US20110224476A1 - Method and Apparatus for Treatment of Discogenic Pain - Google Patents

Method and Apparatus for Treatment of Discogenic Pain Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110224476A1
US20110224476A1 US13/113,873 US201113113873A US2011224476A1 US 20110224476 A1 US20110224476 A1 US 20110224476A1 US 201113113873 A US201113113873 A US 201113113873A US 2011224476 A1 US2011224476 A1 US 2011224476A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
radiation
treatment
disc
back pain
advertisement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/113,873
Inventor
Patrick J. Sweeney
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Spinal Generations LLC
Original Assignee
Spinal Generations LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Spinal Generations LLC filed Critical Spinal Generations LLC
Priority to US13/113,873 priority Critical patent/US20110224476A1/en
Publication of US20110224476A1 publication Critical patent/US20110224476A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q99/00Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the use of radiation to treat back pain such as that caused by spinal disc disorders.
  • the present invention relates to an apparatus for and method of treatment of discogenic pain using radiation.
  • the spinal column is comprised of interlocking vertebrae separated by intervertebral discs.
  • the spine provides load-bearing support for one-half of the body's mass and it protects the nerves of the spinal column.
  • the intervertebral discs provide shock absorption and facilitate the bending of the spine.
  • the combination of the vertebrae and discs at each vertebral segment allows for motion of the spine, in particular, flexing, rotation, and extension.
  • the motion and support functions of the spine, in combination with the many interlocking parts and nerves associated with the spinal column, can result in back pain due to various reasons.
  • Back pain arises in the lumbar region of the back.
  • Back pain may result from strain on the back due to overexertion or may be due to poor posture or an injury to the spine.
  • Chronic back pain is often due to a disorder originating in or from an intervertebral disc (i.e. discogenic pain).
  • Such conditions can include bulging, herniated, or ruptured discs.
  • a bulging, herniated or ruptured disc can trigger a response from proximate nerves, causing the pain sensation.
  • chronic pain may present itself as people age because the annulus fibrosus begins to decay and the resulting small tears in the wall are infiltrated by nerves and blood vessels, causing pressure and chronic pain.
  • Intervertebral discs have an outer annulus fibrosus that surrounds the inner nucleus pulposus.
  • a bulging or herniated disc is a situation where the nucleus pulposus herniates outward through the annulus fibrosus.
  • the annulus fibrosus contains nerves, and the nociceptors and mechanoreceptors associated with the nerves respond to the disc herniation by providing a pain sensation.
  • the pain receptors are concentrated along the posterior wall of the disc and the pain may result from the disc herniation but may also result from internal disc disruption, possibly involving partial tears in the multi-layered annulus fibrosus. Pain may also result from a disc fragment that remains exterior to the annulus fibrosus after the herniated disc recedes.
  • non-surgical approaches that may be used to treat back pain. These include heating the affected area, certain types of exercise, medication, and electrical nerve stimulation. However, non-surgical treatments are often ineffective in treating chronic back pain.
  • Intradiscal electrothermal therapy also called intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty
  • Radiofrequency annuloplasty is another surgical method in which radiofrequency thermal energy is delivered to the affected area of the disc via a needle.
  • Laser discectomy involves using a laser to vaporize a portion of the nucleus pulposus to decrease pressure in the disc.
  • Thermal discoplasty utilizes a needle to deliver heat to the nucleus pulposus to decrease the pressure in the disc.
  • discectomy in which all or part of the disc is removed in an effort to reduce pressure on the affected nerves
  • disc replacement in which the disc is replaced with an artificial disc
  • spinal fusion in which the affected disc is removed and the two adjoining vertebrae are fused together.
  • Certain of the conventional treatments are designed to ablate or remove disc material to reduce the pressure in the disc.
  • These include the discectomy procedures, including laser discectomy and radiofrequency or thermal discoplasty, also referred to as disc nucleoplasty.
  • Other techniques attempt to treat the disc directly using thermal or radiofrequency energy, such as the IDET and radiofrequency annuloplasty procedures. It is not known exactly why the procedures that attempt to directly treat the disc, such as IDET, work. It is theorized that the methods may aid in the repair of tears in the annulus fibrosus, but the procedures may also destroy nociceptors in the treated area, thus disrupting their ability to sense pressure and transmit pain.
  • each of the conventional approaches for treating back pain has certain disadvantages.
  • each of the surgical approaches even those that are minimally invasive, require penetration of the skin with surgical instruments to approach the area to be treated, even where the primary surgical instrument is a catheter or needle.
  • the primary surgical instrument is a catheter or needle.
  • the cause of the back pain may be inoperable due to the anatomy of the spine.
  • all of the present approaches to treatment of back pain exhibit varying degrees of success, especially where the precise reason why the selected treatment method accomplishes its goal is not exactly known.
  • spinal fusion the most invasive of the conventional surgical approaches, is the preferred approach when less invasive methods are not successful.
  • the invention relates to a method of treating discogenic back pain in a patient.
  • the method includes the steps of acquiring an image of at least a portion of the patient's spine, locating the spinal disc causing the back pain, and defining a treatment volume encompassing a portion of the spinal disc.
  • the method further includes the steps of prescribing a radiation dose to be delivered to the treatment volume, providing a radiation therapy machine, and positioning the patient in the radiation therapy machine.
  • the method includes the steps of programming the radiation therapy machine to deliver the radiation dose to the treatment volume and delivering the radiation dose to the treatment volume.
  • the invention further relates to a discogenic back pain treatment device having a patient support, a radiation source, and a radiation delivery mechanism coupled to the radiation source.
  • the discogenic back pain treatment device further includes a treatment planning computer adapted to control the radiation delivery mechanism and programmed to deliver radiation from the radiation source to a treatment volume encompassing at least a portion of a spinal disc.
  • the invention further relates to a method for treating pain resulting from a herniated spinal disc using the discogenic back pain treatment device.
  • the method includes the steps of contacting a medical clinic having a radiation therapy machine to schedule a visit, visiting the medical clinic, assuming a position on the patient support, and inactivating one or more nerves in a treatment volume encompassing at least a portion of the herniated disc by receiving radiation from the radiation source to the treatment volume.
  • FIG. 1 is a side elevation view of a spine
  • FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a portion of the lumbar portion of a spine including an intervertebral disc;
  • FIG. 3 is a sectional view of a portion of the lumbar portion of a spine including a partially herniated intervertebral disc;
  • FIG. 4 is a sectional view of a portion of the lumbar portion of a spine including an intervertebral disc
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic perspective view of a radiation therapy machine with a cut-away portion showing the gantry.
  • the spine 10 includes vertebrae 12 separated by intervertebral discs 14 .
  • a vertebral canal 16 extends along successive vertebrae and houses the spinal cord (not shown).
  • an intervertebral disc 14 includes an inner nucleus pulposus 18 and an outer annulus fibrosus 20 .
  • the annulus fibrosus 20 is made up of a number of bands that are arranged in a series of concentric layers to retain the nucleus pulposus 18 and aid in resisting other forces placed on the spine 10 .
  • the cauda equina 22 runs through the vertebral canal 16 .
  • Spinal nerves 24 extend outwardly from the cauda equina 22 , with nerve roots 26 proximate the cauda equina 22 . While a lumbar vertebra and associated disc are shown in FIGS. 2-4 , the invention is equally applicable to other vertebrae and discs in the spine.
  • the outer portion of the annulus fibrosus 20 is innervated by the sinuvertebral nerve (not shown).
  • the sinuvertebral nerve also innervates other structures in the epidural space.
  • the nociceptors in the annulus fibrosus 20 transmit pain due to herniation of the intervertebral disc 14 or other discogenic causes.
  • the nucleus pulposus 18 may bulge outward, possibly due to degradation in the fibers making up the concentric rings of the annulus fibrosus 20 .
  • the bulging disc 14 may apply pressure on nerves proximate the bulge 28 . Such pressure may result in radiating pain down a patient's leg.
  • the entry into the vertebral canal 16 of the intervertebral disc 14 material may also cause toxic damage to the nerves in the area, resulting in pain.
  • the nociceptors 30 populating the outer portion of the annulus fibrosus 20 may transmit impulses resulting in the sensation of pain.
  • Such nociceptors 30 are typically concentrated along the posterior wall of the disc 14 .
  • a treatment volume 32 may be identified that contains a number of the nociceptors 30 causing the pain sensation. Depopulation of the nociceptors 30 in the treatment volume 32 may result in a decrease or cessation of the pain originating from the treatment volume 32 . It is theorized that certain conventional minimally invasive procedures, such as IDET, result in the thermocoagulation of nociceptors within the walls of the intervertebral disc being treated and therefore result in the reduction of pain.
  • the treatment volume 32 may also include a portion of the intervertebral disc where blood vessels have invaded, such as the area of a tear in the annular wall of the disc. Such invading vasculature can cause back pain.
  • a radiation therapy machine 40 is used to deliver radiation to the treatment volume 32 in order to treat unremitting back pain.
  • the radiation is intended to depopulate or inactivate the nerves providing the pain sensation, eliminate invading vasculature, and/or shrink disc material to reduce pressure in the area.
  • the radiation therapy machine 40 is designed to utilize conformal radiotherapy to deliver the radiation to the treatment volume 32 . Due to the sensitive structures proximate the treatment volume 32 , in particular the spinal cord and cauda equina, ideally a form of image guided radiation therapy is utilized.
  • One such image guided radiation therapy machine is the TomoTherapy HI-ART® system available from TomoTherapy Incorporated of Middleton, Wis.
  • the radiation therapy machine 40 has a rotating gantry 44 within a housing 42 .
  • An x-ray source 46 and corresponding detector 48 used for acquiring data to construct CT images of the patient are mounted on the gantry 44 along with a radiation delivery mechanism 50 used to deliver the desired dose to the treatment volume 32 .
  • the radiation delivery mechanism 50 is a rotating radiation output port on the gantry 44 in the embodiment of FIG. 5 .
  • a radiation source e.g. linear accelerator or Cobalt-60 source, generates the radiation that is delivered via the radiation delivery mechanism 50 .
  • a patient support shown as table 52 , is configured to support the patient (not shown) within the rotating gantry 44 and to slide the patient through the open center portion of the gantry 44 in order to acquire a spiral CT scan of the patient simultaneously with the delivery of radiation in a helical fashion to the desired treatment volume 32 .
  • a computer workstation 54 may be utilized to control the radiation therapy machine 40 as well as to display the acquired images.
  • ⁇ ел ⁇ ии may also be utilized to deliver a prescribed radiation dose to the treatment volume 32 .
  • examples of such devices include linear accelerators and x-ray machines.
  • One machine using a linear accelerator that may be useful in a preferred embodiment is a CYBERKNIFE® stereotactic radiosurgery system that utilizes a radiation delivery mechanism in the form of a robotic arm to deliver a radiation beam from many different angles to the target area.
  • the CYBERKNIFE® stereotactic radiosurgery system is available from Accuray Incorporated of Sunnyvale, Calif.
  • the cause of the pain must first be diagnosed.
  • Various methods for performing such a diagnosis include discography, which involves the injection of a radio-opaque dye into the spinal disc, followed by an x-ray image to determine whether the disc at issue is herniated or degraded in some way.
  • a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan may also be used to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the area thought to be causing the pain to identify the condition causing the pain.
  • Other types of imaging procedures such as PET or SPECT, may also be utilized to identify the intervertebral disc causing the pain.
  • the treatment volume 32 may be defined.
  • the treatment volume 32 is a three-dimensional region encompassing the posterior side of the annulus fibrosus 20 containing the offending nociceptors and/or the inflamed area causing the pain.
  • the physician treating the patient may prescribe a radiation therapy plan.
  • the radiation therapy plan or “treatment plan” involves delivering a specified radiation dose to the treatment volume, ideally using a stereotactic approach in order to spare issues outside of the treatment volume 32 to the extent possible.
  • the radiation may be delivered to the treatment volume 32 in a single treatment or may be fractionated to deliver a portion of the prescribed dose over the course of several treatments.
  • a fluid such as a dye may be injected into the disc space to concentrate the effect of the radiation delivered to the treatment volume.
  • the workstation 54 is a treatment planning computer that is loaded with treatment planning software that may be used to calculate a suitable method for delivering the prescribed radiation dose to the treatment volume 32 .
  • the radiation is delivered from multiple positions relative to the treatment volume 32 such that the radiation beams travel through different tissues en route to the treatment volume 32 .
  • the primary routes to the treatment volume should include certain “treatment portals” that do not include sensitive structures and therefore can accept a larger radiation dose.
  • the radiation therapy machine 40 is programmed to properly deliver the radiation dose to the treatment volume 32 .
  • Definition of the treatment volume 32 and creation of the treatment plan may include an assessment of sensitive regions (e.g. radiosensitive tissues) proximate to the desired treatment volume and according modifications to the treatment volume 32 and/or treatment plan to ensure a lower radiation dose to sensitive areas.
  • the patient may be positioned on the table 52 for delivery of radiation to the treatment volume 32 .
  • the location of the patient may be identified utilizing the on-board CT scanner or other type of imaging device on a similar machine. Verification of the position of the patient is especially important due to the proximity of sensitive structures in the spine.
  • the radiation therapy machine 40 may be used to deliver the prescribed radiation dose to the treatment volume 32 .
  • the utilization of radiation to treat discogenic pain requires the programming of treatment planning software used to control the radiation therapy machine 40 in order to deliver radiation to the treatment volume 32 .
  • radiation therapy is presently used to treat tumors found in the spine, such tumors are not typically found in the intervertebral discs.
  • similar doses and radiation energies are used to treat discogenic pain as are presently used in cancer treatments, but the radiation dose necessary to depopulate and/or inactivate the offending nociceptors 30 and/or eliminate invading vasculature may differ from the radiation dose necessary to kill tumor cells. Therefore, a lower radiation dose may be used to treat discogenic pain as compared to the total overall doses used to treat tumors. Fractionation may also be utilized in radiation treatment of discogenic pain.
  • the radiation therapy machine 40 is owned by a medical clinic, such as a clinic specializing in the treatment of back pain.
  • a patient may contact the clinic to set up an appointment to visit the clinic for diagnosis and/or treatment of the back pain, perhaps in response to advertisements or information provided by the clinic or other organization (e.g. advertisements in magazines, in newspapers, on billboards, or via television, radio, or the internet). Multiple treatment visits will be necessary in the case of a fractionated treatment plan.
  • conformal radiotherapy using machines such as the TomoTherapy HI-ART® or Accuray CYBERKNIFE® systems identified above delivers a radiation dose to a defined three-dimensional volume within the body while sparing proximate tissues to the extent possible, it may be possible to treat discogenic symptoms using radiation therapy where conventional surgical methods are unavailable. Further still, utilization of radiation therapy does not have the inherent risks associated with conventional spine surgery options, such as the spinal fusion surgical procedures that are currently utilized to treat chronic lower back pain.

Abstract

A back pain treatment system includes a patient support, a radiation source, a radiation delivery mechanism, and a treatment planning computer adapted to control the radiation delivery mechanism. The treatment planning computer is programmed to deliver radiation from the radiation source to a treatment volume including a blood vessel.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS
  • This is a divisional of application Ser. No. 12/561,777, filed Sep. 17, 2009, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/393,054, filed Mar. 30, 2006, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to the use of radiation to treat back pain such as that caused by spinal disc disorders. In particular, the present invention relates to an apparatus for and method of treatment of discogenic pain using radiation.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The spinal column is comprised of interlocking vertebrae separated by intervertebral discs. The spine provides load-bearing support for one-half of the body's mass and it protects the nerves of the spinal column. The intervertebral discs provide shock absorption and facilitate the bending of the spine.
  • The combination of the vertebrae and discs at each vertebral segment allows for motion of the spine, in particular, flexing, rotation, and extension. The motion and support functions of the spine, in combination with the many interlocking parts and nerves associated with the spinal column, can result in back pain due to various reasons.
  • Most back pain arises in the lumbar region of the back. Back pain may result from strain on the back due to overexertion or may be due to poor posture or an injury to the spine. Chronic back pain is often due to a disorder originating in or from an intervertebral disc (i.e. discogenic pain). Such conditions can include bulging, herniated, or ruptured discs. A bulging, herniated or ruptured disc can trigger a response from proximate nerves, causing the pain sensation. Even after a herniated disc heals, the anatomy of the disc may not return to normal and may continue to cause pain. Even in the case where a disc is not herniated, chronic pain may present itself as people age because the annulus fibrosus begins to decay and the resulting small tears in the wall are infiltrated by nerves and blood vessels, causing pressure and chronic pain.
  • Intervertebral discs have an outer annulus fibrosus that surrounds the inner nucleus pulposus. A bulging or herniated disc is a situation where the nucleus pulposus herniates outward through the annulus fibrosus. The annulus fibrosus contains nerves, and the nociceptors and mechanoreceptors associated with the nerves respond to the disc herniation by providing a pain sensation. The pain receptors are concentrated along the posterior wall of the disc and the pain may result from the disc herniation but may also result from internal disc disruption, possibly involving partial tears in the multi-layered annulus fibrosus. Pain may also result from a disc fragment that remains exterior to the annulus fibrosus after the herniated disc recedes.
  • There are several non-surgical approaches that may be used to treat back pain. These include heating the affected area, certain types of exercise, medication, and electrical nerve stimulation. However, non-surgical treatments are often ineffective in treating chronic back pain.
  • There are a number of minimally invasive surgical procedures that are used to treat back pain with varying degrees of success. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET), also called intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty, involves the application of heat directly to the inside of the disc via a needle that is inserted into the disc and heated at the desired location. Radiofrequency annuloplasty is another surgical method in which radiofrequency thermal energy is delivered to the affected area of the disc via a needle. Laser discectomy involves using a laser to vaporize a portion of the nucleus pulposus to decrease pressure in the disc. Thermal discoplasty utilizes a needle to deliver heat to the nucleus pulposus to decrease the pressure in the disc.
  • Other conventional surgical approaches are less minimally invasive. These include discectomy, in which all or part of the disc is removed in an effort to reduce pressure on the affected nerves; disc replacement, in which the disc is replaced with an artificial disc; and spinal fusion, in which the affected disc is removed and the two adjoining vertebrae are fused together.
  • Certain of the conventional treatments are designed to ablate or remove disc material to reduce the pressure in the disc. These include the discectomy procedures, including laser discectomy and radiofrequency or thermal discoplasty, also referred to as disc nucleoplasty. Other techniques attempt to treat the disc directly using thermal or radiofrequency energy, such as the IDET and radiofrequency annuloplasty procedures. It is not known exactly why the procedures that attempt to directly treat the disc, such as IDET, work. It is theorized that the methods may aid in the repair of tears in the annulus fibrosus, but the procedures may also destroy nociceptors in the treated area, thus disrupting their ability to sense pressure and transmit pain.
  • Each of the conventional approaches for treating back pain has certain disadvantages. In particular, each of the surgical approaches, even those that are minimally invasive, require penetration of the skin with surgical instruments to approach the area to be treated, even where the primary surgical instrument is a catheter or needle. Further, there are risks associated with the conventional surgical approaches that are inherent in any operation on the spine. Further still, the cause of the back pain may be inoperable due to the anatomy of the spine. Finally, all of the present approaches to treatment of back pain exhibit varying degrees of success, especially where the precise reason why the selected treatment method accomplishes its goal is not exactly known. Presently, spinal fusion, the most invasive of the conventional surgical approaches, is the preferred approach when less invasive methods are not successful.
  • There is a need for a back pain treatment that addresses one or more of the disadvantages of conventional approaches. In particular, there is a need for a back pain treatment that is non-invasive, less expensive than conventional surgical treatments, and able to treat back pain that is otherwise inoperable.
  • It would be desirable to provide a system and/or method that satisfies one or more of the aforementioned needs or provides other advantageous features. Other features and advantages will be made apparent from the present specification. The teachings disclosed extend to those embodiments that fall within the scope of the claims, regardless of whether they accomplish one or more of the aforementioned needs.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to a method of treating discogenic back pain in a patient. The method includes the steps of acquiring an image of at least a portion of the patient's spine, locating the spinal disc causing the back pain, and defining a treatment volume encompassing a portion of the spinal disc. The method further includes the steps of prescribing a radiation dose to be delivered to the treatment volume, providing a radiation therapy machine, and positioning the patient in the radiation therapy machine. Further still, the method includes the steps of programming the radiation therapy machine to deliver the radiation dose to the treatment volume and delivering the radiation dose to the treatment volume.
  • The invention further relates to a discogenic back pain treatment device having a patient support, a radiation source, and a radiation delivery mechanism coupled to the radiation source. The discogenic back pain treatment device further includes a treatment planning computer adapted to control the radiation delivery mechanism and programmed to deliver radiation from the radiation source to a treatment volume encompassing at least a portion of a spinal disc.
  • The invention further relates to a method for treating pain resulting from a herniated spinal disc using the discogenic back pain treatment device. The method includes the steps of contacting a medical clinic having a radiation therapy machine to schedule a visit, visiting the medical clinic, assuming a position on the patient support, and inactivating one or more nerves in a treatment volume encompassing at least a portion of the herniated disc by receiving radiation from the radiation source to the treatment volume.
  • The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Alternative exemplary embodiments relate to other features and combinations of features as may be generally recited in the claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a side elevation view of a spine;
  • FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a portion of the lumbar portion of a spine including an intervertebral disc;
  • FIG. 3 is a sectional view of a portion of the lumbar portion of a spine including a partially herniated intervertebral disc;
  • FIG. 4 is a sectional view of a portion of the lumbar portion of a spine including an intervertebral disc; and
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic perspective view of a radiation therapy machine with a cut-away portion showing the gantry.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Referring to FIG. 1, the spine 10 includes vertebrae 12 separated by intervertebral discs 14. A vertebral canal 16 extends along successive vertebrae and houses the spinal cord (not shown).
  • Referring to FIG. 2, an intervertebral disc 14 includes an inner nucleus pulposus 18 and an outer annulus fibrosus 20. The annulus fibrosus 20 is made up of a number of bands that are arranged in a series of concentric layers to retain the nucleus pulposus 18 and aid in resisting other forces placed on the spine 10. In the lumbar portion of the spine 10, the cauda equina 22 runs through the vertebral canal 16. Spinal nerves 24 extend outwardly from the cauda equina 22, with nerve roots 26 proximate the cauda equina 22. While a lumbar vertebra and associated disc are shown in FIGS. 2-4, the invention is equally applicable to other vertebrae and discs in the spine.
  • The outer portion of the annulus fibrosus 20 is innervated by the sinuvertebral nerve (not shown). The sinuvertebral nerve also innervates other structures in the epidural space. As discussed above, the nociceptors in the annulus fibrosus 20 transmit pain due to herniation of the intervertebral disc 14 or other discogenic causes. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the nucleus pulposus 18 may bulge outward, possibly due to degradation in the fibers making up the concentric rings of the annulus fibrosus 20. The bulging disc 14 may apply pressure on nerves proximate the bulge 28. Such pressure may result in radiating pain down a patient's leg. The entry into the vertebral canal 16 of the intervertebral disc 14 material may also cause toxic damage to the nerves in the area, resulting in pain.
  • Referring to FIG. 4, the nociceptors 30 populating the outer portion of the annulus fibrosus 20 may transmit impulses resulting in the sensation of pain. Such nociceptors 30 are typically concentrated along the posterior wall of the disc 14. A treatment volume 32 may be identified that contains a number of the nociceptors 30 causing the pain sensation. Depopulation of the nociceptors 30 in the treatment volume 32 may result in a decrease or cessation of the pain originating from the treatment volume 32. It is theorized that certain conventional minimally invasive procedures, such as IDET, result in the thermocoagulation of nociceptors within the walls of the intervertebral disc being treated and therefore result in the reduction of pain. The treatment volume 32 may also include a portion of the intervertebral disc where blood vessels have invaded, such as the area of a tear in the annular wall of the disc. Such invading vasculature can cause back pain.
  • Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a radiation therapy machine 40 is used to deliver radiation to the treatment volume 32 in order to treat unremitting back pain. The radiation is intended to depopulate or inactivate the nerves providing the pain sensation, eliminate invading vasculature, and/or shrink disc material to reduce pressure in the area. In a preferred embodiment, the radiation therapy machine 40 is designed to utilize conformal radiotherapy to deliver the radiation to the treatment volume 32. Due to the sensitive structures proximate the treatment volume 32, in particular the spinal cord and cauda equina, ideally a form of image guided radiation therapy is utilized. One such image guided radiation therapy machine is the TomoTherapy HI-ART® system available from TomoTherapy Incorporated of Middleton, Wis.
  • In an exemplary embodiment, where an image-guided radiation therapy approach is utilized, the radiation therapy machine 40 has a rotating gantry 44 within a housing 42. An x-ray source 46 and corresponding detector 48 used for acquiring data to construct CT images of the patient are mounted on the gantry 44 along with a radiation delivery mechanism 50 used to deliver the desired dose to the treatment volume 32. The radiation delivery mechanism 50 is a rotating radiation output port on the gantry 44 in the embodiment of FIG. 5. A radiation source, e.g. linear accelerator or Cobalt-60 source, generates the radiation that is delivered via the radiation delivery mechanism 50. A patient support, shown as table 52, is configured to support the patient (not shown) within the rotating gantry 44 and to slide the patient through the open center portion of the gantry 44 in order to acquire a spiral CT scan of the patient simultaneously with the delivery of radiation in a helical fashion to the desired treatment volume 32. A computer workstation 54 may be utilized to control the radiation therapy machine 40 as well as to display the acquired images.
  • Other types of radiation therapy or radiosurgery equipment may also be utilized to deliver a prescribed radiation dose to the treatment volume 32. Examples of such devices include linear accelerators and x-ray machines. One machine using a linear accelerator that may be useful in a preferred embodiment is a CYBERKNIFE® stereotactic radiosurgery system that utilizes a radiation delivery mechanism in the form of a robotic arm to deliver a radiation beam from many different angles to the target area. The CYBERKNIFE® stereotactic radiosurgery system is available from Accuray Incorporated of Sunnyvale, Calif.
  • In order to determine whether the radiation therapy machine 40 may be utilized to treat lower back pain, the cause of the pain must first be diagnosed. Various methods for performing such a diagnosis are known, and include discography, which involves the injection of a radio-opaque dye into the spinal disc, followed by an x-ray image to determine whether the disc at issue is herniated or degraded in some way. A computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan may also be used to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the area thought to be causing the pain to identify the condition causing the pain. Other types of imaging procedures, such as PET or SPECT, may also be utilized to identify the intervertebral disc causing the pain.
  • Referring again to FIG. 4, once the disc causing the pain has been identified along with the reason for the pain, the treatment volume 32 may be defined. In an exemplary embodiment, the treatment volume 32 is a three-dimensional region encompassing the posterior side of the annulus fibrosus 20 containing the offending nociceptors and/or the inflamed area causing the pain.
  • Once the treatment volume 32 has been defined, the physician treating the patient may prescribe a radiation therapy plan. In an exemplary embodiment, the radiation therapy plan or “treatment plan” involves delivering a specified radiation dose to the treatment volume, ideally using a stereotactic approach in order to spare issues outside of the treatment volume 32 to the extent possible. The radiation may be delivered to the treatment volume 32 in a single treatment or may be fractionated to deliver a portion of the prescribed dose over the course of several treatments. In an alternative embodiment, a fluid such as a dye may be injected into the disc space to concentrate the effect of the radiation delivered to the treatment volume.
  • In an exemplary embodiment, the workstation 54 is a treatment planning computer that is loaded with treatment planning software that may be used to calculate a suitable method for delivering the prescribed radiation dose to the treatment volume 32. In a preferred embodiment, the radiation is delivered from multiple positions relative to the treatment volume 32 such that the radiation beams travel through different tissues en route to the treatment volume 32. Ideally, the primary routes to the treatment volume should include certain “treatment portals” that do not include sensitive structures and therefore can accept a larger radiation dose. In this fashion, the radiation therapy machine 40 is programmed to properly deliver the radiation dose to the treatment volume 32. Definition of the treatment volume 32 and creation of the treatment plan may include an assessment of sensitive regions (e.g. radiosensitive tissues) proximate to the desired treatment volume and according modifications to the treatment volume 32 and/or treatment plan to ensure a lower radiation dose to sensitive areas.
  • Once the treatment volume 32 has been defined, and the treatment plan created, the patient may be positioned on the table 52 for delivery of radiation to the treatment volume 32. Prior to delivery of the radiation, the location of the patient may be identified utilizing the on-board CT scanner or other type of imaging device on a similar machine. Verification of the position of the patient is especially important due to the proximity of sensitive structures in the spine. Once the patient's position has been verified, the radiation therapy machine 40 may be used to deliver the prescribed radiation dose to the treatment volume 32.
  • The utilization of radiation to treat discogenic pain requires the programming of treatment planning software used to control the radiation therapy machine 40 in order to deliver radiation to the treatment volume 32. While radiation therapy is presently used to treat tumors found in the spine, such tumors are not typically found in the intervertebral discs. In one embodiment of the invention, similar doses and radiation energies are used to treat discogenic pain as are presently used in cancer treatments, but the radiation dose necessary to depopulate and/or inactivate the offending nociceptors 30 and/or eliminate invading vasculature may differ from the radiation dose necessary to kill tumor cells. Therefore, a lower radiation dose may be used to treat discogenic pain as compared to the total overall doses used to treat tumors. Fractionation may also be utilized in radiation treatment of discogenic pain.
  • Utilization of radiation therapy machine 40 to treat discogenic pain is non-invasive and may use currently available radiation therapy equipment with modifications in accordance with the invention described herein. In an exemplary embodiment, the radiation therapy machine 40 is owned by a medical clinic, such as a clinic specializing in the treatment of back pain. A patient may contact the clinic to set up an appointment to visit the clinic for diagnosis and/or treatment of the back pain, perhaps in response to advertisements or information provided by the clinic or other organization (e.g. advertisements in magazines, in newspapers, on billboards, or via television, radio, or the internet). Multiple treatment visits will be necessary in the case of a fractionated treatment plan.
  • Because conformal radiotherapy using machines such as the TomoTherapy HI-ART® or Accuray CYBERKNIFE® systems identified above delivers a radiation dose to a defined three-dimensional volume within the body while sparing proximate tissues to the extent possible, it may be possible to treat discogenic symptoms using radiation therapy where conventional surgical methods are unavailable. Further still, utilization of radiation therapy does not have the inherent risks associated with conventional spine surgery options, such as the spinal fusion surgical procedures that are currently utilized to treat chronic lower back pain.
  • While the detailed drawings and specific examples given herein describe various exemplary embodiments, they serve the purpose of illustration only. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the preceding description or illustrated in the drawings. For example the methods may be performed in a variety of sequences of steps. Furthermore, other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangements of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.

Claims (13)

1. A method of operating a back pain treatment clinic, comprising:
providing an apparatus configured to treat back pain with radiation;
creating an advertisement intended to inform potential customers about the back pain treatment clinic; and
soliciting customers via the advertisement.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the advertisement is placed in at least one of a magazine or a newspaper.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the advertisement is placed on a billboard.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the advertisement is run on at least one of a radio station or a television station.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the advertisement is placed on the internet.
6. A back pain treatment system, comprising:
a patient support;
a radiation source;
a radiation delivery mechanism and
a treatment planning computer adapted to control the radiation delivery mechanism, the treatment planning computer programmed to deliver radiation from the radiation source to a treatment volume including a blood vessel.
7. The treatment device of claim 6 wherein the blood vessel has invaded a portion of an intervertebral disc.
8. The treatment device of claim 6, wherein the delivery mechanism is a robotic arm to permit delivery of radiation from different positions.
9. The treatment device of claim 6, wherein the delivery mechanism is coupled to a rotating gantry to permit delivery of radiation from different positions.
10. The treatment device of claim 9, wherein the patient support slides relative to the rotating gantry.
11. The treatment device of claim 6, wherein the radiation source is a Cobalt-60 source.
12. The treatment device of claim 6, wherein the radiation source is a linear accelerator.
13. The treatment device of claim 6, further comprising a computed tomography scanner adapted to provide information to the treatment planning computer for determining the position of a patient.
US13/113,873 2006-03-30 2011-05-23 Method and Apparatus for Treatment of Discogenic Pain Abandoned US20110224476A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/113,873 US20110224476A1 (en) 2006-03-30 2011-05-23 Method and Apparatus for Treatment of Discogenic Pain

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/393,054 US7634307B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2006-03-30 Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain
US12/561,777 US7953472B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2009-09-17 Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain
US13/113,873 US20110224476A1 (en) 2006-03-30 2011-05-23 Method and Apparatus for Treatment of Discogenic Pain

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/561,777 Division US7953472B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2009-09-17 Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110224476A1 true US20110224476A1 (en) 2011-09-15

Family

ID=38576274

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/393,054 Active 2026-05-20 US7634307B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2006-03-30 Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain
US12/561,777 Expired - Fee Related US7953472B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2009-09-17 Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain
US13/113,873 Abandoned US20110224476A1 (en) 2006-03-30 2011-05-23 Method and Apparatus for Treatment of Discogenic Pain

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/393,054 Active 2026-05-20 US7634307B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2006-03-30 Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain
US12/561,777 Expired - Fee Related US7953472B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2009-09-17 Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US7634307B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11439432B2 (en) 2020-04-09 2022-09-13 Spinal Generations, Llc Handle attachment for fluid delivery needle and method of use thereof

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8880189B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2014-11-04 John D. LIPANI System and method for electrical stimulation of the lumbar vertebral column
US9789313B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2017-10-17 John D. LIPANI System and methods for diagnosis and treatment of discogenic lower back pain
US11806069B2 (en) 2019-01-25 2023-11-07 Warsaw Orthopedics, IN Devices and methods for the diagnosis and treatment of discogenic back pain

Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4624846A (en) * 1983-07-29 1986-11-25 Immunomedics, Inc. Method for enhancing target specificity of antibody localization and clearance of non-target diagnostic and therapeutic principles
US5317616A (en) * 1992-03-19 1994-05-31 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method and apparatus for radiation therapy
US5427097A (en) * 1992-12-10 1995-06-27 Accuray, Inc. Apparatus for and method of carrying out stereotaxic radiosurgery and radiotherapy
US5673300A (en) * 1996-06-11 1997-09-30 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method of registering a radiation treatment plan to a patient
US5851182A (en) * 1996-09-11 1998-12-22 Sahadevan; Velayudhan Megavoltage radiation therapy machine combined to diagnostic imaging devices for cost efficient conventional and 3D conformal radiation therapy with on-line Isodose port and diagnostic radiology
US6032066A (en) * 1997-02-07 2000-02-29 Jcrt Radiation Oncology Support Services Method and apparatus for virtual radiotherapy beam projection localization in real space
US20020032378A1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2002-03-14 Henderson Fraser C. Novel radiosurgery methods that utilize stereotactic methods to precisely deliver high dosages of radiation especially to the spine
US6366802B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2002-04-02 Bales Scientific Inc. Photon irradiation human pain treatment monitored by thermal imaging
US6560311B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2003-05-06 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method for preparing a radiation therapy plan
US6618467B1 (en) * 1999-04-02 2003-09-09 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Megavoltage computed tomography during radiotherapy
US6661870B2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2003-12-09 Tomotherapy Incorporated Fluence adjustment for improving delivery to voxels without reoptimization
US20040006070A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2004-01-08 Hassenbusch Samuel J. Intraspinal continuous infusion of midazolam hydrochloride for the treatment of pain
US20040127963A1 (en) * 1999-01-25 2004-07-01 Uchida Andy H. Intervertebral decompression
US6778850B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2004-08-17 Accuray, Inc. Frameless radiosurgery treatment system and method
US20050197564A1 (en) * 2004-02-20 2005-09-08 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. System for delivering conformal radiation therapy while simultaneously imaging soft tissue
US7150710B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2006-12-19 Photomed Technologies, Inc. Therapeutic methods using electromagnetic radiation

Patent Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4624846A (en) * 1983-07-29 1986-11-25 Immunomedics, Inc. Method for enhancing target specificity of antibody localization and clearance of non-target diagnostic and therapeutic principles
US5317616A (en) * 1992-03-19 1994-05-31 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method and apparatus for radiation therapy
US5442675A (en) * 1992-03-19 1995-08-15 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Dynamic collimator for radiation therapy
US5548627A (en) * 1992-03-19 1996-08-20 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Radiation therapy system with constrained rotational freedom
US5427097A (en) * 1992-12-10 1995-06-27 Accuray, Inc. Apparatus for and method of carrying out stereotaxic radiosurgery and radiotherapy
US5673300A (en) * 1996-06-11 1997-09-30 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method of registering a radiation treatment plan to a patient
US5851182A (en) * 1996-09-11 1998-12-22 Sahadevan; Velayudhan Megavoltage radiation therapy machine combined to diagnostic imaging devices for cost efficient conventional and 3D conformal radiation therapy with on-line Isodose port and diagnostic radiology
US6032066A (en) * 1997-02-07 2000-02-29 Jcrt Radiation Oncology Support Services Method and apparatus for virtual radiotherapy beam projection localization in real space
US6560311B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2003-05-06 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method for preparing a radiation therapy plan
US6366802B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2002-04-02 Bales Scientific Inc. Photon irradiation human pain treatment monitored by thermal imaging
US20040127963A1 (en) * 1999-01-25 2004-07-01 Uchida Andy H. Intervertebral decompression
US6778850B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2004-08-17 Accuray, Inc. Frameless radiosurgery treatment system and method
US6618467B1 (en) * 1999-04-02 2003-09-09 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Megavoltage computed tomography during radiotherapy
US20020032378A1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2002-03-14 Henderson Fraser C. Novel radiosurgery methods that utilize stereotactic methods to precisely deliver high dosages of radiation especially to the spine
US6665555B2 (en) * 2000-04-05 2003-12-16 Georgetown University School Of Medicine Radiosurgery methods that utilize stereotactic methods to precisely deliver high dosages of radiation especially to the spine
US6661870B2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2003-12-09 Tomotherapy Incorporated Fluence adjustment for improving delivery to voxels without reoptimization
US7150710B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2006-12-19 Photomed Technologies, Inc. Therapeutic methods using electromagnetic radiation
US20040006070A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2004-01-08 Hassenbusch Samuel J. Intraspinal continuous infusion of midazolam hydrochloride for the treatment of pain
US20050197564A1 (en) * 2004-02-20 2005-09-08 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. System for delivering conformal radiation therapy while simultaneously imaging soft tissue

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11439432B2 (en) 2020-04-09 2022-09-13 Spinal Generations, Llc Handle attachment for fluid delivery needle and method of use thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7953472B2 (en) 2011-05-31
US7634307B2 (en) 2009-12-15
US20070238977A1 (en) 2007-10-11
US20100010677A1 (en) 2010-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mahadevan et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy reirradiation for recurrent epidural spinal metastases
Ryu et al. Image‐guided and intensity‐modulated radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastasis
Rock et al. Postoperative radiosurgery for malignant spinal tumors
Chang et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of near-simultaneous computed tomographic image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases
Chang et al. Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure
Sahgal et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: current status, with a focus on its application in the postoperative patient: a review
Chang et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: a comprehensive review
Benzil et al. Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors of the spine
Rock et al. The evolving role of stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiation therapy for patients with spine tumors
Gerszten Spine metastases: from radiotherapy, surgery, to radiosurgery
Inoue et al. New approach for treatment of vertebral metastases using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
US7953472B2 (en) Method and apparatus for treatment of discogenic pain
Pokhrel et al. Clinical validation of ring‐mounted halcyon linac for lung SBRT: comparison to SBRT‐dedicated C‐arm linac treatments
Nieder et al. Repeat reirradiation of the spinal cord: multi-national expert treatment recommendations
Vega et al. Percutaneous hybrid therapy for spinal metastatic disease: laser interstitial thermal therapy and spinal stereotactic radiosurgery
Monserrate et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for intradural spine tumors using cone-beam CT image guidance
Rief et al. Intensity‐modulated radiotherapy versus proton radiotherapy versus carbon ion radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases: a treatment planning study
Wang et al. Submillimeter alignment of more than three contiguous vertebrae in spinal SRS/SBRT with 6‐degree couch
Pokhrel et al. A simple, yet novel hybrid‐dynamic conformal arc therapy planning via flattening filter‐free beam for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
Romanelli et al. Technology Insight: image-guided robotic radiosurgery—a new approach for noninvasive ablation of spinal lesions
Kuo et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the spine at the University of California, Irvine
Qamhiyeh et al. The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
Wowra et al. Radiosurgery for spinal malignant tumors
Meyer et al. New technologies in the radiotherapy clinic
Quan et al. Comparison of setup accuracy and efficiency between the Klarity system and BodyFIX system for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION