Búsqueda Imágenes Maps Play YouTube Noticias Gmail Drive Más »
Iniciar sesión
Usuarios de lectores de pantalla: deben hacer clic en este enlace para utilizar el modo de accesibilidad. Este modo tiene las mismas funciones esenciales pero funciona mejor con el lector.

Patentes

  1. Búsqueda avanzada de patentes
Número de publicaciónUS20080186389 A1
Tipo de publicaciónSolicitud
Número de solicitudUS 12/035,416
Fecha de publicación7 Ago 2008
Fecha de presentación21 Feb 2008
Fecha de prioridad9 Oct 1997
También publicado comoUS7352394, US7474341, US20080002060
Número de publicación035416, 12035416, US 2008/0186389 A1, US 2008/186389 A1, US 20080186389 A1, US 20080186389A1, US 2008186389 A1, US 2008186389A1, US-A1-20080186389, US-A1-2008186389, US2008/0186389A1, US2008/186389A1, US20080186389 A1, US20080186389A1, US2008186389 A1, US2008186389A1
InventoresMichael J. DeLuca, Yury Prilutsky, Eran Steinberg, Peter Corcoran, Alexei Pososin, Petronel Bigioi, Alexandru Drimbarean, Adrian Capata, Florin Nanu
Cesionario originalFotonation Vision Limited
Exportar citaBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet
Image Modification Based on Red-Eye Filter Analysis
US 20080186389 A1
Resumen
A digital camera has an integral flash and stores and displays a digital image. Under certain conditions, a flash photograph taken with the camera may result in a red-eye phenomenon due to a reflection within an eye of a subject of the photograph. A digital apparatus has a red-eye filter which analyzes the stored image for the red-eye phenomenon and modifies the stored image to eliminate the red-eye phenomenon by changing the red area to black. The modification of the image is enabled when a photograph is taken under conditions indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The modification is subject to anti-falsing analysis which further examines the area around the red-eye area for indicia of the eye of the subject. The detection and correction can be optimized for performance and quality by operating on subsample versions of the image when appropriate.
Imágenes(7)
Previous page
Next page
Reclamaciones(1)
1. A portable digital camera having no photographic film, comprising:
(a) an integral flash for providing illumination during image acquisition;
(b) a digital image capturing apparatus for acquiring an image; and
(c) a red-eye filter for modifying an area within the image indicative of a red-eye phenomenon based on an analysis of a subsample representation of selected regions of the image.
Descripción
    PRIORITY
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation-in-part application which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/635,862, filed Aug. 5, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/170,511, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/947,603, filed Oct. 9, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,407,777, which are each hereby incorporated by reference. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/635,918, filed Aug. 5, 2003 and a continuation-in-part of the '918 application filed contemporaneously with the present application.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The invention relates generally to the area of flash photography, and more specifically to filtering “red-eye” from a digital camera image.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    “Red-eye” is a phenomenon in flash photography where a flash is reflected within a subject's eye and appears in a photograph as a red dot where the black pupil of the subject's eye would normally appear. The unnatural glowing red of an eye is due to internal reflections from the vascular membrane behind the retina, which is rich in blood vessels. This objectionable phenomenon is well understood to be caused in part by a small angle between the flash of the camera and the lens of the camera. This angle has decreased with the miniaturization of cameras with integral flash capabilities. Additional contributors include the relative closeness of the subject to the camera and ambient light levels.
  • [0004]
    The red-eye phenomenon can be minimized by causing the iris to reduce the opening of the pupil. This is typically done with a “pre-flash”, a flash or illumination of light shortly before a flash photograph is taken. This causes the iris to close. Unfortunately, the pre-flash is an objectionable 0.2 to 0.6 seconds prior to the flash photograph. This delay is readily discernible and easily within the reaction time of a human subject. Consequently the subject may believe the pre-flash is the actual photograph and be in a less than desirable position at the time of the actual photograph. Alternately, the subject must be informed of the pre-flash, typically loosing any spontaneity of the subject captured in the photograph.
  • [0005]
    Those familiar with the art have developed complex analysis processes operating within a camera prior to invoking a pre-flash. Various conditions are monitored prior to the photograph before the pre-flash is generated, the conditions include the ambient light level and the distance of the subject from the camera. Such a system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,070,355 to Inoue et al. Although that invention minimizes the occurrences where a pre-flash is used, it does not eliminate the need for a pre-flash. What is needed is a method of eliminating the red-eye phenomenon with a miniature camera having an integral without the distraction of a pre-flash.
  • [0006]
    Digital cameras are becoming more popular and smaller in size. Digital cameras have several advantages over film cameras. Digital cameras eliminate the need for film as the image is digitally captured and stored in a memory array for display on a display screen on the camera itself. This allows photographs to be viewed and enjoyed virtually instantaneously as opposed to waiting for film processing. Furthermore, the digitally captured image may be downloaded to another display device such as a personal computer or color printer for further enhanced viewing. Digital cameras include microprocessors for image processing and compression and camera systems control. Nevertheless, without a pre-flash, both digital and film cameras can capture the red-eye phenomenon as the flash reflects within a subject's eye. Thus, what is needed is a method of eliminating red-eye phenomenon within a miniature digital camera having a flash without the distraction of a pre-flash.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    A portable digital camera having no photographic film includes an integral flash for providing illumination during image acquisition and/or recording, a digital image capturing apparatus for acquiring and/or recording an image, and a red-eye filter. The red eye filter is for modifying an area within the image indicative of a red-eye phenomenon based on an analysis of a subsample representation of selected regions of the image.
  • [0008]
    The analysis may be performed at least in part for determining the area, and/or may be performed at least in part for determining the modifying. The selected regions of the digitized image may include the entire image or one or more regions may be excluded. The selected regions may include multi resolution encoding of the image. The analysis may be performed in part on a full resolution image and in part on a subsample resolution of the digital image.
  • [0009]
    The apparatus may include a module for changing the degree of said subsampling. This changing the degree of the subsampling may be determined empirically, and/or based on a size of the image or selected regions thereof, and/or based on data obtained from the camera relating to the settings of the camera at the time of image capture. In the latter case, the data obtained from the camera may include an aperture setting, focus of the camera, distance of the subject from the camera, or a combination of these. The changing the degree of the subsampling may also be determined based digitized image metadata information and/or a complexity of calculation for the red eye filter.
  • [0010]
    The modifying of the area may be performed including the full resolution of the digital image. The red-eye filter may include multiple sub filters. The subsampling for the sub filters operating on selected regions of the image may be determined by one or more of the image size, suspected as red eye region size, filter computation complexity, empirical success rate of said sub filter, empirical false detection rate of said sub filter, falsing probability of said sub filter, relations between said suspected regions as red eye, results of previous analysis of other said sub filters.
  • [0011]
    The apparatus may include a memory for saving the digitized image after applying the filter for modifying pixels as a modified image, and/or a memory for saving the subsample representation of the image. The subsample representation of selected regions of the image may be determined in hardware. The analysis may be performed in part on the full resolution image and in part on a subsample resolution of the image.
  • [0012]
    The subsample representation may be determined using spline interpolation, and may be determined using bi-cubic interpolation.
  • [0013]
    According to another aspect, a portable digital camera having no photographic film includes an integral flash for providing illumination during image acquisition and/or recording, a digital image capturing apparatus for acquiring and/or recording an image, an image store and a red-eye filter. The image store is for holding a temporary copy of an unprocessed image known as a pre-capture image, a permanent copy of a digitally processed, captured image, and a subsample representation of selected regions of at least one of the images, e.g., the pre-capture image. The red-eye filter is for modifying an area within at least one of the images indicative of a red-eye phenomenon based on an analysis of the subsample representation. Preferably, the at least one of the images includes the digitally processed, captured image. This further aspect may also include one or more features in accordance with the first aspect.
  • [0014]
    In addition, the changing the degree of the subsampling may be determined based on data obtained from the camera relating to image processing analysis of said precapture images. The image processing analysis may be based on histogram data or color correlogram data, or both, obtained from the pre-capture image. The image processing analysis may also be based on global luminance or white balance image data, or both, obtained from the pre-capture image. The image processing analysis may also be based on a face detection analysis of the pre-capture image, or on determining pixel regions with a color characteristic indicative of redeye, or both. The image processing analysis may be performed in hardware. The changing of the degree of the subsampling may be determined based on image metadata information.
  • [0015]
    The red eye filter of a camera in accordance with either aspect may include a pixel locator, a shape analyzer and/or a pixel modifier. The pixel locator is for locating pixels having a color indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The shape analyzer is for determining if a grouping of at least a portion of the pixels located by the pixel locator comprise a shape indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The pixel modifier is for modifying the color of the pixels within the grouping. The camera may further include a falsing analyzer for further processing the image in a vicinity of the grouping for details indicative of an eye, and for enabling the pixel modifier in response thereto. The camera may also include an exposure analyzer for determining if the image was acquired and/or recorded in a condition indicative of the red-eye phenomenon.
  • [0016]
    A method of filtering a red eye phenomenon from an acquired and/or recorded image is also provided in accordance with another aspect, wherein the image includes a multiplicity of pixels indicative of color. The method includes determining whether one or more regions within a subsample representation of the acquired and/or recorded image are suspected as including red eye artifact.
  • [0017]
    The method may include varying a degree of the subsample representation for each region of the one or more regions based on the image, and/or generating a subsample representation based on the image. The subsample representation may be generated or the degree varied, or both, utilizing a hardware-implemented subsampling engine. One or more regions within said subsample representation determined as including red eye artifact may be tested for determining any false redeye groupings.
  • [0018]
    The method may further include associating the one or more regions within the subsample presentation of the image with one or more corresponding regions within the acquired and/or recorded image, and modifying the one or more corresponding regions within the acquired and/or recorded image. The determining may include analyzing meta-data information including image acquisition device-specific information.
  • [0019]
    The method may include analyzing the subsample representation of selected regions of the acquired and/or recorded image, and modifying an area determined to include red eye artifact. The analysis may be performed at least in part for determining said area and/or the modifying. The selected regions of the image may include the entire image or may exclude one or more regions. The selected regions of the image may include multi resolution encoding of the image. The analyzing may be performed in part on a full resolution image and in part on a subsample resolution of the image.
  • [0020]
    The method may include changing the degree of the subsampling. This changing of the degree of subsampling may be determined empirically, and/or based on a size of the image or selected regions thereof.
  • [0021]
    The method may include saving the image after applying the filter for modifying pixels as a modified image, and/or saving the subsample representation of the image. The method may include determining the subsample representation of the image in hardware, and/or using a spline or bi-cubic interpolation.
  • [0022]
    The modifying of the area may be performed including the full resolution of the image. The method may include determining the subsample representation utilizing a plurality of sub-filters. The determining of the plurality of sub-filters may be based on one or more of the image size, a suspected red eye region size, filter computation complexity, empirical success rate of the sub-filter, empirical false detection rate of the sub-filter, falsing probability of the sub-filter, relations between said suspected red eye regions, or results of previous analysis of one or more other sub-filters.
  • [0023]
    The method may further include locating pixels, analyzer pixel shapes and/or modifying pixels, each in accordance with identifying and removing a red eye phenomenon form an acquired and/or recorded digital image. That is, the method may include locating pixels having a color indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The method may further include determining if a grouping of at least a portion of the located pixels comprise a shape indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The method may further include modifying the color of the pixels within the grouping. The method may further include processing the image in a vicinity of the grouping for details indicative of an eye, and enabling the pixel modifier in response thereto. The method may further include determining if the image was acquired and/or recorded in a condition indicative of the red-eye phenomenon.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0024]
    FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a camera apparatus operating in accordance with the present invention.
  • [0025]
    FIG. 2 shows a pixel grid upon which an image of an eye is focused.
  • [0026]
    FIG. 3 shows pixel coordinates of the pupil of FIG. 2.
  • [0027]
    FIG. 4 shows pixel coordinates of the iris of FIG. 2.
  • [0028]
    FIG. 5 shows pixel coordinates which contain a combination of iris and pupil colors of FIG. 2.
  • [0029]
    FIG. 6 shows pixel coordinates of the white eye area of FIG. 2.
  • [0030]
    FIG. 7 shows pixel coordinates of the eyebrow area of FIG. 2.
  • [0031]
    FIG. 8 shows a flow chart of a method operating in accordance with the present invention.
  • [0032]
    FIG. 9 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate the possibility of a red-eye phenomenon photograph.
  • [0033]
    FIG. 10 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate a false red-eye grouping.
  • [0034]
    FIG. 11 illustrates in block form an exemplary arrangement in accordance with a precapture image utilization aspect.
  • DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • [0035]
    FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a camera apparatus operating in accordance with the present invention. The camera 20 includes an exposure control 30 that, in response to a user input, initiates and controls the digital photographic process. Ambient light is determined using light sensor 40 in order to automatically determine if a flash is to be used. The distance to the subject is determined using focusing means 50 which also focuses the image on image capture means 60. The image capture means digitally records the image in color. The image capture means is known to those familiar with the art and may include a CCD (charge coupled device) to facilitate digital recording. If a flash is to be used, exposure control means 30 causes the flash means 70 to generate a photographic flash in substantial coincidence with the recording of the image by image capture means 60. The flash may be selectively generated either in response to the light sensor 40 or a manual input from the user of the camera. The image recorded by image capture means 60 is stored in image store means 80 which may comprise computer memory such a dynamic random access memory or a nonvolatile memory. The red-eye filter 90 then analyzes the stored image for characteristics of red-eye, and if found, modifies the image and removes the red-eye phenomenon from the photograph as will be describe in more detail. The red-eye filter includes a pixel locator 92 for locating pixels having a color indicative of red-eye; a shape analyzer 94 for determining if a grouping of at least a portion of the pixels located by the pixel locator comprise a shape indicative of red-eye; a pixel modifier 96 for modifying the color of pixels within the grouping; and an falsing analyzer 98 for further processing the image around the grouping for details indicative of an image of an eye. The modified image may be either displayed on image display 100 or downloaded to another display device, such as a personal computer or printer via image output means 110. It can be appreciated that many of the processes implemented in the digital camera may be implemented in or controlled by software operating in a microcomputer (μC) or digital signal processor (DSP) and/or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
  • [0036]
    In a further embodiment the image capture means 60 of FIG. 1 includes an optional image subsampling means, wherein the image is actively down-sampled. In one embodiment, the subsampling is done using a bi-cubic spline algorithm, such as those that are known to one familiar in the art of signal and image processing. Those familiar with this art are aware of subsampling algorithms that interpolate and preserve pixel relationships as best they can given the limitation that less data is available. In other words, the subsampling stage is performed to maintain significant data while minimizing the image size, thus the amount of pixel-wise calculations involved, which are generally costly operations.
  • [0037]
    A subsample representation may include a multi resolution presentation of the image, as well as a representation in which the sampling rate is not constant for the entire image. For example, areas suspected as indicative of red eye may have different resolution, most likely higher resolution, than areas positively determined not to include red eye.
  • [0038]
    In an alternative embodiment, the subsampling means utilizes hardware based subsampling wherein the processing unit of the digital imaging appliance incorporates a dedicated subsampling engine providing the advantage of a very fast execution of a subsampling operation. Such digital imaging appliance with dedicated subsampling engine may be based on a state-of-art digital imaging appliance incorporating hardware that facilitates the rapid generation of image thumbnails.
  • [0039]
    The decision to subsample the image is, in part, dependent on the size of the original image. If the user has selected a low resolution image format, there may be little gain in performance of redeye detection and false avoidance steps. Thus, the inclusion of a subsampling means, or step or operation, is optional.
  • [0040]
    The red eye detection filter of the preferred embodiment may comprise a selection of sub filters that may be calculated in succession or in parallel. In such cases, the sub-filters may operate on only a selected region, or a suspected region. Such regions are substantially smaller than the entire image. The decision to subsample the image is, in part, dependent on one or a combination of a few factors such as the size of the suspected region, the success or failure of previous or parallel filters, the distance between the regions and the complexity of the computation of the sub filter. Many of the parameters involved in deciding whether or not to subsample a region, and to what degree, may also be determined by an empirical process of optimization between success rate, failure rate and computation time.
  • [0041]
    Where the subsampling means, step or operation is implemented, then both the original and subsampled images are preferably stored in the image store 80 of FIG. 1. The subsampled image is now available to be used by the redeye detector 90 and the false avoidance analyzer 98 of FIG. 1.
  • [0042]
    As discussed before, the system and method of the preferred embodiment involves the detection and removal of red eye artifacts. The actual removal of the red eye will eventually be performed on the full resolution image. However, all or portions of the detection of redeye candidate pixel groupings, the subsequent testing of said pixel groupings for determining false redeye groupings, and the initial step of the removal, where the image is presented to the user for user confirmation of the correction, can be performed on the entire image, the subsampled image, or a subset of regions of the entire image or the subsampled image.
  • [0043]
    There is generally a tradeoff between speed and accuracy. Therefore, according to yet another embodiment involving performing all detection on the subsampled image, the detection, and subsequent false-determining, may be performed selectively, e.g., sometimes on full resolution regions that are suspected as red-eye, and sometimes on a subsampled resolution. We remark that the search step 200 of FIG. 8 comprises, in a practical embodiment, a number of successively applied color filters based on iterative refinements of an initial pixel by pixel search of the captured image. In addition to searching for a red color, it is preferably determined whether the luminance, or brightness of a redeye region, lies within a suitable range of values. Further, the local spatial distribution of color and luminance are relevant factors in the initial search for redeye pixel groupings. As each subsequent filter is preferably only applied locally to pixels in close proximity to a grouping of potential redeye pixels, it can equally well be applied to the corresponding region in the full-sized image.
  • [0044]
    Thus, where it is advantageous to the accuracy of a particular color-based filter, it is possible to apply that filter to the full-sized image rather than to the subsampled image. This applies equally to filters which may be employed in the false-determining analyzer 98.
  • [0045]
    Examples of non-color based false-determining analysis filters include those which consider the localized contrast, saturation or texture distributions in the vicinity of a potential redeye pixel grouping, those that perform localized edge or shape detection and more sophisticated filters which statistically combine the results of a number of simple local filters to enhance the accuracy of the resulting false-determining analysis.
  • [0046]
    It is preferred that more computationally expensive filters that operate on larger portions of the images will utilize a subsampled version, while the more sensitive and delicate filters may be applied to the corresponding region of the full resolution image. It is preferred that in the case of full resolution only small portions of the image will be used for such filters.
  • [0047]
    As a non exhaustive example, filters that look for a distinction between lips and eyes may utilize a full resolution portion, while filters that distinguish between background colors may use a subsample of the image. Furthermore, several different sizes of subsampled images may be generated and employed selectively to suit the sensitivity of the different pixel locating and false determining filters.
  • [0048]
    The decision whether the filter should use a subsampled representation, and the rate of the downsampling, may be determined empirically by a-priori statistically comparing the success rate vs. mis-detection rate of a filter with the subsampling rate and technique of known images. It is further worth noting that the empirical determination will often be specific to a particular camera model. Thus, the decision to use the full sized image or the subsampled image data, for a particular pixel locating or false determining filter, may be empirically determined for each camera.
  • [0049]
    In another aspect, a pre-acquisition or precapture image may be effectively utilized in an embodiment of the invention. Another type of subsampled representation of the image may be one that differs temporally from the captured image, in addition or alternative to the spatial differentiation with other aforementioned algorithms such as spline and bi-cubic. The subsample representation of the image may be an image captured before the final image is captured, and preferably just before. A camera may provide a digital preview of the image, which may be a continuous subsample version of the image. Such pre-capture may be used by the camera and the camera user, for example, to establish correct exposure, focus and/or composition.
  • [0050]
    The precapture image process may involve an additional step of conversion from the sensor domain, also referred to as raw-ccd, to a known color space that the red eye filter is using for calculations. In the case that the preview or precapture image is being used, an additional step of alignment may be used in the case that the final image and the pre-capture differ, such as in camera or object movement.
  • [0051]
    The pre-acquisition image may be normally processed directly from an image sensor without loading it into camera memory. To facilitate this processing, a dedicated hardware subsystem is implemented to perform pre-acquisition image processing. Depending on the settings of this hardware subsystem, the pre-acquisition image processing may satisfy some predetermined criteria which then implements the loading of raw image data from the buffer of the imaging sensor into the main system memory together with report data, possibly stored as metadata, on the predetermined criteria. One example of such a test criterion is the existence of red areas within the pre-acquisition image prior to the activation of the camera flash module. Report data on such red areas can be passed to the redeye filter to eliminate such areas from the redeye detection process. Note that where the test criteria applied by the pre-acquisition image processing module are not met then it can loop to obtain a new pre-acquisition test image from the imaging sensor. This looping may continue until either the test criteria are satisfied or a system time-out occurs. Note further that the pre-acquisition image processing step is significantly faster than the subsequent image processing chain of operations due to the taking of image data directly from the sensor buffers and the dedicated hardware subsystem used to process this data.
  • [0052]
    Once the test criteria are satisfied, the raw image data may be then properly loaded into main system memory to allow image processing operations to convert the raw sensor data into a final pixelated image. Typical steps may include converting Bayer or RGGB image data to YCC or RGB pixelated image data, calculation and adjustment of image white balance, calculation and adjustment of image color range, and calculation and adjustment of image luminance, potentially among others.
  • [0053]
    Following the application of this image processing chain, the final, full-size image may be available in system memory, and may then be copied to the image store for further processing by the redeye filter subsystem. A camera may incorporate dedicated hardware to do global luminance and/or color/grayscale histogram calculations on the raw and/or final image data. One or more windows within the image may be selected for doing “local” calculations, for example. Thus, valuable data may be obtained using a first pass” or pre-acquisition image before committing to a main image processing approach which generates a more final picture.
  • [0054]
    A subsampled image, in addition to the precapture and more finalized images, may be generated in parallel with the final image by a main image processing toolchain. Such processing may be preferably performed within the image capture module 60 of FIG. 1. An exemplary process may include the following operations. First, a raw image may be acquired or pre-captured. This raw image may be processed prior to storage. This processing may generate some report data based on some predetermined test criteria. If the criteria are not met, the pre-acquisition image processing operation may obtain a second, and perhaps one or more additional, pre-acquisition images from the imaging sensor buffer until such test criteria are satisfied.
  • [0055]
    Once the test criteria are satisfied, a full-sized raw image may be loaded into system memory and the full image processing chain may be applied to the image. A final image and a subsample image may then ultimately preferably be generated.
  • [0056]
    FIG. 11 illustrates in block form a further exemplary arrangement in accordance with a precapture image utilization aspect. After the pre-acquisition test phase, the “raw” image is loaded from the sensor into the image capture module. After converting the image from its raw format (e.g., Bayer RGGB) into a more standardized pixel format such as YCC or RGB, it may be then subject to a post-capture image processing chain which eventually generates a full-sized final image and one or more subsampled copies of the original. These may be preferably passed to the image store, and the red-eye filter is preferably then applied. Note that the image capture and image store functional blocks of FIG. 11 correspond to blocks 60 and 80 illustrated at FIG. 1.
  • [0057]
    FIG. 2 shows a pixel grid upon which an image of an eye is focused. Preferably the digital camera records an image comprising a grid of pixels at least 640 by 480. FIG. 2 shows a 24 by 12 pixel portion of the larger grid labeled columns A-X and rows 1-12 respectively.
  • [0058]
    FIG. 3 shows pixel coordinates of the pupil of FIG. 2. The pupil is the darkened circular portion and substantially includes seventeen pixels: K7, K8, L6, L7, L8, L9, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, N6, N7, N8, N9, O7 and O8, as indicated by shaded squares at the aforementioned coordinates. In a non-flash photograph, these pupil pixels would be substantially black in color. In a red-eye photograph, these pixels would be substantially red in color. It should be noted that the aforementioned pupil pixels have a shape indicative of the pupil of the subject, the shape preferably being a substantially circular, semi-circular or oval grouping of pixels. Locating a group of substantially red pixels forming a substantially circular or oval area is useful by the red-eye filter.
  • [0059]
    FIG. 4 shows pixel coordinates of the iris of FIG. 2. The iris pixels are substantially adjacent to the pupil pixels of FIG. 2. Iris pixels J5, J6, J7, J8, J9, K5, K10, L10, M10, N10, O5, O10, P5, P6, P7, P8 and P9 are indicated by shaded squares at the aforementioned coordinates. The iris pixels substantially surround the pupil pixels and may be used as further indicia of a pupil. In a typical subject, the iris pixels will have a substantially constant color. However, the color will vary as the natural color of the eyes each individual subject varies. The existence of iris pixels depends upon the size of the iris at the time of the photograph, if the pupil is very large then iris pixels may not be present.
  • [0060]
    FIG. 5 shows pixel coordinates which include a combination of iris and pupil colors of FIG. 2. The pupil/iris pixels are located at K6, K9, L5, N5, O6, and O9, as indicated by shaded squares at the aforementioned coordinates. The pupil/iris pixels are adjacent to the pupil pixels, and also adjacent to any iris pixels which may be present. Pupil/iris pixels may also contain colors of other areas of the subject's eyes including skin tones and white areas of the eye.
  • [0061]
    FIG. 6 shows pixel coordinates of the white eye area of FIG. 2. The seventy one pixels are indicated by the shaded squares of FIG. 6 and are substantially white in color and are in the vicinity of and substantially surround the pupil pixels of FIG. 2.
  • [0062]
    FIG. 7 shows pixel coordinates of the eyebrow area of FIG. 2. The pixels are indicated by the shaded squares of FIG. 7 and are substantially white in color. The eyebrow pixels substantially form a continuous line in the vicinity of the pupil pixels. The color of the line will vary as the natural color of the eyebrow of each individual subject varies. Furthermore, some subjects may have no visible eyebrow at all.
  • [0063]
    It should be appreciated that the representations of FIG. 2 through FIG. 7 are particular to the example shown. The coordinates of pixels and actual number of pixels comprising the image of an eye will vary depending upon a number of variables. These variables include the location of the subject within the photograph, the distance between the subject and the camera, and the pixel density of the camera.
  • [0064]
    The red-eye filter 90 of FIG. 1 searches the digitally stored image for pixels having a substantially red color, then determines if the grouping has a round or oval characteristics, similar to the pixels of FIG. 3. If found, the color of the grouping is modified. In the preferred embodiment, the color is modified to black.
  • [0065]
    Searching for a circular or oval grouping helps eliminate falsely modifying red pixels which are not due to the red-eye phenomenon. In the example of FIG. 2, the red-eye phenomenon is found in a 5.times.5 grouping of pixels of FIG. 3. In other examples, the grouping may contain substantially more or less pixels depending upon the actual number of pixels comprising the image of an eye, but the color and shape of the grouping will be similar. Thus for example, a long line of red pixels will not be falsely modified because the shape is not substantially round or oval.
  • [0066]
    Additional tests may be used to avoid falsely modifying a round group of pixels having a color indicative of the red-eye phenomenon by further analysis of the pixels in the vicinity of the grouping. For example, in a red-eye phenomenon photograph, there will typically be no other pixels within the vicinity of a radius originating at the grouping having a similar red color because the pupil is surrounded by components of the subject's face, and the red-eye color is not normally found as a natural color on the face of the subject. Preferably the radius is large enough to analyze enough pixels to avoid falsing, yet small enough to exclude the other eye of the subject, which may also have the red-eye phenomenon. Preferably, the radius includes a range between two and five times the radius of the grouping. Other indicia of the recording may be used to validate the existence of red-eye including identification of iris pixels of FIG. 4 which surround the pupil pixels. The iris pixels will have a substantially common color, but the size and color of the iris will vary from subject to subject. Furthermore, the white area of the eye may be identified as a grouping of substantially white pixels in the vicinity of and substantially surrounding the pupil pixels as shown in FIG. 6. However, the location of the pupil within the opening of the eyelids is variable depending upon the orientation of the head of the subject at the time of the photograph. Consequently, identification of a number of substantially white pixels in the vicinity of the iris without a requirement of surrounding the grouping will further validate the identification of the red-eye phenomenon and prevent false modification of other red pixel groupings. The number of substantially white pixels is preferably between two and twenty times the number of pixels in the pupil grouping. As a further validation, the eyebrow pixels of FIG. 7 can be identified.
  • [0067]
    Further, additional criterion can be used to avoid falsely modifying a grouping of red pixels. The criterion include determining if the photographic conditions were indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. These include conditions known in the art including use of a flash, ambient light levels and distance of the subject. If the conditions indicate the red-eye phenomenon is not present, then red-eye filter 90 is not engaged.
  • [0068]
    FIG. 5 shows combination pupil/iris pixels which have color components of the red-eye phenomenon combined with color components of the iris or even the white area of the eye. The invention modifies these pixels by separating the color components associated with red-eye, modifying color of the separated color components and then adding back modified color to the pixel. Preferably the modified color is black. The result of modifying the red component with a black component makes for a more natural looking result. For example, if the iris is substantially green, a pupil/iris pixel will have components of red and green. The red-eye filter removes the red component and substitutes a black component, effectively resulting in a dark green pixel.
  • [0069]
    FIG. 8 shows a flow chart of a method operating in accordance with the present invention. The red-eye filter process is in addition to other processes known to those skilled in the art which operate within the camera. These other processes include flash control, focus, and image recording, storage and display. The red-eye filter process preferably operates within software within a .mu.C or DSP and processes an image stored in image store 80. The red-eye filter process is entered at step 200. At step 210 conditions are checked for the possibility of the red-eye phenomenon. These conditions are included in signals from exposure control means 30 which are communicated directly to the red-eye filter. Alternatively the exposure control means may store the signals along with the digital image in image store 80. If conditions do not indicate the possibility of red-eye at step 210, then the process exits at step 215. Step 210 is further detailed in FIG. 9, and is an optional step which may be bypassed in an alternate embodiment. Then is step 220 the digital image is searched of pixels having a color indicative of red-eye. The grouping of the red-eye pixels are then analyzed at step 230. Red-eye is determined if the shape of a grouping is indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. This step also accounts for multiple red-eye groupings in response to a subject having two red-eyes, or multiple subjects having red-eyes. If no groupings indicative of red-eye are found, then the process exits at step 215. Otherwise, false red-eye groupings are checked at optional step 240. Step 240 is further detailed in FIG. 10 and prevents the red-eye filter from falsely modifying red pixel groupings which do not have further indicia of the eye of a subject. After eliminating false groupings, if no grouping remain, the process exits at step 215. Otherwise step 250 modifies the color of the groupings which pass step 240, preferably substituting the color red for the color black within the grouping. Then in optional step 260, the pixels surrounding a red-eye grouping are analyzed for a red component. These are equivalent to the pixels of FIG. 5. The red component is substituted for black by the red-eye filter. The process then exits at step 215.
  • [0070]
    It should be appreciated that the pixel color modification can be stored directly in the image store by replacing red-eye pixels with pixels modified by the red-eye filter. Alternately the modified pixels can be stored as an overlay in the image store, thereby preserving the recorded image and only modifying the image when displayed in image display 100. Preferably the filtered image is communicated through image output means 110. Alternately the unfiltered image with the overlay may be communicated through image output means 110 to a external device such as a personal computer capable of processing such information.
  • [0071]
    FIG. 9 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate the possibility of a red-eye phenomenon corresponding to step 210 of FIG. 8. Entered at step 300, step 310 checks if a flash was used in the photograph. If not, step 315 indicates that red-eye is not possible. Otherwise optional step 320 checks if a low level of ambient light was present at the time of the photograph. If not, step 315 indicates that red-eye is not possible. Otherwise optional step 330 checks if the subject is relatively close to the camera at the time of the photograph. If not, step 215 indicates that red-eye is not possible. Otherwise step 340 indicates that red-eye is possible.
  • [0072]
    FIG. 10 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate a false red-eye grouping corresponding to step 240 of FIG. 8. Entered at step 400, step 410 checks if other red-eye pixels are found within a radius of a grouping. Preferably the radius is between two and five times the radius of the grouping. If found step 415 indicates a false red-eye grouping. Otherwise step 420 checks if a substantially white area of pixels is found in the vicinity of the grouping. This area is indicative of the white area of a subject's eye and has preferably between two and twenty times the number of pixels in the grouping. If not found step 415 indicates a false red-eye grouping. Otherwise step 430 searches the vicinity of the grouping for an iris ring or an eyebrow line. If not found, step 415 indicates a false red-eye grouping. Otherwise step 440 indicates the red-eye grouping is not false. It should be appreciated that each of the tests 410, 420 and 430 check for a false red-eye grouping. In alternate embodiments, other tests may be used to prevent false modification of the image, or the tests of FIG. 10 may be used either alone or in combination.
  • [0073]
    It should be further appreciated that either the red-eye condition test 210 or the red-eye falsing test 240 of FIG. 8 may be used to achieve satisfactory results. In an alternate embodiment test 240 may be acceptable enough to eliminate test 210, or visa versa. Alternately the selectivity of either the color and/or grouping analysis of the red-eye phenomenon may be sufficient to eliminate both tests 210 and 240 of FIG. 8. Furthermore, the color red as used herein means the range of colors and hues and brightnesses indicative of the red-eye phenomenon, and the color white as used herein means the range of colors and hues and brightnesses indicative of the white area of the human eye.
  • [0074]
    Thus, what has been provided is an improved method and apparatus for eliminating red-eye phenomenon within a miniature digital camera having a flash without the distraction of a pre-flash.
Citas de patentes
Patente citada Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US5016107 *9 May 198914 May 1991Eastman Kodak CompanyElectronic still camera utilizing image compression and digital storage
US5130789 *13 Dic 198914 Jul 1992Eastman Kodak CompanyLocalized image recoloring using ellipsoid boundary function
US5202720 *31 Ene 199013 Abr 1993Minolta Camera Kabushiki KaishaPhotographic camera with flash unit
US5748764 *3 Abr 19955 May 1998Eastman Kodak CompanyAutomated detection and correction of eye color defects due to flash illumination
US5751836 *27 Sep 199612 May 1998David Sarnoff Research Center Inc.Automated, non-invasive iris recognition system and method
US5761550 *20 Feb 19972 Jun 1998Kancigor; BarryTelescoping flash unit for a camera
US5862217 *28 Mar 199619 Ene 1999Fotonation, Inc.Method and apparatus for in-camera encryption
US5862218 *4 Abr 199619 Ene 1999Fotonation, Inc.Method and apparatus for in-camera image marking and authentication
US6016354 *23 Oct 199718 Ene 2000Hewlett-Packard CompanyApparatus and a method for reducing red-eye in a digital image
US6035072 *8 Dic 19977 Mar 2000Read; Robert LeeMapping defects or dirt dynamically affecting an image acquisition device
US6172706 *5 Abr 19969 Ene 2001Canon Kabushiki KaishaVideo camera with automatic zoom adjustment based on distance between user's eyes
US6204858 *30 May 199720 Mar 2001Adobe Systems IncorporatedSystem and method for adjusting color data of pixels in a digital image
US6252976 *26 May 199826 Jun 2001Eastman Kodak CompanyComputer program product for redeye detection
US6407777 *9 Oct 199718 Jun 2002Deluca Michael JosephRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US6505003 *12 Oct 20017 Ene 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyHybrid cameras that revise stored electronic image metadata at film unit removal and methods
US6510520 *26 Jun 199821 Ene 2003Fotonation, Inc.Secure storage device for transfer of digital camera data
US6516154 *17 Jul 20014 Feb 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyImage revising camera and method
US6700614 *24 Sep 19992 Mar 2004Ricoh Company, Ltd.Autofocus apparatus
US6718051 *16 Oct 20006 Abr 2004Xerox CorporationRed-eye detection method
US6724941 *30 Sep 199920 Abr 2004Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processing method, image processing device, and recording medium
US6728401 *17 Ago 200027 Abr 2004Viewahead TechnologyRed-eye removal using color image processing
US6873743 *29 Mar 200229 Mar 2005Fotonation Holdings, LlcMethod and apparatus for the automatic real-time detection and correction of red-eye defects in batches of digital images or in handheld appliances
US6885766 *30 Ene 200226 Abr 2005Imaging Solutions AgAutomatic color defect correction
US6895112 *13 Feb 200117 May 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US6900882 *4 Dic 200131 May 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Print processing method, printing order receiving machine and print processing device
US6912298 *11 Ago 200328 Jun 2005Adobe Systems IncorporationObject detection using dynamic probability scans
US6984039 *1 Dic 200310 Ene 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyLaser projector having silhouette blanking for objects in the output light path
US7030927 *6 Mar 200218 Abr 2006Fujinon CorporationApparatus for detecting focusing status of taking lens
US7035461 *22 Ago 200225 Abr 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod for detecting objects in digital images
US7042501 *11 Dic 19989 May 2006Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processing apparatus
US7042505 *12 Jun 20029 May 2006Fotonation Ireland Ltd.Red-eye filter method and apparatus
US7062086 *25 Oct 200413 Jun 2006Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US7171044 *8 Oct 200430 Ene 2007Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US7352394 *4 Feb 20041 Abr 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedImage modification based on red-eye filter analysis
US20020041329 *17 May 199911 Abr 2002Eran SteinbergIn camera messaging and advertisement system
US20030007687 *5 Jul 20019 Ene 2003Jasc Software, Inc.Correction of "red-eye" effects in images
US20030021478 *23 Jul 200230 Ene 2003Minolta Co., Ltd.Image processing technology for identification of red eyes in image
US20030025811 *9 Ago 20026 Feb 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyCustomizing a digital camera based on demographic factors
US20030044063 *9 Jul 20026 Mar 2003Guenter MeckesMethod for processing digital photographic image data that includes a method for the automatic detection of red-eye defects
US20030044070 *9 Jul 20026 Mar 2003Manfred FuersichMethod for the automatic detection of red-eye defects in photographic image data
US20030044177 *9 Jul 20026 Mar 2003Knut OberhardtMethod for the automatic detection of red-eye defects in photographic image data
US20030044178 *9 Jul 20026 Mar 2003Knut OberhardtMethod for the automatic detection of red-eye defects in photographic image data
US20030058349 *23 Sep 200227 Mar 2003Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Method, apparatus, and program for image processing
US20030095197 *20 Sep 200122 May 2003Eastman Kodak CompanySystem and method for deciding when to correct image-specific defects based on camera, scene, display and demographic data
US20030113035 *19 Dic 200119 Jun 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod and system for compositing images to produce a cropped image
US20030118216 *6 Feb 200326 Jun 2003Goldberg David A.Obtaining person-specific images in a public venue
US20040017481 *8 Abr 200329 Ene 2004Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Digital camera, image pickup method, and image format conversion method
US20040027593 *12 Oct 200112 Feb 2004David WilkinsTechniques for resolution independent rendering of images
US20040032512 *8 Ago 200319 Feb 2004Kia SilverbrookCorrection of distortions in digital images
US20040032526 *8 Ago 200319 Feb 2004Silverbrook Research Pty LtdMethod of processing digital image to correct for flash effects
US20040033071 *1 Ago 200319 Feb 2004Naoki KuboElectronic flash device and camera having the same
US20040037460 *22 Ago 200226 Feb 2004Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod for detecting objects in digital images
US20040046878 *31 Jul 200211 Mar 2004Nick JarmanImage processing to remove red-eyed features
US20040056975 *22 Sep 200325 Mar 2004Daisuke HataAutofocus apparatus
US20040057715 *30 May 200325 Mar 2004Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Strobe light emitting apparatus and camera
US20040090461 *31 Oct 200313 May 2004Adams Guy De Warrenne BruceInterface devices
US20040093432 *7 Nov 200213 May 2004Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod and system for conducting image processing from a mobile client device
US20040114796 *10 Dic 200317 Jun 2004Toshihiko KakuImage correction apparatus and image pickup apparatus
US20040114797 *22 Oct 200317 Jun 2004Guenter MeckesMethod for automatic determination of color-density correction values for the reproduction of digital image data
US20040114829 *10 Oct 200317 Jun 2004Intelligent System Solutions Corp.Method and system for detecting and correcting defects in a digital image
US20040114904 *11 Dic 200217 Jun 2004Zhaohui SunSystem and method to compose a slide show
US20040119851 *10 Dic 200324 Jun 2004Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Face recognition method, face recognition apparatus, face extraction method, and image pickup apparatus
US20050001024 *3 Dic 20026 Ene 2005Yosuke KusakaElectronic apparatus, electronic camera, electronic device, image display apparatus, and image transmission system
US20050013602 *16 Jul 200420 Ene 2005Pentax CorporationDigital camera having red-eye reduction bracket photographing mode
US20050013603 *13 Jul 200420 Ene 2005Shoji IchimasaImage sensing apparatus, image processing apparatus, and control method therefor
US20050024498 *27 Jul 20043 Feb 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processor and image processing system
US20050031224 *5 Ago 200310 Feb 2005Yury PrilutskyDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US20050041121 *16 Ago 200424 Feb 2005Eran SteinbergRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US20050046730 *24 Ago 20043 Mar 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Digital camera
US20050047655 *29 Ago 20033 Mar 2005Huitao LuoDetecting and correcting redeye in an image
US20050047656 *29 Ago 20033 Mar 2005Huitao LuoSystems and methods of detecting and correcting redeye in an image suitable for embedded applications
US20050053279 *25 Oct 200410 Mar 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US20050058340 *4 Oct 200417 Mar 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US20050058342 *8 Oct 200417 Mar 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US20050062856 *17 Sep 200424 Mar 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Camera equipped with red-eye correction feature
US20050063083 *24 Oct 200324 Mar 2005Dart Scott E.Systems and methods for the implementation of a digital images schema for organizing units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system
US20050074164 *17 Sep 20047 Abr 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processing apparatus and method, red-eye detection method, as well as programs for executing the image processing method and the red-eye detection method
US20050078191 *14 Oct 200314 Abr 2005Hewlett-Packard Development Company LpSystem and method to allow undoing of certain digital image modifications
US20050117132 *1 Dic 20032 Jun 2005Eastman Kodak CompanyLaser projector having silhouette blanking for objects in the output light path
US20050124719 *5 Dic 20039 Jun 2005Yu-Chin LaiSurface modification of contact lenses
US20050129331 *4 Nov 200416 Jun 2005Omron CorporationPupil color estimating device
US20050140801 *4 Feb 200430 Jun 2005Yury PrilutskyOptimized performance and performance for red-eye filter method and apparatus
US20060008171 *6 Jul 200412 Ene 2006Microsoft CorporationDigital photography with flash/no flash extension
US20060039690 *30 Ago 200523 Feb 2006Eran SteinbergForeground/background segmentation in digital images with differential exposure calculations
US20060045352 *1 Sep 20042 Mar 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyDetermining the age of a human subject in a digital image
US20060050300 *16 Ago 20059 Mar 2006Canon Kabushiki KaishaInformation processing apparatus and method for managing order data of on-line orders, program for the same
US20060066628 *30 Sep 200430 Mar 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for controlling dynamically interactive parameters for image processing
US20060082847 *13 Oct 200520 Abr 2006Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image correction apparatus and method of controlling same
US20060093212 *28 Oct 20044 May 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image
US20060093213 *6 May 20054 May 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image based on image quality pre and post filtering
US20060093238 *15 Jul 20054 May 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image using face recognition
US20060098867 *10 Nov 200411 May 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyDetecting irises and pupils in images of humans
US20060098875 *4 Nov 200511 May 2006Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image search apparatus for images to be detected, and method of controlling same
US20060119832 *24 Ene 20068 Jun 2006Takayuki IidaPrint processing method, printing order receiving machine and print processing device
US20060120599 *21 Sep 20058 Jun 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image
US20070116379 *18 Nov 200524 May 2007Peter CorcoranTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US20070133863 *10 Oct 200614 Jun 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Image Alignment Method, Comparative Inspection Method, and Comparative Inspection Device for Comparative Inspections
US20080002060 *27 Jun 20073 Ene 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedOptimized Performance and Performance for Red-Eye Filter Method and Apparatus
US20080043121 *2 Jul 200721 Feb 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedOptimized Performance and Performance for Red-Eye Filter Method and Apparatus
Citada por
Patente citante Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US768463023 Mar 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image adjustable compression and resolution using face detection information
US768900930 Mar 2010Fotonation Vision Ltd.Two stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US76933116 Abr 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedPerfecting the effect of flash within an image acquisition devices using face detection
US77021365 Jul 200720 Abr 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedPerfecting the effect of flash within an image acquisition devices using face detection
US773801516 Ago 200415 Jun 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US774638529 Jun 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US778702213 May 200831 Ago 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US780453128 Sep 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US780916230 Oct 20085 Oct 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US784407630 Nov 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection and skin tone information
US784413530 Nov 2010Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDetecting orientation of digital images using face detection information
US78478397 Ago 20087 Dic 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US78478407 Dic 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US78485497 Dic 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US785238414 Dic 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US785304314 Dic 200914 Dic 2010Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US786027430 Oct 200828 Dic 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US786499011 Dic 20084 Ene 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US786503614 Sep 20094 Ene 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod and apparatus of correcting hybrid flash artifacts in digital images
US786962811 Ene 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US791224522 Mar 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod of improving orientation and color balance of digital images using face detection information
US791619029 Mar 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US79168975 Jun 200929 Mar 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedFace tracking for controlling imaging parameters
US79207232 Ago 20065 Abr 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US795325116 Nov 201031 May 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod and apparatus for detection and correction of flash-induced eye defects within digital images using preview or other reference images
US795325222 Nov 201031 May 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US79626296 Sep 201014 Jun 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod for establishing a paired connection between media devices
US796587512 Jun 200721 Jun 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedAdvances in extending the AAM techniques from grayscale to color images
US797018228 Jun 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US797018322 Nov 201028 Jun 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US797018422 Nov 201028 Jun 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US79958049 Ago 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedRed eye false positive filtering using face location and orientation
US800052616 Ago 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDetecting redeye defects in digital images
US80052658 Sep 200823 Ago 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US80364588 Nov 200711 Oct 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDetecting redeye defects in digital images
US803646011 Oct 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAnalyzing partial face regions for red-eye detection in acquired digital images
US80504651 Nov 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US805502918 Jun 20078 Nov 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US805506718 Ene 20078 Nov 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedColor segmentation
US805509014 Sep 20108 Nov 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US808125420 Dic 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedIn-camera based method of detecting defect eye with high accuracy
US81262083 Dic 201028 Feb 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US81262173 Abr 201128 Feb 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US812621830 May 201128 Feb 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US81310163 Dic 20106 Mar 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US81310214 Abr 20116 Mar 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US813518423 May 201113 Mar 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod and apparatus for detection and correction of multiple image defects within digital images using preview or other reference images
US815539726 Sep 200710 Abr 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace tracking in a camera processor
US816030817 Abr 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US81702941 May 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod of detecting redeye in a digital image
US81753423 Abr 20118 May 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US818011515 May 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US818490020 Ago 200722 May 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAutomatic detection and correction of non-red eye flash defects
US820362114 Jun 201019 Jun 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US821286429 Ene 20093 Jul 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethods and apparatuses for using image acquisition data to detect and correct image defects
US821373720 Jun 20083 Jul 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image enhancement with reference images
US82241084 Dic 201017 Jul 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US823367423 May 201131 Jul 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedRed eye false positive filtering using face location and orientation
US826457511 Sep 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedRed eye filter method and apparatus
US826538811 Sep 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAnalyzing partial face regions for red-eye detection in acquired digital images
US82706743 Ene 201118 Sep 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US832064127 Nov 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection using preview or other reference images
US83260668 Mar 20104 Dic 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image adjustable compression and resolution using face detection information
US833083111 Dic 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod of gathering visual meta data using a reference image
US833535521 Abr 201018 Dic 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod and component for image recognition
US83451141 Ene 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAutomatic face and skin beautification using face detection
US837991719 Feb 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace recognition performance using additional image features
US838479330 Jul 200926 Feb 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAutomatic face and skin beautification using face detection
US838561011 Jun 201026 Feb 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace tracking for controlling imaging parameters
US849845226 Ago 200830 Jul 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US850380027 Feb 20086 Ago 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedIllumination detection using classifier chains
US850381825 Sep 20076 Ago 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedEye defect detection in international standards organization images
US850949616 Nov 200913 Ago 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking with reference images
US852009331 Ago 200927 Ago 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace tracker and partial face tracker for red-eye filter method and apparatus
US859354217 Jun 200826 Nov 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedForeground/background separation using reference images
US86759912 Jun 200618 Mar 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedModification of post-viewing parameters for digital images using region or feature information
US868209716 Jun 200825 Mar 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image enhancement with reference images
US86928672 Dic 20108 Abr 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedObject detection and rendering for wide field of view (WFOV) image acquisition systems
US87239592 Abr 201113 May 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace and other object tracking in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US886081631 Mar 201114 Oct 2014Fotonation LimitedScene enhancements in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US88728872 Dic 201028 Oct 2014Fotonation LimitedObject detection and rendering for wide field of view (WFOV) image acquisition systems
US889670311 Abr 201125 Nov 2014Fotonation LimitedSuperresolution enhancment of peripheral regions in nonlinear lens geometries
US889672517 Jun 200825 Nov 2014Fotonation LimitedImage capture device with contemporaneous reference image capture mechanism
US894750131 Mar 20113 Feb 2015Fotonation LimitedScene enhancements in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US894846826 Jun 20033 Feb 2015Fotonation LimitedModification of viewing parameters for digital images using face detection information
US8957993 *6 Mar 201317 Feb 2015FotoNationDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US89821802 Abr 201117 Mar 2015Fotonation LimitedFace and other object detection and tracking in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US898945326 Ago 200824 Mar 2015Fotonation LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US900748030 Jul 200914 Abr 2015Fotonation LimitedAutomatic face and skin beautification using face detection
US9025054 *19 Feb 20135 May 2015Fotonation LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US905354519 Mar 20079 Jun 2015Fotonation LimitedModification of viewing parameters for digital images using face detection information
US912938117 Jun 20088 Sep 2015Fotonation LimitedModification of post-viewing parameters for digital images using image region or feature information
US941200731 Ago 20099 Ago 2016Fotonation LimitedPartial face detector red-eye filter method and apparatus
US20080043121 *2 Jul 200721 Feb 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedOptimized Performance and Performance for Red-Eye Filter Method and Apparatus
US20080317339 *19 Jun 200825 Dic 2008Fotonation Ireland LimitedMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection using preview or other reference images
US20090232402 *11 Mar 200917 Sep 2009Seiko Epson CorporationImage Processing Apparatus, Image Processing Method, and Computer Program for Image Processing
US20130162869 *19 Feb 201327 Jun 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDetecting Red Eye Filter and Apparatus Using Meta-Data
US20130188077 *6 Mar 201325 Jul 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDetecting Red Eye Filter and Apparatus Using Meta-Data
Clasificaciones
Clasificación de EE.UU.348/222.1, 348/E05.038, 348/E05.031
Clasificación internacionalH04N5/217, H04N5/235, H04N1/62, G06T5/50, G06T7/00, G06T7/40, H04N5/228, G06K9/00, G06T5/00
Clasificación cooperativaG06K9/0061, H04N1/62, G06T5/005, G06T7/408, G06T2207/30216, H04N1/624, H04N5/2354
Clasificación europeaH04N1/62C, G06K9/00S2, H04N1/62, H04N5/235L, G06T5/00D, G06T7/40C
Eventos legales
FechaCódigoEventoDescripción
19 Mar 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: FOTONATION IRELAND LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DELUCA, MICHAEL J.;PRILUTSKY, YURY;STEINBERG, ERAN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020672/0111;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040615 TO 20040624
25 Mar 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: FOTONATION VISION LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FOTONATION IRELAND LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:020700/0122
Effective date: 20041227
10 Oct 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: TESSERA TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FOTONATION VISION LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:025117/0780
Effective date: 20101001
30 Oct 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGITALOPTICS CORPORATION EUROPE LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:TESSERA TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:027144/0293
Effective date: 20110713