US20070118318A1 - Sensor hysteresis reduction - Google Patents

Sensor hysteresis reduction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070118318A1
US20070118318A1 US11/270,124 US27012405A US2007118318A1 US 20070118318 A1 US20070118318 A1 US 20070118318A1 US 27012405 A US27012405 A US 27012405A US 2007118318 A1 US2007118318 A1 US 2007118318A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
signal
hysteresis
correction
recited
input
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/270,124
Other versions
US7228247B1 (en
Inventor
David Cripe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vitesco Technologies USA LLC
Original Assignee
Siemens VDO Automotive Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens VDO Automotive Corp filed Critical Siemens VDO Automotive Corp
Priority to US11/270,124 priority Critical patent/US7228247B1/en
Assigned to SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION reassignment SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CRIPE, DAVID W.
Publication of US20070118318A1 publication Critical patent/US20070118318A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7228247B1 publication Critical patent/US7228247B1/en
Assigned to CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS US, INC. reassignment CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS US, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION
Assigned to CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC. MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS US, INC.
Assigned to Vitesco Technologies USA, LLC reassignment Vitesco Technologies USA, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
Assigned to Vitesco Technologies USA, LLC reassignment Vitesco Technologies USA, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
Assigned to Vitesco Technologies USA, LLC reassignment Vitesco Technologies USA, LLC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE LIST OF PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 057499 FRAME: 0827. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT . Assignors: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01DMEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D3/00Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups
    • G01D3/02Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups with provision for altering or correcting the law of variation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01LMEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
    • G01L25/00Testing or calibrating of apparatus for measuring force, torque, work, mechanical power, or mechanical efficiency
    • G01L25/003Testing or calibrating of apparatus for measuring force, torque, work, mechanical power, or mechanical efficiency for measuring torque

Definitions

  • This invention generally relates to a method of reducing hysteresis in a sensor. More particularly, this invention is a method and circuit for providing a resultant signal that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • a non-contact sensor for measuring force or torque utilizes magnetoelastic material that generates a magnetic field in response to an applied torque.
  • a force or torque applied to the material causes a temporary deformation in a magnetic field that is measured and correlated to a force or torque.
  • the magnetoelastic material generates a magnetic field in response to the applied force. Changes in the magnetic field of the magnetoelastic materials are measured and utilized to derive and measure the applied force according to a known relationship.
  • the magnetoelastic material may not return to an initial state after the release of an applied force.
  • the shift from the initial state causes a zero shift known as hysteresis.
  • Such a shift in zero point affects the desired accuracy of the sensor assembly.
  • An example method and device provides for the reduction of hysteresis in the system by modeling the hysteretic output of the sensor system as a sum of a linear function and a hysteretic correction term.
  • the correction term is determined dependent on the sensor output and then is combined with the sensor output to yield a signal that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • the method according to this invention includes the step of receiving a hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • the hysteresis-bearing signal is then utilized to determine boundary conditions.
  • the boundary conditions along with the hysteretic bearing signal are utilized to determine a correction signal.
  • the correction signal is then combined with the hysteretic bearing input signal to provide an output composite signal that is substantially without hysteresis.
  • the method determines boundary conditions with respect to the specific value of the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • the boundary conditions are modified and changed based on the value of the hysteresis-bearing signal. Modification and change of the boundary conditions accounts for non-linearity in the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • the boundary conditions are defined and remain stable until such time as the hysteresis-bearing signal moves outside the boundary conditions. Once a hysteresis-bearing signal is received that is outside the boundary conditions, the boundary conditions are redefined to accommodate changes to the corrective hysteresis value and provide a correction factor tailored for the position and value of the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • This invention also includes an example hysteresis corrections circuit that corrects a hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • the example hysteresis correction circuit includes a comparator circuit that defines boundary conditions based on the incoming hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • the comparator circuit is coupled to a potentiometer that provides an output that is a correction value.
  • the output of the potentiometer is incremented depending on the value of the comparator circuit.
  • the comparator circuit determines boundary conditions and also provides for incrementing of the potentiometer.
  • the output from the potentiometer provides the correction value that is combined with the hysteresis bearing signal to provide a composite substantially hysteresis free output signal.
  • the method and system according to this invention provides for the correction and reduction in hysteresis present in sensor signals.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the method and system according to this invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of an example hysteresis-bearing signal and example boundary conditions applied to the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the boundary conditions surrounding the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating the method steps of this invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram of an example hysteresis correction circuit according to this invention.
  • a sensor assembly 10 is shown schematically that generates a signal 12 that includes hysteresis.
  • the signal 12 is schematically illustrated by way of graph 15 .
  • the graph 15 relates a force 22 to a voltage 16 .
  • the example sensor assembly 10 is a torque sensor that generates a magnetic field in response to an applied torque. The magnetic field in turn is converted into a voltage signal indicative of the applied force. The voltage signal is then used by various other systems as is desired.
  • the signal emitted from the sensor assembly includes a hysteretic portion meaning that the signal 12 does not retrace itself.
  • the method according to this invention processes a hysteresis-bearing signal 12 with a hysteresis correction circuit 18 to provide a composite signal 20 having a more linear relationship 26 between applied force 22 and an output voltage signal 16 .
  • the example illustrated and discussed is that of a torque sensor that provides an output that is translated into a voltage signal.
  • the torque sensor is illustrated and discussed by way of example other sensors as are known in the art will also benefit from the disclosure of this invention.
  • the hysteresis-bearing signal 12 is schematically illustrated and includes an outgoing portion 44 that is indicative of the application of a torque or other force and an incoming portion 46 indicative of a release of force on the sensor assembly 10 .
  • the relationship between input applied force and output voltage of the sensor differ depending on whether force is being applied or released as is shown by the gap between line 44 representing application of force and the line 46 representing the release of a force.
  • the method according to this invention includes the receipt of an input signal of a specific magnitude for a given force as indicated at 28 .
  • the input signal 28 is utilized to determine boundary conditions 30 disposed about the input signal 28 .
  • the boundary 30 is determined relative to the signal 28 . Accordingly, the boundary 30 and the input signal 28 are utilized to determine a correction signal. Within the boundary 30 , a correction signal is applied to produce a composite signal that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • the boundary 30 defined around the input signal 28 is maintained until such time as the input signal 28 exceeds the boundary limits. At such time new boundary conditions are defined for the new signal.
  • a new boundary 32 is disposed around an input signal 28 ′.
  • the boundaries 30 change.
  • additional boundary conditions are defined relative to each new received input signal. In this instance, the new input signal 28 ′′ is received and a new boundary condition 34 is defined around that new input condition 28 ′.
  • a new set of boundary values are determined and utilized to determine a new correction factor that is combined with the new hysteresis signal to provide a substantially hysteresis free output for use with the system.
  • changing of the boundary conditions is illustrated schematically where the signal 28 is disposed substantially within a symmetrically disposed boundary 30 .
  • the symmetrically disposed boundary 30 includes an upper limit 40 and a lower limit 38 . If the signal 28 remains within the boundary conditions 30 , no changes are made to the correction factor.
  • the boundary conditions remain the same no matter where the input signal is as long as it is within the upper and lower boundary conditions 38 and 40 .
  • the relationship between the input signal 28 and the boundary conditions 38 are incremented according to the following relationship for changes in the input signal.
  • is the input signal.
  • a block diagram illustrating the method steps for reducing hysteresis according to this invention includes the initial step of receiving a hysteresis bearing input signal as indicated at 50 .
  • the input signal is then utilized to define the boundary conditions as indicated 52 .
  • the boundary conditions remain unchanged until such time as the input signal exceeds the initially set boundary conditions.
  • a correction signal is determined based on the input signal and the defined boundary conditions as is indicated at 54 .
  • the correction signal and input signal are combined as shown at 56 to provide a composite output substantially free of hysteresis.
  • This step is repeated each time the input signal exceeds the currently set boundary conditions as indicated at 58 .
  • the boundary conditions are redefined to provide a new set of variables utilized to determine a correction factor as is indicated at 60 .
  • the correction factor is then combined with the hysteresis bearing input to provide a corrected substantially hysteresis free composite signal as indicated at 62 .
  • a circuit for correction of a hysteresis-bearing signal is generally indicated at 70 and generates the correction signal based on boundary conditions tailored to the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • the correction factor is then utilized and combined with the original signal to minimize hysteresis error.
  • the circuit 70 is provided with an input 74 from op amp 72 .
  • the input 74 is a hysteresis-bearing signal and is input into a comparator circuit 75 .
  • the comparator circuit includes a first comparator 86 , a second comparator 84 and resistors 76 , 78 , 80 , 82 .
  • the comparator circuit 75 serves to position the comparators voltage window symmetrically around the input signal 74 .
  • the voltage signal acts as the boundary conditions.
  • the comparator circuit 75 outputs a signal that is combined and utilized by a digital potentiometer 92 .
  • the digital potentiometer 92 provides a feedback signal to the comparator circuit 75 .
  • the comparator circuit 75 will move to a higher or lower state depending on the direction in which the input signal 74 is different than the comparator voltage window. The comparator circuit 75 will then cause an incremental change in voltage emitted by the digital potentiometer 92 , thus causing a change in the correction factor to the input signal 74 .
  • the output from the potentiometer is then combined with the input signal 74 in op amp 98 to provide a composite signal 100 .
  • the composite signal 100 is substantially error free due to the combination of the voltage correction factor provided by the digital potentiometer 92 .
  • an incoming hysteresis-bearing signal 74 is received by the comparator circuit 75 . If the input signal 74 is within the voltage window defined by the comparator circuit 75 no change is made to the digital potentiometer 92 . A voltage or correction factor that is provided by the digital potentiometer is then combined with the input signal at the op amp 98 to provide the composite signal 100 .
  • the potentiometer 92 will increment either to increase or decrease the feedback signal.
  • the change in the feedback signal provides for a change in correction signals combined with the originally input signal 74 .
  • the correction signals 94 goes through a second op amp 94 and then proceeds as a correction signal as indicated generally at 96 and then combined in the top amp 98 with the original input hysteresis bearing signal 74 to provide and yield a composite signal 100 that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • a sensor system is discussed and illustrated as an example embodiment other sensors as are known in the art will benefit from the disclosures of this invention. Further, the method and system according to this invention provides for the substantial reduction of hysteresis in the hysteresis bearing devices with a simple circuit that is implemental in a feed forward fashion to increase accuracy and yield a substantially hysteresis free signal.

Abstract

A method and circuit includes a means for reducing hysteresis in a system. The method includes the definition of boundary conditions relative to an incoming signal. The boundary conditions and the incoming signal are then utilized to determine a proper correction value. The hysteresis correction value is tailored to changes in the input signals. The modification occurs because the boundary conditions are changed depending on the input signal such that the correction values are constantly and continuously varied and implemented to accommodate changes in the input value. The constant accommodation and changing of the correction value provides a simple and effective hysteretic error accommodation that yields a substantially free hysteresis signal.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention generally relates to a method of reducing hysteresis in a sensor. More particularly, this invention is a method and circuit for providing a resultant signal that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • A non-contact sensor for measuring force or torque utilizes magnetoelastic material that generates a magnetic field in response to an applied torque. A force or torque applied to the material causes a temporary deformation in a magnetic field that is measured and correlated to a force or torque. The magnetoelastic material generates a magnetic field in response to the applied force. Changes in the magnetic field of the magnetoelastic materials are measured and utilized to derive and measure the applied force according to a known relationship.
  • Disadvantageously, the magnetoelastic material may not return to an initial state after the release of an applied force. The shift from the initial state causes a zero shift known as hysteresis. Such a shift in zero point affects the desired accuracy of the sensor assembly.
  • Accordingly, it is desirable to develop methods for compensating for the affects of hysteresis in a sensor to improve accuracy and reliability.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An example method and device according to this invention provides for the reduction of hysteresis in the system by modeling the hysteretic output of the sensor system as a sum of a linear function and a hysteretic correction term. The correction term is determined dependent on the sensor output and then is combined with the sensor output to yield a signal that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • The method according to this invention includes the step of receiving a hysteresis-bearing signal. The hysteresis-bearing signal is then utilized to determine boundary conditions. The boundary conditions along with the hysteretic bearing signal are utilized to determine a correction signal. The correction signal is then combined with the hysteretic bearing input signal to provide an output composite signal that is substantially without hysteresis.
  • The method determines boundary conditions with respect to the specific value of the hysteresis-bearing signal. The boundary conditions are modified and changed based on the value of the hysteresis-bearing signal. Modification and change of the boundary conditions accounts for non-linearity in the hysteresis-bearing signal. The boundary conditions are defined and remain stable until such time as the hysteresis-bearing signal moves outside the boundary conditions. Once a hysteresis-bearing signal is received that is outside the boundary conditions, the boundary conditions are redefined to accommodate changes to the corrective hysteresis value and provide a correction factor tailored for the position and value of the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • This invention also includes an example hysteresis corrections circuit that corrects a hysteresis-bearing signal. The example hysteresis correction circuit includes a comparator circuit that defines boundary conditions based on the incoming hysteresis-bearing signal. The comparator circuit is coupled to a potentiometer that provides an output that is a correction value. The output of the potentiometer is incremented depending on the value of the comparator circuit. The comparator circuit determines boundary conditions and also provides for incrementing of the potentiometer. The output from the potentiometer provides the correction value that is combined with the hysteresis bearing signal to provide a composite substantially hysteresis free output signal.
  • If the hysteresis-bearing signal incoming to the comparator circuit is beyond the current boundary conditions, new boundary conditions are defined. When new boundary conditions are defined the potentiometer is incremented to correct and change the correction value that is combined with the hysteresis-bearing signal. In this way, a substantially hysteresis free signal can be obtained throughout an output range of a sensor.
  • Accordingly, the method and system according to this invention provides for the correction and reduction in hysteresis present in sensor signals.
  • These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the method and system according to this invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of an example hysteresis-bearing signal and example boundary conditions applied to the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the boundary conditions surrounding the hysteresis-bearing signal.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating the method steps of this invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram of an example hysteresis correction circuit according to this invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Referring to FIG. 1, a sensor assembly 10 is shown schematically that generates a signal 12 that includes hysteresis. The signal 12 is schematically illustrated by way of graph 15. The graph 15 relates a force 22 to a voltage 16. The example sensor assembly 10 is a torque sensor that generates a magnetic field in response to an applied torque. The magnetic field in turn is converted into a voltage signal indicative of the applied force. The voltage signal is then used by various other systems as is desired. The signal emitted from the sensor assembly includes a hysteretic portion meaning that the signal 12 does not retrace itself.
  • In both mechanical and magnetic systems an applied force when removed does not always result in a return to an initial state. A curve indicative of a magnetic field generated responsive to an applied torque therefore does not always retrace itself. The method according to this invention processes a hysteresis-bearing signal 12 with a hysteresis correction circuit 18 to provide a composite signal 20 having a more linear relationship 26 between applied force 22 and an output voltage signal 16.
  • As is appreciated, the example illustrated and discussed is that of a torque sensor that provides an output that is translated into a voltage signal. Although the torque sensor is illustrated and discussed by way of example other sensors as are known in the art will also benefit from the disclosure of this invention.
  • Referring to FIG. 2, the hysteresis-bearing signal 12 is schematically illustrated and includes an outgoing portion 44 that is indicative of the application of a torque or other force and an incoming portion 46 indicative of a release of force on the sensor assembly 10. The relationship between input applied force and output voltage of the sensor differ depending on whether force is being applied or released as is shown by the gap between line 44 representing application of force and the line 46 representing the release of a force.
  • The method according to this invention includes the receipt of an input signal of a specific magnitude for a given force as indicated at 28. The input signal 28 is utilized to determine boundary conditions 30 disposed about the input signal 28. The boundary 30 is determined relative to the signal 28. Accordingly, the boundary 30 and the input signal 28 are utilized to determine a correction signal. Within the boundary 30, a correction signal is applied to produce a composite signal that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • The boundary 30 defined around the input signal 28 is maintained until such time as the input signal 28 exceeds the boundary limits. At such time new boundary conditions are defined for the new signal. A new boundary 32 is disposed around an input signal 28′. As the input signal 28 changes and new values are received the boundaries 30 change. Further, additional boundary conditions are defined relative to each new received input signal. In this instance, the new input signal 28″ is received and a new boundary condition 34 is defined around that new input condition 28′.
  • Each time the input signal 28 exceeds the existing boundary values, a new set of boundary values are determined and utilized to determine a new correction factor that is combined with the new hysteresis signal to provide a substantially hysteresis free output for use with the system.
  • Referring to FIG. 3, changing of the boundary conditions is illustrated schematically where the signal 28 is disposed substantially within a symmetrically disposed boundary 30. The symmetrically disposed boundary 30 includes an upper limit 40 and a lower limit 38. If the signal 28 remains within the boundary conditions 30, no changes are made to the correction factor. The boundary conditions remain the same no matter where the input signal is as long as it is within the upper and lower boundary conditions 38 and 40. The relationship between the input signal 28 and the boundary conditions 38 are incremented according to the following relationship for changes in the input signal.
  • where if (ε−1)<σ<(ε−1),ε does not change
  • where ε is a boundary value and
  • σ is the input signal.
  • Accordingly, the boundary conditions are modified according to the following relationships:
  • If σ is increasing to the point at which σ=(ε+1),ε is increased as necessary so as to keep ε=(σ−1)
  • If σ is decreasing to the point at which σ=(ε−1),ε is decreased as necessary so as to keep ε=(σ+1)
  • The boundary conditions are then utilized and combined along with the input signal to determine the proper hysteretic correction value. An example generalized expression for a function approximating a hysteretic function is as follows:
    E(σ)=a 0 ·σ+Σa n·ε(b n·σ), n=1, 2, . . .
  • Referring to FIG. 4, a block diagram illustrating the method steps for reducing hysteresis according to this invention includes the initial step of receiving a hysteresis bearing input signal as indicated at 50. The input signal is then utilized to define the boundary conditions as indicated 52. The boundary conditions remain unchanged until such time as the input signal exceeds the initially set boundary conditions. With the boundary conditions set as is indicated at 52; a correction signal is determined based on the input signal and the defined boundary conditions as is indicated at 54. The correction signal and input signal are combined as shown at 56 to provide a composite output substantially free of hysteresis. This step is repeated each time the input signal exceeds the currently set boundary conditions as indicated at 58.
  • Once the input signal exceeds the currently defined boundary conditions, the boundary conditions are redefined to provide a new set of variables utilized to determine a correction factor as is indicated at 60. The correction factor is then combined with the hysteresis bearing input to provide a corrected substantially hysteresis free composite signal as indicated at 62.
  • Referring to FIG. 5, a circuit for correction of a hysteresis-bearing signal is generally indicated at 70 and generates the correction signal based on boundary conditions tailored to the hysteresis-bearing signal. The correction factor is then utilized and combined with the original signal to minimize hysteresis error.
  • The circuit 70 is provided with an input 74 from op amp 72. The input 74 is a hysteresis-bearing signal and is input into a comparator circuit 75. The comparator circuit includes a first comparator 86, a second comparator 84 and resistors 76, 78, 80, 82. The comparator circuit 75 serves to position the comparators voltage window symmetrically around the input signal 74. The voltage signal acts as the boundary conditions. The comparator circuit 75 outputs a signal that is combined and utilized by a digital potentiometer 92. The digital potentiometer 92 provides a feedback signal to the comparator circuit 75. If the voltage input into the comparator circuit 75 exceeds the voltage window, the comparator circuit 75 will move to a higher or lower state depending on the direction in which the input signal 74 is different than the comparator voltage window. The comparator circuit 75 will then cause an incremental change in voltage emitted by the digital potentiometer 92, thus causing a change in the correction factor to the input signal 74.
  • The output from the potentiometer is then combined with the input signal 74 in op amp 98 to provide a composite signal 100. The composite signal 100 is substantially error free due to the combination of the voltage correction factor provided by the digital potentiometer 92.
  • In operation an incoming hysteresis-bearing signal 74 is received by the comparator circuit 75. If the input signal 74 is within the voltage window defined by the comparator circuit 75 no change is made to the digital potentiometer 92. A voltage or correction factor that is provided by the digital potentiometer is then combined with the input signal at the op amp 98 to provide the composite signal 100.
  • If the incoming signal 74 is outside of the voltage window provided by the comparator circuit 75, the potentiometer 92 will increment either to increase or decrease the feedback signal. The change in the feedback signal provides for a change in correction signals combined with the originally input signal 74. The correction signals 94 goes through a second op amp 94 and then proceeds as a correction signal as indicated generally at 96 and then combined in the top amp 98 with the original input hysteresis bearing signal 74 to provide and yield a composite signal 100 that is substantially free of hysteresis.
  • A sensor system is discussed and illustrated as an example embodiment other sensors as are known in the art will benefit from the disclosures of this invention. Further, the method and system according to this invention provides for the substantial reduction of hysteresis in the hysteresis bearing devices with a simple circuit that is implemental in a feed forward fashion to increase accuracy and yield a substantially hysteresis free signal.
  • Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.

Claims (14)

1. A method of reducing hysteresis in a sensor device, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving an input signal from the sensing device;
(b) determining boundary values about the input signal;
(c) determining a correction signal based on the boundary values and the input signal;
(d) combining the correction signal with the input signal yielding a composite signal, wherein the composite signal is indicative of a signal of the sensor device substantially without hysteresis; and
(e) outputting the composite signal for use by a system.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, including maintaining the determined boundary values about the input signal responsive to the input signal remaining within a range of the boundary values.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, including redefining the boundary values responsive to the input signal being a value outside of a range of the boundary values.
4. The method as recited in claim 3, including determining the correction signal based on the redefined boundary values.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, including determining the correction signal based on previous input signals.
6. The method as recited in claim 1, including retaining previous input signal values within the determined boundary values.
7. A hysteresis correction circuit assembly for correcting a hysteresis containing signal comprising:
a comparator circuit that defines boundary conditions based on an incoming hysteresis bearing signal;
a potentiometer providing an output correction value, wherein said correction value is selected responsive to a value of said hysteresis bearing signal; and
an amplifier that combines said hysteretic bearing signal with the selected correction value to yield a composite signal.
8. The assembly as recited in claim 7, wherein said comparator is coupled to the potentiometer such that upon receipt of a hysteretic bearing signal outside of the defined boundary conditions causes an incremental change in said output correction value.
9. The assembly as recited in claim 7, wherein the comparator circuit comprises a first comparator, a second comparator and a first, second, third and forth resistors in series with a corresponding one of said first and second comparators.
10. The assembly as recited in claim 9, wherein one of said first and second comparators increments a logic state responsive to said hysteresis-bearing signal being outside the defined boundary conditions.
11. The assembly as recited in claim 7, wherein the hysteretic bearing signal comprises an input voltage, and said comparator circuit defines a voltage window symmetric about said input voltage.
12. The assembly as recited in claim 11, wherein said correction value comprises a correction voltage, and said correction voltage is incremented responsive to said input voltage being outside of the boundary conditions.
13. The assembly as recited in claim 12, wherein said correction voltage is combined with the input voltage to yield said composite signal.
14. The assembly as recited in claim 13, wherein said correction voltage is subtracted from said input voltage to yield said composite signal.
US11/270,124 2005-11-09 2005-11-09 Sensor hysteresis reduction Active US7228247B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/270,124 US7228247B1 (en) 2005-11-09 2005-11-09 Sensor hysteresis reduction

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/270,124 US7228247B1 (en) 2005-11-09 2005-11-09 Sensor hysteresis reduction

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070118318A1 true US20070118318A1 (en) 2007-05-24
US7228247B1 US7228247B1 (en) 2007-06-05

Family

ID=38054583

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/270,124 Active US7228247B1 (en) 2005-11-09 2005-11-09 Sensor hysteresis reduction

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7228247B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120109385A1 (en) * 2010-10-28 2012-05-03 Jatco Ltd Hydraulic pressure control apparatus
WO2019130875A1 (en) * 2017-12-27 2019-07-04 アズビル株式会社 Method for correcting zero error in torque sensor

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US630085A (en) * 1898-04-26 1899-08-01 Jean Auguste Maignen Filter.
US4187806A (en) * 1976-05-22 1980-02-12 Robert Bosch Gmbh Fuel-air mixture control apparatus
US4280365A (en) * 1979-10-10 1981-07-28 Leeds & Northrup Company Ultrasonic Doppler flowmeter with correction for vibratory signals at zero-flow conditions
US5351555A (en) * 1991-07-29 1994-10-04 Magnetoelastic Devices, Inc. Circularly magnetized non-contact torque sensor and method for measuring torque using same
US5585554A (en) * 1994-10-31 1996-12-17 Handfield; Michael System and method for monitoring a pneumatic tire
US5696575A (en) * 1996-04-23 1997-12-09 Hughes Aircraft Digital flux gate magnetometer
US5889215A (en) * 1996-12-04 1999-03-30 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Magnetoelastic torque sensor with shielding flux guide
US5939881A (en) * 1997-11-13 1999-08-17 Raytheon Company High dynamic range digital fluxgate magnetometer
US6145387A (en) * 1997-10-21 2000-11-14 Magna-Lastic Devices, Inc Collarless circularly magnetized torque transducer and method for measuring torque using same
US6222363B1 (en) * 1999-01-08 2001-04-24 Methode Electronics, Inc. Switch-mode flux-gate magnetometer
US6298467B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2001-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for reducing hysteresis effect in SOI CMOS circuits
US6346812B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2002-02-12 Fast Technology Ag Conditioner circuit for magnetic field sensor
US20020162403A1 (en) * 2001-05-05 2002-11-07 Cripe David W. Magnetoelastic torque sensor
US6516508B1 (en) * 1999-11-10 2003-02-11 Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation Magnetoelastic non-compliant torque sensor and method of producing same
US20040059532A1 (en) * 2000-10-28 2004-03-25 Koenig Hans Guenter Method and device for the hysteresis correction of measured values for sensors with extensometers

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6300855B1 (en) 1998-12-21 2001-10-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Hysteresis reduction in giant magnetostrictive materials

Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US630085A (en) * 1898-04-26 1899-08-01 Jean Auguste Maignen Filter.
US4187806A (en) * 1976-05-22 1980-02-12 Robert Bosch Gmbh Fuel-air mixture control apparatus
US4280365A (en) * 1979-10-10 1981-07-28 Leeds & Northrup Company Ultrasonic Doppler flowmeter with correction for vibratory signals at zero-flow conditions
US5351555A (en) * 1991-07-29 1994-10-04 Magnetoelastic Devices, Inc. Circularly magnetized non-contact torque sensor and method for measuring torque using same
US5585554A (en) * 1994-10-31 1996-12-17 Handfield; Michael System and method for monitoring a pneumatic tire
US5696575A (en) * 1996-04-23 1997-12-09 Hughes Aircraft Digital flux gate magnetometer
US5889215A (en) * 1996-12-04 1999-03-30 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Magnetoelastic torque sensor with shielding flux guide
US6346812B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2002-02-12 Fast Technology Ag Conditioner circuit for magnetic field sensor
US6145387A (en) * 1997-10-21 2000-11-14 Magna-Lastic Devices, Inc Collarless circularly magnetized torque transducer and method for measuring torque using same
US6553847B2 (en) * 1997-10-21 2003-04-29 Magna-Lastic Devices, Inc. Collarless circularly magnetized torque transducer and method for measuring torque using the same
US5939881A (en) * 1997-11-13 1999-08-17 Raytheon Company High dynamic range digital fluxgate magnetometer
US6298467B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2001-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for reducing hysteresis effect in SOI CMOS circuits
US6222363B1 (en) * 1999-01-08 2001-04-24 Methode Electronics, Inc. Switch-mode flux-gate magnetometer
US6516508B1 (en) * 1999-11-10 2003-02-11 Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation Magnetoelastic non-compliant torque sensor and method of producing same
US20040059532A1 (en) * 2000-10-28 2004-03-25 Koenig Hans Guenter Method and device for the hysteresis correction of measured values for sensors with extensometers
US20020162403A1 (en) * 2001-05-05 2002-11-07 Cripe David W. Magnetoelastic torque sensor
US6698299B2 (en) * 2001-05-05 2004-03-02 Methode Electronics, Inc. Magnetoelastic torque sensor

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120109385A1 (en) * 2010-10-28 2012-05-03 Jatco Ltd Hydraulic pressure control apparatus
US9014862B2 (en) * 2010-10-28 2015-04-21 Jatco Ltd Hydraulic pressure control apparatus
WO2019130875A1 (en) * 2017-12-27 2019-07-04 アズビル株式会社 Method for correcting zero error in torque sensor
JP2019117103A (en) * 2017-12-27 2019-07-18 アズビル株式会社 Correction method of zero point error in torque sensor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7228247B1 (en) 2007-06-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0909378B1 (en) A system and method for high accuracy calibration of a sensor for offset and sensitivity variation with temperature
US5877749A (en) Operation inputting apparatus
RU2280901C2 (en) Transmitter and method for implementation of transmitter
US6486661B2 (en) Sensor bias drift compensation
JP3318427B2 (en) Zero point correction method of pressure detection device in injection molding machine
US7228247B1 (en) Sensor hysteresis reduction
US20170115670A1 (en) Apparatus, system and method of mass flow controlling for use in integrated gas delivery system
US6304827B1 (en) Sensor calibration
KR100366730B1 (en) Controller and control method
EP0391880A2 (en) Measurement and control of magnetostrictive transducer motion
US8621932B2 (en) Pressure measuring device and method for ascertaining pressure values
CN101753139B (en) Switching unit for generating an output voltage as a function of a digital data valve and method for calibrating the switching unit
US5724035A (en) Method of correcting signals for encoder and apparatus for same
KR101741531B1 (en) inductive sensor capable of performing fast and precise position sensing and being easily maintained
JPS5825209B2 (en) automatic correction system
US5635622A (en) Method of compensating for gauge hysteresis
US6445529B1 (en) Corrected servo control signal in a servo control loop
JP2007017385A (en) Absolute encoder
US20220263518A1 (en) Control device, switching converter and method for controlling an output variable
KR20200085840A (en) Correction method of zero point error in torque sensor
JPH03183924A (en) Temperature compensator for torque measuring instrument
JP7111913B1 (en) circuit device
US20060109157A1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting voltage of an A/D converter
JP6439865B2 (en) Sensor signal converter and sensor signal conversion method
JP2822829B2 (en) Signal input device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CRIPE, DAVID W.;REEL/FRAME:017220/0213

Effective date: 20051019

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS US, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034979/0865

Effective date: 20071203

AS Assignment

Owner name: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS US, INC.;REEL/FRAME:035091/0577

Effective date: 20121212

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES USA, LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:057499/0827

Effective date: 20210810

AS Assignment

Owner name: VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES USA, LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:058108/0412

Effective date: 20210810

AS Assignment

Owner name: VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES USA, LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PROPERTY SECTION BY REMOVING ERRONEOUSLY LISTED PATENT NUMBERS; PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 057499 FRAME: 0827. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:059567/0001

Effective date: 20210810

Owner name: VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES USA, LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE LIST OF PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 057499 FRAME: 0827. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:059567/0001

Effective date: 20210810