US20140279278A1 - Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order - Google Patents

Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140279278A1
US20140279278A1 US14/281,201 US201414281201A US2014279278A1 US 20140279278 A1 US20140279278 A1 US 20140279278A1 US 201414281201 A US201414281201 A US 201414281201A US 2014279278 A1 US2014279278 A1 US 2014279278A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
item
customer
substitution
oversold
order
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/281,201
Inventor
Joyo Wijaya
Louis H. Borders
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JUNE RAY Ltd
Original Assignee
IpVenture Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=38157161&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20140279278(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by IpVenture Inc filed Critical IpVenture Inc
Priority to US14/281,201 priority Critical patent/US20140279278A1/en
Publication of US20140279278A1 publication Critical patent/US20140279278A1/en
Assigned to JUNE RAY LIMITED reassignment JUNE RAY LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: IPVENTURE, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0633Lists, e.g. purchase orders, compilation or processing
    • G06Q30/0635Processing of requisition or of purchase orders
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • G06Q10/087Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • G06Q10/087Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
    • G06Q10/0875Itemisation or classification of parts, supplies or services, e.g. bill of materials
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0613Third-party assisted
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0613Third-party assisted
    • G06Q30/0617Representative agent
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0631Item recommendations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0633Lists, e.g. purchase orders, compilation or processing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0641Shopping interfaces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0641Shopping interfaces
    • G06Q30/0643Graphical representation of items or shoppers

Definitions

  • the present invention pertains to order substitution methods and systems that automatically perform substitutions for unavailable items in a customer order. More specifically, the invention allows for the substitution of unavailable items based upon predetermined criteria and set processes, so that the substitutions are made in a manner that optimizes efficiency and customer satisfaction.
  • Substitution methods in the current art typically use non-systematic and inefficient procedures in order to provide substitute items for unavailable items in a customer order.
  • some Internet-based grocery shoppers (such as, for example, Peapod Inc., of Skokie, Ill.), send human buyers to one or more stores in order to fulfill customer orders. If a buyer is trying to fulfill an order for Brand A 64 oz. Ketchup, for example, and it is out of stock at the store, the buyer can make a substitution in order to approximate the product that the customer ordered.
  • the substituted item may only be chosen from available items on the grocery shelf, which are typically adjacent to the unavailable items on the shelf space.
  • the buyer might substitute the same brand ketchup in a different size or variety, or a different brand in a similar size or variety, assuming that either is available at the store.
  • This invention provides systems and methods for implementing item substitutions with respect to consumer orders in order to implement substitutions of unavailable items in customer orders.
  • this is accomplished by first taking customer orders via a data or computer network.
  • a selected number of customer orders may then be aggregated and analyzed in order to make item substitution decisions.
  • the decisions may be based upon a variety of different criteria, including one or more of the following: data from the selected customer orders, customer preferences, predefined substitution rules for each of the products, and accurate inventory information on the actual availability of products, etc.
  • Specific embodiments of the invention provide a method and computer program product for effecting, via a computer network, substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order.
  • At least one customer order is received via the computer network.
  • At least a portion of the received customer order is analyzed to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold.
  • the analyzed order data may be compared to available inventory data to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold.
  • Order line items relating to an identified oversold item may then be identified, wherein each order line item may be associated with a respective customer order.
  • order line items for identified oversold items may be selected using at least a portion of the predefined criteria.
  • At least one second item may then be substituted for an identified oversold item in selected customer orders, based upon the predefined criteria.
  • the item substitution technique of the present invention may be performed by an automated computer process. It may also be performed at a time of fulfilling an order without intervention from a human operator.
  • the predefined criteria may include a variety of business rules relating to how line items are selected for substitution analysis, and relating to how substitute items are selected.
  • the predefined criteria may include rules relating to minimizing a total number of order substitutions performed for each customer order; rules relating to selecting, for substitution analysis, order line items which have a relatively highest order quantity; sorted list of substitute products from which substitute items are chosen; rules for substituting a specific quantity of a second item for an unavailable item; etc.
  • An alternate embodiment of the present invention is directed to a system for effecting, via a computer network, substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order.
  • the system may include least one central processing unit, at least one interface configured or designed to receive at least one customer order via the computer network, and memory.
  • the at least one customer order may include at least one order line item relating to an ordered quantity of a particular item of inventory.
  • the memory may be configured to store customer order information and predefined criteria relating to item substitution rules.
  • the system may be configured to analyze at least a portion of the received customer orders to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold.
  • the system may also be configured to identify order line items relating to an identified oversold item, wherein each order line item is associated with a respective customer order.
  • the system may also be configured to substitute, based upon predefined criteria, at least one second item for the identified oversold item in selected customer orders.
  • Alternate embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method and computer program product for effecting, via a computer network, substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order.
  • At least one customer order is received via the computer network.
  • Each customer order may include at least one order line item relating to an ordered quantity of a particular item of inventory.
  • At least a portion of the received customer orders may then be analyzed to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold.
  • Order line items relating to an identified oversold item may be identified, each order line item being associated with a respective customer order.
  • At least one second item may then be substituted for the identified oversold item in selected customer orders based upon predefined criteria.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram showing the most relevant parts of integrated system architecture in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a Customer Order Handling Process in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram of a Substitution Screening Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of substitution instructions for specified SKUs in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow diagram depicting an Item Substitution Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram depicting a Partial Substitution Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram depicting a Full Substitution Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is schematic illustration of hardware that is suitable for implementing the technique of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a specific embodiment of an integrated system architecture 100 which may be used for implementing the automated substitution technique of the present invention.
  • system 100 includes a plurality of subsystems and other components for effecting electronic commerce over a data network.
  • a brief description of at least a portion of the plurality of subsystems of system 100 is presented below.
  • system 100 of FIG. 1 may include a Publishing (PUB) Subsystem 140 which provides an interface to merchants, vendors and/or content managers 133 ; a Webstore Subsystem (WS) 132 which manages the on-line store interface with customers, including customer shopping and ordering transactions; an Order Management Subsystem (OMS) 150 which manages pricing data, item availability data, inventory data, vendor data, finance, procurement, etc.; an Order Fulfillment Subsystem (OFS) 160 which facilitates the fulfillment of customer orders; etc.
  • POB Publishing
  • WS Webstore Subsystem
  • OFS Order Fulfillment Subsystem
  • the PUB Subsystem 140 may be used for managing SKU inventory and catalog information (e.g. SKUs, UPCs, products, categories, descriptive attributes, etc.), and item substitution information provided by merchants or vendors.
  • SKU inventory and catalog information e.g. SKUs, UPCs, products, categories, descriptive attributes, etc.
  • item substitution information provided by merchants or vendors.
  • “Inventory” is the stock of SKU items actually available for customer orders. Each different item of inventory is associated with a respective stock keeping unit or SKU, regardless of whether the item is available for customer purchase.
  • a “stock keeping unit” or SKU may be defined as a unique identifier that corresponds to a particular consumer item.
  • a type of product, for example, Brand A ketchup may have several unique SKUs, each corresponding, for example, to different sizes and/or flavors of Brand A ketchup.
  • the PUB Web GUI interface 134 allows merchants to edit SKU information, products, and/or categories.
  • the PUB Bulk Loader 136 supports the processing of data files from outside the PUB Subsystem into the PUB database 141 .
  • the PUB Bulk Loader is configured to allow merchants to upload a variety of data file types into the PUB database including flat data files, and image files.
  • the Bulk Loader processes the flat file information to create appropriate database records for the PUB catalog.
  • OMS Periodically (e.g., minutes, hours, days) the OMS polls the PUB database for new and updated SKU information, and stores the retrieved data into the OMS database 151 .
  • OMS maintains available-to-promise (ATP), price, and inventory (e.g., replenishment and purchasing) information for each SKU.
  • OMS may also capture and/or manage sales and shipment data relating to each SKU.
  • OMS passes new and updated SKU information it acquires from the PUB Subsystem to the OFS.
  • the SKU information may be used by OFS, for example, to maintain physical inventory and fulfill orders.
  • the PUB Subsystem 140 may be used as an interface to allow merchants/vendors to enter substitution instructions relating to specific SKUs.
  • substitution instructions relating to specific SKUs.
  • An example of a set of substitution instructions for selected SKUs is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of substitution instructions 400 for specified SKUs in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • a set of “substitution instructions” may comprise a plurality of different fields, including, for example, a list of different SKUs 410 , a description 411 of each SKU, and corresponding substitution rules 450 associated with each SKU.
  • substitution instructions are included for four SKU items, namely “Budweiser 6 pack” 402 , “Wheaties 28 oz.” 404 , “Lean Ground Beef” 406 , and “Large Red Apples” 408 .
  • substitution rules 450 for each original SKU 410 may include one or more substitute SKUs 417 .
  • the substitution rules 450 may also include a ranking preference 412 for each substitute SKU, a substitution ratio 416 to be applied for each respective substitute SKU, a description 418 of each substitute SKU, pricing rules 420 for each substitute SKU, etc.
  • the SKU entry 402 corresponding to “Budweiser 6 pack” may be substituted with three alternate SKU items, which have been sorted according to preference, namely, (1) Budweiser 12 pack, (2) Budweiser 2 liter, and (3) Miller 6 pack.
  • the ranking indicates an order of preference, which means that the substitution procedure will attempt to use substitute SKU (1) first, then SKU (2) if SKU (1) is not available, then SKU (3) if neither SKU (1) or SKU (2) are available.
  • substitution rules for particular SKU indicate how substitutions are to be performed for that SKU.
  • the substitute ratio field 416 may be used to determine how much quantity of a substitute SKU is to be substituted for a specified quantity of an original SKU. According to a specific embodiment, it is preferable to have a substitute ratio included since a substitution may not necessarily be one for one.
  • the “charge rule” or pricing field 420 may be used to determine a price to bill the customer for the substituted item.
  • the substitution instructions 400 may be referenced in order to determine which products/items may be substituted for the unavailable item.
  • a “Budweiser 12 pack” is the preferred choice for substituting for a “Budweiser 6 Pack.”
  • substitution rules shown in ( 402 ) a quantity of 0.50 “Budweiser 12 pack” may be substituted for each quantity of 1 “Budweiser 6 pack” item ordered, so that approximately the same amount of actual net weight beer is substituted.
  • substitute ratios may be rounded up to the nearest whole integer so that a customer that ordered one “Budweiser 6 pack” item will receive one “Budweiser 12 pack” item and not one-half of a “Budweiser 12 pack” item. If the customer had ordered two “Budweiser 6 pack” items, the customer may still receive only one “Budweiser 12 pack” item as a substitution.
  • the substitution instructions may include a “charge rule” or pricing field 420 , which may be used to determine a price to bill the customer for the substituted item.
  • a “charge rule” or pricing field 420 may be used to determine a price to bill the customer for the substituted item. For example, as shown in row 402 of FIG. 4 , where one item of “Budweiser 12 pack” has been substituted for one item of “Budweiser 6 pack,” the pricing rule 420 specifies “lesser charge.” This means that the customer will be charged the lower of the two prices of either the original SKU or the substitute SKU.
  • a different pricing rule is shown in FIG. 4 as “no charge.” This means that a customer will not be charged for a substituted item. For example, as shown in FIG. 4 , if the “Miller 6 pack” item is substituted for a “Budweiser 6 pack” item, the customer incurs no charge for the substituted item. Presumably, this pricing may be used as appropriate to achieve desired levels of customer satisfaction.
  • the substitution instructions may also include a “not allowed” substitution rule for one or more SKUs. This is shown, for example, in entry 408 of FIG. 4 .
  • the original SKU item is “Large Red Applies”, and one of the substitute items listed is “Green Apples”, which is indicated by an “X” in the “rank” field 412 , indicating that “Green Apples” are not allowed to be substituted for “Large Red Apples.”
  • the substitution instructions may also include a “not allowed” substitution rule for one or more SKUs. This is shown, for example, in entry 408 of FIG. 4 .
  • the original SKU item is “Large Red Applies”
  • one of the substitute items listed is “Green Apples”, which is indicated by an “X” in the “rank” field 412 , indicating that “Green Apples” are not allowed to be substituted for “Large Red Apples.”
  • any item that is not listed in the substitution list is implicitly not allowed as a substitute SKU, an item may explicitly excluded as
  • the substitution instructions may be entered by merchants, vendors, or other human operators via the Webstore interface 132 , or via other desired system interfaces.
  • the merchant or vendor is able to add, rearrange, and remove items from the substitution list.
  • merchants and/or vendors may be provided with information relating to oversold items. For example, a merchant may be provided with information relating to selected oversold items for customer orders which are to be fulfilled the following day. The merchant is then able to analyze the oversold item information, and submit substitution instructions for the selected oversold items before the customer orders are fulfilled.
  • the oversold item information may be provided to a merchant via the PUB Subsystem 140 .
  • substitution instructions may be generated automatically using a general set of business and customer preference rules in order to save time and also optimize customer satisfaction.
  • Preliminary substitution lists may also be generated in the same manner to be approved or edited by merchants.
  • the substitution instructions are typically stored in a database for retrieval at the appropriate point of use.
  • a substitution list can be dynamically generated at the time of use, again by using a general set of business and customer preference rules.
  • the Webstore Subsystem (WS) 132 provides an interface for enabling customers to access an on-line store (e.g. Webstore), which, for example, may be used to provide a customer with an electronic representation of a retail store.
  • an on-line store e.g. Webstore
  • customers 102 may access the Webstore via the Internet 104 or World Wide Web using any one of a plurality of conventional browsers.
  • the Webstore user interface may be designed to provide a rich set of functions without requiring any special browser plug-ins.
  • customers may access the Webstore using any client machine, regardless of the machine's operating system platform.
  • the Webstore interface also supports data encryption for exchange of any sensitive or private information between the customers and the website.
  • the secure Webstore interface may be implemented using a secure http protocol (HTTPS), commonly known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • the Webstore Subsystem 132 may be configured to support a number of customer related features such as, for example, self registration; accessing of customer account information; browsing of product categories and category hierarchy; viewing of product images and product information; keyword searches; delivery scheduling; accessing of customer order history; customizable shopping lists; on-line shopping and ordering; etc.
  • the Webstore Subsystem may be implemented using at least one server which is connected to the data network.
  • the Webstore may be implemented using a plurality of web servers (e.g. a load-balanced web server farm) which helps to minimize server response time and provide real-time failover and redundancy capabilities.
  • the Webstore may be configured such that all processing is performed on a single server, within one process. Where a plurality of Webstore servers are used, redundant processing may be performed by at least a portion of the servers so that a single Webstore server may handle all Webstore processing tasks associated with a particular on-line customer. It will be appreciated that the Webstore server boundaries may be crossed where appropriate, such as, for example, when accessing desired databases via the data network.
  • OMS Order Management Subsystem
  • the Order Management Subsystem (OMS) 150 manages a variety of aspects related to the integrated system architecture of system 100 , including, for example, pricing, availability, inventory, vendors, financials, procurement, and data flows between various subsystems.
  • the OMS subsystem 150 includes at least one database 151 for storing various data received from at least a portion of the other subsystems.
  • the database 151 is configured to include a plurality of schemas, such as, for example, standard packaged application schemas and/or customized schemas.
  • the OMS database is configured as a single Oracle database running on a Sun Solaris server.
  • OMS batch processing may be controlled using a process scheduler.
  • the process scheduler is able to manage the number of concurrent processes being run and the date/time at which certain processes are to run or be executed.
  • the process scheduler may also enable central visibility of all processes currently running. Batch processing and reporting may be accomplished using a variety of different technologies commonly known to one having ordinary skill in the art.
  • the Order Management Subsystem may be configured to support both asynchronous and synchronous interfaces with the other subsystems.
  • the OMS is configured to support an asynchronous interface with each of the other subsystems.
  • each OMS interface is configurable, and may be configured to support the running of batch processes as often as is desirable.
  • the interface between the OMS and the Webstore Subsystem may be implemented, for example, using a plurality of executable programs.
  • a first portion of the executable programs may be responsible for moving data from the Webstore to the OMS. This data may include, for example, new/updated customer data, new/updated order data, order cutoff information, order billing information, customer return information, customer credits and fees (e.g. bill adjustment data), etc.
  • a second portion of the executable programs is responsible for moving data from the OMS to the Webstore Subsystem. This data may include, for example, inventory data, availability data, pricing data, and information about shipped customer orders.
  • the Order Fulfillment Subsystem 160 manages all functionality of the distribution center (DC).
  • the OFS includes appropriate hardware and/or software for managing the DC, including, for example, a warehouse management system (e.g. application software), at least one database 161 , an automated material handling (AMH) controller component 163 (which manages conveyor, carousel, and scanner components), etc.
  • a warehouse management system e.g. application software
  • AH controller component 163 which manages conveyor, carousel, and scanner components
  • the Order Fulfillment Subsystem 160 may be implemented using a warehouse management system such as, for example, the MOVE warehouse management system provided by Optum, Inc. of Costa Mesa, Calif.
  • the warehouse system also provides an interface with the Order Management Subsystem. In a specific embodiment, this interface may be implemented using a business host interface (BHI).
  • BHI business host interface
  • the warehouse management subsystem may also provide the interface for allowing the OMS subsystem to communicate with the OFS database 161 .
  • the system 100 may include at least a Webstore Subsystem (for receiving customer orders and maintaining inventory records), and an Order Fulfillment Subsystem (for fulfilling customer orders).
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a Customer Order Handling Process 200 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • the Customer Order Handling Process of FIG. 2 depicts a simplified overview of the various processes by which customer orders are taken, the customer orders are processed (including substitutions), and the customer orders are fulfilled and delivered in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • a customer enters his or her customer order via the Webstore 132 interface (described above).
  • a “customer order” includes a list of SKU items that have been ordered, their associated quantities, and other relevant information (e.g., payment information, delivery time information, etc.)
  • the customer order may include one or more “line item orders,” where each line item order corresponds to a particular SKU and includes a desired quantity of the ordered SKU.
  • the customer may also specify whether substitutions are allowed for the customer order generally, or alternatively, whether substitutions are allowed with respect to each specific line item order.
  • the customer's general substitution preferences also may be stored in the Webstore database, and may be accessed and/or modified during the current customer order.
  • customers will be provided information relating to availability of items. For example, customers may be provided with information relating to particular items which will not be available until after the customer's specified delivery date. In this way, item substitution of customer orders may be minimized.
  • ordered items may be oversold or unavailable at the time of fulfillment of the order.
  • quantities of inventory levels for selected SKUs that are anticipated or expected to be available by a specific date are not actually available on that date. If it is not possible to fulfill a customer order because one or more ordered items are unavailable, that order may be said to be incomplete.
  • Incompletes may occur for a variety of reasons, such as, for example, vendor short shipments, goods found damaged at time of fulfillment, etc.
  • reasons such as, for example, vendor short shipments, goods found damaged at time of fulfillment, etc.
  • SKUs such as, for example, bread and milk
  • substitution capability provides an opportunity to turn a problem into an improved customer experience.
  • customers may receive larger sizes at the smaller size price, may receive premium brands at non-premium brand prices, or may receive comparable brands at no charge.
  • a “cutoff” time occurs ( 204 ), at which point the customer is no longer able to modify the order.
  • the customer order is then sent along with other “cutoff” customer orders to be processed ( 206 ).
  • the processing of a customer order is generally described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,603, previously incorporated herein by reference.
  • the processing of a customer order includes performing item substitution analysis, which is generally described in FIGS. 3-7 of the drawings.
  • order processing may be implemented at the Webstore Subsystem 132 .
  • the order processing may be implemented at any desired subsystem which has been configured to handle the various tasks associated with the processing of customer orders.
  • the customer order is then fulfilled ( 208 ) by obtaining the appropriate items from a warehouse, distribution center, or other locations. Once the order has been fulfilled, it may then be delivered ( 210 ) to the customer.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram depicting an Item Substitution Screening Procedure ( 300 ) in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • the Item Substitution Screening Procedure may be initiated during the order processing operations described, for example, at 206 of FIG. 2 .
  • the Item Substitution Screening Procedure may be configured to analyze customer orders and to generate sorted line item orders of oversold items.
  • the quantity of oversold units for a particular SKU may be determined by comparing a total quantity of ordered units of that SKU (derived from the aggregated customer orders) to the quantity of available units of that SKU in the inventory. If the ordered quantity is greater than the available inventory quantity, it may be determined that the SKU has been oversold, wherein the “oversold quantity” may be represented as the difference between the ordered quantity and the available inventory quantity.
  • the quantity of available SKU units may be represented as a quantity of SKU units which are estimated to be available as of a specified date, such as, for example, the customer delivery date.
  • a specified date such as, for example, the customer delivery date.
  • each of the customer orders in a given batch of cutoff customer orders will have the same delivery date.
  • substitution instructions only SKUs that have associated “substitution instructions” will be analyzed for substitution analysis.
  • the system of the present invention may include a respective set of substitution instructions for each or selected SKUs in the inventory. These instructions may either be statically generated (e.g. created by a human operator) or dynamically generated (e.g. created by a computer system using predetermined business rules). An example of a set of substitution instructions for selected SKUs is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings (described previously).
  • a next identified oversold SKU is selected ( 320 ) for substitution analysis. Assuming, however, that substitutions are permitted for the selected oversold SKU, line item orders (from the batch of cutoff customer orders) which correspond to the selected oversold SKU are then retrieved ( 310 ). According to a specific implementation, retrieved line item orders which correspond to customers who have requested not to received substitutions (either for the selected oversold SKU or generally) may be discarded ( 312 ) so that these line item orders are not considered for further substitution analysis. The remaining line item orders may then continue to be processed ( 314 ) for substitution analysis. The remaining line item orders may then be sorted ( 316 ) according to predefined criteria.
  • the predefined criteria may include business rules which define substitution preferences. Some of these business rules include the substitution instructions described previously with respect to FIG. 4 . Other business rules may define substitution preferences based on other criteria, such as, for example: move line item orders that correspond to customer orders which already have at least one substituted item to the bottom of the list (thereby reducing the possibility of having multiple substitutions in a single customer order), substitute higher quantity line item orders first (thereby helping to reduce the total number of customer orders which include substituted items), and other rules designed to maximize customer satisfaction.
  • business rules may be included which prevent an oversold SKU and the substitute SKU from having different regulation codes (e.g. alcohol, tobacco, etc.). Additionally, business rules may be included which do not attempt to substitute a particular SKU for an oversold SKU if it is determined that the substitute SKU already exists as a line item in the customer order. Such business rules may be applied, for example, during substitute SKU selection as described, for example, with respect to FIG. 5 of the drawings.
  • an Item Substitution Procedure (such as that shown, for example, in FIG. 5 of the drawings) may then be implemented ( 317 ) in order to perform the actual substitution for the selected oversold SKU.
  • a determination is then made ( 318 ) as to whether there are any additional oversold SKUs to be analyzed for substitution. If so, the Item Substitution Screening Procedure may then select ( 320 ) a next identified oversold SKU for substitution processing.
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow diagram depicting an Item Substitution Procedure 500 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • the Item Substitution Procedure ( 500 ) may be used to implement SKU substitutions for selected oversold SKUs.
  • the Item Substitution Procedure may receive ( 502 ) one or more input parameters.
  • the input parameters include a sorted list of line item orders for a selected oversold SKU, which may be generated, for example, during the Item Substitution Screening Procedure of FIG. 3 .
  • the Item Substitution Procedure may then retrieve ( 504 ) the substitution instructions and other business rules (if any) relating to the identified oversold SKU.
  • the substitution instructions may be dynamically generated using predefined business rules specifically configured for generating substitution instructions or rules relating to specific SKUs or classes of SKUs.
  • a first line item order from the line item list is selected ( 506 ) for item substitution analysis.
  • the current oversold quantity for the identified oversold SKU is also retrieved ( 508 ).
  • the current quantity of the identified oversold SKU may periodically be updated during the Item Substitution Procedure as orders for the oversold SKU are replaced by substitute SKUs.
  • the current oversold quantity is then compared ( 510 ) to the ordered quantity specified in the selected line item order. If it is determined that the ordered quantity is less than or equal to the current oversold quantity then a Full Substitution Procedure (such as that described, for example, in FIG. 6 of the drawings) may be implemented ( 511 ) for the selected line item order. If it is determined that the ordered quantity is greater than the current oversold quantity, then a Partial Substitution Procedure (such as that described, for example, in FIG. 7 of the drawings) may be implemented ( 512 ) for the selected line item order.
  • a Full Substitution Procedure such as that described, for example, in FIG. 6 of the drawings
  • a Partial Substitution Procedure such as that described, for example, in FIG. 7 of the drawings
  • the current line item order specifies a quantity of 3 Large Red Apples, and the current oversold quantity of Large Red Apples is 4, then a full substitution procedure may be implemented, meaning that the full quantity of the line item order (e.g. 3) may be substituted. Once the substitution has been performed for the selected line item order, the current oversold quantity will be updated to 1 oversold large red apple.
  • the current line item order specifies a quantity of 3 Large Red Apples, and the current oversold quantity of Large Red Apples is 2, then a partial substitution procedure may be implemented, meaning that only a portion the line item order is to be substituted.
  • the line item order may be filled by allocating 1 large red apple to the customer order, and substituting 2 Large Red Apples with other items.
  • the substitution for the selected line item order is successful. If it is determined that the substitution was not successful, then, according to one embodiment, it may be assumed that no substitutions are available for the selected oversold product. Accordingly, the Item Substitution Procedure may end without attempting to perform any further substitutions for the selected oversold SKU.
  • FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram depicting a Partial Substitution Procedure 600 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • the Partial Substitution Procedure ( 600 ) may be implemented for a specified line item order in order to substitute a portion of the ordered quantity of the oversold SKU associated with that particular line item order.
  • the Partial Substitution Procedure may receive ( 602 ) one or more input parameters.
  • the input parameters include a selected line item order for a selected oversold SKU, and an oversold quantity for the selected oversold SKU.
  • substitution instructions relating to the identified oversold SKU are retrieved ( 604 ) and processed in order to select ( 605 ) a first preferred substitute SKU for the identified oversold SKU.
  • An example of substitution instructions is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings.
  • the partial substitution may be performed, for example, by adding ( 610 ) a “substitute line item order” to the customer order, specifying the substitute SKU and substituted quantity, and by reducing or modifying ( 612 ) the quantity in the selected line item of the customer order (corresponding to the identified oversold SKU) as appropriate. Additionally, the oversold quantity may be set ( 608 ) to zero, thereby indicating that the identified oversold SKU is no longer oversold.
  • the Partial Substitution Procedure checks to see whether 4 Medium Red Apples are available to be allocated.
  • a new line item specifying 4 Medium Red Apples will be added to the customer order (associated with the selected line item order).
  • the new line item may be described as a partial substitution for the line item order of 3 Large Red Apples. Additionally, the quantity of the customer's (original) line item order for 3 Large Red Apples will be reduced to 1 Large Red Apples, and the quantity of oversold Large Red Apples will be reduced to zero.
  • a next preferred substitute SKU is selected (if available) for analysis.
  • the next preferred substitute item for Large Red Apples is Large McIntosh Apples (SKU#4007). Accordingly, the Partial Substitution Procedure will check to see whether 2 Large McIntosh Apples are available to be allocated to the identified customer order. If so, then the 2 Large McIntosh Apples will be substituted for 2 of the 3 Large Red Apples ordered in the identified customer order, thereby resulting in a partial substitution.
  • FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram depicting a Full Substitution Procedure 700 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • the Full Substitution Procedure ( 700 ) may be implemented for a specified line item order in order to substitute the ordered quantity of the oversold SKU associated with that particular line item order.
  • the Full Substitution Procedure may receive ( 702 ) one or more input parameters.
  • the input parameters include a selected line item order for a selected oversold SKU, and an oversold quantity for the selected oversold SKU.
  • substitution instructions relating to the identified oversold SKU are retrieved ( 704 ) and processed in order to select ( 705 ) a first preferred substitute SKU for the identified oversold SKU.
  • An example of substitution instructions is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings.
  • the full substitution may be performed, for example, by adding ( 710 ) a “substitute line item order” to the customer order, specifying the substitute SKU and substituted quantity, and by reducing or modifying ( 712 ) the quantity in the selected line item of the customer order (corresponding to the identified oversold SKU) to zero.
  • the original line item order may be dropped from the customer order.
  • the oversold quantity may be modified ( 708 ) or adjusted to reflect a new value which takes into account the number of oversold SKU items being substituted in the currently selected line item order.
  • a new line item specifying 6 Medium Red Apples will be added to the customer order (associated with the selected line item order).
  • the new line item may be described as a full substitution for the line item order of 3 Large Red Apples. Additionally, the quantity of the customer's (original) line item order for 3 Large Red Apples will be reduced to zero Large Red Apples. Further the quantity of oversold Large Red Apples will be reduced by 3, making the new (or current) oversold quantity of Large Red Apples equal to 2.
  • technique of the present invention offers many advantages and capabilities over the conventional techniques.
  • technique of the present invention may be used to minimize the total number of substitutions to be implemented for a selected batch of customer orders by first implementing substitutions for line item orders of higher quantities.
  • technique of the present invention may automatically prioritize line item orders so that customer orders that have already had at least one item substitution performed are less likely to have another item substitution performed. It will be appreciated that either of the above-described features may result in improved customer satisfaction.
  • substitution of ordered customer items may be automatically implemented without involving human decisions and/or human interactions at the time of fulfillment of the customer order(s).
  • the technique of the present invention may be used to expedite order processing and order fulfillment, for example, by eliminating delays associated with human decisions and/or interactions.
  • the technique of the present invention is highly scalable, and provides for more consistent and reliable substitutions as compared to conventional techniques. This, in turn, may result in improved overall quality control.
  • the item substitution technique of the present invention may be implemented on software and/or hardware.
  • it can be implemented in an operating system kernel, in a separate user process, in a library package bound into network applications, on a specially constructed machine, or on a network interface card.
  • the technique of the present invention is implemented in software such as an operating system or in an application running on an operating system.
  • a software or software/hardware hybrid implementation of the item substitution technique of this invention may be implemented on a general-purpose programmable machine selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in memory.
  • Such programmable machine may be a network device designed to handle network traffic, such as, for example, a router or a switch.
  • Such network devices may have multiple network interfaces including frame relay and ISDN interfaces, for example.
  • a general architecture for some of these machines will appear from the description given below.
  • the item substitution technique of this invention may be implemented on a general-purpose network host machine such as a personal computer or workstation. Further, the invention may be at least partially implemented on a card (e.g., an interface card) for a network device or a general-purpose computing device.
  • a card e.g., an interface card
  • a network device 60 suitable for implementing the item substitution technique of the present invention includes a master central processing unit (CPU) 62 , interfaces 68 , and a bus 67 (e.g., a PCI bus).
  • the CPU 62 may be responsible for implementing specific functions associated with the functions of a desired network device. For example, when configured as a load balancing device, the CPU 62 may be responsible for analyzing packets, encapsulating packets, forwarding packets to appropriate network devices, performing content and/or format verification of data, etc.
  • the CPU 62 preferably accomplishes all these functions under the control of software including an operating system (e.g. Windows NT), and any appropriate applications software.
  • an operating system e.g. Windows NT
  • CPU 62 may include one or more processors 63 such as a processor from the Motorola family of microprocessors or the MIPS family of microprocessors. In an alternative embodiment, processor 63 is specially designed hardware for controlling the operations of network device 60 . In a specific embodiment, a memory 61 (such as non-volatile RAM and/or ROM) also forms part of CPU 62 . However, there are many different ways in which memory could be coupled to the system. Memory block 61 may be used for a variety of purposes such as, for example, caching and/or storing data, programming instructions, etc.
  • the interfaces 68 are typically provided as interface cards (sometimes referred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control the sending and receiving of data packets over the network and sometimes support other peripherals used with the network device 60 .
  • interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like.
  • various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like.
  • these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM.
  • the independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as packet switching, media control and management. By providing separate processors for the communications intensive tasks, these interfaces allow the master microprocessor 62 to efficiently perform routing computations, network diagnostics, security functions, etc.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates one specific network device of the present invention, it is by no means the only network device architecture on which the present invention can be implemented.
  • an architecture having a single processor that handles communications as well as routing computations, etc. is often used.
  • other types of interfaces and media could also be used with the network device.
  • network device may employ one or more memories or memory modules (such as, for example, memory block 65 ) configured to store data, program instructions for the general-purpose network operations and/or other information relating to the functionality of the item substitution technique described herein.
  • the program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example.
  • the memory or memories may also be configured to include data structures which store customer order information, inventory data, item substitution instructions, substitution business rules, etc.
  • the present invention relates to machine readable media that include program instructions, state information, etc. for performing various operations described herein.
  • machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media such as floptical disks; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM) and random access memory (RAM).
  • ROM read-only memory devices
  • RAM random access memory
  • the invention may also be embodied in a carrier wave traveling over an appropriate medium such as airwaves, optical lines, electric lines, etc.
  • program instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter.

Abstract

A technique is disclosed for automatically implementing item substitutions for unavailable items in a customer order. According to one embodiment, line item orders from selected customer orders may be aggregated and processed for substitution analysis. Substitutions for unavailable items of selected customer orders may then be automatically implemented based upon substitution instructions, business rules, and/or other predefined criteria.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/334,449, filed Dec. 22, 2011, and entitled “Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order,” which is incorporated herein by references, and which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/818,010, filed Jun. 13, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,090,626, and entitled “Item Substitution for Unavailable Items Relating to a Customer Order,” which is incorporated herein by reference, and which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/750,385, filed Dec. 27, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,233,914, and entitled “Technique for Implementing Item Substitution for Unavailable Items Relating to a Customer Order,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • This application is related to the following patent applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,603, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,825; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,570, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,370,005; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,569, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,622,127, all filed on May 10, 2000. Each of the above-referenced US patent applications is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention pertains to order substitution methods and systems that automatically perform substitutions for unavailable items in a customer order. More specifically, the invention allows for the substitution of unavailable items based upon predetermined criteria and set processes, so that the substitutions are made in a manner that optimizes efficiency and customer satisfaction.
  • Substitution methods in the current art typically use non-systematic and inefficient procedures in order to provide substitute items for unavailable items in a customer order. For example, some Internet-based grocery shoppers, (such as, for example, Peapod Inc., of Skokie, Ill.), send human buyers to one or more stores in order to fulfill customer orders. If a buyer is trying to fulfill an order for Brand A 64 oz. Ketchup, for example, and it is out of stock at the store, the buyer can make a substitution in order to approximate the product that the customer ordered. However, the substituted item may only be chosen from available items on the grocery shelf, which are typically adjacent to the unavailable items on the shelf space. Thus, for example, the buyer might substitute the same brand ketchup in a different size or variety, or a different brand in a similar size or variety, assuming that either is available at the store.
  • There are several problems with conventional order substitution methods. For one, the buyer's guess often does not result in a satisfactory substitute, particularly since they buyer is typically not an expert on all types of products. Also, the buyer does not have a procedure by which to consider all of his or her or her customer orders in the aggregate in order to make decisions that better maximize customer satisfaction. Further, no procedures exist for aggregating the orders of one buyer with that of other buyers in order to make larger aggregate decisions. Additionally, the buyer also does not have access to data concerning the available inventory of the store before attempting to fulfill his or her orders, and therefore is only able to make ad hoc decisions at the time of fulfillment.
  • For these, and other reasons, an efficient, automatic system architecture and method is desired to implement substitutions for unavailable items in customer orders.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention provides systems and methods for implementing item substitutions with respect to consumer orders in order to implement substitutions of unavailable items in customer orders. In a specific embodiment, this is accomplished by first taking customer orders via a data or computer network. A selected number of customer orders may then be aggregated and analyzed in order to make item substitution decisions. The decisions may be based upon a variety of different criteria, including one or more of the following: data from the selected customer orders, customer preferences, predefined substitution rules for each of the products, and accurate inventory information on the actual availability of products, etc.
  • Specific embodiments of the invention provide a method and computer program product for effecting, via a computer network, substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order. At least one customer order is received via the computer network. At least a portion of the received customer order is analyzed to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold. According to a specific implementation, the analyzed order data may be compared to available inventory data to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold. Order line items relating to an identified oversold item may then be identified, wherein each order line item may be associated with a respective customer order. According to a specific implementation, order line items for identified oversold items may be selected using at least a portion of the predefined criteria. At least one second item may then be substituted for an identified oversold item in selected customer orders, based upon the predefined criteria. According to one implementation, the item substitution technique of the present invention may be performed by an automated computer process. It may also be performed at a time of fulfilling an order without intervention from a human operator.
  • According to a specific implementation, the predefined criteria may include a variety of business rules relating to how line items are selected for substitution analysis, and relating to how substitute items are selected. For example, the predefined criteria may include rules relating to minimizing a total number of order substitutions performed for each customer order; rules relating to selecting, for substitution analysis, order line items which have a relatively highest order quantity; sorted list of substitute products from which substitute items are chosen; rules for substituting a specific quantity of a second item for an unavailable item; etc.
  • An alternate embodiment of the present invention is directed to a system for effecting, via a computer network, substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order. The system may include least one central processing unit, at least one interface configured or designed to receive at least one customer order via the computer network, and memory. The at least one customer order may include at least one order line item relating to an ordered quantity of a particular item of inventory. The memory may be configured to store customer order information and predefined criteria relating to item substitution rules. The system may be configured to analyze at least a portion of the received customer orders to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold. The system may also be configured to identify order line items relating to an identified oversold item, wherein each order line item is associated with a respective customer order. The system may also be configured to substitute, based upon predefined criteria, at least one second item for the identified oversold item in selected customer orders.
  • Alternate embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method and computer program product for effecting, via a computer network, substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order. At least one customer order is received via the computer network. Each customer order may include at least one order line item relating to an ordered quantity of a particular item of inventory. At least a portion of the received customer orders may then be analyzed to determine whether at least one item of inventory has been oversold. Order line items relating to an identified oversold item may be identified, each order line item being associated with a respective customer order. At least one second item may then be substituted for the identified oversold item in selected customer orders based upon predefined criteria.
  • Additional objects, features and advantages of the various aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of its preferred embodiments, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram showing the most relevant parts of integrated system architecture in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a Customer Order Handling Process in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram of a Substitution Screening Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of substitution instructions for specified SKUs in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow diagram depicting an Item Substitution Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram depicting a Partial Substitution Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram depicting a Full Substitution Procedure in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is schematic illustration of hardware that is suitable for implementing the technique of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The following discussion presents some terms and concepts pertinent to the operation of a distribution center. The invention is not specifically limited to the examples described hereafter.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a specific embodiment of an integrated system architecture 100 which may be used for implementing the automated substitution technique of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, system 100 includes a plurality of subsystems and other components for effecting electronic commerce over a data network. A brief description of at least a portion of the plurality of subsystems of system 100 is presented below.
  • For example, system 100 of FIG. 1 may include a Publishing (PUB) Subsystem 140 which provides an interface to merchants, vendors and/or content managers 133; a Webstore Subsystem (WS) 132 which manages the on-line store interface with customers, including customer shopping and ordering transactions; an Order Management Subsystem (OMS) 150 which manages pricing data, item availability data, inventory data, vendor data, finance, procurement, etc.; an Order Fulfillment Subsystem (OFS) 160 which facilitates the fulfillment of customer orders; etc. Each of the various subsystems shown in FIG. 1 of the drawings will now be described briefly below.
  • According to a specific implementation, the PUB Subsystem 140 may be used for managing SKU inventory and catalog information (e.g. SKUs, UPCs, products, categories, descriptive attributes, etc.), and item substitution information provided by merchants or vendors.
  • “Inventory” is the stock of SKU items actually available for customer orders. Each different item of inventory is associated with a respective stock keeping unit or SKU, regardless of whether the item is available for customer purchase. A “stock keeping unit” or SKU may be defined as a unique identifier that corresponds to a particular consumer item. A type of product, for example, Brand A ketchup, may have several unique SKUs, each corresponding, for example, to different sizes and/or flavors of Brand A ketchup.
  • Merchants and content managers 133 may enter and maintain SKU information stored in the PUB database using the PUB Web GUI interface 134 and PUB Bulk Loader interface 136. The SKU information may include SKU attribute values such as, for example, UPCs, vendors, categories, category hierarchy, images, articles, descriptive information, etc. The PUB Web GUI interface 134 allows merchants to edit SKU information, products, and/or categories. The PUB Bulk Loader 136 supports the processing of data files from outside the PUB Subsystem into the PUB database 141. According to a specific embodiment, the PUB Bulk Loader is configured to allow merchants to upload a variety of data file types into the PUB database including flat data files, and image files. The Bulk Loader processes the flat file information to create appropriate database records for the PUB catalog.
  • Periodically (e.g., minutes, hours, days) the OMS polls the PUB database for new and updated SKU information, and stores the retrieved data into the OMS database 151. According to a specific embodiment, OMS maintains available-to-promise (ATP), price, and inventory (e.g., replenishment and purchasing) information for each SKU. OMS may also capture and/or manage sales and shipment data relating to each SKU. Periodically, OMS passes new and updated SKU information it acquires from the PUB Subsystem to the OFS. The SKU information may be used by OFS, for example, to maintain physical inventory and fulfill orders.
  • According to a specific embodiment, the PUB Subsystem 140 may be used as an interface to allow merchants/vendors to enter substitution instructions relating to specific SKUs. An example of a set of substitution instructions for selected SKUs is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of substitution instructions 400 for specified SKUs in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the example of FIG. 4, a set of “substitution instructions” may comprise a plurality of different fields, including, for example, a list of different SKUs 410, a description 411 of each SKU, and corresponding substitution rules 450 associated with each SKU. In the example of FIG. 4, substitution instructions are included for four SKU items, namely “Budweiser 6 pack” 402, “Wheaties 28 oz.” 404, “Lean Ground Beef” 406, and “Large Red Apples” 408.
  • As shown in the embodiment of FIG. 4, substitution rules 450 for each original SKU 410 may include one or more substitute SKUs 417. The substitution rules 450 may also include a ranking preference 412 for each substitute SKU, a substitution ratio 416 to be applied for each respective substitute SKU, a description 418 of each substitute SKU, pricing rules 420 for each substitute SKU, etc. For example the SKU entry 402 corresponding to “Budweiser 6 pack” may be substituted with three alternate SKU items, which have been sorted according to preference, namely, (1) Budweiser 12 pack, (2) Budweiser 2 liter, and (3) Miller 6 pack. The ranking indicates an order of preference, which means that the substitution procedure will attempt to use substitute SKU (1) first, then SKU (2) if SKU (1) is not available, then SKU (3) if neither SKU (1) or SKU (2) are available.
  • According to a specific implementation, the “substitution rules” for particular SKU indicate how substitutions are to be performed for that SKU. The substitute ratio field 416 may be used to determine how much quantity of a substitute SKU is to be substituted for a specified quantity of an original SKU. According to a specific embodiment, it is preferable to have a substitute ratio included since a substitution may not necessarily be one for one. The “charge rule” or pricing field 420 may be used to determine a price to bill the customer for the substituted item.
  • For example, if a customer orders a quantity of 1 “Budweiser 6 Pack”, and later it is determined that this SKU is oversold or unavailable, the substitution instructions 400 may be referenced in order to determine which products/items may be substituted for the unavailable item. According to the example of FIG. 4, a “Budweiser 12 pack” is the preferred choice for substituting for a “Budweiser 6 Pack.” Using the substitution rules shown in (402), a quantity of 0.50 “Budweiser 12 pack” may be substituted for each quantity of 1 “Budweiser 6 pack” item ordered, so that approximately the same amount of actual net weight beer is substituted. However, according to a specific implementation, substitute ratios may be rounded up to the nearest whole integer so that a customer that ordered one “Budweiser 6 pack” item will receive one “Budweiser 12 pack” item and not one-half of a “Budweiser 12 pack” item. If the customer had ordered two “Budweiser 6 pack” items, the customer may still receive only one “Budweiser 12 pack” item as a substitution.
  • Another aspect relating substitute item processing concerns pricing for substitute items. As shown in FIG. 4, the substitution instructions may include a “charge rule” or pricing field 420, which may be used to determine a price to bill the customer for the substituted item. For example, as shown in row 402 of FIG. 4, where one item of “Budweiser 12 pack” has been substituted for one item of “Budweiser 6 pack,” the pricing rule 420 specifies “lesser charge.” This means that the customer will be charged the lower of the two prices of either the original SKU or the substitute SKU. Thus, in this example, assuming that the price of a “Budweiser 6 pack.” item is less than the price of a “Budweiser 12 pack” item, the customer will be charged for the price of a “Budweiser 6 pack,” even if an entire “Budweiser 12 pack” item is substituted for the “Budweiser 6 pack.”
  • A different pricing rule is shown in FIG. 4 as “no charge.” This means that a customer will not be charged for a substituted item. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, if the “Miller 6 pack” item is substituted for a “Budweiser 6 pack” item, the customer incurs no charge for the substituted item. Presumably, this pricing may be used as appropriate to achieve desired levels of customer satisfaction.
  • According to a specific embodiment, the substitution instructions may also include a “not allowed” substitution rule for one or more SKUs. This is shown, for example, in entry 408 of FIG. 4. In this example, the original SKU item is “Large Red Applies”, and one of the substitute items listed is “Green Apples”, which is indicated by an “X” in the “rank” field 412, indicating that “Green Apples” are not allowed to be substituted for “Large Red Apples.” Thus, according to a specific implementation, while any item that is not listed in the substitution list is implicitly not allowed as a substitute SKU, an item may explicitly excluded as a possible substitute for one or more specified SKUs.
  • It will be appreciated that, in an alternate embodiment, the substitution instructions may be entered by merchants, vendors, or other human operators via the Webstore interface 132, or via other desired system interfaces. Further, according to a specific implementation, the merchant or vendor is able to add, rearrange, and remove items from the substitution list. Additionally, according to a specific embodiment, merchants and/or vendors may be provided with information relating to oversold items. For example, a merchant may be provided with information relating to selected oversold items for customer orders which are to be fulfilled the following day. The merchant is then able to analyze the oversold item information, and submit substitution instructions for the selected oversold items before the customer orders are fulfilled. According to one implementation, the oversold item information may be provided to a merchant via the PUB Subsystem 140.
  • According to at least one alternate embodiment, substitution instructions may be generated automatically using a general set of business and customer preference rules in order to save time and also optimize customer satisfaction. Preliminary substitution lists may also be generated in the same manner to be approved or edited by merchants. In any of these embodiments, the substitution instructions are typically stored in a database for retrieval at the appropriate point of use. In another embodiment, a substitution list can be dynamically generated at the time of use, again by using a general set of business and customer preference rules.
  • Webstore Subsystem (WS)
  • According to a specific implementation, the Webstore Subsystem (WS) 132 provides an interface for enabling customers to access an on-line store (e.g. Webstore), which, for example, may be used to provide a customer with an electronic representation of a retail store. In a specific embodiment where the Webstore may be implemented as a website on the World Wide Web, customers 102 may access the Webstore via the Internet 104 or World Wide Web using any one of a plurality of conventional browsers. The Webstore user interface may be designed to provide a rich set of functions without requiring any special browser plug-ins. Thus, according to a specific embodiment, customers may access the Webstore using any client machine, regardless of the machine's operating system platform. Additionally, for security purposes, the Webstore interface also supports data encryption for exchange of any sensitive or private information between the customers and the website. According to a specific embodiment, the secure Webstore interface may be implemented using a secure http protocol (HTTPS), commonly known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • In accordance with a specific embodiment, the Webstore Subsystem 132 may be configured to support a number of customer related features such as, for example, self registration; accessing of customer account information; browsing of product categories and category hierarchy; viewing of product images and product information; keyword searches; delivery scheduling; accessing of customer order history; customizable shopping lists; on-line shopping and ordering; etc.
  • The Webstore Subsystem (herein referred to as the Webstore) may be implemented using at least one server which is connected to the data network. According to a specific embodiment, the Webstore may be implemented using a plurality of web servers (e.g. a load-balanced web server farm) which helps to minimize server response time and provide real-time failover and redundancy capabilities. Further, according to a specific embodiment, in order to keep the web server response time to a minimum, the Webstore may be configured such that all processing is performed on a single server, within one process. Where a plurality of Webstore servers are used, redundant processing may be performed by at least a portion of the servers so that a single Webstore server may handle all Webstore processing tasks associated with a particular on-line customer. It will be appreciated that the Webstore server boundaries may be crossed where appropriate, such as, for example, when accessing desired databases via the data network.
  • Order Management Subsystem (OMS)
  • The Order Management Subsystem (OMS) 150 manages a variety of aspects related to the integrated system architecture of system 100, including, for example, pricing, availability, inventory, vendors, financials, procurement, and data flows between various subsystems.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, the OMS subsystem 150 includes at least one database 151 for storing various data received from at least a portion of the other subsystems. According to a specific embodiment, the database 151 is configured to include a plurality of schemas, such as, for example, standard packaged application schemas and/or customized schemas. According to a specific implementation, the OMS database is configured as a single Oracle database running on a Sun Solaris server.
  • According to a specific implementation, OMS batch processing may be controlled using a process scheduler. The process scheduler is able to manage the number of concurrent processes being run and the date/time at which certain processes are to run or be executed. The process scheduler may also enable central visibility of all processes currently running. Batch processing and reporting may be accomplished using a variety of different technologies commonly known to one having ordinary skill in the art.
  • The Order Management Subsystem may be configured to support both asynchronous and synchronous interfaces with the other subsystems. In a specific embodiment, the OMS is configured to support an asynchronous interface with each of the other subsystems. Additionally, each OMS interface is configurable, and may be configured to support the running of batch processes as often as is desirable.
  • Implementation of the various interfaces between OMS and the other subsystems may be accomplished using a variety of different techniques commonly known to one having ordinary skill in the art. The following description provides an example of at least some of the various techniques which may be used for interfacing OMS with the other subsystems. However, it will be appreciated that the specific interfaces described below may be implemented using other techniques commonly known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • The interface between the OMS and the Webstore Subsystem may be implemented, for example, using a plurality of executable programs. A first portion of the executable programs may be responsible for moving data from the Webstore to the OMS. This data may include, for example, new/updated customer data, new/updated order data, order cutoff information, order billing information, customer return information, customer credits and fees (e.g. bill adjustment data), etc. A second portion of the executable programs is responsible for moving data from the OMS to the Webstore Subsystem. This data may include, for example, inventory data, availability data, pricing data, and information about shipped customer orders.
  • Order Fulfillment Subsystem (OFS)
  • The Order Fulfillment Subsystem 160 manages all functionality of the distribution center (DC). In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the OFS includes appropriate hardware and/or software for managing the DC, including, for example, a warehouse management system (e.g. application software), at least one database 161, an automated material handling (AMH) controller component 163 (which manages conveyor, carousel, and scanner components), etc.
  • In a specific implementation, the Order Fulfillment Subsystem 160 may be implemented using a warehouse management system such as, for example, the MOVE warehouse management system provided by Optum, Inc. of Costa Mesa, Calif. The warehouse system also provides an interface with the Order Management Subsystem. In a specific embodiment, this interface may be implemented using a business host interface (BHI). The warehouse management subsystem may also provide the interface for allowing the OMS subsystem to communicate with the OFS database 161.
  • The description is only a partial description of an architecture that is suitable for practicing the current invention, with emphasis on the subsystems that are most directly involved in the substitution procedure of the current invention. For a more complete description of such an architecture, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,603 (Attorney Docket No. WVANP001).
  • It will be appreciated that other embodiments of the system of FIG. 1 may be used for implementing the technique of the present invention. For example, entire subsystems or selected features or components of the WS Subsystem 132, OMS Subsystem 150, PUB Subsystem 140, and/or OFS Subsystem 160 may be eliminated (if desired) or incorporated into other subsystems of the system of FIG. 1. Such modifications will be apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art. In a specific embodiment, it is preferable that the system 100 include at least a Webstore Subsystem (for receiving customer orders and maintaining inventory records), and an Order Fulfillment Subsystem (for fulfilling customer orders).
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a Customer Order Handling Process 200 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. The Customer Order Handling Process of FIG. 2 depicts a simplified overview of the various processes by which customer orders are taken, the customer orders are processed (including substitutions), and the customer orders are fulfilled and delivered in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • At 202, a customer enters his or her customer order via the Webstore 132 interface (described above). According to a specific embodiment, a “customer order” includes a list of SKU items that have been ordered, their associated quantities, and other relevant information (e.g., payment information, delivery time information, etc.)
  • The customer order may include one or more “line item orders,” where each line item order corresponds to a particular SKU and includes a desired quantity of the ordered SKU. According to a specific embodiment, at the time of the customer order, the customer may also specify whether substitutions are allowed for the customer order generally, or alternatively, whether substitutions are allowed with respect to each specific line item order. The customer's general substitution preferences also may be stored in the Webstore database, and may be accessed and/or modified during the current customer order.
  • According to a specific embodiment, during the customer ordering process, customers will be provided information relating to availability of items. For example, customers may be provided with information relating to particular items which will not be available until after the customer's specified delivery date. In this way, item substitution of customer orders may be minimized.
  • However, for various reasons, it is possible that ordered items may be oversold or unavailable at the time of fulfillment of the order. For example, it is possible that the quantities of inventory levels for selected SKUs that are anticipated or expected to be available by a specific date are not actually available on that date. If it is not possible to fulfill a customer order because one or more ordered items are unavailable, that order may be said to be incomplete.
  • Incompletes may occur for a variety of reasons, such as, for example, vendor short shipments, goods found damaged at time of fulfillment, etc. For incompletes which relate to short shelf-life SKUs, such as, for example, bread and milk, it may be preferable, from a customer perspective, to substitute items, rather than to allow the order to be delivered incomplete.
  • Thus it will be appreciated that, substitution capability provides an opportunity to turn a problem into an improved customer experience. For example, customers may receive larger sizes at the smaller size price, may receive premium brands at non-premium brand prices, or may receive comparable brands at no charge.
  • Returning to FIG. 2, at a designated time after a customer order has been placed, a “cutoff” time occurs (204), at which point the customer is no longer able to modify the order. The customer order is then sent along with other “cutoff” customer orders to be processed (206). The processing of a customer order is generally described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,603, previously incorporated herein by reference. According to a specific embodiment, the processing of a customer order includes performing item substitution analysis, which is generally described in FIGS. 3-7 of the drawings. In one implementation, order processing may be implemented at the Webstore Subsystem 132. In alternate embodiments, the order processing may be implemented at any desired subsystem which has been configured to handle the various tasks associated with the processing of customer orders. After the customer order has been processed, the customer order is then fulfilled (208) by obtaining the appropriate items from a warehouse, distribution center, or other locations. Once the order has been fulfilled, it may then be delivered (210) to the customer.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram depicting an Item Substitution Screening Procedure (300) in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. According to one embodiment, the Item Substitution Screening Procedure may be initiated during the order processing operations described, for example, at 206 of FIG. 2. According to a specific implementation, as shown, for example, in FIG. 3, the Item Substitution Screening Procedure may be configured to analyze customer orders and to generate sorted line item orders of oversold items.
  • In the example of FIG. 3, it is assumed that order processing has been initiated for a batch of “cutoff” customer orders. As shown at 302 of FIG. 3, all or a selected portion of the cutoff customer orders are aggregated (302) so that they may be processed collectively by the Item Substitution Screening Procedure. The selected customer orders are then analyzed (304) to determine whether any of the SKUs relating to the customer orders (herein referred to as “original SKUs”) have been oversold. According to a specific embodiment, the quantity of oversold units for a particular SKU may be determined by comparing a total quantity of ordered units of that SKU (derived from the aggregated customer orders) to the quantity of available units of that SKU in the inventory. If the ordered quantity is greater than the available inventory quantity, it may be determined that the SKU has been oversold, wherein the “oversold quantity” may be represented as the difference between the ordered quantity and the available inventory quantity.
  • According to a specific embodiment, the quantity of available SKU units may be represented as a quantity of SKU units which are estimated to be available as of a specified date, such as, for example, the customer delivery date. According to a specific implementation, each of the customer orders in a given batch of cutoff customer orders will have the same delivery date.
  • Further, according to a specific embodiment, only SKUs that have associated “substitution instructions” will be analyzed for substitution analysis. As described previously, the system of the present invention may include a respective set of substitution instructions for each or selected SKUs in the inventory. These instructions may either be statically generated (e.g. created by a human operator) or dynamically generated (e.g. created by a computer system using predetermined business rules). An example of a set of substitution instructions for selected SKUs is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings (described previously).
  • At 306, a determination is made as to whether there are any oversold SKUs identified. If at least one oversold SKU has been identified, then a first oversold SKU is selected (308) for substitution analysis. A determination is then made (309) as to whether substitutions are permitted for the selected oversold SKU. For example, if there are no substitution instructions for the selected oversold SKU, or if there are no substitute SKUs listed in the substitution instructions for the selected oversold SKU, then, according to at least one embodiment, substitutions are not permitted for the oversold SKU. Alternatively, the substitution instructions may specify that substitutions are not permitted for the oversold SKU. This may occur, for example, with respect to restricted SKU items such as alcohol or tobacco products.
  • If it is determined that substitutions are not permitted for the selected oversold SKU, then a next identified oversold SKU is selected (320) for substitution analysis. Assuming, however, that substitutions are permitted for the selected oversold SKU, line item orders (from the batch of cutoff customer orders) which correspond to the selected oversold SKU are then retrieved (310). According to a specific implementation, retrieved line item orders which correspond to customers who have requested not to received substitutions (either for the selected oversold SKU or generally) may be discarded (312) so that these line item orders are not considered for further substitution analysis. The remaining line item orders may then continue to be processed (314) for substitution analysis. The remaining line item orders may then be sorted (316) according to predefined criteria.
  • According to a specific embodiment, the predefined criteria may include business rules which define substitution preferences. Some of these business rules include the substitution instructions described previously with respect to FIG. 4. Other business rules may define substitution preferences based on other criteria, such as, for example: move line item orders that correspond to customer orders which already have at least one substituted item to the bottom of the list (thereby reducing the possibility of having multiple substitutions in a single customer order), substitute higher quantity line item orders first (thereby helping to reduce the total number of customer orders which include substituted items), and other rules designed to maximize customer satisfaction.
  • Additionally, according to a specific implementation, business rules may be included which prevent an oversold SKU and the substitute SKU from having different regulation codes (e.g. alcohol, tobacco, etc.). Additionally, business rules may be included which do not attempt to substitute a particular SKU for an oversold SKU if it is determined that the substitute SKU already exists as a line item in the customer order. Such business rules may be applied, for example, during substitute SKU selection as described, for example, with respect to FIG. 5 of the drawings.
  • Once the selected line item orders have been sorted, an Item Substitution Procedure (such as that shown, for example, in FIG. 5 of the drawings) may then be implemented (317) in order to perform the actual substitution for the selected oversold SKU. After the desired substitutions have been performed for the selected oversold SKU, a determination is then made (318) as to whether there are any additional oversold SKUs to be analyzed for substitution. If so, the Item Substitution Screening Procedure may then select (320) a next identified oversold SKU for substitution processing.
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow diagram depicting an Item Substitution Procedure 500 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. According to a specific embodiment, the Item Substitution Procedure (500) may be used to implement SKU substitutions for selected oversold SKUs.
  • Initially, as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 5, the Item Substitution Procedure may receive (502) one or more input parameters. In the example of FIG. 5, the input parameters include a sorted list of line item orders for a selected oversold SKU, which may be generated, for example, during the Item Substitution Screening Procedure of FIG. 3.
  • Assuming that the selected oversold SKU has been identified, the Item Substitution Procedure may then retrieve (504) the substitution instructions and other business rules (if any) relating to the identified oversold SKU. Alternatively, according to an alternate embodiment, the substitution instructions may be dynamically generated using predefined business rules specifically configured for generating substitution instructions or rules relating to specific SKUs or classes of SKUs.
  • As shown at 506 of FIG. 5, a first line item order from the line item list is selected (506) for item substitution analysis. The current oversold quantity for the identified oversold SKU is also retrieved (508). As described in greater detail below, the current quantity of the identified oversold SKU may periodically be updated during the Item Substitution Procedure as orders for the oversold SKU are replaced by substitute SKUs.
  • As shown at 508, the current oversold quantity is then compared (510) to the ordered quantity specified in the selected line item order. If it is determined that the ordered quantity is less than or equal to the current oversold quantity then a Full Substitution Procedure (such as that described, for example, in FIG. 6 of the drawings) may be implemented (511) for the selected line item order. If it is determined that the ordered quantity is greater than the current oversold quantity, then a Partial Substitution Procedure (such as that described, for example, in FIG. 7 of the drawings) may be implemented (512) for the selected line item order.
  • For example, if the current line item order specifies a quantity of 3 Large Red Apples, and the current oversold quantity of Large Red Apples is 4, then a full substitution procedure may be implemented, meaning that the full quantity of the line item order (e.g. 3) may be substituted. Once the substitution has been performed for the selected line item order, the current oversold quantity will be updated to 1 oversold large red apple. Alternatively, if the current line item order specifies a quantity of 3 Large Red Apples, and the current oversold quantity of Large Red Apples is 2, then a partial substitution procedure may be implemented, meaning that only a portion the line item order is to be substituted. In this example, the line item order may be filled by allocating 1 large red apple to the customer order, and substituting 2 Large Red Apples with other items.
  • After the appropriate substitution procedure has been be implemented for the selected line item order, a determination is then made (513) as to whether the substitution for the selected line item order was successful. If it is determined that the substitution was not successful, then, according to one embodiment, it may be assumed that no substitutions are available for the selected oversold product. Accordingly, the Item Substitution Procedure may end without attempting to perform any further substitutions for the selected oversold SKU.
  • Assuming, however, that the substitution for the selected line item order was successful, a determination is then made (514) as to whether the current oversold quantity for the identified oversold SKU is equal to zero. If it is determined that the current oversold quantity for the identified oversold SKU is equal to zero, then no further substitutions need be performed for the identified oversold SKU. If, however, the current oversold quantity for the identified oversold SKU is greater than zero, a determination may be made (516) as to whether there are additional line item orders (from the sorted list of line item orders) to be analyzed for item substitution analysis. If so, then a next line item order from the list is selected (506) for item substitution analysis.
  • FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram depicting a Partial Substitution Procedure 600 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. According to one embodiment, the Partial Substitution Procedure (600) may be implemented for a specified line item order in order to substitute a portion of the ordered quantity of the oversold SKU associated with that particular line item order.
  • Initially, as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 6, the Partial Substitution Procedure may receive (602) one or more input parameters. In the example of FIG. 6, the input parameters include a selected line item order for a selected oversold SKU, and an oversold quantity for the selected oversold SKU.
  • Once the selected oversold SKU has been identified, substitution instructions relating to the identified oversold SKU are retrieved (604) and processed in order to select (605) a first preferred substitute SKU for the identified oversold SKU. An example of substitution instructions is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings.
  • At 606 a determination is made as to whether there is a sufficient available quantity of the selected substitute SKU to be substituted for the identified oversold SKU. If it is determined that there is an insufficient quantity of the selected substitute SKU available, then the substitution instructions may be consulted to determine (607) whether any alternate substitute SKUs are specified for the identified oversold SKU. Assuming that at least one alternate substitute SKU is specified, a next preferred substitute SKU is selected (605) for analysis. If it is determined that none of the substitute SKU(s) specified in the substitution instructions are available to be substituted for the identified oversold SKU, then, according to a specific implementation, the substitution may be reported (614) as being unsuccessful, and no substitution will be made for the identified oversold SKU.
  • Assuming that sufficient quantities of a selected substitute SKU are available to be substituted for the identified the oversold SKU quantity, then the partial substitution may be performed, for example, by adding (610) a “substitute line item order” to the customer order, specifying the substitute SKU and substituted quantity, and by reducing or modifying (612) the quantity in the selected line item of the customer order (corresponding to the identified oversold SKU) as appropriate. Additionally, the oversold quantity may be set (608) to zero, thereby indicating that the identified oversold SKU is no longer oversold.
  • For purposes of illustration, an example of the Partial Substitution Procedure will now be described using the substitution instructions illustrated in FIG. 4 of the drawings. In this example, it is assumed that the selected line item order specifies a quantity of 3 Large Red Apples, and that the current oversold quantity of Large Red Apples is equal to 2. Using the substitution list entry 408 of FIG. 4, a first preferred substitute item for “Large Red Apples” (SKU#4001) is “Medium Red Apples” (SKU#4003). Thus, the Partial Substitution Procedure will first check to see if there is a sufficient quantity of Medium Red Apples available to be substituted for the Large Red Apples. In this example, since the oversold quantity of Large Red Apples is equal to 2, only 2 of the 3 ordered Large Red Apples (of the customer's line item order) need be substituted. This may be referred to as a “partial substitution.” Additionally, as shown in FIG. 4, the substitute ratio of Medium Red Apples to Large Red Apples is 2:1, meaning that a total of four (4) Medium Red Apples will be required as a substitution for 2 Large Red Apples. Accordingly, the Partial Substitution Procedure checks to see whether 4 Medium Red Apples are available to be allocated.
  • If it is determined that 4 Medium Red Apples are available, a new line item specifying 4 Medium Red Apples will be added to the customer order (associated with the selected line item order). According to a specific embodiment, the new line item may be described as a partial substitution for the line item order of 3 Large Red Apples. Additionally, the quantity of the customer's (original) line item order for 3 Large Red Apples will be reduced to 1 Large Red Apples, and the quantity of oversold Large Red Apples will be reduced to zero.
  • Alternatively, if it is determined that no Medium Red Apples are available, a next preferred substitute SKU is selected (if available) for analysis. In the example of FIG. 4, the next preferred substitute item for Large Red Apples is Large McIntosh Apples (SKU#4007). Accordingly, the Partial Substitution Procedure will check to see whether 2 Large McIntosh Apples are available to be allocated to the identified customer order. If so, then the 2 Large McIntosh Apples will be substituted for 2 of the 3 Large Red Apples ordered in the identified customer order, thereby resulting in a partial substitution.
  • FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram depicting a Full Substitution Procedure 700 in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. According to one embodiment, the Full Substitution Procedure (700) may be implemented for a specified line item order in order to substitute the ordered quantity of the oversold SKU associated with that particular line item order.
  • Initially, as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 7, the Full Substitution Procedure may receive (702) one or more input parameters. In the example of FIG. 7, the input parameters include a selected line item order for a selected oversold SKU, and an oversold quantity for the selected oversold SKU.
  • Once the selected oversold SKU has been identified, substitution instructions relating to the identified oversold SKU are retrieved (704) and processed in order to select (705) a first preferred substitute SKU for the identified oversold SKU. An example of substitution instructions is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings.
  • At 706 a determination is made as to whether there is a sufficient available quantity of the selected substitute SKU to be substituted for the identified oversold SKU. If it is determined that there is an insufficient quantity of the selected substitute SKU available, then the substitution instructions may be consulted to determine (707) whether any alternate substitute SKUs are specified for the identified oversold SKU. Assuming that at least one alternate substitute SKU is specified, a next preferred substitute SKU is selected (705) for analysis. If it is determined that none of the substitute SKU(s) specified in the substitution instructions are available to be substituted for the identified oversold SKU, then, according to a specific implementation, the substitution may be reported (714) as being unsuccessful, and no substitution will be made for the identified oversold SKU.
  • Assuming that sufficient quantities of a selected substitute SKU are available to be substituted for the identified the oversold SKU quantity, then the full substitution may be performed, for example, by adding (710) a “substitute line item order” to the customer order, specifying the substitute SKU and substituted quantity, and by reducing or modifying (712) the quantity in the selected line item of the customer order (corresponding to the identified oversold SKU) to zero. In an alternate embodiment, the original line item order may be dropped from the customer order. Additionally, as shown in FIG. 7, the oversold quantity may be modified (708) or adjusted to reflect a new value which takes into account the number of oversold SKU items being substituted in the currently selected line item order.
  • For purposes of illustration, an example of the Full Substitution Procedure will now be described using the substitution instructions illustrated in FIG. 4 of the drawings. In this example, it is assumed that the selected line item order specifies a quantity of 3 Large Red Apples, and that the current oversold quantity of Large Red Apples is equal to 5. Using the substitution list entry 408 of FIG. 4, a first preferred substitute item for “Large Red Apples” (SKU#4001) is “Medium Red Apples” (SKU#4003). Thus, the Full Substitution Procedure will first check to see if there is a sufficient quantity of Medium Red Apples available to be substituted for the Large Red Apples. In this example, since the quantity of the selected line item order for Large Red Apples is equal to 3, a total of six (6) Medium Red Apples will be required as a substitution for 3 Large Red Apples. Accordingly, the Full Substitution Procedure checks to see whether 6 Medium Red Apples are available to be allocated.
  • If it is determined that 6 Medium Red Apples are available, a new line item specifying 6 Medium Red Apples will be added to the customer order (associated with the selected line item order). According to a specific embodiment, the new line item may be described as a full substitution for the line item order of 3 Large Red Apples. Additionally, the quantity of the customer's (original) line item order for 3 Large Red Apples will be reduced to zero Large Red Apples. Further the quantity of oversold Large Red Apples will be reduced by 3, making the new (or current) oversold quantity of Large Red Apples equal to 2.
  • The substitution technique of the present invention offers many advantages and capabilities over the conventional techniques. For example, technique of the present invention may be used to minimize the total number of substitutions to be implemented for a selected batch of customer orders by first implementing substitutions for line item orders of higher quantities. In addition, technique of the present invention may automatically prioritize line item orders so that customer orders that have already had at least one item substitution performed are less likely to have another item substitution performed. It will be appreciated that either of the above-described features may result in improved customer satisfaction.
  • Additionally, according to at least one embodiment of the present invention, substitution of ordered customer items may be automatically implemented without involving human decisions and/or human interactions at the time of fulfillment of the customer order(s). In this way, the technique of the present invention may be used to expedite order processing and order fulfillment, for example, by eliminating delays associated with human decisions and/or interactions.
  • Moreover, the technique of the present invention is highly scalable, and provides for more consistent and reliable substitutions as compared to conventional techniques. This, in turn, may result in improved overall quality control.
  • Other Embodiments
  • Generally, the item substitution technique of the present invention may be implemented on software and/or hardware. For example, it can be implemented in an operating system kernel, in a separate user process, in a library package bound into network applications, on a specially constructed machine, or on a network interface card. In a specific embodiment of this invention, the technique of the present invention is implemented in software such as an operating system or in an application running on an operating system.
  • A software or software/hardware hybrid implementation of the item substitution technique of this invention may be implemented on a general-purpose programmable machine selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in memory. Such programmable machine may be a network device designed to handle network traffic, such as, for example, a router or a switch. Such network devices may have multiple network interfaces including frame relay and ISDN interfaces, for example. A general architecture for some of these machines will appear from the description given below. In an alternative embodiment, the item substitution technique of this invention may be implemented on a general-purpose network host machine such as a personal computer or workstation. Further, the invention may be at least partially implemented on a card (e.g., an interface card) for a network device or a general-purpose computing device.
  • Referring now to FIG. 8, a network device 60 suitable for implementing the item substitution technique of the present invention includes a master central processing unit (CPU) 62, interfaces 68, and a bus 67 (e.g., a PCI bus). When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, the CPU 62 may be responsible for implementing specific functions associated with the functions of a desired network device. For example, when configured as a load balancing device, the CPU 62 may be responsible for analyzing packets, encapsulating packets, forwarding packets to appropriate network devices, performing content and/or format verification of data, etc. The CPU 62 preferably accomplishes all these functions under the control of software including an operating system (e.g. Windows NT), and any appropriate applications software.
  • CPU 62 may include one or more processors 63 such as a processor from the Motorola family of microprocessors or the MIPS family of microprocessors. In an alternative embodiment, processor 63 is specially designed hardware for controlling the operations of network device 60. In a specific embodiment, a memory 61 (such as non-volatile RAM and/or ROM) also forms part of CPU 62. However, there are many different ways in which memory could be coupled to the system. Memory block 61 may be used for a variety of purposes such as, for example, caching and/or storing data, programming instructions, etc.
  • The interfaces 68 are typically provided as interface cards (sometimes referred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control the sending and receiving of data packets over the network and sometimes support other peripherals used with the network device 60. Among the interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like. In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as packet switching, media control and management. By providing separate processors for the communications intensive tasks, these interfaces allow the master microprocessor 62 to efficiently perform routing computations, network diagnostics, security functions, etc.
  • Although the system shown in FIG. 8 illustrates one specific network device of the present invention, it is by no means the only network device architecture on which the present invention can be implemented. For example, an architecture having a single processor that handles communications as well as routing computations, etc. is often used. Further, other types of interfaces and media could also be used with the network device.
  • Regardless of network device's configuration, it may employ one or more memories or memory modules (such as, for example, memory block 65) configured to store data, program instructions for the general-purpose network operations and/or other information relating to the functionality of the item substitution technique described herein. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to include data structures which store customer order information, inventory data, item substitution instructions, substitution business rules, etc.
  • Because such information and program instructions may be employed to implement the systems/methods described herein, the present invention relates to machine readable media that include program instructions, state information, etc. for performing various operations described herein. Examples of machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media such as floptical disks; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM) and random access memory (RAM). The invention may also be embodied in a carrier wave traveling over an appropriate medium such as airwaves, optical lines, electric lines, etc. Examples of program instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter.
  • Although certain preferred embodiments of this invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these precise embodiments, and at various changes and modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope of spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A computer system for effecting substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order at an online store via a computer network, the computer system comprising:
a computing device; and
a storage device coupled to the computing device, the storage device storing instructions that, when executed, cause the computer system to:
analyze a plurality of customer orders placed by a plurality of customers, via the computer network, to the online store, to identify an item in a customer order from a customer having been oversold, before delivering items in the plurality of customer orders to the plurality of customers; and
substitute the oversold item with a substituted item for the customer order from the customer based on at least one substitution rule,
wherein another substitution rule to restrict substituting another item in the customer order based on an indication from the customer.
2. A computer system as recited in claim 1, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the computer system to charge the customer a different amount in view of the substitute the oversold item in the customer order with the substituted item.
3. A computer system as recited in claim 1, wherein the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on an input from a merchant that provides the oversold item to the online store.
4. A computer system as recited in claim 1, wherein to substitute based on the at least one substitution rule, the instructions, when executed, cause the computer system to upgrade the oversold item based on size and/or brand.
5. A computer system as recited in claim 1, wherein the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends at least in part on a prior interaction of the customer with the online store before the time the customer places the customer order.
6. A computer system as recited in claim 1, wherein the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on an action by the customer at the time the customer places the customer order, to allow the substitute.
7. A computer system as recited in claim 1,
wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the computer system to retrieve a specific preference regarding item substitution entered by the customer in the customer order, and to retrieve a general preference from the customer regarding item substitution,
wherein if the specific preference corresponds to the oversold item in the customer order, then the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on the specific preference, and
wherein if the specific preference does not correspond to the oversold item in the customer order, then the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on the general preference.
8. A computer system as recited in claim 1,
wherein the at least one substitution rule includes a ratio rule,
wherein the customer order includes ordering a first number of the oversold item,
wherein the substitute the oversold item includes substituting a first number of the oversold item by a second number of the substituted item, and
wherein the first number of the oversold item and the second number of the substituted item are related by the ratio rule.
9. A computer system as recited in claim 1,
wherein the customer order includes a delivery time set by the customer, and
wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the computer system to substitute the oversold item at a time that depends on the delivery time.
10. A computer system as recited in claim 9,
wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the computer system to retrieve a specific preference regarding item substitution entered by the customer in the customer order, and to retrieve a general preference from the customer regarding item substitution,
wherein if the specific preference corresponds to the oversold item in the customer order, then the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on the specific preference, and
wherein if the specific preference does not correspond to the oversold item in the customer order, then the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on the general preference.
11. A computer system as recited in claim 10, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the computer system to charge the customer a different amount in view of the substitute the oversold item in the customer order with the substituted item.
12. A computer system as recited in claim 11, wherein the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on an action by the customer at the time the customer places the customer order, to allow the substitute.
13. An article for effecting substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order at an online store comprising: a non-transitory storage medium having stored thereon instructions executable by a computing device to:
analyze a plurality of customer orders collectively to identify an item having been oversold, based on information from the plurality of customer orders placed by a plurality of customers, before delivering items in the plurality of customer orders to the plurality of customers; and
substitute the oversold item in a customer order from a customer with a substituted item for the customer order based on at least one substitution rule.
14. An article as recited in claim 13, wherein the instructions are executable to retrieve a specific preference regarding item substitution entered by the customer in the customer order, and to retrieve a general preference from the customer regarding item substitution,
wherein if the specific preference corresponds to the oversold item in the customer order, then the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on the specific preference, and
wherein if the specific preference does not correspond to the oversold item in the customer order, then the substitute based on the at least one substitution rule depends on the general preference.
15. An article for effecting substitution of at least one ordered item of at least one customer order at an online store comprising: a non-transitory storage medium having stored thereon instructions executable by a computing device to:
retrieve a general preference from a customer regarding item substitution;
retrieve a specific preference regarding item substitution entered by a customer in a customer order that includes at least one item;
determine whether the at least one item has been oversold; and
determine whether the at least one item is to be substituted in accordance with at least one of the general or the specific preference if the determine determines that the at least one item has been oversold,
wherein if the specific preference corresponds to the at least one item, then the determine whether the at least one item is to be substituted depends on the specific preference, and
wherein if the specific preference does not correspond to the at least one item, then the determine whether the at least one item is to be substituted depends on the general preference.
16. An article as recited in claim 15, wherein the specific preference to restrict substituting the at least one item for the determine whether the at least one item is to be substituted.
17. An article as recited in claim 15, wherein the instructions are executable to charge the customer a different amount if the oversold item in the customer order is substituted with a substituted item.
18. An article as recited in claim 15, wherein the instructions are executable to analyze a plurality of customer orders placed by a plurality of customers to determine whether the at least one item has been oversold, before delivering items in the plurality of customer orders to the plurality of customers.
19. An article as recited in claim 18, wherein the specific preference to restrict substituting the at least one item for the determine whether the at least one item is to be substituted.
20. An article as recited in claim 19, wherein the instructions are executable to charge the customer a different amount if the oversold item in the customer order is substituted with a substituted item.
US14/281,201 2000-12-27 2014-05-19 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order Abandoned US20140279278A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/281,201 US20140279278A1 (en) 2000-12-27 2014-05-19 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/750,385 US7233914B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2000-12-27 Technique for implementing item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US11/818,010 US8090626B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2007-06-13 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US13/334,449 US8751334B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2011-12-22 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US14/281,201 US20140279278A1 (en) 2000-12-27 2014-05-19 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/334,449 Continuation US8751334B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2011-12-22 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140279278A1 true US20140279278A1 (en) 2014-09-18

Family

ID=38157161

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/750,385 Expired - Lifetime US7233914B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2000-12-27 Technique for implementing item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US11/818,010 Expired - Lifetime US8090626B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2007-06-13 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US13/334,449 Expired - Fee Related US8751334B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2011-12-22 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US14/281,201 Abandoned US20140279278A1 (en) 2000-12-27 2014-05-19 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/750,385 Expired - Lifetime US7233914B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2000-12-27 Technique for implementing item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US11/818,010 Expired - Lifetime US8090626B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2007-06-13 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US13/334,449 Expired - Fee Related US8751334B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2011-12-22 Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US7233914B1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9342808B2 (en) 1999-05-11 2016-05-17 June Ray Limited Load balancing technique implemented in a data network device utilizing a data cache
US9413808B2 (en) 2000-05-10 2016-08-09 June Ray Limited Data transmission and rendering techniques by a device via a network
US9697547B2 (en) 1999-05-11 2017-07-04 June Ray Limited Integrated online store
WO2017136258A1 (en) * 2016-02-03 2017-08-10 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Systems and methods for providing substitute products in place of ordered products that are out of stock
US10175866B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2019-01-08 Apple Inc. Providing complications on an electronic watch
US10379497B2 (en) * 2015-03-07 2019-08-13 Apple Inc. Obtaining and displaying time-related data on an electronic watch
US10572571B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-02-25 Apple Inc. API for specifying display of complication on an electronic watch
WO2021188359A1 (en) * 2020-03-18 2021-09-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Unified alternative item selection user experience
US11327640B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2022-05-10 Apple Inc. Providing complications on an electronic device

Families Citing this family (77)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6975937B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2005-12-13 Christopher Kantarjiev Technique for processing customer service transactions at customer site using mobile computing device
US7370005B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2008-05-06 Peter Ham Inventory replication based upon order fulfillment rates
US9934478B1 (en) * 2000-09-22 2018-04-03 Jda Software Group, Inc. Generating an ordering of workflow items given a partial ordering and extension data
JP2004529406A (en) 2000-11-10 2004-09-24 アフィノバ, インコーポレイテッド Method and apparatus for dynamic real-time market segmentation
US7233914B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2007-06-19 Joyo Wijaya Technique for implementing item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US7308423B1 (en) * 2001-03-19 2007-12-11 Franklin Goodhue Woodward Technique for handling sales of regulated items implemented over a data network
DE10257199A1 (en) * 2001-12-10 2003-08-21 I2 Technologies Inc Optimized pricing plan generation method for business items, involves determining mathematical model comprising set of initial constraints, and representing pricing plan for group of item
CA2535835A1 (en) * 2003-08-18 2005-03-03 Gilbert Leistner System and method for identification of quasi-fungible goods and services, and financial instruments based thereon
US8595115B2 (en) * 2003-08-18 2013-11-26 Gilbert Leistner Methods for managing a medical event
US7909241B2 (en) 2004-03-09 2011-03-22 Lowe's Companies, Inc. Systems, methods and computer program products for implementing processes relating to retail sales
US8095433B2 (en) * 2005-02-22 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Method and computer storage medium for ordering a replacement kit to build superseded parts
KR100690245B1 (en) * 2005-04-06 2007-03-12 삼성전자주식회사 solder joint method using lower-melting-point solder and method for repairing ball grid array package using the same
US8874477B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2014-10-28 Steven Mark Hoffberg Multifactorial optimization system and method
US20070088599A1 (en) * 2005-10-18 2007-04-19 Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc. Apparatus and method for analyzing new product performance
US8260689B2 (en) * 2006-07-07 2012-09-04 Dollens Joseph R Method and system for managing and displaying product images
US10614513B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2020-04-07 Joseph R. Dollens Method and system for managing and displaying product images with progressive resolution display
US11049175B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2021-06-29 Joseph R. Dollens Method and system for managing and displaying product images with progressive resolution display with audio commands and responses
US8554639B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2013-10-08 Joseph R. Dollens Method and system for managing and displaying product images
US9691098B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2017-06-27 Joseph R. Dollens Method and system for managing and displaying product images with cloud computing
US11481834B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2022-10-25 Joseph R. Dollens Method and system for managing and displaying product images with progressive resolution display with artificial realities
US8577733B2 (en) * 2007-11-02 2013-11-05 Tti Inventions C Llc Method and system for dynamic order fulfillment
US8195527B2 (en) 2008-07-28 2012-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for evaluating product substitutions along multiple criteria in response to a sales opportunity
US8239276B2 (en) * 2008-09-30 2012-08-07 Apple Inc. On-the-go shopping list
JP4565117B1 (en) * 2009-06-25 2010-10-20 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 Reservation processing device, program of reservation processing device, and reservation processing system
WO2011035298A2 (en) * 2009-09-21 2011-03-24 The Nielsen Company (Us) Llc Methods and apparatus to perform choice modeling with substitutability data
US8392266B2 (en) * 2009-11-13 2013-03-05 Omnione Usa, Inc. System and method for certifying information relating to transactions between a seller and a purchaser
US10679469B2 (en) * 2010-10-08 2020-06-09 Ncr Corporation System and method of managing unavailable items in shared screen data
US9202246B1 (en) 2010-10-21 2015-12-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System and method for providing substitute item recommendations in order status messages
US20120259676A1 (en) 2011-04-07 2012-10-11 Wagner John G Methods and apparatus to model consumer choice sourcing
US20130159144A1 (en) * 2011-12-14 2013-06-20 Ebay Inc. System and method for providing alternative fulfillment for a buyer's unfulfillable order
US9311383B1 (en) 2012-01-13 2016-04-12 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Optimal solution identification system and method
US10346784B1 (en) 2012-07-27 2019-07-09 Google Llc Near-term delivery system performance simulation
US20140089129A1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2014-03-27 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Techniques for determining substitutes for products indicated in an electronic shopping list
WO2014143729A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Affinnova, Inc. Method and apparatus for interactive evolutionary optimization of concepts
WO2014152010A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-25 Affinnova, Inc. Method and apparatus for interactive evolutionary algorithms with respondent directed breeding
US11157868B2 (en) 2013-11-20 2021-10-26 Home Depot Product Authority, Llc Systems and methods for identifying substitute goods
US10282774B2 (en) * 2013-11-20 2019-05-07 Fishsix Rc Approach for order resolution
US9824382B2 (en) 2013-12-30 2017-11-21 Elwha, Llc Systems and methods for providing customized food items that are customized based, at least in part, on customized food item integrity preference
US10115142B2 (en) 2013-12-30 2018-10-30 Elwha Llc Directing one or more users to one or more automated customized food generation machines
US10053280B2 (en) 2013-12-30 2018-08-21 Elwha Llc Systems and methods for providing customized packagings for customized food items that were customized based, at least in part, on customized food item integrity preference
US20150186981A1 (en) * 2013-12-30 2015-07-02 Elwha Llc Identifying one or more substitute automated customized food generation machines for generating one or more substitute customized food items
US10726471B2 (en) * 2014-09-23 2020-07-28 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Sales and interaction platform
US10445816B2 (en) * 2014-11-20 2019-10-15 Walmart Apollo, Llc System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable storage media for allowing a customer to place orders remotely and for the order assembler to communicate directly with the customer
US20160189069A1 (en) * 2014-12-30 2016-06-30 E-Gatematrix, Llc Creating pre-order catalogs based on real-time inventories and carrier-related data
US10346810B2 (en) 2015-03-24 2019-07-09 MINDBODY, Inc. Event scheduling
US10147108B2 (en) 2015-04-02 2018-12-04 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to identify affinity between segment attributes and product characteristics
US10430854B2 (en) * 2015-12-31 2019-10-01 Walmart Apollo, Llc System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable storage media for evaluating search results for personalized product substitutions
CN106997546A (en) * 2016-01-26 2017-08-01 中国移动通信集团安徽有限公司 A kind of order processing method and device
US10346793B2 (en) * 2016-01-29 2019-07-09 Walmart Apollo, Llc Systems and methods for order filling
US11373118B2 (en) * 2016-03-17 2022-06-28 Walmart Apollo, Llc Systems and methods for object matching and substitution
USD823315S1 (en) 2016-03-30 2018-07-17 Square, Inc. Display screen having a graphical user interface
US10997549B2 (en) 2016-06-28 2021-05-04 Paypal, Inc. Routing system configurations based on various inventories
US10504091B1 (en) 2016-08-18 2019-12-10 Inmar Clearing, Inc. System including digital promotion based upon product quantity promotion threshold and related methods
US9934530B1 (en) 2016-09-30 2018-04-03 Square, Inc. Application programming interfaces for courier services
US10922743B1 (en) * 2017-01-04 2021-02-16 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Adaptive performance of actions associated with custom user interface controls
US10664146B2 (en) * 2017-01-04 2020-05-26 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Creation of custom user interface controls that are associated with physical devices
US11042834B2 (en) * 2017-01-12 2021-06-22 Vocollect, Inc. Voice-enabled substitutions with customer notification
WO2019014437A1 (en) * 2017-07-12 2019-01-17 Somar Concepts Architecture, system and method for users to order items for delivery during travel events
US20190026770A1 (en) * 2017-07-18 2019-01-24 Walmart Apollo, Llc Systems and methods for pricing combinations of items
US10824834B2 (en) 2017-08-03 2020-11-03 Walmart Apollo, Llc Electronic label system
CN107944663B (en) * 2017-10-30 2021-06-29 浙江智尚实业有限公司广州分公司 Management method for online and offline synchronous processing of product deposit and sale
US11244299B1 (en) 2018-03-16 2022-02-08 DoorDash, Inc. Location-based transaction completion
US11308438B2 (en) 2018-07-12 2022-04-19 Rafael Ramos System and method for user to order items for delivery during travel event
US11373228B2 (en) 2019-01-31 2022-06-28 Walmart Apollo, Llc System and method for determining substitutes for a requested product
US11373231B2 (en) 2019-01-31 2022-06-28 Walmart Apollo, Llc System and method for determining substitutes for a requested product and the order to provide the substitutes
US10685308B1 (en) * 2019-02-19 2020-06-16 Direct Supply, Inc. Systems, methods, and media for harmonizing procurement across distribution networks with heterogeneous product availability
US10664793B1 (en) * 2019-03-18 2020-05-26 Coupang Corp. Systems and methods for automatic package tracking and prioritized reordering
US11151507B2 (en) * 2019-03-18 2021-10-19 Coupang Corp. Systems and methods for automatic package reordering using delivery wave systems
US11023957B1 (en) 2019-06-12 2021-06-01 DoorDash, Inc. Dynamically providing context-based notification and fulfillment
US11308537B1 (en) * 2019-09-03 2022-04-19 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Providing alternative items for unavailable items
US20210081865A1 (en) * 2019-09-14 2021-03-18 Oracle International Corporation Generating and executing a fulfillment plan
US11367119B2 (en) 2020-01-24 2022-06-21 Walmart Apollo, Llc Methods and apparatuses for evaluating substitutions made during order fulfillment processes
US11763216B2 (en) * 2021-01-25 2023-09-19 6 River Systems, Llc Systems and methods for determining dynamic substitutions to minimize distance
KR102363705B1 (en) * 2021-04-09 2022-02-17 쿠팡 주식회사 Information processing method for item in distribution system and electronic device
US20220358570A1 (en) * 2021-05-07 2022-11-10 International Business Machines Corporation Displaying real-time purchase decision criteria in a virtual reality environment
US11691649B2 (en) * 2021-05-21 2023-07-04 6 River Systems, Llc Systems and methods for dynamically limiting alternate pick location attempts before shorting
CN117078363A (en) * 2023-10-18 2023-11-17 深圳硬之城信息技术有限公司 Production feedback method, device, equipment and storage medium for online order

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6963847B1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2005-11-08 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. System and method for managing ATP data in a distributed supply chain planning environment
US7233914B1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2007-06-19 Joyo Wijaya Technique for implementing item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US7236942B1 (en) * 1997-12-19 2007-06-26 Walker Digital, Llc Pre-sale data broadcast system and method

Family Cites Families (292)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2781643A (en) 1953-01-19 1957-02-19 Starr W Fairweather Apparatus for refrigerating foodstuffs
US3406532A (en) 1966-11-09 1968-10-22 Aladdin Ind Inc Food and beverage containers having integral compartments containing a freezable liquid
AT293950B (en) 1968-02-27 1971-10-25 Licentia Gmbh Procedure for picking
US3670867A (en) 1969-11-17 1972-06-20 Fmc Corp Conveyor system
US4455453A (en) 1979-01-26 1984-06-19 Metretek, Incorporated Apparatus and method for remote sensor monitoring, metering and control
US4213310A (en) 1979-04-03 1980-07-22 Igloo Corporation Thermal container with quick-release lid-mounted flask
US4530067A (en) 1981-03-10 1985-07-16 Xecutek Corporation Restaurant management information and control method and apparatus
US4656591A (en) 1983-04-18 1987-04-07 Goody Products, Inc. Order processing method and apparatus (II)
US5246332A (en) 1985-05-13 1993-09-21 Computer Aided Systems, Inc. System for delivery
DE3526868A1 (en) 1985-07-26 1987-02-05 Interroll Foerdertechnik Gmbh METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PICKLESS PICKING OF GOODS
US5273392A (en) 1986-01-02 1993-12-28 Computer Aided Systems, Inc. Automated work center and method
US4823984A (en) 1986-04-30 1989-04-25 Unidynamics Corporation Container storage and dispensing apparatus and vending machine for dispensing refrigerated, unrefrigerated and/or heated foods
US5834753A (en) 1986-08-08 1998-11-10 Norand Corporation Laser scanner module having integral interface with hand-held data capture terminal proximity and label sensing, and enhanced sensitivity and power efficiency
US5598487A (en) 1986-08-15 1997-01-28 Norand Corporation Hand-held data entry system removable signature pad
US4799156A (en) 1986-10-01 1989-01-17 Strategic Processing Corporation Interactive market management system
US4803348A (en) 1987-06-30 1989-02-07 Lohrey David W Automated customer interface for services involving drop-off and pickup
US4958280A (en) 1987-07-10 1990-09-18 Vistakon, Inc. Apparatus and method for satisfying disposable contact lens prescriptions
US4887208A (en) 1987-12-18 1989-12-12 Schneider Bruce H Sales and inventory control system
US5235819A (en) 1988-03-02 1993-08-17 Pallet-Cooler Kb Method and apparatus for storing and distributing materials
US5113349A (en) 1988-03-26 1992-05-12 Fuji Electric Co. Ltd. Method and system for storing/removing and distributing articles of manufacture
US4936738A (en) 1988-04-26 1990-06-26 Food Plant Engineering, Inc. Alternating push back selective rack storage system
US5122959A (en) 1988-10-28 1992-06-16 Automated Dispatch Services, Inc. Transportation dispatch and delivery tracking system
US5038283A (en) 1989-04-13 1991-08-06 Panduit Corp. Shipping method
US5027269A (en) 1989-04-27 1991-06-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for providing continuous availability of applications in a computer network
US5687322A (en) 1989-05-01 1997-11-11 Credit Verification Corporation Method and system for selective incentive point-of-sale marketing in response to customer shopping histories
JPH0833958B2 (en) 1989-05-30 1996-03-29 沖電気工業株式会社 Customer information processing system
US5101352A (en) 1989-06-29 1992-03-31 Carolina Cipher Material requirements planning system
US5093794A (en) 1989-08-22 1992-03-03 United Technologies Corporation Job scheduling system
US5237158A (en) 1989-10-10 1993-08-17 Unisys Corporation Image-based document processing system providing for priority document shipment
EP0425405A3 (en) 1989-10-23 1992-01-22 International Business Machines Corporation An automated customer order promising and confirming method
US5347115A (en) 1990-01-12 1994-09-13 Norand Corporation Portable modular work station including printer and portable data collection terminal
US5949776A (en) 1990-01-18 1999-09-07 Norand Corporation Hierarchical communication system using premises, peripheral and vehicular local area networking
US5880443A (en) 1990-01-24 1999-03-09 Automated Healthcare Automated system for selecting packages from a cylindrical storage area
US5105627A (en) 1990-04-20 1992-04-21 Nihon Freezer Co., Ltd. Cryopreservation container of animal cell
US6006100A (en) 1990-05-25 1999-12-21 Norand Corporation Multi-level, hierarchical radio-frequency communication system
EP0471150B1 (en) 1990-08-13 1995-03-15 Electrocom Automation L.P. Order filling system with cartridge dispenser
US5322406A (en) 1990-08-13 1994-06-21 Electrocom Automation, L.P. Order filling system with cartridge dispenser
JPH04160469A (en) 1990-10-23 1992-06-03 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Automatic order vending management system using facsimile
US5265006A (en) 1990-12-14 1993-11-23 Andersen Consulting Demand scheduled partial carrier load planning system for the transportation industry
US5832457A (en) 1991-05-06 1998-11-03 Catalina Marketing International, Inc. Method and apparatus for selective distribution of discount coupons based on prior customer behavior
US5272638A (en) 1991-05-31 1993-12-21 Texas Instruments Incorporated Systems and methods for planning the scheduling travel routes
JP2957308B2 (en) 1991-06-04 1999-10-04 日本精工株式会社 Automatic drawing ordering device and automatic drawing ordering method
CA2091640A1 (en) 1991-09-19 1994-09-16 Jerry R. Martinez Method and apparatus for validating credit information during home delivery of order
US7028187B1 (en) 1991-11-15 2006-04-11 Citibank, N.A. Electronic transaction apparatus for electronic commerce
US5428210A (en) 1992-01-10 1995-06-27 National Bancard Corporation Data card terminal with embossed character reader and signature capture
JPH05250394A (en) * 1992-03-09 1993-09-28 Hitachi Ltd Inventory controller for combined article
US5395206A (en) 1992-03-17 1995-03-07 Cerny, Jr.; Louis J. Method and apparatus for filling orders in a warehouse
JPH05270611A (en) 1992-03-25 1993-10-19 Toyota Motor Corp Carrying-in and-out controller for automated warehouse
US5363310A (en) 1992-04-09 1994-11-08 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for partial order filling
US5310997A (en) 1992-09-10 1994-05-10 Tandy Corporation Automated order and delivery system
FR2696722A1 (en) 1992-10-09 1994-04-15 Mde Robot stocking tunnel for stocking and distribution - comprises triangular frame supporting identical necks on inclined surface, each forming vertical storage compartment with its neighbour,with compartment internal opening obstructed by trolley having ejector
US5371852A (en) 1992-10-14 1994-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for making a cluster of computers appear as a single host on a network
US5428546A (en) 1992-10-16 1995-06-27 Mobile Information Systems Method and apparatus for tracking vehicle location
US5758313A (en) 1992-10-16 1998-05-26 Mobile Information Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for tracking vehicle location
US5402336A (en) 1993-01-15 1995-03-28 Ss&D Corporation System and method for allocating resources of a retailer among multiple wholesalers
US5712989A (en) 1993-04-02 1998-01-27 Fisher Scientific Company Just-in-time requisition and inventory management system
US6748318B1 (en) 1993-05-18 2004-06-08 Arrivalstar, Inc. Advanced notification systems and methods utilizing a computer network
RU2183854C2 (en) 1993-05-20 2002-06-20 Мур Бизнес Формз, Инк. System of applications and application accompanying system
US6535880B1 (en) 2000-05-09 2003-03-18 Cnet Networks, Inc. Automated on-line commerce method and apparatus utilizing a shopping server verifying product information on product selection
US6119099A (en) 1997-03-21 2000-09-12 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and system for processing supplementary product sales at a point-of-sale terminal
US7058596B1 (en) 1993-08-24 2006-06-06 Lykes Bros., Inc. System for managing customer orders and methods of implementation
US5666493A (en) 1993-08-24 1997-09-09 Lykes Bros., Inc. System for managing customer orders and method of implementation
US5450317A (en) 1993-11-24 1995-09-12 U S West Advanced Technologies, Inc. Method and system for optimized logistics planning
US5467268A (en) 1994-02-25 1995-11-14 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method for resource assignment and scheduling
US5826825A (en) 1994-04-12 1998-10-27 Gabriel; Edwin Zenith Automatically actuated cargo and personnel snatching apparatus with distance sensos, magnets and pivot pins for assistance
US5950173A (en) 1996-10-25 1999-09-07 Ipf, Inc. System and method for delivering consumer product related information to consumers within retail environments using internet-based information servers and sales agents
US5694546A (en) 1994-05-31 1997-12-02 Reisman; Richard R. System for automatic unattended electronic information transport between a server and a client by a vendor provided transport software with a manifest list
US5548518A (en) 1994-05-31 1996-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation Allocation method for generating a production schedule
US5553312A (en) 1994-06-20 1996-09-03 Acs Wireless, Inc. Data transfer and communication network
US5809479A (en) 1994-07-21 1998-09-15 Micron Technology, Inc. On-time delivery, tracking and reporting
US6023683A (en) 1994-08-10 2000-02-08 Fisher Scientific Company Electronic sourcing system and method
US5592378A (en) * 1994-08-19 1997-01-07 Andersen Consulting Llp Computerized order entry system and method
US5715314A (en) 1994-10-24 1998-02-03 Open Market, Inc. Network sales system
US5664110A (en) 1994-12-08 1997-09-02 Highpoint Systems, Inc. Remote ordering system
US5533361A (en) 1994-12-22 1996-07-09 Halpern; Samuel J. Insulated grocery cart cooler
US5615121A (en) 1995-01-31 1997-03-25 U S West Technologies, Inc. System and method for scheduling service providers to perform customer service requests
US5724243A (en) 1995-02-10 1998-03-03 Highwaymaster Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining expected time of arrival
USH1743H (en) 1995-03-17 1998-08-04 Hercules Incorporated Inventory management method and apparatus
US5831860A (en) 1995-04-28 1998-11-03 At&T Corp. Package special delivery service
US5922040A (en) 1995-05-17 1999-07-13 Mobile Information System, Inc. Method and apparatus for fleet management
US5708780A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-01-13 Open Market, Inc. Internet server access control and monitoring systems
US5774668A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-06-30 Microsoft Corporation System for on-line service in which gateway computer uses service map which includes loading condition of servers broadcasted by application servers for load balancing
WO1996041447A1 (en) 1995-06-07 1996-12-19 E-Comm Incorporated Low power telecommunication controller for a host computer server
US7085729B1 (en) 1995-06-16 2006-08-01 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. System and method for allocating manufactured products to sellers
US6188989B1 (en) 1995-06-16 2001-02-13 I2 Technologies, Inc. System and method for managing available to promised product (ATP)
AT402911B (en) 1995-07-18 1997-09-25 Knapp Holding Gmbh PICKING SYSTEM
US5640002A (en) 1995-08-15 1997-06-17 Ruppert; Jonathan Paul Portable RF ID tag and barcode reader
US5710887A (en) 1995-08-29 1998-01-20 Broadvision Computer system and method for electronic commerce
US5774670A (en) 1995-10-06 1998-06-30 Netscape Communications Corporation Persistent client state in a hypertext transfer protocol based client-server system
US5870473A (en) 1995-12-14 1999-02-09 Cybercash, Inc. Electronic transfer system and method
US5918213A (en) 1995-12-22 1999-06-29 Mci Communications Corporation System and method for automated remote previewing and purchasing of music, video, software, and other multimedia products
US5893076A (en) 1996-01-16 1999-04-06 Sterling Commerce, Inc. Supplier driven commerce transaction processing system and methodology
AUPN773496A0 (en) 1996-01-25 1996-02-15 Task Solutions Pty Ltd Task management system
US7035914B1 (en) 1996-01-26 2006-04-25 Simpleair Holdings, Inc. System and method for transmission of data
US5761673A (en) 1996-01-31 1998-06-02 Oracle Corporation Method and apparatus for generating dynamic web pages by invoking a predefined procedural package stored in a database
US5878401A (en) * 1996-02-09 1999-03-02 Joseph; Joseph Sales and inventory method and apparatus
US5758328A (en) 1996-02-22 1998-05-26 Giovannoli; Joseph Computerized quotation system and method
US6003015A (en) 1996-02-28 1999-12-14 Hm Electronics, Inc. Order confirmation system and method of using same
GB9606194D0 (en) 1996-03-23 1996-05-29 Int Computers Ltd Appointment booking and scheduling system
US6549891B1 (en) 1996-03-26 2003-04-15 Recovery Management Corporation Method for managing inventory
US6182053B1 (en) 1996-03-26 2001-01-30 Recovery Sales Corporation Method and apparatus for managing inventory
US6233543B1 (en) 1996-04-01 2001-05-15 Openconnect Systems Incorporated Server and terminal emulator for persistent connection to a legacy host system with printer emulation
JP4059355B2 (en) 1996-04-04 2008-03-12 パイオニア株式会社 Information recording apparatus, information recording method, information reproducing apparatus, and information reproducing method
US5894554A (en) 1996-04-23 1999-04-13 Infospinner, Inc. System for managing dynamic web page generation requests by intercepting request at web server and routing to page server thereby releasing web server to process other requests
US5940807A (en) 1996-05-24 1999-08-17 Purcell; Daniel S. Automated and independently accessible inventory information exchange system
US5897629A (en) 1996-05-29 1999-04-27 Fujitsu Limited Apparatus for solving optimization problems and delivery planning system
US6034689A (en) 1996-06-03 2000-03-07 Webtv Networks, Inc. Web browser allowing navigation between hypertext objects using remote control
US5961601A (en) 1996-06-07 1999-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Preserving state information in a continuing conversation between a client and server networked via a stateless protocol
US6073108A (en) 1996-06-21 2000-06-06 Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker Task-based classification and analysis system
US6360256B1 (en) 1996-07-01 2002-03-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Name service for a redundant array of internet servers
US6070147A (en) 1996-07-02 2000-05-30 Tecmark Services, Inc. Customer identification and marketing analysis systems
US6185601B1 (en) 1996-08-02 2001-02-06 Hewlett-Packard Company Dynamic load balancing of a network of client and server computers
US5774660A (en) 1996-08-05 1998-06-30 Resonate, Inc. World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network
US6016504A (en) 1996-08-28 2000-01-18 Infospace.Com, Inc. Method and system for tracking the purchase of a product and services over the Internet
JP3947251B2 (en) 1996-09-04 2007-07-18 富士フイルム株式会社 Digital print ordering and delivery system and reception processing device
US6970837B1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2005-11-29 Walker Digital, Llc Methods and apparatus wherein a buyer arranges to purchase a first product using a communication network and subsequently takes possession of a substitute product at a retailer
US6084528A (en) 1996-09-05 2000-07-04 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Intranet scanning terminal system
US5979757A (en) * 1996-09-05 1999-11-09 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Method and system for presenting item information using a portable data terminal
US7040541B2 (en) 1996-09-05 2006-05-09 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Portable shopping and order fulfillment system
US5983200A (en) 1996-10-09 1999-11-09 Slotznick; Benjamin Intelligent agent for executing delegated tasks
US6083279A (en) 1996-10-10 2000-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation Platform independent technique for transferring software programs over a network
US5999914A (en) 1996-10-16 1999-12-07 Microsoft Corporation Electronic promotion system for an electronic merchant system
US5897622A (en) 1996-10-16 1999-04-27 Microsoft Corporation Electronic shopping and merchandising system
US6140922A (en) 1996-10-30 2000-10-31 Fujitsu Limited System for indicating locations of sales items, method thereof, and apparatus thereof
US5910896A (en) 1996-11-12 1999-06-08 Hahn-Carlson; Dean W. Shipment transaction system and an arrangement thereof
JP2001504257A (en) 1996-11-22 2001-03-27 ブリティッシュ・テレコミュニケーションズ・パブリック・リミテッド・カンパニー Resource allocation
US7603302B1 (en) 1996-11-27 2009-10-13 Diebold, Incorporated Automated banking machine system with multiple entity interface
US6901382B1 (en) 1996-11-27 2005-05-31 Diebold, Incorporated Automated banking machine and system
JPH10162065A (en) 1996-11-28 1998-06-19 Hitachi Ltd Delivery management system
US6026378A (en) 1996-12-05 2000-02-15 Cnet Co., Ltd. Warehouse managing system
GB2320112B (en) 1996-12-07 2001-07-25 Ibm High-availability computer server system
US6185625B1 (en) 1996-12-20 2001-02-06 Intel Corporation Scaling proxy server sending to the client a graphical user interface for establishing object encoding preferences after receiving the client's request for the object
US6424992B2 (en) 1996-12-23 2002-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Affinity-based router and routing method
US5963919A (en) * 1996-12-23 1999-10-05 Northern Telecom Limited Inventory management strategy evaluation system and method
US6490567B1 (en) 1997-01-15 2002-12-03 At&T Corp. System and method for distributed content electronic commerce
US6225995B1 (en) 1997-10-31 2001-05-01 Oracle Corporaton Method and apparatus for incorporating state information into a URL
US7346564B1 (en) 1997-02-07 2008-03-18 Frederic J Kirklin System for merchandise ordering and order fulfillment
US5835914A (en) 1997-02-18 1998-11-10 Wall Data Incorporated Method for preserving and reusing software objects associated with web pages
US6324520B1 (en) * 1997-10-09 2001-11-27 Walker Digital, Llc Method and apparatus for collecting and applying vending machine demand information
US5895454A (en) 1997-04-17 1999-04-20 Harrington; Juliette Integrated interface for vendor/product oriented internet websites
JP3940975B2 (en) 1997-04-24 2007-07-04 富士フイルム株式会社 Photo print order acceptance device
US6351775B1 (en) 1997-05-30 2002-02-26 International Business Machines Corporation Loading balancing across servers in a computer network
US20030040962A1 (en) 1997-06-12 2003-02-27 Lewis William H. System and data management and on-demand rental and purchase of digital data products
US6679425B1 (en) 1997-06-18 2004-01-20 Express Technology, Inc. Systems, apparatus and processes to verify a person's age to determine if the person is authorized
US6061607A (en) 1997-07-18 2000-05-09 St. Onge Company Order pick system
US5956709A (en) 1997-07-28 1999-09-21 Xue; Yansheng Dynamic data assembling on internet client side
US6236974B1 (en) 1997-08-08 2001-05-22 Parasoft Corporation Method and apparatus for automated selection and organization of products including menus
US6253292B1 (en) 1997-08-22 2001-06-26 Seong Tae Jhang Distributed shared memory multiprocessor system based on a unidirectional ring bus using a snooping scheme
US6178510B1 (en) 1997-09-04 2001-01-23 Gtech Rhode Island Corporation Technique for secure network transactions
US5960411A (en) 1997-09-12 1999-09-28 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network
US6094485A (en) 1997-09-18 2000-07-25 Netscape Communications Corporation SSL step-up
IL121862A (en) 1997-09-29 2005-07-25 Nds Ltd West Drayton Distributed ird system for pay television systems
US6128279A (en) 1997-10-06 2000-10-03 Web Balance, Inc. System for balancing loads among network servers
US6098152A (en) 1997-10-17 2000-08-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for miss sequence cache block replacement utilizing a most recently used state
US6094642A (en) 1997-10-24 2000-07-25 Federal Express Corporation Integrated data collection and transmission system and method of tracking package data
US20020194084A1 (en) 1997-11-14 2002-12-19 Anita Surles Method and use of point-of sale terminal, which receives, transmits, stores, authorizes, reconciles, and calculates transactions electronically
US5991739A (en) 1997-11-24 1999-11-23 Food.Com Internet online order method and apparatus
US6718387B1 (en) 1997-12-10 2004-04-06 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Reallocating address spaces of a plurality of servers using a load balancing policy and a multicast channel
US6115690A (en) 1997-12-22 2000-09-05 Wong; Charles Integrated business-to-business Web commerce and business automation system
US6453306B1 (en) 1998-01-26 2002-09-17 Ict Software S.A. Internet commerce method and apparatus
US6289260B1 (en) 1998-02-05 2001-09-11 St. Onge Company Automated order pick process
US6405173B1 (en) 1998-03-05 2002-06-11 American Management Systems, Inc. Decision management system providing qualitative account/customer assessment via point in time simulation
US6087952A (en) 1998-03-06 2000-07-11 Mobile Information Systems, Inc. Remote mobile data suite and method
US6076108A (en) 1998-03-06 2000-06-13 I2 Technologies, Inc. System and method for maintaining a state for a user session using a web system having a global session server
US6643624B2 (en) 1998-03-09 2003-11-04 Yan Philippe Method and system for integrating transaction mechanisms over multiple internet sites
US6098093A (en) 1998-03-19 2000-08-01 International Business Machines Corp. Maintaining sessions in a clustered server environment
US6249773B1 (en) 1998-03-26 2001-06-19 International Business Machines Corp. Electronic commerce with shopping list builder
US6330575B1 (en) 1998-03-31 2001-12-11 International Business Machines Corporation Web commerce tool kit for distributed payment processing
US6185479B1 (en) 1998-04-15 2001-02-06 John F. Cirrone Article sorting system
US6101486A (en) 1998-04-20 2000-08-08 Nortel Networks Corporation System and method for retrieving customer information at a transaction center
US6123259A (en) 1998-04-30 2000-09-26 Fujitsu Limited Electronic shopping system including customer relocation recognition
US5899088A (en) 1998-05-14 1999-05-04 Throwleigh Technologies, L.L.C. Phase change system for temperature control
US7010501B1 (en) 1998-05-29 2006-03-07 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Personal shopping system
US6279001B1 (en) 1998-05-29 2001-08-21 Webspective Software, Inc. Web service
US6167382A (en) 1998-06-01 2000-12-26 F.A.C. Services Group, L.P. Design and production of print advertising and commercial display materials over the Internet
US6629079B1 (en) 1998-06-25 2003-09-30 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for electronic commerce using multiple roles
US6157945A (en) 1998-07-01 2000-12-05 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Digital communication device and method including a routing function
US6249801B1 (en) 1998-07-15 2001-06-19 Radware Ltd. Load balancing
US6799165B1 (en) 1998-07-28 2004-09-28 Eimar M. Boesjes Apparatus and methods for inventory, sale, and delivery of digitally transferable goods
US6505348B1 (en) 1998-07-29 2003-01-07 Starsight Telecast, Inc. Multiple interactive electronic program guide system and methods
US6289369B1 (en) 1998-08-25 2001-09-11 International Business Machines Corporation Affinity, locality, and load balancing in scheduling user program-level threads for execution by a computer system
US6526392B1 (en) 1998-08-26 2003-02-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for yield managed service contract pricing
US6629135B1 (en) 1998-09-17 2003-09-30 Ddr Holdings, Llc Affiliate commerce system and method
US6223215B1 (en) 1998-09-22 2001-04-24 Sony Corporation Tracking a user's purchases on the internet by associating the user with an inbound source and a session identifier
US6438652B1 (en) 1998-10-09 2002-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation Load balancing cooperating cache servers by shifting forwarded request
US6058417A (en) 1998-10-23 2000-05-02 Ebay Inc. Information presentation and management in an online trading environment
US6385642B1 (en) 1998-11-03 2002-05-07 Youdecide.Com, Inc. Internet web server cache storage and session management system
US6347322B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2002-02-12 Lucent Technologies Inc. Transaction state data replication by transaction forwarding in replicated database systems
US6691165B1 (en) 1998-11-10 2004-02-10 Rainfinity, Inc. Distributed server cluster for controlling network traffic
JP3550503B2 (en) 1998-11-10 2004-08-04 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Method and communication system for enabling communication
US6397246B1 (en) 1998-11-13 2002-05-28 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for processing document requests in a network system
US6466949B2 (en) 1998-11-23 2002-10-15 Myway.Com Corporation Performing event notification in a database having a distributed web cluster
US20020002513A1 (en) 1998-11-25 2002-01-03 James P. Chiasson Computer network transaction system
US6609159B1 (en) 1998-11-30 2003-08-19 Semyon Dukach Methods, systems, and machine readable programming for interposing front end servers between servers and clients
US6289370B1 (en) 1998-11-30 2001-09-11 3Com Corporation Platform independent enhanced help system for an internet enabled embedded system
US6260024B1 (en) 1998-12-02 2001-07-10 Gary Shkedy Method and apparatus for facilitating buyer-driven purchase orders on a commercial network system
US6275812B1 (en) 1998-12-08 2001-08-14 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Intelligent system for dynamic resource management
US6577861B2 (en) 1998-12-14 2003-06-10 Fujitsu Limited Electronic shopping system utilizing a program downloadable wireless telephone
US6295553B1 (en) 1998-12-22 2001-09-25 Unisys Corporation Method and apparatus for prioritizing delivery of data transfer requests
US6463345B1 (en) * 1999-01-04 2002-10-08 International Business Machines Corporation Regenerative available to promise
US20040236635A1 (en) * 1999-01-08 2004-11-25 Publicover Mark W. Distribution system
US6341269B1 (en) 1999-01-26 2002-01-22 Mercani Technologies, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture to optimize inventory and merchandising shelf space utilization
US6421739B1 (en) 1999-01-30 2002-07-16 Nortel Networks Limited Fault-tolerant java virtual machine
CN1423786A (en) 1999-03-02 2003-06-11 奎克斯塔投资公司 Electronic commerce transactions within a marketing system that may contain a member ship buying opportunity
US6369840B1 (en) 1999-03-10 2002-04-09 America Online, Inc. Multi-layered online calendaring and purchasing
US6741995B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2004-05-25 Metaedge Corporation Method for dynamically creating a profile
US20020038261A1 (en) 1999-03-25 2002-03-28 James Kargman System for placing orders through the internet to a selected store of a chain of stores
US6763496B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2004-07-13 Microsoft Corporation Method for promoting contextual information to display pages containing hyperlinks
US7299294B1 (en) 1999-11-10 2007-11-20 Emc Corporation Distributed traffic controller for network data
US6801949B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2004-10-05 Rainfinity, Inc. Distributed server cluster with graphical user interface
US6594641B1 (en) 1999-04-16 2003-07-15 Reshare Corporation Computer facilitated product selling system
WO2000063806A1 (en) 1999-04-19 2000-10-26 Brotherston David N Apparatus and method for providing products and services in a transport vehicle using a network of computers
US20020065700A1 (en) 1999-04-19 2002-05-30 G. Edward Powell Method and system for allocating personnel and resources to efficiently complete diverse work assignments
JP2002543500A (en) 1999-04-27 2002-12-17 アイスリーイー・ホールディングス・エルエルシー Remote ordering system
US6332334B1 (en) 1999-05-10 2001-12-25 Webvan Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for handling and transporting temperature-sensitive items
US6975937B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2005-12-13 Christopher Kantarjiev Technique for processing customer service transactions at customer site using mobile computing device
US7177825B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2007-02-13 Borders Louis H Integrated system for ordering, fulfillment, and delivery of consumer products using a data network
AU4839300A (en) 1999-05-11 2000-11-21 Webvan Group, Inc. Electronic commerce enabled delivery system and method
US7197547B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2007-03-27 Andrew Karl Miller Load balancing technique implemented in a data network device utilizing a data cache
US7370005B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2008-05-06 Peter Ham Inventory replication based upon order fulfillment rates
US7139637B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2006-11-21 William Henry Waddington Order allocation to minimize container stops in a distribution center
US6888836B1 (en) 1999-05-26 2005-05-03 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method for allocating web sites on a web hosting cluster
US6721713B1 (en) 1999-05-27 2004-04-13 Andersen Consulting Llp Business alliance identification in a web architecture framework
US7165041B1 (en) 1999-05-27 2007-01-16 Accenture, Llp Web-based architecture sales tool
US6957186B1 (en) 1999-05-27 2005-10-18 Accenture Llp System method and article of manufacture for building, managing, and supporting various components of a system
US7127412B2 (en) 1999-06-07 2006-10-24 Pointserve, Inc. Method and system for allocating specific appointment time windows in a service industry
US6539494B1 (en) 1999-06-17 2003-03-25 Art Technology Group, Inc. Internet server session backup apparatus
JP3485253B2 (en) 1999-06-18 2004-01-13 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Information processing method, information terminal support server, storage medium for storing information processing program
US6374300B2 (en) 1999-07-15 2002-04-16 F5 Networks, Inc. Method and system for storing load balancing information with an HTTP cookie
US6879995B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2005-04-12 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Application server message logging
US7882501B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2011-02-01 Oracle America, Inc. System and method for enabling dynamic modifed class reloading in an application server environment
US6845503B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2005-01-18 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for enabling atomic class loading in an application server environment
US6697849B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2004-02-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for caching JavaServer Pages™ responses
US6859834B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2005-02-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for enabling application server request failover
US6779016B1 (en) 1999-08-23 2004-08-17 Terraspring, Inc. Extensible computing system
US7181539B1 (en) 1999-09-01 2007-02-20 Microsoft Corporation System and method for data synchronization
US6772333B1 (en) 1999-09-01 2004-08-03 Dickens Coal Llc Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide id visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US6711618B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2004-03-23 Cisco Technology, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing server state and attribute management for voice enabled web applications
US6567786B1 (en) 1999-09-16 2003-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for increasing the effectiveness of customer contact strategies
US7461058B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2008-12-02 Thalveg Data Flow Llc Optimized rule based constraints for collaborative filtering systems
US6701367B1 (en) 1999-09-24 2004-03-02 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Mechanism for enabling customized session managers to interact with a network server
US6587827B1 (en) 1999-10-22 2003-07-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Order fulfillment processing system
US6654726B1 (en) 1999-11-05 2003-11-25 Ford Motor Company Communication schema of online system and method of status inquiry and tracking related to orders for consumer product having specific configurations
US6598027B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2003-07-22 Xs, Inc. Systems, methods and computer program products for conducting regulation-compliant commercial transactions of regulated goods via a computer network
US7062556B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2006-06-13 Motorola, Inc. Load balancing method in a communication network
US7124101B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2006-10-17 Accenture Llp Asset tracking in a network-based supply chain environment
US6671818B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2003-12-30 Accenture Llp Problem isolation through translating and filtering events into a standard object format in a network based supply chain
US6904455B1 (en) 1999-11-24 2005-06-07 Robert C. Yen Method and system for providing local content for use in partially satisfying internet data requests from remote servers
US7222161B2 (en) 1999-11-24 2007-05-22 Yen Robert C Method and system for facilitating usage of local content at client machine
US20050027580A1 (en) 1999-12-01 2005-02-03 Richard Crici Internet-based appointment scheduling system
US7383233B1 (en) 1999-12-03 2008-06-03 General Electric Company Method of designing an electronic transaction system
US20010042021A1 (en) 1999-12-06 2001-11-15 Taiichi Matsuo Electronic settling system and electronic settling method
US6560717B1 (en) 1999-12-10 2003-05-06 Art Technology Group, Inc. Method and system for load balancing and management
US7173177B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2007-02-06 Blue Dolphin Solutions Llc User interface for simultaneous management of owned and unowned inventory
US6463420B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2002-10-08 General Electric Company Online tracking of delivery status information over a computer network
US6571213B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2003-05-27 Pitney Bowes Inc. Router utility for a parcel shipping system
CA2330266C (en) 2000-01-05 2006-04-11 Procure.Com Inc. Secure electronic procurement system and method
US6587866B1 (en) 2000-01-10 2003-07-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method for distributing packets to server nodes using network client affinity and packet distribution table
US7251612B1 (en) 2000-01-10 2007-07-31 Parker John E Method and system for scheduling distribution routes and timeslots
AU2001231197A1 (en) 2000-01-26 2001-08-07 Domino's Pizza Pmc, Inc. Method and system for routing food orders over a computer network
US6505171B1 (en) 2000-02-04 2003-01-07 Robert H. Cohen System and method for handling purchasing transactions over a computer network
US6865601B1 (en) 2000-02-11 2005-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P. Method for allocating web sites on a web server cluster based on balancing memory and load requirements
TW550477B (en) 2000-03-01 2003-09-01 Passgate Corp Method, system and computer readable medium for Web site account and e-commerce management from a central location
US6601101B1 (en) 2000-03-15 2003-07-29 3Com Corporation Transparent access to network attached devices
US6826613B1 (en) 2000-03-15 2004-11-30 3Com Corporation Virtually addressing storage devices through a switch
US6697964B1 (en) 2000-03-23 2004-02-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. HTTP-based load generator for testing an application server configured for dynamically generating web pages for voice enabled web applications
US20010047310A1 (en) 2000-03-27 2001-11-29 Russell Randall A. School commerce system and method
AU2001246270A1 (en) 2000-03-31 2001-10-15 Mdsi Mobile Data Solutions, Inc. Finding technique for a scheduling system
US6862572B1 (en) 2000-04-21 2005-03-01 De Sylva Robert F. System and method for facilitating interaction between businesses, delivery agents, and customers
US6947992B1 (en) 2000-05-01 2005-09-20 International Business Machines Corporation Maintaining HTTP session affinity in a cluster environment
US6505093B1 (en) 2000-05-03 2003-01-07 Si Handling Systems, Inc. Automated order filling method and system
US7139721B2 (en) 2000-05-10 2006-11-21 Borders Louis H Scheduling delivery of products via the internet
US7240283B1 (en) 2000-11-10 2007-07-03 Narasimha Rao Paila Data transmission and rendering techniques implemented over a client-server system
US6530518B1 (en) 2000-05-19 2003-03-11 General Electric Company Method, system and storage medium for viewing product delivery information
US20020004766A1 (en) 2000-07-07 2002-01-10 Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. Methods for permitting non-buyers to order items in an electronic commerce system
US7925524B2 (en) 2000-07-14 2011-04-12 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Method and system of delivering items using overlapping delivery windows
US20020013950A1 (en) 2000-07-25 2002-01-31 Tomsen Mai-Lan Method and system to save context for deferred transaction via interactive television
US6445976B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2002-09-03 Air Fayre Limited Method for delivering products for human consumption from a manufacturing center to passenger carrying vehicles
US7043455B1 (en) 2000-07-28 2006-05-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for securing session information of users in a web application server environment
US7366755B1 (en) 2000-07-28 2008-04-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for affinity of users to application servers
US20020049853A1 (en) 2000-08-16 2002-04-25 Tan-Na Chu End-to-end secure file transfer method and system
US7275042B1 (en) 2000-09-15 2007-09-25 Kelly Registration Systems, Inc. System and method of providing agricultural pesticide information
US6938079B1 (en) 2000-09-19 2005-08-30 3Com Corporation System and method for automatically configuring a client device
US20020038224A1 (en) 2000-09-25 2002-03-28 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Systems and associated methods for notification of package delivery services
US6990460B2 (en) 2000-10-19 2006-01-24 Peapod, Inc. Dynamic demand management
US20020103724A1 (en) 2000-12-01 2002-08-01 Stephen Huxter Courier independent system and method for the delivery of goods ordered by the internet
US6595342B1 (en) 2000-12-07 2003-07-22 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for a biometrically-secured self-service kiosk system for guaranteed product delivery and return
JP2002175453A (en) 2000-12-08 2002-06-21 Ricoh Co Ltd Merchandise order reception and delivery system and merchandise order reception and delivery method in the same system
US6792459B2 (en) 2000-12-14 2004-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation Verification of service level agreement contracts in a client server environment
US20020116279A1 (en) 2001-02-21 2002-08-22 Nobilo Nicholas Thomas Online wine sale process
US7308423B1 (en) 2001-03-19 2007-12-11 Franklin Goodhue Woodward Technique for handling sales of regulated items implemented over a data network
BR0212547A (en) 2001-09-06 2004-10-13 Interlott Technologies Inc Lottery game, ticket and interactive method of playing

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7236942B1 (en) * 1997-12-19 2007-06-26 Walker Digital, Llc Pre-sale data broadcast system and method
US6963847B1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2005-11-08 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. System and method for managing ATP data in a distributed supply chain planning environment
US7233914B1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2007-06-19 Joyo Wijaya Technique for implementing item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US8090626B1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2012-01-03 Ipventure, Inc. Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US8751334B2 (en) * 2000-12-27 2014-06-10 Ipventure, Inc. Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9396451B2 (en) 1999-05-11 2016-07-19 June Ray Limited Method and system for order fulfillment in a distribution center
US9697547B2 (en) 1999-05-11 2017-07-04 June Ray Limited Integrated online store
US9865010B2 (en) 1999-05-11 2018-01-09 June Ray Limited Online store product availability
US9342808B2 (en) 1999-05-11 2016-05-17 June Ray Limited Load balancing technique implemented in a data network device utilizing a data cache
US9413808B2 (en) 2000-05-10 2016-08-09 June Ray Limited Data transmission and rendering techniques by a device via a network
US10379497B2 (en) * 2015-03-07 2019-08-13 Apple Inc. Obtaining and displaying time-related data on an electronic watch
US11327640B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2022-05-10 Apple Inc. Providing complications on an electronic device
US11651137B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2023-05-16 Apple Inc. API for specifying display of complication on an electronic watch
US10175866B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2019-01-08 Apple Inc. Providing complications on an electronic watch
US10572571B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-02-25 Apple Inc. API for specifying display of complication on an electronic watch
US10761702B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-09-01 Apple Inc. Providing complications on an electronic watch
US11029831B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2021-06-08 Apple Inc. Providing complications on an electronic watch
US10540632B2 (en) 2016-02-03 2020-01-21 Walmart Apollo, Llc Systems and methods for providing substitute products in place of ordered products that are out of stock
US11138557B2 (en) 2016-02-03 2021-10-05 Walmart Apollo, Llc Systems and methods for providing substitute products in place of ordered products that are out of stock
WO2017136258A1 (en) * 2016-02-03 2017-08-10 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Systems and methods for providing substitute products in place of ordered products that are out of stock
WO2021188359A1 (en) * 2020-03-18 2021-09-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Unified alternative item selection user experience

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7233914B1 (en) 2007-06-19
US20120095879A1 (en) 2012-04-19
US8090626B1 (en) 2012-01-03
US8751334B2 (en) 2014-06-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8090626B1 (en) Item substitution for unavailable items relating to a customer order
US8880428B2 (en) Restricted purchase of regulated items over a network
US7120595B2 (en) Method and system for providing online comparison shopping
US7904975B2 (en) Real-time display of available products over the internet
US7590567B2 (en) Online shopping system
US7139721B2 (en) Scheduling delivery of products via the internet
US7437305B1 (en) Scheduling delivery of products via the internet
US20140279221A1 (en) Restricted purchase of regulated items over a network
CN111914202B (en) Multi-platform intelligent automatic publishing method, device, system and terminal
US20040260570A1 (en) Method and system for transfer of orders from an order management system to an electronic marketplace
JP2002032644A (en) System for perishables ordering, order reception, and transport and its server system
WO2000057313A1 (en) System and method for implementing web-based direct manufacturer marketing and transactions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: JUNE RAY LIMITED, VIRGIN ISLANDS, BRITISH

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IPVENTURE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:034037/0672

Effective date: 20141002

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION