 151 d circumferentially spaced along shoulder stretch 147 d .
- a pair of adjacent teeth 151 d are separated by a space, generally designated 152 , formed for receiving the teeth of the closure.
- a tooth formed on the closure is positioned within space 152 between the adjacent teeth 151 d , thereby preventing rotation of the closure relative to the neck.
- Cap 121 d ( FIG. 21 ) includes a domed top 160 d having an inner skirt 191 d depending from the underside of the domed top. Inner skirt 191 d engages lip flange 124 d when the cap seats on the neck, forming an internal seal between the cap and the neck.
- the lower band portion 170 d comprises a number of teeth 181 d generally depending from lower edge 68 of upper skirt 61 d .
- the tamper-evidencing means are provided by the teeth 181 d .
- the teeth 181 d are shaped and positioned for interengaging teeth 151 d , with one tooth 181 d slipping into space 52 as the cap 121 d is applied to neck 122 d .
- the teeth 181 d have an inclined surface 83 d which slides along the tooth 151 d to position the tooth 181 d in the space 52 .
- the working surface 84 d of the tooth engages the tooth 151 d on the neck to resist unscrewing of the cap 121 d relative to the neck 122 d .
- the interengagement between teeth 151 d and teeth 181 d substantially restricts twisting of the closure relative to the neck, preventing unscrewing of the cap with the tamper-evidencing structure intact.
- the band 170 d which is formed with the downward depending teeth 181 d , must be severed from upper skirt portion 161 d .
- a line of weakness 179 extends about the circumference of the closure between the upper skirt portion 161 d and the band 170 d .
- the band 170 d is torn away at the line of weakness, facilitating unscrewing of the closure. Removal of the band 170 d is facilitated by a tear tab which is gripped while initiating a continuing tearing away of the lower skirt portion. As is shown in FIG.
- one of the downward extending teeth 181 d may be extended to provide a tear tab.
- the tear tab is deformed outward by depressed section 143 of shoulder stretch 147 d .
- the consumer grips the tear tab shown in FIG. 23 and removes the lower band portion 170 d to separate the interengaged teeth 151 d and 181 d and open the container.
- FIG. 24 Another modification of a cap 121 e of the present invention is shown in FIG. 24 .
- the cap 121 e may be used with a neck of the type shown in FIG. 18 .
- the cap 121 e includes an upper skirt 161 e having a generally vertical portion 164 e and a lower band portion 170 e .
- the lower band 170 e extends generally outward and downward from the lower edge of vertical portion 164 e , and is formed with a curved section 180 .
- a number of internal teeth 181 e are formed on the interior of the curved section 180 of the lower band.
- a frangible section provided in the present embodiment by a line of weakness 176 e , joins the lower band 170 e to the upper skirt portion 161 e .
- a tear tab 186 e depends from the lower band 170 e .
- threads 171 e slip past and interengage threads 129 .
- Curved section 180 slips over outward extending shoulder 142 and lower neck portion 146 , with the teeth 181 e being shaped and positioned to interengage teeth 151 .
- tab 186 e fractures the line of weakness 176 e and separates the lower band from the upper skirt, disengaging teeth 181 e from teeth 151 .
- cap 121 is shown seated on container 125 .
- the closure may be conveniently oriented relative to the container prior to applying the closure to the neck.
- the tab 186 and the non-circular cross section of the container are directed by the capping machine during the capping process to align the cap and container relative to one another, positioning teeth 151 and 181 for direct interengagement when the cap is pushed onto the neck.
- the cap construction of the previous embodiments fosters substantial seating of the cap without prior orientation.
- the locking means of the closure and neck are cooperatively shaped to slip past one another, thereby guiding the teeth 181 formed on the closure into interengagement with the teeth 151 formed on the neck.
- full thread engagement may be achieved once the cap is pushed onto the neck.
- full thread engagement or complete interengagement of the teeth 151 and 181 is not necessary to securely retain the cap on the container.
- the various features of the present invention are not to be restricted to a snap-on, screw-off closure system in which the cap and container are first oriented relative to one another.
- FIGS. 28-32 illustrate another embodiment of a neck 122 f and cap 121 f in accordance with the present invention.
- the neck 122 f includes multiple threads 129 f on the upper neck stretch 128 f .
- the neck 122 f includes seven threads 129 f although it is to be understood that a greater number of threads may be employed if desired.
- the thread finish has a linear thread density of more than 17 threads per inch, for example 17.5 threads per inch, and each thread extends more than 200°, for example 215°, around the circumference of the upper neck stretch 128 f .
- the thread density and length of each thread are also subject to variation within the scope of this invention.
- a plurality of teeth 151 f are formed on the locking wall 146 f of the neck 122 f .
- the teeth 151 f include a working surface 154 and a trailing surface 155 .
- the working surface 154 engages the working surface of a tooth on the cap to resist unscrewing of the cap relative to the neck.
- the trailing surface 155 joins the outer edge of the working surface 154 of one tooth 151 f to the inner edge of the working surface 154 of the adjacent tooth as shown in FIG. 29 .
- the teeth 151 f may be spaced apart so that the trailing surface 155 ends at the locking wall 146 f and is not joined to the adjacent tooth.
- the trailing edges 155 allow the cap 121 f to be twisted slightly, usually no more than about 50°, to fully seat the cap on the neck after the cap has been substantially applied by pushing the cap in an axial direction onto the neck.
- each tooth 151 f includes a bevel 156 at the upper edge of the tooth 151 f .
- the bevels 156 slant downwardly and outwardly to guide the cap teeth 181 f into side-by-side interengagement with the teeth 15 f .
- the bevel 156 is inclined at an angle of about 40° to 50°, such as 45°, relative to a horizontal plane.
- a bevel of an angle in the range of 10° to 70° may be employed.
- the cap 121 f is shown in FIGS. 31 and 32 .
- the cap 121 f includes multiple threads 171 f on the interior of the upper skirt 161 f which mate with the multiple threads 129 f on the upper neck stretch 128 f .
- the cap 121 f includes seven threads each having a length of about 180°, and the thread finish has a linear thread density of more than 17 threads per inch, such as 17.5 threads per inch.
- threads 129 f it is to be understood that the number of threads, the length of the individual threads, and the linear thread density is subject to considerable variation within the scope of the present invention.
- teeth 181 fare provided on the interior of the tamper-evidencing band 170 f .
- teeth 181 f are formed around the entire circumference of the band 170 f , however in other embodiments the teeth 181 f may be arranged in groups spaced around the interior of the band 170 f .
- the teeth 181 f have a working surface 184 f and a trailing surface 185 .
- the working surface 184 f cooperates with the working surface 154 of the teeth 151 f on the neck to resist unscrewing of the cap 121 f from the neck 122 f , while the trailing surface 185 joins the outer edge of the working surface 184 f to either the inner edge of the working surface 184 f of an adjacent tooth or ends at the inner wall of the band 170 f .
- the cap 121 f is moved downwardly onto the neck 122 f in an axial direction, the lower edge of some of the teeth 181 f contact the bevel 156 on the teeth 151 f , which guides the teeth 181 f into side-by-side engagement with the teeth 151 f.
- the downward slope of the working surface 184 f and the trailing surface 185 follows the slope of the band 170 f .
- both the band 170 f and the surfaces 184 f and 185 are substantially vertical corresponding to the substantially vertical orientation of the locking wall 146 f .
- the band 170 f may also be slanted downwardly and outwardly as shown for example by the band 170 in FIGS. 1-5 .
- the bottom or lower edge of the teeth 181 f of the embodiment shown in FIGS. 31-32 is substantially horizontal.
- the bevels 156 provide the primary means for guiding the teeth 151 f and the teeth 181 f into interengagement.
- the neck 122 f may also be used with other caps such as a cap 121 g shown in FIG. 33 .
- the teeth 181 g of the cap 121 g have a bevel or inclined surface 183 g which is slanted in a downward-outward direction.
- the bevel 183 g cooperates with the bevel 156 to guide the teeth 151 f and 181 g into side-by-side interengagement.
- the neck 122 f may also be used with caps of the type shown in FIGS. 13-18 and FIGS. 19-20 , modified to include threads matching the thread pattern on the neck 121 f.
- FIGS. 19-20 , 21 - 23 , 24 , 28 - 32 and 33 resemble those of the preceding modifications and the same reference numerals followed by the subscripts c-g, respectively, are used to designate corresponding parts.
- capping machines After the container has been filled, it is transported through a capping machine.
- the structure of capping machines is well known in the bottling art.
- caps 121 are fed one at a time out of a bowl 111 in the capping machine along a chute 112 ( FIG. 26 ).
- chute 112 One type of chute 112 is formed with a slot 113 between parallel rails 114 , with tear tab 186 orienting the caps for uniform discharge in a pre-determined orientation relative to the containers passing therebelow by fitting into the space 113 between the rails 114 .
- Chutes without slots may be used when the tab does not depend from the lower edge of the tamper-evidencing band or when the cap is not oriented relative to the neck before it is applied.
- each container 125 When orientation is employed, each container 125 preferably has a non-circular cross section or some other variation from a round shape, such as the rectangular shape shown in FIG. 25 , which permits the container to be oriented relative to cap 121 .
- the container 125 travels along a conveyer belt 116 below the capping machine ( FIG. 27 ).
- Guide rails 117 adjacent the conveyor belt 116 directionally align the non-circular cross section of the container 125 relative to the tear tab 186 of the cap.
- the cap 121 and neck 122 may be conveniently oriented relative to one another by the conventional capping machine and conveyor belt system.
- the container passes below the chute and picks up a cap 121 such that the cap is resting on the neck 122 .
- the threads 129 and 181 are in vertical alignment, ensuring full thread engagement. Otherwise, the orientation of the cap relative to the neck is random.
- An axially downward force is applied to the cap, pushing the cap onto the neck without externally imposed relative rotation of the cap and container.
- Threads 171 a and 171 b slip over threads 129 a and 129 b , the slanted surfaces 136 facilitating such movement.
- the cap is sufficiently resilient so that it expands outward to permit the threads to slip.
- teeth 181 fall behind teeth 151 , providing interengagement between teeth 151 and teeth 181 .
- the inclined surfaces 183 of teeth 181 and/or bevels 156 of teeth 151 f guide the teeth 181 and 151 , 151 f into interengagement.
- the interengagement between teeth 151 and 181 prevent unscrewing of the cap from the container, while the interengagement between the threads prevents lifting of cap 121 off neck 122 .
- closure 221 in another embodiment of the present invention illustrated in FIG. 34 , is used with a container neck 222 .
- Neck 222 has a central opening 223 and a downward-outward slanted lip flange 224 terminating in a vertical stretch 228 .
- Threads 229 extend outward of stretch 228 .
- the finish has twelve threads per inch with a double lead, each thread being six pitch and extending slightly in excess of 360° of a full thread. It is to be understood that the threads may be extended greater than 360° for increased thread engagement. Additionally, the thread leads may be of a different linear thread density (threads per inch).
- the upper flank 236 of thread 229 slants downwardly/outwardly at approximately 45° while the lower flank slants downwardly/inwardly at approximately 10°, permitting the threads on the interior of the cap to slip past the threads on the neck finish.
- the thread apex 238 is made with as large a radius as possible.
- threads 229 may be interrupted, instead of continuous.
- the locking wall portion has a shoulder stretch portion 242 and a lower neck stretch portion 246 offset outwardly relative to the upper neck stretch portion.
- the lower neck portion slants downwardly/outwardly at an angle of approximately 10° and terminates in generally horizontal shoulder 247 .
- a vertical stretch 248 depends from shoulder 247 .
- vertical stretch 248 may be formed with a number of bumper ring segments 249 (here shown as four in number).
- a number of ratchet teeth 251 project from lower stretch 246 on opposite sides of neck 222 .
- three teeth 251 are formed on either side of neck 222 , with the total extent of the three teeth being approximately 90°.
- the teeth 251 are shaped to interengage the internal ratchet teeth formed on the cap, preventing twisting of the cap relative to the neck.
- teeth 251 are formed on lower stretch 246 .
- the teeth may be located on shoulder stretch 242 , interengaging ratchet teeth formed on the shoulder of the cap, as is discussed below.
- a cap for use with neck structure 222 is illustrated in FIG. 35 to FIG. 40 .
- the cap has top 261 from the periphery of which depends downward extending upper skirt 262 .
- the top comprises a generally flat top disk; however, other configurations may be substituted.
- the upper edge of upper skirt 262 merges with slanted stretch 263 , which in turn merges with upper skirt portion or vertical stretch 264 .
- An internal shoulder 265 is formed at the intersection of stretches 262 and 263 .
- Members 262 , 263 and 264 have radially spaced vertical ribs 266 to enable the user to grip the cap.
- Threads 271 a and 271 b which are selected to mate with threads 229 of neck 222 , are formed on the interior of the skirt.
- the shape of threads 229 a , 229 b , 71 a and 71 b allow the threads to slip passed one another and then interengage.
- Threads 271 a and 271 b are double lead and extend around the circumference of the cap in excess of 180°, for example, approximately 200°.
- cap 221 is deposited on neck 222 . Since threads 271 a , 271 b are diametrically opposed, the cap tends to rest horizontally on neck 222 , facilitating the application of the cap onto the neck with a downward, axial force.
- the closure has ring-like skirt or lower skirt portion 2 - 70 below upper skirt portion 264 .
- the lower skirt comprises outer skirt portion 274 offset outwardly relative to upper skirt portion 264 and a shoulder 273 extending inwardly from the upper edge of the outer skirt portion.
- a frangible section including a number of radially spaced bridges 276 interconnects the shoulder and the upper skirt portion.
- the lower edges of ribs 266 form the bridges.
- a line of weakness may be formed through the intersection of shoulder 273 and upper skirt 264 .
- a number of internal ratchet teeth 281 spaced and dimensioned to match the teeth 251 of neck 222 are formed on outer skirt portion 274 .
- Teeth 281 are positioned to engage teeth 251 when cap 221 is pushed onto neck 222 .
- the inner edges 282 of teeth 281 are positioned close to lower stretch 246 .
- the interlocking engagement between the teeth on the cap with those on the neck prevent twisting of the cap relative to the container while the lower skirt is intact.
- Teeth 281 are located on the outer skirt in the present embodiment; however, the teeth may alternatively be positioned along the inner surface of shoulder 273 .
- the teeth formed on the shoulder surface would be shaped and positioned to interengage teeth located on the shoulder stretch of neck 222 .
- ratchet teeth 251 and 281 prevent twisting of the cap relative to the neck.
- the lower skirt must first be separated from the upper skirt, as by rupturing of the frangible section, allowing the cap to be unscrewed from the container. The ruptured bridges warn the consumer that the container has been opened and the contents tampered with.
- the interlocking ratchet teeth and frangible bridges of the present invention are a tamper-evident features of the present invention.
- a tear tab 286 is connected to the lower edge of outer skirt 274 .
- the tear tab provides means for removing the lower skirt, and may be used to orient cap 221 relative to the container.
- Lower skirt 270 is formed with a line of weakness generally indicated by 287 extending through outer skirt 274 and shoulder 273 .
- the line of weakness facilitates removal of the lower skirt from the closure, and is another tamper-evident feature of the present invention.
- the consumer pulls tab 286 to remove lower skirt 270 , rupturing line 287 and frangible section 276 .
- the absence of the lower skirt more dramatically alerts the consumer to possible tampering of the contents. A distracted consumer may fail to notice the fractured bridges, therefore the removal of the lower skirt is a more obvious indication of tampering.
- a substantially vertical fin 300 is formed between upper skirt 264 and shoulder 273 .
- vertical fin 300 is located adjacent line of weakness 287 , as is shown particularly in FIG. 36 , FIG. 37 and FIG. 38 .
- line of weakness 287 When a dishonest patron attempts to curl the lower skirt 270 towards the upper skirt, the deformation of the material below the vertical fin 300 , generally indicated at 302 , is resisted by the fin. This resistance distorts lower skirt 270 , causing line of weakness 287 and frangible bridges 276 to rupture, providing evidence of tampering.
- vertical fin 300 provides additional protection against tampering.
- fin 300 is formed with a substantially vertical line of weakness 301 through the closure adjacent the upper skirt. As lower skirt 270 is torn from the closure, line of weakness 301 is ruptured and the fin removed from upper skirt 264 together with the lower skirt. The upper skirt is provided with an even, clean finish once vertical fin 300 is removed. However, if desired, the fin could be formed with a line of weakness extending through the fin adjacent shoulder 273 . The fin would then remain intact on upper skirt 264 after removal of the lower skirt from the container.
- improved tamper evidence is achieved by a camming action of dual fins 310 upstanding from shoulder 273 .
- the fins need not be joined to upper skirt 264 . If a dishonest patron attempts to curl the lower skirt to tamper with the contents of the container, dual fins 310 act as a cam to force the lower skirt radially outward, causing sufficient deformation of the lower skirt to fracture bridges 276 and line of weakness 287 .
- a further advantage of the present embodiment is that no residual material remains on upper skirt 64 after removal of lower skirt 270 .
- line of weakness 287 extending through lower skirt 270 is a continuous section of material. This configuration is preferred as it is simple to manufacture.
- FIG. 41 and FIG. 42 an alternative embodiment having a gap 304 at the intersection of shoulder 273 and outer skirt 274 is shown in FIG. 41 and FIG. 42 .
- Lower skirt 270 has a groove 306 extending through shoulder 273 and outer skirt 274 .
- the shoulder is formed with a first web material 308 bridging groove 306
- the outer skirt is formed having a second web material 310 bridging the groove.
- the first and second web materials 308 , 310 are separated by gap 304 .
- orientation is generally achieved by causing tear tab 286 to be at the trailing edge, riding in a slot cutout of the cap feed chute. It has been observed that occasionally the lower skirt 270 of a trailing cap will ride up onto the shoulder 273 of the preceding cap directly above the tear tab 286 of the preceding cap. This causes a jam and stops the flow of caps. It is readily apparent that an additional benefit of fin 300 and dual fins 310 of the present invention is the prevention of the occurrence of jamming.
- caps 221 are fed one at a time out of a bowl in the capping machine, with tear tab 286 orienting the caps for uniform discharge in a pre-determined orientation relative to the containers passing therebelow.
- each container has a square cross-section or some other variation from a round shape which permits the container to be oriented relative to cap 221 .
- the structure of capping machines is well known in the bottling art. Because of the relative orientation of cap 221 and neck 222 , teeth 251 and 281 are in vertical alignment.
- Threads 271 a and 271 b slip over threads 229 a and 229 b , the slanted surfaces 236 facilitating such movement.
- the cap is sufficiently resilient so that it expands outward sufficiently to permit the threads to slip.
- teeth 281 engage behind teeth 251 to fully engage teeth 281 in place.
- a plurality of substantially vertical castle projections 500 are circumferentially-spaced about the upper skirt 464 extending upwardly from shoulder 473 and spaced outwardly from upper skirt 464 .
- the cap is provided with eight castle projections, however, one will appreciate that the actual number may vary.
- one castle projection 500 ′ is located adjacent line of weakness 487 , as is shown particularly in FIG. 46 and FIG. 47 .
- castle projections 500 are circumferentially spaced about the upper skirt and are spaced away from the upper skirt.
- spacing and height of the castle projections may vary, provided that height of the castle projections is tall enough to allow camming action in that the upper edge 505 abuts against a lower portion of upper skirt 464 as lower skirt 470 is pivoted about the frangible section 476 in the direction of arrow P in FIG. 47 .
- Such camming action is similar to that described above with respect to the dual vertical fins 310 .
- the castle projection extends substantially vertically from the lower skirt portion, however, one will appreciate that the shape of the projection may vary.
- the projection may have an outwardly tapered surface providing a right-triangular cross-section in which the angled surface is spaced outward from the upper skirt portion.
- the angled surface may provide a different aesthetic while the inner vertical surface still provides the camming action which encourages tamper-evidencing rupture of the frangible section.
- the castle projections may be in the form of rod-like extensions which extend upwardly from the lower skirt.
- castle projections 500 act as a cam to force the lower skirt radially outward, causing sufficient deformation of the lower skirt to fracture bridges 476 and line of weakness 487 .
- frangible section 476 is ruptured and the castle projections are removed from upper skirt 464 together with lower skirt 470 .
- a further advantage of the present embodiment is that no residual material remains on upper skirt 64 after removal of lower skirt 470 .
- the cap When a consumer desires to initially open the container, he may merely grip the upper skirt 464 and twist the cap with respect to the neck to unthread the cap from the container neck. In this case, the frangible section will rupture thus allowing the cap to be unthreaded from the neck.
- the cap may be provided with a gripping tab, as discussed above, and pulls circumferentially around the container causing the lower skirt and vertical castle projections to be removed from the remainder of the cap, thereby removing the ratchet teeth of the cap from interlocking engagement with ratchet teeth of the neck, providing evidence of tampering and enabling the consumer to unscrew the cap from the neck. In either case, to replace the cap, the consumer merely reverses the direction of twisting.
Abstract
A tamper-evident, snap-on, screw-off closure is used with a specially shaped container neck. The neck has at least one first helical thread on an upper neck stretch portion, and at least one external ratchet tooth on a locking wall portion below the upper neck stretch portion. The closure has an upper skirt having at least one second helical thread mating with the first helical thread of the neck. A downward extending lower skirt portion includes an outer skirt portion and a shoulder extending inwardly from said outer skirt portion. A frangible section interconnects the shoulder and the upper skirt portion. At least one substantially vertical castle projection is formed upstanding from the shoulder, preventing upward deformation of the lower skirt portion without breaking the frangible section. The lower skirt portion has at least one internal ratchet tooth, and is formed with a line of weakness extending through the outer skirt portion and the shoulder. The lower skirt has a tear tab which, when pulled, fractures the lower skirt on a vertical line. Continued pulling on the tab sequentially fractures the frangible section.
Description
- This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/668,780 filed Sep. 22, 2003, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/210,716, filed Jul. 30, 2002 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,637,611, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/746,882 filed Dec. 22, 2000 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,412, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/356,063 filed Jul. 19, 1999 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,173,853, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/071,625 filed May 1, 1998 and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,975,321, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/781,453, filed Jan. 10, 1997 and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,348, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/456,741 filed Jun. 1, 1995 and now abandoned, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 08/029,177 filed Mar. 10, 1993 and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,376, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/830,133 filed Jan. 31, 1992 and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,267,661, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/772,945 filed Oct. 8, 1991 and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,224, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/565,638 filed Aug. 9, 1990 and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,190,178, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates to a new and improved container closure and container neck structure and more particularly to a structure wherein the closure is applied with a single one-dimensional axial downward force onto the neck and is held in such position by a tamper-evident band. The consumer destroys a frangible connection between the cap and the band during initial removal, preferably by tearing away the band enabling the closure to be unscrewed from the container neck. When the cap is used for reclosure purposes, it may be screwed on and screwed off in the same manner as screw caps have heretofore been used.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- Prior snap-on, screw-off structures may be classified under either of the following categories: (1) Those with thread engagement as initially applied; and (2) Those without.
- The major advantages of the no-thread initial engagement systems are that they are conceptually simple, careful alignment of the closure and the container is not necessary upon application of the closure, and easy (low force) application is possible since no thread-jumping is required. This version can be an aesthetically pleasing, straight wall cap design, and good re-seal is achieved on reclosure because of the torque advantage of threads. On the other hand, the disadvantages of such a system are that it may be confusing to the consumer because initial removal is merely by lifting the cap off the neck but subsequent use requires twisting the cap relative to the neck. Further, it is difficult to use the system with a lined closure because of the height relationships between the finish and the cap, and finally the cap must be relatively tall, which forces the use of fine threads, which can be difficult to mold. None of these disadvantages are present in this invention.
- A closure such as Crisci U.S. Pat. No. 4,561,553 has a number of problems. The tamper evident feature of the closure may be circumvented by being able to engage the threads of the neck and closure (thereby creating a mechanical advantage) and back off the cap while the tamper-evident band is intact. Secondly, the device is confusing to the consumer since the cap is screwed off during removal only by inwardly distorting the cap skirt. The cap is reapplied as a standard snap cap.
- Full thread engagement as the cap is initially applied has a number of conceptual advantages. Consumer confusion is eliminated since initial removal is by unscrewing. A number of seal systems, including foil, full liner, plugs or other linerless seals can be used. However, full engagement systems heretofore have been difficult to achieve in practice. A disadvantage of a closure such as Carr U.S. Pat. No. 4,625,875 is that there is no practical, consistent means to orient the cap relative to the container so that, after application, the cap must be turned at least slightly to ensure a tight seal. This defeats the purpose of a push-on cap. Also, the use of a stretch snap-band tamper evident ring excessively increases the application force necessary to seat the cap.
- The present invention provides full thread engagement by reason of unique thread design and, more particularly, a unique tamper-evident band (i.e., lower skirt portion) attached to the upper part of the cap by multiple bridges or by means of a continuous line of weakness between the cap and tear band, as well as a means of orienting closure and bottle threads to achieve registration prior to straight axial application.
- The present invention has considerable advantages over prior structures for the reasons above noted, among others.
- The present invention comprises an improved closure or cap and an improved neck finish. The cap skirt and neck are provided with mating threads of such shape that the cap may be applied in a simple downward vertical movement, the cap skirt and neck flexing sufficiently to permit the threads to slip past each other.
- The threads may be continuous or interrupted. Also, instead of there being two threads—one on the neck and one on the cap, one external thread may be replaced with a groove. The term “helical engagement means” is sometimes used herein to encompass all such screw retention means.
- The cap has a tamper-evident tear band below the skirt which is connected to the skirt by a plurality of bridges or by a continuous line of weakness. Ratchet teeth are positioned on the inside of the tamper evident band. Correspondingly, the container neck below the threads is formed with external ratchet teeth. The mating ratchet teeth of the cap and container neck are engaged by the initial downward movement of the cap relative to the neck. In other words, in order to engage the ratchet teeth it is not necessary to rotate the cap relative to the neck, thereby differing from conventional threaded tamper-evident caps. It is merely necessary to provide alignment means on the cap and on the container so that the cap is initially properly oriented in such position that a direct single vertically downward movement of the cap relative to the neck causes the threads to slip relative to each other and the ratchet teeth to lock in final position. Chamfers on the ratchet structure of either closure or container can be used as a “fine” orientation system as the closure is initially applied.
- To achieve proper registration of threads when a simple direct axial application force is used, both the neck threads and closure threads must be oriented. Orientation of the container is relatively easy. Generally, containers are either non-circular or have non-circular features which may be used for proper orientation. In accordance with a preferred form of the invention shown herein, the closure has a downward projecting tab similar to the tear tab used on push-on tear-off closures. The vertical tear tab characteristic of the present closure is an excellent orientation feature. However, other means for orienting the cap and container may be used.
- Thread design is another feature of the invention. A large number of threads per inch of axial height is desirable for two reasons. First, a fine thread may be used and such a thread does not have to be as deep as a coarse thread, and hence the forces required for threads to jump during application are minimized. Secondly, fine threads minimize the height required to achieve a standard design criterion of 360° or more of thread engagement which permits a lighter closure weight.
- The greater the number of thread leads, the less actual turning action is required to remove or reapply the cap. In addition, multiple thread leads promote more “squareness” during straight axial application. In other words, the cap seats horizontally on the neck because the termini of the threads are statically balanced. However, additional leads require a higher thread pitch assuming constant threads per inch and excessively high thread pitch results in a situation where the closure may back off or unscrew itself from sealed position.
- In accordance with the present invention, a preferred thread for a blow-molded, high density polyethylene bottle is 12 threads per inch and two leads. If bottle finish processing permits, it would be advantageous to design for higher threads per inch and more leads. For example, if the bottle is made with injection blow mold equipment, a very fine bottle thread is possible. In that case, it might be preferable to use, for example, a 16 thread-per-inch, 4 lead, 4 pitch thread. The more leads, the more squarely the cap sets on the neck and the more effectively the closure will be seated by a direct downward, axial application force.
- Also, consumer advantages of quick release and reapplication can be achieved with multiple lead threads.
- In order to provide a tamper-evident feature, the closure should not be removable without some apparent closure characteristic changing. Generally, this requirement is satisfied by incorporating a frangible section which is destroyed during initial closure removal. One type of frangible section is a continuous thinned tear line, but in a cap of the present invention, such a system may not be the best choice, although permissible and is disclosed as a modification of the first embodiment of the invention. A preferred tamper-evident feature provides a frangible section having a number of frangible connections or bridges between the closure skirt and a tamper-evident ring below the bottom edge of the skirt. The preferred approach is to incorporate enough bridges around the circumference such that the combined strength of the bridges prevents unscrewing. The tamper evident band must be removed to allow unscrewing. Sequential breaking of the many bridges around the circumference simulates a continuous tear. A second approach is to incorporate only a few bridges around the circumference of the skirt such that the combined strength of the bridges is not sufficient to prevent unscrewing and the bridges rupture as the cap is initially unscrewed. With this second approach the broken bridges give evidence of opening. A major advantage of using bridges rather than a continuous tear strip is that a wide range of material choices is possible. Therefore a multiple bridge simulated tear structure is generally preferred over continuous tear frangible sections and this approach is used in the preferred embodiments of the present invention. However, in a modification of the invention an uninterrupted horizontal shoulder between the upper and lower portions of the cap is used, which shoulder is formed with a line of weakness. The alternative modification eliminates the space between the bridges to create a continuous frangible line. This modification is used successfully only when the cap is formed of a low density polyethylene and is not successfully used with higher density plastic materials. One of the advantages of the elimination of the spaced bridges is that of cleanliness in that the continuous shoulder prevents dirt and liquids from contacting any portion of the neck surface above the bottom edge of the cap.
- In a preferred embodiment of the invention hereinafter described in detail, the closure is first oriented by means of its tear tab and the containers are likewise oriented. The closure and bottle are snapped together and the orientation allows registration of both the threads and the ratchets which hold the cap in place until the tamper-evident band is removed. Seal of the container may be made with a liner, foil or a linerless feature such as a plug or flap. Before initial removal, the multiple bridges are collectively sufficiently strong to prevent unscrewing and also resist any tendency of the closure to back off the neck. During initial removal, in the preferred embodiment the tear band is removed through sequential breaking of the bridges, thereby simulating a continuous tear strip but allowing the use of such plastic materials as polypropylene and high density polyethylene. Once the tear band is removed, the system functions as with normal threaded closures. Alternatively the upper and lower portions of the cap skirt are connected by a reduced number of angularly spaced bridges. Merely by twisting the upper skirt portion the bridges may be severed, giving evidence of tampering, and making it possible to unscrew the cap.
- One of the features of the present invention is that the lower skirt portion, which includes tamper-evident features and, more particularly, contains ratchet teeth mating with corresponding teeth on the container neck, is formed with a vertical line of weakness and a tear tab adjacent thereto. When the lower skirt is removed it tears along the vertical line of weakness as well as along the line of weakness between the upper part of the cap and the lower skirt (i.e., tamper-evident band.) This feature has a number of advantages:
- First, it prevents defeating the tamper-evident feature. Were it not for the vertical line of weakness, a dishonest patron might unscrew the upper cap, remove the contents of the container and replace the cap. It is somewhat difficult to observe that the line of weakness between the upper cap and tamper-evident band has been severed. When the vertical line of weakness is severed, this is not a problem since the lower skirt cannot be replaced.
- Second, if the molds for the cap are not perfectly supported, plastic material may fill some or all of the voids between bridges joining the upper cap to the tamper-evident band. This makes it difficult for some users to remove the tamper-evident band. The vertical line of weakness makes it much easier to remove the lower skirt or band. Indeed, the bridges between the upper cap and band may be made thicker or some of the voids between bridges may be eliminated.
- Thirdly, the intact tamper-evident band may create a danger to wildlife if the head of a bird, fish or small animal is entrapped therein. Splitting the band along the vertical line of weakness eliminates this hazard.
- A further feature of the invention is the fact that the cap ratchet lug on the interior of the lower cap skirt is located between two external lugs on the neck finish when the cap is applied so that on application the cap cannot rotate outside of its “tolerance range”, that is, there is an orientation feature of the cap and bottle ratchets for proper engagement.
- Another advantage of the invention is that the cap may be applied to the neck in two stages (i.e., “double click”). When the container is filled with milk or certain other liquids, entrapped air or other gases tend to cause foam. The thread structure of the present invention makes it possible to press the cap down until one set of threads passes the other. This holds the cap on the neck and holds it properly aligned relative to the neck ratchet. However, the cap is not tight and hence air and gas may escape. Then the cap is pressed down once more to tightly engaged and sealed position. To insure two “clicks” the closure thread has to jump two neck threads during application. This means that if the cap threads extend a full 360° around the cap skirt inner wall (180° each for double lead threads), the finish threads have to be repetitive at some point of the circumference. This also means that either the cap threads or the finish thread must be repetitive vertically. I.e., the threads must overlap on either the neck or cap in order to make possible the double click.
- More specifically, the caps pass down a conveyor overlying the path of the containers and as each container passes the end of the conveyor, a cap drops onto the neck. The cap and neck then pass under a roller which preliminarily presses the cap down on the neck. One of the features of the thread construction of the present invention is that there is more than one full turn of thread engagement of the threads. Hence, the roller pushing the cap through the first step or snap prevents the latter from falling off the neck when it is subjected to such action as milk foaming in the interior of the container. Hence the cap stays on the bottle, although not being tightly sealed thereto, until the bottle passes under the conventional capping machine belt or pressure plate which fully seats the cap on the neck. This is a second step or snap of the cap on the bottle and insures that both threads are tightly engaged.
- When the first snap of the cap on the bottle occurs, the ratchet teeth of the cap engage the ratchet teeth of the neck but a slight twisting is possible within the range of tolerance of approximately 20°. Such a rotation of the cap relative to the neck changes the height of the cap only about 0.009 inches. However, this turning ability of the cap relative to the neck with such slight changes in the height of the cap relative to the neck insures proper final alignment of the ratchet teeth of the cap and neck, while permitting release of foam or excess air.
- Still another feature of the invention is an internal shoulder at the intersection of the underside of the disk and the top of the upper cap skirt. This shoulder prevents the cap from being turned or torqued to jump threads or strip the threads. The inner plug of the cap tends to push the neck of the bottle outward against the shoulder and the shoulder then prevents turning or stripping. Further, the fit of the shoulder against the neck tends to reduce leakage and rigidifies the cap.
- Another feature of the present invention is that the cap is provided with a plug or inner skirt which fits inside the bottle neck. The length of this plug is related to the positioning of the screw threads on the cap in such manner that the threads of the cap and bottle neck engage before the plug engages the neck. Thus a quarter-turn of each of the double lead threads occurs before the plug contacts the neck. This feature reduces the possibility of cross-threading when the cap is applied to the neck as a reclosure cap.
- The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention:
-
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a cap and neck before assembly, the cap being partially broken away in section to reveal internal construction. -
FIG. 2 is a bottom plan of the cap. -
FIG. 3 is a fragmentary enlarged top plan of the cap. -
FIGS. 4 and 5 are, respectively, enlarged, fragmentary sectional views taken along lines 4-4 and 5-5 ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 6 is a top plan of the neck. -
FIGS. 7 and 8 are, respectively, enlarged fragmentary sectional views taken along lines 7-7 and 8-8 of -
FIG. 9 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view through an assembled cap and neck taken in the positions of line 4-4 ofFIGS. 2 and 7 -7 ofFIG. 6 . -
FIG. 10 is a view similar toFIG. 9 taken in the positions of line 5-5 ofFIGS. 2 and 8 -8 ofFIG. 6 . -
FIG. 10A is a view similar toFIG. 10 of a modification. -
FIGS. 11A, 11B and 11C are schematic views showing progressive “double click” cap attachment wherein the cap thread has one turn and the neck has multiple threads. -
FIGS. 12A, 12B and 12C are views similar toFIGS. 11A, 11B and 11C wherein the neck thread has on turn and the cap thread multiple turns. -
FIG. 13 is a bottom plan view of a cap. -
FIG. 14 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap taken along line 14-14 ofFIG. 13 . -
FIG. 15 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap taken along line 15-15 ofFIG. 13 . -
FIG. 16 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 16-16 ofFIG. 15 . -
FIG. 17 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap applied to a neck. -
FIG. 17A is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view of a cap applied to a neck. -
FIG. 18 is a fragmentary, top plan view of a container. -
FIG. 19 is a fragmentary, bottom plan view of an another embodiment of a cap. -
FIG. 20 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 20-20 ofFIG. 19 . -
FIG. 21 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of a cap, shown partly in cross section. -
FIG. 22 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of a neck. -
FIG. 23 is a fragmentary, top plan view showing the cap applied to a container. -
FIG. 24 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevational view of another embodiment of a cap. -
FIG. 25 is a top plan view of a cap applied to a container. -
FIG. 26 is a fragmentary plan view of a capping machine, showing a cap positioned within the chute. -
FIG. 27 is a partial top plan view of a capping machine, showing a container positioned on the conveyor belt. -
FIG. 28 is a side elevational view of another embodiment of a neck. -
FIG. 29 is a top plan view of the neck ofFIG. 28 . -
FIG. 30 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 30-30 ofFIG. 29 . -
FIG. 31 is a bottom plan view of another embodiment of a cap. -
FIG. 32 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 32-32 ofFIG. 19 . -
FIG. 33 is view similar toFIG. 32 of another embodiment of a cap. -
FIG. 34 is a perspective view of a cap showing possible upward deformation of the lower skirt portion to the cap. -
FIG. 35 is a side elevational view of a cap and neck before assembly, the cap being partially broken away in section to reveal internal construction. -
FIG. 36 is a fragmentary enlarged bottom plan of the cap. -
FIG. 37 is a fragmentary enlarged top plan of the cap. -
FIG. 38 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 38-38 ofFIG. 37 . -
FIG. 39 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional views taken along line 39-39 ofFIG. 37 . -
FIG. 40 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 40-40 ofFIG. 35 , showing a preferred cross-sectional shape of a line of weakness. -
FIG. 41 is a fragmentary enlarged top plan of an alternative embodiment of a cap of the present invention. -
FIG. 42 is an enlarged, fragmentary sectional view taken along line 42-42 ofFIG. 41 . -
FIG. 43 is an enlarged top view of another alternative embodiment of a cap of the present invention. -
FIG. 44 is a side elevational view of the cap ofFIG. 43 . -
FIG. 45 is a fragmentary sectional view taken along line 45-45 ofFIG. 43 . -
FIG. 46 is perspective view of another cap of the present invention. -
FIG. 47 is a sectional view of the cap ofFIG. 46 mounted on a container neck taken substantially along line 47-47. - Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to those embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
-
Cap 21, hereinafter described in detail, is used with acontainer neck 22.Neck 22 has acentral neck opening 23 and extending outwardly thereof a downward-outward slantedlip flange 24 which terminates in avertical stretch 28. The exterior ofneck 22 is hereinafter described. The interior thereof forms no part of the present invention. With a blow-molded bottle finish as illustrated inFIGS. 7 and 8 , the interior contour of the neck generally tends to follow that of the exterior. However, it will be understood that other types of bottles may be used and in such instances the internal neck shape may vary from that of the exterior. - Extending outward of
stretch 28 are threads 29. In the depicted embodiment ofFIGS. 7 and 8 there are two threads 29 designated 29 a and 29 b. In the embodiment, the finish has twelve threads per inch with a double lead, each thread being six pitch and extending slightly in excess of 360° of a full thread. Thus theupper terminus 31 of the first thread is vertically displaced approximately 0.166 inch from the lower terminus 32 thereof. Theupper terminus 33 of the second thread is displaced 180° relative toterminus 31 and itslower terminus 34 is approximately diametrically opposite terminus 32. It is understood that the threads can be extended greater than 360° to achieve increased thread engagement. Also, additional thread leads and different linear thread density (threads per inch) are permitted and may be advantageously chosen. In order to permit the threads of the cap to slip past the threads of the neck, as shown inFIG. 7 , theupper flank 36 of thread 29 slants downwardly and outwardly at approximately 45° while thelower flank 37 slants downwardly and inwardly at an angle of about 10°. Preferably thethread apex 38 is made with as large a radius as possible. Aportion 41 ofvertical stretch 28 is located below the threads 29 extending down toupper shoulder 42, which is horizontal. - As stated previously, instead of threads on the inside of the skirt and outside of the neck, one thread may be replaced by a groove. Further, instead of threads 29 being continuous, they may be interrupted.
- Below
shoulder 42 is lockingarea wall 46 which slants downward/outward at an angle of about 10°.Wall 46 terminates inlower shoulder 47 which is also approximately horizontal. Outwardly of and belowshoulder 47 is a lowervertical stretch 48 which at its lower end merges with the container. Bumper ring segments 49 (here shown as four in number) may be formed in thestretch 48 to facilitate gripping the container during filling and loading and also to provide certain vertical flexibility to the neck during the capping operation. - On opposite sides of
neck 22 projecting out fromwall 46 areteeth 51. As illustrated inFIG. 6 , there are typically three such teeth on one side of the container neck and three teeth on the opposite side. The total extent of the three teeth on each side is approximately 90°. Each tooth has atop surface 52 which can be co-planar with the surface ofshoulder 42.Outer surface 53 slants downward/outward at an angle of approximately 10°, terminating inshoulder 47. The front edges 54 viewed from above in plan as inFIG. 6 (assuming a right-hand thread) are disposed at varying angles from about 45° to about 0° relative to a radial line drawn perpendicular to the vertical axis and are approximately vertical. - A
preferred cap 21 used with theneck structure 22 previously described is illustrated in FIGS. 1 to 5. The cap has a generally flattop disk 61 from the periphery of which depends substantially vertical shortupper skirt 62. The lower edge ofskirt 62 merges with slantedstretch 63, which, in turn, merges withvertical stretch 64. Aninternal shoulder 65 is formed at the intersection ofstretches Members vertical ribs 66 spaced therearound to enable the user to grip the cap.Chamfers 67 are preferably formed on the upper edges ofribs 66. The ribs of the cap are thus, in effect, rounded but extend higher. Hence they are more severely gripped by the user when screwing or unscrewing the cap. - On the interior of
skirt 66 are formedthreads threads neck 22. Thebottom edge 72 ofskirt 64 is connected toshoulder 73 and generally downwardly/outwardly slantedlower skirt 74 by a plurality ofbridges 76 which in fact constitute the lower edges ofribs 66. The bridges and voids therebetween are sometimes referred to herein as “horizontal lines of weakness”.Skirt 74 has a generally horizontallower edge 77. -
Teeth 81 spaced and dimensioned to match theteeth 51 ofneck 22 are formed on the inside ofwall 74. Theinner edges 82 of the teeth are positioned close toinner surface 46 after cap application. The leadingedge 83 of eachtooth 81 is formed at an angle of approximately 45° to a radial line, thereby ensuring good interlock with thecomplementary surface 54 ofneck 22. This angular relationship biases thecap 21 into a more secure locking arrangement with theneck 22. -
Tear tab 86 extends downwardly fromlower edge 77 and an upper side edge thereof merges with a weakened vertically extendingline 87 formed inskirt 74. Use of weakenedline 87 is optional, but preferably used to prevent the ring-like skirt 74 being a hazard to wildlife and to accomplish the other objects set forth earlier in this description. When theconsumer grips tab 86, bridges 76 are severed and the vertical weakenedline 87 is broken. Thus pulling thetab 86 sequentially fractures weakenedline 87 and then each of the bridges 76 (i.e., the horizontal weakened line). Removal of thelower skirt 74 removes theratchet teeth 81 and hence frees the upper portion of the cap so that it can be unscrewed. However, such removal of the lower skirt gives evidence of the opening of the cap and hence is a tamper-evident feature. Alternatively, the user may twistupper skirt 64, severing bridges 76. To prevent defeating the tamper-evident features of the cap, the bridges may be made stronger. A combination of circumferentially spacedthin bridges 76 and arcuate continuous areas relieved by circular arc tear lines may be used. - Although various liners may be used to secure the under side of
disk 61 to thelip flange 24 ofneck 22, in the accompanying drawings, a preferred embodiment shows an inner skirt or plug 91 extending downward fromtop disk 61 and fitting inside theneck opening 23. Preferably the outer bottom edge ofskirt 91 is formed with abevel 92 to facilitate seating of thecap 21 on theneck 22. Acircular rib 94 on the underside ofdisk 61 is located betweenplug 91 andskirt 62 and engagesneck lip flange 24 to provide a secondary seal. - The
threads cap 21 are double lead and each extends around the circumference of the cap in excess of 180°, i.e., approximately 200°. Thethreads bottom edge 72 ofvertical stretch 64.Threads neck 22 originate spaced somewhat downwardly from the top onvertical stretch 28. As has previously been stated in the summary of this invention, in conventional capping machines,cap 21 is deposited onneck 22. Because of the fact that thethreads cap 21 tends to rest on theneck 22 approximately horizontally. The first step inseating cap 21 is to pass under a roller which pushes thecap 21 downwardly. The threads on the cap slip over the uppermost threads on theneck 22 during this first step which may be termed a “first snap”. At this point the cap is not fully seated, still resting at least one bottle thread above its fully seated and applied position. If the container has been filled with a substance such as milk which tends to foam, the first snap action permits some of the air in the container to escape since the cap is not completely sealed on the neck. Thereafter, the cap and container pass under a seating belt or pressure plate which forces thecap 21 downward until it is completely seated on theneck 22, thereby completing the second snap or step. To achieve this advantageous “double snap application” the relative axial movement of cap and bottle neck to a fully sealed and seated position must involve a portion of the cap threads jumping at least two neck threads or vice versa. - The first step in the seating of the cap on the neck (first snap) brings the
teeth 81 of the cap into partial engagement with theteeth 51 of the neck, but within about a 20° tolerance. This permits the aforementioned foaming without allowing cap rotation away from proper orientation. The second step of the seating causes theteeth - Another feature of the invention best shown in
FIG. 9 is the function of theshoulder 65 ofcap 21. Theinner plug 91 tends to push thelip 24 outwardly. Hence theshoulder 65 tightly engages thesurface 28 and promotes effective sealing. - Directing attention now to
FIG. 10A , instead ofbridges 76 being formed connecting the shoulder 73 a to the lower end ofvertical stretch 64 a, the shoulder 73 a is continued inward but the material is very thin. In other words, a horizontal line of weakness 97 replaces thebridges 76 but the line of weakness is continuous. Hence thelower skirt 74 a may be removed by tearing away the line of weakness 97. - The use of the modification of
FIG. 10A is particularly suited when the cap is made of a material such as low density polyethylene. An advantage of having a line of weakness rather than separated bridges is that dirt and water cannot enter in the voids between the bridges and collect between the cap and neck. - In other respects the modification of
FIG. 10A resembles that of the preceding modification and the same reference numeral followed by the subscript a is used to designate corresponding elements. - Preferred Operation I
- After the container has been filled, it is transported through a capping machine. As is well understood in the bottling art, and in a manner similar to that whereby push-on, pull-off caps are applied, the
caps 21 are fed one at a time out of a bowl in the capping machine along a conveyor, thetear tabs 86 orienting the caps so that they are all discharged in a pre-determined orientation relative to the containers which pass therebelow. Although not shown in the accompanying drawings, each container has a square cross-section or some other variation from a round shape which permits thecontainer neck 22 to be oriented relative to thecap 21. The structure of capping machines is well known in the bottling art. Because of the relative orientation of thecap 21 andcontainer neck 22, theteeth 81 of the cap are in vertical alignment with the gaps betweenteeth 51 ofneck 22. An axially downward force is applied to cap 21 causing it to move down. As it moves down, theinner skirt 91 fits insideneck opening 23. Thethreads threads slanted surfaces 36 facilitating such movement. As has been stated, the sealing is preferably in two steps or snap actions. Thecap 21 is sufficiently resilient so that it expands outward sufficiently to permit the threads to slip. As thecap 21 seats on theneck 22, theteeth 81 engage between theteeth 51 to fully seat theteeth 81 in place.Flange 24 then engages the under side ofdisk 61 and the outer wall ofinner skirt 91, sealing the container. The engagement of threads 71 and 29 retain the cap tightly to the neck. -
FIGS. 11A, 11B and 11C illustrate schematically the two-step seating heretofore described. InFIG. 11A the singleturn cap thread 71 b rests on the top of the uppermost neck thread. InFIG. 11B thethread 71 b of the cap has been pushed overneck thread 29 a but the cap is not fully seated. Hence gases may escape from the container. InFIG. 11C the second click occurs, whenthread 71 b seats underthread 29 b. -
FIG. 12A shows a reverse situation whereinthread 29 a on the neck rests under thecap thread 71 b. InFIG. 12B the first click has occurred andthread 29 a is betweenthreads FIG. 12C shows completion of seating whereinthread 29 a is abovethreads - After the
cap 21 has been fully seated onneck 22 it cannot be removed without giving evidence of tampering. Thus the interengagement ofteeth - When it is desired to open the container, the user grips the
tab 86 and breaksline 87, then pulls circumferentially around the container causing thelower skirt 74 to be removed, thereby removing theteeth 81. This gives evidence of tampering. However, it also permits the user to grip theribs 66 and unscrew thecap 21 fromneck 22. - To replace the cap, it is merely necessary to reverse the direction of turning. Directing attention now to the structure shown in
FIG. 1 , another feature of the relationship between theplug 91 andthreads cap 21 above thelower skirt 74 is used as a reclosure cap, that proper seating of the reclosure cap be insured so that the reclosed bottle does not leak. InFIG. 1 the reference letter X is used to designate the vertical distance between the upper edge ofthreads flange 24 ofneck 22 contacts the slantedsurface 92 ofplug 91. The reference letter Y is used to designate the minimum vertical dimension between the top edge ofvertical stretch 28 ofneck 22 and the underside of thethread start 31. A feature of the structure is that at some position of the cap the dimension X be greater than the dimension Y. Hence when the reclosure cap is placed on the container neck, the threads interengage, preferably a quarter-turn or more before the upper edge of the container neck engages the inner skirt or plug. This prevents cross-threading or stripping of the threads when the reclosure cap is tightened on the neck. - As used in the claims, the term “thread” is used not only to include external threads but internal ones as well and to include continuous and interrupted threads or other “helical engagement means”. In the specification and claims, the cumulative turn total for multi-lead threads or other such helical engagement means is the sum total of the number of turns of the individual multi-lead threads around either the neck stretch portion or the upper skirt portion. For multi-lead threads, “in excess of one turn total” means that the sum total of the number of turns of the individual threads is in excess of 360°. The language “at least one vertically extending arc stretch” refers to a portion of the upper skirt or neck stretch where the threads overlap or are repetitive vertically, whereby a vertical line drawn within the arc stretch will intersect at least two threads. When the threads on either the cap or the neck overlap (i.e. a vertical line drawn within the arc stretch will traverse the helical engagement means at least two times), the application of the cap onto the container with at least two “clicks” is ensured.
-
Closure 121, hereinafter described in detail, is used with acontainer neck 122. The interior of the neck forms no part of the present invention. With a blow-molded bottle finish, the interior contour tends to follow that of the neck exterior. However, it will be understood that other types of bottles may be used, with the internal shape of the neck varying from that of the exterior. -
Neck 122 has acentral opening 123 and a downward-outward slantedlip flange 124 terminating in anupper neck stretch 128.Threads 129 extend outward ofstretch 128. In the illustrated embodiment, there are twothreads upper flank 136 ofthread 129 slants downwardly/outwardly at approximately 45° while thelower flank 137 slants downwardly/inwardly at approximately 10°, permitting the threads on the interior of the cap to slip past the threads on the neck finish. Preferably, thethread apex 138 is made with as large a radius as possible, but being sufficient to insure that the cap must be unscrewed and not pulled from the neck. - Instead of cooperatively shaped threads on the upper neck stretch and the inner surface of the closure, one thread may be replaced by a groove. Further,
threads 129 may be interrupted, instead of being continuous. - The container neck includes a tamper-evidencing
portion 40 below theupper neck stretch 128 which includes an outward extendingshoulder 142, a lockingwall 146 offset outwardly relative to theupper neck stretch 128, and a lower outward extendingshoulder 147. A plurality of upward projectingteeth 151 are formed on the tamper-evidencing portion of the neck. Avertical stretch 148 depends fromshoulder 147. To facilitate gripping the container during filling and loading,vertical stretch 148 may be formed with a number of bumper ring segments 149 (here shown as four in number). - The
teeth 151 extend upwardly from theshoulder stretch 147. The teeth are shaped and positioned to cooperate with internal teeth formed on the closure, the interengagement between the teeth resisting unscrewing of the cap from the neck. Typically, multiple teeth 151 (FIG. 18 ) are formed on either side ofneck 122, with the total extent of the multiple teeth being approximately 90°. - A cap for use with
neck structure 122 is illustrated in FIGS. 13 to 17. The cap has a top 160 from the periphery of which depends downward extendingupper skirt 161. As illustrated, the top comprises a generally flat top disk; however, other configurations may be substituted. Theupper skirt 161 is formed with a generally verticalupper edge 162 which merges with outward-downwardslanted stretch 163, which in turn merges withvertical stretch 164. Aninternal shoulder 165 is formed at the intersection ofstretches bead 168 depends from the underside oftop 160. When thecap 121 seats on the neck,bead 168 engageslip flange 124,internal shoulder 165 engages the upper edge ofvertical stretch 128 and inner skirt or plug 191 engageslip flange 124, substantially sealing the container.Members vertical ribs 166 to enable the user to grip the cap. - As is shown in
FIG. 17A , theinternal shoulder 165 provides an inward projecting portion 161 a of theupper skirt 161 which cooperates with the exterior of theneck stretch 128. Since the circumference of theupper portion 128 a ofneck stretch 128 is greater than the interior circumference of thecap 121 at the inward projecting portion 161 a of the skirt, a tight fit is formed between the inward projecting portion and the neck stretch exterior. The tight fit between the upper skirt portion above thread 171 a and the exterior of theneck stretch 128 abovethread 129 a promotes an effective seal between the exterior of theplug 191 and theinterior edge 124 a of thelip 124. When thecap 121 is applied to theneck 122, theupper skirt 161 is biased outward as the inward projecting portion 161 a engages the exterior of theneck stretch 128. Since the closure is resilient, theinner plug 191 of the cap is urged toward thelip 124 to form a seal between the generally seamlessinterior edge 124 a of the lip and exterior of theplug 191. In other words, the inward projecting portion provides a means for biasing the upper skirt and the plug outward to urge the plug into sealing engagement with thelip 124. The fit of the shoulder against the neck tends to reduce leakage and rigidify the cap, preventing the cap from being turned or torqued to jump threads or strip the threads. Theinner plug 191 of thecap 121 tends to push the neck of the bottle outward against the shoulder and the shoulder then prevents turning or stripping. -
Threads 171 a and 171 b, which are selected to mate withthreads 129 ofneck 122, are formed on the interior of the skirt. The shape ofthreads threads 171 a and 171 b are double lead and each extend around the circumference of the cap in excess of 180°, for example, approximately 200°. In conventional capping machines,cap 121 is deposited onneck 122. Sincethreads 171 a, 171 b are diametrically opposed, the cap tends to rest horizontally onneck 122, facilitating the application of the cap onto the neck with a downward, axial force. - In order for the closure and container threads to effectively slip past each other during direct axial application it is necessary that the threads be finer than would be appropriate for a threaded closure applied by conventional rotary application. As threads become finer, a greater amount of total thread engagement is often necessary to prevent excessive forward stripping on reapplication. For the present embodiment, which includes a linear density of twelve threads per inch and is formed with double leads, a thread engagement of approximately 200° for each of the two cap threads is satisfactory (i.e. 400° of total thread engagement). Finer threads such as sixteen or twenty threads per inch would require greater total thread engagement.
- The closure includes a tamper-evidencing
band 170 below theupper skirt portion 161 provided with a plurality ofinternal ratchet teeth 181. In the present embodiment, the tamper-evidencingband 170 comprises anannular shoulder 173 below theupper skirt 161 and anouter skirt portion 174 extending downwardly from theshoulder 173. Theband 170 is joined to theupper skirt 161 by a frangible section which allows theband 170 to be at least partially torn from the cap. The frangible section includes a number of radially spacedbridges 176 interconnecting theshoulder 173 and the upper skirt portion, the bridges being provided by the lower edges ofribs 166. Alternatively, the frangible section may be provided by a line of weakness formed along the intersection ofshoulder 173 andupper skirt 161. In the illustrated embodiment, theshoulder 173 andouter skirt portion 174 divide the band into two sections, with the outer skirt portion being oriented at an angle relative to the annular shoulder. In a modified embodiment, discussed in relation toFIG. 24 , the tamper-evidencing band may comprise a single, curved section which extends generally outward and downward from the upper skirt portion. The tamper-evidencing band may also take many other forms. - The tamper-evidencing band includes a plurality of the
internal ratchet teeth 181 depending from theshoulder 173. The generally downwardly dependingteeth 181 are positioned to engageteeth 151 whencap 121 is pushed ontoneck 122.Teeth 181 include aninclined surface 183 for facilitating the application of the cap toneck 122 and a workingsurface 184 which cooperates with the working surface of one of theteeth 151 on the neck to resist unscrewing of the closure. As the closure is moved downwardly on the neck, theinclined surface 183 slides alongtooth 151 to thereby guidetooth 181 to a position between adjacent ones ofteeth 151. The downward dependingtooth 181 is retained between theteeth 151, with the interengagement between theteeth cap 121 on the neck so long as the tamper-evidencingband 170 is intact.Teeth 181 are located on the shoulder in the present embodiment; however, the teeth may alternatively be positioned at other locations on the tamper-evidencingband 170, such as along the inner surface ofouter skirt portion 174. - The interlocking engagement between the teeth on the cap with those on the neck prevents twisting of the cap relative to the container while the tamper-evidencing
band 170 is intact. To remove the closure from the neck, theband 170 is at least partially removed from theupper skirt 161 to disengageteeth 181 from theteeth 151 on the neck. The separation of the tamper-evidencingband 170 from theupper skirt 161 is accomplished by rupturing thebridges 176. The ruptured bridges warn the consumer that the container has been opened and the contents tampered with. - A
tear tab 186 is connected to the lower edge of the tamper-evidencingband 170. In the present embodiment, the tear tab provides means for removing the lower band and may additionally be used to orientcap 121 relative to the container prior to application if desired. The tamper-evidencingband 170 is formed with a line of weaknessadjacent tab 186, generally indicated by 187, extending throughouter skirt portion 174 andshoulder 173 of the band. The line of weakness facilitates removal of theband 170 from the closure, and is another tamper-evidencing feature of the present invention. When initially opening the container, the consumer pullstab 186 to removelower band 170, rupturingline 187 andfrangible section 176. The absence of theband 170 more dramatically alerts the consumer to possible tampering with the contents. An inattentive consumer may fail to notice the fractured bridges, therefore the removal of the tamper-evidencing band is a more obvious indication of tampering. In the preferred form, completely removinglower band 170 fromupper skirt 161 aesthetically enhances the appearance ofcap 121, which is used to reseal the container. However, in other forms of the present invention the lower band may be only partially removed from the upper skirt portion for separatingteeth 151 fromteeth 181 to unscrew the cap from the container. - When a consumer desires to initially open the container, he grips
tab 186 and pulls circumferentially around the container detachinglower band 170 fromupper skirt 161. Ratchetteeth 181 are thereby removed from interlocking engagement with upward projectingteeth 151, enabling the consumer to unscrewcap 121 fromneck 122 and providing evidence that the container has been opened. To replace the cap, the consumer merely reverses the direction of twisting. - A modification of the cap is shown in
FIGS. 19 and 20 . The modified cap 121 c may be applied to a container having a neck configuration similar to that shown inFIG. 18 . The cap 121 c includes a tamper-evidencingband 170 c which includes a number of downward dependingteeth 181 c. Theshoulder 173 c of the band extends horizontally outward from the lower edge ofupper skirt portion 161 c, and theouter skirt portion 174 c depends from the shoulder. A frangible section composed of a plurality of circumferentially spacedbridges 176 c connectsshoulder 173 c to the lower edge ofupper skirt 161 c. Theteeth 181 c are dimensioned and positioned to engage the upwardly extendingteeth 151 formed on the neck. To facilitate application of cap 121 c,teeth 181 c include a beveledinner surface 183 c. When pushing the closure onto the neck,inner surface 183 c directs theteeth 181 c into interengagement withteeth 151. The workingsurface 184 c engages the working surface of one of theteeth 151 on the neck to resist unscrewing of the cap 121 c from the neck. -
Teeth 181 c andteeth 151 cooperate to restrain unscrewing of cap 121 c relative to the neck while the lower skirt remains intact. To unscrew the cap,lower band 170 c is removed fromupper skirt portion 161 c by rupturingfrangible bridges 176 c. The modified cap may include a tear tab and a line of weakness extending through the lower skirt, as described with reference to the previously discussed embodiment for facilitating removal of tamper-evidencingband 170 c. Alternatively, cap 121 c may be twisted, fracturing the bridges, and unscrewed from the container withlower band 170 c remaining aroundneck 122. The use of a tear tab and line of weakness is preferred, as it provides a clearer and more obvious indication of tampering, facilitates recycling of the container and substantially eliminates risk of injury to wildlife. - An alternative modification of the cap 121 d and
neck 122 d of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 21 to 23.Neck 122 d is formed withseveral teeth 151 d circumferentially spaced along shoulder stretch 147 d. A pair ofadjacent teeth 151 d are separated by a space, generally designated 152, formed for receiving the teeth of the closure. When the closure is applied to the neck, a tooth formed on the closure is positioned withinspace 152 between theadjacent teeth 151 d, thereby preventing rotation of the closure relative to the neck. - Cap 121 d (
FIG. 21 ) includes a domed top 160 d having an inner skirt 191 d depending from the underside of the domed top. Inner skirt 191 d engageslip flange 124 d when the cap seats on the neck, forming an internal seal between the cap and the neck. In this embodiment, thelower band portion 170 d comprises a number of teeth 181 d generally depending from lower edge 68 of upper skirt 61 d. The tamper-evidencing means are provided by the teeth 181 d. The teeth 181 d are shaped and positioned forinterengaging teeth 151 d, with one tooth 181 d slipping intospace 52 as the cap 121 d is applied toneck 122 d. The teeth 181 d have an inclined surface 83 d which slides along thetooth 151 d to position the tooth 181 d in thespace 52. The working surface 84 d of the tooth engages thetooth 151 d on the neck to resist unscrewing of the cap 121 d relative to theneck 122 d. The interengagement betweenteeth 151 d and teeth 181 d substantially restricts twisting of the closure relative to the neck, preventing unscrewing of the cap with the tamper-evidencing structure intact. - To remove cap 121 d from
neck 122 d, theband 170 d, which is formed with the downward depending teeth 181 d, must be severed fromupper skirt portion 161 d. As is shown inFIG. 21 , a line ofweakness 179 extends about the circumference of the closure between theupper skirt portion 161 d and theband 170 d. To open the container for the first time, theband 170 d is torn away at the line of weakness, facilitating unscrewing of the closure. Removal of theband 170 d is facilitated by a tear tab which is gripped while initiating a continuing tearing away of the lower skirt portion. As is shown inFIG. 23 , one of the downward extending teeth 181 d may be extended to provide a tear tab. When the cap is applied to the neck, the tear tab is deformed outward by depressed section 143 of shoulder stretch 147 d. The consumer grips the tear tab shown inFIG. 23 and removes thelower band portion 170 d to separate theinterengaged teeth 151 d and 181 d and open the container. - Another modification of a cap 121 e of the present invention is shown in
FIG. 24 . The cap 121 e may be used with a neck of the type shown inFIG. 18 . The cap 121 e includes anupper skirt 161 e having a generallyvertical portion 164 e and alower band portion 170 e. Thelower band 170 e extends generally outward and downward from the lower edge ofvertical portion 164 e, and is formed with acurved section 180. A number ofinternal teeth 181 e are formed on the interior of thecurved section 180 of the lower band. A frangible section, provided in the present embodiment by a line ofweakness 176 e, joins thelower band 170 e to theupper skirt portion 161 e. Atear tab 186 e depends from thelower band 170 e. When the cap 121 e is applied to theneck 122, threads 171 e slip past andinterengage threads 129.Curved section 180 slips over outward extendingshoulder 142 andlower neck portion 146, with theteeth 181 e being shaped and positioned tointerengage teeth 151. As with the previously described modifications, to open the container the consumer pullstab 186 e, fractures the line ofweakness 176 e and separates the lower band from the upper skirt, disengagingteeth 181 e fromteeth 151. - Turning to
FIG. 25 ,cap 121 is shown seated oncontainer 125. With the present invention, the closure may be conveniently oriented relative to the container prior to applying the closure to the neck. Thetab 186 and the non-circular cross section of the container are directed by the capping machine during the capping process to align the cap and container relative to one another, positioningteeth teeth 181 formed on the closure into interengagement with theteeth 151 formed on the neck. By first orienting the cap, full thread engagement may be achieved once the cap is pushed onto the neck. However, it is to be understood that in many instances, full thread engagement or complete interengagement of theteeth -
FIGS. 28-32 illustrate another embodiment of aneck 122 f and cap 121 f in accordance with the present invention. Theneck 122 f includesmultiple threads 129 f on theupper neck stretch 128 f. As shown inFIG. 29 , theneck 122 f includes seventhreads 129 f although it is to be understood that a greater number of threads may be employed if desired. In this embodiment, the thread finish has a linear thread density of more than 17 threads per inch, for example 17.5 threads per inch, and each thread extends more than 200°, for example 215°, around the circumference of theupper neck stretch 128 f. The thread density and length of each thread are also subject to variation within the scope of this invention. - A plurality of
teeth 151 f are formed on the lockingwall 146 f of theneck 122 f. As shown particularly inFIG. 20 , theteeth 151 f include a workingsurface 154 and a trailingsurface 155. The workingsurface 154 engages the working surface of a tooth on the cap to resist unscrewing of the cap relative to the neck. The trailingsurface 155 joins the outer edge of the workingsurface 154 of onetooth 151 f to the inner edge of the workingsurface 154 of the adjacent tooth as shown inFIG. 29 . In other modifications of the invention, theteeth 151 f may be spaced apart so that the trailingsurface 155 ends at the lockingwall 146 f and is not joined to the adjacent tooth. The trailingedges 155 allow thecap 121 f to be twisted slightly, usually no more than about 50°, to fully seat the cap on the neck after the cap has been substantially applied by pushing the cap in an axial direction onto the neck. - As shown particularly in
FIGS. 28 and 30 , eachtooth 151 f includes abevel 156 at the upper edge of thetooth 151 f. Thebevels 156 slant downwardly and outwardly to guide thecap teeth 181 f into side-by-side interengagement with the teeth 15 f. In the embodiment ofFIGS. 28-30 , thebevel 156 is inclined at an angle of about 40° to 50°, such as 45°, relative to a horizontal plane. However, a bevel of an angle in the range of 10° to 70° may be employed. - The
cap 121 f is shown inFIGS. 31 and 32 . Thecap 121 f includesmultiple threads 171 f on the interior of theupper skirt 161 f which mate with themultiple threads 129 f on theupper neck stretch 128 f. In the illustrated embodiment, thecap 121 f includes seven threads each having a length of about 180°, and the thread finish has a linear thread density of more than 17 threads per inch, such as 17.5 threads per inch. As withthreads 129 f, it is to be understood that the number of threads, the length of the individual threads, and the linear thread density is subject to considerable variation within the scope of the present invention. - A plurality of
teeth 181 fare provided on the interior of the tamper-evidencingband 170 f. In the illustrated embodiment,teeth 181 f are formed around the entire circumference of theband 170 f, however in other embodiments theteeth 181 f may be arranged in groups spaced around the interior of theband 170 f. Theteeth 181 f have a working surface 184 f and a trailingsurface 185. The working surface 184 f cooperates with the workingsurface 154 of theteeth 151 f on the neck to resist unscrewing of thecap 121 f from theneck 122 f, while the trailingsurface 185 joins the outer edge of the working surface 184 f to either the inner edge of the working surface 184 f of an adjacent tooth or ends at the inner wall of theband 170 f. When thecap 121 f is moved downwardly onto theneck 122 f in an axial direction, the lower edge of some of theteeth 181 f contact thebevel 156 on theteeth 151 f, which guides theteeth 181 f into side-by-side engagement with theteeth 151 f. - In this embodiment shown in
FIGS. 31 and 32 , the downward slope of the working surface 184 f and the trailingsurface 185 follows the slope of theband 170 f. In this instance, both theband 170 f and thesurfaces 184 f and 185 are substantially vertical corresponding to the substantially vertical orientation of the lockingwall 146 f. However, theband 170 f may also be slanted downwardly and outwardly as shown for example by theband 170 inFIGS. 1-5 . The bottom or lower edge of theteeth 181 f of the embodiment shown inFIGS. 31-32 is substantially horizontal. When theneck 122 f is used with thecap 121 f, thebevels 156 provide the primary means for guiding theteeth 151 f and theteeth 181 f into interengagement. Theneck 122 f may also be used with other caps such as acap 121 g shown inFIG. 33 . Theteeth 181 g of thecap 121 g have a bevel orinclined surface 183 g which is slanted in a downward-outward direction. The bevel 183 g cooperates with thebevel 156 to guide theteeth neck 122 f may also be used with caps of the type shown inFIGS. 13-18 andFIGS. 19-20 , modified to include threads matching the thread pattern on theneck 121 f. - Except as set forth above, the modifications of
FIGS. 19-20 , 21-23, 24, 28-32 and 33 resemble those of the preceding modifications and the same reference numerals followed by the subscripts c-g, respectively, are used to designate corresponding parts. - Preferred Operation II
- After the container has been filled, it is transported through a capping machine. The structure of capping machines is well known in the bottling art. As is well understood in the art, and in a manner similar to that whereby push-on, pull-off caps are applied, caps 121 are fed one at a time out of a bowl 111 in the capping machine along a chute 112 (
FIG. 26 ). One type of chute 112 is formed with aslot 113 betweenparallel rails 114, withtear tab 186 orienting the caps for uniform discharge in a pre-determined orientation relative to the containers passing therebelow by fitting into thespace 113 between therails 114. Chutes without slots may be used when the tab does not depend from the lower edge of the tamper-evidencing band or when the cap is not oriented relative to the neck before it is applied. - When orientation is employed, each
container 125 preferably has a non-circular cross section or some other variation from a round shape, such as the rectangular shape shown inFIG. 25 , which permits the container to be oriented relative to cap 121. Thecontainer 125 travels along aconveyer belt 116 below the capping machine (FIG. 27 ).Guide rails 117 adjacent theconveyor belt 116 directionally align the non-circular cross section of thecontainer 125 relative to thetear tab 186 of the cap. Using theslot 113 between theparallel rails 114 and theguide rails 117, thecap 121 andneck 122 may be conveniently oriented relative to one another by the conventional capping machine and conveyor belt system. - As is well known in the art, the container passes below the chute and picks up a
cap 121 such that the cap is resting on theneck 122. If orientation is employed, thethreads Threads 171 a and 171 b slip overthreads slanted surfaces 136 facilitating such movement. The cap is sufficiently resilient so that it expands outward to permit the threads to slip. Ascap 121 seats on the neck,teeth 181 fall behindteeth 151, providing interengagement betweenteeth 151 andteeth 181. Theinclined surfaces 183 ofteeth 181 and/orbevels 156 ofteeth 151 f guide theteeth neck 122, it may not be removed without providing evidence of tampering. The interengagement betweenteeth cap 121 offneck 122. - In another embodiment of the present invention illustrated in
FIG. 34 ,closure 221, hereinafter described in detail, is used with acontainer neck 222.Neck 222 has acentral opening 223 and a downward-outward slantedlip flange 224 terminating in avertical stretch 228. Threads 229 extend outward ofstretch 228. In the illustrated embodiment, there are twothreads upper flank 236 of thread 229 slants downwardly/outwardly at approximately 45° while the lower flank slants downwardly/inwardly at approximately 10°, permitting the threads on the interior of the cap to slip past the threads on the neck finish. Preferably, the thread apex 238 is made with as large a radius as possible. - Instead of cooperatively shaped threads on the upper neck stretch portion and the inner surface of the closure, one thread may be replaced by a groove. Further, threads 229 may be interrupted, instead of continuous.
- Below the vertical stretch is downward extending
locking wall portion 240. The locking wall portion has ashoulder stretch portion 242 and a lowerneck stretch portion 246 offset outwardly relative to the upper neck stretch portion. In the illustrated embodiment, the lower neck portion slants downwardly/outwardly at an angle of approximately 10° and terminates in generallyhorizontal shoulder 247. Avertical stretch 248 depends fromshoulder 247. To facilitate gripping of the container during filling and loading,vertical stretch 248 may be formed with a number of bumper ring segments 249 (here shown as four in number). - A number of
ratchet teeth 251 project fromlower stretch 246 on opposite sides ofneck 222. Typically, threeteeth 251 are formed on either side ofneck 222, with the total extent of the three teeth being approximately 90°. Theteeth 251 are shaped to interengage the internal ratchet teeth formed on the cap, preventing twisting of the cap relative to the neck. In the illustrated embodiment,teeth 251 are formed onlower stretch 246. However, in alternative forms of the present invention the teeth may be located onshoulder stretch 242, interengaging ratchet teeth formed on the shoulder of the cap, as is discussed below. - A cap for use with
neck structure 222 is illustrated inFIG. 35 toFIG. 40 . The cap has top 261 from the periphery of which depends downward extendingupper skirt 262. As illustrated, the top comprises a generally flat top disk; however, other configurations may be substituted. The upper edge ofupper skirt 262 merges with slantedstretch 263, which in turn merges with upper skirt portion orvertical stretch 264. Aninternal shoulder 265 is formed at the intersection ofstretches Members vertical ribs 266 to enable the user to grip the cap. -
Threads neck 222, are formed on the interior of the skirt. The shape ofthreads Threads cap 221 is deposited onneck 222. Sincethreads neck 222, facilitating the application of the cap onto the neck with a downward, axial force. - The closure has ring-like skirt or lower skirt portion 2-70 below
upper skirt portion 264. The lower skirt comprisesouter skirt portion 274 offset outwardly relative toupper skirt portion 264 and ashoulder 273 extending inwardly from the upper edge of the outer skirt portion. A frangible section including a number of radially spacedbridges 276 interconnects the shoulder and the upper skirt portion. In the illustrated embodiment, the lower edges ofribs 266 form the bridges. Alternatively, a line of weakness may be formed through the intersection ofshoulder 273 andupper skirt 264. - A number of
internal ratchet teeth 281 spaced and dimensioned to match theteeth 251 ofneck 222 are formed onouter skirt portion 274.Teeth 281 are positioned to engageteeth 251 whencap 221 is pushed ontoneck 222. After cap application, theinner edges 282 ofteeth 281 are positioned close tolower stretch 246. The interlocking engagement between the teeth on the cap with those on the neck prevent twisting of the cap relative to the container while the lower skirt is intact.Teeth 281 are located on the outer skirt in the present embodiment; however, the teeth may alternatively be positioned along the inner surface ofshoulder 273. The teeth formed on the shoulder surface would be shaped and positioned to interengage teeth located on the shoulder stretch ofneck 222. When the closure is applied to the neck, the ratchet teeth on the opposing surfaces ofshoulder 273 andshoulder stretch 42 interlock, preventing removal of the cap so long as the line of weakness is not broken. - The interengagement between ratchet
teeth - In the preferred embodiment, a
tear tab 286 is connected to the lower edge ofouter skirt 274. The tear tab provides means for removing the lower skirt, and may be used to orientcap 221 relative to the container.Lower skirt 270 is formed with a line of weakness generally indicated by 287 extending throughouter skirt 274 andshoulder 273. The line of weakness facilitates removal of the lower skirt from the closure, and is another tamper-evident feature of the present invention. When initially opening the container, the consumer pullstab 286 to removelower skirt 270, rupturingline 287 andfrangible section 276. The absence of the lower skirt more dramatically alerts the consumer to possible tampering of the contents. A distracted consumer may fail to notice the fractured bridges, therefore the removal of the lower skirt is a more obvious indication of tampering. - It has been contended that the tamper-evident features of the closure which has been described up to this point may be circumvented by curling the
lower skirt 270 in an upward direction. A cap having a partially deformed lower skirt is shown inFIG. 34 . With the lower skirt completely deformed upward,teeth - To further safeguard the consumer from the dangers of tampering, a substantially
vertical fin 300 is formed betweenupper skirt 264 andshoulder 273. In one embodiment,vertical fin 300 is located adjacent line ofweakness 287, as is shown particularly inFIG. 36 ,FIG. 37 andFIG. 38 . When a dishonest patron attempts to curl thelower skirt 270 towards the upper skirt, the deformation of the material below thevertical fin 300, generally indicated at 302, is resisted by the fin. This resistance distortslower skirt 270, causing line ofweakness 287 andfrangible bridges 276 to rupture, providing evidence of tampering. Attempts by a dishonest patron to tamper with the contents of a container by curling the lower skirt to removecap 221 will be revealed by the fracturing offrangible section 276 andline 287. Thus,vertical fin 300 provides additional protection against tampering. - In the preferred form,
fin 300 is formed with a substantially vertical line ofweakness 301 through the closure adjacent the upper skirt. Aslower skirt 270 is torn from the closure, line ofweakness 301 is ruptured and the fin removed fromupper skirt 264 together with the lower skirt. The upper skirt is provided with an even, clean finish oncevertical fin 300 is removed. However, if desired, the fin could be formed with a line of weakness extending through the finadjacent shoulder 273. The fin would then remain intact onupper skirt 264 after removal of the lower skirt from the container. - In the alternative embodiment shown in
FIG. 43 toFIG. 45 , improved tamper evidence is achieved by a camming action ofdual fins 310 upstanding fromshoulder 273. In this embodiment, the fins need not be joined toupper skirt 264. If a dishonest patron attempts to curl the lower skirt to tamper with the contents of the container,dual fins 310 act as a cam to force the lower skirt radially outward, causing sufficient deformation of the lower skirt to fracturebridges 276 and line ofweakness 287. A further advantage of the present embodiment is that no residual material remains onupper skirt 64 after removal oflower skirt 270. - As is illustrated particularly in
FIG. 37 andFIG. 39 , line ofweakness 287 extending throughlower skirt 270 is a continuous section of material. This configuration is preferred as it is simple to manufacture. However, an alternative embodiment having agap 304 at the intersection ofshoulder 273 andouter skirt 274 is shown inFIG. 41 andFIG. 42 .Lower skirt 270 has agroove 306 extending throughshoulder 273 andouter skirt 274. The shoulder is formed with afirst web material 308bridging groove 306, while the outer skirt is formed having asecond web material 310 bridging the groove. The first andsecond web materials gap 304. - With the embodiments illustrated in
FIG. 35 toFIG. 40 andFIG. 43 toFIG. 45 , upward deformation of the lower skirt stretches the lower edge of the outer skirt, placing the corner between the shoulder and the outer skirt in compression. Removing material from the corner and forminggap 304, as inFIG. 41 andFIG. 42 , increases the amount of distortion caused by curling the lower skirt, thereby facilitating the fracturing of line ofweakness 287. Thus, the alternative embodiment provides an additional tamper-evident feature of the cap of the present invention. - In feeding the snap-on screw-off closure, orientation is generally achieved by causing
tear tab 286 to be at the trailing edge, riding in a slot cutout of the cap feed chute. It has been observed that occasionally thelower skirt 270 of a trailing cap will ride up onto theshoulder 273 of the preceding cap directly above thetear tab 286 of the preceding cap. This causes a jam and stops the flow of caps. It is readily apparent that an additional benefit offin 300 anddual fins 310 of the present invention is the prevention of the occurrence of jamming. - After the container has been filled, it is transported through a capping machine. As is well understood in the bottling art, and in a manner similar to that whereby push-on, snap-off caps are applied, caps 221 are fed one at a time out of a bowl in the capping machine, with
tear tab 286 orienting the caps for uniform discharge in a pre-determined orientation relative to the containers passing therebelow. Although not shown in the accompanying drawings, each container has a square cross-section or some other variation from a round shape which permits the container to be oriented relative to cap 221. The structure of capping machines is well known in the bottling art. Because of the relative orientation ofcap 221 andneck 222,teeth Threads threads slanted surfaces 236 facilitating such movement. The cap is sufficiently resilient so that it expands outward sufficiently to permit the threads to slip. Ascap 221 seats on the neck,teeth 281 engage behindteeth 251 to fully engageteeth 281 in place. - After the cap has been fully seated on
neck 222, it can not be removed without providing evidence of tampering. The interengagement betweenteeth cap 221 offneck 222. Substantiallyvertical fin 300 ordual fins 310 prevent upward deformation of the lower skirt without rupturingfrangible bridges 276 and line ofweakness 287. Thus, any attempts to tamper with the contents of the container will be revealed to the consumer. - When a consumer desires to initially open the container, he grips
tab 286 and pulls circumferentially around the container causinglower skirt 270 andvertical fin 300 to be removed. Ratchetteeth 281 are thereby removed from interlocking engagement withratchet teeth 251, providing evidence of tampering and enabling the consumer to unscrewcap 221 fromneck 222. To replace the cap, the consumer merely reverses the direction of twisting. - In another embodiment shown in
FIG. 46 andFIG. 47 , to further safeguard the consumer from the dangers of tampering, a plurality of substantiallyvertical castle projections 500 are circumferentially-spaced about theupper skirt 464 extending upwardly from shoulder 473 and spaced outwardly fromupper skirt 464. In the illustrated embodiment, the cap is provided with eight castle projections, however, one will appreciate that the actual number may vary. In the illustrated embodiment, onecastle projection 500′ is located adjacent line ofweakness 487, as is shown particularly inFIG. 46 andFIG. 47 . When a dishonest patron attempts to curl thelower skirt 470 towards the upper skirt, the deformation of the material below thevertical castle projection 500 is resisted by the castle projection as it abuts againstupper skirt 464. This resistance distortslower skirt 470, causing line ofweakness 487 andfrangible bridges 476 to rupture, providing evidence of tampering. Attempts by a dishonest patron to tamper with the contents of a container by curling the lower skirt to removecap 421 will be revealed by the fracturing offrangible section 476 andline 487. Thus,vertical castle projection 500 provides additional protection against tampering. - In the preferred form,
castle projections 500 are circumferentially spaced about the upper skirt and are spaced away from the upper skirt. On will appreciate that the spacing and height of the castle projections may vary, provided that height of the castle projections is tall enough to allow camming action in that theupper edge 505 abuts against a lower portion ofupper skirt 464 aslower skirt 470 is pivoted about thefrangible section 476 in the direction of arrow P inFIG. 47 . Such camming action is similar to that described above with respect to the dualvertical fins 310. In the illustrated embodiment, the castle projection extends substantially vertically from the lower skirt portion, however, one will appreciate that the shape of the projection may vary. For example, the projection may have an outwardly tapered surface providing a right-triangular cross-section in which the angled surface is spaced outward from the upper skirt portion. The angled surface may provide a different aesthetic while the inner vertical surface still provides the camming action which encourages tamper-evidencing rupture of the frangible section. Alternatively, the castle projections may be in the form of rod-like extensions which extend upwardly from the lower skirt. - If a dishonest patron attempts to curl the lower skirt to tamper with the contents of the container,
castle projections 500 act as a cam to force the lower skirt radially outward, causing sufficient deformation of the lower skirt to fracturebridges 476 and line ofweakness 487. Aslower skirt 470 is torn from the closure,frangible section 476 is ruptured and the castle projections are removed fromupper skirt 464 together withlower skirt 470. A further advantage of the present embodiment is that no residual material remains onupper skirt 64 after removal oflower skirt 470. - After the cap has been fully seated on
neck 422, it can not be removed without providing evidence of tampering. The interengagement betweenteeth cap 421 offneck 422. Substantiallyvertical castle projection 500 prevent upward deformation of the lower skirt without rupturingfrangible bridges 476 and line ofweakness 487. Thus, any attempts to tamper with the contents of the container will be revealed to the consumer. - When a consumer desires to initially open the container, he may merely grip the
upper skirt 464 and twist the cap with respect to the neck to unthread the cap from the container neck. In this case, the frangible section will rupture thus allowing the cap to be unthreaded from the neck. Alternatively, the cap may be provided with a gripping tab, as discussed above, and pulls circumferentially around the container causing the lower skirt and vertical castle projections to be removed from the remainder of the cap, thereby removing the ratchet teeth of the cap from interlocking engagement with ratchet teeth of the neck, providing evidence of tampering and enabling the consumer to unscrew the cap from the neck. In either case, to replace the cap, the consumer merely reverses the direction of twisting. - The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Claims (10)
1. A container closure for use with a container neck of the type having an upper opening, a downward extending upper neck stretch portion below said opening, said upper neck stretch portion having an exterior, at least one first helical engagement thread around said exterior of said upper neck stretch portion, a locking wall portion below said upper neck stretch portion, said locking wall portion comprising a lower neck stretch portion offset outwardly relative to said upper neck stretch portion and a first shoulder extending inwardly from said lower neck stretch portion to said upper neck stretch portion, at least one external tooth on said locking wall portion,
said closure having a top, a downward extending upper skirt portion depending from said top, at least one second helical engagement thread around said interior of said upper skirt portion shaped to mate with said at least one first helical engagement thread, a lower skirt portion below said upper skirt portion, said lower skirt portion comprising an outer skirt portion offset outwardly relative to said upper skirt portion and a second shoulder extending inwardly from said outer skirt portion to said upper skirt portion, a frangible line of weakness interconnecting said upper skirt portion and said second shoulder, at least one castle projection joined to and upstanding from said second shoulder to prevent upward deformation of said lower skirt portion without breaking said frangible line of weakness, at least one internal tooth on said lower skirt portion shaped to engage said at least one external tooth to prevent unscrewing of said closure relative to said neck without breaking said frangible line of weakness.
2. The closure of claim 1 in which said castle projection extends substantially vertically from said lower skirt portion.
3. The closure of claim 1 in which said castle projection is spaced from said upper skirt portion.
4. The closure of claim 1 in which lower skirt portion includes a plurality of said substantially vertical castle projections circumferentially spaced from said upper skirt portion.
5. The closure of claim 4 in which said lower skirt portion is formed with a substantially vertical line of weakness extending adjacent at least one of said substantially vertical castle projections adjacent said upper skirt portion, whereby said at least one substantially vertical castle projection is a tamper-evident feature of said closure.
6. The closure of claim 1 in which said at least one internal tooth is located on said outer skirt portion.
7. A container closure for use with a container neck of the type having an upper opening, a downward extending upper neck stretch portion below said opening, said upper neck stretch portion having an exterior, at least one first helical engagement thread around said exterior of said upper neck stretch portion, a locking wall portion below said upper neck stretch portion, said locking wall portion comprising a lower neck stretch portion offset outwardly relative to said upper neck stretch portion and a first shoulder extending inwardly from said lower neck stretch portion said upper neck stretch portion, at least one external tooth on said locking wall portion,
said closure having a top, a downward extending upper skirt portion depending from said top, said upper skirt portion having an interior, at least one second helical engagement thread around said interior of said upper skirt portion shaped to mate with said at least one first helical engagement thread, a lower skirt portion below said upper skirt portion, said lower skirt portion comprising an outer skirt portion offset outwardly relative to said upper skirt portion and a second shoulder extending inwardly from said outer skirt portion to said upper skirt portion, a frangible line of weakness interconnecting said upper skirt portion and said second shoulder, at least one substantially vertical castle projection upstanding from said second shoulder to prevent upward deformation of said lower skirt portion without breaking said frangible line of weakness, at least one internal tooth on said lower skirt portion shaped to engage said at least one external tooth to prevent unscrewing of said closure relative to said neck without breaking said frangible line of weakness,
said at least one first helical engagement thread and said at least one second helical engagement thread being shaped such that when said closure is moved directly axially downward on said neck without relative rotation of said closure and said neck, said at least one first helical engagement thread and said at least one second helical engagement thread slip passes each other and then interengage,
said second shoulder and said outer skirt portion are formed with a line of weakness extending through said second shoulder and said outer skirt portion.
8. The closure of claim 7 in which said at least one substantially vertical castle projection is located adjacent said line of weakness.
9. The closure of claim 7 in which said line of weakness comprises a groove formed through said second shoulder and said outer skirt portion, said second shoulder formed having a first web material bridging said groove and said outer skirt portion formed having a second web material bridging said groove.
10. The closure of claim 9 in which said first and second web materials are separated by a gap adjacent the intersection of said second shoulder and said outer skirt portion.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/057,952 US20050269282A1 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2005-02-14 | Tamper-evident cap and container neck |
Applications Claiming Priority (12)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US07/565,638 US5190178A (en) | 1990-08-09 | 1990-08-09 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US07/772,945 US5213224A (en) | 1990-08-09 | 1991-10-08 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US07/830,133 US5267661A (en) | 1990-08-09 | 1992-01-31 | Snap-on, screw off cap and container neck |
US08/029,177 US5456376A (en) | 1990-08-09 | 1993-03-10 | Snap-on, screw off cap and container neck |
US45674195A | 1995-06-01 | 1995-06-01 | |
US08/781,453 US5755348A (en) | 1990-08-09 | 1997-01-10 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US09/071,625 US5975321A (en) | 1990-08-09 | 1998-05-01 | Snap-on, screw-off cap with tamper-evidencing skirt and container neck |
US09/356,063 US6173853B1 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 1999-07-19 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US09/746,882 US6439412B2 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2000-12-22 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US10/210,716 US6637611B2 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2002-07-30 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US10/668,780 US20040055991A1 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2003-09-22 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US11/057,952 US20050269282A1 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2005-02-14 | Tamper-evident cap and container neck |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/668,780 Continuation-In-Part US20040055991A1 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2003-09-22 | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050269282A1 true US20050269282A1 (en) | 2005-12-08 |
Family
ID=35446549
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/057,952 Abandoned US20050269282A1 (en) | 1990-08-09 | 2005-02-14 | Tamper-evident cap and container neck |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20050269282A1 (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1990288A2 (en) * | 2007-05-10 | 2008-11-12 | Waldemar Kaduk | Container with cap |
US20090084751A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2009-04-02 | Sacmi Cooperativa Meccanicimola Imola Societa' Cooperativa | Closure means |
US20090242044A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Sturman Bg, Llc | Pressure Regulators for Beverage Dispensers |
US20100084366A1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2010-04-08 | Miller Edward D | Self-righting cap for a beverage bottle |
US20120273452A1 (en) * | 2010-01-06 | 2012-11-01 | Soehnlen Daniel P | Combined lip and shoulder seal for threaded cap |
CN102849329A (en) * | 2012-08-27 | 2013-01-02 | 浙江硕华医用塑料有限公司 | Lid sealing structure |
US20150129534A1 (en) * | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Sacmi Cooperativa Meccanici Imola Societa' Cooperativa | Closure capsule for containers |
US20160023813A1 (en) * | 2014-07-24 | 2016-01-28 | Al Ibtikar Packaging & Investment Co., Ltd. | Method for safe and tight closure using safety strip and cap for closing bottle's neck |
JP2016159961A (en) * | 2015-03-03 | 2016-09-05 | ライオン株式会社 | Container |
USD908495S1 (en) * | 2017-06-07 | 2021-01-26 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Closure |
USD920790S1 (en) * | 2018-09-24 | 2021-06-01 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Ratcheted closure |
US11059633B2 (en) | 2019-10-31 | 2021-07-13 | Cheer Pack North America | Flip-top closure for container |
USD927976S1 (en) * | 2019-02-22 | 2021-08-17 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Ratcheted closure |
US11267622B2 (en) * | 2019-05-10 | 2022-03-08 | Affaba & Ferrari S.R.L. | Aseptic cap for containers with evidence of first opening |
Citations (85)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1630687A (en) * | 1924-11-15 | 1927-05-31 | Passaic Metal Ware Company | Container |
US2181340A (en) * | 1937-07-20 | 1939-11-28 | Continental Can Co | Metal container |
US3022917A (en) * | 1958-10-02 | 1962-02-27 | Bernardin Bottle Cap Company I | Threaded metal closure cap for a container |
US3181725A (en) * | 1963-03-26 | 1965-05-04 | Friedl Otto | Multiple thread plug closure |
US3223269A (en) * | 1964-12-21 | 1965-12-14 | Owens Illinois Glass Co | Snap-on closure |
US3695475A (en) * | 1971-06-15 | 1972-10-03 | Continental Can Co | Child-proof closure |
US3837518A (en) * | 1972-11-30 | 1974-09-24 | Sunbeam Plastics Corp | Tamper-proof and child-proof medicine bottle or the like |
US3844443A (en) * | 1973-03-19 | 1974-10-29 | Reynolds Metals Co | Easy-open container and method of making same |
US3874540A (en) * | 1974-01-30 | 1975-04-01 | Walter E Hidding | Tamperproof cap |
US3885696A (en) * | 1972-11-04 | 1975-05-27 | Heinrich Eberhardt | Closure construction for container with lid |
US3901403A (en) * | 1973-10-15 | 1975-08-26 | West Co | Tear-open tamperproof closure seal |
US3901404A (en) * | 1972-05-18 | 1975-08-26 | Dairy Cap Corp | Bottle cap |
US3902621A (en) * | 1974-08-05 | 1975-09-02 | Walter E Hidding | Tamperproof closure with grippable handle |
US3980195A (en) * | 1974-11-18 | 1976-09-14 | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Tamper-proof closure |
US3997077A (en) * | 1974-11-13 | 1976-12-14 | G. D. Searle & Co. Ltd. | Containers with screw caps |
US4057160A (en) * | 1976-02-02 | 1977-11-08 | E. & J. Gallo Winery | Self-retaining bottle stopper |
US4078700A (en) * | 1974-08-05 | 1978-03-14 | Hidding Walter E | Dripless pouring spout and closure cap therefor |
US4177906A (en) * | 1978-05-31 | 1979-12-11 | Maxcap Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and plastic cap |
US4180175A (en) * | 1977-02-18 | 1979-12-25 | Maxcap, Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and antitamper cap |
US4241841A (en) * | 1979-05-07 | 1980-12-30 | Consumers Glass Company Ltd. | Severable connecting means |
US4269320A (en) * | 1978-06-30 | 1981-05-26 | Maxcap, Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and anti-tamper cap |
US4298129A (en) * | 1980-05-02 | 1981-11-03 | Morton Stull | Childproof, snap-on, twist-off safety cap and container |
US4299330A (en) * | 1979-10-03 | 1981-11-10 | The Continental Group, Inc. | Container closure device |
US4301937A (en) * | 1978-05-31 | 1981-11-24 | Maxcap, Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and plastic cap |
US4354609A (en) * | 1980-01-09 | 1982-10-19 | Hidding Walter E | Snap-on tamperproof bottle cap |
US4385708A (en) * | 1979-10-18 | 1983-05-31 | Curry John J | Tamper proof lid |
US4399926A (en) * | 1982-04-29 | 1983-08-23 | Eidels Dubovoy Samuel | Resealable easy-opening container |
US4402415A (en) * | 1980-10-17 | 1983-09-06 | U. G. Closures & Plastics Limited | Integrally sealed container with cap |
US4423820A (en) * | 1982-03-01 | 1984-01-03 | Klm Company | Tamper proof closure and method of manufacturing same |
US4448319A (en) * | 1982-02-06 | 1984-05-15 | Firma Heinrich Josef Winter | Screw cap |
US4484687A (en) * | 1983-07-27 | 1984-11-27 | Three Sisters Ranch Enterprises Ptnrshp | Tamper-proof container closure for use with container necks sealed with foil seal discs |
US4489843A (en) * | 1983-03-17 | 1984-12-25 | Captive Plastics, Inc. | Tamper-evident closure and container |
US4494664A (en) * | 1982-03-09 | 1985-01-22 | Angelo Guala, S.P.A. | Tamper evident closure |
US4496066A (en) * | 1983-07-27 | 1985-01-29 | Three Sisters Ranch Enterprises Ptrs | Neck finish for plastic containers |
US4498597A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-02-12 | Bashour Joseph E | Container and closure |
US4530437A (en) * | 1982-05-03 | 1985-07-23 | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Tamperproof package |
US4534480A (en) * | 1984-06-01 | 1985-08-13 | Sun Coast Plastics, Inc. | Tamper evident closure |
US4534479A (en) * | 1984-08-15 | 1985-08-13 | American Safety Closure Corp. | Tamper evident container closure |
US4540102A (en) * | 1982-11-17 | 1985-09-10 | Walter Wiedmer | Resilient material screw top for containers |
US4548329A (en) * | 1984-08-16 | 1985-10-22 | Curry John J | Child resistant/tamper resistant cap |
US4561553A (en) * | 1985-01-22 | 1985-12-31 | Northern Engineering And Plastics Corp. | Snap on twist off tamper-proof closure for containers |
US4562930A (en) * | 1984-03-13 | 1986-01-07 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Container finish for resealing with PT closure |
US4567992A (en) * | 1983-12-01 | 1986-02-04 | Johnsen & Jorgensen (Plastics) Limited | Child resistant and tamper-resistant container and closure assembly |
US4593830A (en) * | 1984-09-20 | 1986-06-10 | Bankers Trust Company | Tamper-resistant container closure having auxiliary removal features |
US4609115A (en) * | 1985-05-15 | 1986-09-02 | Phoenix Closures, Inc. | Tamper-evident closure and bottle assembly |
US4625875A (en) * | 1985-02-04 | 1986-12-02 | Carr Joseph J | Tamper-evident closure |
US4699285A (en) * | 1985-01-23 | 1987-10-13 | Astraplastique & Societe Anonyme Des Eaux Minerales D'evian | Closure device for bottles comprising a screwable cap |
US4700860A (en) * | 1986-03-31 | 1987-10-20 | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Tamper indicating vacuum package |
US4739891A (en) * | 1987-04-25 | 1988-04-26 | Velo Bind, Inc. | Plastic bottle cap having foil neck seal |
US4744478A (en) * | 1986-10-23 | 1988-05-17 | Permian Research Corporation | Plastic closure with unitarily molded, foamed sealing layer |
US4784296A (en) * | 1986-01-03 | 1988-11-15 | Cap Snap Co. | Cap for keg dispenser |
US4796770A (en) * | 1987-10-05 | 1989-01-10 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Molded plastic closure with split skirt tamperband |
US4815617A (en) * | 1988-05-12 | 1989-03-28 | Cap Snap Co. | Tamper-evident container cap having sealed disc retention means |
US4828128A (en) * | 1988-05-06 | 1989-05-09 | Cap Snap Co. | Cap for motor oil container |
US4844250A (en) * | 1987-11-16 | 1989-07-04 | Wheeling Stamping Company | Tamper-evident container assembly |
US4848613A (en) * | 1987-03-23 | 1989-07-18 | Pano Cap (Canada) Limited | Tamper-evident closure cap and container |
US4911316A (en) * | 1989-04-27 | 1990-03-27 | Cap Snap Co. | Plastic bottle cap sealing plural neck profiles |
US4930647A (en) * | 1989-01-24 | 1990-06-05 | Continental Plastics, Inc. | Tamper indicating closure system utilizing axially extending ratchet |
US4934546A (en) * | 1989-01-30 | 1990-06-19 | Cap Snap Co. | Tamper evident cap having lift tab on bottom edge |
US4946055A (en) * | 1990-01-09 | 1990-08-07 | Towns Edward J | Tamper indicating screw cap |
US4981230A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1991-01-01 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Composite cap including tamper indicating band |
US4989740A (en) * | 1990-03-07 | 1991-02-05 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Composite cap including tamper indicating feature |
US5020683A (en) * | 1990-01-29 | 1991-06-04 | Extrudiplast Investments, S.A. | Plastic closure |
US5027964A (en) * | 1989-08-14 | 1991-07-02 | Continental White Cap., Inc. | Closure with drop down tamper indicating band and related container finish |
US5050754A (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1991-09-24 | West Penn Plastics, Inc. | Cap for a neck finish on a wide mouth container |
US5105960A (en) * | 1990-12-24 | 1992-04-21 | Northern Engineering & Plastics, Corp. | Container and closure with cooperating threaded portions having fastening configurations |
US5129530A (en) * | 1991-09-09 | 1992-07-14 | Owens-Illinois Closure Inc. | Tamper indicating closure |
US5147060A (en) * | 1991-11-01 | 1992-09-15 | Russell-Stanley Corporation | Safety container |
US5152416A (en) * | 1991-01-09 | 1992-10-06 | Tucker Housewares, Inc. | Container with lid seal |
US5176270A (en) * | 1991-05-22 | 1993-01-05 | Guala S.P.A. | Tamperproof closure for bottles and the like |
US5190178A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-03-02 | Cap Snap Co | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US5213224A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-05-25 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US5224616A (en) * | 1992-08-17 | 1993-07-06 | Northern Engineering And Plastics Corp. | Non-replaceable snap on cap for school milk bottles |
US5267661A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-12-07 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Snap-on, screw off cap and container neck |
US5285912A (en) * | 1992-07-31 | 1994-02-15 | Northern Engineering & Plastics, Corp. | Snap on pull off tamper indicating flexible cap and neck configuration |
US5307946A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1994-05-03 | Northern Engineering & Plastics, Corp. | Neck finish for a container and a matching registering multiple thread pattern in a flexible cap for engagement on neck said finish |
US5307945A (en) * | 1992-06-26 | 1994-05-03 | Hidding Walter E | Closure |
US5385252A (en) * | 1992-06-26 | 1995-01-31 | Hidding; Walter E. | Closure |
US5415306A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1995-05-16 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Foil lined snap-on, screw-off closure and container neck |
US5480045A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1996-01-02 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Neck finish for a container and a matching registering multiple thread pattern in a flexible cap for engagement on said neck finish |
US5560504A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1996-10-01 | Molinaro; Luca | Snap on pull off tamper indicating flexible cap and neck configuration |
US5593055A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1997-01-14 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Snap-on, screw-off cap with tamper-evident skirt and container neck |
US5630520A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1997-05-20 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Tabs for container closures and container neck |
US5687866A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1997-11-18 | Cap Snap Co. | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US5775528A (en) * | 1995-08-21 | 1998-07-07 | Superseal Corporation | Snap-on/screw-off cap and neck configuration |
-
2005
- 2005-02-14 US US11/057,952 patent/US20050269282A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (88)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1630687A (en) * | 1924-11-15 | 1927-05-31 | Passaic Metal Ware Company | Container |
US2181340A (en) * | 1937-07-20 | 1939-11-28 | Continental Can Co | Metal container |
US3022917A (en) * | 1958-10-02 | 1962-02-27 | Bernardin Bottle Cap Company I | Threaded metal closure cap for a container |
US3181725A (en) * | 1963-03-26 | 1965-05-04 | Friedl Otto | Multiple thread plug closure |
US3223269A (en) * | 1964-12-21 | 1965-12-14 | Owens Illinois Glass Co | Snap-on closure |
US3695475A (en) * | 1971-06-15 | 1972-10-03 | Continental Can Co | Child-proof closure |
US3901404A (en) * | 1972-05-18 | 1975-08-26 | Dairy Cap Corp | Bottle cap |
US3885696A (en) * | 1972-11-04 | 1975-05-27 | Heinrich Eberhardt | Closure construction for container with lid |
US3837518A (en) * | 1972-11-30 | 1974-09-24 | Sunbeam Plastics Corp | Tamper-proof and child-proof medicine bottle or the like |
US3844443A (en) * | 1973-03-19 | 1974-10-29 | Reynolds Metals Co | Easy-open container and method of making same |
US3901403A (en) * | 1973-10-15 | 1975-08-26 | West Co | Tear-open tamperproof closure seal |
US3874540A (en) * | 1974-01-30 | 1975-04-01 | Walter E Hidding | Tamperproof cap |
US3902621A (en) * | 1974-08-05 | 1975-09-02 | Walter E Hidding | Tamperproof closure with grippable handle |
US4078700A (en) * | 1974-08-05 | 1978-03-14 | Hidding Walter E | Dripless pouring spout and closure cap therefor |
US3997077A (en) * | 1974-11-13 | 1976-12-14 | G. D. Searle & Co. Ltd. | Containers with screw caps |
US3980195A (en) * | 1974-11-18 | 1976-09-14 | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Tamper-proof closure |
US4057160A (en) * | 1976-02-02 | 1977-11-08 | E. & J. Gallo Winery | Self-retaining bottle stopper |
US4180175A (en) * | 1977-02-18 | 1979-12-25 | Maxcap, Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and antitamper cap |
US4301937A (en) * | 1978-05-31 | 1981-11-24 | Maxcap, Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and plastic cap |
US4177906A (en) * | 1978-05-31 | 1979-12-11 | Maxcap Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and plastic cap |
US4269320A (en) * | 1978-06-30 | 1981-05-26 | Maxcap, Inc. | Blow molded plastic bottle and anti-tamper cap |
US4241841A (en) * | 1979-05-07 | 1980-12-30 | Consumers Glass Company Ltd. | Severable connecting means |
US4299330A (en) * | 1979-10-03 | 1981-11-10 | The Continental Group, Inc. | Container closure device |
US4385708A (en) * | 1979-10-18 | 1983-05-31 | Curry John J | Tamper proof lid |
US4354609A (en) * | 1980-01-09 | 1982-10-19 | Hidding Walter E | Snap-on tamperproof bottle cap |
US4298129A (en) * | 1980-05-02 | 1981-11-03 | Morton Stull | Childproof, snap-on, twist-off safety cap and container |
US4402415A (en) * | 1980-10-17 | 1983-09-06 | U. G. Closures & Plastics Limited | Integrally sealed container with cap |
US4448319A (en) * | 1982-02-06 | 1984-05-15 | Firma Heinrich Josef Winter | Screw cap |
US4423820A (en) * | 1982-03-01 | 1984-01-03 | Klm Company | Tamper proof closure and method of manufacturing same |
US4494664A (en) * | 1982-03-09 | 1985-01-22 | Angelo Guala, S.P.A. | Tamper evident closure |
US4399926A (en) * | 1982-04-29 | 1983-08-23 | Eidels Dubovoy Samuel | Resealable easy-opening container |
US4530437A (en) * | 1982-05-03 | 1985-07-23 | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Tamperproof package |
US4540102A (en) * | 1982-11-17 | 1985-09-10 | Walter Wiedmer | Resilient material screw top for containers |
US4489843A (en) * | 1983-03-17 | 1984-12-25 | Captive Plastics, Inc. | Tamper-evident closure and container |
US4484687B1 (en) * | 1983-07-27 | 1997-06-17 | Portola Packaging Inc | Tamper-proof container closure for use with container necks sealed with foil seal disks |
US4496066A (en) * | 1983-07-27 | 1985-01-29 | Three Sisters Ranch Enterprises Ptrs | Neck finish for plastic containers |
US4496066B1 (en) * | 1983-07-27 | 1998-04-14 | Portola Packaging Inc | Neck finish for plastic containers |
US4484687A (en) * | 1983-07-27 | 1984-11-27 | Three Sisters Ranch Enterprises Ptnrshp | Tamper-proof container closure for use with container necks sealed with foil seal discs |
US4567992A (en) * | 1983-12-01 | 1986-02-04 | Johnsen & Jorgensen (Plastics) Limited | Child resistant and tamper-resistant container and closure assembly |
US4498597A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-02-12 | Bashour Joseph E | Container and closure |
US4562930A (en) * | 1984-03-13 | 1986-01-07 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Container finish for resealing with PT closure |
US4534480A (en) * | 1984-06-01 | 1985-08-13 | Sun Coast Plastics, Inc. | Tamper evident closure |
US4534479A (en) * | 1984-08-15 | 1985-08-13 | American Safety Closure Corp. | Tamper evident container closure |
US4548329A (en) * | 1984-08-16 | 1985-10-22 | Curry John J | Child resistant/tamper resistant cap |
US4593830A (en) * | 1984-09-20 | 1986-06-10 | Bankers Trust Company | Tamper-resistant container closure having auxiliary removal features |
US4561553A (en) * | 1985-01-22 | 1985-12-31 | Northern Engineering And Plastics Corp. | Snap on twist off tamper-proof closure for containers |
US4699285A (en) * | 1985-01-23 | 1987-10-13 | Astraplastique & Societe Anonyme Des Eaux Minerales D'evian | Closure device for bottles comprising a screwable cap |
US4625875A (en) * | 1985-02-04 | 1986-12-02 | Carr Joseph J | Tamper-evident closure |
US4609115A (en) * | 1985-05-15 | 1986-09-02 | Phoenix Closures, Inc. | Tamper-evident closure and bottle assembly |
US4784296A (en) * | 1986-01-03 | 1988-11-15 | Cap Snap Co. | Cap for keg dispenser |
US4700860A (en) * | 1986-03-31 | 1987-10-20 | Owens-Illinois, Inc. | Tamper indicating vacuum package |
US4744478A (en) * | 1986-10-23 | 1988-05-17 | Permian Research Corporation | Plastic closure with unitarily molded, foamed sealing layer |
US4848613A (en) * | 1987-03-23 | 1989-07-18 | Pano Cap (Canada) Limited | Tamper-evident closure cap and container |
US4739891A (en) * | 1987-04-25 | 1988-04-26 | Velo Bind, Inc. | Plastic bottle cap having foil neck seal |
US4796770A (en) * | 1987-10-05 | 1989-01-10 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Molded plastic closure with split skirt tamperband |
US4844250A (en) * | 1987-11-16 | 1989-07-04 | Wheeling Stamping Company | Tamper-evident container assembly |
US4828128A (en) * | 1988-05-06 | 1989-05-09 | Cap Snap Co. | Cap for motor oil container |
US4815617A (en) * | 1988-05-12 | 1989-03-28 | Cap Snap Co. | Tamper-evident container cap having sealed disc retention means |
US4930647A (en) * | 1989-01-24 | 1990-06-05 | Continental Plastics, Inc. | Tamper indicating closure system utilizing axially extending ratchet |
US4934546A (en) * | 1989-01-30 | 1990-06-19 | Cap Snap Co. | Tamper evident cap having lift tab on bottom edge |
US4911316A (en) * | 1989-04-27 | 1990-03-27 | Cap Snap Co. | Plastic bottle cap sealing plural neck profiles |
US5027964A (en) * | 1989-08-14 | 1991-07-02 | Continental White Cap., Inc. | Closure with drop down tamper indicating band and related container finish |
US5050754A (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1991-09-24 | West Penn Plastics, Inc. | Cap for a neck finish on a wide mouth container |
US4946055A (en) * | 1990-01-09 | 1990-08-07 | Towns Edward J | Tamper indicating screw cap |
US5020683A (en) * | 1990-01-29 | 1991-06-04 | Extrudiplast Investments, S.A. | Plastic closure |
US4989740A (en) * | 1990-03-07 | 1991-02-05 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Composite cap including tamper indicating feature |
US4981230A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1991-01-01 | Continental White Cap, Inc. | Composite cap including tamper indicating band |
US5415306A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1995-05-16 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Foil lined snap-on, screw-off closure and container neck |
US5593055A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1997-01-14 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Snap-on, screw-off cap with tamper-evident skirt and container neck |
US5190178A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-03-02 | Cap Snap Co | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US5213224A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-05-25 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US5267661A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-12-07 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Snap-on, screw off cap and container neck |
US5687866A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1997-11-18 | Cap Snap Co. | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck |
US5630520A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1997-05-20 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Tabs for container closures and container neck |
US5105960A (en) * | 1990-12-24 | 1992-04-21 | Northern Engineering & Plastics, Corp. | Container and closure with cooperating threaded portions having fastening configurations |
US5152416A (en) * | 1991-01-09 | 1992-10-06 | Tucker Housewares, Inc. | Container with lid seal |
US5176270A (en) * | 1991-05-22 | 1993-01-05 | Guala S.P.A. | Tamperproof closure for bottles and the like |
US5129530A (en) * | 1991-09-09 | 1992-07-14 | Owens-Illinois Closure Inc. | Tamper indicating closure |
US5147060A (en) * | 1991-11-01 | 1992-09-15 | Russell-Stanley Corporation | Safety container |
US5385252A (en) * | 1992-06-26 | 1995-01-31 | Hidding; Walter E. | Closure |
US5307945A (en) * | 1992-06-26 | 1994-05-03 | Hidding Walter E | Closure |
US5285912A (en) * | 1992-07-31 | 1994-02-15 | Northern Engineering & Plastics, Corp. | Snap on pull off tamper indicating flexible cap and neck configuration |
US5224616A (en) * | 1992-08-17 | 1993-07-06 | Northern Engineering And Plastics Corp. | Non-replaceable snap on cap for school milk bottles |
US5480045A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1996-01-02 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Neck finish for a container and a matching registering multiple thread pattern in a flexible cap for engagement on said neck finish |
US5560504A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1996-10-01 | Molinaro; Luca | Snap on pull off tamper indicating flexible cap and neck configuration |
US5307946A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1994-05-03 | Northern Engineering & Plastics, Corp. | Neck finish for a container and a matching registering multiple thread pattern in a flexible cap for engagement on neck said finish |
US5690243A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1997-11-25 | Portola Packaging, Inc. | Snap on twist off tamper indicating flexible cap and neck configuration |
US5775528A (en) * | 1995-08-21 | 1998-07-07 | Superseal Corporation | Snap-on/screw-off cap and neck configuration |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090084751A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2009-04-02 | Sacmi Cooperativa Meccanicimola Imola Societa' Cooperativa | Closure means |
US8528759B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2013-09-10 | Sacmi Cooperativa Meccanici Imola Societa' Cooperativa | Closure means |
EP1990288A2 (en) * | 2007-05-10 | 2008-11-12 | Waldemar Kaduk | Container with cap |
EP1990288A3 (en) * | 2007-05-10 | 2008-11-26 | Waldemar Kaduk | Container with cap |
US20090242044A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Sturman Bg, Llc | Pressure Regulators for Beverage Dispensers |
US8302822B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2012-11-06 | Sturman Bg, Llc | Pressure regulators for beverage dispensers |
US20100084366A1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2010-04-08 | Miller Edward D | Self-righting cap for a beverage bottle |
US20120273452A1 (en) * | 2010-01-06 | 2012-11-01 | Soehnlen Daniel P | Combined lip and shoulder seal for threaded cap |
CN102849329A (en) * | 2012-08-27 | 2013-01-02 | 浙江硕华医用塑料有限公司 | Lid sealing structure |
US20150129534A1 (en) * | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Sacmi Cooperativa Meccanici Imola Societa' Cooperativa | Closure capsule for containers |
US20160023813A1 (en) * | 2014-07-24 | 2016-01-28 | Al Ibtikar Packaging & Investment Co., Ltd. | Method for safe and tight closure using safety strip and cap for closing bottle's neck |
US10773860B2 (en) * | 2014-07-24 | 2020-09-15 | Al Ibtikar Packaging & Investment Co., Ltd. | Method for safe and tight closure using safety strip and cap for closing bottle's neck |
JP2016159961A (en) * | 2015-03-03 | 2016-09-05 | ライオン株式会社 | Container |
USD908495S1 (en) * | 2017-06-07 | 2021-01-26 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Closure |
USD957254S1 (en) | 2017-06-07 | 2022-07-12 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Closure |
USD920790S1 (en) * | 2018-09-24 | 2021-06-01 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Ratcheted closure |
USD982444S1 (en) * | 2018-09-24 | 2023-04-04 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Ratcheted closure |
USD927976S1 (en) * | 2019-02-22 | 2021-08-17 | Silgan White Cap LLC | Ratcheted closure |
US11267622B2 (en) * | 2019-05-10 | 2022-03-08 | Affaba & Ferrari S.R.L. | Aseptic cap for containers with evidence of first opening |
US11059633B2 (en) | 2019-10-31 | 2021-07-13 | Cheer Pack North America | Flip-top closure for container |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6637611B2 (en) | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck | |
US20050269282A1 (en) | Tamper-evident cap and container neck | |
US5213224A (en) | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck | |
US5593055A (en) | Snap-on, screw-off cap with tamper-evident skirt and container neck | |
US5190178A (en) | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck | |
CA2157398C (en) | Snap-on, screw off cap and container neck | |
US5967352A (en) | Interrupted thread cap structure | |
US5267661A (en) | Snap-on, screw off cap and container neck | |
EP0324196B1 (en) | Tamper-evident buttress plug closure | |
US5415306A (en) | Foil lined snap-on, screw-off closure and container neck | |
US5450973A (en) | Tamper-evident closure apparatus | |
US4436212A (en) | Tamper proof closure | |
US5887738A (en) | Foil lined snap-on, screw-off closure and container neck | |
EP0390412B2 (en) | Tamper resistant closure cap for containers | |
WO1983003810A1 (en) | Closures for containers | |
US5755348A (en) | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck | |
US5630520A (en) | Tabs for container closures and container neck | |
US4830208A (en) | Tamper-evident container-closure assembly | |
US20010030164A1 (en) | Tamper-proof bottle cap | |
GB2274838A (en) | Snap-on screw-off cap and container neck | |
WO1995015285A1 (en) | Vented snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck | |
GB2299329A (en) | Snap on, screw off cap and container | |
GB2129784A (en) | Tamper-indicating closures | |
GB2312423A (en) | Snap-on, screw-off cap and container neck | |
GB2305167A (en) | Cap with plugging and sealing cooperation with container neck lip |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PORTOLA PACKAGING, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LUCH, DANIEL;REEL/FRAME:016872/0513 Effective date: 20050803 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |