US20080062406A1 - Method and system for measuring patterned structures - Google Patents
Method and system for measuring patterned structures Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080062406A1 US20080062406A1 US11/930,594 US93059407A US2008062406A1 US 20080062406 A1 US20080062406 A1 US 20080062406A1 US 93059407 A US93059407 A US 93059407A US 2008062406 A1 US2008062406 A1 US 2008062406A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- patterned structure
- light
- patterned
- measurement
- polarizer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70483—Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
- G03F7/70605—Workpiece metrology
- G03F7/70616—Monitoring the printed patterns
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B11/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B11/24—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring contours or curvatures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/47—Scattering, i.e. diffuse reflection
- G01N21/4788—Diffraction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/55—Specular reflectivity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F1/00—Originals for photomechanical production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g., masks, photo-masks, reticles; Mask blanks or pellicles therefor; Containers specially adapted therefor; Preparation thereof
- G03F1/68—Preparation processes not covered by groups G03F1/20 - G03F1/50
- G03F1/82—Auxiliary processes, e.g. cleaning or inspecting
- G03F1/84—Inspecting
Abstract
A method and system are presented for determining a line profile in a patterned structure, aimed at controlling a process of manufacture of the structure. The patterned structure comprises a plurality of different layers, the pattern in the structure being formed by patterned regions and un-patterned regions. At least first and second measurements are carried out, each utilizing illumination of the structure with a broad wavelengths band of incident light directed on the structure at a certain angle of incidence, detection of spectral characteristics of light returned from the structure, and generation of measured data representative thereof. The measured data obtained with the first measurement is analyzed, and at least one parameter of the structure is thereby determined. Then, this determined parameter is utilized, while analyzing the measured data obtained with the second measurements enabling the determination of the profile of the structure.
Description
- This invention is in the field of measurement techniques, and relates to an optical system and method for the accurate measurement of parameters of regular patterned structures. The invention is particularly useful in controlling a lithography process.
- Lithography is widely used in various industrial applications, including the manufacture of integrated circuits, flat panel displays, micro-electro-mechanical systems, micro-optical systems etc. Generally speaking, the lithography process is used for producing a patterned structure. During the manufacture of integrated circuits, a semiconductor wafer undergoes a sequence of lithography-etching steps to produce a plurality of spaced-apart stacks, each formed by a plurality of different layers having different optical properties. Each lithography procedure applied to the wafer results in the pattern on the uppermost layer formed by a plurality of spaced-apart photoresist regions.
- To assure the performance of the manufactured products, the applications of the kind specified above require accurate control of the dimensions of the sub-micron features of the obtained pattern. When dealing with wafers, the most frequently used dimensions are the layer thickness and the so-called “critical dimension” (CD). CD is the smallest transverse dimension of the developed photoresist, usually the width of the finest lines and spaces between these lines. Since the topography of the measured features is rarely an ideal square, additional information found in the height profile, such as slopes, curves etc., may also be valuable in order to improve the control of the fabrication process.
- Generally, an ordinary optical microscope can be used for measuring features' dimensions. A microscope is practically capable of measuring line width with a resolution of no less than 0.1 μm. The current high-performance semiconductor devices, however, have features' dimensions of 0.18 μm, and require CD measurement with the resolution of a few nanometers.
- Several Optical CD (OCD) measurement techniques recently developed rely on imaging a certain test pattern which is placed in a special test area of the wafer. These techniques utilize various methods aimed at amplifying tiny differences in the line-width to obtain macroscopic effects that could be resolved by visible light, although the original differences are more than two orders of magnitude below the wavelength used. However, some of these techniques do not rely on fundamental physical effects, and thus could be more effective in some cases and less effective in others.
- Another kind of technique utilizes scatterometric measurements, i.e., measurements of the characteristics of light scattered by the sample. To this end, a test pattern in the form of a grating is usually placed in the scribe line between the dies. The measurement includes the illumination of the grating with a beam of incident light and determining the diffraction efficiency of the grating under various conditions. The diffraction efficiency is a complicated function of the grating line profile and of the measurement conditions, such as the wavelength, the angle of incidence, the polarization and the diffraction order. Thus, it is possible to gather a wealth of data thereby allowing the extraction of information about the line profile.
- Techniques that utilize the principles of scatterometry and are aimed at the characterization of three-dimensional grating structures and the determination of line profiles have been disclosed in numerous publications. Publications, in which diffraction efficiency was measured versus wavelength, include, for example the following:
- (1) A. Roger and D. Maystre, J. Opt. Soc. Am, 70 (12), pp. 1483-1495 (1979) and A. Roger and D. Maystre, Optica Acta, 26 (4), pp. 447-460 (1979) describe and systematically analyze the problem of reconstruction of the line profile of a grating from its diffraction properties (the inverse scattering problem). A later article “Grating Profile Reconstruction by an Inverse Scattering Method”, A. Roger and M. Breidne, Optics Comm., 35 (3), pp. 299-302 (1980) discloses how the idea disclosed in the above articles can be experimentally used. The experimental results show that the line profile can be fitted such that the calculated diffraction efficiency will closely match the diffraction efficiency measured as a function of wavelength for “−1” diffraction order. The comparison of these experimental results with electron microscopy measurement showed a reasonable agreement.
- (2) “Reconstruction of the Profile of Gold Wire Gratings: A comparison of Different Methods”, H. Lochbihler et. al., Optik, 98 (1), pp. 21-25 (1994) deals with the comparison of the results of several experimental techniques. Both optical transmittance and reflectance efficiencies were measured in the “0” order as a function of wavelength. By fitting the measurements to theoretical spectra calculated using diffraction theory, the grating profile was found. Comparison of these results with the results of X-ray diffraction efficiency and electron microscopy showed a good agreement.
- (3) Voskovtsova, L. M. et al., Soviet Journal of Optical Technology 60 (9) pp. 617-19 (1993) studies the properties of gratings fabricated by replica technique. It has been found that the line profile of the hologram diffraction grating differs from the calculated sinusoidal profile. This difference leads to a difference in the spectral diffraction efficiency, an effect that was utilized for process control.
- (4) Savitskii, G. M. and Golubenko, I. V., Optics and Spectroscopy 59 (2), pp. 251-4 (1985) describes a theory for the reflection properties of diffraction gratings with a groove profile which is a trapezoid with rounded corners. Such gratings can be fabricated by a holographic technique with photosensitive materials. It was found that the parameters of the trapezoidal profile, such as the depth of the groove, the width of a flat top and the slope of the side walls, affect the diffraction efficiency of the grating working in the auto collimation regime for the “−1” order.
- (5) Spikhal'skii A. A., Opt Commun 57 (6) pp. 375-379 (1986) presents the analysis of the spectral characteristics of gratings etched into a dielectric material. It has been found that these characteristics can be significantly varied by slightly changing the grating groove profile.
- (6) U.S. Pat. No. 5,867,276 discloses a technique for broadband scatterometry, consisting of the illumination of a sample with an incident light beam having a broad spectral composition and detecting a beam of light diffracted from the sample with a spectrometer. The technique is aimed at obtaining the spectrally-resolved diffraction characteristics of the sample for determining the parameters of the sample. The patent suffers from the following drawbacks: the measurements are done in the “0” diffraction order which is insensitive to asymmetries in the profile; and the analysis is done using the Neural Network (N.N.) method, which is sub-optimal by nature for applications requiring a high resolution. Additionally, the method does not take into account the need to focus the light onto a small spot, which is determined by the small area of the test structure allowed in the scribe line.
- According to another group of publications, a monochromatic light source (e.g. laser) is utilized, and grating profile parameters are extracted from the measurement of the diffraction efficiency versus incidence angle. Such publications include, for example the following:
- (A) S. S. H. Naqvi et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11 (9), 2485-2493 (1994) discloses a technique that utilizes measurement of the diffraction efficiency in “0” order versus incidence angle to find the height of etched grating. Calculations are based on the Rigorous Coupled Wave Theory (RCWT), initially developed by Moharam and Gaylord and disclosed in M. G. Moharam and T. K. Gaylord, J. Opt. Soc. Am, 71, pp. 811-818 (1981), and several existing statistical techniques for the fitting stage.
- (B) Raymond, J. R. et al., SPIE 3050, pp. 476-486 (1997) discloses a technique that utilizes a laser beam scanning with a range of angles to measure the diffraction efficiency versus incidence angle and to extract the line profile from the measured data.
- (C) U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,710,642 and 5,164,790 disclose optical instruments which require to rotate the sample under test, which is definitely a disadvantage.
- (D) U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,999,014; 5,889,593 and 5,703,692 disclose instruments employing angle-dependent intensity measurements without the requirement to rotate the sample. According to these techniques, different optical arrangements are used for providing the changes of the angle of incidence of an illuminating monochromatic beam onto the sample (wafer), without moving the sample. According to U.S. Pat. No. 5,703,692, the measurement is carried out by mechanically scanning the angle of incidence using a rotating block. The main disadvantages of such a technique are as follows: it requires the use of moving parts, the calibration of an angle in a dynamical situation, and has a limited angle range which does not provide enough information allowing accurate extraction of profile. According to U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,593, an optical arrangement includes a first lens that serves for focusing incident light onto a wafer at a range of angles, and a second lens that serves for focusing diffracted light onto a detector array. Although this technique does not need any moving parts, since the measurements are simultaneous, special care has to be taken to destroy coherence and avoid interference between the different light paths. Any suitable component for destroying the coherence always reduces the system resolution, thereby reducing the amount of obtained information.
- In a third group of publications, the diffraction efficiency is measured when both wavelength and incidence angle are constant. In this case, information is extracted from the comparison of diffraction efficiency of several orders. This group of publications includes, for example, the following documents:
- (I) U.S. Pat. No. 4,330,213 discloses a line-width measurement system using a diffraction grating. In this system, the intensities of first and second order light components are obtained to determine the line-width using empirical formulae.
- (II) U.S. Pat. No. 5,361,137 discloses another example of the use of a conventional scatterrometry technique. Here, a set of intensities of the “1” or “2” diffraction order image of the set of “fixed-line width and variable-pitch-width” test gratings is recorded. From this set of intensities, line-width can be calculated.
- Generally speaking, the conventional techniques use the following methodology in order to analyze the measured results:
- First, a model is assumed for the grating profile having a number of parameters that uniquely define the profile. The user defines the required model (type of model) and sets the limits and the required resolution for each of the desired parameters.
- Second, a spectral library is prepared using an optical model. The spectral library contains the calculated spectra for all possible profiles as defined by the user.
- Third, given a measured spectrum, a fitting procedure finds the profile whose calculated spectrum included in the spectral library best matches the measured spectrum.
- There is accordingly a need in the art to facilitate the control of the manufacture of patterned structures by providing a novel method and system for measurements in a patterned structure to determine a line profile of the structure, utilizing the principles of scatterometry.
- The term “patterned structure” signifies a structure comprising a plurality of spaced-apart stacks (elements) each including different layers, the pattern being formed by patterned regions and un-patterned regions. The term “pattern region” used herein signifies is a region including elements (stacks) having different optical properties, and the term “un-patterned region” signifies a region with substantially uniform optical properties, as compared to the patterned region. Such an un-patterned region is comprised of a single stack including different layers having different optical properties.
- The main idea of the present invention is based on obtaining measured data from at least two measurements applied to the same patterned structure (e.g., wafer) in order to achieve both high accuracy and high reliability measurements. The entire measurement procedure is carried out is several steps, taking a different measurement at each step. Analysis, likewise, is performed in several steps, wherein each analysis step utilizes the information obtained in the previous steps. The two measurements could be applied at two different measurement sites located, respectively, in patterned and un-patterned regions. The two measurements may be carried out so as to detect light returned from the structure with different solid angles of propagation, or with different states of polarization.
- According to the present invention, at least one parameter of the profile considered in an optical model used for measurements is determined by analyzing at least one preliminary measurement applied to a predetermined site on the structure (wafer). The preliminary measurement is inherently different from further measurements by either the type of site under measurements or the measurement conditions (angle, polarization, wavelength range, diffraction order, etc.). For example, the preliminary measurement utilizes normal incidence of an illuminating beam, while the further measurement utilizes oblique illumination. Data (parameters) obtained through this preliminary measurement is used for optimizing the fitting procedure, thereby improving further measurements applied to other locations on the structure.
- Preferably, the parameters obtained through the preliminary measurement include the reflectivity and thickness of at least one layer underneath the uppermost layer. Additionally, the at least one preliminary measurement allows for determining optical constants (i.e., refraction and absorption coefficients n and k) and thickness of the regions of the uppermost layer.
- There is thus provided according to one aspect of the present invention, a method of determining a line profile in a patterned structure for controlling a process of manufacture thereof, wherein the patterned structure comprises a plurality of different layers, the pattern in the structure being formed by patterned regions and un-patterned regions, the method comprising the steps of:
-
- carrying out at least first and second measurements, each of the measurements utilizing illumination of the structure with a broad wavelengths band of incident light which is directed on the structure at a certain angle of incidence, detection of spectral characteristics of light returned from the structure, and generation of measured data representative thereof;
- analyzing the measured data obtained with the first measurement and determining at least one parameter of the structure; and
- analyzing the measured data obtained with the second measurement and utilizing said at least one parameter for determining the profile of the structure.
- According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a measurement system for determining a line profile in a patterned structure comprising a plurality of different layers, the pattern in the structure being formed by patterned regions and un-patterned regions, the system comprising a measuring unit including an illumination assembly and a collection-detection assembly, and a control unit coupled to output of the measuring unit, wherein:
-
- the illumination assembly produces incident light of substantially broad wavelengths band directed onto the structure at a certain angle of incidence, and the collection-detection assembly detects spectral characteristics of light returned from the structure and generates measured data representative thereof;
- the measuring unit is operable for carrying out at least first and second measurements and generating measured data representative of the detected returned light; and
- said control unit is operable to be responsive to the generated measured data for analyzing the measured data obtained with the first measurement to determine at least one parameter of the structure, and utilizing the at least one determined parameter while analyzing the measured data obtained with the second measurement for determining the line profile of the structure.
- The scatterometry based measurement technique provides the collection of a large amount of data from each measured profile, e.g., the diffraction efficiency in a large number of different angles or a large number of wavelengths. This richness of data may allow the fitting of the measurements to the results of a multi-parameter model describing the measured profile, thus providing more information than merely stating the CD. This additional information also provides confidence in the results, particularly if the effective number of independent measured values is significantly larger than the number of free parameters in the model. Since exact models describing diffraction from general profiles and in general situations have been developed for years and are known to be of high accuracy, these methods have a good chance of obtaining accurate results.
- The system according to the invention can be applied as an integrated metrology tool. In contrast to all conventionally used off-line measurement tools, occupying a large footprint and requiring additional manual operations that slow down the entire fabrication process and allow only the measurement of samples from each production lot, the system of the present invention may be integrated as part of the production machine, thus allowing full automation of the manufacturing process. For this integration to be possible, the system should be very economical in space.
- Additionally, the operation of the system is fast enough, so that every semiconductor wafer in the production line can be measured, allowing closer control over the process. The system of the present invention enables a multi-stage measurement procedure, thereby improving the quality of the entire measurement. The measurement technique according to the invention requires only a small measurement site in accordance with the area constraints, which characterize current lithography.
- More specifically, the present invention is used for process control in the manufacture of semiconductor devices (wafers), e.g., the control of a lithography process, and is therefore described below with respect to this application.
- In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, a preferred embodiment will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a wafer structure; -
FIGS. 2A and 2B are schematic illustrations of two possible examples, respectively of the line profile showing some parameters thereof to be measured; -
FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the main components of a measurement system constructed according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of the main components of a measurement system constructed according to another embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of the main components of a measurement system constructed according to yet another embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of one more embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 7 is an example of a part of a production line utilizing the system of either ofFIGS. 3, 4 , 5 and 6; -
FIG. 8 illustrates another example of a production line utilizing the system of either ofFIGS. 3, 4 , 5 and 6; and -
FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of a system utilizing several measurement systems according to the invention using a common server utility. - Referring to
FIG. 1 , there is illustrated (not in a correct scale) a wafer W that typically has a plurality of stacks formed by different layers, and presents a structure with a periodic pattern. Measurements are aimed at determining the profile of the periodic pattern (“grating”) formed in one or more of the wafer's layers—layer 2 in the present example. Generally, the periodic pattern may involve more than a single layer (which are not specifically shown here), provided that the periodicity in all patterned layers is equivalent. This periodicity may be either one-dimensional (i.e. repeated lines) or two-dimensional periodicity (i.e. finite-area units repeatedly placed on the nodes of a two-dimensional grid). The patterned layer is enclosed between a plurality of un-patterned,underlying layers 3 a and a plurality of un-patterned, over-lying layers 3 b terminated by a background medium 3 c (e.g. air). - The patterned
layer 2 may include both patterned and un-patterned sites. In the un-patterned site, e.g. L1, L3, a single material, either Ma or Mb, is to be found within an area larger than the area of the measurement spot. As to the patterned site, e.g. L2, both materials Ma and Mb, having different optical constants, are to be repeatedly found within the area of the measurement spot. In specific applications, materials Ma and Mb may take different identities. For example, both the materials of all over-lying layers and one of the materials Ma and Mb are identical to the background medium, i.e., the measured pattern is a relief pattern. Such a relief pattern could be formed, for example, by a post-developed photoresist, or by a post-etched Poly-Silicon, Aluminum or Silicon dioxide, either stacked with photoresist or not. Examples in which none of the materials Ma and Mb is equivalent to the background medium may include post-exposure (undeveloped) photoresist, or “dual-damascene” type Copper lines. An example of two-dimensional periodicity would be a two-dimensional array of via-holes formed as a test pattern in order to measure the diameter and other parameters of the via-hole process. - Usually, the smallest transverse dimension of the pattern is called the “critical dimension” (CD), however other definitions of the CD may be also applied. Usually, the CD of the developed photoresist determines the CD of the patterns formed in later stages of the entire manufacturing process, thus bearing extra importance.
- The model of the periodic structure will depend on the specific application and on the requirements of the end-user. For example,
FIG. 2A illustrates a graph G1 exemplifying a possible model for line profile, being trapezoidal with rounded corners. In this case, the parameters to be determined may include the following: -
- height H of the profile G (i.e., the thickness of the photoresist);
- critical dimensions CDB and CDT at the bottom and top of the photoresist region, respectively;
- radius RB and RT of the curvatures at the bottom and top of the photoresist region, respectively; and
- the period of grating.
- The above is the example of a symmetrical line profile. In the case of an asymmetrical profile, an additional tilt angle should also be determined. More elaborate models can also be used, e.g., by dividing the profile into several layers, each layer described by a geometric shape (e.g., trapeze), while requiring matching of the profile width in the interfaces between layers. This is exemplified in
FIG. 2B showing a two-part trapezoidal line profile G2 formed by top and bottom trapezoids G2 (B) and G2 (T). In this case, the parameters to be determined may, for example, include the following: -
- total height Htot of an envelope E defined by the profile G2 (i.e., the thickness of the photoresist);
- the average value of the critical dimension CDaver corresponding to the width of the envelope E at a height H0 equal to the half of the total height Htot;
- radius R of the curvature at the top of the photoresist region;
- the tilt of the envelope α with respect to the horizontal plane P;
- the maximal distance t between the profile G2 and the envelope defined thereby;
- the height Hb of the bottom-part trapezoid G2 (B); and
- the period of grating.
- Measurement is based on obtaining the diffraction efficiency spectrum from a grating on the wafer. The grating is any periodic structure in one or two dimensions composed of features whose parameters should be measured, e.g. line-width, through holes diameters, etc. Due to the periodic structure, the diffraction from the features on the wafer is limited to a discrete number of angles (diffraction orders), as governed by the diffraction equation:
where Θi is the incidence angle, Θr is the reflected angle, λ is the wavelength, d is the grating period and n is the order number (n=0 being the specular reflection). - It should be noted that the measured gratings could be either an integral part of the operative portion of the wafer or a test pattern. Such small test structures which are typically smaller than 40 μm×40 μm are measured using a focusing optics.
- Reference is made to
FIG. 3 , illustrating ameasurement system 1 constructed and operated according to the invention for measuring parameters of a wafer W (constituting a patterned structure). Thesystem 1 includes ameasurement unit 4, asupport stage 5 for supporting the wafer W and acontrol unit 6. Also provided in thesystem 1, is a wafer handler, which is not specifically shown. The wafer handler serves for loading/unloading wafers to and from thestage 5, and may include a suction means for holding the wafer. Generally speaking, the wafer handler and wafer stage serve together for receiving wafers from a processing tool (not shown here), pre-aligning them along coordinate axes (e.g., by rotating the handler), maintaining, placing in a measuring position and returning them to the same or another processing tool. - The
measurement unit 4 defines two measurement channels, generally at 8 a and 8 b, respectively. Each measurement channel includes such main constructional parts as illumination and collection-detection assemblies. - The illumination assembly of the channel 8 a is composed of a
light source 10, for example a Xenon arc lamp, a controlledpolarizer 11, abeam splitter 12 and anobjective lens 14 that is driven by a suitable motor (not shown) for auto-focusing purposes. Thelight source 10 generates incident light Bi (1) of a broad wavelength band. Thepolarizer 11 serves to separate only light components of the desired polarization and allow its collection. Thebeam splitter 12 serves for spatially separating incident and returned light components. It should be noted that the polarizer could be accommodated in any point along the optical path. However, in order to avoid possible changes in the polarization state of light induced by optical elements located between the polarizer and the wafer, the polarizer is preferably positioned as close as possible to the wafer. The collection-detection assembly of the channel 8 a includes aspectrophotometric detector 16 and abeam splitter 17 in the form of a pinhole mirror, the purpose of which will be explained further below. As shown, an additional polarizer 15 a may be accommodated in the optical path of light ensuing from thepinhole mirror 17 and propagating towards thedetector 16. In the measurement channel 8 a, the incident light Bi (1) normally impinges onto the wafer W, and light Br (1), specularly reflected (normal “0” order), is collected and directed towards thedetector 16, in a manner described further below. - The illumination assembly of the measurement channel 8 b is composed of a light source 18 (e.g., the same Xenon arc lamp) generating incident light Bi (2) of a broad wavelength band, an
objective lens 20 which is similarly associated with a suitable drive (not shown) for auto-focusing purposes, and a controlledpolarizer 21. The collection-detection assembly of the channel 8 b includes a collectinglens 22, aspectrophotometric detector 24 and, optionally, a controlled polarizer 23 (shown in dashed lines). The incident light Bi (2) impinges onto the wafer W at a certain angle (e.g., 60°), and a specularly reflected light component Br (2) (oblique “0” order) is detected. It should be noted that alternatively, either one of thepolarizers - It should be noted, although not specifically shown, that optical fibers may be used for directing light components ensuing from the
pinhole mirror 17 andlens 22 to thedetectors wafer stage 5 is also equipped with a drive assembly (not shown), which allows for aligning the wafer along the Z-axis, rotating the wafer in the horizontal plane, and leveling the wafer around two rotational axes such that the surface of the wafer will be parallel to the X-Y plane of the optical elements. The requirement for the leveling is derived from the sensitivity of the measurements to the angle of incidence. The requirement for rotating the wafer in the horizontal plane (so-called “Θ-control”) is derived from the fact that the diffraction depends on the mounting direction. Thus, in order to bring the wafer to the so-called “conventional mounting” position, this degree of freedom is required. Additionally, this degree of freedom allows for using a window that covers only a half of the wafer. Hence, the two halves of the wafer are sequentially measured by rotating the wafer by 180° with respect to the window. This concept is described in a co-pending application assigned to the assignee of the present application. Such a technique enables to save considerable foot print area which is a critical factor when using a measurement system as an integrated metrology tool. - It should also be noted that the
system 1 could be provided with a dynamic auto-focusing assembly enabling high-speed measurements. Auto-focusing could be performed either with each measurement channel separately, by moving one or more of its optical elements (lenses), or with both measurement channels, using the wafer stage Z-axis control. - As further shown in
FIG. 3 , an additional,imaging channel 26 is provided.Channel 26 includes the illumination assembly of the “normal incidence” channel 8 a, a polarizer 15 b and an imaging detector 30 (e.g., a CCD camera) receiving light components reflected from thepinhole mirror 17. - The polarizers 15 a and 15 b are used in the collection-detection assemblies of the measurement channel 8 a and
imaging channel 26. Alternatively, a single polarizer 13 (shown in dashed lines) could substitute thepolarizers 11, 15 a and 15 b. While, the option of using thesingle polarizer 13 is more economical in price and space as compared to the option of using threepolarizers 11, 15 a and 15 b, the use of three separate polarizers allows for measuring in the preferred polarization whilst observing the wafer surface with the imaging channel through perpendicular polarization. This configuration, called “Nomarski”, is similar to dark-field configuration in the sense that the pattern edges are strongly enhanced in the image, thus allowing for better, more accurate pattern recognition in some cases. The polarizer 15 b in theimaging channel 26 could thus be mounted for rotation so as to change its preferred polarization, or for shifting between its two operational positions so as to be in or out of the optical path, per user's choice. - The main principles of the construction and operation of a measurement system including the zero-order detection spectrophotometer (measurement channel 8 a) and the
imaging channel 26 is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/497,382, assigned to the assignee of the present application. This document is therefore incorporated herein by reference with respect to this specific example. - The
pinhole mirror 17 separates a central part Br1 (1) (about 20 μm) of light Br (1) specularly reflected from the illuminated spot and collected by thelens 14, and allows its propagation towards thespectrophotometric detector 16. A periphery part Br2 (1) of light Br (1) is reflected from themirror 17 towards theimaging detector 30. As a result, the measurement area, considered in thespectrophotometric detector 16, presents a “dark” central region, typically 40 μm in diameter, in the center of the field of view of the imaging channel, typically being 20 mm×20 mm, both measured on the wafer. This approach enables to locate the measurement area in the entire illuminated spot defined by the field of view of the CCD. - The outputs of the
spectrophotometric detectors imaging detector 30 are coupled to thecontrol unit 6. Thecontrol unit 6 is typically a computer device having a memory for storing reference data (libraries), one or more processors for analyzing data coming from the detectors and controlling all the operations of themeasurement system 1 including driver(s), light sources, power supply, interface, etc. The preparation of libraries will be described further below. Thecontrol unit 6 also displays the measurement results. The processor is operated by suitable image processing and pattern recognition software, capable of both global and site-to-site alignment. The alignment technique based on the features of the pattern is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,682,242 and 5,867,590, both assigned to the assignee of the present application. Thus, thecontrol unit 6 is capable of locating and processing measurements. The analysis of the measured data could be used for establishing feedback closed-loop control of a corresponding processing tool, as will be described further below. - Another feature of the present invention consists of the optional use of a second spectrophotometer for calibrating the light sources' spectra. It is known that several types of light sources have spectral characteristics varying in time. Thus, any previous measurement (calibration) of the incident spectrum will lead to significant errors in interpretation. By taking a known fraction of the incident light (e.g., in channel 8 a, the signal reflected by the beam splitter) and measuring its spectral characteristics simultaneously with the measurement of the diffraction signal, this problem can be avoided. Alternatively, a photodiode whose output has been previously learned could be used to calibrate for intensity variations, assuming the relative spectrum to be constant.
- Reference is made to
FIG. 4 illustrating ameasurement system 100, constructed and operated according to another embodiment of the invention. To facilitate understanding, same reference numbers are used for identifying those components which are identical in thesystem system 100, ameasurement channel 34 collecting a light component of “−1” diffraction order is provided instead of the oblique “0” order measurement channel 8 b. The illumination assembly of themeasurement channel 34 includes thelight source 18, thepolarizer 21 and theobjective lens 20, while its collection-detection assembly includes alinear detector array 36, for example, a plurality of photodiodes and an optical light guiding assembly 37 (e.g., fiber bundle, set of prisms or combination of both). Here, each of the lenses is of a small numerical aperture (NA=0.1) providing the angles of light propagation within a range of ±5°. In this specific example, the angle of incidence of the light component Bi (2) is about 60°, and light components Br (3) being the “−1” order of diffraction from the wafer propagate within a large solid angle, e.g., 50°, and are collected by thelinear detector array 36. The optionally provided light-guidingassembly 37 serves for transferring the light diffracted in the “−1” order from the vicinity of the wafer W to a remote location of thedetector array 36, thus allowing some flexibility in its location. - The
measurement channel 34, in distinction to the channel 8 b, does not need a spectrophotometer. Indeed, the photoresist grating already disperses the light diffracted in the “−1” order, and therefore there is no need for any additional dispersive element in the system. However, it is also possible to use the light-guiding assembly for focusing light collected at the “−1” order to the entrance of a spectrophotometer, thus converging and re-dispersing the optical signal. This configuration together with an appropriate switching device (not shown) will eliminate the use of thespecial detector array 36 for detecting the “−1” order by using thesame spectrophotometer 16 for sequential measurement of both “0” and “−1” orders. The use of one or more switching devices of the same kind would allow the utilization of a single spectrophotometer for all themeasurement channels 8 a, 8 b and 34. - It should be noted that if the resulting signal is not sufficiently strong, a cylindrical lens (anamorphic optics) could be used to concentrate more energy onto the detector. Additionally, in order to detect the spatial distribution of different wavelengths within the solid angle corresponding to the “−1” diffraction order, an appropriate calibration procedure is previously carried out, for example, by using spectral filters, or by finding spectral peaks of the light source using a calibration target having sufficiently smooth diffraction efficiency in a spectral region around the peaks.
- Turning back to the diffraction equation presented above, the configuration of
FIG. 4 allows for collecting, for example, the following wavelength ranges: (a) in the case that d=0.36 μm, 344 nm<λ<606 nm, or (b) in the case that d=0.26 μm, 248 nm<λ<438 nm, both cases correspond to Θr=(−5°)−(−55°). - The above wavelength ranges are, on the one hand, sufficiently wide (i.e., λmax/λmin=1.76) and substantially outside the DUV region, and, on the other hand, approach the following condition: λ=d. This allows for meaningful information to be gained.
-
FIG. 5 illustrates ameasurement system 200 which includes three measurement channels—channel 8 a (normal “0” order), channel 8 b (oblique “0” order) and channel 34 (“−1” order), and theimaging channel 26. For simplicity, the different polarizers are not shown here. This configuration combines the measurement channels of thesystems - Referring now to
FIG. 6 , there is illustrated ameasurement system 300, where the collection-detection means of the normal “0” order” and “−1” order form aunified collection channel 8′, utilizing a commonobjective lens 14′ and acommon spectrophotometric detector 16. To this end, bothlens 14′ andlens 20′ have a larger numerical aperture, as compared to their counterparts in the previously described systems. Anaperture 38 is provided, being mounted for movement along thelens 14′ in a plane parallel thereto. Each location of the aperture 38 (locations I, II and III in the present example) “opens” only a small part oflens 14′. Thus, at each position of theaperture 38, only light components propagating within a solid angle defined by the aperture, and therefore being only a small part of the entire solid angle covered bylens 14′, are directed towards thedetector 16. Since the diffraction angle Θr in non-zero orders is determined by both the incidence angle and the wavelength, and through the diffraction equation (1) above, fixing the diffraction angle means that the incident angle is a function of the wavelength. For a fixed collection angle Θr and n=−1, one thus has: - The obtained spectrum is thus inherently different from those obtained by prior art techniques, since, in distinction to these techniques, neither the angle of incidence nor the wavelength is fixed. The measurement system according to the present invention allows for a multiplicity of diffraction angles Θr, and for increasing the amount of information that can be collected, as well as the accuracy and reliability of the results.
- As to the normal “0” order, it is successfully collected when the
aperture 38 is shifted so as to be centered with the optical axis of thelens 14′ (position III), and illumination from thelight source 10 is used instead of that of thelight source 18. - Reference is made to
FIG. 7 , showing a part of the wafers' production line utilizing the measurement system of the present invention. Here, the measurement system, for example thesystem 1, is associated with alithography arrangement 40. Thisarrangement 40 typically includes coater, exposure and developer tools T1, T2 and T3, loading and unloading cassette stations C1 and C2, and a robot R. The construction and operation of such a lithography arrangement are known per se, and therefore need not be specifically described. - In the present example, the
system 1 is integrated with thearrangement 40, and is accommodated in a manner allowing its application to a wafer ensuing from the developer tool T3. The control unit of the invented system is coupled to a control unit of the exposure tool T2 (not shown) for feedback purposes, for example for adjusting the exposure dose/time, focusing, etc. It should, however, be noted that thesystem 1 could also be coupled to the coater and/or developer tool for adjusting their parameters (e.g., photoresist thickness, post-exposure baking time, development time, etc.) prior to processing the next coming wafer. As for the measured wafer, it can be returned for reprocessing, if needed. - It should also be noted that data indicative of the wafer's profile can be used for adjusting the parameters of an etching tool prior to its application to the measured wafer or the next coming wafer, i.e., for feed-forward purposes. Alternatively or additionally, the measurement system can be used for post-etching measurement.
-
FIG. 8 shows another example of a production line utilizing the measurement system of the present invention, for example thesystem 1. Here, the measurement system is integrated into a completeCD control system 500. Thesystem 500 includes the following components: -
- a
system 60 for measuring the parameters of the photoresist and of the under-lying layers prior to exposure, which system is composed of a measuringunit 61 and acontrol unit 62; - the
system 1 for measuring CD and other profile parameters, which system comprises the measuringunit 4 and thecontrol unit 6; - a set of
controllers - a
system controller 80.
- a
- The main idea of the
system 500 is that information from both pre-exposure and post-develop stages is combined, allowing for a complete closed-loop-control utilizing both feedback and feed forward. The operation of thesystem 500 is mainly guided by thecontroller 80, which receives information from bothsystems controller 80, accumulates the information from different measurements (across the wafer, wafer to wafer, etc.) and learns the correlation between pre-exposure and post-develop measurement. The expert system also learns the effectiveness of using different control parameters related to tools T1, T2, T3, in the reduction of variations in the resulting CD and the methods to combine them in the most effective way. - One of the features, that the system 1 (or similarly
systems system 500, is OCR (optical character recognition) capability for identifying each wafer by its identity number. Identifying the wafers in a deterministic way is important for the reliability of thesystem controller 80, as well as for the integration ofsystem 500 with post-etch measurements carried out on other processing tools in the fab through a common communication network or database. OCR capability could be achieved either by scanning the area containing the identity number using the X-Y stage and theviewing channel 26, or, alternatively, by a special OCR channel (which is not specifically shown). Such an OCR channel may include a CCD camera, imaging optics, and a controller running OCR software. - The operation of the measurement system according to the invention will now be described. Setup of the measurement includes the following two stages:
- 1) Definition by the user of a profile model to be used and ranges for each parameter of the selected model. Additionally, knowledge about all the layers in the wafer and their optical properties, and any additional relevant information concerning the product (wafer) to be measured and/or the measurement conditions, is desired for defining the measurement sites.
- 2) Preparation of a library of spectra (reference data) corresponding to all the possible profiles. Each spectrum in the library provides the diffraction efficiency for a given profile of the grating, given polarization, given angle of incidence and mounting method, given numerical aperture of the system, and a given diffraction order as a function of wavelength.
- An important feature of the present invention refers to the fact that one has to take into account the finite numerical aperture of the system. This numerical aperture, required for measuring small sites, means that light is incident on the wafer at a considerable range of angles at the same time. Since diffraction efficiency is a sensitive function of the incident angle, failing to consider this fact will result in significant error. In order to take this effect into consideration, one can calculate the diffraction efficiency from each profile at several angles of incidence around the central one (i.e., the average direction of the solid angle of light propagation). Then, the weighted average of diffraction efficiency spectra at the different angles will be calculated in order to obtain the effective diffraction efficiency for the entire cone (solid angle) of angles of incidence. For example, in a system having the central angle of incidence equal to 60°, the diffraction efficiency corresponding to 57°, 60° and 63° angles of incidence could be calculated, and then weighted with respective weights of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.25. The fact that a small number (e.g., three) of such angles is sufficient to describe a continuum of angles is not trivial, and the selection of the number, spacing and averaging of the different angles may be application dependent.
- The calculation is made using the known Rigorous Couple Wave Analysis method, modal methods, or by a hybrid method containing parts of both previous methods.
- The preparation of the library may be made in one or more stages. For example, the following scheme may be used:
-
- (1) Initially, the spectra corresponding to a small number of profiles only are calculated, sparsely sampling the whole multi-dimensional space of possible profiles.
- (2) At this point, several measurements are taken and analyzed using the initial library. Approximate average values of the desired parameters are then determined, describing an approximate average profile of the grating.
- (3) A sub-space of possible profiles is defined around the average profile. The sub-space is sampled with the required (final) resolution, and the spectra of all profiles in the sub-space are calculated. Alternatively, the spectra in the sub-space can be calculated “upon request”, i.e., when required for the interpretation of consecutive measurements.
- (4) The rest of the profile space is divided into sub-spaces with increasing distance in the parameter space from the average measurement.
- (5) These sub-spaces are consecutively sampled and their corresponding spectra are calculated until the whole parameter space is calculated in the final resolution.
- The advantage of the above scheme is that the continuous measurement can start already after step (3) thereby significantly saving the setup time. In fact, the above-described dynamic process of the library preparation allows to operate the system almost immediately after the recipe is prepared. Initially, the system will support only a reduced throughput, since it will have to rely mainly on slow, real-time spectrum calculations. At this stage, only some of the wafers will be measured on-line, while others will be measured, but their results will either be stored for later interpretation (if needed) or interpreted with a very low accuracy, using the crude initial library. With time, the system will support higher and higher throughput, since most of the relevant parts of the spectral library will be ready, until the maximal throughput is obtained when the whole library is prepared.
- Additionally, in distinction to alternative techniques, in which the system has no independent ability to prepare a library on-site, the above dynamic scheme advantageously has the possibility of handling variations in optical constants. It is well possible that over time, the optical constants of some layers will change slightly. This change could result from lot-to-lot variations due to the changes of the properties of photoresist (e.g. composition) or slight changes in process conditions (e.g. temperature, humidity). The chemical producer may disregard such changes since they are not supposed to have any direct effect on the process (e.g. changes in the optical constants of photoresist at wavelengths different from the exposure wavelength). On the other hand, any change in the optical constants of the measured layers will obviously have an effect on the measurement with the measurement system (1, 100, 200, 300). In order to avoid this problem, the system has to monitor on a continuous basis the optical constants of the layers, and, in case that these deviate significantly from the constants used for the calculation of the library, the library has to be rebuilt. If the changes in the optical constants are sufficiently smooth, a system with on-board computational power will be able to follow the changes without a significant deterioration in the measurement accuracy. Obviously, any technique that relies on external computational power will be disadvantageous in the scenario.
- As an alternative to geometrical profile models (e.g. trapeze), the profiles to be used for the preparation of the spectral library could be obtained through simulation of the relevant process. This is in contrast to the above technique of producing possible profiles that has no a-priori connection to the real process. For example, if the patterned layer is developed photoresist, than simulation of the lithographic process may be used to obtain expected line profiles from input parameters such as resist thickness, absorption coefficient, sub-layer reflection, exposure wavelength and doze, and parameters of the exposure system, such as numerical aperture and focus conditions. In this case, each set of such input parameters will result in a corresponding expected profile, and the preparation of the spectral library will include an additional step. The required steps thus are as follows:
- (a) The user defines the type of process, type of model and the required input parameters, describing the situation prior to the process and the range of possible parameters for the process;
- (b) Simulation of the process is used to produce a large set of possible profiles according to some or all possible combinations of process parameters and uncertain parameters of the structure prior to the process;
- (c) An optical model is used to produce the expected spectrum for each profile according to experimental conditions of the measurement (incidence angle, numerical aperture etc.).
- Step (c) of this preparation process (and the following fitting process) does not depend on the way the initial profiles have been prepared. A clear advantage of using a process-related method for profile preparation is that a greater variety of inherently different profiles can be used, thus the chances of finding the real profile are increased. Additionally, by providing the input parameters used for the simulation of the profile in addition to the actual profile, the system may provide more ready-to-use information to the user, and may possibly indicate the source of deviations found in the process.
- Measurement Procedure
-
Step 1. Alignment of thewafer 2 is performed by the wafer handler and wafer stage, so as to provide the correct position and orientation of the wafer with respect to themeasurement system 1. Alignment is controlled by feedback from position and angle sensors typically provided in the measurement system, as well as from theimaging channel 26. The alignment procedure is a very important stage of the entire measurement process, since diffraction efficiency is also a function of the angles between the incidence beam, normal to the wafer's surface and the direction of the grating. -
Step 2. The first measurement site is found. This is implemented by providing a relative displacement between the objective lens (and possibly other optical elements) and the wafer along two mutually perpendicular axes within a plane parallel to the wafer's surface. For this purpose, feedback from images of some parts of the wafer acquired by theCCD camera 30 can be used. -
Step 3. The measurement of reflection coefficient spectrum is carried out with the measurement channel 8 a (“normal incidence “0” order”) applied to one or more so-called “unpatterned site”. Turning back toFIG. 1 , such sites L1, L3 are located where there is no lateral variation within an area larger than that of the measurement spot of the measurement channel. These measurements enable to determine the thickness, reflectivity and optical constants (refraction index and extinction coefficient, n and k) of one or more layers including the patternedlayer 2. -
Step 4. The relative location between thewafer 2 and the incident beam Bi (1) is changed (e.g., by moving either the support stage or the optics of the measurement system) to a further measurement site L2 having a required grating structure (a patterned site, as described above). Measurement of the reflection efficiency spectra is carried out with the “normal incidence” measurement channel 8 a, in one or more polarization states. These measurement can be later utilized to extract parameters such as the thickness of the patternedlayer 2, grating parameters, and optionally also optical constants. - It should be noted that generally, steps 3 and 4 could in some cases be combined, namely the above parameters of one or more underneath layers could also be determined at
step 4, whilst measuring in the photoresist region by the measurement spot less than the dimensions of this region. In other words, the determination of the parameters of the patterned layer and those of one or more underneath layers could be carried out at such measurement site(s) and with such measuring conditions, that the spectral characteristic of light returned from the measurement spot is not significantly affected by the line profile. - It should, however, be noted, that, if the optical constants of a patterned layer are known or could be considered to be stable for some bunch of wafers (lot), the “normal incidence” measurement channel and the “oblique incidence” measurement channel could be applied to the same site(s) L2. The measurements are preferably separated in time. Such a technique is time saving, since it eliminates the need for additional movements from the “unpatterned” site to the “patterned” site.
-
Step 5. Measurement of the reflection efficiency spectra is carried out at the oblique incidence in one or more diffraction orders (i.e., “0” and/or “−1” order), with the measurement channels 8 b and/or 34, respectively, or in the case ofsystem 300 through theunified measurement channel 8′. These measurements are applied to patterned sites L2 as defined above (FIG. 1 ). Measurements can be taken from one or more grating structures per measured die, where different gratings may have different line/space ratios in order to simulate different conditions of the controlled process. - The Analysis of Measured Data
- Step A: Initially, the normal incidence measurements (steps 3-4, or
step 4 only) are analyzed to extract the above parameters of one or more underneath layers and of the photoresist layer, and to determine the thickness and optionally optical constants of the photoresist layer. Some of these measurements, e.g., yielding the optical constants n and k, can be carried out only once per several measurements ofstep 5 above, namely once per wafer, once per lot, etc. - Step B: The spectral characteristics measured with either one of the “oblique incidence” channel 8 b (step 5) and the “normal incidence” channel 8 a (step 4), or both are compared to the corresponding reference data, i.e., spectra stored in the library, and a so-called “best-fitting” between the measured and reference data is found. In this step, the results of the previous step are used to limit the scope of the search, thus reducing computation time. Having found a sufficiently good fitting for all the spectra, one can conclude that the measured structure has a profile most similar to that with which the “best-fitting” spectra have been determined, and can output the parameters of this profile.
- By carrying out the analysis in the above two steps A and B, the problem of finding the best fitting profile is significantly reduced. This reduction is gained by de-coupling some of the parameters, e.g., heights, thus reducing the number of independent parameters in step B above. Since finding an optimum in a multi-parameter space is a problem whose complexity considerably increases with the number of independent parameters (dimensions), the de-coupling results in a faster, more accurate and more stable solution.
- Several algorithms are required for the interpretation of the measured data (after the spectral library is prepared). Analysis of the layer(s)' thickness is based on algorithms utilized in NovaScan System (commercially available from Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd.) and may also apply other algorithms, for example an analysis of the optical properties of the semiconductor layer(s) utilizing a technique disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,905,170 with some modifications. The fitting of the measured data to the reference data (i.e., spectral library) utilizes known statistical multivariate techniques such as Neural Networks, genetic algorithms, etc.
- In a FAB for the wafers' manufacture, several concurrently operated production lines are usually utilized, which perform either the same or different manufacturing steps. Consequently, several measurement systems constructed and operated according to the invention could be installed within these production lines. In this case, the control units of the different measuring systems can be associated with a local area network (LAN), with a common server utility installed outside the production line, and possibly remote from the FAB being connected to the LAN through the computer network, e.g., the Internet. It is also possible that a common server utility is associated with control units of different measurement systems installed at different FABs.
-
FIG. 9 illustrates ameasurement system 400 based on the above concept. Thesystem 400 is composed of several measuring modules, each constructed similarly to either one of thesystems system 1 being shown in the present example). Thus, eachsuch measuring module 1 comprises the measuringunit 4, applied to the wafer progressing on a corresponding part of the production line. - As illustrated in
FIG. 9 , thesystem 400 includes aserver utility 42 and several measuring modules,e.g. system 1, connectable to theserver 42 through acommunication link 44. Theserver 42 is a central processor of theentire system 400, and may perform different tasks at different operational steps. The communication network serves for connecting theserver 42 to the measuringmodules 1, providing the connection between the measuringmodules 1, as well as connection between theserver 42 and a host machine (not shown) of the FAB to enable the closed loop control of a corresponding processing tool. - During the setup of measurement, the
server 42 is responsible for receiving information from the user and preparing reference data (libraries of possible models). The reference data is then transmitted over the communication network to thecorresponding measuring module 1. - During the measurement procedure, the
server 42 may perform the following tasks: - 1) Monitor the operation of the
measuring module 1 in thesystem 400. This utilizes both the receiving of signals from sensors, that monitor internal parameters of the measuring module (e.g. temperature, light source parameters, etc.), and generating an alarm signal in case of malfunction or evidence for required preventive maintenance. - 2) Display measurement results of any one of the measuring modules to the operator. The displayed information may include the statistical analysis of any sub-group of results (e.g., in-wafer statistics, wafer-to-wafer statistics, lot-to-lot statistics, module-to-module statistics, etc.).
- 3) Perform all or part of the interpretation of the measured data. For example, the machine-specific calculations, such as normalization to calibration data, could be made in each measuring module, while the comparison between measured spectrum and reference data could be carried out at the server.
- During the maintenance procedure, the server may display the sensors' output, perform the remote control of various mechanisms and provide on-line assistance (“help interface”).
- The preparation of the reference data (libraries) may be carried out by any suitable technique, for example as follows:
-
- Preparation by the
server 42 only; - Preparation by each
control unit 6 separately, as described above with respect to the operation of thesystem 1; - Parallel preparation by several control units associated with different measuring modules connected to the same network;
- Preparation by a distant server connected to the
local server 42 or directly to thecontrol units 6 through the network, e.g. the Internet.
- Preparation by the
- The advantages of the present invention are thus self-evident. Measurement is carried out in both normal and oblique “0” orders, and may be measured both in “0” and “−1” orders. Thus, a wealth of data is measured which can result in more accurate reconstruction of the profile. Since the “−1” order light is that diffracted by the sample grating, it is possible to place a detector array and measure the diffracted signal directly as it comes from the wafer.
- The analysis is carried out in several steps, using first the most sensitive measurement channel to measure each parameter before final optimization, and is done using data from all channels. This method reduces the possibility of finding a local minimum of the fitting function, which is not the correct profile.
- The analysis is carried out using a Genetic Algorithm or another technique that does not depend on a training stage, in which the system learns from calibration examples. This increases the chances for correct measurement, and reduces the setup time.
- The system allows for the measurement on small test structures (typically smaller than 40 μm×40 μm) utilizing focusing optics. The fact that a significant angle range is used is taken into account in the computation to avoid misinterpretation. The system is designed in a way that will enable its incorporation into a closed loop control system for controlling CD.
- Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various modifications and changes can be applied to the embodiments of the invention as hereinbefore exemplified without departing from its scope as defined in and by the appended claims.
Claims (35)
1. A measurement system for measuring one or more parameters of a patterned structure, the system comprising:
an illumination system that produces broad wavelength illumination and provides normal incidence of at least a part of said illumination towards the patterned structure;
a polarizer located in an optical path of the broad wavelength illumination propagating towards the patterned structure and located in an optical path of light returned from an illuminated region of the patterned structure, said polarizer being controllably operable to vary its orientation to the patterned structure;
a detection system for collecting at least a part of the light returned from the patterned structure and propagating through the polarizer, and generating measured data indicative thereof, the detection system comprising a spectrophotometer generating measured data indicative of intensity of spectral components of zero order diffracted light returned through said polarizer at a plurality of polarization orientations between said polarizer and said patterned structure; and
a computer system configured and operable for analyzing said measured data to determine said one or more parameters of said patterned structure, said computer system comprising at least one processor connected to said spectrophotometer and configured and operable for receiving and analyzing said measured data to extract spectral information from said measured data, for obtaining an optical model simulating said patterned structure and obtaining spectral information for said optical model, and for fitting said spectral information for said optical model to the extracted spectral information to determine said one or more parameters of said patterned structure.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein said one or more parameters of the patterned structure comprise one or more parameters of a patterned layer and one or more parameters of a layer underneath the patterned layer.
3. The system of claim 1 , wherein said one or more parameters of the patterned structure comprise one or more parameters of a patterned layer and one or more parameters of a layer above the patterned layer.
4. The measurement system of claim 1 , comprising an objective lens unit for directing the illumination to the patterned structure and collecting the light returned from the illuminated region of the patterned structure.
5. The measurement system of claim 4 , wherein the polarizer is located downstream of the objective lens unit with respect to a direction of propagation of the light returned from the patterned structure towards the detection system.
6. The measurement system of claim 1 , wherein said plurality of polarization orientations comprises two perpendicular polarization orientations.
7. The measurement system of claim 1 , wherein said illumination system is configured and operable for providing oblique incidence of a part of the broad wavelength illumination onto the patterned structure, said detection system comprising a second spectrophotometer for generating second measured data indicative of intensity of spectral components of diffracted light returned from the patterned structure.
8. The measurement system of claim 7 , wherein said oblique incident light illuminates substantially the same region of the patterned structure as said normal incident light.
9. The measurement system of claim 7 , comprising additional polarizers in optical paths of said oblique incident light and said returned light propagating towards the second spectrophotometer.
10. The system of claim 1 , wherein said computer system is configured and operable for obtaining the optical model and the spectral information for said optical model by using Rigorous Coupled Wave Theory (RCWT).
11. The system of claim 1 , wherein said computer system is configured and operable for calculating spectral characteristics of light reflected from said patterned structure for a plurality of wavelengths of said broad wavelength light at a plurality of polarization states of said polarizer relative to said patterned structure, and carrying out a fitting process for said spectral characteristics for said plurality of wavelengths at said plurality of polarization states.
12. The measurement system of claim 1 configured for integrating it as part of a production machine tool performing a manufacturing process.
13. A method for use in measuring at least one parameter of a patterned structure, the method comprising: (a) passing broad wavelength light through a polarizer to produce polarized light; (b) directing said polarized light to be normally incident on said patterned structure, said polarized light being diffracted by said patterned structure; (c) analyzing a zero order diffracted light with said polarizer to produce an output beam with a polarity orientation; (d) detecting intensity of spectral components of said output beam; (e) producing a relative rotation between said polarizer and said patterned structure to alter the orientation of said polarized element relative to said patterned structure thus producing at least two orientations of said polarizer and said patterned structure and detecting the intensity of spectral components of the so produced output beams; and (f) using the detected intensities of the spectral components of the output beams for a plurality of orientations to determine said at least one parameter of said patterned structure.
14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the patterned structure comprises a patterned layer and an underneath layer.
15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patterned structure comprises a patterned layer, and underneath layer and a layer above the patterned layer.
16. The method of claim 13 , comprising providing a reference database of different patterned structures having at least one variable parameter related to a plurality of wavelengths and a plurality of orientations; comparing said detected intensities of said spectral components to said database to determine said at least one parameter of said patterned structure.
17. An optical measurement system for use in determining parameters of a patterned structure, the system comprises a normal incidence channel and an oblique incidence channel, the normal incidence channel comprising a light source, a light detector, and a single polarizer located so as to polarize both incident light propagating from the light source towards the patterned structure and light reflected from the patterned structure and propagating towards the detector, the oblique incidence channel comprising at least one of additional light source and an additional detector.
18. The system of claim 17 , comprising a polarizer in the oblique incidence channel.
19. The system of claim 17 , where the polarizer is configured and operable for rotation according to a type of the patterned structure being measured
20. The system of claim 19 , where the polarizer is aligned either parallel or perpendicular to a direction of the pattern in the patterned structure
21. The system of claim 17 , comprising a rotatable stage to control angle of wafer.
22. The system of claim 20 , where the patterned structure is rotated by rotatable stage to control an incidence angle of illumination in relation to a direction of the pattern in the patterned structure.
23. The system of claim 17 , wherein said oblique incidence channel is configured to provide measurement of non-zero diffraction order.
24. A method for use in determining parameters of a patterned structure, the method comprising: directing illumination with an essentially small numerical aperture towards the surface of the patterned structure; collecting light returned from the patterned structure by a detection module with at least one wide angular collection range.
25. The method of claim 24 , where detected light comprises zero order diffracted light corresponding to essentially normal incidence.
26. The method of claim 24 , where detected light comprises zero order diffracted light corresponding to oblique incidence angle.
27. The method of claim 24 , where detected light comprises non-zero order diffracted light with diffraction angle determined by a pitch of the pattern in the patterned structure.
28. The method of claim 27 , where the angular range is determined by a wavelength range of illumination.
29. The method of claim 24 , where collected light is sampled by a spatially limited detector.
30. The method of claim 29 , where the spatially limited detector is a pixel element of a detector array.
31. The method of claim 24 , where light is collected by a large angular range optics.
32. The method of claim 31 , where the collected light is sampled by a spectrophotometer.
33. The method of claim 32 , where a sample is defined by an aperture behind said large angular range optics.
34. The method of claim 33 , where the aperture is a scanning aperture.
35. The method of claim 31 , where the collected light is sampled by a spatially limited aperture behind said large angular range optics.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/930,594 US20080062406A1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IL130874 | 1999-07-09 | ||
IL13087499A IL130874A (en) | 1999-07-09 | 1999-07-09 | System and method for measuring patterned structures |
US09/610,889 US6657736B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2000-07-06 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US10/724,113 US7477405B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2003-12-01 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/930,594 US20080062406A1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/724,113 Continuation US7477405B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2003-12-01 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080062406A1 true US20080062406A1 (en) | 2008-03-13 |
Family
ID=11073004
Family Applications (13)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/610,889 Expired - Lifetime US6657736B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2000-07-06 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US10/724,113 Expired - Lifetime US7477405B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2003-12-01 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,435 Expired - Fee Related US7663768B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,342 Expired - Lifetime US7760368B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,169 Expired - Fee Related US7626710B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,598 Expired - Lifetime US7495782B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/930,594 Abandoned US20080062406A1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,520 Expired - Fee Related US7626711B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/389,890 Expired - Fee Related US7791740B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2009-02-20 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/624,555 Expired - Fee Related US7864343B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2009-11-24 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/838,763 Expired - Fee Related US8023122B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2010-07-19 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/838,739 Abandoned US20100280807A1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2010-07-19 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/853,453 Expired - Fee Related US7864344B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2010-08-10 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
Family Applications Before (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/610,889 Expired - Lifetime US6657736B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2000-07-06 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US10/724,113 Expired - Lifetime US7477405B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2003-12-01 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,435 Expired - Fee Related US7663768B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,342 Expired - Lifetime US7760368B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,169 Expired - Fee Related US7626710B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US11/931,598 Expired - Lifetime US7495782B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
Family Applications After (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/931,520 Expired - Fee Related US7626711B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2007-10-31 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/389,890 Expired - Fee Related US7791740B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2009-02-20 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/624,555 Expired - Fee Related US7864343B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2009-11-24 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/838,763 Expired - Fee Related US8023122B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2010-07-19 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/838,739 Abandoned US20100280807A1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2010-07-19 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US12/853,453 Expired - Fee Related US7864344B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2010-08-10 | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (13) | US6657736B1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL130874A (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090082993A1 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2009-03-26 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Automated process control of a fabrication tool using a dispersion function relating process parameter to dispersion |
US20090180111A1 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-16 | Xerox Corporation | Illuminator for specular measurements |
US20100280807A1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2010-11-04 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US20130216247A1 (en) * | 2012-02-17 | 2013-08-22 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Optical sensor and image forming apparatus |
US8531678B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2013-09-10 | Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US20150234290A1 (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2015-08-20 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Mark position measuring apparatus and method, lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US9218690B2 (en) | 2012-08-29 | 2015-12-22 | Ge Aviation Systems, Llc | Method for simulating hyperspectral imagery |
US20180052119A1 (en) * | 2014-11-02 | 2018-02-22 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for optical metrology in patterned structures |
Families Citing this family (123)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6483580B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2002-11-19 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Spectroscopic scatterometer system |
US6836324B2 (en) * | 1998-03-18 | 2004-12-28 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and apparatus for measurements of patterned structures |
AU2001234575A1 (en) * | 2000-01-26 | 2001-08-07 | Timbre Technologies, Incorporated | Caching of intra-layer calculations for rapid rigorous coupled-wave analyses |
US6943900B2 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2005-09-13 | Timbre Technologies, Inc. | Generation of a library of periodic grating diffraction signals |
US7115858B1 (en) | 2000-09-25 | 2006-10-03 | Nanometrics Incorporated | Apparatus and method for the measurement of diffracting structures |
US7099005B1 (en) * | 2000-09-27 | 2006-08-29 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | System for scatterometric measurements and applications |
US6900892B2 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2005-05-31 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Parametric profiling using optical spectroscopic systems |
JP4230674B2 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2009-02-25 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Defect inspection apparatus and method |
US7515279B2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2009-04-07 | Nanometrics Incorporated | Line profile asymmetry measurement |
WO2002095372A1 (en) * | 2001-05-22 | 2002-11-28 | Horiba, Ltd. | Thin-film characteristic measuring method using spectroellipsometer |
US6713753B1 (en) | 2001-07-03 | 2004-03-30 | Nanometrics Incorporated | Combination of normal and oblique incidence polarimetry for the characterization of gratings |
US6704661B1 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2004-03-09 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Real time analysis of periodic structures on semiconductors |
US7280230B2 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2007-10-09 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Parametric profiling using optical spectroscopic systems |
US6742168B1 (en) * | 2002-03-19 | 2004-05-25 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Method and structure for calibrating scatterometry-based metrology tool used to measure dimensions of features on a semiconductor device |
US6819844B2 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2004-11-16 | The Boeing Company | Fiber-optic based surface spectroscopy |
AU2003236819A1 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2004-02-02 | Luka Optoscope Aps | Method and apparatus for optically measuring the topography of nearly planar periodic structures |
US6967349B2 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2005-11-22 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method for fabricating a multi-level integrated circuit having scatterometry test structures stacked over same footprint area |
TWI227814B (en) | 2002-09-20 | 2005-02-11 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Alignment system and methods for lithographic systems using at least two wavelengths |
JP4302965B2 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2009-07-29 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Semiconductor device manufacturing method and manufacturing system thereof |
US8564780B2 (en) | 2003-01-16 | 2013-10-22 | Jordan Valley Semiconductors Ltd. | Method and system for using reflectometry below deep ultra-violet (DUV) wavelengths for measuring properties of diffracting or scattering structures on substrate work pieces |
US20080246951A1 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2008-10-09 | Phillip Walsh | Method and system for using reflectometry below deep ultra-violet (DUV) wavelengths for measuring properties of diffracting or scattering structures on substrate work-pieces |
DE10315086B4 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2006-08-24 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Method and apparatus for aligning semiconductor wafers in semiconductor manufacturing |
JP2005009941A (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2005-01-13 | Canon Inc | Library preparing method |
US20040267397A1 (en) * | 2003-06-27 | 2004-12-30 | Srinivas Doddi | Optical metrology of structures formed on semiconductor wafer using machine learning systems |
US7428443B2 (en) * | 2003-07-22 | 2008-09-23 | Precision Automation, Inc. | Measurement transmission for material processing |
DE10345551A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-05-04 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Method for characterizing a layer |
AU2003300005A1 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2005-08-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Differential critical dimension and overlay metrology apparatus and measurement method |
US7158221B2 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2007-01-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing limited area spectral analysis |
US7523076B2 (en) | 2004-03-01 | 2009-04-21 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Selecting a profile model for use in optical metrology using a machine learning system |
IL162199A (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2008-04-13 | Nova Measuring Instr Ltd | Optical measurements of articles with periodic patterns |
US7212293B1 (en) * | 2004-06-01 | 2007-05-01 | N&K Technology, Inc. | Optical determination of pattern feature parameters using a scalar model having effective optical properties |
US7321426B1 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2008-01-22 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Optical metrology on patterned samples |
EP1605241A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-14 | Automation & Robotics | Device for the optical test of transparent or reflective samples |
FR2872897B1 (en) * | 2004-07-06 | 2006-10-13 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | OPTICAL DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE THICKNESS OF AT LEAST PARTIALLY TRANSPARENT MEDIA |
DE102004033602A1 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2006-02-16 | Carl Zeiss Sms Gmbh | Imaging system for emulation of high-aperture scanner systems |
DE102004033603A1 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2006-02-16 | Carl Zeiss Sms Gmbh | Microscopic imaging system and method for emulating a high-aperture imaging system, in particular for mask inspection |
US7274440B1 (en) * | 2004-09-08 | 2007-09-25 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for measuring stress in a specimen |
US7280229B2 (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2007-10-09 | Timbre Technologies, Inc. | Examining a structure formed on a semiconductor wafer using machine learning systems |
JP2006162500A (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2006-06-22 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corp | Defect inspection device |
US7483133B2 (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2009-01-27 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation. | Multiple angle of incidence spectroscopic scatterometer system |
TWI269870B (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2007-01-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Method for deciding structure parameters of a grating |
US20060147820A1 (en) * | 2005-01-04 | 2006-07-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Phase contrast alignment method and apparatus for nano imprint lithography |
US7421414B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2008-09-02 | Timbre Technologies, Inc. | Split machine learning systems |
US7315384B2 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2008-01-01 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Inspection apparatus and method of inspection |
US7465590B1 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2008-12-16 | Nanometrics Incorporated | Measurement of a sample using multiple models |
US7428060B2 (en) * | 2006-03-24 | 2008-09-23 | Timbre Technologies, Inc. | Optimization of diffraction order selection for two-dimensional structures |
US7561282B1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2009-07-14 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Techniques for determining overlay and critical dimension using a single metrology tool |
US7586607B2 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2009-09-08 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Polarization imaging |
US7525673B2 (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2009-04-28 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Optimizing selected variables of an optical metrology system |
US7526354B2 (en) | 2006-07-10 | 2009-04-28 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Managing and using metrology data for process and equipment control |
US8139232B2 (en) | 2006-07-27 | 2012-03-20 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Multiple measurement techniques including focused beam scatterometry for characterization of samples |
KR101235171B1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2013-02-20 | 어플라이드 머티리얼즈 이스라엘 리미티드 | Method and system for defect detection |
US8213024B2 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2012-07-03 | Applied Materials Israel, Ltd. | Method and system for aerial imaging of a reticle |
US7792602B2 (en) * | 2006-08-22 | 2010-09-07 | Precision Automation, Inc. | Material processing system and a material processing method including a saw station and an interface with touch screen |
US7755775B1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2010-07-13 | N&K Technology, Inc. | Broadband optical metrology with reduced wave front distortion, chromatic dispersion compensation and monitoring |
US7417750B2 (en) * | 2006-11-07 | 2008-08-26 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Consecutive measurement of structures formed on a semiconductor wafer using an angle-resolved spectroscopic scatterometer |
US20080129986A1 (en) * | 2006-11-30 | 2008-06-05 | Phillip Walsh | Method and apparatus for optically measuring periodic structures using orthogonal azimuthal sample orientations |
US7596422B2 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2009-09-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Determining one or more profile parameters of a structure using optical metrology and a correlation between profile models and key profile shape variables |
US7639351B2 (en) * | 2007-03-20 | 2009-12-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Automated process control using optical metrology with a photonic nanojet |
US7949618B2 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2011-05-24 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Training a machine learning system to determine photoresist parameters |
US7567353B2 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2009-07-28 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Automated process control using optical metrology and photoresist parameters |
US7372583B1 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2008-05-13 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Controlling a fabrication tool using support vector machine |
US7511835B2 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2009-03-31 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Optical metrology using a support vector machine with simulated diffraction signal inputs |
US7483809B2 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2009-01-27 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Optical metrology using support vector machine with profile parameter inputs |
TWI416096B (en) * | 2007-07-11 | 2013-11-21 | Nova Measuring Instr Ltd | Method and system for use in monitoring properties of patterned structures |
US8699027B2 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2014-04-15 | Rudolph Technologies, Inc. | Multiple measurement techniques including focused beam scatterometry for characterization of samples |
US7663766B2 (en) * | 2007-09-05 | 2010-02-16 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Incorporating film optical property measurements into scatterometry metrology |
US8069020B2 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2011-11-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Generating simulated diffraction signal using a dispersion function relating process parameter to dispersion |
US7800108B2 (en) * | 2007-11-30 | 2010-09-21 | Nec Electronics Corporation | Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing semiconductor device including optical test pattern above a light shielding film |
IL188029A0 (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2008-11-03 | Nova Measuring Instr Ltd | Optical method and system |
DE102008000038A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2009-07-16 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | contraption |
DE102008019341B4 (en) * | 2008-04-15 | 2020-09-24 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Method for the analysis of masks for photolithography |
US8126694B2 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2012-02-28 | Nanometrics Incorporated | Modeling conductive patterns using an effective model |
JP2010034402A (en) * | 2008-07-30 | 2010-02-12 | Toshiba Corp | Method of estimating pattern form |
US7885786B2 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2011-02-08 | Seagate Technology Llc | Sleeve cone quality measurement system and method |
JP5302631B2 (en) * | 2008-11-08 | 2013-10-02 | 株式会社堀場製作所 | Optical measuring apparatus, program, and measuring method |
EP2409195B1 (en) | 2008-12-30 | 2019-05-08 | ASML Netherlands BV | Inspection method and apparatus |
TWI521624B (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2016-02-11 | 魯道夫科技股份有限公司 | Polarization imaging |
EP2430498B1 (en) * | 2009-05-12 | 2018-01-31 | ASML Netherlands BV | Inspection method for lithography |
US8289527B2 (en) * | 2010-04-01 | 2012-10-16 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Optimization of ray tracing and beam propagation parameters |
JP5450275B2 (en) * | 2010-06-14 | 2014-03-26 | 株式会社東芝 | Pattern dimension calculation method and pattern dimension calculation program |
US20120022819A1 (en) * | 2010-07-26 | 2012-01-26 | Norton Robert J | Correcting the Motion of a Monochromator |
JP2014500613A (en) * | 2010-10-15 | 2014-01-09 | アプライド マテリアルズ インコーポレイテッド | Construction of spectral library for optical monitoring |
NL2007765A (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2012-05-15 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Metrology method and inspection apparatus, lithographic system and device manufacturing method. |
WO2012062501A1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2012-05-18 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Metrology method and apparatus, and device manufacturing method |
US9568872B2 (en) | 2011-01-12 | 2017-02-14 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Process control using non-zero order diffraction |
US8867041B2 (en) | 2011-01-18 | 2014-10-21 | Jordan Valley Semiconductor Ltd | Optical vacuum ultra-violet wavelength nanoimprint metrology |
WO2012098550A1 (en) * | 2011-01-19 | 2012-07-26 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Optical system and method for measuring in three-dimensional structures |
US8565379B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2013-10-22 | Jordan Valley Semiconductors Ltd. | Combining X-ray and VUV analysis of thin film layers |
US9140544B2 (en) * | 2011-07-19 | 2015-09-22 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Optical system and method for measuring in patterned structures |
NL2009079A (en) * | 2011-08-23 | 2013-02-27 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Metrology method and apparatus, and device manufacturing method. |
US8570531B2 (en) * | 2011-12-11 | 2013-10-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method of regenerating diffraction signals for optical metrology systems |
JP6033890B2 (en) * | 2012-02-21 | 2016-11-30 | エーエスエムエル ネザーランズ ビー.ブイ. | Inspection apparatus and method |
JP5889699B2 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2016-03-22 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Optical inspection method and apparatus for magnetic media |
US9459206B2 (en) * | 2012-05-02 | 2016-10-04 | Datacolor Holding Ag | System and apparatus for measurement of light scattering from a sample |
US9435735B1 (en) * | 2012-05-08 | 2016-09-06 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Optical parametric model optimization |
NL2010717A (en) * | 2012-05-21 | 2013-11-25 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Determining a structural parameter and correcting an asymmetry property. |
US10073045B2 (en) * | 2012-07-24 | 2018-09-11 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Optical method and system for measuring isolated features of a structure |
US8950078B2 (en) * | 2012-08-07 | 2015-02-10 | Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh | Apparatus with internal optical reference |
US20140242880A1 (en) * | 2013-02-26 | 2014-08-28 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Optical model with polarization direction effects for comparison to measured spectrum |
US9236219B2 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2016-01-12 | Macronix International Co., Ltd. | Measurement of line-edge-roughness and line-width-roughness on pre-layered structures |
US9518932B2 (en) * | 2013-11-06 | 2016-12-13 | Kla-Tencor Corp. | Metrology optimized inspection |
US9146193B2 (en) | 2014-01-03 | 2015-09-29 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Scatterometry metrology methods and methods of modeling formation of a vertical region of a multilayer semiconductor substrate to comprise a scatterometry target |
DE102014108789A1 (en) * | 2014-06-24 | 2016-01-07 | Byk-Gardner Gmbh | Multi-stage process for the examination of surfaces and corresponding device |
US9482519B2 (en) | 2014-12-04 | 2016-11-01 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Measuring semiconductor device features using stepwise optical metrology |
IL252666B (en) | 2014-12-10 | 2022-06-01 | Nova Ltd | Test structure for use in metrology measurements of patterns |
TWI506242B (en) * | 2014-12-12 | 2015-11-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Thin-film curvature measurment apparatus and method thereof |
EP3238135B1 (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2020-02-05 | California Institute Of Technology | Epi-illumination fourier ptychographic imaging for thick samples |
US9310313B1 (en) * | 2014-12-29 | 2016-04-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Diffractive imaging of groove structures on optical tape |
WO2016150957A1 (en) | 2015-03-25 | 2016-09-29 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Metrology methods, metrology apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US10380728B2 (en) * | 2015-08-31 | 2019-08-13 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Model-based metrology using images |
US10451412B2 (en) * | 2016-04-22 | 2019-10-22 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Apparatus and methods for detecting overlay errors using scatterometry |
US10481111B2 (en) * | 2016-10-21 | 2019-11-19 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Calibration of a small angle X-ray scatterometry based metrology system |
CN114137803A (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2022-03-04 | Asml荷兰有限公司 | Method for changing etching parameters |
WO2018153711A1 (en) * | 2017-02-22 | 2018-08-30 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Computational metrology |
US10989652B2 (en) * | 2017-09-06 | 2021-04-27 | Lam Research Corporation | Systems and methods for combining optical metrology with mass metrology |
CN107944210A (en) * | 2017-11-16 | 2018-04-20 | 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of screening technique of high insulating gas |
US10677588B2 (en) * | 2018-04-09 | 2020-06-09 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Localized telecentricity and focus optimization for overlay metrology |
US10872403B2 (en) | 2018-08-10 | 2020-12-22 | Micron Technology, Inc. | System for predicting properties of structures, imager system, and related methods |
US11668658B2 (en) * | 2018-10-08 | 2023-06-06 | Araz Yacoubian | Multi-parameter inspection apparatus for monitoring of additive manufacturing parts |
US20200306960A1 (en) * | 2019-04-01 | 2020-10-01 | Nvidia Corporation | Simulation of tasks using neural networks |
WO2020237016A1 (en) | 2019-05-23 | 2020-11-26 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Optical diagnostics of semiconductor process using hyperspectral imaging |
US11561089B2 (en) | 2019-07-04 | 2023-01-24 | Hitachi High-Tech Corporation | Three-dimensional shape detection apparatus, three-dimensional shape detection method and plasma processing apparatus |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5007708A (en) * | 1988-07-26 | 1991-04-16 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Technique for producing antireflection grating surfaces on dielectrics, semiconductors and metals |
US5555474A (en) * | 1994-12-21 | 1996-09-10 | Integrated Process Equipment Corp. | Automatic rejection of diffraction effects in thin film metrology |
US5607800A (en) * | 1995-02-15 | 1997-03-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and arrangement for characterizing micro-size patterns |
US5682242A (en) * | 1995-01-11 | 1997-10-28 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and apparatus for determining a location on a surface of an object |
US5798837A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 1998-08-25 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Thin film optical measurement system and method with calibrating ellipsometer |
US5867590A (en) * | 1995-01-11 | 1999-02-02 | Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for determining a location on a surface of an object |
US5963329A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 1999-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring the profile of small repeating lines |
US5978074A (en) * | 1997-07-03 | 1999-11-02 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Apparatus for evaluating metalized layers on semiconductors |
US6045433A (en) * | 1995-05-23 | 2000-04-04 | Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. | Apparatus for optical inspection of wafers during polishing |
US6067465A (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2000-05-23 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting and tracking reference position changes with linear phase shift in magnetic resonance imaging |
US6122046A (en) * | 1998-10-02 | 2000-09-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Dual resolution combined laser spot scanning and area imaging inspection |
US6278519B1 (en) * | 1998-01-29 | 2001-08-21 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Apparatus for analyzing multi-layer thin film stacks on semiconductors |
US6363166B1 (en) * | 1991-08-22 | 2002-03-26 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Automated photomask inspection apparatus |
US6426502B1 (en) * | 1998-11-08 | 2002-07-30 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus for integrated monitoring of wafers and for process control in the semiconductor manufacturing and a method for use thereof |
US6483580B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2002-11-19 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Spectroscopic scatterometer system |
US6633831B2 (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2003-10-14 | Kla Tencor Technologies | Methods and systems for determining a critical dimension and a thin film characteristic of a specimen |
US7271889B2 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2007-09-18 | Leica Microsystems Cms Gmbh | Device and method for inspecting an object |
Family Cites Families (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US499014A (en) * | 1893-06-06 | doane | ||
US4330213A (en) | 1980-02-14 | 1982-05-18 | Rca Corporation | Optical line width measuring apparatus and method |
US4710642A (en) | 1985-08-20 | 1987-12-01 | Mcneil John R | Optical scatterometer having improved sensitivity and bandwidth |
US4890239A (en) | 1987-10-20 | 1989-12-26 | Shipley Company, Inc. | Lithographic process analysis and control system |
US4905170A (en) | 1987-11-12 | 1990-02-27 | Forouhi Abdul R | Method and apparatus of determining optical constants of amorphous semiconductors and dielectrics |
JP2560371B2 (en) * | 1988-01-05 | 1996-12-04 | 株式会社ニコン | Substrate processing system |
US5393624A (en) * | 1988-07-29 | 1995-02-28 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for manufacturing a semiconductor device |
US4999014A (en) | 1989-05-04 | 1991-03-12 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring thickness of thin films |
EP0456479B1 (en) | 1990-05-09 | 2001-01-31 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Pattern forming process and process for preparing semiconductor device utilizing said pattern forming process |
US5293216A (en) * | 1990-12-31 | 1994-03-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Sensor for semiconductor device manufacturing process control |
US5270222A (en) * | 1990-12-31 | 1993-12-14 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and apparatus for semiconductor device fabrication diagnosis and prognosis |
US5164790A (en) | 1991-02-27 | 1992-11-17 | Mcneil John R | Simple CD measurement of periodic structures on photomasks |
DE4222804A1 (en) * | 1991-07-10 | 1993-04-01 | Raytheon Co | Automatic visual tester for electrical and electronic components - performs video scans of different surfaces with unequal intensities of illumination by annular and halogen lamps |
US5361137A (en) | 1992-08-31 | 1994-11-01 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Process control for submicron linewidth measurement |
US5452953A (en) * | 1993-10-12 | 1995-09-26 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Film thickness measurement of structures containing a scattering surface |
JP3339174B2 (en) | 1993-11-08 | 2002-10-28 | ソニー株式会社 | Photomask manufacturing method, exposure method, and semiconductor device manufacturing method |
TW295677B (en) * | 1994-08-19 | 1997-01-11 | Tokyo Electron Co Ltd | |
US5604800A (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 1997-02-18 | Eta Technologies Corporation | Personal access management system |
US5703692A (en) | 1995-08-03 | 1997-12-30 | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | Lens scatterometer system employing source light beam scanning means |
JP2842362B2 (en) | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-06 | 日本電気株式会社 | Superposition measurement method |
US6462813B1 (en) * | 1996-04-12 | 2002-10-08 | Perceptron, Inc. | Surface defect inspection system and method |
US5983329A (en) * | 1996-05-03 | 1999-11-09 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Caching virtual memory locks |
US6246787B1 (en) | 1996-05-31 | 2001-06-12 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System and method for knowledgebase generation and management |
US5703892A (en) * | 1996-07-01 | 1997-12-30 | Motorola, Inc. | Method of mode detection and control in semiconductor lasers |
US6076465A (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 2000-06-20 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | System and method for determining reticle defect printability |
US5889593A (en) | 1997-02-26 | 1999-03-30 | Kla Instruments Corporation | Optical system and method for angle-dependent reflection or transmission measurement |
US5867276A (en) | 1997-03-07 | 1999-02-02 | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | Method for broad wavelength scatterometry |
JP3789040B2 (en) * | 1997-03-28 | 2006-06-21 | キヤノン株式会社 | Electrophotographic image forming apparatus |
EP0973069A3 (en) | 1998-07-14 | 2006-10-04 | Nova Measuring Instruments Limited | Monitoring apparatus and method particularly useful in photolithographically processing substrates |
IL125337A0 (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 1999-03-12 | Nova Measuring Instr Ltd | Method and apparatus for lithography monitoring and process control |
JP4601744B2 (en) | 1998-07-14 | 2010-12-22 | ノバ メジャリング インスツルメンツ リミテッド | Method and system for controlling a photolithographic process |
IL130874A (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2002-12-01 | Nova Measuring Instr Ltd | System and method for measuring patterned structures |
US6943900B2 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2005-09-13 | Timbre Technologies, Inc. | Generation of a library of periodic grating diffraction signals |
US7515279B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2009-04-07 | Nanometrics Incorporated | Line profile asymmetry measurement |
WO2002070985A1 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-12 | Accent Optical Technologies, Inc. | Line profile asymmetry measurement using scatterometry |
US20030002043A1 (en) | 2001-04-10 | 2003-01-02 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Periodic patterns and technique to control misalignment |
US6537833B1 (en) * | 2001-06-19 | 2003-03-25 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Method and apparatus for characterizing an interconnect structure profile using scatterometry measurements |
US7666768B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-02-23 | Intel Corporation | Through-die metal vias with a dispersed phase of graphitic structures of carbon for reduced thermal expansion and increased electrical conductance |
-
1999
- 1999-07-09 IL IL13087499A patent/IL130874A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2000
- 2000-07-06 US US09/610,889 patent/US6657736B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-12-01 US US10/724,113 patent/US7477405B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2007
- 2007-10-31 US US11/931,435 patent/US7663768B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-10-31 US US11/931,342 patent/US7760368B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2007-10-31 US US11/931,169 patent/US7626710B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-10-31 US US11/931,598 patent/US7495782B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2007-10-31 US US11/930,594 patent/US20080062406A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2007-10-31 US US11/931,520 patent/US7626711B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-02-20 US US12/389,890 patent/US7791740B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2009-11-24 US US12/624,555 patent/US7864343B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-07-19 US US12/838,763 patent/US8023122B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-07-19 US US12/838,739 patent/US20100280807A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2010-08-10 US US12/853,453 patent/US7864344B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5007708A (en) * | 1988-07-26 | 1991-04-16 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Technique for producing antireflection grating surfaces on dielectrics, semiconductors and metals |
US6363166B1 (en) * | 1991-08-22 | 2002-03-26 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Automated photomask inspection apparatus |
US5555474A (en) * | 1994-12-21 | 1996-09-10 | Integrated Process Equipment Corp. | Automatic rejection of diffraction effects in thin film metrology |
US5682242A (en) * | 1995-01-11 | 1997-10-28 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and apparatus for determining a location on a surface of an object |
US5867590A (en) * | 1995-01-11 | 1999-02-02 | Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for determining a location on a surface of an object |
US5607800A (en) * | 1995-02-15 | 1997-03-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and arrangement for characterizing micro-size patterns |
US6045433A (en) * | 1995-05-23 | 2000-04-04 | Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. | Apparatus for optical inspection of wafers during polishing |
US5978074A (en) * | 1997-07-03 | 1999-11-02 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Apparatus for evaluating metalized layers on semiconductors |
US5798837A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 1998-08-25 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Thin film optical measurement system and method with calibrating ellipsometer |
US5900939A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 1999-05-04 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Thin film optical measurement system and method with calibrating ellipsometer |
US5963329A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 1999-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring the profile of small repeating lines |
US6067465A (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2000-05-23 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting and tracking reference position changes with linear phase shift in magnetic resonance imaging |
US6278519B1 (en) * | 1998-01-29 | 2001-08-21 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Apparatus for analyzing multi-layer thin film stacks on semiconductors |
US6297880B1 (en) * | 1998-01-29 | 2001-10-02 | Therma-Wave, Inc. | Apparatus for analyzing multi-layer thin film stacks on semiconductors |
US6483580B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2002-11-19 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Spectroscopic scatterometer system |
US6122046A (en) * | 1998-10-02 | 2000-09-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Dual resolution combined laser spot scanning and area imaging inspection |
US6426502B1 (en) * | 1998-11-08 | 2002-07-30 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Apparatus for integrated monitoring of wafers and for process control in the semiconductor manufacturing and a method for use thereof |
US6633831B2 (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2003-10-14 | Kla Tencor Technologies | Methods and systems for determining a critical dimension and a thin film characteristic of a specimen |
US7271889B2 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2007-09-18 | Leica Microsystems Cms Gmbh | Device and method for inspecting an object |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8531678B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2013-09-10 | Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US7864344B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2011-01-04 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US9184102B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2015-11-10 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US8023122B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2011-09-20 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US20100280807A1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2010-11-04 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for measuring patterned structures |
US7636649B2 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2009-12-22 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Automated process control of a fabrication tool using a dispersion function relating process parameter to dispersion |
US20090082993A1 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2009-03-26 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Automated process control of a fabrication tool using a dispersion function relating process parameter to dispersion |
US20090180111A1 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-16 | Xerox Corporation | Illuminator for specular measurements |
US7764382B2 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2010-07-27 | Xerox Corporation | Illuminator for specular measurements |
US20130216247A1 (en) * | 2012-02-17 | 2013-08-22 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Optical sensor and image forming apparatus |
US8971749B2 (en) * | 2012-02-17 | 2015-03-03 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Optical sensor and image forming apparatus |
US9218690B2 (en) | 2012-08-29 | 2015-12-22 | Ge Aviation Systems, Llc | Method for simulating hyperspectral imagery |
US20150234290A1 (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2015-08-20 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Mark position measuring apparatus and method, lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US9551939B2 (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2017-01-24 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Mark position measuring apparatus and method, lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US10761036B2 (en) * | 2014-11-02 | 2020-09-01 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for optical metrology in patterned structures |
US20180052119A1 (en) * | 2014-11-02 | 2018-02-22 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for optical metrology in patterned structures |
US10274435B2 (en) * | 2014-11-02 | 2019-04-30 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for optical metrology in patterned structures |
US20190317024A1 (en) * | 2014-11-02 | 2019-10-17 | Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. | Method and system for optical metrology in patterned structures |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7495782B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 |
US7864344B1 (en) | 2011-01-04 |
US20100324865A1 (en) | 2010-12-23 |
US20040109173A1 (en) | 2004-06-10 |
US7864343B2 (en) | 2011-01-04 |
US20080055609A1 (en) | 2008-03-06 |
US20100280808A1 (en) | 2010-11-04 |
US20080068611A1 (en) | 2008-03-20 |
US7626711B2 (en) | 2009-12-01 |
US8023122B2 (en) | 2011-09-20 |
US20080065339A1 (en) | 2008-03-13 |
US20080059129A1 (en) | 2008-03-06 |
US6657736B1 (en) | 2003-12-02 |
US7791740B2 (en) | 2010-09-07 |
US7477405B2 (en) | 2009-01-13 |
IL130874A (en) | 2002-12-01 |
US7663768B2 (en) | 2010-02-16 |
IL130874A0 (en) | 2001-01-28 |
US7626710B2 (en) | 2009-12-01 |
US7760368B2 (en) | 2010-07-20 |
US20080059141A1 (en) | 2008-03-06 |
US20100121627A1 (en) | 2010-05-13 |
US20090161123A1 (en) | 2009-06-25 |
US20100280807A1 (en) | 2010-11-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7626711B2 (en) | Method and system for measuring patterned structures | |
US9184102B2 (en) | Method and system for measuring patterned structures | |
TWI633299B (en) | Metrology methods, metrology apparatus and device manufacturing method | |
US8289527B2 (en) | Optimization of ray tracing and beam propagation parameters | |
TWI444781B (en) | Inspection method and apparatus, lithographic apparatus, lithographic processing cell and device manufacturing method | |
TWI461857B (en) | Method and apparatus for angular-resolved spectroscopic lithography characterization | |
US20110246141A1 (en) | Method of optical metrology optimization using ray tracing | |
US20110246400A1 (en) | System for optical metrology optimization using ray tracing | |
US7589845B1 (en) | Process control using an optical metrology system optimized with signal criteria | |
JP2013083659A (en) | Diffraction structure, broadband, polarization, ellipsometry and underlying structure measurement | |
US9103664B2 (en) | Automated process control using an adjusted metrology output signal | |
KR20220137167A (en) | System and method for fabricating metrology targets oriented with an angle rotated with respect to device features | |
US7734437B2 (en) | Apparatus for designing an optical metrology system optimized with signal criteria | |
US7292335B2 (en) | Optical measurements of patterned structures |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |