US20150285904A1 - Antenna configuration for parking assist radar - Google Patents
Antenna configuration for parking assist radar Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20150285904A1 US20150285904A1 US14/319,293 US201414319293A US2015285904A1 US 20150285904 A1 US20150285904 A1 US 20150285904A1 US 201414319293 A US201414319293 A US 201414319293A US 2015285904 A1 US2015285904 A1 US 2015285904A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- estimated
- frequency
- elevation
- azimuth
- obstacle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/02—Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
- G01S13/06—Systems determining position data of a target
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/02—Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
- G01S13/06—Systems determining position data of a target
- G01S13/42—Simultaneous measurement of distance and other co-ordinates
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/02—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
- G01S7/35—Details of non-pulse systems
- G01S7/352—Receivers
- G01S7/354—Extracting wanted echo-signals
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q25/00—Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q3/00—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system
- H01Q3/26—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture
- H01Q3/2605—Array of radiating elements provided with a feedback control over the element weights, e.g. adaptive arrays
- H01Q3/2611—Means for null steering; Adaptive interference nulling
- H01Q3/2629—Combination of a main antenna unit with an auxiliary antenna unit
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9314—Parking operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9327—Sensor installation details
- G01S2013/93271—Sensor installation details in the front of the vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9327—Sensor installation details
- G01S2013/93272—Sensor installation details in the back of the vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9327—Sensor installation details
- G01S2013/93275—Sensor installation details in the bumper area
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/02—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
- G01S7/35—Details of non-pulse systems
- G01S7/352—Receivers
- G01S7/356—Receivers involving particularities of FFT processing
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
Abstract
A method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus. An azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle are estimated to generate an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. A metric is estimated from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle. The metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. On error detection, a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency is inverted to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively.
Description
- Embodiments of the disclosure relate generally to communication antennas and more particularly to an antenna unit in radars that assists in vehicle parking.
- A vehicle has parking sensors to detect an obstacle behind the vehicle. The parking sensors determine a distance of the vehicle from the obstacle using ultrasonic signals when backing a vehicle. The parking sensor operates at ultrasonic frequencies. The parking sensor outputs an ultrasonic detecting signal to detect whether any obstacle is behind the rear of the vehicle and receives an ultrasonic signal as reply from the obstacle. A vehicle generally requires multiple parking sensors to cover the entire rear of the vehicle which makes it a cost intensive solution. Also, the ultrasonic parking sensors use a time division obstacle detecting method in which each sensor sends and receives ultrasonic detect signal in a defined time slot. Thus, the process of detecting obstacles using ultrasonic sensors is time consuming which is unsafe in vehicles moving with high velocity.
- Ultrasonic parking sensors require the measurement and drilling of holes in the vehicle's bumper to install transducers. There are risks associated with drilling and mounting the transducers into the bumper. The performance of the Ultrasonic sensors is sensitive to temperature and atmospheric conditions such as snow and rain. The performance of ultrasonic sensors is severely degraded when the sensors are covered with snow. In addition, the range over which the ultrasonic sensors operates is limited.
- The use of radars in automotive applications is evolving rapidly. Radars do not have the drawbacks discussed above in the context of ultrasonic sensors. Radar finds use in number of applications associated with a vehicle such as collision warning, blind spot warning, lane change assist, parking assist and rear collision warning. Pulse radar and FMCW (Frequency Modulation Continuous Wave) radar are predominantly used in such applications. In the pulse radar, a signal in the shape of a pulse is transmitted from the radar at fixed intervals. The transmitted pulse is scattered by the obstacle. The scattered pulse is received by the radar and the time between the transmission of the pulse and receiving the scattered pulse is proportional to a distance of the radar from the target. For better resolution, a narrower pulse is used which requires a high sampling rate in an ADC (analog to digital converter) used in the pulse radar. In addition, sensitivity of a pulse radar is directly proportional to the power which complicates the design process of the pulse radar.
- In an FMCW radar, a transmit signal is frequency modulated to generate a transmit chirp. An obstacle scatters the transmit chirp. The scattered chirp is received by the FMCW radar. A signal obtained by mixing the transmitted chirp and the received scattered chirp is termed as a beat signal. The frequency of the beat signal is proportional to the distance of the obstacle from the FMCW radar. The beat signal is sampled by an analog to digital converter (ADC). A sampling rate of the ADC is proportional to the maximum frequency of the beat signal and the maximum frequency of the beat signal is proportional to the range of the farthest obstacle which can be detected by the FMCW radar. Thus, unlike in the pulse radar, the sampling rate of the ADC in the FMCW radar is independent of the range resolution, typically in the FMCW radar, multiple chirps are transmitted in a unit called as frame. A 2-dimensional (2D) FFT is performed on the sampled beat signal data received over a frame for range and relative velocity estimation of the obstacle. A bin is a 2D FFT grid that corresponds to a range and relative velocity estimate of an obstacle. A signal detected in a specific bin represents the presence of an obstacle with a predefined range and relative velocity. When multiple receive antennas are used to receive the scattered chirp, the FMCW radar estimates an elevation angle of the obstacle and an azimuth angle of the obstacle. In each frame, a 2D FFT is computed using the data received from each receive antenna. Thus, the number of 2D FFT's is equal to the number of the receive antennas. When an obstacle is detected in a specific grid of the 2D FFT grid, the value of the specific grid corresponding to each of the receive antennas is used to estimate the azimuth angle and the elevation angle of the obstacle. The FMCW radar resolves obstacles in the dimensions of range, relative velocity and angle. To accurately estimate position of the obstacle, it is required that the obstacle is resolved in any one of these dimensions. Thus, if there are multiple obstacles at the same distance from the FMCW radar and travelling with same relative velocity, the FMCW radar is required to resolve these obstacles in angle dimension. Thus, angle estimation and angle resolution is an important factor in determining the performance of the FMCW radar. The resolution and accuracy of the angle estimation is directly proportional to the number of antennas in the FMCW radar. As FMCW radars are used in a broad range of applications, their design becomes more cost-sensitive. Each antenna used to receive the scattered chirp has a distinct receiver path which includes amplifiers, mixers, ADCs and filters. Thus, the number of antennas used in the FMCW radar is a key factor in determining the overall cost of the FMCW radar. Therefore it is important to minimize the number of antennas in the FMCW radar and at the same time maintaining optimum performance level and accuracy.
- This Summary is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.73, requiring a summary of the invention briefly indicating the nature and substance of the invention. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.
- An embodiment provides a radar apparatus for estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles. The radar apparatus includes an antenna unit. A signal processing unit is coupled to the antenna unit. The signal processing unit estimates an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle. The signal processing unit generates an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. A grazing angle detection module is coupled to the signal processing unit and estimates a metric from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle. The metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. A grazing angle error correction module is coupled to the grazing angle detection module and inverts a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency on error detection.
- Another embodiment provides a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus. The method provides estimating an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle to generate an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated rge of the obstacle. A metric is estimated from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle. The metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. On error detection, a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency is inverted to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively.
- Yet another embodiment provides a radar apparatus. The radar apparatus includes an antenna unit that transmits an outbound radio frequency (RF) signal to an obstacle of the plurality of obstacles and receive an inbound RF signal from the obstacle. A transmitter is coupled to the antenna unit and generates the outbound RF signal. A receiver is coupled to the antenna unit and receives the inbound RF signal from the antenna unit. The outbound RF signal is scattered by the obstacle to generate the inbound RF signal. A mixer is coupled to the receiver and to the transmitter and demodulates the inbound RF signal to generate a demodulated signal. An analog to digital converter (ADC) coupled to the mixer and generates a digital signal in response to the demodulated signal received from the mixer. An FFT (fast fourier transform) module transforms the digital signal from time domain to frequency domain. A digital signal processor is coupled to the FFT module and processes the digital signal. The digital signal processor includes a signal processing unit that estimates an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle and generates an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. A grazing angle detection module is coupled to the signal processing unit and estimates a metric from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle. The metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. A grazing angle error correction module is coupled to the grazing angle detection module and configured to invert a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency on error detection.
- Other aspects and example embodiments are provided in the Drawings and the Detailed Description that follows.
-
FIG. 1( a) illustrates an antenna unit in a radar apparatus; -
FIG. 1( b) illustrates a response of the antenna unit to an obstacle; -
FIG. 1( c) illustrates grazing angle ambiguity regions for the antenna unit; -
FIG. 2( a) illustrates an antenna unit in a radar apparatus; -
FIG. 2( b) illustrates grazing angle ambiguity regions associated with the antenna unit; -
FIG. 3( a) illustrates an antenna unit in a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 3( b) is a flowchart illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with an antenna unit, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical comparison of theantenna unit 200 and theantenna unit 300, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 5( a) illustrates the antenna unit placed on a bumper of a vehicle; -
FIG. 5( b) illustrates an antenna unit placed on a bumper of a vehicle, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 6( a) illustrates a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 6( b) is a flowchart illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 6( c) is a flowchart illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 6( d) is a flowchart illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 7( a) illustrates an antenna unit in a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 7( b) illustrates the antenna unit placed on a bumper of a vehicle, according to an embodiment; and -
FIG. 8 illustrates a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment. -
FIG. 1( a) illustrates anantenna unit 100 in a radar apparatus. Theantenna unit 100 is integrated in a radar apparatus which is further integrated in an industrial or automotive application. Theantenna unit 100 includes a linear array of antennas arranged in a horizontal plane. The linear array of antennas includes a plurality of antennas, for example, antenna A1, A2 and A3. For the sake of simplicity and understanding, the plurality of antennas is represented inFIG. 1( a) by antennas A1-A3. The linear array of antennas is represented to be placed along the X-axis. The adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas are separated by a spacing d. Typical value of d is 12, where λ is an operating wavelength of theantenna unit 100. Theantenna unit 100 is configured to transmit an RF (radio frequency) signal and receives a scattered RF signal from anobstacle 102. The angle 104 (θ) represents an azimuth angle between theobstacle 102 and antenna unit. The azimuth angle 104 (θ) represents a direction of arrival of a scattered signal from theobstacle 102. -
FIG. 1( b) illustrates a response of theantenna unit 100 to anobstacle 102 when d is λ/2. Graph A represents the response of theantenna unit 100 when theobstacle 102 is at Y axis (normal incidence) i.e. θ is zero degrees. Graph B represents the response of theantenna unit 100 when θ is 80 degrees. As illustrated, graph A has only one peak represented as al while graph B has two peaks b1 and b2. When direction of arrival is zero degrees, theantenna unit 100 is able to correctly detect the position of theobstacle 102. However, when the direction of arrival is 80 degrees, the response of theantenna unit 100 show two peaks i.e. b1 and b2. This is referred to as grazing angle problem since theantenna unit 100 cannot be used to estimate if the correct direction of arrival is around +80 degrees or −80 degrees, especially in the presence of noise. The grazing angle problem occurs as the magnitude of the direction of arrival or θ increases and approaches the grazing angle. For a given spacing d, the grazing angle is defined as +/−sin−1(λ/2d)). For d=λ/2, the computations by the radar apparatus are severely impacted when θ is 90 degrees. This problem is further compounded if the distance (d) between antennas A1-A3 is further increased i.e. if d is increased.FIG. 1( c) illustrates grazing angle ambiguity regions for theantenna unit 100. The regions G1 and G2 represents regions for which theantenna unit 100 will not be able to resolve the direction of arrival and hence will not be able to correctly detect the position of theobstacle 102. That is why these regions are termed as grazing angle ambiguity regions. -
FIG. 2( a) illustrates anantenna unit 200 in a radar apparatus. Theantenna unit 200 is integrated in a radar apparatus which is further integrated in an industrial or automotive application. Theantenna unit 200 includes a linear array of antenna arranged in a horizontal plane. The linear array of antennas includes a plurality of antennas, for example, antenna A1, A2 and A3. For the sake of simplicity and understanding, the plurality of antennas is represented inFIG. 2( a) by antennas A1-A3. The linear array of antennas is represented to be placed along the X-axis. The adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas are separated by a spacing d. Typical value of d is λ/2, where λ is an operating wavelength of theantenna unit 200. Theantenna unit 200 further includes an additional antenna B1 at an offset from at least one antenna in the linear array of antennas. An angle 204 (θ) represents an azimuth angle between theobstacle 202 and theantenna unit 200 and an angle 208 (φ) represents an elevation angle between theobstacle 202 and theantenna unit 200. The azimuth angle (θ) 204 or the horizontal angle is defined as an angle between Y axis and a projection of a vector from the antenna A1 to theobstacle 202 on the XY plane. The elevation angle (φ) 208 is an angle between a vector from antenna A1 to theobstacle 202 and the XY plane. - The
antenna unit 200 is configured to transmit an RF (radio frequency) signal and receives a scattered signal from theobstacle 202. The signal received at theantenna unit 200 from theobstacle 202 is represented inequation 1 below. It is to be noted that the signal ‘Y’ represented inequation 1 depicts a signal obtained after a signal processing unit processes the signal received at theantenna unit 200. In an embodiment, the signal ‘Y’ depicts a signal obtained after performing 2D FFT on the signal received at each antenna in theantenna unit 200 from theobstacle 202. -
Y=A[1e −jwx e −j2w xe −jw z] (1) -
Where, -
w x=(2π/λ)d sin(θ)cos(φ) (2) -
w z==(2π/Å)β sin(φ) (3) - wx is referred to as azimuth frequency and wz is referred to as elevation frequency. A is the complex amplitude corresponding to the obstacle. In
equation 1, the component e−jwx represents a factor as a result of the antenna A2, the component e−j2wx represents a factor as a result of the antenna A3 and the component e−jwz represents a factor as a result of the additional antenna B1. The azimuth frequency wx and the elevation frequency wz are estimated and then the azimuth angle (θ) 204 and the elevation angle (φ) 208 are calculated using the above equations. If multiple obstacles are identified by theantenna unit 200, then multiple pairs of wx and wz are estimated by theantenna unit 200. Thus, the azimuth angle (θ) 204 and the elevation angle (φ) 208 for theobstacle 202 can be estimated using theantenna unit 200. -
FIG. 2( b) illustrates grazing angle ambiguity regions associated with theantenna unit 200. The regions G1 and G2 represent regions for which theantenna unit 200 will not be able to correctly detect the position of theobstacle 202. The regions H and H2 represent regions for which theantenna unit 200 will not be able to correctly detect the position of theobstacle 202. That is why these regions are termed as grazing angle ambiguity regions. Due to the grazing angle problem in the azimuth angle (θ) 204 an obstacle located around region G1 can be wrongly estimated to be located in region G2. Likewise, due to the grazing angle problem in the elevation angle (φ) an obstacle located around region H1 can be wrongly estimated to be located in region H2. Additionally the pair (G1, G2) and (H1, H2) are termed as ambiguous region pairs. -
FIG. 3( a) illustrates anantenna unit 300 in a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment. In an embodiment, theantenna unit 300 is integrated in a radar apparatus which is further integrated in an industrial or automotive application. Theantenna unit 300 includes a linear array of antennas. The linear array of antennas includes a plurality of antennas, for example, antenna A1, A2, A3 and AN, where AN is the Nth antenna and N is an integer. For the sake of simplicity and understanding, the plurality of antennas represented inFIG. 3( a) will be represented as A1-AN further in the description. The linear array of antennas A1-AN is represented to be placed along the X-axis. The adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas A1-AN are separated by a spacing d i.e. the antennas A1 and A2 are placed at d distance from each other. Theantenna unit 300 further includes an additional antenna B. The additional antenna B1 is at a predefined offset from at least one antenna in the linear array of antennas A1-AN. The predefined offset is (α, β) from the antenna A1 in the linear array of antennas A1-AN as illustrated inFIG. 3( a). α is a distance of the additional antenna B1 from the Z axis in the XZ plane and β is a distance of the additional antenna B from the X axis in the XZ plane. In one embodiment, the additional antenna B1 is not in XZ plane and a perpendicular distance of the additional antenna B1 from the XZ plane is γ. In one embodiment, α and β are multiples of λ/2, where λ is an operating wavelength of theantenna unit 300. In an embodiment, d is λ/2, α is λ/4, β is λ/2 and γ is 0. - For ease of understanding, we consider an embodiment in which the linear array of antennas consists of three antennas (A1, A2 and A3). The
antenna unit 300 is configured to transmit an RF (radio frequency) signal and receives a scattered signal from anobstacle 302 of the plurality of obstacles. The signal received at theantenna unit 300 from theobstacle 302 is represented in equation 4 below. It is to be noted that the signal ‘Y’ represented in equation 4 depicts a signal obtained after a signal processing unit processes the signal received at theantenna unit 300. In an embodiment, the signal ‘Y’ depicts a signal obtained after performing 2D FFT on the signal received at each antenna in theantenna unit 300 from theobstacle 302. -
- where, A is the complex amplitude corresponding to the
obstacle 302. wx is referred to as azimuth frequency and wz is referred to as elevation frequency, defined as: -
w x=(2π/Å)d sin(θ)cos(φ) (5) -
w z=(2π/λ)β sin(φ) (6) - In equation 4, the component e−jw
x represents a factor as a result of the antenna A2, the component e−j2wx represents a factor as a result of the antenna A3 and the component component -
- represents a factor as a result of the additional antenna B1. The azimuth frequency wx is estimated from the linear array of antennas A1-AN to obtain estimated azimuth frequency wx
— est. In one embodiment, the signal processing unit coupled to the linear array of antennas A1-AN is configured to estimate the azimuth frequency wx using a suitable angle estimation algorithm known in the art to obtain estimated azimuth frequency wx— est. - An angle 304 (θ) represents an azimuth angle between the
obstacle 302 and theantenna unit 300 and an angle 308 (φ) represents an elevation angle between theobstacle 302 and theantenna unit 300. The azimuth angle (θ) 304 or the horizontal angle is defined as an angle between Y axis and a projection of a vector from the antenna Alto theobstacle 302 on the XY plane. The elevation angle (φ) 308 is an angle between a vector from antenna A1 to theobstacle 302 and the XY plane. The azimuth angle (θ) 304 and the elevation angle (φ) 308 are estimated using the following equations. -
- d represents the spacing between the adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas A1-AN and ψ represents a phase of a signal received from the
obstacle 302 at the additional antenna B1. ξ represents a metric. The phase of the signal ii at the additional antenna B1 is measured. The elevation frequency wz is estimated from the phase of the signal ψ at the additional antenna B1, the predefined offset and the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est as represented in equation 9 to obtain an estimated elevation frequency wz— est. - A process for grazing angle detection and grazing angle error correction is now explained, according to an embodiment. The metric 4 is configured to be estimated from the estimated azimuth frequency wx
— est and the estimated elevation frequency wz— est. An error is detected in the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est when the metric ξ is above a threshold. In one embodiment, the threshold is a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the signal received at theantenna unit 300. The metric ξ is an estimate of a sine function of the azimuth angle (θ) 304. When the metric is above a threshold, an error is detected in the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est. If the metric ξ is above a threshold, a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est is inverted to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency. Thus, if the metric ξ is above the threshold and the estimated azimuth frequency is +wx— est, a true estimated azimuth frequency will be (−wx— est). Similarly, if the metric ξ is above the threshold and the estimated azimuth frequency is (−wx— est), a true estimated azimuth frequency will be (+wx— est). Thus, the magnitude of the true estimated azimuth frequency is same as estimated azimuth frequency wx— est. If the metric ξ is below the threshold, the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est is the true estimated azimuth frequency. - The elevation frequency wz for the
obstacle 302 is re-estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency. The elevation frequency wz is re-estimated from the phase of the signal ψ at the additional antenna B1, the predefined offset and the true estimated azimuth frequency using equation 9 to generate a true estimated elevation frequency. The elevation angle (φ) 308 between theantenna unit 300 and theobstacle 302 is estimated from the true estimated elevation frequency as represented in equation 7. The azimuth angle (θ) 304 between theantenna unit 300 and theobstacle 302 is estimated from the elevation angle (φ) 308 and the true estimated azimuth frequency as represented in equation 8. In an embodiment, when plurality of obstacles are identified by theantenna unit 300, then azimuth frequency wx is estimated from the linear array of antennas A1-AN to obtain estimated azimuth frequency wx— est for each obstacle of the plurality of obstacles. Also, phase of a signal received at the additional antenna B1 from each obstacle of the plurality of obstacles is measured. Thereafter, the true estimated azimuth frequency, the true estimated elevation frequency, the azimuth angle (θ) 304 and the elevation angle (φ) 308 is estimated for each obstacle of the plurality of obstacles using the similar approach discussed with reference to theobstacle 302. - Thus, the additional antenna B1 in the
antenna unit 300, besides estimating the angle of elevation (φ) also helps in alleviating the grazing angle problem for azimuth angle (θ). This is explained with the help of the following example, with reference to an embodiment of theantenna unit 300 in which d=β=λ/2, α=λ4 and in which an obstacle is approaching theantenna unit 300 with an azimuth angle (θ) close to grazing angle (i.e. 90 degrees) and elevation angle (φ) close to zero degrees. The azimuth frequency wx is estimated from the linear array of antennas A1-AN to obtain estimated azimuth frequency wx— est. The elevation frequency wz is estimated from the phase of the signal ψ at the additional antenna B1, the predefined offset and the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est as represented in equation 9 to obtain an estimated elevation frequency wz— est. The metric ξ is estimated from the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est and the estimated elevation frequency wz— est. As illustrated in equation 7 and 8, an increase in absolute value of φ will result in increase in the value of metric ξ. At grazing angles (i.e. angles close to 90 degrees) the metric ξ will increase beyond 1, which is an undefined value of sine function (equation 8). Thus, an error is detected in the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est. Therefore a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est is inverted to generate the true estimated azimuth frequency. Subsequently, the elevation frequency wz, for theobstacle 302 is re-estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency to obtain true estimated elevation frequency. - Thus the
antenna unit 300 is able to address the grazing angle problem as theantenna unit 300 would be able to determine azimuth angle (θ) accurately using the above mentioned approach. Theantenna unit 300 will not have the grazing angle ambiguity regions G1 and G2 discussed with reference toFIG. 2( b) earlier in the description. Theantenna unit 300 uses a computationally simple approach to detect and correct the grazing angle problem that can work in conjunction with any angle estimation algorithm for estimating the azimuth and elevation frequencies of a plurality of obstacles. -
FIG. 3( b) is a flowchart illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with anantenna unit 300, according to an embodiment. Atstep 350, an azimuth frequency associated with the obstacle is estimated to obtain an estimated azimuth frequency. As illustrated forantenna unit 300, the azimuth frequency wx is estimated from the linear array of antennas A1-AN to obtain an estimated azimuth frequency wx— est. Atstep 355, a phase of the signal received from the obstacle at the additional antenna, for example additional antenna B1 in theantenna unit 300, is measured. Atstep 360, the elevation frequency wz is estimated from the phase of the signal ψ at the additional antenna B1, the predefined offset and the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est as represented in equation 9 to obtain an estimated elevation frequency wz— est. The metric ξ is estimated from the estimated azimuth frequency wx— est and the estimated elevation frequency wz— est atstep 365. Atstep 370, a condition check is made if the metric is above a threshold. In one embodiment, the threshold is a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the signal received at theantenna unit 300. If the metric is above the threshold, an error is detected in the estimated azimuth frequency. A sign of the estimated azimuth frequency is inverted to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency, atstep 375. If the metric is below the threshold, the system proceeds to step 380 where the estimated azimuth frequency is the true estimated azimuth frequency. Atstep 385, the elevation frequency for the obstacle is re-estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency to obtain a true estimated elevation frequency. Atstep 390, an elevation angle and an azimuth angle associated with the obstacle are estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency. -
FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical comparison of theantenna unit 200 and theantenna unit 300, according to an embodiment. d=β=λ/2, α=λ/4 and γ=0 is considered for this analysis. The graph depicts the error in azimuth angle (θ) estimation on Y axis against the azimuth angle (θ) on X axis. Curve A represents the response of theantenna unit 200. As illustrated in curve A, the error in the estimation of azimuth angle (θ) increases as the azimuth angle (θ) approaches 90 degrees. Thus the error in the estimation of azimuth angle is large when an obstacle is approaching a vehicle comprising theantenna unit 200 at angles in the range of 70 degrees to 90 degrees. This is because of the grazing angle problem, in which theantenna unit 200 is not able to resolve if the correct azimuth angle has a positive sign or a negative sign for example +80 degrees or −80 degrees. Curve B represents the response of theantenna unit 300. As illustrated in curve B, theantenna unit 300 is able to detect the correct position of obstacle even when the azimuth angle (θ) is approaching 90 degrees. This is because theantenna unit 300 with the help of additional antenna B1 is able to identify the azimuth angle (θ) accurately. Thus, the error in azimuth angle (θ) estimation is minimal in theantenna unit 300 as compared to the error in theantenna unit 200 as seen in the graphical comparison inFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 5( a) illustrates theantenna unit 200 placed on a bumper of a vehicle. The regions G1, G2, H1 and H2 represent grazing angle ambiguity regions for theantenna unit 200. Theantenna unit 200 can have one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions. The regions G1, G2, H, and H2 represent regions for which theantenna unit 200 will not be able to correctly detect the position of an obstacle. Each of the grazing angle ambiguity regions correspond to regions close to a specific azimuth and elevation angle. For example, the grazing angle ambiguity region G1 corresponds to the region close to azimuth angle of −90 degrees and the elevation angle of 0 degrees. Similarly the regions G2, H1, H2 corresponds to the regions close to the azimuth angle and the elevation angle of (90 degrees, 0 degrees), (0 degrees, 90 degrees) and (0 degrees, −90 degrees) respectively. It is convenient to refer to these angle pairs in terms of their azimuth frequency and elevation frequency. The grazing angle ambiguity points for the regions G1, G2, H1, H2 are defined as (−pi/2, 0), (pi/2, 0), (0, pi/2) and (0,−pi/2) respectively, where the first element in the ordered pair refers to the azimuth frequency in radians and the second element in the ordered pair refers to the elevation frequency in radians. These 4 grazing angle ambiguity points corresponding to the regions G1,G2,H1,H2 in terms of frequency are denoted by (wxa1, wza1), (wxa2, wza2), (wxa3, wza3), (wxn4, wzs4) respectively. -
FIG. 5( b) illustrates anantenna unit 500 placed on a bumper of a vehicle, according to an embodiment. Theantenna unit 500 is similar in function and operation to theantenna unit 200 explained with reference toFIG. 2( a). However, theantenna unit 200 is rotated by an angle μ to obtainantenna unit 500. Note that in the present discussion, for the ease of understanding and calculations, this rotation also rotates the x axis and the z axis, and thus the azimuth angle and the elevation angle are also suitably rotated. In one embodiment, angle μ for theantenna unit 500 is 45 degrees. For theantenna unit 500, the rotation by an angle μ moves a significant portion of the grazing angle ambiguity regions H2 and G2 (denoted as H2′ and G2′) below the ground. However an obstacle below the ground is outside a region of interest of a moving vehicle, since obstacles that are likely to be encountered by the moving vehicle are going to be above the ground. In an embodiment, the region of interest is a region which is above the ground and within a definite distance from the vehicle. An obstacle detected by theantenna unit 500 in the grazing angle ambiguity regions H2′ and G2′ are mapped to their complementary locations above the ground i.e. H1′ and G1′ respectively. - A process for grazing angle detection and grazing angle error correction is now explained, according to an embodiment. In an embodiment, a signal processing unit is coupled to the
antenna unit 500. The signal processing unit coupled to theantenna unit 500 is configured to estimate an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency, and a range of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles to generate an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. The estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle are used to determine the co-ordinates of the obstacle which is then used to determine if the obstacle lies outside the region of interest. If it is determined that the object lies outside the region of interest then the following procedure is adopted. A first difference between the estimated azimuth frequency and an azimuth frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions is estimated. A second difference between the estimated elevation frequency and an elevation frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions is estimated. A metric is estimated from a sum of an absolute value of the first difference and an absolute value of the second difference for each grazing angle ambiguity region. In an embodiment, the metric (γ) is given as -
γ=mini(|ωxai−ωx— est|+|(ωzai−ωz— est) (10) - The metric (γ) is calculated for i=1, 2, 3, and 4 and compared with a threshold to detect an error in the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. In one embodiment, the threshold is a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the signal received at the
antenna unit 500. In one embodiment, the metric is a function of the first difference and the second difference. When the metric (γ) is below a threshold for any given value of i, a grazing angle error is detected and it is ascertained if the obstacle is outside the region of interest. If the obstacle is outside the region of interest, the grazing angle error is detected. Once the grazing angle error is detected, grazing error correction process is commenced to map the obstacle to a complementary locations above the ground. In the grazing angle error correction process, a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency is inverted to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively, when the metric (γ) is below the threshold. The estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency are the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency respectively, when the metric (γ) is above the threshold. In one embodiment, a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency is inverted to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively. As an example, inFIG. 5( b), an obstacle detected at location P′ in the region G2′ is mapped to the corresponding location P in the region G1′. Thus theantenna unit 500 addresses the grazing angle problem to a significant extent. The above described technique of rotation of antenna can be applied to any antenna unit to address the grazing angle problem. This method is computationally simple and works in conjunction with any angle estimation methods known in the art. The angle estimation method can run independent of any mathematical constraints imposed by the region of interest. Further, the method of grazing angle error correction does not require the angle estimation procedure to be repeated. -
FIG. 6( a) illustrates aradar apparatus 600 according to an embodiment. Theradar apparatus 600 includes anantenna unit 605. Asignal processing unit 608 is coupled to theantenna unit 605. A grazingangle detection module 610 is coupled to thesignal processing unit 608 and a grazing angleerror correction module 615 is coupled to the grazingangle detection module 610. Theradar apparatus 600 may include one or more additional components known to those skilled in the relevant art and are not discussed here for simplicity of the description. It is noted that theradar apparatus 600 is one of the many ways of implementing radar apparatus and variations, and alternative constructions are apparent and well within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. - In the following flowcharts, the specifically disclosed operations, sequences, and formats are provided to explain the logical flow of the methods and are understood not to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
-
FIG. 6( b) is aflowchart 630 illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment. Theflowchart 630 is illustrated with theradar apparatus 600. Atstep 632, thesignal processing unit 608 estimates an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle and generates an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. In an embodiment, thestep 632 is performed in a logic unit in theradar apparatus 600. Atstep 634, the grazingangle detection module 610 estimates a metric from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle. Atstep 636, the metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. In one embodiment, the threshold is a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the signal received at theantenna unit 605. Atstep 638, the grazing angleerror correction module 615 on error detection, inverts a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively. In one embodiment, when the error is not detected in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency, the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency are the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency respectively. -
FIG. 6( c) is aflowchart 650 illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment. Theflowchart 650 is illustrated with theradar apparatus 600. Atstep 652, thesignal processing unit 608 estimates an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle and generates an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. In an embodiment, thestep 652 is performed in a logic unit in theradar apparatus 600. Atstep 654, the grazingangle detection module 610 estimates a metric from the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. The metric is an estimate of a sine function of an azimuth angle associated with the obstacle. In one embodiment, the metric is a function of an estimate of the azimuth angle. Atstep 656, the metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in the estimated azimuth frequency. In one embodiment, the threshold is a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the signal received at theantenna unit 605. When the metric is above the threshold, the error is detected in the estimated azimuth frequency and the system proceeds to step 658. Atstep 658, the grazing angleerror correction module 615 inverts a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency. In an embodiment, thestep 658 is performed by a logic unit in theradar apparatus 600. Atstep 660, when metric is below the threshold i.e. the error is not detected, the estimated azimuth frequency is the true estimated azimuth frequency and the system proceed to step 662. Atstep 662, the elevation frequency is re-estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency to obtain true estimated elevation frequency. Atstep 664, an elevation angle and the azimuth angle associated with the obstacle are estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency. -
FIG. 6( d) is aflowchart 680 illustrating a method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment. Theflowchart 680 is illustrated with theradar apparatus 600. Atstep 682, theantenna unit 605 is rotated by a predefined angle such that one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions associated with theantenna unit 605 are outside a region of interest. In an embodiment, the rotation of theantenna unit 605 is performed only once at the time of mounting theantenna unit 605 on a vehicle. It is preferable to choose the angle of rotation such that at least one of the grazing angle ambiguity regions in each ambiguous region pair is outside the region of interest. In one of the embodiment, theantenna unit 605 is rotated by 45 degrees. Atstep 684, thesignal processing unit 608 estimates an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle and generates an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. In an embodiment, thestep 684 is performed in a logic unit in theradar apparatus 600. Atstep 685, it is determined if the estimated location of the obstacle is outside the region of interest. The estimated location of the obstacle is computed using the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle. If the estimated location of the obstacle is outside the region of interest, the system proceeds to step 686. Otherwise, the system proceeds to step 694. Atstep 686, the grazingangle detection module 610 estimates a first difference between the estimated azimuth frequency and an azimuth frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions that are outside the region of interest. Atstep 688, a second difference between the estimated elevation frequency and an elevation frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions that are outside the region of interest. The metric is estimated from a sum of an absolute value of the first difference and an absolute value of the second difference for each grazing angle ambiguity region. In one embodiment, the metric is a function of the first difference and the second difference. Atstep 690, the metric is compared with a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. In one embodiment, the threshold is a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the signal received at theantenna unit 605. When the metric is below the threshold, an error is detected in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency and the system proceed to step 692. Atstep 692, the grazing angleerror correction module 615 inverts a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively. In one embodiment, a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency is inverted to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively. Atstep 694, when the metric is above the threshold, the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency are the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency respectively and the system proceeds to step 696. Atstep 696, the elevation angle and the azimuth angle are estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency. -
FIG. 7( a) illustrates anantenna unit 700 in a radar apparatus, according to an embodiment. In an embodiment, theantenna unit 700 is integrated in a radar apparatus which is further integrated in an industrial or automotive application. Theantenna unit 700 includes a linear array of antenna arranged in a first horizontal plane. The linear array of antennas includes a plurality of antennas, for example, antenna A1, A2, A3 and AN, where AN is the Nth antenna and N is an integer. For the sake of simplicity and understanding, the plurality of antennas represented inFIG. 7( a) will be represented as A1-AN further in the description. The linear array of antennas A1-AN is represented to be placed along the X-axis. The adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas A1-AN are separated by a spacing d i.e. the antennas A1 and A2 are placed at d distance from each other. Theantenna unit 700 further includes an additional antenna B1 in a second horizontal plane and a second additional antenna B2 in a third horizontal plane. The first horizontal plane is parallel to the second horizontal plane and the third horizontal plane. The additional antenna B1 is at a predefined offset from at least one antenna in the linear array of antennas A1-AN. The predefined offset is (α, β) from the antenna A1 in the linear array of antennas A1-AN. a is a distance of the additional antenna B1 from the Z axis in the XZ plane and β is a distance of the additional antenna B1 from the X axis in the XZ plane. In one embodiment, the additional antenna B1 is not in XZ plane and a perpendicular distance of the additional antenna B1 from the XZ plane is γ. In one embodiment, the predefined offset is a multiple of λ/2, where λ is an operating wavelength of theantenna unit 700. In an embodiment, α is λ/4 and β is λ/2. In an embodiment, the spacing d between adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas is a multiple of λ/2. The second additional antenna B2 is at a second predefined offset from at least one antenna in the linear array of antennas A1-AN. The second predefined offset is (δ, ε) from the antenna A1 in the linear array of antennas A1-AN. δ is a distance of the second additional antenna B2 from the Z axis in the XZ plane and ε is a distance of the second additional antenna B2 from the X axis in the XZ plane. In one embodiment, the second additional antenna B2 is not in XZ plane and a perpendicular distance of the additional antenna B1 from the XZ plane is η. In one embodiment, the second predefined offset is a multiple of λ/2, where λ is an operating wavelength of theantenna unit 700. In an embodiment, δ is λ/4 and ε is λ/2. In one embodiment, α is equal to δ and is equal to ε. In an embodiment, the additional antenna B1 and the second additional antenna B2 are in a same vertical plane for example as illustrated, the linear array of antennas A1-AB, the additional antenna B1 and the second additional antenna B2 are in XZ plane. - The operation of the linear array of antenna A1-AN and the additional antenna B1 is similar to the
antenna unit 300 and is therefore not explained again for brevity reasons.FIG. 7( b) illustrates theantenna unit 700 placed on a bumper of a vehicle, according to an embodiment. The regions G1, G2, H1 and H2 represent grazing angle ambiguity regions for theantenna unit 700. These regions represent a range for which theantenna unit 700 will not be able to resolve the direction of arrival and hence will not be able to correctly detect the position of anobstacle 102. However an obstacle below the ground is outside the region of interest of a moving vehicle, since obstacles that are likely to be encountered by the moving vehicle are going to be above the ground. An obstacle detected by theantenna unit 700 in the grazing angle ambiguity regions H2 and G2 are mapped to their complementary locations above the ground i.e. H1 and G1 respectively. As an example isFIG. 7( b), an obstacle detected in the region G2 is mapped to the corresponding region G1. Thus theantenna unit 700 addresses the grazing angle problem to a significant extent. -
FIG. 8 illustrates aradar apparatus 800 according to an embodiment. The radar apparatus includes anantenna unit 805. Atransmitter 810 and areceiver 820 are coupled to theantenna unit 805. Acontrol module 815 is coupled to thetransmitter 810. Amixer 825 is coupled to thereceiver 820 and to thetransmitter 810. An analog to digital converter (ADC) 830 is coupled to themixer 825 and an FFT (fast fourier transform)module 835 is coupled to theADC 830. A digital signal processor (DSP) 850 is coupled to theFFT module 835. TheDSP 850 includes asignal processing unit 837, a grazingangle detection module 840 and a grazing angleerror correction module 845 coupled to the grazing angle detection module. In an embodiment, all the components of theradar apparatus 800 are integrated on a chip. In other embodiment, all the components of theradar apparatus 800 except theDSP 850 are integrated on a chip. Theradar apparatus 800 may include one or more additional components known to those skilled in the relevant art and are not discussed here for simplicity of the description. - The operation of the
radar apparatus 800 illustrated inFIG. 8 is explained now. Theantenna unit 805 is analogous to at least one of theantenna unit 300,antenna unit 500 andantenna unit 605 in connection and operation. Theantenna unit 805 transmits an outbound RF (radio frequency) signal to an obstacle of the plurality of obstacles and receives an inbound RF signal from the obstacle. Thecontrol module 815 provides a control signal to thetransmitter 810. Thetransmitter 810 generates the outbound RF signal and thereceiver 820 receives the inbound RF signal from theantenna unit 805. In one embodiment, theantenna unit 805 includes one or more transmit antennas coupled to thetransmitter 810 and one or more receive antennas coupled to thereceiver 820. In an embodiment, theantenna unit 805 is analogous to theantenna unit 300 and thus includes a linear array of antenna and an additional antenna. Each antenna in the linear array of antenna and the additional antenna will have a separate receiver path comprising receiver, mixer and ADC. Each receiver path will be coupled to thedigital signal processor 850. - The
mixer 825 receives the inbound RF signal from thereceiver 820 and generates a demodulated signal. TheADC 830 receives the demodulated signal from themixer 825 and generates a digital signal in response to the demodulated signal. TheFFT module 835 receives the digital signal from theADC 830 and is configured to transform the digital signal from a time domain to a frequency domain. TheDSP 850 is configured to process the digital signal received from theFFT module 835. Thesignal processing unit 837 estimates an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle and generates an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle. The grazingangle detection module 840 estimates a metric from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle. The metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency. In one embodiment, the threshold is a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the signal received at theantenna unit 805. The grazing angleerror correction module 845 is coupled to the grazingangle detection module 840 and inverts a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency on error detection. The process of estimating position of the obstacle with the grazingangle detection module 840 and the grazing angleerror correction module 845 have been explained in the flowcharts inFIG. 6( b),FIG. 6( c) andFIG. 6( d) and therefore is not included herein for sake of brevity of description. - In the foregoing discussion, the terms “connected” means at least either a direct electrical connection between the devices connected or an indirect connection through one or more passive intermediary devices. The term “circuit” means at least either a single component or a multiplicity of passive or active components, that are connected together to provide a desired function. The term “signal” means at least one current, voltage, charge, data, or other signal. Also, the terms “connected to” or “connected with” (and the like) are intended to describe either an indirect or direct electrical connection. Thus, if a first device is coupled to a second device, that connection can be through a direct electrical connection, or through an indirect electrical connection via other devices and connections.
- It should be noted that reference throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages should be or are in any single embodiment. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, discussion of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.
- Further, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of the disclosure may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize that the disclosure can be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments of the disclosure.
- One having ordinary skill in the art will understand that the present disclosure, as discussed above, may be practiced with steps and/or operations in a different order, and/or with hardware elements in configurations which are different than those which are disclosed. Therefore, although the disclosure has been described based upon these preferred embodiments, it should be appreciated that certain modifications, variations, and alternative constructions are apparent and well within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. In order to determine the metes and bounds of the disclosure, therefore, reference should be made to the appended claims.
Claims (23)
1. A radar apparatus for estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles comprising:
an antenna unit;
a signal processing unit coupled to the antenna unit, the signal processing unit configured to estimate an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle and configured to generate an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle;
a grazing angle detection module coupled to the signal processing unit and configured to estimate a metric from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle, wherein the metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency; and
a grazing angle error correction module coupled to the grazing angle detection module and configured to invert a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency on error detection.
2. The radar apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the antenna unit further comprises:
a linear array of antennas configured to estimate the azimuth frequency associated with the obstacle to generate the estimated azimuth frequency; and
an additional antenna at a predefined offset from at least one antenna in the linear array of antennas, wherein the elevation frequency is estimated from the predefined offset, the estimated azimuth frequency and a phase of a signal received from the obstacle at the additional antenna, to generate the estimated elevation frequency.
3. The radar apparatus of claim 2 , wherein a spacing is defined between adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas.
4. The radar apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the predefined offset is a multiple ofhalfofan operating wavelength of the antenna unit and the spacing between adjacent antennas in the linear array of antennas is a multiple of half of the operating wavelength of the antenna unit.
5. The radar apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the grazing angle detection module configured to estimate the metric from the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency, wherein the metric is an estimate of a sine function of an azimuth angle.
6. The radar apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the grazing angle error correction module configured to invert a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency when the metric is above the threshold and, wherein the estimated azimuth frequency is the true estimated azimuth frequency when the metric is below the threshold.
7. The radar apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the elevation frequency, is configured to be re-estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency to generate a true estimated elevation frequency and, wherein an elevation angle and the azimuth angle are configured to be estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency.
8. The radar apparatus of claim 1 further comprising rotating the antenna unit by a predefined angle such that one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions associated with the antenna unit are outside a region of interest.
9. The radar apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the grazing angle detection module configured to estimate:
a first difference between the estimated azimuth frequency and an azimuth frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions; and
a second difference between the estimated elevation frequency and an elevation frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions, wherein the metric is estimated from a sum of an absolute value of the first difference and an absolute value of the second difference for each grazing angle ambiguity region.
10. The radar apparatus of claim 9 , wherein
the grazing angle error correction module configured to invert a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency to generate the true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively, when the metric is below the threshold; and
the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency are the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency respectively, when the metric is above the threshold.
11. The radar apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the elevation angle and the azimuth angle are re-estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency.
12. A method of estimating position of an obstacle of a plurality of obstacles with a radar apparatus comprising:
estimating an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle to generate an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle;
estimating a metric from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle, wherein the metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency; and
inverting, on error detection, a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the radar apparatus comprises an antenna unit, the antenna unit further comprises:
a linear array of antennas configured to estimate the azimuth frequency associated with the obstacle to generate the estimated azimuth frequency; and
an additional antenna at a predefined offset from at least one antenna in the linear array of antennas, wherein the elevation frequency is estimated from the predefined offset, the estimated azimuth frequency and a phase of a signal received from the obstacle at the additional antenna, to generate the estimated elevation frequency.
14. The method of claim 13 further comprising estimating the metric from the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency, wherein the metric is an estimate of a sine function of an azimuth angle
15. The method of claim 13 further comprising:
inverting a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency to generate the true estimated azimuth frequency when the metric is above the threshold and, wherein the estimated azimuth frequency is the true estimated azimuth frequency when the metric is below the threshold;
re-estimating the elevation frequency from the true estimated azimuth frequency to generate a true estimated elevation frequency; and
estimating an elevation angle and the azimuth angle from the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency.
16. The method of claim 12 further comprising rotating an antenna unit by a predefined angle such that one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions associated with the antenna unit are outside a region of interest.
17. The method of claim 16 further comprising:
estimating a first difference between the estimated azimuth frequency and an azimuth frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions; and
estimating a second difference between the estimated elevation frequency and an elevation frequency at each grazing angle ambiguity region of the one or more grazing angle ambiguity regions, wherein the metric is estimated from a sum of an absolute value of the first difference and an absolute value of the second difference for each grazing angle ambiguity region.
18. The method of claim 16 further comprising inverting a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency and a true estimated elevation frequency respectively, when the metric is below the threshold, and wherein the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency are the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency respectively, when the metric is above the threshold.
19. A radar apparatus comprising:
an antenna unit configured to transmit an outbound radio frequency (RF) signal to an obstacle of the plurality of obstacles and receive an inbound RF signal from the obstacle;
a transmitter coupled to the antenna unit and configured to generate the outbound RF signal;
a receiver coupled to the antenna unit and configured to receive the inbound RF signal from the antenna unit, wherein the outbound RF signal is scattered by the obstacle to generate the inbound RF signal;
a mixer coupled to the receiver and to the transmitter and configured to demodulate the inbound RF signal to generate a demodulated signal;
an analog to digital converter (ADC) coupled to the mixer and configured to generate a digital signal in response to the demodulated signal received from the mixer,
an FFT (fast fourier transform) module configured to transform the digital signal from time domain to frequency domain; and
a digital signal processor coupled to the FFT module and configured to process the digital signal, the digital signal processor further comprising:
a signal processing unit configured to estimate an azimuth frequency, an elevation frequency and a range of the obstacle and configured to generate an estimated azimuth frequency, an estimated elevation frequency and an estimated range of the obstacle;
a grazing angle detection module coupled to the signal processing unit and configured to estimate a metric from one or more of the estimated azimuth frequency, the estimated elevation frequency and the estimated range of the obstacle, wherein the metric is compared to a threshold to detect an error in at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency; and
a grazing angle error correction module coupled to the grazing angle detection module and configured to invert a sign of at least one of the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency on error detection.
20. The radar apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the antenna unit further comprises:
a linear array of antennas configured to estimate the azimuth frequency associated with the obstacle to generate the estimated azimuth frequency; and
an additional antenna at a predefined offset from at least one antenna in the linear array of antennas, wherein the elevation frequency is estimated from the predefined offset, the estimated azimuth frequency and a phase of a signal received from the obstacle at the additional antenna, to generate the estimated elevation frequency.
21. The radar apparatus of claim 20 , wherein the grazing angle detection module configured to estimate the metric from the estimated azimuth frequency and the estimated elevation frequency, wherein the metric is an estimate of a sine function of an azimuth angle.
22. The radar apparatus of claim 20 , wherein the grazing angle error correction module configured to invert a sign of the estimated azimuth frequency to generate a true estimated azimuth frequency when the metric is above the threshold and, wherein the estimated azimuth frequency is the true estimated azimuth frequency when the metric is below the threshold.
23. The radar apparatus of claim 20 , wherein the elevation frequency is configured to be re-estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency to generate a true estimated elevation frequency and, wherein an elevation angle and the azimuth angle are configured to be estimated from the true estimated azimuth frequency and the true estimated elevation frequency.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/024555 WO2015154085A1 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2015-04-06 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
CN201580018890.1A CN106164702B (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2015-04-06 | Antenna configuration for parking backup radar |
JP2017503801A JP6577996B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2015-04-06 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
US15/661,891 US10725162B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2017-07-27 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
US16/897,309 US11131761B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2020-06-10 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IN1801CH2014 | 2014-04-04 | ||
IN1801/CHE/2014 | 2014-04-04 |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/661,891 Continuation US10725162B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2017-07-27 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150285904A1 true US20150285904A1 (en) | 2015-10-08 |
Family
ID=54209591
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/319,293 Abandoned US20150285904A1 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2014-06-30 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
US15/661,891 Active 2034-08-14 US10725162B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2017-07-27 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
US16/897,309 Active US11131761B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2020-06-10 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/661,891 Active 2034-08-14 US10725162B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2017-07-27 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
US16/897,309 Active US11131761B2 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2020-06-10 | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US20150285904A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6577996B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN106164702B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015154085A1 (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9739881B1 (en) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-08-22 | RFNAV, Inc. | Low cost 3D radar imaging and 3D association method from low count linear arrays for all weather autonomous vehicle navigation |
US20180172813A1 (en) * | 2016-12-15 | 2018-06-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Maximum Measurable Velocity in Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Radar |
US20190195998A1 (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-06-27 | Waymo Llc | Radar Based Three Dimensional Point Cloud for Autonomous Vehicles |
US10630249B2 (en) | 2017-08-04 | 2020-04-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Low power mode of operation for mm-wave radar |
CN112590688A (en) * | 2020-12-18 | 2021-04-02 | 芜湖易来达雷达科技有限公司 | Design method for heavy truck accurate reversing auxiliary warehousing radar system |
US11181614B2 (en) * | 2019-06-06 | 2021-11-23 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Antenna array tilt and processing to eliminate false detections in a radar system |
US11262434B2 (en) * | 2019-04-01 | 2022-03-01 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Antenna array design and processing to eliminate false detections in a radar system |
US20220146664A1 (en) * | 2019-03-28 | 2022-05-12 | Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation | Signal processing device, signal processing method, program, and information processing device |
US11340347B2 (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2022-05-24 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Radar sensor device |
US20220334250A1 (en) * | 2019-09-12 | 2022-10-20 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Method for elevation angle estimation based on an ultrasound sensor |
US20220390582A1 (en) * | 2021-06-03 | 2022-12-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Object detection and ranging using one-dimensional radar arrays |
US11543518B2 (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2023-01-03 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Vehicle radar apparatus and method of controlling the same |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150285904A1 (en) * | 2014-04-04 | 2015-10-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
CN111987785B (en) * | 2018-04-26 | 2022-08-05 | 苏州喜全软件科技有限公司 | Stereo garage system based on Bluetooth equipment and LI-Fi wireless transmission |
CN108614267A (en) * | 2018-07-09 | 2018-10-02 | 南京普陆康电子科技有限公司 | A kind of Anticollision Radar design method based on 77GHz millimeter-wave technologies |
WO2020075682A1 (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2020-04-16 | 京セラ株式会社 | Electronic device, method for controlling electronic device, and program for controlling electronic device |
CN110796896B (en) * | 2019-11-29 | 2021-02-26 | 江苏集萃智能传感技术研究所有限公司 | Parking lot parking space state monitoring system and monitoring method |
US20210364599A1 (en) * | 2020-05-20 | 2021-11-25 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Radar receiving system and method for compensating a phase error between radar receiving circuits |
US11899095B2 (en) * | 2020-09-17 | 2024-02-13 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Doppler processing in frequency-modulated continuous wave radar systems using dither |
Citations (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3212088A (en) * | 1960-12-21 | 1965-10-12 | Ibm | Radar display system |
US3218639A (en) * | 1955-05-03 | 1965-11-16 | Sanders Associates Inc | Non-scanning panoramic radar system |
US3362024A (en) * | 1966-01-10 | 1968-01-02 | Ryan Aeronautical Co | Verticality, altitude and velocity sensing radar |
US3369231A (en) * | 1964-08-26 | 1968-02-13 | Navy Usa | Airborne obstacle avoidance system |
US4700716A (en) * | 1986-02-27 | 1987-10-20 | Kasevich Associates, Inc. | Collinear antenna array applicator |
US5999121A (en) * | 1995-03-28 | 1999-12-07 | Salonen; Pentti | Radiometer and water indicating method |
US6181270B1 (en) * | 1999-02-23 | 2001-01-30 | Veridian Erim International, Inc. | Reference-based autofocusing method for IFSAR and other applications |
US6255991B1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2001-07-03 | Trw Inc. | Low cost angle of arrival measurement system |
US6424287B1 (en) * | 2001-04-24 | 2002-07-23 | Sandia Corporation | Error correction for IFSAR |
US6801156B1 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2004-10-05 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Frequency-agile monopulse technique for resolving closely spaced targets |
US20050088642A1 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2005-04-28 | Sanjiv Singh | Apparatus and method for detecting obstacles |
US7227493B2 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2007-06-05 | Cambridge Consultants Limited | Methods and apparatus for obtaining positional information |
US7479920B2 (en) * | 2002-12-29 | 2009-01-20 | Haim Niv | Obstacle and terrain avoidance sensor |
US20090021421A1 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2009-01-22 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Radar device |
US7714782B2 (en) * | 2004-01-13 | 2010-05-11 | Dennis Willard Davis | Phase arrays exploiting geometry phase and methods of creating such arrays |
US7773665B2 (en) * | 2004-05-12 | 2010-08-10 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Apparatus and method for corresponding frequency synchronization in on-channel repeater |
US20100231455A1 (en) * | 2006-11-12 | 2010-09-16 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Method and system for detecting signal sources in a surveillance space |
US7965225B1 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2011-06-21 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Radar antenna stabilization enhancement using vertical beam switching |
US8064550B2 (en) * | 2007-03-09 | 2011-11-22 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Quadrature imbalance estimation using unbiased training sequences |
US20120068882A1 (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2012-03-22 | Trw Automotive Us Llc | Antennas |
US20120281503A1 (en) * | 2011-05-06 | 2012-11-08 | Rikoski Richard J | Systems and methods for holographic navigation |
US8483607B2 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2013-07-09 | Fujitsu Limited | Wireless communication method and relay apparatus |
US20130182790A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-07-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference mitigation techniques for air to ground systems |
US8570211B1 (en) * | 2009-01-22 | 2013-10-29 | Gregory Hubert Piesinger | Aircraft bird strike avoidance method and apparatus |
US8922423B2 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2014-12-30 | Furuno Electric Company Limited | Radar apparatus and method of detecting target object |
US9024805B1 (en) * | 2012-09-26 | 2015-05-05 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Radar antenna elevation error estimation method and apparatus |
US20150188237A1 (en) * | 2012-02-13 | 2015-07-02 | AMI Research & Development, LLC | Travelling wave antenna feed structures |
US9341706B2 (en) * | 2010-10-12 | 2016-05-17 | Tmd Technologies Limited | Radar system |
US20160285611A1 (en) * | 2011-08-17 | 2016-09-29 | CBF Networks, Inc. | Radio with oobe victim detection |
Family Cites Families (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2630563A (en) * | 1944-05-25 | 1953-03-03 | Leland J Haworth | Pulse echo range azimuth and elevation presentation |
US3530465A (en) * | 1957-07-10 | 1970-09-22 | Sperry Rand Corp | Obstacle clearance system for aircraft |
US3490018A (en) * | 1967-07-24 | 1970-01-13 | United Aircraft Corp | Phase interferometer ambiguity resolution system |
US5311183A (en) * | 1991-06-13 | 1994-05-10 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Windshear radar system with upper and lower elevation radar scans |
JP2616318B2 (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1997-06-04 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Radar signal processing equipment |
GB9602250D0 (en) * | 1996-02-05 | 1996-04-03 | Secr Defence | Collision warning system |
DE69721085T2 (en) * | 1996-05-14 | 2004-04-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Autonomous landing system |
US6011505A (en) * | 1996-07-11 | 2000-01-04 | Science Applications International Corporation | Terrain elevation measurement by interferometric synthetic aperture radar (IFSAR) |
US8139685B2 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2012-03-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems, methods, and apparatus for frequency control |
JP4293194B2 (en) * | 2005-09-02 | 2009-07-08 | 財団法人雑賀技術研究所 | Distance measuring device and distance measuring method |
WO2007111130A1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2007-10-04 | Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Radar apparatus and mobile unit |
DE102006032539A1 (en) * | 2006-07-13 | 2008-01-17 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | FMCW radar sensor |
US7623061B2 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2009-11-24 | Autoliv Asp | Method and apparatus for discriminating with respect to low elevation target objects |
GB0701869D0 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2007-03-14 | Cambridge Consultants | Adaptive radar |
US8515600B1 (en) * | 2007-09-06 | 2013-08-20 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System and method for sensor-based terrain avoidance |
US7859449B1 (en) * | 2007-09-06 | 2010-12-28 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System and method for a terrain database and/or position validation |
JP2009265007A (en) * | 2008-04-28 | 2009-11-12 | Hitachi Ltd | Mobile radar and planar antenna |
JP4715871B2 (en) * | 2008-06-10 | 2011-07-06 | 株式会社デンソー | Direction detection device, radar device |
DE102008038365A1 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2010-01-07 | Adc Automotive Distance Control Systems Gmbh | Vehicle radar system and method for determining a position of at least one object relative to a vehicle |
US7633429B1 (en) * | 2009-01-22 | 2009-12-15 | Bae Systems Controls Inc. | Monopulse radar signal processing for rotorcraft brownout aid application |
FR2950148B1 (en) * | 2009-09-15 | 2012-06-15 | Thales Sa | AIRBORNE RADAR WITH LARGE ANGULAR COVERAGE, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE DETECTION AND OBSTACLE REMOVAL FUNCTION |
US8839056B2 (en) * | 2011-05-13 | 2014-09-16 | James Francis Harvey | Equipment testing method and apparatus |
WO2012167135A1 (en) * | 2011-06-03 | 2012-12-06 | Skyfiber, Inc | Active tracking for free-space optical communication systems |
WO2013080570A1 (en) * | 2011-12-02 | 2013-06-06 | パナソニック株式会社 | Radar device |
US20150285904A1 (en) * | 2014-04-04 | 2015-10-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar |
TWI590969B (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2017-07-11 | 啟碁科技股份有限公司 | Pre-warning method and vehicle radar system |
TWI645733B (en) * | 2017-11-13 | 2018-12-21 | 財團法人工業技術研究院 | Channel-based positioning device, system and method thereof |
-
2014
- 2014-06-30 US US14/319,293 patent/US20150285904A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2015
- 2015-04-06 WO PCT/US2015/024555 patent/WO2015154085A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-04-06 CN CN201580018890.1A patent/CN106164702B/en active Active
- 2015-04-06 JP JP2017503801A patent/JP6577996B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-07-27 US US15/661,891 patent/US10725162B2/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-06-10 US US16/897,309 patent/US11131761B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3218639A (en) * | 1955-05-03 | 1965-11-16 | Sanders Associates Inc | Non-scanning panoramic radar system |
US3212088A (en) * | 1960-12-21 | 1965-10-12 | Ibm | Radar display system |
US3369231A (en) * | 1964-08-26 | 1968-02-13 | Navy Usa | Airborne obstacle avoidance system |
US3362024A (en) * | 1966-01-10 | 1968-01-02 | Ryan Aeronautical Co | Verticality, altitude and velocity sensing radar |
US4700716A (en) * | 1986-02-27 | 1987-10-20 | Kasevich Associates, Inc. | Collinear antenna array applicator |
US5999121A (en) * | 1995-03-28 | 1999-12-07 | Salonen; Pentti | Radiometer and water indicating method |
US6181270B1 (en) * | 1999-02-23 | 2001-01-30 | Veridian Erim International, Inc. | Reference-based autofocusing method for IFSAR and other applications |
US6255991B1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2001-07-03 | Trw Inc. | Low cost angle of arrival measurement system |
US7227493B2 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2007-06-05 | Cambridge Consultants Limited | Methods and apparatus for obtaining positional information |
US6424287B1 (en) * | 2001-04-24 | 2002-07-23 | Sandia Corporation | Error correction for IFSAR |
US20050088642A1 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2005-04-28 | Sanjiv Singh | Apparatus and method for detecting obstacles |
US7479920B2 (en) * | 2002-12-29 | 2009-01-20 | Haim Niv | Obstacle and terrain avoidance sensor |
US6801156B1 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2004-10-05 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Frequency-agile monopulse technique for resolving closely spaced targets |
US7714782B2 (en) * | 2004-01-13 | 2010-05-11 | Dennis Willard Davis | Phase arrays exploiting geometry phase and methods of creating such arrays |
US7773665B2 (en) * | 2004-05-12 | 2010-08-10 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Apparatus and method for corresponding frequency synchronization in on-channel repeater |
US20100231455A1 (en) * | 2006-11-12 | 2010-09-16 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Method and system for detecting signal sources in a surveillance space |
US8064550B2 (en) * | 2007-03-09 | 2011-11-22 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Quadrature imbalance estimation using unbiased training sequences |
US20090021421A1 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2009-01-22 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Radar device |
US7965225B1 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2011-06-21 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Radar antenna stabilization enhancement using vertical beam switching |
US8570211B1 (en) * | 2009-01-22 | 2013-10-29 | Gregory Hubert Piesinger | Aircraft bird strike avoidance method and apparatus |
US20120068882A1 (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2012-03-22 | Trw Automotive Us Llc | Antennas |
US8483607B2 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2013-07-09 | Fujitsu Limited | Wireless communication method and relay apparatus |
US9341706B2 (en) * | 2010-10-12 | 2016-05-17 | Tmd Technologies Limited | Radar system |
US8922423B2 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2014-12-30 | Furuno Electric Company Limited | Radar apparatus and method of detecting target object |
US20120281503A1 (en) * | 2011-05-06 | 2012-11-08 | Rikoski Richard J | Systems and methods for holographic navigation |
US20160285611A1 (en) * | 2011-08-17 | 2016-09-29 | CBF Networks, Inc. | Radio with oobe victim detection |
US20130182790A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-07-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference mitigation techniques for air to ground systems |
US20150188237A1 (en) * | 2012-02-13 | 2015-07-02 | AMI Research & Development, LLC | Travelling wave antenna feed structures |
US9024805B1 (en) * | 2012-09-26 | 2015-05-05 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Radar antenna elevation error estimation method and apparatus |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2017165728A1 (en) * | 2016-03-24 | 2017-09-28 | RFNAV, Inc. | Low cost 3d sonar, lidar, all weather radar imaging and 3d association method for autonomous vehicle navigation |
US9983305B2 (en) | 2016-03-24 | 2018-05-29 | RFNAV, Inc. | Low cost 3D radar imaging and 3D association method from low count linear arrays for all weather autonomous vehicle navigation |
US9739881B1 (en) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-08-22 | RFNAV, Inc. | Low cost 3D radar imaging and 3D association method from low count linear arrays for all weather autonomous vehicle navigation |
US11366211B2 (en) * | 2016-12-15 | 2022-06-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Maximum measurable velocity in frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar |
US20180172813A1 (en) * | 2016-12-15 | 2018-06-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Maximum Measurable Velocity in Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Radar |
US11579282B2 (en) * | 2016-12-15 | 2023-02-14 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Maximum measurable velocity in frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar |
US10775489B2 (en) * | 2016-12-15 | 2020-09-15 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Maximum measurable velocity in frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar |
US20220326368A1 (en) * | 2016-12-15 | 2022-10-13 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Maximum Measurable Velocity in Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Radar |
US10630249B2 (en) | 2017-08-04 | 2020-04-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Low power mode of operation for mm-wave radar |
US11456713B2 (en) | 2017-08-04 | 2022-09-27 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Low power mode of operation for mm-wave radar |
US10935650B2 (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2021-03-02 | Waymo Llc | Radar based three dimensional point cloud for autonomous vehicles |
US20190195998A1 (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-06-27 | Waymo Llc | Radar Based Three Dimensional Point Cloud for Autonomous Vehicles |
US11698454B2 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2023-07-11 | Waymo Llc | Radar based three dimensional point cloud for autonomous vehicles |
US11340347B2 (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2022-05-24 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Radar sensor device |
US20220146664A1 (en) * | 2019-03-28 | 2022-05-12 | Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation | Signal processing device, signal processing method, program, and information processing device |
US11262434B2 (en) * | 2019-04-01 | 2022-03-01 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Antenna array design and processing to eliminate false detections in a radar system |
US11181614B2 (en) * | 2019-06-06 | 2021-11-23 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Antenna array tilt and processing to eliminate false detections in a radar system |
US20220334250A1 (en) * | 2019-09-12 | 2022-10-20 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Method for elevation angle estimation based on an ultrasound sensor |
US11543518B2 (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2023-01-03 | Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. | Vehicle radar apparatus and method of controlling the same |
CN112590688A (en) * | 2020-12-18 | 2021-04-02 | 芜湖易来达雷达科技有限公司 | Design method for heavy truck accurate reversing auxiliary warehousing radar system |
US20220390582A1 (en) * | 2021-06-03 | 2022-12-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Object detection and ranging using one-dimensional radar arrays |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106164702B (en) | 2019-04-19 |
US10725162B2 (en) | 2020-07-28 |
WO2015154085A8 (en) | 2016-06-02 |
US20170322296A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 |
CN106164702A (en) | 2016-11-23 |
WO2015154085A1 (en) | 2015-10-08 |
US20200301000A1 (en) | 2020-09-24 |
JP2017516116A (en) | 2017-06-15 |
JP6577996B2 (en) | 2019-09-18 |
US11131761B2 (en) | 2021-09-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11131761B2 (en) | Antenna configuration for parking assist radar | |
US11022675B2 (en) | Techniques for angle resolution in radar | |
US10234541B2 (en) | FMCW radar device | |
US8026843B2 (en) | Radar methods and systems using ramp sequences | |
US11822006B2 (en) | Radar system with monitoring of the frequency modulation of a sequence of similar transmission signals | |
US20150061923A1 (en) | Phase monopulse radar system and target detecting method | |
US11226409B2 (en) | In-vehicle radar device | |
US11714180B2 (en) | Radar system to detect angles in bistatic and monostatic scenarios | |
KR20230116783A (en) | Magnetic Velocity Estimation Using Radar or LIDAR Beam Steering | |
US11860299B2 (en) | Method and device for generating a modulated continuous-wave radar signal | |
WO2019049680A1 (en) | Radar device and automobile provided with same | |
US20230384418A1 (en) | Channel offset correction for radar data | |
WO2023058559A1 (en) | Information processing device, object tracking device, tracking method, and program | |
US20230070779A1 (en) | Radar control device and method | |
JP2007232499A (en) | Vehicle-mounted radar system | |
WO2015060997A1 (en) | Angle resolution in radar |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RAO, SANDEEP;REEL/FRAME:033211/0148 Effective date: 20140617 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |