US20070221573A2 - In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system - Google Patents
In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070221573A2 US20070221573A2 US11/090,380 US9038005A US2007221573A2 US 20070221573 A2 US20070221573 A2 US 20070221573A2 US 9038005 A US9038005 A US 9038005A US 2007221573 A2 US2007221573 A2 US 2007221573A2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- groundwater
- monitoring
- nitrification
- oxygen
- ground
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 186
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000005067 remediation Methods 0.000 title claims description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 99
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 77
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 75
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 67
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 67
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 67
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 230000001546 nitrifying effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229910001873 dinitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 79
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 61
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 49
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 49
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 41
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims description 36
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 29
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 claims description 27
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 19
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphoric acid Chemical group OP(O)(O)=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229910000147 aluminium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000014214 soft drink Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dioxygen Chemical compound O=O MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000005862 Whey Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000007544 Whey Proteins Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010046377 Whey Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 28
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 25
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 21
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 13
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acetate Chemical compound CC([O-])=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 9
- 238000011021 bench scale process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000013049 sediment Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000036284 oxygen consumption Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005273 aeration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001651 autotrophic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013405 beer Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003651 drinking water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020188 drinking water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013505 freshwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008821 health effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006213 oxygenation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F3/30—Aerobic and anaerobic processes
- C02F3/302—Nitrification and denitrification treatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/002—Reclamation of contaminated soil involving in-situ ground water treatment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/001—Processes for the treatment of water whereby the filtration technique is of importance
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
- C02F2103/06—Contaminated groundwater or leachate
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2305/00—Use of specific compounds during water treatment
- C02F2305/06—Nutrients for stimulating the growth of microorganisms
Definitions
- the present invention may be used to alternately provide in-situ groundwater nitrification by encouraging the growth of nitrifying bacteria in the ground; or to provide in-situ groundwater de-nitrification by encouraging the growth of de-nitrifying bacteria in the ground.
- nutrients and either oxygen or a carbon source are added to extracted groundwater which is then returned to the ground.
- the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater nitrification, by: extracting groundwater from the ground; adding oxygen to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the oxygen reacts with in-situ nitrifying bacteria to oxidize ammonia to nitrate, and wherein the nutrients encourage the nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- the present system is ideally suited to remediate groundwater contaminated by ammonia. Elevated ammonia concentrations are a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas and airports.
- the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater de-nitrification, by: extracting the groundwater from the ground; adding a carbon source to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the carbon source reacts with in-situ de-nitrifying bacteria to reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas, and wherein the nutrients encourage the de-nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- the present system is ideally suited to remediate groundwater contaminated by nitrate. Elevated nitrate concentrations are also a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas and airports.
- the present system provides an integrated system of groundwater remediation, by: in-situ groundwater de-nitrification; and in-situ groundwater nitrification, wherein the in-situ groundwater de-nitrification is performed down gradient of the in-situ groundwater nitrification.
- the present system can be operated such that when groundwater ammonia concentrations are elevated, the nitrification process is used, and conversely, when groundwater nitrate concentrations are elevated, the de-nitrification process is used.
- FIG. 1 is a plot plan of a field site showing extraction (i.e.: pumping) well 2002-PW1, injection (i.e.: treatment) well 2002-INJECT and various monitoring wells (which may be used in either of the preferred nitrification or de-nitrification processes).
- FIG. 2 is a cross section showing the in-situ nitrification process in operation.
- FIG. 3 shows nitrification bench test results of ammonia degradation kinetics for ground water only (ground water), soil and nutrient amended ground water (soil and nutrient), poisoned reactor (killed control), soil amended ground water (Soil control) and nutrient amended ground water (Nutrient 1 and 2 ) reactors incubated at 9° C.
- FIG. 4 shows nitrification bench test results of nitrate concentrations for ground water only (ground water), soil and nutrient amended ground water (soil and nutrient), poisoned reactor (killed control), soil amended ground water (Soil control) and nutrient amended ground water (Nutrient 1 and 2 ) reactors incubated at 9° C.
- FIG. 5 is a graphical presentation showing the ammonia reductions at a representative monitoring (TH13) well within the reaction cell at the site during the nitrification process.
- FIG. 6 is a graphical presentation showing parameters at a representative monitoring well (2002MW41) outside the reaction cell at the site during the nitrification process.
- FIG. 7 is a cross section showing the in-situ de-nitrification process in operation.
- FIG. 8 shows de-nitrification bench test results of nitrate concentrations for acetate and soil amended ground water (Acetate soil), activated sludge amended ground water (Sludge), soil amended ground water (Test), poisoned reactor (Killed), acetate amended ground water (Acetate no soil) and Ground water only (No soil control).
- FIG. 9 is a graphical presentation showing the nitrate reductions at a representative monitoring well (TH1) within the reaction cell at the site during the de-nitrification process.
- FIG. 10 is a graphical presentation showing parameters at a representative monitoring well (2002MW41) outside the reaction cell at the site during the de-nitrification process.
- Table 1 provides the process reaction and ammonia reduction test results for the nitrification process.
- Table 2 provides the process reaction and nitrate reduction test results for the de-nitrification process.
- Elevated ammonia concentrations are a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas and airports.
- elevated concentrations of ammonia in water can present a freshwater aquatic environment health concern where concentrations exceed approximately 2.6 mg-N/L.
- Discharges of ammonia contaminated groundwater to aquatic environments is a growing public concern.
- one aspect of the present invention provides in-situ remediation of ammonia contaminated groundwater in a cost effective manner.
- the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater nitrification, by: extracting groundwater from the ground; adding oxygen to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and then injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the oxygen reacts with in-situ nitrifying bacteria to oxidize ammonia to nitrate, and wherein the nutrients encourage the nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- the conversion of ammonia to nitrate occurs through the following reactions: NH 4 + +2 ⁇ 3O 2 ⁇ NO 2 ⁇ +2H + +H 2 O NO 2 ⁇ +1 ⁇ 2O 2 ⁇ NO 3 ⁇
- such nitrifying bacteria are autotrophic bacteria.
- the addition of carbon and a phosphate nutrient source results in the following preferred reaction occurring: CO 2 +NH 4 + +PO 4 2 ⁇ ⁇ C 5 H 7 NO 2 P 0.03 (Bacteria)
- the oxygen can be added by adding air, by adding pure oxygen, by adding an oxygen releasing compound, or by any other practical oxygen source.
- oxygen may be added by bubblers.
- the oxygen is added in an amount sufficient to maintain oxygen levels above 1 mg/L in groundwater; however, the present invention is not so limited, as other oxygen levels may be used instead.
- the added nutrients include phosphorus such as phosphate.
- phosphate may be in the form of phosphoric acid; however, the present invention is not so limited, as other nutrients may be used as well.
- the phosphorus is added so that the groundwater has a concentration of 0.2 to 0.8 mg/L of phosphate however, the present invention is not so limited, as other phosphate levels may be used instead.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the relative locations of an injection well labeled “2002-INJECT” and an extraction (i.e.: pumping) well labeled “2002-PW1” and a plurality of monitoring wells labeled TH” or “MW”.
- FIG. 2 shows a cross sectional view through the ground of a system with an injection well and a pumping (i.e. extraction) well used to illustrate the present nitrification process.
- the groundwater is extracted at a location that is downgradient of the location where the groundwater is injected back into the ground.
- the oxygen and nutrients may be added to the ground water in an above ground structure (labeled the “REMEDIATION EQUIPMENT STORAGE SHED”). Alternately, however, the oxygen and nutrients may instead be added to the ground water in one or more injection wells.
- the effectiveness of the groundwater nitrification method is monitored by measuring at least one of oxygen concentration, ortho-phosphate, pH or temperature of the groundwater.
- Such monitoring may be carried out in a separate monitoring well (e.g.: TH wells), or in a monitoring well that is also the groundwater extraction well (e.g.: 2002-PW1) as shown on FIG. 1 .
- a “reaction cell” as understood herein is the volume of soil in contact with the ground water in which the preferred nitrification (or- denitrification) process is being carried out.
- the effectiveness of the present groundwater nitrification method may be monitored within such the reaction cell.
- such monitoring may simply be carried out in the extraction well (2002-PW1) located downgradient of the injection well (2002-INJECT).
- such monitoring may be carried out in a monitoring well that is outside of the reaction cell. This has the advantage of determining whether excess nutrients are being added to the groundwater. (i.e.: determining whether nutrient concentration outside of the reaction cell is increasing above standard background levels). Therefore, in further aspects of the present invention, the addition of the nutrients is stopped if phosphate is found above background levels in a monitoring well outside of a reaction cell.
- the oxygen source is added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner, wherein the amount of oxygen required to be added to the groundwater will depend upon the oxygen demand of the nitrifying bacteria in addition to other sources of oxygen consumption within the groundwater.
- the chemical and biochemical oxygen demand of the groundwater may be more than the stoichiometric oxygen requirement to convert the ammonia to nitrate.
- the extraction well can be placed downgradient of the injection well. This is particularly advantageous in that a substantial portion of the water that was oxygenated is re-oxygenated and injected back into the ground. As a result, the groundwater will be recycled through the extraction well and oxygenation system, and be re-injected into the subsurface groundwater. Such groundwater recycling will result in additional oxygen supplied to the groundwater so that the nitrification process can remove substantive quantities of ammonia.
- the extraction well does not have to be sited downgradient of the injection well because large quantities of oxygen can be added at once to the groundwater.
- the nutrient source is also added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner.
- the nutrient source can be any phosphorus containing nutrient supply such as including phosphate including phosphoric acid.
- the nutrient is supplied to the groundwater to maintain a phosphorus concentration of 0.2-0.8 mg/L; however, the present invention is not so limited, as higher concentrations can be added if the nutrient demand exceeds this. In those environments where nutrients may already exist (naturally or having been introduced), there may be situations where little or no nutrient addition may be required.
- the injection well(s) are located upgradient or substantially upgradient from the extraction well(s) if the amount of oxygen required to remove the ammonia cannot be added all at once. In this way, a substantial proportion of the water, will recycle through the reaction cell to undergo further nitrification in order for substantive ammonia reductions to be achieved.
- the number of injection wells does not have to equal the number of extraction wells.
- the extraction wells do not have to be placed in a circular pattern around an the injection well. Rather, the injection well(s) can be cross gradient or upgradient of the extraction well(s), or between these two locations.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a specific, non-limiting, embodiment of the present system (corresponding to FIG. 2 ) as tested by the present inventors in which the extraction well (2002-PW1) was located 22 m downgradient of the injection well (2002-INJECT).
- the reaction cell of the nitrification process was approximately 20 m, as measured perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow halfway between the extraction well (2002-PW1) and injection well (2002-INJECT).
- This reaction cell size was achieved using an extraction/injection rate of 50 imperial gallons per minute (igpm).
- the groundwater gradient was 0.023, hydraulic conductivity approximately 50 m/day.
- the reaction cell size can be increased by increasing the distance between the injection well and extraction well. For example if the distance of separation is 70 m, then the reaction cell size will extend on the order of 60 m perpendicular to the ground water flow direction.
- the maximum reaction cell size obtainable in the case where the water is infused with oxygen (with micro or macro bubbles using air or pure oxygen) will ultimately be a function of many separate variables including the groundwater extraction rate, the groundwater injection rate, the groundwater gradient, the oxygen demand, the rate of oxygen consumption and the zone of migration of air/oxygen bubbles.
- ORC Oxygen Releasing Compound
- ammonia concentrations can be monitored using groundwater monitoring wells located downgradient of the injection well(s).
- the extraction well(s) may also be used to monitor ammonia concentrations.
- a number of monitoring wells could be installed in the anticipated reaction cell as well as a few outside the anticipated reaction cell to assess the size of the actual reaction cell.
- the reaction cell is the portion of the groundwater under the influence of the various amendments added.
- one or more of the dissolved oxygen, ortho-phosphate concentration, pH and temperature could be measured in these monitoring wells to ensure that adequate dissolved oxygen and nutrients are available for the microorganisms to carry out the required nitrification process.
- nitrate and ammonia could also be measured in monitoring wells both inside and outside the reaction cell to assess the kinetics of transformation of ammonia to nitrate.
- Dissolved oxygen and ortho-phosphate should always be present for effective nitrification to occur.
- the pH should decrease and the temperature may increase in the reaction cell due to the nitrification process.
- the pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and ortho-phosphate concentrations in monitoring wells outside the reaction cell should be similar to background levels in the groundwater.
- the delivery of oxygen and nutrients (E.G.: phosphate) to the groundwater can be adjusted to maintain preferred levels of both of these compounds.
- aerobic conditions i.e. dissolved oxygen concentrations above 1 mg/L
- phosphate concentrations are maintained between 0.2 and 0.8 mg/L. If phosphate is found in wells outside of the reaction cell, the addition of phosphate may be stopped.
- the present inventors successfully performed a bench scale study to demonstrate the capabilities of naturally occurring bacteria at the site for their capacity to nitrify ammonia in the groundwater in accordance with the present invention.
- contaminated ground water along with alluvial soils collected from a drilling program on site were collected in order to study the feasibility of biological nitrification at 9° C. which is the average groundwater temperatures at the site.
- the bench scale study consisted of 1 L reactors filled with 800 mL of contaminated ground water. Mixing and surface aeration was supplied by the use of paddle mixers. A number of reactor conditions and controls were examined and their effect on nitrification assessed.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 show the effect of these reactor conditions on ammonia and nitrate concentrations, as follows.
- FIG. 3 illustrates decreasing ammonia concentrations over time. Specifically, this figure shows that ground water amended with phosphate showed the highest nitrification rate and by 18 days the ammonia was gone. It also shows that sufficient phosphate was present in the ground water which resulted in full nitrification realized after a month. The addition of soil had little effect on the nitrification rates.
- FIG. 4 illustrates increasing nitrate concentrations over time. Specifically, this figure shows the concomitant increase in nitrate when nitrification is occurring (i.e.: while ammonia is decreasing as shown in FIG. 3 ). It also shows that in all cases and reactor conditions, nitrate was produced when nitrification occurs.
- Table 1 and FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate the success of the field test (using the well layout of FIG. 1 ), as follows.
- Table 1 illustrates the experimental results achieved, showing ammonia concentration reductions at various monitoring wells inside the reaction cell.
- FIG. 5 illustrates ammonia reductions at a representative monitoring well (TH13) within the reaction cell during the nitrification process.
- FIG. 6 illustrates parameters at a representative monitoring well TH41 outside of the reaction cell during the nitrification process.
- Elevated nitrate concentrations in groundwater are a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas, airports, etc.
- elevated concentrations of nitrate in drinking water can present a human health concern where concentrations exceed 10 mg-N/L.
- Discharges of nitrate contaminated groundwater to the environment is a growing public concern because adverse human health effects can occur.
- one aspect of the present invention provides an in-situ system of remediation of nitrate contaminated groundwater in a cost effective manner.
- the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater de-nitrification, comprising: extracting the groundwater from the ground; adding carbon to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and then injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the carbon reacts with in-situ de-nitrifying bacteria to reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas, and wherein the nutrients encourage the de-nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- such de-nitrifying bacteria are attached growth biofilms, and the conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas occurs through the following reaction: 2NO 3 ⁇ +1.5(CH 3 COOH) ⁇ N 2 +3CO 2 +3H 2 O (Acetic Acid or Another Carbon Source)
- the carbon may be added by adding at least one of acetic acid, sugar, sugar water, softdrink waste products, whey, yeast wastewater or any other practical carbon source.
- the added nutrients include phosphorus.
- phosphorus may be in the form of phosphate including phosphoric acid; however, the present invention is not so limited as other nutrients may be used.
- the phosphorus may be added so that the groundwater has a concentration of 0.2 to 0.8 mg/L of phosphate, however the present invention is not so limited as other phosphate levels may be used.
- the groundwater may be extracted at a location that is downgradient or cross-gradient of the location where the groundwater is injected back into the ground.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the relative locations of an injection well labeled “2002-INJECT” and an extraction (i.e.: pumping) well “2002-PW1” and a plurality of/monitoring wells labeled “TH” or “MW”.
- FIG. 7 shows a cross sectional view through the ground of a system with an injection well labeled “INJECTION WELL” and an extraction well labeled “PUMPING WELL” used to illustrate the present nitrification process.
- one or more extraction wells may be used for the removal of groundwater from the aquifer containing the nitrate.
- the groundwater is extracted at a location that is downgradient of the location where the groundwater is injected back into the ground, however, the present invention is not so limited as the ground water can be injected cross gradient from the position of the extraction well.
- the carbon and nutrients may be added to the ground water in an above ground structure (labeled the “REMEDIATION EQUIPMENT STORAGE SHED”). Alternately, however, the carbon and nutrients may instead be added to the ground water in one or more injection wells.
- the effectiveness of the groundwater de-nitrification method is monitored by measuring carbon concentration and/or phosphate and/or nitrate concentrations in the groundwater.
- the addition of nutrients may be stopped if nutrients are found in extraction wells positioned downgradient from the reaction cell.
- the addition of carbon may be stopped if carbon is found in monitoring wells positioned downgradient from the reaction cell.
- the effectiveness of the groundwater de-nitrification method may be monitored by measuring at least one of biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, and orthophosphate concentration.
- the addition of carbon and/or nutrients may be stopped if the biochemical oxygen demand or chemical oxygen demand or nutrients are found above background levels in a monitoring well located outside of the reaction cell.
- the effectiveness of the groundwater de-nitrification method is monitored by measuring at least one of the pH, dissolved oxygen concentration and temperature.
- such monitoring may be carried out in a monitoring well within the reaction cell. Alternately, such monitoring may be carried out in a monitoring well located outside of the reaction cell. Optionally, such monitoring may also be carried out in a extraction well located downgradient of an injection well.
- the carbon source or readily biodegradable carbon substrate is added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner.
- the carbon source may include, but is not limited to, acetic acid, granulated or liquid sugar, sugar water, soft drink manufacturing waste products (e.g.: such as discarded cola or other soft drink products that do not meet manufacturers specs), whey, yeast wastewater, yeast product from beer production, or any other practical carbon source.
- the concentration of carbon being added to the groundwater may be varied under different circumstances such that the amount of carbon added will be that which is used to achieve de-nitrification.
- the concentration of readily biodegradable carbon substrate that is added to the groundwater can be modeled in a number of ways. For example, the mass flux of nitrate entering the reaction cell can be modeled and the stoichiometric carbon equivalent required to reduce the nitrate can then be added to the groundwater, with the groundwater being recirculated between the extraction well(s) and the injection wells.
- the stoichiometric carbon equivalent of the nitrate in the recirculated groundwater can also be added as specified in the above reactions.
- There are other numerous ways of calculating the amount of carbon to add For example, down gradient groundwater samples could be monitored for the added carbon and the addition of carbon stopped if it is encountered down gradient of the reaction cell.
- the nutrient source is added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner.
- the nutrient source can be any phosphorus containing nutrient supply, and may include, but is not limited to, phosphoric acid. In those environments where nutrients may already exist (naturally or having been introduced), there may be situations where little or no nutrient addition may be required.
- the concentration of the nutrients to be added can be calculated stoichiometrically as above taking into account standard bacterial growth rates. In one preferred method of operation, the phosphorus concentration is maintained between 0.2 and 0.8 mg/L. There are other numerous ways of calculating the amount of nutrient to add. For example, down gradient groundwater samples could be monitored for the added nutrient and the addition of the nutrient stopped if it is encountered down gradient of the reaction cell.
- the carbon and nutrient (if required) amended groundwater is injected back into the aquifer, or above the aquifer into an unsaturated zone.
- This may be performed through the use of one or more injection wells.
- the injection well(s) can be located upgradient, downgradient or cross gradient from the extraction well(s).
- there may be one or more injection wells for each extraction well.
- the extraction wells do not have to be placed in a circular configuration around the injection well(s).
- FIG. 1 illustrates a specific, non-limiting, embodiment of the present system (corresponding to FIG. 7 ) as tested by the present inventors in which the extraction well (2002-PW1) was located 22 m downgradient of the injection well (2002-INJECT).
- An advantage of this well configuration is that it ensured that enough carbon and nutrient contact occurs with the attached growth biomass in the reaction cell.
- the de-nitrification reaction cell size was approximately 20 m, measured perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow halfway between the extraction well and injection well. This reaction cell size was achieved using an extraction/injection rate of 50 imperial gallons per minute (igpm).
- the groundwater gradient was 0.023, hydraulic conductivity approximately 50 m/day.
- the reaction cell size can be increased by increasing the distance between the injection well and extraction wells. For example, if the distance of separation is 70 m, then the reaction cell size is on the order of 60 m perpendicular to ground water flow direction. The maximum reaction cell size obtainable is the same as the zone occupied by the injected ground water. In this case the extraction well and the injection well zone of influence may not overlap. In both cases, given a constant extraction/injection rate, the reaction cell size increases with increasing hydraulic conductivity and decreasing groundwater gradient.
- the effectiveness of the de-nitrification process can be measured by monitoring nitrate concentrations in monitoring wells located downgradient of the injection well(s).
- the extraction well(s) may also be used to monitor nitrate concentrations.
- Such monitoring wells could be installed either inside and outside the reaction cell in order to assess the size of the de-nitrification cell.
- the effectiveness of the de-nitrification process can also be measured by monitoring biochemical and/or chemical oxygen demand (BOD and/or COD) and orthophosphate (both inside and outside of the reaction cell).
- BOD and/or COD biochemical and/or chemical oxygen demand
- orthophosphate both inside and outside of the reaction cell.
- BOD, COD and phosphate should be similar to background levels.
- the orthophosphate concentration is maintained at a concentration between 0.2 and 0.8 mg/L in the reaction cell.
- both BOD and/or COD concentrations are commensurate to the calculated stoichiometric requirement based on the total mass of nitrate required for de-nitrification and the type of readily biodegradable substrate chosen.
- the BOD and or COD added would double for the same substrate if the nitrate concentrations in the ground waters double. Moreover, since the BOD and/or COD of the same concentrations of different substrate is different, therefore the final amount of BOD and/or COD would change with different substrates.
- the pH, dissolved oxygen and temperature could also be measured. It is to be expected that the pH would increase in the reaction cell due to the de-nitrification process and the dissolved oxygen concentration would approach zero for effective denitrification to occur.
- the phosphate or BOD and/or COD may be measured in wells down gradient of the reaction cell. If the phosphate concentration or BOD and/or COD are detected at levels higher than background levels, then the addition of the nutrient and carbon could be stopped.
- the size of the reaction cell can be determined since both the carbon and nutrient levels in wells just outside the reaction cell should be similar to background levels. Therefore, nitrate could be measured inside and outside of the cell to assess denitrification kinetics.
- the present inventors successfully performed a bench scale study to demonstrate the capabilities of naturally occurring bacteria at the site for their capacity to denitrify fully nitrified ammonia contaminated groundwater.
- contaminated ground water along with soils from the site were collected in order to study the feasibility of de-nitrifying fully nitrified groundwaters under batch conditions.
- Oxygen depleted nitrified groundwater was dispensed into 300 mL BOD bottles for subsequent denitrification experiments.
- a number of reactor conditions and controls were examined and their effect on denitrification assessed.
- FIG. 8 shows the effect of these reactor conditions on nitrate concentrations, as follows.
- FIG. 8 illustrates decreasing nitrate concentrations over time. Specifically, the figure shows that the additional spike of acetate on June 16 resulted in the rapid denitrification under a variety of different batch conditions including, reactors amended with activated sludge (Sludge), soil from the site (Test), and soil with an initial small acetate spike (Acetate soil). It also shows that in experiments where no acetate was added (Acetate no soil, no soil control, killed) denitrification was not apparent.
- Table 2 and FIGS. 9 and 10 illustrate the success of the field test (using the well layout of FIG. 1 ), as follows.
- Table 2 illustrates the experimental results achieved, showing nitrate concentration reductions at various monitoring wells inside the reaction cell.
- FIG. 9 illustrates nitrate reductions at a representative monitoring well TH1 within the reaction cell during the nitrification process.
- FIG. 10 illustrates parameters at a representative monitoring well TH41 outside of the reaction cell during the de-nitrification process.
- the present nitrification and de-nitrification remediation methods are especially applicable under site conditions where the hydraulic conductivity is relatively high, such as in sand and sandy gravel deposits.
- the present remediation methods may be used in any unconsolidated sediment type where there is relatively high hydraulic conductivity.
- the present invention is not so limited, as the present ground water remediation method may be used in relatively high hydraulic conductivity bedrock deposits such as vugular limestones/dolomites, fractured formations and any other lithologic bedrock.
- reaction cell size of the injection wells can be maximized, and the number of injection wells can be minimized, thus resulting in lower cost systems.
- the reaction cell size in the vicinity the injection wells may optimally be determined using widely recognized aquifer testing methods (including, but not limited to: pump testing and zone of influence assessment, numeric approximation, computer modeling, etc.).
- High hydraulic conductivity sediments/bedrock will have wide zones of influence while low hydraulic conductively sediments/bedrock will have narrow zones of influence.
- high hydraulic conductivity sediments/bedrock can accommodate injection of relatively large volumes of water, thereby providing for significant treatment of water, while low hydraulic conductively sediments/bedrock cannot accommodate injection of large volumes of water.
- the zone of influence of the oxygen and nutrient amended water may also be estimated based upon advective transport models of the injected water.
- the zone of influence of the carbon and nutrient amended water may also be estimated based upon advective transport models of the injected water.
- High hydraulic conductivity sediments/bedrock have wide zones of influence while low hydraulic conductively sediments/bedrock have narrow zones of influence.
Abstract
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/580,415, filed Jun. 16, 2004 entitled In-Situ Nitrification and Denitrification Remediation Technology of Groundwater.
- The present invention may be used to alternately provide in-situ groundwater nitrification by encouraging the growth of nitrifying bacteria in the ground; or to provide in-situ groundwater de-nitrification by encouraging the growth of de-nitrifying bacteria in the ground. In various aspects, nutrients and either oxygen or a carbon source are added to extracted groundwater which is then returned to the ground.
- In one aspect, the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater nitrification, by: extracting groundwater from the ground; adding oxygen to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the oxygen reacts with in-situ nitrifying bacteria to oxidize ammonia to nitrate, and wherein the nutrients encourage the nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- As a result, the present system is ideally suited to remediate groundwater contaminated by ammonia. Elevated ammonia concentrations are a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas and airports.
- In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater de-nitrification, by: extracting the groundwater from the ground; adding a carbon source to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the carbon source reacts with in-situ de-nitrifying bacteria to reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas, and wherein the nutrients encourage the de-nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- As a result, the present system is ideally suited to remediate groundwater contaminated by nitrate. Elevated nitrate concentrations are also a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas and airports.
- In yet another aspect, the present system provides an integrated system of groundwater remediation, by: in-situ groundwater de-nitrification; and in-situ groundwater nitrification, wherein the in-situ groundwater de-nitrification is performed down gradient of the in-situ groundwater nitrification.
- As a result, the present system can be operated such that when groundwater ammonia concentrations are elevated, the nitrification process is used, and conversely, when groundwater nitrate concentrations are elevated, the de-nitrification process is used.
-
FIG. 1 is a plot plan of a field site showing extraction (i.e.: pumping) well 2002-PW1, injection (i.e.: treatment) well 2002-INJECT and various monitoring wells (which may be used in either of the preferred nitrification or de-nitrification processes). -
FIG. 2 is a cross section showing the in-situ nitrification process in operation. -
FIG. 3 shows nitrification bench test results of ammonia degradation kinetics for ground water only (ground water), soil and nutrient amended ground water (soil and nutrient), poisoned reactor (killed control), soil amended ground water (Soil control) and nutrient amended ground water (Nutrient 1 and 2) reactors incubated at 9° C. -
FIG. 4 shows nitrification bench test results of nitrate concentrations for ground water only (ground water), soil and nutrient amended ground water (soil and nutrient), poisoned reactor (killed control), soil amended ground water (Soil control) and nutrient amended ground water (Nutrient 1 and 2) reactors incubated at 9° C. -
FIG. 5 is a graphical presentation showing the ammonia reductions at a representative monitoring (TH13) well within the reaction cell at the site during the nitrification process. -
FIG. 6 is a graphical presentation showing parameters at a representative monitoring well (2002MW41) outside the reaction cell at the site during the nitrification process. -
FIG. 7 is a cross section showing the in-situ de-nitrification process in operation. -
FIG. 8 shows de-nitrification bench test results of nitrate concentrations for acetate and soil amended ground water (Acetate soil), activated sludge amended ground water (Sludge), soil amended ground water (Test), poisoned reactor (Killed), acetate amended ground water (Acetate no soil) and Ground water only (No soil control). -
FIG. 9 is a graphical presentation showing the nitrate reductions at a representative monitoring well (TH1) within the reaction cell at the site during the de-nitrification process. -
FIG. 10 is a graphical presentation showing parameters at a representative monitoring well (2002MW41) outside the reaction cell at the site during the de-nitrification process. - Table 1 provides the process reaction and ammonia reduction test results for the nitrification process.
- Table 2 provides the process reaction and nitrate reduction test results for the de-nitrification process.
- (a) Nitrification
- Elevated ammonia concentrations are a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas and airports. Unfortunately, elevated concentrations of ammonia in water can present a freshwater aquatic environment health concern where concentrations exceed approximately 2.6 mg-N/L. Discharges of ammonia contaminated groundwater to aquatic environments is a growing public concern. As will be explained, one aspect of the present invention provides in-situ remediation of ammonia contaminated groundwater in a cost effective manner.
- Specifically, the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater nitrification, by: extracting groundwater from the ground; adding oxygen to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and then injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the oxygen reacts with in-situ nitrifying bacteria to oxidize ammonia to nitrate, and wherein the nutrients encourage the nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- Preferably, the conversion of ammonia to nitrate occurs through the following reactions:
NH4 ++⅔O2→NO2 −+2H++H2O
NO2 −+½O2→NO3 − - As a result, the following overall reaction occurs:
NH4 ++ 7/6O2→NO3 −+2H++H2O - Preferably, such nitrifying bacteria are autotrophic bacteria. The addition of carbon and a phosphate nutrient source results in the following preferred reaction occurring:
CO2+NH4 ++PO4 2−→C5H7NO2P0.03 (Bacteria) - In accordance with various aspects of the present invention, the oxygen can be added by adding air, by adding pure oxygen, by adding an oxygen releasing compound, or by any other practical oxygen source. Such oxygen may be added by bubblers. In preferred methods of operation, the oxygen is added in an amount sufficient to maintain oxygen levels above 1 mg/L in groundwater; however, the present invention is not so limited, as other oxygen levels may be used instead.
- In accordance with various aspects of the invention, the added nutrients include phosphorus such as phosphate. Such phosphate may be in the form of phosphoric acid; however, the present invention is not so limited, as other nutrients may be used as well. In preferred methods of operation, the phosphorus is added so that the groundwater has a concentration of 0.2 to 0.8 mg/L of phosphate however, the present invention is not so limited, as other phosphate levels may be used instead.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates the relative locations of an injection well labeled “2002-INJECT” and an extraction (i.e.: pumping) well labeled “2002-PW1” and a plurality of monitoring wells labeled TH” or “MW”.FIG. 2 shows a cross sectional view through the ground of a system with an injection well and a pumping (i.e. extraction) well used to illustrate the present nitrification process. - As can be seen in
FIG. 1 , in preferred methods of operation, the groundwater is extracted at a location that is downgradient of the location where the groundwater is injected back into the ground. - As can be seen in
FIG. 2 , the oxygen and nutrients may be added to the ground water in an above ground structure (labeled the “REMEDIATION EQUIPMENT STORAGE SHED”). Alternately, however, the oxygen and nutrients may instead be added to the ground water in one or more injection wells. - In further aspects of the invention, the effectiveness of the groundwater nitrification method is monitored by measuring at least one of oxygen concentration, ortho-phosphate, pH or temperature of the groundwater. Such monitoring may be carried out in a separate monitoring well (e.g.: TH wells), or in a monitoring well that is also the groundwater extraction well (e.g.: 2002-PW1) as shown on
FIG. 1 . - A “reaction cell” as understood herein is the volume of soil in contact with the ground water in which the preferred nitrification (or- denitrification) process is being carried out. In preferred aspects, the effectiveness of the present groundwater nitrification method may be monitored within such the reaction cell. In preferred aspects, such monitoring may simply be carried out in the extraction well (2002-PW1) located downgradient of the injection well (2002-INJECT). Alternately, such monitoring may be carried out in a monitoring well that is outside of the reaction cell. This has the advantage of determining whether excess nutrients are being added to the groundwater. (i.e.: determining whether nutrient concentration outside of the reaction cell is increasing above standard background levels). Therefore, in further aspects of the present invention, the addition of the nutrients is stopped if phosphate is found above background levels in a monitoring well outside of a reaction cell.
- The oxygen source is added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner, wherein the amount of oxygen required to be added to the groundwater will depend upon the oxygen demand of the nitrifying bacteria in addition to other sources of oxygen consumption within the groundwater. For example, the chemical and biochemical oxygen demand of the groundwater may be more than the stoichiometric oxygen requirement to convert the ammonia to nitrate.
- Moreover, in cases where the oxygen demand of the nitrifying bacteria (in addition to other sources of oxygen consumption) exceeds the amount of dissolved oxygen that can be practically transferred to the groundwater, then the extraction well can be placed downgradient of the injection well. This is particularly advantageous in that a substantial portion of the water that was oxygenated is re-oxygenated and injected back into the ground. As a result, the groundwater will be recycled through the extraction well and oxygenation system, and be re-injected into the subsurface groundwater. Such groundwater recycling will result in additional oxygen supplied to the groundwater so that the nitrification process can remove substantive quantities of ammonia.
- Advantageously, if the oxygen source is an oxygen releasing compound, then the extraction well does not have to be sited downgradient of the injection well because large quantities of oxygen can be added at once to the groundwater.
- The nutrient source is also added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner. The nutrient source can be any phosphorus containing nutrient supply such as including phosphate including phosphoric acid. In preferred methods of operation, the nutrient is supplied to the groundwater to maintain a phosphorus concentration of 0.2-0.8 mg/L; however, the present invention is not so limited, as higher concentrations can be added if the nutrient demand exceeds this. In those environments where nutrients may already exist (naturally or having been introduced), there may be situations where little or no nutrient addition may be required.
- Preferably, the injection well(s) are located upgradient or substantially upgradient from the extraction well(s) if the amount of oxygen required to remove the ammonia cannot be added all at once. In this way, a substantial proportion of the water, will recycle through the reaction cell to undergo further nitrification in order for substantive ammonia reductions to be achieved.
- In accordance with the present invention, there may be one or more injection wells; and the number of injection wells does not have to equal the number of extraction wells. Moreover, the extraction wells do not have to be placed in a circular pattern around an the injection well. Rather, the injection well(s) can be cross gradient or upgradient of the extraction well(s), or between these two locations.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a specific, non-limiting, embodiment of the present system (corresponding toFIG. 2 ) as tested by the present inventors in which the extraction well (2002-PW1) was located 22 m downgradient of the injection well (2002-INJECT). For the particular soils involved, the inventors found the reaction cell of the nitrification process to be approximately 20 m, as measured perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow halfway between the extraction well (2002-PW1) and injection well (2002-INJECT). This reaction cell size was achieved using an extraction/injection rate of 50 imperial gallons per minute (igpm). The groundwater gradient was 0.023, hydraulic conductivity approximately 50 m/day. It is to be understood that the reaction cell size can be increased by increasing the distance between the injection well and extraction well. For example if the distance of separation is 70 m, then the reaction cell size will extend on the order of 60 m perpendicular to the ground water flow direction. The maximum reaction cell size obtainable in the case where the water is infused with oxygen (with micro or macro bubbles using air or pure oxygen) will ultimately be a function of many separate variables including the groundwater extraction rate, the groundwater injection rate, the groundwater gradient, the oxygen demand, the rate of oxygen consumption and the zone of migration of air/oxygen bubbles. In the case where an Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC) is used to add oxygen to the groundwater, then the reaction cell size will be the same as the zone occupied by the injected ground water. In both cases, given a constant groundwater extraction and injection rate, the reaction cell size increases with increasing hydraulic conductivity and decreasing groundwater gradient. - To assess the effectiveness of the nitrification process, ammonia concentrations can be monitored using groundwater monitoring wells located downgradient of the injection well(s). In the instance where the extraction well(s) is (are) located downgradient of the injection well(s), then the extraction well(s) may also be used to monitor ammonia concentrations. A number of monitoring wells could be installed in the anticipated reaction cell as well as a few outside the anticipated reaction cell to assess the size of the actual reaction cell. As understood herein, the reaction cell is the portion of the groundwater under the influence of the various amendments added.
- In preferred methods of operation, one or more of the dissolved oxygen, ortho-phosphate concentration, pH and temperature could be measured in these monitoring wells to ensure that adequate dissolved oxygen and nutrients are available for the microorganisms to carry out the required nitrification process. Moreover, nitrate and ammonia could also be measured in monitoring wells both inside and outside the reaction cell to assess the kinetics of transformation of ammonia to nitrate. Dissolved oxygen and ortho-phosphate should always be present for effective nitrification to occur. In addition, the pH should decrease and the temperature may increase in the reaction cell due to the nitrification process. The pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and ortho-phosphate concentrations in monitoring wells outside the reaction cell should be similar to background levels in the groundwater. Therefore, the delivery of oxygen and nutrients (E.G.: phosphate) to the groundwater can be adjusted to maintain preferred levels of both of these compounds. In preferred methods of operation, aerobic conditions are maintained (i.e. dissolved oxygen concentrations above 1 mg/L) and phosphate concentrations are maintained between 0.2 and 0.8 mg/L. If phosphate is found in wells outside of the reaction cell, the addition of phosphate may be stopped.
- Nitrification—Bench Scale Testing
- The present inventors successfully performed a bench scale study to demonstrate the capabilities of naturally occurring bacteria at the site for their capacity to nitrify ammonia in the groundwater in accordance with the present invention. To do this, contaminated ground water along with alluvial soils collected from a drilling program on site were collected in order to study the feasibility of biological nitrification at 9° C. which is the average groundwater temperatures at the site. The bench scale study consisted of 1 L reactors filled with 800 mL of contaminated ground water. Mixing and surface aeration was supplied by the use of paddle mixers. A number of reactor conditions and controls were examined and their effect on nitrification assessed.
FIGS. 3 and 4 show the effect of these reactor conditions on ammonia and nitrate concentrations, as follows. -
FIG. 3 illustrates decreasing ammonia concentrations over time. Specifically, this figure shows that ground water amended with phosphate showed the highest nitrification rate and by 18 days the ammonia was gone. It also shows that sufficient phosphate was present in the ground water which resulted in full nitrification realized after a month. The addition of soil had little effect on the nitrification rates. -
FIG. 4 illustrates increasing nitrate concentrations over time. Specifically, this figure shows the concomitant increase in nitrate when nitrification is occurring (i.e.: while ammonia is decreasing as shown inFIG. 3 ). It also shows that in all cases and reactor conditions, nitrate was produced when nitrification occurs. - Nitrification—Field Scale Testing
- Following the bench scale testing, the present inventors successfully performed a field scale treatment test. Table 1 and
FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate the success of the field test (using the well layout ofFIG. 1 ), as follows. - Table 1 illustrates the experimental results achieved, showing ammonia concentration reductions at various monitoring wells inside the reaction cell. In addition,
FIG. 5 illustrates ammonia reductions at a representative monitoring well (TH13) within the reaction cell during the nitrification process.FIG. 6 illustrates parameters at a representative monitoring well TH41 outside of the reaction cell during the nitrification process. - (b) De-Nitrification:
- Elevated nitrate concentrations in groundwater are a particular problem at fertilizer manufacturing facilities, sewage treatment facilities, agricultural areas, airports, etc. Unfortunately, elevated concentrations of nitrate in drinking water can present a human health concern where concentrations exceed 10 mg-N/L. Discharges of nitrate contaminated groundwater to the environment is a growing public concern because adverse human health effects can occur. As will be explained, one aspect of the present invention provides an in-situ system of remediation of nitrate contaminated groundwater in a cost effective manner.
- Specifically, the present invention provides a method of in-situ groundwater de-nitrification, comprising: extracting the groundwater from the ground; adding carbon to the extracted groundwater; adding nutrients to the extracted groundwater; and then injecting the groundwater back into the ground, wherein the carbon reacts with in-situ de-nitrifying bacteria to reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas, and wherein the nutrients encourage the de-nitrifying bacteria to grow and reproduce.
- Preferably, such de-nitrifying bacteria are attached growth biofilms, and the conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas occurs through the following reaction:
2NO3 −+1.5(CH3COOH)→N2+3CO2+3H2O (Acetic Acid or Another Carbon Source) - The addition of carbon and a phosphate nutrient source results in the following preferred reaction occurring:
CO2+NH4 ++PO4 2−→C5H7NO2P0.03 (Bacteria) - In accordance with the present invention, the carbon may be added by adding at least one of acetic acid, sugar, sugar water, softdrink waste products, whey, yeast wastewater or any other practical carbon source.
- In accordance with various aspects of the invention, the added nutrients include phosphorus. Such phosphorus may be in the form of phosphate including phosphoric acid; however, the present invention is not so limited as other nutrients may be used. In preferred methods of operation, the phosphorus may be added so that the groundwater has a concentration of 0.2 to 0.8 mg/L of phosphate, however the present invention is not so limited as other phosphate levels may be used.
- In preferred methods of operation, the groundwater may be extracted at a location that is downgradient or cross-gradient of the location where the groundwater is injected back into the ground.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates the relative locations of an injection well labeled “2002-INJECT” and an extraction (i.e.: pumping) well “2002-PW1” and a plurality of/monitoring wells labeled “TH” or “MW”.FIG. 7 shows a cross sectional view through the ground of a system with an injection well labeled “INJECTION WELL” and an extraction well labeled “PUMPING WELL” used to illustrate the present nitrification process. In alternate aspects of the present invention, one or more extraction wells may be used for the removal of groundwater from the aquifer containing the nitrate. - As can be seen in
FIG. 1 , in preferred methods of operation, the groundwater is extracted at a location that is downgradient of the location where the groundwater is injected back into the ground, however, the present invention is not so limited as the ground water can be injected cross gradient from the position of the extraction well. - As can be seen in
FIG. 7 , the carbon and nutrients may be added to the ground water in an above ground structure (labeled the “REMEDIATION EQUIPMENT STORAGE SHED”). Alternately, however, the carbon and nutrients may instead be added to the ground water in one or more injection wells. - In further aspects of the invention, the effectiveness of the groundwater de-nitrification method is monitored by measuring carbon concentration and/or phosphate and/or nitrate concentrations in the groundwater. The addition of nutrients may be stopped if nutrients are found in extraction wells positioned downgradient from the reaction cell. Similarly, the addition of carbon may be stopped if carbon is found in monitoring wells positioned downgradient from the reaction cell.
- In further aspects of the invention, the effectiveness of the groundwater de-nitrification method may be monitored by measuring at least one of biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, and orthophosphate concentration. The addition of carbon and/or nutrients may be stopped if the biochemical oxygen demand or chemical oxygen demand or nutrients are found above background levels in a monitoring well located outside of the reaction cell.
- In further aspects of the invention, the effectiveness of the groundwater de-nitrification method is monitored by measuring at least one of the pH, dissolved oxygen concentration and temperature.
- In preferred aspects, such monitoring may be carried out in a monitoring well within the reaction cell. Alternately, such monitoring may be carried out in a monitoring well located outside of the reaction cell. Optionally, such monitoring may also be carried out in a extraction well located downgradient of an injection well.
- In accordance with the present invention, the carbon source or readily biodegradable carbon substrate is added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner. In various embodiments of the invention, the carbon source may include, but is not limited to, acetic acid, granulated or liquid sugar, sugar water, soft drink manufacturing waste products (e.g.: such as discarded cola or other soft drink products that do not meet manufacturers specs), whey, yeast wastewater, yeast product from beer production, or any other practical carbon source.
- The concentration of carbon being added to the groundwater may be varied under different circumstances such that the amount of carbon added will be that which is used to achieve de-nitrification. The concentration of readily biodegradable carbon substrate that is added to the groundwater can be modeled in a number of ways. For example, the mass flux of nitrate entering the reaction cell can be modeled and the stoichiometric carbon equivalent required to reduce the nitrate can then be added to the groundwater, with the groundwater being recirculated between the extraction well(s) and the injection wells. The stoichiometric carbon equivalent of the nitrate in the recirculated groundwater can also be added as specified in the above reactions. There are other numerous ways of calculating the amount of carbon to add. For example, down gradient groundwater samples could be monitored for the added carbon and the addition of carbon stopped if it is encountered down gradient of the reaction cell.
- In accordance with the present invention, the nutrient source is added to the extracted groundwater in a controlled manner. In various aspects, the nutrient source can be any phosphorus containing nutrient supply, and may include, but is not limited to, phosphoric acid. In those environments where nutrients may already exist (naturally or having been introduced), there may be situations where little or no nutrient addition may be required.
- The concentration of the nutrients to be added can be calculated stoichiometrically as above taking into account standard bacterial growth rates. In one preferred method of operation, the phosphorus concentration is maintained between 0.2 and 0.8 mg/L. There are other numerous ways of calculating the amount of nutrient to add. For example, down gradient groundwater samples could be monitored for the added nutrient and the addition of the nutrient stopped if it is encountered down gradient of the reaction cell.
- In accordance with the present invention, the carbon and nutrient (if required) amended groundwater is injected back into the aquifer, or above the aquifer into an unsaturated zone. This may be performed through the use of one or more injection wells. In various aspects of the invention, the injection well(s) can be located upgradient, downgradient or cross gradient from the extraction well(s). Moreover, there may be one or more injection wells for each extraction well. Moreover, the extraction wells do not have to be placed in a circular configuration around the injection well(s).
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a specific, non-limiting, embodiment of the present system (corresponding toFIG. 7 ) as tested by the present inventors in which the extraction well (2002-PW1) was located 22 m downgradient of the injection well (2002-INJECT). An advantage of this well configuration is that it ensured that enough carbon and nutrient contact occurs with the attached growth biomass in the reaction cell. For the particular soils involved, the inventors found the de-nitrification reaction cell size to be approximately 20 m, measured perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow halfway between the extraction well and injection well. This reaction cell size was achieved using an extraction/injection rate of 50 imperial gallons per minute (igpm). The groundwater gradient was 0.023, hydraulic conductivity approximately 50 m/day. The reaction cell size can be increased by increasing the distance between the injection well and extraction wells. For example, if the distance of separation is 70 m, then the reaction cell size is on the order of 60 m perpendicular to ground water flow direction. The maximum reaction cell size obtainable is the same as the zone occupied by the injected ground water. In this case the extraction well and the injection well zone of influence may not overlap. In both cases, given a constant extraction/injection rate, the reaction cell size increases with increasing hydraulic conductivity and decreasing groundwater gradient. - In accordance with the present invention, the effectiveness of the de-nitrification process can be measured by monitoring nitrate concentrations in monitoring wells located downgradient of the injection well(s). When the extraction well(s) is (are) located downgradient of the injection well(s), then the extraction well(s) may also be used to monitor nitrate concentrations. Such monitoring wells could be installed either inside and outside the reaction cell in order to assess the size of the de-nitrification cell.
- In accordance with the present invention, the effectiveness of the de-nitrification process can also be measured by monitoring biochemical and/or chemical oxygen demand (BOD and/or COD) and orthophosphate (both inside and outside of the reaction cell). For example, outside the reaction cell the concentration of BOD, COD and phosphate should be similar to background levels. In a preferred method of operation, the orthophosphate concentration is maintained at a concentration between 0.2 and 0.8 mg/L in the reaction cell. Preferably, both BOD and/or COD concentrations are commensurate to the calculated stoichiometric requirement based on the total mass of nitrate required for de-nitrification and the type of readily biodegradable substrate chosen. For example, the BOD and or COD added would double for the same substrate if the nitrate concentrations in the ground waters double. Moreover, since the BOD and/or COD of the same concentrations of different substrate is different, therefore the final amount of BOD and/or COD would change with different substrates. In preferred methods of operation, the pH, dissolved oxygen and temperature could also be measured. It is to be expected that the pH would increase in the reaction cell due to the de-nitrification process and the dissolved oxygen concentration would approach zero for effective denitrification to occur.
- In accordance with the present invention, the phosphate or BOD and/or COD may be measured in wells down gradient of the reaction cell. If the phosphate concentration or BOD and/or COD are detected at levels higher than background levels, then the addition of the nutrient and carbon could be stopped.
- The size of the reaction cell can be determined since both the carbon and nutrient levels in wells just outside the reaction cell should be similar to background levels. Therefore, nitrate could be measured inside and outside of the cell to assess denitrification kinetics.
- De-Nitrification—Bench Scale Testing
- The present inventors successfully performed a bench scale study to demonstrate the capabilities of naturally occurring bacteria at the site for their capacity to denitrify fully nitrified ammonia contaminated groundwater. To do this, contaminated ground water along with soils from the site were collected in order to study the feasibility of de-nitrifying fully nitrified groundwaters under batch conditions. Oxygen depleted nitrified groundwater was dispensed into 300 mL BOD bottles for subsequent denitrification experiments. A number of reactor conditions and controls were examined and their effect on denitrification assessed.
FIG. 8 shows the effect of these reactor conditions on nitrate concentrations, as follows. -
FIG. 8 illustrates decreasing nitrate concentrations over time. Specifically, the figure shows that the additional spike of acetate on June 16 resulted in the rapid denitrification under a variety of different batch conditions including, reactors amended with activated sludge (Sludge), soil from the site (Test), and soil with an initial small acetate spike (Acetate soil). It also shows that in experiments where no acetate was added (Acetate no soil, no soil control, killed) denitrification was not apparent. - De-Nitrification—Field Scale Testing
- Following the bench scale testing, the present inventors successfully performed a field scale treatment test. Table 2 and
FIGS. 9 and 10 illustrate the success of the field test (using the well layout ofFIG. 1 ), as follows. - Table 2 illustrates the experimental results achieved, showing nitrate concentration reductions at various monitoring wells inside the reaction cell. In addition,
FIG. 9 illustrates nitrate reductions at a representative monitoring well TH1 within the reaction cell during the nitrification process.FIG. 10 illustrates parameters at a representative monitoring well TH41 outside of the reaction cell during the de-nitrification process. - (c) Geological Setting Requirements
- The present nitrification and de-nitrification remediation methods are especially applicable under site conditions where the hydraulic conductivity is relatively high, such as in sand and sandy gravel deposits. However, it is to be understood that the present remediation methods may be used in any unconsolidated sediment type where there is relatively high hydraulic conductivity. The present invention is not so limited, as the present ground water remediation method may be used in relatively high hydraulic conductivity bedrock deposits such as vugular limestones/dolomites, fractured formations and any other lithologic bedrock.
- An advantage of operating the present system in soils with relatively high hydraulic conductivity is that the reaction cell size of the injection wells can be maximized, and the number of injection wells can be minimized, thus resulting in lower cost systems. The reaction cell size in the vicinity the injection wells may optimally be determined using widely recognized aquifer testing methods (including, but not limited to: pump testing and zone of influence assessment, numeric approximation, computer modeling, etc.).
- High hydraulic conductivity sediments/bedrock will have wide zones of influence while low hydraulic conductively sediments/bedrock will have narrow zones of influence. Similarly, high hydraulic conductivity sediments/bedrock can accommodate injection of relatively large volumes of water, thereby providing for significant treatment of water, while low hydraulic conductively sediments/bedrock cannot accommodate injection of large volumes of water.
- In the preferred nitrification method, the zone of influence of the oxygen and nutrient amended water may also be estimated based upon advective transport models of the injected water.
- In the preferred de-nitrification method, the zone of influence of the carbon and nutrient amended water may also be estimated based upon advective transport models of the injected water. High hydraulic conductivity sediments/bedrock have wide zones of influence while low hydraulic conductively sediments/bedrock have narrow zones of influence.
TABLE 1.0 In-situ Nitrification Reaction: NH4 + + 7/6 O2 → NO3 − + 2H+ + H2O Field Results Monitoring Wells Inside Reaction Cell Ammonia concentration (mg-N/L) Well Pre nitrification After nitrification % Reduction TH1 47.00 (1) 11.75 75 TH2 52.00 (2) 12.25 76.4 TH3 ˜50 16.00 68 TH5 50.25 (2) 13.75 72.6 TH6 51.50 (1) 12.00 76.7 TH7 50.00 (2) 10.75 78.5 TH9 ˜50 12.00 76 TH10 52.00 (2) 15.00 71.2 TH11 ∫50 11.75 76.5 TH12 50.75 (2) 17.00 66.5 TH13 57.50 (1) 6.00 89.6 TH14 58.00 (1) 12.25 78.9 TH15 45.25 (1) 21.50 72.9 2002PWI 57.75 (1) 12.25 78.8 Monitoring Wells Outside Reaction Cell Ammonia concentration (mg-N/L) Well Pre nitrification After nitrification % Reduction TH4 47.00 (1) 49.25 NA TH8 52.00 (2) 58.0 NA 2002MW40 43.0 (1) 39.25 NA 2002MW41 30.0 (1) 49.0 NA
Notes
1. Sampled first day of testing
2. Sampled tenth day of testing
-
TABLE 2.0 In-situ Denitrification Reaction: 2NO3 − + 1.5(CH3COOH) → N2 + 3CO2 + 3H2O Acetic acid or another carbon source Field Results Monitoring Wells Inside Reaction Cell Nitrate concentration (mg-N/L) Well Pre denitrifcation After denitrification % Reduction TH1 63 0.5 99 TH2 58 0.8 98.6 TH3 66 0.2 99.7 TH5 56 12.1 78.4 TH6 66 0.5 99.2 TH7 57 0.5 99.1 TH9 63 0.6 99 TH10 57 0.6 98.9 TH11 59 0.8 98.6 TH12 56 9.0 83.9 TH13 55 4.6 91.6 TH14 61 0.5 99.2 Monitoring Wells Outside Reaction Cell Nitrate concentration (mg-N/L) Well Pre denitrification After denitrification % Reduction TH4 50 53 NA TH8 54 30 NA TH15 58 18 NA 2002MW41 42 52 NA
Claims (37)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/090,380 US7407583B2 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2005-03-25 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
PCT/CA2005/000931 WO2005123610A1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2005-06-16 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
CA002610722A CA2610722C (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2005-06-16 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
US12/174,078 US20090026134A1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2008-07-16 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US58041504P | 2004-06-16 | 2004-06-16 | |
US11/090,380 US7407583B2 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2005-03-25 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/174,078 Division US20090026134A1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2008-07-16 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060213830A1 US20060213830A1 (en) | 2006-09-28 |
US20070221573A2 true US20070221573A2 (en) | 2007-09-27 |
US7407583B2 US7407583B2 (en) | 2008-08-05 |
Family
ID=35509579
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/090,380 Expired - Fee Related US7407583B2 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2005-03-25 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
US12/174,078 Abandoned US20090026134A1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2008-07-16 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/174,078 Abandoned US20090026134A1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2008-07-16 | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7407583B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2610722C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005123610A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060086663A1 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-04-27 | Chowdhury Ajit K | System and method for remediaton of soil and groundwater |
US20090242482A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Gerardo Buelna | Method of biofiltration of a liquid effluent |
US20100032378A1 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2010-02-11 | O'brien Philip Patrick Peter | Effluent treatment process |
US11150166B2 (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2021-10-19 | Tsinghua University | Method for sampling groundwater |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8826975B2 (en) | 2011-04-12 | 2014-09-09 | Glori Energy Inc. | Systems and methods of microbial enhanced oil recovery |
WO2012158300A1 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2012-11-22 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | In situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater using electron acceptor salts |
US8580114B2 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2013-11-12 | Kleinfelder West, Inc. | Processes for remediation of contaminant plumes |
US8783345B2 (en) | 2011-06-22 | 2014-07-22 | Glori Energy Inc. | Microbial enhanced oil recovery delivery systems and methods |
CN103630659B (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2015-06-24 | 上海市环境科学研究院 | Simulation test device and simulation test method for in-situ chemical and biological remediation of underground water |
WO2014207198A1 (en) * | 2013-06-28 | 2014-12-31 | Krüger A/S | An apparatus for treating raw water by microbial nitrification |
BR112017019795A2 (en) * | 2015-03-17 | 2018-05-29 | Tetra Tech | ? system and method to remedy a site? |
CN108117165B (en) * | 2016-11-29 | 2021-02-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for treating ammonia-containing wastewater |
CN111592184A (en) * | 2020-05-25 | 2020-08-28 | 苏州鑫泷生态环境有限公司 | Method for treating sewage by utilizing efficient microorganisms |
CN112462700B (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2021-09-14 | 西安热工研究院有限公司 | Intelligent chemical water working condition control system and method for power plant |
NL2028515B1 (en) * | 2021-06-22 | 2022-12-29 | Im Aces B V | A method to treat liquid manure |
Citations (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7524A (en) * | 1850-07-30 | Stanchion for cattle | ||
US46972A (en) * | 1865-03-21 | Improvement in mallets | ||
US66761A (en) * | 1867-07-16 | Carriage-curtain button-holes | ||
US134733A (en) * | 1873-01-14 | Improvement in foot-rests for chairs | ||
US3846290A (en) * | 1972-09-29 | 1974-11-05 | Sun Research Development | Reclamation of hydrocarbon contaminated ground waters |
US4401569A (en) * | 1981-07-09 | 1983-08-30 | Groundwater Decontamination Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for treating hydrocarbon and halogenated hydrocarbon contaminated ground and ground water |
US4683064A (en) * | 1984-01-16 | 1987-07-28 | Hallberg Rolf O | Process for decreasing the nitrate content in water |
US4749491A (en) * | 1987-04-02 | 1988-06-07 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Microbiological decomposition of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons |
US5178491A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-01-12 | International Technology Corporation | Vapor-phase nutrient delivery system for in situ bioremediation of soil |
US5221159A (en) * | 1990-03-28 | 1993-06-22 | Environmental Improvement Technologies, Inc. | Subsurface contaminant remediation, biodegradation and extraction methods and apparatuses |
US5384048A (en) * | 1992-08-27 | 1995-01-24 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Bioremediation of contaminated groundwater |
US5480549A (en) * | 1994-01-25 | 1996-01-02 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Method for phosphate-accelerated bioremediation |
US5653288A (en) * | 1990-03-28 | 1997-08-05 | Billings; Jeffery F. | Contaminant remediation, biodegradation and volatilization methods and apparatuses |
US5829918A (en) * | 1994-03-24 | 1998-11-03 | Chintis; Candice | Method and apparatus for remediating contamination in soils |
US5975800A (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 1999-11-02 | Haley & Aldrich, Inc. | Method for directing groundwater flow and treating groundwater in situ |
US6312605B1 (en) * | 1995-05-05 | 2001-11-06 | William B. Kerfoot | Gas-gas-water treatment for groundwater and soil remediation |
US20030029792A1 (en) * | 2001-05-18 | 2003-02-13 | Kerfoot William B. | Environmental remediation method and apparatus |
US6524842B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2003-02-25 | Envirogen, Inc. | Biodegradation of gasoline oxygenates |
US20030037924A1 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2003-02-27 | Ellis Mark T. | Remediation method |
US6551815B1 (en) * | 1997-05-09 | 2003-04-22 | University Of New Mexico | In situ denitrification |
US6572773B1 (en) * | 1998-10-27 | 2003-06-03 | The Manchester Metropolitan University | Nitrification process |
US6599425B2 (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2003-07-29 | National Research Council Of Canada | Bioremediation of nitrate contaminated groundwater |
US20040245173A1 (en) * | 2003-05-14 | 2004-12-09 | University Of Utah | Submerged ammonia removal system and method |
US20060086663A1 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-04-27 | Chowdhury Ajit K | System and method for remediaton of soil and groundwater |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2622567B1 (en) | 1987-11-04 | 1991-01-18 | Gestion Sa Fse Et | METHOD FOR IN SITU ANOXIC DETOXIFICATION OF CONTAMINATED SUBTERRANEAN TABLECLOTHS |
GB9104510D0 (en) * | 1991-03-04 | 1991-04-17 | Robertson William | Dinitrification of septic tank effluent |
US5534147A (en) * | 1995-02-01 | 1996-07-09 | Fluidyne, Incorporated | Apparatus and method for modifying waste water |
US5855775A (en) | 1995-05-05 | 1999-01-05 | Kerfoot; William B. | Microporous diffusion apparatus |
US20020117445A1 (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2002-08-29 | Whiteman G. Robert | Fermentation systems, methods, and apparatus |
US6391184B1 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 2002-05-21 | H2O Technologies, Ltd. | Decontamination method and system, such as an in-situ groundwater decontamination system, producing dissolved oxygen and reactive initiators |
US6398958B1 (en) * | 2000-03-08 | 2002-06-04 | Waste Management, Inc. | Facultative landfill bioreactor |
US6561497B2 (en) | 2000-10-03 | 2003-05-13 | William A. Newman | Bioremediation system |
AU2002361650A1 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2003-06-30 | Environmental Operating Solutions, Inc. | Process and apparatus for waste water treatment |
US20060094106A1 (en) * | 2002-03-25 | 2006-05-04 | Priester Lamar E Iii | Biodegradation of subsurface contaminants by injection of gaseous microbial metabolic inducer |
US6787034B2 (en) | 2002-07-12 | 2004-09-07 | Remediation Products, Inc. | Compositions for removing hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons from contaminated environments |
US7442313B2 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2008-10-28 | Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc | Environmental remediation method and system |
-
2005
- 2005-03-25 US US11/090,380 patent/US7407583B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-06-16 WO PCT/CA2005/000931 patent/WO2005123610A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-06-16 CA CA002610722A patent/CA2610722C/en active Active
-
2008
- 2008-07-16 US US12/174,078 patent/US20090026134A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7524A (en) * | 1850-07-30 | Stanchion for cattle | ||
US46972A (en) * | 1865-03-21 | Improvement in mallets | ||
US66761A (en) * | 1867-07-16 | Carriage-curtain button-holes | ||
US134733A (en) * | 1873-01-14 | Improvement in foot-rests for chairs | ||
US3846290A (en) * | 1972-09-29 | 1974-11-05 | Sun Research Development | Reclamation of hydrocarbon contaminated ground waters |
US4401569A (en) * | 1981-07-09 | 1983-08-30 | Groundwater Decontamination Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for treating hydrocarbon and halogenated hydrocarbon contaminated ground and ground water |
US4683064A (en) * | 1984-01-16 | 1987-07-28 | Hallberg Rolf O | Process for decreasing the nitrate content in water |
US4749491A (en) * | 1987-04-02 | 1988-06-07 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Microbiological decomposition of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons |
US5653288A (en) * | 1990-03-28 | 1997-08-05 | Billings; Jeffery F. | Contaminant remediation, biodegradation and volatilization methods and apparatuses |
US5221159A (en) * | 1990-03-28 | 1993-06-22 | Environmental Improvement Technologies, Inc. | Subsurface contaminant remediation, biodegradation and extraction methods and apparatuses |
US5178491A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-01-12 | International Technology Corporation | Vapor-phase nutrient delivery system for in situ bioremediation of soil |
US5384048A (en) * | 1992-08-27 | 1995-01-24 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Bioremediation of contaminated groundwater |
US5480549A (en) * | 1994-01-25 | 1996-01-02 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Method for phosphate-accelerated bioremediation |
US5829918A (en) * | 1994-03-24 | 1998-11-03 | Chintis; Candice | Method and apparatus for remediating contamination in soils |
US6312605B1 (en) * | 1995-05-05 | 2001-11-06 | William B. Kerfoot | Gas-gas-water treatment for groundwater and soil remediation |
US5975800A (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 1999-11-02 | Haley & Aldrich, Inc. | Method for directing groundwater flow and treating groundwater in situ |
US6551815B1 (en) * | 1997-05-09 | 2003-04-22 | University Of New Mexico | In situ denitrification |
US6572773B1 (en) * | 1998-10-27 | 2003-06-03 | The Manchester Metropolitan University | Nitrification process |
US6524842B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2003-02-25 | Envirogen, Inc. | Biodegradation of gasoline oxygenates |
US6599425B2 (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2003-07-29 | National Research Council Of Canada | Bioremediation of nitrate contaminated groundwater |
US20030037924A1 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2003-02-27 | Ellis Mark T. | Remediation method |
US20030029792A1 (en) * | 2001-05-18 | 2003-02-13 | Kerfoot William B. | Environmental remediation method and apparatus |
US20040245173A1 (en) * | 2003-05-14 | 2004-12-09 | University Of Utah | Submerged ammonia removal system and method |
US20060086663A1 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-04-27 | Chowdhury Ajit K | System and method for remediaton of soil and groundwater |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060086663A1 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-04-27 | Chowdhury Ajit K | System and method for remediaton of soil and groundwater |
US7497948B2 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2009-03-03 | Rmt, Inc. | Method for remediation of soil and groundwater |
US20090242482A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Gerardo Buelna | Method of biofiltration of a liquid effluent |
US7887706B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2011-02-15 | Gerardo Buelna | Method of biofiltration of a liquid effluent |
US20100032378A1 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2010-02-11 | O'brien Philip Patrick Peter | Effluent treatment process |
US11150166B2 (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2021-10-19 | Tsinghua University | Method for sampling groundwater |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7407583B2 (en) | 2008-08-05 |
CA2610722A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
WO2005123610A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
CA2610722C (en) | 2009-12-22 |
US20060213830A1 (en) | 2006-09-28 |
US20090026134A1 (en) | 2009-01-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7407583B2 (en) | In-situ groundwater nitrification and de-nitrification remediation system | |
Hiscock et al. | Review of natural and artificial denitrification of groundwater | |
Cui et al. | Removal of nutrients from wastewater with Canna indica L. under different vertical-flow constructed wetland conditions | |
Saeed et al. | Enhanced denitrification and organics removal in hybrid wetland columns: comparative experiments | |
US7329349B2 (en) | Water treatment | |
Janda et al. | In situ denitrification of drinking water | |
CN101792244B (en) | Nitrite type nitrification-reactive sludge, manufacturing method thereof, manufacturing device thereof and waste water treatment method and apparatus | |
Wang et al. | Enhancing nitrogen removal via the complete autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite process in a modified single-stage tidal flow constructed wetland | |
US6551815B1 (en) | In situ denitrification | |
Zhou et al. | Nutrient removal, methane and nitrous oxide emissions in a hybrid constructed wetland treating anaerobic digestate | |
Zhang et al. | The innovative application of agriculture straw in in situ field permeable reactive barrier for remediating nitrate-contaminated groundwater in grain-production areas | |
CN105152330B (en) | A kind of processing method for percolate | |
Dahab et al. | Nitrate reduction by in-situ bio-denitrification in groundwater | |
Garrell et al. | Effects of hypolimnetic aeration on nitrogen and phosphorus in a eutrophic lake | |
Chen et al. | Efficient nitrogen removal from onsite wastewater by a novel continuous flow biofilter | |
KR100464110B1 (en) | Sewage disposal apparatus | |
US6599425B2 (en) | Bioremediation of nitrate contaminated groundwater | |
JP2003024986A (en) | Biological denitrification method and biological denitrification apparatus | |
CN107879477A (en) | Collapsible multistage Inner electrolysis drowned flow artificial wet land | |
Liu et al. | Influence of saturated zone depth and vegetation on the performance of vertical flow-constructed wetland with continuous feeding | |
Xiong et al. | Enhanced performance of pilot-scale hybrid constructed wetlands with A/O reactor in raw domestic sewage treatment | |
Wang et al. | Synergistic effects of natural ventilation and animal disturbance on oxygen transfer, pollutants removal and microbial activity in constructed wetlands | |
Wang et al. | Nitrogen removal and abundances of associated functional genes in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere of a vertical flow constructed wetland in response to salinity | |
CN105016467B (en) | A kind of device for landfill leachate treatment | |
Dahab | Comparison and evaluation of in-situ bio-denitrification systems for nitrate reduction in groundwater |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL LLP, CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAILATH, STEPHEN B.;CHU, ANN CHIEN;REEL/FRAME:021141/0887;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080606 TO 20080624 Owner name: UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL LLP, CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAILATH, STEPHEN B.;CHU, ANN CHIEN;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080606 TO 20080624;REEL/FRAME:021141/0887 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment |
Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |