US20080183690A1 - Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment - Google Patents
Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080183690A1 US20080183690A1 US11/627,398 US62739807A US2008183690A1 US 20080183690 A1 US20080183690 A1 US 20080183690A1 US 62739807 A US62739807 A US 62739807A US 2008183690 A1 US2008183690 A1 US 2008183690A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- cis
- cmdb
- given
- information
- change
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
- G06F8/71—Version control; Configuration management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/27—Replication, distribution or synchronisation of data between databases or within a distributed database system; Distributed database system architectures therefor
- G06F16/275—Synchronous replication
Definitions
- the invention disclosed and claimed herein generally pertains to a method for providing assistance in decision making in a configurable managed environment or system, that includes a configuration management database (CMDB) and configuration items (CI). More particularly, the invention pertains to a method of the above type for providing assistance in determining whether or not to make a change in the system that would affect one or more of the CIs. Even more particularly, the invention pertains to a method of the above type for computing a confidence level representing the probability that information provided by the CMDB is accurate. The Change Manager also gets the information on the impact of the proposed change.
- CMDB configuration management database
- CI configuration items
- Configuration management is a critical process responsible for identifying, controlling and tracking all versions of hardware, software, documentation, and other inanimate components of a configurable managed environment, such as an Information Technology organization.
- the goal of configuration management is to ensure that only authorized components, referred to as configuration items (CIs), are used in the configurable managed environment, and that all changes to CIs are recorded and tracked throughout the life cycle of the component.
- the configuration management process includes performing tasks such as identifying CIs and their relationships, and adding them to the CMDB.
- the CMDB is a database that contains all relevant details for each CI, such as relationships between CIs, state or status, and historical information. Some examples of CIs are Computer System, Application Server etc.
- CMDB Computed Data and relationships in the CMDB are used by a system manager, referred to as a Change Manager, for making changes in the configurable managed environment or system, wherein the changes generally will affect one or more of the configuration items.
- a system manager referred to as a Change Manager
- ITIL Information Technology Infrastructure Library
- the CMDB nominally contains the latest information of the above type for all CIs, such as the states and relationships thereof.
- Information about respective CIs is referred to herein as configuration item data (CID).
- CID configuration item data
- the CMDB In a configurable managed environment, as events occur that change the states or relationships of respective CIs, the CMDB must be synchronized accordingly. That is, the CMDB must be updated, so that the data contained therein will represent the new CID, that is, new realities of the CIs.
- multiple point products are commonly present that create and change relationships among the CIs. Such point products are described hereinafter in further detail, and may, for example, comprise devices such as the Tivoli Configuration Manager (TCM), a product of International Business Machines Corporation. The multiple point products are also commonly used to report changed conditions of the CIs to the CMDB.
- TCM Tivoli Configuration Manager
- CMDB Because the CMDB receives CI change data from different point products, it can happen that data received from the different point products, in regard to the same CIs, will be in conflict. Moreover, delays of varying lengths may occur between actual changes of CI conditions, and the reporting of such changed conditions to the CMDB. As a result, a typical CMDB that is being populated with data from multiple point product sources cannot be kept in synchronization with the actual real world condition of all CIs, since it is virtually impossible to keep CID synchronization up to date.
- Change Managers make systems management decisions based on the state and relationships of the CIs, as shown by information in the CMDB.
- Some changes to the environment are trivial, while other changes can have serious consequences. For example, a change such as disabling a monitoring service on a hardware CI will usually be of low impact, while deleting a software component from a server for a change management operation can have serious consequences.
- CMDB information available to the Change Manager is likely to contain inaccuracies, even though such information is to be used as the basis for making changes. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide the Change Manager with a tool that could serve as an aid in determining whether or not to make certain changes that affect CIs. The tool would take into account both the possibility of inaccurate CMDB information, and the comparative impact of the proposed change and provide information on the probability of a given change being successful or a failure.
- a method for determining whether to allow a particular change that would affect at least one of the CIs.
- the method comprises the steps of acquiring information from the CMDB pertaining to CIs that would be affected by the particular change, and processing the acquired information to compute a confidence level indicating the probability that the acquired information is correct.
- a particular change is then allowed to be made in the configurable system only if the confidence level is no less than a pre-specified minimum value.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a configurable managed system in which an embodiment of the invention may be carried out.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a computer or data processing system for implementing a change station that may be used in the system of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing respective steps for an embodiment of the invention.
- a configurable managed system or environment 100 that includes a number of interrelated configuration items (CIs).
- CIs interrelated configuration items
- Well known types of CIs include desktop computers, servers and computer clients, which are exemplified in FIG. 1 by servers 102 and 104 , and by client 106 .
- the hardware CIs of system 100 may contain operating systems, application programs and other software components that are also CIs.
- Respective CIs of configurable system 100 can be selectively connected to one another by means of a network 108 , which may, for example, comprise the Internet or a LAN.
- system 100 provided with a CMDB 112 and point products 114 and 116 .
- the point products are components that monitor or provide management services for the CIs of system 100 , and furnish data concerning respective CIs to CMDB 108 .
- CID information pertaining to CIs is stored in CMDB 108 by multiple point product sources, exemplified in FIG. 1 by point products 114 and 116 .
- the CID information includes relationships between the CIs.
- Each of the point products may comprise, for example, a Tivoli Configuration Manager (TCM) as described above, or a Tivoli Provisioning Manager or IBM Tivoli Monitor. These are each well known products and systems made available by the International Business Machines Corporation. Alternatively, such products could include a BMC protocol or a Microsoft SMS.
- information sent to the CMDB for the CI may include data representing the value or state of each element.
- the CI comprises a computer component having a hard drive
- data stored in the CMDB for the CI could include a value indicating the hard drive storage capacity.
- FIG. 1 further shows a computer work station, comprising a change station 110 , for use by a Change Manager, or another administrator or user associated with configurable managed system 100 .
- a Change Manager or another administrator or user associated with configurable managed system 100 .
- a Change Advisory Board CAB
- CAB Change Advisory Board
- Change station 110 is operable by the Change Manager or other user to establish and change relationships between respective CIs. Accordingly, change station 110 is provided with a user interface as further indicated at FIG. 2 .
- change station 110 could be operated by the Change Manager or other user to install an application into one of the servers 102 or 104 , or to disconnect a point product monitor from another CI. Change station 110 may also be operated to carry out an embodiment of the invention, as described herein.
- FIG. 2 there is shown a block diagram of a generalized data processing system 200 which may be used to implement change station 110 .
- Data processing system 200 exemplifies a computer, in which code or instructions for implementing the processes of the present invention may be located.
- Data processing system 200 usefully employs a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) local bus architecture, although other bus architectures may alternatively be used.
- FIG. 2 shows a processor 202 and main memory 204 connected to a PCI local bus 206 through a Host/PCI bridge 208 .
- PCI bridge 208 also may include an integrated memory controller and cache memory for processor 202 .
- LAN local area network
- SCSI small computer system interface
- expansion bus interface 214 respectively connected to PCI local bus 206 by direct component connection.
- SCSI host bus adapter 210 provides a connection for hard disk drive 218 , and also for CD-ROM drive 220 .
- Expansion bus interface 214 provides a connection for user interface elements such as a keyboard and mouse adapter 222 , modem 224 , and additional memory 226 .
- An operating system runs on processor 202 and is used to coordinate and provide control of various components within data processing system 200 shown in FIG. 2 .
- the operating system may be a commercially available operating system such as Windows XP, which is available from Microsoft Corporation. Instructions for the operating system and for applications or programs are located on storage devices, such as hard disk drive 220 , and may be loaded into main memory 204 for execution by processor 202 .
- the CI data reported from multiple products is in a standard form, and the CI information from all the products is consolidated into a single CI data item.
- the CI information from all the products is consolidated into a single CI data item.
- change station 110 can be used to implement a procedure in accordance with the embodiment of the invention, as illustrated by FIG. 3 . This procedure will reduce the possibility of adverse consequences that are caused by making a change based on inaccurate CI information in the CMDB.
- an initial step 302 of identifying each of the CIs that are affected by a proposed change is performed by the CMDB, which is a repository for information pertaining to all CIs of a system, including the states and relationships thereof.
- the CMDB receives data indicating a proposed change, it will be able to determine, from the relationships existing therein, whether a particular CI will be affected by the changes. If so, the CMDB identifies the particular CI.
- step 304 information stored in the CMDB for one of the identified CIs is selected or acquired from the CMDB, wherein the acquired information is relevant to the proposed change.
- the proposed change could require loading an application into the hard drive of a particular CI, so that it would be necessary to know the available capacity of the hard drive.
- the CMDB might contain reports listing information for a number of elements of the particular CI, only the value of hard drive capacity would be pertinent to the proposed change.
- Step 304 would be carried out for all of the CIs identified at step 302 .
- SAP Service Advertising Protocol
- SAP Service Advertising Protocol
- SAP is a service for managing server assets in a system.
- SAP makes a record of the server model and serial number, and of the operating system placed therein.
- a year later a point product conducts a scan and indicates that a different operating system is in the server.
- the SAP is an authoritative system, but its information can be out of date, if the operating system was changed but the SAP was not informed of the change.
- the point product can perform a scan to correctly identify the operating system, at the time such information is requested. Accordingly, the point product data will simply be accepted over the data from SAP.
- the hard drive capacity of the particular CI is stated to be 200 GB in three reports sent to the CMDB, but is stated to be 100 GB in one other report.
- a confidence level or weight
- CMDB reports typically are stored in a log file or in a data warehouse. Decisions about respective reports are revisited when new information becomes available.
- weights are assigned to the CI based on one or more criteria. These criteria can include the number of times a CI has been read by other CIs, the number of times a CI has been written to or updated by other CIs, the number of relationships that a CI has with other CIs, as shown by information in the CMDB, and how recently a CI was last accessed or updated.
- a weight can be determined on the basis of a known update or synchronization by a point product source, or can be based on a reported revision level, patch level or update level, giving greater weight to the most recent of such events.
- a weight can also be based on the date of a report or most recent report update, or on the frequency of access to the report.
- the confidence level may be determined from following the expression:
- confidence level is increased by increasing the number of writes to the CR, and decreased by decreasing the number of relationships.
- the configurable managed system 100 be changed by loading a specified software application into the hard drive of a server, wherein both the application software and the server are CIs of system 100 .
- the server hard drive must have enough available capacity to accommodate the size of the application. From steps 304 and 306 discussed above, change station 110 has determined that the application requires X MB of storage, with an 80% weighting that this information is correct. Similarly, change station 110 has determined that the hard drive of the server has available storage capacity of X MB, with a 70% weighting that this information is accurate. Accordingly, change station 110 carries out step 308 of FIG. 3 by averaging the weights for the two CIs affected by the proposed task, to compute a confidence level of 75%.
- the minimum acceptable value of confidence level (CL min ) for the proposed change This value could be predetermined for a possible or prospective change to a CI, and would correspond to the comparative amount of harm that would result if the change was carried out based on information found to be incorrect.
- a table would be preconfigured to list a number of specified changes that could be made to system 100 .
- the table would further list the minimum confidence level values needed to allow respective listed changes to be made.
- the table (not shown) could reside in the CMBD, or elsewhere in system 100 .
- the determination of confidence level would generally be based on heuristics, or knowledge based on experience. It could also be based on collected historical data, that was continually updated.
- the minimum confidence level to allow this proposed task to proceed is usefully predetermined to be 70%.
- Such value would therefore be selected from the table by change station 110 , in accordance with step 310 of FIG. 3 .
- the computed confidence level of 75% is compared with the 70% minimum acceptable level value. Since the computed value is greater, the change is allowed to be made, as shown by step 314 .
- Step 316 emphasizes that changes are disallowed, whenever the computed confidence level is less than the minimum acceptable value.
- an embodiment of the invention can be configured to provide notice to a user, when a confidence level is found to be below the acceptable minimum.
- a Change Manager may be authorized in certain situations to execute a change, even when the confidence level is less than the acceptable minimum value. For example, notwithstanding a low confidence level, the Change Manager may be willing to risk possible inaccuracies, where action is necessary to avoid hacking or the loss of important data.
- the invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements.
- the invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
- the invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system.
- a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any tangible apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- the medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium.
- Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk.
- Current examples of optical disks include compact disk—read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk—read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.
- a data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus.
- the memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.
- I/O devices including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.
- I/O controllers can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
- Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks.
- Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
Abstract
A method is provided for assigning weights to CIs in a configurable managed system, wherein respective weights are derived from information contained in an associated CMDB. The information could include without limitation the relationships that a CI has with other CIs and the number of reads and writes that are made between the CI and other CIs. A Change Manager in the configurable system makes changes affecting CIs, wherein different types of changes require different levels of confidence in the integrity of data in the CMDB. Accordingly, the weights of respective CIs are used to provide a confidence level regarding the accuracy of CMDB data, pertinent to a proposed change. The confidence level is then used by the Change Manager in deciding whether or not to make the change. One embodiment comprises acquiring information from the CMDB pertaining to CIs that would be affected by a particular change, and processing the acquired information to compute a confidence level indicating the probability that the acquired information is correct. The particular change is then allowed only if the confidence level is no less than a pre-specified minimum value.
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The invention disclosed and claimed herein generally pertains to a method for providing assistance in decision making in a configurable managed environment or system, that includes a configuration management database (CMDB) and configuration items (CI). More particularly, the invention pertains to a method of the above type for providing assistance in determining whether or not to make a change in the system that would affect one or more of the CIs. Even more particularly, the invention pertains to a method of the above type for computing a confidence level representing the probability that information provided by the CMDB is accurate. The Change Manager also gets the information on the impact of the proposed change.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- Configuration management is a critical process responsible for identifying, controlling and tracking all versions of hardware, software, documentation, and other inanimate components of a configurable managed environment, such as an Information Technology organization. The goal of configuration management is to ensure that only authorized components, referred to as configuration items (CIs), are used in the configurable managed environment, and that all changes to CIs are recorded and tracked throughout the life cycle of the component. The configuration management process includes performing tasks such as identifying CIs and their relationships, and adding them to the CMDB. The CMDB is a database that contains all relevant details for each CI, such as relationships between CIs, state or status, and historical information. Some examples of CIs are Computer System, Application Server etc. The data and relationships in the CMDB are used by a system manager, referred to as a Change Manager, for making changes in the configurable managed environment or system, wherein the changes generally will affect one or more of the configuration items. A definition of the Change Manager, provided by the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL), is set forth hereinafter.
- The CMDB nominally contains the latest information of the above type for all CIs, such as the states and relationships thereof. Information about respective CIs is referred to herein as configuration item data (CID). In a configurable managed environment, as events occur that change the states or relationships of respective CIs, the CMDB must be synchronized accordingly. That is, the CMDB must be updated, so that the data contained therein will represent the new CID, that is, new realities of the CIs. However, in a configurable managed environment of the above type, multiple point products are commonly present that create and change relationships among the CIs. Such point products are described hereinafter in further detail, and may, for example, comprise devices such as the Tivoli Configuration Manager (TCM), a product of International Business Machines Corporation. The multiple point products are also commonly used to report changed conditions of the CIs to the CMDB.
- Because the CMDB receives CI change data from different point products, it can happen that data received from the different point products, in regard to the same CIs, will be in conflict. Moreover, delays of varying lengths may occur between actual changes of CI conditions, and the reporting of such changed conditions to the CMDB. As a result, a typical CMDB that is being populated with data from multiple point product sources cannot be kept in synchronization with the actual real world condition of all CIs, since it is virtually impossible to keep CID synchronization up to date.
- In a configurable managed environment or system, Change Managers make systems management decisions based on the state and relationships of the CIs, as shown by information in the CMDB. Some changes to the environment are trivial, while other changes can have serious consequences. For example, a change such as disabling a monitoring service on a hardware CI will usually be of low impact, while deleting a software component from a server for a change management operation can have serious consequences. However, as discussed above, CMDB information available to the Change Manager is likely to contain inaccuracies, even though such information is to be used as the basis for making changes. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide the Change Manager with a tool that could serve as an aid in determining whether or not to make certain changes that affect CIs. The tool would take into account both the possibility of inaccurate CMDB information, and the comparative impact of the proposed change and provide information on the probability of a given change being successful or a failure.
- In association with a CMDB containing information that relates to configuration items (CIs) in a configurable managed system, wherein a change station is provided to make respective changes, a method is provided for determining whether to allow a particular change that would affect at least one of the CIs. The method comprises the steps of acquiring information from the CMDB pertaining to CIs that would be affected by the particular change, and processing the acquired information to compute a confidence level indicating the probability that the acquired information is correct. A particular change is then allowed to be made in the configurable system only if the confidence level is no less than a pre-specified minimum value.
- The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a configurable managed system in which an embodiment of the invention may be carried out. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a computer or data processing system for implementing a change station that may be used in the system ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing respective steps for an embodiment of the invention. - Referring to
FIG. 1 , there is shown a configurable managed system orenvironment 100 that includes a number of interrelated configuration items (CIs). Well known types of CIs include desktop computers, servers and computer clients, which are exemplified inFIG. 1 byservers client 106. While not shown, the hardware CIs ofsystem 100 may contain operating systems, application programs and other software components that are also CIs. Respective CIs ofconfigurable system 100 can be selectively connected to one another by means of anetwork 108, which may, for example, comprise the Internet or a LAN. - Referring further to
FIG. 1 , there is shownsystem 100 provided with a CMDB 112 andpoint products system 100, and furnish data concerning respective CIs to CMDB 108. Thus, CID information pertaining to CIs, wherein the CIs include hardware, software, and monitoring applications, is stored in CMDB 108 by multiple point product sources, exemplified inFIG. 1 bypoint products - Since information is supplied to CMDB 112 from multiple product point sources, it frequently happens that two or more sources send information to the CMDB that all pertains to the same CI. Also, if the CI includes a number of different configurable elements, information sent to the CMDB for the CI may include data representing the value or state of each element. For example, if the CI comprises a computer component having a hard drive, data stored in the CMDB for the CI could include a value indicating the hard drive storage capacity.
-
FIG. 1 further shows a computer work station, comprising achange station 110, for use by a Change Manager, or another administrator or user associated with configurable managedsystem 100. In a system of this type, for example a new healthcare system, it is typically necessary to make sure that there are sufficient hardware and software resources, sufficient power and training, and sufficient other types of resources. System changes to some of the resources can impact other resources as well. Accordingly, a Change Advisory Board (CAB) may be established to oversee changes, and a Change Manager, or another administrator or user, is tasked with executing changes. -
Change station 110 is operable by the Change Manager or other user to establish and change relationships between respective CIs. Accordingly,change station 110 is provided with a user interface as further indicated atFIG. 2 . For example,change station 110 could be operated by the Change Manager or other user to install an application into one of theservers Change station 110 may also be operated to carry out an embodiment of the invention, as described herein. - Referring to
FIG. 2 , there is shown a block diagram of a generalizeddata processing system 200 which may be used to implementchange station 110.Data processing system 200 exemplifies a computer, in which code or instructions for implementing the processes of the present invention may be located.Data processing system 200 usefully employs a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) local bus architecture, although other bus architectures may alternatively be used.FIG. 2 shows aprocessor 202 andmain memory 204 connected to a PCIlocal bus 206 through a Host/PCI bridge 208.PCI bridge 208 also may include an integrated memory controller and cache memory forprocessor 202. - Referring further to
FIG. 2 , there is shown a local area network (LAN)adapter 212, a small computer system interface (SCSI) host bus adapter 210, and anexpansion bus interface 214 respectively connected to PCIlocal bus 206 by direct component connection. SCSI host bus adapter 210 provides a connection forhard disk drive 218, and also for CD-ROM drive 220.Expansion bus interface 214 provides a connection for user interface elements such as a keyboard andmouse adapter 222,modem 224, andadditional memory 226. - An operating system runs on
processor 202 and is used to coordinate and provide control of various components withindata processing system 200 shown inFIG. 2 . The operating system may be a commercially available operating system such as Windows XP, which is available from Microsoft Corporation. Instructions for the operating system and for applications or programs are located on storage devices, such ashard disk drive 220, and may be loaded intomain memory 204 for execution byprocessor 202. - The CI data reported from multiple products is in a standard form, and the CI information from all the products is consolidated into a single CI data item. As discussed above, it is likely that at any given time, at least some of the data stored in the CMDB for a particular CI will not be accurate. This is due in part to delay between an actual change in the condition or state of a CI, and the reporting of the change to the CMDB. Inaccuracies can also result from conflicts in information pertaining to a CI that is reported to the CMDB by different point products. Thus, when the Change Manager is tasked with making a proposed change to the configurable managed
system 100, wherein the change will affect one or more CIs,change station 110 can be used to implement a procedure in accordance with the embodiment of the invention, as illustrated byFIG. 3 . This procedure will reduce the possibility of adverse consequences that are caused by making a change based on inaccurate CI information in the CMDB. - Referring to
FIG. 3 , there is shown aninitial step 302 of identifying each of the CIs that are affected by a proposed change. Such identification is performed by the CMDB, which is a repository for information pertaining to all CIs of a system, including the states and relationships thereof. When the CMDB receives data indicating a proposed change, it will be able to determine, from the relationships existing therein, whether a particular CI will be affected by the changes. If so, the CMDB identifies the particular CI. - At
step 304, information stored in the CMDB for one of the identified CIs is selected or acquired from the CMDB, wherein the acquired information is relevant to the proposed change. For example, the proposed change could require loading an application into the hard drive of a particular CI, so that it would be necessary to know the available capacity of the hard drive. While the CMDB might contain reports listing information for a number of elements of the particular CI, only the value of hard drive capacity would be pertinent to the proposed change. Step 304 would be carried out for all of the CIs identified atstep 302. - It will be appreciated that in some situations a particular source of information will have such authority, relative to competing sources, that the conflicting data from the other competing sources will not be considered. For example, Service Advertising Protocol (SAP) is a service for managing server assets in a system. When a server is first brought into the system, SAP makes a record of the server model and serial number, and of the operating system placed therein. A year later, a point product conducts a scan and indicates that a different operating system is in the server. The SAP is an authoritative system, but its information can be out of date, if the operating system was changed but the SAP was not informed of the change. On the other hand, the point product can perform a scan to correctly identify the operating system, at the time such information is requested. Accordingly, the point product data will simply be accepted over the data from SAP.
- As a further example for illustrating the embodiment of
FIG. 3 , the hard drive capacity of the particular CI is stated to be 200 GB in three reports sent to the CMDB, but is stated to be 100 GB in one other report. In view of this discrepancy, it becomes necessary to assign a confidence level, or weight, to the information pertaining to this element of the particular CI, as shown bystep 306 ofFIG. 3 . With three reports indicating the 200 GB hard drive value against only one report for the 100 GB value, a comparatively high confidence level would be assigned to the 200 GB value. However, if all the reports indicated very different values from one another, the confidence level for this configurable element would be relatively low. CMDB reports typically are stored in a log file or in a data warehouse. Decisions about respective reports are revisited when new information becomes available. - More generally, where there are discrepancies or disagreements between multiple reports in the CMDB for a CI or CI element, weights are assigned to the CI based on one or more criteria. These criteria can include the number of times a CI has been read by other CIs, the number of times a CI has been written to or updated by other CIs, the number of relationships that a CI has with other CIs, as shown by information in the CMDB, and how recently a CI was last accessed or updated.
- Moreover, if one report for a CI element is several years old and another report is very recent, the more recent report will be given significantly higher weight. Generally, a weight can be determined on the basis of a known update or synchronization by a point product source, or can be based on a reported revision level, patch level or update level, giving greater weight to the most recent of such events. A weight can also be based on the date of a report or most recent report update, or on the frequency of access to the report.
- After weighting the accuracy of the information for each of the CIs, such as by using one or more of the weighting approaches described above, one of the sources may appear to be so much more reliable than all others that the data from such source will be selected as the correct data. Otherwise, it is necessary to compute an over-all confidence level, as shown by
step 308 ofFIG. 3 . The confidence level may be determined from following the expression: -
Confidence Level=(X*No. of writes to the CI)/(Y*No. of CI Relationships) - where X and Y are constants. Thus, confidence level is increased by increasing the number of writes to the CR, and decreased by decreasing the number of relationships.
- As a further example, it is proposed that the configurable managed
system 100 be changed by loading a specified software application into the hard drive of a server, wherein both the application software and the server are CIs ofsystem 100. To perform this task, the server hard drive must have enough available capacity to accommodate the size of the application. Fromsteps change station 110 has determined that the application requires X MB of storage, with an 80% weighting that this information is correct. Similarly,change station 110 has determined that the hard drive of the server has available storage capacity of X MB, with a 70% weighting that this information is accurate. Accordingly,change station 110 carries outstep 308 ofFIG. 3 by averaging the weights for the two CIs affected by the proposed task, to compute a confidence level of 75%. - At
step 310, it is necessary to select the minimum acceptable value of confidence level (CLmin) for the proposed change. This value could be predetermined for a possible or prospective change to a CI, and would correspond to the comparative amount of harm that would result if the change was carried out based on information found to be incorrect. In one embodiment, a table would be preconfigured to list a number of specified changes that could be made tosystem 100. The table would further list the minimum confidence level values needed to allow respective listed changes to be made. The table (not shown) could reside in the CMBD, or elsewhere insystem 100. The determination of confidence level would generally be based on heuristics, or knowledge based on experience. It could also be based on collected historical data, that was continually updated. - For the above example, an inability to load the software application into the server would be a comparatively adverse consequence for
system 100. Accordingly, the minimum confidence level to allow this proposed task to proceed is usefully predetermined to be 70%. Such value would therefore be selected from the table bychange station 110, in accordance withstep 310 ofFIG. 3 . Atstep 312, the computed confidence level of 75% is compared with the 70% minimum acceptable level value. Since the computed value is greater, the change is allowed to be made, as shown bystep 314. Step 316 emphasizes that changes are disallowed, whenever the computed confidence level is less than the minimum acceptable value. - The following are examples of changes that a Change Manager could execute, after finding that the confidence level was at or above the minimum acceptable value:
- Install a Patch on a set of servers that hosts a business application.
- Hot Swap Storage in an environment.
- Upgrade a business software application to the next version/release.
- Upgrade a router that is connected to several servers.
- As a further feature, an embodiment of the invention can be configured to provide notice to a user, when a confidence level is found to be below the acceptable minimum. Also, a Change Manager may be authorized in certain situations to execute a change, even when the confidence level is less than the acceptable minimum value. For example, notwithstanding a low confidence level, the Change Manager may be willing to risk possible inaccuracies, where action is necessary to avoid hacking or the loss of important data.
- The invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements. In a preferred embodiment, the invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
- Furthermore, the invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any tangible apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk—read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk—read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.
- A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.
- Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
- Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
- The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, and is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention, the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Claims (20)
1. In association with a CMDB containing information that relates to configuration items (CIs) in a configurable managed system, wherein a change station is provided to make respective changes, a method for determining whether to allow a particular change that would affect at least one of the CIs, said method comprising the steps of:
acquiring information from said CMDB pertaining to CIs that would be affected by said particular change;
processing said acquired information to compute a confidence level indicating the probability that said acquired information is correct; and
allowing said particular change to be made in said configurable system only if said confidence level is no less than a pre-specified minimum value.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
said acquiring step includes identifying CIs that would be affected by said particular change.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein:
said method includes assigning weights to respective identified CIs, wherein the weight assigned to a given CI represents the probable accuracy of information acquired from said CMDB that pertains to said given CI.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein:
said assigned CI weights are respectively processed to compute said confidence level.
5. The method of claim 3 , wherein:
the weight of said given CI is derived at least in part from the number of relationships said given CI has with other CIs in said system.
6. The method of claim 3 , wherein:
the weight of said given CI is derived at least in part from the number of reads made from said given CI by other CIs, from the number of writes made to said given CI from other CIs, or from the time of the most recent synchronization of said given CI with said CMDB, selectively.
7. The method of claim 3 , wherein:
said confidence level is determined by averaging said weights.
8. The method of claim 3 , wherein:
said confidence level is determined by selecting data associated with the CI having the highest assigned weight.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
said method includes generating a table that lists a number of specified changes that could be made to said system, and that further lists the minimum confidence level values that are needed to allow respective specified changes to be made.
10. In association with a CMDB containing information that relates to configuration items (CIs) in a configurable managed system, wherein a change station is provided to make respective changes, a computer program product in a computer readable medium for determining whether to allow a particular change that would affect at least one of the CIs, said computer program product comprising:
first instructions for acquiring information from said CMDB pertaining to CIs that would be affected by said particular change;
second instructions for processing said acquired information to compute a confidence level indicating the probability that said acquired information is correct; and
third instructions for allowing said particular change to be made in said configurable system only if said confidential level is no less than a pre-specified minimum value.
11. The computer program product of claim 10 , wherein:
fourth instructions are provided for identifying CIs that would be affected by said particular change.
12. The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein:
fifth instructions are provided for assigning weights to respective identified CIs, wherein the weight assigned to a given CI represents the probable accuracy of information acquired from said CMDB that pertains to said given CI.
13. The computer program product of claim 12 , wherein:
the product is transmitted over a communications link.
14. The computer program product of claim 12 , wherein:
the weight of said given CI is derived at least in part from the number of relationships said given CI has with other CIs in said configurable system, from the number of writes made to said given CI from other CIs, and from the number of reads made from said given CI by other CIs, selectively.
15. The computer program product of claim 12 , wherein:
the weight of said given CI is derived at least in part from the time of the most recent synchronization of said given CI with said CMDB.
16. In a configurable managed system, provided with configuration items (CI) and with a change station adapted to make respective changes, apparatus for determining whether to allow a particular change that would affect at least one of the CIs, said apparatus comprising:
a CMDB containing information that relates to configuration items (CIs);
a device for acquiring information from said CMDB pertaining to CIs that would be affected by said particular change;
a device for processing said acquired information to compute a confidence level indicating the probability that said acquired information is correct; and
a comparator device for allowing said particular change to be made in said configurable system only if said confidential level is no less than a pre-specified minimum value.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein:
said acquiring device is adapted to identify CIs that would be affected by said particular change.
18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein:
said processing device assigns weights to respective identified CIs, wherein the weight assigned to a given CI represents the probable accuracy of information acquired from said CMDB that pertains to said given CI.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein:
said processing device processes respective assigned weights to compute said confidence level.
20. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein:
said apparatus includes means for generating a table that lists a number of specified changes that could be made to said system, and that further lists the minimum confidence level values that are needed to allow respective specified changes to be made.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/627,398 US20080183690A1 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2007-01-26 | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
CN2008100088229A CN101231656B (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2008-01-24 | Method and device for determining whether allowing specified modification in a configurable managed environment |
US13/159,114 US8473909B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2011-06-13 | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US13/925,343 US9026996B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2013-06-24 | Providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/627,398 US20080183690A1 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2007-01-26 | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/159,114 Continuation US8473909B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2011-06-13 | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080183690A1 true US20080183690A1 (en) | 2008-07-31 |
Family
ID=39669098
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/627,398 Abandoned US20080183690A1 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2007-01-26 | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US13/159,114 Active US8473909B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2011-06-13 | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US13/925,343 Active US9026996B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2013-06-24 | Providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/159,114 Active US8473909B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2011-06-13 | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US13/925,343 Active US9026996B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2013-06-24 | Providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US20080183690A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101231656B (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070239700A1 (en) * | 2006-04-11 | 2007-10-11 | Ramachandran Puthukode G | Weighted Determination in Configuration Management Systems |
US20090228506A1 (en) * | 2008-03-10 | 2009-09-10 | Fujitsu Limited | Information processing apparatus |
US20100095273A1 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2010-04-15 | International Businass Machines Corporation | Analysis of effects of a software maintenance patch on configuration items of a cmdb |
US20110153564A1 (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-23 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Error-sensitive electronic directory synchronization system and methods |
US20110185167A1 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2011-07-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Change impact research support device and change impact research support method |
US20110239191A1 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2011-09-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for Providing Assistance in Making Change Decisions in a Configurable Managed Environment |
US20130204837A1 (en) * | 2012-02-02 | 2013-08-08 | Navin Sabharwal | Method and system to evaluate risk of configuration changes in an information system |
US20130219163A1 (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2013-08-22 | Yaniv Sayers | Systems and methods for scheduling changes |
US20130297672A1 (en) * | 2012-05-01 | 2013-11-07 | Red Hat, Inc. | Mechanism for tracking and utilizing facts about a node of a multi-tenant cloud hosting environment |
US20140007068A1 (en) * | 2012-06-28 | 2014-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing changes to one or more files via linked mapping records |
CN105939227A (en) * | 2016-07-13 | 2016-09-14 | 浪潮(北京)电子信息产业有限公司 | Service configuration method and system based on CMDB and server |
US9853863B1 (en) | 2014-10-08 | 2017-12-26 | Servicenow, Inc. | Collision detection using state management of configuration items |
US10255110B2 (en) | 2012-05-01 | 2019-04-09 | Red Hat, Inc. | Node selection for a new application in a multi-tenant cloud hosting environment |
US20200320407A1 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2020-10-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performing natural language based reasoning and automation by transforming a configuration management database to a knowledge base |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8219541B2 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2012-07-10 | Ca, Inc. | System and method for automatically detecting, reporting, and tracking conflicts in a change management system |
CN103870349B (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2017-06-23 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | For the configuration management device and method of data handling system |
CN103914482B (en) * | 2013-01-07 | 2017-09-19 | 上海宝信软件股份有限公司 | Centralized Monitoring event influence property based on CMDB determines method |
US10152318B2 (en) * | 2017-01-31 | 2018-12-11 | Oracle Financial Services Software Limited | Computer system and method for executing applications with new data structures |
US10754643B2 (en) | 2017-12-08 | 2020-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting software incompatibilities within a system stack |
CN108897838A (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2018-11-27 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of configuration method and device of the WEB application system based on CMDB |
CN109299118B (en) * | 2018-08-11 | 2022-11-11 | 梁育刚 | Management method for configuration items in system change |
US11070435B2 (en) | 2019-01-16 | 2021-07-20 | Servicenow, Inc. | Service model re-computation based on configuration item change type |
US11126468B2 (en) | 2019-07-19 | 2021-09-21 | Red Hat, Inc. | Agent driven cluster gating for service management |
US10613919B1 (en) | 2019-10-28 | 2020-04-07 | Capital One Services, Llc | System and method for data error notification in interconnected data production systems |
US11729057B1 (en) | 2022-02-07 | 2023-08-15 | The Bank Of New York Mellon | Application architecture drift detection system |
Citations (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5914879A (en) * | 1997-03-04 | 1999-06-22 | Advanced Micro Devices | System and method for calculating cluster tool performance metrics using a weighted configuration matrix |
US6128730A (en) * | 1997-12-29 | 2000-10-03 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for multilevel software configuration having administrator and software driven override limiting capabilities |
US6385770B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2002-05-07 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Software upgrade |
US20020133541A1 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-09-19 | Sturtevant Joseph C. | System and method for aggregating data having data and application dependencies |
US20020184247A1 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2002-12-05 | Jokela Sami Santeri | Method of data block aggregation |
US20020199194A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2002-12-26 | Kamal Ali | Intelligent system and methods of recommending media content items based on user preferences |
US20030018451A1 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2003-01-23 | Level 3 Communications, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for rating enterprise metrics |
US20030061132A1 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2003-03-27 | Yu, Mason K. | System and method for categorizing, aggregating and analyzing payment transactions data |
US20030130887A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2003-07-10 | Thurston Nathaniel | Non-deterministic method and system for the optimization of a targeted content delivery |
US20030204791A1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2003-10-30 | Helgren Matthew J. | Rules-based configuration problem detection |
US20040002880A1 (en) * | 2000-09-21 | 2004-01-01 | Jones William B. | Method and system for states of beings configuration management |
US20040039917A1 (en) * | 2002-05-29 | 2004-02-26 | Ross David Justin | Authentication query strategizer and results compiler |
US6704737B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2004-03-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Accessing and updating a configuration database from distributed physical locations within a process control system |
US20040162887A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-08-19 | Steven Dillon | Open network-based data acquisition, aggregation and optimization for use with process control systems |
US20040220782A1 (en) * | 1997-04-24 | 2004-11-04 | Cook Daniel Reed | Signal interpretation engine |
US6832346B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2004-12-14 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | System and method for managing and communicating state changes of a complex system |
US20050015388A1 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2005-01-20 | Subhajit Dasgupta | Maintaining aggregate data counts for flow controllable queues |
US20050065837A1 (en) * | 2001-05-17 | 2005-03-24 | Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc., A Maryland Corporation | System and method for generating forecasts and analysis of contact center behavior for planning purposes |
US20050071838A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Keisuke Hatasaki | System-updating method and computer system adopting the method |
US20050097150A1 (en) * | 2003-11-03 | 2005-05-05 | Mckeon Adrian J. | Data aggregation |
US20050097547A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic auto-configuration using prior installation configuration relationships |
US20050144022A1 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2005-06-30 | Evans Lori M. | Web-based system, method, apparatus and software to manage performance securely across an extended enterprise and between entities |
US20050210048A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Zenodata Corporation | Automated posting systems and methods |
US6968540B2 (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2005-11-22 | Opnet Technologies Inc. | Software instrumentation method and apparatus |
US20060004875A1 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2006-01-05 | Microsoft Corporation | CMDB schema |
US20060031371A1 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2006-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Prioritization of application component distribution |
US20060101421A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-05-11 | Eric Bodden | Method and system for performance profiling of software |
US20060149501A1 (en) * | 2002-11-20 | 2006-07-06 | Chris Tsalakopoulos | Apparatus and method for determining a level of confidence in a risk assessment and/or determining a level of acceptability of an event occuring |
US20060161879A1 (en) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-07-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods for managing standards |
US20070203952A1 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Configuration management database state model |
US20080140778A1 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-12 | Guruduth Somasekhara Banavar | Change Approvals for Computing Systems |
US20100095273A1 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2010-04-15 | International Businass Machines Corporation | Analysis of effects of a software maintenance patch on configuration items of a cmdb |
US7747987B1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2010-06-29 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method of analyzing risk in risk-based software testing |
US7926031B2 (en) * | 2007-04-18 | 2011-04-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Configuration management database and system |
Family Cites Families (55)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5099412A (en) | 1989-09-29 | 1992-03-24 | Honeywell, Inc | Automatic control of a discrete system with redundancy management and prioritized conflict resolution |
US5565316A (en) | 1992-10-09 | 1996-10-15 | Educational Testing Service | System and method for computer based testing |
US5535335A (en) | 1992-12-22 | 1996-07-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for reporting the status of an aggregate resource residing in a network of interconnected real resources |
US7082426B2 (en) | 1993-06-18 | 2006-07-25 | Cnet Networks, Inc. | Content aggregation method and apparatus for an on-line product catalog |
GB2286508A (en) | 1994-02-08 | 1995-08-16 | Ibm | Performance and status monitoring in a computer network |
US6289368B1 (en) | 1995-12-27 | 2001-09-11 | First Data Corporation | Method and apparatus for indicating the status of one or more computer processes |
US5758071A (en) | 1996-07-12 | 1998-05-26 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and system for tracking the configuration of a computer coupled to a computer network |
JPH1115646A (en) | 1997-06-25 | 1999-01-22 | Fujitsu Ltd | Technique information managing system |
US6295540B1 (en) | 1997-10-02 | 2001-09-25 | Nortel Networks Limited | Alignment of tirks using network manager |
US6170065B1 (en) | 1997-11-14 | 2001-01-02 | E-Parcel, Llc | Automatic system for dynamic diagnosis and repair of computer configurations |
US6098098A (en) | 1997-11-14 | 2000-08-01 | Enhanced Messaging Systems, Inc. | System for managing the configuration of multiple computer devices |
JPH11266244A (en) | 1998-03-16 | 1999-09-28 | Fujitsu Ltd | Network constitution data generator and generation method |
US6279001B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2001-08-21 | Webspective Software, Inc. | Web service |
US6279125B1 (en) | 1998-06-24 | 2001-08-21 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Computer system diagnostics |
US6691067B1 (en) | 1999-04-07 | 2004-02-10 | Bmc Software, Inc. | Enterprise management system and method which includes statistical recreation of system resource usage for more accurate monitoring, prediction, and performance workload characterization |
US6826715B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2004-11-30 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Automatic capture and comparison of computer configuration data |
WO2001053948A2 (en) | 2000-01-18 | 2001-07-26 | Isogon Corporation | Continuous inventorying monitor |
EP1428142A2 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2004-06-16 | Sidestep, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamic information connection engine |
US7395170B2 (en) | 2001-05-24 | 2008-07-01 | Test Advantage, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for data analysis |
US7167811B2 (en) | 2001-05-24 | 2007-01-23 | Test Advantage, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for data analysis |
US6836750B2 (en) | 2001-04-23 | 2004-12-28 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Systems and methods for providing an automated diagnostic audit for cluster computer systems |
US7113883B1 (en) | 2001-08-24 | 2006-09-26 | Vi Technology, Inc. | Test configuration and data management system and associated method for enterprise test operations |
US6845474B2 (en) | 2001-09-10 | 2005-01-18 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Problem detector and method |
US6804632B2 (en) | 2001-12-06 | 2004-10-12 | Intel Corporation | Distribution of processing activity across processing hardware based on power consumption considerations |
US20030204781A1 (en) | 2002-04-30 | 2003-10-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for displaying diagnostic recommendations for monitored processes |
US6839710B2 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2005-01-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and system for maintaining a configuration history of a vehicle |
US20040039646A1 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2004-02-26 | Reynolds And Reynolds Holdings, Inc. | Automobile inventory engine |
US7765521B2 (en) | 2002-08-29 | 2010-07-27 | Jeffrey F Bryant | Configuration engine |
US20040088314A1 (en) | 2002-10-31 | 2004-05-06 | Simes Scott T. | Method and system for reporting performance data for a network |
US7302590B2 (en) | 2003-01-06 | 2007-11-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for providing time-and weight-based flexibly tolerant hardware ID |
US7139906B2 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2006-11-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Starting point configuration determination for complex configurable systems |
US20050065839A1 (en) | 2003-09-22 | 2005-03-24 | Debra Benson | Methods, systems and computer program products for generating an aggregate report to provide a certification of controls associated with a data set |
US20050080811A1 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2005-04-14 | Cendura Corporation | Configuration management architecture |
US7233935B1 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2007-06-19 | Veritas Operating Corporation | Policy-based automation using multiple inference techniques |
US7389444B2 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2008-06-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for troubleshooting a misconfiguration of a computer system based on product support services information |
US7493350B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2009-02-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Entity based configurable data management system and method |
US7590653B2 (en) | 2005-03-02 | 2009-09-15 | Cassatt Corporation | Automated discovery and inventory of nodes within an autonomic distributed computing system |
US8738822B2 (en) | 2005-05-03 | 2014-05-27 | Flexera Software Llc | System and method for controlling operation of a component on a computer system |
US7761849B2 (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2010-07-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated analysis and recovery of localization data |
CN1794724A (en) * | 2005-10-27 | 2006-06-28 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method of realizing data synchronization on SyncML layer |
US8782201B2 (en) | 2005-10-28 | 2014-07-15 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for managing the configuration of resources in an enterprise |
US20070234331A1 (en) * | 2006-01-06 | 2007-10-04 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Targeted automatic patch retrieval |
US8712973B2 (en) * | 2006-04-11 | 2014-04-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Weighted determination in configuration management systems |
US8887133B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2014-11-11 | Bmc Software, Inc. | Bi-directional communication between change management tool and implementation tools |
US20080183690A1 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2008-07-31 | Ramachandran Puthukode G | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US7913227B2 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2011-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and apparatus for management of configuration item lifecycle state transitions |
US7912813B2 (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2011-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | CMDB-based policy propagation |
US9262295B2 (en) * | 2007-07-09 | 2016-02-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multiple configuration item status value analysis |
US8413130B2 (en) * | 2007-10-03 | 2013-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for self policing of authorized configuration by end points |
US8181173B2 (en) * | 2007-10-12 | 2012-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining priority for installing a patch into multiple patch recipients of a network |
JP5136159B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2013-02-06 | 富士通株式会社 | Configuration information management apparatus, configuration information management program, and configuration information management method |
US9471406B2 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2016-10-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Remote product invocation framework |
US8380749B2 (en) * | 2009-01-14 | 2013-02-19 | Bmc Software, Inc. | MDR federation facility for CMDBf |
US8799436B2 (en) * | 2009-07-14 | 2014-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for automated configuration control, audit verification and process analytics |
US7975031B2 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-07-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Change management in multi-domain environments |
-
2007
- 2007-01-26 US US11/627,398 patent/US20080183690A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2008
- 2008-01-24 CN CN2008100088229A patent/CN101231656B/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-06-13 US US13/159,114 patent/US8473909B2/en active Active
-
2013
- 2013-06-24 US US13/925,343 patent/US9026996B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5914879A (en) * | 1997-03-04 | 1999-06-22 | Advanced Micro Devices | System and method for calculating cluster tool performance metrics using a weighted configuration matrix |
US20040220782A1 (en) * | 1997-04-24 | 2004-11-04 | Cook Daniel Reed | Signal interpretation engine |
US6128730A (en) * | 1997-12-29 | 2000-10-03 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for multilevel software configuration having administrator and software driven override limiting capabilities |
US6385770B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2002-05-07 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Software upgrade |
US6704737B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2004-03-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Accessing and updating a configuration database from distributed physical locations within a process control system |
US20020199194A1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2002-12-26 | Kamal Ali | Intelligent system and methods of recommending media content items based on user preferences |
US20040002880A1 (en) * | 2000-09-21 | 2004-01-01 | Jones William B. | Method and system for states of beings configuration management |
US6968540B2 (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2005-11-22 | Opnet Technologies Inc. | Software instrumentation method and apparatus |
US20020133541A1 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-09-19 | Sturtevant Joseph C. | System and method for aggregating data having data and application dependencies |
US6832346B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2004-12-14 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | System and method for managing and communicating state changes of a complex system |
US20050065837A1 (en) * | 2001-05-17 | 2005-03-24 | Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc., A Maryland Corporation | System and method for generating forecasts and analysis of contact center behavior for planning purposes |
US20020184247A1 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2002-12-05 | Jokela Sami Santeri | Method of data block aggregation |
US20030018451A1 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2003-01-23 | Level 3 Communications, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for rating enterprise metrics |
US20030061132A1 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2003-03-27 | Yu, Mason K. | System and method for categorizing, aggregating and analyzing payment transactions data |
US20030130887A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2003-07-10 | Thurston Nathaniel | Non-deterministic method and system for the optimization of a targeted content delivery |
US20030204791A1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2003-10-30 | Helgren Matthew J. | Rules-based configuration problem detection |
US20040039917A1 (en) * | 2002-05-29 | 2004-02-26 | Ross David Justin | Authentication query strategizer and results compiler |
US20060149501A1 (en) * | 2002-11-20 | 2006-07-06 | Chris Tsalakopoulos | Apparatus and method for determining a level of confidence in a risk assessment and/or determining a level of acceptability of an event occuring |
US20040162887A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-08-19 | Steven Dillon | Open network-based data acquisition, aggregation and optimization for use with process control systems |
US20050015388A1 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2005-01-20 | Subhajit Dasgupta | Maintaining aggregate data counts for flow controllable queues |
US20050071838A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Keisuke Hatasaki | System-updating method and computer system adopting the method |
US20050097547A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic auto-configuration using prior installation configuration relationships |
US20050097150A1 (en) * | 2003-11-03 | 2005-05-05 | Mckeon Adrian J. | Data aggregation |
US20050144022A1 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2005-06-30 | Evans Lori M. | Web-based system, method, apparatus and software to manage performance securely across an extended enterprise and between entities |
US20050210048A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Zenodata Corporation | Automated posting systems and methods |
US20060004875A1 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2006-01-05 | Microsoft Corporation | CMDB schema |
US20060031371A1 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2006-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Prioritization of application component distribution |
US7747987B1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2010-06-29 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method of analyzing risk in risk-based software testing |
US20060101421A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-05-11 | Eric Bodden | Method and system for performance profiling of software |
US20060161879A1 (en) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-07-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods for managing standards |
US20070203952A1 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Configuration management database state model |
US20080140778A1 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-12 | Guruduth Somasekhara Banavar | Change Approvals for Computing Systems |
US7926031B2 (en) * | 2007-04-18 | 2011-04-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Configuration management database and system |
US20100095273A1 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2010-04-15 | International Businass Machines Corporation | Analysis of effects of a software maintenance patch on configuration items of a cmdb |
Cited By (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8712973B2 (en) | 2006-04-11 | 2014-04-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Weighted determination in configuration management systems |
US20070239700A1 (en) * | 2006-04-11 | 2007-10-11 | Ramachandran Puthukode G | Weighted Determination in Configuration Management Systems |
US20110239191A1 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2011-09-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for Providing Assistance in Making Change Decisions in a Configurable Managed Environment |
US9026996B2 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2015-05-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US20130282659A1 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2013-10-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US8473909B2 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2013-06-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment |
US8311977B2 (en) * | 2008-03-10 | 2012-11-13 | Fujitsu Limited | Information processing apparatus |
GB2458204A (en) * | 2008-03-10 | 2009-09-16 | Fujitsu Ltd | Selecting attributes of resources of a system with the highest degree of reliability where conflict exists between plural attributes as to the same resources |
US20090228506A1 (en) * | 2008-03-10 | 2009-09-10 | Fujitsu Limited | Information processing apparatus |
US8302088B2 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2012-10-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Analysis of effects of a software maintenance patch on configuration items of a CMDB |
US20100095273A1 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2010-04-15 | International Businass Machines Corporation | Analysis of effects of a software maintenance patch on configuration items of a cmdb |
US20110185167A1 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2011-07-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Change impact research support device and change impact research support method |
US20110153564A1 (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-23 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Error-sensitive electronic directory synchronization system and methods |
US20130219163A1 (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2013-08-22 | Yaniv Sayers | Systems and methods for scheduling changes |
US20130204837A1 (en) * | 2012-02-02 | 2013-08-08 | Navin Sabharwal | Method and system to evaluate risk of configuration changes in an information system |
US9111235B2 (en) * | 2012-02-02 | 2015-08-18 | HCL America Inc. | Method and system to evaluate risk of configuration changes in an information system |
US10255110B2 (en) | 2012-05-01 | 2019-04-09 | Red Hat, Inc. | Node selection for a new application in a multi-tenant cloud hosting environment |
US20130297672A1 (en) * | 2012-05-01 | 2013-11-07 | Red Hat, Inc. | Mechanism for tracking and utilizing facts about a node of a multi-tenant cloud hosting environment |
US10365953B2 (en) * | 2012-05-01 | 2019-07-30 | Red Hat, Inc. | Tracking and utilizing facts about a node of a multi-tenant cloud hosting environment |
US20140007068A1 (en) * | 2012-06-28 | 2014-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing changes to one or more files via linked mapping records |
US9471575B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2016-10-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing changes to one or more files via linked mapping records |
US10095698B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2018-10-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing changes to one or more files via linked mapping records |
US9116899B2 (en) * | 2012-06-28 | 2015-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing changes to one or more files via linked mapping records |
US11106626B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2021-08-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing changes to one or more files via linked mapping records |
US9853863B1 (en) | 2014-10-08 | 2017-12-26 | Servicenow, Inc. | Collision detection using state management of configuration items |
US10803041B2 (en) | 2014-10-08 | 2020-10-13 | Servicenow, Inc. | Collision detection using state management of configuration items |
US11269838B2 (en) | 2014-10-08 | 2022-03-08 | Servicenow, Inc. | Collision detection using state management of configuration items |
CN105939227A (en) * | 2016-07-13 | 2016-09-14 | 浪潮(北京)电子信息产业有限公司 | Service configuration method and system based on CMDB and server |
US20200320407A1 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2020-10-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performing natural language based reasoning and automation by transforming a configuration management database to a knowledge base |
US11755931B2 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2023-09-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performing natural language based reasoning and automation by transforming a configuration management database to a knowledge base |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20130282659A1 (en) | 2013-10-24 |
US8473909B2 (en) | 2013-06-25 |
CN101231656A (en) | 2008-07-30 |
CN101231656B (en) | 2012-05-23 |
US9026996B2 (en) | 2015-05-05 |
US20110239191A1 (en) | 2011-09-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9026996B2 (en) | Providing assistance in making change decisions in a configurable managed environment | |
US9047132B2 (en) | Automatic management of configuration parameters and parameter management engine | |
US20070156731A1 (en) | Automatic project management application | |
US8302088B2 (en) | Analysis of effects of a software maintenance patch on configuration items of a CMDB | |
US9479527B2 (en) | Methods and systems for automated network scanning in dynamic virtualized environments | |
US7739377B2 (en) | Performing inventory scan to determine presence of prerequisite resources | |
CN108369544B (en) | Deferred server recovery in a computing system | |
US20100274984A1 (en) | Management server device for managing virtual storage device, and method for managing virtual storage device | |
US20070233837A1 (en) | Job assigning device, job assigning method, and computer product | |
US7793114B2 (en) | Method for forecasting risks associated with software packages | |
US8838762B2 (en) | Virtual-machine management program and method for managing virtual machines | |
JP2006048559A (en) | Method for managing storage capacity of storage system | |
US9514176B2 (en) | Database update notification method | |
US20080301255A1 (en) | Dynamically Matching Data Service Capabilities to Data Service Level Objectives | |
CN114424222A (en) | Service ticket upgrade based on interactive mode | |
CN101159596A (en) | Method and apparatus for deploying servers | |
US8370800B2 (en) | Determining application distribution based on application state tracking information | |
US8234644B2 (en) | Selecting a system management product for performance of system management tasks | |
JP2010003224A (en) | Test information management server, test information management method and program | |
US8433877B2 (en) | Storage scalability management | |
JP2017033079A (en) | Program, device, and method for supporting software introduction | |
CN114731326B (en) | Block chain system, program and network connection device | |
JP2011221625A (en) | Communication device and shared information updating method and program | |
JP2019057133A (en) | Image processing device and program | |
WO2023242640A1 (en) | Automatically orchestrating a computerized workflow |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RAMACHANDRAN, PUTHUKODE G.;REEL/FRAME:018808/0920 Effective date: 20070105 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SERVICENOW, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES;REEL/FRAME:042269/0682 Effective date: 20161224 |