US20140013492A1

US20140013492A1 - Protective helmet for mitigation of linear and rotational acceleration

Info

Publication number: US20140013492A1
Application number: US13/803,962
Authority: US
Inventors: Michael Bottlang; Steven Madey; Nathan Dau; Kirk Hansen; Ashton Wackym
Original assignee: Apex Biomedical Co LLC
Current assignee: Apex Biomedical Co LLC
Priority date: 2012-07-11
Filing date: 2013-03-14
Publication date: 2014-01-16
Also published as: EP2854584A4; CN104427896A; EP2854584A1; CA2878613A1; WO2014011802A1; AU2013290156A1

Abstract

Embodiments provide protective helmets configured to protect the head from linear and rotational acceleration in an impact. In various embodiments, the helmets may include an outer layer, an inner layer, and at least one intermediate layer coupled to the outer and inner layers by alternate fixation sites, thereby providing a suspension between the outer and inner layers. In various embodiments, the intermediate layer may be made from a honeycomb material, such as an aluminum honeycomb. In use, in-plane deformation of the honeycomb may allow for translation of the outer layer in a substantially tangential direction relative to the inner layer, thereby mitigating rotational acceleration imparted by the tangential impact component. Additionally, crumpling of the honeycomb in a substantially non-elastic manner may deplete impact energy to minimize the elastic rebound that can contribute to linear and rotational head acceleration, thereby mitigating linear acceleration imparted by the perpendicular impact component.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 61/670,258, filed Jul. 11, 2012, entitled “PROTECTIVE HELMET FOR MITIGATION OF LINEAR AND ROTATIONAL ACCELERATION,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments herein relate to the field of protective helmets and, more specifically, to helmets designed to protect the head from linear and rotational acceleration

BACKGROUND

Helmets protect the head from injury during a direct impact. An impact to the head can cause skull fracture and/or traumatic brain injury (TBI), and TBI is the leading cause of death and long-term disability in the US among people under 45. 90% of traumatic brain injuries occur without the presence of a skull fracture, and TBI can be induced by rotational acceleration alone. Despite the vulnerability of the brain to rotational acceleration, contemporary bicycle helmets are primarily designed and tested to mitigate linear acceleration. Most contemporary helmets have two principal shortcomings: first, they have limited means to absorb rotational acceleration, and second, elastic helmet liners may store energy during impact, and release of the stored energy may induce a rebound after impact that may contribute to the severity and duration of rotational head acceleration.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional mid-sagittal view of an example of a helmet, shown in an unloaded, non-deformed configuration, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional mid-sagittal view of a helmet shown during impact in a loaded, partially deformed configuration, and depicting relative translation between the outer and inner layers, accommodated by in-plane compression and tension of the intermediate layer, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate non-elastic, plastic deformation of an example of a honeycomb membrane, shown in non-deformed (FIG. 3A) and deformed (FIG. 3B, with cut-away) states, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate schematic drawings of a planar segment (FIG. 4A) and a spherically shaped segment (FIG. 4B) of an exemplary honeycomb configuration that enables spherical, three-dimensional shaping, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C depict a schematic drawing of a honeycomb layer segment with alternate fixation points, shown in unloaded (FIG. 5A) and loaded, deformed conditions (FIG. 5B), and a perspective view of the honeycomb layer in a loaded, deformed condition (FIG. 5C), in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 6 illustrates a cross-sectional mid-sagittal view of an exemplary helmet shown in conjunction with additional layer segments adjacent to the intermediate layer to facilitate sliding of the intermediate layer relative to the inner and outer layers, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 7 illustrates a cross-sectional mid-sagittal view of one embodiment of a helmet, shown during impact in a loaded, partially deformed configuration, in accordance with various embodiments; and

FIG. 8 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a section of another embodiment, wherein the outer layer and inner layer are perforated with a multitude of holes, which may allow for ventilation through the honeycomb cells, in accordance with various embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration embodiments that may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope. Therefore, the following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of embodiments is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Various operations may be described as multiple discrete operations in turn, in a manner that may be helpful in understanding embodiments; however, the order of description should not be construed to imply that these operations are order dependent.
The description may use perspective-based descriptions such as up/down, back/front, and top/bottom. Such descriptions are merely used to facilitate the discussion and are not intended to restrict the application of disclosed embodiments.
The terms “coupled” and “connected,” along with their derivatives, may be used. It should be understood that these terms are not intended as synonyms for each other. Rather, in particular embodiments, “connected” may be used to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical with each other. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact. However, “coupled” may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still cooperate or interact with each other.
For the purposes of the description, a phrase in the form “A/B” or in the form “A and/or B” means (A), (B), or (A and B). For the purposes of the description, a phrase in the form “at least one of A, B, and C” means (A), (B), (C), (A and B), (A and C), (B and C), or (A, B and C). For the purposes of the description, a phrase in the form “(A)B” means (B) or (AB) that is, A is an optional element.
The description may use the terms “embodiment” or “embodiments,” which may each refer to one or more of the same or different embodiments. Furthermore, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and the like, as used with respect to embodiments, are synonymous.
Embodiments herein provide protective helmets designed to lessen the amount of harmful acceleration (both straight linear and rotational) that reaches the brain of a wearer during an impact to the head. In various embodiments, the helmets may include a multilayer construction for both cushioning and absorbing impact and rotational energy, thus reducing peak acceleration or deceleration of a wearer's head in an impact. In various embodiments, this reduction in head acceleration and deceleration may result in a corresponding reduction in the magnitude of acceleration or deceleration experienced by the brain, reducing the risk and/or severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI).
In various embodiments, the helmets disclosed herein may include a suspension of a compressible intermediate layer suspended between generally non-compressible inner and outer layers. In various embodiments, the suspension of the compressible intermediate layer may mitigate transfer of rotational acceleration from the outer layer to the inner layer. In various embodiments, the suspension may be created by coupling the compressible intermediate layer, such as a honeycomb layer, through discrete, alternate (e.g., non-opposing) fixation sites, to the outer and inner helmet layers in a manner that allows substantially tangential translation of the outer layer relative to the inner layer. Thus, in various embodiments, translation of the outer layer relative to the inner layer may induce in-plane compression and tension in the intermediate layer, rather than shearing.
In various embodiments, in addition to providing a suspension between the inner and outer layers, the intermediate layer also may crumple and/or compress in an essentially non-elastic manner to mitigate linear acceleration by depleting impact energy and minimizing elastic rebound, which can otherwise contribute to linear and rotational head acceleration. As such, in various embodiments, the disclosed helmets may allow tangential impact components to be absorbed by in-plane compressive or tensile deformation of the intermediate layer, and perpendicular impact components to be absorbed by non-elastic crumpling/compression of the intermediate layer.
In various embodiments, the intermediate layer may include a honeycomb, such as a honeycomb formed from any material having little or no elastic rebound. For example, in various embodiments, the honeycomb may be formed from compressible aluminum elements. Although the examples illustrated herein use aluminum honeycombs, one of skill in the art will appreciate that other lightweight, compressible materials may be employed that have little or no elastic rebound, such as cardboard or paper pulp, various natural or synthetic foams (such as aluminum foam), plastic, non-elastic polymers, and the like.
In various embodiments, the layered construction of the helmets disclosed herein may be used to construct any type of protective headgear, such as safety helmets, motorcycle helmets, bicycle helmets, ski helmets, lacrosse helmets, hockey helmets, football helmets, batting helmets for baseball and softball, headgear for rock and mountain climbers, headgear for boxers, construction helmets, helmets for defense and military applications, and headgear for underground activities. In other embodiments, the layered technologies disclosed herein may be adapted for use in other types of protective gear, such as elbow pads, knee pads, shoulder pads, shin guards, and the like.
FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional mid-sagittal view of an example of a helmet, shown in an unloaded, non-deformed configuration, in accordance with various embodiments. In the illustrated embodiment, the helmet 101 has an aerodynamic shape designed for use by bicyclists. As illustrated, helmet 101 may include an outer layer 104, an inner layer 105, and an intermediate layer 102. In various embodiments, intermediate layer 102 may be made from a honeycomb material, such as an aluminum honeycomb material, and may be coupled to the outer and inner layers 104, 105 at alternate fixation sites 103 a, 103 b, 103 c. As defined herein, the term “alternate fixation sites” refers to attachment points between the outer and intermediate layers, or the intermediate and inner layers, that are spaced apart such that the outer and intermediate layers are not coupled together at a point directly above (e.g., across a thickness dimension of the helmet) a fixation site between the intermediate and inner layers. The term “alternate fixation sites” does not require that each fixation site alternates with respect to adjacent sites along a length of a layer. In embodiments, there may be, for example, two fixation sites adjacent to each other between the intermediate layer 102 and the outer layer 104 and one or more fixation sites between the intermediate layer 102 and the inner layer 105 further in one direction along the layers. In various embodiments, these alternate fixation sites 103 a, 103 b, 103 c may be positioned such that intermediate layer 102 is not coupled to both the outer and inner layers 104, 105 at opposing locations of intermediate layer 102, so that, for example, a fixation site 103 b between intermediate layer 102 and outer layer 104 is not directly opposed to a fixation site 103 a, 103 c between intermediate layer 102 and inner layer 105, and vice versa. In various embodiments, this alternate fixation may leave portions of intermediate layer 102 that are coupled to neither outer layer 104 nor inner layer 105, enabling stretching and/or compression of intermediate layer 102 between alternate fixation sites 103 a, 103 b, 103 c, thus enabling translation of outer layer 104 relative to inner layer 105, as described in greater detail below.
In various embodiments, outer helmet layer 104 may be sufficiently stable, rigid, and/or non-compressible to distribute impact forces over an extended area. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the shape depicted in FIG. 1 is merely exemplary, and that the helmet shape can vary depending on the particular sporting event or activity for which the helmet is designed. Furthermore, helmets in accordance with the present disclosure may include additional features, such as a cage for a hockey helmet, a face mask for a football helmet, a visor for a motorcycle helmet, and/or retention straps, chin straps, and the like. Although not shown in the illustrated embodiment, inner, intermediate, and/or outer layers 105, 102, 104 may include one or more ventilation openings to permit air flow for cooling the wearer's head.
In the illustrated embodiment, intermediate layer 102 may include an aluminum honeycomb, arranged with its cells oriented generally perpendicular to the outer layer 104 of the helmet. In various embodiments, inner layer 105 may be applied to at least a portion of the intermediate layer 102 interior surface. In embodiments, the inner layer covers most if not all of the intermediate layer. The inner layer may be comprised of a singular component, of multiple, partially overlapping components, or of multiple components that are joined together in a flexible manner (e.g., like the sewn patches of a soccer ball). As described above, in various embodiments, intermediate layer 102 may be coupled to outer layer 104 and inner layer 105 at discrete and alternate fixation sites 103 a, 103 b, 103 c so as to provide a suspension between outer layer 104 and inner layer 105. For example, in some embodiments, outer layer 104 may be coupled to intermediate layer 102 at the helmet crown 103 b, and inner layer 105 may be coupled to intermediate layer 102 at the helmet periphery 103 a, 103 c. Without being bound by theory, this configuration may reduce the rotational head acceleration caused by the impact component acting tangential to the helmet surface, and it also may reduce linear head acceleration caused by the impact component acting perpendicular to the helmet surface, as described in greater detail below. Other configurations/arrangements may be used in other embodiments.
FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional mid-sagittal view of a helmet 201 shown during impact in a loaded, partially deformed configuration, and depicting relative translation between the outer and inner layers 204, 205, accommodated by in-plane compression and tension of the intermediate layer 202, in accordance with various embodiments. In the illustrated embodiment, as described above, intermediate layer 202 may be suspended between inner layer 205 and outer layer 204 via coupling to both layers 204, 205 at alternate fixation sites 203 a, 203 b, 203 c. In use, when helmet 201 is exposed to a primarily tangential impact, this impact induces relative translation between outer layer 204 and inner layer 205, accommodated by in-plane compression 206 and tension 207 (e.g., expansion) of intermediate layer 202.
In various embodiments, the suspension of intermediate layer 202 between inner layer 205 and outer layer 204 also may allow for small amounts of translation of inner layer 205 perpendicular to and away from outer layer 204. In various embodiments, this increase in separation between outer layer 204 and inner layer 205 may accommodate tangential translation between outer and inner layers 204, 205 in an ovoid, non-spherical shape of helmet 201. Without being bound by theory, in various embodiments, a primary benefit of translation between the outer and inner layers 204, 205 during impact may be mitigation of rotational head acceleration. In some embodiments, an additional benefit may be that translation distributes the impact over a larger segment of intermediate layer 202, which may increase absorption of the impact force component perpendicular to the outer layer 204 by controlled crumpling of the honeycomb of the intermediate layer 202 in a direction perpendicular to the honeycomb elements. In some embodiments, a surface of inner layer 205, outer layer 204, or intermediate layer 202 may include one or more indicators that show the amount of translation 208 between the outer and inner layers 204, 205 in response to an impact to estimate impact severity. For example, such indicators may be comprised of graded color bands 209, 210 that circumscribe the periphery of the inside of outer layer 204, whereby increased exposure of color bands 209, 210 indicates an increased impact force.
In some embodiments, the intermediate layer may include two or more layers of honeycomb materials having different stiffness, such that the less stiff layers protect the brain during mild impacts, and the stiffer layers protect the brain during severe impacts. In other embodiments, the honeycomb cells may be entirely or partially filled with an additional energy absorbing material, such as an expanded foam. In particular embodiments, the additional energy absorbing material may be of non-uniform thickness, and may be configured, for example, such that the intermediate layer becomes progressively stiffer as it is crushed in the direction tangential to the outer layer, and/or in the direction perpendicular to the outer layer. In still other embodiments, the additional energy absorbing material also may form a solid layer on the inner and/or outer surface of the honeycomb.
FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate non-elastic, plastic deformation of an example of a honeycomb layer, shown in non-deformed (FIG. 3A) and deformed, partially cut-away (FIG. 3B) states, in accordance with various embodiments. In various embodiments, an impact force acting perpendicular to the outer helmet surface in excess of the compressive strength of the honeycomb layer may induce plastic, permanent compression of the honeycomb layer by means of crumpling of honeycomb cells. In various embodiments, the plastic, non-recoverable crumpling of honeycomb cells may absorb an impact by depleting a portion of the impact force. Thus, this crumpling may reduce or eliminate rebound after impact, which may otherwise induce rotational head acceleration subsequent to a primary impact. In some embodiments, in order to minimize an initial peak force required to initiate crumpling, the honeycomb layer may be pre-crushed to a certain degree, such as about 1-20% of its thickness, or about 5-15% in various embodiments.
FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate schematic drawings of a planar portion (FIG. 4A) and a spherically shaped portion (FIG. 4B) of an example honeycomb configuration that enables spherical, three-dimensional shaping, in accordance with various embodiments. In the illustrated example, this honeycomb configuration 404 enables conforming of an aluminum honeycomb into the spherical, three-dimensional shape of a helmet, while retaining a substantially symmetric shape of honeycomb elements without buckling of honeycomb elements.
FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C depict a schematic drawing of a honeycomb layer segment with alternate fixation points, shown in unloaded (FIG. 5A) and loaded, deformed conditions (FIG. 5B), and a perspective view of the honeycomb layer in loaded, deformed condition (FIG. 5C), in accordance with various embodiments. FIG. 5A illustrates an example of a non-deformed honeycomb 502, with some fixation sites 510 attached to an inner helmet layer, and other fixation sites 511 attached to an outer helmet layer. In various embodiments, honeycomb 502 may include void sections 512 for ventilation, which may correspond to similar void sections in the inner and outer helmet layers. FIG. 5B illustrates honeycomb 502 under tangential loading, whereby honeycomb segments between alternate fixation points 510 and 511 are deformed to accommodate suspension and translation between the inner and outer helmet layers. FIG. 5C illustrates again the deformed shape of honeycomb 502 due to tangential force introduction through fixation point 511.
In some embodiments, the alternate fixation sites between the respective layers may include non-permanent connections, such as hook-and-loop connections, and may allow for replacement of the inner, outer, or intermediate layer if damaged. In other embodiments, the inner layer may be attached to the outer layer with an elastic material, and wherein the elastic material holds the inner layer in place during normal wearing, but allows relative displacement between the inner layer and outer layer in an impact.
FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a helmet 601 having an intermediate layer 602 in suspension between outer layer 604 and inner layer 605, wherein intermediate layer 602 is coupled to the inner and outer layers via alternate fixation sites 603. In the illustrated embodiment, helmet 601 also includes a padding layer 608 on the inside of inner layer 605 to improve comfort and help attenuate impacts. In various embodiments, padding layer 608 may include a single layer or may be comprised of multiple sections. In some embodiments, one or more glidable interface layers 607 may be added between at least a part of intermediate layer 602 and outer layer 604. In some embodiments, one or more glidable interface layers 606 may be added between at least a part of intermediate layer 602 and inner layer 605. In some embodiments, these interface layers 606 and 607 may reduce friction to enhance tangential displacement between the inner and outer layers during an oblique impact. In addition, in some embodiments, inner layer 605 may be configured with perforations or alternative means to reduce its in-plane stiffness in order to enhance tangential displacement between the inner and outer layer during an oblique impact. In further embodiments, intermediate layer 602, and/or inner 605 layer or outer 607 layer, may be provided with a colorimetric indicator that indicates the severity of impact when the helmet sustains an impact force. In some embodiments, the severity of impact may be shown as the degree of displacement of the outer layer 607 relative to the inner 605 and/or intermediate 602 layers.
FIG. 7 illustrates a cross-sectional mid-sagittal view of another embodiment of a helmet 701 shown during impact in a loaded, partially deformed configuration. In this embodiment, some or all of the fixation points 703 a, 703 b, 703 c are not rigid connections (703 b), but rather are unidirectional couplings 703 a, 703 c that locally couple the layers together upon tangential forces in one direction, while allowing free relative displacement upon tangential forces in another direction. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, relative translation between the outer layer 704 and inner layer 705 is accompanied by in-plane compression of the intermediate layer 702 on one side 706, but the other side 707 remains undeformed in the in-plane direction. In the illustrated embodiment, the inner layer 705 is held in place in the undeformed configuration by elastic connections 708, and in various embodiments, these elastic connections may allow for relative displacement between the outer layer 704 and inner layer 705 in an impact. In practice, this embodiment may allow for greater control of the in-plane stiffness of the intermediate layer 701.
FIG. 8 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a section of another embodiment, wherein the outer layer 801 and inner layer 802 are perforated with a multitude of holes 803, which may allow for ventilation through the honeycomb cells in intermediate layer 804. Although a particular hole size is illustrated, one of skill in the art will appreciate that a range of hole sizes is contemplated, for example, from about 1 mm to about 3 cm, such as about 0.5-2 cm, or about 1 cm, depending on the application. The holes may be ordered in an array or random in placement, and different portions of the helmet may have holes of different sizes and/or placement, depending on the ventilation needs of the particular application. It will be appreciated that it may be advantageous to supply the helmet with a multitude of small ventilation holes in order to prevent the gaps in protection that may result from the larger ventilation holes used in most conventional helmets. Additionally, providing a multitude of small holes may enable the helmet to have a more streamlined, smooth shape, which in turn may reduce the chance that a helmet contour may “catch” on an obstacle or obstruction during a fall or other head impact, which could increase rotational impact forces.
Although certain embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a wide variety of alternate and/or equivalent embodiments or implementations calculated to achieve the same purposes may be substituted for the embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope. Those with skill in the art will readily appreciate that embodiments may be implemented in a very wide variety of ways. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the embodiments discussed herein. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that embodiments be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A helmet for protecting a head during an impact, comprising:

an outer layer;

an inner layer; and

at least one deformable intermediate layer, wherein the intermediate layer has substantially no elastic rebound, and wherein the intermediate layer is coupled to both the outer and inner layers at alternate fixation sites.

2. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the intermediate layer is configured to provide a suspension between the outer and inner layers.

3. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the outer layer is configured to translate in a substantially tangential direction relative to the inner layer via in-plane deformation of at least a portion of the intermediate layer.

4. The helmet of claim 3, wherein the intermediate layer is configured to absorb impact energy by deformation in directions both perpendicular and tangential to the outer layer.

5. The helmet of claim 3, wherein the outer layer is further configured to translate in a direction substantially perpendicular to the inner layer.

6. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the helmet further comprises a glidable interface layer disposed between the intermediate layer and the inner and/or outer layer, wherein the glidable interface layer is configured to facilitate sliding between the intermediate layer and the inner and/or outer layer.

7. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the inner, outer, and/or intermediate layer comprises a colorimetric indicator configured to indicate the severity of an impact sustained by the helmet.

8. The helmet of claim 1, wherein an alternate fixation site between the intermediate layer and the inner or outer layer comprises a unidirectional coupling, and wherein the unidirectional coupling permits tangential translation at the unidirectional coupling site between the intermediate layer and in the inner or outer layer in only one direction.

9. The helmet of claim 8, wherein the unidirectional coupling is configured such that a tangential impact deforms the intermediate layer only in compression, and not in tension.

10. The helmet of claim 8, wherein the unidirectional coupling comprises an edge or hook on the inner and/or outer layer that overlaps at least a portion of the intermediate layer.

11. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the outer and/or inner layer is perforated with a plurality of holes having an average diameter of from about 1 mm to about 3 cm.

12. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the alternate fixation sites comprise removable couplings.

13. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the alternate fixation sites comprise elastic couplings, and wherein the elastic couplings are configured to allow relative displacement between the inner layer and outer layer in an impact.

14. A helmet for protecting a head during an impact, comprising:

an outer layer;

an inner layer; and

at least one deformable intermediate layer, wherein the intermediate layer comprises a honeycomb, and wherein the helmet is configured to permit relative tangential displacement of the inner and/or outer layers with respect to one another.

15. The helmet of claim 14, wherein the honeycomb is an aluminum honeycomb.

16. The helmet of claim 14, wherein the honeycomb comprises a plurality of honeycomb elements configured to retain a substantially symmetric shape and/or resist buckling when the intermediate layer adopts a curved or substantially spherical shape.

17. The helmet of claim 14, wherein the honeycomb is configured to crumple and absorb an impact force component actin substantially perpendicular to the outer layer.

18. The helmet of claim 17, wherein the honeycomb provides a substantially linear crush response.

19. The helmet of claim 17, wherein the honeycomb is pre-crushed by 1-20% of its thickness.

20. The helmet of claim 14, wherein the intermediate layer comprises at least two layers of honeycomb, wherein each layer of honeycomb has a different crush resistance.

21. The helmet of claim 14, wherein the honeycomb cells are at least partially filled with an additional energy-absorbing material.

22. The helmet of claim 21, wherein the additional energy-absorbing material comprises an expanded foam.

23. The helmet of claim 21, wherein the additional energy-absorbing material has a non-uniform thickness, and wherein the additional energy-absorbing material is configured such that the intermediate layer becomes progressively more crush-resistant as it is crushed in a direction tangential to the outer layer and/or in a direction perpendicular to the outer layer.

24. The helmet of claim 14, wherein the outer layer and/or inner layer is permeable to air and configured to allow for ventilation through the honeycomb.

25. A method for making a helmet that mitigates linear and rotational acceleration of a head during impact, the method comprising:

suspending an intermediate layer between an outer layer and an inner layer, wherein suspending the intermediate layer comprises coupling the intermediate layer to the inner layer and the outer layer at alternate fixation sites, wherein the intermediate layer is configured to absorb impact energy by deformation in a direction perpendicular to the outer layer and in a direction tangential to the outer layer.