US20160109362A1 - Method for determining a local refractive index and device therefor - Google Patents

Method for determining a local refractive index and device therefor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160109362A1
US20160109362A1 US14/886,408 US201514886408A US2016109362A1 US 20160109362 A1 US20160109362 A1 US 20160109362A1 US 201514886408 A US201514886408 A US 201514886408A US 2016109362 A1 US2016109362 A1 US 2016109362A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
determining
refractive index
transparent object
pattern
shape
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US14/886,408
Other versions
US9818021B2 (en
Inventor
Rolf Kubiak
Christian Ripperda
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Isra Surface Vision GmbH
Original Assignee
Isra Surface Vision GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE102014115331.6A external-priority patent/DE102014115331A1/en
Priority claimed from DE102014115336.7A external-priority patent/DE102014115336A1/en
Application filed by Isra Surface Vision GmbH filed Critical Isra Surface Vision GmbH
Assigned to ISRA SURFACE VISION GMBH reassignment ISRA SURFACE VISION GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KUBIAK, ROLF, RIPPERDA, CHRISTIAN
Publication of US20160109362A1 publication Critical patent/US20160109362A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9818021B2 publication Critical patent/US9818021B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/60Type of objects
    • G06V20/64Three-dimensional objects
    • G06V20/647Three-dimensional objects by matching two-dimensional images to three-dimensional objects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/41Refractivity; Phase-affecting properties, e.g. optical path length
    • G01N21/45Refractivity; Phase-affecting properties, e.g. optical path length using interferometric methods; using Schlieren methods
    • G01N21/455Schlieren methods, e.g. for gradient index determination; Shadowgraph
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/41Refractivity; Phase-affecting properties, e.g. optical path length
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/95Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination characterised by the material or shape of the object to be examined
    • G01N21/958Inspecting transparent materials or objects, e.g. windscreens
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection
    • G06T7/0008Industrial image inspection checking presence/absence
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/95Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination characterised by the material or shape of the object to be examined
    • G01N21/958Inspecting transparent materials or objects, e.g. windscreens
    • G01N2021/9586Windscreens
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10028Range image; Depth image; 3D point clouds
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection

Definitions

  • German Patent Application DE 10 2014 115 336.7 filed on Oct. 21, 2014
  • German Patent Application DE 10 2014 115 331.6 also filed on Oct. 21, 2014.
  • German Patent Applications, subject matters of which are incorporated herein by reference, provide the basis for a claim of priority of invention under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d).
  • the present invention relates to a method for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object using a pattern, which is observed through the transparent object by a camera.
  • the invention furthermore relates to a device therefor.
  • the optical distortion is often measured using the device shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the optical distortion is converted to a local refractive index.
  • ECE Economic Commission for Europe
  • a projector 1 is used.
  • the projector 1 projects a predefined pattern through a transparent object (e.g. a windshield) onto a projection wall 3 .
  • the light from the projector 1 passing through the windshield 2 is observed there using electronic means or manually.
  • the windshield 2 is often tested in the installed position.
  • the known distance (propagation length) R 1 between the projector 1 and the windshield 2 as well as R 2 between the windshield 2 and the projection wall 3 apply only for the region of the windshield 2 that lies on the optical axis between the projector 1 and the projection wall 3 .
  • the volume elements of the windshield remote from the optical axis have a greater spacing distance from the projector 1 and the projection wall 3 . According to the aforementioned regulation, it is therefore required that high-precision measurements of the refractive index be carried out only on the optical axis. This means that either the windshield 2 or the projector 1 , with the projection wall 3 , must be moved in order to investigate a larger region of the windshield. This is highly time-consuming with respect to the measuring time.
  • the present invention overcomes the shortcomings of known arts, such as those mentioned above.
  • the invention provides a simpler and more cost-effective method for carrying out a high-precision measurement of the local refractive index on a transparent object than known methods, and realizes a cost-effective device therefor.
  • the invention provides a method in which the three-dimensional shape and position of the surface of the particular volume element of the transparent object facing a pattern is ascertained and is used to determine the local refractive index.
  • volume element should be understood to be a three-dimensional element or part of a transparent object, for example, en element or part extending from a front side to a back side of the transparent object.
  • each transparent object consists of one or more volume elements, for example, a plurality of volume elements.
  • the local refractive index is determined in order to detect and classify optical faults, which induce optical distortions, e.g., within the scope of an automatic quality inspection of the transparent object.
  • the determined local refractive indices are automatically compared with required refractive indices. If these do not match or if discrepancies that are too great exist between the determined local refractive indices and the required refraction indices for the particular volume element or a selected region of the transparent object, an error is reported. For example, an error associated with an object may be optically and/or acoustically indicated and/or the particular object is removed from the production process.
  • the invention relies on means for determining such an error in a form of a computer device, such as a processor or electronic controller, which includes or is coupled to a means for generating an optical or acoustic indication, such as a loudspeaker.
  • a computer device such as a processor or electronic controller
  • a means for generating an optical or acoustic indication such as a loudspeaker.
  • the removal of the object for which an error is reported can be facilitated, for example, by a picker arm or a branching in the belt conveyor, in communication with the processor or electronic controller.
  • the removal may be controlled by a separate controller that is in communication with the above-mentioned processor or electronic controller.
  • the local refractive index (refractive power) is understood to be the refractive index in the particular volume element of the object, which results from the particular curvatures of the surfaces of the particular volume element, the nature of the volume element and the refractive index (optical material property of the object), and is the reciprocal of the (local) focal length.
  • the local refractive index is determined in any direction (optical axis), e.g., a direction which is required in the particular quality inspection, for example, the look-through direction through a windshield in the installed position.
  • the three-dimensional shape of the surface and position relative to the particular volume element is determined by deflectometry with the aid of a camera.
  • the three-dimensional shape and position of the surface can be determined by methods using reference marks, by purely mechanical, tactile measurements, or by a measurement of diffusively reflective surfaces via triangulation.
  • the inventive method is based on the finding that, when the three-dimensional geometric shape of the transparent and reflective object can be measured, it is advantageous to use these shape data to correct the refractive-value measurement in transmission. If the shape of the object is known, corresponding geometric corrections can be carried out. It is not absolutely necessary to carry out measurements of the refractive index for all volume elements on the optical axis. For the volume elements which do not lie on the optical axis in the above-described refractive-index determination, it is possible, given that the three-dimensional shape and position of the particular volume element of the object is known, to carry out a correction of the refractive index corresponding to the distance from the optical axis or corresponding to the curvature of the surface. This shortens the measuring time considerably and simultaneously increases the accuracy of the measurement, since the correct propagation length can be used. In addition, the method according to the invention therefore has greater reliability of the process. Furthermore, less space is required.
  • optical effects are measured, which are caused both by the large-surface-area shape of the Object and by local deformations on the surface or in the volume of the object.
  • the device when the three-dimensional overall shape (topography of the individual volume elements and the position thereof) of the object is known, the device can deduct global effects caused by the overall shape of the object.
  • the refractive power of each volume element can be split into a portion caused by the global overall shape of the object and a portion for which only optical effects caused by local deformations (e.g. defects on the surface or in the volume) are significant. It is therefore possible, using the present invention, to separate large-surface-area and local optical effects.
  • the determination of the three-dimensional shape of the surface of the transparent object is carried out before the refractive-index measurement in transmission or simultaneously with this measurement.
  • the measuring results of the transmission optics i.e., the ascertained refractive powers
  • the ascertained refractive powers are presented in a manner corrected for perspective, since the shape of the surface of the transparent object is known.
  • a dynamic lattice is used to generate the pattern.
  • This lattice generates different patterns for the refractive-index determination, for example, for different requirements, e.g., from customers, with respect to the quality inspection.
  • the dynamic lattice electronically generates patterns which are suitable for the particular purpose of the measurement.
  • the local refractive index is determined for each volume element on the basis of the local distortion of the pattern, which is considered in transmission.
  • a separate measurement must be carried out for each pattern, wherein the measurements are carried out in temporal succession.
  • different patterns can be color-coded and/or coded with respect to the polarization thereof, thereby allowing projection and measurement to take place simultaneously, which saves even more time.
  • three different lattices can be generated using three photodiodes (red, yellow, blue). This makes it possible to measure these three lattices simultaneously.
  • the camera capturing the transmission images of the lattice can distinguish between the different lattices by a color and/or polarization filter.
  • the three-dimensional overall shape of the surface of the transparent object facing the pattern is determined by combining the three-dimensional shapes of the surfaces of all volume elements.
  • the overall shape of the surface of the transparent object is therefore composed of the individual shapes of the volume elements with consideration for the position of the particular volume element.
  • a plurality of cameras is required in order to ascertain the overall shape of the transparent object, wherein each camera observes a portion of the transparent object.
  • the three-dimensional overall shape of the surface of the transparent object facing the pattern is compared with CAD data on the transparent object and, on the basis thereof, a visual range to be selected for the determination of the local refractive index is ascertained.
  • a visual range field of view
  • Such a visual range is sometimes required for the inspection of transparent objects, since it is often not the entire transparent object that is significant for the quality inspection, but rather merely one special region of the object, which is usually defined in the particular requirement.
  • a device for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object wherein the device is designed to determine the local refractive index with the aid of a predefined pattern, which can be observed through the transparent object by means of a camera, and to determine the three-dimensional shape and position of the surface of the particular volume element of the transparent object facing the pattern (e.g. in reflection) and use this to determine the local refractive index.
  • the device is used within the scope of the automatic quality inspection of a transparent object.
  • the device according to the invention has the advantages mentioned above with respect to the method according to the invention.
  • the device is designed to carry out the above-described method steps.
  • FIG. 1 presents a side view of a device for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object according to the prior art
  • FIG. 2 presents a side view of a device according to the invention for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object.
  • any type of pattern generated by a dynamic lattice 11 is observed by a first camera 13 through a transparent object in the form of a windshield 12 (comprising volume element 17 a ).
  • a transparent object in the form of a windshield 12 comprising volume element 17 a .
  • local refractive indices for the volume elements 17 a of the windshield 12 are determined in a manner known per se, and specifically also for the volume elements 17 a located outside of the optical axis.
  • a second camera 15 is provided, which is disposed on the same side of the windshield 12 as the dynamic lattice 11 and observes the light reflected by the windshield 12 .
  • the shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12 is simultaneously determined by deflectometry by the second camera 15 .
  • the three-dimensional shape of the surface facing the pattern/lattice 11 is determined for each volume element 17 a and the position of the particular volume element is determined.
  • the shape of the surface 17 of the transparent object 12 is also considered in the determination of the local refractive index of the particular volume element 17 a considered in the transmission measurement.
  • the second camera 15 captures another image of the windshield 12 and then determines the shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12 simultaneously.
  • the local refractive index was determined far outside the optical axis, it is possible to make corrections to the determined local refractive index for volume elements not lying on the optical axis 19 , which corrections result from the shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12 and the position of the volume element in the windshield. It is therefore not necessary to move either the windshield 12 or the first camera 13 with the dynamic lattice 11 during the measurement in order to determine the refractive index. As a result, the measuring time is considerably shortened and the accuracy of the determined refractive indices is increased.
  • the first camera 13 is used to measure optical effects on the basis of the distortion of the lattice 11 .
  • the optical effects are caused by the large-surface-area shape of the windshield 12 as well as by local deformations on the surface 17 or in the volume of the windshield 12 .
  • the local three-dimensional shapes of the surface 17 of all volume elements are combined to form a three-dimensional overall shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12 , global effects caused by the large-surface-area shape of the object are deducted in the device.
  • Computer or electronic controller 16 determines the 3D shape of the surface 17 and the position of the volume element 17 a .
  • the computer or electronic controller 16 uses the 3D shape of the surface 17 and the position of the volume element 178 are used to determine the refractive index and to compare the refractive index to the predetermined refractive index.
  • the refractive indices determined for the specified volume elements are compared with required refractive indices of refractive index ranges. If the determined refractive indices do not match the required refractive indices or refractive index ranges, the particular transparent object does not meet the quality requirements and an error is signaled and/or the object is removed from the production process.

