US20090224146A1 - Apparatus and Method for Determining Thermal Neutron Capture Cross Section of a Subsurface Formation From a Borehole Using Multiple Detectors - Google Patents
Apparatus and Method for Determining Thermal Neutron Capture Cross Section of a Subsurface Formation From a Borehole Using Multiple Detectors Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090224146A1 US20090224146A1 US11/835,241 US83524107A US2009224146A1 US 20090224146 A1 US20090224146 A1 US 20090224146A1 US 83524107 A US83524107 A US 83524107A US 2009224146 A1 US2009224146 A1 US 2009224146A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- measurements
- measurement
- detector
- source
- detectors
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V5/00—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity
- G01V5/04—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging
- G01V5/08—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays
- G01V5/10—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays using neutron sources
- G01V5/101—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays using neutron sources and detecting the secondary Y-rays produced in the surrounding layers of the bore hole
- G01V5/102—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for well-logging using primary nuclear radiation sources or X-rays using neutron sources and detecting the secondary Y-rays produced in the surrounding layers of the bore hole the neutron source being of the pulsed type
Abstract
A well logging instrument including a plurality of detectors having different precisions and accuracies, the more precise detectors generally having lower accuracies. The detectors are responsive to the interaction of radiation from a suitable source on the instrument with earth formations. Outputs from the plurality of detectors are smoothed and combined to provide processed measurements with improved accuracy and precision.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/955,867, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,253,402, which claimed priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/507,383.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The invention is related to the field of pulsed neutron well logging. More specifically, the invention is an apparatus and method for improving accuracy and precision of capture cross-section measurements.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- Pulsed neutron well logging instruments are known in the art for determining the macroscopic thermal neutron capture cross-section of earth formations penetrated by a wellbore. Typical pulsed neutron instruments include a controllable source of high-energy neutrons and one or more gamma ray radiation detectors positioned at spaced apart locations from the neutron source. The source is periodically activated to emit controlled-duration “bursts” of high-energy neutrons into the earth formations surrounding the well borehole. These neutrons interact with the atomic nuclei of the materials in the earth formations, losing energy with each interaction until the neutrons reach the thermal energy level (defined as having a most likely energy of about 0.025 electron volts). Depending on the material composition of the earth formations proximal to the instrument, the thermal neutrons can be absorbed (captured), at various rates by certain types of atomic nuclei in the earth formations. When one of these atomic nuclei captures a thermal neutron, it emits a gamma ray, which is referred to as a “capture gamma ray”.
- The rate at which the capture gamma rays are emitted, with respect to the elapsed time after the end of the neutron “burst” depends on, among other things, the relative concentration per unit volume in the earth formations of those atomic nuclei which have a relatively large tendency to absorb thermal neutrons and emit capture gamma rays in response. This tendency is referred to as the thermal neutron capture cross-section.
- The capture cross section, designated as Σ, of the formation is determined by sending a burst of neutrons from the tool and watching the decline of the gamma ray count rate with time as the neutrons are captured by the surrounding materials (neutron capture) and as they diffuse farther away (neutron diffusion). Σ is inferred from this observed decline in the gamma ray count rate versus time. However, in addition to the neutron capture, two key environmental effects contribute to the observed decline, or decay rate: diffusion and the so-called “borehole contamination.” These effects need to be carefully characterized in order to determine the correct Σ throughout the wide range of operating conditions typically encountered in the oilfield. These effects are controlled by parameters which include borehole size, casing size, casing weight, borehole fluid salinity, porosity, and lithology.
- Some approaches to handling these environmental effects have been described in the prior art literature. See, for e.g., Steinman, et al. “Dual-Burst Thermal Decay Time Logging Principles,” 1986 SPE Annual Technical conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, La., (Oct. 5-8, 1986), paper SPE 15437; Smith, et al., “Obtaining Intrinsic Formation Capture Cross Sections with Pulsed Neutron Capture Logging Tools,” Transactions of the 29th Annual SPWLA Symposium, San Antonio, Tex. (Jun. 5-8, 1988), paper SS; Murdoch, et al., “Diffusion Corrections to Pulsed Neutron Capture Logs: Methodology,” Transactions of the 31st Annual SPWLA Symposium, Lafayette, La. (Jun. 24-27, 1990), paper Q; and Odom et al., “Quantitative Use of Computer Models in Calibration of the Computalog Pulsed Neutron Thermal Decay, Transactions of the 33rd Annual SPWLA Logging Symposium, Oklahoma City, Okla. (Jun. 14-17, 1992), paper P.
- Under certain wellbore conditions, it is difficult to determine the fractional saturation of oil or gas by processing the capture gamma ray measurements according to methods known in the art for determining the thermal neutron capture cross-section, ΣF, of the earth formation of interest. Several factors contribute to this difficulty. First, the well logging instrument is typically inserted into a wellbore which is filled with liquid. At the time the pulsed neutron instrument is typically used, the wellbore generally has inserted therein a steel liner or casing. The liner or casing is generally held in place by cement filling the annular space between the wellbore wall and the exterior of the liner or casing. As high-energy neutrons leave the neutron source in the logging instrument, the mud in the wellbore has the effect of rapidly moderating (or slowing down) the high-energy neutrons to the thermal level due to of the high concentration of hydrogen nuclei in the mud.
- In general, the relative numbers of thermal neutrons (“population”) at any particular time after a neutron burst, or thermal neutrons in the wellbore and in the earth formations proximal to the wellbore, will depend on the porosity and on the hydrogen nucleus concentration within the earth formation. This population can be “captured,” or absorbed by nuclei of various chemical elements in the wellbore and formations, at a rate which depends upon the relative concentration and on the thermal neutron capture cross-section of these elements. In wellbores and in earth formations, some of the more common elements having high thermal neutron cross-sections include chlorine, hydrogen, iron, silicon, calcium, boron, and sulfur. As determined from measurements of capture gamma rays made by the well logging instrument, the thermal neutron decay time (neutron lifetime), represents combined effects of the thermal neutron capture cross-section in each of several regions within the wellbore as well as in the earth formations proximal to the wellbore. These regions include the instrument itself, the fluid in the wellbore, the steel casing, the cement, the earth formations radially proximal to the wellbore wall (which may have been infiltrated by fluid from within the wellbore), and the earth formations radially more distal from the wellbore wall (which have minimal infiltration from the fluid in the wellbore).
- Several prior art are aimed at improving measurements in capture cross-section logging. A method and apparatus employing a source and two detectors are discussed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,645,926 and 4,656,354, both issued to Randall. A subsurface instrument includes a long-spaced (LS) and short-spaced (SS) detector for detecting natural or induced gamma ray emissions from subsurface formations. The detectors produce electrical pulses, with each pulse corresponding in time with the incidence of a corresponding gamma ray on the detector and having an analog voltage amplitude correlative of the gamma ray. A method is discussed in Randall '354 for determining presence of a gas by comparing first and second parameters obtained at the detectors. The first parameter is indicative of a count of detected impingements of primarily inelastic gamma radiation upon a detector. The second parameter is indicative of a count of detected impingements of primarily capture gamma radiation upon a detector. Randall '926 discusses a method of determining a parameter of the borehole, wherein primarily inelastic gamma radiation is normalized upon impingement on a detection means.
- In U.S. Pat. No. 4,668,863, issued to Gray, et al., an apparatus is used to analyze and process parameters including, for example, the macroscopic thermal neutron absorption capture cross-section of the formation at borehole elevations corresponding to the locations from which such spectra are derived. For acquiring temporal spectral data, a multi-channel scale section is provided which includes a channel number generator which produces a numerical sequence of memory address codes corresponding to a sequence of adjacent time windows. A suitable memory device is part of the downhole apparatus. Each code uniquely defines a start time, whereby the windows collectively comprise the time interval of the desired spectrum. Each time a gamma ray pulse is detected, the memory address generated at that time addresses a corresponding memory location and increments the count value resident therein. At the conclusion of the time spectrum interval of interest, the memory locations may be interrogated by the CPU and the resultant spectral data analyzed, transmitted to the surface, or presented visually as a gamma ray emission count versus time plot. Correlation is made of detection signals in response to impingement of gamma radiation upon first and second detectors.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,321, issued to Schmidt, discusses a method for determining the fractional amounts and the thermal neutron capture cross-sections of various regions in a wellbore and regions in earth formations in the vicinity of the wellbore, each having a distinct mean neutron decay time or macroscopic thermal neutron capture cross-section. The method includes generating a data kernel which is made up of representors (models), or potential decay components of the wellbore and of the earth formations in the vicinity of the wellbore. A thermal neutron decay spectrum is measured by a pulsed neutron instrument including a controllable source of high-energy neutrons and one or more gamma ray detectors at spaced-apart locations from the source. The decay spectrum measured by the instrument is inverted to determine model parameters by which the individual representors are scaled so that when combined, the scaled representors most closely match the measured decay spectrum.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,298, issued to Mickael, discusses a method for determining the oil saturation in an earth formation penetrated by a wellbore. Measurement of the relative amounts of carbon and oxygen in the wellbore and formation are made by spectral analysis of neutron-induced inelastic gamma rays detected from the earth formation at spaced-apart locations. The method includes calculating an apparent oil holdup in the wellbore at each one of the spaced-apart locations from the measurements of the relative amounts of carbon and oxygen. A corrected oil holdup is calculated in the wellbore from differences between the apparent holdups determined at each of the spaced-apart locations. An apparent oil saturation in the formation is determined at each of the spaced-apart locations from the relative amounts of carbon and oxygen and the corrected oil holdup. A corrected formation oil saturation is determined from differences between the apparent oil saturations at each of the spaced apart locations.
- Plasek et al., 1995, “Improved Pulsed Neutron Capture Logging With Slim Carbon-Oxygen Tools: Methodology,” SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, Dallas, Tex., Oct. 22-25, 1995, paper SPE 30598, discusses a method of carbon-oxygen ratio determination using a reservoir saturation tool for determining physical parameters of a formation. In one embodiment of the tool, the source and detectors are cylindrically symmetrical. In an alternate embodiment of the tool, the short-spaced detector is positioned so as to face toward the borehole while the long-spaced detector is positioned against a face of the borehole wall so as to receive signals from inside a formation layer.
- A need exists for improving a precision and accuracy of parameter estimation obtained from earth formations. The present invention fulfills this need.
- The present invention is a method and apparatus for determining a parameter of interest of an earth formation with a logging tool having a source for irradiating said earth formation and a plurality of detectors spaced apart from the source for making measurements resulting from interaction of the radiation with the earth formation. The parameter of interest may be a density or porosity of the earth formation. In one embodiment of the invention, a first and second set of measurements are made with first and second detectors. The first detector has a higher precision, higher resolution, and lower accuracy than the second detector. The measurements of the first and second detectors are combined to give measurements with improved accuracy and precision. The combination is effected after filtering the first detector measurements to match the resolution of the second detector. A normalization factor for the first detector measurements is derived from the combined measurement, and then applied to the first detector measurements. A similar method is used when three detectors of varying accuracy and precision are used for making measurements. In another aspect, the invention is a system that includes a conveyance device such as a wireline or a drilling tubular for conveying a logging tool into a borehole, the logging tool having a source for irradiating said earth formation and a plurality of detectors spaced apart from the source for making measurements resulting from interaction of the radiation with the earth formation.
- The present invention is best understood with reference to the attached drawings in which like numerals refer to like elements, and in which:
-
FIG. 1 shows an illustration of an apparatus suitable for use with the present invention; -
FIG. 2 (prior art) is an overall schematic diagram of the nuclear well logging system of the present invention; and -
FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of the method of the present invention. -
FIG. 1 shows an illustration of an apparatus suitable for use with the present invention. The apparatus illustrated is that of the Reservoir Performance Monitor (RPM) of Baker Atlas, Incorporated. Ameasurement device 100 comprises aneutron source 101 and three axially spaced apart detectors described below. The number of detectors shown in the embodiment ofFIG. 1 is only example of the number of detectors employed in an embodiment of the present invention. It is not a limitation on the scope of the present invention. The measurement device of the present invention may comprise two or more detectors. Theneutron source 101 may be pulsed at different frequencies and modes for different types of measurements. Detector short-spaced (SS)detector 105 is closest to thesource 101 The long-spaced (LS) detector is denoted by 106, and thefurthest detector 107 is referred to as the extra-large spaced (XLS) detector. Fast neutrons (approximately 14 MeV) are emitted from thesource 101 and enter the borehole and formation, where they undergo several types of interactions. During the first few microseconds (μs), before they lose much energy, some neutrons are involved in inelastic scattering with nuclei in the borehole formation and produce gamma rays. Theseinelastic gamma rays 120, have energies that are characteristic of the atomic nuclei that produced them. The atomic nuclei found in this environment include, for example, carbon, oxygen, silicon, calcium, and some others. - Two or more gamma-ray detectors are employed, in one or more modes of operation. Such modes include, but are not limited to, a pulsed neutron capture mode, a pulsed neutron spectrometry mode, a pulsed neutron holdup imager mode, and a neutron activation mode. In a pulsed neutron capture mode, for example, the tool pulses at 1 kHz, and records a complete time spectrum for each detector. An energy spectrum is also recorded for maintaining energy discrimination levels. Time spectra from short-spaced and long-spaced detectors can be processed individually to provide traditional thermal neutron capture cross section information, or the two spectra can be used together to automatically correct for borehole and diffusion effects and produce results substantially approximating intrinsic formation values.
- In a pulsed neutron spectrometry mode, the instrument pulses at 10 kHz, for example, and records full inelastic and capture gamma ray energy spectra from each detector. These data are processed to determine critical elemental ratios including carbon/oxygen and calcium/silicon from the inelastic spectra and silicon/calcium from the capture spectra. A pulsed neutron holdup imager mode yields both energy spectra and time decay spectra from each detector simultaneously. Measurements can be used to determine holdups of gas, oil, and water. When combined with other production logs, the measurements made herein can provide a comprehensive production profile picture, even in deviated or horizontal wells. A neutron activation mode provides water-flow measurements using one of several data acquisition methods. Stationary measurements are made in either of two modes, and measurements at different logging speeds can be used to segregate different flow rates in either an annulus or in an adjacent tubing string. Various spectra of count rates from these can be used either individually or in combination as needed for each measurement mode.
- With the neutron generator turned off, the measurement apparatus can also be used to detect the distribution of materials, tagged with radioactive tracers, that are injected into the well during well treatments. In this manner, the effectiveness of operations such as hydraulic fracturing or gravel pack placement can be evaluated.
- In an embodiment of the present invention, a pulsed neutron generator with improved reliability and higher output is coupled with high-speed downhole microprocessor-controlled drivers and detector electronics. The system supports multiple frequency operation and different detection gate timings to make the different measurements. The modes of operation can be selected from the surface with no need to pull the tool out of the well.
- After just a few μs, most of the neutrons are slowed by either inelastic or elastic scattering until they reach thermal energies, about 0.025 eV. This process is illustrated schematically in
FIG. 1 as the sequence ofsolid arrows 110. At thermal energies, neutrons continue to undergo elastic collisions, but they no longer lose energy on average. A few μs after the neutron generator shuts off, this process is complete. Over the next several hundred μs, thermal neutrons are captured by nuclei of various elements—again producing gammas rays, known ascapture gamma rays 130. A capture gamma ray energy spectrum yields information about the relative abundances of these elements. - The rate at which the thermal neutron population is captured can be determined from the total number of capture gamma rays recorded as a function of time. This time decay spectrum can provide information about those elements with large cross sections for (or high probabilities of) thermal neutron capture.
- Typically, the precision and accuracy of a given detector are dependent on the distance from the detector to the source. At shorter distances, a significant number of received signals are attributable to material residing in the borehole region, rather than in the earth formation being investigated. The accuracy of such a measurement at short source-detector distances is thereby reduced. On the other hand, close proximity of a detector to a source results in a high signal strength. This high signal strength leads to a high degree of statistical precision of the measurement taken at that short distance. At longer distances between detector and source, an increased percentage of signals are obtained from the earth formation, thereby leading to a higher degree of accuracy of the measurement obtained. However, the number of signals obtained by the detector is significantly reduced due to the increased distance and diffusion processes. Lack of sufficient signal strength yields a lower statistical precision of the measurement.
- In the present invention described above with reference to
FIG. 1 , theSS detector 105 measures the received signals at a high level of precision. As the source-detector spacing increases, this level of precision drops, so that measurements atLS detector 106 are not as precise as the measurements from the SS detector. On the other hand, measurements obtained at the SS detector are highly perturbed by interaction with elements within the borehole. Increasing the spacing between source and detector reduces the perturbative effects of the borehole, thereby increasing the accuracy of the measurement at theXLS detector 107. The logging tool described above may be part of a system, such as that illustrated inFIG. 2 . The system shown inFIG. 2 is a prior art system. Well 10 penetrates the earth's surface and may or may not be cased depending upon the particular well being investigated. Disposed within well 10 is subsurfacewell logging instrument 12. The system diagramed inFIG. 2 is a microprocessor-based nuclear well logging system using multi-channel scale analysis for determining the timing distributions of the detected gamma rays. Well logginginstrument 12 includes long-spaced (LS)detector 14, short-spaced (SS)detector 16 andpulses neutron source 18. In one embodiment, LS andSS detectors source 18 comprises a pulsed neutron source using a D-T reaction wherein deuterium ions are accelerated into a tritium target, thereby generating neutrons having an energy of approximately 14 MeV. The filament current and accelerator voltage are supplied to source 18 throughpower supply 15.Cable 20 suspendsinstrument 12 in well 10 and contains the required conductors for electrically connectinginstrument 12 with the surface apparatus. - The outputs from LS and
SS detectors detector board 22, which amplifies these outputs and compares them to an adjustable discriminator level for passage to channelgenerator 26.Channel generator 26 is a component of multi-channel scale (MCS)section 24 which further includesspectrum accumulator 28 and central processor unit (CPU) 30. As will be explained later,MCS section 24 accumulates spectral data inspectrum accumulator 28 by using a channel number generated bychannel generator 26 and associated with a pulse as an address for a memory location. After all of the channels have had their data accumulated,CPU 30 reads the spectrum, or collection of data from all of the channels, and sends the data tomodem 32 which is coupled tocable 20 for transmission of the data over a communication link to the surface apparatus. Also to be explained later is the further function ofchannel generator 26 in generating synchronization signals which control the pulse frequency ofsource 18, and further functions ofCPU 30 in communicating control commands which define certain operational parameters ofinstrument 12 including the discriminator levels ofdetector board 22, and the filament current and accelerator voltage supplied to source 18 bypower supply 15. - The surface apparatus includes
master controller 34 coupled tocable 20 for recovery of data frominstrument 12 and for transmitting command signals toinstrument 12. There is also associated with the surfaceapparatus depth controller 36 which provides signals tomaster controller 34 indicating the movement ofinstrument 12 within well 10. The system operator accesses themaster controller 34 to allow the system operator to provide selected input for the logging operation to be performed by the system.Display unit 40 andmass storage unit 44 are also coupled tomaster controller 34. The primary purpose ofdisplay unit 40 is to provide visual indications of the generated logging data as well as systems operations data.Storage unit 44 is provided for storing logging data generated by the system as well as for retrieval of stored data and system operation programs. A satellite link may be provided to send data and or receive instructions from a remote location. - In a well logging operation such as is illustrated by
FIG. 2 ,master controller 34 initially transmits system operation programs and command signals to be implemented byCPU 30, such programs and signals being related to the particular well logging operation.Instrument 12 is then caused to traverse well 10 in a conventional manner, withsource 18 being pulsed in response to synchronization signals fromchannel generator 26. Typically,source 18 is pulsed at a rate of 1000 bursts/second (1 KHz). This, in turn, causes a burst of high energy neutrons on the order of 14 MeV to be introduced into the surrounding formation to be investigated. In a manner previously described, this population of high energy neutrons introduced into the formation will cause the generation of gamma rays within the formation which at various times will impinge on LS andSS detectors detector board 22. It will be recalled thatdetector board 22 amplifies each pulse and compares them to an adjustable discriminator level, typically set at a value corresponding to approximately 100 KeV. If such pulse has an amplitude corresponding to an energy of at least approximately 100 KeV, the voltage pulse is transformed into a digital signal and passed to channelgenerator 26 ofMCS section 24. - The system of the present invention may differ from the prior art system in that three detectors may be used. This has been discussed above. In addition, as would be known to those versed in the art, many of the functions of the components described with reference to
FIG. 2 may be carried out by a processor. It should also be noted that the system described inFIG. 2 involves conveyance of the logging device into the well by a wireline. However, it is envisaged that the logging device could be part of a measurement while drilling (MWD) bottom hole assembly conveyed into the borehole by a drilling tubular such as a drillstring or coiled tubing. - In a multi-detector device, several measurements of capture cross-sections can be obtained. These measurements can be combined to create a combined capture cross-section:
-
Σcomb=ω1Σ1+ω2Σ2+ (1) - where Σi is the capture cross-section measured at detector i, and ωi is a corresponding weight of the ith capture cross-section. The weight of an individual capture cross-section can be typically determined by a statistical precision of the measurement. For example, the weight can be inversely proportionally to the standard deviation of the measurement at a given detector:
-
- where σ is the variance of the measurement of the ith detector. This weighting is done currently, for example, for C/O measurements. Variance can be measured in a variety of ways. As an example, with the RPM system, σ can be determined by measuring an average arrival time of the gamma rays at the detector, and relating this average time to a decay rate. The average time technique is a remarkably robust and statistically precise method of computing Σ.
- The computation of the true or “intrinsic” formation sigma is complicated by the fact that the raw data from the instrument contain contributions from the borehole as well as from the formation. In general, the early part of the decay is most affected by neutron absorption in the borehole and the late decay by formation absorption, although they are not completely independent of each other. That is, the borehole influences the formation decay and the formation influences the borehole decay. A typical computation of sigma minimizes the borehole influence by using a late portion of the decay for the formation sigma calculation.
- Combined pulsed neutron capture data from multiple detectors can be used in such a way as to improve the statistical precision and the accuracy of the measurement. The term “precision” refers, in a general sense, to the repeatability of the measurements, i.e., a more precise sensing device will give the same value for repeated measurements of the same parameter. The term “accuracy” refers to how close the output of a sensing device is to the true value of the quantity being measured. Thus, a precise measurement that has a bias is not an accurate measurement.
- In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a weighted combination of data from two or more detectors is used to provide measurements with statistical precision superior to any one of the individual detectors alone. Such combinations will have measurement characteristics that are somewhat different from those of any individual detector alone. As discussed above, the
XLS detector 107 achieves a higher degree of accuracy over the measured interval than measurements of theSS 105 andLS 106 detector. TheXLS 107 detector will also have a lower resolution and lower precision than the LS and SS detectors. In the present invention, a measurement is obtained with an accuracy of a measurement from the XLS detector and a precision obtained from a weighted normalized Σcomb. This can be done in the manner described next. - Turning now to
FIG. 3 , one embodiment of the invention is shown. A first set of measurements, preferably the SS measurements, are smoothed 401 by a suitable filtering operation to match the resolution of a second set of measurements, preferably the XLS measurements. The resulting smoothed SS measurements has an even smaller standard deviation (higher precision) than the original SS measurements. The smoothed measurements are then combined 403 with a second set of measurements (preferably the XLS measurements) using eq. (1) to give a combined measurement. This combined measurement will be more accurate than the first measurements. U.S. Pat. No. 4,794,792 to Flaum, et al, discusses a step similar to the filtering carried out herein, but does not teach or suggest combining the measurements to give a measurement with improved accuracy. Next, the combined measurements are compared with thefirst measurements 405. Using this comparison, a normalization factor is determined 407 and applied 409 to the first measurements to give a normalized measurement. The normalized measurements will be more accurate than the first measurements. The normalization factor may be additive or multiplicative, depending upon the type of measurements being used. Optionally, the normalized measurements may be combined with the XLS measurements using eq. (1). - In a second, preferred embodiment of the invention, a sequence of steps similar to that outlined in
FIG. 3 is carried out with one difference: the first set of measurements include both the SS and LS measurements. In this manner, a more precise and more accurate measurement with reasonably high resolution is obtained. - The processing of the data may be accomplished using a processor that may be located downhole or at an uphole location. Once the measurement accuracy and precision have been improved using the methods described above, the parameter of interest may be obtained using well known prior art techniques. As would be known to those versed in the art, parameters of interest that may be determined by nuclear logging tools include a density and a porosity of the earth formation.
- The logging instrument as described above is suitable for use on a wireline or may be conveyed into the borehole on a measurement while drilling device using a drilling tubular such as a drillstring or coiled tubing. When a drilling tubular is used, the measurement apparatus is usually part of a bottom hole drilling assembly. Such conveyance devices are known in the art and are not discussed further here.
- The present invention has been described with reference to a nuclear logging instrument. However, the method of the present invention may also be used with other types of logging instruments, including an acoustic logging instrument. In an acoustic logging instrument, signals generated from an acoustic source propagate through an earth formation and are detected at a plurality of spaced apart detectors. Dur to the passage through a dispersive earth formation, the signals suffer degradation at increased source-receiver distances.
- Additionally, the method of the present invention may also be used when, for example, the first and second detectors are at the same distance from the source. However, if the second detector is sampled more frequently than the first detector, then the second detector will be less precise than and as accurate as the first detector.
- While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the preferred embodiments of the invention, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all such variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
Claims (19)
1. A method for determining a parameter of interest of an earth formation with a logging tool having an energy source and a plurality of detectors for making measurements resulting from interaction of said energy source with said earth formation, the method comprising:
(a) making a first measurement indicative of said parameter of interest at a first of said plurality of detectors, said first measurement having a first precision;
(b) making a second measurement indicative of said parameter of interest at a second of said plurality of detectors, said second measurement having a second precision not greater than said first precision;
(c) combining said first and second measurements using a standard deviation of the measurements for each of the detectors to give a processed measurement having a higher precision than the first measurement; and
(d) recording the processed measurement on a suitable medium.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said energy source comprises a source of radiation.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said first measurement has a first accuracy, said second measurement has a second accuracy not less than said first accuracy, and wherein said processed measurement has an accuracy at least the same as said second accuracy.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising:
making a third set of measurements indicative of said parameter of interest, said third measurements having a precision intermediate to said first and second precisions and a third accuracy intermediate to said first and second accuracies;
and wherein combining said first and, second measurements further comprises combining the third measurement with the first and second measurements.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said first measurement is made with a first detector having a first distance from said source, and said second measurements are made with a second detector having a second distance from said source greater than said first distance.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said third measurement is made with a third detector having a distance from said source that is intermediate to said first and second distances.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said measurements comprise gamma ray counts.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said measurements comprise neutron counts.
9. The method of claim 4 wherein combining said first, second and third measurements further comprises forming a weighted sum of said first, second and third measurements.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein combining said first and second measurements further comprises filtering said first measurement to give filtered measurements having a resolution that is substantially equal to a resolution of said second measurement.
11. The method of claim 4 wherein combining said first, second and third measurements further comprises filtering said first and third measurements to give output measurements having a resolution that is substantially equal to a resolution of said second measurement.
12. The method of claim 15 further comprising determining said parameter of interest from said processed measurements.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein said parameter of interest is selected from: (i) a porosity of said formation, and (ii) a density of said formation.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein said first and second detectors are at the same spacing from said source, and wherein said second detector is sampled more frequently than said first detector.
15. An apparatus for determining a parameter of interest of an earth formation comprising:
(a) a logging tool configured to be conveyed into a borehole in said earth formation, said logging tool including a source which propagates energy into said earth formation;
(b) a first detector on said logging tool spaced apart from the source at a first distance, said first detector configured to make a first measurement indicative of an interaction of said energy with said earth formation, said first measurement having a first precision;
(c) a second detector on said logging tool spaced apart from the source at a second distance greater than the first distance, said second detector configured to make a second measurement indicative of said parameter of interest, said second measurement having a second precision not greater than said first precision; and
(d) a processor configured to combine said first and second measurements using a standard deviation of the measurements for each of the detectors to give a processed measurement having a higher precision than the first measurement.
16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein said second measurement has a second accuracy not less than a first accuracy of said first measurement, and wherein said processed measurement has at least the same accuracy of the second measurement.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 further comprising a memory device configured to store said first and second measurements.
18. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein said source comprises a pulsed neutron source.
19. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising a third detector on said logging tool spaced apart from said source at a third distance intermediate to said first and second distances, and wherein said processor is further configured to combine measurements made by said third detector with measurements made by said first and second detectors.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/835,241 US20090224146A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-08-07 | Apparatus and Method for Determining Thermal Neutron Capture Cross Section of a Subsurface Formation From a Borehole Using Multiple Detectors |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US50738303P | 2003-09-30 | 2003-09-30 | |
US10/955,867 US7253402B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2004-09-30 | Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors |
US11/835,241 US20090224146A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-08-07 | Apparatus and Method for Determining Thermal Neutron Capture Cross Section of a Subsurface Formation From a Borehole Using Multiple Detectors |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/955,867 Continuation US7253402B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2004-09-30 | Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090224146A1 true US20090224146A1 (en) | 2009-09-10 |
Family
ID=34381346
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/955,867 Expired - Fee Related US7253402B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2004-09-30 | Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors |
US11/835,241 Abandoned US20090224146A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-08-07 | Apparatus and Method for Determining Thermal Neutron Capture Cross Section of a Subsurface Formation From a Borehole Using Multiple Detectors |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/955,867 Expired - Fee Related US7253402B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2004-09-30 | Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7253402B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2606386A1 (en) * | 2010-08-19 | 2013-06-26 | Probe Technology Services, Inc. | Well-logging tool for determining properties in a flowstream |
WO2013165780A1 (en) * | 2012-05-01 | 2013-11-07 | Carbo Ceramics Inc. | Pnc tools used to locate proppant near a borehole |
CN107505661A (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2017-12-22 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A kind of detector elements well logging apparatus of controllable neutron three and method |
US11681069B1 (en) * | 2022-01-03 | 2023-06-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Pulsed neutron tool for elemental decay logging |
Families Citing this family (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7294829B2 (en) * | 2005-04-27 | 2007-11-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for an improved formation density indicator using pulsed neutron instruments |
EP1917545B1 (en) * | 2005-07-26 | 2023-02-22 | Baker Hughes Holdings LLC | Measurement of formation gas pressure in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation |
US7566869B2 (en) * | 2005-07-26 | 2009-07-28 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Measurement of water-oil saturation using pulsed neutron instrumentation |
US7372018B2 (en) * | 2005-07-26 | 2008-05-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Determination of gas pressure and saturation simultaneously |
GB2442014B (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2011-08-03 | Reeves Wireline Tech Ltd | A method of acquiring and processing neutron log data, and related apparatuses |
US7543636B2 (en) * | 2006-10-06 | 2009-06-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Diagnostic sleeve shifting tool |
BRPI0820898B1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2019-09-24 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MODELING OR SIMULATING ANSWER TO THE RANGE TOOL |
US10061055B2 (en) | 2008-06-25 | 2018-08-28 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Absolute elemental concentrations from nuclear spectroscopy |
RU2502096C2 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2013-12-20 | Шлюмбергер Текнолоджи Б.В. | Downhole measurement by neutron activation |
WO2010047865A1 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2010-04-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Nuclear logging tool calibration system and method |
BRPI0921589A2 (en) * | 2008-11-18 | 2017-06-06 | Prad Res & Dev Ltd | in-pit tool, method, system, and device |
MX2010008343A (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2010-11-30 | Halliburton Energy Serv Inc | Method and system of determining a value indicative of gas saturation of a formation. |
WO2011037583A1 (en) * | 2009-09-28 | 2011-03-31 | Halliburton Energy Services. Inc. | Systems and methods for downhole fluid typing with pulsed neutron logging |
US8502135B2 (en) * | 2010-03-25 | 2013-08-06 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method for through-casing 3-phase saturation determination |
US9715035B2 (en) * | 2010-05-19 | 2017-07-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pulse neutron formation gas identification with LWD measurements |
MX2013000523A (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2013-04-11 | Halliburton Energy Serv Inc | Method and system of determining a parameter associated with a formation corrected for neutrons produced. |
CA2804835C (en) | 2010-08-24 | 2016-04-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method and system of determining elemental content of an earth formation |
CA2802981A1 (en) | 2010-09-16 | 2011-03-22 | Kwokshan Kwong | Combined sonic/pulsed neutron cased hole logging tool |
US20130341012A1 (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2013-12-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for tracking a treatment fluid in a subterranean formation |
US10429540B2 (en) * | 2011-12-15 | 2019-10-01 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Combining inelastic and capture gamma ray spectroscopy for determining formation elemental |
WO2014059267A1 (en) * | 2012-10-12 | 2014-04-17 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Alpha processing to improve accuracy and precision of elemental concentrations from gamma-ray spectroscopy |
US9885802B2 (en) * | 2013-10-01 | 2018-02-06 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Downhole cement evalution using pulsed neutron measurements |
WO2016148696A1 (en) | 2015-03-17 | 2016-09-22 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc. | Gamma analysis of cement |
US9599743B2 (en) | 2015-04-29 | 2017-03-21 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Density measurements using detectors on a pulsed neutron measurement platform |
US10215880B1 (en) * | 2017-10-04 | 2019-02-26 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Pulsed neutron determination of gravel pack density |
CN110080752A (en) * | 2018-01-23 | 2019-08-02 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | A kind of pulsed drive sequence configuration method |
US11143786B2 (en) * | 2018-07-05 | 2021-10-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Intrinsic geological formation carbon to oxygen ratio measurements |
KR20210111256A (en) * | 2018-12-07 | 2021-09-10 | 어번 유니버시티 | Application of Scanning Mode of Neutron Gamma Analysis for Soil Carbon Mapping |
RU2761053C1 (en) * | 2021-03-11 | 2021-12-02 | Объединенный Институт Ядерных Исследований (Оияи) | Method for measuring the probability of absorption of neutrons upon their sub-barrier reflection from the surface and the structure for its implementation |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4645926A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-02-24 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method for induced gamma ray logging |
US4656354A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-04-07 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method for induced gamma ray logging |
US4668863A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-05-26 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Neutron logging time spectral data acquisition system and method |
US4794792A (en) * | 1986-10-06 | 1989-01-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for determining formation characteristics with enhanced vertical resolution |
US4909075A (en) * | 1986-10-06 | 1990-03-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for determining formation characteristics with enhanced statistical precision without degrading the vertical resolution or with enhanced vertical resolution |
US5808298A (en) * | 1997-02-11 | 1998-09-15 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method for determining formation hydrocarbon saturation and wellbore hydrocarbon holdup from multidetector carbon-oxygen measurements |
US5973321A (en) * | 1997-06-11 | 1999-10-26 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method for determining multiple thermal neutron decay components from the capture gamma ray spectrum measured by a pulsed neutron instrument |
US20020190198A1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2002-12-19 | Mickael Medhat W. | Standoff compensation for nuclear measurements |
US20030009288A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2003-01-09 | Baker Hughes, Inc. | Method for determining decay characteristics of multi-component downhole decay data |
US20030136916A1 (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2003-07-24 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Method and system for determining depth distribution of radiation-emitting material located in a source medium and radiation detector system for use therein |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4445033A (en) * | 1981-09-14 | 1984-04-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for environmental correction of thermal neutron logs |
US6124590A (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2000-09-26 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method for determining thermal neutron capture cross-section of earth formations using measurements from multiple capture gamma ray detectors |
US6064063A (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2000-05-16 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method for determining thermal neutron capture cross-section of earth formations using measurement from multiple capture gamma ray detectors |
US6566649B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2003-05-20 | Precision Drilling Technology Services Group Inc. | Standoff compensation for nuclear measurements |
US20030178560A1 (en) * | 2002-03-19 | 2003-09-25 | Odom Richard C. | Apparatus and method for determining density, porosity and fluid saturation of formations penetrated by a borehole |
-
2004
- 2004-09-30 US US10/955,867 patent/US7253402B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2007
- 2007-08-07 US US11/835,241 patent/US20090224146A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4645926A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-02-24 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method for induced gamma ray logging |
US4656354A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-04-07 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Method for induced gamma ray logging |
US4668863A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-05-26 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Neutron logging time spectral data acquisition system and method |
US4794792A (en) * | 1986-10-06 | 1989-01-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for determining formation characteristics with enhanced vertical resolution |
US4909075A (en) * | 1986-10-06 | 1990-03-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for determining formation characteristics with enhanced statistical precision without degrading the vertical resolution or with enhanced vertical resolution |
US5808298A (en) * | 1997-02-11 | 1998-09-15 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method for determining formation hydrocarbon saturation and wellbore hydrocarbon holdup from multidetector carbon-oxygen measurements |
US5973321A (en) * | 1997-06-11 | 1999-10-26 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method for determining multiple thermal neutron decay components from the capture gamma ray spectrum measured by a pulsed neutron instrument |
US20030136916A1 (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2003-07-24 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Method and system for determining depth distribution of radiation-emitting material located in a source medium and radiation detector system for use therein |
US20020190198A1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2002-12-19 | Mickael Medhat W. | Standoff compensation for nuclear measurements |
US20030009288A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2003-01-09 | Baker Hughes, Inc. | Method for determining decay characteristics of multi-component downhole decay data |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2606386A1 (en) * | 2010-08-19 | 2013-06-26 | Probe Technology Services, Inc. | Well-logging tool for determining properties in a flowstream |
EP2606386A4 (en) * | 2010-08-19 | 2017-05-10 | Probe Technology Services, Inc. | Well-logging tool for determining properties in a flowstream |
WO2013165780A1 (en) * | 2012-05-01 | 2013-11-07 | Carbo Ceramics Inc. | Pnc tools used to locate proppant near a borehole |
US9038715B2 (en) | 2012-05-01 | 2015-05-26 | Carbo Ceramics | Use of PNC tools to determine the depth and relative location of proppant in fractures and the near borehole region |
RU2641047C2 (en) * | 2012-05-01 | 2018-01-15 | Карбо Сирамикс Инк. | Use of logging instruments by pulsed neutron capture method to detect proppant near wellbore |
CN107505661A (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2017-12-22 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A kind of detector elements well logging apparatus of controllable neutron three and method |
US11681069B1 (en) * | 2022-01-03 | 2023-06-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Pulsed neutron tool for elemental decay logging |
US20230213682A1 (en) * | 2022-01-03 | 2023-07-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Pulsed neutron tool for elemental decay logging |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050067563A1 (en) | 2005-03-31 |
US7253402B2 (en) | 2007-08-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7253402B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors | |
US7294829B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for an improved formation density indicator using pulsed neutron instruments | |
US7365308B2 (en) | Measurement of formation gas saturation in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation | |
AU762368B2 (en) | Neutron burst timing method and system for multiple measurement pulsed neutron formation evaluation | |
US7566869B2 (en) | Measurement of water-oil saturation using pulsed neutron instrumentation | |
JP4195522B2 (en) | Method for distinguishing soil layer concentration | |
US7615741B2 (en) | Determining organic carbon downhole from nuclear spectroscopy | |
US7538319B2 (en) | Use of thorium-uranium ratio as an indicator of hydrocarbon source rock | |
US7372018B2 (en) | Determination of gas pressure and saturation simultaneously | |
US7446308B2 (en) | Method of calibrating multi-channel nuclear energy spectra | |
US7554081B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining silicon content of the earth formations in cased well bores | |
US7361887B2 (en) | Measurement of formation gas pressure in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation | |
US7439494B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the thermal neutron capture cross-section of a subsurface formation from a borehole | |
US20070241275A1 (en) | Neutron source for well logging | |
US7718956B2 (en) | Use of elemental pulse neutron spectroscopy measurements for indexing bitumen viscosity in the well | |
EP1917545B1 (en) | Measurement of formation gas pressure in cased wellbores using pulsed neutron instrumentation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GILCHRIST, ALLEN;TRCKA, DARRYL E.;REEL/FRAME:020101/0414;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040914 TO 20040929 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |