US20070141132A1

US20070141132A1 - Human growth hormone patch formulations

Info

Publication number: US20070141132A1
Application number: US11/592,791
Authority: US
Inventors: Hagit Sacks; Meir Stern
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
Priority date: 2005-11-02
Filing date: 2006-11-02
Publication date: 2007-06-21
Also published as: EP1948221A2; CA2634181A1; JP2009514869A; WO2007056105A2; EP1948221B1; WO2007056105A3; US7947304B2; IL191197A; JP5522939B2; US20080226703A1

Abstract

The invention encompasses a transdermal patch formulation comprising hGH, at least one sugar, one amino acid or polyol, and a buffer, wherein the buffer maintains the pH of the formulation in the range of about 5 to about 9 and the formulation does not contain both glycine and mannitol.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/733,005, filed Nov. 2, 2005 and 60/739,288, filed Nov. 22, 2005, hereby incorporated by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention encompasses human growth hormone formulations for use in transdermal patches and methods of their preparation.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Human growth hormone (“hGH”) is a hormone secreted by the human pituitary glands. It consists of 191 amino acids and has a molecular weight of about 22,000. hGH is commonly administered to person with a deficiency of this hormone in order to promote growth of organ systems, such as the skeleton, connective tissue, muscles, liver, intestines, and kidneys.
hGH has been formulated for pharmaceutical administration through subcutaneous injection. See U.S. Pat. No. 5,096,885. These hGH formulations have generally included various excipients such as sugars, surfactants, preservatives, and salts. However, subcutaneous injection is frequently associated with pain and poor compliance. Therefore, an alternative delivery method that eliminates such disadvantages is desirable.
The transdermal patch offers a painless, more convenient, needle-free platform as an alternative to subcutaneous injections. The present invention encompasses formulations of hGH for administration using transdermal patches as well as methods of preparation of those formulations of hGH.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the invention encompasses a transdermal patch formulation comprising hGH, at least one sugar, one amino acid or polyol, and a buffer, wherein the buffer maintains the pH of the formulation in the range of about 5 to about 9 and the formulation does not contain both glycine and mannitol. Typically, the hGH may be present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 10 mg/ml to 255 mg/ml and preferably, the hGH concentration of the formulation may be from about 20 mg/ml to about 170 mg/ml.
In the transdermal patch formulation, the sugar may be glucose, fructose, sucrose, or trehalose and preferably, the sugar may be sucrose or trehalose. Typically, the sugar may be present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about II mg/ml to 300 mg/ml, and preferably, the sugar is present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 22 mg/ml to about 200 mg/ml.
In the transdermal patch formulation, the polyol may be mannitol or glycerin. The polyol may be present in the formulation in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 5 mg/ml to 150 mg/ml and preferably, polyol may be present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 10 mg/ml to about 100 mg/ml.
In the transdermal patch formulation, the amino acid may be glycine. The amino acid may be present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 3 mg/ml to about 99 mg/ml and preferably in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 6 mg/ml to about 66 mg/ml.
In the transdermal patch formulation, the buffer may be a phosphate buffer or a citrate buffer. The buffer may be present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation pH of about 6 to 8.
Another embodiment of the invention encompasses a transdermal patch formulation comprising hGH, sucrose, and glycine in a 30 mM phosphate buffer, wherein the concentration ratio (mg/ml) of hGH, sucrose, and glycine is about 85:100:33 to about 100:120:40. Typically, the pH of transdermal patch formulation is from about 6 to about 8.
Yet another embodiment of the invention encompasses a transdermal patch formulation comprising hGH, trehalose, and mannitol dissolved in a 20 mM citrate buffer, wherein the concentration ratio (mg/ml) of hGH, trehalose, and mannitol is about 85:100:50 to about 100:120:60 and the pH is from about 6 to 8.
One embodiment of the invention encompasses methods for preparing a transdermal formulation of hGH comprising dissolving at least one sugar and at least one polyol or amino acid in a buffer to form an excipient solution; dissolving hGH in the excipient solution to obtain a hGH formulation having a hGH concentration of about 10 mg/ml to 255 mg/ml; and storing the hGH formulation for a time sufficient to promote dissolution, wherein the formulation has a pH of about 6 to 8. Optionally, the method may further comprise removing any non-dissolved particles of hGH after storage.
Another embodiment of the invention encompasses a method for preparing a transdermal formulation of hGH comprising forming an excipient solution by dissolving sucrose and glycine in 30 mM phosphate buffer to achieve a formulation concentration of about 100 mg/ml of sucrose and about 33 mg/ml of glycine and a final formulation pH of about 7.5±0.5; dissolving hGH in the excipient solution to achieve a hGH final concentration of about 85-100 mg/ml; storing the hGH solution to promote dissolution; and optionally, removing any non-dissolved particles of hGH.
Yet another embodiment of the invention encompasses a transdermal patch comprising a formulation of hGH, at least one sugar, at least one polyol, and a buffer in an amount sufficient to maintain the formulation pH in the range of about 6 to about 8, wherein after six months of storage at a temperature of about 4° C., the patch has related hGH proteins in an amount of about 0.5% to about 13% and aggregate proteins in an amount of about 0.01% to about 6% by weight and the formulation does not contain both glycine and mannitol. Preferably, after storage for six months at a temperature of about 4° C., the transdermal patch formulation has related proteins in an amount of about 2% to 10% by weight. Preferably, after storage for six months at a temperature of about 4° C., the transdermal patch has aggregate proteins in an amount of about 0.2% to 4% by weight.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 illustrates the drug delivery profile of transdermal patches in pigs using the formulation of the invention as compared to an injectable dosage form.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention encompasses hGH formulations for use in transdermal patches, as well as methods of their preparation. Because the formulations are designed for use with patch manufacturing, the hGH formulations are prepared in a concentrated solution of hGH, such that when administered to a patient in the form of a patch, the formulations of the invention achieve a pharmacokinetic profile sufficient to achieve the desired result.
The formulations of the invention comprise hGH, at least one sugar, at least one polyol or amino acid, and a buffer, wherein the buffer maintains the pH of the formulation in the range of about 6 to about 8 and the formulation does not contain both glycine and mannitol.
The hGH used in the formulations is readily available from commercial sources. For example, the hGH can be obtained from Bio-Technology General Ltd. (Israel) or BresaGen Ltd. (Australia). hGH can also be obtained as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,763,215. As used herein, the term “hGH” or “human growth hormone” also includes biologically active human growth hormone equivalents; e.g., differing in one or more amino acid(s) in the overall sequence as well as Met-hGH (192 amino acids). Further, the terms as used are intended to cover substitution, deletion, and insertion amino acid variants of hGH, or post translational modifications. Typically, the hGH is present in the formulation in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 10 mg/ml to 255 mg/ml. Preferably, the hGH concentration of the formulation is from about 20 mg/ml to about 170 mg/ml, and more preferably, the hGH concentration of the formulation is about 30 mg/ml to about 120 mg/ml.
The sugar may be any pharmaceutically acceptable sugar. Sugars include, but are not limited to, monosaccharides, disaccharides, and polysaccharides. Preferred sugars include glucose, fructose, sucrose, trehalose, lactose, maltose, galactose, sorbitol, or xylitol. Preferably, the sugar is sucrose or trehalose. Typically, the sugar is present in the formulation in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 11 mg/ml to 300 mg/ml. Preferably, the sugar concentration of the formulation is about 22 mg/ml to about 200 mg/ml, and more preferably, the sugar concentration of the formulation is about 30 mg/ml to about 120 mg/ml.
The polyol may be any pharmaceutically acceptable polyol. Polyols include, but are not limited to, mannitol, glycerin, polyethylene glycol, or block copolymers such as α-hydro-omega-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)poly(oxypropylene)poly(oxyethylene) block copolymer. Preferably, the polyols include mannitol. Typically, the polyol is present in the formulation in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 5 mg/ml to 150 mg/ml. Preferably, the polyol concentration of the formulation is about 10 mg/ml to about 100 mg/ml, and more preferably, the polyol concentration of the formulation is about 15 mg/ml to about 70 mg/ml.
The amino acid may be any pharmaceutically acceptable amino acid. Amino acids include, but are not limited to, glycine or histidine. A preferred amino acid is glycine. Typically, the amino acid in the formulation is present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 3 mg/ml to about 99 mg/ml. Preferably, the amino acid formulation concentration is about 6 mg/ml to 66 mg/ml, and more preferably, the amino acid formulation concentration is about 10 mg/ml to 50 mg/ml.
The buffer may be any buffer that maintains the desired pH and is physiologically compatible. One of ordinary skill in the art with little or no experimentation can easily determine the type and amount of buffer necessary to achieve the desired pH. Preferably, the buffer is a phosphate buffer, a citrate buffer, phosphate-acetate buffer, citrate-phosphate buffer, or succinate buffer. The buffer should be present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation pH of about 5 to 9, preferably of about 6 to 8, and more preferably of about 6.5 to 7.5.
In one preferred embodiment, the formulation comprises hGH, sucrose, and glycine in a 30 mM phosphate buffer, herein defined as hGH Formulation I. In hGH Formulation I, the concentration ratio (mg/ml) of hGH, sucrose, and glycine is about 0.85:0.80:0.26 to about 0.85:1.20:0.40, respectively, and preferably 0.85:1.00:0.33. The pH of hGH Formulation I is from about 6 to about 8.
In another preferred embodiment, the formulation comprises hGH, trehalose, and mannitol dissolved in a 20 mM citrate buffer, herein defined as hGH Formulation II. In hGH Formulation II, the concentration ratio (mg/ml) of hGH, trehalose, and mannitol is about 0.85:0.8:0.4 to about 0.85:1.20:0.60, respectively, and preferably, 0.85:1.00:0.50, respectively. The pH of hGH Formulation II is from about 6 to 8.
The invention encompasses methods of preparing the formulation. The method for preparing a transdermal formulation of hGH comprises dissolving at least one sugar and at least one polyol or amino acid in a buffer to form an excipient solution; dissolving hGH in the excipient solution to obtain a hGH formulation having a hGH concentration of about 10 mg/ml to 255 mg/ml; and storing the hGH formulation for a time sufficient to promote dissolution, wherein the formulation has a pH of about 6 to 8 and the formulation does not contain both glycine and mannitol. Optionally, the method may further comprise removing non-dissolved particles of hGH. Typically, the hGH, sugar, polyol, amino acid, and buffer are added in amounts sufficient to achieve the concentrations disclosed above for the hGH formulations.
Using methods commonly known to the skilled artisan, the artisan can easily determine with little or no experimentation the methods necessary for dissolving, mixing, storing, the formulation and if necessary of removing non-dissolved particles of hGH.
One preferred method of preparing hGH Formulation I comprises dissolving sucrose and glycine in 30 mM phosphate buffer to achieve a final concentration of about 100 mg/ml of sucrose and about 33 mg/ml of glycine and a final formulation pH of about 7.5±0.5. The hGH is then dissolved in the solution to achieve a final concentration of about 85-100 mg/ml. The formulated hGH solution is stored to promote dissolution. Preferably, the solution is stored overnight at a temperature of 5±3° C. Thereafter, the non-dissolved particles are removed from the solution by any means known to the skilled artisan. Preferably, the non-dissolved particles are removed by filtration or centrifugation.
One preferred method of preparing hGH Formulation II comprises dissolving trehalose and mannitol in 20 mM citrate buffer to achieve final concentrations of about 100 mg/ml of trehalose and about 50 mg/ml of mannitol and a final formulation pH of about 6.7±0.5. The hGH is then dissolved in the solution to achieve a final concentration of about 85-100 mg/ml. The formulated hGH solution is stored to promote dissolution. Preferably, the formulation is stored overnight at 5±3° C. Thereafter, the non-dissolved particles are removed from the solution by any means known to the skilled artisan. Preferably, the non-dissolved particles are removed by filtration or centrifugation.
Yet another embodiment of the invention encompasses transdermal patches and methods of making the transdermal patches having the formulation of the invention.
Typically, a transdermal patch comprises a formulation of hGH, at least one sugar, at least one polyol or glycine, and a buffer in an amount sufficient to maintain the formulation pH in the range of about 6 to about 8, wherein after six months of storage at a temperature of about 4° C. to about room temperature, the patch has related hGH proteins in an amount of about 4% to about 13% and aggregate proteins in an amount of about 0.1% to about 6% by weight. As used herein, the term “aggregate proteins” refers to adducts of at least two molecules forming a dimer and adducts of other impurities of higher molecular weight. As used herein, unless otherwise define the term “related proteins” refers to deamidated forms, oxidation forms, and other impurities such as translocated, cleaved, and truncated proteins.
Preferably, after storage for six months at a temperature of about 4° C., the transdermal patch has related proteins in an amount of about 0.5% to 13% by weight and more preferably, in an amount of about 2% to 10%. Preferably, after storage for six months at a temperature of about 4° C. the transdermal patch has aggregate proteins in an amount of about 0.01% to 6% by weight and more preferably, in an amount of about 0.2% to 4%.
The formulations of the invention may be used to prepare patches having various doses of hGH. Printing and patch technology is generally described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,689,789; 5,985,311; 5,948,433; 5,750,138; and 5,008,110, hereby incorporated by reference. Preferably, the patches are prepared using the printing and patch production technology disclosed in U.S. Publication No. 2004/137,044, hereby incorporated by reference. The dose density of hGH on the patch is from 0.01-1.6 mg hGH per cm².
In one embodiment, the hGH formulations of the invention are administered using the Viaderm device, which uses radiofrequency to induce microchannels in the skin. The device is described inter alia, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,060. Following creation of the microchannels, the patch containing the drug formulation is applied to the skin.
The stability of the patches is typically studied to determine storage conditions and shelf life. The appearance, identity, purity, and quantity, along with other tests can be studied for each patch. All patches should meet the specifications according to the European Pharmacopeia guidelines for hGH (EP 5.0 (2005)) or US guidelines (USP 28 (2005)). The formulations of the invention have been shown to be particularly stable when printed on the patch, and achieve PK profiles similar to subcutaneous injection in pigs. The use of commercial formulations of hGH is limited with respect to the dose that can be printed on the patch and therefore will not result in sufficient levels of hGH in the blood.
The invention is further defined by reference to the following non-limiting examples describing in detail the formulations and methods described above. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that many modifications, both to materials and methods, may be practiced without departing from the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Preparation of hGH Formulation I

An excipient solution of phosphate buffer containing sucrose and glycine was prepared by dissolving sucrose and glycine in 30 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6, such that final concentrations of 100 mg/ml of sucrose and 33 mg/ml of glycine were achieved. hGH was then dissolved in the excipient solution at a concentration of 85 mg/ml. The formulated hGH solution was left standing overnight at 5±3° C. to promote dissolution. The non-dissolved particles were then removed by two cycles of centrifugation for 5 minutes at 3940 g. The final concentration of the formulation's components was 85:100:33 mg/ml for hGH, sucrose, and glycine, respectively. The final formulation pH was 7.5±0.5.

Example 2

Preparation of hGH Formulation II

An excipient solution of citrate buffer containing trehalose and mannitol was prepared by dissolving trehalose and mannitol in 20 mM citrate buffer, pH 4, such that final concentrations of 85 mg/ml of trehalose and 50 mg/ml of mannitol were achieved. hGH was then dissolved in the excipient solution at a concentration of 85 mg/ml. The formulated hGH solution was left standing overnight at 4° C. to promote dissolution. The non-dissolved particles were then removed by two cycles of centrifugation for 5 minutes at 3940 g. The final concentration of the formulation's components was 85:100:50 mg/ml for hGH, trehalose, and mannitol, respectively. The final formulation pH was 6.7±0.5.

Example 3

Preparation of Test Patches

Test patches were prepared with hGH Formulations I and II. The test patches were manufactured using the printing and patch production technology disclosed in U.S. Publication No. 2004/0137044 and BLF2080 printing liner (Dow). Test patches were manufactured using the MAXNC equipment at sizes of 1.4 cm²and dose of 1 mg (parallel to 4 mg per 5 cm²patch). Each printed patch was individually packed in a histosette frame. Each histosette containing the printed core was packed in a sealed laminated aluminum bag with silica gel and argon.

Example 4

Preparation of Verification Patches

Verification patches were prepared from various doses of hGH Formulations I and II. The verification patches were manufactured using the printing and patch production technology disclosed in U.S. Publication No. 2004/0137044 and BLF2080 (Dow) printing liner. The verification patches were manufactured using the BioDot AD 3200 equipment at sizes of 5 cm²and doses of 2 and 6 mg. The patch structure design described in PCT application No. PCT/IL2006/000679, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional No. 60/689,763, was utilized. The patch component included the following transdermal liners: 3M-9733 foam tape, 3M-9877 double coated medical tape, 3M-9907W backing Nonwoven tape, and 3M-Scotchpak 9742 release liner. Each patch was individually packed and sealed in a laminated aluminum bag with silica gel and argon.

Example 5

Stability of the Formulations

TABLE 1


Summary of stability specification of hGH printed patch

	analytical
Tests	procedure	Acceptance Limits

APPEARANCE
State	Visual	The drug liner is Transparent
	inspection	backing liner with clear or
		white dots
IDENTITY
Distribution of	Isoelectric	In the electropherogram obtained
polyacrylamide	focusing	with test solution (30 mcg of
gel according		protein) the principal band
to isoelectric		corresponds in position to that
point		in the electropherogram obtained
		with reference solution (30 mcg
		of protein)
Distribution in	RP-HPLC	The retention time of the
chromatographic		principal peak in the chromato-
column according		gram obtained with the test
to protein		solution is similar to that of
hydrophobic		the principal peak in the
properties		chromatogram obtained with the
		reference solution
Distribution in	SE-HPLC	The retention time of the
chromatographic		principal peak in the chromato-
column according		gram obtained with the test
to protein		solution is similar to that of
molecular size		the principal peak in the
		chromatogram obtained with
		the reference solution
PURITY
Related	RP-HPLC	In the chromatogram obtained
proteins		with the test solution the sum
		of the areas of all peaks, apart
		from the principal peak, is not
		greater than 13 percent of the
		total area of the peaks
Dimer and	SE-HPLC	In the chromatogram obtained
related		with the test solution the sum
substances		of the areas of all peaks with
of higher		a retention time less than that
molecular		of the principal peak is not
mass		greater than 6.0 percent of the
		total area of the peaks
Isoform	Isoelectric	The electropherogram obtained
distribution	focusing	with reference solution (30 mcg
		of protein) contains a major band
		with an isoelectric point of
		approximately five and a slightly
		more acidic minor band at
		approximately 4.8
		In the electropherogram obtained
		with test solution (30 mcg of
		protein) no band apart from the
		major band is more intense than
		the major band in the electro-
		pherogram obtained with test
		solution (1.88 mcg of protein,
		i.e. 6.25 percent)
QUANTITY
hGH monomer	SE-HPLC	90.0-110.0 percent of label
amount		claim
OTHER TESTS
Uniformity	SE-HPLC	The amount of protein in each of
of dosage		the patches is 90.0-110.0 percent
content		of label claim measured with
		relative standard deviation not
		higher than 6.0 percent
		(N = 10)
Water Content	KF	N/A (For information only)
Biological	cell	N/A (For information only)
activity	proliferation
	test
Drug release		N/A (For information only)
(dissolution)
Total aerobic		NMT 100 CFU/patch
count
Total anaerobic		Non detected
count
Bacterial		LT 5 EU/patch
Endotoxin

The stability of patches made with hGH Formulations I and II was measured upon storage for 1, 2, 3, and 6 months at room temperature and upon storage for 3 and 6 months at 5±3° C. The patches contained 1 mg hGH per patch on a 1.4 cm²patch. Stability tests were performed in triplicate. The results of the stability tests are contained in Table 2. The test patches conformed to all appearance and identity tests. In Tables 2, 3a, and 3b, the following definitions were used RT=“room temperature;” NP=“not performed”, LT=“less than;” NMT=“not more than;” and ND=“not determined.”

TABLE 2


Stability of Test Patches

Other Tests

Storage

Purity

Quantity

Drug

Conditions

Water

Release

Time

Proteins

Aggregates

Isoform

Assay

Content

(% of total

Formulation	Temperature	(mos.)	(NMT 13%)	(NMT 6.0%)	distribution	(90 ÷ 110%)	(μg/patch)	(% w/w)	recovered)

I	RT		0	3	0.6	Conform	101.2	NP	NP	73.7 ± 2.5
	RT	1	5	0.6		101.4	47	2.0	80.9 ± 1.8
	RT	2	7	0.8		100.9	39	1.6	83.4 ± 1.5
	RT	3	5	0.7		101.5	58	2.4	88.7 ± 1.4
	4° C.	3	4	0.7		102.3	80	3.3	81.3 ± 1.3
	RT	6	8	0.7		98.1	60	2.6	79.7 ± 5.0
	4° C.	6	7	0.4		96.1	90	3.8	85.2 ± 2.7
II	RT	0	4	LT 0.4	Conform	9.3	67	2.6	89.7 ± 2.0
	RT	1	4	0.6		99.5	51	2.0	86.5 ± 0.9
	RT	2	3	0.6		100.5	53	2.1	92.1 ± 0.5
	RT	3	4	0.6		97.9	41	1.6	91.8 ± 0.4
	4° C.	3	4	0.5		98.3	104	4.0	89.9 ± 0.8
	RT	6	10	1.0		96.7	39	1.6	86.7 ± 1.9
	4° C.	6	8	0.6		95.7	67	2.7	95.2 ± 2.4

The stability of the verification patches made from hGH Formulations I and II was measured upon storage for 1, 2, and 3 months at room temperature and upon storage for 3 months at 5±3° C. The verification patches contained 2 and 6 mg hGH per patch on a 5.0 cm²patch. Stability tests were performed in five replicates. The results of the stability tests are contained in Tables 3a and 3b. The verification patches conformed to all appearance, purity, and identity tests.

TABLE 3a


Stability of Verification Patches

Storage

Purity

Quantity

Other Tests

Conditions

Water

Drug Release

Formulation/

Time

Proteins

Aggregates

Isoform

Assay

Content

(% of total

Dose	Temperature	(mos.)	(NMT 13%)	(NMT 6.0%)	distribution	(90 ÷ 110%)	(μg/patch)	(% w/w)	recovered)

I/2 mg	RT		0	2.7	0.8	Conform	103.0	130.5	2.7	89.1 ± 3.7
	RT	1	3.3	0.8		103.6	93.7	2.0	90.6 ± 4.8
	RT	2	3.9	0.8		101.8	115.9	2.4	95.3 ± 1.1
I/6 mg	RT		0	3.6	0.8	Conform	103.5	482.1	3.3	73.6 ± 3.3
	RT	1	3.5	0.9		101.6	396.4	2.8	78.3 ± 0.6
	RT	2	3.9	0.8		99.3	253.0	1.8	94.4 ± 2.6
II/2 mg	RT		0	3.1	0.7	Conform	93.2	156.0	3.0	86.0 ± 1.1
	RT	1	3.0	0.7		93.1	88.4	1.7	82.2 ± 0.9
	RT	2	3.4	0.7		91.5	30.9	0.6	89.5 ± 1.3
II/6 mg	RT		0	3.3	0.7	Conform	104.7	604.9	3.9	77.8 ± 3.1
	RT	1	3.0	0.8		105.0	120.6	0.8	80.9 ± 0.8
	RT	2	3.5	0.8		104.7	229.0	1.5	103.8 ± 3.0

TABLE 3b


Stability of Verification Patches (continued)

Storage

Other Tests

Conditions

Biological

Bacterial

Formulation/		Time	Uniformity	Activity (%	Bioburden	Endotoxin
Dose	Temperature	(mos.)	of Content	of label claim)	(CFU/patch)	(EU/patch)

I/2 mg	RT		0	Conform,	50	55 (35-81)	0.34-0.81
			RSD 0.3
	RT	1	NP	NP	NP	NP
	RT
	2	NP	102	14 (4-27)	NP
I/6 mg	RT		0	Conform,	110	16 (8-26)	0.94-1.52
			RSD 0.6
	RT	1	NP	NP	NP	NP
	RT
	2	NP	NP	7 (1-16)	NP
II/2 mg	RT		0	Conform,	120	36 (14-73)	0.27-0.30
			RSD 0.5
	RT	1	NP	NP	NP	NP
	RT
	2	NP	NP	8 (4-15)	NP
II/6 mg	RT		0	Conform,	111	41 (11-67)	0.54-0.74
			RSD 0.3
	RT	1	NP	NP	NP	NP
	RT
	2	NP	NP	16 (3-39)	NP

As illustrated by Tables 2, 3a, and 3b, both test and verification patches made using the formulations of the invention, (hGH Formulations I and II) maintained good stability. The test batches were stable for a minimum of 6 months at both room temperature and 5±3° C. The results of purity tests for both the test and verification patches meet the acceptance limits in Table 1. In addition, biological activity tests of the verification patches made with hGH Formulations I and II at 0 months demonstrated good potency of the printed protein (about 100% of the label claim).
Pharmacokinetic properties in pigs of patches made from hGH Formulation I at a dosage of 4 mg of hGH on a 5.0 cm²patch were compared to those of 0.4 mg subcutaneous hGH injections. The pharmacokinetic properties of interest include area under the curve (“AUC”) and bioavailability. The microchannels per cm²and the dimension of the electrode arrays were varied with respect to the patches.

Example 6

Pharmacokinetic Study in Pigs

The pharmacokinetic studies were carried out on 10-15 kg white male pigs using the following procedure: The skin application site of the pigs was treated with saline for 30 minutes in order to moisten the site and increase the number of micro-channels in the pigs (about 70%) to the observed percentage in humans (>90%). ViaDerm was then applied using positive feedback setting. The device was applied on the dorsal back area near the spine and was covered with a patch. The pigs were under general anesthesia for the initial procedure, cannulation and 1 hour post patch application, and conscious for the remainder of the trial. Blood was drawn from the jugular cannula into a plasma tube at regular intervals after the administration of the patch. The patch was removed after 12 hours. Analysis of hGH plasma levels was performed by ELISA DSL 10-1900 test. A subcutaneous injection of 0.4 mg hGH (Genotropin, Pharmacia) was used as positive control group for bioavailability calculations.

hGH plasma levels of the patches and injection are reported in FIG. 1. AUC and bioavailability parameters patches made with hGH Formulation I and injection are reported in Table 4. Patches with 150, 300, and 450 microchannels (“MCs”) per Cm²and 60-80 μm diameter electrode arrays were compared to a subcutaneous injection (“SC”) of 0.4 mg hGH (Genotropin, Pharmacia).

TABLE 4


AUC and Bioavailability Parameters in pigs for
hGH when Administered by Injection and Patches

		Relative
	AUC	Bioavailability
Treatment	(ng*hr/ml)	(%)

SC - 0.4 mg	135 ± 22	100 ± 0
4 mg/patch	137 ± 40	10 ± 3
150 MCs/cm²- 80 μm
4 mg/patch	214 ± 57	16 ± 4
300 MCs/cm²- 80 μm
4 mg/patch	193 ± 43	14 ± 3
450 MCs/cm²- 60 μm

As illustrated by FIG. 1, the maximum plasma level of hGH is obtained at approximately 1 hour when administered by injection and at approximately 3-4 hours when administered by transdermal patch. With respect to the administration of hGH through the patches, FIG. 1 illustrates that the more microchannels that are used, the higher the transdermal delivery of hGH. Table 4 demonstrates that increasing the dimension of the electrode array has the effect of increasing bioavailability. For example, Table 4 shows that a patch with 300 microchannels/cm²and an electrode array 80 μm in diameter exhibits similar bioavailability to a patch with 450 microchannels/cm²and an electrode array 60 μm in diameter (14% vs. 16%).

Claims

1. A transdermal patch formulation comprising:

hGH, at least one sugar, at least one polyol or one amino acid, and a buffer, wherein the buffer maintains the pH of the formulation in the range of about 5 to about 9 and the formulation does not contain both glycine and mannitol.

2. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the hGH is present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 10 mg/ml to 255 mg/ml.

3. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the hGH concentration of the formulation is from about 20 mg/ml to about 120 mg/ml.

4. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the sugar is glucose, fructose, sucrose, trehalose, lactose, maltose, galactose, sorbitol, or xylitol.

5. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the sugar is sucrose or trehalose.

6. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the sugar is present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 11 mg/ml to 300 mg/ml.

7. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the sugar is present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 22 mg/ml to about 200 mg/ml.

8. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the polyol is mannitol, glycerin, polyethylene glycol, or α-hydro-omega-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)poly(oxypropylene)poly(oxyethylene) block copolymer.

9. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the polyol is mannitol.

10. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the polyol is present in the formulation in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 5 mg/ml to 150 mg/ml.

11. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the polyol is present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 10 mg/ml to about 100 mg/ml.

12. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the amino acid is glycine or histidine.

13. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the amino acid is glycine.

14. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the amino acid is present in the formulation in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 3 mg/ml to about 99 mg/ml.

15. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the amino acid is present in the formulation in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation concentration of about 6 mg/ml to about 66 mg/ml.

16. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the buffer is a phosphate buffer, a citrate buffer, phosphate-acetate buffer, citrate-phosphate buffer, or succinate buffer.

17. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the buffer is a phosphate buffer or a citrate buffer.

18. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 1, wherein the buffer is present in an amount sufficient to achieve a formulation pH of about 6 to 8.

19. A transdermal patch formulation comprising hGH, sucrose, and glycine in a 30 mM phosphate buffer, wherein the concentration ratio (mg/ml) of hGH, sucrose, and glycine is about 0.85:0.8:0.26 to about 0.85:1.20:0.40.

20. The transdermal patch formulation according to claim 19, wherein the pH of transdermal patch formulation is from about 6 to about 8.

21. A transdermal patch formulation comprising hGH, trehalose, and mannitol dissolved in a 20 mM citrate buffer, wherein the concentration ratio (mg/ml) of hGH, trehalose, and mannitol is about 0.85:0.80:0.40 to about 0.8:1.20:0.60 and the pH is from about 6 to 8.

22. A method for preparing a transdermal formulation of hGH comprising:

dissolving at least one sugar and at least one polyol or amino acid in a buffer to form an excipient solution;

dissolving hGH in the excipient solution to obtain a hGH formulation having a hGH concentration of about 10 mg/ml to 252 mg/ml; and

storing the hGH formulation for a time sufficient to promote dissolution, wherein the formulation has a pH of about 6 to 8.

23. The method according to claim 22, further comprising removing any non-dissolved particles of hGH after storage.

24. A method for preparing a transdermal formulation of hGH comprising:

forming an excipient solution by dissolving sucrose and glycine in 30 mM phosphate buffer to achieve a formulation concentration of about 100 mg/ml of sucrose and about 33 mg/ml of glycine and a final formulation pH of about 7.5±0.5;

dissolving hGH in the excipient solution to achieve a hGH final concentration of about 85-100 mg/ml;

storing the hGH solution to promote dissolution; and

optionally, removing any non-dissolved particles of hGH.

25. A transdermal patch comprising a formulation of hGH, at least one sugar, at least one polyol or amino acid, and a buffer in an amount sufficient to maintain the formulation pH in the range of about 6 to about 8, wherein after six months of storage at a temperature of about 4° C., the patch has related hGH proteins in an amount of about 0.5% to about 13% and aggregate proteins in an amount of about 0.01% to about 6% by weight and the formulation does not contain both glycine and mannitol.

26. The transdermal patch according to claim 25, wherein after storage for six months at a temperature of about 4° C., the transdermal patch formulation has related proteins in an amount of about 2% to 10% by weight.

27. The transdermal patch according to claim 25, wherein after storage for six months at a temperature of about 4° C., the transdermal patch has aggregate proteins in an amount of about 0.2% to 4% by weight.