Abstract

A method for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object using a pattern includes observing the pattern through the transparent object by a first camera, determining, using the observed pattern, a three-dimensional (3-D) shape and position of a surface of a particular volume element of the transparent object facing the pattern and using the determined 3-D shape and surface position of the particular volume element, determining a local refractive index for the particular volume element.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION
  • The invention described and claimed hereinbelow is also described in German Patent Application DE 10 2014 115 336.7, filed on Oct. 21, 2014, and in German Patent Application DE 10 2014 115 331.6, also filed on Oct. 21, 2014. The German Patent Applications, subject matters of which are incorporated herein by reference, provide the basis for a claim of priority of invention under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d).
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object using a pattern, which is observed through the transparent object by a camera. The invention furthermore relates to a device therefor.
  • For the quality inspection of transparent objects, e.g., glass panes for automobiles, the optical distortion is often measured using the device shown in FIG. 1. The optical distortion is converted to a local refractive index. In the known method mentioned in the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) R43 Regulation, a projector 1 is used. The projector 1 projects a predefined pattern through a transparent object (e.g. a windshield) onto a projection wall 3. The light from the projector 1 passing through the windshield 2 is observed there using electronic means or manually. The windshield 2 is often tested in the installed position.
  • Since the windshield 2 has a non-negligible extension, the known distance (propagation length) R1 between the projector 1 and the windshield 2 as well as R2 between the windshield 2 and the projection wall 3 apply only for the region of the windshield 2 that lies on the optical axis between the projector 1 and the projection wall 3. The volume elements of the windshield remote from the optical axis have a greater spacing distance from the projector 1 and the projection wall 3. According to the aforementioned regulation, it is therefore required that high-precision measurements of the refractive index be carried out only on the optical axis. This means that either the windshield 2 or the projector 1, with the projection wall 3, must be moved in order to investigate a larger region of the windshield. This is highly time-consuming with respect to the measuring time.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention overcomes the shortcomings of known arts, such as those mentioned above.
  • The invention provides a simpler and more cost-effective method for carrying out a high-precision measurement of the local refractive index on a transparent object than known methods, and realizes a cost-effective device therefor.
  • In one embodiment, the invention provides a method in which the three-dimensional shape and position of the surface of the particular volume element of the transparent object facing a pattern is ascertained and is used to determine the local refractive index. As used herein, volume element should be understood to be a three-dimensional element or part of a transparent object, for example, en element or part extending from a front side to a back side of the transparent object. As such, each transparent object consists of one or more volume elements, for example, a plurality of volume elements.
  • The local refractive index is determined in order to detect and classify optical faults, which induce optical distortions, e.g., within the scope of an automatic quality inspection of the transparent object. To this end, the determined local refractive indices are automatically compared with required refractive indices. If these do not match or if discrepancies that are too great exist between the determined local refractive indices and the required refraction indices for the particular volume element or a selected region of the transparent object, an error is reported. For example, an error associated with an object may be optically and/or acoustically indicated and/or the particular object is removed from the production process. To do so, the invention relies on means for determining such an error in a form of a computer device, such as a processor or electronic controller, which includes or is coupled to a means for generating an optical or acoustic indication, such as a loudspeaker. The removal of the object for which an error is reported can be facilitated, for example, by a picker arm or a branching in the belt conveyor, in communication with the processor or electronic controller. Alternatively, the removal may be controlled by a separate controller that is in communication with the above-mentioned processor or electronic controller.
  • In this connection, the local refractive index (refractive power) is understood to be the refractive index in the particular volume element of the object, which results from the particular curvatures of the surfaces of the particular volume element, the nature of the volume element and the refractive index (optical material property of the object), and is the reciprocal of the (local) focal length. The local refractive index is determined in any direction (optical axis), e.g., a direction which is required in the particular quality inspection, for example, the look-through direction through a windshield in the installed position.
  • In an embodiment, the three-dimensional shape of the surface and position relative to the particular volume element is determined by deflectometry with the aid of a camera. As an alternative, the three-dimensional shape and position of the surface can be determined by methods using reference marks, by purely mechanical, tactile measurements, or by a measurement of diffusively reflective surfaces via triangulation.
  • The inventive method is based on the finding that, when the three-dimensional geometric shape of the transparent and reflective object can be measured, it is advantageous to use these shape data to correct the refractive-value measurement in transmission. If the shape of the object is known, corresponding geometric corrections can be carried out. It is not absolutely necessary to carry out measurements of the refractive index for all volume elements on the optical axis. For the volume elements which do not lie on the optical axis in the above-described refractive-index determination, it is possible, given that the three-dimensional shape and position of the particular volume element of the object is known, to carry out a correction of the refractive index corresponding to the distance from the optical axis or corresponding to the curvature of the surface. This shortens the measuring time considerably and simultaneously increases the accuracy of the measurement, since the correct propagation length can be used. In addition, the method according to the invention therefore has greater reliability of the process. Furthermore, less space is required.
  • Given that the shape of the surface of the transparent object and the position of the individual volume elements are known, real coordinates can be assigned to these volume elements.
  • It is also advantageous that optical effects are measured, which are caused both by the large-surface-area shape of the Object and by local deformations on the surface or in the volume of the object. According to the invention, when the three-dimensional overall shape (topography of the individual volume elements and the position thereof) of the object is known, the device can deduct global effects caused by the overall shape of the object. In other words, the refractive power of each volume element can be split into a portion caused by the global overall shape of the object and a portion for which only optical effects caused by local deformations (e.g. defects on the surface or in the volume) are significant. It is therefore possible, using the present invention, to separate large-surface-area and local optical effects.
  • The determination of the three-dimensional shape of the surface of the transparent object is carried out before the refractive-index measurement in transmission or simultaneously with this measurement.
  • In addition, the measuring results of the transmission optics, i.e., the ascertained refractive powers, are presented in a manner corrected for perspective, since the shape of the surface of the transparent object is known.
  • In an embodiment, a dynamic lattice is used to generate the pattern. This lattice generates different patterns for the refractive-index determination, for example, for different requirements, e.g., from customers, with respect to the quality inspection. The dynamic lattice electronically generates patterns which are suitable for the particular purpose of the measurement. The local refractive index is determined for each volume element on the basis of the local distortion of the pattern, which is considered in transmission.
  • When a dynamic lattice is used, a separate measurement must be carried out for each pattern, wherein the measurements are carried out in temporal succession. In an embodiment, different patterns can be color-coded and/or coded with respect to the polarization thereof, thereby allowing projection and measurement to take place simultaneously, which saves even more time. For example, three different lattices can be generated using three photodiodes (red, yellow, blue). This makes it possible to measure these three lattices simultaneously. The camera capturing the transmission images of the lattice can distinguish between the different lattices by a color and/or polarization filter.
  • In an embodiment, the three-dimensional overall shape of the surface of the transparent object facing the pattern is determined by combining the three-dimensional shapes of the surfaces of all volume elements. The overall shape of the surface of the transparent object is therefore composed of the individual shapes of the volume elements with consideration for the position of the particular volume element. In the case of a relatively large transparent object and/or relatively great curvatures in the surface of the object, a plurality of cameras is required in order to ascertain the overall shape of the transparent object, wherein each camera observes a portion of the transparent object.
  • It is furthermore advantageous that, since the three-dimensional overall shape of the surface of the transparent object is known, the curvatures of this surface and, therefore, the refractive powers of the transparent object with respect to the various viewing angles are known. The optics of the glass pane, which are based solely on the shape of the object as determined by the design, can therefore be calculated.
  • In an embodiment, the three-dimensional overall shape of the surface of the transparent object facing the pattern is compared with CAD data on the transparent object and, on the basis thereof, a visual range to be selected for the determination of the local refractive index is ascertained. Such a visual range (field of view) is sometimes required for the inspection of transparent objects, since it is often not the entire transparent object that is significant for the quality inspection, but rather merely one special region of the object, which is usually defined in the particular requirement.
  • The aforementioned problem is furthermore solved by a device for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object, wherein the device is designed to determine the local refractive index with the aid of a predefined pattern, which can be observed through the transparent object by means of a camera, and to determine the three-dimensional shape and position of the surface of the particular volume element of the transparent object facing the pattern (e.g. in reflection) and use this to determine the local refractive index.
  • As explained above, the device is used within the scope of the automatic quality inspection of a transparent object.
  • The device according to the invention has the advantages mentioned above with respect to the method according to the invention. The device is designed to carry out the above-described method steps.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Further features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the description of embodiments that follows, with reference to the attached figures, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 presents a side view of a device for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object according to the prior art; and
  • FIG. 2 presents a side view of a device according to the invention for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The following is a detailed description of example embodiments of the invention depicted in the accompanying drawings. The example embodiments are presented in such detail as to clearly communicate the invention and are designed to make such embodiments obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. However, the amount of detail offered is not intended to limit the anticipated variations of embodiments; on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention, as defined by the appended claims.
  • In the device depicted in FIG. 2, any type of pattern generated by a dynamic lattice 11 is observed by a first camera 13 through a transparent object in the form of a windshield 12 (comprising volume element 17 a). On the basis thereof, local refractive indices for the volume elements 17 a of the windshield 12 are determined in a manner known per se, and specifically also for the volume elements 17 a located outside of the optical axis. Furthermore, a second camera 15 is provided, which is disposed on the same side of the windshield 12 as the dynamic lattice 11 and observes the light reflected by the windshield 12.
  • The shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12 is simultaneously determined by deflectometry by the second camera 15. In so doing, the three-dimensional shape of the surface facing the pattern/lattice 11 is determined for each volume element 17 a and the position of the particular volume element is determined. The shape of the surface 17 of the transparent object 12 is also considered in the determination of the local refractive index of the particular volume element 17 a considered in the transmission measurement. The second camera 15 captures another image of the windshield 12 and then determines the shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12 simultaneously.
  • Therefore, if the local refractive index was determined far outside the optical axis, it is possible to make corrections to the determined local refractive index for volume elements not lying on the optical axis 19, which corrections result from the shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12 and the position of the volume element in the windshield. It is therefore not necessary to move either the windshield 12 or the first camera 13 with the dynamic lattice 11 during the measurement in order to determine the refractive index. As a result, the measuring time is considerably shortened and the accuracy of the determined refractive indices is increased.
  • The first camera 13 is used to measure optical effects on the basis of the distortion of the lattice 11. The optical effects are caused by the large-surface-area shape of the windshield 12 as well as by local deformations on the surface 17 or in the volume of the windshield 12. According to the invention, when the local three-dimensional shapes of the surface 17 of all volume elements are combined to form a three-dimensional overall shape of the surface 17 of the windshield 12, global effects caused by the large-surface-area shape of the object are deducted in the device.
  • Computer or electronic controller 16 determines the 3D shape of the surface 17 and the position of the volume element 17 a. The computer or electronic controller 16 uses the 3D shape of the surface 17 and the position of the volume element 178 are used to determine the refractive index and to compare the refractive index to the predetermined refractive index. As a result, it is possible to indicate the optical effects caused by local deformations in the determination of the local refractive index. It is therefore possible, using the present invention, to separate large-surface-area and local optical effects.
  • Within the scope of a quality inspection of the transparent object, the refractive indices determined for the specified volume elements (e.g. of a visual range) are compared with required refractive indices of refractive index ranges. If the determined refractive indices do not match the required refractive indices or refractive index ranges, the particular transparent object does not meet the quality requirements and an error is signaled and/or the object is removed from the production process.
  • LIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS
    • 1 projector
    • 2 transparent object
    • 3 projection wall
    • R1 distance: protector—transparent object
    • R2 distance: transparent object—projection wall
    • 11 dynamic lattice
    • 12 windshield
    • 13 first camera
    • 15 second camera
    • 16 computer
    • 17 surface of the windshield
    • 17 a volume element
  • As will be evident to persons skilled in the art, the foregoing detailed description and figures are presented as examples of the invention, and that variations are contemplated that do not depart from the fair scope of the teachings and descriptions set forth in this disclosure. The foregoing is not intended to limit what has been invented, except to the extent that the following claims so limit that.

Claims (14)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object using a pattern, the method comprising the steps of:
observing the pattern through the transparent object by a first camera;
using the observed pattern, determining a three-dimensional (3-D) shape and position of a surface of a particular volume element of the transparent object facing the pattern; and
using the determined 3-D shape and surface position of the particular volume element, determining a local refractive index for the particular volume element.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of determining the 3-D shape and position of surface position includes implementing deflectometry in reliance upon a second camera.
3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising generating the pattern by use of a dynamic lattice.
4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining a three-dimensional (3-D) overall shape of the surface of the transparent object facing the pattern is determined by combining three-dimensional (3-D) shapes of all volume elements.
5. The method according to claim 4, further comprising comparing the 3-D overall shape with CAD data on the transparent object; and
based on the comparing, determining a visual range to be selected for the determination of the local refractive index.
6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising comparing the local refractive index to a required refractive indices or refractive index ranges.
7. A device for determining a local refractive index in a volume element of a transparent object using a predefined pattern, comprising:
a first camera for capturing an image of the predefined pattern through the transparent object;
means for determining a three-dimensional (3-D) shape and position of a surface of a particular volume element of the transparent object facing the pattern in reliance upon the captured image;
wherein the means for determining utilizes the 3-D shape and position of the surface of the particular volume element to determine a local refractive index for the particular volume element.
8. The device according to claim 7, further comprising a second camera for capturing light reflected from the transparent object and wherein the means for determining determines the 3-D shape and position of the surface using deflectometry the reflected light captured by the a second camera.
9. The device according to claim 7, further comprising a dynamic lattice for generating the predefined pattern.
10. The device according to claim 7, wherein the means for determining determine a three-dimensional (3-D) overall shape of the surface of the transparent object facing the predefined pattern by combining three-dimensional (3-D) shapes of all volume elements comprising the transparent object.
11. The device according to claim 10, wherein the means for determining compares the 3-D overall shape with CAD data on the transparent object and, on the basis thereof, ascertains a visual range to be selected for the determination of the local refractive index.
12. The device according to claim 7, wherein the means for determining compares the local refractive index to a required refractive indices or refractive index ranges.
13. The device according to claim 7, wherein the means for determining is a computer or electronic controller.
14. The device according to claim 8, wherein the means for determining is a computer or electronic controller connected to the second camera.
US14/886,408 2014-10-21 2015-10-19 Method for determining a local refractive power and device therefor Active US9818021B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102014115336 2014-10-21
DE102014115331.6 2014-10-21
DE102014115331.6A DE102014115331A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2014-10-21 Method and device for determining a three-dimensional distortion
DE102014115336.7 2014-10-21
DE102014115331 2014-10-21
DE102014115336.7A DE102014115336A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2014-10-21 Method for determining a local power and device therefor

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160109362A1 true US20160109362A1 (en) 2016-04-21
US9818021B2 US9818021B2 (en) 2017-11-14

Family

ID=55748815

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/886,422 Active 2035-11-10 US10289895B2 (en) 2014-10-21 2015-10-19 Method and device for determining a three-dimensional distortion
US14/886,408 Active US9818021B2 (en) 2014-10-21 2015-10-19 Method for determining a local refractive power and device therefor

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/886,422 Active 2035-11-10 US10289895B2 (en) 2014-10-21 2015-10-19 Method and device for determining a three-dimensional distortion

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US10289895B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3561446A1 (en) * 2018-04-23 2019-10-30 Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wear situations of a user

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11867630B1 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-01-09 Glasstech, Inc. Fixture and method for optical alignment in a system for measuring a surface in contoured glass sheets

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5151752A (en) * 1988-06-16 1992-09-29 Asahi Kogaku Kogyo K.K. Method of measuring refractive indices of lens and sample liquid
US5491550A (en) * 1990-08-31 1996-02-13 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization Interference methods and interference microscopes for measuring energy path length differences, path length between two locaitons or for determiing refractive index
US5946100A (en) * 1995-09-29 1999-08-31 Takaoka Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd. Three-dimensional shape measuring apparatus
US6317201B1 (en) * 1998-09-19 2001-11-13 Merck Patent Gesellesschaft Method for the determination of refractive indices and optical instrument therefor
US20020123868A1 (en) * 2000-06-27 2002-09-05 Asahi Glass Company Limited Method for evaluating the dynamic perspective distortion of a transparent body and method for supporting the designing of a three-dimensionally curved shape of a transparent body
US20020191193A1 (en) * 2001-05-07 2002-12-19 Asml Us, Inc. Method, system, and computer program product for determining refractive index distribution
US20060028727A1 (en) * 2002-08-20 2006-02-09 Moon John A Method and apparatus for drug product tracking using encoded optical identification elements
US20100110429A1 (en) * 2007-04-18 2010-05-06 Universita' Politecnica Delle Marche Method and apparatus for measuring the refractive index of a material with bragg gratings
US8224066B2 (en) * 2007-05-29 2012-07-17 Gerd Haeusler Method and microscopy device for the deflectometric detection of local gradients and the three-dimensional shape of an object
US8488112B2 (en) * 2008-08-05 2013-07-16 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Method for contactless measurement of the density of a porous material, using a measurement of the refractive index of the material by optical coherence tomography
US20140327909A1 (en) * 2011-12-16 2014-11-06 Mikael Käll Method for exciting a sub-wavelength inclusion structure
US20150049331A1 (en) * 2012-03-14 2015-02-19 National Institute Of Advanced Industrial Science And Technology Method and device for analysing phase distribution of fringe image using high-dimensional intensity information, and program for the same
US20150309300A1 (en) * 2013-01-18 2015-10-29 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image pickup apparatus, image pickup system, and image processing method

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05272949A (en) 1992-03-30 1993-10-22 Nippon Sheet Glass Co Ltd Method for evaluating glass plate surface
JPH10111953A (en) 1996-10-07 1998-04-28 Canon Inc Image processing method, device therefor and recording medium
JP3411829B2 (en) 1997-07-02 2003-06-03 旭硝子株式会社 Method and apparatus for evaluating surface shape
DE10217068B4 (en) 2002-04-17 2005-09-15 Michael Dr.-Ing. Gandyra Method for optically measuring the shape of reflective and scattering free-form surfaces
EP1567827B1 (en) * 2002-11-29 2012-07-25 OBE Ohnmacht & Baumgärtner GmbH & Co. KG Method and device for optical form measurement and/or estimation
DE10258130A1 (en) 2002-11-29 2004-06-17 Christoph Wagner Optically rough surface photometric form determination procedure uses stereo photometry via scattering body with color coded illumination and color camera
JP4072466B2 (en) 2002-12-27 2008-04-09 日本板硝子株式会社 Apparatus and method for evaluating optical distortion of plate-like body
DE102004033526A1 (en) 2004-07-08 2006-02-02 Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institut für Mess- und Regelungstechnik Analysis of at least partly reflecting surfaces involves varying relative orientation/position of object, pattern generation device and/or image receiver(s) for image reflected at surface, to obtain surface, especially geometry, information
JP4667161B2 (en) 2005-08-10 2011-04-06 大日本印刷株式会社 Two-dimensional image generation method and generation apparatus based on a three-dimensional virtual object with a fiber sheet attached to the surface
DE102006015792A1 (en) 2006-04-05 2007-10-18 Isra Surface Vision Gmbh Method and system for measuring the shape of a reflective surface
US9767599B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2017-09-19 X-Rite Inc. Surface appearance simulation
JP4998711B2 (en) 2007-03-12 2012-08-15 Jfeスチール株式会社 Apparatus and method for measuring surface distortion
US8415648B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2013-04-09 Pilkington Group Limited Method of determination of glass surface shapes and optical distortion by reflected optical imaging
EP2101143A1 (en) 2008-03-10 2009-09-16 Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig Method and device for recording the shape of transparent refractive objects
JP5083052B2 (en) * 2008-06-06 2012-11-28 ソニー株式会社 Stereoscopic image generation apparatus, stereoscopic image generation method, and program
JP2010071782A (en) * 2008-09-18 2010-04-02 Omron Corp Three-dimensional measurement apparatus and method thereof
FR2951544A1 (en) 2009-10-21 2011-04-22 Saint Gobain METHOD FOR ANALYZING THE QUALITY OF A GLAZING
CN102243074B (en) 2010-05-13 2014-06-18 中国科学院遥感应用研究所 Method for simulating geometric distortion of aerial remote sensing image based on ray tracing technology
EP2637011A1 (en) 2012-03-09 2013-09-11 Essilor International Method and apparatus for measuring the geometric structure of an optical component
US8976250B2 (en) 2012-05-01 2015-03-10 Apple Inc. Lens inspection system
DE102013105570A1 (en) 2013-05-29 2014-12-04 Isra Surface Vision Gmbh Method for determining the refractive power of a transparent object and corresponding device

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5151752A (en) * 1988-06-16 1992-09-29 Asahi Kogaku Kogyo K.K. Method of measuring refractive indices of lens and sample liquid
US5491550A (en) * 1990-08-31 1996-02-13 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization Interference methods and interference microscopes for measuring energy path length differences, path length between two locaitons or for determiing refractive index
US5946100A (en) * 1995-09-29 1999-08-31 Takaoka Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd. Three-dimensional shape measuring apparatus
US6373978B1 (en) * 1995-09-29 2002-04-16 Takaoka Electric Mtg. Co., Ltd. Three-dimensional shape measuring apparatus
US6317201B1 (en) * 1998-09-19 2001-11-13 Merck Patent Gesellesschaft Method for the determination of refractive indices and optical instrument therefor
US20020123868A1 (en) * 2000-06-27 2002-09-05 Asahi Glass Company Limited Method for evaluating the dynamic perspective distortion of a transparent body and method for supporting the designing of a three-dimensionally curved shape of a transparent body
US20020191193A1 (en) * 2001-05-07 2002-12-19 Asml Us, Inc. Method, system, and computer program product for determining refractive index distribution
US20060028727A1 (en) * 2002-08-20 2006-02-09 Moon John A Method and apparatus for drug product tracking using encoded optical identification elements
US20100110429A1 (en) * 2007-04-18 2010-05-06 Universita' Politecnica Delle Marche Method and apparatus for measuring the refractive index of a material with bragg gratings
US8224066B2 (en) * 2007-05-29 2012-07-17 Gerd Haeusler Method and microscopy device for the deflectometric detection of local gradients and the three-dimensional shape of an object
US8488112B2 (en) * 2008-08-05 2013-07-16 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives Method for contactless measurement of the density of a porous material, using a measurement of the refractive index of the material by optical coherence tomography
US20140327909A1 (en) * 2011-12-16 2014-11-06 Mikael Käll Method for exciting a sub-wavelength inclusion structure
US20150049331A1 (en) * 2012-03-14 2015-02-19 National Institute Of Advanced Industrial Science And Technology Method and device for analysing phase distribution of fringe image using high-dimensional intensity information, and program for the same
US20150309300A1 (en) * 2013-01-18 2015-10-29 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image pickup apparatus, image pickup system, and image processing method

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3561446A1 (en) * 2018-04-23 2019-10-30 Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wear situations of a user
WO2019206893A2 (en) 2018-04-23 2019-10-31 Carl Zeiss Vision International Gmbh Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wearing situations by an user
WO2019206893A3 (en) * 2018-04-23 2019-12-19 Carl Zeiss Vision International Gmbh Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wearing situations by an user
KR20200136449A (en) * 2018-04-23 2020-12-07 칼 자이스 비전 인터내셔널 게엠베하 Method and apparatus for measuring optical lenses for individual wearing situations by users
EP3783303A1 (en) 2018-04-23 2021-02-24 Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wear situations of a user
US11099100B2 (en) 2018-04-23 2021-08-24 Carl Zeiss Vision International Gmbh Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wearing situations by a user
EP3869150A1 (en) 2018-04-23 2021-08-25 Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH Method and apparatus for corneal measurement of a subject
KR102306581B1 (en) 2018-04-23 2021-09-30 칼 자이스 비전 인터내셔널 게엠베하 Method and apparatus for measuring optical lenses for individual wearing situations by a user
KR20210119571A (en) * 2018-04-23 2021-10-05 칼 자이스 비전 인터내셔널 게엠베하 Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wearing situations by a user
KR102443550B1 (en) 2018-04-23 2022-09-16 칼 자이스 비전 인터내셔널 게엠베하 Method and device for measuring an optical lens for individual wearing situations by a user

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9818021B2 (en) 2017-11-14
US10289895B2 (en) 2019-05-14
US20160110860A1 (en) 2016-04-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10859375B2 (en) Methods for improving the accuracy of dimensioning-system measurements
US8094322B2 (en) Method and apparatus for the determination of the 3D coordinates of an object
US9239235B2 (en) Three-dimensional measuring apparatus, three-dimensional measuring method, and three-dimensional measuring program
US10782126B2 (en) Three-dimensional scanning method containing multiple lasers with different wavelengths and scanner
KR101856595B1 (en) Method for determining a local refractive index and device therefor
CN105277133B (en) The calculation method of the height map of the main body of surface inclination or curved transparent material
JP6227647B2 (en) Non-destructive testing method for blade preforms
JP6633454B2 (en) How to detect deformed parts
CN109765240A (en) A kind of detection industrial part stitch defect device and method
US9551571B2 (en) Method and device for measuring a decentration and tilt of faces of an optical element
US9818021B2 (en) Method for determining a local refractive power and device therefor
CN110095069A (en) A kind of high-speed rail white body assembling quality detection system and method
US10151581B2 (en) Method and device for determining the position and orientation of a specular surface forming a diopter
TWI687649B (en) Shoe upper detection device and shoe upper detection method
JP2020016667A (en) Inspection device for deformed part
JP6485616B2 (en) Appearance measurement system, image processing method, and program
JP2011064617A (en) Three-dimensional information measuring device and three-dimensional information measuring method
Sansoni et al. Design and development of a 3D system for the measurement of tube eccentricity
CN106097297B (en) A kind of camera blocks range computation method
CN105528777B (en) Method and apparatus for determining three-dimensional distortion
KR20160040767A (en) An object-recognition 3D measurement camera, such as a face, in which the center of two camera lenses is fixed in a horizontal position at intervals of 5 to 100 cm.
JP2013210410A (en) Inspection apparatus
TWI659725B (en) Virtual projection vision detecting device
Chang Measuring Stereo Camera Alignment Using Depth Map Smoothness
KR101748072B1 (en) Apparatus and method for recognizing object

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ISRA SURFACE VISION GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KUBIAK, ROLF;RIPPERDA, CHRISTIAN;REEL/FRAME:037010/0273

Effective date: 20151015

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4