US20060081513A1 - Sorting recycle materials with automatically adjustable separator using upstream feedback - Google Patents
Sorting recycle materials with automatically adjustable separator using upstream feedback Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060081513A1 US20060081513A1 US11/194,708 US19470805A US2006081513A1 US 20060081513 A1 US20060081513 A1 US 20060081513A1 US 19470805 A US19470805 A US 19470805A US 2006081513 A1 US2006081513 A1 US 2006081513A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- stream
- input
- adjustable
- separator
- screen
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B1/00—Sieving, screening, sifting, or sorting solid materials using networks, gratings, grids, or the like
- B07B1/12—Apparatus having only parallel elements
- B07B1/14—Roller screens
- B07B1/15—Roller screens using corrugated, grooved or ribbed rollers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03B—SEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
- B03B9/00—General arrangement of separating plant, e.g. flow sheets
- B03B9/06—General arrangement of separating plant, e.g. flow sheets specially adapted for refuse
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B11/00—Arrangement of accessories in apparatus for separating solids from solids using gas currents
- B07B11/04—Control arrangements
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B13/00—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B13/00—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
- B07B13/08—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices according to weight
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B13/00—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
- B07B13/14—Details or accessories
- B07B13/18—Control
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B4/00—Separating solids from solids by subjecting their mixture to gas currents
- B07B4/08—Separating solids from solids by subjecting their mixture to gas currents while the mixtures are supported by sieves, screens, or like mechanical elements
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B9/00—Combinations of apparatus for screening or sifting or for separating solids from solids using gas currents; General arrangement of plant, e.g. flow sheets
- B07B9/02—Combinations of similar or different apparatus for separating solids from solids using gas currents
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C5/00—Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21B—FIBROUS RAW MATERIALS OR THEIR MECHANICAL TREATMENT
- D21B1/00—Fibrous raw materials or their mechanical treatment
- D21B1/02—Pretreatment of the raw materials by chemical or physical means
- D21B1/026—Separating fibrous materials from waste
- D21B1/028—Separating fibrous materials from waste by dry methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/30—Administration of product recycling or disposal
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/50—Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
- Y02W30/52—Mechanical processing of waste for the recovery of materials, e.g. crushing, shredding, separation or disassembly
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S209/00—Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
- Y10S209/93—Municipal solid waste sorting
Abstract
Methods and systems are provided for controlling an automatic separator apparatus of a Materials Recovery Facility. An input stream of recycled materials is provided, wherein the composition of the input stream is subject to variation during a time interval. At least one characteristic of the input waste material stream is measured. An initial value is selected for an adjustable parameter of the automatic separator apparatus based upon the measured characteristic of the input stream.
Description
- This is a Utility Patent Application filed by Garry R. Kenny, a citizen of the United States, residing in West Linn, Oreg. 97068, in an invention entitled “Sorting Recycled Materials With Automatically Adjustable Separator Using Upstream Feedback”
- This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/600,206, filed Aug. 10, 2004, entitled “Materials Recovery Facility Process Optimization Via Unit Operation Feedback”, the details of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to the field of sorting of recycled materials, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to methods and apparatus for optimizing the operation of an adjustable sorting apparatus or sorting system.
- 2. Description of Prior Art
- Materials Recovery Facilities (MRFs) have been receiving and processing recyclable materials for the past 25 years. The recyclable material normally consists of newspaper, plastic bottles, steel and aluminum cans, and sometimes glass bottles and fragments. The newspaper stream was typically kept separate from the containers. During the first five to ten years the processing typically involved conveying the recyclables under a magnet to remove the steel, then past an air stream to separate the plastic and aluminum cans from the glass bottles. The rest of the components were then sorting manually by hand.
- In the mid 1980s eddy current separators were introduced to automatically remove the aluminum from the plastic bottle and aluminum can stream. Then in the mid 1990s separation modules became available to separate the plastic bottles by resin type and by color. These separators did not, however, begin use in MRFs until around 1998. At about the same time the first system to automatically sort office paper was introduced by the assignee of the present invention (MSS, Inc.) in collaboration with Weyerhaeuser Company. An example of those systems is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,472 to Grubbs et al., assigned to assignee of the present invention and the details of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- Mechanical screens saw limited use in MRFs until the late 1990s when the first cardboard screens were introduced. These screens were used to remove oversize cardboard from the newspaper stream. With the introduction of so called “single stream” collection in the late 1990s, however, screen technology was improved to address sorting of containers (i.e. plastic and glass bottles and metal cans) from the mixed paper and cardboard stream.
- The first generation of screens involved either one or two flat bed screen “decks” which were inclined in the direction of motion of the material. The screens themselves were comprised of a number of discs attached to rotating shafts. In operation, the more 3 dimensional materials such as containers would tend to roll or bounce down the screen deck while more 2 dimensional materials such as newspaper and cardboard would go up and over the top of the screen. An example of inclined flat bed rotary disc screens is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,472 to Grubbs et al.
- This screen technology evolved to where the angle of the screen, as well as the rotor speed, was adjustable to compensate for differing material composition and moisture content. The latest generation screen patented by CP Manufacturing is in the shape of a wide bottom V, with the entire V bottom tilted from horizontal. This screen has additional adjustable settings with include not only the rotor speed and tilt angle of the V sides, but also the tilt angle of the entire V. In this screen the paper is propelled by the discs up and over each side of the V. The containers roll back from the sides of the V and migrate down the bottom of the V in the direction of the tilt. Examples of such V shape rotary disc separators are seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,460,706 to Davis and U.S. Pat. No. 6,648,145 to Davis et al., the details of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- Unfortunately, however, very few MRF operators are capable of determining the optimum operating parameters for these new screens. Experience in MRFs also shows that even when the screens are properly set for a certain mixture of recyclables and moisture content, that setting is only good for a matter of a few minutes as the composition and moisture content changes.
-
FIG. 1 schematically illustrates the flow of material through a typical prior art Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) generally designated by the numeral 10. An inputwaste material stream 12 enters the MRF 10. As indicated atblock 14 oversized and non-recyclable objects are removed by hand. - As indicated at block 16 a screening device may be used to separate large cardboard items which go to a
cardboard destination 18. The bulk of the material which is made up typically of containers of various types and newspaper goes to amechanical screening device 20 which separates the newspaper from the containers. Themechanical screening device 20 may for example be an adjustable angle trough-shaped screen such as those shown for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,648,145 and 6,460,706. - The
screening device 20 separates the material stream into a first stream orpaper stream 22 which includes some containers, and a second stream orcontainer stream 24 which includes some paper. - Typically the
paper stream 22 is hand sorted as indicated atblock 25 into acontainer destination 26, apaper destination 28, acontaminant destination 30, and with ferrous and aluminum materials directed todestinations 34 and 44, respectively. - The container stream 24 from
separator 20 then passes through amagnetic separator 32 which removes ferrous items into aferrous metal stream 34. The container stream continues at 36 to ahand sorting location 38 where newspaper is removed at 40 and returned to thenewspaper destination 28, and the containers are hand sorted into plastic containers which go todestination 42 and aluminum containers which go to destination 44. - The plastic containers at
destination 42 are then again hand sorted as indicated byblock 46 into PET (Polyethylene Terephalate) containers todestination 48, colored HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) todestination 50, and natural HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) todestination 52. - What is needed then is a way to optimize the screen parameter settings and to modify those settings in real time as the composition and moisture content of the feedstream changes continuously. Even when set optimally the screens are not 100% effective. Containers (particularly flat ones) are sometimes carried over with the paper fraction, and as well some paper is carried along with the containers.
- What is also needed is a way to optimize all of or a portion of a Materials Recovery Facility which includes one or more adjustable screens.
- In one embodiment the invention provides a method of separating an input waste material stream. The method includes measuring at least one characteristic of the input waste material stream correlating to a density of the input waste material stream. An initial value is selected for an adjustable parameter of an adjustable material separator based upon the at least one characteristic measured. The input waste material stream is separated with the adjustable material separator into a first output stream containing a majority of a first material and some of a second material, and a second output stream containing a majority of the second material and some of the first material.
- In another embodiment the present invention provides a method of sorting recycled materials, comprising:
- (a) providing an input stream of recycled materials, wherein a composition of the input stream is subject to variation during a time interval;
- (b) moving the input stream through a separator machine having a plurality of adjustable machine operating parameters;
- (c) providing stored historical data representative of a set of historical values of the operating parameters corresponding to improved quality of separation for given values of a characteristic of said input stream;
- (d) sensing a present value of said characteristic of said input stream; and
- (e) adjusting said plurality of adjustable machine operating parameters, via a computerized control system, in response to said sensed present value of said characteristic of said input stream so that said adjustable machine operating parameters approach said historical values of the adjustable machine operating parameters corresponding to improved quality of separation for said sensed present value of said characteristic of said input stream.
- In another embodiment the invention provides an automated separator apparatus for separating an input material stream into first and second output streams, including a plurality of spaced rotating discs defining a screen having a length, a first actuator for adjusting an angle of inclination of said length, a second actuator for adjusting a rotational speed of said rotating discs, a sensing unit for sensing at least one characteristic of said input material stream, and a control system responsive to said sensing unit and operably connected to said actuators, so that said screen automatically adjusts to changes in the sensed characteristic of said input material stream.
- Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide methods of adjusting the operation of an adjustable separator, using upstream feedback.
- Another object of the present invention to provide improved methods of adjusting the operation of an adjustable separator based upon the density of an incoming material stream.
- And another object of the present invention is to provide methods of automated control of adjustable separators.
- Still another object of the present invention is the provision of methods and systems for continuously monitoring and adjusting the operation of a material separator to improve the efficiency of operation of the separator.
- Other and further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following disclosure when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a typical prior art Materials Recovery Facility. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart of the Materials Recovery Facility of the present invention utilizing automated sorting devices, and utilizing sensors and counting technology for automating the control of the sorting devices. -
FIG. 3 is a schematic vertical elevation view of a trough shape rotary disc screening apparatus. -
FIG. 4 is a plan view of the apparatus ofFIG. 3 . -
FIG. 5 is a view similar toFIG. 3 illustrating the mechanism for adjusting the V angle of the separator ofFIGS. 3 and 4 . -
FIG. 6 is a schematic side elevation view of the apparatus ofFIGS. 3-5 showing the manner of adjustment of the inclination along the length of the trough. -
FIG. 7 is a schematic side elevation view of an alternative separator system including two inclined flat bed rotary disc screening devices. -
FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of the computerized control system. -
FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of separating efficiency versus throughput or feed rate for a mechanical or automated separator. -
FIG. 10 is a graphical representation of the operating cost of mechanical equipment as a function of time of operation. -
FIG. 11 is a first graphical representation of manual labor costs versus time of operation where labor is available on an hourly basis. -
FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of manual labor costs versus time of operation when labor is only available in larger increments due to shift work requirements. - The Overall MRF System
- Referring now to
FIG. 2 , the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) of the present invention is shown and generally designated by the numeral 200.FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the major components of and the material flow through theMaterials Recovery Facility 200. - An input
waste material stream 202 enters theMRF 200. As indicated atblock 204, oversized and non-recyclable objects are removed by hand. - A weight and
profile sensor 206 and amoisture sensor 208 are provided to monitor the weight, the height profile and the moisture content of theinput material stream 202. - As indicated at block 210 a large
article screening device 210 may be used to separate large cardboard items which go to acardboard destination 212. - The bulk of the material which is typically made up of containers of various types and newspaper goes to a
mechanical screening device 214 which may, for example, be an adjustable angle trough shape screening device such as that further described below with regard toFIGS. 3-6 . Alternatively the screening device may include inclined flat bed screens like those described below with regard toFIG. 7 or other suitable screening devices. - The
screening device 214 separates the material stream into a first stream orpaper stream 216 which includes some containers, and a second stream orcontainer stream 218 which includes some paper. - As further described below, the weight and
profile sensors 206 andmoisture sensor 208 will be used to provide, among other things, an initial estimation of the composition of theincoming material stream 202 for the initial setting of operating parameters on theadjustable screening device 214. - The
paper stream 216 is carried to afirst sorting module 220, which may for example be a FiberSort™ module, available from Advanced Sorting Technologies of Nashville, Tenn. Thefirst sorting module 220 separates thepaper stream 216 into anewspaper stream 222, asecondary container stream 224 and acontaminant stream 226. Thecontaminant stream 226 fromfirst separator 220 may include cardboard, six pack carriers, pizza boxes, frozen food boxes and the like. - The
first sorting module 220 has associated therewith afirst sensing device 228 which counts the number of items of various types flowing into thenewspaper stream 222, thesecondary container stream 224 and thecontaminant stream 226. As is further disclosed below, this counting is preferably done on the basis of area so that what is actually counted is the area occupied by the various streams on a conveyor as they pass through thefirst sorting module 220. As further described below, the data collected from thefirst sensing device 228 and other sensing devices to be described below, is utilized with an automated control system (seeFIG. 8 ) to adjust various operating parameters of the automated equipment and to adjust flow rates for various portions of the MRF in order to optimize the operation of the MRF as desired or necessary. - The
container stream 218 exiting theseparator apparatus 214 passes through amagnetic separator 230 which removes ferrous items into aferrous metal stream 232. Thecontainer stream 218 then flows to asecond sorting module 234. Thesecond sorting module 234 may also be a FiberSort™ module from Advanced Sorting Technologies, similar to thefirst sorting module 220 described above. Thesecond sorting module 234 separates thecontainer stream 218 into aplastic container stream 236, analuminum container stream 238 and asecondary newspaper stream 240. - The
second sorting module 234 has asecond sensing device 242 associated therewith which counts the plastic containers, aluminum containers and newspaper sorted by thesecond sorting module 234. Again, this counting is preferably done on the basis of the area of the conveyor belt or other conveyor mechanism passing throughsorting module 234 which is occupied by the various materials. - The
supplemental newspaper stream 240 is returned to and joined with themain newspaper stream 222 exitingfirst sorting module 220. Similarly, thesecondary container stream 224 existingfirst sorting module 220 is returned to thecontainer stream 218 upstream ofmagnetic separator 230. - The
plastic container stream 236 passes to athird sorting module 244. Thethird sorting module 244 may for example be an Aladdin™ or Sapphire™ sorting module, each available from MSS, Inc., which provide sorting of different types of plastic containers. Sortingmodule 244 sorts theplastic container stream 236 into a PET (Polyethylene Terephalate)container stream 246, a colored HDPE (High Density Polyethylene)stream 248, and a natural HDPE (High Density Polyethylene)stream 250. -
Third sorting module 244 has athird sensing device 252 associated therewith for sensing and counting the number of containers in thePET stream 246, thecolored HDPE stream 248, and thenatural HDPE stream 250. - The sensor systems used in each of the sorting modules described above such as the Aladdin™, Sapphire™ or FiberSort™ sorting modules available from MSS, Inc., divide the area on the conveyor belt into an array of pixels. Each pixel is scanned by the sensor to determine various measurable characteristics of the material located in that pixel. The data representative of each scanned pixel is then compared to a set of data maps and either matches one of the known data maps or is determined to be an unknown material, or is determined not to be an object at all. For example, the maps may be representative of metal, plastic, paper or other material. Thus each pixel, and accordingly each increment of area on the conveyor belt passing below the sensor, is identified as either being: (1) metal, (2) plastic, (3) paper, or (4) other. Periodically the
control system 300 described below with regard toFIG. 8 will query the sensor units and the units will send the count total for the number of pixels falling in each category to themicroprocessor 304, and then reset the counts to zero. Alternatively, the unit could calculate a moving average of each count type over some period (such as one minute) and then report those values directly to themicroprocessor 304 when asked. Themicroprocessor 304 will use the four count totals or averages to calculate the percentage of each material in the feedstream and the total feed rate, if desired. This pixel count is representative of the area that each of the identified material types occupies on the conveyor. This information will then be used to optimize the feed system. - The V Shape Rotary Disc Screen
- One preferred separator apparatus for use as the
separator apparatus 214 ofFIG. 1 is the adjustable V shape trough type rotary disc screen available from CP Manufacturing previously noted. Such an adjustable screening device is schematically illustrated inFIGS. 3-6 and referred to by the numeral 214A. The V troughstyle separator apparatus 214A is preferably constructed in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 6,648,145 to Davis et al., the details of which are incorporated herein by reference. - The
separator apparatus 214A is in the form of a trough-shapeddisc screen 112 equipped with a pair ofseparator air manifolds FIGS. 3 and 4 , therecycling apparatus 214A includes aframe 118 that rotatably supports a plurality of laterally extendingshafts 119 that spin about laterally extending axes such as 120. Theshafts 119 of the trough-shapeddisc screen 112 are longitudinally spaced and are located at progressive heights to provide a generally V-shaped configuration as best seen inFIG. 3 . The shaft that rotates about the axis 120 (FIG. 4 ) and the additional shafts to the left ofaxis 120 are rotated by amotor 122 through adrive linkage 124 in a counter-clockwise direction inFIG. 3 . The shafts to the right of the axis 120 (FIG. 4 ) are rotated by another motor 126 (FIG. 3 ) via adrive linkage 128 to rotate thediscs 129 on these shafts in a clockwise direction inFIG. 3 . Thedrive linkages shafts 119 and a plurality of separate chains (not illustrated) entrained about these sprockets. Sprockets (not illustrated) are also mounted on separate gear reduction assemblies (not illustrated) driven by each of themotors shafts 119 could be driven directly or indirectly with gears, belts, chain drives, transmissions, electric motors, hydraulic motors, internal combustion engines, and various combinations of these drive means. - The
input stream 12 of mixed recyclable materials is carried by a conveyor 130 (FIG. 3 ) and deposited onto alowermost region 131 of the trough-shapeddisc screen 112. While thediscs 129 are referred to as “discs” they preferably have an irregular outer contour or shape so that when all of theshafts 119 of therecycling apparatus 214A are rotated, mixed recyclable materials deposited thereon will be agitated and moved along in various conveying directions. In accordance with well known techniques, the spacing of thediscs 129 and the resulting dimensions of the openings therebetween determines the size of the materials that will fall downwardly between thediscs 129. - The shafts of the
lowermost region 131 are preferably slightly downwardly angled from the horizontal, at an angle, for example, of about five degrees. The spacing of thediscs 129 along the various shafts of the trough-shapeddisc screen 112 and the angle of vertical inclination of the two verticallyinclined regions disc screen 112, along with the rotational speed of these discs, is adjustable as further described below. - Optimum classification by the
recycling apparatus 110 is enhanced by theair manifolds squirrel cage blowers 132 and 134 (FIG. 4 ). Themanifolds discs 129 to press newspaper against the discs and aid in thediscs 129 conveying the same upwardly. Preferably the streams of air are inclined to help advance the newspaper upwardly. Each of theair manifolds blowers inclined regions inclined regions second air manifolds squirrel cage blowers - The lateral spacing between the
discs 129 of thelowermost region 131 is less than the lateral spacing between thediscs 129 of the verticallyinclined regions discs 129 of thelowermost region 131 of the trough-shapeddisc screen 112. Mixed recyclable materials fall through thediscs 129 located along the intermediate portions of the verticallyinclined regions inclined regions newspaper stream 222. Large articles such as plastic milk bottles and soda pop containers tumble down the verticallyinclined regions disc screen 112 and eventually fall off of the side of therecycling apparatus 214A to thecontainer stream 224. Preferably the axes of theshafts 119 of theinclined region 112A all extend in a first common plane and the axes of the shafts of theinclined region 112B all extend in a second common plane. - Thus a stream of mixed recyclable materials is conveyed onto one side of the V-shaped
disc screen 112 by theconveyor 130 at the end marked “INFEED” inFIG. 4 and large articles are conveyed out of the other side of the V-shapeddisc screen 112 at the side marked “CONTAINERS OUT” inFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 5 is a view similar toFIG. 3 but illustrating the structure and manner of adjustment of the V angle of theseparator apparatus 214A ofFIG. 3 . Theinclined portions base frame portion 136 viapivot assemblies pivot assemblies shafts 119 that support thediscs 129. Lifting devices in the form ofhydraulic cylinders inclination 146 of theinclined sections devices - The articulating V shape
disc screen apparatus 214A ofFIG. 5 also incorporatesinternal air ducting air manifolds 152 to provideair jets 154 blowing onto the face of theinclined screen portions - As schematically illustrated in the side elevation view of
FIG. 6 , thebase frame 136 of theseparator apparatus 214A is also inclined along itslength 156, which is generally parallel to theaxis 120 ofFIG. 4 . An angle ofinclination 158 along thelength 156 is adjustable by a lifting means 160 which pivots theframe 136 about apivot point 162. The lifting means 160 may be a hydraulic cylinder or any of the other suitable lifting means described above with regard to lifting means 142 and 144. - Inclined Flat Bed Screens
- Referring now to
FIG. 7 , analternative separator apparatus 214B includes a pair of inclinedflat bed screens flat bed screens FIGS. 8 and 9 thereof, the details of which are incorporated herein by reference. The inclinedflat bed screens FIGS. 1-3 thereof, the details of which are incorporated herein by reference. - Each of the flat bed screens such as
screen 164 includes a plurality of shafts such as 168 seen in end view inFIG. 7 , having discs such as 170 rotatable with theshaft 168. Theshafts 168 are mounted upon aframe 172 which is pivotable about apivot point 174 due to liftingmechanism 176 to adjust an angle ofinclination 178. Theshafts 168 anddisc 170 are rotated by amotor 180 which drives the shafts throughchain 182 or other suitable linkage. - An
air manifold 184 has air provided fromair supply 186 so thatjets 188 are directed onto the face of theflat bed screen 164. - The
second flatbed screen 166 is similarly constructed. - Controls Based Upon Monitoring Characteristics of Input Stream
- One approach to determining the composition of the
feedstream 12 is to measure the weight and depth profile of the material on the conveyor that feeds the screen withsensor 206. The density of the feed material can then be computed from the weight and depth profile and an estimate made of the composition of the material entering thescreens - This approach can provide a first approximation to optimizing the screen operating parameters in real time. Detailed observation of the operation of the screen and experimentation with the operating parameters with feed material of differing densities would be used to develop a table of optimum operating parameters for the different feed material densities. Then as the feed material density changes the operating parameters of the screen would be automatically changed via variable frequency drives for the shaft motors and hydraulic or actuator controls for the screen angle.
- The above method while approximate would still provide an improvement over current operating practices wherein the screen parameters are only occasionally adjusted manually using only the operator's estimate of the feed material composition.
- Using the information from the weight and
profile sensors 206 on the infeed belt an approximate correlation can be made between the density of the infeed and the optimum screen parameter settings. This information can also be used to determine the approximate optimum screen parameters and shorten the time for the optimization program to find the actual optimum settings. - The moisture content of the feedstream strongly effects the operation of the screens. The moisture is primarily contained in the paper, and alters the infrared signature of the paper depending upon the amount of moisture in the paper; the amount of moisture can be measured in this way. Also devices are available for measuring the moisture content of the air in proximity to the paper. By adding a
moisture sensor 208 to the system, a further data point is available for “presetting” the screen parameters based on the “setup” data collection process. - Adjustment Based Upon Measuring The Effectiveness of the Separation
- Another more accurate approach to the above problem is also possible now. In the past few years automated sorting devices such as sorting
modules - By incorporating additional software into these systems, the sorting modules can also be used to count the number of plastic, metal and paper objects that pass through them as indicated at 228, 242 and 252 in
FIG. 2 . What is proposed then is a system wherein data are taken from at least two sorting modules and used to optimize the screen operating parameters. - One
sorting module 220 would receive thepaper output stream 216 from thescreen 214 while theother sorting module 234 would receive thecontainer output stream 218 from thescreen 214. Thefirst sorting module 220 would reclaim the containers lost to the paper stream while at the same time counting the number of containers and paper objects viasensor 228. Thesecond sorting module 234 would reclaim the paper lost to thecontainer stream 218 while also counting, viasensor 242, the number of paper objects reclaimed and the number of containers passing through thesensor 242. - This information can then be used to optimize the screen parameters with the following as an example. Other approaches to implementing the software algorithm can also be implemented. It should also be understood that it is relatively straightforward to determine the practical operating range of the screen parameters by visual observation of the operation of the
screen 214. For example the angle between thesides tilt angle 158 of the V typically ranges from about 5 to 12 degrees, and the rotor motor variable frequency drive frequency typically ranges from about 40 to 70 Hertz. - Data from sorting
modules say 1 minute to 5 or 10 minutes). Then the number of paper and plastic objects counted by each module would be averaged over that period of time. Then either the screen angle or rotor speed or tilt angle would be changed by a few percent (say 5 percent of the total range of change available). Then the data from the two sorting modules would be averaged over a same period of time and the results compared with the previous result. - If the comparison shows an improvement (reduced total paper in the containers and containers in the paper) then the parameter would be changed by a few percent further in the same direction (increased or decreased). This process would be continued until a decrease in screen performance was found.
- If the parameter change produces a decrease in screen performance then the change would be reversed and a few percent change made in the parameter in the opposite direction. If no change in performance is measured after the parameter change, then the selected parameter would be sequentially changed in addition incremental percents until a change is measured.
- The actual software process would be equivalent to making a series of operation measurements for different settings of the selected parameter, plotting the operational efficiency again the parameter setting and then finding the maximum of the operation efficiency.
- When the optimum setting has been determined for the selected parameter, the next parameter (e.g. rotor speed) would be changed as above while operating measurements are made. After all the operating parameter maximums are determined, the process is started over again. A body of operational data will then be collected such that each of the operating parameters maximums are found with different values of the other parameter settings. That is, it may be that
parameter 1 could have a different maximum operating setting whenparameter 2 is set differently than when the maximum forparameter 1 was determined for thefirst parameter 2 setting. - The data collected above can then be stored in 3 dimensional look up tables (tilt angle axis, rotor speed, and V angle) or as concentrations of optimum points in a 3 dimensional graph for each range of feed material composition. The composition data would be derived from the outputs of the sensor modules.
- The above can be considered to be the data collection phase of the optimization system. It is anticipated that for each new installation of a screen as part of an overall sorting system (or a retrofit) that the data collection phase would be implemented for sufficient time to cover the feed material collected from all the different locations. It is well known that recyclables from different neighborhoods are often of differing composition of paper versus containers, glass versus aluminum, etc.
- These graphs or lookup tables would then be used to determine the best starting point setting for the screen parameters for day to day implementation of the optimization program. The actual running of the program would proceed as above with continual varying of the operating parameters while continually measuring the paper contamination in the plastic and the plastic contamination in the paper.
- A further goal of the program is to refine the starting parameters based on the measured composition of the feedstream. The closer the initial setting of the screen parameters are to optimum the less time it will take to reach optimization for that particular composition. Thus, the more data available on the composition the more refined the starting parameters can be.
- Newly available eddy current sorting modules for aluminum cans utilize an array of eddy current detectors spanning a sorting belt. As aluminum or steel cans cross the array their presence is detected and with appropriate timing an air jet array ejects the aluminum can away from other cans, paper or plastic containers. The array can additionally be used to count the number of aluminum (and separately steel cans) which pass through the module. This newly available eddy current separator can thus be used to provide additional composition data for the optimization program.
- Recently the eddy current array has been added to the near infrared plastic sensor array to allow reclamation of aluminum cans from the screen's paper stream in addition to the reclamation of plastic bottles. This allows counting of all the aluminum cans in the feedstream (those in the container stream as well as those lost to the paper stream). Further the plastic bottle stream typically needs to be separated into the three standard types, PET (drink bottles), colored HDPE (detergent bottles) and natural HDPE (milk bottles).
- This separation is accomplished with the
third separator module 244. Thus, further information on the composition of the feedstream is now available as these modules can also count the number of each type of plastic bottle (as well as the color). - Two components of the recyclable stream that at this time cannot be directly measured are the glass bottles and the steel cans. If we, however, combine the data from the three separation modules such that the number and therefore the approximate weight of the paper, aluminum, and plastic in the feedstream is known, then the majority of the remaining weight is glass and ferrous metal. Since the ferrous metal is typically baled and sold on a daily basis, the approximate weight of the glass can then be calculated.
- The Automated Control System
- The control system of
FIG. 8 is generally designated by the numeral 300. Thecontrol system 300 includes a microprocessor basedcontroller 302 which includesmicroprocessor 304,memory 306, asoftware portion 308, and an input-output device 310. - The
system 300 also includes the various sensors and actuators previously described and schematically illustrated inFIG. 8 , along with various communication lines (or wireless systems) connecting the sensors to thecontroller 302, and the various actuators for the mechanical separators along with control devices for those actuators which are capable of converting an electronic control signal fromcontroller 302 into a physical action of the actuator. - The sensors include
weight sensor 206A andprofile sensor 206B which comprise the weight andprofile sensor 206 ofFIG. 2 . Also included is themoisture sensor 208 ofFIG. 2 , and thecounting devices - The actuators include the first and
second lifting mechanisms V shape separator 214A. Also included is thelifting mechanism 160 for controlling the bed tilt angle of theseparator 214A. Also included are themotors separator 214A. Also included are theblowers separator apparatus 214A. - The
microprocessor 304, in response to input signals from the various sensors, and in accordance with the programming contained insoftware 308, and instructions received from an operator via input-output device 310, sends various control signals viacontrol signal lines - Control signals over
line 312 go to controldevices mechanisms - A control signal communicated over
control line 314 to controldevice 324 controls the flow of hydraulic fluid to liftingmechanism 160. - Control signals are carried over
control line 316 to controldevices motors - Control signals over
control line 328 are carried to controldevices blowers - As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art many other types of sensors could be used to sense various parameters of the input stream and of the various product streams, and various actuators can be utilized to control the various operating parameters of the separating devices.
- Methods Of Sorting Recycled Materials With Automatically Adjustable Separator Using Downstream Feedback
- One method of operation of the
Materials Recycling Facility 200 can be described as a method of sorting recycled materials which begins with providing theinput stream 202 of recycled materials, wherein a composition of theinput stream 202 is subject to variation during a time interval. This is very common for any typical materials recycling facility where the makeup of the recycled materials and other input parameters such as moisture content can vary rapidly throughout the day. - That
input stream 202 is moved through a separator machine such asseparator apparatus 214A ofFIGS. 3-6 or 214B ofFIG. 7 , which separating machine has a plurality of adjustable machine operating parameters. - For the V
shape separator device 214A ofFIGS. 3-6 , the adjustable parameters include the angle of the V between thesides tilt angle 158 of the frame parallel to itscentral axis 120, the speed of the rotors as determined by the speed ofmotors air manifolds - For the inclined flat bed separators such as
separator 214B ofFIG. 7 , the adjustable parameters includetilt angle 178, the rotor speed as determined by the speed ofmotor 180, and the air flow toair jets 188 directed against the face of the separator screen. - Typically a feedback control loop for any type of control system will simply monitor a downstream parameter and compare that to some preset target and then adjust the upstream adjustment in order to achieve the predetermined target. Such a feedback system could be utilized in some cases with the present invention, but the preferred control system instead takes each of the adjustable machine operator parameters in turn and via the
control system 302 adjusts a first one of those adjustable machine operating parameters while monitoring with the computerized control system a quality of separation achieved by the separator machine, so as to select a value of the first parameter that improves the effect of the first parameter on the monitored quality of separation. - After the first adjustable parameter has been optimized, the
controller 302 will begin adjusting a second one of the adjustable machine operating parameters while monitoring the quality of separation achieved by the separator machine, so as to select a value of the second parameter that improves the effect of the second parameter on the monitored quality of separation. This can be continued until the second adjustable machine operating parameter has been optimized. This is continued with each of the adjustable machine operating parameters for the separator machine in question, and then the process is repeated, returning to the first of the adjustable machine operating parameters and adjusting it to see if further optimization can be achieved. - In this manner, there is a continuous ongoing process of sequential adjustment of each adjustable machine operating parameter while observing the effect of that adjustment on the quality of separation, so that in effect a continuous adjustment of the separator machine is provided throughout its period of operation thus accommodating changes in the input stream very quickly.
- When utilizing counting devices such as
counters - More particularly, this method of adjustment can be described as a method of sorting an input
waste material stream 202 including a mixture of first and second material such as paper and containers. That inputwaste material stream 202 passes through theadjustable separator 214 and is separated into afirst output stream 216 which in this case is a paper stream containing the majority of the paper and some contaminant containers, and asecond output stream 218, which in this case is thecontainer stream 218, containing the majority of the containers and some contaminant paper. - The
counting devices supplemental container stream 224 which is extracted from thepaper stream 216, and the amount of contaminating paper in thesupplemental paper stream 240 which is extracted from thecontainer stream 218. - Then, when one of the adjustable machine operating parameters of
separator 214 is adjusted, the amount of contaminant containers insupplemental container stream 224 and the amount of contaminant paper insupplemental paper stream 240 are observed, and a signal is generated indicative of whether the combined amount of contaminant material has decreased. If the total amount of contaminant material contained instreams streams separator machine 214 is continuously adjusted in this manner until there is no further improvement or reduction in the total amount of contaminants. - The
first counter 228 may also be referred to as afirst detector 228 for detecting an amount of container contaminants in thepaper stream 216. Thesecond counter 242 may be referred to as a second detector for detecting an amount of paper contaminants in thecontainer stream 218. - It will be appreciated that the
controller 302 may be readily programmed to either equally weight the contaminants in each of the paper stream and container stream, or to favor a reduction in contaminants in one stream at the expense of an increase in contaminants in the other stream. - As previously noted, the sorting
modules - Typical examples of such optical sensing technology are found for example in the following U.S. patents and applications which are assigned to the assignee of the present invention or its subsidiary AST, Inc., and the details of which are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,570,653; 6,778,276; 6,369,882; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/516,257, entitled “Multi-Grade Object Sorting System and Method”, filed Feb. 29, 2000; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/921,000, filed Aug. 18, 2004 for “Sorting System Using Narrow-Band Electromagnetic Radiation”; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,318,172; 5,460,271; 5,917,585; 5,966,217; 6,137,074; 6,144,004; 6,504,124; and 6,497,324.
- The chosen sensor technology, as previously noted, is preferably utilized to measure the presence of the various material types on an area basis.
- Methods of Sorting Recycled Materials with Automatically Adjustable Separators Using Upstream Feedback
- In another aspect of the present invention a method is provided for separating the input
waste material stream 202. In this method, at least one characteristic of the input waste material stream correlating to a density of the waste material stream is measured. Preferably both weight and a height profile of the input waste material stream are measured. The weight can be measured bysensor 206A through any suitable device for weighing the incoming material on a portion of an incoming conveyor belt. Theprofile sensing device 206B can be a light beam or the like across the conveyor at various height intervals so as to determine the height of the incoming stream of waste material. Since the width of the stream on a conveyor belt is relatively constant, by knowing the weight and height the density of the incoming waste material stream can be approximated. - Based upon that sensed density, an initial value is selected for one or more of the adjustable parameters of
separator device 214. This initial value is preferably determined based upon comparison of the sensed density to a historical database ofcontroller 302 which correlates to the particular input stream. - Thus by sensing characteristics of the incoming material stream and comparing the same to a historical database, an initial setting for one or more of the various adjustable parameters of the
separator machine 214 can be selected so as to quickly place theseparator machine 214 in a condition relatively close to its optimum operating condition. - Then, the
separator machine 214 can be run through the process of individually adjusting each of its adjustable parameters and monitoring the downstream effect of that adjustment on the outgoing product streams to further optimize the individual machine. - The initial setting of the separator machine can also be based upon measurements of moisture content in the incoming stream as sensed by
moisture sensor 208. - The historical database is built by taking a plurality of samples of a sample waste material stream and determining both the density and composition of each sample, to compile the database of density versus composition. Thus the initial estimation of the composition of the input waste material stream is based upon the measured incoming density, as compared to the historical database.
- The
controller 302 can collect this data over a period of time and correlate the content of the various product streams to the measured parameters such as density and moisture content of the input stream, and to the optimum settings for the various adjustable parameters of theseparator machine 214 so as to further build the historical database and provide a basis for rapid selection of the optimum settings for the adjustable operating parameters of the separator device. - Methods of Optimization of the Overall Materials Recovery Facility
- MRFs are designed to handle a “typical” composition of recyclables such that each sorting step is optimally loaded but not overloaded. In overloaded operation, whether it be automated, mechanical or a manual sorting process, removal efficiency suffers as does product purity. Also MRFs typically must process all the material that is delivered each day.
- Therefore, as the composition of the feedstream changes it is likely that either one or more of the separation unit operations is being overloaded or that the system is being run at less than its optimum capacity, or that it is not being run at its optimum shift length.
- What is needed is a system that optimizes the system operation in terms of the three above considerations. The addition of sensor modules to the MRF can provide real time feedback as to the number of objects going through the various unit operations of the system. Comparing the known capacity of each unit operation with the actual throughput of that operation allows the efficiency of that operation to be determined.
- All typical MRFs weigh the incoming recyclables, and many receive all their material before noon. Knowing the amount of material needing to be processed and the capacity of the system allows the approximate processing time to be calculated. A relatively straightforward program can then be implemented which takes the data in real time from the unit operations and knowing the dollar value of each component and the approximate feedrate versus efficiency curves for each unit operation can calculate the optimum processing rate. Conversely if the operating time is fixed, the program can calculate the loss in revenue due to lower product purity or the number of manual sorters that would need to be added to the system to maintain optimum purity.
- The ultimate optimization of the Materials Recovery Facility includes an overall assessment of each of the separator devices while taking into consideration other factors such as the economic value of various ones of the output material streams, the cost of operating the various machinery, the cost of manual labor which may be necessary to supplement the automated machinery in certain situations, and various time constraints such as the number of hours the Materials Recovery Facility can be operated each day, and of course taking into account the total volume of material which must be recycled and separated during the operating day for the facility.
- Optimizing the profitability of the Materials Recovery Facility depends upon operating the mechanical equipment at the best capacity versus efficiency while minimizing the cost of manual operations, all the while producing the highest possible saleable material quality.
- In general, the lower the feed rate to mechanical and automated sorting equipment the higher the quality of the saleable output material (i.e. glass, ferrous material, aluminum, plastic, cardboard, and paper). It is possible to measure the general sorting parameters of both mechanical and automated sorters with regard to sorting efficiency versus throughput. The specific operating parameters will depend upon other factors such as moisture content and percentage composition, but these are second order effects as compared to throughput. Data representative of the feed rate versus separating efficiency relationship for an automatic separator apparatus will typically take the form of a curve generally like that of
FIG. 9 . - In general, but with less connection, the higher quality saleable output materials will command a higher selling price. However, due to market conditions it is often the case that higher quality does not bring a higher selling price. Further, prices for saleable materials such as glass, paper, aluminum, cardboard and steel are readily available on a day-to-day basis.
- The operating costs of mechanical and automated sorting equipment are largely proportional to the length of time the equipment is operated, rather than on the total amount of material processed. The amount of material processed does contribute to wear on the equipment, but the dominant cost factors are electrical usage and wear due to running, whether material is being processed or not. Disc screens are somewhat of an exception to this as material flow over the screen causes significant wear to the discs which must be periodically replaced. Cost for electrical power and spare parts costs are also readily available on a day-to-day basis and may be entered into the system. Data representative of the operating costs of mechanical equipment will typically take the form of a curve like that set forth in
FIG. 10 . - Materials Recovery Facility operating costs due to manual labor are proportional to the length of time the Materials Recovery Facility is in operation regardless of the amount of material being processed. Manual sorters cannot be sent home and then called back in a matter of a few hours. It is also well known from experience how much material a human sorter can on average process per hour. Again, labor costs are also well known on a day-to-day basis and can be input into the system. Data representative of the cost of manual labor will typically take the form of a curve like that of FIGS. 11 or 12.
FIG. 11 is representative of manual labor costs which are directly variable according to the time of labor required.FIG. 12 is representative of the situation in which labor can only be obtained in increments such as the length of a minimum shift for a worker of four hours, eight hours or the like. - The present invention utilizes a computer program in the
software portion 308 into which daily material prices can be entered along with current manual sorting hourly costs, the amount of material that needs to be processed that day, and in which the program can compute the optimum processing time and/or personnel for the day's material to generate the maximum possible net revenue. The program has operating characteristics available, such as in lookup tables or in graph form, for feed rate versus separation quality, manual sorting capacity, wear characteristics of the various mechanical components and the like, as well as the material pricing data noted above. - One such method of optimization can be described as a method of controlling a Materials Recovery Facility. An automatic separator apparatus is used for separating the input material stream into at least a
first output stream 216 and asecond output stream 218 containing predominantly first and second materials, in this case paper and containers, respectively. Data representative of a feed rate versus separating efficiency relationship for theautomatic separator apparatus 214 is provided to theautomatic control system 300. It will be appreciated that the faster theseparator device 214 is operated, the less efficient it will typically be and the more contaminants will be contained in each of thestreams separator 214 is operated too slowly it may not be possible to process all of the material that may be processed within the allotted time. Theautomatic control system 300 can calculate an optimum processing rate to maximize the profitability of the separation process. The control system can then adjust the feed rate of the input material stream to the automatic separator apparatus so that said feed rate approximates the optimum processing rate. - The control system can provide such a calculated optimum processing rate for the
separator 214 and for the various sortingmodules - The control system will further take into account costs that are representative of a cost of operating the Materials Recovery Facility. That cost data can include data representative of a cost of manual labor for supplemental manual sorting to sort contaminants from one or more of the various output streams. That cost data can further include consideration of an increased cost of manual labor for supplemental manual sorting needed as a result of increased feed rate to one or more of the separators.
- The
software portion 308 ofcontroller 302 includes a data input software portion for receiving data representative of such an economic value of a product of at least one of the product streams. The data input software portion can also receive inputs of current costs of operation of various portions of the Materials Recovery Facility along with the current cost of manual labor for supplemental manual separation. - It will be appreciated that the historical database can also include data representative of the amount of supplemental manual labor that may be necessary, for example when one or more portions of the Materials Recovery Facility are operated at such a high feed rate that totally efficient separation cannot be achieved and thus manual supplementation may be required. The data input software portion of the automatic control system is also adapted to receive input of total throughput requirement for the facility for a given time interval and a constraint for processing the total throughput requirement through the facility.
- Thus it is seen that the apparatus and methods of the present invention readily achieve the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those inherent therein. While certain preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described for purposes of the present disclosure, numerous changes in the arrangement and construction of parts and steps may be made by those skilled in the art, which changes are encompassed within the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (25)
1. A method of separating an input waste material stream, the method comprising:
(a) measuring at least one characteristic of said input waste material stream correlating to a density of said input waste material stream;
(b) selecting an initial value for an adjustable parameter of an adjustable material separator based upon the at least one characteristic measured in step (a); and
(c) separating said input waste material stream, with said adjustable material separator, into a first output stream containing a majority of a first material and some of a second material, and a second output stream containing a majority of the second material and some of the first material.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
estimating a composition of the input waste material stream in terms of relative portions of said first and second materials, based upon the at least one characteristic measured in step (a); and
wherein step (b) includes selecting said initial value for said adjustable parameter based upon said estimated composition.
3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:
prior to step (a), taking a plurality of samples of a sample waste material stream, determining both the density and composition of each sample, and compiling a historical database of density versus composition; and
wherein said estimating step is based upon said historical database.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
prior to step (a), taking a plurality of samples of a sample waste material stream, determining both the density and composition of each sample, and compiling a historical database of density versus composition; and
wherein said selecting step is based upon said historical database.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (a) comprises:
(a)(1) weighing a portion of said input material stream; and
(a)(2) sensing a height of said portion of said input material stream.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said adjustable material separator is an inclined screen, and wherein:
in step (b), said adjustable parameter is an angle of inclination of said inclined screen.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
in step (b), said adjustable parameter is a flow of air against a face of the screen.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said inclined screen includes a V-shape trough having an adjustable V-angle, and wherein:
in step (b), said adjustable parameter is said V-angle.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said adjustable material separator is a screen having spaced rotating discs, and wherein:
in step (b), said adjustable parameter is a rotational speed of said discs.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein in step (b) said adjustable material separator is a flat bed inclined screen.
11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after said selecting of said initial value:
monitoring an amount of contaminant second material in said first output stream and an amount of contaminant first material in said second output stream;
then adjusting said adjustable parameter from said initial value;
then again monitoring the amount of contaminant second material in said first output stream and the amount of contaminant first material in said second output stream;
then further adjusting said adjustable parameter in a direction indicated as being favorable to decreasing a combined amount of contaminant material in said first and second output streams.
12. A method of sorting recycled materials, comprising:
(a) providing an input stream of recycled materials, wherein a composition of the input stream is subject to variation during a time interval;
(b) moving the input stream through a separator machine having a plurality of adjustable machine operating parameters;
(c) providing stored historical data representative of a set of historical values of the operating parameters corresponding to improved quality of separation for given values of a characteristic of said input stream;
(d) sensing a present value of said characteristic of said input stream; and
(e) adjusting said plurality of adjustable machine operating parameters, via a computerized control system, in response to said sensed present value of said characteristic of said input stream so that said adjustable machine operating parameters approach said historical values of the adjustable machine operating parameters corresponding to improved quality of separation for said sensed present value of said characteristic of said input stream.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the characteristic of the input stream is density.
14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the density of the input stream is estimated by measuring a height of a portion of said input stream and a weight of said portion of said input stream.
15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the characteristic of the input stream is moisture content.
16. The method of claim 12 , wherein:
in step (a) the input stream is comprised primarily of paper and containers, the paper being primarily newspaper; and
in step (b) the separator machine separates the input stream into a paper stream made up primarily of paper, and a container stream made up primarily of containers.
17. An automated separator apparatus for separating an input material stream into first and second output streams, comprising:
a plurality of spaced rotating discs defining a screen having a length;
a first actuator for adjusting an angle of inclination of said length;
a second actuator for adjusting a rotational speed of said rotating discs;
a sensing unit for sensing at least one characteristic of said input material stream; and
a control system responsive to said sensing unit and operably connected to said actuators, so that said screen automatically adjusts to changes in the sensed characteristic of said input material stream.
18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein said at least one sensed characteristic includes density.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein said at least one sensed characteristic includes moisture content.
20. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein said at least one sensed characteristic includes moisture content.
21. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein said at least one sensed characteristic includes weight and a profile height.
22. The apparatus of claim 17 , further comprising:
a first separator for further separating the first output stream;
a first optical sensor for identifying and measuring individual items of the first output stream and thereby determining a composition of the first output stream;
a second separator for further separating the second output stream; and
a second optical sensor for identifying and measuring individual items of the second output stream and thereby determining a composition of the second output stream.
23. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein:
said plurality of spaced rotating discs define said screen in a trough shape having inclined sidewalls; and
said apparatus further comprises a third actuator for adjusting an angle of lateral inclination of said side walls.
24. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein:
said screen is a flat bed screen.
25. The apparatus of claim 17 , further comprising:
a third actuator for adjusting a flow of air against a face of the screen.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/194,708 US20060081513A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2005-08-01 | Sorting recycle materials with automatically adjustable separator using upstream feedback |
US12/038,301 US20080156703A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-02-27 | Sorting Recycled Materials With Automatically Adjustable Separator Using Upstream Feedback |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US60020604P | 2004-08-10 | 2004-08-10 | |
US11/194,708 US20060081513A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2005-08-01 | Sorting recycle materials with automatically adjustable separator using upstream feedback |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/038,301 Division US20080156703A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-02-27 | Sorting Recycled Materials With Automatically Adjustable Separator Using Upstream Feedback |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060081513A1 true US20060081513A1 (en) | 2006-04-20 |
Family
ID=35908039
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/194,820 Abandoned US20060085212A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2005-08-01 | Optimization of a materials recycling facility |
US11/194,708 Abandoned US20060081513A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2005-08-01 | Sorting recycle materials with automatically adjustable separator using upstream feedback |
US11/194,709 Active 2028-06-01 US7893378B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2005-08-01 | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
US12/038,301 Abandoned US20080156703A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-02-27 | Sorting Recycled Materials With Automatically Adjustable Separator Using Upstream Feedback |
US12/109,202 Abandoned US20080197056A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-04-24 | Materials Recovery Facility Process Optimization Via Unit Operation Feedback |
US12/109,213 Active 2026-12-12 US7994448B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-04-24 | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/194,820 Abandoned US20060085212A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2005-08-01 | Optimization of a materials recycling facility |
Family Applications After (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/194,709 Active 2028-06-01 US7893378B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2005-08-01 | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
US12/038,301 Abandoned US20080156703A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-02-27 | Sorting Recycled Materials With Automatically Adjustable Separator Using Upstream Feedback |
US12/109,202 Abandoned US20080197056A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-04-24 | Materials Recovery Facility Process Optimization Via Unit Operation Feedback |
US12/109,213 Active 2026-12-12 US7994448B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2008-04-24 | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US20060085212A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006020455A2 (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060000237A1 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2006-01-05 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for glass recycling at a beneficiator and/or a material recovery facility |
US20080290006A1 (en) * | 2007-05-23 | 2008-11-27 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for optimizing a single-stream materials recovery facility |
EP2125253A1 (en) * | 2007-01-05 | 2009-12-02 | Thomas A. Valerio | System and method for sorting dissimilar materials |
US7893378B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2011-02-22 | Mss, Inc. | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
WO2012071113A1 (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2012-05-31 | Organic Energy Corporation | Mechanized separation of mixed solid waste and recovery of recyclable products |
US8684288B2 (en) | 2010-11-24 | 2014-04-01 | Organic Energy Corporation | Mechanized separation of mixed solid waste and recovery of recyclable products |
US9650650B2 (en) | 2010-01-25 | 2017-05-16 | Organic Energy Corporation | Systems and methods for processing mixed solid waste |
US9700896B1 (en) | 2013-02-16 | 2017-07-11 | Organic Energy Corporation | Systems and methods for processing mixed solid waste |
US9713812B1 (en) | 2011-09-12 | 2017-07-25 | Organic Energy Corporation | Methods and systems for separating and recovering recyclables using a comminution device |
US20180243751A1 (en) * | 2017-02-28 | 2018-08-30 | Van Dyk Baler Corp. & Lubo USA, LLC | Method of sorting trash for recycling of paper and apparatus for sorting trash for paper recycling |
US10111385B2 (en) | 2016-06-24 | 2018-10-30 | Jackrabbit | Nut harvester with separating disks |
WO2020146930A1 (en) * | 2019-01-17 | 2020-07-23 | Baumgarten Julio Carlos Benjamin | Automatic control system for a gravity separator |
US10943195B2 (en) * | 2015-03-20 | 2021-03-09 | Schneider Electric Systems Usa, Inc. | Asset management in a process control system |
US11432463B2 (en) | 2019-02-08 | 2022-09-06 | Jackrabbit, Inc. | Nut harvester with a removable assembly and a method of replacing a removable assembly of a nut harvester |
Families Citing this family (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8857621B2 (en) * | 2001-10-02 | 2014-10-14 | Emerging Acquisitions, Llc | De-inking screen with air knife |
PT1458499E (en) | 2001-10-02 | 2007-04-30 | Emerging Acquisitions Llc | Screen |
US7264124B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2007-09-04 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for sorting recyclables at a material recovery facility |
CA2476194C (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2010-06-22 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Sizing roller screen ore processing apparatus |
CA2565415A1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2006-05-26 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | System for and method of mixed-color cullet characterization and certification, and providing contaminant-free, uniformly colored mixed-color cullet |
US8393561B2 (en) * | 2005-11-09 | 2013-03-12 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Method and apparatus for creating a slurry |
WO2007112591A1 (en) * | 2006-04-04 | 2007-10-11 | 6511660 Canada Inc. | System and method for identifying and sorting material |
DE102006016324A1 (en) * | 2006-04-06 | 2007-10-25 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Apparatus and method for flexibly classifying polycrystalline silicon fragments |
CN101497399A (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-08-05 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Automatic material-separating machine |
US20110137812A1 (en) * | 2008-08-15 | 2011-06-09 | Ronald Matthew Sherga | System and method for monetizing and trading energy or environmental credits from polymeric materials |
CA2640514A1 (en) * | 2008-09-18 | 2010-03-18 | Kyle Alan Bruggencate | Method and apparatus for processing an ore feed |
WO2010050126A1 (en) * | 2008-10-28 | 2010-05-06 | パナソニック株式会社 | Assorting method |
CA2688805C (en) | 2008-11-18 | 2013-07-02 | John F. Green | Method and apparatus for sorting heterogeneous material |
CA2812125A1 (en) * | 2009-07-24 | 2011-01-24 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Screening disk, roller, and roller screen for screening an ore feed |
US8813463B2 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2014-08-26 | Allen J. Berte | Recyclable containers and manufacturing method for controlling the container value to maximize container recycling |
CA2752081C (en) * | 2011-09-12 | 2017-10-31 | Purolator Inc. | An adjustable speed control system, method and computer readable medium for use with a conveyor and a reader |
WO2014046660A1 (en) * | 2012-09-20 | 2014-03-27 | Empire Technology Development Llc | Methods and systems for calculating energy credits for materials |
US8813972B1 (en) | 2012-10-24 | 2014-08-26 | Michael C. Centers | Secondary separation system for recyclables |
WO2014130898A1 (en) * | 2013-02-21 | 2014-08-28 | Miller Spencer Allen | Material separation and conveyance using tuned waves |
ITMI20130849A1 (en) * | 2013-05-24 | 2014-11-25 | Previero Sas | PLANT AND METHOD FOR SEPARATION OF LABELS AND OTHER MATERIALS FROM PLASTIC BOTTLES |
WO2015142937A1 (en) * | 2014-03-17 | 2015-09-24 | Archer Andrew J | Material separator |
WO2015188166A2 (en) * | 2014-06-06 | 2015-12-10 | Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Energy-efficient extraction of acid gas from flue gases |
US20160247627A1 (en) | 2015-02-24 | 2016-08-25 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Low-profile coupled inductors with leakage control |
US10449572B2 (en) | 2015-12-16 | 2019-10-22 | Waste Repurposing International, Inc. | Household hazardous waste recovery |
US9707595B2 (en) | 2015-12-16 | 2017-07-18 | Waste Repurposing International, Inc. | Household hazardous waste recovery |
FR3057788B1 (en) * | 2016-10-24 | 2018-10-19 | Pellenc | SORTING TABLE FOR FRUIT WITH ADAPTIVE SCREW |
US10131507B1 (en) * | 2017-07-27 | 2018-11-20 | Mss, Inc. | Ejector hood |
US10512942B2 (en) | 2017-10-30 | 2019-12-24 | Optisort, Llc | System and method for sorting objects |
US11135620B2 (en) | 2018-01-12 | 2021-10-05 | Emerging Acquisitions, Llc | Autonomous data collection and system control for material recovery facilities |
US11033936B2 (en) * | 2018-02-28 | 2021-06-15 | Karl Paul Dockendorf | Method and apparatus for sorting pieces |
US10835927B2 (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2020-11-17 | Wm Intellectual Property Holdings Llc | System and process for sorting and recovery of recyclable materials from mixed waste |
AU2020289549B2 (en) * | 2019-06-05 | 2023-05-18 | X Development Llc | Determining ore characteristics |
GB2598097B (en) * | 2020-08-11 | 2022-12-28 | Reliagen Holdings Ltd | A method of processing waste material to produce various grades of plastics |
CN112191670A (en) * | 2020-10-28 | 2021-01-08 | 南开大学 | Urban and rural mixed household garbage on-site low-temperature integrated treatment device and application |
US20230012120A1 (en) * | 2021-07-12 | 2023-01-12 | MicroRecycling Systems | Apparatus and method for sorting and trading scrap for recycling |
US11707747B1 (en) * | 2021-08-05 | 2023-07-25 | Wm Intellectual Property Holdings, L.L.C. | System and process for sorting and recovery of recyclable materials from mixed municipal solid waste |
CN115084703B (en) * | 2022-08-18 | 2022-12-06 | 深圳市杰成镍钴新能源科技有限公司 | Retired power battery recycling method, device and system |
Citations (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3834534A (en) * | 1971-12-20 | 1974-09-10 | Kennecott Copper Corp | Variable mode vibratory screen |
US3888351A (en) * | 1974-05-31 | 1975-06-10 | Massachusetts Inst Technology | Automatic refuse reclamation system |
US4088227A (en) * | 1976-07-12 | 1978-05-09 | Geosource Inc. | Multiplexed sorting apparatus with test circuitry |
US4316799A (en) * | 1978-07-28 | 1982-02-23 | Satake Engineering Company, Ltd. | Automatic control apparatus for an oscillating grain separator |
US4658964A (en) * | 1985-09-03 | 1987-04-21 | Williams Patent Crusher And Pulverizer Company | Rotary disc screen and method of operation |
US4912624A (en) * | 1988-03-30 | 1990-03-27 | Syracuse University | Multi-parameter optimization circuit |
US5024334A (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1991-06-18 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Method and means for gravity table automation |
US5148922A (en) * | 1988-04-26 | 1992-09-22 | Marriott Paul A | Gravity particle separator |
US5236093A (en) * | 1992-11-13 | 1993-08-17 | Weyerhaeuser Company | Rate control overflow system for disk screens |
US5263591A (en) * | 1991-12-12 | 1993-11-23 | Taormina Industries, Inc. | Refuse recycling system |
US5318172A (en) * | 1992-02-03 | 1994-06-07 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | Process and apparatus for identification and separation of plastic containers |
US5333738A (en) * | 1989-02-04 | 1994-08-02 | Maschinenfabrik Bezner Gmbh & Co. Kg | Process and installation for recovering valuable materials, in particular from waste material on building sites |
US5460271A (en) * | 1993-10-19 | 1995-10-24 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | System and method for singulating inhomogeneous materials |
US5541831A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1996-07-30 | Oliver Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Computer controlled separator device |
US5609256A (en) * | 1995-01-04 | 1997-03-11 | Carpco, Inc. | Process for recovery of values from solid waste materials |
US5917585A (en) * | 1997-09-22 | 1999-06-29 | Roe; Mitchell Gregg | Method for distinguishing pen from other materials |
US5966217A (en) * | 1997-09-22 | 1999-10-12 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | System and method for distinguishing an item from a group of items |
US6115644A (en) * | 1993-03-11 | 2000-09-05 | Cedarapids, Inc., | Moisture content measuring apparatus and method |
US6137074A (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2000-10-24 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | Optical glass sorting machine and method |
US6143183A (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 2000-11-07 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for controlling and monitoring continuous feed centrifuge |
US6168642B1 (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 2001-01-02 | Innoval Management Limited | Industrial utilization of garbage with effective recycling and with optimization in energy production |
US6196394B1 (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2001-03-06 | Zemag Gmbh | Method for operating a roller bar screen |
US6250472B1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2001-06-26 | Advanced Sorting Technologies, Llc | Paper sorting system |
US6409105B1 (en) * | 1999-08-19 | 2002-06-25 | The Quaker Oats Company | Corn milling and separating device and method |
US6460706B1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-10-08 | Cp Manufacturing | Disc screen apparatus with air manifold |
US6497324B1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2002-12-24 | Mss, Inc. | Sorting system with multi-plexer |
US6570653B2 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2003-05-27 | Advanced Sorting Technologies, Llc | System and method for sensing white paper |
US20040159593A1 (en) * | 2002-07-22 | 2004-08-19 | Allen Paul C. | Transportable plastics recovery system |
US6780002B2 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2004-08-24 | Siempelkamp Maschinen- Und Anlagenbau Gmbh & Co. Kg | Spreader for wood chips, wood particle and sawdust |
US20050061716A1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2005-03-24 | Centers Michael C. | Separation system for single stream compressed recyclables |
US7014824B2 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2006-03-21 | Centrotherm Elektrische Anlagen Gmbh & Co. | Method for purifying process waste gases |
US20060070851A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2006-04-06 | Stephane Marisy | Device for the dynamic weighing of postal items |
US20060081514A1 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2006-04-20 | Kenny Garry R | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
US7264124B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2007-09-04 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for sorting recyclables at a material recovery facility |
US7341156B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2008-03-11 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for sorting, collecting data pertaining to and certifying recyclables at a material recovery facility |
US7383195B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-06-03 | Vesta Medical, Llc | Methods of sorting waste |
Family Cites Families (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3401891A (en) | 1966-10-25 | 1968-09-17 | Gen Electric | Control system for a closed circuit grinding system for finish cement |
ZA721495B (en) | 1971-04-21 | 1972-11-29 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | An improvement in or relating to mineral material particle size determination |
DE2143817A1 (en) | 1971-09-01 | 1973-03-08 | Nii Udobrenijam I Insektofungi | PROCEDURE FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SCHUETTGUETERN ACCORDING TO GRAIN SIZE TO SMALL GRAIN FRACTION AND COMMERCIAL GOODS |
FR2170287A5 (en) | 1971-10-06 | 1973-09-14 | Inst Udobreniyam | |
DE2160540C3 (en) | 1971-12-07 | 1980-03-20 | Ruhrkohle Ag, 4300 Essen | Process and device for dedusting hard coal in the wind sifter |
GB1446583A (en) | 1973-07-03 | 1976-08-18 | Amf Inc | Apparatus for measuring and dispensing portions of parti culate material |
SU474356A1 (en) | 1974-01-30 | 1975-06-25 | Свердловский Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Горный Институт Им. В.В.Вахрушева | The device for automatic control of the quality of enrichment products |
DE2552308A1 (en) | 1975-11-21 | 1977-06-08 | Schwing Hydraulik Elektronik | Air-assisted gyroscopic sorter esp. for mining - has drive unit allowing easy infinite adjustment of fan wheel |
DE2643759C3 (en) | 1976-09-29 | 1981-10-29 | Brankamp, Klaus, Prof. Dr.-Ing., 4006 Erkrath | Procedure for monitoring cyclically recurring production processes |
DE2716095A1 (en) | 1977-04-12 | 1978-10-19 | Zoeld Tibor Dr Phys | GAS CONTROLLED PROCESS FOR SORTING PARTICLES SUSPENDED IN AN ELECTROLYTE AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROCESS |
ZA782389B (en) | 1978-04-26 | 1979-09-26 | Sphere Invest | Material benefication |
GB2048477A (en) | 1979-03-20 | 1980-12-10 | Gen Electric Co Ltd | Ultrasonic imaging system |
JPS55157364A (en) | 1979-05-28 | 1980-12-08 | Hosokawa Micron Kk | Classifier |
DE3003308C1 (en) | 1980-01-30 | 1982-08-05 | Gebr. Schmidt, 8432 Beilngries | Device for separating heavier grains of a bulk material from lighter grains and dust |
SE446158B (en) | 1981-12-10 | 1986-08-18 | Kamas Ind Ab | DEVICE FOR MACHINES FOR SEPARATION OF MATERIALS WITH DIFFERENT AERODYNAMIC PROPERTIES |
IT1205622B (en) | 1982-12-21 | 1989-03-23 | Illycaffe Spa | PROCEDURE TO MAKE A SELECTION IN A GRANULIFORM MATERIAL AND MACHINE TO IMPLEMENT THE PROCEDURE |
DE3428672A1 (en) | 1984-08-03 | 1986-02-13 | Gebr. Ruberg GmbH & Co KG Maschinenfabrik für Mühlen- und Speicherbau, 3493 Nieheim | Automatic cereal-inflow regulation for a cereal-cleaning machine |
JPS61122144A (en) | 1984-11-17 | 1986-06-10 | コトブキ技研工業株式会社 | Sand manufacture |
DE3522478A1 (en) | 1985-06-22 | 1987-01-02 | Aufbreitungsmaschinen Mbh & Co | Process and apparatus for producing a gravel/sand finished product |
DE3706134A1 (en) | 1987-02-26 | 1988-09-08 | Barth Maschf G W | Air-sifting device |
DD259800A1 (en) | 1987-04-01 | 1988-09-07 | Entstaubungstech Edgar Andre | METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENT OF THE DISPERSITIVE CONDITION OF DISPERSER SOLIDS SYSTEMS |
US4844351A (en) * | 1988-03-21 | 1989-07-04 | Holloway Clifford C | Method for separation, recovery, and recycling of plastics from municipal solid waste |
US4991721A (en) * | 1988-08-15 | 1991-02-12 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Automation of an air-screen seed cleaner |
CA2008493A1 (en) | 1990-01-24 | 1991-07-24 | Dan R. Pace | Adjusting mechanisms for low speed particle concentrator |
DE4103166A1 (en) | 1990-07-09 | 1992-01-23 | Schulz Rudolf | Real=time quality control for workpiece manufacturing process - uses sensor mechanisms to monitor each stage of process simultaneously to enable maintenance of tolerances |
DE4035160A1 (en) | 1990-11-06 | 1992-05-07 | Buehler Gmbh | Rising sifter for loose bulk material - has accurately controlled flow speed through by=pass and measuring probes |
IT1244019B (en) | 1990-11-21 | 1994-06-28 | Pirelli Transmissioni Ind Spa | PROCEDURE AND AUTOMATIC SYSTEM FOR THE QUALITY CONTROL AND PRODUCTION OF BELTS FOR TRANSMISSION. |
DE4118675A1 (en) | 1991-06-07 | 1992-12-10 | Lindemann Maschfab Gmbh | AIR SUPPORTED SEPARATOR |
WO1993004839A1 (en) | 1991-09-12 | 1993-03-18 | Engel Maschinenbau Gesellschaft M.B.H. | Process for controlling a production machine, in particular an injection moulding machine |
US5390860A (en) * | 1992-05-15 | 1995-02-21 | Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance Sa | Method and apparatus for separating paper fiber and plastics from mixed waste materials and products obtained thereby |
US6024226A (en) * | 1997-06-05 | 2000-02-15 | Olivier; Paul A. | System and process for separating and recovering/recycling solid wastes and waste streams |
JP4365984B2 (en) * | 1999-05-14 | 2009-11-18 | キヤノン株式会社 | Manufacturing method of recycled plastic material |
US20020125600A1 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2002-09-12 | David Horne | Plastic recycling system and process |
WO2002070816A2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-12 | Sep Technologies, Llc | Electrical field apparatus and methods for fluid for decontamination and other purposes |
US6648146B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-11-18 | Spx Corporation | Suction oil filter for transmissions or engines with a movable suction tube |
DE60331425D1 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2010-04-08 | Mba Polymers Inc | MULTI-STAGE SEPARATION OF PLASTICS |
-
2005
- 2005-08-01 US US11/194,820 patent/US20060085212A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-08-01 US US11/194,708 patent/US20060081513A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-08-01 US US11/194,709 patent/US7893378B2/en active Active
- 2005-08-02 WO PCT/US2005/027404 patent/WO2006020455A2/en active Application Filing
-
2008
- 2008-02-27 US US12/038,301 patent/US20080156703A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-04-24 US US12/109,202 patent/US20080197056A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-04-24 US US12/109,213 patent/US7994448B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3834534A (en) * | 1971-12-20 | 1974-09-10 | Kennecott Copper Corp | Variable mode vibratory screen |
US3888351A (en) * | 1974-05-31 | 1975-06-10 | Massachusetts Inst Technology | Automatic refuse reclamation system |
US4088227A (en) * | 1976-07-12 | 1978-05-09 | Geosource Inc. | Multiplexed sorting apparatus with test circuitry |
US4316799A (en) * | 1978-07-28 | 1982-02-23 | Satake Engineering Company, Ltd. | Automatic control apparatus for an oscillating grain separator |
US4658964A (en) * | 1985-09-03 | 1987-04-21 | Williams Patent Crusher And Pulverizer Company | Rotary disc screen and method of operation |
US4912624A (en) * | 1988-03-30 | 1990-03-27 | Syracuse University | Multi-parameter optimization circuit |
US5148922A (en) * | 1988-04-26 | 1992-09-22 | Marriott Paul A | Gravity particle separator |
US5333738A (en) * | 1989-02-04 | 1994-08-02 | Maschinenfabrik Bezner Gmbh & Co. Kg | Process and installation for recovering valuable materials, in particular from waste material on building sites |
US5024334A (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1991-06-18 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Method and means for gravity table automation |
US5263591A (en) * | 1991-12-12 | 1993-11-23 | Taormina Industries, Inc. | Refuse recycling system |
US5318172A (en) * | 1992-02-03 | 1994-06-07 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | Process and apparatus for identification and separation of plastic containers |
US5236093A (en) * | 1992-11-13 | 1993-08-17 | Weyerhaeuser Company | Rate control overflow system for disk screens |
US6115644A (en) * | 1993-03-11 | 2000-09-05 | Cedarapids, Inc., | Moisture content measuring apparatus and method |
US5541831A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1996-07-30 | Oliver Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Computer controlled separator device |
US6351676B1 (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 2002-02-26 | Oliver Manufacturing Company | Computer controlled separator device |
US5943231A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1999-08-24 | Oliver Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Computer controlled separator device |
US5460271A (en) * | 1993-10-19 | 1995-10-24 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | System and method for singulating inhomogeneous materials |
US5609256A (en) * | 1995-01-04 | 1997-03-11 | Carpco, Inc. | Process for recovery of values from solid waste materials |
US6143183A (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 2000-11-07 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for controlling and monitoring continuous feed centrifuge |
US6168642B1 (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 2001-01-02 | Innoval Management Limited | Industrial utilization of garbage with effective recycling and with optimization in energy production |
US5966217A (en) * | 1997-09-22 | 1999-10-12 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | System and method for distinguishing an item from a group of items |
US5917585A (en) * | 1997-09-22 | 1999-06-29 | Roe; Mitchell Gregg | Method for distinguishing pen from other materials |
US7014824B2 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2006-03-21 | Centrotherm Elektrische Anlagen Gmbh & Co. | Method for purifying process waste gases |
US6196394B1 (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2001-03-06 | Zemag Gmbh | Method for operating a roller bar screen |
US6137074A (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2000-10-24 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | Optical glass sorting machine and method |
US6144004A (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2000-11-07 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | Optical glass sorting machine and method |
US6504124B1 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2003-01-07 | Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. | Optical glass sorting machine and method |
US6570653B2 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2003-05-27 | Advanced Sorting Technologies, Llc | System and method for sensing white paper |
US6250472B1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2001-06-26 | Advanced Sorting Technologies, Llc | Paper sorting system |
US6778276B2 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2004-08-17 | Advanced Sorting Technologies Llc | System and method for sensing white paper |
US6409105B1 (en) * | 1999-08-19 | 2002-06-25 | The Quaker Oats Company | Corn milling and separating device and method |
US6497324B1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2002-12-24 | Mss, Inc. | Sorting system with multi-plexer |
US6780002B2 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2004-08-24 | Siempelkamp Maschinen- Und Anlagenbau Gmbh & Co. Kg | Spreader for wood chips, wood particle and sawdust |
US6460706B1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-10-08 | Cp Manufacturing | Disc screen apparatus with air manifold |
US6648145B2 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2003-11-18 | Cp Manufacturing, Inc. | V-shaped disc screen and method of classifying mixed recyclable materials into four streams |
US20040159593A1 (en) * | 2002-07-22 | 2004-08-19 | Allen Paul C. | Transportable plastics recovery system |
US20060070851A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2006-04-06 | Stephane Marisy | Device for the dynamic weighing of postal items |
US7383195B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-06-03 | Vesta Medical, Llc | Methods of sorting waste |
US20050061716A1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2005-03-24 | Centers Michael C. | Separation system for single stream compressed recyclables |
US7264124B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2007-09-04 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for sorting recyclables at a material recovery facility |
US7341156B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2008-03-11 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for sorting, collecting data pertaining to and certifying recyclables at a material recovery facility |
US20080237093A1 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2008-10-02 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and Methods For Sorting Recyclables at a Material Recovery Facility |
US20060081514A1 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2006-04-20 | Kenny Garry R | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
US20060085212A1 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2006-04-20 | Kenny Garry R | Optimization of a materials recycling facility |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7757863B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2010-07-20 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for glass recycling at a beneficiator and/or a material recovery facility |
US20060000237A1 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2006-01-05 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for glass recycling at a beneficiator and/or a material recovery facility |
US7893378B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2011-02-22 | Mss, Inc. | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback |
EP2125253A1 (en) * | 2007-01-05 | 2009-12-02 | Thomas A. Valerio | System and method for sorting dissimilar materials |
EP2125253A4 (en) * | 2007-01-05 | 2012-05-30 | Thomas A Valerio | System and method for sorting dissimilar materials |
US8459466B2 (en) * | 2007-05-23 | 2013-06-11 | Re Community Energy, Llc | Systems and methods for optimizing a single-stream materials recovery facility |
US20080290006A1 (en) * | 2007-05-23 | 2008-11-27 | Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for optimizing a single-stream materials recovery facility |
US9650650B2 (en) | 2010-01-25 | 2017-05-16 | Organic Energy Corporation | Systems and methods for processing mixed solid waste |
US8684288B2 (en) | 2010-11-24 | 2014-04-01 | Organic Energy Corporation | Mechanized separation of mixed solid waste and recovery of recyclable products |
US9884324B2 (en) | 2010-11-24 | 2018-02-06 | Organic Energy Corporation | Advanced solid waste sorting systems and methods |
WO2012071112A1 (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2012-05-31 | Organic Energy Corporation | Mechanized separation of wet and dry materials in a solid waste stream |
US9649666B2 (en) | 2010-11-24 | 2017-05-16 | Organic Energy Corporation | Mechanized separation of mixed solid waste and recovery of recyclable products using optical sorter |
WO2012071113A1 (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2012-05-31 | Organic Energy Corporation | Mechanized separation of mixed solid waste and recovery of recyclable products |
JP2014501608A (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2014-01-23 | オーガニック エナジー コーポレーション | Mechanical sorting of wet and dry materials in solid waste streams |
US9713812B1 (en) | 2011-09-12 | 2017-07-25 | Organic Energy Corporation | Methods and systems for separating and recovering recyclables using a comminution device |
US9700896B1 (en) | 2013-02-16 | 2017-07-11 | Organic Energy Corporation | Systems and methods for processing mixed solid waste |
US10943195B2 (en) * | 2015-03-20 | 2021-03-09 | Schneider Electric Systems Usa, Inc. | Asset management in a process control system |
US10111385B2 (en) | 2016-06-24 | 2018-10-30 | Jackrabbit | Nut harvester with separating disks |
US20180243751A1 (en) * | 2017-02-28 | 2018-08-30 | Van Dyk Baler Corp. & Lubo USA, LLC | Method of sorting trash for recycling of paper and apparatus for sorting trash for paper recycling |
US10507470B2 (en) * | 2017-02-28 | 2019-12-17 | Van Dyk Baler Corp. | Method of sorting trash for recycling of paper and apparatus for sorting trash for paper recycling |
US10981176B2 (en) * | 2017-02-28 | 2021-04-20 | Van Dyk Baler Corp. | Method of sorting trash for recycling of paper and apparatus for sorting trash for paper recycling |
WO2020146930A1 (en) * | 2019-01-17 | 2020-07-23 | Baumgarten Julio Carlos Benjamin | Automatic control system for a gravity separator |
US11432463B2 (en) | 2019-02-08 | 2022-09-06 | Jackrabbit, Inc. | Nut harvester with a removable assembly and a method of replacing a removable assembly of a nut harvester |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2006020455A3 (en) | 2007-09-27 |
US7994448B2 (en) | 2011-08-09 |
WO2006020455A2 (en) | 2006-02-23 |
US20060085212A1 (en) | 2006-04-20 |
US20080156703A1 (en) | 2008-07-03 |
US20060081514A1 (en) | 2006-04-20 |
US7893378B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 |
US20080197056A1 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
US20080197058A1 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7893378B2 (en) | Materials recovery facility process optimization via unit operation feedback | |
US6533125B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for batching-out items such as poultry pieces | |
US8459466B2 (en) | Systems and methods for optimizing a single-stream materials recovery facility | |
US5263591A (en) | Refuse recycling system | |
US11097283B2 (en) | Systems and methods for municipal solid waste recycling facility | |
JPH07256231A (en) | Method and device for selective recovery of metal | |
CN204018236U (en) | Small-sized agricultural product separation system | |
CN106944358A (en) | A kind of automatic weighing and sorting device | |
CN219460229U (en) | Full-automatic sorting system for quality grading and defective product removal of large yellow croaker | |
US6260713B1 (en) | Cherry sizing process and apparatus | |
US4933074A (en) | Article singulating system and method | |
CN115581308A (en) | Stem and crutch removing system and stem and crutch removing method | |
US3455446A (en) | Apparatus and method for advancing objects to gauging slots | |
KR100594936B1 (en) | Automatic pepper sorter | |
KR100590595B1 (en) | Apparatus of taking an image of bulk crops, apparatus of dividing bulk crops and apparatus of sorting bulk crops | |
KR100816784B1 (en) | Apparatus for sorting pepper | |
CN211217575U (en) | Fruit optimizing equipment with material separating box structure | |
JP2853855B2 (en) | Method for constant quantitative sorting and carrying out of fruit and vegetable sorter | |
CA2351888A1 (en) | Vegetable length grader with segmented roller | |
CN220738576U (en) | Sheet sorting system | |
CN220760133U (en) | Material receiving device for color sorter | |
CN220635406U (en) | Grain look selection machine with automatically regulated feed quantity | |
CN214682965U (en) | Bamboo strip shape sorting machine | |
CN117225735B (en) | Board grading visual inspection conveying equipment and method thereof | |
CN212384115U (en) | Product separation production line and sorting mechanism |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MSS, INC., TENNESSEE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KENNY, GARRY R.;REEL/FRAME:018781/0470 Effective date: 20070102 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |