US20080237116A1 - Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom - Google Patents

Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080237116A1
US20080237116A1 US12/137,195 US13719508A US2008237116A1 US 20080237116 A1 US20080237116 A1 US 20080237116A1 US 13719508 A US13719508 A US 13719508A US 2008237116 A1 US2008237116 A1 US 2008237116A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
membrane
article
water
flux rate
sample
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/137,195
Inventor
John E. Bacino
Alex R. Hobson
Jason J. Strid
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
WL Gore and Associates Inc
Original Assignee
Bacino John E
Hobson Alex R
Strid Jason J
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bacino John E, Hobson Alex R, Strid Jason J filed Critical Bacino John E
Priority to US12/137,195 priority Critical patent/US20080237116A1/en
Publication of US20080237116A1 publication Critical patent/US20080237116A1/en
Assigned to W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. reassignment W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GORE ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06Organic material
    • B01D71/30Polyalkenyl halides
    • B01D71/32Polyalkenyl halides containing fluorine atoms
    • B01D71/36Polytetrafluoroethene
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D39/00Filtering material for liquid or gaseous fluids
    • B01D39/14Other self-supporting filtering material ; Other filtering material
    • B01D39/16Other self-supporting filtering material ; Other filtering material of organic material, e.g. synthetic fibres
    • B01D39/1692Other shaped material, e.g. perforated or porous sheets
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0023Organic membrane manufacture by inducing porosity into non porous precursor membranes
    • B01D67/0025Organic membrane manufacture by inducing porosity into non porous precursor membranes by mechanical treatment, e.g. pore-stretching
    • B01D67/0027Organic membrane manufacture by inducing porosity into non porous precursor membranes by mechanical treatment, e.g. pore-stretching by stretching
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D69/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D69/02Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor characterised by their properties
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D69/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D69/12Composite membranes; Ultra-thin membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/02Details relating to pores or porosity of the membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/02Details relating to pores or porosity of the membranes
    • B01D2325/021Pore shapes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/02Details relating to pores or porosity of the membranes
    • B01D2325/0283Pore size
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/20Specific permeability or cut-off range
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/24Mechanical properties, e.g. strength
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/43Specific optical properties
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2264/00Composition or properties of particles which form a particulate layer or are present as additives
    • B32B2264/02Synthetic macromolecular particles
    • B32B2264/0214Particles made of materials belonging to B32B27/00
    • B32B2264/0257Polyolefin particles, e.g. polyethylene or polypropylene homopolymers or ethylene-propylene copolymers
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/40Properties of the layers or laminate having particular optical properties
    • B32B2307/414Translucent
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/50Properties of the layers or laminate having particular mechanical properties
    • B32B2307/54Yield strength; Tensile strength
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/70Other properties
    • B32B2307/72Density
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/70Other properties
    • B32B2307/724Permeability to gases, adsorption
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/70Other properties
    • B32B2307/726Permeability to liquids, absorption
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/70Other properties
    • B32B2307/732Dimensional properties
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B27/00Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin
    • B32B27/12Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin next to a fibrous or filamentary layer
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B27/00Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin
    • B32B27/32Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin comprising polyolefins
    • B32B27/322Layered products comprising a layer of synthetic resin comprising polyolefins comprising halogenated polyolefins, e.g. PTFE
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B3/00Layered products comprising a layer with external or internal discontinuities or unevennesses, or a layer of non-planar form; Layered products having particular features of form
    • B32B3/02Layered products comprising a layer with external or internal discontinuities or unevennesses, or a layer of non-planar form; Layered products having particular features of form characterised by features of form at particular places, e.g. in edge regions
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B3/00Layered products comprising a layer with external or internal discontinuities or unevennesses, or a layer of non-planar form; Layered products having particular features of form
    • B32B3/26Layered products comprising a layer with external or internal discontinuities or unevennesses, or a layer of non-planar form; Layered products having particular features of form characterised by a particular shape of the outline of the cross-section of a continuous layer; characterised by a layer with cavities or internal voids ; characterised by an apertured layer
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B5/00Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts
    • B32B5/02Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by structural features of a fibrous or filamentary layer
    • B32B5/022Non-woven fabric
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B5/00Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts
    • B32B5/02Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by structural features of a fibrous or filamentary layer
    • B32B5/024Woven fabric
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B5/00Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts
    • B32B5/02Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by structural features of a fibrous or filamentary layer
    • B32B5/026Knitted fabric
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B5/00Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts
    • B32B5/16Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by features of a layer formed of particles, e.g. chips, powder or granules
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B5/00Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts
    • B32B5/22Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by the presence of two or more layers which are next to each other and are fibrous, filamentary, formed of particles or foamed
    • B32B5/24Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by the presence of two or more layers which are next to each other and are fibrous, filamentary, formed of particles or foamed one layer being a fibrous or filamentary layer
    • B32B5/245Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by the presence of two or more layers which are next to each other and are fibrous, filamentary, formed of particles or foamed one layer being a fibrous or filamentary layer another layer next to it being a foam layer
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B7/00Layered products characterised by the relation between layers; Layered products characterised by the relative orientation of features between layers, or by the relative values of a measurable parameter between layers, i.e. products comprising layers having different physical, chemical or physicochemical properties; Layered products characterised by the interconnection of layers
    • B32B7/04Interconnection of layers
    • B32B7/05Interconnection of layers the layers not being connected over the whole surface, e.g. discontinuous connection or patterned connection
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B7/00Layered products characterised by the relation between layers; Layered products characterised by the relative orientation of features between layers, or by the relative values of a measurable parameter between layers, i.e. products comprising layers having different physical, chemical or physicochemical properties; Layered products characterised by the interconnection of layers
    • B32B7/04Interconnection of layers
    • B32B7/12Interconnection of layers using interposed adhesives or interposed materials with bonding properties
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/249921Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component
    • Y10T428/249953Composite having voids in a component [e.g., porous, cellular, etc.]
    • Y10T428/249954With chemically effective material or specified gas other than air, N, or carbon dioxide in void-containing component
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/26Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component, the element or component having a specified physical dimension
    • Y10T428/269Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component, the element or component having a specified physical dimension including synthetic resin or polymer layer or component
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/20Coated or impregnated woven, knit, or nonwoven fabric which is not [a] associated with another preformed layer or fiber layer or, [b] with respect to woven and knit, characterized, respectively, by a particular or differential weave or knit, wherein the coating or impregnation is neither a foamed material nor a free metal or alloy layer
    • Y10T442/2139Coating or impregnation specified as porous or permeable to a specific substance [e.g., water vapor, air, etc.]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to porous PTFE membranes with a combination of high air or liquid permeability and small pore size and filter materials made therefrom.
  • filtration efficiency means the percentage of particles within a specified size range captured by a filtration material, or media, at a given flow rate.
  • flow means the passage of a fluid through a membrane or filter material.
  • flow rate means the volume of flow per unit time and the term “flow resistance” means the restriction of flow as results during flow through membranes or media with small pores.
  • permeability means the ability to transmit fluids (liquid or gas) through the pores of a membrane or filter material when the material is subjected to a differential pressure across it. Permeability can be characterized by Gurley number, Frazier number, or water flux rate.
  • Pore size means the size of the pores in porous membranes. Pore size can be characterized by bubble point, mean flow pore size, or water entry pressure, as described in more detail herein.
  • water entry pressure means the pressure required to drive water droplets through a membrane, as further described in the test methods contained herein.
  • Expanded PTFE (ePTFE) membranes have enjoyed great success in the fields of liquid and gas filtration. Expanded PTFE membranes are typically hydrophobic unless treated or modified or otherwise altered. Such membranes not only possess high chemical inertness and thermal stability at extremes of temperature, but they also possess high strength.
  • the present invention is directed to novel porous PTFE membranes possessing a unique combination of high strength, low flow resistance, and small pore size. Further, the present invention is directed to unique high performance filter materials and vent constructions, including those suitable for venting applications, with filtration performance which has been heretofore unachievable.
  • Unique performance as measured by water entry pressure versus Gurley number, water flux rate versus bubble point and water flux rate versus mean flow pore size are also achievable with the membranes of the present invention.
  • articles which include composites of at least one porous PTFE membrane and at least one additional layer may be made.
  • the at least one additional layer may be in the form of membranes, nonwovens, scrims and/or fabrics, depending on the desired characteristics of the final article.
  • articles comprising porous PTFE membranes having an oil rating of at least 2, more preferably at least 4, and even more preferably at least 5, and a water entry pressure above 500 kPa with a Gurley number up to 350 seconds can be made in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.
  • such oleophobic membranes can be made with a water entry pressure above 1250 kPa and a Gurley number up to 200 seconds.
  • such oleophobic membranes can be made with a water entry pressure above 2000 kPa and a Gurley number up to 100 seconds.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph depicting Gurley number versus bubble point for porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus bubble point for porous PTFE membranes and composite membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus bubble point for hydrophilic porous PTFE membranes and composite membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph depicting water entry pressure versus Gurley number for oleophobic porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph depicting water entry pressure versus Gurley number for porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus mean flow pore size for porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • porous PTFE articles of the present invention provide the surprising combination of high strength, low flow resistance, and small pore size. These articles fill needs for high-performance filtration media.
  • Prior art materials suffer from either high flow resistance or low filtration efficiency or both in comparison to materials of the present invention.
  • Materials of the present invention provide lower flow resistance with smaller pore size compared to prior art materials.
  • the inventive materials have utility in both liquid and gas filtration applications.
  • inventive ePTFE articles can be rendered oleophobic by various techniques, thereby making them fit for use in certain venting applications where the material has high air flow and high water entry pressure and is resistant to penetration by low surface tension fluids like oil.
  • inventive membranes can be rendered hydrophilic (water-wettable under little or no pressure) by various techniques making them usable in liquid filtration applications which involve, for example, filtration of aqueous fluids.
  • the porous PTFE membranes of this invention can be constructed as composite filters or composite vents, for example by layering the membrane with one or more additional layers that may provide support or protection to the membrane.
  • the additional layer or layers can be in the form of one or more porous membranes or more traditional air permeable materials like knits, non-wovens, scrims, woven fabrics, etc.
  • an additional layer or layers may be oriented on only one side or on both sides of the membrane.
  • the additional layer or layers may or may not be bonded to the membrane, depending on the end-use requirements.
  • the membrane and additional layers may be loosely stacked, then held together by appropriate means around a perimeter of the filter, such as by a housing, a frame, a potting compound, an adhesive, or any other suitable means.
  • the additional layer or layers may be attached to the membrane at a relatively few number of sites, e.g., via a suitable adhesive at locations around at least a portion of the perimeter, by a discontinuous lamination adhesive across the surface of the layers, or any other suitable configuration meeting the requirements of the end use application.
  • Suitable adhesives can include, but are not limited to, polypropylenes, polyesters, polyethylenes, PFA, FEP, and other suitable forms of thermoplastics, thermosets, and the like.
  • composite filters and vents include, but are not limited to, improved handling of the membrane making it easier to fabricate filter cartridges or vents, improved filtration efficiency in some cases, and the like.
  • the additional layers are typically chosen so as to minimize flow resistance.
  • the composite filters and vents can either be hydrophobic, oleophobic, or hydrophilic depending on the application in which they are used.
  • permeability is characterized by Gurley number or water flux rate. Increased permeability is manifested by lower Gurley numbers (i.e., less time for a given volume of air to pass through the membrane at a given pressure), higher Frazier numbers (i.e., the flow rate of air through the membrane for a given pressure drop and sample area), and higher water flux rates.
  • Pore size is characterized by the bubble point (BP), mean flow pore size, or water entry pressure (WEP) values.
  • FIGS. 1 through 6 show the characteristics of inventive articles compared to articles of the prior art.
  • FIG. 1 depicts Gurley number and BP measurements for inventive and prior art membranes.
  • FIG. 2 depicts water flux rate and BP measurements for inventive and prior art materials.
  • the equation, log (water flux rate (cm/min/kPa)) ⁇ 3.5 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 3 (BP (kPa))+1.3, describes the line drawn on the graph.
  • FIG. 3 depicts water flux rate and BP measurements for inventive and prior art hydrophilic materials.
  • the equation, log (water flux rate (cm/min/kPa)) ⁇ 0.01 (BP (kPa))+1.3, describes the line drawn on the graph.
  • the data points for inventive materials fall on or above this line and those for prior art materials fall below this line.
  • FIG. 4 depicts water entry pressure and Gurley number measurements for inventive and prior art oleophobic materials.
  • the data points corresponding to inventive materials have water entry pressure values of 500 kPa or higher and Gurley numbers of 350 sec or lower.
  • FIG. 5 depicts water entry pressure versus Gurley number for inventive and prior art membranes.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus mean flow pore size for inventive and prior art membranes.
  • Gurley number is expressed in units of seconds, BP in units of kPa, water flux rate in units of cm/min/kPa, water entry pressure in units of kPa, and mean flow pore size in units of microns.
  • the logarithmic equations utilize log to the base 10.
  • the inventive articles exhibit higher permeability for a given pore size and a smaller pore size for a given permeability as compared to prior art articles.
  • the superior filtration properties of these novel membranes and composite articles are further enhanced by the high strength of the membranes.
  • the present membranes are the strongest, balanced matrix tensile strength ePTFE articles ever produced.
  • the balance of the strength of a membrane is indicated by how closely the ratio of the matrix tensile strengths of the membrane in two orthogonal directions approaches unity.
  • Balanced membranes typically exhibit ratios of about 2 to 1 or less.
  • these membranes possess the largest product of matrix tensile strengths measured in two orthogonal directions.
  • the product of matrix tensile strengths in two orthogonal directions is greater than 1.3 ⁇ 10 5 MPa 2 more preferably greater than 1.5 ⁇ 10 5 MPa 2 , and even more preferably greater than 1.9 ⁇ 10 5 MPa 2 .
  • Orthogonal directions include, but are not limited to, longitudinal and transverse directions.
  • the high strength is particularly valuable for filtration applications in which the membrane is not used in combination with an additional layer or layers. Higher strength also affords the use of thinner membranes. Thinner membranes present lower flow resistance than otherwise identical thicker membranes.
  • the high strength also facilitates the lamination of the thin membrane to additional layers and also can improve in-use life of filter media in pleated forms. Furthermore, strong membranes better resist rupture in situations in which the filter is subjected to high pressures or pulses of pressure.
  • Yet another surprising aspect of the invention is the unprecedented high surface area of these novel membranes, as measured herein.
  • Prior art ePTFE membranes are referred to as having surface area per mass values in the range of 10 to 19 m 2 /g.
  • Some membranes of the present invention can be tailored to have a surface area at least as high as 20 to 27 m 2 /g.
  • Non-porous forms of PTFE and ePTFE allow significantly more visible light to pass though them than do porous, lower density forms.
  • the index of refraction of PTFE (typically 1.3 to 1.4 depending on percent crystallinity of the PTFE) causes ePTFE materials to be diffusely reflective. Typically, these materials have light transmission values of less than 50%.
  • Another feature of this invention is that membranes possessing high clarity can also be made which possess remarkably high degrees of porosity.
  • membranes of the present invention can have a light transmission of least 50% and a porosity of at least 50%. Light transmission values of 85% and higher are obtainable in membranes that are greater than 75% porous. Such materials have particular value in applications requiring the combination of transparency, or translucency, and permeability.
  • Membrane thickness was measured by placing the membrane between the two plates of a Kafer FZ1000/30 thickness snap gauge (Kafer Messuhrenfabrik GmbH, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany). The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Tensile break load was measured using an INSTRON 1122 tensile test machine equipped with flat-faced grips and a 0.445 kN load cell. The gauge length was 5.08 cm and the cross-head speed was 50.8 cm/min. The sample dimensions were 2.54 cm by 15.24 cm.
  • For longitudinal MTS measurements the larger dimension of the sample was oriented in the machine, or “down web,” direction.
  • For the transverse MTS measurements the larger dimension of the sample was oriented perpendicular to the machine direction, also known as the cross web direction.
  • Each sample was weighed using a Mettler Toledo Scale Model AG204, then the thickness of the samples was taken using the Kafer FZ1000/30 thickness snap gauge. The samples were then tested individually on the tensile tester. Three different sections of each sample were measured. The average of the three maximum load (i.e., the peak force) measurements was used.
  • the longitudinal and transverse MTS were calculated using the following equation:
  • MTS (maximum load/cross-section area)*(bulk density of PTFE )/density of the porous membrane
  • test method and related sample mounting apparatus were developed by W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. for use with a Chatillon Test Stand.
  • the test measures the burst strength of materials such as fabrics (woven, knit, nonwoven, etc.), porous or nonporous plastic films, membranes, sheets, etc., laminates thereof, and other materials in planar form.
  • a specimen was mounted taut, but unstretched, between two annular clamping plates with an opening of 7.62 cm diameter.
  • a metal rod having a polished steel 2.54 cm diameter ball-shaped tip applied a load against the center of the specimen in the Z-direction (normal to the X-Y planar directions).
  • the rod was connected at its other end to an appropriate Chatillon force gauge mounted in a Chatillon Materials Test Stand, Model No.TCD-200.
  • the load was applied at the rate of 25.4 cm/minute until failure of the specimen occurred. The failure (tearing, burst, etc.) may occur anywhere within the clamped area. Results were reported as the average of three measurements of the maximum applied force before failure.
  • Ball burst data can be expressed as the ball burst strength as a function of mass per area of the sample; mass per area of the sample can be determined from the product of density and thickness of the sample.
  • Gurley air flow test measures the time in seconds for 100 cm 3 of air to flow through a 6.45 cm 2 sample at 12.4 cm of water pressure. The samples were measured in a Gurley Densometer Model 4340 Automatic Densometer. Articles possessing Gurley values less than about 2 seconds were submitted for Frazier number testing, since this test provides more reliable values for the characterization of highly permeable articles. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • the following procedure was used to calculate the water flux rate through the membrane.
  • the membrane was either draped across the tester (Sterifil Holder 47 mm Catalog Number: XX11J4750, Millipore) or cut to size and laid over the test plate.
  • the membrane was first wet out completely with 100% isopropyl alcohol.
  • the tester was filled with de-ionized water (room temperature).
  • a pressure of 33.87 kPa was applied across the membrane; the time for 400 cm 3 of de-ionized water to flow through the membrane was measured.
  • the water flux rate was then calculated using the following equation:
  • water flux rate [cm/min/kPa] water flow rate [cm 3 /min]/sample area [cm 2 ]/test pressure [kPa].
  • hydrophilic membranes the membrane was not pre-wet with isopropyl alcohol. The same procedure outlined above was used to measure water flux rate through composite filters. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Water entry pressure is a test method for measuring water intrusion through a membrane.
  • a Mullen® Tester (Serial No: 8240+92+2949, manufactured by BF. Perkins, Chicopee, Mass., USA) was used.
  • a test sample was clamped between a pair of testing fixtures made of 1.27 cm thick square plexiglass sheets, 10.16 cm long on each side. The lower fixture had the ability to pressurize a section of the sample with water.
  • a piece of pH paper was placed on top of the sample to serve as an indicator of evidence for water entry. The sample was then pressurized in small increments of pressure until a color change in the pH paper was noticed. The corresponding breakthrough pressure or entry pressure was recorded as the water entry pressure. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • the bubble point and mean flow pore size were measured according to the general teachings of ASTM F316-03 using a Capillary Flow Porometer (Model CFP 1500 AEXL from Porous Materials Inc., Ithaca, N.Y.).
  • the sample membrane was placed into the sample chamber and wet with SilWick Silicone Fluid (available from Porous Materials Inc.) having a surface tension of 19.1 dynes/cm.
  • the bottom clamp of the sample chamber had a 2.54 cm diameter, 3.175 mm thick porous metal disc insert (Mott Metallurgical, Farmington, Conn., 40 micron porous metal disk) and the top clamp of the sample chamber had a 3.175 mm diameter hole.
  • the Capwin software version 6.62.1 the following parameters were set as specified in the table immediately below. The values presented for bubble point and mean flow pore size were the average of two measurements.
  • Parameter Set Point maxflow (cc/m) 200000 bublflow (cc/m) 100 F/PT (old bubltime) 40 minbppres (PSI) 0 zerotime (sec) 1 v2incr (cts) 10 preginc (cts) 1 pulse delay (sec) 2 maxpre (PSI) 500 pulse width (sec) 0.2 mineqtime (sec) 30 presslew (cts) 10 flowslew (cts) 50 eqiter 3 aveiter 20 maxpdif (PSI) 0.1 maxfdif (cc/m) 50 sartp (PSI) 1 sartf (cc/m) 500
  • a radiometer (Model IC 1700, International Light, Newburyport, Mass.) was used to measure the amount of light transmission through the samples of ePTFE membrane.
  • a black tube approximately the same diameter as the outer diameter of the light receiving sensor, Model SED 033, was clamped onto the light sensor and protruded approximately 13.3 cm from the receiving face of the sensor.
  • the light source a Sylvania Reflector 50 W, 120V bulb, was mounted directly across from the light sensor approximately 28.6 cm from the receiving face of the light sensor.
  • the radiometer was calibrated by placing a cap over the end of the tube protruding from the light sensor to set the zero point, and removing the cap and turning on the light source with nothing between the light source and the light sensor to set the 100% point.
  • the ePTFE membrane was mounted into a 25.4 cm diameter embroidery hoop and held between the light source and the light sensor, approximately 7.6 cm from the light source. The percent transmission of light displayed on the IC 1700 radiometer was recorded. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • the surface area per unit mass, expressed in units of m 2 /g, of the ePTFE membrane was measured using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method on a Coulter SA3100 Gas Adsorption Analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, Calif.). A sample was cut from the center of the ePTFE membrane sheet and placed into a small sample tube (reference number 8201151). The mass of the ePTFE sample was approximately 0.1 to 0.2 grams. The tube was placed into the Coulter SA-Prep Surface Area Outgasser, (Model SA-PREP, P/N 5102014) from Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, Calif. and purged at 110 C for 2 hours with helium.
  • BET Brunauer-Emmett-Teller
  • sample tube was then removed from the SA-Prep Outgasser and weighed.
  • sample tube was then placed into the SA3100 Gas Adsorption Analyzer and the BET surface area analysis was run in accordance with the instrument instructions using helium to calculate the free space and nitrogen as the adsorbate gas. A single measurement was recorded for each sample.
  • Porosity was expressed in percent porosity and was determined by subtracting the quotient of the average density of the article (described earlier herein) and that of the bulk density of PTFE from 1, then multiplying that value by 100%. For the purposes of this calculation, the bulk density of PTFE was taken to be 2.2 g/cc.
  • Oil rating was measured using the AATCC Test Method 118-1997.
  • the oil rating of a membrane is the lower of the two ratings obtained when testing the two sides of the membrane. The higher the number, the better the oil repellency.
  • Water-wettability was measured in order to characterize the degree of hydrophilicity of a sample.
  • the sample was held taught in a 10.16 cm diameter hoop.
  • a single droplet of water was dropped from a height of 5 cm directly above the sample onto the sample.
  • the time for the droplet to penetrate the pores of the sample was measured.
  • the degree of water-wettability was defined using the following scale:
  • Hydrophobic materials such as porous ePTFE materials possessing relatively small pores typically exhibit water-wettability ratings of 2. Materials exhibiting water-wettability ratings of 0 or 1 were considered to be instantly wettable.
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer (Daikin Industries, Ltd., Orangeburg, N.Y.) was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder.
  • the lubricated powder was compressed in a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried in an oven set at 270° C.
  • the dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 340° C.
  • the speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls, and hence the expansion ratio, was 8:1.
  • the longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 320° C. to a ratio of 34:1 and then constrained and heated in an oven set at 320° C. for approximately 24 seconds.
  • the process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • the process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1 . Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 5 . Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6 .
  • Example 1 Example 2
  • Example 3 Example 4
  • Bubble point (kPa) 647 564 877 605 764 water flux rate 0.23 0.33 0.12 0.61 0.25 mean flow pore size 0.056 0.065 0.05545 0.0765 0.0642 (micron) water entry pressure 3111 2939 ⁇ 4136 (kPa) surface area (
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer (Daikin Industries, Ltd., Orangeburg, N.Y.) was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder.
  • the lubricated powder was compressed in a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours.
  • the compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick.
  • Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm.
  • the tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 270° C.
  • the dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls in a heat zone set to a temperature of 340° C.
  • the speed ratio between the second bank of rolls to the first bank of rolls, and hence the expansion ratio, was 13:1.
  • the longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 320° C. to a ratio of 32:1 and then restrained and heated to 320° C. for approximately 24 seconds.
  • the process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • the process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1 . Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 5 . Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6 .
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.202 g/g of fine powder.
  • the lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 250° C.
  • the dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 345° C.
  • the speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 15:1.
  • the longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 30:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 390° C. for approximately 20 seconds.
  • the process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • Table 1 The process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Note that the water entry pressure was at least 4136 kPa because the tester was unable to measure higher than that. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1 . Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6 .
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder.
  • the lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours.
  • the compressed and heated pellet was ram extruded to produce a tape approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick.
  • the extruded tape was then rolled down between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.254 mm.
  • the tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 270° C.
  • the dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 345° C.
  • the speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 15:1.
  • the longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 30:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 380° C. for approximately 24 seconds.
  • the process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • Table 1 The process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Light transmission was measured to be 90%. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1 . Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6 .
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.202 g/g of fine powder.
  • the lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 250° C.
  • the dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls in a heat zone set to a temperature of 345° C.
  • the speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 20:1.
  • the longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 22:1 and then restrained and heated to 390° C. for approximately 20 seconds.
  • the process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • the process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1 . Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6 .
  • the membrane of Example 1 was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure.
  • the membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter).
  • a solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water.
  • the hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute.
  • the hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute.
  • the membrane of Example 2 was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure.
  • the membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter).
  • a solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water. The hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute.
  • the membrane of Example 4 was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure.
  • the membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter).
  • a solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water.
  • the hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute.
  • the hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), and 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute.
  • the solution temperature was maintained at 50 deg C. This was followed by a deionized water rinse for 1 minute.
  • the sample was dried in an oven at 150 deg C. The sample was removed from the oven when it was completely dry. The resulting sample was instantaneously water-wettable, it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0.
  • Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic membrane made in this example were 760 kPa and 0.1 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3 .
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer (Daikin Industries, Ltd., Orangeburg, N.Y.) was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder.
  • the lubricated powder was compressed in a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried in an oven set at 270° C.
  • the dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 340° C.
  • the expansion ratio was calculated as the ratio between the speeds of the two banks of rolls and was determined to be 25:1.
  • the longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 20:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 390° C. for approximately 60 seconds. The process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • the membrane had the following properties: a thickness of 0.0051 mm, a density of 0.334 g/cc, longitudinal matrix tensile strength of 546 MPa, transverse matrix tensile strength of 276 MPa, ball burst strength of 22.7 N, Frazier number of 2.8, bubble point of 317 kPa, water flux rate of 1.72 cm/min/kPa, mean flow pore size of 0.101 microns, and a surface area of 24.8 m 2 /g. Water flux rate and BP data for this membrane appear in FIG. 2 . Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for this membrane appear in FIG. 6 .
  • the membrane was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure.
  • the membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter).
  • a solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water.
  • the hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute.
  • the hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), and 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute.
  • the hydrophilic membrane of Example 7 was constructed as a composite hydrophilic filter by layering the membrane between two other layers.
  • outer layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40 which were subsequently hydrophilized.
  • These two layers served as cover layers (i.e., a layer which covers at least a portion of the surface of the membrane); they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant assembled composite hydrophilic filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the hydrophilic membrane of Example 7.
  • the outer, or cover, layer membranes were rendered hydrophilic using the following procedure. Each cover layer membrane was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter). A solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water.
  • the hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute.
  • the hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), and 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute.
  • the solution temperature was maintained at 50 deg C. This was followed by a deionized water rinse for 1 minute.
  • each cover layer was dried in an oven set to 150 deg C. The sample was removed from the oven when it was dry.
  • the composite hydrophilic filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the hydrophilic membrane of Example 7 between the two hydrophilic cover membranes.
  • the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic composite were 678 kPa and 0.06 cm/min/kPa, respectively.
  • the composite was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3 . Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 7) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • the hydrophilic membrane of Example 8 was constructed as a composite hydrophilic filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These two outer, or cover, layers were created in the same manner as described in Example 10.
  • the composite hydrophilic filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the hydrophilic membrane of Example 8 between the two hydrophilic cover membranes.
  • the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures.
  • Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic composite made in this example were 705 kPa and 0.09 cm/min/kPa, respectively.
  • the composite was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3 . Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 8) used in constructing the composite.
  • the similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Example 9 The hydrophilic membrane of Example 9 was used to construct a composite hydrophilic filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These two outer, or cover, layers were created in the same manner as described in Example 10.
  • the composite hydrophilic filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the hydrophilic membrane of Example 9 between the two hydrophilic cover membranes. During testing, the edges of the composite were clamped, as appropriate, to perform the test. Thus, the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. The composite was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3 . Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 9) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Example 1 The membrane of Example 1 was treated to render it oleophobic according to the teachings of Example 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,650.
  • the resulting membrane had an oil rating of 3.
  • Water entry pressure and Gurley values for the oleophobic membrane made in this example were 2447 kPa and 34 sec, respectively. Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 4 .
  • Example 2 The membrane of Example 2 was treated to render it oleophobic according to the teachings of Example 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,650. This membrane had an oil rating of 3. Water entry pressure and Gurley values for the oleophobic membrane made in this example were 2530 kPa and 22 sec, respectively. Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 4 .
  • the membrane of Example 2 was used to construct a composite filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These two outer, or cover, layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40. These two layers served as cover layers; they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant composite filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the membrane of Example 2.
  • the composite filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the membrane of Example 2 between the two cover membranes.
  • the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values for the composite filter were 556 kPa and 0.37 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 2) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • the membrane of Example 4 was used to construct a composite filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These outer layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40. These two layers served as cover layers; they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant composite filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the membrane of Example 4.
  • the composite filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the membrane of Example 4 between the two cover membranes.
  • the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values for the composite filter were 575 kPa and 0.66 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 4) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder.
  • the lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours.
  • the compressed and heated pellet was ram extruded to produce a tape approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick.
  • the extruded tape was then rolled down between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.19 mm.
  • the tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1) then dried at a temperature of 250° C.
  • the dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 340° C.
  • the speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 20:1.
  • the longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 20:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 400° C. for approximately 180 seconds.
  • the membrane had the following properties: a thickness of 0.0025 mm, a density of 0.180 g/cc, longitudinal matrix tensile strength of 609 MPa, transverse matrix tensile strength of 220 MPa, ball burst strength of 3.6 N, Frazier number of 6.1, bubble point of 337 kPa, water flux rate of 2.49 cm/min/kPa, mean flow pore size of 0.085 microns, and a light transmission of 92%. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for this membrane appear in FIG. 6 .
  • This membrane was used to construct a composite filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These outer layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40. These two layers served as cover layers; they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant composite filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the membrane made earlier in this example.
  • the composite filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration this membrane between the two cover membranes.
  • the composite filter consisted of three layers were loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures.
  • Bubble point and water flux rate values for the composite filter were 374 kPa and 1.92 cm/min/kPa, respectively.
  • Water flux rate and BP data for the membrane and the composite article of this example appear in FIG. 2 . Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane made in this example can be preserved in the final composite article.

Abstract

Novel porous PTFE membranes are described possessing a unique combination of high strength, low flow resistance, and small pore size. Additionally, unique constructions with superior filtration and venting properties incorporating porous PTFE membranes are described.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present application is a division application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/931,890, filed Oct. 31, 2007, which is a continuation application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,306,729. which granted Dec. 11, 2007, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/184,706, filed Jul. 18, 2005, abandoned.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to porous PTFE membranes with a combination of high air or liquid permeability and small pore size and filter materials made therefrom.
  • DEFINITIONS
  • As used in this application, the term “filtration efficiency” means the percentage of particles within a specified size range captured by a filtration material, or media, at a given flow rate.
  • As used in this application, the term “flow” means the passage of a fluid through a membrane or filter material. The term “flow rate” means the volume of flow per unit time and the term “flow resistance” means the restriction of flow as results during flow through membranes or media with small pores.
  • As used in this application, the term “permeability” means the ability to transmit fluids (liquid or gas) through the pores of a membrane or filter material when the material is subjected to a differential pressure across it. Permeability can be characterized by Gurley number, Frazier number, or water flux rate.
  • As used in this application, the term “pore size” means the size of the pores in porous membranes. Pore size can be characterized by bubble point, mean flow pore size, or water entry pressure, as described in more detail herein.
  • As used in this application, the term “water entry pressure” means the pressure required to drive water droplets through a membrane, as further described in the test methods contained herein.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Ideal filtration membranes possess adequate strength for the intended applications and combine high air or liquid permeability properties with high filtration efficiencies. High permeability or high flow through the membrane for a given pressure drop across the membrane affords lower energy costs due to lower energy loss and more rapid filtration times. Additionally, these features make it possible to install smaller, more cost effective systems. Improved filtration efficiency affords improved capture of contaminants. Typically, optimizing either filtration efficiency or permeability comes at the expense of compromising the other. For example, in order to capture smaller particles, the membrane must possess small pores, but the smaller pore size typically increases flow resistance and therefore decreases the liquid or gas permeability through the membrane. Similarly, increasing flow through the membrane is readily achieved by increasing the pore size of the filter media, but in doing so the membrane captures fewer particles and is less efficient in the capture of smaller particles.
  • Improvement in the development of filtration media has focused on finding ideal combinations of high permeability, small pore size, and high strength. Expanded PTFE (ePTFE) membranes have enjoyed great success in the fields of liquid and gas filtration. Expanded PTFE membranes are typically hydrophobic unless treated or modified or otherwise altered. Such membranes not only possess high chemical inertness and thermal stability at extremes of temperature, but they also possess high strength.
  • Methods for processing expanded PTFE and articles made therefrom are taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,589 to Bacino. Bacino teaches very thin articles consisting essentially of microfibrils. This patent enables the processing of high strength PTFE articles possessing small pore sizes and high air permeability not previously obtainable. The articles are made by transversely stretching PTFE, then expanding it in the longitudinal and transverse directions. These materials, albeit having improved filtration performance compared to predecessor membranes, have limitations in their ability to satisfy increasingly demanding commercial needs.
  • It is well established in the art that increasing the ratio of expansion of PTFE typically increases the pore size of resulting porous expanded articles. The larger pore size results in lower flow resistance through the membranes, but, as noted above, at the expense of filtration efficiencies, especially for smaller particles. Further stretching tends to decrease membrane thickness which can result in a reduction in flow resistance.
  • Thus, while numerous efforts have been made to improve the filtration characteristics of PTFE membranes, a clear need still exists for thin, strong filtration membranes that provide both small pore size and low flow resistance.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed to novel porous PTFE membranes possessing a unique combination of high strength, low flow resistance, and small pore size. Further, the present invention is directed to unique high performance filter materials and vent constructions, including those suitable for venting applications, with filtration performance which has been heretofore unachievable.
  • Porous PTFE membranes of the present invention can be fabricated which exhibit, for example, a combination of Gurley number versus bubble point equal to or below the line defined by the equation log (Gurley)=5.13×10−3 (Bubble Point)−1.26 and a surface area of at least 20 m2/g, a combination of a light transmission of a least 50% and a porosity of at least 50%, a matrix tensile strength in two orthogonal directions of at least 1.3×105 MPa2, as well as various combinations of these unique properties. Other membranes of the invention exhibit a Gurley number versus bubble point equal to or below the line defined by the equation log (Gurley)=5.13×10−3 (Bubble Point)−1.58, and even equal to or below the line defined by the equation log (Gurley)=5.13×10−3 (Bubble Point)−2.02, while still exhibiting a surface area of at least 20 m2/g. Unique performance as measured by water entry pressure versus Gurley number, water flux rate versus bubble point and water flux rate versus mean flow pore size are also achievable with the membranes of the present invention. For example, membranes with a water entry pressure versus Gurley number equal to or above the line defined by the equation WEP=3(Gurley number)+2500 have been achieved. Further, membranes with a water flux rate versus bubble point equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−3.5×10−3 (bubble point)+1.3 have been made. Further, membranes with a water flux rate versus mean flow pore size equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=16.9(mean flow pore size)−1.85 are within the scope of the present invention.
  • In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, articles which include composites of at least one porous PTFE membrane and at least one additional layer may be made. The at least one additional layer may be in the form of membranes, nonwovens, scrims and/or fabrics, depending on the desired characteristics of the final article. For example, it is possible to form such composite articles wherein the composites have a water flux rate versus bubble point equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−3.5×10−3 (bubble point)+1.3, more preferably equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−3.5×10−3 (bubble point)+1.6, and even more preferably the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−3.5×10−3 (bubble point)+2.0. Alternative composite constructions may include composites of at least one porous PTFE membrane and at least one additional layer where the composite is instantly wettable with water and has a water flux rate versus bubble point equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−0.01×10−3 (bubble point)+1.3, more preferably equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−0.01×10−3 (bubble point)+2.48, and even more preferably equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−0.01×10−3 (bubble point)+5.0.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, articles comprising porous PTFE membranes which are instantly wettable with water and which have a water flux rate versus bubble point equal to or above the line defined by the equation log(water flux rate)=−0.01×10−3 (bubble point)+1.3, more preferably by the equation log (water flux rate)=−0.01×10−3 (bubble point)+2.48, and most preferably by the equation log (water flux rate)=−0.01×10−3 (bubble point)+5.0 can be made in accordance with the present invention.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, articles comprising porous PTFE membranes having an oil rating of at least 2, more preferably at least 4, and even more preferably at least 5, and a water entry pressure above 500 kPa with a Gurley number up to 350 seconds can be made in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. In a further embodiment, such oleophobic membranes can be made with a water entry pressure above 1250 kPa and a Gurley number up to 200 seconds. In an even further embodiment, such oleophobic membranes can be made with a water entry pressure above 2000 kPa and a Gurley number up to 100 seconds.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, articles can be made with porous PTFE membranes having a light transmission of at least 50% and a Gurley versus bubble point equal to or below the line defined by the equation log (Gurley)=5.13×10−3 (bubble point)−1.22, more preferably equal to or below the line defined by the equation log (Gurley)=5.13×10−3 (bubble point)−1.58, and most preferably equal to or below the line defined by the equation log (Gurley)=5.13×10−3 (bubble point)−2.02.
  • Finally, filtering of fluids utilizing filters incorporating these unique membranes and composites, including venting material as well is contemplated herein.
  • These and other unique features of the invention are described herein.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 is a graph depicting Gurley number versus bubble point for porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus bubble point for porous PTFE membranes and composite membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus bubble point for hydrophilic porous PTFE membranes and composite membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph depicting water entry pressure versus Gurley number for oleophobic porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph depicting water entry pressure versus Gurley number for porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus mean flow pore size for porous PTFE membranes made in accordance with examples contained herein.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The porous PTFE articles of the present invention provide the surprising combination of high strength, low flow resistance, and small pore size. These articles fill needs for high-performance filtration media. Prior art materials suffer from either high flow resistance or low filtration efficiency or both in comparison to materials of the present invention. Materials of the present invention provide lower flow resistance with smaller pore size compared to prior art materials. The inventive materials have utility in both liquid and gas filtration applications.
  • The combination of low flow resistance and high water entry pressure makes the inventive materials suitable for use in gas venting applications, where the material allows gases and vapors to pass through while repelling liquid water or other liquids.
  • The inventive ePTFE articles can be rendered oleophobic by various techniques, thereby making them fit for use in certain venting applications where the material has high air flow and high water entry pressure and is resistant to penetration by low surface tension fluids like oil.
  • The inventive membranes can be rendered hydrophilic (water-wettable under little or no pressure) by various techniques making them usable in liquid filtration applications which involve, for example, filtration of aqueous fluids.
  • The porous PTFE membranes of this invention can be constructed as composite filters or composite vents, for example by layering the membrane with one or more additional layers that may provide support or protection to the membrane. The additional layer or layers can be in the form of one or more porous membranes or more traditional air permeable materials like knits, non-wovens, scrims, woven fabrics, etc. Depending on the end-use requirements, an additional layer or layers may be oriented on only one side or on both sides of the membrane. The additional layer or layers may or may not be bonded to the membrane, depending on the end-use requirements. For example, the membrane and additional layers may be loosely stacked, then held together by appropriate means around a perimeter of the filter, such as by a housing, a frame, a potting compound, an adhesive, or any other suitable means. Alternatively, the additional layer or layers may be attached to the membrane at a relatively few number of sites, e.g., via a suitable adhesive at locations around at least a portion of the perimeter, by a discontinuous lamination adhesive across the surface of the layers, or any other suitable configuration meeting the requirements of the end use application. Suitable adhesives can include, but are not limited to, polypropylenes, polyesters, polyethylenes, PFA, FEP, and other suitable forms of thermoplastics, thermosets, and the like. Benefits of composite filters and vents include, but are not limited to, improved handling of the membrane making it easier to fabricate filter cartridges or vents, improved filtration efficiency in some cases, and the like. In order to retain high flow properties of the membrane when used as a composite filter, the additional layers are typically chosen so as to minimize flow resistance. Also, the composite filters and vents can either be hydrophobic, oleophobic, or hydrophilic depending on the application in which they are used.
  • It is generally expected based on the teachings of the prior art that the more a PTFE material is expanded, the larger the pore size of the resulting PTFE structure. In the case of the present invention, however, it has been unexpectedly discovered that under certain conditions it is possible to achieve smaller pore sizes by increasing the amount of expansion. Even more surprising, this decrease in pore size is accompanied by an increase in the permeability of the membrane. The process results in a novel membrane structure that increases permeability while decreasing the effective pore size. Furthermore, the resulting membrane possesses high strength.
  • The unique combination of permeability and pore size properties of membranes of the present invention is demonstrated in the graphs shown in the Figures. In these graphs, permeability is characterized by Gurley number or water flux rate. Increased permeability is manifested by lower Gurley numbers (i.e., less time for a given volume of air to pass through the membrane at a given pressure), higher Frazier numbers (i.e., the flow rate of air through the membrane for a given pressure drop and sample area), and higher water flux rates. Pore size is characterized by the bubble point (BP), mean flow pore size, or water entry pressure (WEP) values. Higher bubble point values (the pressure required to pass a bubble of air through a wetted sample of membrane) and higher WEP values (the pressure required to drive water droplets through a membrane) indicate smaller pore sizes. Test methods for measuring Gurley number, Frazier number, water flux rate, WEP, mean flow pore size, and BP are provided herein in more detail.
  • FIGS. 1 through 6 show the characteristics of inventive articles compared to articles of the prior art. FIG. 1 depicts Gurley number and BP measurements for inventive and prior art membranes. The equation, log (Gurley (sec))=2.60×10−3 (BP (kPa))−0.54 describes the line drawn on the graph for a bubble point greater than 448 kPa. The data points for inventive materials fall on or below this line and those for prior art materials fall above this line. FIG. 2 depicts water flux rate and BP measurements for inventive and prior art materials. The equation, log (water flux rate (cm/min/kPa))=−3.5×10−3 (BP (kPa))+1.3, describes the line drawn on the graph. The data points for inventive materials fall on or above this line and those for prior art materials fall below this line. FIG. 3 depicts water flux rate and BP measurements for inventive and prior art hydrophilic materials. The equation, log (water flux rate (cm/min/kPa))=−0.01 (BP (kPa))+1.3, describes the line drawn on the graph. The data points for inventive materials fall on or above this line and those for prior art materials fall below this line. FIG. 4 depicts water entry pressure and Gurley number measurements for inventive and prior art oleophobic materials. The data points corresponding to inventive materials have water entry pressure values of 500 kPa or higher and Gurley numbers of 350 sec or lower. FIG. 5 depicts water entry pressure versus Gurley number for inventive and prior art membranes. The equation, WEP (kPa)=3 (Gurley (sec))+2500, describes the line drawn on the graph. The data points for inventive materials fall on or above this line, those for prior art materials fall below this line. FIG. 6 is a graph depicting water flux rate versus mean flow pore size for inventive and prior art membranes. The equation, log (water flux rate (cm/min/kPa))=16.9 (mean flow pore size (microns))-1.85, describes the line drawn on the graph. The data points for inventive materials fall on or above this line and those for prior art materials fall below this line.
  • In the equations provided above, Gurley number is expressed in units of seconds, BP in units of kPa, water flux rate in units of cm/min/kPa, water entry pressure in units of kPa, and mean flow pore size in units of microns. The logarithmic equations utilize log to the base 10.
  • In these six figures, the inventive articles exhibit higher permeability for a given pore size and a smaller pore size for a given permeability as compared to prior art articles.
  • The superior filtration properties of these novel membranes and composite articles are further enhanced by the high strength of the membranes. Not only are the present membranes strong, they are the strongest, balanced matrix tensile strength ePTFE articles ever produced. The balance of the strength of a membrane is indicated by how closely the ratio of the matrix tensile strengths of the membrane in two orthogonal directions approaches unity. Balanced membranes typically exhibit ratios of about 2 to 1 or less. Further, these membranes possess the largest product of matrix tensile strengths measured in two orthogonal directions. For example, the product of matrix tensile strengths in two orthogonal directions is greater than 1.3×105 MPa2 more preferably greater than 1.5×105 MPa2, and even more preferably greater than 1.9×105 MPa2. Orthogonal directions include, but are not limited to, longitudinal and transverse directions. The high strength is particularly valuable for filtration applications in which the membrane is not used in combination with an additional layer or layers. Higher strength also affords the use of thinner membranes. Thinner membranes present lower flow resistance than otherwise identical thicker membranes. The high strength also facilitates the lamination of the thin membrane to additional layers and also can improve in-use life of filter media in pleated forms. Furthermore, strong membranes better resist rupture in situations in which the filter is subjected to high pressures or pulses of pressure.
  • Yet another surprising aspect of the invention is the unprecedented high surface area of these novel membranes, as measured herein. Prior art ePTFE membranes are referred to as having surface area per mass values in the range of 10 to 19 m2/g. Some membranes of the present invention can be tailored to have a surface area at least as high as 20 to 27 m2/g.
  • Non-porous forms of PTFE and ePTFE allow significantly more visible light to pass though them than do porous, lower density forms. The index of refraction of PTFE (typically 1.3 to 1.4 depending on percent crystallinity of the PTFE) causes ePTFE materials to be diffusely reflective. Typically, these materials have light transmission values of less than 50%. Another feature of this invention is that membranes possessing high clarity can also be made which possess remarkably high degrees of porosity. For example, membranes of the present invention can have a light transmission of least 50% and a porosity of at least 50%. Light transmission values of 85% and higher are obtainable in membranes that are greater than 75% porous. Such materials have particular value in applications requiring the combination of transparency, or translucency, and permeability.
  • The present invention will be further described with respect to the non-limiting examples provided below.
  • EXAMPLES Testing Methods Utilized in the Examples Thickness Measurements
  • Membrane thickness was measured by placing the membrane between the two plates of a Kafer FZ1000/30 thickness snap gauge (Kafer Messuhrenfabrik GmbH, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany). The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Density Measurements
  • Samples die cut to form rectangular sections 2.54 cm by 15.24 cm were measured to determine their mass (using a Mettler-Toledo analytical balance modelAG204) and their thickness (using a Kafer FZ1000/30 snap gauge). Using these data, density was calculated with the following formula:
  • ρ = m w * l * t
  • in which: ρ=density (g/cc); m=mass (g); w=width (cm); I=length (cm); and t=thickness (cm). The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Tensile Break Load Measurements and Matrix Tensile Strength (MTS) Calculations
  • Tensile break load was measured using an INSTRON 1122 tensile test machine equipped with flat-faced grips and a 0.445 kN load cell. The gauge length was 5.08 cm and the cross-head speed was 50.8 cm/min. The sample dimensions were 2.54 cm by 15.24 cm. For longitudinal MTS measurements, the larger dimension of the sample was oriented in the machine, or “down web,” direction. For the transverse MTS measurements, the larger dimension of the sample was oriented perpendicular to the machine direction, also known as the cross web direction. Each sample was weighed using a Mettler Toledo Scale Model AG204, then the thickness of the samples was taken using the Kafer FZ1000/30 thickness snap gauge. The samples were then tested individually on the tensile tester. Three different sections of each sample were measured. The average of the three maximum load (i.e., the peak force) measurements was used. The longitudinal and transverse MTS were calculated using the following equation:

  • MTS=(maximum load/cross-section area)*(bulk density of PTFE)/density of the porous membrane),
  • wherein the bulk density of PTFE is taken to be 2.2 g/cc.
  • Ball Burst Strength Measurements
  • The test method and related sample mounting apparatus were developed by W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. for use with a Chatillon Test Stand. The test measures the burst strength of materials such as fabrics (woven, knit, nonwoven, etc.), porous or nonporous plastic films, membranes, sheets, etc., laminates thereof, and other materials in planar form.
  • A specimen was mounted taut, but unstretched, between two annular clamping plates with an opening of 7.62 cm diameter. A metal rod having a polished steel 2.54 cm diameter ball-shaped tip applied a load against the center of the specimen in the Z-direction (normal to the X-Y planar directions). The rod was connected at its other end to an appropriate Chatillon force gauge mounted in a Chatillon Materials Test Stand, Model No.TCD-200. The load was applied at the rate of 25.4 cm/minute until failure of the specimen occurred. The failure (tearing, burst, etc.) may occur anywhere within the clamped area. Results were reported as the average of three measurements of the maximum applied force before failure.
  • Testing was done at ambient interior temperature and humidity conditions, generally at a temperature of 21 to 24° C. and relative humidity of 35 to 55%. Ball burst data can be expressed as the ball burst strength as a function of mass per area of the sample; mass per area of the sample can be determined from the product of density and thickness of the sample.
  • Gurley Measurements
  • The Gurley air flow test measures the time in seconds for 100 cm3 of air to flow through a 6.45 cm2 sample at 12.4 cm of water pressure. The samples were measured in a Gurley Densometer Model 4340 Automatic Densometer. Articles possessing Gurley values less than about 2 seconds were submitted for Frazier number testing, since this test provides more reliable values for the characterization of highly permeable articles. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Frazier Measurements
  • The Frazier permeability reading is the rate of flow of air in cubic feet per square foot of sample area per minute at a differential pressure drop across the test sample of 12.7 mm water column. Air permeability was measured by clamping a test sample into a circular gasketed flanged fixture which provided a circular opening of 17.2 cm diameter (232 cm2 area). The upstream side of the sample fixture was connected to a flow meter in line with a source of dry compressed air. The downstream side of the sample fixture was open to the atmosphere. The flow rate through the sample was measured and recorded as the Frazier number. The average of the three measurements was used. Frazier number data can be converted to Gurley numbers by use of the following equation: Gurley=3.126/Frazier, in which Gurley number is expressed in units of seconds.
  • Water Flux Rate Measurement
  • The following procedure was used to calculate the water flux rate through the membrane. The membrane was either draped across the tester (Sterifil Holder 47 mm Catalog Number: XX11J4750, Millipore) or cut to size and laid over the test plate. The membrane was first wet out completely with 100% isopropyl alcohol. The tester was filled with de-ionized water (room temperature). A pressure of 33.87 kPa was applied across the membrane; the time for 400 cm3 of de-ionized water to flow through the membrane was measured. The water flux rate was then calculated using the following equation:

  • water flux rate [cm/min/kPa]=water flow rate [cm3/min]/sample area [cm2]/test pressure [kPa].
  • It should be noted that for hydrophilic membranes, the membrane was not pre-wet with isopropyl alcohol. The same procedure outlined above was used to measure water flux rate through composite filters. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Water Entry Pressure Measurement
  • Water entry pressure is a test method for measuring water intrusion through a membrane. A Mullen® Tester (Serial No: 8240+92+2949, manufactured by BF. Perkins, Chicopee, Mass., USA) was used. A test sample was clamped between a pair of testing fixtures made of 1.27 cm thick square plexiglass sheets, 10.16 cm long on each side. The lower fixture had the ability to pressurize a section of the sample with water. A piece of pH paper was placed on top of the sample to serve as an indicator of evidence for water entry. The sample was then pressurized in small increments of pressure until a color change in the pH paper was noticed. The corresponding breakthrough pressure or entry pressure was recorded as the water entry pressure. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Bubble Point Measurements
  • The bubble point and mean flow pore size were measured according to the general teachings of ASTM F316-03 using a Capillary Flow Porometer (Model CFP 1500 AEXL from Porous Materials Inc., Ithaca, N.Y.). The sample membrane was placed into the sample chamber and wet with SilWick Silicone Fluid (available from Porous Materials Inc.) having a surface tension of 19.1 dynes/cm. The bottom clamp of the sample chamber had a 2.54 cm diameter, 3.175 mm thick porous metal disc insert (Mott Metallurgical, Farmington, Conn., 40 micron porous metal disk) and the top clamp of the sample chamber had a 3.175 mm diameter hole. Using the Capwin software version 6.62.1 the following parameters were set as specified in the table immediately below. The values presented for bubble point and mean flow pore size were the average of two measurements.
  • Parameter Set Point
    maxflow (cc/m) 200000
    bublflow (cc/m) 100
    F/PT (old bubltime) 40
    minbppres (PSI) 0
    zerotime (sec) 1
    v2incr (cts) 10
    preginc (cts) 1
    pulse delay (sec) 2
    maxpre (PSI) 500
    pulse width (sec) 0.2
    mineqtime (sec) 30
    presslew (cts) 10
    flowslew (cts) 50
    eqiter 3
    aveiter 20
    maxpdif (PSI) 0.1
    maxfdif (cc/m) 50
    sartp (PSI) 1
    sartf (cc/m) 500
  • Light Transmission Measurements
  • A radiometer (Model IC 1700, International Light, Newburyport, Mass.) was used to measure the amount of light transmission through the samples of ePTFE membrane. A black tube, approximately the same diameter as the outer diameter of the light receiving sensor, Model SED 033, was clamped onto the light sensor and protruded approximately 13.3 cm from the receiving face of the sensor. The light source, a Sylvania Reflector 50 W, 120V bulb, was mounted directly across from the light sensor approximately 28.6 cm from the receiving face of the light sensor. The radiometer was calibrated by placing a cap over the end of the tube protruding from the light sensor to set the zero point, and removing the cap and turning on the light source with nothing between the light source and the light sensor to set the 100% point. After calibrating the radiometer, the ePTFE membrane was mounted into a 25.4 cm diameter embroidery hoop and held between the light source and the light sensor, approximately 7.6 cm from the light source. The percent transmission of light displayed on the IC 1700 radiometer was recorded. The average of the three measurements was used.
  • Surface Area Measurements
  • The surface area per unit mass, expressed in units of m2/g, of the ePTFE membrane was measured using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method on a Coulter SA3100 Gas Adsorption Analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, Calif.). A sample was cut from the center of the ePTFE membrane sheet and placed into a small sample tube (reference number 8201151). The mass of the ePTFE sample was approximately 0.1 to 0.2 grams. The tube was placed into the Coulter SA-Prep Surface Area Outgasser, (Model SA-PREP, P/N 5102014) from Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, Calif. and purged at 110 C for 2 hours with helium. The sample tube was then removed from the SA-Prep Outgasser and weighed. The sample tube was then placed into the SA3100 Gas Adsorption Analyzer and the BET surface area analysis was run in accordance with the instrument instructions using helium to calculate the free space and nitrogen as the adsorbate gas. A single measurement was recorded for each sample.
  • Porosity Calculations
  • Porosity was expressed in percent porosity and was determined by subtracting the quotient of the average density of the article (described earlier herein) and that of the bulk density of PTFE from 1, then multiplying that value by 100%. For the purposes of this calculation, the bulk density of PTFE was taken to be 2.2 g/cc.
  • Oil Repellency Measurement/Oil Rating
  • Oil rating was measured using the AATCC Test Method 118-1997. The oil rating of a membrane is the lower of the two ratings obtained when testing the two sides of the membrane. The higher the number, the better the oil repellency.
  • Water-Wettability Measurement
  • Water-wettability was measured in order to characterize the degree of hydrophilicity of a sample. The sample was held taught in a 10.16 cm diameter hoop. A single droplet of water was dropped from a height of 5 cm directly above the sample onto the sample. The time for the droplet to penetrate the pores of the sample was measured. The degree of water-wettability was defined using the following scale:
  • 0=water droplet penetrated the sample within 5 seconds
    1=water droplet penetrated the sample after greater than 5 seconds and less than
    60 seconds
    2=water drop did not penetrate the sample after 60 seconds.
  • Hydrophobic materials such as porous ePTFE materials possessing relatively small pores typically exhibit water-wettability ratings of 2. Materials exhibiting water-wettability ratings of 0 or 1 were considered to be instantly wettable.
  • Example 1
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer (Daikin Industries, Ltd., Orangeburg, N.Y.) was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder. The lubricated powder was compressed in a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried in an oven set at 270° C. The dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 340° C. The speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls, and hence the expansion ratio, was 8:1. The longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 320° C. to a ratio of 34:1 and then constrained and heated in an oven set at 320° C. for approximately 24 seconds. The process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1. The process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • TABLE 1
    Process Conditions & Example Example Example Example Example
    Intermediate Article Dimensions 1 2 3 4 5
    lubrication level (g/g of resin) 0.196 0.196 0.202 0.196 0.202
    pellet conditioning - time (hr) 12 12 12 12 12
    pellet conditioning - temperature set 70 70 70 70 70
    point (deg C.)
    tape width (cm) 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2
    tape thickness (mm) 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73
    number of tape layers 3 3 3 1 3
    calendered tape thickness (mm) 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.25 0.76
    transverse stretch ratio 3.7:1 3.7:1 3.7:1 3.7:1 3.7:1
    drying temperature set point (deg C.) 270 270 250 270 250
    expansion temperature set point (deg 340 340 345 345 345
    C.)
    longitudinal expansion ratio 8:1 13:1 15:1 15:1 20:1
    expansion temperature set point (deg 320 320 360 360 360
    C.)
    transverse expansion ratio 34:1 32:1 30:1 30:1 22:1
    heat treatment temperature set point 320 320 390 380 390
    (deg C.)
    heat treatment time (sec) 24 24 20 24 20
  • This membrane was then characterized by measuring various properties in the manners described above. Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2. Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 5. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6.
  • TABLE 2
    Membrane Property Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5
    density (g/cc) 0.357 0.339 0.348 0.294 0.358
    thickness (mm) 0.020 0.013 0.010 0.0025 0.0076
    longitudinal MTS 217 312 471 414 584
    (MPa)
    transverse MTS 214 249 289 460 229
    (MPa)
    product of longitudinal 46,570 77,568 136,042 190,562 133,539
    and transverse MTS
    (MPa{circumflex over ( )}2)
    ball burst strength (N) 21.3 18.0 45.4 16.5 35.1
    Gurley Number (sec) 11.1 7.6 12.5 2.1 7.3
    Bubble point (kPa) 647 564 877 605 764
    water flux rate 0.23 0.33 0.12 0.61 0.25
    (cm/min/kPa)
    mean flow pore size 0.056 0.065 0.05545 0.0765 0.0642
    (micron)
    water entry pressure 3111 2939 ≧4136
    (kPa)
    surface area (m{circumflex over ( )}2/g) 17.2 18.4 27.4 23.5
  • Example 2
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer (Daikin Industries, Ltd., Orangeburg, N.Y.) was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder. The lubricated powder was compressed in a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. The compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 270° C. The dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls in a heat zone set to a temperature of 340° C. The speed ratio between the second bank of rolls to the first bank of rolls, and hence the expansion ratio, was 13:1. The longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 320° C. to a ratio of 32:1 and then restrained and heated to 320° C. for approximately 24 seconds. The process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1. The process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • This membrane was then characterized by measuring various properties in the manners described above. Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2. Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 5. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6.
  • Example 3
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.202 g/g of fine powder. The lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 250° C. The dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 345° C. The speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 15:1. The longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 30:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 390° C. for approximately 20 seconds. The process produced a thin strong porous membrane. The process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • This membrane was then characterized by measuring various properties in the manners described above. Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Note that the water entry pressure was at least 4136 kPa because the tester was unable to measure higher than that. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6.
  • Example 4
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder. The lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. The compressed and heated pellet was ram extruded to produce a tape approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. The extruded tape was then rolled down between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.254 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 270° C. The dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 345° C. The speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 15:1. The longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 30:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 380° C. for approximately 24 seconds. The process produced a thin strong porous membrane. The process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • This membrane was then characterized by measuring various properties in the manners described above. Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Light transmission was measured to be 90%. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6.
  • Example 5
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.202 g/g of fine powder. The lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried at a temperature of 250° C. The dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls in a heat zone set to a temperature of 345° C. The speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 20:1. The longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 22:1 and then restrained and heated to 390° C. for approximately 20 seconds. The process produced a thin strong porous membrane. The process conditions and intermediate article dimensions for this example appear in Table 1.
  • This membrane was then characterized by measuring various properties in the manners described above. Membrane properties for the sample made in this example appear in Table 2. Gurley number and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 1. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 6.
  • Example 6
  • The membrane of Example 1 was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure. The membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter). A solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water. The hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute. The hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute. The solution temperature was maintained at 50 deg C. This was followed by a deionized water rinse for 1 minute. Finally, the sample was dried in an oven set to 150 deg C. The sample was removed from the oven when it was completely dry. The resulting sample was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic membrane made in this example were 697 kPa and 0.03 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3.
  • Example 7
  • The membrane of Example 2 was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure. The membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter). A solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water. The hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute. The hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), and 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute. The solution temperature was maintained at 50 deg C. This was followed by a deionized water rinse for 1 minute. Finally, the sample was dried in an oven set to 150 deg C. The sample was removed from the oven when it was completely dry. The resulting sample was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic membrane made in this example were 672 kPa and 0.05 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3.
  • Example 8
  • The membrane of Example 4 was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure. The membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter). A solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water. The hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute. The hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), and 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute. The solution temperature was maintained at 50 deg C. This was followed by a deionized water rinse for 1 minute. Finally, the sample was dried in an oven at 150 deg C. The sample was removed from the oven when it was completely dry. The resulting sample was instantaneously water-wettable, it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic membrane made in this example were 760 kPa and 0.1 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3.
  • Example 9
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer (Daikin Industries, Ltd., Orangeburg, N.Y.) was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder. The lubricated powder was compressed in a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. Compressed and heated pellets were ram extruded to produce tapes approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. Three separate rolls of tape were produced and layered together between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.76 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1), restrained, then dried in an oven set at 270° C. The dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 340° C. The expansion ratio was calculated as the ratio between the speeds of the two banks of rolls and was determined to be 25:1. The longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 20:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 390° C. for approximately 60 seconds. The process produced a thin strong porous membrane.
  • The membrane had the following properties: a thickness of 0.0051 mm, a density of 0.334 g/cc, longitudinal matrix tensile strength of 546 MPa, transverse matrix tensile strength of 276 MPa, ball burst strength of 22.7 N, Frazier number of 2.8, bubble point of 317 kPa, water flux rate of 1.72 cm/min/kPa, mean flow pore size of 0.101 microns, and a surface area of 24.8 m2/g. Water flux rate and BP data for this membrane appear in FIG. 2. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for this membrane appear in FIG. 6.
  • The membrane was treated to render it hydrophilic according to the following procedure. The membrane sample was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter). A solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water. The hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute. The hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), and 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute. The solution temperature was maintained at 50 deg C. This was followed by a deionized water rinse for 1 minute. Finally, the sample was dried in an oven set to 150 deg C. The sample was removed from the oven when it was dry. The resulting sample was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic membrane made in this example were 312 kPa and 0.42 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the treated membrane of this example appear in FIG. 3.
  • Example 10
  • The hydrophilic membrane of Example 7 was constructed as a composite hydrophilic filter by layering the membrane between two other layers.
  • These outer layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40 which were subsequently hydrophilized. These two layers served as cover layers (i.e., a layer which covers at least a portion of the surface of the membrane); they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant assembled composite hydrophilic filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the hydrophilic membrane of Example 7. The outer, or cover, layer membranes were rendered hydrophilic using the following procedure. Each cover layer membrane was held taut in a hoop (10.16 cm diameter). A solution was prepared by dissolving 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Catalog Number 363170, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol/deionized water. The hoop was immersed in this solution for 1 minute and then rinsed in deionized water for another minute. The hoop was then immersed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Catalog Number 340855, Sigma-Aldrich Co), and 1% hydrochloric acid (Catalog Number 435570, Sigma-Aldrich Co) in deionized water for 1 minute. The solution temperature was maintained at 50 deg C. This was followed by a deionized water rinse for 1 minute. Finally, each cover layer was dried in an oven set to 150 deg C. The sample was removed from the oven when it was dry.
  • At this point, the composite hydrophilic filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the hydrophilic membrane of Example 7 between the two hydrophilic cover membranes. Thus, the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic composite were 678 kPa and 0.06 cm/min/kPa, respectively. The composite was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3. Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 7) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Example 11
  • The hydrophilic membrane of Example 8 was constructed as a composite hydrophilic filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These two outer, or cover, layers were created in the same manner as described in Example 10.
  • The composite hydrophilic filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the hydrophilic membrane of Example 8 between the two hydrophilic cover membranes. Thus, the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values of the hydrophilic composite made in this example were 705 kPa and 0.09 cm/min/kPa, respectively. The composite was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3. Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 8) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Example 12
  • The hydrophilic membrane of Example 9 was used to construct a composite hydrophilic filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These two outer, or cover, layers were created in the same manner as described in Example 10.
  • At this point, the composite hydrophilic filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the hydrophilic membrane of Example 9 between the two hydrophilic cover membranes. During testing, the edges of the composite were clamped, as appropriate, to perform the test. Thus, the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. The composite was instantaneously water-wettable, as it exhibited a water-wettability rating of 0. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 3. Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 9) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Example 13
  • The membrane of Example 1 was treated to render it oleophobic according to the teachings of Example 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,650. The resulting membrane had an oil rating of 3. Water entry pressure and Gurley values for the oleophobic membrane made in this example were 2447 kPa and 34 sec, respectively. Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 4.
  • Example 14
  • The membrane of Example 2 was treated to render it oleophobic according to the teachings of Example 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,650. This membrane had an oil rating of 3. Water entry pressure and Gurley values for the oleophobic membrane made in this example were 2530 kPa and 22 sec, respectively. Water entry pressure and Gurley number data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 4.
  • Example 15
  • The membrane of Example 2 was used to construct a composite filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These two outer, or cover, layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40. These two layers served as cover layers; they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant composite filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the membrane of Example 2.
  • The composite filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the membrane of Example 2 between the two cover membranes. Thus, the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values for the composite filter were 556 kPa and 0.37 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2. Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 2) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Example 16
  • The membrane of Example 4 was used to construct a composite filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These outer layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40. These two layers served as cover layers; they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant composite filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the membrane of Example 4.
  • The composite filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration the membrane of Example 4 between the two cover membranes. Thus, the composite filter consisted of three layers loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values for the composite filter were 575 kPa and 0.66 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the sample of this example appear in FIG. 2. Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane (of Example 4) used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • Example 17
  • Fine powder of PTFE polymer as described and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,541,589 was blended with Isopar K (Exxon Mobil Corp., Fairfax, Va.) in the proportion of 0.196 g/g of fine powder. The lubricated powder was compressed into a cylinder to form a pellet and placed into an oven set at 70° C. for approximately 12 hours. The compressed and heated pellet was ram extruded to produce a tape approximately 15.2 cm wide by 0.73 mm thick. The extruded tape was then rolled down between compression rolls to a thickness of 0.19 mm. The tape was then transversely stretched to 56 cm (i.e., at a ratio of 3.7:1) then dried at a temperature of 250° C. The dry tape was longitudinally expanded between banks of rolls over a heated plate set to a temperature of 340° C. The speed ratio between the second bank of rolls and the first bank of rolls was 20:1. The longitudinally expanded tape was then expanded transversely at a temperature of approximately 360° C. to a ratio of 20:1 and then restrained and heated in an oven set at 400° C. for approximately 180 seconds.
  • The process produced a thin strong porous membrane. The membrane had the following properties: a thickness of 0.0025 mm, a density of 0.180 g/cc, longitudinal matrix tensile strength of 609 MPa, transverse matrix tensile strength of 220 MPa, ball burst strength of 3.6 N, Frazier number of 6.1, bubble point of 337 kPa, water flux rate of 2.49 cm/min/kPa, mean flow pore size of 0.085 microns, and a light transmission of 92%. Water flux rate and mean flow pore size data for this membrane appear in FIG. 6.
  • This membrane was used to construct a composite filter by layering the membrane between two other layers. These outer layers were ePTFE membranes possessing a Frazier number of 40. These two layers served as cover layers; they had very high fluid permeability such that the resultant composite filter possessed essentially the same permeability as the membrane made earlier in this example.
  • The composite filter was assembled by orienting in a layered, but unbonded, configuration this membrane between the two cover membranes. Thus, the composite filter consisted of three layers were loosely stacked on top of each other. The edges of the composite were sealed as needed in the test fixtures. Bubble point and water flux rate values for the composite filter were 374 kPa and 1.92 cm/min/kPa, respectively. Water flux rate and BP data for the membrane and the composite article of this example appear in FIG. 2. Note the proximity of the data point for the composite article relative to the data point for the membrane used in constructing the composite. The similar properties of the membrane and the composite attest to how well the properties of the membrane made in this example can be preserved in the final composite article.
  • While the invention has been disclosed herein in connection with certain embodiments and detailed descriptions, it will be clear to one skilled in the art that modifications or variations of such detail can be made without deviating from the spirit of the invention, and such modifications or variations are considered to be within the scope of the claims herein.

Claims (21)

1. An article comprising an expanded PTFE membrane having a membrane surface area of at least 17 m2/g.
2. The article of claim 1, wherein said PTFE membrane has a light transmission through the membrane of greater than 50%.
3. The article of claim 1, wherein the PTFE membrane surface area is at least 20 m2/g.
4. The article of claim 1, wherein the PTFE membrane surface area is at least 23 m2/g.
5. An article comprising an expanded PTFE membrane having a light transmission through the membrane of at least 50% and a porosity of at least 50%.
6. The article of claim 5, wherein the expanded PTFE membrane has a light transmission through the membrane of at least 85% and a porosity of at least 75%.
7. An article comprising an expanded PTFE membrane having a water entry pressure versus Gurley equal to or above the line defined by the equation WEP=3(Gurley)+2500.
8. The article of claim 7, wherein the expanded PTFE membrane has a water entry pressure equal to or above the line defined by the equation WEP=3(Gurley)+2900.
9. The article of claim 7, further comprising at least one additional layer selected from the group consisting of non-woven, scrim and fabric.
10. The article of claim 7, further comprising at least one additional layer on each side of the PTFE membrane.
11. The article of claim 10, wherein said at least one additional layer comprises at least one porous membrane.
12. The article of claim 11, wherein said at least one additional layer comprises ePTFE.
13. The article of claim 7 in the form of a filter.
14. The article of claim 7 in the form of a vent.
15. The article of claim 7 in the form of a filter cartridge.
16. An article comprising expanded PTFE membrane which is instantly wettable with water, said membrane having a water flux rate versus bubble point equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−0.01 (bubble point)+1.3.
17. The article of claim 16, having a water flux rate versus bubble point equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−0.01 (bubble point)+2.48.
18. The article of claim 16 in the form of a filter cartridge.
19. An article comprising an expanded PTFE membrane having a water flux rate versus bubble point equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−3.5×10−3 (bubble point)+1.3 and a surface area of at least 17 m2/g.
20. The article of claim 19, wherein the water flux rate versus bubble point is equal to or above the line defined by the equation log (water flux rate)=−3.5×10−3 (bubble point)+1.6.
21. The article of claim 19 in the form of a filter cartridge.
US12/137,195 2005-07-18 2008-06-11 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom Abandoned US20080237116A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/137,195 US20080237116A1 (en) 2005-07-18 2008-06-11 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18470605A 2005-07-18 2005-07-18
US11/334,243 US7306729B2 (en) 2005-07-18 2006-01-18 Porous PTFE materials and articles produced therefrom
US11/931,890 US20080053892A1 (en) 2005-07-18 2007-10-31 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom
US12/137,195 US20080237116A1 (en) 2005-07-18 2008-06-11 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/931,890 Division US20080053892A1 (en) 2005-07-18 2007-10-31 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080237116A1 true US20080237116A1 (en) 2008-10-02

Family

ID=36941976

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/334,243 Active US7306729B2 (en) 2005-07-18 2006-01-18 Porous PTFE materials and articles produced therefrom
US11/931,890 Abandoned US20080053892A1 (en) 2005-07-18 2007-10-31 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom
US12/137,195 Abandoned US20080237116A1 (en) 2005-07-18 2008-06-11 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom
US12/211,311 Active US8757395B2 (en) 2005-07-18 2008-09-16 Porous PTFE materials and articles produced therefrom

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/334,243 Active US7306729B2 (en) 2005-07-18 2006-01-18 Porous PTFE materials and articles produced therefrom
US11/931,890 Abandoned US20080053892A1 (en) 2005-07-18 2007-10-31 Porous PTFE Materials and Articles Produced Therefrom

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/211,311 Active US8757395B2 (en) 2005-07-18 2008-09-16 Porous PTFE materials and articles produced therefrom

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (4) US7306729B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1907105B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5054007B2 (en)
KR (2) KR101014700B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2007011492A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140021145A1 (en) * 2012-06-21 2014-01-23 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Filtration Article With Fluoropolymer Knit
US20140120287A1 (en) * 2012-10-30 2014-05-01 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Sleeve for medical device assembly

Families Citing this family (244)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8603609B2 (en) * 2009-11-16 2013-12-10 The Glad Products Company Discontinuously laminated film
US9486977B2 (en) 2012-07-18 2016-11-08 The Glad Products Company Multi-ply puckered films formed by discontinuous lamination of films having different rebound ratios
US9604429B2 (en) 2010-11-16 2017-03-28 The Glad Products Company Ribbed film structures with pigment created visual characteristics
US8865294B2 (en) 2012-10-25 2014-10-21 The Glad Products Company Thermoplastic multi-ply film with metallic appearance
US9566760B2 (en) 2010-11-16 2017-02-14 The Glad Products Company Ribbed film structures with voiding agent created visual characteristics
US8734016B2 (en) 2012-03-28 2014-05-27 The Glad Products Company Incrementally-stretched thermoplastic films with enhanced look and feel and methods for making the same
US9393757B2 (en) 2010-11-16 2016-07-19 The Glad Products Company Discontinuously laminated film structures with improved visual characteristics
DE102005043791A1 (en) * 2005-09-13 2007-03-15 Mann + Hummel Gmbh Device for cleaning air
US20080125711A1 (en) 2006-08-07 2008-05-29 Alpini Alfred A Catheter balloons with integrated non-distensible seals
US20080140173A1 (en) * 2006-08-07 2008-06-12 Sherif Eskaros Non-shortening wrapped balloon
US9180279B2 (en) * 2006-08-07 2015-11-10 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Inflatable imbibed polymer devices
US8460240B2 (en) * 2006-08-07 2013-06-11 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Inflatable toroidal-shaped balloons
US20080097300A1 (en) * 2006-08-07 2008-04-24 Sherif Eskaros Catheter balloon with multiple micropleats
US7785290B2 (en) 2006-08-07 2010-08-31 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Non-shortening high angle wrapped balloons
SG182176A1 (en) * 2007-07-03 2012-07-30 Sumitomo Elec Fine Polymer Inc Flat sheet membrane element for filtration and flat sheet membrane filtration module
US20090053103A1 (en) * 2007-08-20 2009-02-26 William Patrick Mortimer Non-linting sterilization packaging material
JP5207694B2 (en) * 2007-09-20 2013-06-12 日本ゴア株式会社 Stretched porous polytetrafluoroethylene film laminated gasket sheet and gasket composed of this gasket sheet
US8926688B2 (en) 2008-01-11 2015-01-06 W. L. Gore & Assoc. Inc. Stent having adjacent elements connected by flexible webs
US20090252926A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-08 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Thin-walled calendered ptfe
US20090259246A1 (en) * 2008-04-14 2009-10-15 Sherif Eskaros Intragastric Volume-Occupying Device
EP3058981B1 (en) 2008-06-04 2019-11-13 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Introducer sheath valve assembly for medical procedures
US20090319034A1 (en) * 2008-06-19 2009-12-24 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc METHOD OF DENSIFYING ePTFE TUBE
US20100068431A1 (en) * 2008-09-17 2010-03-18 Vishal Bansal Article and method for forming an article
US9637278B2 (en) * 2008-10-20 2017-05-02 The Glad Products Company Non-continuously laminated multi-layered bags with ribbed patterns and methods of forming the same
US8888365B2 (en) 2009-11-16 2014-11-18 The Glad Products Company Non-continuously laminated multi-layered bags
US20130268062A1 (en) 2012-04-05 2013-10-10 Zeus Industrial Products, Inc. Composite prosthetic devices
CN104178926B (en) 2009-01-16 2018-02-09 Zeus工业品公司 Electrospun is carried out to PTFE using heavy viscous material
US8118910B2 (en) * 2009-03-23 2012-02-21 General Electric Company Layered filtration membrane and methods of making same
US9139669B2 (en) 2009-03-24 2015-09-22 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Expandable functional TFE copolymer fine powder, the expandable functional products obtained therefrom and reaction of the expanded products
US8658707B2 (en) 2009-03-24 2014-02-25 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Expandable functional TFE copolymer fine powder, the expanded functional products obtained therefrom and reaction of the expanded products
US20100280200A1 (en) 2009-03-24 2010-11-04 Poddar Tarun K Water Permeable Fluoropolymer Articles
WO2010117845A2 (en) 2009-04-06 2010-10-14 Entegris, Inc. Non-dewetting porous membranes
US8163662B2 (en) * 2009-05-13 2012-04-24 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Lightweight, durable enclosures and laminates for making the same
US9006117B2 (en) 2009-05-13 2015-04-14 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Lightweight, durable apparel and laminates for making the same
US9084447B2 (en) 2009-05-13 2015-07-21 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Lightweight, durable apparel and laminates for making the same
EP2461766A4 (en) 2009-08-07 2013-09-18 Zeus Ind Products Inc Prosthetic device including electrostatically spun fibrous layer and method for making the same
US8794835B2 (en) * 2009-09-03 2014-08-05 The Glad Products Company Draw tape bag
JP2013505824A (en) 2009-09-24 2013-02-21 ゴア エンタープライズ ホールディングス,インコーポレイティド Integrity test method for porous filters
US8296970B2 (en) 2009-09-29 2012-10-30 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Waterproof breathable footwear having hybrid upper construction
US8474120B2 (en) * 2009-10-09 2013-07-02 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Bifurcated highly conformable medical device branch access
US8673440B2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2014-03-18 Bha Altair, Llc Porous membrane
US9108390B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2015-08-18 The Glad Products Company Incrementally-stretched thermoplastic films and bags with increased haze
US9114596B2 (en) 2009-11-16 2015-08-25 The Glad Products Company Incrementally-stretched adhesively-laminated films and methods for making the same
US9469443B2 (en) 2010-09-14 2016-10-18 The Glad Products Company Multilayer plastic film
US10780669B2 (en) 2009-11-16 2020-09-22 The Glad Products Company Films and bags with visually distinct regions and methods of making the same
US8940377B2 (en) 2009-11-16 2015-01-27 The Glad Products Company Multi-layered bags with discrete non-continuous lamination
US11345118B2 (en) 2009-11-16 2022-05-31 The Glad Products Company Films and bags with visually distinct regions and methods of making the same
US9186862B2 (en) 2009-11-16 2015-11-17 The Glad Products Company Multi-layered lightly-laminated films and methods of making the same
US10293981B2 (en) 2009-11-16 2019-05-21 The Glad Products Company Non-continuously laminated structures of thermoplastic films with differing material compositions and functional material properties
WO2011116338A1 (en) * 2010-03-19 2011-09-22 Vinperfect, Inc. Oxygen regulation mechanism for a beverage gasket
JP5470140B2 (en) 2010-03-31 2014-04-16 富士フイルム株式会社 Crystalline polymer microporous membrane and filter for filtration
US9944044B2 (en) 2010-05-06 2018-04-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Contamination resistant air permeable fabric laminate and garments made therefrom
US20140367023A1 (en) * 2010-05-27 2014-12-18 W. L. Gore & Associates, Co., Ltd. Expanded Porous Polytetrafluoroethylene Film-Laminated Sheet, and Gasket Composed of Said Sheet
JP5595802B2 (en) * 2010-06-15 2014-09-24 日東電工株式会社 Polytetrafluoroethylene porous membrane having low elongation anisotropy and method for producing the same
US9132616B2 (en) * 2010-08-31 2015-09-15 Bha Altair, Llc Multi-layer composite membrane materials and methods therefor
EP3058878B1 (en) 2010-09-09 2019-07-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Method of increasing film tear strength
EP2613734A2 (en) 2010-09-09 2013-07-17 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Surgical mesh
US8808848B2 (en) 2010-09-10 2014-08-19 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Porous article
US9839540B2 (en) 2011-01-14 2017-12-12 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Stent
US10166128B2 (en) 2011-01-14 2019-01-01 W. L. Gore & Associates. Inc. Lattice
JP2012176361A (en) 2011-02-25 2012-09-13 Sumitomo Electric Fine Polymer Inc Porous multilayered filter
US9021865B1 (en) * 2011-03-02 2015-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Apparatus and method for measuring permeation of contaminants through protective materials
US9801712B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2017-10-31 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Coherent single layer high strength synthetic polymer composites for prosthetic valves
US8945212B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2015-02-03 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Durable multi-layer high strength polymer composite suitable for implant and articles produced therefrom
US9554900B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2017-01-31 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Durable high strength polymer composites suitable for implant and articles produced therefrom
US8961599B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2015-02-24 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Durable high strength polymer composite suitable for implant and articles produced therefrom
US9744033B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2017-08-29 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Elastomeric leaflet for prosthetic heart valves
US20130197631A1 (en) 2011-04-01 2013-08-01 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Durable multi-layer high strength polymer composite suitable for implant and articles produced therefrom
CA2832730C (en) 2011-04-25 2018-11-13 The Glad Products Company Multi-layered films with visually-distinct regions and methods of making the same
CN103648750B (en) 2011-04-25 2016-08-24 格拉德产品公司 There is thermoplastic film and the manufacture method thereof of the most different stretch zones
US20130004690A1 (en) 2011-06-29 2013-01-03 Mikhael Michael G Hydrophilic expanded fluoropolymer composite and method of making same
JP5985279B2 (en) * 2011-07-05 2016-09-06 日東電工株式会社 Method for producing polytetrafluoroethylene porous membrane
BR112014002174B1 (en) 2011-07-29 2020-12-01 University Of Pittsburgh Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education heart valve structure, multi-membrane heart valve structure and method for making a heart valve structure
US9554806B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2017-01-31 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Occlusive devices
JP6039673B2 (en) 2011-09-23 2016-12-07 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティドW.L. Gore & Associates, Incorporated Surface-modified fluoropolymer membrane and method for producing the same
US8726917B2 (en) * 2011-10-04 2014-05-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Stretch floss band
US9808605B2 (en) 2011-10-06 2017-11-07 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Controlled porosity devices for tissue treatments, methods of use, and methods of manufacture
US9730726B2 (en) 2011-10-07 2017-08-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Balloon assemblies having controllably variable topographies
US10343085B2 (en) 2011-10-14 2019-07-09 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Multilayer porous composite
US20130112621A1 (en) 2011-11-03 2013-05-09 Lei Zheng Water filtration article and related methods
US9510935B2 (en) 2012-01-16 2016-12-06 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Articles including expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes with serpentine fibrils and having a discontinuous fluoropolymer layer thereon
WO2013109337A1 (en) * 2012-01-16 2013-07-25 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Articles including expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes with serpentine fibrils and having a discontinuous fluoropolymer layer thereon
BR112014019005A8 (en) * 2012-02-02 2017-07-11 Nano Now Pty Ltd METHOD; AND COATED MATERIAL
US9594010B1 (en) * 2012-02-24 2017-03-14 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Apparatus and method for measuring permeation of contaminants through protective materials
US9775933B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2017-10-03 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Biocompatible surfaces and devices incorporating such surfaces
US8715391B2 (en) 2012-04-10 2014-05-06 Milliken & Company High temperature filter
US8790432B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2014-07-29 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Seam-sealed filters and methods of making thereof
WO2013168203A1 (en) * 2012-05-08 2013-11-14 日東電工株式会社 Porous polytetrafluoroethylene film and waterproof air-permeable member
KR101984884B1 (en) 2012-07-23 2019-06-03 더블유.엘. 고어 앤드 어소시에이트스, 인코포레이티드 Filtration article with fluoropolymer knit
US9283072B2 (en) 2012-07-25 2016-03-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Everting transcatheter valve and methods
US10376360B2 (en) 2012-07-27 2019-08-13 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Multi-frame prosthetic valve apparatus and methods
JP6099330B2 (en) * 2012-08-02 2017-03-22 日本バイリーン株式会社 filter
US20140142682A1 (en) 2012-08-10 2014-05-22 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc Implantable biocompatible tubular material
US9038773B2 (en) * 2012-08-20 2015-05-26 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Acoustic cover assembly
US9145469B2 (en) 2012-09-27 2015-09-29 Ticona Llc Aromatic polyester containing a biphenyl chain disruptor
US9480953B2 (en) 2012-10-17 2016-11-01 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Composite filter media for fuel streams
US9631589B2 (en) * 2012-10-17 2017-04-25 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Fuel filter monitor for fuel streams
US9931193B2 (en) 2012-11-13 2018-04-03 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Elastic stent graft
PL2742820T3 (en) 2012-12-14 2015-10-30 Gore W L & Ass Gmbh Monofilament footwear lining
EP4123294A1 (en) 2012-12-18 2023-01-25 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. An optical analytical device
US10321986B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2019-06-18 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Multi-frame prosthetic heart valve
US10966820B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2021-04-06 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Geometric control of bending character in prosthetic heart valve leaflets
US10039638B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2018-08-07 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Geometric prosthetic heart valves
US10279084B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2019-05-07 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Medical balloon devices and methods
US9398952B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2016-07-26 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Planar zone in prosthetic heart valve leaflet
US9737398B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2017-08-22 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Prosthetic valves, frames and leaflets and methods thereof
US9144492B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2015-09-29 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Truncated leaflet for prosthetic heart valves, preformed valve
US9968443B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2018-05-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Vertical coaptation zone in a planar portion of prosthetic heart valve leaflet
US9101469B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2015-08-11 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Prosthetic heart valve with leaflet shelving
US9573339B2 (en) 2013-01-18 2017-02-21 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Low gloss, air permeable, abrasion resistant, printable laminate containing an asymmetric membrane and articles made therefrom
WO2015116045A1 (en) 2014-01-29 2015-08-06 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Elastic stent graft
EP4094725A1 (en) 2013-03-08 2022-11-30 Carnegie Mellon University Expandable implantable conduit
CN105188788A (en) 2013-03-13 2015-12-23 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Durable multi-layer high strength polymer composite suitable for implant and articles produced therefrom
CN105188782B (en) 2013-03-13 2017-11-17 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Elastomer leaflet for prosthetic heart valve
WO2014163795A1 (en) 2013-03-13 2014-10-09 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Durable high strength polymer composites suitable for implant and articles produced therefrom
US11167063B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2021-11-09 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Porous composites with high-aspect ratio crystals
WO2014149295A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-25 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Prosthetic heart valve leaflet adapted for external imaging
US11911258B2 (en) 2013-06-26 2024-02-27 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Space filling devices
EP2839949B1 (en) 2013-08-23 2016-10-12 W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH Process for the production of a structured film
EP3036028B1 (en) 2013-08-23 2022-03-02 American Air Filter Company, Inc. Canister filter with prefiltration
CA2922694C (en) 2013-08-29 2017-12-05 Teleflex Medical Incorporated High-strength multi-component suture
US20150096933A1 (en) 2013-10-07 2015-04-09 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Filtration Article Having Thermoplastic Filled Edges
JP5849148B2 (en) 2013-11-29 2016-01-27 旭化成イーマテリアルズ株式会社 Polymer electrolyte membrane
EP3075768A4 (en) 2013-11-29 2017-06-21 Daikin Industries, Ltd. Biaxially-oriented porous film
EP3065209B1 (en) 2013-11-29 2019-04-10 Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha Polymer electrolyte film
EP3053937B1 (en) 2013-11-29 2019-02-27 Daikin Industries, Ltd. Modified polytetrafluoroethylene fine powder and uniaxially oriented porous body
JP5862751B2 (en) 2013-11-29 2016-02-16 ダイキン工業株式会社 Porous body, polymer electrolyte membrane, filter medium for filter and filter unit
US10842918B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2020-11-24 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Length extensible implantable device and methods for making such devices
US9814560B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2017-11-14 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Tapered implantable device and methods for making such devices
US9504565B2 (en) 2013-12-06 2016-11-29 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Asymmetric opening and closing prosthetic valve leaflet
US10369524B2 (en) 2014-01-06 2019-08-06 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Autogenous cleaning filtration method and device
KR101564759B1 (en) * 2014-02-04 2015-11-02 한국과학기술연구원 Separation Membrame for Membrane Distillation
US20150230553A1 (en) 2014-02-14 2015-08-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Gmbh Conformable Booties, Shoe Inserts, and Footwear Assemblies Made Therewith, and Waterproof Breathable Socks
CA2939235A1 (en) 2014-02-14 2015-08-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Conformable seamless shoe inserts and footwear assemblies and methods therefor
US20150230554A1 (en) 2014-02-14 2015-08-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Gmbh Conformable Booties, Shoe Inserts, and Waterproof Breathable Socks Containing an Integrally Joined Interface
CA2939240A1 (en) 2014-02-14 2015-08-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Conformable seamless booties and footwear assemblies, and methods and lasts therefor
WO2015123485A1 (en) 2014-02-14 2015-08-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Conformable shoe inserts with integrally joined interfaces and footwear assemblies, and methods therefor
EP2937004A1 (en) 2014-04-24 2015-10-28 W.L. Gore & Associates (UK) Ltd. Garment with air ventilating system
JP6338054B2 (en) 2014-05-30 2018-06-06 住友電工ファインポリマー株式会社 Method for producing porous filter
US9737855B2 (en) 2014-06-17 2017-08-22 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Filtration article containing a filtration material containing fibrous layers having different lengths
US20160376144A1 (en) * 2014-07-07 2016-12-29 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Apparatus and Method For Protecting a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System
US9895243B2 (en) 2014-07-17 2018-02-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Stent having adjacent elements connected by narrow flexible webs
US20160016126A1 (en) * 2014-07-21 2016-01-21 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc Fluoropolymer Article For Bacterial Filtration
US20160016124A1 (en) * 2014-07-21 2016-01-21 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Fluoropolymer Article for Mycoplasma Filtration
AU2015305868B2 (en) 2014-08-18 2018-09-20 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Frame with integral sewing cuff for prosthetic valves
CN109940933A (en) 2014-09-12 2019-06-28 哥伦比亚运动休闲北美公司 Fabric with waterproof barrier
US20160075914A1 (en) 2014-09-12 2016-03-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Porous Air Permeable Polytetrafluoroethylene Composites with Improved Mechanical and Thermal Properties
US10189231B2 (en) 2014-09-12 2019-01-29 Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. Fabric having a waterproof barrier
US9862859B2 (en) 2014-09-12 2018-01-09 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Porous air permeable polytetrafluoroethylene composites with improved mechanical and thermal properties
US9827094B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2017-11-28 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Prosthetic heart valve with retention elements
US20160096127A1 (en) 2014-10-07 2016-04-07 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Filtration Article with Heat-Treated and Shrunken Fluoropolymer Knit
US10507101B2 (en) 2014-10-13 2019-12-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Valved conduit
US9802384B2 (en) 2014-11-07 2017-10-31 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Fire retardant laminates
JP2017536232A (en) 2014-11-20 2017-12-07 インテグリス・インコーポレーテッド Grafted ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene microporous membrane
US9731239B2 (en) 2014-12-15 2017-08-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Fluoropolymer article for bacterial filtration
US9855141B2 (en) 2014-12-18 2018-01-02 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Prosthetic valves with mechanically coupled leaflets
CR20170313A (en) 2014-12-18 2017-08-29 Gore & Ass PROSTHETIC VALVES WITH MECHANICALLY COUPLED VALVES
US10367217B2 (en) 2015-02-09 2019-07-30 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Membrane electrode assembly manufacturing process
BR112017016552A2 (en) 2015-02-13 2018-04-10 Gore & Ass ? high strength single layer synthetic polymer composites for prosthetic valves?
EP3061598B1 (en) 2015-02-24 2019-04-03 W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH Process for the formation of a porous film assembly
US11136697B2 (en) * 2015-03-16 2021-10-05 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Fabrics containing conformable low density fluoropolymer fiber blends
CA2986047C (en) 2015-05-14 2020-11-10 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Devices and methods for occlusion of an atrial appendage
CA2985477C (en) 2015-06-05 2020-03-10 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. A low bleed implantable prosthesis with a taper
US10110981B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2018-10-23 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Vibro acoustic cover using expanded PTFE composite
US10525376B2 (en) 2015-07-20 2020-01-07 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Affinity chromatography devices
US10526367B2 (en) 2015-07-20 2020-01-07 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Affinity chromatography devices
JP2018522686A (en) 2015-08-13 2018-08-16 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティドW.L. Gore & Associates, Incorporated Booties and footwear assemblies comprising seamless stretchable films and methods therefor
CN108135302A (en) 2015-08-19 2018-06-08 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Compliance seamless three-dimensional product and the method for the product
CN105137660A (en) * 2015-09-25 2015-12-09 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 Device and method for removing impurities in optical alignment film
US10022223B2 (en) 2015-10-06 2018-07-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Leaflet support devices and methods of making and using the same
KR102569879B1 (en) * 2015-11-24 2023-08-24 닛토덴코 가부시키가이샤 Waterproof sound-permeable membrane, waterproof sound-permeable member and electronic device
US11000370B2 (en) 2016-03-02 2021-05-11 Peca Labs, Inc. Expandable implantable conduit
CN109069949B (en) 2016-04-08 2021-03-16 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Affinity chromatography device
CN109069257B (en) 2016-04-21 2021-08-24 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Adjustable diameter endoprosthesis and related systems and methods
EP3284985B1 (en) 2016-08-17 2020-01-08 W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH Check valve
WO2018049600A1 (en) 2016-09-14 2018-03-22 W.L. Gore & Associates Gmbh Assembly for protecting acoustic device
JP6861493B2 (en) * 2016-09-30 2021-04-21 日東電工株式会社 Air filter filter media, air filter pack and air filter unit
KR102451680B1 (en) 2016-10-04 2022-10-07 더블유.엘. 고어 앤드 어소시에이트스, 인코포레이티드 stretch laminate
US10610357B2 (en) 2016-10-10 2020-04-07 Peca Labs, Inc. Transcatheter stent and valve assembly
JP7245158B2 (en) 2016-10-21 2023-03-23 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティド Acoustic protective cover assembly including shrink membrane material
US11406533B2 (en) 2017-03-17 2022-08-09 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Integrated aqueous shunt for glaucoma treatment
WO2018185183A1 (en) 2017-04-04 2018-10-11 W. L. Gore & Associates Gmbh Dielectric composite with reinforced elastomer and integrated electrode
US11724075B2 (en) 2017-04-18 2023-08-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Deployment constraining sheath that enables staged deployment by device section
US10952842B2 (en) 2017-06-07 2021-03-23 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Prosthetic valve with improved washout
WO2018231232A1 (en) 2017-06-15 2018-12-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Highly reinforced ionomer membranes for high selectivity and high strength
AU2018334191B2 (en) 2017-09-12 2021-04-08 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Leaflet frame attachment for prosthetic valves
DE112017008059B4 (en) 2017-09-19 2024-02-29 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. ACOUSTIC PROTECTIVE COVER INCLUDING A HARDENABLE BACKING LAYER
CN111163728B (en) 2017-09-27 2022-04-29 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Prosthetic valve with mechanically coupled leaflets
CN111132636B (en) 2017-09-27 2022-04-08 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Prosthetic valves with expandable frames and associated systems and methods
US11278219B2 (en) 2017-09-29 2022-03-22 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Fluid handling detectors
EP3694445A1 (en) 2017-10-13 2020-08-19 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Telescoping prosthetic valve and delivery system
US11173023B2 (en) 2017-10-16 2021-11-16 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Medical devices and anchors therefor
JP7052032B2 (en) 2017-10-31 2022-04-11 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティド Medical valves and valve membranes that promote inward tissue growth
CA3158944A1 (en) 2017-10-31 2019-05-09 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Valved conduit
CA3078473C (en) 2017-10-31 2023-03-14 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Transcatheter deployment systems and associated methods
US11154397B2 (en) 2017-10-31 2021-10-26 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Jacket for surgical heart valve
JP2021500963A (en) 2017-10-31 2021-01-14 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティドW.L. Gore & Associates, Incorporated Synthetic prosthetic valve leaflet
JP7227240B2 (en) 2017-10-31 2023-02-21 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティド artificial heart valve
CN111344372A (en) 2017-11-01 2020-06-26 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Protective cover assembly with improved Z strength
CA3082518C (en) 2017-12-20 2023-04-11 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Sutures and related medical devices
EP3673528A1 (en) 2017-12-22 2020-07-01 W. L. Gore & Associates Inc Catalyst ink containing a c5-c10 alcohol or carboxylic acid, and mea manufacturing process
JP7085022B2 (en) 2018-05-08 2022-06-15 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティド Flexible and extensible printed circuit on extensible substrate
KR20210006963A (en) 2018-05-08 2021-01-19 더블유.엘. 고어 앤드 어소시에이트스, 인코포레이티드 Durable flexible printed circuits on stretchable and non-stretchable substrates
KR102612806B1 (en) 2018-05-08 2023-12-11 더블유.엘. 고어 앤드 어소시에이트스, 인코포레이티드 Flexible printed circuits for skin attachment
CA3103272C (en) 2018-06-14 2023-09-19 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Epitheliazing microporous biomaterial for use in avascular environments and in corneal implants
CA3105184C (en) 2018-07-27 2023-09-26 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Integral composite membrane with a continuous ionomer phase
CA3114181C (en) 2018-10-05 2023-12-05 Michael E. Kennedy Structured dense fluoropolymer films and methods of making same
KR102218062B1 (en) 2018-10-18 2021-02-19 주식회사 엘지화학 Porous fluorine resin film and method for preparing the same
USD977642S1 (en) 2018-10-29 2023-02-07 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Pulmonary valve conduit
US20220032209A1 (en) 2018-11-05 2022-02-03 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Spiral wound protein separation device
USD926322S1 (en) 2018-11-07 2021-07-27 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Heart valve cover
US11678983B2 (en) 2018-12-12 2023-06-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Implantable component with socket
WO2020131752A1 (en) * 2018-12-17 2020-06-25 Donaldson Company, Inc. Porous ptfe membrane
WO2020131107A1 (en) 2018-12-21 2020-06-25 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Systems and methods for fuel tank draining and polishing
US11497601B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2022-11-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Telescoping prosthetic valve with retention element
US10835704B1 (en) * 2019-05-15 2020-11-17 Applied Research Associates, Inc. Reusable respiratory protection device
WO2020243668A1 (en) 2019-05-31 2020-12-03 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Cell encapsulation devices with controlled oxygen diffusion distances
CA3139585C (en) 2019-05-31 2024-01-23 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. A biocompatible membrane composite
EP3976236A1 (en) 2019-05-31 2022-04-06 W.L. Gore & Associates Inc. A biocompatible membrane composite
JP2022534545A (en) 2019-05-31 2022-08-01 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティド biocompatible membrane composite
US20220320558A1 (en) 2019-06-06 2022-10-06 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Method of wetting low surface energy substrate and a system therefor
US20230081107A1 (en) * 2019-06-13 2023-03-16 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Lightweight expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes having high instrinsic strength and optical transparency
JP2022551953A (en) 2019-10-14 2022-12-14 ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエイツ,インコーポレイティド Acoustic composites containing stiffening polymers, devices and assemblies containing them
US20230002614A1 (en) 2019-12-13 2023-01-05 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Reinforced biopolymers
WO2021150564A1 (en) 2020-01-21 2021-07-29 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Endoprostheses with interlocking stents having varying stiffness
TW202200259A (en) 2020-05-08 2022-01-01 日商科慕 三井氟產品股份有限公司 Porous membrane of polytetrafluoroethylene and/or modified polytetrafluoroethylene having high strength and small pore diameter
US11417311B2 (en) 2020-08-03 2022-08-16 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Acoustically resistive supported membrane assemblies including at least one support structure
US20230369621A1 (en) 2020-08-19 2023-11-16 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Improved electrochemical membrane
KR20230054448A (en) 2020-08-27 2023-04-24 더블유.엘. 고어 앤드 어소시에이트스, 인코포레이티드 Composite fluoropolymer membranes with different surface energies
CN116033949A (en) 2020-09-11 2023-04-28 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Affinity chromatography device comprising fibrillated heat treated polymer membrane and collector comprising the same
WO2022126134A1 (en) 2020-12-11 2022-06-16 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Apparatuses, methods and systems that include a synthetic material for ophthalmic surgeries
JP2022117687A (en) 2021-02-01 2022-08-12 三井・ケマーズ フロロプロダクツ株式会社 Porous membrane prepared by stretching heat-treated sheet comprising polytetrafluoroethylene and/or modified polytetrafluoroethylene
WO2022167628A1 (en) 2021-02-04 2022-08-11 W. L. Gore & Associates Gmbh Garments including electronic panels
DE102021002460A1 (en) 2021-05-08 2022-11-10 Maike Wallnig Air filter system for a transport trailer for people, in particular for children and babies, which can be attached to a bicycle, and for a cargo bike with a passenger transport cabin
WO2022251195A1 (en) 2021-05-24 2022-12-01 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Photoluminescent composites and processes for fabricating the same
WO2022251197A1 (en) 2021-05-24 2022-12-01 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Dense photoluminescent composites and processes for fabricating the same
CN117500956A (en) 2021-06-14 2024-02-02 W.L.戈尔及同仁股份有限公司 Improved electrochemical membranes
KR20240022549A (en) 2021-06-14 2024-02-20 더블유. 엘. 고어 앤드 어소시에이트스, 인코포레이티드 Polyelectrolyte membranes, membrane electrode assemblies, and redox flow batteries
WO2023091369A1 (en) 2021-11-19 2023-05-25 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Poly(ionic liquid)s composite for absorption and separation
EP4218981A1 (en) 2022-02-01 2023-08-02 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Affinity chromatography devices containing a fibrillated polymer membrane for the separation of mrna and viral vectors from an aqueous mixture
EP4218980A1 (en) 2022-02-01 2023-08-02 W.L. Gore & Associates Inc. Affinity chromatography devices containing a heat treated fibrillated polymer membrane for the separation of mrna and viral vectors from an aqueous mixture
WO2023154249A1 (en) 2022-02-11 2023-08-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Structurally reinforced ferroelectric articles of manufacture and methods of making and using the same
WO2023196756A1 (en) 2022-04-04 2023-10-12 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Protected acoustic transducer
EP4258683A1 (en) 2022-04-04 2023-10-11 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Protected acoustic transducer

Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3953566A (en) * 1970-05-21 1976-04-27 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Process for producing porous products
US4613441A (en) * 1980-05-15 1986-09-23 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Thermoplastic resin porous membrane having an increased strength factor
US4902423A (en) * 1989-02-02 1990-02-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Highly air permeable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes and process for making them
US5234739A (en) * 1991-07-23 1993-08-10 Daikin Industries Ltd. Polytetrafluoroethylene porous film and preparation and use thereof
US5362553A (en) * 1987-01-05 1994-11-08 Tetratec Corporation Microporous waterproof and moisture vapor permeable fabric
US5403524A (en) * 1993-03-16 1995-04-04 Buerger; Wolfgang Porous polytetrafluoroethylene and a process for the production thereof
US5451453A (en) * 1992-06-09 1995-09-19 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Supports having azlactone-functional surfaces, adduct supports, and methods of preparing both
US5476589A (en) * 1995-03-10 1995-12-19 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Porpous PTFE film and a manufacturing method therefor
US5547551A (en) * 1995-03-15 1996-08-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Ultra-thin integral composite membrane
US5599614A (en) * 1995-03-15 1997-02-04 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Integral composite membrane
US5834528A (en) * 1994-04-28 1998-11-10 Daikin Industries Ltd. Polytetrafluoroethylene porous composite film
US5838406A (en) * 1995-08-29 1998-11-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Light reflectant surface of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene with nodes and fibrils for backlit liquid crystal displays
US6103172A (en) * 1998-04-07 2000-08-15 Pall Corporation Method of preparaing a porous polytetrafluoroethylene membranne
US6130175A (en) * 1997-04-29 2000-10-10 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Integral multi-layered ion-exchange composite membranes
US6143675A (en) * 1995-06-07 2000-11-07 W. L. Gore & Associates (Uk) Ltd. Porous composite
US6196708B1 (en) * 1998-05-14 2001-03-06 Donaldson Company, Inc. Oleophobic laminated articles, assemblies of use, and methods
US6199979B1 (en) * 1997-01-21 2001-03-13 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Ink filter element for printers
US6235377B1 (en) * 1995-09-05 2001-05-22 Bio Med Sciences, Inc. Microporous membrane with a stratified pore structure created in situ and process
USRE37701E1 (en) * 1994-11-14 2002-05-14 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Integral composite membrane
US6541589B1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-04-01 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Tetrafluoroethylene copolymer
US6545589B1 (en) * 1984-09-14 2003-04-08 Aspect Communications Corporation Method and apparatus for managing telecommunications
US6582223B2 (en) * 2000-11-24 2003-06-24 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Pickup apparatus for semiconductor chips
US6676993B2 (en) * 1999-02-12 2004-01-13 Bha Technologies, Inc. Porous membrane structure and method
US6737158B1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2004-05-18 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Porous polymeric membrane toughened composites
US6825865B2 (en) * 2002-01-18 2004-11-30 Rohm Co., Ltd. Printhead with liquid crystal shutter

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4596837A (en) * 1982-02-22 1986-06-24 Daikin Industries Ltd. Semisintered polytetrafluoroethylene article and production thereof
JPS59109506A (en) * 1982-12-14 1984-06-25 Daikin Ind Ltd Novel fine polytetrafluoroethylene powder
JP2533229B2 (en) * 1989-09-12 1996-09-11 住友電気工業株式会社 Polytetrafluoroethylene porous body and method for producing the same
JPH0689165B2 (en) * 1990-01-29 1994-11-09 ダイキン工業株式会社 Polytetrafluoroethylene porous membrane and method for producing the same
JPH0774290B2 (en) * 1990-05-18 1995-08-09 ジャパンゴアテックス株式会社 Hydrophilic porous fluororesin material
JP3358828B2 (en) * 1991-07-04 2002-12-24 日本バルカー工業株式会社 Polytetrafluoroethylene porous membrane and method for producing the same
JPH07178318A (en) * 1993-12-24 1995-07-18 Nitto Denko Corp Circulating and filtering method of liquid filter
US5476889A (en) * 1995-01-05 1995-12-19 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Curable sealer and/or adhesive composition, and a method for coating same in a dry state with automotive paint, and coated substrates formed therewith
US5814405A (en) * 1995-08-04 1998-09-29 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Strong, air permeable membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene
KR100591061B1 (en) * 1998-10-01 2006-06-19 토넨 케미칼 코퍼레이션 Microporous Polyolefin Membrane, and Method of Producing the same
JP2001000844A (en) * 1999-06-24 2001-01-09 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd Porous filter and its production
JP2002035558A (en) * 2000-07-24 2002-02-05 Nitto Denko Corp Liquid-resistant air filter and method for manufacturing the same
JP3580790B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2004-10-27 宇明泰化工股▲ふん▼有限公司 Asymmetric porous polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and method for producing the same

Patent Citations (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4187390A (en) * 1970-05-21 1980-02-05 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Porous products and process therefor
US3953566A (en) * 1970-05-21 1976-04-27 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Process for producing porous products
US4613441A (en) * 1980-05-15 1986-09-23 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Thermoplastic resin porous membrane having an increased strength factor
US6545589B1 (en) * 1984-09-14 2003-04-08 Aspect Communications Corporation Method and apparatus for managing telecommunications
US5362553A (en) * 1987-01-05 1994-11-08 Tetratec Corporation Microporous waterproof and moisture vapor permeable fabric
US4902423A (en) * 1989-02-02 1990-02-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Highly air permeable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes and process for making them
US5234739A (en) * 1991-07-23 1993-08-10 Daikin Industries Ltd. Polytetrafluoroethylene porous film and preparation and use thereof
US5451453A (en) * 1992-06-09 1995-09-19 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Supports having azlactone-functional surfaces, adduct supports, and methods of preparing both
US5403524A (en) * 1993-03-16 1995-04-04 Buerger; Wolfgang Porous polytetrafluoroethylene and a process for the production thereof
US5426128A (en) * 1993-03-16 1995-06-20 Buerger; Wolfgang Porous polytetrafluoroethylene and a process for the production thereof
US5834528A (en) * 1994-04-28 1998-11-10 Daikin Industries Ltd. Polytetrafluoroethylene porous composite film
USRE37701E1 (en) * 1994-11-14 2002-05-14 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Integral composite membrane
US5476589A (en) * 1995-03-10 1995-12-19 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Porpous PTFE film and a manufacturing method therefor
US5599614A (en) * 1995-03-15 1997-02-04 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Integral composite membrane
US5547551A (en) * 1995-03-15 1996-08-20 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Ultra-thin integral composite membrane
US6143675A (en) * 1995-06-07 2000-11-07 W. L. Gore & Associates (Uk) Ltd. Porous composite
US5838406A (en) * 1995-08-29 1998-11-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Light reflectant surface of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene with nodes and fibrils for backlit liquid crystal displays
US6235377B1 (en) * 1995-09-05 2001-05-22 Bio Med Sciences, Inc. Microporous membrane with a stratified pore structure created in situ and process
US6199979B1 (en) * 1997-01-21 2001-03-13 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Ink filter element for printers
US6130175A (en) * 1997-04-29 2000-10-10 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Integral multi-layered ion-exchange composite membranes
US6274043B1 (en) * 1998-04-07 2001-08-14 Pall Corporation Porous polytetrafluoroethylene membrane
US6103172A (en) * 1998-04-07 2000-08-15 Pall Corporation Method of preparaing a porous polytetrafluoroethylene membranne
US6196708B1 (en) * 1998-05-14 2001-03-06 Donaldson Company, Inc. Oleophobic laminated articles, assemblies of use, and methods
US6582113B2 (en) * 1998-05-14 2003-06-24 Donaldson Company, Inc. Oleophobic laminated articles, assemblies of use, and methods
US6676993B2 (en) * 1999-02-12 2004-01-13 Bha Technologies, Inc. Porous membrane structure and method
US6582223B2 (en) * 2000-11-24 2003-06-24 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Pickup apparatus for semiconductor chips
US6541589B1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-04-01 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Tetrafluoroethylene copolymer
US6825865B2 (en) * 2002-01-18 2004-11-30 Rohm Co., Ltd. Printhead with liquid crystal shutter
US6737158B1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2004-05-18 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Porous polymeric membrane toughened composites

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140021145A1 (en) * 2012-06-21 2014-01-23 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Filtration Article With Fluoropolymer Knit
US10350529B2 (en) * 2012-06-21 2019-07-16 Entegris, Inc. Filtration article with fluoropolymer knit
US20140120287A1 (en) * 2012-10-30 2014-05-01 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Sleeve for medical device assembly
US10010654B2 (en) * 2012-10-30 2018-07-03 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Sleeve for medical device assembly
US10675388B2 (en) 2012-10-30 2020-06-09 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Sleeve for medical device assembly
US11266769B2 (en) 2012-10-30 2022-03-08 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Sleeve for medical device assembly
US11918708B2 (en) 2012-10-30 2024-03-05 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Sleeve for medical device assembly

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8757395B2 (en) 2014-06-24
KR20080041202A (en) 2008-05-09
JP5054007B2 (en) 2012-10-24
KR101049212B1 (en) 2011-07-14
US20080053892A1 (en) 2008-03-06
US20070012624A1 (en) 2007-01-18
EP1907105B1 (en) 2017-05-17
KR101014700B1 (en) 2011-02-16
JP2009501632A (en) 2009-01-22
EP1907105A1 (en) 2008-04-09
WO2007011492A1 (en) 2007-01-25
US7306729B2 (en) 2007-12-11
KR20100098573A (en) 2010-09-07
US20090032470A1 (en) 2009-02-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7306729B2 (en) Porous PTFE materials and articles produced therefrom
KR101480926B1 (en) Porous article with fused thermoplastic particles
EP2152395B1 (en) Porous composite venting element
JP3390004B2 (en) Dioxol / TFE copolymer composition
RU2527989C2 (en) Soil-resistant, breathable fabric laminate material and clothes from it
US7846238B2 (en) Method of manufacturing porous polytetrafluoroethylene membrane, filter medium, and filter unit
EP0808648A1 (en) Porous polytetrafluoroethylene membrane, process for producing the same and its use as air filter material
KR100429718B1 (en) Air filter medium, air filter pack and air filter unit using the same and method of manufacturing the air filter medium
KR20010074698A (en) Laminate product, pulse jet filter bag, and methods for manufacturing
CN101242889A (en) Porous PTFE materials and articles produced therefrom
JPH09206568A (en) Material for air filter
EP1022130B1 (en) Laminate and its use as container
WO1996014913A1 (en) Hydrophilized filter cartridge and process for making same
WO2023091369A1 (en) Poly(ionic liquid)s composite for absorption and separation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GORE ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:027906/0508

Effective date: 20120130