US20060150901A1 - Powder generating apparatus and method for producing powder - Google Patents

Powder generating apparatus and method for producing powder Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060150901A1
US20060150901A1 US10/546,636 US54663605A US2006150901A1 US 20060150901 A1 US20060150901 A1 US 20060150901A1 US 54663605 A US54663605 A US 54663605A US 2006150901 A1 US2006150901 A1 US 2006150901A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
powder
reactor
generating means
generating
droplets
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/546,636
Inventor
Orest Lastow
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
AstraZeneca AB
Original Assignee
AstraZeneca AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by AstraZeneca AB filed Critical AstraZeneca AB
Assigned to ASTRAZENECA AB reassignment ASTRAZENECA AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LASTOW, OREST
Publication of US20060150901A1 publication Critical patent/US20060150901A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B05SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
    • B05BSPRAYING APPARATUS; ATOMISING APPARATUS; NOZZLES
    • B05B5/00Electrostatic spraying apparatus; Spraying apparatus with means for charging the spray electrically; Apparatus for spraying liquids or other fluent materials by other electric means
    • B05B5/025Discharge apparatus, e.g. electrostatic spray guns
    • B05B5/0255Discharge apparatus, e.g. electrostatic spray guns spraying and depositing by electrostatic forces only
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2/00Processes or devices for granulating materials, e.g. fertilisers in general; Rendering particulate materials free flowing in general, e.g. making them hydrophobic
    • B01J2/02Processes or devices for granulating materials, e.g. fertilisers in general; Rendering particulate materials free flowing in general, e.g. making them hydrophobic by dividing the liquid material into drops, e.g. by spraying, and solidifying the drops
    • B01J2/04Processes or devices for granulating materials, e.g. fertilisers in general; Rendering particulate materials free flowing in general, e.g. making them hydrophobic by dividing the liquid material into drops, e.g. by spraying, and solidifying the drops in a gaseous medium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B05SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
    • B05BSPRAYING APPARATUS; ATOMISING APPARATUS; NOZZLES
    • B05B5/00Electrostatic spraying apparatus; Spraying apparatus with means for charging the spray electrically; Apparatus for spraying liquids or other fluent materials by other electric means
    • B05B5/025Discharge apparatus, e.g. electrostatic spray guns

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a powder generation apparatus and methods and in particular to the electro hydrodynamic (EHD) spraying of liquids and drying thereof to a powder.
  • the apparatus and methods may be used for generation of a variety of powders for use in different applications, in particular but not solely in the field of medicinal drug powder production.
  • the apparatus and methods can produce powders of different properties in terms of size distribution, density, morphology, solid state etc.
  • EHD spray drying is a well-known technology and produces droplets of a narrow size distribution.
  • a conventional nozzle ( 2 ), see FIG. 1 operates at high voltages, usually up to the order of 10-20 kV.
  • the conventional nozzle requires a counter electrode ( 1 ) at a distance down stream of the nozzle. Either ground or a potential different to the potential of the nozzle is applied to the counter electrode. The position down stream of the nozzle leads to deposition of droplets on the counter electrode, hence low production yield and less robust process.
  • the high atomisation potential leads to highly charged droplets.
  • the surface charge concentration of a droplet increases as the droplet dries until a charge concentration limit is reached.
  • the charge concentration limit is when the repelling electrical forces are near or exceed the cohesive forces and the surface tension in the droplet.
  • the consequence is a disintegration of the droplet into a multitude of droplets with a wide size distribution.
  • the aerosol obtained after droplet disintegration is of a quality, in terms of size distribution, not adequate for powder production.
  • the discharging means is commonly situated at a suitable position, typically along the spraying axis, opposite the atomization point.
  • the fully or partially discharged droplets can only be controlled or transported by aerodynamic or gravitational forces.
  • the discharged droplets are transported by the airflow ( 3 ) and collected on a filter ( 4 ).
  • the solution is atomised perpendicularly to the airflow and the particle trajectories ( 6 ) are turned 90 degrees.
  • the yield is therefore low due to deposition on the reactor walls and other parts of the reactor.
  • a filter is also unsuitable for particle collection since no continuous retrieval is possible.
  • the discharged droplets can, however, coalesce leading to a wider size distribution. Due to increased coalescence rate, the process cannot be scaled up by use of multiple nozzles.
  • An object of the present invention is to overcome various problems and limitations associated with the prior art methods and apparatus for producing powders using electrostatic spraying of liquids and drying thereof.
  • a further object is to provide an apparatus and methods capable of dispensing liquids, which have conductivities and viscosities outside the range of those capable of being dispensed by the apparatus, and methods of the prior art.
  • the present invention provides a powder generation apparatus and methods and in particular the electrostatic spraying of liquids and drying thereof to a powder, in particular but not solely for the production of medicinal drug powder.
  • the apparatus there are several members provided in the apparatus.
  • the different members are: fluid supply means, droplets generation means and reactor.
  • one form of the present invention consists of a fluid supply means ( 13 ).
  • the fluid supply means may comprise means for over pressurising the fluid.
  • the fluid supply means consists of a liquid feeder.
  • the bulk of the fluid may be stored in a tank or any other cavity.
  • the fluid supply means in which medicines are dispensed the fluid supply means will need to be of a form that does not affect the medical properties of the fluid.
  • the preferred flow rate of fluid is, in this particular embodiment, 0.5 microlitres per second.
  • a suitable pump is a syringe pump or any other pump that can provide a stable flow rate.
  • Droplet generation means comprise an electrically conductive fluid dispensing nozzle ( 10 , 20 ) receiving fluid supplied by suitable fluid supply means and having an exit ( 11 ), see FIG. 2 , a counter electrode means ( 8 ) surrounding said dispensing nozzle and being distal to the fluid dispensing nozzle exit and having an electrical potential difference thereto.
  • the droplet generation means is characterised in that the inside diameter of the dispensing nozzle is less than 3 millimetres. In a preferred form the inside diameter of the dispensing nozzle is less than 1 millimetre and in a particularly preferred forms of the invention, when the liquid is outside the above mentioned conductivity range found in prior art, the inside is less than 0.5 millimetres.
  • the electrically conducting fluid dispensing nozzle ( 10 ) may take the form of a small diameter syringe needle. Suitable dispensing nozzles may be machined or a small diameter syringe needle may be used.
  • the nozzle is required to be electrically conductive and to be made of a material that does not affect the properties of the fluid to be dispensed.
  • a suitable needle material is e.g. stainless steel or other suitable non-reactive material.
  • the nozzle could be injection moulded or machined plastic with a conducting part. The conductive part could be immersed in the liquid and not being in contact with the nozzle.
  • grounding means Surrounding the fluid-dispensing nozzle, at least in part, is grounding means or counter electrode means, ( 8 ).
  • the means is distal to the exit of the fluid-dispensing nozzle.
  • the grounding means is in the form of a ring or cylinder and completely surrounds the nozzle. In other less preferred forms of the invention there may be a break in the grounding means. This may allow an electrically non-conducting support to be attached to the fluid-dispensing nozzle.
  • the grounding means in use, has an electrical potential difference to the electrically conductive fluid-dispensing nozzle. The potential difference required to obtained atomisation is, due to the novel geometry, significantly lower that what can be found in prior art.
  • the potential difference is +2.2 kV ( 14 , 15 ).
  • the potential difference could be as a result of the grounding means having an electrical potential of +1 kV ( 14 ) and the dispensing nozzle being at +3.2 kV ( 15 ). It has been found that if the grounding means is actually grounded, that is, at a potential of 0 volts, the droplets are drawn to the grounding means and are thus not dispensed property.
  • the potential difference may be greater than or less than 2.2 kV but it has been found that this level gives the best results for this particular nozzle diameter, flow rate and drug ethanol solution.
  • the potential difference may be produced by a number of means for example: High voltage DC/DC converter.
  • the potential difference between the dispensing nozzle and the counter electrode is less than 5 kV. More preferably, the potential difference is less than 3 kilovolts.
  • the potentials applied to the nozzle and counter electrode should be below such magnitude that leads to corona discharging or streamer formations.
  • the low atomization voltage gives moderately charged droplets and no discharging is needed.
  • the potential difference characterised as sufficiently low so that no discharging of the airborne droplets is needed.
  • the grounding means ( 8 ), see FIG. 2 may have a variety of shapes but is preferably in the form of a ring or a cylinder.
  • the grounding means consists of a cylinder positioned in level with the exit of the nozzle.
  • the grounding means is preferably made from a metallic material and especially preferably it may be machined or less preferably moulded.
  • An insulating material such as a plastic material or preferably a ceramic preferably occupies the volume between the fluid dispensing nozzle and the grounding means ( 12 ), see FIG. 3 . I many cases air or another gas or gas mixture can be used to provide sufficient electrical insulation.
  • the purpose of this material is to both electrically insulating the grounding means from the fluid-dispensing nozzle and to support the dispensing nozzle inside the grounding means.
  • the dispensing nozzle should be centred in the grounding means.
  • the spray is generated inside an axially symmetrical reactor and dried to a powder.
  • the spray can be generated outside the reactor and directed into the reactor.
  • the droplets are dried by the flow of air ( 19 ) or any other suitable gas that in some instances can be heated.
  • the heating of the air or gas in which the droplets are dried can be obtained using various kinds of heating means e.g. heating coils positioned inside the walls of the reactor or inside the reactor cavity. In a preferred form the heating coils are wrapped around the outside of the reactor ( 16 ).
  • the above-mentioned air or gas can be heated prior to entering the reactor. To increase the evaporation rate the liquid can be heated prior to aerosolization.
  • the shape of the reactor is axis-symmetric, either cylindrical or conical. Other shapes e.g. non-circular cross section or asymmetric shapes could be used in a less preferred form of the invention.
  • the size of the reactor should be such that droplet and particle deposition is at a minimum. In a particular form, the reactor diameter is 15 cm and the height is 30 cm. Both dimensions can be either higher or lower to accommodate for different sizes of nozzles or different number of nozzles.
  • the dimensions of the reactor also influence the residence time and consequently affect the drying process.
  • the dimensions and geometry of the reactor must be optimised with respect to the flow inside.
  • the reactor is connected to vacuum or low pressure ( 25 ) to obtain a flow of air ( 19 ) or gas in the direction of the spray away from the nozzle. In some forms no such flow is required.
  • the flow rate can also be used to control the residence time of the droplets and particles inside the reactor. The residence time is an important control parameter for the drying process.
  • preferred forms of the present invention could provide droplets with a moderate charge.
  • a moderate charge is when the majority of the droplets is below the Rayleigh limit for the whole duration of the time that said droplets are airborne.
  • Preferred forms of the present invention operate at lower voltages than found in prior art and consequently produce less charged droplets.
  • the reactor can be significantly simplified since no discharging means has to be implemented.
  • a reactor without any discharging means is significantly more robust and simpler to operate and optimise.
  • the moderate charge is however sufficient to affect the transport in of said airborne droplets or particles and consequently droplets or particles will repel each other and minimise coalescence.
  • Undesired deposition, particularly but not solely, on the reactor walls can be avoided by applying a potential of the same polarity as the droplets ( 17 ). By decreasing the deposition of the droplets and particles inside the reactor the production yield can be improved.
  • the potential applied to sites of undesired deposition ( 17 ) should be sufficiently high to repel the charged droplets or charged particles.
  • the potential on the collecting surface ( 18 ) should be sufficiently high to efficiently collect the charged particles. All the potentials applied to the different members of the reactor should be below such magnitudes that lead to corona discharging or streamer formations.
  • the low atomization voltage applied to the above-mentioned nozzle gives moderately charged droplets and no discharging is needed.
  • the charged droplets can be transported and collected by means of electric fields.
  • the dry particles are collected on a charged solid plate ( 21 ) of opposite polarity ( 18 ).
  • the plate can be placed on an insulating disk ( 22 ), which is placed on a conductive grid also connected to a potential of the same polarity as the droplets or particles.
  • the dried particles are collected on a rotating disk, rotating cylinder, moving conveying belt or any other means of continuous collection and retrieval of the generated powder.
  • the flow rate of the fluid in one of the preferred forms of the present invention, is 0.5 microlitres a second. In some applications this may be sufficient.
  • the process can be scaled up by use of nozzles with a larger diameter or by use of multiple nozzles. Due to the unipolar charge of the droplets, no coalescence occurs.
  • a further preferred form of the present invention provides a plurality of nozzles. For example, there may be ten nozzles in close proximity to each other. It is preferable that the fluid dispensing nozzles in this case are very close to each other in order to ensure that the fluid dispensed is in a single flow of droplets.
  • the grounding means may surround all of the fluid dispensing nozzles. In other, less preferred, forms of the invention each fluid-dispensing nozzle may have an individual grounding means surrounding it.
  • the present invention is able to produce powders of a variety of substances, including medicines such as steroids or other suitable powders such as inhaled substances.
  • the ability to produce a powder of a particular substance is dependent on the solubility of said substance in a suitable solvent that can be atomised using the above-mentioned nozzle.
  • suitable solvents are e.g.: ethanol, heptane, butanol, methanol, ethylene glycol, octanol, acetone, propylene glycol, acetone, dioxane, dodecanol, hexane etc. and also water.
  • the present invention can dispense liquids of higher conductivities, e.g. water, than can be found in prior art. Liquids with conductivities up to 10 ⁇ 2 S/m can be dispensed using the present invention.
  • the particle size depends mainly on liquid flow rate, nozzle geometry, solvent properties and drug concentration in the solution.
  • the particle morphology depends mainly on drug concentration in the solution, solvent properties, evaporation rate, droplet residence time, and air temperature and airflow rate.
  • Preferred forms of the present invention are able to provide particles, which are in the respirable range, that is, of a size between 2 and 5 microns. It has been found that particles of this size provide the best medical effect.
  • the fact that preferred forms of the invention can dispense fluids having a great range of conductivities enables a wider range of substances to be dispensed without the addition of other agents.
  • particles of smaller sizes than 2 microns can be produced. Particles with the size down to 10 nm can be produced. Particles of a size range 5-100 microns can also be produced.
  • the present invention can produce powders consisting of particles of a narrow size distribution.
  • the present invention is able to produce powders consisting of porous particles with a density less than of homogeneous particles.
  • the porous particles have a geometric size greater than the aerodynamic size. Porous particles have been recognised as desirable for improved lung deposition and efficacy of medical drugs.
  • the porosity can be obtained and controlled by changing the drug concentration in the solution and by changing the drying conditions.
  • the present invention is able to produce powders consisting of solid particles.
  • the present invention is able to produce powders from multiple drug substance solutions including medicines such as: budesonide-formoterol or any other combination of drugs that can be dissolved in the same sprayable solvent.
  • the result of a multi component solution is a multi component powder containing e.g. both budesonide-formoterol in the individual particles.

Abstract

Powder generating apparatus for the generation of a powder in particular but not solely for the production of medicinal drug powder. The apparatus comprises a fluid supply means (13), droplet generation means having a dispensing nozzle (20), a surrounding grounding means and a reactor characterised in that said dispensing nozzle of said droplet generation means is less than 3 millimetres.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • This invention relates to a powder generation apparatus and methods and in particular to the electro hydrodynamic (EHD) spraying of liquids and drying thereof to a powder. The apparatus and methods may be used for generation of a variety of powders for use in different applications, in particular but not solely in the field of medicinal drug powder production. The apparatus and methods can produce powders of different properties in terms of size distribution, density, morphology, solid state etc.
  • There are a number of known inventions in prior art, which produce powders using electrostatic spraying of liquids and drying thereof to a powder. The present invention addresses a number of problems and limitations associated with the prior art.
  • PRIOR ART
  • EHD spray drying is a well-known technology and produces droplets of a narrow size distribution. A conventional nozzle (2), see FIG. 1, operates at high voltages, usually up to the order of 10-20 kV. The conventional nozzle requires a counter electrode (1) at a distance down stream of the nozzle. Either ground or a potential different to the potential of the nozzle is applied to the counter electrode. The position down stream of the nozzle leads to deposition of droplets on the counter electrode, hence low production yield and less robust process.
  • The high atomisation potential leads to highly charged droplets. The surface charge concentration of a droplet increases as the droplet dries until a charge concentration limit is reached. The charge concentration limit is when the repelling electrical forces are near or exceed the cohesive forces and the surface tension in the droplet. The consequence is a disintegration of the droplet into a multitude of droplets with a wide size distribution. The aerosol obtained after droplet disintegration is of a quality, in terms of size distribution, not adequate for powder production. The reactors, described in prior art, therefore always include a discharging means (7). The discharging means is commonly situated at a suitable position, typically along the spraying axis, opposite the atomization point.
  • The fully or partially discharged droplets can only be controlled or transported by aerodynamic or gravitational forces. In prior art the discharged droplets are transported by the airflow (3) and collected on a filter (4). In a traditional reactor the solution is atomised perpendicularly to the airflow and the particle trajectories (6) are turned 90 degrees. The yield is therefore low due to deposition on the reactor walls and other parts of the reactor. A filter is also unsuitable for particle collection since no continuous retrieval is possible.
  • Charged droplets repel each other. The discharged droplets can, however, coalesce leading to a wider size distribution. Due to increased coalescence rate, the process cannot be scaled up by use of multiple nozzles.
  • There are limits on the types of liquids that can be spray dried in a conventional reactor. A major limiting factor is the conductivity of the liquid. It is disclosed in the literature that the conductivity of the liquid must be in the range of 10−5 S/m-10−7 S/M.
  • There are limits to the usefulness of such known apparatus and methods described in prior art. There exists a need for apparatus and methods, which can generate droplets in a reactor with a nozzle not requiring a down stream counter electrode, not requiring discharging of the generated droplets, that can control the transport and collection of droplets by electrical means utilizing the charge of droplets, that can be scaled up by using a multiple of nozzles and that can use liquids outside the conductivity range found in prior art.
  • PRESENT INVENTION
  • An object of the present invention is to overcome various problems and limitations associated with the prior art methods and apparatus for producing powders using electrostatic spraying of liquids and drying thereof.
  • A further object is to provide an apparatus and methods capable of dispensing liquids, which have conductivities and viscosities outside the range of those capable of being dispensed by the apparatus, and methods of the prior art.
  • The present invention provides a powder generation apparatus and methods and in particular the electrostatic spraying of liquids and drying thereof to a powder, in particular but not solely for the production of medicinal drug powder.
  • According to a one aspect of the present invention there are several members provided in the apparatus. The different members are: fluid supply means, droplets generation means and reactor.
  • Fluid Supply Means
  • Referring to FIG. 4, one form of the present invention consists of a fluid supply means (13). In some forms of the present invention, the fluid supply means may comprise means for over pressurising the fluid. In a preferred form of the present invention the fluid supply means consists of a liquid feeder. The bulk of the fluid may be stored in a tank or any other cavity. In preferred forms of the invention, in which medicines are dispensed the fluid supply means will need to be of a form that does not affect the medical properties of the fluid. The preferred flow rate of fluid is, in this particular embodiment, 0.5 microlitres per second. A suitable pump is a syringe pump or any other pump that can provide a stable flow rate.
  • Droplet Generation Means
  • Droplet generation means comprise an electrically conductive fluid dispensing nozzle (10, 20) receiving fluid supplied by suitable fluid supply means and having an exit (11), see FIG. 2, a counter electrode means (8) surrounding said dispensing nozzle and being distal to the fluid dispensing nozzle exit and having an electrical potential difference thereto. The droplet generation means is characterised in that the inside diameter of the dispensing nozzle is less than 3 millimetres. In a preferred form the inside diameter of the dispensing nozzle is less than 1 millimetre and in a particularly preferred forms of the invention, when the liquid is outside the above mentioned conductivity range found in prior art, the inside is less than 0.5 millimetres.
  • In preferred forms of the present invention, the electrically conducting fluid dispensing nozzle (10) may take the form of a small diameter syringe needle. Suitable dispensing nozzles may be machined or a small diameter syringe needle may be used. The nozzle is required to be electrically conductive and to be made of a material that does not affect the properties of the fluid to be dispensed. Such a suitable needle material is e.g. stainless steel or other suitable non-reactive material. The nozzle could be injection moulded or machined plastic with a conducting part. The conductive part could be immersed in the liquid and not being in contact with the nozzle.
  • Surrounding the fluid-dispensing nozzle, at least in part, is grounding means or counter electrode means, (8). The means is distal to the exit of the fluid-dispensing nozzle. In preferred forms of the present invention the grounding means is in the form of a ring or cylinder and completely surrounds the nozzle. In other less preferred forms of the invention there may be a break in the grounding means. This may allow an electrically non-conducting support to be attached to the fluid-dispensing nozzle. The grounding means, in use, has an electrical potential difference to the electrically conductive fluid-dispensing nozzle. The potential difference required to obtained atomisation is, due to the novel geometry, significantly lower that what can be found in prior art. In preferred forms of the present invention the potential difference is +2.2 kV (14,15). For example the potential difference could be as a result of the grounding means having an electrical potential of +1 kV (14) and the dispensing nozzle being at +3.2 kV (15). It has been found that if the grounding means is actually grounded, that is, at a potential of 0 volts, the droplets are drawn to the grounding means and are thus not dispensed property. The potential difference may be greater than or less than 2.2 kV but it has been found that this level gives the best results for this particular nozzle diameter, flow rate and drug ethanol solution. The potential difference may be produced by a number of means for example: High voltage DC/DC converter. Preferably the potential difference between the dispensing nozzle and the counter electrode is less than 5 kV. More preferably, the potential difference is less than 3 kilovolts. The potentials applied to the nozzle and counter electrode should be below such magnitude that leads to corona discharging or streamer formations.
  • The low atomization voltage gives moderately charged droplets and no discharging is needed. The potential difference characterised as sufficiently low so that no discharging of the airborne droplets is needed.
  • The grounding means (8), see FIG. 2, may have a variety of shapes but is preferably in the form of a ring or a cylinder. In the preferred form of the invention, as illustrated, the grounding means consists of a cylinder positioned in level with the exit of the nozzle. The grounding means is preferably made from a metallic material and especially preferably it may be machined or less preferably moulded. An insulating material such as a plastic material or preferably a ceramic preferably occupies the volume between the fluid dispensing nozzle and the grounding means (12), see FIG. 3. I many cases air or another gas or gas mixture can be used to provide sufficient electrical insulation. The purpose of this material is to both electrically insulating the grounding means from the fluid-dispensing nozzle and to support the dispensing nozzle inside the grounding means. The dispensing nozzle should be centred in the grounding means.
  • Reactor
  • A solution of one or several drugs, in an organic solvent, e.g. ethanol, is dispensed using the above-mentioned nozzle; see FIG. 4 (20). In a preferred form of the invention the spray is generated inside an axially symmetrical reactor and dried to a powder. In a less preferred form, the spray can be generated outside the reactor and directed into the reactor. The droplets are dried by the flow of air (19) or any other suitable gas that in some instances can be heated. The heating of the air or gas in which the droplets are dried can be obtained using various kinds of heating means e.g. heating coils positioned inside the walls of the reactor or inside the reactor cavity. In a preferred form the heating coils are wrapped around the outside of the reactor (16). In another preferred form the above-mentioned air or gas can be heated prior to entering the reactor. To increase the evaporation rate the liquid can be heated prior to aerosolization.
  • In one preferred form, the shape of the reactor is axis-symmetric, either cylindrical or conical. Other shapes e.g. non-circular cross section or asymmetric shapes could be used in a less preferred form of the invention. The size of the reactor should be such that droplet and particle deposition is at a minimum. In a particular form, the reactor diameter is 15 cm and the height is 30 cm. Both dimensions can be either higher or lower to accommodate for different sizes of nozzles or different number of nozzles. The dimensions of the reactor also influence the residence time and consequently affect the drying process. The dimensions and geometry of the reactor must be optimised with respect to the flow inside.
  • In one preferred form, the reactor is connected to vacuum or low pressure (25) to obtain a flow of air (19) or gas in the direction of the spray away from the nozzle. In some forms no such flow is required. The flow rate can also be used to control the residence time of the droplets and particles inside the reactor. The residence time is an important control parameter for the drying process.
  • It has been found that preferred forms of the present invention could provide droplets with a moderate charge. A moderate charge is when the majority of the droplets is below the Rayleigh limit for the whole duration of the time that said droplets are airborne. Preferred forms of the present invention operate at lower voltages than found in prior art and consequently produce less charged droplets. When the droplet and particle charge is sufficiently low no discharging is required and the reactor can be significantly simplified since no discharging means has to be implemented. A reactor without any discharging means is significantly more robust and simpler to operate and optimise.
  • The moderate charge is however sufficient to affect the transport in of said airborne droplets or particles and consequently droplets or particles will repel each other and minimise coalescence. Undesired deposition, particularly but not solely, on the reactor walls can be avoided by applying a potential of the same polarity as the droplets (17). By decreasing the deposition of the droplets and particles inside the reactor the production yield can be improved. The potential applied to sites of undesired deposition (17) should be sufficiently high to repel the charged droplets or charged particles. The potential on the collecting surface (18) should be sufficiently high to efficiently collect the charged particles. All the potentials applied to the different members of the reactor should be below such magnitudes that lead to corona discharging or streamer formations.
  • The low atomization voltage applied to the above-mentioned nozzle gives moderately charged droplets and no discharging is needed. The charged droplets can be transported and collected by means of electric fields. In one form of the invention the dry particles are collected on a charged solid plate (21) of opposite polarity (18). The plate can be placed on an insulating disk (22), which is placed on a conductive grid also connected to a potential of the same polarity as the droplets or particles. In other preferred forms of the invention the dried particles are collected on a rotating disk, rotating cylinder, moving conveying belt or any other means of continuous collection and retrieval of the generated powder.
  • As mention above, the flow rate of the fluid, in one of the preferred forms of the present invention, is 0.5 microlitres a second. In some applications this may be sufficient. The process can be scaled up by use of nozzles with a larger diameter or by use of multiple nozzles. Due to the unipolar charge of the droplets, no coalescence occurs. In these cases a further preferred form of the present invention provides a plurality of nozzles. For example, there may be ten nozzles in close proximity to each other. It is preferable that the fluid dispensing nozzles in this case are very close to each other in order to ensure that the fluid dispensed is in a single flow of droplets. In other forms of this invention, the grounding means may surround all of the fluid dispensing nozzles. In other, less preferred, forms of the invention each fluid-dispensing nozzle may have an individual grounding means surrounding it.
  • The present invention is able to produce powders of a variety of substances, including medicines such as steroids or other suitable powders such as inhaled substances. The ability to produce a powder of a particular substance is dependent on the solubility of said substance in a suitable solvent that can be atomised using the above-mentioned nozzle. Suitable solvents are e.g.: ethanol, heptane, butanol, methanol, ethylene glycol, octanol, acetone, propylene glycol, acetone, dioxane, dodecanol, hexane etc. and also water. The present invention can dispense liquids of higher conductivities, e.g. water, than can be found in prior art. Liquids with conductivities up to 10−2 S/m can be dispensed using the present invention.
  • The particle size depends mainly on liquid flow rate, nozzle geometry, solvent properties and drug concentration in the solution. The particle morphology depends mainly on drug concentration in the solution, solvent properties, evaporation rate, droplet residence time, and air temperature and airflow rate.
  • Preferred forms of the present invention are able to provide particles, which are in the respirable range, that is, of a size between 2 and 5 microns. It has been found that particles of this size provide the best medical effect. The fact that preferred forms of the invention can dispense fluids having a great range of conductivities enables a wider range of substances to be dispensed without the addition of other agents. Also particles of smaller sizes than 2 microns can be produced. Particles with the size down to 10 nm can be produced. Particles of a size range 5-100 microns can also be produced. The present invention can produce powders consisting of particles of a narrow size distribution.
  • The present invention is able to produce powders consisting of porous particles with a density less than of homogeneous particles. The porous particles have a geometric size greater than the aerodynamic size. Porous particles have been recognised as desirable for improved lung deposition and efficacy of medical drugs. The porosity can be obtained and controlled by changing the drug concentration in the solution and by changing the drying conditions.
  • The present invention is able to produce powders consisting of solid particles.
  • The present invention is able to produce powders from multiple drug substance solutions including medicines such as: budesonide-formoterol or any other combination of drugs that can be dissolved in the same sprayable solvent. The result of a multi component solution is a multi component powder containing e.g. both budesonide-formoterol in the individual particles.
  • Finally, it will be understood that the present invention is not restricted to the described embodiments but can be modified in many different ways within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (19)

1. Powder generating apparatus for the generation of a powder in particular but not solely for the production of medicinal drug powder the apparatus comprising: fluid supply means, droplet generation means having a dispensing nozzle and surrounding grounding means and a reactor characterised in that said dispensing nozzle of said droplet generation means is less than 3 millimetres.
2. Powder generating as claimed in claim 1 wherein said dispensing nozzle has an inside diameter of less than 1 millimetre.
3. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein there is a potential difference between said dispensing means and said grounding means of +2.2 kV.
4. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein said reactor is a low-pressure reactor.
5. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 1 wherein said reactor is an asymmetric chamber.
6. A method of generating powder utilising powder generating means as claimed in claim 1.
7. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 2 wherein there is a potential difference between said dispensing means and said grounding means of +2.2 kV.
8. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 2 wherein said reactor is a low-pressure reactor.
9. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 3 wherein said reactor is a low-pressure reactor.
10. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 7 wherein said reactor is a low-pressure reactor.
11. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 2 wherein said reactor is an asymmetric chamber.
12. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 3 wherein said reactor is an asymmetric chamber.
13. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 7 wherein said reactor is an asymmetric chamber.
14. A method of generating powder utilising powder generating means as claimed in claim 2.
15. A method of generating powder utilising powder generating means as claimed in claim 3.
16. A method of generating powder utilising powder generating means as claimed in claim 7.
17. Powder generating means as claimed in claim 4 wherein said reactor is an asymmetric chamber.
18. A method of generating powder utilising powder generating means as claimed in claim 4.
19. A method of generating powder utilising powder generating means as claimed in claim 5.
US10/546,636 2003-02-26 2004-02-25 Powder generating apparatus and method for producing powder Abandoned US20060150901A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0300514A SE0300514D0 (en) 2003-02-26 2003-02-26 Powder generating apparatus and methods
PCT/SE2004/000246 WO2004076057A1 (en) 2003-02-26 2004-02-25 Powder generating apparatus and method for producing powder

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060150901A1 true US20060150901A1 (en) 2006-07-13

Family

ID=20290506

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/546,636 Abandoned US20060150901A1 (en) 2003-02-26 2004-02-25 Powder generating apparatus and method for producing powder

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20060150901A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1603665B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2006519687A (en)
AT (1) ATE399591T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602004014742D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2308154T3 (en)
SE (1) SE0300514D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2004076057A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100263663A1 (en) * 2007-07-18 2010-10-21 Mcglasson Stuart A Manufacture of components for medicinal dispensers
US9862799B2 (en) * 2014-04-24 2018-01-09 May-Hwa Enterprise Corporation Polymer particle and preparation method thereof

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4690418B2 (en) * 2004-11-10 2011-06-01 ザ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ミシガン Multiphase nanoparticles
NL1033253C2 (en) * 2007-01-18 2008-07-22 Stichting Wetsus Ct Of Excellence Method and device for purifying a liquid.
US20120167410A1 (en) * 2010-12-21 2012-07-05 Basf Se Spray drying techniques
WO2012099961A2 (en) 2011-01-19 2012-07-26 Washington University Electrohydrodynamic atomization nozzle emitting a liquid sheet
JP6459660B2 (en) * 2015-03-12 2019-01-30 日本ゼオン株式会社 Granulating apparatus and method for producing composite particles
CN107028765A (en) * 2017-05-05 2017-08-11 盐城卫生职业技术学院 Pharmaceutical process plant and drug handling device

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4264641A (en) * 1977-03-17 1981-04-28 Phrasor Technology Inc. Electrohydrodynamic spraying to produce ultrafine particles
US4748043A (en) * 1986-08-29 1988-05-31 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Electrospray coating process
US4762553A (en) * 1987-04-24 1988-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Method for making rapidly solidified powder
US4795330A (en) * 1986-02-21 1989-01-03 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Apparatus for particles
US4894081A (en) * 1987-07-09 1990-01-16 Glaverbel Spherulizing furnace
US4919854A (en) * 1985-09-24 1990-04-24 Dr.-Ing. Luder Gerking Method for producing superfine powder in spherical form
US5015845A (en) * 1990-06-01 1991-05-14 Vestec Corporation Electrospray method for mass spectrometry
US5344676A (en) * 1992-10-23 1994-09-06 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Method and apparatus for producing nanodrops and nanoparticles and thin film deposits therefrom
US5503372A (en) * 1989-11-27 1996-04-02 Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Nozzle for electric dispersion reactor
US20010046599A1 (en) * 2000-02-18 2001-11-29 Charged Injection Corporation Method and apparatus for high throughput generation of fibers by charge injection
US6399362B1 (en) * 1997-06-12 2002-06-04 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Electrospraying apparatus and method for introducing material into cells
US6479077B1 (en) * 1996-06-27 2002-11-12 Technische Universiteit Delft Method of manufacturing powder particles
US6572893B2 (en) * 1996-12-31 2003-06-03 Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Inc. Systems and processes for spray drying hydrophobic drugs with hydrophilic excipients
US6684879B1 (en) * 1998-12-17 2004-02-03 Battelle Memorial Institute Inhaler

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2409093C (en) * 2000-05-16 2009-07-21 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota High mass throughput particle generation using multiple nozzle spraying
KR100394371B1 (en) * 2000-09-22 2003-08-09 주식회사 에이스랩 Appratus for controlling static eletricity using ultra-fine particles
SE0101478D0 (en) * 2001-04-25 2001-04-25 Astrazeneca Ab Fluid dispensing apparatus and methods

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4264641A (en) * 1977-03-17 1981-04-28 Phrasor Technology Inc. Electrohydrodynamic spraying to produce ultrafine particles
US4919854A (en) * 1985-09-24 1990-04-24 Dr.-Ing. Luder Gerking Method for producing superfine powder in spherical form
US4795330A (en) * 1986-02-21 1989-01-03 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Apparatus for particles
US4748043A (en) * 1986-08-29 1988-05-31 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Electrospray coating process
US4762553A (en) * 1987-04-24 1988-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Method for making rapidly solidified powder
US4894081A (en) * 1987-07-09 1990-01-16 Glaverbel Spherulizing furnace
US5503372A (en) * 1989-11-27 1996-04-02 Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Nozzle for electric dispersion reactor
US5015845A (en) * 1990-06-01 1991-05-14 Vestec Corporation Electrospray method for mass spectrometry
US5344676A (en) * 1992-10-23 1994-09-06 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Method and apparatus for producing nanodrops and nanoparticles and thin film deposits therefrom
US6479077B1 (en) * 1996-06-27 2002-11-12 Technische Universiteit Delft Method of manufacturing powder particles
US6572893B2 (en) * 1996-12-31 2003-06-03 Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Inc. Systems and processes for spray drying hydrophobic drugs with hydrophilic excipients
US6399362B1 (en) * 1997-06-12 2002-06-04 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Electrospraying apparatus and method for introducing material into cells
US20020150669A1 (en) * 1997-06-12 2002-10-17 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Electrospraying apparatus and method for coating particles
US6684879B1 (en) * 1998-12-17 2004-02-03 Battelle Memorial Institute Inhaler
US20010046599A1 (en) * 2000-02-18 2001-11-29 Charged Injection Corporation Method and apparatus for high throughput generation of fibers by charge injection

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100263663A1 (en) * 2007-07-18 2010-10-21 Mcglasson Stuart A Manufacture of components for medicinal dispensers
US9862799B2 (en) * 2014-04-24 2018-01-09 May-Hwa Enterprise Corporation Polymer particle and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2308154T3 (en) 2008-12-01
EP1603665B1 (en) 2008-07-02
DE602004014742D1 (en) 2008-08-14
JP2006519687A (en) 2006-08-31
SE0300514D0 (en) 2003-02-26
ATE399591T1 (en) 2008-07-15
WO2004076057A1 (en) 2004-09-10
EP1603665A1 (en) 2005-12-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jaworek Micro-and nanoparticle production by electrospraying
Yurteri et al. Producing pharmaceutical particles via electrospraying with an emphasis on nano and nano structured particles-A review
US6764720B2 (en) High mass throughput particle generation using multiple nozzle spraying
EP0952893B1 (en) Device for manufacture of composite filtering material and method of its manufacture
US4659012A (en) Electrostatic spraying process and apparatus
KR950005188B1 (en) Electrospray coating process
JP4577629B2 (en) Method for producing dry powder particles, powder produced by the method, and electrode and apparatus used in the method
AU2001261625A1 (en) High mass throughput particle generation using multiple nozzle spraying
CN1161661A (en) Electrostatic spraying device
IL146033A (en) Directionally controlled ehd aerosol sprayer
EP1603665B1 (en) Powder generating apparatus and method for producing powder
WO2004074172A1 (en) Fixing method, fixing apparatus and method for producing microstructure
US20120138701A1 (en) Electrospray Dispensing System
KR101668894B1 (en) Process and apparatus for producing coated particles
CN110681505B (en) Electric spraying device
Jaworek et al. Viscosity effect on EHD spraying using AC superimposed on DC electric field
KR20130012400A (en) Cone-jet mode electrostatic spray deposition apparatus
WO2006047453A2 (en) Process for high throughput electrohydrodynamic spraying of fluids
CN219377559U (en) Electrostatic atomizing device
Chen et al. Electrospray and its medical applications
KR810001882B1 (en) Atomisation of liquides
US20230311138A1 (en) Electrostatic spray nozzle including induction ring
US20060144972A1 (en) Apparatus and method for generating fine particulates
Pui et al. High mass throughput particle generation using multiple nozzle spraying
KR101569288B1 (en) Method and apparatus for generating aerosol

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ASTRAZENECA AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LASTOW, OREST;REEL/FRAME:017697/0991

Effective date: 20050705

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION