|Número de publicación||US20100310825 A1|
|Tipo de publicación||Solicitud|
|Número de solicitud||US 12/857,868|
|Fecha de publicación||9 Dic 2010|
|Fecha de prioridad||6 Nov 2002|
|También publicado como||US7537820, US7781046, US8173243, US8383228, US8409689, US8592025, US8615968, US8950161, US8959875, US8959876, US20070011978, US20090193745, US20120047838, US20120210666, US20130180196, US20130219819, US20140053492, US20140250816, US20140290170|
|Número de publicación||12857868, 857868, US 2010/0310825 A1, US 2010/310825 A1, US 20100310825 A1, US 20100310825A1, US 2010310825 A1, US 2010310825A1, US-A1-20100310825, US-A1-2010310825, US2010/0310825A1, US2010/310825A1, US20100310825 A1, US20100310825A1, US2010310825 A1, US2010310825A1|
|Inventores||Husnu M. Kalkanoglu, Stephen A. Koch|
|Cesionario original||Certainteed Corporation|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citada por (6), Clasificaciones (30)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/422,506 filed Apr. 13, 2009, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/421,893, filed Jun. 2, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,537,820 which, in turn, is a continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/871,911, filed Jun. 18, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,118,794, which, in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/288,747, filed Nov. 6, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,758,019.
In the manufacture of shingles, it has been known that when shingles are subjected to strong winds, the winds can engage the lower edges or tab portions of the shingles, and bend them upwardly.
On occasion, under strong winds, the tabs can bend upwardly in amounts sufficient that the inherent, internal resistance to substantial bending and perhaps cracking, can be overcome, in that the mat that is formed internally of the shingle, and the asphaltic material on the surfaces of the shingle, may not be sufficient to withstand certain wind conditions.
Various approaches have been made to resist shingle failure via cracking and the like, not all with substantial success.
For example, strips of adhesive material along lower ends of tabs of shingle have been applied, which, when subjected to hot weather conditions, soften an amount sufficient that such adhesive will adhere to the next-subjacent shingle on a roof, eventually harden and thereafter resist upward deflection of shingle tabs under severe wind conditions. However, such adhesive sometimes dries out, or becomes brittle over time, offering reduced adhesion. In other cases, strong wind conditions can exist during high temperature situations when such adhesive located under tabs remains soft, and thus the adhesive does not function in its intended manner.
Other approaches have resorted to thickening the mat and/or asphaltic material, to offer internal resistance to bending, but nonetheless, failures due to wind-related bending of tabs of shingle continue to exist.
The present invention is directed toward providing a shingle, wherein a separate, exterior reinforcement layer is provided outside the rear surface of the shingle, with such layer comprising a material that is not coated or covered by any thick layer of asphalt or the like.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a novel shingle having a layer on the lower surface of the shingle, that comprises a reinforcing material.
It is a further object of the invention to accomplish the above objects, wherein the reinforcement layer comprises a scrim material.
It is another object of this invention to accomplish the above objects, wherein the reinforcing material extends into either or both of the tab portion of the shingle and the headlap portion of the shingle.
It is a further object of this invention to accomplish the object above, wherein the reinforcing material extends into a nailing zone or other fastening zone of the shingle through which nails or other fasteners pass upon securing the shingle to a roof.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a method of making shingles in accordance with the objects set forth above.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will be readily understood upon a reading of the following brief descriptions of the drawing figures, detailed descriptions of the preferred embodiments and the appended claims.
Referring now to the drawings in detail, reference is first made to
The basic shingle of
With specific reference to
A nailing zone “N” exists on the front surface of the shingle 20, generally located above the release tape or strip 26, running between edges 27, 28 above the slots 24. Essentially, the shingle 20 is similar to that of the shingle 10 of
Thus, the reinforcement layer 29 may be a fiberglass scrim and will preferably be a woven construction, involving woven strands disposed at right angles to each other, with a preferred density of, for example nine strands in the vertical direction and nine strands in the horizontal direction per square inch of scrim (9×9 per in2).
With reference to
It will be apparent that other lengths of scrim 29, 39, will be appropriate depending upon the desired resistance to bending under wind conditions, as will be addressed hereinafter.
The scrim layers 29, 39, will not be coated with a bitumen or other asphaltic material, nor will they have granules applied thereto, such that the filaments of the scrim 29, 39, especially those extending vertically as shown in
The scrim may have a density other than the 9×9 per in2. addressed above, such as but not limited to 8×8 per in2 or 7×7 per in2, and may be of various compositions other than fiberglass, such as polyester, polypropylene and/or nylon. In lieu of a scrim, the reinforcement layers 29, 39 may comprise woven or nonwoven thin fabric, plastic film, paper, parchment, foil or the like, either embedded in the asphaltic layer on the rear of the shingle or adhered to the rear of the shingle by an additional post-applied thin layer of asphaltic or non-asphaltic adhesive. The reinforcement layer 29, 39, will be adhered to the rear surface 21, 31 of the shingles of this invention, by means of any suitable adhesive, such as a bitumen or the like, or any other adhesive.
With reference now to
It will be understood that up to some level of force applied by wind in the direction 43, the shingle tab portion 44 will bend within its elastic limit in accordance with Hook's law. In this regard, any given weight of shingle, under any particular conditions, will have its own modulus of elasticity, which is a measure of the stiffness or rigidity of the shingle, and within which the shingle will return to its original, flat condition when the force of wind is removed.
With reference to
Reference will now be made to the graphs of
With reference to
Referring now to
Referring now to
With reference now to
It has thus been found that the bending tests, performed with a Tinius-Olsen Flexibility Tester to apply the force bending the shingle tab portions 44 in the direction of the arrow 45 of
Nail pull tests were run on a plurality of shingles, with and without reinforcement layers. The tests were run on 4 inch by 4 inch specimens, placed over a plate having a 2½ inch center hole, with the nail being driven through the shingle, so as to place the nail at the center of the 2½ inch hole, which in turn is at the center of the 4 inch by 4 inch plate, and with the nail then being pulled upwardly to determine the strength of the shingle in resisting failure or tearing against the force of the nail pull. This is a standardized test for shingles pursuant to ASTM.
First, ten specimens of control shingles were tested, having no reinforcement layer on their rear surface. The resistance strength of the control samples prior to failure, averaged 29.69 lb.±3.78 lb. deviation over the ten shingles tested.
Next, ten specimens of the same type of shingle as the control shingle were tested, but which deviated from the control shingle, in that they had a 17 gram polyester mat reinforcement layer on their rear surfaces. The resistance strength of these specimen resisting the nail pull, prior to failure, averaged 33.27 lb.±3.52 lb. deviation over the ten specimens tested.
Then, ten specimens of shingle constructed the same as the control shingles, but different from the control shingles in that they each had a reinforcement layer on the rear surface, of 30 gram polyester mat. The resistance strength, of these specimens in resisting the nail pull prior to failure averaged 36.96 lb.±3.98 lb. deviation over the ten specimens tested.
Then, ten specimens of the same type of specimens as the control shingle were tested, but wherein the reinforcement layer was a fiberglass scrim having nine strands in the vertical direction and nine strands in the horizontal direction per square inch (9×9 per in2). The ten specimens with the fiberglass scrim on the rear surface averaged 54.13 lb. resistance to the nail pull test prior to failure, ±4.02 lb. deviation over the ten specimens tested.
These nail pull strength tests thus revealed that the fiberglass scrim as a reinforcement layer provided the greatest resistance prior to failure, although each of the 17 gram polyester mat and 30 gram polyester mat provided greater resistance prior to failure than the control specimens without any reinforcement layer.
It will thus be seen that, when nails or other fasteners are applied to the shingle, for fastening the shingle to a roof, they pass through the reinforcement layer. This more securely fastens the shingle to a roof, and is especially desirable when applied to roofs having steep slopes, in that it can sometimes occur on very hot sunny days, on a steep roof, perhaps with workmen walking on the roof, that the stress on the shingle can cause the shingle to tear above the fastening points and perhaps become dislodged from the roof. By fastening the shingle to a roof through the reinforcement zone in such a situation, the fasteners are more prone to maintain the shingle adhered to the roof. This can be especially so if the reinforcement material that is applied to the rear of the roof comprises a scrim of crossing strands, a fabric, or other material that is resistant to tearing.
It will be apparent from the forgoing that various modifications may be made in the details of construction, as well as with the use of shingles of this invention, all within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US8156704||28 Feb 2011||17 Abr 2012||Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology, Inc.||Reducing humping of stacked roofing shingles|
|US8181413||30 Sep 2010||22 May 2012||Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc||Shingle with reinforced nail zone and method of manufacturing|
|US8240102||5 Ago 2006||14 Ago 2012||Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc||Shingle with reinforced nail zone and method of manufacturing|
|US8430983||29 Jul 2011||30 Abr 2013||Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc||Method of manufacturing a shingle with reinforced nail zone|
|US8557366||3 Abr 2006||15 Oct 2013||Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc||Roofing shingle including sheet as headlap|
|US9097020||4 Mar 2010||4 Ago 2015||Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc||Hip and ridge roofing shingle|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||428/143, 156/60|
|Clasificación internacional||E04D1/26, E04D1/00, B32B37/14, E04D1/22, B32B11/02, E04D1/28|
|Clasificación cooperativa||E04D1/20, E04D1/34, Y10T428/24372, Y10T156/10, Y10T428/25, B32B11/02, E04D1/26, E04D2001/005, B32B2395/00, B32B2260/021, B32B5/24, B32B2260/042, B32B2307/5825, B32B2250/02, B32B2419/06, B32B2255/20, B32B2262/101, E04D1/28, E04D1/22|
|Clasificación europea||B32B11/02, E04D1/26, B32B5/24|