US20080020867A1 - Golfer's impact properties during a golf swing - Google Patents
Golfer's impact properties during a golf swing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080020867A1 US20080020867A1 US11/828,655 US82865507A US2008020867A1 US 20080020867 A1 US20080020867 A1 US 20080020867A1 US 82865507 A US82865507 A US 82865507A US 2008020867 A1 US2008020867 A1 US 2008020867A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- golf
- golf club
- ball
- golf ball
- club head
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B69/00—Training appliances or apparatus for special sports
- A63B69/36—Training appliances or apparatus for special sports for golf
- A63B69/3623—Training appliances or apparatus for special sports for golf for driving
- A63B69/3632—Clubs or attachments on clubs, e.g. for measuring, aligning
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B24/00—Electric or electronic controls for exercising apparatus of preceding groups; Controlling or monitoring of exercises, sportive games, training or athletic performances
- A63B24/0003—Analysing the course of a movement or motion sequences during an exercise or trainings sequence, e.g. swing for golf or tennis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B24/00—Electric or electronic controls for exercising apparatus of preceding groups; Controlling or monitoring of exercises, sportive games, training or athletic performances
- A63B24/0021—Tracking a path or terminating locations
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B69/00—Training appliances or apparatus for special sports
- A63B69/36—Training appliances or apparatus for special sports for golf
- A63B69/3617—Striking surfaces with impact indicating means, e.g. markers
- A63B69/362—Striking surfaces with impact indicating means, e.g. markers electrical or electronic
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B69/00—Training appliances or apparatus for special sports
- A63B69/36—Training appliances or apparatus for special sports for golf
- A63B69/3658—Means associated with the ball for indicating or measuring, e.g. speed, direction
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B71/00—Games or sports accessories not covered in groups A63B1/00 - A63B69/00
- A63B71/06—Indicating or scoring devices for games or players, or for other sports activities
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B24/00—Electric or electronic controls for exercising apparatus of preceding groups; Controlling or monitoring of exercises, sportive games, training or athletic performances
- A63B24/0021—Tracking a path or terminating locations
- A63B2024/0028—Tracking the path of an object, e.g. a ball inside a soccer pitch
- A63B2024/0031—Tracking the path of an object, e.g. a ball inside a soccer pitch at the starting point
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/05—Image processing for measuring physical parameters
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/10—Positions
- A63B2220/16—Angular positions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/20—Distances or displacements
- A63B2220/24—Angular displacement
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/30—Speed
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/30—Speed
- A63B2220/34—Angular speed
- A63B2220/35—Spin
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/80—Special sensors, transducers or devices therefor
- A63B2220/805—Optical or opto-electronic sensors
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/80—Special sensors, transducers or devices therefor
- A63B2220/807—Photo cameras
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2220/00—Measuring of physical parameters relating to sporting activity
- A63B2220/80—Special sensors, transducers or devices therefor
- A63B2220/89—Field sensors, e.g. radar systems
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B2225/00—Miscellaneous features of sport apparatus, devices or equipment
- A63B2225/74—Miscellaneous features of sport apparatus, devices or equipment with powered illuminating means, e.g. lights
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for determining a golfer's impact properties for a golf swing. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for determining a golfer's golf club head orientation and impact location for a golf swing.
- high speed camera technology has been used for gathering information on a golfer's swing.
- the information has varied from simple club head speed to the spin of the golf ball after impact with a certain golf club.
- this information has fostered numerous improvements in golf clubs and golf balls, and assisted golfers in choosing golf clubs and golf balls that improve their game.
- systems incorporating such high speed camera technology have been used in teaching golfers how to improve their swing when using a given golf club.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,042,483 for a Method Of Measuring Motion Of A Golf Ball.
- the patent discloses a system that uses three cameras, an optical sensor means, and strobes to obtain golf club and golf ball information.
- the present invention is a method that allows for determining the impact location and golf club head orientation during a golfer's swing based on information obtained during a golfer's swing and measured inherent properties of a golf ball and golf club.
- the present invention uses an optimization method such as the Powell Optimization method or the Nelder & Mead Simplex optimization method to obtain the impact location and golf club head orientation.
- One aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a golfer's impact properties during a golf swing.
- the method includes providing a plurality of golf club head properties for a golf club, a plurality of golf ball properties for a golf ball, and a first optimization value including an orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on the golf club head.
- the method also includes measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing, and a plurality of actual ball launch parameters.
- the method also includes inputting the plurality of golf club properties, the plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the first optimization value into a rigid body code.
- the method also includes generating a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters from the rigid body code.
- the method also includes verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters.
- the method includes providing a plurality of golf club head properties for a first golf club, a plurality of golf ball properties for a first golf ball, and a first optimization value including an orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on the golf club head.
- the method also includes measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing, and a plurality of actual ball launch parameters.
- the method also includes inputting the plurality of golf club properties, the plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the first optimization value into a rigid body code.
- the method also includes generating a first plurality of ball launch parameters from the rigid body code for the first golf ball.
- the method also includes inputting the first plurality of ball launch parameters, a plurality of atmospheric conditions and a plurality of lift and drag properties for the first golf ball into a trajectory code.
- the method also includes generating the performance from the trajectory code of the first golf ball if struck by the golfer with the first golf club under the plurality of atmospheric conditions.
- the method also includes inputting a plurality of mass properties of a second golf club, the plurality of mass properties of the first golf ball, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball, and the impact location of a golf ball on the golf club head into the rigid body code.
- the method also includes generating a second plurality of ball launch parameters from the rigid body code.
- the method also includes inputting the second plurality of ball launch parameters, the plurality of atmospheric conditions and the plurality of lift and drag properties for the first golf ball into the trajectory code.
- the method also includes generating the performance from the trajectory code of the first golf ball if struck by the golfer with the second golf club under the first atmospheric conditions.
- the method also includes inputting the plurality of mass properties of the first golf club, a plurality of mass properties of a second golf ball the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball, and the impact location of a golf ball on the golf club head into the rigid body code.
- the method also includes generating a third plurality of ball launch parameters from the rigid body code.
- the method also includes inputting the third plurality of ball launch parameters, the plurality of atmospheric conditions and a plurality of lift and drag properties for the second golf ball into the trajectory code.
- the method also includes generating the performance from the trajectory code of the second golf ball if struck by the golfer with the first golf club under the atmospheric conditions.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the general method of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured values.
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the golf club swing properties.
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured golf ball inherent properties.
- FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured golf club head inherent properties.
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the contents for the plurality of actual ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 7 is a flow chart of the contents for the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the inputs for the optimized values.
- FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the inputs for the optimized values for the golf club head orientation.
- FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a golf club head illustrating the yaw, pitch and roll of the golf club head.
- FIG. 11 is a flow chart for the verification of the ball results.
- FIG. 12 is a flow chart of the contents for the comparison of the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 13 is a flow chart of the contents for the weighting of the absolute values of the differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 14 is a perspective view of the monitoring system of the present invention.
- FIG. 15 is a schematic representation of a full frame CMOS sensor array.
- FIG. 15A is a schematic representation of a field of view.
- FIG. 16 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array.
- FIG. 17 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view.
- FIG. 18 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view.
- FIG. 19 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array.
- FIG. 20 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view.
- FIG. 21 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array.
- FIG. 22 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view.
- FIG. 23 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array.
- FIG. 24 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention.
- FIG. 25 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention.
- FIG. 26 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention.
- FIG. 27 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention.
- FIG. 28 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention.
- FIG. 29 is a schematic representation of the highly reflective points of the golf club positioned in accordance with the first, second and third exposures of the golf club.
- FIG. 30 is an isolated view of a golf ball striped for measurement.
- FIG. 30A is an isolated view of a golf ball striped for measurement using an image with a partial phantom of a prior image with vector signs present to demonstrate calculation of angle ⁇ .
- FIG. 31 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the first find grouping of the highly reflective points.
- FIG. 31A illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the first find grouping of the highly reflective points.
- FIG. 32 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the second find grouping of the highly reflective points.
- FIG. 33 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the second find grouping of the highly reflective points.
- FIG. 34 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball with repeated points eliminated and results of the find displayed.
- FIG. 35 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball with repeated points eliminated and results of the find displayed.
- FIG. 36 is a chart of the processed final pairs giving the x, y and z coordinates.
- FIG. 37 is an illustration of the thresholding of the images for the golf ball in flight.
- FIG. 38 is an isolated view of the golf ball to illustrate determining the best ball center and radius.
- FIG. 39 is a partial flow chart with images of golf balls for stereo correlating two dimensional points.
- FIG. 40 illustrates the teed golf ball and the first, second third and fourth images of the golf ball after impact, along with positioning information.
- FIG. 41 is a flow chart of a method of predicting performance using the impact location and golf club head orientation values obtained through the optimization method.
- FIG. 42 is a table of the golf club swing properties.
- FIG. 43 is a table of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 44 is a table of the golf club head properties.
- FIG. 45 is a table of the golf ball properties.
- FIG. 46 is a table of a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 47 is a table of optimized values for the impact location and golf club head orientation.
- FIG. 48 is a table of the difference between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 49 is a table of the weighting of the absolute values of the differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 50 a table of the error value.
- a method for determining a golfer's impact properties during a golf swing is generally designated 20 .
- the method 20 involves using measured dynamic properties for a golfer during a golf swing and inherent properties of a golf ball and golf club to determine through an optimization method the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- the first optimized values for impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing are selected by an operator. These first optimized values are speculative, and are probably not the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. However, these first optimized values must be used to obtain the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- the measured values are collected for input to determine through an optimization method the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- a rigid body code is set forth in equations B1-B13 below, and explained in further detail below.
- the rigid body code generates a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters.
- a plurality of actual ball launch parameters is collected from an acquisition system as discussed below.
- the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters is verified by comparison to the plurality of actual ball launch parameters, as discussed in greater detail below.
- the values selected for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing are correct and the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- the values selected for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing is not correct and an optimization method must be used to obtain the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- the optimization method selects new values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing for input into the rigid body code at block 26 .
- a preferred optimization method is the Powell Optimization method, which is disclosed in Chapter 10 of Numerical Recipes in C: The Art Of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press (1988-1992), which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference.
- An alternative optimization method is the Nelder & Mead Simplex optimization method. Those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other optimization methods may be used with the method without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
- the method is repeated with new optimization values until the value obtained during the verification step of block 32 is within an error value thereby indicating that the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing have been determined by the method.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs or content of the measured values of block 24 of FIG. 1 .
- Block 40 contains the golf swing properties.
- Block 41 contains the measured golf ball inherent properties.
- Block 42 contains the measured golf club inherent properties.
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs or content of the golf club swing properties of block 40 of FIG. 2 .
- the golf club swing properties are obtained from the acquisition system as disclosed below.
- Block 43 contains the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- Block 44 contains the angular velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured golf ball inherent properties of block 41 of FIG. 2 .
- the measurement of the mass of the golf ball is collected at block 45 .
- the measurement of the radius of the golf ball is collected at block 46 .
- the measurement of the coefficient of restitution of the golf ball is collected at block 47 .
- the measurement of the moment of inertia of the golf ball is collected at block 48 .
- the data collected at blocks 45 - 48 is inputted to create the measured golf ball inherent properties at block 41 of FIG. 2 .
- the golf ball properties of block 41 that are stored and collected include the mass of the golf ball (the Rules of Golf, as set forth by the USGA and the R&A, limit the mass to 45 grains or less), the radius of the golf ball (the Rules of Golf require a diameter of at least 1.68 inches), the COR of the golf ball and the MOI of the golf ball.
- the MOI of the golf ball may be determined using method well known in the industry. One such method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,822, which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference.
- the COR is determined using a method such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,443,858, entitled Golf Ball With A High Coefficient Of Restitution, assigned to Callaway Golf Company, the assignee of the present application, and which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference.
- FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the golf club head properties of block 42 of FIG. 2 .
- the measurements for the face properties are collected at block 49 .
- the face properties include the face geometry, the face center, the bulge radius and the roll radius.
- the measurements for the mass properties of the golf club head are collected or recalled from a database at block 50 .
- the mass properties include the inertia tensor, the mass of the club head, and the center of gravity location.
- the measurement for the coefficient of restitution (“COR”) of the golf club head using a specific golf ball is collected at block 51 .
- the measurements for the loft and lie angles of the golf club head are collected at block 52 .
- the data collected at blocks 49 - 52 is inputted to create the golf club head properties at block 42 of FIG. 2 .
- the mass, bulge and roll radii, loft and lie angles, face geometry and face center are determined using conventional methods well known in the golf industry.
- the inertia tensor is calculated using: the moment of inertia about the x-axis, Ixx; the moment of inertia about the y-axis, Iyy; the moment of inertia about the z-axis, Izz; the product of inertia Ixy; the product of inertia Izy; and the product of inertia Izx.
- the CG and the MOI of the club head are determined according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No.
- the COR of the golf club head is determined using a method used by the United States Golf Association (“USGA”) and disclosed at www.usga.org, or using the method and system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,585,605, entitled Measurement Of The Coefficient Of Restitution Of A Golf Club, assigned to Callaway Golf Company, the assignee of the present application, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- USGA United States Golf Association
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,585,605 entitled Measurement Of The Coefficient Of Restitution Of A Golf Club, assigned to Callaway Golf Company, the assignee of the present application, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- the COR of the golf club head is predicated on the golf ball, and will vary for different types of golf balls.
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the contents of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters at block 30 of FIG. 1 .
- the side spin of the golf ball is measured at block 53 .
- the back spin of the golf ball is measured at block 54 .
- the ball speed is measured at block 55 .
- the side angle of the golf ball is measured at block 56 .
- the launch angle of the golf ball is measured at block 57 .
- the information from blocks 53 - 57 is inputted/contained as the measured ball launch parameters or plurality of actual ball launch parameters, at block 30 of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 7 is a flow chart of the contents of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters at block 28 of FIG. 1 .
- the side spin of the golf ball is calculated at block 63 .
- the back spin of the golf ball is calculated at block 64 .
- the ball speed is calculated at block 65 .
- the side angle of the golf ball is calculated at block 66 .
- the launch angle of the golf ball is calculated at block 67 .
- the information from blocks 63 - 67 is inputted/contained as the calculated ball launch parameters or plurality of calculated ball launch parameters, at block 28 of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the optimization values of block 22 of FIG. 1 .
- the impact location is selected at block 69 .
- the golf club head orientation is selected at block 70 .
- FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the inputs/contents of the optimization values for the golf club head orientation of block 70 of FIG. 8 .
- the pitch of the golf club head is selected at block 71 .
- the yaw of the golf club head is selected at block 72 .
- the roll of the golf club head is selected at block 73 .
- FIG. 10 illustrates the pitch, yaw and roll of a golf club head 133 .
- FIG. 11 is a flow chart of the verification step of block 32 of FIG. 1 .
- the information from block 28 the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters
- the information from block 30 the plurality of actual ball launch parameters
- the absolute value of the differences is obtained for further processing at block 75 .
- absolute values obtained at block 74 are weighted in accordance of importance to determining the true values of the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing.
- the weighted values from block 75 are used in a root-mean-sum equation to obtain an error check value.
- the product of each of the weighted absolute values to the second power are added together and the square root of that addition value is the error value.
- the error value is within 30, then the optimization values are acceptable, and these values are accepted as the true values of the impact location and the golf club head orientation. If the error value is greater than 30, then the optimized values are not accepted and new optimized values must be used to calculate a new set of a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters to verify against the plurality of actual ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 12 is a flow chart illustrating the comparison process to obtain the absolute values for the plurality of ball launch parameters.
- the differences between the side spin of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the side spin of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the side spin for the ball launch parameters.
- the differences between the back spin of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the back spin of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the back spin for the ball launch parameters.
- the differences between the ball speed of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the ball speed of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the ball speed for the ball launch parameters.
- the differences between the side angle of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the side angle of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the side angle for the ball launch parameters.
- the differences between the launch angle of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the launch angle of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the launch angle for the ball launch parameters.
- FIG. 13 is a flow chart illustrating the weighting process to obtain the weighted absolute values for the plurality of ball launch parameters.
- the absolute value for the side spin is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the side spin for the plurality of ball launch parameters.
- the absolute value for the back spin is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the back spin for the plurality of ball launch parameters.
- the absolute value for the ball speed is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the ball speed for the plurality of ball launch parameters.
- the absolute value for the side angle is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the side angle for the plurality of ball launch parameters.
- the absolute value for the launch angle is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the launch angle for the plurality of ball launch parameters.
- the acquisition system used to measure the dynamic swing properties of the golfer and the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is a system that captures and analyzes golf club information and golf ball information during and after a golfer's swing.
- the golf club information includes golf club head orientation, golf club head velocity, and golf club spin.
- the golf club head orientation includes dynamic lie, loft and face angle of the golf club head.
- the golf club head velocity includes path of the golf club head and attack of the golf club head.
- the golf ball information includes golf ball velocity, golf ball launch angle, golf ball side angle, golf ball speed and golf ball orientation.
- the golf ball orientation includes the true spin of the golf ball, and the tilt axis of the golf ball which entails the back spin and the side spin of the golf ball.
- the acquisition system 120 generally includes a computer 122 , a camera structure 124 with a first CMOS camera unit 126 , a second CMOS camera unit 128 and an optional trigger device 130 , a golf ball 132 and a golf club 133 .
- the acquisition system 120 is designed to operate on-course, at a driving range, inside a retail store/showroom, or at similar facilities.
- the first camera unit 126 preferably includes a first camera 140 and optional flash units 142 a and 142 b.
- the second camera unit 128 preferably includes a second camera 44 and optional flash units 146 a and 146 b.
- a preferred camera is a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (“CMOS”) camera with active pixel technology and a full frame rate ranging from 250 to 500 frames per second.
- CMOS complementary metal oxide semiconductor
- the field of view of the cameras 140 and 144 corresponds to the CMOS sensor array 200 .
- the CMOS sensor array 200 is at least one megapixel in size having one thousand rows of pixels and one thousand columns of pixels for a total of one million pixels.
- a CMOS sensor array 200 preferably has one million active pixels 205 .
- Each active pixel 205 is capable of acting as a single camera to provide an image or a portion of an image.
- the field of view 1000 corresponds to the full frame sensor array 200 , which preferably operates at a minimum frame rate ranging from 250 to 500 frames per second, however, it may have a frame rate as low as 30 frames per second.
- the CMOS sensor array is monitoring the field of view at a rate of 250-500 times per second and is capable of creating images at 250 to 500 times per second.
- the CMOS sensor array 200 preferably has one thousand columns of active pixels 205 and one thousand rows of active pixels 205 .
- the field of view 1000 is large enough to capture pre-impact golf club information and post-impact golf ball information.
- the field of view 1000 may be adjusted to focus on any particular action by the golfer such as only pre-impact information, putting information, and the like.
- an initial region of interest (“ROI”) 210 is established at the edge 150 of the field of view 1000 or CMOS sensor array 200 .
- the initial ROI 210 extends along all of the rows of the sensor array 200 and from 10 to 100 columns of the CMOS sensor array 200 beginning with the first column of active pixels 205 at the edge 150 .
- the frame rate of the ROI is 2000 frames per second.
- the establishment of an ROI 210 at the edge 150 ′ allows for “through the lens” triggering of the system 20 .
- the through the lens triggering is a substitute for the triggering device 30 .
- the system 20 is monitoring the ROI 210 at a very high frame rate, 1000 to 4000 frames per second, to detect any activity, or the appearance of the golf club 133 .
- the system 120 can be instructed to monitor the ROI 210 for a certain brightness provided by the reflected dots 106 a - c. Once the system 20 detects the object in the ROI 210 , the cameras are instructed to gather information on the object.
- FIG. 17 illustrates the object or golf club, shown as reflective dots 106 a - c, as entering the field of view 100 .
- the CMOS sensor array 200 creates new ROIs the encompass the reflective dots 106 a - c.
- the golf club 133 (shown by the reflective dots 106 a - c ) has moved from its position in FIG. 17 .
- a second ROI 215 is established around the golf club 133 . It is preferably to create an ROI having a minimum size since the frame rate is increased as the number of active pixels 205 is reduced. Some CMOS cameras only allow reduction in the number of columns which would limit the frame rate.
- the current ROI preferably overlaps the previous ROI in order to better track the movement of the object or golf club 33 .
- the current ROI 220 (shown by bold dashed lines) overlaps the previous ROI 217 (shown by small dashed lines).
- FIG. 21 illustrates the CMOS sensor array 200 for ROI 220 .
- FIGS. 22 and 23 illustrate the continued movement of the object or golf club 133 through the field of view 1000 and the new ROI 225 encompassing the current position of the golf club 133 .
- FIG. 24 is a flow chart of a method 300 of using the system 120 of the invention.
- the full CMOS sensor array is active similar to FIG. 15 .
- an object such as a golf club 33 is detected within the field of view 1000 . If analyzing a golfer's swing, this first detection may be the golfer addressing the golf ball 166 . During this address of the golf ball, the system 120 may be gathering information concerning the orientation of the club head to the golf ball as the golfer adjusts the position of the golf club to strike the golf ball.
- the CMOS sensor array 200 is operating at a minimum frame rate since all of the active pixels 205 are activated. However, since the movement of the golf club 133 is slow, this minimum frame rate is sufficient to gather the necessary information.
- a ROI is created around the object.
- the objected is monitored at a higher frame rate.
- the object is removed from the field of view. If the golf club 133 is monitored during address at box 304 , increased information is provided until the golf club is taken away for a swing. Alternatively, if a golf ball 166 is monitored at prior to impact, at impact and post impact, then the ROI is created around the golf ball 166 until it leaves the field of view 1000 .
- FIG. 25 is a flow chart of a specific method 310 for analysis of a golf club at address.
- the CMOS sensor array monitors the field of view 1000 at a minimum frame rate.
- the indication markers (reflective dots or other like markers) on the golf club 133 are detected within the field of view 1000 .
- a ROI is created around the indication markers of the golf club 133 .
- the golf club 133 is monitored at a higher frame rate within the ROI.
- the golf club 133 is taken away from the field of view 1000 .
- FIG. 26 is a method 320 for using the system 120 to monitor an object.
- a portion of the field of view 1000 is monitored at a maximum rate, similar to the ROI 210 established and monitored in FIG. 16 .
- an object is detected within the ROI.
- a first ROI is created around the object.
- a plurality of ROIs is created around the object as it tracks through the field of view 1000 .
- information is provided on the movement of the object through the field of view.
- FIG. 27 is a flow chart of a method 330 for using the system to monitor a golf club.
- a portion of the field of view 1000 is monitored at a maximum rate, similar to the ROI 210 established and monitored in FIG. 16 .
- a golf club 133 or more specifically the indication markers of the golf club 133 , is detected within the ROI.
- a first ROI is created around the indications markers on the golf club 133 .
- a plurality of ROIs is created around the indication markers as the golf club tracks through the field of view 1000 .
- information is provided on the movement of the golf club through the field of view to determine the swing properties of the golfer.
- FIG. 28 is a flow chart of a method 340 for using the system to monitor a golf ball during launch.
- an ROI is created around the golf ball prior to impact with a golf club.
- movement of the golf ball 166 is detected by the system 120 .
- a plurality of ROIs is created around the golf ball during the initial launch of the golf ball subsequent to impact with a golf club.
- the system analyzes the movement of the golf ball to provide launch parameters of the golf ball 166 .
- the CMOS sensor array 200 can operate at frames rates 4000 frames per second for a very small ROI. However, processing time between images or frames requires preferably less than 500 microseconds, and preferably less than 250 microseconds. The processing time is needed to analyze the image to determine if an object is detected and if the object is moving.
- the system 120 may be calibrated using many techniques known to those skilled in the pertinent art. One such technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,803,823, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- the system 120 is calibrated when first activated, and then may operate to analyze golf swings for golfers until deactivated.
- the system 120 captures and analyzes golf club information and golf ball information during and after a golfer's swing.
- the system 120 uses the images and other information to generate the information on the golfer's swing.
- the golf club 133 has at least two, but preferably three highly reflective points 106 a - c preferably positioned on the shaft, heel and toe of the golf club 133 .
- the highly reflective points 106 a - c may be inherent with the golf club design, or each may be composed of a highly reflective material that is adhesively attached to the desired positions of the golf club 133 .
- the points 106 a - c are preferably highly reflective since the cameras 140 and 144 are preferably programmed to search for two or three points that have a certain brightness such as 200 out of a gray scale of 0-255.
- the cameras 140 and 144 search for point pairs that have approximately one inch separation, and in this manner, the detection of the golf club 133 is acquired by the cameras for data acquisition.
- the first row of acquired highly reflective points 106 a (on the shaft) is designated series one
- the second row of acquired highly reflective points 106 b (on the heel) is designated series two
- the third row of acquired highly reflective points 106 c (on the toe) is designated series three.
- the first row is the acquired highly reflective points 106 a from the shaft
- the second row is the acquired highly reflective points 106 a from the heel
- the third row is the acquired highly reflective points 106 a from the toe.
- Ptx is the position in the x direction
- Pty is the position in the y direction
- the system 120 may use a three point mode or a two point mode to generate further information.
- the two point mode uses V toe , V heel and V clubtop to calculate the head speed.
- V toe [( Ptx 3 ⁇ Ptx 1 ) 2 +( Pty 3 ⁇ Pty 1 ) 2 +( Ptz 3 ⁇ Ptz 1 ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/ ⁇ T]
- V heel [( Ptx 3 ⁇ Ptx 1 ) 2 +( Pty 3 ⁇ Pty 1 ) 2 +( Ptz 3 ⁇ Ptz 1 ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/ ⁇ T]
- V clubtop [V toe +V heel ][1/2]
- Vy [( y 3heel ⁇ y 1heel ) 2 +( y 3toe ⁇ y 1toe ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/(2* ⁇ T )]
- Vz [( z 3heel ⁇ z 1heel ) 2 +( z
- the Path angle sin ⁇ 1 (Vy/[V]) where [V] is the magnitude of V.
- attack angle sin ⁇ 1 (Vz/[V]), and the dynamic loft and dynamic lie are obtained by using Series one and Series two to project the loft and lie onto the vertical and horizontal planes.
- the two point mode uses the shaft highly reflective point 106 a or the toe highly reflective point 106 c along with the heel highly reflective point 106 b to calculate the head speed of the golf club, the path angle and the attack angle.
- V heel [( Ptx 3 ⁇ Ptx 1 ) 2 +( Pty 3 ⁇ Pty 1 ) 2 +( Ptz 3 ⁇ Ptz 1 ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/ ⁇ T]
- V shaft [( Ptx 3 ⁇ Ptx 1 ) 2 +( Pty 3 ⁇ Pty 1 ) 2 +( Ptz 3 ⁇ Ptz 1 ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/ ⁇ T]
- V center 1.02*( V shaft +V heel )
- Vy [( y 3heel ⁇ y 1heel ) 2 +( y 3shaft ⁇ y 1shaft ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/(2* ⁇ T )]
- Vz [( z 3
- V toe [( x 3 ⁇ x 1 ) 2 +( y 3 ⁇ y 1 ) 2 +( z 3 ⁇ z 1 ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/ ⁇ T]
- V heel [( x 2 ⁇ x 1 ) 2 +( y 2 ⁇ y 1 ) 2 +( z 2 ⁇ z 1 ) 2 ] 1/2 [1/ ⁇ T]
- V clubtop [V toe +V heel ][1/2]
- the attack angle sin ⁇ 1 (Vz clubtop /[V clubtop ]) where [V clubtop ] is the magnitude of V clubtop .
- the system 120 looks for the stripes 108 a - b, as shown in FIGS. 30 and 30 A, on the golf ball 166 by using a random transformation searching for the spot of greatest contrast.
- X, Y and Z coordinates are used with the arc of stripe 108 a and the arc of stripe 108 b to orient the arc on the golf ball.
- the system 120 determines which arc is most normal using (x 2 +y 2 ) 1/2 .
- the angle ⁇ is determined from the position of vector A at both rotation positions. This allows for the spin to be determined.
- the back spin is calculated and applied to the first set of axis with a tilt axis of zero.
- the resultant vectors are compared to those of the next image and a theta is calculated for each of the vectors. This is done for each tilt axis until the Theta between the rotated first set of axis and the second set of axis is minimized.
- the golf club information includes golf club head orientation, golf club head velocity, and golf club spin.
- the golf club head orientation includes dynamic lie, loft and face angle of the golf club head.
- the golf club head velocity includes path of the golf club head, attack of the golf club head and downrange information.
- the golf ball information includes golf ball velocity, golf ball launch angle, golf ball side angle, golf ball speed manipulation and golf ball orientation.
- the golf ball orientation includes the true spin of the golf ball, and the tilt axis of the golf ball which entails the back spin and the side spin of the golf ball.
- the system 120 pairs the points 106 a - c, verifying size, separation, orientation and attack angle. Then, the system 120 captures a set of six points (three pairs) from a first find as shown in FIGS. 31 and 31 A. Then, the system 120 searches above and below the three pairs for a second find, as shown in FIGS. 32 and 33 . The repeated points 106 are eliminated and the results are displayed from the find, as shown in FIGS. 34 and 35 . The points of the final pairs are processed by the computer 122 and displayed as shown in FIG. 36 .
- the speed of the head of the golf club 133 is determined by the system 120 using the equations discussed above.
- attack angle ⁇ a tan( ⁇ z/ ⁇ x )
- ⁇ z is the z value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the z value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3 .
- ⁇ x is the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3 .
- path angle ⁇ a tan( ⁇ y/ ⁇ x )
- ⁇ y is the y value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the y value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3 .
- ⁇ x is the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3 .
- the golf ball 166 data is determined b the system 120 .
- the thresholding of the image is established as shown in FIG. 37 , at a lower gray scale value, approximately 100 to 120, to detect the golf ball 166 .
- well-known edge detection methods are used to obtain the best golf ball 166 center and radius, as shown in FIG. 38 .
- the stereo correlation of two dimensional points on the golf ball 166 is performed by the system 120 as in FIG. 39 , which illustrates the images of the first camera 140 and the second camera 144 .
- the speed of the golf ball 166 is determined by the system 120 .
- the speed of the golf ball [( ⁇ 161.68+( ⁇ 605.26)) 2 +( ⁇ 43.41+( ⁇ 38.46)) 2 +( ⁇ 282.74+( ⁇ 193.85)) 2 ] 1/2 /(13127 ⁇ 5115), which is equal to 126 MPH once converted from millimeters over microseconds.
- the rigid body code solves the impact problem using conservation of linear and angular momentum, which gives the complete motion of the two rigid bodies.
- the impulses are calculated using the definition of impulse, and the equations are set forth below.
- the coordinate system used for the impulse equations is set forth below.
- the impulse-momentum method does not take in account the time history of the impact event. The collision is described at only the instant before contact and the instant after contact.
- the force transmitted from the club head to the ball is equal and opposite to the force transmitted from the ball to the club head.
- the rigid body code assumes that both the golf ball 166 and the golf club head 150 are unconstrained rigid bodies, even though the golf club head 150 is obviously connected to the shaft 152 , and the ball 166 is not floating in air upon impact with the golf club head 150 .
- the assumption of an unconstrained rigid body is that the impact with the golf ball 166 occurs within a very short time frame (microseconds), that only a small portion of the tip of the shaft 152 contributes to the impact.
- the impulse due to friction between itself and the surface it is placed upon e.g. tee, mat or ground
- this friction is ignored in the calculations.
- the absolute performance numbers are defined in the global coordinate system, or the global frame. This coordinate system has the origin at the center of the golf ball, one axis points toward the intended final destination of the shot, one axis points straight up into the air, and the third axis is normal to both of the first two axis.
- the global coordinate system preferably follows the right hand rule.
- the coordinate system used for the analysis is referred to as the impact coordinate system, or the impact frame.
- This frame is defined relative to the global frame for complete analysis of a golf shot.
- the impact frame is determined by the surface normal at the impact location on the golf club head 150 .
- the positive z-direction is defined as the normal outward from the golf club head 150 .
- the plane tangent to the point of impact contains both the x-axis and the y-axis.
- the x-axis is arbitrarily chosen to be parallel to the global ground plane, and thus the yz-plane is normal to the ground plane.
- the impact frame incorporates the loft, bulge and roll of a club head, and also includes the net result of the golf swing.
- Motion in the impact frame is converted to equivalent motion in the global frame since the relationship between the global coordinate system and the impact coordinate system is known.
- the post impact motion of the golf ball 166 is used as inputs in the Trajectory Code, and the distance and deviation of the shot is calculated by the present invention.
- the term e zz includes all the energy that is lost in the impact in the normal direction of impact.
- e xx and e yy are account for the complicated interaction between the golf ball 166 and the golf club head 150 in the tangential plane by addressing the end result.
- the off diagonal terms e ij where i ⁇ j, are equal to zero for isotropic materials.
- a method for predicting a golfer's ball striking performance is generally designated 90.
- a similar method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,124 for a Method For Predicting A Golfer's Ball Striking Performance, assigned to Callaway Golf Company (the Assignee of the present application) and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- the method 90 commences with inputting information on a specific golf club, specific golf ball, and the swing characteristics of a golfer.
- the club head properties of the specific golf club are selected from a database of stored and previously collected club head information.
- the specific information for the club head properties is set forth in greater detail above in reference to FIG. 5 , specifically the inputs to block 42 .
- the golf club swing properties of the golfer are collected and stored in a database.
- the specific information for the golfer's golf club swing properties includes the true values for the impact location and the golf club head orientation, which are obtained according to method 20 of FIG. 1 . Additionally, information from FIG. 3 , specifically the inputs to block 40 , are part of the golf club swing properties.
- the golf ball properties of the specific golf ball are selected from database of stored and previously collected golf ball information. The specific information for the golf ball properties is set forth in greater detail above in reference to FIG. 4 , specifically the inputs to block 41 .
- the information from blocks 91 , 92 and 93 are inputted into a rigid body code.
- the rigid body code is explained in greater detail above.
- the rigid body code is used to generate a plurality of ball launch parameters, such as disclosed above in reference to FIG. 7 , specifically the inputs for block 28 .
- information concerning the atmospheric conditions is selected from a database of stored atmospheric conditions.
- information concerning the lift and drag properties of the golf ball are collected and stored.
- the lift and drag properties of golf balls are measured using conventional methods such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,002, entitled Method For Determining Coefficients Of Lift And Drag Of A Golf Ball, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- the lift and drag coefficients of a number of golf balls at specific Reynolds numbers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,224,499, entitled A Golf Ball With Multiple Sets Of Dimples, which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference.
- the ball launch parameters, the atmospheric conditions and the lift and drag properties are inputted into a trajectory code.
- the trajectory code is utilized to predict the performance of the golfer when swinging the specific golf club, with the specific golf ball under the specific atmospheric conditions.
- Trajectory codes are known in the industry, and one such code is disclosed in the afore-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,002. The USGA has such a trajectory code available for purchase.
- an operator In predicting the performance of a golf ball struck by a golfer with a specific golf club under predetermined atmospheric conditions, an operator has the option of inputting an impact of the face at a certain location regardless of the true location of impact. This allows for prediction of the performance of the golf club 133 for toe shots, heel shots and center shots.
- the type of golf ball may be selected, the type of golf club may be selected, the atmospheric conditions including wind speed, direction, relative humidity, air pressure, temperature and the terrain may be selected by the operator to predict a golfer's performance using these input parameters along with the pre-impact swing properties for the golfer.
- FIG. 42 is a table of the golf club swing properties of block 40 for a six exemplary golf shots using a BIG BERTHA C4® Driver available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad, Calif., which is composed of a composite material.
- FIG. 43 is a table of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters of block 30 for the six exemplary golf shots using a HX® RED Golf Ball available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad.
- FIG. 44 is a table of the measured golf club inherent properties of block 42 for a BIG BERTHA C4® Driver available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad, Calif., which is composed of a composite material.
- FIG. 45 is a table of the golf ball properties of block 41 for a HX® RED Golf Ball available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad.
- FIG. 46 is a table of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters of block 28 generated by the rigid body code for six exemplary shots.
- the table includes an example of information for blocks 63 - 67 of FIG. 7 .
- FIG. 47 is a table of the plurality of optimized values for the impact location and orientation of the golf club head of block 69 and 70 for the six exemplary shots.
- FIG. 48 is a table of differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters of 74 for the six exemplary shots.
- the table includes an example of information for blocks 77 - 81 of FIG. 12 .
- FIG. 49 is a table of the weighting values for absolute values of the differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters of 75 for the six exemplary shots.
- the table includes an example of information for blocks 82 - 86 of FIG. 13 .
- FIG. 50 is a table of the error value of block 76 for the six exemplary shots.
Abstract
A method for determining a golfer's golf club head orientation and impact location for a golf swing is disclosed herein. The method inputs the optimized values for the golf club head orientation and impact location, a plurality of golf swing properties of a golfer, a plurality of mass properties of a first golf club, and a plurality of mass properties of a first golf ball into a rigid body code. A plurality of calculated ball launch parameters is generated from the rigid body, which are compared to a plurality of actual ball launch parameters measured using a CMOS imaging system. The ball launch parameters are compared to each other to verify the optimized values. If the verification is not within a predetermined value, new optimized values are selected for the method. The method is repeated until the verification is within the value.
Description
- The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/843,782, filed on May 11, 2004, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/498,796, filed on Aug. 28, 2003.
- Not Applicable
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to a method for determining a golfer's impact properties for a golf swing. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for determining a golfer's golf club head orientation and impact location for a golf swing.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- For over twenty-five years, high speed camera technology has been used for gathering information on a golfer's swing. The information has varied from simple club head speed to the spin of the golf ball after impact with a certain golf club. Over the years, this information has fostered numerous improvements in golf clubs and golf balls, and assisted golfers in choosing golf clubs and golf balls that improve their game. Additionally, systems incorporating such high speed camera technology have been used in teaching golfers how to improve their swing when using a given golf club.
- An example of such a system is U.S. Pat. No. 4,063,259 to Lynch et al., for a Method Of Matching Golfer With Golf Ball, Golf Club, Or Style Of Play, which was filed in 1975. Lynch discloses a system that provides golf ball launch measurements through use of a shuttered camera that is activated when a club head breaks a beam of light that activates the flashing of a light source to provide stop action of the club head and golf ball on a camera film. The golf ball launch measurements retrieved by the Lynch system include initial velocity, initial spin velocity and launch angle.
- Another example is U.S. Pat. No. 4,136,387 to Sullivan, et al., for a Golf Club Impact And Golf Ball Launching Monitoring System, which was filed in 1977. Sullivan discloses a system that not only provides golf ball launch measurements, it also provides measurements on the golf club.
- Yet another example is a family of patents to Gobush et al.,: U.S. Pat. No. 5,471,383 filed on Sep. 30, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,501,463 filed on Feb. 24, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,719 filed on Aug. 1, 1995; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,803,823 filed on Nov. 18, 1996. This family of patents discloses a system that has two cameras angled toward each other, a golf ball with reflective markers, a golf club with reflective markers thereon and a computer. The system allows for measurement of the golf club or golf ball separately, based on the plotting of points.
- Yet another example is U.S. Pat. No. 6,042,483 for a Method Of Measuring Motion Of A Golf Ball. The patent discloses a system that uses three cameras, an optical sensor means, and strobes to obtain golf club and golf ball information.
- The prior disclosures and most launch monitors, however, fail to disclose a system and method that determine the impact location and golf club head orientation during a golfer's swing.
- The present invention is a method that allows for determining the impact location and golf club head orientation during a golfer's swing based on information obtained during a golfer's swing and measured inherent properties of a golf ball and golf club. The present invention uses an optimization method such as the Powell Optimization method or the Nelder & Mead Simplex optimization method to obtain the impact location and golf club head orientation.
- One aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a golfer's impact properties during a golf swing. The method includes providing a plurality of golf club head properties for a golf club, a plurality of golf ball properties for a golf ball, and a first optimization value including an orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on the golf club head. The method also includes measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing, and a plurality of actual ball launch parameters. The method also includes inputting the plurality of golf club properties, the plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the first optimization value into a rigid body code. The method also includes generating a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters from the rigid body code. The method also includes verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters.
- Another aspect of the present invention is using the impact properties obtained through an optimization method to predict a golfer's ball striking performance. The method includes providing a plurality of golf club head properties for a first golf club, a plurality of golf ball properties for a first golf ball, and a first optimization value including an orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on the golf club head. The method also includes measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing, and a plurality of actual ball launch parameters. The method also includes inputting the plurality of golf club properties, the plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the first optimization value into a rigid body code. The method also includes generating a first plurality of ball launch parameters from the rigid body code for the first golf ball. The method also includes inputting the first plurality of ball launch parameters, a plurality of atmospheric conditions and a plurality of lift and drag properties for the first golf ball into a trajectory code. The method also includes generating the performance from the trajectory code of the first golf ball if struck by the golfer with the first golf club under the plurality of atmospheric conditions. The method also includes inputting a plurality of mass properties of a second golf club, the plurality of mass properties of the first golf ball, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball, and the impact location of a golf ball on the golf club head into the rigid body code. The method also includes generating a second plurality of ball launch parameters from the rigid body code. The method also includes inputting the second plurality of ball launch parameters, the plurality of atmospheric conditions and the plurality of lift and drag properties for the first golf ball into the trajectory code. The method also includes generating the performance from the trajectory code of the first golf ball if struck by the golfer with the second golf club under the first atmospheric conditions. The method also includes inputting the plurality of mass properties of the first golf club, a plurality of mass properties of a second golf ball the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball, and the impact location of a golf ball on the golf club head into the rigid body code. The method also includes generating a third plurality of ball launch parameters from the rigid body code. The method also includes inputting the third plurality of ball launch parameters, the plurality of atmospheric conditions and a plurality of lift and drag properties for the second golf ball into the trajectory code. The method also includes generating the performance from the trajectory code of the second golf ball if struck by the golfer with the first golf club under the atmospheric conditions.
-
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the general method of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured values. -
FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the golf club swing properties. -
FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured golf ball inherent properties. -
FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured golf club head inherent properties. -
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the contents for the plurality of actual ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 7 is a flow chart of the contents for the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the inputs for the optimized values. -
FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the inputs for the optimized values for the golf club head orientation. -
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a golf club head illustrating the yaw, pitch and roll of the golf club head. -
FIG. 11 is a flow chart for the verification of the ball results. -
FIG. 12 is a flow chart of the contents for the comparison of the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 13 is a flow chart of the contents for the weighting of the absolute values of the differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 14 is a perspective view of the monitoring system of the present invention. -
FIG. 15 is a schematic representation of a full frame CMOS sensor array. -
FIG. 15A is a schematic representation of a field of view. -
FIG. 16 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array. -
FIG. 17 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view. -
FIG. 18 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view. -
FIG. 19 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array. -
FIG. 20 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view. -
FIG. 21 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array. -
FIG. 22 a schematic representation of an object within the field of view. -
FIG. 23 a schematic representation of a ROI within the CMOS sensor array. -
FIG. 24 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention. -
FIG. 25 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention. -
FIG. 26 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention. -
FIG. 27 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention. -
FIG. 28 is a flow chart of a method of using the system of the invention. -
FIG. 29 is a schematic representation of the highly reflective points of the golf club positioned in accordance with the first, second and third exposures of the golf club. -
FIG. 30 is an isolated view of a golf ball striped for measurement. -
FIG. 30A is an isolated view of a golf ball striped for measurement using an image with a partial phantom of a prior image with vector signs present to demonstrate calculation of angle θ. -
FIG. 31 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the first find grouping of the highly reflective points. -
FIG. 31A illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the first find grouping of the highly reflective points. -
FIG. 32 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the second find grouping of the highly reflective points. -
FIG. 33 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball for the second find grouping of the highly reflective points. -
FIG. 34 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball with repeated points eliminated and results of the find displayed. -
FIG. 35 illustrates first, second and third images of the connected highly reflective points on a golf club, and the teed golf ball with repeated points eliminated and results of the find displayed. -
FIG. 36 is a chart of the processed final pairs giving the x, y and z coordinates. -
FIG. 37 is an illustration of the thresholding of the images for the golf ball in flight. -
FIG. 38 is an isolated view of the golf ball to illustrate determining the best ball center and radius. -
FIG. 39 is a partial flow chart with images of golf balls for stereo correlating two dimensional points. -
FIG. 40 illustrates the teed golf ball and the first, second third and fourth images of the golf ball after impact, along with positioning information. -
FIG. 41 is a flow chart of a method of predicting performance using the impact location and golf club head orientation values obtained through the optimization method. -
FIG. 42 is a table of the golf club swing properties. -
FIG. 43 is a table of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 44 is a table of the golf club head properties. -
FIG. 45 is a table of the golf ball properties. -
FIG. 46 is a table of a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 47 is a table of optimized values for the impact location and golf club head orientation. -
FIG. 48 is a table of the difference between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 49 is a table of the weighting of the absolute values of the differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 50 a table of the error value. - As shown in
FIG. 1 , a method for determining a golfer's impact properties during a golf swing is generally designated 20. Themethod 20 involves using measured dynamic properties for a golfer during a golf swing and inherent properties of a golf ball and golf club to determine through an optimization method the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. Atblock 22, the first optimized values for impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing are selected by an operator. These first optimized values are speculative, and are probably not the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. However, these first optimized values must be used to obtain the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. Atblock 24, the measured values are collected for input to determine through an optimization method the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. - At
block 26, information fromblocks block 28, the rigid body code generates a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters. Atblock 30, a plurality of actual ball launch parameters is collected from an acquisition system as discussed below. Atblock 32, the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters is verified by comparison to the plurality of actual ball launch parameters, as discussed in greater detail below. Atblock 34, if the value obtained during the verification step ofblock 32 is within an error value, then the values selected for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing are correct and the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. Atblock 36, if the value obtained during the verification step ofblock 32 is outside of the error value, then the values selected for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing is not correct and an optimization method must be used to obtain the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. - At
block 38, the optimization method selects new values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing for input into the rigid body code atblock 26. A preferred optimization method is the Powell Optimization method, which is disclosed inChapter 10 of Numerical Recipes in C: The Art Of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press (1988-1992), which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference. An alternative optimization method is the Nelder & Mead Simplex optimization method. Those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other optimization methods may be used with the method without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. The method is repeated with new optimization values until the value obtained during the verification step ofblock 32 is within an error value thereby indicating that the true values for the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing have been determined by the method. -
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs or content of the measured values ofblock 24 ofFIG. 1 .Block 40 contains the golf swing properties.Block 41 contains the measured golf ball inherent properties.Block 42 contains the measured golf club inherent properties. -
FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs or content of the golf club swing properties ofblock 40 ofFIG. 2 . The golf club swing properties are obtained from the acquisition system as disclosed below.Block 43 contains the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing. Block 44 contains the angular velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing. -
FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the measured golf ball inherent properties ofblock 41 ofFIG. 2 . The measurement of the mass of the golf ball is collected atblock 45. The measurement of the radius of the golf ball is collected atblock 46. The measurement of the coefficient of restitution of the golf ball is collected atblock 47. The measurement of the moment of inertia of the golf ball is collected at block 48. The data collected at blocks 45-48 is inputted to create the measured golf ball inherent properties atblock 41 ofFIG. 2 . - The golf ball properties of
block 41 that are stored and collected include the mass of the golf ball (the Rules of Golf, as set forth by the USGA and the R&A, limit the mass to 45 grains or less), the radius of the golf ball (the Rules of Golf require a diameter of at least 1.68 inches), the COR of the golf ball and the MOI of the golf ball. The MOI of the golf ball may be determined using method well known in the industry. One such method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,822, which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference. The COR is determined using a method such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,443,858, entitled Golf Ball With A High Coefficient Of Restitution, assigned to Callaway Golf Company, the assignee of the present application, and which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference. -
FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the inputs for the golf club head properties ofblock 42 ofFIG. 2 . The measurements for the face properties are collected atblock 49. The face properties include the face geometry, the face center, the bulge radius and the roll radius. The measurements for the mass properties of the golf club head are collected or recalled from a database atblock 50. The mass properties include the inertia tensor, the mass of the club head, and the center of gravity location. The measurement for the coefficient of restitution (“COR”) of the golf club head using a specific golf ball is collected atblock 51. The measurements for the loft and lie angles of the golf club head are collected atblock 52. The data collected at blocks 49-52 is inputted to create the golf club head properties atblock 42 ofFIG. 2 . - The mass, bulge and roll radii, loft and lie angles, face geometry and face center are determined using conventional methods well known in the golf industry. The inertia tensor is calculated using: the moment of inertia about the x-axis, Ixx; the moment of inertia about the y-axis, Iyy; the moment of inertia about the z-axis, Izz; the product of inertia Ixy; the product of inertia Izy; and the product of inertia Izx. The CG and the MOI of the club head are determined according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 6,607,452, entitled High Moment of Inertia Composite Golf Club, assigned to Callaway Golf Company, the assignee of the present application, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The products of inertia Ixy, Ixz and Izy are determined according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,832, entitled Golf Club Head That Optimizes Products Of Inertia, assigned to Callaway Golf Company, the assignee of the present application, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- The COR of the golf club head is determined using a method used by the United States Golf Association (“USGA”) and disclosed at www.usga.org, or using the method and system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,585,605, entitled Measurement Of The Coefficient Of Restitution Of A Golf Club, assigned to Callaway Golf Company, the assignee of the present application, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. However, the COR of the golf club head is predicated on the golf ball, and will vary for different types of golf balls.
-
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the contents of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters atblock 30 ofFIG. 1 . The side spin of the golf ball is measured atblock 53. The back spin of the golf ball is measured atblock 54. The ball speed is measured atblock 55. The side angle of the golf ball is measured atblock 56. The launch angle of the golf ball is measured atblock 57. The information from blocks 53-57 is inputted/contained as the measured ball launch parameters or plurality of actual ball launch parameters, atblock 30 ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 7 is a flow chart of the contents of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters atblock 28 ofFIG. 1 . The side spin of the golf ball is calculated atblock 63. The back spin of the golf ball is calculated atblock 64. The ball speed is calculated atblock 65. The side angle of the golf ball is calculated atblock 66. The launch angle of the golf ball is calculated atblock 67. The information from blocks 63-67 is inputted/contained as the calculated ball launch parameters or plurality of calculated ball launch parameters, atblock 28 ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the optimization values ofblock 22 ofFIG. 1 . The impact location is selected atblock 69. The golf club head orientation is selected atblock 70. -
FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the inputs/contents of the optimization values for the golf club head orientation ofblock 70 ofFIG. 8 . The pitch of the golf club head is selected atblock 71. The yaw of the golf club head is selected atblock 72. The roll of the golf club head is selected atblock 73.FIG. 10 illustrates the pitch, yaw and roll of agolf club head 133. -
FIG. 11 is a flow chart of the verification step ofblock 32 ofFIG. 1 . Atblock 74, the information from block 28 (the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters) and the information from block 30 (the plurality of actual ball launch parameters) are compared to each other, and the absolute value of the differences is obtained for further processing atblock 75. Atblock 75, absolute values obtained atblock 74 are weighted in accordance of importance to determining the true values of the impact location and the orientation of the golf club during the golfer's swing. Atblock 76, the weighted values fromblock 75 are used in a root-mean-sum equation to obtain an error check value. In such a root-mean-sum calculation, the product of each of the weighted absolute values to the second power are added together and the square root of that addition value is the error value. In a preferred example, if the error value is within 30, then the optimization values are acceptable, and these values are accepted as the true values of the impact location and the golf club head orientation. If the error value is greater than 30, then the optimized values are not accepted and new optimized values must be used to calculate a new set of a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters to verify against the plurality of actual ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 12 is a flow chart illustrating the comparison process to obtain the absolute values for the plurality of ball launch parameters. Atblock 77, the differences between the side spin of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the side spin of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the side spin for the ball launch parameters. Atblock 78, the differences between the back spin of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the back spin of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the back spin for the ball launch parameters. Atblock 79, the differences between the ball speed of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the ball speed of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the ball speed for the ball launch parameters. Atblock 80, the differences between the side angle of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the side angle of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the side angle for the ball launch parameters. Atblock 81, the differences between the launch angle of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the launch angle of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is obtained to determine the absolute value of the launch angle for the ball launch parameters. -
FIG. 13 is a flow chart illustrating the weighting process to obtain the weighted absolute values for the plurality of ball launch parameters. Atblock 82, the absolute value for the side spin is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the side spin for the plurality of ball launch parameters. Atblock 83, the absolute value for the back spin is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the back spin for the plurality of ball launch parameters. Atblock 84, the absolute value for the ball speed is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the ball speed for the plurality of ball launch parameters. Atblock 85, the absolute value for the side angle is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the side angle for the plurality of ball launch parameters. Atblock 86, the absolute value for the launch angle is weighted to determine a weighted absolute value for the launch angle for the plurality of ball launch parameters. - The acquisition system used to measure the dynamic swing properties of the golfer and the plurality of actual ball launch parameters is a system that captures and analyzes golf club information and golf ball information during and after a golfer's swing. The golf club information includes golf club head orientation, golf club head velocity, and golf club spin. The golf club head orientation includes dynamic lie, loft and face angle of the golf club head. The golf club head velocity includes path of the golf club head and attack of the golf club head. The golf ball information includes golf ball velocity, golf ball launch angle, golf ball side angle, golf ball speed and golf ball orientation. The golf ball orientation includes the true spin of the golf ball, and the tilt axis of the golf ball which entails the back spin and the side spin of the golf ball. The various measurements will be described in greater detail below.
- As shown in
FIG. 14 , theacquisition system 120 generally includes acomputer 122, acamera structure 124 with a firstCMOS camera unit 126, a secondCMOS camera unit 128 and anoptional trigger device 130, agolf ball 132 and agolf club 133. Theacquisition system 120 is designed to operate on-course, at a driving range, inside a retail store/showroom, or at similar facilities. - The
first camera unit 126 preferably includes afirst camera 140 andoptional flash units second camera unit 128 preferably includes a second camera 44 andoptional flash units - The field of view of the
cameras CMOS sensor array 200. In a preferred embodiment, theCMOS sensor array 200 is at least one megapixel in size having one thousand rows of pixels and one thousand columns of pixels for a total of one million pixels. - As shown in
FIG. 15 , aCMOS sensor array 200 preferably has one millionactive pixels 205. Eachactive pixel 205 is capable of acting as a single camera to provide an image or a portion of an image. As shown inFIG. 15A , the field ofview 1000 corresponds to the fullframe sensor array 200, which preferably operates at a minimum frame rate ranging from 250 to 500 frames per second, however, it may have a frame rate as low as 30 frames per second. At this frame rate, the CMOS sensor array is monitoring the field of view at a rate of 250-500 times per second and is capable of creating images at 250 to 500 times per second. TheCMOS sensor array 200 preferably has one thousand columns ofactive pixels 205 and one thousand rows ofactive pixels 205. In a preferred embodiment, the field ofview 1000 is large enough to capture pre-impact golf club information and post-impact golf ball information. However, those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize that the field ofview 1000 may be adjusted to focus on any particular action by the golfer such as only pre-impact information, putting information, and the like. - As shown in
FIG. 16 , an initial region of interest (“ROI”) 210 is established at theedge 150 of the field ofview 1000 orCMOS sensor array 200. In a preferred embodiment, theinitial ROI 210 extends along all of the rows of thesensor array 200 and from 10 to 100 columns of theCMOS sensor array 200 beginning with the first column ofactive pixels 205 at theedge 150. In establishing an ROI, only those pixels within the ROI are activated while the pixels outside of the ROI are deactivated. Reducing the number ofactive pixels 205 increases the frame rate in a pseudo-inverse relationship. Thus, if only 25% of the active pixels of the CMOS sensor array are activated, and the full frame rate of theCMOS sensor array 200 is 500 frames per second. Then, the frame rate of the ROI is 2000 frames per second. Thus, reducing the number ofactive pixels 205 allows for the increased monitoring of a ROI thereby providing increased information about an object entering the ROI since an increased number of images may be obtained of the object within the ROI. - The establishment of an
ROI 210 at theedge 150′ allows for “through the lens” triggering of thesystem 20. The through the lens triggering is a substitute for the triggeringdevice 30. Thesystem 20 is monitoring theROI 210 at a very high frame rate, 1000 to 4000 frames per second, to detect any activity, or the appearance of thegolf club 133. Thesystem 120 can be instructed to monitor theROI 210 for a certain brightness provided by the reflected dots 106 a-c. Once thesystem 20 detects the object in theROI 210, the cameras are instructed to gather information on the object.FIG. 17 illustrates the object or golf club, shown as reflective dots 106 a-c, as entering the field of view 100. - As the
golf club 133 tracks through the field ofview 1000, theCMOS sensor array 200 creates new ROIs the encompass the reflective dots 106 a-c. As shown inFIG. 18 , the golf club 133 (shown by the reflective dots 106 a-c) has moved from its position inFIG. 17 . As shown inFIG. 19 , asecond ROI 215 is established around thegolf club 133. It is preferably to create an ROI having a minimum size since the frame rate is increased as the number ofactive pixels 205 is reduced. Some CMOS cameras only allow reduction in the number of columns which would limit the frame rate. - As the object or
golf club 133 moves through the field ofview 1000, the current ROI preferably overlaps the previous ROI in order to better track the movement of the object or golf club 33. As shown inFIG. 20 , the current ROI 220 (shown by bold dashed lines) overlaps the previous ROI 217 (shown by small dashed lines).FIG. 21 illustrates theCMOS sensor array 200 forROI 220. -
FIGS. 22 and 23 illustrate the continued movement of the object orgolf club 133 through the field ofview 1000 and thenew ROI 225 encompassing the current position of thegolf club 133. -
FIG. 24 is a flow chart of amethod 300 of using thesystem 120 of the invention. Atbox 301, the full CMOS sensor array is active similar toFIG. 15 . Atbox 302, an object such as a golf club 33 is detected within the field ofview 1000. If analyzing a golfer's swing, this first detection may be the golfer addressing thegolf ball 166. During this address of the golf ball, thesystem 120 may be gathering information concerning the orientation of the club head to the golf ball as the golfer adjusts the position of the golf club to strike the golf ball. TheCMOS sensor array 200 is operating at a minimum frame rate since all of theactive pixels 205 are activated. However, since the movement of thegolf club 133 is slow, this minimum frame rate is sufficient to gather the necessary information. - At
box 303, a ROI is created around the object. Atbox 304, the objected is monitored at a higher frame rate. Atbox 305, the object is removed from the field of view. If thegolf club 133 is monitored during address atbox 304, increased information is provided until the golf club is taken away for a swing. Alternatively, if agolf ball 166 is monitored at prior to impact, at impact and post impact, then the ROI is created around thegolf ball 166 until it leaves the field ofview 1000. -
FIG. 25 is a flow chart of aspecific method 310 for analysis of a golf club at address. Atbox 311, the CMOS sensor array monitors the field ofview 1000 at a minimum frame rate. Atbox 312, the indication markers (reflective dots or other like markers) on thegolf club 133 are detected within the field ofview 1000. Atbox 313, a ROI is created around the indication markers of thegolf club 133. Atbox 314, thegolf club 133 is monitored at a higher frame rate within the ROI. Atbox 315, thegolf club 133 is taken away from the field ofview 1000. -
FIG. 26 is amethod 320 for using thesystem 120 to monitor an object. Atbox 321, a portion of the field ofview 1000 is monitored at a maximum rate, similar to theROI 210 established and monitored inFIG. 16 . Atbox 322, an object is detected within the ROI. Atbox 323, a first ROI is created around the object. Atbox 324, a plurality of ROIs is created around the object as it tracks through the field ofview 1000. Atbox 325, information is provided on the movement of the object through the field of view. -
FIG. 27 is a flow chart of amethod 330 for using the system to monitor a golf club. Atbox 331, a portion of the field ofview 1000 is monitored at a maximum rate, similar to theROI 210 established and monitored inFIG. 16 . Atbox 332, agolf club 133, or more specifically the indication markers of thegolf club 133, is detected within the ROI. Atbox 333, a first ROI is created around the indications markers on thegolf club 133. Atbox 334, a plurality of ROIs is created around the indication markers as the golf club tracks through the field ofview 1000. Atbox 335, information is provided on the movement of the golf club through the field of view to determine the swing properties of the golfer. -
FIG. 28 is a flow chart of amethod 340 for using the system to monitor a golf ball during launch. Atbox 341, an ROI is created around the golf ball prior to impact with a golf club. Atbox 342, movement of thegolf ball 166 is detected by thesystem 120. Atbox 343, a plurality of ROIs is created around the golf ball during the initial launch of the golf ball subsequent to impact with a golf club. Atbox 344, the system analyzes the movement of the golf ball to provide launch parameters of thegolf ball 166. - The
CMOS sensor array 200 can operate at frames rates 4000 frames per second for a very small ROI. However, processing time between images or frames requires preferably less than 500 microseconds, and preferably less than 250 microseconds. The processing time is needed to analyze the image to determine if an object is detected and if the object is moving. - The
system 120 may be calibrated using many techniques known to those skilled in the pertinent art. One such technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,803,823, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Thesystem 120 is calibrated when first activated, and then may operate to analyze golf swings for golfers until deactivated. - As mentioned above, the
system 120 captures and analyzes golf club information and golf ball information during and after a golfer's swing. Thesystem 120 uses the images and other information to generate the information on the golfer's swing. Thegolf club 133 has at least two, but preferably three highly reflective points 106 a-c preferably positioned on the shaft, heel and toe of thegolf club 133. The highly reflective points 106 a-c may be inherent with the golf club design, or each may be composed of a highly reflective material that is adhesively attached to the desired positions of thegolf club 133. The points 106 a-c are preferably highly reflective since thecameras cameras golf club 133 is acquired by the cameras for data acquisition. - As shown in
FIG. 29 , the first row of acquired highlyreflective points 106 a (on the shaft) is designated series one, the second row of acquired highlyreflective points 106 b (on the heel) is designated series two, and the third row of acquired highlyreflective points 106 c (on the toe) is designated series three. The first row is the acquired highlyreflective points 106 a from the shaft, the second row is the acquired highlyreflective points 106 a from the heel, and the third row is the acquired highlyreflective points 106 a from the toe. The following equation is used to acquire the positioning information:
d=[(Ptx−Pnx)2+(Pty−Ptny)2 . . . ]1/2 - where d is the distance, Ptx is the position in the x direction and Pty is the position in the y direction.
- The
system 120 may use a three point mode or a two point mode to generate further information. The two point mode uses Vtoe, Vheel and Vclubtop to calculate the head speed.
V toe=[(Ptx 3 −Ptx 1)2+(Pty 3 −Pty 1)2+(Ptz 3 −Ptz 1)2]1/2[1/δT]
V heel=[(Ptx 3 −Ptx 1)2+(Pty 3 −Pty 1)2+(Ptz 3 −Ptz 1)2]1/2[1/δT]
V clubtop =[V toe +V heel][1/2]
Vy=[(y 3heel −y 1heel)2+(y 3toe −y 1toe)2]1/2[1/(2*δT)]
Vz=[(z 3heel −z 1heel)2+(z 3toe −z 1toe)2]1/2[1/(2*δT)] - This information is then used to acquire the path angle and attack angle of the
golf club 133. The Path angle=sin−1(Vy/[V]) where [V] is the magnitude of V. - The attack angle=sin−1(Vz/[V]), and the dynamic loft and dynamic lie are obtained by using Series one and Series two to project the loft and lie onto the vertical and horizontal planes.
- The two point mode uses the shaft highly
reflective point 106 a or the toe highlyreflective point 106 c along with the heel highlyreflective point 106 b to calculate the head speed of the golf club, the path angle and the attack angle. Using the shaft highlyreflective point 106 a, the equations are:
V heel=[(Ptx 3 −Ptx 1)2+(Pty 3 −Pty 1)2+(Ptz 3 −Ptz 1)2]1/2[1/δT]
V shaft=[(Ptx 3 −Ptx 1)2+(Pty 3 −Pty 1)2+(Ptz 3 −Ptz 1)2]1/2[1/δT]
V center=1.02*(V shaft +V heel)
Vy=[(y 3heel −y 1heel)2+(y 3shaft −y 1shaft)2]1/2[1/(2*δT)]
Vz=[(z 3heel −z 1heel)2+(z 3shaft −z 1shaft)2]1/2[1/(2*δT)] - The Path angle=sin−1(Vy/[V]) where [V] is the magnitude of V.
- The attack angle=sin−1(Vz/[V]).
- Using the toe highly
reflective point 106 c, the equations are:
V toe=[(x 3 −x 1)2+(y 3 −y 1)2+(z 3 −z 1)2]1/2[1/δT]
V heel=[(x 2 −x 1)2+(y 2 −y 1)2+(z 2 −z 1)2]1/2[1/δT]
V clubtop =[V toe +V heel][1/2] - The path angle=sin−1(Vyclubtop/[Vclubtop]) where [Vclubtop] is the magnitude of Vclubtop.
- The attack angle=sin−1(Vzclubtop/[Vclubtop]) where [Vclubtop] is the magnitude of Vclubtop.
- The
golf ball 166 information is mostly obtained from images of the golf ball post impact. First, the best radius and position of the two dimensional areas of interest are determined from the images. Next, all of the combinations of thegolf ball 166 centers in the images are matched and passed through a calibration model to obtain the X, Y, and Z coordinates of thegolf ball 166. Thesystem 120 removes the pairs with an error value greater then 5 millimeters to get acceptable X, Y, Z coordinates. Next, the velocity of thegolf ball 166 is obtained from Vx, Vy and Vz using a linear approximation. Next the golf ball speed is obtained by calculating the magnitude of Vx, Vy and Vz.
The launch angle=sin−1(Vz/golf ball speed),
and the spin angle=sin−1(Vy/golf ball speed). - Next, the
system 120 looks for the stripes 108 a-b, as shown inFIGS. 30 and 30 A, on thegolf ball 166 by using a random transformation searching for the spot of greatest contrast. X, Y and Z coordinates are used with the arc ofstripe 108 a and the arc ofstripe 108 b to orient the arc on the golf ball. Then, thesystem 120 determines which arc is most normal using (x2+y2)1/2. - Next, the θ angle of the
golf ball 166 is measured by taking the first vector and the second vector and using the equation:
θ=cos−1 [(vector A1)(vector A2)]/([V 1 ][V 2]) where [V 1] is the magnitude of V 1 and [V 2] is the magnitude of V 2. - As the
golf ball 166 rotates from the position shown inFIG. 30 to the position shown inFIG. 30A , the angle θ is determined from the position of vector A at both rotation positions. This allows for the spin to be determined. The back spin is calculated and applied to the first set of axis with a tilt axis of zero. The resultant vectors are compared to those of the next image and a theta is calculated for each of the vectors. This is done for each tilt axis until the Theta between the rotated first set of axis and the second set of axis is minimized. - The following is an example of how the system captures and analyzes golf club information and golf ball information during and after a golfer's swing. The golf club information includes golf club head orientation, golf club head velocity, and golf club spin. The golf club head orientation includes dynamic lie, loft and face angle of the golf club head. The golf club head velocity includes path of the golf club head, attack of the golf club head and downrange information. The golf ball information includes golf ball velocity, golf ball launch angle, golf ball side angle, golf ball speed manipulation and golf ball orientation. The golf ball orientation includes the true spin of the golf ball, and the tilt axis of the golf ball which entails the back spin and the side spin of the golf ball.
- The
system 120 pairs the points 106 a-c, verifying size, separation, orientation and attack angle. Then, thesystem 120 captures a set of six points (three pairs) from a first find as shown inFIGS. 31 and 31 A. Then, thesystem 120 searches above and below the three pairs for a second find, as shown inFIGS. 32 and 33 . The repeated points 106 are eliminated and the results are displayed from the find, as shown inFIGS. 34 and 35 . The points of the final pairs are processed by thecomputer 122 and displayed as shown inFIG. 36 . - Next the speed of the head of the
golf club 133 is determined by thesystem 120 using the equations discussed above. - Next the path angle and the attack angle of the
golf club 133 is determined by thesystem 120. Using the methods previously described, the attack angle is determined from the following equation:
Attack angle=−a tan(δz/δx) - Where δz is the z value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the z value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3. Where δx is the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3.
- The path angle is determined from the following equation:
path angle=−a tan(δy/δx) - Where δy is the y value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the y value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3. Where δx is the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 1 and 106 b 1 minus the x value of the midpoint between 106 a 3 and 106 b 3.
- Next, the
golf ball 166 data is determined b thesystem 120. First, the thresholding of the image is established as shown inFIG. 37 , at a lower gray scale value, approximately 100 to 120, to detect thegolf ball 166. Next, well-known edge detection methods are used to obtain thebest golf ball 166 center and radius, as shown inFIG. 38 . Next, the stereo correlation of two dimensional points on thegolf ball 166 is performed by thesystem 120 as inFIG. 39 , which illustrates the images of thefirst camera 140 and thesecond camera 144. - Next, as shown in
FIG. 40 , with the positioning information provided therein, the speed of thegolf ball 166, the launch angle of thegolf ball 166, and the side angle of thegolf ball 166 is determined by thesystem 120. The speed of the golf ball is determined by the following equation:
Golf ball speed=[δX 2 +δY 2 +δZ 2]1/2 /δT. For the information provided in FIG. 40, the speed of the golf ball=[(−161.68+(−605.26))2+(−43.41+(−38.46))2+(−282.74+(−193.85))2]1/2/(13127−5115), which is equal to 126 MPH once converted from millimeters over microseconds. - The launch angle of the
golf ball 166 is determined by the following equation:
Launch angle=sin−1(Vz/golf ball speed) where Vz=δZ/δT.
For the information provided inFIG. 40 , Vz=[(−282.74+(−193.85)]/(13127−5115)=11.3 MPH.
Then, the launch angle=sin−1(11.3/126.3)=11.3 degrees. - The side angle of the
golf ball 166 is determined by the following equation:
Side angle=sin−1(Vy/golf ball speed) where Vy=δY/δT. For the information provided in FIG. 40, Vy=[(−43.41+(−38.46)]/(13127−5115)=1.4 MPH.
Then, the side angle=sin−1(1.4/126.3)=0.6 degrees. - The ball spin is calculated by determining the location of the three striped on each of the acquired golf balls. Matching each axis in the field of view and determine which of the axis is orthogonal to the vertical plane. The spin is then calculated by:
θ=a cos((vectorA1 dot vector A2)/mag(v1)*mag(v2)) as discussed above. - The rigid body code solves the impact problem using conservation of linear and angular momentum, which gives the complete motion of the two rigid bodies. The impulses are calculated using the definition of impulse, and the equations are set forth below. The coordinate system used for the impulse equations is set forth below. The impulse-momentum method does not take in account the time history of the impact event. The collision is described at only the instant before contact and the instant after contact. The force transmitted from the club head to the ball is equal and opposite to the force transmitted from the ball to the club head. These forces are conveniently summed up over the period of time in which the two objects are in contact, and they are called the linear and angular impulses.
- The rigid body code assumes that both the
golf ball 166 and thegolf club head 150 are unconstrained rigid bodies, even though thegolf club head 150 is obviously connected to the shaft 152, and theball 166 is not floating in air upon impact with thegolf club head 150. For thegolf club head 150, the assumption of an unconstrained rigid body is that the impact with thegolf ball 166 occurs within a very short time frame (microseconds), that only a small portion of the tip of the shaft 152 contributes to the impact. For thegolf ball 166, the impulse due to friction between itself and the surface it is placed upon (e.g. tee, mat or ground) is very small in magnitude relative to the impulse due to the impact with thegolf club head 150, and thus this friction is ignored in the calculations. - In addition to the normal coefficient of restitution, which governs the normal component of velocity during the impact, there are coefficients of restitution that govern the tangential components of velocity. The additional coefficients of restitution are determined experimentally.
- The absolute performance numbers are defined in the global coordinate system, or the global frame. This coordinate system has the origin at the center of the golf ball, one axis points toward the intended final destination of the shot, one axis points straight up into the air, and the third axis is normal to both of the first two axis. The global coordinate system preferably follows the right hand rule.
- The coordinate system used for the analysis is referred to as the impact coordinate system, or the impact frame. This frame is defined relative to the global frame for complete analysis of a golf shot. The impact frame is determined by the surface normal at the impact location on the
golf club head 150. The positive z-direction is defined as the normal outward from thegolf club head 150. The plane tangent to the point of impact contains both the x-axis and the y-axis. For ease of calculation, the x-axis is arbitrarily chosen to be parallel to the global ground plane, and thus the yz-plane is normal to the ground plane. The impact frame incorporates the loft, bulge and roll of a club head, and also includes the net result of the golf swing. Dynamic loft, open or close to the face, and toe down all measured for definition of the impact frame. Motion in the impact frame is converted to equivalent motion in the global frame since the relationship between the global coordinate system and the impact coordinate system is known. The post impact motion of thegolf ball 166 is used as inputs in the Trajectory Code, and the distance and deviation of the shot is calculated by the present invention. - The symbols are defined as below:
- {right arrow over (i)}=(1 0 0), the unit vector in the x-direction.
- {right arrow over (j)}=(0 1 0), the unit vector in the y-direction.
- {right arrow over (k)}=(0 0 1), the unit vector in the z-direction.
- m1, the mass of the club head.
- m2, the mass of the golf ball.
the inertia tensor of the club head.
the inertia tensor of the golf ball. - {right arrow over (r)}1=(a1 b1 c1), the vector from point of impact to the center of gravity of the club head.
- {right arrow over (r)}2=(a2 b2 c2), the vector from point of impact to the center of gravity of the golf ball.
- {right arrow over (r)}3=−{right arrow over (r)}1+{right arrow over (r)}2=(−a1+a2 −b1+b2 −c1+c2)=(a3 b3 c3), the vector from center of gravity of club head to the center of gravity of the golf ball.
- {right arrow over (v)}1,i=(vx,1,i vy,1,i vz,1,i), the velocity of the club head before impact.
- {right arrow over (v)}1,f=(vx,1,f vy,1,f vz,1,f), the velocity of the club head after impact.
- {right arrow over (v)}1,i=(vx,1,i vy,1,i vz,1,i), the velocity of the golf ball before impact.
- {right arrow over (v)}2,f=(vx,2,f vy,2,f vz,2,f), the velocity of the golf ball after impact.
- {right arrow over (ω)}1,i=(ωx,1,i ωy,1,i ωz,1,i), the angular velocity of the club head before impact.
- {right arrow over (ω)}1,f=(ωx,1,f ωy,1,f ωz,1,f), the angular velocity of the club head after impact.
- {right arrow over (ω)}2,i=(ωx,2,i ωy,2,i ωz,2,i), the angular velocity of the golf ball before impact.
- {right arrow over (ω)}2,f=(ωx,2,f ωy,2,f ωz,2,f), the angular velocity of the golf ball after impact.
the coefficient of restitution matrix. - [L]=m{right arrow over (v)}, definition of linear momentum.
- [H]=[I]{right arrow over (ω)}, definition of angular momentum.
Conservation of linear momentum:
m 1 {right arrow over (v)} 1,f +m 2 {right arrow over (v)} 2,f =m 1 {right arrow over (v)} 1,i +m 2 {right arrow over (v)} 2,i B1-B3
Conservation of angular momentum:
The definition of coefficients of restitution:
The tangential impulse on the ball causes both rotation and translation:
Equations B1-B12 can be combined to form a system of linear equations of the form:
[A]{x}={B} B13
where [A], and {B} are determined from the known velocities before the impact, the mass properties of thegolf ball 166 andgolf club head 150, the impact location relative to the center of gravity of thegolf ball 166 and thegolf club head 150, and the surface normal at the point of impact. {x} contains all the post impact velocities (linear and angular), and is solved by pre-multiplying {B} by the inverse of [A], or any other method in solving system of equations in linear algebra. - When the
golf ball 166 is sitting on thetee 168, it is in equilibrium. Thegolf ball 166 will not move until a force that's greater than Fm, the maximum static friction force between thegolf ball 166 and thetee 168, is applied on thegolf ball 166.
Fm=μsN=μsm2g C1
μs , is the static coefficient of friction and g is gravity.
For agolf ball 166 with 45 grams of mass, and a μs of 0.3,
F m=μs mg=(0.3)(0.045)(9.81)=0.132N
Assume this force is applied on thegolf ball 166 for the duration of an impact of 0.0005 sec (which is an overestimation of the actual impulse), then the impulse, L, on thegolf ball 166 is:
L=(0.132)(0.0005)=0.0000662N·s
This impulse, L, would cause thegolf ball 166 to move at 0.00147 m/s (or 0.00483 ft/sec), and rotate at 8.08 rad/sec (or 77.1 rpm). Both of these numbers are small relative to the range of numbers normally seen for irons and woods. If the rigid body code of the present invention were to be applied to putters, then it would be preferable to include the friction force between the green and thegolf ball 166 for the analysis. - Each of the individual terms in the above matrix, eij, where i=x, y, z, and j =x, y, z, relates the velocity in the i-direction to the j-direction. Each of the diagonal terms, where i=j, indicate the relationship in velocity of one of the axis, x, y, or z, before and after the impact. Let x, y, z be the axis defined in the impact frame. The term ezz includes all the energy that is lost in the impact in the normal direction of impact. exx and eyy are account for the complicated interaction between the
golf ball 166 and thegolf club head 150 in the tangential plane by addressing the end result. In general, the off diagonal terms eij, where i≠j, are equal to zero for isotropic materials. - As shown in
FIG. 41 , a method for predicting a golfer's ball striking performance is generally designated 90. A similar method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,124 for a Method For Predicting A Golfer's Ball Striking Performance, assigned to Callaway Golf Company (the Assignee of the present application) and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Themethod 90 commences with inputting information on a specific golf club, specific golf ball, and the swing characteristics of a golfer. Atblock 91, the club head properties of the specific golf club are selected from a database of stored and previously collected club head information. The specific information for the club head properties is set forth in greater detail above in reference toFIG. 5 , specifically the inputs to block 42. Atblock 92, the golf club swing properties of the golfer are collected and stored in a database. The specific information for the golfer's golf club swing properties includes the true values for the impact location and the golf club head orientation, which are obtained according tomethod 20 ofFIG. 1 . Additionally, information fromFIG. 3 , specifically the inputs to block 40, are part of the golf club swing properties. Atblock 93, the golf ball properties of the specific golf ball are selected from database of stored and previously collected golf ball information. The specific information for the golf ball properties is set forth in greater detail above in reference toFIG. 4 , specifically the inputs to block 41. - At
block 94, the information fromblocks block 94, the rigid body code is used to generate a plurality of ball launch parameters, such as disclosed above in reference toFIG. 7 , specifically the inputs forblock 28. Atblock 95, information concerning the atmospheric conditions is selected from a database of stored atmospheric conditions. Atblock 97, information concerning the lift and drag properties of the golf ball are collected and stored. The lift and drag properties of golf balls are measured using conventional methods such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,002, entitled Method For Determining Coefficients Of Lift And Drag Of A Golf Ball, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The lift and drag coefficients of a number of golf balls at specific Reynolds numbers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,224,499, entitled A Golf Ball With Multiple Sets Of Dimples, which pertinent parts are hereby incorporated by reference. - At
block 98, the ball launch parameters, the atmospheric conditions and the lift and drag properties are inputted into a trajectory code. Atblock 99, the trajectory code is utilized to predict the performance of the golfer when swinging the specific golf club, with the specific golf ball under the specific atmospheric conditions. Trajectory codes are known in the industry, and one such code is disclosed in the afore-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,002. The USGA has such a trajectory code available for purchase. - In predicting the performance of a golf ball struck by a golfer with a specific golf club under predetermined atmospheric conditions, an operator has the option of inputting an impact of the face at a certain location regardless of the true location of impact. This allows for prediction of the performance of the
golf club 133 for toe shots, heel shots and center shots. The type of golf ball may be selected, the type of golf club may be selected, the atmospheric conditions including wind speed, direction, relative humidity, air pressure, temperature and the terrain may be selected by the operator to predict a golfer's performance using these input parameters along with the pre-impact swing properties for the golfer. -
FIG. 42 is a table of the golf club swing properties ofblock 40 for a six exemplary golf shots using a BIG BERTHA C4® Driver available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad, Calif., which is composed of a composite material. -
FIG. 43 is a table of the plurality of actual ball launch parameters ofblock 30 for the six exemplary golf shots using a HX® RED Golf Ball available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad. -
FIG. 44 is a table of the measured golf club inherent properties ofblock 42 for a BIG BERTHA C4® Driver available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad, Calif., which is composed of a composite material. -
FIG. 45 is a table of the golf ball properties ofblock 41 for a HX® RED Golf Ball available from Callaway Golf Company of Carlsbad. -
FIG. 46 is a table of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters ofblock 28 generated by the rigid body code for six exemplary shots. The table includes an example of information for blocks 63-67 ofFIG. 7 . -
FIG. 47 is a table of the plurality of optimized values for the impact location and orientation of the golf club head ofblock -
FIG. 48 is a table of differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters of 74 for the six exemplary shots. The table includes an example of information for blocks 77-81 ofFIG. 12 . -
FIG. 49 is a table of the weighting values for absolute values of the differences between the actual and calculated plurality of ball launch parameters of 75 for the six exemplary shots. The table includes an example of information for blocks 82-86 ofFIG. 13 . -
FIG. 50 is a table of the error value ofblock 76 for the six exemplary shots. - From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes, modifications and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claims. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.
Claims (25)
1. A method for determining a golfer's impact properties during impact of a golf club with a golf ball, the method comprising:
obtaining a first optimization value, the first optimization value comprising an orientation of a golf club head of the golf club during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on a face of the golf club head;
measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and a linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing using a CMOS imaging system, the CMOS imaging system having a sensor array with at least one megapixel in size, wherein the CMOS imaging system forms a region of interest operating at a frame rate of 1000 to 4000 frames per second prior to the golf club entering the field of view and then forms subsequent regions of interest as the golf club travels through the field of view;
measuring a plurality of actual ball launch parameters using the CMOS imaging system;
inputting a plurality of golf club properties, a plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the first optimization value into a rigid body code;
generating a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters from the rigid body code; and
verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters to actual ball parameters by obtaining a plurality of absolute values of the differences between each of the ball launch parameters of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the plurality of actual ball launch parameters, weighting each of the plurality of absolute values of the differences to create a plurality of weighted values, and obtaining an error value from the root-mean-sum of the plurality of weighted values.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the plurality of golf club head properties comprises the mass of the golf club head, the location of the center of gravity of the golf club head relative to the impact location of the golf ball, the inertia tensor of the golf club head, the geometry of the face of the golf club head, the bulge and roll radii of the face of the golf club head, the loft of the golf club head and the face center location of the golf club head.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the plurality of golf ball properties comprises the mass of the golf ball, the coefficient of restitution of the first golf ball at a speed of 143 feet per second, the moment of inertia of the golf ball and the radius of the golf ball.
4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the plurality of actual ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball.
5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball.
6. The method according to claim 2 wherein the plurality of golf club head properties further comprises the coefficient of restitution of the golf club head when striking the golf ball, and a spin coefficient of restitution of the golf club head when striking the golf ball.
7. A method for determining a golfer's impact properties during impact of a golf club with a golf ball, the method comprising:
a) providing an optimization value, the optimization value comprising an orientation of a golf club head of the golf club during impact with the golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on a face of the golf club head;
b) measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and a linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing using a CMOS imaging system, the CMOS imaging system having a sensor array with at least one megapixel in size, wherein the CMOS imaging system forms a region of interest operating at a frame rate of 1000 to 4000 frames per second prior to the golf club entering the field of view and then forms subsequent regions of interest as the golf club travels through the field of view during the golfer's swing;
c) measuring a plurality of actual ball launch parameters using the CMOS imaging system;
d) providing a plurality of golf club head properties for the golf club;
e) providing a plurality of golf ball properties for the golf ball;
f) inputting the plurality of golf club properties, the plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the optimization value into a rigid body code;
g) generating a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters from the rigid body code;
h) verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters to actual ball parameters by obtaining a plurality of absolute values of the differences between each of the ball launch parameters of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the plurality of actual ball launch parameters, weighting each of the plurality of absolute values of the differences to create a plurality of weighted values, and obtaining an error value from the root-mean-sum of the plurality of weighted values;
i) repeating steps d-h with different optimization values using non-linear optimization methods until the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters is verified to measurements in step c.
8. The method according to claim 7 wherein the optimization value for the orientation of the golf club head comprises the yaw of the golf club head, the pitch of the golf club head and the roll of the golf club head, all relative to the ground.
9. The method according to claim 7 wherein the optimization value for the impact location of the golf ball with the golf club head comprises a X-coordinate relative to the center of a face of the golf club head and a Y-coordinate relative to the center of the face of the golf club head.
10. The method according to claim 7 wherein the optimization values are generated from the Powell non-linear optimization method.
11. The method according to claim 7 wherein the plurality of golf club head properties comprises the mass of the golf club head, the location of the center of gravity of the golf club head relative to the impact location of the golf ball, the inertia tensor of the golf club head, the geometry of the face of the golf club head, the bulge and roll radii of the face of the golf club head, the loft of the golf club head and the face center location of the golf club head.
12. The method according to claim 7 wherein the plurality of golf ball properties comprises the mass of the golf ball, the coefficient of restitution of the first golf ball at a speed of 143 feet per second, the moment of inertia of the golf ball and the radius of the golf ball.
13. The method according to claim 7 wherein the plurality of actual ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball.
14. The method according to claim 7 wherein the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball.
15. A method for determining a golfer's impact properties during a golf swing, the method comprising:
inputting a plurality of golf club properties, a plurality of golf ball properties, an angular velocity of a golf club, a linear velocity of the golf club, and an optimization value into a rigid body code, wherein the optimization value is generated from a Powell non-linear optimization method;
generating a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters from the rigid body code; and
verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters against a plurality of actual ball launch parameters measured using a CMOS imaging system, the CMOS imaging system having a sensor array with at least one megapixel in size, wherein the CMOS imaging system forms a region of interest operating at a frame rate of 1000 to 4000 frames per second prior to a golf ball entering the field of view and then forms subsequent regions of interest as the golf ball travels through the field of view.
16. The method according to claim 15 wherein the optimization value comprises an orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on the golf club head.
17. A method for determining a golfer's impact properties during a golf swing, the method comprising:
providing a plurality of golf club head properties for a golf club;
providing a plurality of golf ball properties for a golf ball;
providing a first optimization value, the first optimization value comprising an orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on the golf club head;
measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing;
measuring a plurality of actual ball launch parameters;
inputting the plurality of golf club properties, the plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the first optimization value into a rigid body code;
generating a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters from the rigid body code; and
verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters.
18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the plurality of golf club head properties comprises the mass of the golf club head, the location of the center of gravity of the golf club head relative to the impact location of the golf ball, the inertia tensor of the golf club head, the geometry of the face of the golf club head, the bulge and roll radii of the face of the golf club head, the loft of the golf club head and the face center location of the golf club head.
19. The method according to claim 17 wherein the plurality of golf ball properties comprises the mass of the golf ball, the coefficient of restitution of the first golf ball at a speed of 143 feet per second, the moment of inertia of the golf ball and the radius of the golf ball.
20. The method according to claim 17 wherein the plurality of actual ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball.
21. The method according to claim 17 wherein the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball.
22. A method for determining a golfer's impact properties during a golf swing, the method comprising:
b) providing an optimization value, the optimization value comprising an orientation of the golf club head during impact with a golf ball and an impact location of the golf ball on the golf club head;
b) measuring an angular velocity of the golf club and the linear velocity of the golf club during the golfer's swing;
c) measuring a plurality of actual ball launch parameters, wherein the plurality of actual ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball;
d) providing a plurality of golf club head properties for a golf club, wherein the plurality of golf club head properties comprises a mass of the golf club head, a location of the center of gravity of the golf club head relative to the impact location of the golf ball, an inertia tensor of the golf club head, the geometry of the face of the golf club head, a bulge and roll radii of the face of the golf club head, a loft of the golf club head and a face center location of the golf club head;
e) providing a plurality of golf ball properties for a golf ball, wherein the plurality of golf ball properties comprises a mass of the golf ball, a coefficient of restitution of the first golf ball at a speed of 143 feet per second, a moment of inertia of the golf ball and a radius of the golf ball;
f) inputting the plurality of golf club properties, the plurality of golf ball properties, the angular velocity of the golf club, the linear velocity of the golf club, and the optimization value into a rigid body code;
g) generating a plurality of calculated ball launch parameters from the rigid body code, wherein the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters comprises a launch angle of the golf ball, a side angle of the golf ball, a golf ball speed, a side spin of the golf ball and a back spin of the golf ball;
h) verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters;
i) repeating steps d-h with different optimization values until the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters is verified.
23. The method according to claim 22 wherein the verifying the accuracy of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters comprises:
obtaining a plurality of absolute values of the differences between each of the ball launch parameters of the plurality of calculated ball launch parameters and the plurality of actual ball launch parameters;
weighting each of the plurality of absolute values of the differences to create a plurality of weighted values; and
obtaining an error value from the root-mean-sum of the plurality of weighted values.
24. The method according to claim 22 wherein the optimization value for the orientation of the golf club head comprises the yaw of the golf club head, the pitch of the golf club head and the roll of the golf club head, all relative to the ground.
25. The method according to claim 22 wherein the optimization value for the impact location of the golf ball with the golf club head comprises a X-coordinate relative to the center of a face of the golf club head and a Y-coordinate relative to the center of the face of the golf club head.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/828,655 US20080020867A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2007-07-26 | Golfer's impact properties during a golf swing |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US49879603P | 2003-08-28 | 2003-08-28 | |
US84378204A | 2004-05-11 | 2004-05-11 | |
US11/828,655 US20080020867A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2007-07-26 | Golfer's impact properties during a golf swing |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US84378204A Continuation | 2003-08-28 | 2004-05-11 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080020867A1 true US20080020867A1 (en) | 2008-01-24 |
Family
ID=38972109
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/828,655 Abandoned US20080020867A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2007-07-26 | Golfer's impact properties during a golf swing |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20080020867A1 (en) |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090088276A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Solheim John K | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US20090131193A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-05-21 | Swartz Gregory J | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US20100151956A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2010-06-17 | Swartz Gregory J | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US20110028248A1 (en) * | 2009-07-31 | 2011-02-03 | Masahiko Ueda | Method of evaluating a golf club |
US20120316004A1 (en) * | 2011-06-09 | 2012-12-13 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing device, swing analyzing program, and recording medium |
CN103657052A (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2014-03-26 | 卡西欧计算机株式会社 | State finding apparatus and state finding method |
US8747246B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2014-06-10 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US20140158768A1 (en) * | 2012-11-27 | 2014-06-12 | Diebold Self-Service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated | Automated banking machine that outputs interference signals to jam reading ability of unauthorized card reader devices |
US8852028B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2014-10-07 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US8876621B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2014-11-04 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing device, swing analyzing program, and recording medium |
US8974313B2 (en) | 2011-11-30 | 2015-03-10 | Nike, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining an angle of attack from multiple ball hitting |
US8982216B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2015-03-17 | Nike, Inc. | Portable movement capture device and method of finite element analysis |
US9211439B1 (en) | 2010-10-05 | 2015-12-15 | Swingbyte, Inc. | Three dimensional golf swing analyzer |
US20160089568A1 (en) * | 2014-09-26 | 2016-03-31 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Exercise analysis device, exercise analysis system, exercise analysis method, and program |
US20160175673A1 (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2016-06-23 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Motion analysis device, motion analysis system, motion analysis method, program, and recording medium |
US9731165B2 (en) | 2010-12-20 | 2017-08-15 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing apparatus |
US10121173B2 (en) | 2010-03-12 | 2018-11-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving application/content based on purchase information |
US10213645B1 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2019-02-26 | Swingbyte, Inc. | Motion attributes recognition system and methods |
US20190255413A1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2019-08-22 | Golfzon Co., Ltd. | Device for calculating flight information of ball, method of calculating flight information of ball, and computing-device-readable recording medium having the method recorded therein |
US20220233942A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2022-07-28 | Trajekt Sports Inc. | Method and system of replicating ball trajectories using an automated ball throwing machine |
Citations (47)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4063259A (en) * | 1975-10-29 | 1977-12-13 | Acushnet Company | Method of matching golfer with golf ball, golf club, or style of play |
US4136387A (en) * | 1977-09-12 | 1979-01-23 | Acushnet Company | Golf club impact and golf ball launching monitoring system |
US4360199A (en) * | 1980-12-22 | 1982-11-23 | Andrew Jackson | Placement device for golf tee and ball |
US4375887A (en) * | 1975-10-29 | 1983-03-08 | Acushnet Company | Method of matching golfer with golf ball, golf club, or style of play |
US4580786A (en) * | 1982-05-20 | 1986-04-08 | Shipley Barry E | Device for controlling golf swing |
US5269177A (en) * | 1992-04-21 | 1993-12-14 | Miggins Lawrence E | Apparatus and method for determining the center of percussion ("sweet spot") for baseball bats and other objects |
US5309753A (en) * | 1993-04-08 | 1994-05-10 | U.S. Golf Association | Apparatus and method for determining the inertia matrix of a rigid body |
US5375844A (en) * | 1993-10-18 | 1994-12-27 | Waud; Michael J. | Golfer's aid |
US5471383A (en) * | 1992-01-22 | 1995-11-28 | Acushnet Company | Monitoring systems to measure and display flight characteristics of moving sports object |
US5501463A (en) * | 1992-11-20 | 1996-03-26 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine object striking instrument movement conditions |
US5575719A (en) * | 1994-02-24 | 1996-11-19 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine object striking instrument movement conditions |
US5582552A (en) * | 1995-10-04 | 1996-12-10 | Henry-Griffitts, Inc. | Training aid for golfer |
US5625577A (en) * | 1990-12-25 | 1997-04-29 | Shukyohojin, Kongo Zen Sohonzan Shorinji | Computer-implemented motion analysis method using dynamics |
US5661917A (en) * | 1995-04-25 | 1997-09-02 | Mecalac | Civil engineering works machine in which the working tool is mounted at the end of an articulated arm |
US5672809A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1997-09-30 | Brandt; Richard A. | Method and apparatus for determining the performance of sports bats and similar equipment |
US5682230A (en) * | 1995-11-01 | 1997-10-28 | United States Golf Association | Test range for determining the aerodynamic characteristics of a ball in flight |
US5694340A (en) * | 1995-04-05 | 1997-12-02 | Kim; Charles Hongchul | Method of training physical skills using a digital motion analyzer and an accelerometer |
US5697791A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1997-12-16 | Nashner; Lewis M. | Apparatus and method for assessment and biofeedback training of body coordination skills critical and ball-strike power and accuracy during athletic activitites |
US5700204A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1997-12-23 | Teder; Rein S. | Projectile motion parameter determination device using successive approximation and high measurement angle speed sensor |
US5779241A (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 1998-07-14 | D'costa; Joseph F. | Apparatus and method for measurement of position and velocity |
US5899822A (en) * | 1996-11-25 | 1999-05-04 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Three-piece solid golf ball |
US5935014A (en) * | 1993-03-12 | 1999-08-10 | Zevo Golf Co., Inc. | Golf swing analyzing equipment |
US6042483A (en) * | 1996-10-30 | 2000-03-28 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Method of measuring motion of a golf ball |
US6186002B1 (en) * | 1998-04-21 | 2001-02-13 | United States Golf Associates | Method for determining coefficients of lift and drag of a golf ball |
US6224493B1 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2001-05-01 | Callaway Golf Company | Instrumented golf club system and method of use |
US6224499B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2001-05-01 | Callaway Golf Company | Golf ball with multiple sets of dimples |
US6285445B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-09-04 | Acushnet Company | Method for determining aerodynamic characteristics of a golf ball |
US6328660B1 (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2001-12-11 | Bunn, Iii Julian W. | Method for club fitting |
US6390934B1 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-05-21 | Acushnet Company | Method of image processing of paint dots on golf balls |
US6411370B1 (en) * | 1998-11-23 | 2002-06-25 | Vantageport, Inc. | Optical system and method for measuring distance |
US6431990B1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-08-13 | Callaway Golf Company | System and method for measuring a golfer's ball striking parameters |
US6458035B1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2002-10-01 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Method of measuring rotational motion of a golf ball |
US20020173367A1 (en) * | 2001-02-14 | 2002-11-21 | William Gobush | Performance measurement system with fluorescent markers for golf equipment |
US6488591B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2002-12-03 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine golf ball trajectory and flight |
US6506124B1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-01-14 | Callaway Golf Company | Method for predicting a golfer's ball striking performance |
US6514081B1 (en) * | 1999-08-06 | 2003-02-04 | Jeffrey L. Mengoli | Method and apparatus for automating motion analysis |
US6533674B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2003-03-18 | Acushnet Company | Multishutter camera system |
US6563535B1 (en) * | 1998-05-19 | 2003-05-13 | Flashpoint Technology, Inc. | Image processing system for high performance digital imaging devices |
US6565448B2 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2003-05-20 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus for configuring a golf club in accordance with a golfer's individual swing characteristics |
US6571600B2 (en) * | 2001-09-19 | 2003-06-03 | Acushnet Company | Apparatus and method for measurement of coefficient of restitution and contact time |
US6579190B2 (en) * | 2000-03-15 | 2003-06-17 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Ball motion measuring apparatus |
US6594623B1 (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2003-07-15 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Determining three-dimensional orientation of objects |
US6592465B2 (en) * | 2001-08-02 | 2003-07-15 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus for monitoring objects in flight |
US6607450B1 (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2003-08-19 | Lloyd E. Hackman | Golf swing frequency analyzer |
US6638175B2 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2003-10-28 | Callaway Golf Company | Diagnostic golf club system |
US6648769B2 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2003-11-18 | Callaway Golf Company | Instrumented golf club system & method of use |
US6667826B1 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2003-12-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Chromatic modulator for high resolution CCD or APS devices |
-
2007
- 2007-07-26 US US11/828,655 patent/US20080020867A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (52)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4375887A (en) * | 1975-10-29 | 1983-03-08 | Acushnet Company | Method of matching golfer with golf ball, golf club, or style of play |
US4063259A (en) * | 1975-10-29 | 1977-12-13 | Acushnet Company | Method of matching golfer with golf ball, golf club, or style of play |
US4136387A (en) * | 1977-09-12 | 1979-01-23 | Acushnet Company | Golf club impact and golf ball launching monitoring system |
US4360199A (en) * | 1980-12-22 | 1982-11-23 | Andrew Jackson | Placement device for golf tee and ball |
US4580786A (en) * | 1982-05-20 | 1986-04-08 | Shipley Barry E | Device for controlling golf swing |
US5625577A (en) * | 1990-12-25 | 1997-04-29 | Shukyohojin, Kongo Zen Sohonzan Shorinji | Computer-implemented motion analysis method using dynamics |
US5471383A (en) * | 1992-01-22 | 1995-11-28 | Acushnet Company | Monitoring systems to measure and display flight characteristics of moving sports object |
US5269177A (en) * | 1992-04-21 | 1993-12-14 | Miggins Lawrence E | Apparatus and method for determining the center of percussion ("sweet spot") for baseball bats and other objects |
US5501463A (en) * | 1992-11-20 | 1996-03-26 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine object striking instrument movement conditions |
US6500073B1 (en) * | 1992-11-20 | 2002-12-31 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine golf ball trajectory and flight |
US5803823A (en) * | 1992-11-20 | 1998-09-08 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine object striking instrument movement conditions |
US5935014A (en) * | 1993-03-12 | 1999-08-10 | Zevo Golf Co., Inc. | Golf swing analyzing equipment |
US5309753A (en) * | 1993-04-08 | 1994-05-10 | U.S. Golf Association | Apparatus and method for determining the inertia matrix of a rigid body |
US5375844A (en) * | 1993-10-18 | 1994-12-27 | Waud; Michael J. | Golfer's aid |
US5575719A (en) * | 1994-02-24 | 1996-11-19 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine object striking instrument movement conditions |
US5697791A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1997-12-16 | Nashner; Lewis M. | Apparatus and method for assessment and biofeedback training of body coordination skills critical and ball-strike power and accuracy during athletic activitites |
US5694340A (en) * | 1995-04-05 | 1997-12-02 | Kim; Charles Hongchul | Method of training physical skills using a digital motion analyzer and an accelerometer |
US5661917A (en) * | 1995-04-25 | 1997-09-02 | Mecalac | Civil engineering works machine in which the working tool is mounted at the end of an articulated arm |
US5779241A (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 1998-07-14 | D'costa; Joseph F. | Apparatus and method for measurement of position and velocity |
US5582552A (en) * | 1995-10-04 | 1996-12-10 | Henry-Griffitts, Inc. | Training aid for golfer |
US5682230A (en) * | 1995-11-01 | 1997-10-28 | United States Golf Association | Test range for determining the aerodynamic characteristics of a ball in flight |
US5672809A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1997-09-30 | Brandt; Richard A. | Method and apparatus for determining the performance of sports bats and similar equipment |
US5700204A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1997-12-23 | Teder; Rein S. | Projectile motion parameter determination device using successive approximation and high measurement angle speed sensor |
US6042483A (en) * | 1996-10-30 | 2000-03-28 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Method of measuring motion of a golf ball |
US5899822A (en) * | 1996-11-25 | 1999-05-04 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Three-piece solid golf ball |
US6186002B1 (en) * | 1998-04-21 | 2001-02-13 | United States Golf Associates | Method for determining coefficients of lift and drag of a golf ball |
US6563535B1 (en) * | 1998-05-19 | 2003-05-13 | Flashpoint Technology, Inc. | Image processing system for high performance digital imaging devices |
US6458035B1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2002-10-01 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Method of measuring rotational motion of a golf ball |
US6565448B2 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2003-05-20 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus for configuring a golf club in accordance with a golfer's individual swing characteristics |
US6533674B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2003-03-18 | Acushnet Company | Multishutter camera system |
US6616543B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2003-09-09 | Acushnet Company | Apparatus to determine golf ball trajectory and flight |
US6488591B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2002-12-03 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus to determine golf ball trajectory and flight |
US6607450B1 (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2003-08-19 | Lloyd E. Hackman | Golf swing frequency analyzer |
US6411370B1 (en) * | 1998-11-23 | 2002-06-25 | Vantageport, Inc. | Optical system and method for measuring distance |
US6328660B1 (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2001-12-11 | Bunn, Iii Julian W. | Method for club fitting |
US6402634B2 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2002-06-11 | Callaway Golf Company | Instrumented golf club system and method of use |
US6648769B2 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2003-11-18 | Callaway Golf Company | Instrumented golf club system & method of use |
US6638175B2 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2003-10-28 | Callaway Golf Company | Diagnostic golf club system |
US6224493B1 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2001-05-01 | Callaway Golf Company | Instrumented golf club system and method of use |
US6514081B1 (en) * | 1999-08-06 | 2003-02-04 | Jeffrey L. Mengoli | Method and apparatus for automating motion analysis |
US6224499B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2001-05-01 | Callaway Golf Company | Golf ball with multiple sets of dimples |
US6285445B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-09-04 | Acushnet Company | Method for determining aerodynamic characteristics of a golf ball |
US6594623B1 (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2003-07-15 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Determining three-dimensional orientation of objects |
US6579190B2 (en) * | 2000-03-15 | 2003-06-17 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Ball motion measuring apparatus |
US6431990B1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-08-13 | Callaway Golf Company | System and method for measuring a golfer's ball striking parameters |
US20020173367A1 (en) * | 2001-02-14 | 2002-11-21 | William Gobush | Performance measurement system with fluorescent markers for golf equipment |
US6390934B1 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-05-21 | Acushnet Company | Method of image processing of paint dots on golf balls |
US6592465B2 (en) * | 2001-08-02 | 2003-07-15 | Acushnet Company | Method and apparatus for monitoring objects in flight |
US6571600B2 (en) * | 2001-09-19 | 2003-06-03 | Acushnet Company | Apparatus and method for measurement of coefficient of restitution and contact time |
US6602144B2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-08-05 | Callaway Golf Company | Method for predicting a golfer's ball striking performance |
US6506124B1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-01-14 | Callaway Golf Company | Method for predicting a golfer's ball striking performance |
US6667826B1 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2003-12-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Chromatic modulator for high resolution CCD or APS devices |
Cited By (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8747246B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2014-06-10 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US20090131193A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-05-21 | Swartz Gregory J | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US20100151956A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2010-06-17 | Swartz Gregory J | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US9675862B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2017-06-13 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US8852028B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2014-10-07 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US8360899B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2013-01-29 | Karsten Manfacturing Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US20090088276A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Solheim John K | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US9827464B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2017-11-28 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and systems to custom fit golf clubs |
US8475300B2 (en) * | 2009-07-31 | 2013-07-02 | Sri Sports Limited | Method of evaluating a golf club |
US20110028248A1 (en) * | 2009-07-31 | 2011-02-03 | Masahiko Ueda | Method of evaluating a golf club |
US10121173B2 (en) | 2010-03-12 | 2018-11-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving application/content based on purchase information |
US9211439B1 (en) | 2010-10-05 | 2015-12-15 | Swingbyte, Inc. | Three dimensional golf swing analyzer |
US9731165B2 (en) | 2010-12-20 | 2017-08-15 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing apparatus |
US9162130B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2015-10-20 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing device, swing analyzing program, and recording medium |
US20120316004A1 (en) * | 2011-06-09 | 2012-12-13 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing device, swing analyzing program, and recording medium |
US9403057B2 (en) * | 2011-06-09 | 2016-08-02 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing device, swing analyzing program, and recording medium |
US8876621B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2014-11-04 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Swing analyzing device, swing analyzing program, and recording medium |
US10213645B1 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2019-02-26 | Swingbyte, Inc. | Motion attributes recognition system and methods |
US8982216B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2015-03-17 | Nike, Inc. | Portable movement capture device and method of finite element analysis |
US8974313B2 (en) | 2011-11-30 | 2015-03-10 | Nike, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining an angle of attack from multiple ball hitting |
CN103657052A (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2014-03-26 | 卡西欧计算机株式会社 | State finding apparatus and state finding method |
US9203548B2 (en) * | 2012-11-27 | 2015-12-01 | Diebold Self-Service Systems Division Of Diebold, Incorporated | Automated banking machine that outputs interference signals to jam reading ability of unauthorized card reader devices |
US20140158768A1 (en) * | 2012-11-27 | 2014-06-12 | Diebold Self-Service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated | Automated banking machine that outputs interference signals to jam reading ability of unauthorized card reader devices |
US20160089568A1 (en) * | 2014-09-26 | 2016-03-31 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Exercise analysis device, exercise analysis system, exercise analysis method, and program |
US20160175673A1 (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2016-06-23 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Motion analysis device, motion analysis system, motion analysis method, program, and recording medium |
US9999394B2 (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2018-06-19 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Motion analysis device, motion analysis system, motion analysis method, program, and recording medium |
US10600056B2 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2020-03-24 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Motion analysis device, motion analysis system, motion analysis method, program, and recording medium |
US20190255413A1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2019-08-22 | Golfzon Co., Ltd. | Device for calculating flight information of ball, method of calculating flight information of ball, and computing-device-readable recording medium having the method recorded therein |
US20220233939A1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2022-07-28 | Golfzon Co., Ltd. | Device for calculating flight information of ball, method of calculating flight information of ball, and computing-device-readable recording medium having the method recorded therein |
US20220233942A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2022-07-28 | Trajekt Sports Inc. | Method and system of replicating ball trajectories using an automated ball throwing machine |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8398508B2 (en) | Method for predicting a golfer's ball striking performance | |
US20080020867A1 (en) | Golfer's impact properties during a golf swing | |
US6602144B2 (en) | Method for predicting a golfer's ball striking performance | |
US6431990B1 (en) | System and method for measuring a golfer's ball striking parameters | |
US20080287207A1 (en) | System and method for measuring a golfer's ball striking parameters | |
US4136387A (en) | Golf club impact and golf ball launching monitoring system | |
US20180318687A1 (en) | Systems and Methods for Coordinating Radar Data and Image Data to Track a Flight of a Projectile | |
JP3749072B2 (en) | Golf club selection method and selection system | |
US8052543B2 (en) | Analysis system of golf ball and head information using lasers and 4 axis light sensing | |
EP0599118A1 (en) | Method and apparatus to determine object striking instrument movement conditions | |
CN109562289B (en) | Ball flight information calculation device, ball flight information calculation method, and computer-readable recording medium on which ball flight information calculation method is recorded | |
JP4271615B2 (en) | Golf club head behavior measuring device | |
JP2003117044A (en) | Hit ball diagnosing device | |
JP4028771B2 (en) | Method for measuring impact state of golf swing | |
US20060068927A1 (en) | System, method and computer program product for estimating club swing condition(s) from ball launch measurements | |
JP2002535102A (en) | Golf ball flight monitor system | |
JP4118118B2 (en) | Plot method of test hit mark, flight distance chart, and golf club selection support device using flight distance chart | |
KR20200080562A (en) | Method and system for in/out determination in sport court | |
JP2005324023A (en) | Method for determining golfer's impact property during golf swing | |
JP2005319304A (en) | Method for determining impact characteristics of golfer during swing | |
JP2005324022A (en) | Method for predicting golfer's ball striking performance | |
JP2003117043A (en) | Golf club selecting method | |
US20230347209A1 (en) | Device for sensing golf swing and method for sensing impact position on club head using the same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MANWARING, SCOTT R.;REEL/FRAME:019612/0788 Effective date: 20070619 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FAN, FRANK H.;REEL/FRAME:019986/0938 Effective date: 20070925 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |