US20070268025A1 - Damage detection system - Google Patents
Damage detection system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070268025A1 US20070268025A1 US11/437,237 US43723706A US2007268025A1 US 20070268025 A1 US20070268025 A1 US 20070268025A1 US 43723706 A US43723706 A US 43723706A US 2007268025 A1 US2007268025 A1 US 2007268025A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- transmitter
- processor
- transmitters
- vehicle
- aircraft
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/08—Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
- G07C5/0808—Diagnosing performance data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/008—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles communicating information to a remotely located station
Definitions
- This invention is generally directed to damage detection and evaluation systems, and, more particularly to aircraft damage detection and evaluation systems that use a plurality of wireless transmitters.
- Identification of damaged locations in a system or on a vehicle is commonly dependent upon operator perception and analysis. Often, an operator is unable to adequately perceive the entire damaged location due to dynamic system movement or limited field of vision. For example, a machine operator may not be able to see a portion of the machine because it may be blocked by other parts of the machine or workers. Additionally, poor lighting may contribute to inadequate perception of the operator.
- sensors for secondary systems or subsystems may have a sensor that reports hydraulic pressure available. When the available hydraulic pressure drops below a normal operating pressure, the operator may know that there is a malfunction or damage in the hydraulic system.
- sensors for other subsystems may include, but are not limited to, electrical systems, pneumatic systems, navigation systems, etc.
- Systems that are particularly susceptible to this type of problem include vehicles, and specifically include aircraft. Often a pilot of an aircraft is confined to a cockpit area that has a limited field of view. The pilot must rely almost exclusively on instrument readings that are reported to the cockpit. However, the pilot may also perceive vibrations through the aircraft. Should an aircraft be involved in a collision, with a bird for example, the pilot may not be able to ascertain the full extent of damage to the aircraft until after landing. This is often too late.
- Aircraft are generally designed with certain safety features that may isolate aircraft systems in the case of an emergency.
- the pilots often have no indication of potential system failure due to aircraft damage until system resources are depleted.
- small arms fire may be a threat to the aircraft.
- a bullet pierces the body of the aircraft and damages a hydraulic line thereby creating a small leak in the hydraulic system
- the pilot may have no indication of the damage for several minutes or longer.
- the hydraulic system may be losing hydraulic fluid and the fluid may not be replaceable.
- the hydraulic system may be depleted of fluid potentially causing even more serious problems.
- the pilot were aware of the slow leak, the pilot may be able to isolate a portion of the hydraulic system that includes the leak, thus preserving the hydraulic fluid for the rest of the hydraulic system.
- the present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems or disadvantages associated with the prior art.
- a damage detection system includes a processor and at least one transmitter communicatively connected to the processor.
- the transmitter sends a signal to the processor and the processor may be programmed to assign a spatial coordinate to the transmitter.
- the processor may be further programmed to identify a transmitter location as damaged when the transmitter fails to send the signal.
- a method of identifying a damaged location includes attaching a plurality of remotely powered transmitters to a vehicle, and each of the plurality of transmitters is adapted to send a signal to a processor.
- the method may further include providing remote power to the plurality of transmitters, thereby causing each of the plurality of transmitters to send the signal to the processor.
- the processor may then assign spatial coordinates to each of the plurality of transmitters and may monitor the plurality of transmitters to identify non-functioning transmitters.
- the processor may determine a damaged location by identifying an area of the vehicle based upon the spatial coordinates assigned to any non-functioning transmitter.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of an exemplary aircraft
- FIG. 2 is a top perspective view of the aircraft of FIG. 1 showing locations of a plurality of remote transmitters which comprise a damage detection system;
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the damage detection system of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4 is an example of tabulated data that may be compiled by the damage detection system of FIG. 3 .
- Damage detection systems may be employed on vehicles such as an aircraft.
- damage detection systems such as the systems disclosed herein, can easily be adapted for use on any type of vehicle, for example, a car, a truck, a tank, a submarine, an airship, a space vehicle, a ship, or virtually any other type of vehicle.
- damage detection systems may be especially useful for combat aircraft.
- an aircraft 10 generally includes a cockpit or flight deck 12 from which one or more pilots controls the aircraft 10 .
- the pilot's view of the aircraft 10 is obscured by the body 14 of the aircraft 10 . Accordingly, the pilot is unable to view large portions of the aircraft 10 , for example, the underside of the wings 16 , the landing gear 18 , and/or the empennage 20 .
- the pilots must rely on system instrumentation indications, such as hydraulic pressure, electrical volts and amperes, pneumatic pressures, etc., to alert the pilots to potential damage on the aircraft 10 .
- the aircraft 10 in FIG. 1 is shown as an example of a vehicle that may use the damage detection system. Virtually any vehicle could use such a system, for example, automobiles, ships, submarines, helicopters, trucks, earth moving equipment, spacecraft, etc.
- FIG. 2 shows the aircraft of FIG. 1 having a damage detection system.
- the damage detection system includes a processor 30 located in the aircraft 10 and a plurality of transmitters 32 arranged on the aircraft 10 at various locations. While FIG. 2 shows only certain locations having transmitters 32 , the entire aircraft 10 could be substantially covered with such transmitters 32 . Additionally, transmitters 32 may be located at certain critical locations within the body of the aircraft 10 itself to enhance early detection of damage to internal aircraft systems.
- the transmitters 32 may communicate with the processor 30 by sending a coded signal to the processor 30 continuously or periodically.
- the processor 30 may be programmed to decode the signal and determine the location of the transmitter 32 that sent the signal.
- the processor 30 may monitor all of the transmitters 32 and if a transmitter 32 fails to send the expected signal, the processor 30 may alert the pilot and identify the location of the transmitter 32 as a damaged location. The processor 30 may also determine if the transmitter 32 is simply malfunctioning, in which case, the processor 32 may simply remove the transmitter 32 from the system. As shown in FIG. 2 , the damage detection system may allow the pilots to monitor the entire aircraft 10 without needing the ability to visually observe each part of the aircraft 10 .
- FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of the damage detection system.
- Each of the transmitters 32 transmits a signal to the processor 30 .
- the transmitters 32 first transmit the signal to a node 34 which summarizes signal data from a group 36 of transmitters 32 .
- the transmitters 32 may be assigned to certain groups 36 based on location or based on system type. For example, transmitters 32 placed on a wing structural component may be assigned to one group while transmitters 32 inside the wing on a hydraulic line may be assigned to another group.
- the nodes 34 may act as intermediaries between the transmitters 32 and the processor 30 . This arrangement of nodes 34 may speed up transmission of the signals and may minimize processing time to analyze the signals.
- the transmitters 32 preferably communicate with the processor 30 wirelessly. However, the transmitters 32 could be wired to the processor 30 if desired. Additionally, where nodes 34 are employed, the transmitters 32 preferably communicate wirelessly with the node 34 which in turn communicates wirelessly with the processor 30 . However, in certain locations, it may be advantageous for the transmitters 32 to be wired to the node 34 .
- the transmitters 32 may either generate power internally, or rely on an excitement signal for power.
- the transmitters 32 may be piezo-electric in nature and generate power from vibrations of the aircraft 10 .
- the piezo-electric transmitters may be chips that generate approximately 100 microcoulombs of electricity which may be stored temporarily in a capacitor. This amount of power is sufficient to generate and transmit the signal to the processor 30 . Because an aircraft, or any vehicle, constantly generates vibrational energy, a virtually endless energy supply exists for the transmitters 32 .
- the transmitters 32 may be radio frequency stimulated (e.g., RFID tags).
- the processor 30 may send out a radio frequency signal to the transmitters 32 which reflect back a signal to the processor 30 .
- This arrangement is especially desirable for combat aircraft where the pilot may select a scanning time based on potential threats. For example, the pilot may only scan the aircraft 10 on egress after a mission to avoid potential detection by enemy anti-aircraft systems.
- a wireless system is much lighter than a like wired system.
- a wireless system is desirable over a wired system for an aircraft 10 because any reduction in empty weight of an aircraft 10 results in a corresponding increase in payload available.
- one transmitter 32 fails, there is no doubt as to whether the transmitter 32 itself failed or the wiring between the transmitter and the processor has broken because there is no wire to break.
- such wireless systems are very easily scaled and adaptable. For example, if an external fuel tank is added to an aircraft after an initial production, one or more transmitters 32 may simply be added to the external fuel tank and the programming of the processor 30 updated accordingly. Similar modifications could be made to the wireless system after repair or replacement of a component of after a rebuild of the wireless system.
- transmitters may exist, for example, solar power or wind power.
- the means of powering the transmitters 32 is not limiting so long as the transmitters 32 are able to transmit the signal to the processor 30 .
- the damage detection system may use power scavenging chips as transmitters, the transmitters are not limited to a chip-like configuration and could vary widely in size and shape as long as the transmitters are able to send a signal to the processor.
- FIG. 4 shows an example of data that may be generated by the processor 30 in response to signals sent from the transmitters 32 .
- the data is only shown in table form for ease of reading and explanation.
- the processor 30 does not actually need to tabulate the data before analysis.
- the table 100 includes several columns of information.
- the first column 110 shows an identification number assigned to the individual transmitter 32 .
- the second column 112 shows a System ID, which corresponds to a particular aircraft system to which the transmitter 32 is assigned.
- the System ID of “1000” shown in the figure may correspond to a structural member, such as a wing, tail, fuselage, etc.
- Other systems can be identified as well, for example, a System ID of “2000” may correspond to an engine, a System ID of “3000” may correspond to the hydraulic system, a System ID of “4000” may correspond to the electrical system, etc.
- this labeling system allows for various sub-system identifiers as well.
- a System ID of “2100” may correspond to the #1 engine
- a System ID of “2110” may correspond to the fuel control unit of the #1 engine.
- the System ID's may be kept very general or be made extremely specific based on user requirements, the complexity of the aircraft or vehicle and/or the number of transmitters employed in the system.
- Columns 114 - 118 show the X, Y, and Z spatial coordinates assigned to the transmitter 32 . These spatial coordinates may be assigned to the transmitter 32 at installation by exciting the system and recording the location of each transmitter 32 based on a reference location. Thereafter, the processor 30 is able to correlate a particular spatial coordinate to a particular location on the aircraft or vehicle.
- the Assigned Size column 120 shows how large an area is assigned to each transmitter 32 . The assigned size may depend on the proximity of other transmitters 32 . For example, transmitters 32 that are placed 1 inch apart may be assigned a size of one inch square.
- the Transmitting column 122 simply shows whether the particular transmitter 32 is sending the processor 30 a signal.
- the Damage Data table 130 shows a summary of data for a non-functional transmitter 32 .
- the non-functional transmitter's 32 spatial coordinates are shown in columns 132 - 136 .
- the processor may be programmed to identify the area bounded by the spatial coordinates in columns 132 - 136 as the damaged area.
- the system column 138 shows that this particular transmitter 32 was assigned to a structure group meaning that the transmitter 32 was attached to a structure of the aircraft 10 as opposed to a sub-system.
- the information in column 138 corresponds to the System ID information of column 112 of table 100 .
- the size column 140 shows that the area assigned to this particular transmitter is 0.1 inches square.
- the information from the Damage Data table 130 may be available to the processor 30 for further analysis.
- the processor 30 may be programmed to analyze the data from the Damage Data table 130 for assessing structural integrity of the aircraft 10 . After identifying the damage area, the processor may compare the damage area to structural information about the aircraft 10 and the processor 30 may determine whether the aircraft 10 remains airworthy based on the location and size of the damaged area. For example, should the size and location of the damage area indicate that a wing spar can no longer support its design load, the aircraft 10 should be subjected to only limited maneuvering until an appropriate repair is made. The processor 30 may further analyze the damage location to determine whether any sub-systems may be affected. For example, should the damage area be in the vicinity of a hydraulic line, the processor 30 may prompt the pilot to accomplish a particular checklist or to isolate the hydraulic system in the vicinity of the damage area if possible.
- the processor 30 may immediately notify the pilot (or vehicle operator) through some sort of alert system, e.g., visual or aural alerts in the cockpit. The pilot may then take appropriate action based on the possible loss of the critical sub-system.
- some sort of alert system e.g., visual or aural alerts in the cockpit. The pilot may then take appropriate action based on the possible loss of the critical sub-system.
- the processor 30 may be further programmed to infer potentially affected sub-systems or components based on two separate damage areas. For example, a projectile may enter a bottom portion of a wing and exit through a top portion of the wing. Should the damage detection system only have transmitters 32 disposed on the outer surfaces of the aircraft, the processor 30 may interpolate between the upper and lower damage locations to determine whether any sub-systems within the wing structure may have been damaged.
- the damage detection system disclosed herein requires very little processing power due to the fact that only a limited amount of data is required for transmission.
- Each of the transmitters 32 may essentially send an identity code that can be a single number, and the processor 30 has stored the location and system data assigned to each particular transmitter 32 . Data storage requirements for such a system are small as well. This limited amount of data also enables very fast processing times and simple programming for cross-referencing of each transmitter 32 . As a result, damage detection systems described herein are relatively inexpensive and very light weight.
- the processor 30 may transmit the damage data to a ground station for further analysis.
- a maintenance technician may have access to the damage data and may recommend actions or procedures in addition to the actions and procedures recommended by the on-board damage detection system.
- the maintenance personnel may have additional time to prepare for potential repairs to the aircraft 10 before the aircraft 10 arrives at a maintenance station, thus saving valuable time and enabling a faster repair of the aircraft 10 . This ability may prove critical in a war fighting situation.
- maintenance personnel may be able to determine an ideal repair facility to direct the aircraft 10 to should repair facilities with different capabilities be available. For example, if two repair facilities are available, but only one has a sheet metal shop, an aircraft with sheet metal damage should be directed to this particular repair facility if it is safe to do so.
- the transmitters 32 may be individually attached to the aircraft with an adhesive, or for smaller transmitter sizes, via brushing, spraying or spreading the transmitters over the selected surface.
- the transmitters 32 may be integrated into the structures during fabrication of the structures.
- the transmitters 32 may be mixed with or bonded into raw material prior to forming a particular structural element, such as a wing or a tail.
- the transmitters 32 may be bonded between layers of a laminated structural element.
- a malfunctioning transmitter 32 may be “locked out” of the system. In other words, malfunctioning transmitters 32 may simply be ignored by the processor 30 . Additionally, malfunctioning transmitters are easily replaced because the processor need only be updated to recognize the identity of each new transmitter 32 . The spatial coordinates of the old transmitter 32 may then simply be assigned to the new transmitter 32 .
- this information may be sent to other aircraft systems for further analysis.
- the damage area information may be sent to the fuel management system which may account for extra drag associated with the damage area.
- the navigation system may update the maximum range of the aircraft 10 and inform the pilot if the original destination is unreachable with the added drag.
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention is generally directed to damage detection and evaluation systems, and, more particularly to aircraft damage detection and evaluation systems that use a plurality of wireless transmitters.
- 2. Background Description
- Identification of damaged locations in a system or on a vehicle is commonly dependent upon operator perception and analysis. Often, an operator is unable to adequately perceive the entire damaged location due to dynamic system movement or limited field of vision. For example, a machine operator may not be able to see a portion of the machine because it may be blocked by other parts of the machine or workers. Additionally, poor lighting may contribute to inadequate perception of the operator.
- Quite often, the operator must rely on sensors for secondary systems or subsystems to obtain information relating to possible system damage. For example, a machine may have a sensor that reports hydraulic pressure available. When the available hydraulic pressure drops below a normal operating pressure, the operator may know that there is a malfunction or damage in the hydraulic system. Of course, sensors for other subsystems may include, but are not limited to, electrical systems, pneumatic systems, navigation systems, etc.
- Systems that are particularly susceptible to this type of problem include vehicles, and specifically include aircraft. Often a pilot of an aircraft is confined to a cockpit area that has a limited field of view. The pilot must rely almost exclusively on instrument readings that are reported to the cockpit. However, the pilot may also perceive vibrations through the aircraft. Should an aircraft be involved in a collision, with a bird for example, the pilot may not be able to ascertain the full extent of damage to the aircraft until after landing. This is often too late.
- Aircraft are generally designed with certain safety features that may isolate aircraft systems in the case of an emergency. However, the pilots often have no indication of potential system failure due to aircraft damage until system resources are depleted. For example, during combat, small arms fire may be a threat to the aircraft. If a bullet pierces the body of the aircraft and damages a hydraulic line thereby creating a small leak in the hydraulic system, the pilot may have no indication of the damage for several minutes or longer. During this time, the hydraulic system may be losing hydraulic fluid and the fluid may not be replaceable. Eventually, the hydraulic system may be depleted of fluid potentially causing even more serious problems. However, if the pilot were aware of the slow leak, the pilot may be able to isolate a portion of the hydraulic system that includes the leak, thus preserving the hydraulic fluid for the rest of the hydraulic system.
- One well known incident involved a commercial aircraft crash at Sioux City Iowa. In this incident, an engine failure ruptured lines of all three hydraulic systems causing a total loss of hydraulic pressure to the aircraft. Had the pilots been aware of the damage to the hydraulic systems soon after the failure of the engine, they may have been able to isolate the damaged area before the total failure of the hydraulic system.
- The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems or disadvantages associated with the prior art.
- Systems have been developed which sense positions of certain components. For example, a method of sensing position for a workpiece and a tool that performs a manufacturing operation on the workpiece is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,612, assigned to The Boeing Company, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. This method includes measuring at least three discrete point positions associated with a first component by using a transmitter having a known position and orientation and in a line of sight with the three distinct point positions. The three distinct point positions have known distances relative to one another. The method computes a current position and orientation of the first component using data provided by the transmitter and the three distinct point positions, along with position and orientation data from a last known location of the first component. The method assumes no sudden position changes for the first component. While this method tracks and senses position of certain components, the method does not detect or analyze damaged locations.
- A damage detection system is described herein that includes a processor and at least one transmitter communicatively connected to the processor. The transmitter sends a signal to the processor and the processor may be programmed to assign a spatial coordinate to the transmitter. The processor may be further programmed to identify a transmitter location as damaged when the transmitter fails to send the signal.
- A method of identifying a damaged location is also described herein. The method includes attaching a plurality of remotely powered transmitters to a vehicle, and each of the plurality of transmitters is adapted to send a signal to a processor. The method may further include providing remote power to the plurality of transmitters, thereby causing each of the plurality of transmitters to send the signal to the processor. The processor may then assign spatial coordinates to each of the plurality of transmitters and may monitor the plurality of transmitters to identify non-functioning transmitters. The processor may determine a damaged location by identifying an area of the vehicle based upon the spatial coordinates assigned to any non-functioning transmitter.
- The features, functions, and advantages can be achieved independently in various embodiments of the present invention or may be combined in yet other embodiments.
-
FIG. 1 is a side view of an exemplary aircraft; -
FIG. 2 , is a top perspective view of the aircraft ofFIG. 1 showing locations of a plurality of remote transmitters which comprise a damage detection system; -
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the damage detection system ofFIG. 2 ; and -
FIG. 4 is an example of tabulated data that may be compiled by the damage detection system ofFIG. 3 . - Damage detection systems may be employed on vehicles such as an aircraft. However, damage detection systems, such as the systems disclosed herein, can easily be adapted for use on any type of vehicle, for example, a car, a truck, a tank, a submarine, an airship, a space vehicle, a ship, or virtually any other type of vehicle. Such damage detection systems may be especially useful for combat aircraft.
- As shown in
FIG. 1 , anaircraft 10 generally includes a cockpit orflight deck 12 from which one or more pilots controls theaircraft 10. Often, the pilot's view of theaircraft 10 is obscured by thebody 14 of theaircraft 10. Accordingly, the pilot is unable to view large portions of theaircraft 10, for example, the underside of thewings 16, thelanding gear 18, and/or theempennage 20. As a result, the pilots must rely on system instrumentation indications, such as hydraulic pressure, electrical volts and amperes, pneumatic pressures, etc., to alert the pilots to potential damage on theaircraft 10. Theaircraft 10 inFIG. 1 is shown as an example of a vehicle that may use the damage detection system. Virtually any vehicle could use such a system, for example, automobiles, ships, submarines, helicopters, trucks, earth moving equipment, spacecraft, etc. -
FIG. 2 shows the aircraft ofFIG. 1 having a damage detection system. The damage detection system includes aprocessor 30 located in theaircraft 10 and a plurality oftransmitters 32 arranged on theaircraft 10 at various locations. WhileFIG. 2 shows only certainlocations having transmitters 32, theentire aircraft 10 could be substantially covered withsuch transmitters 32. Additionally,transmitters 32 may be located at certain critical locations within the body of theaircraft 10 itself to enhance early detection of damage to internal aircraft systems. Thetransmitters 32 may communicate with theprocessor 30 by sending a coded signal to theprocessor 30 continuously or periodically. Theprocessor 30 may be programmed to decode the signal and determine the location of thetransmitter 32 that sent the signal. Theprocessor 30 may monitor all of thetransmitters 32 and if atransmitter 32 fails to send the expected signal, theprocessor 30 may alert the pilot and identify the location of thetransmitter 32 as a damaged location. Theprocessor 30 may also determine if thetransmitter 32 is simply malfunctioning, in which case, theprocessor 32 may simply remove thetransmitter 32 from the system. As shown inFIG. 2 , the damage detection system may allow the pilots to monitor theentire aircraft 10 without needing the ability to visually observe each part of theaircraft 10. -
FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of the damage detection system. Each of thetransmitters 32 transmits a signal to theprocessor 30. In one embodiment, thetransmitters 32 first transmit the signal to anode 34 which summarizes signal data from agroup 36 oftransmitters 32. Thetransmitters 32 may be assigned tocertain groups 36 based on location or based on system type. For example,transmitters 32 placed on a wing structural component may be assigned to one group whiletransmitters 32 inside the wing on a hydraulic line may be assigned to another group. Thenodes 34 may act as intermediaries between thetransmitters 32 and theprocessor 30. This arrangement ofnodes 34 may speed up transmission of the signals and may minimize processing time to analyze the signals. - The
transmitters 32 preferably communicate with theprocessor 30 wirelessly. However, thetransmitters 32 could be wired to theprocessor 30 if desired. Additionally, wherenodes 34 are employed, thetransmitters 32 preferably communicate wirelessly with thenode 34 which in turn communicates wirelessly with theprocessor 30. However, in certain locations, it may be advantageous for thetransmitters 32 to be wired to thenode 34. - The
transmitters 32 may either generate power internally, or rely on an excitement signal for power. For example, thetransmitters 32 may be piezo-electric in nature and generate power from vibrations of theaircraft 10. In one embodiment, the piezo-electric transmitters may be chips that generate approximately 100 microcoulombs of electricity which may be stored temporarily in a capacitor. This amount of power is sufficient to generate and transmit the signal to theprocessor 30. Because an aircraft, or any vehicle, constantly generates vibrational energy, a virtually endless energy supply exists for thetransmitters 32. - In another embodiment, the
transmitters 32 may be radio frequency stimulated (e.g., RFID tags). Theprocessor 30 may send out a radio frequency signal to thetransmitters 32 which reflect back a signal to theprocessor 30. This arrangement is especially desirable for combat aircraft where the pilot may select a scanning time based on potential threats. For example, the pilot may only scan theaircraft 10 on egress after a mission to avoid potential detection by enemy anti-aircraft systems. - A wireless system is much lighter than a like wired system. Thus a wireless system is desirable over a wired system for an
aircraft 10 because any reduction in empty weight of anaircraft 10 results in a corresponding increase in payload available. Furthermore, should onetransmitter 32 fail, there is no doubt as to whether thetransmitter 32 itself failed or the wiring between the transmitter and the processor has broken because there is no wire to break. Moreover, such wireless systems are very easily scaled and adaptable. For example, if an external fuel tank is added to an aircraft after an initial production, one ormore transmitters 32 may simply be added to the external fuel tank and the programming of theprocessor 30 updated accordingly. Similar modifications could be made to the wireless system after repair or replacement of a component of after a rebuild of the wireless system. - Other means of powering the transmitters may exist, for example, solar power or wind power. The means of powering the
transmitters 32 is not limiting so long as thetransmitters 32 are able to transmit the signal to theprocessor 30. Additionally, while one embodiment of the damage detection system may use power scavenging chips as transmitters, the transmitters are not limited to a chip-like configuration and could vary widely in size and shape as long as the transmitters are able to send a signal to the processor. -
FIG. 4 shows an example of data that may be generated by theprocessor 30 in response to signals sent from thetransmitters 32. The data is only shown in table form for ease of reading and explanation. Theprocessor 30 does not actually need to tabulate the data before analysis. - The table 100 includes several columns of information. The
first column 110 shows an identification number assigned to theindividual transmitter 32. Thesecond column 112 shows a System ID, which corresponds to a particular aircraft system to which thetransmitter 32 is assigned. For example, the System ID of “1000” shown in the figure may correspond to a structural member, such as a wing, tail, fuselage, etc. Other systems can be identified as well, for example, a System ID of “2000” may correspond to an engine, a System ID of “3000” may correspond to the hydraulic system, a System ID of “4000” may correspond to the electrical system, etc. Of course this labeling system allows for various sub-system identifiers as well. For example, a System ID of “2100” may correspond to the #1 engine, and a System ID of “2110” may correspond to the fuel control unit of the #1 engine. The System ID's may be kept very general or be made extremely specific based on user requirements, the complexity of the aircraft or vehicle and/or the number of transmitters employed in the system. - Columns 114-118 show the X, Y, and Z spatial coordinates assigned to the
transmitter 32. These spatial coordinates may be assigned to thetransmitter 32 at installation by exciting the system and recording the location of eachtransmitter 32 based on a reference location. Thereafter, theprocessor 30 is able to correlate a particular spatial coordinate to a particular location on the aircraft or vehicle. TheAssigned Size column 120 shows how large an area is assigned to eachtransmitter 32. The assigned size may depend on the proximity ofother transmitters 32. For example,transmitters 32 that are placed 1 inch apart may be assigned a size of one inch square. TheTransmitting column 122 simply shows whether theparticular transmitter 32 is sending the processor 30 a signal. - The Damage Data table 130 shows a summary of data for a
non-functional transmitter 32. The non-functional transmitter's 32 spatial coordinates are shown in columns 132-136. The processor may be programmed to identify the area bounded by the spatial coordinates in columns 132-136 as the damaged area. Thesystem column 138 shows that thisparticular transmitter 32 was assigned to a structure group meaning that thetransmitter 32 was attached to a structure of theaircraft 10 as opposed to a sub-system. The information incolumn 138 corresponds to the System ID information ofcolumn 112 of table 100. Thesize column 140 shows that the area assigned to this particular transmitter is 0.1 inches square. The information from the Damage Data table 130 may be available to theprocessor 30 for further analysis. - The
processor 30 may be programmed to analyze the data from the Damage Data table 130 for assessing structural integrity of theaircraft 10. After identifying the damage area, the processor may compare the damage area to structural information about theaircraft 10 and theprocessor 30 may determine whether theaircraft 10 remains airworthy based on the location and size of the damaged area. For example, should the size and location of the damage area indicate that a wing spar can no longer support its design load, theaircraft 10 should be subjected to only limited maneuvering until an appropriate repair is made. Theprocessor 30 may further analyze the damage location to determine whether any sub-systems may be affected. For example, should the damage area be in the vicinity of a hydraulic line, theprocessor 30 may prompt the pilot to accomplish a particular checklist or to isolate the hydraulic system in the vicinity of the damage area if possible. - Should the damage detection system determine that a critical sub-system is located in the damage area, the
processor 30 may immediately notify the pilot (or vehicle operator) through some sort of alert system, e.g., visual or aural alerts in the cockpit. The pilot may then take appropriate action based on the possible loss of the critical sub-system. - The
processor 30 may be further programmed to infer potentially affected sub-systems or components based on two separate damage areas. For example, a projectile may enter a bottom portion of a wing and exit through a top portion of the wing. Should the damage detection system only havetransmitters 32 disposed on the outer surfaces of the aircraft, theprocessor 30 may interpolate between the upper and lower damage locations to determine whether any sub-systems within the wing structure may have been damaged. - The damage detection system disclosed herein requires very little processing power due to the fact that only a limited amount of data is required for transmission. Each of the
transmitters 32 may essentially send an identity code that can be a single number, and theprocessor 30 has stored the location and system data assigned to eachparticular transmitter 32. Data storage requirements for such a system are small as well. This limited amount of data also enables very fast processing times and simple programming for cross-referencing of eachtransmitter 32. As a result, damage detection systems described herein are relatively inexpensive and very light weight. - Additionally, the
processor 30 may transmit the damage data to a ground station for further analysis. As a result, a maintenance technician may have access to the damage data and may recommend actions or procedures in addition to the actions and procedures recommended by the on-board damage detection system. Furthermore, the maintenance personnel may have additional time to prepare for potential repairs to theaircraft 10 before theaircraft 10 arrives at a maintenance station, thus saving valuable time and enabling a faster repair of theaircraft 10. This ability may prove critical in a war fighting situation. - Still further, based on the downloaded damage data, maintenance personnel may be able to determine an ideal repair facility to direct the
aircraft 10 to should repair facilities with different capabilities be available. For example, if two repair facilities are available, but only one has a sheet metal shop, an aircraft with sheet metal damage should be directed to this particular repair facility if it is safe to do so. - Installations of such damage detection systems are simple as well. As transmitter sizes get smaller in response to technological advances, several application techniques may be available such as using light-duty adhesive bonding, for example. Furthermore, the
transmitters 32 may be individually attached to the aircraft with an adhesive, or for smaller transmitter sizes, via brushing, spraying or spreading the transmitters over the selected surface. Moreover, thetransmitters 32 may be integrated into the structures during fabrication of the structures. For example, thetransmitters 32 may be mixed with or bonded into raw material prior to forming a particular structural element, such as a wing or a tail. For example, thetransmitters 32 may be bonded between layers of a laminated structural element. - As a result, certain areas of the aircraft may be targeted for the
transmitters 32. For example, only critical flight surfaces may be integrated in an effort to reduce cost and weight. Furthermore, a malfunctioningtransmitter 32 may be “locked out” of the system. In other words, malfunctioningtransmitters 32 may simply be ignored by theprocessor 30. Additionally, malfunctioning transmitters are easily replaced because the processor need only be updated to recognize the identity of eachnew transmitter 32. The spatial coordinates of theold transmitter 32 may then simply be assigned to thenew transmitter 32. - Once the damage detection system has identified the damage area, this information may be sent to other aircraft systems for further analysis. For example, the damage area information may be sent to the fuel management system which may account for extra drag associated with the damage area. As a result, the navigation system may update the maximum range of the
aircraft 10 and inform the pilot if the original destination is unreachable with the added drag. - Other aspects and features of the present invention can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims.
Claims (26)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/437,237 US7298152B1 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2006-05-19 | Damage detection system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/437,237 US7298152B1 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2006-05-19 | Damage detection system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US7298152B1 US7298152B1 (en) | 2007-11-20 |
US20070268025A1 true US20070268025A1 (en) | 2007-11-22 |
Family
ID=38690923
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/437,237 Active 2026-07-20 US7298152B1 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2006-05-19 | Damage detection system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7298152B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130273824A1 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2013-10-17 | Mekra Lang GmbH & Co, KG | Housing for Accommodation and Temperature Regulation of an Electronic Device and Vehicle Provided with such Housing |
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8594882B2 (en) * | 2008-01-16 | 2013-11-26 | The Boeing Company | Damage detection system |
US8630819B2 (en) * | 2008-02-18 | 2014-01-14 | The Boeing Company | System and method for electronic inspection and record creation of assembly, repair and maintenance operations |
US8022843B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2011-09-20 | The Boeing Company | Wireless aircraft sensor network |
US8274383B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2012-09-25 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for sensing activity using energy harvesting devices |
US20110029804A1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2011-02-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Fleet mission management system and method using health capability determination |
US20100162027A1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2010-06-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Health capability determination system and method |
US9046891B2 (en) | 2010-10-22 | 2015-06-02 | Honeywell International Inc. | Control effector health capabilities determination reasoning system and method |
FR2973132B1 (en) * | 2011-03-24 | 2013-04-26 | Dassault Aviat | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE OPERATING CAPABILITIES OF AN AIRCRAFT |
US9020689B2 (en) | 2011-09-19 | 2015-04-28 | The Boeing Company | Method for real-time model based structural anomaly detection |
US9119976B2 (en) * | 2012-06-28 | 2015-09-01 | Zodiac Aerotechnics | Oxygen breathing device and method for maintaining an emergency oxygen system |
US9389138B2 (en) | 2012-10-26 | 2016-07-12 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and method to detect damage of a component of a system |
US9488589B2 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2016-11-08 | The Boeing Company | Mapping damaged regions on objects |
EP3043322A1 (en) * | 2015-01-12 | 2016-07-13 | Airbus Operations GmbH | System and method for damage tracking and monitoring during ground handling of aircraft |
US20160239921A1 (en) * | 2015-02-16 | 2016-08-18 | Autoclaims Direct Inc. | Apparatus and methods for estimating an extent of property damage |
Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3363184A (en) * | 1963-05-21 | 1968-01-09 | Atomic Energy Commission Usa | Power scavenging deq'ing circuit for a line-type pulser |
US4573521A (en) * | 1983-11-26 | 1986-03-04 | Haftung Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft mit beschrankter | Testing apparatus for detecting damage of the casting belts of a continuous casting mold |
US4627034A (en) * | 1984-11-09 | 1986-12-02 | Fairchild Camera And Instrument Corporation | Memory cell power scavenging apparatus and method |
US4972176A (en) * | 1989-09-15 | 1990-11-20 | General Electric Company | Polymeric security window with an integrated intrusion detector |
US5056089A (en) * | 1988-02-08 | 1991-10-08 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Memory device |
US5426362A (en) * | 1992-09-30 | 1995-06-20 | Ninnis; Ronald M. | Damage detection apparatus and method for a conveyor belt having magnetically permeable members |
US5537427A (en) * | 1991-08-21 | 1996-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modular multiple error correcting code system |
US5797201A (en) * | 1997-07-24 | 1998-08-25 | Huang; Tien-Tsai | Shoe with step counting capability |
US6150928A (en) * | 1996-04-24 | 2000-11-21 | Murray; Steve | Multi passenger frequency controlled alarm system |
US6219817B1 (en) * | 1998-04-20 | 2001-04-17 | Intel Corporation | Error correction and detection for faults on time multiplexed data lines |
US6233717B1 (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 2001-05-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Multi-bit memory device having error check and correction circuit and method for checking and correcting data errors therein |
US6263737B1 (en) * | 1999-07-23 | 2001-07-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Acoustic fault injection tool |
US20030048203A1 (en) * | 2001-07-19 | 2003-03-13 | Clary David E. | Flight management annunciator panel and system |
US20040054959A1 (en) * | 2002-09-18 | 2004-03-18 | Yufei Blankenship | Method and apparatus for encoding data |
US20040117081A1 (en) * | 2002-11-26 | 2004-06-17 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and device for detecting damaged parts |
US6822457B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2004-11-23 | Marshall B. Borchert | Method of precisely determining the location of a fault on an electrical transmission system |
US6915861B2 (en) * | 2002-09-18 | 2005-07-12 | The Boeing Company | Ballistic fire protection packaging system |
US20060061369A1 (en) * | 2004-09-20 | 2006-03-23 | Marks Kevin T | Information handling system integrated cable tester |
US20060073761A1 (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2006-04-06 | Weiss Stephen N | Remote controlled toy vehicle, toy vehicle control system and game using remote controlled toy vehicle |
-
2006
- 2006-05-19 US US11/437,237 patent/US7298152B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3363184A (en) * | 1963-05-21 | 1968-01-09 | Atomic Energy Commission Usa | Power scavenging deq'ing circuit for a line-type pulser |
US4573521A (en) * | 1983-11-26 | 1986-03-04 | Haftung Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft mit beschrankter | Testing apparatus for detecting damage of the casting belts of a continuous casting mold |
US4627034A (en) * | 1984-11-09 | 1986-12-02 | Fairchild Camera And Instrument Corporation | Memory cell power scavenging apparatus and method |
US5056089A (en) * | 1988-02-08 | 1991-10-08 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Memory device |
US4972176A (en) * | 1989-09-15 | 1990-11-20 | General Electric Company | Polymeric security window with an integrated intrusion detector |
US5537427A (en) * | 1991-08-21 | 1996-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modular multiple error correcting code system |
US5426362A (en) * | 1992-09-30 | 1995-06-20 | Ninnis; Ronald M. | Damage detection apparatus and method for a conveyor belt having magnetically permeable members |
US6150928A (en) * | 1996-04-24 | 2000-11-21 | Murray; Steve | Multi passenger frequency controlled alarm system |
US5797201A (en) * | 1997-07-24 | 1998-08-25 | Huang; Tien-Tsai | Shoe with step counting capability |
US6233717B1 (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 2001-05-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Multi-bit memory device having error check and correction circuit and method for checking and correcting data errors therein |
US6219817B1 (en) * | 1998-04-20 | 2001-04-17 | Intel Corporation | Error correction and detection for faults on time multiplexed data lines |
US6263737B1 (en) * | 1999-07-23 | 2001-07-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Acoustic fault injection tool |
US20030048203A1 (en) * | 2001-07-19 | 2003-03-13 | Clary David E. | Flight management annunciator panel and system |
US20040054959A1 (en) * | 2002-09-18 | 2004-03-18 | Yufei Blankenship | Method and apparatus for encoding data |
US6915861B2 (en) * | 2002-09-18 | 2005-07-12 | The Boeing Company | Ballistic fire protection packaging system |
US20060073761A1 (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2006-04-06 | Weiss Stephen N | Remote controlled toy vehicle, toy vehicle control system and game using remote controlled toy vehicle |
US20040117081A1 (en) * | 2002-11-26 | 2004-06-17 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and device for detecting damaged parts |
US7082356B2 (en) * | 2002-11-26 | 2006-07-25 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and device for detecting damaged parts |
US6822457B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2004-11-23 | Marshall B. Borchert | Method of precisely determining the location of a fault on an electrical transmission system |
US20060061369A1 (en) * | 2004-09-20 | 2006-03-23 | Marks Kevin T | Information handling system integrated cable tester |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130273824A1 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2013-10-17 | Mekra Lang GmbH & Co, KG | Housing for Accommodation and Temperature Regulation of an Electronic Device and Vehicle Provided with such Housing |
US10363793B2 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2019-07-30 | Mekra Lang Gmbh & Co. Kg | Housing for accommodation and temperature regulation of an electronic device and vehicle provided with such housing |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7298152B1 (en) | 2007-11-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7298152B1 (en) | Damage detection system | |
US8594882B2 (en) | Damage detection system | |
US10689102B2 (en) | Vertical take-off and landing aircraft | |
CN104950740B (en) | The system for the vehicles with redundant computer | |
US8957790B2 (en) | System and method for cruise monitoring and alerting | |
US10650685B2 (en) | Method for autonomous controlling of a remote controlled aerial vehicle and corresponding system | |
ES2908842T3 (en) | Method for the autonomous control of an aerial vehicle and corresponding system | |
CN104859489A (en) | Apparatus And Method To Monitor The Occupancy Of Seating | |
US9108739B2 (en) | Taxiing aircraft vicinity visualization system and method | |
US20150302669A1 (en) | Method for inspecting an airborne vehicle | |
EP3281491A1 (en) | A wireless sensor system for a vehicle | |
US8428793B2 (en) | Automatic downlink messaging during emergency flight situations | |
EP3655323A1 (en) | Automated safety system for aircraft | |
US9776740B2 (en) | Aircraft capable of passing from the aerial domain to the spatial domain and method for automatically adapting the configuration of same | |
CN103345231A (en) | Digitization general aviation fixed operation base information management system integration platform | |
Salt et al. | Technical Innovation in Light Aircraft Aerial Dispersant Application Systems | |
Stimson | Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability & Reliability (ELTSAR)-Phase 1: Research & Work Plan | |
Harris et al. | X-36 tailless agility aircraft subsystems integration | |
Mussi Amraes | EH101 helicopter designed for service | |
BORTNER | MM DERRISO, DM PRATT, DB HOMAN, JB SCHROEDER and RA BORTNER | |
Parasida et al. | Tilt rotors for US and international missions | |
SUD | Concorde Equipment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BOEING COMPANY, THE, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WILKE, DANIEL D.;MCCARTHY, DENNIS K.;REEL/FRAME:017904/0739 Effective date: 20060515 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |